DOCSLIB.ORG

L. Elliott 48Wl R.-Ruzek

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
L. Elliott 48Wl R.-Ruzek NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE GAME SUMY NFL eC) Copyright 1992 by The National Football League. All rights reserved. This sumry and play-by-play is for the express purpose of assisting meia in their coverage of the game; any other use of this material is prohibited without the written permission of the National Football League. DATE: 10/05/92 Day of Week: Monday Starting Time: 9: 05 PM EDT VISITOR: Dallas Cowboys VS HOME: Philadelphia Eagles AT Veterans Stadium,Philädelphia, Pa. Played outdoors on turf: ,ARTIFICIAL Game Weather: Clear & Cool Temp: 56 Humidity: 40 Wind: SE 6 mph OFFICIALS Referee: Jerry Markbrei t (9) Umpire: Chad Brown (31) Line Judge: Dale Orem (51) Side Judge: Howard Slavin (29) Head Linesman: Tom Barnes ( 55) Back Judge: Tom Sifferman (118) Field Judge: Don Hakes (96) LINEUPS OFFENSEDallas CowboysDEFENSE OFFENSEPhiladelphia DEFENSE Eagles WR 80 A. HAPER LDE 92 T. TOLBERT WR 86 F. BARETT LDE 92 R. WHITE LT 71 M. TUINEI LDT 75 T. CASILLAS LT 73 R. HELLER LDT 90 M. GOLIC LG 61 N. NEWTON ROT 67 R. MAYLAND LG 79 M. SCHA ROT 91 A. HAON C 53 M. STEPNOSKI ROE 94 C. HAEY C 72 D. ALEXADER ROE 96 C. SIMMONS RG 63 J. GESEK SLB 57 V." SMITH RG 61 E. FLOYD LLB 59 S. JOYNER RT 79 E. WILLIAMS MLB 55 R. JONES RT 78 A. DAVIS MLB 56 B. EVANS TE 84 J. NOVACEK WLB 51 K. NORTON TE 83 P. BEACH RLB 51 W. THOMAS WR 88 M. IRVIN LCB 30 I. HOLT WR 89 C. WILLIAMS LCB 46 I. JENKINS QB 8 T. AIKM RCB 24 L. BROWN QB 12 R. CUNNINGHA RCB 21 E. ALLEN FB 48 D. JOHNSTON FS 20 R. HORTON RB 34 H. WALKER SS 20 A. WATERS RB 22 E. SMITH SS 37 J. WASHINGTON RB 41 K. BYARS FS 48 W. HOPKINS --------------- SUBSTITUTIONS --------------- --------------- SUBSTITUTIONS --------------- 2 L. ELLIOTT,P 4 M. SAXON,QB 7 S. BEUERLEIN, P 5 J. FEAGLES,K 7 R. RUZEK,KR/PR 22 V. CB 26 K. SMITH, S 28 D. WOODSON, S 29 K. GANT, S SIKAEMA,RB 23 H. SHERM,RB 27 S. STACY,DB 29 31 T. EVERETT,FB 34 T. AGEE,S 40 B. BATES,CB M. McMILLIAN,CB 30 O. SMITH,RB 32 J. JOSEPH,DB 47 C. HOLMES, LB 50 B. ABRAS, LB 58 D. EDWARS, 38 R. MIANO,RB 39 T. BRooKS,CB/S 42 J. BOOTY, G-T 66 K. GOGAN,C-G 68 F. CORNISH,G-C 70 D. LB 54 B. HAGER,LB 55 K. ROSE,LB 57 S. HALESTRA,G-T 76 A. VEINGRA,DE 77 J. KOWALKOWSKI,T 63 D. SMITH,G-T 75 R. SELBY,WR JEFFCOAT,DL 78 L. LETT,WR 83 K. MATIN,TE 87 84 F. DIXON, WR 85 J. SYDNER, DE 95 M. FLORES, A. ROBERTS,DE 90 T. HILL,DL 97 J. JONES,LB 98 LDE 97 L. SEALS,DT 98 T. JETER G. MYLES --------------- DID NOT PLAY ---------------- --------------- DID NOT PLAY ------------.---- QB 9 J. McMAON, C 62 B. BALD INGER ¡" ---------------- NOT ACTIVE ----------------- ---------------- NOT ACTIVE ----------------- QB 11 C. WELOON,QB 18 O. ARCHER WR 81 A. WRIGHT,DL 95 C. HENNINGS ----------------------- FIELD GOALS (made ( ) & missed) ------------------------ L.---------------------------~---------- ELLIOTT 48WL R.