Cross Border Acquisitions of Residential Property in the EU: Problems Encountered by Citizens

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cross Border Acquisitions of Residential Property in the EU: Problems Encountered by Citizens DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS LEGAL AFFAIRS Cross Border Acquisitions of Residential Property in the EU: Problems Encountered by Citizens STUDY Abstract This study was commissioned by the European Parliament's Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the JURI Committee. It identifies and analyses the legal and practical difficulties that an EU citizen faces when buying properties abroad and investigates what can be done to assist an EU citizen when buying residential immovable property in another Member State, making ten recommendations to improve their lot. PE 556.936 EN ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This research paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs and commissioned, supervised and published by the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Policy departments provide independent expertise, both in-house and externally, to support European Parliament committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU external and internal policies. To contact the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to:[email protected] Research Administrator Responsible Roberta PANIZZA Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] AUTHORS Professor Peter Sparkes, University of Southampton. Dr Dilsen Bulut, ZERP, University of Bremen; Professor Magdalena Habdas, University of Silesia; Mark Jordan, Southampton Law School; Dr Héctor Simón Moreno, University Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona; Professor Sergio Nasarre Aznar, University Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona; Dr Tommi Ralli, ZERP, University of Bremen; Professor Christoph Schmid, ZERP, University of Bremen. LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Manuscript completed in March, 2016 © European Union, 2016 This document is available on the internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. Cross Border Acquisitions of Residential Property in the EU: Problems Encountered by Citizens ____________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 12 LIST OF TABLES 12 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15 1. METHODOLOGY 26 1.1. Objective 26 1.2. Our approach 26 1.3. Specimen conveyancing systems 27 1.4. Authorship 28 References 29 2. CROSS BORDER PURCHASERS 30 2.1. The European market in land 30 2.2. The scale of cross border acquisition 31 2.2.1. The conveyancing market in Europe 31 2.2.2. Foreign buyers in Spain 31 2.2.3. ‘Pull’ factors reflected in mobility of EU citizens 32 2.2.4. ‘Push’ factors reflected in EU emigration 33 2.2.5. EU citizens crossing language boundaries 34 2.2.6. Summary of flows of people moving within the EU 35 2.3. Economically active purchasers 35 2.3.1. Residential purchase by economic actors 35 2.3.2. Categories and sub-categories of economically active purchasers 36 2.3.3. Numbers of economically active purchasers 36 2.4. Properties bought to let 39 2.5. Holiday homes 39 2.5.1. Holiday home owners 39 2.5.2. Volume 40 2.6. Self-supporters and pensioners 41 2.7. Cross border ownership, purchasing and borrowing 44 2.7.1. Britons abroad 44 2.7.2. Cyprus 44 2.7.3. Finland 44 2.7.4. Sweden 45 2.7.5. Spain 46 2.8. Recommendation 46 3 Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs ____________________________________________________________________________________________ References 47 3. ACCESS TO PROPERTY INFORMATION 48 3.1. Concerns of a buyer 48 3.2. Property search 49 3.2.1. Setting the parameters 49 3.2.2. Estate agents’ particulars 50 3.2.3. Generalised locational information 51 3.3. Access to the cadastre 51 3.4. Accessible registers of title 53 3.5. Less accessible land registers 56 3.5.1. Title registers lacking conciseness 57 3.5.2. Registers accessible locally 57 3.5.3. Registers used mainly by notaries 57 3.5.4. Registers of deeds 58 3.5.5. Privacy 59 3.6. European initiatives on the accessibility of registers and cadastre 60 3.6.1. Institutional co-operation 60 3.6.2. Knowledge exchange 60 3.6.3. Substantive standards 61 3.6.4. Academic analyses 61 3.6.5. EULIS 61 3.7. Recommendations 62 