DOCSLIB.ORG

The Latter-Day Saint Woman

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Latter-Day Saint Woman THE LATTER-DAY SAINT WOMAN Basic Manual for Women, Part B THE LATTER-DAY SAINT WOMAN Basic Manual for Women, Part B Published by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Salt Lake City, Utah Revised 2000 Comments and Suggestions Your comments and suggestions about this manual would be appreciated. Please submit them to: Curriculum Planning 50 East North Temple Street, Floor 24 Salt Lake City, UT 84150-3200 USA E-mail: [email protected] Please list your name, address, ward, and stake. Be sure to give the title of the manual. Then offer your comments and suggestions about the manual’s strengths and areas of potential improvement. © 1979, 1993, 2000 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America English approval: 1/99 CONTENTS Introduction . v The Living Christ . viii The Family: A Proclamation to the World . x The Relief Society Declaration . xi Gospel Principles and Doctrine 1. Jesus Christ, Our Sure Foundation . 2 2. Agency and Accountability . 11 3. Gifts of the Spirit . 18 4. The Sabbath Day . 25 5. The Word of Wisdom . 34 6. Tithes and Offerings . 43 7. Honesty . 51 8. Forgiveness . 57 9. Purity of Thought . 66 10. Building the Kingdom of God . 73 11. The Worth of a Soul . 80 Duties and Responsibilities 12. Church Organization . 88 13. Follow the Brethren . 99 14. Withstanding the Evils of the World . 110 15. Trials and Adversity . 119 16. Responsibility to Parents . 126 17. What Our Home Teachers Can Do for Us . 135 18. Developing Self-Reliance . 143 19. Family and Personal Histories . 152 20. Our Temple and Family History Responsibilities . 160 Homemaking 21. Planning Healthful Meals . 172 22. Maternal and Infant Care . 179 23. First Aid, Part 1: Preventing and Preparing for Injuries . 185 24. First Aid, Part 2: Treating Injuries . 194 25. Home Storage . 214 26. Having Fun as a Family . 221 27. Caring for Our Homes . 229 iii Contents Personal and Family Development 28. Serving in the Church . 240 29. Developing Leadership . 247 30. Learning to Delegate Responsibility . 257 31. Decision Making . 263 32. Setting Personal and Family Goals . 271 33. Continuing to Learn . 282 34. Individual and Family Prayer . 293 35. Developing Gratitude . 303 Index . 312 Picture Section . 321 iv INTRODUCTION Using This Manual This manual provides 35 lessons related to basic gospel principles and the responsibilities of Latter-day Saint women. As prompted by the Spirit, leaders and teachers should plan and teach lessons that address the spiritual, emotional, and temporal needs of the members in their branch or ward. This manual should be used as the instruction manual for both Relief Society and Young Women in units of the Church where Teachings of Presidents of the Church and Young Women manuals are not yet pub- lished in the needed language. In such units, copies of this manual should be made available to all members of the Relief Society and to Young Women leaders and teachers. Local leaders should consult Information for Priesthood and Auxiliary Leaders on Curriculum for the schedule showing which years part A and part B of The Latter-day Saint Woman are to be used. In units of the Church where Teachings of Presidents of the Church and Young Women manuals are available, this manual should be used (1) as a resource for Relief Society instruction on first and fourth Sundays and for home, family, and personal enrichment meetings; (2) as a supplementary resource for Young Women instruction; and (3) as designated, for Relief Society “Teachings for Our Time” lessons on fourth Sundays. In such units, copies of the manual should be made available to the leaders and instructors in the Relief Society, Young Women, and Melchizedek Priesthood. In addition, leaders may encour- age the Relief Society sisters to purchase a copy of this manual for per- sonal study and for family teaching in the home. Preparing to Teach Teaching helps provided in this manual include a “Teacher Preparation” section, questions teachers could ask, suggestions for class participation, and directions for using pictures and charts. In addition to the discus- sion questions and methods suggested, teachers may choose to use v Introduction other methods or lesson approaches they find effective to involve their class members and stimulate participation and learning. Almost every lesson suggests the use of a chalkboard, so if possible teachers should arrange to have a chalkboard and chalk available for each lesson. Many of the visual aids suggested for use as posters could be drawn or writ- ten on the chalkboard. Other suggestions for teaching can be found in the Teaching Guidebook (34595) and in Teaching, No Greater Call (36123). Class members should be encouraged to prepare for class discussion by studying the assigned lesson during the week. They should also be encouraged to bring their scriptures. Involving Members with Disabilities During His mortal ministry, Jesus went up into the mountain near the Sea of Galilee. “And great multitudes came unto him, having with them those that were lame, blind, dumb, maimed, and many others, and cast them down at Jesus’ feet; and he healed them: “Insomuch that the multitude wondered, when they saw the dumb to speak, the maimed to be whole, the lame to walk, and the blind to see: and they glorified the God of Israel” (Matthew 15:30–31). The Savior set the example for us in feeling compassion for