Black Politics but Not Black People Rethinking the Social and “Racial” History of Early Minstrelsy Douglas A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Black Politics but Not Black People Rethinking the Social and “Racial” History of Early Minstrelsy Douglas A Black Politics but Not Black People Rethinking the Social and “Racial” History of Early Minstrelsy Douglas A. Jones Jr. During an 1833 anti-abolition riot in New York City, a mob of an estimated two thousand peo- ple found the entrance to the Chatham Street Chapel blocked by locked iron gates. Inside the chapel, a committee of abolitionists was busy laying the foundation for an “association to oppose slavery, and reaffirm the doctrine of their revolutionary forefathers,” as one member put it (Tappan 1870:172). That association would become the New York City Anti-Slavery Society, a regional precursor of the American Anti-Slavery Society that formed later that year. After the adoption of resolutions concerning the group’s function and structure, the abolitionists gave the keys to the janitor and instructed him to allow the mob to enter the chapel. When the rioters discovered their targets had escaped by way of private passages and therefore violence against the abolitionists was no longer possible, they decided they would “amuse themselves” another way (171–72): namely, they would “be rich in black fun,” to use the evocative phrase of contem- poraneous British actor Charles Mathews (Mathews 1839:29).1 Thus, the mob moved to hold a mock antislavery meeting. The rioters forced an African American bystander to assume the role of leading abolitionist and social reformer Arthur Tappan, chair the proceedings, and offer a speech. Although the conscripted participant resisted performing in their improvisation, “his audience would take no denial.” He addressed the mob in a stunning, yet dangerous performance of blackness: I am called upon to make a speech! You doubtless know that I am a poor, ignorant man, not accustomed to make speeches. But I have heard of the Declaration of Independence, and have read the Bible. The Declaration says all men are created equal, and the Bible 1. Tracy C. Davis reads Mathews’s comment somewhat differently. She argues that he sought to emphasize his belief that the black content of his piece, Trip to America, would literally make him rich and make the work more engaging. In my view, however, the personal significations of Mathews’s remark do not necessarily under- cut or oppose the way the phrase captures broader functions of contemporaneous blackface performance. Indeed, the “black fun” that Mathews sought for his Trip to America in order to increase his popularity, and therefore his receipts, rests on structures of social feeling and racial expropriation very similar to those the anti-abolitionist rioters sought to produce in their improvisational entertainment (see Davis 2011). Douglas A. Jones Jr. is Cotsen Fellow in the Princeton Society of Fellows. At Princeton, he holds appointments in the Department of English and the Center for African American Studies. His book, The Captive Stage: Performance and the Proslavery Imagination of the Antebellum North, is forthcoming from University of Michigan Press. In fall 2013, he will join the English department faculty of Rutgers University. [email protected] TDR: The Drama Review 57:2 (T218) Summer 2013. ©2013 New York University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 21 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/DRAM_a_00259 by guest on 27 September 2021 says God has made us all of one blood. I think, therefore, we are entitled to good treat- ment, that it is wrong to hold men in slavery, and that — (in Tappan 1870:171–72) The rioters halted his words with “yells and curses” and “broke up their meeting and dispersed” (172). Perhaps they did not expect such daring eloquence in the face of their violent multitude. Nonetheless, this man’s performance enacted the menace of what theorist Nahum Chandler calls black “exorbitance”: that is, the destabilization of normative understandings of sociality and historicity by means of a politicized, epistemic surplus (Chandler 2008). The mob made the mistake of allowing (black) “Tappan” to speak for himself: his improvisatory excess disrupted the intended narrative, and therefore the political intentionality, of their production. The circumstances of this (misfired) riot-cum-minstrel act evoke a number of concerns regarding the interconnectedness of political ideology, class formation, and the function of minstrelsy in the antebellum period. Most notably, why and in what ways did the perform- ers and publics of blackface minstrelsy circumvent the threats of black exorbitance but main- tain their clear investment in black culture? What were the dynamics of this negotiation? And how did this investment yield crucial material for the development of white cultural and polit- ical formations? I address these questions specifically in relation to the socioeconomic and racial contexts that conditioned the production of early minstrelsy (1829–1843). Robert Toll and Eric Lott, among other scholars who have traced minstrelsy’s diachroneity, have persua- sively shown that after 