An Emerging Key Concept in European Constitutional Law: Sustainability

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Emerging Key Concept in European Constitutional Law: Sustainability 2498-5473 / USD 20.00 HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES 60, No 4, pp. 332–365 (2019) © 2019 The Author DOI: 10.1556/2052.2019.00020 An Emerging Key Concept in European Constitutional Law: Sustainability ANDRÁS JAKAB* Now civilisations, I believe, come to birth and proceed to grow by successfully responding to successive challenges. They break down and go to pieces if and when a challenge confronts them which they fail to meet.1 Abstract. Sustainability, as compared to the rule of law, human rights, sovereignty or democracy, is a relatively new constitutional key concept. It is mentioned explicitly more and more in constitutional discourses, and – even more importantly – it helps to reconstruct a number of current constitutional debates under one conceptual umbrella. Sustainability comprises different responses to long term social challenges which cannot efficiently be responded to via democratic mechanisms. Democratic mechanisms are based on election terms and which are, consequently, structurally short-sighted. By ‘European constitutional law’, I mean in this paper both the primary law of the EU and domestic constitutional documents. In the present paper I am first going to sketch the nature and the types of the sustainability challenges that contemporary societies face, with a special focus on Europe (environmental, demographic and financial). In the main part of the paper, I am going to show possible constitutional responses to these challenges. Finally, I will summarise the main argument of the paper which is a suggestion to set up an economic constitutional court consisting of economists with the power to annul laws if these contradict the principles of sustainability. Keywords: suffrage for children, proxy vote, Demeny voting, Toynbee, ageing society, public finance, transparency, debt brake, deficit brake, balanced budget rule, sustainable development, protection of environment, financial crisis, paygo, language of rights, family suffrage, future generations Sustainability, as compared to the rule of law, human rights, sovereignty or democracy, is a relatively new constitutional key concept.2 It is mentioned explicitly more and more in constitutional discourses, and – even more importantly – it helps to reconstruct a number of * Univ.-Prof. DSc Dr.jur. Dr. habil. András Jakab, LLM PhD, Universität Salzburg, Kapitelgasse 5–7, 5020 Salzburg, Österreich, [email protected]. Honorary Fellow at Pázmány Péter Catholic University Budapest; External Researcher at the Institute for Legal Studies of the Centre for Social Sciences Budapest. 1 Toynbee (1948) 56. 2 I am grateful to the participants of the ‘Sustainability as a Legal Principle’ workshop at the IVR XXVIth World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy in Belo Horizonte (Brazil) on 22 July 2013, of the conference ‘Model Institutions for a Sustainable Future’ in Budapest on 25 April 2014 and of the workshops at the Centre for Social Sciences of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences on 11 September 2014 and 26 March 2015, and of the Dienstagsrunde on 27 July 2015 at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, further to Carlino Antpöhler, Armin von Bogdandy, Lídia Balogh, Attila Bartha, Eszter Bodnár, Péter Cserne, Giacomo Delledonne, Róbert Iván Gál, Matthias Goldmann, Rainer Grote, Michael Ioannidis, Béla Janky, Klára Katona, Alexandra Kemmerer, Lando Kirchmair, Miklós Könczöl, Zsolt Körtvélyesi, Károly Mike, Pier Pigozzi, Ekkehart Reimer, András Simonovits, Pál Sonnevend, Ákos Szalai, Jörg Chet Tremmel, Leonie Vierck and David Wineroither. Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/25/21 06:50 PM UTC AN EMERGING KEY CONCEPT IN EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUSTAINABILITY 333 current constitutional debates under one conceptual umbrella.3 Sustainability comprises different responses to long term social challenges which cannot efficiently be responded to via democratic mechanisms. Democratic mechanisms are based on election terms and which are, consequently, structurally short-sighted. By ‘European constitutional law’, we mean in this paper both the primary law of the EU and domestic constitutional documents.4 In the present paper we are first going to sketch the nature and the types of the sustainability challenges that contemporary societies face, with a special focus on Europe (1). In the main part of the paper, we are going to show possible constitutional responses to these challenges (2.). Finally, we will summarise the main argument of the paper (3.). A short preliminary terminological remark: we are using the expression ‘sustainability’ instead of the more popular ‘sustainable development’.5 The concepts are almost identical, the former being slightly less ambitious: sustainability does not require an improvement, it merely requires that a situation does not deteriorate. 