Socialism Advocated to Reduce Oppression of Human And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Socialism Advocated to Reduce Oppression of Human And David Nibert. Animal Rights/Human Rights: Entanglements of Oppression and Liberation. Lanham and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2002. x + 269 pp. $102.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-7425-1775-2. Reviewed by Kathy Gerbasi Published on H-Nilas (July, 2003) Socialism Advocated to Reduce Oppression of same overwhelming forces of capitalist society. Human and Non-Human Animals Most of his book is an exposition and analysis of I am a psychologist, not a sociologist or histo‐ these forces of oppression. He proposes socialism rian, and as such my social construction of reality as a means to reduce the resultant misery that differs considerably from David Nibert's. I am capitalism and its related social structures have generally inclined to attribute an individual's po‐ imposed on all oppressed groups. sition on, or even awareness of, animal rights is‐ Nibert states in chapter 1 that "[t]his book will sues to that person's attitudes, beliefs, and emo‐ explore these fused forms of oppression by way of tions rather than the structure of society. In an at‐ reflections on Western history and on developing tempt to give a fair review of this book I will economic practices, political processes, and belief briefly describe each of the seven chapters and in‐ systems.... [T]his book will document how the his‐ dicate what to me are the strengths and weak‐ torical oppression of humans and other animals nesses of this work. I suspect a sociologist, histori‐ has provided a benefit primarily for a relatively an, or maybe political scientist would evaluate small number of humans, particularly those with this book quite differently, but aside from the substantial privilege and power" (p. 3). Through‐ book's back cover and the foreword by Michael out the book Nibert provides countless compelling W. Fox I have not found any other reviews of the examples of events that support his view. book with which to compare my views. His goal is to convince the reader that people In Animal Rights/Human Rights: Entangle‐ involved in various liberation movements need to ments of Oppression and Liberation, sociologist cooperate and join forces in order to become suc‐ David Nibert passionately attempts to demon‐ cessful. He posits three societal factors that are strate that all devalued and oppressed groups--in‐ necessary to develop and maintain oppression of cluding women, gays, blacks, people with disabili‐ humans and other animals. These forces are eco‐ ties, and nonhuman animals--are victims of the nomic exploitation and competition, unequal H-Net Reviews power, and ideological control. Nibert identifies sulted in horrific living and death for livestock. capitalism and the profit motive as the major Nibert refers to meat production as disassem‐ force of oppression. His comprehensive list of op‐ bling. That is a compelling image, one I will use pressors includes the ever-expanding and power‐ when I discuss the topic with my students. Nibert ful agribusinesses, governments (which Nibert also links the horror of the animals' condition says predominantly serve the powerful), and cul‐ with those of the human meat-production work‐ tural forces such as mass media, museums, the ers and the insult to the environment caused by family, and educational institutions, all of which agribusiness. Nibert further discusses the conspir‐ promote the status quo of oppression. acy between big business and the U.S. Department In chapter 2 he argues that "the motivation of Agriculture (USDA) to promote meat consump‐ for the development and institutionalization of tion as healthy and necessary for human nutri‐ oppressive practices is primarily material, not at‐ tion. The point of this chapter is that these prac‐ titudinal. Such arrangements are not generic or tices are not good for anyone, human or nonhu‐ innate, and prejudice is the product of these ar‐ man. rangements not the principal cause" (p. 52). While The message of chapter 5 is that "many ac‐ I agree that individuals are influenced by situa‐ tivists and scholars view the state as 'a device ac‐ tions and circumstances around them, I am not tively developed by powerful elites to establish convinced it is sufficient to relegate attitudinal in‐ and maintain their dominance' over others" (p. fluences to the backseat. 