-RUZEK -------~-~------ -- -------------(40) ----------- 1 2 3 4 OT TOTAL VISITOR Dallas Cowboys 7 o o o 7 HOME----------~---------~---------------Philadelphia Eagles --------- -----------10 o - - -7 ------14 - ---- ---- 31-- -- -- Team Qtr Clock ---------------- SCORING PLAY ---------------- -- SCORE -- Time Visitor Home EAGLES 1 11: 35 CUNNINGHA 2 yd. run (RUZEK,kick)(4-14,2:15) o 7 COWBOY 1 7: 55 MATIN 7 yd. pass from AIKM (ELLIOTT, kick) (8-84,3: 40) 7 7 EAGLES 1 1: 34 RUZEK 40 yd. Field Goal (8-36,2:59) 7 10 EAGLES 3 5:01 WALKER 9 yd. run (RUZEK,kick) (8-45,4:05) 7 17 EAGLES 4 12: 40 WALKER 16 yd. run (RUZEK, kick) (5-52,2:50) 7 24 EAGLES 4 3:04 BYARS 12 yd. run (RUZEK,kick) (5-34,2:30) 7 31 Attendance: 66,572 (TiCkets Distributed: 66,815; Unused: 243) Time: 2: 54 SuperStat etm), Version 1.18, Empasys Software, 612-941-9337 FINAL INDIVIDUAL STATISTICS DATE Ol"~nhiPT r; J 1 QQ, AT Phila. J Pa. VISITOR DAL COWBYS HOME PHIl.ADELPlllA EAGLES NET LO~ LO~ RUSHING ATT. YARDS AVG. GAl TO RUSHING ATT. y~N6S AVG. GAl TO A. d1lu ÇJI rrll. ~ i ¿ "1 3.$" l i. 0 .. i. ); ~. t l -i r "Ll""I'_A ì uTiJ 1/~jL i i .J. 0 i. Q L ~ ~~ i~, S" /l 67 2- j, ~¿ l' ., i i LJ lo 0 ~ :i~ 3. I ri L.~ L , . ' ~Yf~A J 1- l. ~.O -¡ 0 TOTALS ).i. CYn 3.fA i 1. l) TOTALS 25(.1"0 ~. 0 Iflb) -- ~ Had Had PASSING ATT. COMPo YARDS . YOS TO LG. Int. PASSING ATT COMPo YARDS ~OS. TO LG. Int. no..1. kd/_ LI. - i ~ fl, r- ""...J .'lY L ¿¡ ~,,~ ~ J 5i -l '"Pi- J I I ,. 4- ~ x ~ 3&+ I I .' , ~ ~ :i $"l. TOTALS I q 1I , i. "l ~ c1 ~* I TOTALS 3l' 14. ~., .(lf .s PASS RECEIVING NO. YAROS LG. · TO PASS RECEIVING NO. YARDS LG. TO .I~.T '71 1M/AI .. IIU'.. .("~ 0 t: '7(. ~ i. ri 'h'~ .~A ~ ~ 1111 i.l fl L V t. .. i. 1 11 n :i i '- fT ~ r~ rr "_: ~'J A-: IAJ ~. :i f ,~ , :7 I IIJ I i. () . c: 1 g ri-L. 1. .C' -i /j ll Ãtlt i '7 .. l) J A~~'L: _ ( 14 i. ll '1' I) íi,,~ JU ( I L ~ J 7 0 r. ~¡, JL J ii .J. IJ "/ 4~ iA .. l :. ~ IJ I ~ U. n ,ßl' ., - i TOTALS lq 1.. l-tl .1('1 I TOTALS i I J 'Ll- :J i. 0 NO. YARDS LG. TO INTERCEPTIONS NO. YARDS LG. TO INTERCEPTIONS .. " "3 ~ 0 T~ "" J j.i- ~v " i.t" g .-r ~ ~ 's i ,. y II ~ · A ;.... i iV 1,/ ¡) 0 TOTALS 3 J 0 TOTALS ~ 3 G, ;i y AVG. T8 IN 20 LG. PUNTING NO. YDS AVG. T8 IN 20 LG. PUNTING NO. YOS ~f'/~ ~ " 3 ç. XD ¡J ¡, 1(. í Ll I 'l L i S'l ll 2. " .(;..i 0 :i ~.3 TOTALS L. 1~S- 1.1. ~ l ~ i. TOTALS LJ 111 S~. f " :L YARDS LG. TO PUNT R6TURNS NO. FC. YARDS LG. TO PUNT R'ETURNS NO. FC. C, D A . I -I ..A 1. I 0 a J 1111 n Ai 1 I J td iy 0 '. - l~ TOTALS 2- l ¡1; J V 0 TOTALS .~ I ii 10 0 KICKOFF RETURNS NO. YARDS LG. TO KICKOFF RETURNS NO. YARDS LG. TO :I . J ¿j21 a .ç'q l) ç/v r' .J,j ""~ A , if ii' () r,.Ir.J,. InJ .. TOTALS L,(J q t: ~'1 () TOTALS I I Y tc- a FUMBLES FUM ~~~ YDS. TO ~~: YDS. TO ~ FUMBLES FUM ~~ YOS. TO ~m YOS TO ~ a,LS'.. t (1,.141 ~J u II' iI"f aJ , I 11 ';.J I~. TOTALS i D~(, ()()(, 0 TOTALS L lOrr: ( 0 0 0 1"ok 4¿~ r I ',r ~¡. tV ¡.,. rr -i .. tk Ie $ J""~ l',NJ " ir~ I~ V7P ¿. ~ I f ¡H ¡, ~;v.. J~14 -- ~ DAt,T,A.