The United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The United Nations Peacebuilding Architecture UN Photo/Martine Perret UN Photo/Martine THE UNITED NATIONS PEACEBUILDING ARCHITECTURE “Building peace is about much more than ending war. It is about putting in place the institutions and trust that will carry people forward into a peaceful future. We often have a limited window of opportunity in which to do this.” – Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon Our collective goal:ÎtoÎhelpÎcountriesÎbuildÎsustainableÎpeaceÎandÎpreventÎrelapseÎintoÎviolentÎconflict Peacebuilding — the most frequent needs ÎÎ SafetyÎandÎsecurity,ÎincludingÎruleÎofÎlaw ÎÎ SupportÎtoÎpoliticalÎprocessesÎandÎreconciliation ÎÎ BasicÎservicesÎsuchÎasÎwater,ÎhealthÎandÎprimaryÎeducation ÎÎ InstitutionÎbuildingÎandÎpublicÎadministration ÎÎ EconomicÎrevitalization,ÎincludingÎjobsÎandÎlivelihoods Essential features of peacebuilding ÎÎ ÎAnÎearlyÎstart:ÎPeacebuildingÎstartsÎwhenÎviolentÎconflictÎends,ÎorÎevenÎbefore. TheÎriskÎofÎrelapseÎ meansÎtheÎfirstÎtwoÎyearsÎareÎcrucialÎforÎlong-termÎsuccess. ÎÎ ÎNationalÎ ownership:Î PeacebuildingÎ isÎ primarilyÎ aÎ nationalÎ challengeÎ andÎ responsibility.Î DevelopingÎ nationalÎcapacityÎisÎaÎpriorityÎfromÎdayÎone. ÎÎ ÎCommonÎstrategy:ÎNationallyÎownedÎandÎbasedÎonÎaÎcountry’sÎneeds,ÎaÎcommonÎstrategyÎsetsÎtheÎ prioritiesÎforÎaction. Most components of the United Nations system have a role in peacebuilding. In 2006 the United Nations peacebuilding capacity was strengthened by the creation of ÎÎ theÎPeacebuildingÎCommission ÎÎ theÎPeacebuildingÎFund ÎÎ theÎPeacebuildingÎSupportÎOffice http://www.un.org/peace/peacebuilding/pbso.shtml PEACEBUILDING SUPPORT OFFICE MobilizingÎ THE PEACEBUILDING COMMISSION resourcesÎ ÎÎ ÎTheÎ intergovernmentalÎ UNÎ bodyÎ thatÎ supportsÎ peacebuildingÎ inÎ countriesÎ emergingÎ fromÎ conflictÎ andÎ advisesÎtheÎGeneralÎAssemblyÎandÎtheÎSecurityÎCouncil ÎÎ ÎUniquelyÎbroadÎandÎdiverse,ÎitsÎmembersÎcomeÎfromÎtheÎ SecurityÎCouncil,ÎtheÎGeneralÎAssembly,ÎtheÎEconomicÎandÎ SocialÎCouncilÎandÎtopÎfinancialÎandÎtroopÎcontributors.Î TheÎ EuropeanÎ Union,Î theÎ IMF,Î theÎ OrganizationÎ ofÎ theÎ IslamicÎConferenceÎandÎtheÎWorldÎBankÎparticipateÎinÎallÎ PoliticalÎÎ FosteringÎ meetings supportÎandÎÎ coordinatedÎ ÎÎ TheÎlynchpinÎofÎtheÎUN’sÎpeacebuildingÎarchitecture advocacy actionÎ Key features ÎÎ ÎHelpsÎ identifyÎ clearÎ peacebuildingÎ prioritiesÎ forÎ theÎ countriesÎ onÎ itsÎ agendaÎ –Î Burundi,Î theÎ CentralÎ AfricanÎRepublic,ÎGuinea-Bissau,ÎLiberiaÎandÎSierraÎLeoneÎ ÎÎ EncouragesÎnationalÎownership,ÎpartnershipsÎandÎmutualÎaccountability ÎÎ ÎNetworksÎcloselyÎwithÎtheÎUNÎsystemÎatÎheadquartersÎandÎinÎtheÎfield,ÎwithÎtheÎSecretary-General’sÎ seniorÎrepresentativesÎandÎUNÎcountryÎteams ÎÎ RaisesÎ Î fundsÎ forÎ peacebuildingÎ throughÎ donorÎ conferencesÎ andÎ publicÎ advocacyÎ –Î particularlyÎ forÎ countriesÎthatÎattractÎlessÎdonorÎinterestÎ The Peacebuilding Commission — its impact on the ground Burundi:ÎTheÎCommissionÎhasÎ(i)ÎimprovedÎdialogueÎamongÎpoliticalÎpartiesÎandÎcivilÎsocietyÎonÎ theÎ country’sÎ peaceÎ priorities;Î (ii)Î mobilizedÎ fundsÎ forÎ peacebuilding,Î particularlyÎ throughÎ theÎ 2007ÎDonorÎConferenceΖÎwhichÎgeneratedÎ$570ÎmillionÎinÎpledgesΖÎandÎtheÎCommission’sÎroleÎinÎ breakingÎtheÎimpasseÎoverÎtheÎIMF’sÎsixthÎreplenishmentÎreview;ÎandÎ(iii)ÎfacilitatedÎaÎdialogueÎtoÎ ensureÎfree,ÎfairÎandÎpeacefulÎelectionsÎinÎ2010ÎtoÎwhichÎtheÎCommission’sÎmembersÎcontributedÎ $27Îmillion. Central African Republic:ÎTheÎCommissionÎhasÎmobilizedÎinternationalÎsupportÎandÎfinancialÎsupportÎ forÎtheÎdisarmament,ÎdemobilizationÎandÎreintegrationÎprogrammeÎandÎtheÎelectionsÎscheduledÎforÎ JanuaryÎ2011. TheÎCommissionÎhasÎalsoÎsucceededÎinÎgettingÎnewÎpartnersÎinvolvedÎinÎtheÎcountry,Î suchÎasÎtheÎInter-ParliamentaryÎUnionÎandÎCARITAS. Guinea-Bissau: Î TheÎ CommissionÎ hasÎ contributedÎ toÎ peaceÎ consolidationÎ byÎ (i)Î mobilizingÎ financialÎsupportÎforÎelectionsÎinÎ2008ÎandÎ2009;ÎandÎ(ii)ÎactivelyÎencouragingÎnationalÎdialogueÎ amongÎallÎkeyÎstakeholdersÎasÎaÎmeansÎofÎresolvingÎtheirÎdifferencesÎinÎtheÎdifficultÎnationalÎ contextÎsinceÎ2007. Sierra Leone: TheÎCommissionÎhasÎ(i)ÎhelpedÎtoÎcoordinateÎinternationalÎassistanceÎinÎsupportÎofÎaÎ single,ÎnationallyÎownedÎpeacebuildingÎstrategy,ÎtheÎAgendaÎforÎChange;Î(ii)ÎfosteredÎUNÎintegrationÎ behindÎoneÎsingleÎJointÎVisionÎforÎSierraÎLeone;Î(iii)ÎfosteredÎtheÎcoordinationÎofÎyouthÎemploymentÎ programmesÎthatÎaimÎtoÎcreateÎ106,000Îjobs;ÎandÎ(iv)ÎprovidedÎpoliticalÎsupportÎtoÎtheÎExecutiveÎ RepresentativeÎ ofÎ theÎ Secretary-GeneralÎ asÎ heÎ brokeredÎ negotiationsÎ betweenÎ theÎ twoÎ mainÎ politicalÎpartiesÎafterÎpoliticalÎviolenceÎbrokeÎoutÎinÎMarchÎ2009,ÎnegotiationsÎwhichÎproducedÎaÎJointÎ CommuniquéÎandÎputÎanÎendÎtoÎtheÎmostÎseriousÎthreatÎtoÎpeaceÎandÎsecurity.Î http://www.un.org/peace/peacebuilding/mandate.shtml PEACEBUILDING SUPPORT OFFICE Fast ÎTHE PEACEBUILDING FUND The Peacebuilding Fund focuses on projects in four priority areas ÎÎ ÎRespondÎtoÎimminentÎthreatsÎtoÎtheÎpeaceÎprocess,ÎorÎsupportÎ peaceÎagreementsÎorÎpoliticalÎdialogue ÎÎ ÎBuildÎorÎstrengthenÎnationalÎcapacitiesÎtoÎpromoteÎcoexistenceÎ andÎpeacefulÎresolutionÎofÎconflict Î Î StimulateÎeconomicÎrevitalizationÎandÎgenerateÎpeaceÎdividends Relevant Catalytic ÎÎ Re-establishÎessentialÎadministrativeÎservices Key features ÎÎ Results-oriented,ÎwithÎfocusÎonÎmonitoringÎandÎevaluation ÎÎ BroadÎdonorÎbase:Î48ÎdonorsÎhaveÎcontributed ÎÎ ÎCanÎfundÎcrucialÎearlyÎinterventionsÎthroughÎitsÎImmediateÎResponseÎFacilityÎ(decisionsÎwithinÎthreeÎ weeks)ÎasÎwellÎasÎlongerÎtermÎprogrammesÎthroughÎtheÎPeacebuildingÎandÎRecoveryÎFacility ÎÎ DirectÎlinksÎtoÎseniorÎUNÎleadershipÎ-ÎbothÎatÎheadquartersÎandÎinÎtheÎfield ÎÎ ÎInclusiveÎ-ÎnationalÎandÎinternationalÎstakeholdersÎsitÎonÎProjectÎSteeringÎCommitteesÎestablishedÎinÎcountry ÎÎ ÎBroadÎparticipationÎofÎUNÎagenciesÎasÎimplementingÎpartners,ÎdrawingÎonÎtheirÎcomparativeÎadvantages Achievements of the Peacebuilding Fund, as of mid-2010 ÎÎ RaisedÎaboutÎ$360ÎmillionÎsinceÎitsÎlaunchÎinÎ2006 ÎÎ AllocatedÎ$180ÎmillionÎtoÎ142ÎprojectsÎinÎ16ÎcountriesÎ ÎÎ ApportionedÎ6%ÎofÎitsÎfundingÎtoÎprojectsÎaimedÎatÎgenderÎequality Future Goals ÎÎ InvestÎ$100ÎmillionÎperÎyearÎinÎpeacebuildingÎ ÎÎ ReplenishÎfundÎbyÎendÎ2011Î ÎÎ StrengthenÎmonitoringÎandÎevaluationÎofÎperformanceÎandÎimpact ÎÎ IncreaseÎproportionÎofÎfundingÎforÎprojectsÎthatÎbenefitÎwomen The Peacebuilding Fund in operation TheÎFundÎhasÎsupportedÎactivitiesÎsuchÎasÎdisarming,ÎdemobilizingÎandÎreintegratingÎex-combatants,Î improvingÎ prisons,Î strengtheningÎ policeÎ forces,Î fightingÎ corruption,Î eliminatingÎ impunityÎ andÎ denialÎofÎbasicÎhumanÎrights,ÎpromotingÎtheÎprivateÎsector,ÎcreatingÎyouthÎemployment,ÎrebuildingÎ infrastructureÎandÎprovidingÎsafeÎdrinkingÎwaterÎandÎproperÎsanitation.ÎÎ Burundi:Î 15,000Î militaryÎ staffÎ removedÎ fromÎ populatedÎ areasÎ andÎ nowÎ housedÎ inÎ 14Î rehabilitatedÎ barracks;ÎeconomicÎopportunitiesÎprovidedÎtoÎ14,000Îhigh-riskÎyouthsÎthroughÎpublicÎworks,ÎemploymentÎ activities,ÎskillsÎtraining,ÎawarenessÎofÎconflictÎmanagementÎandÎ1,100ÎmicrocreditÎprojectsÎ Côte d’Ivoire:Îsocio-economicÎreintegrationÎofÎ3,500Îex-combatantsÎandÎyouthÎatÎriskÎthroughÎ1,000Î micro-projectsÎ Sierra Leone:Î establishmentÎ ofÎ aÎ dedicatedÎ ReparationsÎ Unit,Î enablingÎ theÎ registrationÎ ofÎ aboutÎ 29,000Î warÎ victimsÎ forÎ purposesÎ ofÎ compensation,Î overÎ 7,000Î ofÎ whomÎ haveÎ receivedÎ medical,Î educationalÎandÎpsychosocialÎsupportÎ Central African Republic:Î supportÎ toÎ theÎ organizationÎ ofÎ theÎ DecemberÎ 2008Î InclusiveÎ PoliticalÎ DialogueÎthatÎproducedÎaÎcommonÎsetÎofÎnationalÎpeacebuildingÎpriorities www.unpbf.org PEACEBUILDING SUPPORT OFFICE PEACEBUILDING SUPPORT OFFICE PBSO: its main functions ÎÎ ÎToÎ supportÎ theÎ PeacebuildingÎ CommissionÎ byÎ providingÎ strategicÎ adviceÎ andÎ policyÎ “Building lasting peace after conflict is at the guidanceÎ heart of the United Nations’ mission and purpose. ÎÎ ÎToÎadministerÎtheÎPeacebuildingÎFundÎandÎ helpÎraiseÎfundsÎforÎitÎ From peacekeepers to civil servants, from lawyers ÎÎ ÎToÎfosterÎaÎcoherent,ÎcoordinatedÎapproachÎ to police, from humanitarian staff to development