Sports and Entertainment Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT LAW What does a sports lawyer do? Sports law is a broad area best defined as a legal practice responsive to the needs of owners, coaches, athletes, universities, and business organizations such as sports marketing firms and apparel manufacturers. Sports lawyers represent clients in complex commercial transactions, intellectual property rights, licensing, regulatory compliance, contract negotiation and dispute resolution. Accordingly, lawyers in this area must have a strong background in business transactions and intellectual property. What does an entertainment lawyer do? Like sports lawyers, entertainment lawyers have diverse practices that require expertise in business and intellectual property law. Key areas of service include entertainment finance, development and production agreements, sales and distribution agreements, advertising contracts, publishing, licensing, and merchandising agreements, and talent agreements. How can I become a sports or entertainment lawyer? An aspiring lawyer in this field should gain as much experience that he or she can with intellectual property law (see Quick Guide to Intellectual Property Law) and corporate transactions. You should take all the courses offered in these areas and participate in student organizations. Join the relevant sections of the Maryland State Bar Association and the American Bar Association, and take advantage of their networking opportunities. Networking is best way to break into these fields as opportunities are limited, especially for entry-level attorneys, and competition for them is intense. Where can I practice sports or entertainment law? Many lawyers in these areas work in law firms or corporate law departments of businesses involved in sports and/or entertainment. Positions in sports law are also available at colleges and universities, professional sports franchises, and national sports associations and foundations. Where can I learn more? ABA Forum on the Entertainment and Sports Industries American Arts Alliance Broadcast Music Incorporated (BMI) PEN American Center Washington Area Lawyers for the Arts Sports Law Blog Sports Lawyers Association Who teaches sports or entertainment law at UB? Dionne Koller [email protected] Ronald V. Miller, Jr. (Adjunct) [email protected] .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Nysba Spring 2020 | Vol
NYSBA SPRING 2020 | VOL. 31 | NO. 2 Entertainment, Arts and Sports Law Journal A publication of the Entertainment, Arts and Sports Law Section of the New York State Bar Association In This Issue n A Case of “Creative Destruction”: Takeaways from the 5Pointz Graffiti Dispute n The American Actress, the English Duchess, and the Privacy Litigation n The Battle Against the Bots: The Legislative Fight Against Ticket Bots ....and more www.nysba.org/EASL NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION In The Arena: A Sports Law Handbook Co-sponsored by the New York State Bar Association and the Entertainment, Arts and Sports Law Section As the world of professional athletics has become more competitive and the issues more complex, so has the need for more reliable representation in the field of sports law. Written by dozens of sports law attorneys and medical professionals, In the Arena: A Sports Law Handbook is a reflection of the multiple issues that face athletes and the attorneys who represent them. Included in this book are chapters on representing professional athletes, NCAA enforcement, advertising, sponsorship, intellectual property rights, doping, concussion-related issues, Title IX and dozens of useful appendices. Table of Contents Intellectual Property Rights and Endorsement Agreements How Trademark Protection Intersects with the Athlete’s EDITORS Right of Publicity Elissa D. Hecker, Esq. Collective Bargaining in the Big Three David Krell, Esq. Agency Law Sports, Torts and Criminal Law PRODUCT INFO AND PRICES 2013 | 539 pages Role of Advertising and Sponsorship in the Business of Sports PN: 4002 (Print) Doping in Sport: A Historical and Current Perspective PN: 4002E (E-Book) Athlete Concussion-Related Issues Non-Members $80 Concussions—From a Neuropsychological and Medical Perspective NYSBA Members $65 In-Arena Giveaways: Sweepstakes Law Basics and Compliance Issues Order multiple titles to take advantage of our low flat Navigating the NCAA Enforcement Process rate shipping charge of $5.95 per order, regardless of the number of items shipped.
