DOCSLIB.ORG

WOLF ISLAND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Mcintosh County, Georgia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WOLF ISLAND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Mcintosh County, Georgia DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WOLF ISLAND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE McIntosh County, Georgia U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia June 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A. DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN I. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Need for the Plan .................................................................................................... 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ...................................................................................................... 2 National Wildlife Refuge System .................................................................................................. 2 Legal Policy Context ..................................................................................................................... 4 Legal Mandates, Administrative and Policy Guidelines, and Other Special Considerations .......................................................................................................4 Biological Integrity, Diversity, and Environmental Health Policy ......................................... 5 National and International Conservation Plans and Initiatives ..................................................... 5 II. REFUGE OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................ 9 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 9 Refuge History and Purpose ........................................................................................................ 9 Special Designations .................................................................................................................. 12 Wilderness ........................................................................................................................ 12 Class I Air Quality Area .....................................................................................................13 Ecosystem Context .....................................................................................................................13 Regional Conservation Plans and Initiatives ..............................................................................14 Initiative for Watershed Excellence: Upper Altamaha Pilot Project ................................... 14 Ecological Threats and Problems ............................................................................................... 15 Beach Erosion and Accretion ............................................................................................15 Control of Nuisance Wildlife ..............................................................................................15 Protection of the Natural Functions of the Altamaha River System ..................................16 Physical Resources .................................................................................................................... 16 Climate .............................................................................................................................. 16 Geology and Topography ..................................................................................................17 Soils .................................................................................................................................. 18 Hydrology .......................................................................................................................... 18 Air Quality ..........................................................................................................................19 Water Quality and Quantity ...............................................................................................19 Biological Resources .................................................................................................................. 19 Habitat ............................................................................................................................... 19 Wildlife ............................................................................................................................... 20 Cultural Resources ..................................................................................................................... 21 Socioeconomic Environment ...................................................................................................... 21 Refuge Administration and Management ...................................................................................23 Land Protection and Conservation ....................................................................................23 Visitor Services ................................................................................................................. 23 Personnel, Operations, and Maintenance .........................................................................23 III. PLAN DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................................................. 25 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 25 Public Involvement and the Planning Process ...........................................................................25 Table of Contents i Summary of Issues, Concerns, and Opportunities ..................................................................... 27 Fish and Wildlife Population Management........................................................................ 27 Habitat Management......................................................................................................... 32 Resource Protection ......................................................................................................... 34 Land Acquisition ............................................................................................................... 34 Visitor Services ................................................................................................................. 35 Refuge Administration ...................................................................................................... 35 IV. MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ......................................................................................................... 