DOCSLIB.ORG

Potential for Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistance In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Potential for Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistance In Report of the Scientific Committee of the Food Safety Authority of Ireland 2015 Potential for Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistance in the Food Chain Report of the Scientific Committee of the Food Safety Authority of Ireland Potential for Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistance in the Food Chain Published by: Food Safety Authority of Ireland Abbey Court, Lower Abbey St Dublin 1 DO1 W2H4 Tel: +353 1 8171300 Fax: +353 1 8171301 [email protected] www.fsai.ie © FSAI 2015 Applications for reproduction should be made to the FSAI Information Unit ISBN 978-1-910348-01-7 Report of the Scientific Committee of the Food Safety Authority of Ireland Potential for Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistance in the Food Chain CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5 ABBREVIATIONS 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 10 1.1 The Scale of the Antimicrobial Resistance Problem ...................10 1.2 Human and Animals – The ‘One Health’ Concept.....................11 1.3 The Background to the Antimicrobial Resistance Problem . .11 1.4 Genetic Diversity, Genetic Determinants and Change in Bacteria . 14 1.5 Selection for Antimicrobial Resistance...............................15 1.6 Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Ireland and Europe . .15 1.7 Prudent Use of Antimicrobials – Definition . 15 1.8 Surveillance of Antimicrobial Use in Ireland and Europe ...............16 1.9 Antimicrobials and the Food Chain . .16 1.10 Antimicrobial-resistant Bacteria and the Food Chain ..................16 1.11 Summary . .17 1.12 Chapter Bibliography..............................................17 CHAPTER 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE 20 2.1 Chapter Bibliography..............................................20 1 of 58 Report of the Scientific Potential for Transmission of Committee of the Food Safety Authority of Ireland Antimicrobial Resistance in the Food Chain CHAPTER 3. REVIEW OF POTENTIAL ROUTES OF TRANSMISSION AND METHODS OF PREVENTION OF ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN THE FOOD CHAIN 21 3.1 Introduction . .21 3.2 Potential Routes of Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistance in the Food Chain.................................................22 3.3 Chapter Bibliography..............................................26 CHAPTER 4. ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN THE FOOD CHAIN IN IRELAND 29 4.1 Chapter Bibliography..............................................35 CHAPTER 5. USE OF VETERINARY ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN IRELAND 36 5.1 Introduction .....................................................36 5.2 Regulatory Framework for Antimicrobial Use in Veterinary Practice ....36 5.3 Training as it Relates to Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance 38 5.4 Available Data on Antimicrobial Use in Food animals in Ireland . 38 5.5 The Sales Data . .39 5.6 Disposal of Unused Antimicrobial Agents . .46 5.7 Monitoring of Antimicrobial Residues in Foods . .46 5.8 Chapter Bibliography..............................................47 CHAPTER 6. THE INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE TO ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN THE FOOD CHAIN 48 6.1 Introduction .....................................................48 6.2 Global Response..................................................48 6.3 European Response . .48 6.4 Country Level Responses ..........................................49 6.5 Chapter Bibliography..............................................51 CONCLUSIONS 54 RECOMMENDATIONS 56 GLOSSARY 58 2 of 58 Quote from Alexander Fleming’s 1945 Nobel Prize Lecture “But I would like to sound one note of warning. Penicillin is to all intents and purposes non-poisonous so there is no need to worry about giving an overdose and poisoning the patient. There may be a danger, though, in underdosage. It is not difficult to make microbes resistant to penicillin in the laboratory by exposing them to concentrations not sufficient to kill them, and the same thing has occasionally happened in the body. The time may come when penicillin can be bought by anyone in the shops. Then there is the danger that the ignorant man may easily underdose himself and by exposing his microbes to non-lethal quantities of the drug make them resistant. Here is a hypothetical illustration. Mr. X. has a sore throat. He buys some penicillin and gives himself, not enough to kill the streptococci but enough to educate them to resist penicillin. He then infects his wife. Mrs. X gets pneumonia and is treated with penicillin. As the streptococci are now resistant to penicillin the treatment fails. Mrs. X dies. Who is primarily responsible for Mrs. X’s death? Why Mr. X whose negligent use of penicillin changed the nature of the microbe. Moral: If you use penicillin, use enough.” Nobel Lectures, Physiology or Medicine 1942-1962, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1964 Source: “Sir Alexander Fleming - Nobel Lecture: Penicillin”. Nobelprize.org. Nobel Media AB 2014. Web. 8 Oct 2015. 