DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on Identified Barriers to Ecological Connectivity in The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on Identified Barriers to Ecological Connectivity in The Report on identified barriers to ecological connectivity in the Carpathians European Academy of Bolzano/Bozen Institute for Regional Development and Location Management Filippo Favilli, Christian Hoffmann, Mariachiara Alberton and Marianna Elmi Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano Bolzano, June 2014 CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Study area ............................................................................................................................. 8 1.1.1 Carpathians & Pilot Area approach ............................................................................... 9 1.2 Barriers to ecological connectivity ....................................................................................... 10 1.2.1 Physical barriers strategy ............................................................................................ 11 1.2.2 Socio-economic barriers strategy ................................................................................ 12 1.2.3 Legal barriers strategy ................................................................................................. 13 1.3 Umbrella Species – the theoretic background ..................................................................... 13 1.4 Habitat suitability and Dispersal paths ................................................................................ 14 1.5 GIS Modelling ...................................................................................................................... 15 1.6 Recommendations – to sustain and restore ecological connectivity ................................... 16 2 Methods ................................................................................................................................... 19 2.1 Physical barriers .................................................................................................................. 19 2.1.1 Data Collection and Analysis ....................................................................................... 19 2.1.2 Questionnaires ............................................................................................................ 22 2.1.3 GIS modelling to identify habitat suitability and dispersal paths by advanced tools and methodologies ......................................................................................................................... 23 2.2 Socio-economic barriers ...................................................................................................... 27 2.2.1 Site visits ..................................................................................................................... 27 2.2.2 Semi-structured interviews .......................................................................................... 29 2.2.3 Online questionnaire for partners ................................................................................ 29 2.3 Legal barriers and possibilities ............................................................................................ 30 2.3.1 Desk research on international and European legal acts ............................................ 31 2.3.2 In depth analysis of legal issues for Carpathian countries .......................................... 32 3 Results and Scientific Outputs ................................................................................................ 33 3.1 Findings according to physical barriers ............................................................................... 33 3.1.1 Habitat Suitability Map and Least Cost Paths for the umbrella species derived from the corridor model ......................................................................................................................... 33 3.1.2 Web GIS Application ................................................................................................... 46 3.1.3 Lesson learned ............................................................................................................ 48 3.2 Findings according to socio-economic barriers ................................................................... 49 3.2.1 Statements and lessons learned from the site visits ................................................... 55 3.2.2 Recommendations ....................................................................................................... 61 3.3 Findings according to legal barriers .................................................................................... 62 3.4 Dissemination ...................................................................................................................... 69 3.4.1 Articles, presentations and conferences ...................................................................... 69 3.4.2 Presentation of BioREGIO WP5 at International conferences .................................... 69 3.4.3 WP5 results inclusion in conferences proceedings and scientific papers ................... 71 4 Guidelines and strategies to sustain, restore and enhance ecological connectivity in the Carpathians ..................................................................................................................................... 73 4.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 73 4.2 Guidelines ........................................................................................................................... 74 4.2.1 New infrastructure, roads & motorways ....................................................................... 74 4.2.2 Animal-Vehicle Collision (AVC) ................................................................................... 