1843, in response to the economic depression of the late 1830s and early 1840s and the commercialization and sentimentalization (i.e., the inclusion of bourgeois mores) of the form, minstrelsy began to solidify its pro-plantation ideology and nostalgia (Toll 1974; Lott 1993:111–67). For Lott, and especially for musicologist Dale Cockrell and cultural his- torian W.T. Lhamon, this periodization represents the course of antebellum minstrelsy — that is, “an early radical phase followed by its co-optation by commercial and middle-class inter- ests by the 1850s” (Nyong’o 2009:8; see also Lott 1993; Cockrell 1997; Lhamon 1998, 2003).2 For these scholars, much of what made early minstrelsy “radical” is that it “asks poor [and dis- affected] whites to align themselves with blacks against the civil sense that it was ‘a gross out- rage’ to do so” and that such an alliance reflected white spectators’ desire to form bonds of interracial, particularly working-class, solidarity (Lhamon 2003:28). This view is an “increas- ingly orthodox” one, as Tavia Nyong’o notes (2009:8). Yet I seek to disturb that historiographic orthodoxy, arguing instead that an examination of the socioeconomic and racial conditions that shaped and surrounded minstrelsy in its first decade and a half reveals how the form helped fos- ter the development of white working-class Northerners’ distinct brand of antiblack, proslavery thought, a worldview intended to bring about their own betterment. Perhaps more than any other factor, whites’ refusals to collaborate with actual African Americans in early minstrelsy undermine the claim that the form’s producers and publics sought social and political accord with their black counterparts, both within the theatrical frame and beyond. Simply put, blackface minstrelsy was for, by, and about the white commu- nity. Although in its early period it was “a form of engaging the black ‘Other,’” it is mislead- ing to suggest that this engagement “might even [have been] supportive of action to correct the Other’s social plight” (Cockrell 1997:161). This claim is emblematic of much of the scholarly literature on American early minstrelsy that has followed Lott’s Love and Theft (1993). These studies seek to “re-complicate” the earlier findings of Ralph Ellison (1964), Nathan Huggins ([1971] 2007:244–301), and Toll (1974), among others, who stressed minstrelsy’s virulent rac- ism and fashioning of white supremacy. Yet in its effort to construe early minstrelsy as an aes- theticized reflection of white workers’ desire for interracial solidarity, this work has too quickly minimized the broader, extratheatrical doings of those who produced the form, including their allegiance to an antiblack and often proslavery Jacksonian democracy, forms of racial terror, 2. Lott, Cockrell, and Lhamon are the most influential and determinative treatments of early minstrelsy. Douglas A. Jones Jr. A. Douglas 22 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/DRAM_a_00259 by guest on 27 September 2021 and violence against African American communities (see Grimsted 1998; Litwack 1961; Harris 2003). These actions simultaneously conditioned and were conditioned by early minstrelsy’s ideological and aesthetic formations, manifesting, for example, in the form’s explicit pro- Jacksonian politics and its visual and discursive reliance upon the battered and bruised black body for its humor.3 As both archive and repertoire of this sociopolitical history, the textual and performative traces of early minstrelsy do not uphold claims of white working-class interest in the amelioration of black social, political, and economic abjection. Moreover, the view that early minstrelsy represents an aspirational yet abortive attempt to forge an alliance of African American and white workingmen also fails to take account of the equally critical fact that although performances very often took place near black communi- ties, the producers of such performances almost always barred the contributions of actual black people.4 Black input would have subverted the mechanisms of identification and structures of (inter)racial feeling that white audiences (predominately male) worked out for themselves in minstrelsy and other sociocultural formations — structures they used to buffer the ongoing vicissitudes of industrialization and the entrenchment of capitalism. Indeed, black performance by black people (as opposed to “black” performance from within the minstrel mask) would have altered the very definition and history of the American working class itself: at the very least, the embrace of black performers and their politics would have broadened the imaginative space, and therefore the political space, of white working-class culture. Had that happened, “working class” might not have become the “racially specific gendered category” (i.e., white, male) that labor theorist and historian Stanley Aronowitz (1990:175) claims it is. We have no record of black minstrel performers during the early period of minstrelsy because, perhaps, none existed. The improvisation of (black) “Tappan” at the Chatham Street Chapel tells us why: there was always the threat that African Americans might move off script and subvert dominant intentionality.
