Ann Arbor Municipal Airport Ann Arbor, Michigan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ann Arbor Municipal Airport Ann Arbor, Michigan DRAFT Environmental Assessment for Ann Arbor Municipal Airport Ann Arbor, Michigan Prepared for: City of Ann Arbor Michigan Department of Transportation - Office of Aeronautics and Federal Aviation Administration Prepared by: SmithGroupJJR and Michigan Department of Transportation – Office of Aeronautics This Environmental Assessment becomes both a State and Federal document when evaluated, signed and dated by the responsible State (AERO) and Federal (FAA) officials. ________________________________________ ____________________ Responsible AERO Official (State Actions) Date of Approval ________________________________________ ____________________ Responsible FAA Official (Federal Actions) Date of Approval This Environmental Assessment describes the social, economic, and environmental impacts associated, or lack thereof, with the Preferred Alternative for implementing proposed improvements at the Ann Arbor Municipal Airport. The alternatives considered were: no development, use of other airports, construction of a new airport, and five different Runway 6/24 alternatives. Comments on this Environmental Assessment should be received within 30 days of the date of publication and should be sent to Mr. Steve Houtteman, Environmental Specialist, Project Support Unit, MDOT-Office of Aeronautics, 2700 Port Lansing Road, Lansing, Michigan 48906-2160. OCTOBER 2016 1 Ann Arbor Municipal Airport Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Topic..................................................................................................Page Number Title Page…………………………………………………………........................1 Table of Contents...................................................................................................2 List of Appendices…………………………………………………………..........4 List of Figures.........................................................................................................4 List of Tables…………………..............................................................................5 Section 1. Purpose and Need……………………………………………..............................6 1.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………..6 1.2 Setting………………………………………………………………..........7 1.3 Background………………………………………………………………..9 1.4 Purpose and Need………………………………………………………..12 1.5 Aircraft, Activity, Operations, & Forecasts……………………………...12 1.5.1 Critical Aircraft Determination………………………......12 1.5.2 Aircraft Activity……………………………………….....14 1.5.3 Aircraft Characteristics and Runway Recommendations..14 1.5.4 Airport Operations and Forecasts……………………......17 1.6 Sponsor’s Proposed Action…………………………………………........21 1.7 Requested Federal, State, & Local Actions…..............……………….....22 1.7.1 Federal Actions..................................................................23 1.7.2 State Actions......................................................................23 1.7.3 Local Actions.....................................................................23 1.8 Other Considerations…………………………………………………….23 1.8.1 Line of Sight Concern…………………………………...23 1.8.2 Approach Slope Concern…………………...…………....24 1.8.3 Runway Overrun Concern…………………………….....25 1.8.4 Enhancement of Commerce……………………………...25 1.9 Summary………………………………………………………………....26 Section 2. Description of Alternatives..................................................................................27 2.1 Alternatives Considered and Dismissed………………….……...............27 2.1.1 Use Other Airports……………………….………...…….27 2.1.2 Construct New Airport…………………………………...28 2.1.3 Extend Runway to the East………………………………28 2.1.4 150 foot Runway Shift Only……………………………..29 2.2 Alternatives Carried Forward…………………………………………....29 2.2.1 No Build Alternative……………………………………..29 2.2.2 Build Alternatives………………………………………..29 OCTOBER 2016 2 2.3 Alternatives Evaluation…………………………………………………..35 2.3.1 No Build Alternative……………………………………..35 2.3.2 Build Alternative 1……………………………………….36 2.3.3 Build Alternative 2…………………………………….....36 2.3.4 Build Alternative 3……………………………………….36 2.4 Preferred Alternative…………………………………………………......36 Section 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences…………………..38 3.1 Noise Analysis…………………………………………………………...38 3.1.1 Methodology……………………………………………..38 3.1.2 Aircraft Noise Exposure…………………………………40 3.1.3 Reevaluation of Noise Exposure Analysis 2015................41 3.2 Land Use Impacts………………………………………………………..46 3.3 Induced Socioeconomic Impacts………………………………………...52 3.3.1 Community Displacement……………………………….52 3.3.2 Environmental Justice………………………………........52 3.3.3 Community Cohesion and Community Facilities………..53 3.3.4 Demographics....................................................................54 3.3.5 Economics………………………………………………..56 3.4 Air Quality……………………………………………………………….56 3.5 Water Quality………………………………………………………….....59 3.5.1 Surface Hydrology……………………………………….59 3.5.2 Geology, Groundwater, and Soils………………………..59 3.6 Section 4(f) Resources……………………………………………….......60 3.7 Cultural Resources – Archaeological, Architectural, & Historic……..