37 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 37 Vision ......................................................................................................................................... 38 Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .............................................................................................. 38 Fish and Wildlife Population Management........................................................................ 38 Habitat Management......................................................................................................... 42 Resource Protection ......................................................................................................... 44 Visitor Services ................................................................................................................. 46 Refuge Administration ...................................................................................................... 47 V. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION .............................................................................................................. 49 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 49 Proposed Projects ...................................................................................................................... 49 Fish and Wildlife Population Management........................................................................ 49 Habitat Management......................................................................................................... 51 Resource Protection ......................................................................................................... 52 Visitor Services ................................................................................................................. 53 Refuge Administration ...................................................................................................... 54 Funding and Personnel .............................................................................................................. 54 Partnership and Volunteer Opportunities ................................................................................... 55 Step-down Management Plans .................................................................................................. 56 Monitoring and Adaptive Management ....................................................................................... 56 Plan Review and Revision.......................................................................................................... 57 SECTION B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Translocation of Great Spotted Kiwi/Roa to Rotoiti Nature Recovery Project
    Translocation of great spotted kiwi/roa (Apteryx haasti) to Rotoiti Nature Recovery Project Gasson P.A. DECEMBER 2005 Published by Department of Conservation Private Bag 5 Nelson, New Zealand (PM2005/9035) Publ.info. Occasional Publication No. 67 ISSN 0113-3853 ISBN 0-478-14086-X CONTENTS Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 6 2. Background 8 2.1 Great spotted kiwi biology and conservation 8 2.2 Rotoiti Nature Recovery Project 10 2.3 Purpose of the translocation 11 2.4 Previous attempts at establishing mainland kiwi populations 12 3. Development of the translocation proposal 14 3.1 Choice of kiwi species 14 3.2 Development of the operational plan 14 3.3 Choice of a source population 15 3.4 Consultation with iwi 16 3.5 Health assessment of the source population 17 3.6 Translocation approval 18 4. Transfer methods 19 4.1 Kiwi collection methods 19 4.2 Measuring, marking and health sampling 20 4.3 Holding and transportation methods 21 4.4 Release method 22 5. Transfer results 24 5.1 Collection results 24 5.2 Holding and transportation results 26 5.3 Release results 27 5.4 Health sampling results 29 6. Discussion of transfer methods and results 33 7. Post-release monitoring methods 35 7.1 Distribution monitoring 35 7.2 Breeding monitoring 36 7.3 Recapture and physical examination methods 36 8. Post-release monitoring results 38 8.1 Dispersal 38 8.2 Pair bond survival 41 8.3 Habitat usage 41 8.4 Breeding 43 8.5 Physical examinations 45 9. Post-release kiwi management 47 9.1 Management approach 47 9.2 Dispersal management 47 9.3 Road signs 48 9.4 Dog management 48 9.5 Possum control 49 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume
    ISBN 0-9689167-4-x Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean (Davis Strait, Southern Greenland and Flemish Cap to Cape Hatteras) Volume One Acipenseriformes through Syngnathiformes Michael P. Fahay ii Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean iii Dedication This monograph is dedicated to those highly skilled larval fish illustrators whose talents and efforts have greatly facilitated the study of fish ontogeny. The works of many of those fine illustrators grace these pages. iv Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean v Preface The contents of this monograph are a revision and update of an earlier atlas describing the eggs and larvae of western Atlantic marine fishes occurring between the Scotian Shelf and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (Fahay, 1983). The three-fold increase in the total num- ber of species covered in the current compilation is the result of both a larger study area and a recent increase in published ontogenetic studies of fishes by many authors and students of the morphology of early stages of marine fishes. It is a tribute to the efforts of those authors that the ontogeny of greater than 70% of species known from the western North Atlantic Ocean is now well described. Michael Fahay 241 Sabino Road West Bath, Maine 04530 U.S.A. vi Acknowledgements I greatly appreciate the help provided by a number of very knowledgeable friends and colleagues dur- ing the preparation of this monograph. Jon Hare undertook a painstakingly critical review of the entire monograph, corrected omissions, inconsistencies, and errors of fact, and made suggestions which markedly improved its organization and presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds Of