147). In this chapter Nibert gives many examples Chapter 3 is a detailed analysis of the key role of laws and Congressional hearings that have un‐ that capitalism plays in oppression. "The denigra‐ satisfactorily (from the point of view of the ani‐ tion and exploitation of workers, ruthless eco‐ mal activist) dealt with animal issues. He also nomic concentration and centralization--all com‐ makes clear the conflict of interest apparent in pelled by the capitalist system--fanned the fames the USDA's dual role as both health inspector and of prejudice and ethnocentrism against all poten‐ promoter of meat products. Nibert concludes this tially exploitable and devalued groups" (p. 64). In chapter by saying that, "[f]ully aware of the limi‐ this analysis oppression is viewed as the outcome tations and obstacles to real and lasting change of institutional and economic forces, not individu‐ under capitalism, strategists for liberation of hu‐ al attitudes or psychological factors. Furthermore, mans and other animals should continue to pur‐ Nibert claims "millions of humans and billions of sue liberation through political measures, but other animals have been cruelly treated and they must also challenge the control of the capital‐ killed because their existence somehow hindered, ist elite over the various powers of the state while or their exploitation furthered the accumulation striving to change the structure of the state to one of private profit--particularly for the affluent and that is responsive to public, not monied, interests" powerful" (p. 94). (p. 188). Chapter 4 is a review of the development of Chapter 6 is titled "The Social Construction of agribusiness and the "Green Revolution." The Speciesist Reality." The thesis of this chapter is message here is that as small farms have been that "the entangled nature of the oppression of consumed by huge factory farms, the animal has humans and other animals not only has deep eco‐ become a product instead of a living being. nomic roots, supported by a powerful state appa‐ Agribusiness gives no consideration to the quality ratus, but also has considerable public support of life for animals, who are referred to as prod‐ among a citizenry raised in a society in which ucts. Agribusiness and its profit motive have re‐ powerful corporations exert extraordinary con‐ 2 H-Net Reviews trol over beliefs and values" (p. 196). The exam‐ animals. I work for PSYETA (Psychologists for the ples Nibert provides in this chapter support his Ethical Treatment of Animals, www.psyeta.org), view that "the political, educational, religious, and whose goal it is to reduce human and animal suf‐ familial institutions of these societies were fering and abuse. I am a vegetarian. My route to shaped and molded by the economically motivat‐ vegetarianism was not through the creation of a ed oppression of humans and other animals" (p. socialist society but through psychology and cog‐ 199). He continues by identifying and discussing nitive ethology. Knowledge gained from these "agencies of socialization" such as mass media, fields confirmed my appreciation of the unique‐ schools, museums, and the state that promote and ness, sentience, and individuality of nonhuman indoctrinate people with the accepted socially animals. I decided it was simply wrong to eat any constructed view of reality. other beings.[1] While I completely agree with In his seventh and fnal chapter Nibert ex‐ Nibert's statements about the horrors of factory horts activists who are working to improve condi‐ farming and disassembly plants, I did not really tions for various oppressed groups to join forces learn about these atrocities until after I had al‐ and promote socialism as a means of gaining ready stopped consuming meat. rights for the oppressed. He discusses the inability Reading this book made me think about ele‐ of many who are working in the arena of human ments of society and how they may collude to rights to see this connection between the oppres‐ treat the oppressed and perpetuate the miserable sion of human and nonhuman others. Nibert condition of nonhuman animals. However, I do states that "[i]t is important that members of oth‐ not think I would have fnished reading the book er contemporary liberation movements come to if I had not agreed to review it. I found many of realize that the current oppression of other ani‐ the examples and themes repetitive and the tone mals, especially as 'food,' is ethically atrocious of the book didactic. I wanted to know how Nibert and causes unimaginable pain and suffering" (p. could be so certain that he was correct. I might 240). "Many on the Left, who otherwise will chal‐ have been more convinced by a two-sided rather lenge authority and question the status quo, none‐ than a one-sided argument. I kept waiting (in theless accept the social position and treatment of vain) for some empirical evidence other than cor‐ other animals determined by agribusiness; the relational examples to convince me of the right‐ pharmaceutical, biomedical, and chemical indus‐ ness of Nibert's socialist position. tries; state departments of 'wildlife.'... As long as I suspect others would have similar problems social critics and activists accept this state of af‐ with the book. The book presents no replicable fairs, odds are great that, among the numerous methodology. Nibert himself tells us that he is go‐ other disastrous consequences, the dispossessed ing to give us "reflections" on Western history. of the Earth will continue to experience malnutri‐ While I am sympathetic to the condition of op‐ tion and oppression while the masses in more af‐ pression, I cannot believe that every person's re‐ fluent countries are pacified in part by making flective process would lead to Nibert's conclu‐ themselves obese and sick eating 'meat,' dairy sions.
Recommended publications
  • Derogatory Discourses of Veganism and the Reproduction of Speciesism in UK 1 National Newspapers Bjos 1348 134..152
    The British Journal of Sociology 2011 Volume 62 Issue 1 Vegaphobia: derogatory discourses of veganism and the reproduction of speciesism in UK 1 national newspapers bjos_1348 134..152 Matthew Cole and Karen Morgan Abstract This paper critically examines discourses of veganism in UK national newspapers in 2007. In setting parameters for what can and cannot easily be discussed, domi- nant discourses also help frame understanding. Discourses relating to veganism are therefore presented as contravening commonsense, because they fall outside readily understood meat-eating discourses. Newspapers tend to discredit veganism through ridicule, or as being difficult or impossible to maintain in practice. Vegans are variously stereotyped as ascetics, faddists, sentimentalists, or in some cases, hostile extremists. The overall effect is of a derogatory portrayal of vegans and veganism that we interpret as ‘vegaphobia’. We interpret derogatory discourses of veganism in UK national newspapers as evidence of the cultural reproduction of speciesism, through which veganism is dissociated from its connection with debates concerning nonhuman animals’ rights or liberation. This is problematic in three, interrelated, respects. First, it empirically misrepresents the experience of veganism, and thereby marginalizes vegans. Second, it perpetuates a moral injury to omnivorous readers who are not presented with the opportunity to understand veganism and the challenge to speciesism that it contains. Third, and most seri- ously, it obscures and thereby reproduces
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Agribusiness Sector on the South Carolina Economy
    The Impact of the Agribusiness Sector on the South Carolina Economy Prepared for: Palmetto AgriBusiness Council South Carolina Department of Agriculture South Carolina Farm Bureau Clemson University Public Service Activities London & Associates January 2015 This report was prepared with statistics that are readily available through public sources, without any private or confidential proprietary information from any industry sector being included. For consistency, the current impact assessment for the agribusiness sector uses the same approach and data sources used in the earlier report released in 2008 using 2006 data. The current model uses 2013 data released in December 2014. Data in both studies were provided by the Minnesota Impact Group drawn from annual reports of the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. Both assessments were conducted with the IMPLAN model maintained by the Minnesota Impact Group and originally developed at the U.S. Forest Service. The Impact of the Agribusiness Sector on the South Carolina Economy Palmetto AgriBusiness Council South Carolina Department of Agriculture South Carolina Farm Bureau Clemson University Public Service Activities Report Prepared by James B. London London & Associates Photograph provided by Peter Tögel, Clemson University Public Service Activities Contents PREFACE.......................................................................................................................... iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AGRO-PESSIMISM, CAPITALISM and AGRARIAN CHANGE: TRAJECTORIES and CONTRADICTIONS in SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA Carlos Oya
    AGRO-PESSIMISM, CAPITALISM AND AGRARIAN CHANGE: TRAJECTORIES AND CONTRADICTIONS IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA Carlos Oya Chapter 10 forthcoming in the Political Economy of Africa, edited by V. Padayachee, London: Routledge, 2010, ISBN: 978-0-415-48039-0. Version before proofs. INTRODUCTION The importance of agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) appears to be obvious and is widely noted in the literature on African1 development. For example, the Commission for Africa (2005) states that „agriculture contributes at least 40 per cent of exports, 30 per cent of GDP, up to 30 per cent of foreign exchange earnings, and 70 to 80 per cent of employment‟. There is however wide variation across countries in the relative importance of agriculture measured in terms of its contribution to GDP and exports, as well as aggregate evidence that agriculture‟s share of GDP has declined significantly in many countries. Still, the significance of agriculture as an occupation (either as “main” or “secondary” occupation in both rural and peri-urban areas) is well established. Conventional wisdom tends to present us with two images. First, one hears that there is significant potential for agricultural development, often understood in static terms of comparative advantage.2 This informs agriculture-centred development strategies where „agricultural productivity gains must be the basis for national economic growth and the instrument for mass poverty reduction and food security‟ (World Bank 2007: 19).3 Second, this potential is regarded as severely constrained for several reasons and aggregate agricultural performance is judged to have been disappointing if not dismal. The literature on Africa, especially in the aftermath of the global recession of the 1970s, has been largely pessimistic, and despite some more nuanced assessments in recent times, „Agro-Afro- pessimism‟ continues to permeate policy discourse.