3.7.1. Summary 62 3.7.2. Specific problems 63 3.7.3. Recommendations about access to land information 64 References 64 Web portals 65 4. PHYSICAL EXTENT AND CONDITION 66 4.1. Concerns of a buyer 66 4.2. Physical extent 66 4.2.1. Sources of information 66 4.2.2. Problems with the quality of spatial information 67 4.2.3. Coordination of cadastre and land register 67 4.2.4. Problems with spatial information 68 4.3. Boundaries 69 4.3.1. Plot separation systems 69 4.3.2. Common law systems 70 4.3.3. Latin registers 71 4.4. Physical condition/value 71 4 Cross Border Acquisitions of Residential Property in the EU: Problems Encountered by Citizens ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 4.4.1. Survey before contract: England 72 4.4.2. Survey before mortgage: Spain 73 4.5. Fixtures and fittings 73 4.6. What are you buying in Poland? – A case study 74 4.7. Recommendations 76 References 77 5. LEGAL TITLE 78 5.1. Concerns of a purchaser 78 5.2. The paradigm of ownership 78 5.2.1. General observations 78 5.2.2. French influenced states 79 5.2.3. German influenced states 80 5.2.4. England/common law states 80 5.3. Interests short of the paradigm of ownership 81 5.3.1. General observations 81 5.3.2. Leaseholds 81 5.3.3. Shares 82 5.3.4. A life interest/reversion on a life interest 83 5.3.5. Intermediate tenures 83 5.3.6. Property affected by squatting 85 5.3.7. Polish perpetual usufruct and cooperative proprietary right 85 5.4. The seller’s spouse or partner as an incumbrance 86 5.4.1. England 86 5.4.2. Spain 86 5.5. Defective titles in Northern Cyprus 87 5.6. Burdens 88 5.6.1. Burdens on the register 88 5.7. Burdens not on the register (overriding interests) 88 5.7.1. England 88 5.7.2. Poland 89 5.7.3. Tenancy contracts 90 5.5 Recommendations 90 5.8. Comparative accounts of European property law 91 5.8.1. EU funded projects 91 5.8.2. The Common Core Project (the ‘Trento’ project) 91 5.8.3. The European Network for Housing Research (ENHR) 91 5.8.4. Commercial texts 91 5.8.5. Ius Commune Casebooks 92 References 92 5 Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 6. FLATS AND NEW BUILD 93 6.1. Flats 93 6.1.1. Prevalence of flats 93 6.1.2. Buying a second hand flat 94 6.1.3. Flat schemes 94 6.2. Ownership of a flat 95 6.2.1. Market terminology 95 6.2.2. Dualist schemes on continental Europe 95 6.2.3. Unitary systems on continental Europe 96 6.2.4. Leasehold flats in Britain and Ireland 97 6.2.5. Potential difficulties in England 97 6.3. Restrictions on purchase of flats 97 6.4. Block ownership and management 98 6.4.1. Block management 98 6.4.2. Service charges 99 6.4.3. Problems with the communal aspects of flat schemes 100 6.5. New build - information 101 6.5.1. Competence to protect buyers of new build 101 6.5.2. Protection of buyers of land 102 6.5.3. National legislation 103 6.5.4. Provision of legal advice to buyers of new build 104 6.5.5. Recommendation on provision of legal advice to buyers of new build 104 6.6. Value added tax 106 6.7. New build flats 106 6.8. New build – construction and stage payments 107 6.8.1. Acceptance of the work 107 6.8.2. Post completion guarantees 108 6.8.3. Security of stage payments 109 6.8.4. Residual liability 111 6.8.5. Dispute resolution 111 6.9. New build flats – ongoing management 111 6.9.1. Problems while an estate is only partly sold 111 6.9.2. Hidden mortgages in Cyprus 112 6.9.3. Block management 113 6.10.Recommendations 113 References 114 7. PUBLIC RULES 115 7.1. Concerns of a purchaser 115 7.2. Controls on alien purchase 116 6 Cross Border Acquisitions of Residential Property in the EU: Problems Encountered by Citizens ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 7.3. Lawful development 116 7.3.1. Urbanisation 116 7.3.2. Planning permission 117 7.3.3. Lawful construction 118 7.3.4. Energy certification 118 7.3.5. Limitation periods 118 7.3.6. Illegals 118 7.4. Public rights and proposals 119 7.4.1. Absence of public charges and proposals 119 7.4.2. Absence of development potential 120 7.5. Utilities 120 7.5.1. Residential infrastructure 120 7.5.2. ‘Land grab’ laws in Valencia 120 7.5.3. Does ‘land grab’ infringe the human rights of owners in Valencia? 122 7.5.4. Does ‘land grab’ infringe public procurement rules? 124 7.5.5. De facto expropriation 125 7.6. Special areas 125 7.6.1. Special designations 125 7.6.2. The coast of Iberia 125 7.7.