toÎpeacebuildingÎthroughoutÎtheÎUNÎfamily experts, all parts of the UN family are engaged in ÎÎ ÎToÎspreadÎlessonsÎlearnedÎandÎgoodÎpracticeÎ peacebuilding.” onÎpeacebuildingÎinÎtheÎUNÎandÎbeyondÎ – Assistant Secretary-General Future goals for Peacebuilding Support, ÎÎ ÎToÎ increaseÎ theÎ valueÎ addedÎ ofÎ theÎ Judy Cheng-Hopkins PeacebuildingÎCommissionÎatÎcountryÎlevel ÎÎ ÎToÎ strengthenÎ theÎ PeacebuildingÎ Fund’sÎ performanceÎ andÎ identityÎ asÎ aÎ sourceÎ ofÎ fast,Î relevantÎ andÎ catalyticÎ fundingÎ forÎ peacebuilding ÎÎ ÎToÎimproveÎtheÎqualityÎofÎcivilianÎsupportÎ toÎ peacebuildingÎ throughÎ aÎ successfulÎ outcomeÎ toÎ theÎ internationalÎ reviewÎ ofÎ civilianÎcapacitiesÎledÎbyÎPBSO UN Photo/Allison Cooper ÎÎ ÎToÎplayÎaÎmoreÎeffectiveÎroleÎinÎknowledgeÎ management,Î throughÎ deepeningÎ theÎ technicalÎexpertiseÎofÎPBSO,ÎstrengtheningÎ linksÎ withÎ UNÎ andÎ non-UNÎ partnersÎ andÎ spreadingÎ lessonsÎ learnedÎ andÎ goodÎ practiceÎmoreÎactively ÎÎ ÎToÎ ensureÎ thatÎ theÎ recommendationsÎ inÎ theÎ Secretary-General’sÎ reportsÎ onÎ peacebuildingÎ inÎ theÎ immediateÎaftermathÎofÎconflictÎandÎonÎwomenÎandÎpeacebuildingÎareÎfullyÎimplementedΖÎincludingÎ meetingÎtheÎgoalsÎforÎwomen’sÎparticipationÎinÎpeacebuilding Case study: Nepal – coordinated UN support to peacebuilding ÎÎ ÎTheÎPBFÎhasÎsupportedÎ$10ÎmillionÎworthÎofÎactivities,ÎrespondingÎquicklyÎtoÎaÎfundingÎgapÎandÎ catalysingÎcontributionsÎfromÎotherÎdonorsÎforÎtheÎUNÎPeaceÎFundÎforÎNepal ÎÎ ÎPBFÎfundingÎhasÎenabledÎUNÎsupportÎtoÎexpandÎintoÎnewÎareasÎincludingÎyouthÎemployment,Î
Recommended publications
  • Aspr China's Emergence As a Peacebuilding Actor
    INTRODUCING THE ASPR CHINA'S EMERGENCE AS A RESEARCH AGENDA PEACEBUILDING ACTOR policy brief 1/2018 POLICY BRIEF 4/2018 by Pascal Abb peacekeeping, conflict mediation and infrastructure investment in conflict zones are coordinated and thus part of a genuinely Ever since its announcement in 2013, the Chinese ‘Belt and Road alternative model of peacebuilding. While the currently available Initiative’ (BRI) has attracted significant attention from evidence is far from sufficient to answer this question, it is worth international observers, speculating about its impact on fields posing if only to inform future efforts. ranging from economic integration to geopolitics. However, the peace and security implications of the BRI have seen Expanding activities in conflict settings comparatively little interest, as has China's overall engagement with conflict and post-conflict societies – many of which, like Owing to a lack of conceptual clarity as well as the large number Pakistan, South Sudan and Sri Lanka, are key members of the of involved agencies, many Chinese 'peacebuilding' activities are BRI.1 Due to the enormous volume of Chinese investments now not labelled as such or indeed primarily directed towards this being poured into these countries, China seems poised to gain a aim. Three main strands are important here: peacekeeping, significant stake in ongoing peace processes and other conflict mediation, and economic investments, especially in settlement efforts. This will crucially affect their post-conflict infrastructure. The latter also capture profit-oriented reconstruction and economic development. While the existence investments rather than pure aid projects, which may seem at of economic interests is not the sole explanation for deeper odds with a traditional peacebuilding portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • Making War and Building Peace: the United Nations Since the 1990'S