Recommended publications
  • “America” on Nineteenth-Century Stages; Or, Jonathan in England and Jonathan at Home
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by D-Scholarship@Pitt PLAYING “AMERICA” ON NINETEENTH-CENTURY STAGES; OR, JONATHAN IN ENGLAND AND JONATHAN AT HOME by Maura L. Jortner BA, Franciscan University, 1993 MA, Xavier University, 1998 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2005 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by It was defended on December 6, 2005 and approved by Heather Nathans, Ph.D., University of Maryland Kathleen George, Ph.D., Theatre Arts Attilio Favorini, Ph.D., Theatre Arts Dissertation Advisor: Bruce McConachie, Ph.D., Theatre Arts ii Copyright © by Maura L. Jortner 2005 iii PLAYING “AMERICA” ON NINETEENTH-CENTURY STAGES; OR, JONATHAN IN ENGLAND AND JONATHAN AT HOME Maura L. Jortner, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2005 This dissertation, prepared towards the completion of a Ph.D. in Theatre and Performance Studies at the University of Pittsburgh, examines “Yankee Theatre” in America and London through a post-colonial lens from 1787 to 1855. Actors under consideration include: Charles Mathews, James Hackett, George Hill, Danforth Marble and Joshua Silsbee. These actors were selected due to their status as iconic performers in “Yankee Theatre.” The Post-Revolutionary period in America was filled with questions of national identity. Much of American culture came directly from England. American citizens read English books, studied English texts in school, and watched English theatre. They were inundated with English culture and unsure of what their own civilization might look like.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliographr of the LIFE - AND:DRAMATIC AET OFDIGH BGUGICAULT5
    A bibliography of the life and dramatic art of Dion Boucicault; with a handlist of plays Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Livieratos, James Nicholas, 1923- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 29/09/2021 23:28:54 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/318894 A BiBLIOGRAPHr OF THE LIFE - AND:DRAMATIC AET OFDIGH BGUGICAULT5 ■w i t h A M i d l i s t of pla ys v :': . y '- v ■ V; - , ■■ : ■ \.." ■ .' , ' ' „ ; James H 0 Livieratos " ###*##* " A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPART1#!NT OF DRAMA : ^ : Z; In;Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements ... ■ ' For the Degree : qT :.. y , : ^■ . MASTER OF ARTS : •/ : In the Graduate College ■ / UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA ; 1 9 6 0 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill­ ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in The University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable with­ out special permission, provided that accurate acknowledg­ ment of source is made. Requests for permission for ex­ tended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in their judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Brotherton Library Nineteenth-Century Playbills Handlist of Playbills of the Nineteenth Century Given to the Library by Mrs Blan
    Brotherton Library Nineteenth-Century Playbills Handlist of playbills of the nineteenth century given to the Library by Mrs Blanche Legat Leigh (died 194 5) and Professor P.H. Sawyer. The collection is shelved in Special Collections: Theatre: Playbills Contents Pages 1-7: 1-65: Given by Mrs Leigh Pages 8-9: 66-75: Given by Professor Sawyer Pages 10-2 9: Index of Authors, Titles and actors 1 -65: Playbills given by Mrs Leigh 1. 7th Feb. 1806. Theatre Royal, Drury Lane. The Travellers; or, Music's Fascination, by Andrew Cherry (17 62 -1812). Three Weeks after Marriage, by Arthur Murphy (1727-1805), 2. 