[Show full text]
Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ENTERTAINMENT LAW VOLUME 5 FALL 2015 NUMBER 1 FOREWORD THE INTERNATIONAL EVOLUTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS RICHARD A. EPSTEIN* Two of the papers included in this issue of the NYU Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law illustrate, in the context of intellectual property law, a tension that exists across all areas of international law. To what extent should the rules of different countries be harmonized? Or, alternatively, to what extent should these laws be adapted to the local conditions within any given country? A moment’s reflection should indicate why there is no pat answer to this challenge in any area of substantive law. On the one side, a stout commitment to uniformity of law facilitates the cross-border transactions that are the life-blood of international trade and cooperation. The ability of private parties and government officials to know that the rules of the game are constant in all arenas should lead to a massive simplification of the overall operation of the international legal order. The gains from such simplification should be substantial even in transactions requiring harmonization between only two legal systems. But with intellectual property, nothing is more common than for key transactions to have a global reach that could * Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law, The New York University School of Law, the Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow, The Hoover Institution and the James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law Emeritus and Senior Lecturer, the University of Chicago School of Law. My thanks to Craig Fligor and Manuel Valle, the University of Chicago Law School, Class of 2017 for their valuable research assistance.
[Show full text]
That's Entertainment
NONPROFIT ORG. SPRING 2011 U.S. POSTAGE IN THIS ISSUE SPRING 2011 421 Mondale Hall PAID Mary Robinson • Alumni Weekend • Summer CLE 229 19th Avenue South TWIN CITIES, MN Minneapolis, MN 55455 PERMIT NO. 90155 Perspectives M ARY R OBINSON • N EW F * ACULTY > 692 alumni needed • A LUMNI W to hit 20% participation EEKEND • R OSENBAUM P APERS • S That’s UMMER Copyrights, Contracts, WE ARE VERY CLOSE TO HITTING OUR RECORD SETTING GOAL OF 20% CLE and All That Jazz ALUMNI GIVING PARTICIPATION. IF YOU HAVE NOT DONE SO, PLEASE Entertainment CONSIDER JOINING YOUR FRIENDS AND COLLEAGUES BY GIVING A GIFT TODAY IN SUPPORT OF OUR ALMA MATER AT WWW.GIVING.UMN.EDU/LAW. Law Thank You! Liza G. Ring (2011 National Chair, Partners in Excellence Annual Fund) www.law.umn.edu *DONORS NEEDED AS OF 4/27/11 PARTNERS IN EXCELLENCE > Annual Fund Update DEAN BOARD OF ADVISORS David Wippman The Honorable Paul H. Anderson (’68) The Honorable Russell A. ASSISTANT DEAN AND CHIEF OF STAFF Anderson (’68) Nora Klaphake Governor James J. Blanchard (’68) James L. Chosy (’89) DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS Jan M. Conlin (’88) Cynthia Huff William E. Drake (’66) Dear Friends and Fellow Alumni: David M. Eldred (’02) SENIOR EDITOR AND WRITER Kristine S. Erickson (’72) Corrine Charais Joseph M. Finley (’80) As my term as National Chair of the Partners in Excellence Annual Fund and the Law School’s fiscal Patrice A. Halbach (’80) year near a close, I want to thank so many of you who have already stepped forward and supported COMMUNICATIONS ASSISTANT Catharine F.
[Show full text]
3Rd Rgnul Sports and Entertainment Law Mediation Competition
CENTRE FOR ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION RAJIV GANDHI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LAW PUNJAB 3RD RGNUL SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT LAW MEDIATION COMPETITION 6 - 8 MARCH 2021 ORGANIZERS CENTRE FOR ALTERNATIVE THE PEACEKEEPING AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION | CONFLICT RESOLUTION TEAM RGNUL (PACT) CHIEF KNOWLEDGE PARTNER SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL MEDIATION INSTITUTE (SIMI) CHIEF ADVISORY ORGANIZATION KRIDA LEGAL KNOWLEDGE PARTNERS MARKANDA STRAUS INSTITUTE FOR ADVOCATES DISPUTE RESOLUTION - PEPPERDINE SCHOOL OF LAW FROM THE VICE-CHANCELLOR'S DESK Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law has always endeavoured to encourage novel events and competitions that are of great contemporary relevance in this developing world. That spirit has been reflected in the activities undertaken by Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution, RGNUL. I am elated to announce that CADR will be organising the 3rd RGNUL Sports & Entertainment Law National Mediation Competition 2021 from March 6 – 8, 2021. After successfully venturing into this field and setting a niche for two consequent years, I am certain that this event will tremendously augment the knowledge of participants in respect of Sports and Entertainment law mediation. I look forward to welcoming teams from around the nation, competing for the opportunity to represent India internationally at the Singapore International Mediation Institute (SIMI) Mediation Competition 2021 and securing many more awards. Dr. Anand Pawar, Vice-Chancellor, Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab. A MESSAGE FROM THE REGISTRAR-CUM-FACULTY COORDINATOR, CADR The Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution (CADR) has been at the forefront of hosting events that contribute to the holistic growth of the students. Since its establishment, it has encouraged novel ideas that have made the university proud and have immensely contributed to the legal domain.
