Permanganate Hazard Summary Identification
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Decolorization of Reactive Orange 16 Via Ferrate(VI) Oxidation Assisted by Sonication
Turkish Journal of Chemistry Turk J Chem (2017) 41: 577 { 586 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/chem/ ⃝c TUB¨ ITAK_ Research Article doi:10.3906/kim-1701-8 Decolorization of reactive orange 16 via ferrate(VI) oxidation assisted by sonication Serkan S¸AHINKAYA_ ∗ Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Nev¸sehirHacı Bekta¸sVeli University, Nev¸sehir,Turkey Received: 02.01.2017 • Accepted/Published Online: 24.03.2017 • Final Version: 05.09.2017 Abstract: The decolorization of azo dye C.I. reactive orange 16 (RO 16) via ferrate(VI) and sono-ferrate(VI) methods, which is the combination of the ferrate(VI) oxidation method with sonication, has been achieved in the present study. The influences of some important operating parameters, which are the initial pH, the concentration of potassium ferrate(VI) (K 2 FeO 4) and the RO 16 dye, and ultrasonic density (for only the sono-ferrate(VI) method), on the color removal have −1 been investigated. The optimum conditions have been determined as pH = 7 and [K 2 FeO 4 ] = 50 mg L for the −1 −1 individual ferrate(VI) oxidation method and pH = 7 and [K 2 FeO 4 ] = 50 mg L by direct sonication at 0.50 W mL ultrasonic density and 20 kHz fixed frequency for the sono-ferrate(VI) method. The color removal efficiencies were 85% by ferrate(VI) method and 91% by sono-ferrate(VI) method. Kinetic studies were also performed for the decolorization of RO 16 under the optimized conditions at room temperature. It was seen that the oxidative decolorization of RO 16 via the sono-ferrate(VI) method happened more rapidly because of the production of OH • radical through sonication compared to the individual ferrate(VI) method. -
Kinetic Studies on Permanganate Oxidation of Acetophenones Under
Indi an Journal of Chemistry Vol. 40A, June 2001, pp. 610-612 Kinetic studies on permanganate oxidation of The ketones were further purified by vacuum acetophenones under phase transfer catalysis distillation. The solvents employed were purified by standard methods and doubly distilled water was P S Sheeba & T D Radhakrishnan Nair* always used. The catalysts used were tricapryl Department of Chemistry, Calicut University methylammonium chloride (TCMAC) and tetrabutyl Calicut University P.O., Kerala 673 635. India ammonium bromide (TBAB). The former has Received 18 October 2000; revised 8 March 2001 relatively larger organic structure (C 10H21 )JN+CH 3Cr compared to the latter (C4 H9) 4N+B(. Kinetic studies on the permanganate oxidation of The solutions containing the permanganate ions in acetopheno_ne and some of its substituents in organic media using the organic solvents were prepared by shaking the techn1que of phase transfer catalysis are reported. aqueous potassium permanganate solution with the Tncaprylmethylammonium chloride and tetrabutylammonium bromide have been used as the phase transfer catalysts. The organic solvents contammg the phase transfer 4 reaction shows first order dependence each on [ketones] and the catalysts as reported elsewhere . The solutions of the [permanganate ions] respectively . The rate coefficients fit well oxidant thus prepared in the organic solvent and the with the Hammett equation and the p-value calculated aorees well substrate in the organic solvent were thermally with the reaction requirements. "' equilibrated (± 0.05°C) at the desired temperature for Potassium permanganate is a powerful oxidizing about half an hour before mixing. Kinetic runs were carried out under pseudo-first order conditions. -
Manufacturing of Potassium Permanganate Kmno4 This Is the Most Important and Well Known Salt of Permanganic Acid