14th Feb. 1807. Theatre Royal, Drury Lane. The Jealous Wife, by George Colman the elder (1732-94); Tekeli; or, The Siege of Montgatz, by Theodore Edward Hook (17 88-1841). 3. 10th Nov. 1808. Theatre Royal, Drury Lane. The Siege of St. Quintin; or, Spanish Heroism, by T . E. Hook; : The Spoil'd Child, by Isaac Bickerstaffe (173 5-1812), 4. 24th July, 1810. Lyceum Theatre, English Opera. The Duenna, by Richard Brinsley Sheridan (1751- 1816); Twenty Years Ago! by Isaac Pocock (17 82 -183 5). 5. 1st April, 1811. King's Theatre, Haymarket. The Earl of Warwick. .6. 10th Oct. 1812. Theatre Royal, Drury Lane. Hamlet, Prince, of Denmark, by William Shakespeare (1564 -1616); The Devil to Pay; or, The Wives Metamorphosed, by Charles Coffey (d.1745) and John Mottley (1692-1750). 7. 25th May, 1813. Theatre Royal, Covent Garden. The Gameste; by Mrs Susannah Centlivre (1667-1723); The Devil to Pay, by C. Coffey and J.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 X 10 Long.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-88967-4 - Romantic Drama: Acting and Reacting Frederick Burwick Excerpt More information Introduction The poet, John Keats insisted in his letter to Richard Woodhouse (October 27, 1818), has no self, no character, no identity, but is ever ready to assume identity and enter into a role: As to the poetical Character . it has no self – it is everything and nothing – It has no character – it enjoys light and shade; it lives in gusto, be it foul or fair, high or low, mean or elevated. It has as much delight in conceiving an Iago as an Imogen. What shocks the virtuous philosopher, delights the camelion Poet. It does no harm from its relish of the dark side of things any more than its taste for the bright one; because they both end in speculation. A Poet is the most unpoetical of anything in existence because he has no Identity; he is continually 1 in for and filling some other Body. To describe how the poetic imagination moves from nonentity to iden- tity, Keats introduces contrasting Shakespearean characters: the innocent Imogen, the evil Iago. Whatever their moral difference, both have equal affective value because “both end in speculation.” The poet is always ready for such role-playing, “continually in for and filling some other Body.” Keats’s theatrical metaphor for entering into character might seem to apply broadly to the assumptions about acting in the period. The successful performer, a Sarah Siddons or a John Philip Kemble, is pre- sumably one who can enter convincingly into role and become that character for the duration of the play.
    [Show full text]
  • The Career of Dion Boucicault
    The C are e r o f Dio n Bouc ic ault To wnse nd W al s h N EW YO RK THE D UNLAP SO CI ETY M C M XV o 1 1 b C pyright, 9 5 , y T H E D UN LAP S O C I ETY fl 00 g i b O i ) , This is on e of an edition of three hundre d c opies prin te d from typ e for Th e D unlap Soc iety in th e mo of Se ember 1 1 nth pt , 9 5 , by The D e Vinne Press Qtflfl tmtfi E CHAPT R I . m a — Origin o f th e B our s iquots or B ourc icaults Th c — ’ family in Dublin Mys te ry o f Di on s parentage — — Was h e born in 1820 or 1822 ? S trong e vi — d ence to prov e that h e was a l ove - child H i s — — e u e e Th e D e m D r D ion r p t d fath r arl y fa ily . y s ins Lardne r CHAPTE R II . — S ch ool - days P ranks with Charl es Lamb Ken —“ ’ ” ney Nap ol eon s Old Guard acte d at Brent — — ford by hi s s ch ool fe ll ow s Extraordinary p r e — ’ c ocity B ec omes an a cto r in 1839 - Barton Hill s r emini s cenc e s o f B ouc i cault at th e Ch eltenham — and Gl ouces ter Th eatre s Rol e s enact e d at Hull — “ ‘ ” — An adaptati on o f Jack S h eppard ~ Plays “ J ack hims e lf und e r th e n om d e théé tr e o f Lee ” More ton E CHAPT R III .