[Show full text]
Entertainment and Sports Law University of Memphis Law School Career Services Office
Entertainment and Sports Law University of Memphis Law School Career Services Office What is entertainment and sports law? Entertainment and sports law is civil law of a specific character that relates to the fields of entertainment and athletics. The practice involves contracts, labor law, corporate finance, intellectual property, and antitrust. Lawyers practicing in the field of entertainment and sports law specialize in knowing and understanding their clients’ industry and are able to advocate for their clients’ interests. In the major professional sports leagues of the National Football League (“NFL”), Major League Baseball (“MLB”), Na- tional Basketball Association (“NBA”), and National Hockey League (“NHL”), players’ associations act much like unions, regulating fees and salaries for sports professionals, coaches, and agents. For the lawyer specializing in entertainment law, intellectual property law takes center stage. Copyright law concerns the rights of creators of artistic works in the music, entertainment, publishing, and fine arts industries. Where do entertainment and Where do sports and entertainment lawyers do? sports lawyers work? Negotiating: Sports and entertainment lawyers negotiate contracts with spon- Private law firms: Some large firms sorships, television syndicators, and other representatives that interact with have departments specializing in the sports and entertainment industry. A lawyer working for a band might help to negotiate contracts with particular venues at a particular rate. entertainment and sports law, es- pecially in large cities where record Transactional work: Entertainment lawyers frequently contract for one-time labels house their headquarters or events that may never reoccur. Thus, entertainment and sports lawyers must in cities with professional sports be able to draft contracts that advance and protect their clients’ interests under a variety of circumstances.
[Show full text]
Areas of Law That Every Celebrity Licensing Attorney Ought to Know Something About
© Practising Law Institute INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Course Handbook Series Number G-1308 Advanced Licensing Agreements 2017 Volume Two Co-Chairs Marcelo Halpern Ira Jay Levy Joseph Yang To order this book, call (800) 260-4PLI or fax us at (800) 321-0093. Ask our Customer Service Department for PLI Order Number 185480, Dept. BAV5. Practising Law Institute 1177 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 © Practising Law Institute 16 Areas of Law That Every Celebrity Licensing Attorney Ought to Know Something About Mark G. Tratos Greenberg Traurig, LLP University of Nevada Las Vegas Boyd School of Law © 2016 Mr. Tratos is the Founding Shareholder and former Managing Shareholder of the Las Vegas Office of the international law firm Greenberg Traurig. Mr. Tratos focuses his practice on entertainers, athletes, celebrities and artists and represents artists and businesses in both career development planning and strategy, as well as State and Federal Court litigation. He has been the primary contributing author to the Nevada Chapter of the International Trademark Association’s Unfair Competition in State Trademark Law Handbook. He is also the author of chapters in the New York Bar Association’s Entertainment Treatise, Ch. 5–Entertainment on the Internet: The Evolution of Entertainment Production, Distribution, Ownership and Control in the Digital Age, 3rd and 4th Eds; and Ch. 10–Exhibitions: Art and Artifacts Exhibits as an Expansion of the Entertainment Industry, 4th Ed. If you find this article helpful, you can learn more about the subject by going to www.pli.edu to view the on demand program or segment for which it was written.