3 of 58 Report of the Scientific Potential for Transmission of Committee of the Food Safety Authority of Ireland Antimicrobial Resistance in the Food Chain FOREWORD In 1929, Alexander Fleming identified the first antibiotic, penicillin. In his 1945 Nobel Prize lecture, Fleming reminded the world of the need to use antibiotics cautiously to ensure their continued effectiveness. The rise in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is now recognised worldwide as one of the greatest potential threats to human and animal health, with possible serious consequences for public health, animal welfare and the agri-food sectors. In 2014, the Irish Government published a National Risk Assessment (NRA) document. The purpose was to identify strategic risks which might have an adverse impact on Ireland’s well-being and ensure appropriate prevention and mitigation frameworks are in place. Antimicrobial resistance was identified as a national risk in both the 2014 and again in the draft 2015 NRA document. These documents recognise that the advances achieved as a result of the use of antimicrobial agents are now seriously in jeopardy because of the emergence and spread of resistant bacteria against which an increasing number of antimicrobials are ineffective. The documents highlight that if the level of AMR continues to rise, it will become increasingly difficult and expensive to control and treat infections in medical care and more difficult to maintain animal health and welfare. It is well established that bacteria frequently transfer between humans, animals and the environment. These interconnections between human and animal health and the environment are recognised in the ‘One Health’ concept, which promotes the importance of collaborative efforts to attain optimal health for all three. The concept is supported by global animal health (OIE) and human health agencies (WHO) and has an important role in the control of antimicrobial resistance. In 2014, the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Simon Coveney, T.D. and the Minister for Health, Leo Varadkar, T.D. recognised the need for a coordinated ‘One Health’ approach for Ireland and established a National Interdepartmental Antimicrobial Resistance Consultative Committee to tackle the growing problem of antimicrobial resistant bacteria. The objective of this report of the Scientific Committee of the Food Safety Authority of Ireland is to focus on the potential for transmission of AMR through the food chain, while recognising the interconnectedness between the food chain, the environment and humans, and to identify control strategies. The Scientific Committee would like to especially acknowledge the work of the Biological Safety Subcommittee and the expert Working Group in contributing to this report. Prof. Martin Cormican, University College Hospital, Galway Member of Scientific Committee and Chair of both the Biological Safety Sub-committee and the Antimicrobial Resistance Working Group 4 of 58 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Scientific Committee Biological Safety Technical Secretariat Sub-committee to the Biological Safety Prof. Albert Flynn, Sub-committee University College, Cork (Chair) Prof. Martin Cormican, Dr Lisa O’Connor Prof. Brian McKenna, National University of Ireland, University College, Dublin Galway (Chair) Secretariat to the Biological Dr Colette Bonner, Dr Bill Doré, Safety Sub-committee Department of Health Marine Institute Ms Eileen Lippert Dr Dan O’Sullivan, Ms Catherine Foye, Department of Agriculture, Health Service Executive Antimicrobial Resistance Food and the Marine Dr Geraldine Duffy, Working Group Dr Geraldine Duffy, Teagasc Teagasc Dr Helen O’Shea, Prof. Martin Cormican, Ms Ita Saul, Cork Institute of Technology National University of Ireland, Galway (Chair) Our Lady’s Childrens Hospital, Mr John Griffin, Crumlin Department of Agriculture, Ms Caroline Garvan, Dr Margaret O’Sullivan, Food and the Marine Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine Health Service Executive Dr Kieran Jordan, Prof. Martin Cormican, Teagasc Dr Gabriel Beechinor, Health Products Regulatory Authority University College Hospital, Galway Dr Margaret O’Sullivan, Dr Michael O’Keeffe, Health Service Executive Dr Geraldine Duffy, Teagasc Residue Specialist Dr Micheál O’Mahony, Dr Paul McKeown, Sea-Fisheries Protection Authority Dr Margaret O’Sullivan, Health Service Executive Health Protection Surveillance Dr Montserrat Gutierrez, Centre Department of Agriculture, Dr Montserrat Gutierrez, Dr Paula Barry Walsh, Food and the Marine Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine Department of Agriculture, Dr Paul McKeown, Food and the Marine Health Protection Surveillance Dr Nola Leonard, Prof. Peter Jones, Centre University College, Dublin University