    Making War and Building Peace: The United Nations since the 1990’s Michael W. Doyle Harold Brown Professor of Law and International Affairs Columbia University [email protected] and Nicholas Sambanis Associate Professor of Political Science Yale University [email protected] Contents List of figures and tables Acknowledgements i ONE. INTRODUCTION 1 War-Making, Peacebuilding and the United Nations 1 The New Interventionism 5 Generations of UN Peace Operations 9 The Challenge of Peacebuilding 16 Plan of the Book 20 TWO. THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES 23 Internal (Civil) War and Peacebuilding 23 Theories of Civil War 25 A Definition of Civil War 25 Political-Economic Theories of Civil War Onset 27 International Dimensions of Civil War 35 Civil War Duration, Termination, and Recurrence 39 Implications of Civil War Theory for UN Intervention 44 Type of Conflict and Optimal Peacekeeping Strategy 45 Enhancing Coordination by Improving Communication, Providing Assurance and Building Capacity 47 Enhancing Cooperation by Making Noncompliance Costly and Compliance Cheap, or Transforming the Game 48 Strategic Peacebuilding 50 Defining Peacekeeping Success in a Dynamic Model of Peacebuilding 53 A Peacebuilding Triangle 56 THREE. TESTING PEACEBUILDING STRATEGIES 62 Triangulating Peace 62 The Peacebuilding Dataset 65 The Dependent Variable 65 Explanatory Variables 72 Analysis of Peacebuilding Success in the Short Run 77 Policy Hypothesis and Hypothesis Testing 82 Hostility Indicators 83 Local Capacities Indicators 92 International Capacities Indicators 95 Measuring the Effects of UN Missions on the Probability of Peacebuilding Success 101 Robustness Tests 103 Selection on Observables 105 Long-term Analysis of Peace Duration 108 Index Models of Peacebuilding Success 109 Policy Analysis 110 Conclusion 117 Appendix A: Definition and Coding Rules 119 A.1 Definition and Coding of Civil War 119 A.2 Coding of the Dependent Variable 122 Appendix B: Summary Statistics for Key Variables 123 FOUR.
    [Show full text]
  • A Future for Israeli-Palestinian Peacebuilding
    Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre A future for Israeli-Palestinian peacebuilding Ned Lazarus July 2017 The Israel-Palestine conflict is one of the most heavily researched in the world. Yet a shockingly small fraction of this research focuses on the millions of Israelis and Palestinians who share this land, their relations with one another, and how such relations could be improved so that a breakthrough might be possible. This report is both timely and necessary, and can hopefully provide a blueprint for greater international support of civil society efforts to foster conflict resolution. John Lyndon Executive Director of OneVoice Europe and Research Fellow at Kings College London BICOM, the Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre, is an independent British think tank producing research and analysis to increase understanding of Israel and the Middle East in the UK. Fathom: for a deeper understanding of Israel and the region is BICOM’s online research journal, publishing interviews, articles and reviews from a range of Israeli, Palestinian and international contributors. Front Cover Photo: EcoPeace’s Israeli, Jordanian and Palestinian directors and staff standing together in the Jordan River as part of their campaign to rehabilitate the river which is dwindling due to diversion of its source waters and pollution. Photograph used by permission of EcoPeace. The Author Ned Lazarus is Visiting Professor of International Affairs at the George Washington University’s Elliott School, and an Israel Institute Teaching Fellow. A conflict resolution scholar, practitioner and evaluator, Ned has conducted evaluative studies of Israeli-Palestinian peacebuilding initiatives on behalf of USAID, USIP and the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • A Roadmap for the 2020 Review of the Peacebuilding Architecture
    A roadmap for the 2020 review of the peacebuilding architecture Chair’s Summary 6th Peacebuilding Commission Retreat organized by the Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation in collaboration with the UN Peacebuilding Support Office 15-16-October 2019, Greentree Estate, Manhasset, NY The Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation and the Peacebuilding Support Office (PBSO) co-led a retreat of the Peacebuilding Commission (PBC) intended to serve as an informal exchange on core thematic areas to be addressed in the forthcoming review of the Peacebuilding Architecture mandated by resolutions A/RES/70/262 and S/RES/2282 (2016) (hereinafter