…63 3.8 Biotic Communities…………………………………………………...…63 3.9 Threatened & Endangered Species…………………………………....…64 3.10 Wetlands…………………………………………………....……………65 3.11 Floodplains………………………………………………….....…………66 3.12 Farmland………………………………………………………........……66 3.13 Energy Supply & Natural Resources………………….....………………67 3.14 Light Emissions………………………………………….........…………68 3.15 Construction Impacts…………………………………….........…………68 3.16 Solid Waste Impacts……………………………………………..………68 3.17 Existing & Future Traffic Conditions……………………………...…….69 3.18 Hazardous Waste Sites……………………………………………...……69 Section 4. Environmental Mitigation......…………………………………….………………71 4.1 Summary…………………………………………………....……………71 4.2 Mitigation Measures…………………………………………..…………71 4.2.1 Threatened and Endangered Species………….…………71 4.2.1 Permits…………………………………………...………72 OCTOBER 2016 3 Section 5. Agency Coordination and Public Participation……………………….....………73 5.1 Agency Coordination…………………………………………….....……73 5.2 Public Participation………………………………………………………73 5.2.1 Citizen’s Advisory Committee…………………………..........…73 5.2.2 Public Hearing……………………………………………...……74 Section 6. List of Preparers…………………………………………………………..….....…75 Section 7. References and Sources…………………………………………………..…......…77 Section 8. Glossary.....................................................................................................................80 Appendices Appendix A. User Survey Reports/Airport Operations Records/Forecasts of Operations Appendix B. Noise Analysis Report Appendix C. Air Quality Analysis Report Appendix D. Early Agency Coordination Appendix E. Field Observation Report Appendix F. Audubon Society Bird Species Observed List Appendix G. Citizens Advisory Committee Coordination Appendix H. Additional Agency Correspondence Appendix I. Public Notices Appendix J. Agency Distribution & Comment Appendix K. Response to Comments List of Figures Figure 2.1 Location Map...........................................................................................................8 Figure 2.2 Airport Layout Plan...............................................................................................11 Figure 3.1 Existing Conditions................................................................................................31 Figure 3.2 Build Alternative 1 – Extend & Realign................................................................32 Figure 3.3 Build Alternative 2 – Extend West........................................................................33 Figure 3.4 Build Alternative 3 – Preferred Alternative...........................................................34 Figure 4.1 Noise Contour Map – Existing Conditions............................................................43 Figure 4.2 Noise Contour Map – No Build Alternative..........................................................44 Figure 4.3 Noise Contour Map – Preferred Alternative..........................................................45 Figure 4.4 Pittsfield Charter Township Existing Land Use....................................................48 Figure 4.5 Pittsfield Charter Township Zoning Map..............................................................49 Figure 4.6 City of Ann Arbor Zoning Map.............................................................................50 Figure 4.7 Pittsfield Charter Township Future Land Use.......................................................51 Figure 4.8 Existing Water Resources and Land Cover...........................................................62 OCTOBER 2016 4 List of Tables Table 1-1 Actual and Forecasted Total Operations at Ann Arbor Municipal Airport...........20 Table 2-1 Summary of Alternatives Carried Forward............................................................35 Table 3-1 Ann Arbor Area Population and Projections.........................................................54 Table 3-2 Summary of Demographic Data............................................................................55 OCTOBER 2016 5 Section 1. Purpose and Need 1.1 INTRODUCTION Note: The following information contains a large number of aviation related acronyms. A glossary with definitions is included in Section 8 of this document. Ann Arbor Municipal Airport (ARB) is a public-use, general aviation airport owned and operated by the City of Ann Arbor, Michigan. The airport is located in Pittsfield Charter Township, Washtenaw County, Michigan and consists of approximately 733 acres. ARB’s operating budget is through a City enterprise fund comprised solely of revenue generated by airport operations.