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Commentary Disease Transmission Dynamics and the Evolution
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 96, pp. 800–801, February 1999 Commentary Disease transmission dynamics and the evolution of antibiotic resistance in hospitals and communal settings Simon A. Levin*† and Viggo Andreasen‡ *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Eno Hall, Princeton University, Princeton NJ 08544; and ‡Department of Mathematics, Roskilde University, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark Despite the tremendous benefits of antibiotics for dealing with sally, exercising little influence on their host under normal a wide range of pathogens, there is by now little doubt that conditions. Antibiotics are typically introduced to treat the their indiscriminate use has led to the emergence of novel true pathogens, and for them the problem of resistance resistant strains and a frightening new set of threats to public introduces questions concerning the length and intensity of health. Hospitals and other community settings provide an treatment, multidrug strategies, and patient compliance. (See, especially fertile ground for the spread of those types; in for example, refs. 2–4). Commensals provide a different sort particular, the recent emergence and proliferation of bacteria of problem, however. Under normal conditions, they live in resistant to both methicillin and vancomycin has engendered such places as the skin or upper respiratory tract, causing little serious concern, threatening the effectiveness of the last or no harm. On occasion, however, they become translocated available options for treatment of potentially fatal Staphylo- to sites that are normally sterile, such as the blood or lungs, coccus strains. where they may have serious harmful effects (6). Many viru- It seems clear that a considered and comprehensive strategy lence factors, for example in Staphylococcus aureus, are carried for antibiotic use is essential, permitting the intelligent de- on plasmids, and can be exchanged among different strains.
    [Show full text]
  • Valacyclovir Reduced Genital Herpes Transmission in Couples Discordant for Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Infection Corey L, Wald A, Patel R, Et Al
    146 THERAPEUTICS Evid Based Med: first published as 10.1136/ebm.9.5.146 on 30 September 2004. Downloaded from Valacyclovir reduced genital herpes transmission in couples discordant for herpes simplex virus type 2 infection Corey L, Wald A, Patel R, et al. Once-daily valacyclovir to reduce the risk of transmission of genital herpes. N Engl J Med 2004;350:11–20. Clinical impact ratings GP/FP/Primary care wwwwwwq Infectious diseases wwwwwqq ............................................................................................................................... In heterosexual couples who are serologically discordant for herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infection, does once Q daily valacyclovir reduce the sexual transmission of genital herpes? METHODS MAIN RESULTS The table shows the results. Design: randomised placebo controlled trial. CONCLUSION In heterosexual couples discordant for herpes simplex virus type 2 infection, valacyclovir reduced transmission of infection. Allocation: concealed.* Commentary Blinding: blinded {participants, healthcare providers, data revious studies have shown that antiviral drugs can reduce the collectors, data analysts, and outcome assessors}À.* frequency of recurrence and subclinical shedding of viral particles.1 Follow up period: 8 months. P This important, large, well designed trial by Corey et al is the first to show an effect on the transmission of HSV-2 infection to an uninfected partner. In this study, the reduction in transmission was limited; 62 partners had Setting: 96 sites in the US, Canada, Europe, Latin America, and to take the drug daily for 8 months to prevent 1 infection, and 57 partners Australia. had to take the drug daily to prevent overall acquisition of HSV-2 infection. 2 independent predictors were found in addition to the drugs: Participants: 1498 couples >18 years who were women as the susceptible partners (hazard ratio [HR] 3.3) and duration immunocompetent, heterosexual, monogamous, in good health, of HSV-2 infection ,2 years (HR 2.9).