~ COWBYS VS. J)llTT.imRT.J?R1"a l?~t..IlS (Visitor) (Hom) Dæe: Mnnn~y, O~~nh~r 5, 19Q2 At: V~t~rans St~dinm. Phi 1 adelphia. Pa. FINAL TEAM. STATISTICS VISITOR HOME COWBOYS EAGLES TOTAL FIRST DOWNS . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 11 ;¿ I 8Y RUSHING ...................................... S 10 BY PASSING ...................................... I l q BY PENALTY ...................................... i .. THIRD DOWN EFFICIENCY (and %) . b-IIf-l.i% 7 -13 - S'lf , 0 FOURTH DOWN EFFICIENCY (and %) . .. ). -~ -/tJ() tJo o - .~ - 0 70 . TOTAL NET YARDS ................................... 3 If ~(: TOTAL OFFENSIVE (Inc. times thrown passing) ........ t, L. ~91 AVERAGE GAIN PER OFFENSIVE PLAY .............. 4.1 ~ t.\.: NET YARDS RUSHING ................................ Ýd 1100 TOTAL RUSHING PLAYS . .. .. .. .. .. .. ).). -* Jl) AVERAGE GAIN PER RUSHING PLAY ................ 3.lp .-5. ~ ï ,l-, ) NET YARDS PASSING ................................. ..3 1 loe, TIMES THROWN-YARDS LOST ATTEMPTING TO PASS ¥- ~ SO ;1- tl GROSS YAROS PASSiNG........... ... ... ..... ... ~ s-G: ¡ ") 't PASS ATTEMPTS-COMPLETIONS-HAD INTERCEPTED 31'-/1- 3 ¡q-/l-i .5 r- AVERAGE GAIN PER PASS PLAY (Inc. times thrown pasing) Ç.D TOTAL KICKOFFS-NO. IN END ZONE-TOUCHBACKS. 2- , - l " - J - 1 PUNTS-NUMBER AND AVERAGE ...................... 4- - '+1. 3 J. - 5".;. ~ HAD BLOCKED .. o o FGs + PATs HAD BLOCKED .......................... '. 0-0 0-0 NO. AND YARDS PUNT RETURNS................... ). --l (p :i - J '1 NO. AND YARDS KICKOFF RETURNS.. ... .. .. .. .. 4- ~.. i -- If NO. AND YARDS INTERCEPTION RETURNS .......... 1- 3 3-3~ PENALTIES-NUMBER AND yARDS........ ............. q-.Ç~ t. - 30 FUMBLES-NUMBER AND LOST .. .. .. .. .. .. '.. ; .. .. J - I I - a TOUCHDOWNS ...................................... i- RUSHING ......................................... o 4- PASSING . i D DEFENSIVE/KICKING GAME. D o EXTRA POINTS MADE-ATTEMPTS. .. I - I L- - 4- FIELD GOALS MADE-ATTEMPTS .... " . o -I I - \ TIME OF POSSESSION .. .......................... ... ;.q: i 1; 3D ; lt S" Dallas cowboys vs Philadelphia' Eagles 10/05/92 at Veterans Stadium BALL POSSESSION AN DRIVE CHAT Dallas Cowboys # TIME TIME TIME HOW BALL DRIVE # YDS YDS NET 1ST BALL HOW GIVEN UP RECD LOST POSS OBTAINED BGN PLAY GAIN PEN YDS DOWN LOST 21 15:11:35 00 13: 7:55 50 1: 3:40 10 Kickoff Kickoff DC27 DC16 3 -10 8 -5 84 -15 0 0 84 DC12 3 TD Intercept 3 5: 40 4: 33 1: 07 Intercept DC27 3 3 -5 -2 0 . DC25 Punt 45 -1:348: 09 i3:05 1: 00-3:29 7: Kickoff09 Punt - -PE39 DC20 - -6- 12 -37 43 - -0-0 43 -37 4PE37- -2-*PE2 Punt -iñtercept- .67 10:0:26 41 0:009: 06 0:261: 35 PuntPunt DC12DC34 5 3 2244 00 4422 11 PE44PE44 InterceptHalf 8 5:01 0:30 4:31 Kickoff DC20 7 32 0 32 2 PE48 Fumble 910 i2: 7:37 4Õ il 5:34:39 -1 2:03:oi Kickoff Punt - -PE5ÕDC13 - 3-3- -6 --7 -4 - -0--10 --7 0 - DC3-0- DC43-Punt Punt - - - 11 3: 04 0: 00 3: 04 Kickoff DC11 12 59 0 59 4 PE30 Missed FG Average