    [Show full text]
  • The Nineteenth-Century Home Theatre: Women and Material Space
    The Nineteenth-Century Home Theatre: Women and Material Space Ann Margaret Mazur Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania B.S. Mathematics and English, University of Notre Dame, 2007 M.A. English and American literature, University of Notre Dame, 2009 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English University of Virginia May, 2014 © 2014 Ann M. Mazur Table of Contents Acknowledgments…………...…………………………………………………………..…..……i Dedication…………...……………………………………………………………………………ii Chapter 1 Introduction: The Home Theatre in Context……………………………………...………………1 Chapter 2 A Parlour Education: Reworking Gender and Domestic Space in Ladies’ and Children’s Theatricals...........................63 Chapter 3 Beyond the Home (Drama): Imperialism, Painting, and Adaptation in the Home Theatrical………………………………..126 Chapter 4 Props in Victorian Parlour Plays: the Periperformative, Private Objects, and Restructuring Material Space……………………..206 Chapter 5 Victorian Women, the Home Theatre, and the Cultural Potency of A Doll’s House……….….279 Works Cited………………………………………………………………………………....…325 Acknowledgements I am deeply grateful to the American Association of University Women for my 2013-2014 American Dissertation Fellowship, which provided valuable time as well as the financial means to complete The Nineteenth-Century Home Theatre: Women and Material Space over the past year. I wish to thank my dissertation director Alison Booth, whose support and advice has been tremendous throughout my entire writing process, and who has served as a wonderful mentor during my time as a Ph.D. student at the University of Virginia. My dissertation truly began during an Independent Study on women in the Victorian theatre with Alison during Spring 2011. Karen Chase and John O’Brien, the two supporting members of what I have often called my dream dissertation committee, offered timely encouragement, refreshing insight on chapter drafts, and supported my vision for this genre recovery project.
    [Show full text]
  • Plimpton Collection of Dramas 1675-1920 (Bulk 1850-1900)
    AMHERST COLLEGE ARCHIVES AND SPECIAL COLLECTIONS Plimpton Collection of Dramas 1675-1920 (bulk 1850-1900) Summary: A collection of 1429 plays, largely from nineteenth century American and Brisish popular theater. Quantity: 14 linear feet Listed by: Neha Wadia, AC 2013, Student Assistant Note: These plays are cataloged in the Amherst College online catalog. To find the complete listing in the catalog, do a basic keyword search for “Plimpton collection of dramas”. Individual plays can be searched by title and author. The call number for the collection is PN6111.P5 © 2013 Amherst College Archives and Special Collections Page 1 Plimpton Collection of Dramas INTRODUCTION THE PLIMPTON COLLECTION OF PLAYS by Curtis Canfield Originally published in the Amherst Graduates’ Quarterly, May 1932 Mr. George A. Plimpton, ’76, recently presented to the college a large collection of material relating to the English and American theatre of the nineteenth century. More than 1200 plays are represented in the collection in addition to numerous playbills, programs, libretti, histories, and after-pieces, as well as an autographed photograph of Edwin Booth as Richelieu. The collection seems to have been a part of the extensive theatrical library of Mr. Edward Boltwood of Pittsfield, whose father was born in Amherst in 1839 and moved to Pittsfield in 1870. Mr. Boltwood, although an active member of the Berkshire bar, made the theatre his avocation and found time to write a number of small pieces for the stage, one of which is included in the present collection. He was also instrumental in establishing the William Parke Stock Company in Pittsfield, and continued his connection with this company by writing reviews of its plays.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uncompromising Victorian. the Law and the Family in the Plays Of