80 4.2.3 Hunting procedures ..................................................................................................... 85 4.2.4 Forest .......................................................................................................................... 90 4.2.5 Agriculture ................................................................................................................... 92 4.2.6 Trans-boundary issues ................................................................................................ 94 4.2.7 Hunting laws ................................................................................................................ 95 4.2.8 Urban sprawl and settlement expansion ..................................................................... 96 4.2.9 Ecological connectivity: beyond protected areas ......................................................... 99 4.2.10 Compensation of damages ....................................................................................... 100 4.3 Recommendations for national strategies regarding ecological connectivity in the Carpathians ............................................................................................................................... 102 4.3.1 Slovakia ..................................................................................................................... 102 4.3.2 Czech Republic ......................................................................................................... 104 4.3.3 Hungary ..................................................................................................................... 106 4.3.4 Romania .................................................................................................................... 107 4.3.5 Serbia ........................................................................................................................ 109 4.3.6 Ukraine ...................................................................................................................... 110 4.3.7 Poland ....................................................................................................................... 111 5 References ............................................................................................................................ 113 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Investigation Area and Pilot Regions of the BioREGIO project ......................................... 9 Figure 2: Ecological corridors in Romania ...................................................................................... 28 Figure 3: Carpathians Habitat Suitability Map for the Lynx ............................................................ 33 Figure 4: Suitability and Core Areas identification for the Lynx in the Djerdap/Iron Gate ............... 34 Figure 5: Identification of Least Cost Paths for the Lynx in the Pilot Area Djerdap/Iron Gate ........ 34 Figure 6: Identified LCPs for the Lynx in Djerdap/Iron Gate .......................................................... 35 Figure 7: Carpathians Habitat Suitability Model for Lynx ............................................................... 37 Figure 8: Carpathians Habitat Suitability for Bear .......................................................................... 38 Figure 9: Carpathians Habitat Suitability for Carpencaille .............................................................. 40 Figure 10: Carpathians Habitat Suitability for Chamois ................................................................. 41 Figure 11: Carpathians Habitat Suitability for European hare ........................................................ 43 Figure 12: Carpathians Habitat Suitability for European
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Business and the Visit of the Secretary of State for Foreign Trade from France, Charles De Chambrun (1966)
    THE “RENAULT” BUSINESS AND THE VISIT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN TRADE FROM FRANCE, CHARLES DE CHAMBRUN (1966) Antoaneta Laura SAVA Abstract: Because the representatives of the “Renault” and “Volkswagen” companies did not show any interest, in the period 1973–1976, for a collaboration in the direction expected by the authorities from Bucharest, Nicolae Ceauşescu agreed on the prime minister Manea Mănescu signing a contract and several industrial and financial collaboration agreements, with the purpose of producing, at Craiova, under French licence, the models “Citroën Visa Spécial” and “Citroën Visa Club” (called in Romania, “Oltcit Special” and “Oltcit Club”). Meanwhile, the collaboration of Romania with “Renault” National Administration continued according to the intentions expressed by the prime minister Raymond Barre and Manea Mănescu in Paris (the 17th of December 1976), and the Romanian-French agreement concluded in the summer of 1978 (Bucharest, the 12th of June 1978), having the purpose to certify the continuation of “Dacia 1300” production, along with certain subsets, electric engines, dashboard instruments and components for the machines used in the car industry from Romania. Keywords: fields, authority, car manufacturing industry, Renault company, development. In the last decade, were written, both in Romania and abroad, several studies and analyses that refer to the success registered by “Renault” French company, on addressing “Dacia Logan”, “Dacia MCV”, “Dacia Sandero” and “Dacia Duster” car makes. First produced at the Colibaşi plant, they had, since the beginning, a low selling price, as compared to other makes of renowned companies. Due to a special interest manifested for understanding the manner in which “Dacia” products reached the commercial success during the period 2004–2014, we are to present, further on, the beginning of the cooperation between the authorities from Romania and the “Renault” company.