Recommended publications
  • The Economic Impact of Willow Run Airport 2014
    The Economic Impact of Willow Run Airport 2014 Wayne County Airport Authority Board: Michael J. Jackson, Sr., chairperson; Suzanne K. Hall, vice chairperson; Reginald M. Turner, secretary; Nabih H. Ayad Esq.; Irma Clark-Coleman; Michael Garavaglia; Ronald Hall, Jr. Thomas J. Naughton, CEO Christopher J. Mullin, Director, Willow Run Airport WCAA Photos by Vito Palmisano and Jeff Ellis Lee Redding, Project Director Tim Davis, Director of iLabs 2 The Economic Impact of Willow Run Airport 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 4 II. Assessing Economic Impact of Willow Run .......................................................................... 5 II.1 The Scope of Economic Impact Analysis ........................................................................ 5 II.1.1 Types of Economic Activities ................................................................................... 5 II.1.2 Geographic Scope of Economic Impact ................................................................... 6 II.2 Quantifying Economic Impact ......................................................................................... 7 II.3 Broader Importance of Willow Run ................................................................................. 9 III. Economic Impact of Cargo Transportation ........................................................................... 10 IV. Economic Impact of Visitors ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 1995 / Notices 27803 Safety, Adversely Affecting the Efficient Procedural and Substantive ACTION: Notice
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 1995 / Notices 27803 safety, adversely affecting the efficient procedural and substantive ACTION: Notice. use and management of the navigable requirements of the Act and FAR Part airspace and air traffic control systems, 150 have been satisfied. The overall SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation or adversely affecting other powers and program, therefore, was approved by the Administration (FAA) announces that it responsibilities of the Administrator Assistant Administrator for Airports is reviewing a proposed revision to the prescribed by law. effective July 25, 1994. noise compatibility program that was Specific limitations with respect to Outright approval was granted for all submitted by the Regional Airport the FAA's approval of an airport noise of the specific program elements with Authority of Louisville and Jefferson compatibility program are delineated in the exception of Item 1b, Development County (RAA) under the provisions of FAR Part 150, section 150.5. Approval of SIDS and STARS (Standard Title I of the Aviation Safety and Noise is not a determination concerning the Instrument Departure and Standard Abatement Act of 1979 (Public Law 96± acceptability of land uses under Federal, Arrival Procedures), which was 193) and 14 CFR Part 150. The existing state, or local law. Approval does not by disapproved pending submittal of noise compatibility program was itself constitute an FAA implementing additional information. approved April 8, 1994. The proposed action. A request for Federal action or The approved items are: revision to the noise compatibility approval to implement specific noise program will be approved or compatibility measures may be Noise Abatement Procedures disapproved on or before November 13, required, and an FAA decision on the 1a.
    [Show full text]
  • 01/21/2021 Page 1 MICHIGAN AERONAUTICS COMMISSION
    MICHIGAN AERONAUTICS COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting Lansing, Michigan January 21, 2021 Pursuant to Section 31 of Act 327 of the Public Acts of 1945, Public Act 254 of 2020, and recommendations to prevent the spread of Covid-19, the Commissioners of the Michigan Aeronautics Commission (MAC) met via video conference call, on Thursday, January 21, 2021. COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT and LOCATION ATTENDING FROM Rick Fiddler, Chair – Ada, Michigan Russ Kavalhuna, Vice Chair – Dearborn, Michigan Dr. Brian Smith, Commissioner – Detroit, Michigan Roger Salo, Commissioner – Plymouth, Michigan Kelly Burris, Commissioner – Pleasant Ridge, Michigan Brig. Gen, Bryan Teff, Designee MDMVA – Lansing, Michigan Laura Mester, Designee MDOT – Clinton County, Michigan Kevin Jacobs, Designee MDNR – Roscommon, Michigan F/Lt. Brian Bahlau, Designee MSP – Lansing, Michigan Mike Trout, Director – Clarklake, Michigan Bryan Budds, Commission Advisor – Howell, Michigan Alicia Morrison, Commission Analyst – Lansing, Michigan COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT None I. OPENING REMARKS Director Mike Trout began by explaining the meeting was being held via video conference call in accordance with recommendations to slow the spread of COVID-19. He welcomed all who were participating and thanked the Commissioners for coming together in the virtual format. He then turned the meeting over to Chairperson Rick Fiddler. The January 21, 2021 MAC meeting was officially called to order by Chair Rick Fiddler at 10:02 am. Chair Fiddler thanked the Commissioners and all in attendance on the call for participating. He then led the attendees in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. Chair Fiddler asked for a formal roll call. Roll call was taken. It was announced all nine (9) Commissioners were present for a quorum.