    [Show full text]
  • Zoonotic Diseases Fact Sheet
    ZOONOTIC DISEASES FACT SHEET s e ion ecie s n t n p is ms n e e s tio s g s m to a a o u t Rang s p t tme to e th n s n m c a s a ra y a re ho Di P Ge Ho T S Incub F T P Brucella (B. Infected animals Skin or mucous membrane High and protracted (extended) fever. 1-15 weeks Most commonly Antibiotic melitensis, B. (swine, cattle, goats, contact with infected Infection affects bone, heart, reported U.S. combination: abortus, B. suis, B. sheep, dogs) animals, their blood, tissue, gallbladder, kidney, spleen, and laboratory-associated streptomycina, Brucellosis* Bacteria canis ) and other body fluids causes highly disseminated lesions bacterial infection in tetracycline, and and abscess man sulfonamides Salmonella (S. Domestic (dogs, cats, Direct contact as well as Mild gastroenteritiis (diarrhea) to high 6 hours to 3 Fatality rate of 5-10% Antibiotic cholera-suis, S. monkeys, rodents, indirect consumption fever, severe headache, and spleen days combination: enteriditis, S. labor-atory rodents, (eggs, food vehicles using enlargement. May lead to focal chloramphenicol, typhymurium, S. rep-tiles [especially eggs, etc.). Human to infection in any organ or tissue of the neomycin, ampicillin Salmonellosis Bacteria typhi) turtles], chickens and human transmission also body) fish) and herd animals possible (cattle, chickens, pigs) All Shigella species Captive non-human Oral-fecal route Ranges from asymptomatic carrier to Varies by Highly infective. Low Intravenous fluids primates severe bacillary dysentery with high species. 16 number of organisms and electrolytes, fevers, weakness, severe abdominal hours to 7 capable of causing Antibiotics: ampicillin, cramps, prostration, edema of the days.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Disease Transmission During the COVID-19
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Evolution of disease transmission during the COVID‑19 pandemic: patterns and determinants Jie Zhu & Blanca Gallego* Epidemic models are being used by governments to inform public health strategies to reduce the spread of SARS‑CoV‑2. They simulate potential scenarios by manipulating model parameters that control processes of disease transmission and recovery. However, the validity of these parameters is challenged by the uncertainty of the impact of public health interventions on disease transmission, and the forecasting accuracy of these models is rarely investigated during an outbreak. We ftted a stochastic transmission model on reported cases, recoveries and deaths associated with SARS‑CoV‑2 infection across 101 countries. The dynamics of disease transmission was represented in terms of the daily efective reproduction number ( Rt ). The relationship between public health interventions and Rt was explored, frstly using a hierarchical clustering algorithm on initial Rt patterns, and secondly computing the time‑lagged cross correlation among the daily number of policies implemented, Rt , and daily incidence counts in subsequent months. The impact of updating Rt every time a prediction is made on the forecasting accuracy of the model was investigated. We identifed 5 groups of countries with distinct transmission patterns during the frst 6 months of the pandemic. Early adoption of social distancing measures and a shorter gap between interventions were associated with a reduction on the duration of outbreaks. The lagged correlation analysis revealed that increased policy volume was associated with lower future Rt (75 days lag), while a lower Rt was associated with lower future policy volume (102 days lag).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Disease and Disease Transmission
    DISEASE AND DISEASE TRANSMISSION Chapter 2 Disease and disease transmission An enormous variety of organisms exist, including some which can survive and even develop in the body of people or animals. If the organism can cause infection, it is an infectious agent. In this manual infectious agents which cause infection and illness are called pathogens. Diseases caused by pathogens, or the toxins they produce, are communicable or infectious diseases (45). In this manual these will be called disease and infection. This chapter presents the transmission cycle of disease with its different elements, and categorises the different infections related to WES. 2.1 Introduction to the transmission cycle of disease To be able to persist or live on, pathogens must be able to leave an infected host, survive transmission in the environment, enter a susceptible person or animal, and develop and/or multiply in the newly infected host. The transmission of pathogens from current to future host follows a repeating cycle. This cycle can be simple, with a direct transmission from current to future host, or complex, where transmission occurs through (multiple) intermediate hosts or vectors. This cycle is called the transmission cycle of disease, or transmission cycle. The transmission cycle has different elements: The pathogen: the organism causing the infection The host: the infected person or animal ‘carrying’ the pathogen The exit: the method the pathogen uses to leave the body of the host Transmission: how the pathogen is transferred from host to susceptible person or animal, which can include developmental stages in the environment, in intermediate hosts, or in vectors 7 CONTROLLING AND PREVENTING DISEASE The environment: the environment in which transmission of the pathogen takes place.
    [Show full text]
  • STD (Sexually Transmitted Disease) Or STI (Sexually Transmitted Infection): Should We Choose? Janet Byron Anderson, Phd
    STD (sexually transmitted disease) or STI (sexually transmitted infection): Should we choose? Janet Byron Anderson, PhD 1. Clinical foundation of the problem Another surprise: Documented incidence had shown Each of the terms—“sexual(ly)”, “transmitted”, “disease”, that the two routes of sexual transmission were male-to- and “infection”—is problematic independently, as this female and male-to-male. However, on 15 July 2016 the study will show. Moreover, co-occurring variants, used CDC reported the first case of suspected female-to-male as synonyms in English medical articles worldwide, ag- sexual transmission in New York City [4]. Since 2008, gravate the problem. The purpose of this study is to pro- then, the Zika virus has shown that it is now sexually pose a single term that can stimulate discussion about transmissible. “Transmissible” denotes a potential, and is whether the co-occurring variants are clinically and lin- distinct from “transmitted”, which denotes a reality. guistically justifiable—especially now, when STDs/STIs To say that Zika has proved to be transmissible through have become a global health problem, and public health sexual contact means that it can be transmitted through agencies in every country are scrambling to educate their sex but that it need not be (Zika remains a chiefly vec- citizens. [Until the presentation advances to the point tor-borne disease). However, cases reported since 2008 where the question posed in the title can be definitively document the reality of transmittedness through sexual answered, I’ll use the expression “STD/STI” or the terms contact. “illness(es)” and “condition(s)”.] The predisposing epidemiologic context will first be clar- This carefully differentiated language is used by the ified, for it sheds light on two of the problematic terms: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control chiefly “transmitted” but also “sexual(ly)”.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission of SARS-Cov-2: Implications for Infection Prevention Precautions
    Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions Scientific brief 9 July 2020 This document is an update to the scientific brief published on 29 March 2020 entitled “Modes of transmission of virus causing COVID-19: implications for infection prevention and control (IPC) precaution recommendations” and includes new scientific evidence available on transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Overview This scientific brief provides an overview of the modes of transmission of SARS-CoV-2, what is known about when infected people transmit the virus, and the implications for infection prevention and control precautions within and outside health facilities. This scientific brief is not a systematic review. Rather, it reflects the consolidation of rapid reviews of publications in peer-reviewed journals and of non-peer-reviewed manuscripts on pre-print servers, undertaken by WHO and partners. Preprint findings should be interpreted with caution in the absence of peer review. This brief is also informed by several discussions via teleconferences with the WHO Health Emergencies Programme ad hoc Experts Advisory Panel for IPC Preparedness, Readiness and Response to COVID-19, the WHO ad hoc COVID-19 IPC Guidance Development Group (COVID-19 IPC GDG), and by review of external experts with relevant technical backgrounds. The overarching aim of the global Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan for COVID-19(1) is to control COVID-19 by suppressing transmission of the virus and preventing associated illness and death. Current evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is predominantly spread from person-to-person.