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Bear Distribution Bulgaria
    DISTRIBUTIONAND ECOLOGYOF BROWNBEAR IN ROMANIA LASZLO KALABER, 4225 Reghin Str., Eminescu 26, Romania AUREL NEGRUTIU IOAN MICU ANTON DOGARU MIHAI BRATEANU Int. Conf. Bear Res. and Manage. 9(1):173-178 Simionescu (1938) wrote: "Here, at us, thanks God! beech nut fructification, the bear changed its place a they hide in the high mountains, from the Retezat and little, in day time it was in its shelter, in the thicket, Godeanu to Maramures. They are more numerous in and at night time it went into the old forest for food and the Rodna and Calimani mountains." Almasan and to the brook for water. Generally, the bear follows the Vasiliu (1967) reportedthat brown bears (Ursus arctos) paths if it isn't disturbed." in Romania are found (Fig. 1) on about 2.8 million Negrutiu (unpubl. data): "Romaniahas the second ha., occupying the whole range of the Carpathiansfrom largest estimated bear population in Europe after Maramures to the East of Banat and in the Apuseni Russia." Bear distribution in Romania occurs on mountains. about 2.8 million ha. mainly in the Carpathian Cotta and Bodea (1969) estimated a population of mountains. In this area, a well-balanced number is 4,050 bears or about 1.25 bear per 1,000 ha: "It is an about 4,800 individuals. The present estimate in this animal devoted to the place it lives in and to its habits. area is 6,800 bears (Table 1). In the years when in the beech zone there existed a Continuing with the distribution of the bears, we BrownBear Distribution Bulgaria I I 126 miles Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • August Von Spiess - Under the Sign of the Destiny
    Muzeul Olteniei Craiova. Oltenia. Studii şi comunicări. Ştiinţele Naturii. Tom. 34, No. 2/2018 ISSN 1454-6914 AUGUST VON SPIESS - UNDER THE SIGN OF THE DESTINY ANTONIE Iuliana Abstract. August von Spiess was born on the 6th of August 1864. He spent his childhood on his mother’s estate in the Fiume region, Poland. The mother inspired him with the first feelings of love for nature. He attended junior school in several garrisons, following, as all his family, his father’s displacements as an active military officer. Irrespective of the place, the child August preferred to wander in nature, instead of acquiring school knowledge. At the age of eleven he was enrolled in the Military School in Saint Poelten. After leaving the school, he graduated the Theresianum Military Academy in Vienna and was given the rank of second lieutenant. A schoolmate described Transylvania to him as a dream world in terms of relief and abundance of fauna. From this moment on, he did his best to come to Transylvania. He succeeded in being appointed to a regiment in Orastie and then in Sibiu. Here he made it a duty to improve himself in the art of hunting. After the First World War, under favourable circumstances, he was named by the Romanian king Ferdinand I, on the first of July 1921, in the position of manager of the royal hunting. In this position he developed a fruitful activity to organize royal hunting parties, to protect the fauna and also to build roads, huts, shelters and refuges. He proved his literary talent by writing articles inspired by the world of cynegetics and also writing specialized works, which are authentic monographs of the most known hunting fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Bear Distribution Bulgaria
    DISTRIBUTIONAND ECOLOGYOF BROWNBEAR IN ROMANIA LASZLO KALABER, 4225 Reghin Str., Eminescu 26, Romania AUREL NEGRUTIU IOAN MICU ANTON DOGARU MIHAI BRATEANU Int. Conf. Bear Res. and Manage. 9(1):173-178 Simionescu (1938) wrote: "Here, at us, thanks God! beech nut fructification, the bear changed its place a they hide in the high mountains, from the Retezat and little, in day time it was in its shelter, in the thicket, Godeanu to Maramures. They are more numerous in and at night time it went into the old forest for food and the Rodna and Calimani mountains." Almasan and to the brook for water. Generally, the bear follows the Vasiliu (1967) reportedthat brown bears (Ursus arctos) paths if it isn't disturbed." in Romania are found (Fig. 1) on about 2.8 million Negrutiu (unpubl. data): "Romaniahas the second ha., occupying the whole range of the Carpathiansfrom largest estimated bear population in Europe after Maramures to the East of Banat and in the Apuseni Russia." Bear distribution in Romania occurs on mountains. about 2.8 million ha. mainly in the Carpathian Cotta and Bodea (1969) estimated a population of mountains. In this area, a well-balanced number is 4,050 bears or about 1.25 bear per 1,000 ha: "It is an about 4,800 individuals. The present estimate in this animal devoted to the place it lives in and to its habits. area is 6,800 bears (Table 1). In the years when in the beech zone there existed a Continuing with the distribution of the bears, we BrownBear Distribution Bulgaria I I 126 miles Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Review of Hunting Tourism in the Czech Republic and Hungary