    Haast’sThe Eagle Birds of Moa The Haast’s eagle was the largest eagle to have ever existed, weighing up to 230 kg (510 lbs)! It became extinct in the 1400’s after its primary food source, the moa, was hunted to extinction. Kākāpō Early inhabitants hunted the kākāpō for its plumage and meat. European settlers cleared their land, and newly-introduced predators such as cats, rats and stoats hunted them to near extinction. There are fewer than 160 known surviving kākāpō! Kea Kea are the world’s only alpine parrot. They nest in holes in the ground which makes them easy prey for rodents introduced to New Zealand such as stoats, rats, and possums. They are endangered in New Zealand, with fewer than 7,000 left. Kiwi There are fewer than 68,000 kiwis left, and about 2% of unmanaged kiwi are lost every year. Rodents introduced to New Zealand share the same food sources; this appears to stunt the growth of kiwi chicks. Moa New Zealand was home to nine different species of moa, a flightless bird reaching 3.6m (12 ft) in height. They became hunted to extinction by around the year 1400, but are a prime candidate for cloning due to the amount of moa remains in exis- tence. Morepork The morepork is known for its haunting, melancholy song in the night. It is New Zealand’s only surviving native owl. The morepork belong to the spirit world and are watchful guardians in Māori tradition. Pūkeko Pūkeko average 51cm long (20 in). They’re found in marshy or open country.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Bibliography of Diet Studies of Fish of the Southeast United States and Gray’S Reef National Marine Sanctuary
    Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series MSD-05-2 An annotated bibliography of diet studies of fish of the southeast United States and Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary U.S. Department of Commerce February 2005 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management Marine Sanctuaries Division About the Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Marine Sanctuary Division (MSD) administers the National Marine Sanctuary Program. Its mission is to identify, designate, protect and manage the ecological, recreational, research, educational, historical, and aesthetic resources and qualities of nationally significant coastal and marine areas. The existing marine sanctuaries differ widely in their natural and historical resources and include nearshore and open ocean areas ranging in size from less than one to over 5,000 square miles. Protected habitats include rocky coasts, kelp forests, coral reefs, sea grass beds, estuarine habitats, hard and soft bottom habitats, segments of whale migration routes, and shipwrecks. Because of considerable differences in settings, resources, and threats, each marine sanctuary has a tailored management plan. Conservation, education, research, monitoring and enforcement programs vary accordingly. The integration of these programs is fundamental to marine protected area management. The Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series reflects and supports this integration by providing a forum for publication and discussion of the complex issues currently facing the National Marine Sanctuary Program. Topics of published reports vary substantially and may include descriptions of educational programs, discussions on resource management issues, and results of scientific research and monitoring projects. The series facilitates integration of natural sciences, socioeconomic and cultural sciences, education, and policy development to accomplish the diverse needs of NOAA’s resource protection mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • SHORT NOTE a Holocene Fossil South Island Takahē
    34 Notornis, 2019, Vol. 66: 34-36 0029-4470 © The Ornithological Society of New Zealand Inc. SHORT NOTE A Holocene fossil South Island takahē (Porphyrio hochstetteri) in a high-altitude north-west Nelson cave ALEXANDER P. BOAST School of Environment, University of Auckland, New Zealand Long-Term Ecology Laboratory, Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, 54 Gerald Street, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand South Island takahē (Porphyrio hochstetteri) is one of to the alpine zone (Beauchamp & Worthy 1988; New Zealand’s most critically endangered endemic Worthy & Holdaway 2002). A related species, the bird species (NZ threat classification system A (1/1), North Island takahē or “moho” (P. mantelli) became “nationally vulnerable”) (Robertson et al. 2017). extinct before the 20th Century and is primarily Maori lore, and as few as 4 recorded sightings during known from fossils, although a live bird may have the 19th Century suggest that takahē occurred only been caught in 1894 (“takahē” in this article will in high Fiordland valleys and possibly the Nelson refer to P. hochstetteri only) (Phillipps 1959; Trewick region in recent history (Williams 1960; Reid 1974). 1996; Worthy & Holdaway 2002). It has been The birds were so infrequently seen that they were argued that takahē are a specialist tussock-feeding assumed extinct until a population of ~250–500 was “glacial-relict” species, and thus most lowland discovered in the Murchison Mountains, Fiordland, takahē subfossils date from the glacial period when in 1948 (Reid & Stack 1974). This population sharply grasslands and herbfields were more extensive declined until intensive conservation commenced (Mills et al. 1984). However, subsequent surveys of in 1981 (since fluctuating between ~100–180 birds) takahē subfossil data suggest that takahē occurred (Crouchley 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Grounded Birds in New Zealand
    Flightless Grounded Birds in New Zealand An 8th Grade Research Paper By Nathaniel Roth Hilltown Cooperative Charter Public School June 2014 1 More than half of the birds in New Zealand either can’t fly, can only partially fly, or don’t like to fly. (Te Ara) This is a fact. Although only sixteen species in New Zealand are technically flightless, with another sixteen that are extinct (TerraNature), a majority of more than 170 bird species will not fly unless their lives are threatened, or not even then. This is surprising, since birds are usually known for flying. A flightless bird is a bird that cannot fly, such as the well­known ostrich and emu, not to mention penguins. The two main islands southeast of Australia that make up New Zealand have an unusually diverse population of these birds. I am personally very interested in New Zealand and know a lot about it because my mother was born there, and I still have family there. I was very intrigued by these birds in particular, and how different they are from most of the world’s birds. I asked myself, why New Zealand? What made this tiny little country have so many birds that can’t fly, while in the rest of the world, hardly any live in one place? My research has informed me that the population and diversity of flightless birds here is so large because it has been isolated for so long from other land masses. Almost no mammals, and no land predators, lived there in the millions of years after it split from the Australian continent, so flying birds didn’t have as much of an advantage during this time.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States And