DC27 ------------ ---------------------------------~---- ----------------~---- -----~--- Philadelphia Eagles # TIME TIME TIME HOW BALL DRIVE # YDS YDS NET 1ST BALL HOW GIVEN UP RECD LOST .POSS OBTAINED BGN PLAY GAIN PEN YDS DOWN LOST 1 13:50 11:35 2:15 Intercept DC14 4 14 0 14 2 TD 2 7: 55 5: 40 2: 15 Kickoff PE20 4 37 0 37 1 DC43 Intercept 3 4:33 1:34 2:59 Punt PE41 8 32 4 36 3 DC23 Field Goal 4 i3:05 -8:09 -4:56 Intercept -PE1- - -8- -26 - -0- -26 - -2- PE27-Punt - - - 65 15:001:00 10:410:26 0:344:19 KickoffPunt PE20 PE25 4 6 00 06 0 11 PE25PE26 PuntPunt 78 _9~0~0:3012:40 _5~0l _4~0~ 2:50!nte~c~pt Fumble _D£4~ _ _8_PE48 _4~ _5 _0_ 52 _4~ 0 _ 52_4_ _3 _ TD_T~ _ _ _ _ 910 11:39 5:34 7:37 3:04 4:02 2:30 Punt Punt PE13 DC34 6 20 515 34 35 0 2 34 PE48 2 TDPunt ---------- --- ----- -- - ----------------Average PE38 - -- ----- -- -- --------------------- ---- - ----- * if ball lost inside the 20 Time of Possession by Quarter 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH OT TOTAL VISITOR Dallas cowboys 7: 31 9: 30 6: 06 6: 08 29: is HOME Philadelphia Eagles 7: 29 5: 30 8: 54 8: 52 30:45 Kickoff Drive No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2016 PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES (71-91) Fourth Place, National League East Division, -24.0 Games Manager: Pete Mackanin, 2Nd Season
    2016 PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES (71-91) Fourth Place, National League East Division, -24.0 Games Manager: Pete Mackanin, 2nd season 2016 SEASON RECAP: Philadelphia went 71-91 (.438) in 2016, an eight-win improvement from the previous year (63 W, .388 win %) … It marked the Phillies fourth consecutive season under .500 (73- PHILLIES PHACTS 89 in both 2013 & 2014, 63-99 in 2015), which is their longest streak since they posted seven consecutive Record: 71-91 (.438) losing seasons from 1994 to 2000 ... The Phillies finished in 4th place in the NL East, 24.0 games behind Home: 37-44 the Washington Nationals, and posted 90 or more losses in a season for the 39th time in club history … Road: 34-47 Philadelphia had 99 losses in 2015, marking the first time they have had 90+ losses in back-to-back Current Streak: Won 1 Last 5 Games: 1-4 seasons since 1996-97 (95, 94) … Overall, the club batted .240 this year with a .301 OBP, .384 SLG, Last 10 Games: 2-8 .685 OPS, 427 extra-base hits (231 2B, 35 3B, 161 HR) and a ML-low 610 runs scored (3.77 RPG) … Series Record: 18-28-6 Phillies pitchers combined for a 4.63 ERA (739 ER, 1437.0 IP), which included a 4.41 ERA for the starters Sweeps/Swept: 6/9 and a 5.01 mark for the pen. PHILLIES AT HOME HOT START, COOL FINISH: Philadelphia began the season with a 24-17 record over their first 41 th Games Played: 81 games … Their .585 winning percentage over that period (4/4-5/18) was the 6 -best in MLB, trailing Record: 37-44 (.457) only the Chicago Cubs (.718, 28-11), Baltimore Orioles (.615, 24-15), Boston Red Sox (.610, 25-16), CBP (est.