    [Show full text]
  • 10468-WCAA Report.Qxd
    ALTITUDE Gaining through New Leadership and Growth WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY Report to Key Stakeholders VISION STATEMENT MISSION STATEMENT “To be the best major hub and “To build and maintain, through teamwork, reliever airports in the world.” innovation and dedication, the safest, friendliest, cleanest, most convenient airports in the world.” VALUES Safety and Security We maintain our facilities and conduct our operations in the safest possible manner. We are vigilant about the safety and security of the traveling public, our tenants and our employees. Quality/Customer Service We provide world-class facilities that are properly maintained to ensure a positive travel experience. Employees are respectful, courteous and helpful at all times to our customers. Professionalism (Learning/Conduct/Work Ethic/Respect/Attitude) We employ, develop and retain employees motivated to achieve the mission and vision of the organization. We treat each employee with the same respect that we expect to receive. We recognize and embrace our common interests as well as our differences. Integrity/Honesty We will perform our duties in an exemplary manner, making the best possible business decisions for the users and stakeholders of the Airports. Efficiency (Cost Effective/Streamlined Processes) We manage the facilities and operations of the Airports in a manner that is consistent with the best practices of the industry. We strive to provide a seamless experience for the traveling public, ensure value and quality for our tenants, and meet the needs of our employees. Innovation (Best Practices) We establish and use the best practices and standards available. We are committed to using our resources to provide the best possible travel experience and highest level of customer satisfaction.
    [Show full text]
  • FILE FORM # SIZE PAGE DATE COLOR Accessories Kaiser
    DATE FORM # PAGE SIZE COLOR FILE Accessories No Date Kaiser Accessories, Featuring a complete line of 1951-55 0 8 1/4 x 5 1/2 Sepia-toned Facts Book Copyright 1951 Henry J: Salesman Facts 1951-117 104 8 x 7 1/4 White / Blue / Black Cover Miscellaneous No Date Kaiser-Henry J: Kaiser Frazer Graphic Willow Run 1953 1953-34 16 11 x 15 Part Color No Date Kaiser | Henry J: 1953 Colors, color chips and tissue insert 1953-39 4 10 1/2 x 8 1/2 Green / Black / White Owners Manual Copyright Aug Henry J: Owners packet, includes owners manual, 2-sided sheet, 1951-116 1950 #740343; service policy # 740537; owners card #740538, in envelope #740577, plus Air Conditioner and Radio Instructions, if equipped 0 4 x 8 1/2 Rose / Black / White No Date RF28-9999 Allstate: Owners packet, includes owners manual, service policy 1952-29 and owners card in envelope, plus Air Conditioner and Radio Instructions, if equipped 20 5 x 7 Red / Black / White Copyright 1952 734988 Henry J: Owners Packet, includes owners manual, 2-sided sheet, 1952-47 Service Policy #740537; owners card #740538; in envelope #740987, plus Air Conditioner and Radio Instructions, if equipped 0 4 x 8 1/2 Blue / Black / White RF28-9999 Allstate: Allstate: Owners packet, includes owner manual, service 1953-44 policy and owners card, in envelope, plus Air Conditioner and Radio Instructions, if equipped 20 5 x 7 Orange / Black / White 740880 Henry J: Owners Packet, includes owners manual, #740880, 1953-79 service policy #745630; owners card #745629;,Care of Bright Trim card, plus Air Conditioner and
    [Show full text]
  • 5 PAI.150.Noise Abt
    DETROIT METROPOLITAN WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT FAR PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE CHAPTERINVENTORY A Inventory Introduction Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport (DTW) is an integral component of the transportation infrastructure serving the Detroit Metropolitan area, southeast Michigan, and northwest Ohio. Because of its airfield and facility capabilities, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport is also a vital part of the national system of airports. The Airport serves as not only the City of Detroit’s front door by providing visitors with an important first impression of the community, but also is the state's largest airport. The Airport provides transportation facilities that are an absolute necessity for some businesses, and a "required" convenience for others. Additionally, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport provides recreational and leisure traveler’s convenient access