those with disabilities. When He visited the Nephites after His Resurrection, He said: “Behold, my bowels are filled with compassion towards you. “Have ye any that are sick among you? Bring them hither. Have ye any that are lame, or blind, or halt, or maimed, or leprous, or that are with- ered, or that are deaf, or that are afflicted in any manner? Bring them hither and I will heal them, for I have compassion upon you; my bowels are filled with mercy” (3 Nephi 17:6–7). As a teacher in a Church classroom, you are in an excellent position to show compassion. Although not usually trained to give professional assistance to class members with disabilities, teachers should desire to understand and include these members in the learning activities of the class. Class members with mental, physical, emotional, and other disabilities may need special attention. The following guidelines should help you reach every member: I Strive to understand the needs and abilities of each class member. I Check in advance with a class member before calling on her to read, pray, or otherwise participate. Ask such questions as “How do you feel about reading in class?” or “Would you feel comfortable praying in class?” If appropriate, check with priesthood leaders, parents, and family members to determine the member’s special needs. vi Introduction I Try to increase and improve the involvement and learning of the member with a disability. I Ensure that each class member treats every other class member with respect. I Be natural, friendly, and warm. Every child of God needs love and understanding. As a teacher in the Church, remember that each member, regardless of physical, mental, emotional, or social capacity, has the potential for growth toward exaltation. You have an obligation to help each individ- ual learn gospel principles in your class. Remember the words of the Savior: “Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me” (Matthew 25:40). vii viii THET HELIVINGTESTIMONY OF THE ACHRISTPOSTLES THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS s we commemorate the birth of Jesus Christ Of the Living Christ, the Prophet Joseph wrote: two millennia ago, we offer our testimony of “His eyes were as a flame of fire; the hair of his head the reality of His matchless life and the infi- was white like the pure snow; his countenance shone niteA virtue of His great atoning sacrifice. None other above the brightness of the sun; and his voice was as has had so profound an influence upon all who have the sound of the rushing of great waters, even the lived and will yet live upon the earth. voice of Jehovah, saying: He was the Great Jehovah of the Old Testament, “I am the first and the last; I am he who liveth, the Messiah of the New. Under the direction of His I am he who was slain; I am your advocate with the Father, He was the creator of the earth.“All things Father”(D&C 110:3–4). were made by him; and without him was not any Of Him the Prophet also declared: “And now, after thing made that was made”(John 1:3). Though sin- the many testimonies which have been given of him, less, He was baptized to fulfill all righteousness. this is the testimony, last of all, which we give of him: He “went about doing good”(Acts 10:38), yet was That he lives! despised for it. His gospel was a message of peace “For we saw him, even on the right hand of God; and goodwill. He entreated all to follow His example. and we heard the voice bearing record that he is the He walked the roads of Palestine, healing the sick, Only Begotten of the Father— causing the blind to see, and raising the dead. He “That by him, and through him, and of him, the taught the truths of eternity, the reality of our pre- worlds are and were created, and the inhabitants mortal existence, the purpose of our life on earth, and thereof are begotten sons and daughters unto God” the potential for the sons and daughters of God in (D&C 76:22–24).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eve's Answer to the Serpent: an Alternative Paradigm for Sin and Some Implications in Theology
    Calvin Theological Journal 33 (1998) : 399-420 Copyright © 1980 by Calvin Theological Seminary. Cited with permission. Scholia et Homiletica Eve's Answer to the Serpent: An Alternative Paradigm for Sin and Some Implications in Theology P. Wayne Townsend The woman said to the serpent, "We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but God did say, `You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die. "' (Gen. 3:2-3) Can we take these italicized words seriously, or must we dismiss them as the hasty additions of Eve's overactive imagination? Did God say or mean this when he instructed Adam in Genesis 2:16-17? I suggest that, not only did Eve speak accu- rately and insightfully in responding to the serpent but that her words hold a key to reevaluating the doctrine of original sin and especially the puzzles of alien guilt and the imputation of sin. In this article, I seek to reignite discussion on these top- ics by suggesting an alternative paradigm for discussing the doctrine of original sin and by applying that paradigm in a preliminary manner to various themes in the- ology, biblical interpretation, and Christian living. I seek not so much to answer questions as to evoke new ones that will jar us into a more productive path of the- ological explanation. I suggest that Eve's words indicate that the Bible structures the ideas that we recognize as original sin around the concept of uncleanness.