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Farming: Communication Strategies for Animal Rights Critical Animal Studies 2
    Framing Farming: Communication Strategies for Animal Rights Critical Animal Studies 2 General Editors: Helena Pedersen, Stockholm University (Sweden) Vasile Stănescu, Mercer University (U.S.) Editorial Board: Stephen R.L. Clark, University of Liverpool (U.K.) Amy J. Fitzgerald, University of Windsor (Canada) Anthony J. Nocella, II, Hamline University (U.S.) John Sorenson, Brock University (Canada) Richard Twine, University of London and Edge Hill University (U.K.) Richard J. White, Sheffield Hallam University (U.K.) Framing Farming: Communication Strategies for Animal Rights Carrie P. Freeman Amsterdam - New York, NY 2014 Critical Animal Studies 2. Carrie P. Freeman, Framing Farming: Communication Strategies for Animal Rights. 1. Kim Socha, Women, Destruction, and the Avant-Garde. A Paradigm for Animal Liberation. This book is printed on recycled paper. Cover photo: Jo-Anne McArthur / We Animals The paper on which this book is printed meets the requirements of “ISO 9706:1994, Information and documentation - Paper for documents - Requirements for permanence”. ISBN: 978-90-420-3892-9 E-Book ISBN: 978-94-012-1174-1 © Editions Rodopi B.V., Amsterdam – New York, NY 2014 Printed in The Netherlands Table of Contents List of Images 9 Foreword 11 Author’s perspective and background 11 Acknowledgements 14 Dedication 15 Chapter 1: Introduction 17 Themes and Theses in This Book 19 The Unique Contributions of This Book 20 Social Significance of Vegetarianism & Animal Rights 22 The Structure and Content of This Book 26 Word Choice 29 PART I OVERVIEW OF ANIMAL RIGHTS, VEGETARIANISM, AND COMMUNICATION Chapter 2: Ethical Views on Animals as Fellows & as Food 33 Development of Animal Activism in the United States 34 Western Thought on Other Animals 36 Western Vegetarian Ethics 43 Human Eating Habits 62 Chapter 3: Activist Communication Strategy & Debates 67 Communication and the Social Construction of Reality 68 Strategies for Social Movement Organizations 75 Ideological Framing Debates in U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scope and Importance of Agribusiness
    The Scope and Importance of Agribusiness MERICANS enjoy a high standard of Aliving because of the abundance of inexpensive agricultural products. Most Americans do not have to worry about having enough food to eat or clothes to wear because of an agribusiness system that is the best in the world. Objective: þ Describe agribusiness, and determine the scope of the agriculture industry. Key Terms: Ñ agribusiness exports private sector agribusiness input gross domestic product production sector imports production agriculture agribusiness output input production efficiency sector marketing public agriservices agriservice output public sector agriservices sector private agriservices value-added products Agribusiness and Society Agribusiness includes all the activities within the agricultural food and natural resource industry involved in the production of food and fiber. Individual agribusinesses may sell items to farmers for production; provide services to other agricultural businesses; or be engaged in the marketing, transportation, processing, and distribution of agricultural products. Agriservice is activities of value to the user or buyer. The activities are an intangible product. Marketing is providing the products and services that people want when and where they want them. Agribusiness provides people with food, clothing, and shelter. It also provides jobs for mil- lions of people in science, research, engineering, education, advertisement, government agen- E-unit: The Scope and Importance of Agribusiness Page 1 u www.MyCAERT.com Copyright © by CAERT, Inc. — Reproduction by subscription only. E060001 cies, trade organizations, and commodity organizations. Agribusiness pertains to the public and private sectors. The public sector is the economic and administrative functions of dealing with the delivery of goods and services by and for the government.
