Watershed Health Score Summary
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Long Prairie River Miss R-Brainerd Snake River Long Prairie River Mean Watershed North Fork Crow R 65 54 63 Health Scores WATERSHED HEALTH ASSESSMENT SCORES Miss R-Sartell 44 70 84 79 68 46 64 Mean (average) Health Score 50 42 54 63 Sauk River 73 78 68 Minimum Health Index Score Rum River 60 69 69 7 48 68 Minimum Health Index: 40 57 Biology - Habitat Quality 69 59 6663 65 Health Score 51 62 67 41 58 Watershed Assessment Tool Miss R-St. Cloud 64 64 64 0 - 20 63 http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/watershed_tool 67 45 59 21 - 40 45 61 62 50 51 58 Chippewa River 53 49 59 41 - 60 46 50 42 61 - 80 47 45 44 50 46 81 - 100 54 43 45 48 48 49 55 North Fork Crow R 48 45 49 50 47 63 44 43 43 54 NLCD 2001 - Land Cover 45 45 49 47 4760 44 Open Water Watershed Health Scores compare and rank various aspects of ecological health Developed Mississippi River across Minnesota. Index values are based on a variety of data sources, calculations Forest South Fork Crow R and scientific approaches. Each index is scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 0 being Grassland Minn R-Granite Falls the least desirable result or condtion to 100 being the best existing condition or most Pasture/Hay desirable result. Major watershed scale rankings may mask the range of conditions Cultivated Crops Minn R-Shakopee that occur at more local scales. A high score may indicate the least impacted condition Wetlands 0 2.51.25 Miles Minn R-Mankato in Minnesota, not necessarily a healthy condition. COMPONENT SCORES HYDROLOGY GEOMORPHOLOGY BIOLOGY CONNECTIVITY WATER QUALITY Mean (Ave.) 65 Mean (Ave.) 69 Mean (Ave.) 36 Mean (Ave.) 30 Mean (Ave.) 52 Minimum Index 33 Minimum Index 47 Minimum Index 7 Minimum Index 10 Minimum Index 30 INDEX SCORES INDEX SCORES INDEX SCORES INDEX SCORES INDEX SCORES Soil Erosion Terrestrial Habitat Terrestrial Habitat Perennial Cover 33 72 7 10 Non-Point Source 30 Susceptibility Quality Connectivity Impervious Cover 78 * Point Source 85 Groundwater Stream Species 59 Aquatic Connectivity 14 * Withdrawal 93 * 47 Storage Susceptibility Assessments 42 52 Species Richness 49 Riparian 64 Flow Variability 69 Climate Connectivity 89 At-Risk Species 28 Vulnerability Richness Metric Sub-Scores Metric Sub-Scores Metric Sub-Scores Storage: Aquatic Connectivity: Non-Point Source: Stream/Ditch Ratio 43 Bridges/Culverts 17 Nutrient Application 51 Surface storage 62 Dams 11 Riparian Impervious 9 *These index values are influenced by very low scores associated with dense urban use of resources. This gives comparatively high scores for outstate Minnesota. Viewing input data is necessary to evaluate possible watershed scale concerns. November, 2011.