    [Show full text]
  • Iatrogenic Vs Natural Transmission Equinediseasecc.Org Edcc@Aaep
    Equine Disease Communication Center: Iatrogenic vs Natural Transmission Iatrogenic vs Natural Transmission What is Iatrogenic Transmission? Iatrogenic transmission of infectious disease refers to the spread of a pathogen, (bacteria or virus) through a medical procedure or treatment such as a blood transfusion, reuse of needles or IV sets, or by touching a wound on an infected horse and then handling another horse. Iatrogenic spread of Equine Infectious Anemia (EIA) and Equine Piroplasmosis is often due to the reuse of needles or syringes without sterilization. What is Natural Transmission? Natural transmission refers to the spread of a pathogen through direct contact transmission (horse-to horse contact), by indirect contact transmission (contact with a contaminated surface), by means of an insect vector such as biting flies, mosquitoes, by ticks, or via aerosol spread (contaminated droplets spread by coughing or sneezing that are then inhaled or come in direct contact with the eyes, nose, or mouth). Respiratory diseases such as Equine Herpesvirus and Equine Influenza are often spread by direct contact transmission, contact with contaminated surfaces, contaminated water sources and/or aerosol spread. Arboviruses, such as West Nile Virus, Eastern Equine Encephalitis, and Western Equine Encephalitis are viruses that are transmitted by biting insects and cannot be spread by direct contact or from an infected horse to humans or visa versa. How can I Prevent Iatrogenic Transmission? Always use new or sterilized equipment for medical procedures: • Needles and syringes for both IV (intravenous) and IM (intramuscular) injections are single use only. o Use a new hypodermic needle for every injection on every horse.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Prevention and Control of Antibiotic-Resistant Organisms
    GUIDELINES FOR PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANT ORGANISMS Alabama Department of Public Health Bureau of Communicable Disease PO Box 303017 Montgomery, AL 36130-3017 334-206-5325 December 2002 Alabama Task Force on Antibiotic-resistant Organisms Leland Allen, M.D., Alabaster, Alabama Glenn D. Bedsole, M.D., Montgomery, Alabama Crystal Callies, R.N., Montgomery, Alabama Charlotte Denton, B.S.N., C.I.C., Montgomery, Alabama Richard H. Esham, M.D., Mobile, Alabama Walter Thomas Geary, Jr., M.D., Montgomery, Alabama Elva Goldman, R.N., M.B.A., Montgomery, Alabama Wickliff Many, Jr., M.D., Montgomery, Alabama Patty Moody Miller, B.S., M.T. (ASCP), C.I.C., Montgomery, Alabama Mia Sadler, R.N., B.S.N., Montgomery, Alabama Rodney Snow, M.D., Birmingham, Alabama Charles H. Woernle, M.D., M.P.H., Montgomery, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose ............................................................................................................................ 1 Emergence of Resistant Organisms .............................................................................. 3 Colonization vs. Infection ............................................................................................... 5 Definitions .................................................................................................................... 6 Measures for Controlling the Spread of Antibiotic Resistance in ............................... 9 all Healthcare Facilities Infection Control Plan ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Antibiotic Pharmaceuticals Enhance the Transmission of Exogenous Antibiotic Resistance Genes Through Bacterial Transformation
    The ISME Journal (2020) 14:2179–2196 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-0679-2 ARTICLE Non-antibiotic pharmaceuticals enhance the transmission of exogenous antibiotic resistance genes through bacterial transformation 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 Yue Wang ● Ji Lu ● Jan Engelstädter ● Shuai Zhang ● Pengbo Ding ● Likai Mao ● Zhiguo Yuan ● 1 1 Philip L. Bond ● Jianhua Guo Received: 25 January 2020 / Revised: 4 May 2020 / Accepted: 5 May 2020 / Published online: 18 May 2020 © The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access, corrected publication 2021 Abstract Antibiotic resistance is a serious global threat for public health. Considering the high abundance of cell-free DNA encoding antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in both clinical and environmental settings, natural transformation is an important horizontal gene transfer pathway to transmit antibiotic resistance. It is acknowledged that antibiotics are key drivers for disseminating antibiotic resistance, yet the contributions of non-antibiotic pharmaceuticals on transformation of ARGs are overlooked. In this study, we report that some commonly consumed non-antibiotic pharmaceuticals, at clinically and 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: environmentally relevant concentrations, significantly facilitated the spread of antibiotic resistance through the uptake of exogenous ARGs. This included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, the lipid-lowering drug, gemfibrozil, and the β-blocker propranolol. Based on the results of flow cytometry, whole-genome RNA sequencing and proteomic analysis, the enhanced transformation of ARGs was affiliated with promoted bacterial competence, enhanced stress levels, over-produced reactive oxygen species and increased cell membrane permeability. In addition, a mathematical model was proposed and calibrated to predict the dynamics of transformation during exposure to non-antibiotic pharmaceuticals.
    [Show full text]
  • ROLE of ANIMALS in TRANSMISSION of ZOONOSES Part I: Domesticated Animals; Domicialated Animals and Cold-Blooded Animals
    ROLE OF ANIMALS IN TRANSMISSION OF ZOONOSES Part I: Domesticated animals; Domicialated animals and Cold-blooded animals Dr. R.S.TAYDE Assistant Professor Dept. of VPH & Epidemiology Co.V.Sc. & A.H., Mhow, Indore (M.P.) 1. Domesticated animals • The role of domestic animals in the epidemiology of many zoonoses, particularly the direct zoonoses, cyclozoonoses and metazoonoses is highly important. Cyclozoonoses such as hydatidosis can be transmitted from dogs and sheep. • Unhygienic conditions of lairages and cattle sheds are responsible for transmission of many important infectious diseases. • In both urban and rural areas, a number of animal species are becoming popular as household pets which may be a source of infection for their owners. • Keeping dogs as pets may be responsible for rabies, Toxocara canis infestation and leptospirosis if proper care is not taken. • Cats act as reservoirs for toxoplasmosis and cat scratch disease. • Domestic animals harbour many infectious diseases in subclinical form. 2. Domicialated animals • Domicialated animals are those who live in close association with human dwelling, e.g. rats, rodents, mice, bandicoots, badger etc. • These animals play great role in transmission as well as maintenance of numerous zoonoses. • Pulmonary or bubonic plague, for instance, is an excellent example of such zoonoses wherein rodents act as source/reservoir for plague bacilli. • These animals also serve as reservoirs for leptospirosis, tularaemia, rabies, murine typhus, Q fever etc. • Increase in population density, inadequate sanitary measures, easy access to garbage and food material etc. in urban area, and improved methods of agriculture, decrease in number of their natural enemy etc. in rural area, has resulted in severe increase in the population of these animals and so also the threat of spread of zoonotic diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: Increased Transmission in the EU/EEA and the UK – Sixth Update 12 March 2020
    RAPID RISK ASSESSMENT Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: increased transmission in the EU/EEA and the UK – sixth update 12 March 2020 Summary On 31 December 2019, a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown aetiology was reported in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. On 9 January 2020, China CDC reported a novel coronavirus as the causative agent of this outbreak, which is phylogenetically in the SARS-CoV clade. The disease associated with the virus is referred to as novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As of 11 March 2020, 118 598 cases of COVID-19 were reported worldwide by more than 100 countries. Since late February, the majority of cases reported are from outside China, with an increasing majority of these reported from EU/EEA countries and the UK. The Director General of the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic on 11 March 2020. All EU/EEA countries and the UK are affected, reporting a total of 17 413 cases as of 11 March. Seven hundred and eleven cases reported by EU/EEA countries and the UK have died. Italy represents 58% of the cases (n=10 149) and 88% of the fatalities (n=631). The current pace of the increase in cases in the EU/EEA and the UK mirrors trends seen in China in January-early February and trends seen in Italy in mid-February. In the current situation where COVID-19 is rapidly spreading worldwide and the number of cases in Europe is rising with increasing pace in several affected areas, there is a need for immediate targeted action.
    [Show full text]