    [Show full text]
  • On Vegetarianism(S) and Food Choices
    On Vegetarianism(s) and Food Choices “The symbolism of meat-eating is never neutral. To himself, the meat-eater seems to be eating life. To the vegetarian, he seems to be eating death. There is a kind of gestalt-shift between the two positions…” (Midgley) Steven Davis, “The Least Harm Principle May Require that Humans Consume a Diet...of...Large Herbivores” • What is the argument here, following Regan’s least harm principle? Can you see any different alternatives (see freeganism…) other than the ones he mentions (local agriculture, larger herbivores, ‘everyone hunt’) • This article is a good example of heavily debatable statistics—how does he get his numbers? • Does the question of intentionality matter? (i.e., intended vs. unintended/incidental deaths—246) James Rachels, “The Basic Argument for Vegetarianism” • What is the “basic argument” according to Rachels? (two steps, on 260) • Quoting Scully’s Dominion on pigs and the Omnivore’s Dilemma on ‘steer No. 534’, in a “premodern city” • “it is natural for people to resist arguments that require them to do things they don’t want to do” (how much does this account for opposition to reform, do you think?) Also, “if all of your friends are eating meat, you are unlikely to be moved by a mere argument.” (Pollan, Anthony Bourdain, and others also mention the specifically social aspects of eating, and how being a vegetarian (etc.) can often remove you from important forms of social community). • “Eating shrimp may turn out to be acceptable” from an animal welfare perspective—are there others? Kathryn Paxton George, “A Paradox of Ethical Vegetarianism: Unfairness to Women and Children” • George is saying that Regan/Singer’s ethical requirements “unfairly penalize people who live in certain kinds of economic and environmental circumstances,” because they are “nutritionally vulnerable….All current arguments for ethical vegetarianism treat such nutritional vulnerability as an exception rather than as a norm.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Jobs Available for Agribusiness & Agricultural Economics Graduates
    TYPES OF JOBS AVAILABLE FOR AGRIBUSINESS & AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS GRADUATES EMPLOYER POSITION(S) AAA Claims Representative Agrilogic Research Analyst AgriNorthwest Market Analyst Agri-Vision Operations Manager Alamo Title Escrow Agent Allen, Williford & Seale Real Estate Appraiser Animal Health International Outside Sales Representative Attebury Grain Grain Merchandiser Augusta National Golf Club Marketing Consultant BASF Corporation Agro Development & Programs BCI Broker Blue Bell Creameries Production Supervisor; Purchasing Agent BNSF Management Trainee Capital Farm Credit Credit Analyst Capital One Operations Analyst Operations Associate; Commodities Trader; Cargill Procurement Chevron Fundamental Analyst Citibank Dallas Credit Analyst Cold Creek Construction Project Coordinaotr Coldwell Banker Agent Assistant Collier Construction Project Coordinator Concierge Magazine Media Sales Conoco Estimator Constellation Energy Data Analyst Continuum Health Care Financial Department Dean Foods Management Trainee Dow AgroSciences Sales Trainee Ducks Unlimited, Inc. Regional Director Dupre Energy Services Sales Representative E&J Gallo Winery Management Development Edward Jones Financial Advisor Elanco Sales Representative FDIC FIS Trainee Federal Energy Regulation Commission Economist Food & Drug Administration Economist Frac-Tech International Research Associate Sales Management Trainee; Traffic Resource; Frito Lay Associate Analyst Glazer's Sales Trainee Graaves Mechanical Bidder Halliburton Associate Technical Professional School of Retail