referred to as “the 2016 resolutions on the review of the peacebuilding architecture”). The retreat opened with a reception and welcome dinner during which the Secretary-General shared key reflections on peacebuilding and sustaining peace and the forthcoming review, emphasising its importance for the full UN system and all reform efforts. In addition to the Secretary-General, the Presidents of the General Assembly, Security Council and ECOSOC, Permanent Representatives/Ambassadors from the membership of the Peacebuilding Commission (PBC), Under Secretaries-General of the Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs and the Department of Peace Operations, as well as Assistant Secretaries-General of other lead UN entities engaged in peacebuilding participated in the event. Building on the experiences of 2010 and 2015, the purpose of the retreat was to give Member States an opportunity to identify critical themes and issues to shape the 2020 review, based on a shared understanding of the expectations and modalities outlined in the agreed Terms of Reference; and to explore practical ways for the PBC to build on its previous efforts in fulfilment of its advisory role to the General Assembly and the Security Council, including by convening discussions during the informal phase of the review.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Peace Building in Sierra Leone — Toward Vertical Integration? Michael Lawrence
    CIGI PAPERS NO. 49 — NOVEMBER 2014 UNITED NATIONS PEACE BUILDING IN SIERRA LEONE — TOWARD VERTICAL INTEGRATION? MICHAEL LAWRENCE UNITED NATIONS PEACE BUILDING IN SIERRA LEONE — TOWARD VERTICAL INTEGRATION? Michael Lawrence Copyright © 2014 by the Centre for International Governance Innovation The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Centre for International Governance Innovation or its Board of Directors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution — Non-commercial — No Derivatives License. To view this license, visit (www.creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). For re-use or distribution, please include this copyright notice. 67 Erb Street West Waterloo, Ontario N2L 6C2 Canada tel +1 519 885 2444 fax +1 519 885 5450 www.cigionline.org TABLE OF CONTENTS iv About the Author iv Acronyms 1 Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1 Vertically-integrated Peace Building 3 The Persistent Causes of Conflict in Sierra Leone 5 The United Nations and The Civil Society Landscape of Sierra Leone 7 Vertical Integration as Coordination: The NSA Project and the Triangular Mode 9 Vertical Integration as Coordination: The National Youth Commission and the Linear Mode 11 Vertical Integration as Coherence: Different Meanings of Peace Building? 12 Analysis: Vertically-integrated Peace Building and Sierra Leone’s Ongoing Youth Crisis 15 Appendix 1: Interviews in Sierra Leone 17 Appendix 2: Scales of Governance and Youth in Sierra Leone 18 Works Cited 20 About CIGI 20 CIGI Masthead CIGI PAPERS NO. 49 — NOVEMBER 2014 ACRONYMS ABOUT THE AUTHOR APC All People’s Congress APPYA All Political Parties Youth Association CSP Civil Society Platform CSO Civil Society Organization DAC Development Assistance Council DISEC District Security Committee GoSL Government of Sierra Leone NPRC National Provisional Ruling Council Michael Lawrence is a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Peacebuilding 1200 17Th Street,NW, Washington, DC 20036 T 202.457.1700 F 202.429.6063
    UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE PR GRESS IN PEACEBUILDING 1200 17th Street,NW, Washington, DC 20036 t 202.457.1700 f 202.429.6063 www.usip.org JANUARY 2011 SUDAN The Current Situation Sudan faces challenges on many fronts: among them are the ongoing crisis in Darfur, a fragile Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) between the North and South that ended decades of civil war, and significant local violence in the southern and central parts of the country. Heightening the already tense situation is the referendum in southern Sudan scheduled for January 2011 to determine whether