Recommended publications
  • Read the Full Issue of the Real Estate Gazette As A
    ISSUE 34 Real Estate Gazette FOCUS ON: FOREIGN INVESTMENTS www.dlapiperrealworld.com Australia Australia’s foreign investment approval regime Poland Foreign real estate Brazil investment in Poland Foreign investment in Brazil (and in Brazilian farmlands) Portugal Portugal and foreign investors Germany Foreign real estate investments in Singapore Germany — unlimited opportunities? Private education in Southeast Asia — investment plays and regulatory hurdles Morocco Real estate foreign investments in Morocco United Kingdom Taxing non-UK resident Netherlands investors in UK property The 2019 Dutch tax plan — key takeaways for inbound real estate investments WWW.DLAPIPERREALWORLD.COM A note from the Editor A very warm welcome to all our readers to DLA Piper’s first Real Estate Gazette of the year. In this issue, we focus on foreign investment. Olaf Schmidt There are many rewards to be that its legal system contains some Co-Chair of the Global Cross- had from investing in real estate unique features, such as perpetual Practice Real Estate Sector overseas, including the opportunity usufruct, which any foreign investor to diversify and the potential for would need to consider (page 22), stable and safe returns, among while our UK article focuses on the others. However, in addition to tax implications for non-UK resident such advantages, prudent investors investors in UK property (page should also be aware of the pitfalls, 32). However, it is not all doom including unfamiliar tax regimes and and gloom. Many of the articles a completely alien legal framework stress the opportunities available governing the purchasing process. for foreign investors, citing, for example, the growth in city dwellers, In our Australian article (page increasing rent levels, and the 6), the authors describe the potential for significant, long-term country’s foreign investment returns.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Real Estate Law Overview
    Polish Real Estate Law Overview Legal Framework Perpetual Usufruct The fundamental principles of Polish law regarding real estate are The scope of the perpetual usufruct is similar to ownership. codified in the Polish Civil Code and supported by a wide range Differences include: of legislation regulating all special issues regarding in particular • in principle, the perpetual usufruct can only be established on land transfer of the legal title, development and management of real owned by the State Treasury or by a unit of local government estate. Case law (rulings of the Supreme Court and courts of appeal) is used for the interpretation of ambiguous regulations. • the maximum time period of perpetual usufruct is 99 years (but it can be given for a shorter period of at least 40 years in special Titles to Real Estates circumstances) and it can be prolonged The Polish Civil Code distinguishes between several legal institutions • buildings and other facilities erected on real estate by a perpetual that give a title to use and dispose of real estate. The most common are: usufructuary become their property (the same applies to buildings and other facilities which the perpetual usufructuary acquired at • titles to the most extensive rights to the real estate, i.e. the the time when the contract for putting land into perpetual usufruct ownership and the perpetual usufruct was executed) • limited property rights to another person’s real estate in the scope • the ownership of buildings and facilities erected on real estate strictly defined by law including usufruct, easement (servitude) held in perpetual usufruct can only be transferred together with the and mortgage right of the perpetual usufruct of that real estate • rights to use another person’s real estate arising from a contractual In addition to other charges and taxes related to property, the relationship, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Hines Global REIT 09.30.2018 10-Q
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2018 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number: 000-53964 Hines Global REIT, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Maryland 26-3999995 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 2800 Post Oak Boulevard Suite 5000 Houston, Texas 77056-6118 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) (888) 220-6121 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Effects on Real Estate Market: an Explanation of Urbanization