    Researches Reviews of the Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management 42/2013. Review article UDC 338.48:639(437+439) COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF HUNTING TOURISM IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND HUNGARY Zoran RistićI, Sajko GabrielaII, Karolina SimatIII, Milosava MatejevićI Received: 22.09.2013. | Accepted: 30.11.2013. Abstract: Hunting tourism is one of the most important tourism product in Hungary and the CzechRepublic. Hunting in the CzechRepublic and Hungary has very long tradi- tion dating from the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Today, hunting is based on the sustaina- ble use of wildlife. Diverse natural and environmental resources in the area of these coun- tries made hunting areas very interesting for hunting tourists from all over the world. The aim of this paper is to show and compare the basic indicators of hunting tourism in these countries, based on the collected data. Descriptive statistics and comparative analysis method were used for analysis of result. Hunting in the Czech Republic and Hungary is the most organised in whole Europe, but, as many other developed countries, Czech Republic and Hungary are faced with the problem of reduced number of certain game species. Key words: hunting tourism, Czech Republic, Hungary INTRODUCTION More and more authors consider hunting tourism as an element of active, eco, na- ture or green tourism (Higginbottom, 2004). All classifications are based on the same idea: hunting tourism is a form of tourism related to nature, which is the main mo- tivation for observation and / or hunting of game. Hunting is an independent mar- ket product(SzaboиLengyel, 2012).According to the 2005th, which was conducted by the Federation of Associations for Hunting and Conservation of the European Union - FACE, the European Union and its 25 Member States counted about 6.4 million hunters (FACE, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • CAPRA SLAM EUROPA Hunting Season: October + November
    ESCORTED CAPRA SLAM EUROPA Hunting season: October + November Main hunting countries: Austria – Alpine chamois: The Alpine mountains of Austria, Switzerland, South-Germany, Italy, Slovenia and France are the habitat of the Alpine Chamois. And the highest number of chamois not only in Austria but in all Europe lives on the „Hochschwab“, where I will hunt with my Grand Slam guests at an altitude between 3600 – 6600 ft. A second hunting area possible to hunt is north of the “Hochschwab” just in neighbourhood. Hunting in Austria requires physical fitness. Romania - Carpathian chamois: The habitat of the Carpathian Chamois is limited to the Romanian Alps only. They grow the top quality chamois trophies of 120 CIC points and even more in the world. The world record trophies were harvested in Romania. The hunting is only done on foot and hunting at an altitude of 4500 – 10000 ft. The hunter has to have a very good physical condition. Croatia – Balkan chamois: The habitat of Balkan Chamois is the countries of Serbia, Bulgaria, Macedonia and Croatia. For your Grand Slam I will go for them in Croatia in the mountains along the Adriatic coast around Split with always having a breath taking view of the sea. The hunting area does not require special fitness, only the ability to walk over longer distances. We will hunt at an altitude between 1500 – 3900 ft. Interhunt – Eva-Maria Blaimauer-Schnopfhagen Phone +43.664.9269462 | Fax +43.125.330331980 | [email protected] | www.interhunt.com Program: 1. day: Arrival at Vienna airport, pick up Service and transport to the hunting area.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting Packs in Romania
    Tel/fax:+40 368 41 58 60 +40 740 21 36 87 +40 770 74 81 98 DAMASK Paraului St. No. 7, #. 1 500260, Brasov-Romania E-mail: [email protected] www.romania -travel.biz Tour operator Discover Romania HUNTING IN ROMANIA Romania is a top destination for european hunting tourism. Very often, we can find celebrities from all over the world, like the King of Spain, who come in Romania for hunting. Also, the wild boars hunting meetings organised by Ion Tiriac in Balc village are very famous. Romanian hunt has a long history. Romania is a remarkable hunting destination, due to it’s big number of brown bears, wolfs, wild boars, deers and chamois. The concentration of brown bears (Ursus arctos ) in the Carpathien Mountains from the center of Romania, is the biggest from the world and it has half from the Europe’s population, except Russia. HUNTING SEASON IN ROMANIA 2011 – 2012 Species Hunting Period BEAR Individual Hunting 15.09.2011 – 31.12.2011 Driven hunt 10.10.2011 – 31.01.2012 WILD BOAR 01.08.2011 – 31.01.2012 ROEBUCK 15.05.2011 – 15.10.2011 STAG 15.09.2011 – 15.10.2011 CHAMOIS 15.09.2011 – 15.12.2011 ROE DEAR 01.09.2011 – 15.12.2011 WOLF and LYNX 15.09.2011 – 31.03.2012 CAPERCAILLE 05.04.2011 – 05.05.2011 Bear Hunting Pack 4 nights/5 days 1.300 euro/person 4 nights accommodation All inclusive Transfer and transport Hunting taxes Technical staff specialized in hunting (1 person for each tourist) Translator Preparation of the trophees and its wrapping for delivery Sanitary – veterinary certificate (CITES) S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. Brown Bear Management Patterns in Five European Countries and Their Implications for a Bear Management Plan in Austria
    Chapter 3. Brown bear management patterns in five European countries and their implications for a bear management plan in Austria. INTRODUCTION Brown bear management in Europe includes a broad spectrum of goals, ranging from no protection, to regulated hunting, to total protection. In each country, different organizations are involved in bear management, including private and governmental organizations. The first part of this study is an assessment of the organizational structure of different bear management programs in Europe. For each country, including Slovenia, Romania, Italy, Norway, Sweden, and Austria, I identified organizations involved in bear management, determined if a management plan exists, if and how hunting and damage compensation is structured, examined how the countries deal with problem bears, and finally, identified what kind of management problems each country encounters. In the second part of the study I tried to illustrate patterns of bear management in Europe, including advantages, disadvantages, and effectiveness of each approach within the various countries. The results of this assessment will be used to recommend a bear management strategy for Austria and provide a reference on bear management strategies in Europe. METHODS I interviewed wildlife managers, hunters, government officials and farmers in Slovenia, Romania, Italy, Norway, Sweden, and Austria. Several people involved in bear management in their countries were interviewed. Following the ‘snow - ball method’ (Babbie 1992), initial contacts were made by Dr. Wolfgang Schröder of the Munich Wildlife Society (for a list of initial contacts see Appendix 1). Interviews with initial contacts resulted in identification of additional people to be interviewed. The initial contacts also helped to establish contact with other interviewees.
    [Show full text]
  • Eco-Cinegetic Management in Romania's Maramureș Forest District
    Asian Journal of Biology 12(1): 10-19, 2021; Article no.AJOB.67984 ISSN: 2456-7124 Eco-cinegetic Management in Romania’s Maramureș Forest District Andrei Nicolae Helindian1 and Bogdan-Vasile Cioruța2* 1Faculty of Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca - North University Centre of Baia Mare, 62A Victor Babeș street, 430083, Baia Mare, Romania. 2Technical University of Cluj-Napoca - North University Center of Baia Mare, Office of Informatics, 62A Victor Babeș street, 430083, Baia Mare, Romania. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between both authors. Author BVC designed the study, performed the literature searches, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Author ANH managed the analyses of the entire study. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/AJOB/2021/v12i130153 Editor(s): (1) Dr. Md. Abdulla Al Mamun, The University of Tokyo, Japan. Reviewers: (1) Justus Eronmosele Omijeh, Modibbo Adama University of Technology, Nigeria. (2) Gyula Lakatos, Debrecen University, Hungary. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sdiarticle4.com/review-history/67984 Received 18 March 2021 Original Research Article Accepted 22 May 2021 Published 26 May 2021 ABSTRACT Hunting has been one of the first major concerns of humans since their appearance on this earth for many thousands of years. For the civilized world, however, the hunting activity made huge leaps of content, manifestation, and attitude, eventually reaching to be defined as a cultural, educational, recreational, sports, and even art activity. The present paper has as a subject the national hunting fund, having as a case study, the hunting fund of Maramureș county, specifically, the Vișeu district.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania 2018