southern Sudan will remain part of a united Sudan or secede. Looking ahead to post-CPA Sudan, there will be many questions about the future of northern and southern Sudan, how the central government will interact with periphery regions including Darfur and eastern Sudan, and the threat of renewed civil war. Decisions made over the next year have the potential to lay the foundation for sustainable peace across the whole of Sudan, or to reignite violence and propel the country, and potentially the region, back to war. The U.S. Institute of Peace is engaging on many key in an effort to help build a more peaceful, stable and secure Sudan. Going Forward: USIP’s Work in Sudan Since 2005, USIP experts have focused on helping to build peace and stability in Sudan, working through partner- ships with the U.S. Department of State, nongovernmental organizations in Sudan, and key stakeholders. USIP’s current programs focus on • supporting efforts to resolve border issues • engaging the Darfur diaspora • preventing electoral and referendum violence • analyzing rule of law and customary justice Supporting Efforts to Resolve Border Issues Popular Consultation: USIP is working with state officials, political leaders, and civil society members from the Blue Nile and Southern Kordofan states to design and conduct Popular Consultation—a CPA-mandated process whereby the two states may seek to renegotiate political, administrative, and constitutional arrangements with the central government.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper on Peacebuilding in South Sudan
    WORKING PAPER ON PEACEBUILDING IN SOUTH SUDAN Acknowledgements © CARE International in South Sudan, February 2020 This working paper was commissioned by CARE International in South Sudan and CARE Nederland to Rita Lopidia, independent Peacebuilding consultant and builds on information shared during an exchange and learning event for local Peacebuilding practitioners in South Sudan that took place in October 2019. The working paper reflects experiences and insights on grassroots level Peacebuilding based on first hand experiences by field-based Peacebuilding practitioners of diverse national and international NGOs, complemented by a literature study and desk research. The working paper was developed as part of the Addressing Root Causes of Conflict (ARC) Project funded by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Royal Kingdom of the Netherlands. For further information and feedback on this paper, please contact CARE International South Sudan Head Office in Juba. This publication is copyright of CARE South Sudan, but the information may be used by all stakeholders free of charge for the purpose of capacity building, advocacy, civic education, policy discourses and research, provided that the source is acknowledged in full. The copyright holder requests that all such use be communicated to them for access, utilization and impact measurement purposes. The picture on the front page shows women participating in a peace rally in Jonglei, 2019. 2 |Working Paper on Peacebuilding in South Sudan Table of contents 1. Country Context 1.1 Background 1.2 Underlying factors and trends of conflict in South Sudan 2. Introduction to CARE’s Addressing Root Causes (ARC) Project in South Sudan 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pbf in Sierra Leone
    THE PBF IN SIERRA LEONE UN Photo/Eric Kanalstein Peacebuilding Challenges The new government, which committed to promote national unity, cohesion and disciplined leadership, faces The April 2018 election in Sierra Leone resulted in a the challenging task of rebuilding the impoverished West peaceful transfer of power from former President Ernest African nation’s economy which has been dragged down Bai Koroma to opposition leader, Julius Maada Bio, former by the world’s deadliest Ebola epidemic and a global slump military Head of State. The elections are an important sign in commodity prices. Other challenges remain, including of progress since the end of the civil war in January 2002, tackling corruption, proper natural resource