    00_pped_mastro 11/09/17 11:17 Pagina 3 M. Serena Marchesi The Uncompromising Victorian The Law and the Family in the Plays of Dion Boucicault vai alla scheda del libro su www.edizioniets.com Edizioni ETS 00_pped_mastro 11/09/17 11:17 Pagina 4 www.edizioniets.com © Copyright 2017 Edizioni ETS Piazza Carrara, 16-19 , I-56126 Pisa [email protected] www.edizioniets.com Distribuzione Messaggerie Libri SPA Sede legale: via G. Verdi 8 - 20090 Assago (MI) Promozione PDE PROMOZIONE SRL via Zago 2/2 - 40128 Bologna ISBN 978-884675010-5 00indice 5_mastro 15/09/17 09:08 Pagina 5 Contents Introduction: Boucicault and the Victorian audiences 7 “A Little Emerald” in London: The Irish Heiress 13 Ghosts from a Time of Civil War: The Vampire / The Phantom 33 A Diorama of the Modern City: The Poor of New York / The Streets of London 51 The Three Plays of 1866 71 The Long Strike 72 Flying Scud 83 Hunted down, or, The Two Lives of Mary Leigh 89 “The Degradation of the British Stage”: Formosa, or, the Railroad to Ruin 97 Representing an alien culture: The Corsican Brothers 119 Afterword 133 Chronology 135 Works cited 143 Index 149 00indice 5_mastro 11/09/17 11:17 Pagina 6 00intro 7_mastro 11/09/17 11:17 Pagina 7 Introduction: Boucicault and the Victorian audiences If illegitimate, Dion may never have been baptized. (Walsh 1915: 8) Dion Boucicault was a man full of contradictions. He was a playwright who knew his literary worth but chose to write for profit, producing what the audi - ence expected of him – or nearly so –, an actor who aimed to destroy the stereotyped stage Irishman, and turned it into another stereotype, as powerful as the one he had meant to destroy, a director who radically innovated the Vic - torian stage but always catered to the taste of the audience, a respectable mem - ber of the community who got married twice, possibly three times – once, at least, bigamously – a proud, rebellious Irishman who believed he was – or, at least, sometimes pretended to be – the scion of an aristocratic French house.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Plays of Richard Brinsley Peake (1792-1847)
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my appreciation to all of the people whose aid, advice, and encouragement have made this study possible. To the staffs of the Literature Division of the Cleveland Public Library and the Li lly Library of Indiana University, who have aided me in retrieving and examining some very fragile original texts, I offer my sincerest thanks. I am especially indebted to the staff of the Ohio State University Theatre Research Institute, and in particular Barbara Kachur, for assistance with the microfilm resources of the archives so painstakingly developed by Professor John H. McDowell over many years. Of the many students, staff, and faculty members of the Ohio State University Department of Theatre who have shown great interest and support for this project, only a handful can be mentioned in this space. But to each of these co-workers and friends, I extend my thanks. especially thank my advisers Dr. John C. Morrow and Dr. Alan Woods, whose unceasing enthusiasm and guidance have sustained this study for over a year. To Anna Sears, who typed the final draft of this thesis, I offer my most sincere appreciation. Finally, wish to thank my wife, Laura, for long months of patient assistance as I gathered and organized the material needed for the study, and for her invaluable companionship and suggestions during the typing of the first draft. i i Page VI. PEAKE'S COMEDY. 107 Overview .•..... 107 ~ C1 imbing Boy (1832) 110 The Title Deeds (1847). 113 VII. CONCLUSIONS 120 The Importance of Peake . 120 Suggestions For Further Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Drury Lane
    :CNJ ! VMBBJ ICD ' : '- - --" ; . , ",.' 1 \. ffi . I | m 1 1 ! |g ' 1 -' - . '. _ : I ' - - - ' ' : '_ i p I /,'.'/v;^' v | j ' ' - , '-', , nHI pn ; H ^ B 1 ' .'"' ''-'"' : K ' ' a mm i OLD DRURY LANE. A OLD DRURY LANE FIFTY YESES' RECOLLECTIONS OF AUTHOR, ACTOR, AND MANAGER BY EDWARD STIRLING IN TWO VOLUMES VOL. II. lontton CHATTO AND WINDUS, PICCADILLY 1881 [All Rights Reserved] CONTENTS OF VOL. II. BOOK III. PAGE ACTORS AND ACTRESSES WHO HAVE APPEARED AT DRURY LANE THEATRE FROM ITS EARLIEST ANNALS TO THE PRESENT TIME, SKETCHES OF THEIR CAREER, AND ANEC- DOTES CONNECTED WITH THEM ... I BOOK IV. DRAMATIC ANA AND THEATRICAL VARIETIES, WITH AN ACCOUNT OF CURIOUS OLD PLAYS, ETC. 267 OLD DRURY LANE. BOOK III. ACTORS AND ACTRESSES WHO HAVE APPEARED AT DRURY LANE THEATRE FROM ITS EARLIEST ANNALS TO THE PRESENT TIME, SKETCHES OF THEIR CAREER, AND ANECDOTES CONNECTED WITH THEM. ' Players are the abstracts and brief chronicles of the Time : after your death, you were better have a bad epitaph than their ill report.' VOL. II. EDWARD KYNASTON, 16191687. IN the Restoration days (Charles II.), it was a frequent custom of the ladies of quality to carry Kynaston, the actor of Drury Lane and Lincoln's Inn Fields, in his female dress, after the performances, in their coaches to Hyde Park. JOHN LACEY, 16221681. JOHN LACEY, a Yorkshireman and King's servant at Drury Lane, greatly relished by Charles II., who frequently commanded his performances. CLUN (DIED 1664). TRAGIC NEWS, 1664. 