[Show full text]
Entertainment Law – Qst La 430
Spring 2020. Boston University in Los Angeles ENTERTAINMENT LAW – QST LA 430. Thursdays 7.30 -10 pm. Classroom 4. Professor Brian Walton. 310-600-3660 <> [email protected]. _______________________________________________________________ _ COURSE DESCRIPTION AND SYLLABUS. FIRST AND LATER ASSIGNMENTS. The details of the reading and assignments, including those for the first three classes, are at the end of this document. See page 5, infra. LEARNING OBJECTIVES. The primary objectives of the class will be that students end the semester having gained: [1] Clear and elevated understandings of laws applicable to the entertainment business industries; [2] Useful and informed awareness of the original development and intent of these laws and how they have been applied in the past, how they are applied today and options and likelihoods for how they might be amended and applied in the future; [3] An improved ability to present, in writing and orally, clear analyses of legal and practical issues within the entertainment industries; [4] Practical insights into and an appreciation of how to deal with lawyers and the law in their entertainment or other business futures. [5] Confidence in their ability to work with and problem solve in the legal-business milieu of the entertainment industries and elsewhere. 1 PREREQUISITES. For BU students, LA-245. For non-BU students, an equivalent Introduction to Business Law course will satisfy the prerequisite, subject to Questrom’s approval. DESCRIPTION. This survey class will begin with an overview of procedural and substantive law. The first class session will include a refresher on the structure, process and substance of American law and how effectively to study it.
[Show full text]
Journal of International Media & Entertainment
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDIA & ENTERTAINMENT LAW PUBLISHED BY THE DONALD E. BIEDERMAN ENTERTAINMENT AND MEDIA LAW INSTITUTE OF SOUTHWESTERN LAW SCHOOL IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION FORUMS ON COMMUNICATIONS LAW AND THE ENTERTAINMENT AND SPORTS INDUSTRIES Volume 8, Number 2 2019-2020 SYMPOSIUM FAKE NEWS AND “WEAPONIZED DEFAMATION”: GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES EDITOR’S NOTE ARTICLES Credibility-Enhancing Regulatory Models to Counter Fake News: Risks of a Non-Harmonized Intermediary Liability Paradigm Shift Teresa Rodríguez de las Heras Ballell Criminal Defamation: Still “An Instrument of Destruction” In the Age of Fake News Jane E. Kirtley & Casey Carmody Stemming the Tide of Fake News: A Global Case Study of Decisions to Regulate Amy Kristin Sanders, Rachel L. Jones, and Xiran Liu Legal Responsibility for Fake News Tommaso Tani JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDIA & ENTERTAINMENT LAW VOL. 8, NO. 2 ■ 2019–2020 JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDIA & ENTERTAINMENT LAW Volume 8 Number 2 2019–2020 PUBLISHED BY THE DONALD E. BIEDERMAN ENTERTAINMENT AND MEDIA LAW INSTITUTE OF SOUTHWESTERN LAW SCHOOL IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION FORUMS ON COMMUNICATIONS LAW AND THE ENTERTAINMENT AND SPORTS INDUSTRIES Mission Statement: The Journal of International Media & Entertainment Law is a semi- annual publication of the Donald E. Biederman Entertainment and Media Law Institute of Southwestern Law School in association with the American Bar Association Forums on Communications Law and the Entertainment and Sports Industries. The Journal provides a forum for exploring the complex and unsettled legal principles that apply to the production and distribution of media and entertainment in an international, comparative, and local context. The legal issues surrounding the creation and dissemination of news and entertainment products on a worldwide basis necessarily implicate the laws, customs, and practices of multiple jurisdictions.
[Show full text]
Panel One: Cutting-Edge Case Developments in Entertainment
CUTTING-EDGE CASE DEVELOPMENTS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW PRESENTED TO THE ENTERTAINMENT, ARTS & SPORTS LAW SECTION OF THE NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION May 15, 2018 By STAN SOOCHER, ESQ. Stan Soocher is the long-time Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado’s Denver Campus. He is also an award- winning entertainment attorney and entertainment law journalist. Stan has authored the books Baby You’re a Rich Man: Suing the Beatles for Fun & Profit, https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1611683807?redirect=true&ref_=s9_ simh_gw_p14_d0_i1, and They Fought the Law: Rock Music Goes to Court. He has spoken to the New York State Bar Association EASL Section on a number of well-received occasions. He can be reached at [email protected]. Website: www.stansoocher.com. © 2018 Stan Soocher. Reprinted with Permission. All Rights Reserved. TV REALITY SHOW RELEASE OVERIDES OBJECTION CLAUSE The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York upheld a release clause signed by an entertainment attorney who appeared in WE network’s reality TV show Money. Power. Respect. Shapiro v. NFGTV Inc., 16 Civ. 9152 (S.D.N.Y. 2018). Entertainment attorney Kelly Shapiro filed suit alleging fraudulent inducement, among other things, over how she was depicted in the series. District Judge Paul G. Gardephe noted Shapiro claimed “the production company falsely represent[ed] that the series was intended to ‘shed light’ on ‘minority females in the entertainment