to air transportation with convenient non-stop and connecting service to many popular destinations. This Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 150 Noise Compatibility Planning Study is an update of a 1992 Study that was adopted by Wayne County and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 1993. The Wayne County Airport Authority has implemented many of the recommendations contained in the previous FAR Part 150 Study. However, since completion of the previous study, there have been changes to the airfield, type of aircraft, and the number of aircraft operating at the airport. As such, many of these changes have likely resulted in changes to noise exposure and therefore the need for an update to the previous Study. The purpose of this airport facilities INVENTORY chapter of the Part 150 Study is to establish a baseline of information about existing airport facilities and operations, as well as local land use.
    [Show full text]
  • Willow Run Expressway "Bridges
    WILLOW RUN EXPRESSWAY "BRIDGES - ! '*-- HAER No, MI-97-A <f£rl-d-ge-,-R4H:,)-.,.- US-12 over the Conrail Railway, Eastboum Ypsilanti vicinity Washtenaw County Michigan PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service Northeast Region . Philadelphia Support Office U.S. Custom House 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, P.A. 19106 fc*—ih. HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD WILLOW RUN EXPRESSWAY BRIDGES* M«- fit! Q,£ HAER No. MI-97-A Location: US-12 over the Conrail Railway,Eastbound Ypsilanti vicinity, Washtenaw County Michigan UTM: 17.288830.4680060 (Eastbound) 17.288780.46802 00 (Westbound) Quad: Ypsilanti East, MI 1:24,000 Dates of Construction: 1941, 1966 Builder: Michigan State Highway Department and various contractors ■ Present Owner Michigan Department of Transportation, 425 West Ottawa Lansing, Michigan 48909 Present Use: Vehicular Bridges Significance: This pair of bridges created a grade separation between the Willow Run Expressway and a railroad line serving the Willow Run Bomber plant (1942). The Willow Run Expressway, the first substantial limited-access highway in Michigan, along with its continuation, the Detroit Industrial Expressway, enabled vast numbers of workers living in Detroit to commute to the Willow Run plant. This is one of only two highway- railroad grade separations to survive from the original expressway system. Project Information: This documentation is the result of a Memorandum of Agreement between the Federal Highway Administration and the Michigan State Historic Preservation Office as a mitigative measure- prior to demolition of the structures. It was completed in 1995 by Dr. Charles K. Hyde, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202 WILLOW RUN EXPRESSWAY BRIDG Wfr«?3gef»H*6»''>w*gl»-RQ 2.)* HAER No.
    [Show full text]
  • Towneplace Suites Detroit Livonia
    Fact Sheet TownePlace Suites Detroit Livonia Phone: 1-734-542-7400 17450 Fox Drive Fax: 1-734-542-7401 Livonia, Michigan 48152 USA Sales: 17347790108ext.2108 Sales Fax: 1-734-542-7401 Key Facts Check-in and Check-out Parking • Check-in: 3:00 PM • Complimentary on-site parking • Check-out: 12:00 PM • Express Checkout Property Details Free Breakfast • 3 floors95 suites High-Speed Internet Smoke-free Policy • Public Areas: Wired, Wireless • This hotel has a smoke-free policy • Guest Rooms: Wired, Wireless Pet Policy • Pets allowed, non-refundable sanitation fee: 100 USD; contact hotel for details Accessibility For more information call the general manager of the hotel • Accessible guest rooms have a 32 inch wide opening • Business center entrance is accessible • Fitness center entrance is accessible • Hotel has on site accessible self-parking • Main entrance is accessible • Pathway to registration desk is accessible • Pool entrances are all accessible • Registration desk is accessible • Route to accessible guest rooms is accessible • Service animals allowed for persons with disabilities Driving Directions from Airport Detroit Metro Airport – DTW Willow Run Airport – YIP Phone: 1-734-427-7678 Phone: 1-734-485-6666 Hotel direction: 20 mile(s) NW Hotel direction: 25 mile(s) SW Driving directions:I-94 W from Detroit Metro Airport to 275 N. Get off at Exit 170 (6 Mile Road). Take a left off exit, cross over interstate. Take a right on Fox Drive. This hotel does not provide shuttle service. Follow Fox Drive around to end of street, hotel is on the right. • Alternate transportation:Always Transporation This hotel does not provide shuttle service.