    [Show full text]
  • Though It Has Been Known by Different Names, the Young Women Orga
    Though it has been known by different names, the Young Women Orga- nization has always sought to help young women improve themselves, de- velop their talents, serve others, and strengthen their testimonies of Jesus Christ. (© Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved.) A Firm Foundation Janet Peterson 12 Young Women of Zion: An Organizational History The Young Women program of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has grown from the desires of young women to im- prove themselves, develop their talents, serve others, and strengthen their testimonies of Jesus Christ. The various names of the organization are listed below: • The Young Gentlemen and Ladies’ Relief Society of Nauvoo, 1843 • The Young Ladies’ Department of the Cooperative Retrench- ment Association (Young Ladies’ Retrenchment Association), 1869 • Young Ladies’ National Mutual Improvement Association, 1877 Janet Peterson is a member of the Church Correlation Committee, Materials Evaluation Division. A Firm Foundation • Young Ladies’ Mutual Improvement Association (YLMIA), 1904 • Young Women’s Mutual Improvement Association (YWMIA), 1934 • Aaronic Priesthood MIA, Young Women, 1972 • Young Women, 1974 Though the name has changed several times over the years, the pur- poses have not. Marba C. Josephson, editor of the Improvement Era and general board member, described the goals as “aiding the LDS girl to gain a testimony of the gospel through wholesome lesson work and spiritualized recreation.”1 Church leaders have long recognized the vital role that this auxiliary fills in helping adolescent girls to develop testimonies of the Savior and to become faithful, covenant-keeping women. The programs and procedures have changed to meet the needs of an ever-growing Church population and to help young women face the chal- lenges of their particular eras.
    [Show full text]
  • The Salt Lake Tabernacle: a Witness to the Growth of God’S Kingdom
    Chapter 5 The Salt Lake Tabernacle: A Witness to the Growth of God’s Kingdom Scott C. Esplin “ n great deeds something abides,” reminisced Joshua Lawrence IChamberlain, a famed Civil War colonel. “On great fields some- thing stays. Forms change and pass; bodies disappear, but spirits linger, to consecrate ground for the vision-place of souls. And reverent men and women from afar, and generations that know us not and that we know not of, heart-drawn to see where and by whom great things were suffered and done for them, shall come to this deathless field to ponder and dream; And lo! the shadow of a mighty presence shall wrap them in its bosom, and the power of the vision pass into their souls.”1 For Latter-day Saints, the historic Salt Lake Tabernacle has become one of those sacred sites—a consecrated hall where “something abides” and “spirits linger” and where modern visitors are wrapped in “the shadow of a mighty presence” while visions of the Restoration “pass into their souls.” President Gordon B. Hinckley summarized the influence the Scott C. Esplin is an assistant professor of Church history and doctrine at Brigham Young University. 69 Salt Lake City: The Place Which God Prepared Tabernacle has had on the Church: “The Spirit of the Lord has been in this structure. It is sacred unto us.”2 With the construction of larger and more modern conference halls, the Salt Lake Tabernacle stands today as a silent witness to its pioneer past. Having undergone significant transformations throughout its life, the building serves not only as a monument to pioneer greatness but also as an example of changes in the Church’s history.