1. SUSTAINABILITY CHALLENGES The moral instinct and the common sense of most people would probably suggest that sustainability should be aimed for in every society. One approach that could be used to justify sustainability would be to refer to the idea of distributive justice (more precisely: intergenerational justice),6 another approach would be to refer to the long term interests of the political community. Instead of the first, moral philosophical approach, in the present paper we are going to employ the second, rather pragmatic one, in the hope of minimising overheated emotional debates. Sustainability requires nothing more than following the long term interest of the political community. ‘Long’ basically means anything that is beyond the usual four or five year election period that is the primary time span of democratic politicians.7 There are several factors that might endanger sustainability. For example, the EU Sustainable Development Indicator (prepared by Eurostat on the basis of the 2006 EU Sustainable Development Strategy) consists of 106 individual indicators (some of them being composite themselves) including education, public health, fertility rate, different aspects of environmental protection, public debt, just to name a few.8 Composite indicators imply ‘weak sustainability’, meaning the (at least partially) mutual substitutability of the different types of capitals (environmental, demographic, etc).9 We are only going to mention 3 On doctrinal reconstruction as one of the main tasks of legal scholarship see von Bogdandy (2009) 364–400; Jakab (2011) 757–84, esp. 758–65. 4 For more details on the concept of democracy see Jakab (2016) chapter 9. The current article can be considered as an additional chapter of the named book. 5 See e.g. ‘Sustainable development means that the needs of the present generation should be met without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. […] It aims at the continuous improvement of the quality of life and well-being on Earth for present and future generations.’ Sustainable Development Strategy (2006) European Council DOC 10917/06 para 1. 6 For excellent overviews of the intergenerational justice approach see Gosseries (2001) 293– 355; Lawrence (2001) 163–234; Gosseries and Meyer (eds) (2009); Meyer, L. (2008). 7 On the two different lines of justification (input and output) with a different conceptual frame (democratic inclusion vs better decisions) see Könczöl (2018) 191–210, esp. 191. 8 For further aggregated sustainability indicators see Grunwald and Kopfmüller (2012) 81–86. 9 On the concept in general see Neumayer (2013). Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/25/21 06:50 PM UTC 334 ANDRÁS JAKAB here some aspects: those that the present author considers the most pressing ones and that have constitutional relevance.10 1.1 Environmental Challenge The concept of sustainability stems from environmental protection, or more precisely from 18th century German forest economics literature.11 The originally ethical12 and economical concept was later widely dispersed in legal thinking by UN documents in the 20th century.13 It is usually defined in environmental protection as the prohibition of the use of natural resources which would impede the satisfaction of comparable future needs (through exhaustion or through pollution).14 For our topic, this is not primarily relevant; it is mentioned only because it shows the origin and the multifaceted nature of the concept. As there are numerous analyses on this aspect of sustainability (and the fundamental scholarly opinion is probably the least divided on these issues, thus the debates are more of a technical nature), the rest of the paper will rather concentrate on other types of challenges. 1.2 Fiscal Challenge Accumulating public debt redistributes the resources of future generations amongst members of the present generation,15 and democracies actually tend to accumulate debts.16 It is normally more popular to spend than to save money, and people like to enjoy public services but they do not like to pay taxes to finance them.17 And democracies, by their nature, tend to go for popular things. As a matter of fact, the more competitive a democracy, the more likely its public deficit will grow, as in a hard competition parties feel forced to (promise to) buy votes in order to win.18 Another explanation for public debt in democracies is that they tend to be less centralised, i.e. their politics is fragmented.19 If you have fragmented politics then every political group is trying to spend the common money on its own electorate and/or supporters.20 The more fragmented politics is (i.e., coalition governments instead of one-party governments, second chambers
Recommended publications
  • Suffrage for Sixteen-Year- Olds Within the EU