    [Show full text]
  • I-94 & Rawsonville Ypsilanti, Michigan
    LAND FOR SALE I-94 & Rawsonville Ypsilanti, Michigan 1111 W. Oakley Park Road Suite 220 Commerce, Michigan 48390 (248) 359-9000 – Detroit Office (616) 241-2200 – Grand Rapids Office www.insitecommercial.com OFFICE I INDUSTRIAL I RETAIL I LAND I INVESTMENT I TENANT REPRESENTATION I CORPORATE SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS OF TABLE LAND FOR SALE I-94 and Rawsonville Ypsilanti, Michigan SUMMARY page 1 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS page 2 PARCEL A SKETCH page 3 PARCEL A SURVEY page 4 PARCEL A LEGAL DESCRIPTION page 5 PARCEL B SKETCH page 6 PARCEL C SKETCH page 7 TRUCK ROUTE page 8 PROPOSED NEXUS PIPELINE page 9 DETROIT AEROTROPOLIS REGIONAL MAP page 10 AEROTROPOLIS ARTICLE page 11-12 ZONING ACT page 13 AREA MAPS pages 14-15 DEMOGRAPHICS pages 16-17 TRAFFIC COUNTS page 18 Information contained herein was obtained from sources deemed to be reliable but is not guaranteed. Subject to prior sale, change of price or withdrawal. OFFICE I INDUSTRIAL I RETAIL I LAND I INVESTMENT I TENANT REPRESENTATION I CORPORATE SERVICES PROPERTY PROPERTY SUMMARY Location: I-94 and Rawsonville, Ypsilanti, MI Total Land Size: Parcel A (I-94 Service Drive) – 16.49 Acres Parcel B (2575 State St.) – 6.18 Acres Parcel C (NEC State & Watson) – 17.5 Acres Total Available: Up to 40.17 Acres Parcel ID #’s: Parcel A – K-11-13-382-005 Parcel B – K-11-13-200-001 Parcel C – K-11-13-256-002 Sale Price: Parcel A - $825,000.00 ($50,000.00 per acre) Parcel B - $61,800.00 ($10,000.00 per acre) Parcel C – $437,500.00 ($25,000.00 per acre) Utilities: 24” water main one block west of site.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Aviation Hall of Fame 6151 Portage Rd
    Michigan Aviation Hall of Fame 6151 Portage Rd. Portage, MI 49002 Ph: 269.350.2812 Fax: 269.382.1813 Email: [email protected] Dear Michigan Aviation Hall of Fame Elector, Thank you for your interest in the election of the 2019 Michigan Aviation Hall of Fame (MAHOF) enshrinees. You are receiving this ballot because you are a member of the Air Zoo and/or: have been enshrined in the MAHOF, have been selected by the MAHOF Advisory Panel as an appointed elector, or are a member of the MAHOF Advisory Panel. The next enshrinement ceremony will take place at the Air Zoo’s Science Innovation Hall of Fame Awards Gala on Saturday, April 13, 2019. Please read the following very carefully before you cast your votes: Candidates are divided into two groups. Group I candidates are deceased. Group II candidates are living. To help you cast your votes, brief biographies of the nominees in each group follow the lists of names. Once your decisions are made, please cast your votes for the MAHOF enshrinees by following the submission instructions at the bottom of the ballot on the next page. Because the number of First-, Second-, and Third-place votes is often needed to break ties in ballot counting, it is critical that you vote for three candidates in each group. Ballots without three votes per group will not be counted. For questions, contact the Hall of Fame Advisory Panel via email at [email protected]. Ballots must be received by January 26, 2019. Thank you very much for your participation in this process! Through the Michigan Aviation Hall of Fame, you help preserve this state’s rich aviation and space history.