    [Show full text]
  • God Made Eve and Ordained Marriage
    GGOODD MMAADDEE EEVVEE aanndd oorrddaaiinneedd mmaarrrriiaaggee Several thousand years have passed since Adam and Eve became man and wife, but God hasn’t changed what he first instructed mankind regarding marriage in the Bible. Did you know that God was the One who decided that man and woman should marry? In Genesis 2 we find part of the wedding service spoken in many wedding ceremonies today. Men and women and marriage and children are very important to God. Marriage is not just a good idea… it’s a “God Idea”! But some people don’t know or don’t believe what God says about marriage. They say that marriage is something to be tried out to see if it will work—depending upon how you feel about it. Many folks are even suggesting that the idea of marriage is outdated. But what does the Bible say about marriage? Let’s take a look and find out! God decided that Adam needed a wife to help him and to be his companion. Genesis 2:18 The LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.” God decided that Adam should not live alone. - God was his Creator and knew what was best for him. - God didn’t ask Adam what he wanted or thought best. - God made the decision to make a wife for Adam. God loved Adam and wanted him to be complete. - God knew that Adam wouldn’t continue to be happy if he remained alone. - Because God loved Adam and wanted what was best for him, he decided to make a wife for him.
    [Show full text]
  • Another Look at Cain: from a Narrative Perspective
    신학논단 제102집 (2020. 12. 31): 241-263 https://doi.org/10.17301/tf.2020.12.102.241 Another Look at Cain: From a Narrative Perspective Wm. J McKinstry IV, MATS Adjunct Faculty, Department of General Education Presbyterian University and Theological Seminary In the Hebrew primeval histories names often carry significant weight. Much etymological rigour has been exercised in determining many of the names within the Bible. Some of the meaning of these names appear to have a consensus among scholars; among others there is less consensus and more contention. Numerous proposals have come forward with varying degrees of convincing (or unconvincing as the case may be) philological arguments, analysis of wordplays, possi- ble textual emendations, undiscovered etymologies from cognates in other languages, or onomastic studies detailing newly discovered names of similarity found in other ancient Semitic languages. Through these robust studies, when applicable, we can ascertain the meanings of names that may help to unveil certain themes or actions of a character within a narrative. For most of the names within the primeval histories of Genesis, the 242 신학논단 제102집(2020) meaning of a name is only one feature. For some names there is an en- compassing feature set: wordplay, character trait and/or character role, and foreshadowing. Three of the four members in the first family in Genesis, Adam, Eve, and Abel, have names that readily feature all the elements listed above. Cain, however, has rather been an exception in this area, further adding to Genesis 4’s enigmaticness in the Hebrew Bible’s primeval history. While three characters (Adam, Eve, and Abel) have names that (1) sound like other Hebrew words, that are (2) sug- gestive of their character or actions and (3) foreshadow or suggest fu- ture events about those characters, the meaning of Cain’s name does not render itself so explicitly to his character or his role in the narrative, at least not to the same degree of immediate conspicuousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles of the Church of Christ” in Relation to Section 20 of the Doctrine and Covenants
    BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 43 Issue 4 Article 4 10-1-2004 An Examination of the 1829 “Articles of the Church of Christ” in Relation to Section 20 of the Doctrine and Covenants Scott H. Faulring Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq Recommended Citation Faulring, Scott H. (2004) "An Examination of the 1829 “Articles of the Church of Christ” in Relation to Section 20 of the Doctrine and Covenants," BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 43 : Iss. 4 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol43/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Studies Quarterly by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Faulring: An Examination of the 1829 “Articles of the Church of Christ” in An Examination of the 1829 "Articles of the Church of Christ" in Relation to Section 20 of the Doctrine and Covenants Scott H. Faulring he 1829 "Articles of the Church of Christ" is a little-known anteced­ Tent to section 20 of the Doctrine and Covenants. This article explores Joseph Smith's and Oliver Cowdery's involvement in bringing forth these two documents that were important in laying the foundation for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Section 20 was originally labeled the "Articles and Covenants." It was the first revelation canonized by the restored Church and the most lengthy revelation given before the first priesthood conference was held in June 1830.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam and Eve—Community: Reading Genesis