    Romania 2018 Hunting in Romania has a high potential for passionate hunters as it offers only wild game, in a gen- Romania uine, almost untouched landscape, while offering excellent to VIP accommodation condi- tions and services based on an excellent infrastructure. The quality of the trophies goes from good to outstanding. Our Partner ASOCIATIA VANATORILOR SI PESCARILOR SPORTIVI BRADUL and partner grant access to about 250 000 ha of hunting ground, accessible to all our guest hunters in fields located from the Carpathian mountains to the Danube Delta in all types of biotopes: mountains, hills, plain, lakes and swamps, along the Danube and Dan- ube Delta. The landscapes are magnificent and huge areas are as if deprived of human presence. In many mountain areas you can walk days and see only very few people…. The game is always 100% wild animals, thus adding more emotions and some new di- mension to your hunting experience. Weather conditions go from a normal 22 to 30C, to a sometimes very hot 38-40C in the summer, to an average of +5 to -10 with sometimes down to 25-28C in the mountains and some “cold spots” areas. The hunter must be equipped according to the field and conditions at the place and moment of the hunting action. Autumn is often a kind of “Indian summer”, with mild temperatures, mostly dry and pleas- ant. Hunting in Romania is not only a hunting experience, it is also a human and cultural expe- rience that opens a new window on Europe, it’s an adventure in the wilderness in safety and excellent conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Research on the SWOT Analysis of the Hunting Funds from the Caransebes Experimental Base
    Volume 22(2), 111- 114, 2018 JOURNAL of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology www.journal-hfb.usab-tm.ro Research on the SWOT analysis of the hunting funds from the Caransebes Experimental Base Ciontu C.I.1*, Chisăliţă I.1,2,Cântar I. C.1 1National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry „Marin Drăcea”; 2Univeristy of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine of Banat „King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, Faculty of Horticulture and Forestry *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract This paper addresses the SWOT analysis of hunting funds Key words within the Caransebes Experimental Base by presenting strengths, weaknesses, threats, opportunities and directions of action. In the first part of SWOT analysis, hunting the paper are presented some general concepts regarding the SWOT funds, strengths, analysis. The two assesed hunting funds F.C. no. 1 Tincova-Maciova and weaknesses, threats, F.C. no. 3 Borlova are also presented in terms of location, main game, small opportunities, directions of furred game, feathered game and carnivorous or harmful animals. In terms of action hunting funds description, need to be specified that F.C. no. 1 Tincova- Maciova and F.C. no. 3 Bolova covere a territory from lowland area to high- mountain area. The work continues with the presentation of the studied material of the two hunting funds and the general research methods used, but also a brief characterization of the SWOT analysis used. Results and discussions show the SWOT analysis of the two hunting funds and discussing the main issues analyzed, common issues for the two funds and different issues for F.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 9 of the Terms of Reference Starts on a New Page
    Active dissemination of environmental information in relation to the Birds and Habitats Directive: Appendices ENV.D.4/ETU/2013/0063r In collaboration with: Active dissemination of Natura 2000 information – Final report appendices Active dissemination of Natura 2000 information – Final report appendices Active dissemination of environmental information in relation to the Birds and Habitats Directive: - Appendices Final report on improving data availability for conservation of wild birds, natural habitats and flora and fauna conservation Authors: Richard Peters, Mark Snethlage, Hans van Gossum, Glenn Vancauwenberghe, Danny Vandenbroucke, Veronika Mikos, Amor Torre-Marín, Linde Vertriest & Johan Lammerant. ARCADIS Belgium nv/sa Maatschappelijke zetel Koningsstraat 80 B-1000 Brussel Reference: Peters, R.L., Snethlage, M., Van Gossum, H., Vancauwenberghe, G., Vandenbroucke, Veronika Mikos, Amor Torre-Marín, D., Vertriest, L., & Lammerant, J. (2014) Active dissemination of environmental information in relation to the Birds and Habitats Directive. Final report on improving data availability for conservation of wild birds, natural habitats and flora and fauna conservation. Appendices. Assignment commissioned by the European Commission, ENV.D.4/ETU/2013/0063r. Keywords: Natura 2000, Online information, INSPIRE, Dissemination, Webpage, Stakeholder analysis. Disclaimer: The information and views set out in this [report/study/article/publication…] are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Active dissemination of Natura 2000 information – Final report appendices Active dissemination of Natura 2000 information – Final report appendices Contents 1 Appendix A: Survey questionnaire.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]