    [Show full text]
  • Agribusiness Interest in a Supervised Agricultural Experience (S AE)
    Agribusiness Interest In A Supervised Agricultural Experience (S AE) Ideas for developing an agribusiness-related SAE Agribusiness Overview • According to the National Council for Agricultural Education, Agribusiness Systems (ABS) is described as: … the principles and techniques for the development and management of a business. • A wide range of technical skills and supports nearly all other areas of interest. • Sometimes agribusiness projects are either (1) Products or (2) Service Summary Of Skills Associated With Agribusiness • Business development through applying principles of supply and demand • Developing a business plan (SAE plan) • Management of resources (ex: land, labor, capital and management) • Record keeping, fnancial statements and inventory management • Cost of production and measurement of proft • Marketing and brand development • Risk management techniques and strategy • Other skills in technology and math Connect Your Interests To Your Project Entrepreneurship Placement Research Foundational An agribusiness learning A business or An agribusiness work A research project related experience or career for-profit venture experience to a business decision planning Time (Money, if applicable) Time is invested Time is invested Time is invested are invested Money is invested & Provides opportunity to at risk; Provides opportunity to Provides opportunity to learn about agribusiness or Provides opportunity to learn learn through exploration marketing through a learn and possibly earn a & possibly earn a paycheck or job shadowing
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics and Animals Fall 2020
    Ethics and Animals Fall 2020 Description This course examines the morality of our treatment of nonhuman animals. We start with a survey of moral theory. Do animals have moral status? Do we have a right to harm or kill some animals in order to benefit or save others? We consider these questions from a variety of moral perspectives, including consequentialism, Kantian ethics, virtue ethics, and feminist ethics. We then apply these ideas to different kinds of animal use. For example, what is the morality of our treatment of animals in food, research, captivity, and the wild? Finally, we will explore ethical questions that arise for animal activists, including about what ends they should pursue, what means they should take towards those ends, and how they should relate to other social movements. General Information Time: T 5:00{7:30 ET Place: online Instructor: Name: Jeff Sebo Email: jeff[email protected] Office: online Office Hours: M 3-5pm ET 1 Readings The required books for this class are: Julia Driver, Ethics: The Fundamentals; Lori Gruen, Ethics and Animals; and Gary Francione & Robert Garner, The Animal Rights Debate. These books are available online, and the Gruen and Francione & Garner books are also available for free at the NYU library website. All readings not from the required books will be posted on the course website. Grading Your grades will be determined as follows: • Papers (75%): You will write three papers explaining and evaluating the ideas and arguments discussed in class. You will email this paper to [email protected]. For each paper, you can either create your own prompt (provided that you clear it with us in advance) or select from prompts that we create.