    last day of creative work. In the second account, however, Man is created before anything else.2 Of course, it is not to be denied that the text did not spring up ex nihilo, created by a Volume 1, Issue 1 | Fall 2003 writer without reference to previous texts. The redactor undoubtedly had a number of Adam and Eve—Community: texts to which he could refer in creating the Reading Genesis 2-3 Genesis text, and he undoubtedly used works already familiar to him as sources. Or James E. Faulconer it is conceivable that there was no individual Brigham Young University redactor or set of redactors, but only the egin thinking about human community solidifying of an oral tradition. For our B and its possibility at the beginning, or purposes, it does not matter. In either case it almost at the beginning, one step after the is too much to assume that the final text is immemorial beginning.1 The biblical story merely contradictory. There may be of the creation of Man (’adam) and Woman contradictions within the text, but the more (’isha) and their expulsion from the garden obvious those contradictions are, the less places humans in the world in a particular likely it is that they are contradictions that way; it creates a habitation for human life so undo the text. It is too much to assume that that the history shared by humans and the the redaction of Genesis was a product of story that manifests community includes the blindness. A considerable amount of “cut possibility of gathering together all humans and paste” work was surely involved in the as unique individuals rather than simply as creation of the Genesis story, but unless we members of a collective.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam, Eve, and the New and Everlasting Covenant
    Adam, Eve, and the New and Everlasting Covenant Jeffrey M. Bradshaw While the importance of account of the Creation and the Fall in Moses 1-4 cannot be overstated, a careful reading of Moses 5-8 is required to see the prior material in its overall context.1 Reeves observes: Most modern students of Bible fail to discern the pivotal significance which [the tale of Cain and Abel] plays in the present narrative structure of Genesis because of the enormous religious significance with which ancient, medieval, and modern Christian interpreters have invested the immediately preceding story of Adam and Eve in the Garden… I would like to suggest that while admittedly the episode of disobedience in the Garden was not a good thing, the story of Cain and Abel introduces something far worse into the created order… It represents a critical turning point in antediluvian history, and is… the key crime which leads ineluctably to the Flood.2 Foreseeing the similar rise of alluring wickedness in our own time, the Savior warned that “as it was in the days of Noah, so it shall be also at the coming of the Son of Man.”3 The illustration above is taken from Stephen Vincent Benét’s 1936 story The Devil and Daniel Webster, made into a popular film in 1941. Piazza characterizes the latter as “a fascinating allegory, filmed on the eve of World War II, of a society gone mad with materialism, a premonition of the opportunities and dangers awaiting the United States as it recovered from the Great Depression.”4 Old Scratch is portrayed as polite, refined, and soft-spoken—and as usual, he “gets the best lines” as he preaches his gospel of cold cash to a down-on-his-luck New Hampshire farmer.
    [Show full text]
  • God's Rejection of Cain Outside the Garden of Eden (Genesis 4:1-16)
    Concordia Seminary - Saint Louis Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary Master of Sacred Theology Thesis Concordia Seminary Scholarship Spring 5-18-2018 Falling Far from the Tree? God's Rejection of Cain outside the Garden of Eden (Genesis 4:1-16) Mark Remington Squire Concordia Seminary - St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.csl.edu/stm Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, History of Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Squire, Mark Remington, "Falling Far from the Tree? God's Rejection of Cain outside the Garden of Eden (Genesis 4:1-16)" (2018). Master of Sacred Theology Thesis. 395. https://scholar.csl.edu/stm/395 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Concordia Seminary Scholarship at Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Sacred Theology Thesis by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FALLING FAR FROM THE TREE? GOD’S REJECTION OF CAIN OUTSIDE THE GARDEN OF EDEN (GENESIS 4:1–16) A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, Department of Exegetical Theology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Sacred Theology By Mark Remington Squire April 2018 Approved by Dr. David L. Adams Advisor Rev. Thomas J. Egger Reader Dr. Joel C. Elowsky Reader © 2018 by Mark Remington Squire. All rights reserved. ii CONTENTS PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... v ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................... vi ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Science & Mormonism Series 1: Cosmos, Earth, And