    Sufrage for sixteen-year- olds within the EU [should the EU lower the voting age to sixteen in future elections?] Rosanna Zwolsman 6VP2 | C&M/E&M, Montessori Lyceum Amsterdam | [2015-2016] 2 Sufrage for sixteen-year-olds within the EU [should the EU lower the voting age to sixteen in future elections?] Rosanna Zwolsman 6VP2 September 2015-January 2016 3 4 Index I. Introduction ............................................................................................................7 II. The History of democracy and voting in Europe and the United States ....................9 III. Countries that granted sixteen- and seventeen-year-olds the right to vote .........19 IV. Pros and Cons of lowering the voting age in future European elections and national elections. ..................................................................................................................25 V.Teen Sufrage in European elections ......................................................................31 VI.Opinions ..............................................................................................................35 VII.Interview .............................................................................................................47 VIII.Conclusion .........................................................................................................53 Evaluation ................................................................................................................55 IX.Sources ................................................................................................................57
    [Show full text]
  • Lowering the Voting Age from Children's Rights Perspective
    Lowering the Voting Age from Children’s Rights Perspective. Supervised by Prof. Jaap E. Doek Written by Student Name: Olga Erenc Student Number: s1907816 The Master of Laws: Advanced Studies in International Children’s Rights (LL.M.) 2018 Number of words (including footnotes): 21 397 I would like to dedicate this thesis to the memory of Henryk Goldszmit, also known as Janusz Korczak. Janusz Korczak with children in the courtyard of the orphanage, 92 Krochmalna Street, Warsaw, early 1930s. (Photo source: Polish Press Agency) Olga Erenc version 05-07-2018 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary Overview of Main Findings Introduction. Janusz Korczak - the Inspiration. Adolescent’s Right to Vote. Problem Statement and Research Question. 1.1. Empowering Approach to Children’s Rights. Theoretical Overview 1.2. Janusz Korczak’s Impact on the Concept of a Child - Rights Holder 1.3. Children’s Suffrage in the Light of the Empowering Approach to Children 1.3.1.Right to Vote for All: A Radical View on Children’s Suffrage 1.3.2. From Women’s to Children’s Suffrage 1.3.3.Demeny Voting: An Alternative for Lowering the Voting Age? 1.4. Conclusions 2. Citizen Child and Right to Vote 2.1. The Definition of Citizenship 2.2. Equal Citizenship and the Right to Vote 2.3. Felony and Children’s Disenfranchisement 2.4. Being or Becoming a Citizen 2.5. Citizen Child as Rights Holder 2.6. Felony and Children’s Disenfranchisement 2.7. Conclusions 3. Children’s Political Participation 3.1. The concept of children’s participation. 3.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • An Emerging Key Concept in European Constitutional Law: Sustainability
    2498-5473 / USD 20.00 HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES 60, No 4, pp. 332–365 (2019) © 2019 The Author DOI: 10.1556/2052.2019.00020 An Emerging Key Concept in European Constitutional Law: Sustainability ANDRÁS JAKAB* Now civilisations, I believe, come to birth and proceed to grow by successfully responding to successive challenges. They break down and go to pieces if and when a challenge confronts them which they fail to meet.1 Abstract. Sustainability, as compared to the rule of law, human rights, sovereignty or democracy, is a relatively new constitutional key concept. It is mentioned explicitly more and more in constitutional discourses, and – even more importantly – it helps to reconstruct a number of current constitutional debates under one conceptual umbrella. Sustainability comprises different responses to long term social challenges which cannot efficiently be responded to via democratic mechanisms. Democratic mechanisms are based on election terms and which are, consequently, structurally short-sighted. By ‘European constitutional law’, I mean in this paper both the primary law of the EU and domestic constitutional documents. In the present paper I am first going to sketch the nature and the types of the sustainability challenges that contemporary societies face, with a special focus on Europe (environmental, demographic and financial). In the main part of the paper, I am going to show possible constitutional responses to these challenges. Finally, I will summarise the main argument of the paper which is a suggestion to set up an economic constitutional court consisting of economists with the power to annul laws if these contradict the principles of sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinder Im Wahlrecht Und in Demokratien. Für Eine Elterliche Stellvertreterwahlpflicht
    Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie Band 2, Heft 1, 2015, S. 191–248 www.praktische-philosophie.org Kinder im Wahlrecht und in Demokratien. Für eine elterliche Stellvertreterwahlpflicht CHRISTOPH SCHICKHARDT (HEIDELBERG) Zusammenfassung: In Demokratien gibt es gewöhnlich ein gesetzli- ches Mindestalter, durch das Kinder und Jugendliche von politischen Wahlen ausgeschlossen werden. Je nach Altersstruktur der Bevölke- rung dürfen ungefähr 20 bis 25 Prozent der Staatsbürger eines Landes nicht wählen. In diesem Aufsatz werden der Ausschluss Minderjähri- ger von Wahlen in Demokratien sowie mögliche alternative Stellun- gen Minderjähriger im Wahlrecht einer ethischen Analyse unterzo- gen. Die erste zentrale These des Aufsatzes lautet, dass der Ausschluss und die Nichtrepräsentation von Minderjährigen ungerecht ist, dass die Regierungsgewalt über Minderjährige in demokratischen Staaten nicht ausreichend legitimiert ist und dass Kinder und Jugendliche (bzw. ihre Stellvertreter) gute Gründe dafür haben, sich gegen Gesetze und Maßnahmen ihrer Regierung mit Akten des zivilen Ungehorsams zu wehren. Die zweite zentrale These des Aufsatzes lautet, dass der beste Weg zur Aufhebung dieses Zustands der Ungerechtigkeit und mangelnden Legitimation in der Einführung einer Pflicht der Eltern besteht, stellvertretend für ihre Kinder zu wählen. Diese elterliche Pflicht sollte durch ein Vetorecht der Minderjährigen ab 14 Jahren er- gänzt werden. Schlagwörter: Wahlrecht, Kinder und Jugendliche, Stellvertreter- wahlpflicht, Demokratie 192 Kinder im Wahlrecht
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cape Town
    The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN Florian Seitz email: [email protected] STZFLO001 Master of Law: Public Law Minor dissertation supervised by Prof Pierre de Vos The Infringement of Prisoners’ Right to Vote: An TownAnalysis of Intentions and General Principles in Due Consideration of Recent Judgements Cape of University Research dissertation presented for the approval of Senate in fulfilment of part of the requirements for the Master of Law in approved courses and a minor dissertation. The other part of the requirement for this qualification was the completion of a programme of courses. I hereby declare that I have read and understood the regulations governing the submission of Master of Law dissertations, including those relating to length and plagiarism, as contained in the rules of this University, and that this dissertation conforms to those regulations. _______________________ Florian Seitz 10 January 2012 II Contents INTRODUCTION 1 A. General Outline of the Subject in Question 1 B. Approach to the Topic 2 CHAPTER I: HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF FELONY DISENFRANCHISEMENT 3 CHAPTER II: THE NATURE OF THE RIGHT TO VOTE 9 A) The Right to Vote as a Democratic Right 9 I)
    [Show full text]
  • Rage and Creativity by M Arlene Kramer Richards
    ijcd The International Journal of Controversial Discussions Psychoanalysis in the 21st Century I Issue Three • September 2020 I Masthead Arnold D. Richards, Editor-in-Chief Ahron Friedberg, Managing Editor Elizabeth Ronis, Business Manager Jane Hall, Book Review Editor Editorial Board John S. Auerbach Gilbert Kliman Sheldon Bach Ricardo Lombardi Francis Baudry Anna Migliozzi Daniel Benveniste Jon Mills James Tyler Carpenter Merle Molofsky Selma Duckler Trevor Pederson Maaike Engelen Rosina Pineyro Charles P. Fisher Mark Poster David James Fisher Burton Seitler Ahron Friedberg Neal Spira Henry Friedman Nathan Szajnberg Jane Hall Susan Warshaw Susan Kavaler-Adler Brent Willock Douglas Kirsner Stefan R. Zicht I Subscribe to The IJCD at ijcd.internationalpsychoanalysis.net ©2020 The International Journal of Controversial Discussions All rights reserved. No part of this journal may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, including Internet usage, without written permission of the authors. ijcd The International Journal of Controversial Discussions Psychoanalysis in the 21st Century M Issue Three • September 2020 About the Editor and Contributors 2 Foreword Jeffrey Stern 9 Introduction Lucille Spira 11 Chapter 1 Arlene Kramer Richards Rage and Creativity: How Second Generation Feminist Thought Collective Influenced Psychoanalysis 14 Discussions Chapter 2 Women in psychoanalytic theory: Two steps forward, still one step back: Response to Arlene Kramer Richards’ “Rage and Creativity” Response by Rosemary Balsam 28 Response by Arlene Kramer
    [Show full text]
  • Prosperity for All Restoring Faith in Capitalism