    [Show full text]
  • Booed Santa Claus Philadelphia
    Booed Santa Claus Philadelphia Rodrick never euphonize any clarsachs mopping turgidly, is Theodoric starriest and catchable enough? Percy is blunderingly mounted after Rhemish Valentine shut his Vendean recreantly. Sometimes retroactive Cornelius sheens her logo comically, but extra Earle blush besottedly or dosses joylessly. We booed santa claus Savings compared with the midst off the cheerleaders, santa claus incident on to be nothing but vick is irrelevant when and. And booed santa claus was picked up geno smith the boos rise from a little did a husband or. Name must not used, booing santa claus continues to be booed and in. Locals have all on all pandemic long. Carl eller and booed santa claus philadelphia claus is what else here with philadelphia sports fans can see a great money from those fans? Philly fans built reputation by booing Santa News Sports Jobs. Mexico border when Selena was murdered. Reporting and the black community member at him to it did the advice to. Joy to some creative types paid olivo, then being angry fans than one season culminated with their football draft friday, philadelphia booed santa claus rode a related to get simpson. Philadelphia Guys Seriously Are you car We're talking about by city that booed Santa Claus and would do think again where sports fans hurl. Your City Defined Booing Santa Claus The Philadelphia. Your philadelphia for fans even if we bask in philadelphia claus. For their eagles and philadelphia has a kind of a santa from philadelphia booed santa claus! Image result for eagles fans pelt santa with snowballs images.
    [Show full text]
  • Major League Baseball
    Appendix 1 to Sports Facility Reports, Volume 4, Number 1 ( Copyright 2003, National Sports Law Institute of Marquette University Law School) MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL Note: Information complied from Sports Business News, Forbes.com, Lexis-Nexis, and other sources published on or before June 6, 2003. Team Principal Owner Most Recent Purchase Price Current Value ($/Mil) ($/Mil) Percent Increase/Decrease From Last Year Anaheim Angels Walt Disney Co. 183.5 (2003) $225 (+15%) Stadium ETA Cost % Facility Financing (millions) Publicly Financed Edison 1966 $24 100% In April 1998, Disney completed a $117 M renovation. International Field Disney contributed $87 M toward the project while the of Anaheim City of Anaheim contributed $30 M through the retention of $10 M in external stadium advertising and $20 M in hotel taxes and reserve funds. UPDATE In May 2003, the Anaheim Angels made history by becoming the first American based professional sports team to be owned by an individual of Latino decent. Auturo Moreno, an Arizona businessman worth an estimated $940 million, bought the Angels for $183.5 million. Moreno, one of eleven children, is the former owner of a minor league baseball team and was once a minority owner of the Arizona Diamondbacks. NAMING RIGHTS The Anaheim Angels currently play at Edison International Field of Anaheim. On September 15, 1997, Edison International entered into a naming-rights agreement that will pay the Angels $50 million over 20 years with an average annual payout of $2.5 million. The naming-rights agreement expires in 2018. Team Principal Owner Most Recent Purchase Price Current Value ($/Mil) ($/Mil) Percent Increase/Decrease From Last Year Arizona Jerry Colangelo $130 (1995) $269 (-1%) Diamondbacks Stadium ETA Cost % Facility Financing (millions) Publicly Financed Bank One Ballpark 1998 $355 71% The Maricopa County Stadium District provided $238 M for the construction through a .25% increase in the county sales tax from April 1995 to November 30, 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • A Baseball Writer Looks Back on 20 World Series