Manufacturing of Potassium Permanganate KMnO4 This is the most important and well known salt of permanganic acid. It is prepared from the pyrolusite ore. It is prepared by fusing pyrolusite ore either with KOH or K2CO3 in presence of atmospheric oxygen or any other oxidising agent such as KNO3. The mass turns green with the formation of potassium manganate, K2MnO4. 2MnO2 + 4KOH + O2 →2K2MnO4 + 2H2O 2MnO2 + 2K2CO3 + O2 →2K2MnO4 + 2CO2 The fused mass is extracted with water. The solution is now treated with a current of chlorine or ozone or carbon dioxide to convert manganate into permanganate. 2K2MnO4 + Cl2 → 2KMnO4 + 2KCl 2K2MnO4 + H2O + O3 → 2KMnO4 + 2KOH + O2 3K2MnO4 + 2CO2 → 2KMnO4 + MnO2 + 2K2CO3 Now-a-days, the conversion is done electrolytically. It is electrolysed between iron cathode and nickel anode. Dilute alkali solution is taken in the cathodic compartment and potassium manganate solution is taken in the anodic compartment. Both the compartments are separated by a diaphragm. On passing current, the oxygen evolved at anode oxidises manganate into permanganate. At anode: 2K2MnO4 + H2O + O → 2KMnO4 + 2KOH 2- - - MnO4 → MnO4 + e + - At cathode: 2H + 2e → H2 Properties: It is purple coloured crystalline compound. It is fairly soluble in water. When heated alone or with an alkali, it decomposes evolving oxygen. 2KMnO4 → K2MnO4 + MnO2 + O2 4KMnO4 + 4KOH → 4K2MnO4 + 2H2O + O2 On treatment with conc. H2SO4, it forms manganese heptoxide via permanganyl sulphate which decomposes explosively on heating. 2KMnO4+3H2SO4 → 2KHSO4 + (MnO3)2SO4 + 2H2O (MnO3)2SO4 + H2O → Mn2O7 + H2SO4 Mn2O7 → 2MnO2 + 3/2O2 Potassium permanganate is a powerful oxidising agent. A mixture of sulphur, charcoal and KMnO4 forms an explosive powder. -
Prohibited and Restricted Chemical List
School Emergency Response Plan and Management Guide Prohibited and Restricted Chemical List PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED CHEMICAL LIST Introduction After incidents of laboratory chemical contamination at several schools, DCPS, The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and DC Fire and Emergency Management Services developed an aggressive program for chemical control to eliminate student and staff exposure to potential hazardous chemicals. Based upon this program, all principals are required to conduct a complete yearly inventory of all chemicals located at each school building to identify for the removal and disposal of any prohibited/banned chemicals. Prohibited chemicals are those that pose an inherent, immediate, and potentially life- threatening risk, injury, or impairment due to toxicity or other chemical properties to students, staff, or other occupants of the school. These chemicals are prohibited from use and/or storage at the school, and the school is prohibited from purchasing or accepting donations of such chemicals. Restricted chemicals are chemicals that are restricted by use and/or quantities. If restricted chemicals are present at the school, each storage location must be addressed in the school's written emergency plan. Also, plan maps must clearly denote the storage locations of these chemicals. Restricted chemicals—demonstration use only are a subclass in the Restricted chemicals list that are limited to instructor demonstration. Students may not participate in handling or preparation of restricted chemicals as part of a demonstration. If Restricted chemicals—demonstration use only are present at the school, each storage location must be addressed in the school's written emergency plan. Section 7: Appendices – October 2009 37 School Emergency Response Plan and Management Guide Prohibited and Restricted Chemical List Following is a table of chemicals that are Prohibited—banned, Restricted—academic curriculum use, and Restricted—demonstration use only. -
Experiment: Determination of Manganese in Steel
p.1 of 4 Chemistry 201 – Winter 2007 Experiment: Determination of Manganese in Steel Manganese (Mn) in steel may be determined upon dissolution as manganese (VII) after oxidation from the manganese oxidation state (II). This procedure calls for three oxidizing agents. Manganese (VII) may be determined spectrophotometrically. During dissolution of the sample with dilute nitric acid to form iron (II) and manganese (II), nitrogen oxide gases are formed. These must be removed, partially by boiling, and the rest with ammonium peroxydisulfate which also removes carbon or other organic matter present. The nitrogen oxides may react with periodic acid which is used to convert manganese to the (VII) oxidation state. Excess peroxydisulfate is decomposed by boiling. The equations are: - + 2+ 3 Mn + 2 NO3 + 8H ---> 3 Mn + 2 NO (g) + 4H2O 2- - 2- + 2 NO2 (g) + S2O8 + 2 H2O ---> 2 NO3 + 2 SO4 + 4 H 2- 2- + 2 S2O8 + 2 H2O + heat ---> 4 SO4 + O2 + 4 H 2+ - - + - 2 Mn + 5 IO4 + 3 H2O ---> 2 MnO4 + 6 H + 5 IO3 NO(colorless gas) + 1/2 O2 (g) <---> NO2 (brown gas) Note: Peroxydisulfate has the required oxidizing potential to change the oxidation state of manganese from (II) to (IV), but the reaction is too slow. Silver could be employed catalytically but the results are too erratic. Periodate oxidizes the manganese to the (VII) state quantitatively and rapidly at the boiling point, and it is advisable to add the sparingly soluble periodate salt in several portions to maintain an excess and to allow for some decomposition of the latter salt at the elevated temperatures. -
Basic Description for Ground and Air Hazardous
BASIC DESCRIPTION FOR GROUND AND AIR GROUND AND AIR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SHIPMENTS GROUND SHIPMENTS AIR SHIPMENTS SHIPMENTS HAZARD DOT DOT CLASS OR MAXIMUM EXEMPTION, GROUND EXEMPTION, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DESCRIPTIONS DIVISION I.D. NUMBER LABEL(S) REQUIRED OR QUANTITY PER SPECIAL SERVICE TO LABEL(S) REQUIRED OR MAXIMUM NET CARGO SPECIAL NON-BULK AND PROPER SHIPPING NAME (Subsidiary if (ALSO MARK PACKING EXEMPTION, SPECIAL PERMIT INNER PERMIT CANADA EXEMPTION, SPECIAL PERMIT QUANTITY PER AIRCRAFT PERMIT SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS PACKAGING (ALSO MARK ON PACKAGE) applicable) ON PACKAGE) GROUP OR EXCEPTION RECEPTACLE OR 173.13 PERMITTED OR EXCEPTION PACKAGE** QUANTITY OR 173.13 PROVISIONS §173.*** §173.*** (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) Accellerene, see p-Nitrosodimethylaniline Accumulators, electric, see Batteries, wet etc Accumulators, pressurized, pneumatic or hydraulic (containing non-flammable gas), see Articles pressurized, pneumatic or hydraulic (containing non-flammable gas) FLAMMABLE FLAMMABLE Acetal 3 UN1088 II LIQUID * YES LIQUID * 5 L 150 202 FLAMMABLE Acetaldehyde 3 UN1089 I LIQUID YES Forbidden None 201 May not be regulated when shipped via UPS Acetaldehyde ammonia 9 UN1841 III ground YES CLASS 9 * 30 kg 30 kg 155 204 FLAMMABLE FLAMMABLE Acetaldehyde oxime 3 UN2332 III LIQUID * YES LIQUID * 25 L 150 203 CORROSIVE, CORROSIVE, Acetic acid, glacial or Acetic acid solution, FLAMMABLE FLAMMABLE A3, A6, with more than 80 percent acid, by mass 8 (3) UN2789 II LIQUID * YES LIQUID * 1 L A7, A10 154 202 Acetic -
Potassium Permanganate MSDS
He a lt h 2 0 Fire 0 1 0 Re a c t iv it y 0 Pe rs o n a l Pro t e c t io n J Material Safety Data Sheet Potassium permanganate MSDS Section 1: Chemical Product and Company Identification Product Name: Potassium permanganate Contact Information: Catalog Codes: SLP4912, SLP3892, SLP1075 Sciencelab.com, Inc. 14025 Smith Rd. CAS#: 7722-64-7 Houston, Texas 77396 RTECS: SD6475000 US Sales: 1-800-901-7247 International Sales: 1-281-441-4400 TSCA: TSCA 8(b) inventory: Potassium permanganate Order Online: ScienceLab.com CI#: Not available. CHEMTREC (24HR Emergency Telephone), call: Synonym: Potassium Permanganate, Biotech Grade 1-800-424-9300 Chemical Name: Potassium Permanganate International CHEMTREC, call: 1-703-527-3887 Chemical Formula: KMnO4 For non-emergency assistance, call: 1-281-441-4400 Section 2: Composition and Information on Ingredients Composition: Name CAS # % by Weight Potassium permanganate 7722-64-7 100 Toxicological Data on Ingredients: Potassium permanganate, Biotech: ORAL (LD50): Acute: 1090 mg/kg [Rat]. 2157 mg/kg [Mouse]. Section 3: Hazards Identification Potential Acute Health Effects: Hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of eye contact (irritant), of ingestion, of inhalation. Slightly hazardous in case of skin contact (permeator). Possibly corrosive to eyes and skin. The amount of tissue damage depends on length of contact. Eye contact can result in corneal damage or blindness. Skin contact can produce inflammation and blistering. Inhalation of dust will produce irritation to gastro-intestinal or respiratory tract, characterized by burning, sneezing and coughing. Severe over-exposure can produce lung damage, choking, unconsciousness or death. -
150 Subpart A—General Subpart B—Table of Hazardous Materials