    t a AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY QL 614 .A43 V.2 .A 4-3 AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY Special Publication No. 2 A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes -^ ru from the United States m CD and Canada (SECOND EDITION) A/^Ssrf>* '-^\ —---^ Report of the Committee on Names of Fishes, Presented at the Ei^ty-ninth Annual Meeting, Clearwater, Florida, September 16-18, 1959 Reeve M. Bailey, Chairman Ernest A. Lachner, C. C. Lindsey, C. Richard Robins Phil M. Roedel, W. B. Scott, Loren P. Woods Ann Arbor, Michigan • 1960 Copies of this publication may be purchased for $1.00 each (paper cover) or $2.00 (cloth cover). Orders, accompanied by remittance payable to the American Fisheries Society, should be addressed to E. A. Seaman, Secretary-Treasurer, American Fisheries Society, Box 483, McLean, Virginia. Copyright 1960 American Fisheries Society Printed by Waverly Press, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland lutroduction This second list of the names of fishes of The shore fishes from Greenland, eastern the United States and Canada is not sim- Canada and the United States, and the ply a reprinting with corrections, but con- northern Gulf of Mexico to the mouth of stitutes a major revision and enlargement. the Rio Grande are included, but those The earlier list, published in 1948 as Special from Iceland, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Cuba Publication No. 1 of the American Fisheries and the other West Indian islands, and Society, has been widely used and has Mexico are excluded unless they occur also contributed substantially toward its goal of in the region covered. In the Pacific, the achieving uniformity and avoiding confusion area treated includes that part of the conti- in nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Summer 2016 Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Linardich, Christi. "Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes" (2016). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/hydh-jp82 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/13 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES by Christi Linardich B.A. December 2006, Florida Gulf Coast University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE BIOLOGY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2016 Approved by: Kent E. Carpenter (Advisor) Beth Polidoro (Member) Holly Gaff (Member) ABSTRACT HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, 2016 Advisor: Dr. Kent E. Carpenter Understanding the status of species is important for allocation of resources to redress biodiversity loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum Alive Educator Guide
    GRADES K-8 EDUCATOR GUIDE ABOUT COLOSSUS PRODUCTIONS Colossus Productions is the 3D-specialist production company formed by Atlantic Productions (see more below) with Sky in 2011. The joint venture was created to develop and produce high-end 3D films for UK and international audiences. Emerging from Atlantic Production’s record in producing award winning content, Colossus has already released in IMAX and Giant Screen such diverse educational and entertaining films as Flying Monsters 3D, Penguins 3D and Galapagos 3D: Nature’s Wonderland into cinemas worldwide. Colossus’ most recent IMAX/Giant Screen films are Museum Alive and Amazing Mighty Micro Monsters which were released in late 2016 and the newest Colossus production, Conquest of the Skies will be released in IMAX and Giant Screen later in 2016. ATLANTIC PRODUCTIONS Atlantic Productions is one of the world’s leading factual production companies whose multi BAFTA and Emmy award-winning films nda content are regularly seen in over 100 countries around the world. Founded in 1992, Atlantic has built a reputation for world-class story-telling, enhanced by the latest techniques and technologies including the building of pioneering cross-platform and digital experiences. Atlantic Productions leads a group of companies which make television programmes, theatrical and IMAX films, apps (Atlantic Digital), visual effects (Zoo VFX) and now, immersive virtual reality experiences (Alchemy VR). CREDITS Educator Reviewers Writer Garrick Humphrey, M.S.Ed. Literacy, Samantha Zuhlke, Creative Management elementary educator Solutions Colleen Humphrey, M.S.Ed. Curriculum and Instruction, secondary math educator Editors Christina Riska Simmons, Education Fact Checker Consultant Bob Connelly Jessica Shea, M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2015 ISSN 1179-2981
    May 2015 www.yellow-eyedpenguin.org.nz ISSN 1179-2981 Papanui waka found on Trust reserve Shar Briden, Technical Advisor Historic and over a 1.2 metre length and appeared well years ago (Dilys Johns). The fibre may be Cultural, Department of Conservation weathered. We three knew it was something dressed cabbage tree leaves. out of the ordinary. A person had been seen Last year a partial hull of a totara waka A group of dedicated archaeologists and driving over the waka with a four-wheel ATV was re-discovered on the foreshore volunteers have been monitoring the sparking urgency for recovery. bounding the south of the Okia Flat foreshore over the past eight years. The Reserve, Papanui Inlet, Otago Peninsula. It was a surprise to everyone to find the group set up in 2009 includes Dr Matthew partial waka measured 6.17 metres long Schmidt (Heritage NZ), Phil Latham (Otago The Reserve is managed by the Yellow-eyed once excavation exposed it. There was no University), Dr Jill Hamel, Hoani Langsbury Penguin Trust (YEPT) and Dunedin City stern section or prow present suggesting and Rachel Wesley (Te Runanga o Otakou), Council (DCC). Jim Fyfe (DOC) and Kuini the waka may have been constructed in Juliette Parsons (a volunteer who has (Carole) Scott and myself were among three separate pieces then lashed together tirelessly monitored the foreshore since a group monitoring the foreshore (4th to form the base of the hull. Radiocarbon 2007), a representative from YEPT and October 2014) when they came across dates obtained from plaited fibre (cordage DCC, Gordon Graham and Leith Thomson a length of exposed timber resembling a or rope) found both inside and outside the respectively., and myself.