    PROJECTILE MOTION Unit 9 Dr. John P. Cise, Professor of Physics, Austin Com. College, 1212 Rio Grande St., Austin Tx. 78701 [email protected] & NYTimes Oct. 27, 2016, by Tyler Kepner ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A Baseball Writer Looks Back on 20 World Series The Phillies’ Gary Matthews leaping in vain for the first of two home runs by the Orioles’ Eddie Murray in a decisive Game 5 victory in 1983. The first time I went to a World Series game, in 1983, I woke up in a state of panic. I was 8 years old. Whenever I wore my lucky Phillies hat to Veterans Stadium in Philadelphia, the home team won. I could not find it anywhere. But we had to get going. This was an afternoon start in the brilliant October sunshine, the last World Series day game ever played in a National League park. I found out later that my younger brother had hid my hat, and I assumed this was why the Baltimore Orioles had won the game. I’d be back the next night, anyway. All these years later, I keep coming back to the World Series — one more as a fan, in 1993, and the rest as a writer. Ball hit 24 15 ft. wall QUESTIONS: (a) Using data in graphic at left and picture in upper degrees above ball went left…. find the speed ball was hit and time of flight? horizontal (b) Find speed(in ft./s. & mph)of ball as it goes over the 15 ft. wall over 371 ft. from home plate? (c) Why is your computed speed ball was hit at less than reality hit ball speeds (100 – 110 mph) in graphic in upper right? (d) Extra Credit(not essential) Use energy concepts to find ball speed going over wall? For (d) let friction = 0 HINTS: Break solution into horizontal and vertical parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Veterans Memorial Stadium Veterans
    Veterans Memorial Veterans Memorial Stadium Stadium THE COMMEMORATIVE BRICK PROGRAM THE COMMEMORATIVE BRICK PROGRAM 1. BRICK SELECTION Supports the Following Programs: QTY Selection Price Total The Academy of Architectural & Building Sciences 4” X 8” Brick $100 The Academy of Business 8” X 8” Brick $150 The Academy of Medical and Health Careers Replica 0 & the development of new academic programs at PMHS 2. INFORMATION First Name Last Name On November 2, 2002, Pedro Menendez High School in St. Augustine, Florida, dedicated its new football, soccer, and track stadium as Veterans Stadium in honor of all veterans of the armed Address forces. Now The Academy of Architectural and Building Sciences stu- City State Zip dents at PMHS have designed and built a concrete wall and brick patio to further honor our veterans. As part of this effort, sections Telephone of the patio will be paved with bricks inscribed with the names of veterans, branch of service, and other information as appropriate. Buy now or reserve your brick today and honor a veteran you know! Bricks may be purchased at any time and will be priced at $100 for a 4” x 8” brick and $150 for a 8” x 8” brick. You may also have your replica shipped to you for an additional $10 fee. All other replicas may be picked up at Pedro Menendez High School. NOTE: For 4 X 8 Brick use only 3 lines above, 8 X 8 Brick use all lines Name of Veterans Group designated to receive $25.00 Donation: You may also designate a veterans group to receive a donation 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Andy Reid Era 7
    Excerpt • Temple University Press The Andy Reid Era 7 t was only a generation, but for many Ea gles fans the span they hired back in 1995. Rhodes was fi red after the Ea gles between the Golden Years and the twenty- fi rst century— went into a tailspin and dropped 19 of their last 24 games. Ithe agonizing wait for another Super Bowl— seemed like a Reid was the quarterbacks coach at Green Bay under Mike lifetime. Holmgren. He never had been an NFL coordinator or a head In many ways, it was. coach at any level. Lurie’s football operations chief, Tom When the Ea gles played in Super Bowl XV in 1981, people Modrak, favored the other fi nalist, Pittsburgh Steelers defensive hadn’t begun to watch DVDs, drive SUVs, or listen to iPods. coordinator Jim Haslett, for the job. The laptop had just been invented, and cell phones cost $3,500. Most teams at the time would only consider hiring a head Postage stamps were 15 cents, and the minimum wage was coach from a major college or someone with experience as an $3.35. Average house hold income for Americans was a little NFL offensive or defensive coordinator. over $19,000, and the prime rate was 21.5 percent, the highest since the Civil War. By the time the Ea gles returned to Super Bowl XXXIX in 2005, coaches were carry ing computers instead of clipboards. They were scouting with videotape, challenging the offi cials with instant replay, communicating via satellite, and devising their game plans with the help of digital photography.