    CULTURAL EFFECTS ON REAL ESTATE MARKET: AN EXPLANATION OF URBANIZATION Ling Wang Project submitted as partial requirement for the conferral of the degree of Master in Business Administration Supervisor: Prof. Rui Alpalhão, ISCTE Business School, Departamento de Finanças Sep 2016 Cultural effects on real estate market: an explanation of urbanization Resumo Este estudo investiga a Teoria do homem no comportamento do consumidor e as dimensões culturais de Hofstede, proporcionando uma compreensão mais profunda das atitudes dos consumidores relativamente ao investimento no mercado imobiliário para explicar a urbanização atual em diferentes países. Depois da quebra do mercado imobiliário e do processo de investimento imobiliário, os indicadores são seleccionados a partir de Atividades Económicas, Mercado Imobiliário, Risco e Limitação e dos Factores Culturais para explicar o fenómeno da urbanização para alcançar o objetivo deste trabalho. Após a realização do Stepwise, o resultado mostra que há ligação entre eles. Juntamente com o desempenho imobiliário, representado pelo Índice de Rendas e Índice de direito de propriedade, o índice cultural, representado pelo Índice de Incerteza e Prevenção e pelo Índice da Indulgência, bem como outros dois factores da Teoria do Comportamento do Consumidor – a Teoria do Homem é estatisticamente significativa para a urbanização. Palavras-chave: Investimento imobiliário · Diferenças culturais · Urbanização. JEL Sistema de Classificação: R29, R30, Z10. I Cultural effects on real estate market: an explanation of urbanization Abstract This study investigates the Theory of Man in Consumer Behavior and Hofstede Cultural dimensions by providing deeper understanding of consumers‟ attitudes towards investment in real estate market to explain nowadays´ urbanization in different countries. After breaking down the Real estate market and RE investment process, the predictors are selected from Economic Activities, Real Estate Market, Risk and Limitation and Cultural Factors to explain the Urbanization phenomenon to reach the purpose of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development
    Journal of Agribusiness pISSN 1899-5241 eISSN 1899-5772 and Rural Development www.jard.edu.pl 4(34) 2014, 159-171 PERPETUAL USUFRUCT OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS – SELECTED LEGAL AND FINANCIAL ISSUES Aneta Suchoń Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań Abstract. The article makes an attempt to determine whether the legal regulations provide a perpetual lessee with, first of all, stable conditions to hold agricultural lands and to run a business activity on these lands and, second of all, whether the regulations make it easi- er for perpetual lessees to acquire the right to own the lands they possess. The first part of the article concentrates on the legal nature of perpetual usufruct as well as the rights and financial obligations of a perpetual lessee. Then, the paper focuses on the transformation of perpetual usufruct into the right of ownership and the expiry of perpetual usufruct. Next, the article analyses the issue of a perpetual lessee as an agricultural producer. At the end, the Author states that perpetual lessee possesses a wide range of rights and can freely run an agricultural activity on agricultural lands. The legislator has acknowledged perpet- ual usufruct, along with the most popular forms of holding lands such as ownership and lease, to be a stable element of rural relations. Thus, a perpetual lessee can be granted the European funds, agricultural tax reliefs and insurance in KRUS. Key words: perpetual usufruct, agricultural lands, agricultural activity, EU funds INTRODUCTION For each agricultural producer it is essential to possess lands in an autonomous and stable way in order to ensure uninterrupted course of an agricultural activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Acquisition for Public Purpose in Poland on Example of Public Roads Construction
    Land Acquisition for Public Purpose in Poland on Example of Public Roads Construction Mirosaw BELEJ and Marek WALACIK, Poland Key words: land management, legislation, real estate development, valuation SUMMARY Classifying investments to so called “public purpose category” enables the government and local councils to acquire land through expropriation (compulsory purchase). Every restriction on the right to real estate requires compensation. It ought to be just which means, that it should only make up for the constrained use of property but also recompensate the loss of any profits. Currently the amount of compensation in Poland is strictly connected with market value – it equals that value. The loss of future profit, if such is possible, or all the inconveniences associated with expropriation do not influence the amount of compensation. It shows the need of working out new procedures and rules of the compensation estimation, running the registers of compulsory purchase proceedings and thorough analysis of them. The authors of the article are going to analyze the legal status regulation processes that took place in the Warmia and Mazury Province between 2004-2006. The greatest emphasis will be placed on the special localization of the investments, identification of the entities involved in the expropriation, proposed amounts of the compensation and the number of compulsory purchase proceedings. TS 4B - Compulsory Acquisition of Land 1/13 Miroslaw Belej and Marek Walacik Land acquisition for public purpose in Poland on example of public roads construction Integrating Generations FIG Working Week 2008 Stockholm, Sweden 14-19 June 2008 Land Acquisition for Public Purpose in Poland on Example of Public Roads Construction Mirosaw BELEJ and Marek WALACIK, Poland 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in Poland-Direct Sales
    Introduction The information in this publication provides an overview of some of the fundamental legal considerations to be addressed when operating or establishing a business in Poland. The content is intended to summarize some of the pertinent provisions which apply and is not intended as specific legal advice. Readers are advised to seek the counsel of lawyers in their home states to advise on compliance with the laws and identify the many planning opportunities. Visit our website at www.millercanfield.com for additional information, updates and newsletters. © 2015 Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or copied in any form without written permission from the publisher. i Table of Contents Overview.................................................................................................................. 1 Forms of Entity........................................................................................................ 1 Establishing A Business........................................................................................... 2 Specific Form of Doing Business In Poland-Direct Sales....................................... 4 Dispute Resolution Mechanism.............................................................................. 5 Labor Matters and Employment............................................................................ 7 Taxes.....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate Investment in Poland Your Legal Guide Introduction
    Real Estate Investment in Poland Your Legal Guide Introduction Dear Friends and Business Partners, Poland is the largest economy in Central Europe, with a population of ~38 million. The implementation of large urban and infrastructure projects is one of the pillars of the new economic policy that the Polish government has recently adopted to meet the UEFA requirements (Poland is one of the countries co-organizing UEFA EURO 2012 Football Championship) and to minimize the negative influence of the turmoil in global markets on the Polish market. Large investments are expected to reduce the unemployment rate and secure the further growth of Poland's economy. It is estimated that the value of the infrastructure projects implemented in Poland within the next 7-8 years will amount to at least EUR 60-70 billion. The sectors of vital importance for the further Poland's development will be: real estate, energy & infrastructure, as well as transport & logistics. Our Clifford Chance Warsaw Real Estate, Construction & Infrastructure Department covers all legal aspects related to the successful completion of large real estate and infrastructure projects. We have the same business objectives as both private and public investors: working on a better infrastructure in Poland. We advise investors, developers, contractors, financial institutions, and professional consultants involved in the development process. We have a wide range of expertise in relation to the development of retail, office, warehouse, residential, mixed-use, energy, industrial plant as well as PPP and infrastructure projects, as well as a long record of experience in contracts based on forms such as FIDIC and AiA.
    [Show full text]
  • ACT of 24 March 920 on the ACQUISITION of IMMOVABLE
    ACT ON ACQUISITION OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTIES BY FOREIGN PERSONS ACT of 24 March 920 ON THE ACQUISITION OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTIES BY FOREIGN PERSONS (Consolidated text: Dziennik Ustaw 2004, No. 167, item 1758; 2005, No. 94, item 788, No. 83, item 538) Article 1. Acquisition of immovable properties by a foreign person shall require a permit. The permit shall be issued by the minister competent for internal affairs by an administrative decision unless the Minister of National Defence lodges an objection, and as regards the agricultural immovable properties – unless the minister competent for rural development lodges an objection. a. The objection referred to in paragraph 1 shall be expressed, by a ruling, within 14 days of serving the paper prepared by the minister competent for internal affairs. In par- ticularly justified cases the minister competent for internal affairs shall, upon a request of an authority entitled to lodge an objection, extend the time limit for lodging thereof up to 2 months of the day of serving the paper prepared by said minister. b. A refusal to grant the permit referred to in paragraph 1 shall not require that either the Minister of National Defence or the minister competent for rural be addressed. 2. Under this Act, a foreign person shall mean: ) a natural person not having the Polish citizenship; 2) a legal person having its seat abroad; 3) a partnership of the persons referred to in subparagraph or 2 having no legal personality and with its seat abroad, created in compliance with statutory law of foreign states; 4) a legal person and a commercial partnership having no legal personality and with its seat in the territory of the Republic of Poland, which is directly or indirectly under the control of the persons or partnerships mentioned in subparagraphs to 3; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Polish Real Estate Law Ensures Transparency