    [Show full text]
  • Increase Youth Participation in Agribusiness in Tanzania
    Increase Youth Participation in Agribusiness in Tanzania HAFIDH KABANDA Economist (Natural Resources and Energy). Economic and Social Research Foundation (ESRF) Increasing Youth Inclusion in Agribusiness in Tanzania Focus: Enhancing Enabling Environment to Increase Youth Participation in Agribusiness in Tanzania. Presentation Structure: i. Youth Status ii. About the Project and Observations iii. Agricultural Hub and Results. iv. Way Forward. i. Youth Status (ILFS, 2014). The total youth population aged 15-35 years is comprised of 14.8 million persons of whom only 12.5 million (84.5 percent) are economically active. And out of those economically active youth population, only 11.0 million (88.3 percent) persons are employed and 11.7 percent of youth remained are unemployed. i. Youth Status Unemployment is more proportional to young female Tanzanians at 14.5 percent. Compared to 8.9 percent of young males who are unemployed. Depending on the angle of view, the youth unemployment is even higher with 12.0 percent of youths who are employed are underemployed. i. Youth Status In 2006 the number of employed youth was 4,166,620 persons. Majority of them worked in agriculture sector in the rural areas, primarily on smallholdings as self – employed or unpaid family workers. In over decade time, despite the effort to improve enabling environment of youth inclusion in agribusiness, still employment among the young Tanzanians has been growing at low rate. Hence increasing of youth rural – urban migration. ii. About the Project and Observations This Ongoing East Africa Youth Inclusion Program (EAYIP), implemented by HEIFER international in collaboration with ESRF and other partner institutions has focused in identifying barriers and recommend appropriate policies that will catalyze youth participation and inclusion in economic activities particularly in agriculture sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Science”: False Teachings
    Responsible Policies www.RPAforAll.org P.O. Box 891 For Animals, Inc. Glenside, PA 19038 Factsheet #8 [email protected] “Animal Science”: False Teachings for Destructive Industries + = ? Responsible Policies for Animals’ (RPA’s) 10,000 Years Is Enough campaign seeks to end our publicly funded land-grant universities’ (LGUs’) “animal science” programs that serve the flesh, milk and egg industries and are an egregious disservice to the common good. This factsheet is part of the fourth mailing to the 50 states’ “1862” LGUs showing how the violations of nonhuman animals’ rights inherent in “animal science”bring other harm to nonhuman animals, people, and ecosystems. In addition to violating nonhuman animals’ rights and teaching without factual basis that nonhuman animals have no rights, “animal science” programs otherwise fail to meet basic pedagogical standards. They omit relevant available knowledge. They fail to challenge assumptions and to correct false notions. Conflict of interest produces those failings. Rather than serve farmers, sustainable agriculture, and sound nutrition as our LGUs should, “animal science” serves the private interests of the flesh, milk, and egg industries and related industries including but not limited to pharmaceuticals, feed crop, petroleum, and fast food. Following are some of the many beliefs “animal science” programs teach or fail to correct that are shown to be false by biology, anthropology, nutrition, medicine, philosophy, and other fields. Absent such beliefs, it makes no sense to study “animal science” or to plan or build a career in the flesh, milk, or egg industry. Upon request, RPA gladly elaborates further and provides sources in addition to those touched upon here.
    [Show full text]
  • Career Education: Agribusiness and Natural Resources Occupations Cluster
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 079 481 VT 020 375 AUTHOR Lee, Jasper S. TITLE Career Education: Agribusiness and Natural Resources Occupations Cluster. INSTITUTION Ohio State Univ., Columbus. Center for Vocational and Technical Education. SPONS AGENCY National Inst. of Education (DHEW), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO Inf-Ser-87 PUB DATE 73 NOTE 34p. AVAILABLE FROMProduct Utilization Section, The Center for Vocational and Technical Education, 1960 Kenny Road, Columbus, Ohio 43210 (one of a set, prices available upon request) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS *Agribusiness; *Career Education; *Employment Opportunities; *Natural Resources; Occupational Clusters; *Occupational Information ABSTRACT Intended for teachers, counselors, and administrators, this booklet is designed to provide a brief description of the agribusiness and natural resources occupations cluster. Agribusiness is a blending of agriculture and business and is composed of two groups of occupations known as farm and nonfarm. Agribusiness and natural resources occupations are concerned with meeting the baiic needs of man.. Occupations in agribusiness and natural resources involve a wide range of subjects and skill requirements in such areas as biological science, economics, communications, business procedures, and transportation. Included in this booklet is a brief description of the opportunities and requirements of occupations belonging to these subgroups of the agribusiness and natural resources cluster: (1) agricultural production, J21 agricultural supplies and services, (3) agricultural mechanics, (4) agricultural products, (5) ornamental horticulture, (6) forestry, and (7) natural resources. In addition to the brief descriptions, a review of the changes occurring in agriculture, the importance of agribusiness and natural resources occupations, and employment trends are discussed. (SB) r-4 cc .....t ON N.
    [Show full text]