    Science & Mormonism Series 1: Cosmos, Earth, and Man Chapter Title: Science and Genesis: A Personal View Chapter Author: Jeffrey M. Bradshaw This book from which this chapter is excerpted is available through Eborn Books: https://ebornbooks.com/shop/non-fiction/mormon-lds/mormon-science/science-and- mormonism-1-cosmos-earth-and-man-hardbound-jeffrey-m-bradshaw/ Recommended Citation Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, "Science and Genesis: A Personal View" in Science & Mormonism Series 1: Cosmos, Earth, and Man, edited by David H. Bailey, Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, John S. Lewis, Gregory L. Smith, and Michael R. Stark (Orem, UT, and Salt Lake City: The Interpreter Foundation and Eborn Books, 2016), https://interpreterfoundation.org/reprints/science-and-mormonism/SM1Chap06.pdf. SCIENCE AND MORMONISM 1: COSMOS, EARTH, AND MAN David H. Bailey, Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, John S. Lewis, Gregory L. Smith, and Michael R. Stark The Interpreter Foundation Eborn Books 2016 © 2016 The Interpreter Foundation. A 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. The goal of The Interpreter Foundation is to increase understanding of scripture through careful scholarly investigation and analysis of the insights provided by a wide range of ancillary disciplines. We hope to illuminate, by study and faith, the eternal spiritual message of the scriptures — that Jesus is the Christ. Although the Board fully supports the goals and teachings of the Church, the Interpreter Foundation is an independent entity and is not owned, controlled by, or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or with Brigham Young University. All research and opinions provided are the sole responsibility of their respective authors, and should not be interpreted as the opinions of the Board, nor as official statements of LDS doctrine, belief, or practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradoxes in Paradise
    Paradoxes in Paradise Julie M. Smith In the last few decades, two very different interpretive communities, each presumably unacquainted with the other’s work, cast aside the millennia-old interpretation1 of Genesis 3 that found fault with Eve’s actions. They adopted the same innovative reading: Eve’s choice to eat from the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil was wise—an idea that I will call the Wise Choice Theory. No one would be surprised that one of these groups consists of feminist biblical scholars;2 what may be a bit of a shock is that the other group is composed of members and leaders of the LDS Church.3 Obstacles to the Wise Choice Theory While the appeal of the Wise Choice Theory is obvious in an age of anxiety over women’s4 nature and roles,5 there are many problems associated with this reading. I will explore these difculties and then consider some other ways in which we might approach this most enigmatic of texts. I nd nine major obstacles to the Wise Choice Theory. Reactions Note the reactions to eating 6 the fruit: Adam and Eve hide from God (Genesis 3:8), they are afraid (v. 10),7 they are ashamed,8 and, most importantly, instead of proudly announcing their act when questioned, 9 they try to deect blame (vv. 12–13). Further, when asked why she had eaten, Eve states that she had been tricked (v. 13).10 These are not the responses of people who think they have just done something wise.
    [Show full text]
  • Righteous Abel, Wicked Cain: Genesis 4:1-16 in the Masoretic Text, the Septuagint, and the New Testament Joel N
    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons Benerd School of Education Faculty Articles Gladys L. Benerd School of Education 7-1-2009 Righteous Abel, Wicked Cain: Genesis 4:1-16 in the Masoretic Text, the Septuagint, and the New Testament Joel N. Lohr University of the Pacific, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/ed-facarticles Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Lohr, J. N. (2009). Righteous Abel, Wicked Cain: Genesis 4:1-16 in the Masoretic Text, the Septuagint, and the New Testament. Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 71(3), 485–496. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/ed-facarticles/23 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Gladys L. Benerd School of Education at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Benerd School of Education Faculty Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Righteous Abel, Wicked Cain: Genesis 4:1-16 in the Masoretic Text, the Septuagint, and the New Testament JOEL N. LOHR Trinity Western University Langley, BC V2Y 1Y1, Canada THERE APPEARS TO BE a long-standing interpretive crux in the story of Cain and Abel (Gen 4:1-16) regarding why God looks with favor on Abel but not on Cain. The interpretive instinct to determine the reasons for God's favor is perhaps quite natural: religiously speaking, a deity who favors or disfavors without reason could appear arbitrary or unjust, an issue to resolve. The Old Greek (LXX) translation of the story also seems to explain God's favor toward Abel and not Cain in a partic­ ular way, perhaps providing one of the earliest extant examples of this interpretive practice.1 Through what might be called a theological translation, the LXX paints a negative portrait of Cain (in his offering and in other ways), one that has left an indelible mark on later tradition.
    [Show full text]