    REAL ESTATE IN POLAND Short legal guide 1. Polish real estate law - introduction Polish real estate law ensures transparency and reliability thanks to the codification of rules and the registration of legal titles to property in a court register. The Civil Code is the main source of legal rules governing property rights, whereas the Act of 6 July 1982 on Land and Mortgage Register and on Mortgage provides an additional set of rules relevant for the title registration system and various types of mortgages. Apart from full ownership of real estate, which is similar to the English legal concept of freehold, Polish law also provides for a so-called perpetual usufruct, which is similar to ownership in that it is freely transferable and ensures the use of the property in a similar manner as an owner. Polish law also provides for a number of limited property rights, such as mortgages, usufruct and servitudes (rights similar to easements under English law). On the other hand, under Polish law, two types of lease of property are possible. Titles are registered in the Land and Mortgage Register, which is kept by district courts having jurisdiction over particular properties. The data kept by the district courts across the country is currently being transferred to a national electronic register; a great portion of properties can already be checked at Land Register Information Centre outlets. The register provides a statutory warranty for the acquirer of real estate that the rights entered in the register exist as they are registered, provided that the acquirer acted in good faith and acquired the property for a valuable consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legion of the Archangel Michael: the Past and Present Appeal of Decentralized Fascism
    Providence College DigitalCommons@Providence History & Classics Undergraduate Theses History & Classics Fall 2020 The Legion of the Archangel Michael: The Past and Present Appeal of Decentralized Fascism Andrew Bennet Gillen Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/history_undergrad_theses Part of the Cultural History Commons, European History Commons, and the Political History Commons The Legion of the Archangel Michael: The Past and Present Appeal of Decentralized Fascism By Andrew Bennet Gillen HIS 490 History Honors Thesis Department of History Providence College Fall 2020 ii CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. NEW APPEAL ………………………………… 1 CHAPTER 1. IDEAOLOGY OF THE IRON GUARD……………...13 CHAPTER 2. FITTING IN: 1931-41…………………………………37 CONCLUSION. COMPARISONS……………………………………52 BIBLIOGRPAHY……………………………………………………...69 iii INTRODUCTION: NEW APPEAL In August of 2017, far right groups of the United States of America, such as the Proud Boys, Christogenea, Vanguard America, and the Global Crusader Knights, among others, gathered in an unprecedented fashion at Charlottesville, Virginia.1 These groups believed that they were given the power to avert the changes of more liberal forces in the country. One of the organizers of the event, Matthew Heimbach, wore a shirt depicting Corneliu Codreanu.2 Codreanu was the charismatic founder, and to some extent heart and soul, of the Legion of the Archangel Michael (LAM), or the Iron Guard, as it was frequently referred to in the English speaking world,the main fascist force in Romanian politics
    [Show full text]
  • Five Issues to Consider Before Purchasing an Apartment in Poland
    2 CEPIF C E E R e v i e w 5 ISSUES TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION BEFORE PURCHASING AN APARTMENT IN POLAND Aleksander Hetko Associate Hogan & Hartson Warsaw 1. Title to Land Upon purchasing an apartment you have to purchase also a title to the common areas in the building and a title to land on which the building stands. The title to land may be ownership or perpetual usufruct. Perpetual usufruct is a strong property right established on public land and is freely transferable. It is usually established for 99 years subject to the possibility of prolongation for a minimum 40 years and maximum 99 following years. Developers often build on land obtained in perpetual usufruct as, on the one side, it is also a preference of local authorities to give land into perpetual usufruct instead of selling ownership. On the other side, only a fee of 15-25% of the value of the land is charged up front for establishment of the perpetual usufruct and then 1% of the value annually instead of charging upfront 100% as in the case of ownership sale. For the purchaser of an apartment the above advantage is not as relevant as usually the price he pays for the title to the plot is just a minor percentage of what is paid for the actual apartment. Naturally in the case of ownership it will be slightly higher but in the case of perpetual usufruct the purchaser must remember to pay afterwards his share of the annual fee by March 31 of each year for the entire period of perpetual usufruct.
    [Show full text]