'Clun, one of the best tragic actors at the King's House, 242 Old Drury Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-88967-4 - Romantic Drama: Acting and Reacting Frederick Burwick Excerpt More information Introduction The poet, John Keats insisted in his letter to Richard Woodhouse (October 27, 1818), has no self, no character, no identity, but is ever ready to assume identity and enter into a role: As to the poetical Character . it has no self – it is everything and nothing – It has no character – it enjoys light and shade; it lives in gusto, be it foul or fair, high or low, mean or elevated. It has as much delight in conceiving an Iago as an Imogen. What shocks the virtuous philosopher, delights the camelion Poet. It does no harm from its relish of the dark side of things any more than its taste for the bright one; because they both end in speculation. A Poet is the most unpoetical of anything in existence because he has no Identity; he is continually 1 in for and filling some other Body. To describe how the poetic imagination moves from nonentity to iden- tity, Keats introduces contrasting Shakespearean characters: the innocent Imogen, the evil Iago. Whatever their moral difference, both have equal affective value because “both end in speculation.” The poet is always ready for such role-playing, “continually in for and filling some other Body.” Keats’s theatrical metaphor for entering into character might seem to apply broadly to the assumptions about acting in the period. The successful performer, a Sarah Siddons or a John Philip Kemble, is pre- sumably one who can enter convincingly into role and become that character for the duration of the play.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation of Black Character Formulas: a Critical Examination of Stereotypical Anthropomorphic Depictions and Their Role in Maintaining Whiteness
    THE CREATION OF BLACK CHARACTER FORMULAS: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF STEREOTYPICAL ANTHROPOMORPHIC DEPICTIONS AND THEIR ROLE IN MAINTAINING WHITENESS THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master‘s Degree in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Melissa Renee Crum, B.A. Graduate Program in African American and African Studies The Ohio State University 2010 Master‘s Thesis Committee: Professor Horace Ike Newsum, Advisor Professor Maurice Stevens Professor Kenneth Goings Copyright by Melissa Renee Crum 2010 ABSTRACT The mass media industry as a hegemonic entity has played a vital role in displaying fallacious accounts of black life. Grounded in ideas from scholars like Richard Schechner, Patricia Ticineto, Joseph Roach and Sara Ahmed, this research is a critique of the ways in which memory, and its possible manifestations, plays in non-blacks‘ (specifically whites) interpretation, motivation, and perception of stereotypical visual portrayals of blackness. The focus will be on how the continuing phenomenon of stereotyping blackness in the 20th and 21st centuries is perpetuated in child-targeted feature-length animations with animal characters. I argue that the possible furtive and/or involuntary visual manifestations of ―black identity‖ in animation have their sources in a white historical memory that clings to the desire to maintain whiteness. This work demonstrates how ideas of blackness in white memory were not solely constructed from the imaginations of producers of mainstream culture. Rather black stereotypes are the result of a combination of black protest against negative portrayals, blacks as accomplices in perpetuating their negative stereotypes, and whites‘ imagined ways of blackness.
    [Show full text]