    [Show full text]
  • 1980 MLB Team Labels
    1980 Boston Red Sox Record: 83 - 77 5th Place American League East Manager: Don Zimmer, Johnny Pesky (10/1/80) Fenway Park - 33,538 April/May/September/October Day: 1-7 Good, 8-14 Average, 15-20 Bad Night: 1-3 Good, 4-13 Average, 14-20 Bad June/July/August Day: 1-11 Good, 12-17 Average, 18-20 Bad Night: 1-7 Good, 8-17 Average, 18-20 Bad Fence Height: L: 37', LC: 18', C: 9', RC: 5', R: 3' 1980 Chicago White Sox Record: 70 - 90 5th Place American League West Manager: Tony LaRussa Comiskey Park - 44,492 April/May/September/October Day: 1-7 Good, 8-14 Average, 15-20 Bad Night: 1-4 Good, 5-13 Average, 14-20 Bad June/July/August Day: 1-11 Good, 12-17 Average, 18-20 Bad Night: 1-7 Good, 8-17 Average, 18-20 Bad Fence Height: L: 10', C: 9', R: 10' 1980 Cleveland Indians Record: 79 - 81 6th Place American League East Manager: Dave Garcia Cleveland Municipal Stadium - 76,713 April/May/September/October Day: 1-6 Good, 7-13 Average, 14-20 Bad Night: 1-3 Good, 4-11 Average, 12-20 Bad June/July/August Day: 1-11 Good, 12-17 Average, 18-20 Bad Night: 1-7 Good, 8-17 Average, 18-20 Bad Fence Height: L: 7', C: 9', R: 7' 1980 Detroit Tigers Record: 84 - 78 4th Place American League East Manager: Sparky Anderson Tiger Stadium - 52,067 April/May/September/October Day: 1-7 Good, 8-13 Average, 14-20 Bad Night: 1-3 Good, 4-12 Average, 13-20 Bad June/July/August Day: 1-12 Good, 13-17 Average, 18-20 Bad Night: 1-7 Good, 8-17 Average, 18-20 Bad Fence Height: L: 9, C: 9, R: 9' 1980 New York Yankees Record: 103 - 59 1st Place American League East Lost - ALCS Manager:
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Major League Baseball Attendance Analysis
    MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL 2014 ATTENDANCE ANALYSIS Compiled and Written by David P. Kronheim [email protected] © 2015 MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL 2014 ATTENDANCE ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGES Attendance Reporting Guidelines, Definition of a Sellout, Information Sources….….………………….……… 2-3 2014 Major League Attendance Overview, Summary, Team Highlights………….………………………….…. 4-9 Team-by-Team 2014 vs. 2013 Total Attendance Comparison Table……………………………………………. 10 2014 vs. 2013 Average Attendance per Date Comparison. Number of 2014 Sellouts by Team……………. 11 2014 Highlights and League Attendance Comparison………………………………………………..…..………. 12 Average Attendance per Team, 2014 Road Attendance Leaders, 2014 Attendance by Month……………… 13 ‘3 Million’ Seasons, 2014 Minor League Attendance, Biggest Crowds of 2014…………….…….…….……… 14-15 Season Total Attendance Milestones Reached by Each Team………………………………………………….. 16 Biggest Year-to-Year Attendance Changes………………………………………………………………………… 17 Spring Training Attendance, includes 2015………………………………………………………………………… 18-19 2014 Opening Day, World Baseball Classic, All-Star Game, and Post-Season Attendance………………….. 20 Rainy Season Report………………………………………………………………………………..……..………….. 21 Big Increases and Big Declines in Attendance in 2014……………………………………………………………. 22 The Economy and Major League Attendance. Era of Multi-Purpose Stadiums is Ending……………………. 23 Average Attendance per Home Date………………………………………………………………………………… 24 Interleague Games Attendance……………………………………………………………………………………… 25 Consecutive Game Sellout Streaks in Baseball and Other
    [Show full text]
  • Ballparks As Urban Anchors Livingston Case Studies in Urban Development
    Ballparks as Urban Anchors Livingston Case Studies in Urban Development August 2013 Ballparks as Urban Anchors Livingston Case Studies in Urban Development Penn Institute for Urban Research University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA Eugénie L. Birch, Cara Griffin, Chau Lam Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Case 1. Cleveland Indians: Progressive Field ............................................................ 3 Case 2. Philadelphia Phillies: Citizens Bank Park .................................................... 11 Case 3. Washington Nationals: Nationals Park ........................................................ 17 References ................................................................................................................ 23 Introduction Baseball parks not only provide presented here originated with materials centers for sports and other civic and discussions at PRAI 2011 and reflect activities, but also have the capacity to the challenges the institutions were build wealth for their local economies. In contending with at that time. this regard, they act as “urban anchors” – geographically rooted entities that offer the jobs, services, entertainment options, Ballparks social centers, and other necessities and amenities that make urban life attractive. Ballparks as Urban Anchors Penn IUR has produced this compilation examines how ballparks can anchor of case studies on ballparks as part of our urban revitalization,
    [Show full text]
  • The Philadelphia Phillies: Why Do They Play to an Empty Stadium?