§ 172.1 49 CFR Ch. I (10–1–19 Edition) APPENDIX B TO PART 172—TREFOIL SYMBOL shipping name. In addition, the Table APPENDIX C TO PART 172—DIMENSIONAL SPEC- specifies or references requirements in IFICATIONS FOR RECOMMENDED PLACARD this subchapter pertaining to labeling, HOLDER packaging, quantity limits aboard air- APPENDIX D TO PART 172—RAIL RISK ANAL- YSIS FACTORS craft and stowage of hazardous mate- rials aboard vessels. AUTHORITY: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.81, 1.96 and 1.97. (b) Column 1: Symbols. Column 1 of the Table contains six symbols (‘‘ + ’’, ‘‘A’’, SOURCE: Amdt. 172–29, 41 FR 15996, Apr. 15, ‘‘D’’, ‘‘G’’, ‘‘I’’ and ‘‘W’’) as follows: 1976, unless otherwise noted. (1) The plus (+) sign fixes the proper shipping name, hazard class and pack- Subpart A—General ing group for that entry without regard to whether the material meets the defi- § 172.1 Purpose and scope. nition of that class, packing group or This part lists and classifies those any other hazard class definition. When materials which the Department has the plus sign is assigned to a proper designated as hazardous materials for shipping name in Column (1) of the purposes of transportation and pre- § 172.101 Table, it means that the mate- scribes the requirements for shipping rial is known to pose a risk to humans. papers, package marking, labeling, and When a plus sign is assigned to mix- transport vehicle placarding applicable tures or solutions containing a mate- to the shipment and transportation of rial where the hazard to humans is sig- those hazardous materials. -
In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Creosote/Coal Tar Residuals: Experimental and Numerical Investigation
In situ Chemical Oxidation of Creosote/Coal Tar Residuals: Experimental and Numerical Investigation by Steven Philip Forsey A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Earth Sciences Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2004 ©Steven Philip Forsey 2004 I herby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final version, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public Steven Forsey ii Abstract Coal tar, coal tar creosote and oily wastes are often present as subsurface contaminants that may migrate below the water table, leaving a widely distributed residual source of contaminants leaching to the ground water. In situ chemical oxidation is a potentially viable technology for the remediation of aquifers contaminated with creosote and coal tars. The oxidant of choice would be flushed through the contaminated area to oxidize aqueous contaminants and enhance the mass transfer of contaminants from the oil phase. A series of batch and column experiments were performed to assess the ability of a chemical oxidizing reagent to oxidize creosote compounds and to increase mass transfer rates. Results from the column experiments were then simulated using a reactive transport model that considered 12 different creosote compounds undergoing dissolution, oxidation and advective-dispersive transport. Three strong chemical oxidizing reagents, Fenton’s Reagent, potassium persulfate with ferrous ions, and potassium permanganate were tested with batch experiments to determine their reactivity towards creosote compounds. All three reagents successfully decomposed aqueous creosote compounds and were able to reduce the mass of the monitored creosote compounds within the oil phase. -
Chemical Compatibility Storage Group
CHEMICAL SEGREGATION Chemicals are to be segregated into 11 different categories depending on the compatibility of that chemical with other chemicals The Storage Groups are as follows: Group A – Compatible Organic Acids Group B – Compatible Pyrophoric & Water Reactive Materials Group C – Compatible Inorganic Bases Group D – Compatible Organic Acids Group E – Compatible Oxidizers including Peroxides Group F– Compatible Inorganic Acids not including Oxidizers or Combustible Group G – Not Intrinsically Reactive or Flammable or Combustible Group J* – Poison Compressed Gases Group K* – Compatible Explosive or other highly Unstable Material Group L – Non-Reactive Flammable and Combustible, including solvents Group X* – Incompatible with ALL other storage groups The following is a list of chemicals and their compatibility storage codes. This is not a complete list of chemicals, but is provided to give examples of each