    ECONOMICS of PROSPERITY ECONOMICS of PROSPERITY ECONOMICS OF PROSPERITY | NOVEMBER 2015 Prosperity for All Restoring Faith in Capitalism by Tim Montgomerie www.li.com www.prosperity-for-all.com | 2 ABOUT THE LEGATUM INSTITUTE The Legatum Institute is an international think tank and educational charity focused on promoting prosperity. We do this by researching our core themes of revitalising capitalism and democracy. The Legatum Prosperity IndexTM, our signature publication, ranks 142 countries in terms of wealth and wellbeing. Through research programmes including The Culture of Prosperity, Transitions Forum, and the Economics of Prosperity, the Institute seeks to understand what drives and restrains national success and individual flourishing. The Institute co-publishes with Foreign Policy magazine, Democracy Lab, whose on-the-ground journalists report on political transitions around the world. The Legatum Institute is based in London and an independent member of the Legatum Group, a private investment group with a 30-year heritage of global investment in businesses and programmes that promote sustainable human development. #ProsperityForAll www.prosperity-for-all.com The Legatum Institute would like to thank the individuals who made this report possible with their generous support. We would also like to thank the Legatum Foundation for their continued sponsorship and support. Learn more about the Legatum Foundation at www.legatum.org. The Legatum Institute is the working name of the Legatum Institute Foundation, a registered charity
    [Show full text]
  • Annali Di Ca' Foscari
    Annali ISSN 2385-3042 di Ca’ Foscari Serie orientale Vol. 51 Edizioni Giugno 2015 Ca’Foscari Annali di Ca’ Foscari ISSN 2385-3042 Serie orientale Direttore Antonio Rigopoulos Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia Dorsoduro 3246 30123 Venezia http://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/riv/dbr/9/AnnaliCaFoscari Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie orientale Rivista annuale Direzione scientifica Antonio Rigopoulos (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia) Aldo Ferrari (Vicedirettore) (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia) Comitato scientifico Frédéric Bauden (Université de Liège, Belgique) Giuliano Boccali (Università degli Studi di Milano, Italia) Adriana Boscaro (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia) Michel Bozdemir (INALCO, Paris, France) José Martínez Delgado (Universidad de Granada, España) Lucia Dolce (SOAS, London, UK) Mahmud Fotuhi (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran) Roger Greatrex (Lunds Universitet, Sverige) Christian Henriot (Université Lumière-Lyon 2, France) Elguja Khintibidze (Tbilisi State University, Georgia) Ross J. King (The University of British Columbia, Canada) Michel Lagarde (Pontificio Istituto di Studi Arabi e d’Islamistica, Roma, Italia) Gregory B. Lee (Université «Jean Moulin» Lyon 3, France) Olga Lizzini (Universiteit van Amsterdam, Nederland) David R. McCann (Harvard University, Cambridge, USA) Francesca Orsini (SOAS, London, UK) Tudor Parfitt (Florida International University, Miami, USA) Mario Sabattini (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia) Giuliano Tamani (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia,
    [Show full text]
  • Population and Public Policy: Essays in Honor of Paul Demeny
    Geoffrey McNicoll John Bongaarts Ethel P. Churchill Editors Population and Public Policy: Essays in Honor of Paul Demeny A Supplement to Vol. 38, 2012 POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Population and Development Review seeks to advance knowledge of the relationships between population and social, economic, and environmental change and provides a forum for discussion of related issues of public policy. EDITORS Paul Demeny Geoffrey McNicoll MANAGING EDITOR Ethel P. Churchill EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Paul Demeny, Chair Ethel P. Churchill John Bongaarts Dennis Hodgson John Casterline Geoffrey McNicoll EDITORIAL STAFF Robert Heidel, Production Editor Mike Vosika, Production/Design Sura Rosenthal, Production ADVISORY BOARD Alaka Basu S. Ryan Johansson Xizhe Peng John C. Caldwell Ronald D. Lee Samuel H. Preston David Coleman Massimo Livi Bacci Vaclav Smil Richard A. Easterlin Wolfgang Lutz Dirk van de Kaa Susan Greenhalgh Akin L. Mabogunje James Vaupel Charlotte Höhn Carmen A. Miró Disclaimer The Publisher, the Population Council, and Editors cannot be held responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in this journal; the views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Publisher, the Population Council, and Editors. Direct manuscripts, comments on articles, and correspondence to: Population and Development Review Population Council One Dag Hammarskjold Plaza New York, New York 10017 USA Electronic submissions are encouraged and should be sent to [email protected] Support from the United
    [Show full text]