management, which devastated most of the country’s infrastructure, killed access to basic social services, youth unemployment, more than 50,000 Sierra Leoneans, and drove over two addressing countrywide inequality and fiscal policy, and million refugees into neighboring countries. implementing decentralized governance with a focus on border regions. PBF INVESTMENTS IN SIERRA LEONE: TOTAL ALLOCATION: FOCUSING ON: Peaceful dialogue $ 57.3 MILLION invested since 2007 CURRENT PORTFOLIO: PARTNERS: $ MILLION UNDPA, OHCHR, UNDP, UNESCO, UNWOMEN, 5.8 UNDP, IOM, UNFPA, UNICEF, UNOPS PBF Interventions Organizations (CSOs), international partners and the Peacebuilding Commission (PBC), PBF has been Since 2007, the PBF has invested over USD $57 million instrumental in resolving tensions at this very critical in Sierra Leone.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Peacebuilding June 2019 What Works and Why Ii | Local Peacebuilding: What Works and Why Local Peacebuilding: What Works and Why | Iii Abbreviations
    Summary Report Local peacebuilding June 2019 What works and why ii | Local peacebuilding: What works and why Local peacebuilding: What works and why | iii Abbreviations DRC Democratic Republic of Congo DM&E Design, Monitoring and Evaluation NGO Non-governmental organization SDG Sustainable Development Goals UN United Nations Acknowledgements This is a summary version of a longer report which is available online at: https://www.peaceinsight.org/reports/whatworks This research was conducted and the final report written by Phil Vernon under the guidance of a steering group consisting of Jessica Baumgardner-Zuzik, Elizabeth Hume, Dylan Mathews, Bridget Moix and Sarah Phillips. The research benefited from support by Mohamed Ismail, Vahe Mirikian and Shaziya Netto, and we would also like to thank Ken Barlow for editorial support. The author retains final responsibility for all errors of fact or judgement. We acknowledge and thank all the organizations who contributed source documents, and particularly those who kindly agreed to the inclusion of references to their work in the text. This report would not have been possible without generous financial support from Milt Lauenstein. Local peacebuilding: What works and why | iii Preface Although the Global Peace Index recorded the fi rst eff ecti veness and impact, and a lack of contextual increase in global peacefulness in fi ve years in 2019, understanding sti ll hampers eff orts to provide the facts on the ground in many countries speak ti mely, fl exible support to local peacebuilding to a diff erent reality; one where communiti es are eff orts. In additi on, existi ng policy commitments at being torn apart by violence that was both avoidable the UN level have not yet been operati onalized.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Peacekeeping
    UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING NFHS POTENTIAL DEBATE TOPIC 2022-2023 July 1, 2021 Submitted by: Ryan Nierman Wylie E. Groves High School Beverly Hills, Michigan Ruth Kay Detroit Country Day School Beverly Hills, Michigan Background The United Nations (UN) was founded as an international organization in 1945. It is made up of 193 Member States. Over a 72-year period, more than 1 million individuals from 125 countries have served in 71 peacekeeping missions. As of 2021 there are approximately 90,000 peacekeepers in 12 operations around the world (UN 2021). The number one goal of UN Peacekeeping is to protect civilians. In addition to their main goal, the UN identifies a total of six objectives of their Peacekeeping operations: Protecting civilians, Preventing conflicts, Building Rule of Law and security institutions, Promoting human rights, Empowering women, and Delivery of field support. Of late, the UN has made a commitment to include more women in peacekeeping roles. Ultimately, the deployment of women as peacekeepers is up to the member states. But the UN has established a global effort to increase the role of women. According to the UN, “The 2028 target for women serving in military contingents is 15%, and 25% for military observers and staff officers. The 2028 target for women serving in formed police units is 20%, and 30% for individual police officers.” Main Organs The main organs of the United Nations (UN) are the General Assembly, Security Council, Economic and Social Council, Trusteeship Council, International Court of Justice, and the Secretariat. The General Assembly is the main organ of the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Brief: Perspectives on the Peacebuilding Commission's