[Show full text]
Social Networking Sites Play a Different and Larger Role, but Include Publishing Abilities Within Their Structures
Social Media and its Impact on the Legal Process Robert A. Heverly Associate Professor Albany Law School New York State Magistrate’s Association and Magistrate’s Court Clerks Conference Annual Conference Monday, September 28, 2015 Sheraton, Niagara Falls, NY | [email protected] | http://robert.heverly.org | 518 445-2379 | Robert A. Heverly is an Associate Professor of Law at Albany Law School of Union University. He has taught as a visiting professor at Michigan State University College of Law, taught in and directed a Masters in Law Program at the University of East Anglia’s Norwich Law School in the UK, has taught in Trier, Germany as a Guest Professor of the Common Law, and regularly teaches Internet Law as part of the George Washington University School of Law’s Munich Intellectual Property Summer Program. Professor Heverly earned his LL.M. from Yale Law School, after which he undertook a Resident Fellowship with the Information Society Project at Yale Law School, where he retains an affiliation as a Faculty Fellow. He received dual Bachelor of Arts degrees (Broadcasting & Mass Communications Studies and Psychology) from the State University of New York College at Oswego (with honors), and a Juris Doctor (with honors) from Albany Law School of Union University. Prof. Heverly is currently the Chair of the Internet and Computer Law Section of the American Association of Law Schools. Professor Heverly’s research interests include intellectual property, technology and society (especially the Internet, computers, networks, and information law), media law, property, and globalization. He regularly teaches continuing legal education courses on legal ethics and social media & online activity.
[Show full text]
Freedom of Expression and the 1992 Cable Act: an Introduction Eli M
Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 17 | Number 1 Article 1 1-1-1994 Freedom of Expression and the 1992 Cable Act: An Introduction Eli M. Noam Carolyn Cutler Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_comm_ent_law_journal Part of the Communications Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Eli M. Noam and Carolyn Cutler, Freedom of Expression and the 1992 Cable Act: An Introduction, 17 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 1 (1994). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_comm_ent_law_journal/vol17/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Freedom of Expression and the 1992 Cable Act: An Introduction ELI M. NOAM* and CAROLYN CUTLER** Table of Contents I. The 1992 Cable A ct ..................................... II. Th e Issues .............................................. III. Common Carriage as a Free Speech Remedy? .......... * Professor of Finance and Economics, and Director, Columbia Institute for Tele- Information, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University. A.B. 1970, A.M. 1972, J.D. 1975, Ph.D. Economics 1975, Harvard University. ** Research Affiliate, Columbia Institute for Tele-Information, and Director, Instruc- tional Technology, New York School for the Deaf. B.A. 1981, M.A. Communications 1992, University of Texas. HASTINGS COMM/ENT L.J. [Vol. 17:1 Introduction On October 5, 1992, Congress passed the Cable Television Con- sumer Protection and Competition Act1 (1992 Cable Act) by overrid- ing a presidential veto, the only such occurrence during President Bush's term of office.
[Show full text]
Back on Track: How the California Supreme Court Got It Wrong, and What Legislature Can Do to Fix It
Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Volume 27 Number 1 Article 1 9-1-2006 Back on Track: How the California Supreme Court Got It Wrong, and What Legislature Can Do to Fix It Jeffrey S. Goodfried Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jeffrey S. Goodfried, Back on Track: How the California Supreme Court Got It Wrong, and What Legislature Can Do to Fix It, 27 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 1 (2006). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/elr/vol27/iss1/1 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BACK ON TRACK: HOW THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT GOT IT WRONG, AND WHAT LEGISLATURE CAN DO TO FIX IT I. ALL ABOARD - INTRODUCTION According to the California Supreme Court, operators of roller coasters and similar amusement park rides should be held to the same safety standards that apply to buses, planes, and other modes of public transportation.' The court's dubious 4-3 decision in Gomez v. Disney means that when a lower court adjudicates negligence claims against an amusement park, it will have to hold thrill rides to an utmost safety standard, rather than the reasonable care standard, which would likely be extraordinary diligence.2 On first impression, one might find little difference between utmost care and extraordinarydiligence.
[Show full text]