    [Show full text]
  • Seamap Environmental and Biological Atlas of the Gulf of Mexico, 2014
    environmental and biological atlas of the gulf of mexico 2014 gulf states marine fisheries commission number 262 february 2017 seamap SEAMAP ENVIRONMENTAL AND BIOLOGICAL ATLAS OF THE GULF OF MEXICO, 2014 Edited by Jeffrey K. Rester Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Manuscript Design and Layout Ashley P. Lott Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission GULF STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FEBRUARY 2017 NUMBER 262 This project was supported in part by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, under State/Federal Project Number NA16NMFS4350111. GULF STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS ALABAMA John Roussel N. Gunter Guy, Jr. 1221 Plains Port Hudson Road Alabama Department of Conservation Zachary, LA 70791 and Natural Resources 64 North Union Street MISSISSIPPI Montgomery, AL 36130-1901 Jamie Miller, Executive Director Mississippi Department of Marine Resources Steve McMillan 1141 Bayview Avenue P.O. Box 337 Biloxi, MS 39530 Bay Minette, AL 36507 Senator Brice Wiggins Chris Nelson 1501 Roswell Street Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Pascagoula, MS 39581 P.O. Box 60 Bon Secour, AL 36511 Joe Gill, Jr. Joe Gill Consulting, LLC FLORIDA 910 Desoto Street Nick Wiley, Executive Director Ocean Springs, MS 39566-0535 FL Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 620 South Meridian Street TEXAS Tallahassee, FL 32399-1600 Carter Smith, Executive Director Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Senator Thad Altman 4200 Smith School Road State Senator, District 24 Austin, TX 78744 6767 North Wickham Road, Suite 211 Melbourne, FL 32940 Troy B. Williamson, II P.O. Box 967 TBA Corpus Christi, TX 78403 LOUISIANA Representative Wayne Faircloth Jack Montoucet, Secretary Texas House of Representatives LA Department of Wildlife and Fisheries 2121 Market Street, Suite 205 P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering the Huia: Extinction and Nostalgia in a Bird World Cameron Boyle Lincoln University
    Animal Studies Journal Volume 8 | Number 1 Article 5 2019 Remembering the Huia: Extinction and Nostalgia in a Bird World Cameron Boyle Lincoln University Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/asj Part of the Agricultural and Resource Economics Commons, Art and Design Commons, Art Practice Commons, Australian Studies Commons, Communication Commons, Creative Writing Commons, Digital Humanities Commons, Education Commons, English Language and Literature Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Film and Media Studies Commons, Fine Arts Commons, Legal Studies Commons, Linguistics Commons, Philosophy Commons, Political Science Commons, Public Health Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons, Sociology Commons, and the Theatre and Performance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Boyle, Cameron, Remembering the Huia: Extinction and Nostalgia in a Bird World, Animal Studies Journal, 8(1), 2019, 66-91. Available at:https://ro.uow.edu.au/asj/vol8/iss1/5 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Remembering the Huia: Extinction and Nostalgia in a Bird World Abstract This paper examines the role of nostalgia in practices of remembering the Huia, an extinct bird endemic to Aotearoa New Zealand. It suggests that nostalgia for the Huia specifically, and New Zealand's indigenous birds more generally, has occurred as both restorative nostalgia and reflective nostalgia. It argues that the former problematically looks to recreate a past world in which birds flourished. In contrast, the paintings of Bill Hammond and the sound art of Sally Ann McIntyre are drawn on to explore the potential of reflective nostalgia for remembering the Huia, and New Zealand's extinct indigenous birds more generally, in a more critical and nuanced way.
    [Show full text]