    Issue Brief: Perspectives on the Peacebuilding Commission’s Coordination Role NOVEMBER 2009 This issue brief was prepared by The founding resolutions of the Peacebuilding Commission (PBC) (A/60/180, Jenna Slotin, Senior Program S/Res/1645) call for a review in 2010. As member states gear up for this review, IPI has prepared issue briefs to offer perspectives on aspects of the PBC’s role. Officer, as part of IPI’s work on While there are several procedural issues that member states will want to address, peacebuilding and state fragility. this review offers an opportunity to reflect more broadly on the role of the PBC. This work is generously supported These briefs are offered in that spirit. They are not intended to cover all aspects by the Carnegie Corporation of New of the PBC’s role, but rather to offer food for thought on some elements of the York. It also fits within IPI’s umbrella PBC’s comparative advantage. program, Coping with Crisis, The founding resolutions of the Peacebuilding Commission (PBC) state that Conflict, and Change , which is one of the main purposes of the commission is “to improve the coordination generously supported by the of all relevant actors within and outside the United Nations.” What does this governments of Denmark, Finland, mean for an intergovernmental advisory organ? Can the PBC really be Greece, Luxembourg, the expected to coordinate the many UN agencies, funds, and programs on the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, ground, let alone the many bilateral, multilateral, and nongovernmental actors Sweden, Switzerland, and the that are present in a postconflict country? What does the PBC have to offer United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth As Peacebuilders Enhancing Youth Resilience and Building Peace
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Youth as Peacebuilders Enhancing youth resilience and building peace Violent extremism threatens the security and fundamental rights of citizens all over the world, and undermines the attempts of many countries to achieve sustainable peace. Youth make up almost Many violent extremist organizations recruit disenfranchised billion of the youth and incite them to commit acts of violence. The way youth resilience manifests itself is highly dependent 1.2 world’s population on its social, economic and political environments. When and this number is expected to grow. youth are provided with opportunities for participation, they are more likely to capitalize on their resilience constructively, thus becoming very valuable assets in peacebuilding. At least Youth are essential actors in contributing to peacebuilding processes. They are among the most youth affected by conflict and can play important roles as agents (aged 15-29) of positive change. UNESCO aims to create opportunities 1 in 4 for young people to practice new forms of global solidarity is affected by violence so that they can become engaged as change-makers and or armed conflict in some way (as of 2016). peacebuilders in their communities and wider societies, and promote a constructive vision of young people as leaders. What UNESCO does We believe that nurturing young people’s resilience and supporting their right to use their knowledge, perspectives and experiences will allow them to be agents of positive change. UNESCO’s framework for action on resilience and peacebuilding is structured in three areas: nnYouth empowerment and inclusion: yyFoster youth participation in peace and security decision-making processes, thus supporting good governance.
    [Show full text]