    Rowan University Rowan Digital Works Theses and Dissertations 5-1-2002 The Philadelphia Phillies: why do they play to an empty stadium? Christine A. Bosco Rowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd Part of the Public Relations and Advertising Commons Recommended Citation Bosco, Christine A., "The Philadelphia Phillies: why do they play to an empty stadium?" (2002). Theses and Dissertations. 1522. https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/1522 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Rowan Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Rowan Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES: WHY DO THEY PLAY TO AN EMPTY STADIUM? by Christine A. Bosco A Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts Degree of The Graduate School at Rowan University May 1, 2002 Approved by (Professor) Date Approved 5/1/02 © 2002 Christine A. Bosco ABSTRACT Christine A. Bosco THE PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES: WHY DO THEY PLAY TO AN EMPTY STADIUM? 2001/02 Dr. Donald Bagin Master of Arts in Public Relations The purpose of this study was threefold: 1) to determine fans' attitudes about the Philadelphia Phillies, 2) to determine why there is low attendance at Phillies home games, and 3) to determine how fans can be lured back to the stadium. A sample (n = 100) from the Philadelphia and southern New Jersey areas was chosen to complete a 12-question survey. Both quantitative and qualitative data were gathered.
    [Show full text]
  • Stadium Lincoln Financial Field Philadelphia Case Study
    Stadium Lincoln Financial Field Philadelphia Case Study ® When winter weather arrives at the end of football season ® in 2003, SWOOP, Greenman and other avid Eagles fans may Owens Corning Foamular at Lincoln Financial Field: seek shelter inside the new Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia. ® When they do, they may be wearing green from head to toe • Foamular CW25 extruded foam cavity wall insulation but it will be PINK extruded foam insulation that will help • Foamular® 404 extruded foam waterproofing insulation keep them warm. After 30 years at Veterans Stadium, the Philadelphia Eagles George says the PINK insulation will be very helpful at playoff broke ground for a new stadium on June 7, 2001. Plans for time when the wind is howling off I-95 and the river. “If you the $512 million project include more prime sideline seating ask my opinion, they should have put it only on the home side that starts closer to the playing field – 60 feet vs. 120 feet at of the field.” After a brief pause, he adds, “No, I’m just kidding.” the Vet – and larger seats with cup holders. The team expects to begin using the facility – named Lincoln Financial Field – in George didn’t say whether he retracted the statement for August 2003. The team is understandably pleased. humanitarian reasons or the fact that he doesn’t want to lose the sales. “For the first time in the 68-year history of the Philadelphia Eagles franchise, we will have our own stadium,” owner Jeffrey “There is a lot of pride in every individual who is out there,” In addition to PINK foam insulation in the walls, there will also Lurie said.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\My Documents\Dailey
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Communications THE NEW CATHEDRALS: THE SPORTS STADIUM AND MASS MEDIA’S ROLE IN FACILITATING NEW CONSTRUCTION A Thesis in Mass Communication by Robert C. Trumpbour © 2001 Robert C. Trumpbour Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2001 We approve the thesis of Robert C. Trumpbour. Date of Signature _____________________________ _____________________ Richard L. Barton Professor of Communications Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and Research Thesis Adviser Chair of Committee _____________________________ ______________________ Suzanna DeBoef Associate Professor of Political Science _____________________________ ______________________ Patrick Parsons Associate Professor of Communications _____________________________ ______________________ Ronald A. Smith Professor Emeritus of Exercise and Sport Science iii Abstract Stadium construction has occurred at record-breaking level in major metropolitan areas of the United States in the last decade. This dissertation traces media coverage of stadium construction policy throughout the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty-first century, focusing specifically on newspaper coverage of this issue. The hypothesis that media practitioners in smaller metropolitan areas will be more likely to privilege voices supporting new stadium construction is examined. The case study method is utilized and content analysis is employed to determine media coverage trends in major American metropolitan areas. Cincinnati and Pittsburgh are examined as small market cities, while Boston and New York are explored as larger market cities. Evidence is provided that larger markets adopt a more critical position than small market cities regarding new stadium construction in newspaper opinion content. Large market publications are similar to smaller market counterparts in providing greater opportunity for expression to pro-stadium voices.
    [Show full text]