    [Show full text]
  • 42000 Ecorse Road, Van Buren Township, Michigan
    AVAILABLE Q4 2020 CROSSROADS DISTRIBUTION CENTER-NORTH 42000 ECORSE ROAD, VAN BUREN TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN CROSSROADS DISTRIBUTION CENTER - NORTH (CRN), VAN BUREN TOWNSHIP, IS A SPRAWLING 265 ACRE INDUSTRIAL PARK LOCATED IN THE WAYNE COUNTY SUBMARKET OF SOUTH EAST MICHIGAN. CRN IS JUST MINUTES FROM DETROIT METROPOLITAN AIRPORT, WILLOW RUN AIRPORT AND ALL MAJOR EXPRESSWAYS; I-94 TO CHICAGO, I-75 TO TOLEDO, CANADA’S INTERNATIONAL CROSSING AND I-275 PROVIDING ACCESS NORTH AND SOUTH. CLICK HERE FOR A 3D VIEW! BUILDING #4 CROSSROADS DISTRIBUTION SITE PLAN BUILDING 4 CENTER - NORTH (CRN) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE Size: 261,561 SF Buildings #4, #5 and #6 are the latest buildings to be Dimensions: 225’x1150’ developed by Ashley Capital, one of the nation’s leading to 23,550 SF development companies and Michigan’s largest industrial Divisible: owner in Southeast Michigan. These buildings are of state Lease Rate: $6.50 PSF NNN of the art design offering all the features and amenities Available Office: To Suit (up to 5%) required by today’s sophisticated warehouse/distribution Ceiling Height: 30’ Clear and manufacturing companies globally. BUILDING Parking: 360 Car / 103 Trailer Grade Level Doors: 10 CRN offers 30’ - 32’ ceiling heights, 52’4”x50’ column spacing 6 26 within and 52’4”x60’ at the loading dock areas, ESFR fire Dock Doors: suppression, stunning office finishes and abundant tractor trailer parking and staging areas. This ideal location provides for optimized logistics and distribution within acceptable BUILDING 5 broadcast time to many of the Big Three Assembly Plants DISTRIBUTION CENTER within Michigan, Canada, Ohio, Indiana and Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • 02 Dtw 150 B
    DETROIT METROPOLITAN WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT FAR PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE CHAPTERFORECAST OF B AVIATION ACTIVITY Forecast of Aviation Activity Introduction This chapter summarizes past aviation activity at Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport (DTW), and estimates future activity. This forecast of aviation activity serves as the basis for analyzing existing aircraft noise levels and identifying future noise levels associated with aircraft activity. Forecasts, like the prediction of next month’s weather, are never exact; rather, the forecast indicates, based on past conditions, how activity may change in the future. In that manner, the forecast serves as a basis for evaluating how noise exposure may change in the future. The following section describes the basic methodology for developing the forecast of aircraft operations at DTW. This information served as the basis for the future fleet mix forecasts described in the following Noise Analysis chapter. Background In preparing a Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 150 Noise Compatibility Plan, one of the key products is the preparation of the Noise Exposure Maps (NEM’s). The Noise Exposure Maps identify the existing and future noise exposure (typically five years into the future from the date of submission of the NEM’s), and are prepared using the Federal Aviation Administration’s Integrated Noise Model (INM). To prepare a noise exposure contour map for a particular year, the INM requires information concerning the number of aircraft operations, the types of aircraft (fleet mix), and the time of day (day or night) that the activity occurs. This forecast chapter presents the method used to identify future aircraft operations, which along with the future aircraft fleet mix assumptions described in the Noise Analysis chapter serve as the basis for developing the noise exposure contour maps.
    [Show full text]