storage group: Storage Group A 94‐75‐7 2,4‐D (2,4‐Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) 94‐82‐6 2,4‐DB 609-99-4 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid 64‐19‐7 Acetic acid (Flammable liquid @ 102°F avoid alcohols, Amines, ox agents see SDS) 631-61-8 Acetic acid, Ammonium salt (Ammonium acetate) 108-24-7 Acetic anhydride (Flammable liquid @102°F avoid alcohols see SDS) 79‐10‐7 Acrylic acid Peroxide Former 65‐85‐0 Benzoic acid 98‐07‐7 Benzotrichloride 98‐88‐4 Benzoyl chloride 107-92-6 Butyric Acid 115‐28‐6 Chlorendic acid 79‐11‐8 Chloroacetic acid 627‐11‐2 Chloroethyl chloroformate 77‐92‐9 Citric acid 5949-29-1 Citric acid monohydrate 57-00-1 Creatine 20624-25-3 -
Es-1 Doe Has More Than 7,000 Surplus Contaminated
Executive Summary - Background DOE HAS MORE THAN 7,0001 SURPLUS CONTAMINATED FACILITIES THAT MAY REQUIRE DECOMMISSIONING, COSTING THE DEPARTMENT MORE THAN $20 BILLION, OR ABOUT 10% OF ITS TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP LIABILITY. Life Cycle Cost $227 Billion NV OH OK $3.6B $8.8B $4.5B 1.6% 3.9% 2% CH $3.1B 1.4% ID Remedial $18.6B SR Action, Waste 8.2% $48.8B Management, 21.5% and Stabilization AL $193.4B $18B Decommissioning 7.9% Life Cycle Cost Other2 OR $1.3B RL RL 6.1% $53.9B $2.3B $50.2B 23.8% 22.1% S&M and 11.2% Deactivation RF $13B $17.3B Facility OR 7.6% Life Cycle $6.2B RF 30.1% Cost Decommissioning $3.6B $20.6B 17.5% SR $7.2B 35.1% Source: 1996 BEMR Report, Volumes II and III. The term "life cycle cost" refers to the cost to complete the mission of the Environmental Management program. The Ten Year Plan was not finalized at the time of report publication. 1 DOE EM-40 "Decommissioning of Facilities" Web Page (http://www.em.doe.gov/dd/), October 4, 1996. 2 Fernald and Weldon Spring decommissioning cost estimates are included under remedial actions. ES-1 Executive Summary - Background THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY IS TO ANALYZE PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES IN FACILITY DECOMMISSIONING AND TO DETERMINE APPROACHES TO IMPROVE THE DECOMMISSIONING PROCESS IN DOE'S ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROGRAM. Facility Life Cycle Facility Construction Operations Shutdown Deactivation Decommissioning End State Planning Processing Operations cease Decontamination Decontamination Site release Siting Manufacturing System shutdown De-energization Dismantlement Facility reuse Designing Testing Process shutdown Stabilization Demolition Permitting Storage STUDY FOCUS DOE's Office of Environmental Restoration is currently responsible for more than 1,000 facilities and accepts deactivated facilities for decommissioning. -
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Appendix B Classification of common chemicals by chemical band 1 1 EXHIBIT 1 2 CHEMICAL CLASSIFICATION LIST 3 4 1. Pyrophoric Chemicals 5 1.1. Aluminum alkyls: R3A1, R2A1C1, RA1C12 6 Examples: Et3A1, Et2A1C1, EtA.1111C12, Me3A1, Diethylethoxyaluminium 7 1.2. Grignard Reagents: RMgX (R=alkyl, aryl, vinyl X=halogen) 8 1.3. Lithium Reagents: RLi (R 7 alkyls, aryls, vinyls) 9 Examples: Butyllithium, Isobutylthhium, sec-Butyllithium, tert-Butyllithium, 10 Ethyllithium, Isopropyllithium, Methyllithium, (Trimethylsilyl)methyllithium, 11 Phenyllithiurn, 2-Thienyllithium, Vinyllithium, Lithium acetylide ethylenediamine 12 complex, Lithium (trimethylsilyl)acetylide, Lithium phenylacetylide 13 1.4. Zinc Alkyl Reagents: RZnX, R2Zn 14 Examples: Et2Zn 15 1.5. Metal carbonyls: Lithium carbonyl, Nickel tetracarbonyl, Dicobalt octacarbonyl 16 1.6. Metal powders (finely divided): Bismuth, Calcium, Cobalt, Hafnium, Iron, 17 Magnesium, Titanium, Uranium, Zinc, Zirconium 18 1.7. Low Valent Metals: Titanium dichloride 19 1.8. Metal hydrides: Potassium Hydride, Sodium hydride, Lithium Aluminum Hydride, 20 Diethylaluminium hydride, Diisobutylaluminum hydride 21 1.9. Nonmetal hydrides: Arsine, Boranes, Diethylarsine, diethylphosphine, Germane, 22 Phosphine, phenylphosphine, Silane, Methanetellurol (CH3TeH) 23 1.10. Non-metal alkyls: R3B, R3P, R3As; Tributylphosphine, Dichloro(methyl)silane 24 1.11. Used hydrogenation catalysts: Raney nickel, Palladium, Platinum 25 1.12. Activated Copper fuel cell catalysts, e.g. Cu/ZnO/A1203 26 1.13. Finely Divided Sulfides: