Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Report 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Report 2017 WIMBLEDON AND PUTNEY COMMONS ECOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT 2017 THANKS ARE DUE TO EVERYONE WHO HAS CONTRIBUTED RECORDS FOR THIS REPORT; TO THE WILLING VOLUNTEERS; FOR THE SUPPORT OF WILDLIFE AND CONSERVATION FORUM MEMBERS; AND FOR THE RECIPROCAL ENTHUSIASM OF WIMBLEDON AND PUTNEY COMMONS STAFF. A SPECIAL THANK YOU GOES TO ANGELA EVANS-HILL FOR HER HELP WITH PROOF READING, CHASING MISSING DATA AND ASSISTANCE WITH THE FINAL FORMATTING, COMPILATION AND PRINTING OF THE REPORT. CONTENTS Page Context 1 A. Systematic Recording 5 Results 7 Reflections and Recommendations 27 B. BioBlitz 29 Reflections and Recommendations 34 C. References 35 List of Tables Table 1 Mowing Dates for the Conservation Zone of the Plain 2008-2017 4 Table 2 Summary of Systematic Recording in 2017 and Recent Years 6 Table 3 Recording Effort and Overall Plant Species Counts on The Plain 10 2014-17 Table 4 The Habitat Patches (for detailed records see Appendix 3b) 10 Table 5 Confirmed Bird Records for The Plain, March-September, 2017 12 Table 6 Comparison of the Most Abundant Butterfly Species Recorded 14 2015, 2016, 2017 Table 7 Dragonfly and Damselflies Species Found at the Standard 17 Sampling Locations 2017 Table 8 Locations and Site Descriptions of Refugia 20 Table 9 Summary of Frogs and Toads Sightings Reported 2nd March and 21 8th March 2017 Table 10 Mammals Sighted on Wimbledon and Putney Commons 2017 22 Table 11 Fauna at Putney Lower Common, January – December 2017 25 Table 12 Wet and Dry Periods as Revealed by Raynes Park (SW20) Rainfall 27 Data Table 13 Summary of BioBlitz Sightings, 2017 32 List of Figures Figure 1 Location of The Plain on Wimbledon and Putney Commons 3 Figure 2 The Variable Height ‘Grassy’ Sward with Cut Bramble in the 8 Formerly Uncut Area Figure 3 Bee Orchid amidst Yellow Rattle and Ribwort Plantain 9 Figure 4 Autumn Hawkbit flourishing in the late summer mowed sward 9 Figure 5 Trifid Bur Marigold and Marsh Pennywort on the Exposed 11 Marginal Areas of Bluegate Pond Figure 6 Stonechat 13 Figure 7 Holly Blue 15 Figure 8 Black Darter at Bluegate Pond 16 Figure 9 Double Line Moth 18 Figure 10 Common Lizards Sightings on Wimbledon Common and Putney 20 Heath 2017 Figure 11 One of 9 Common Lizards seen on Heathland during a Scrub- 21 bashing Session Close to the Junction of Ladies Mile and Inner Park Ride 20th May 2017 (Map area 13 on Figure 10) Figure 12 Leccinum melaneum 24 Figure 13 BioBlitz Route 2017 29 Figure 14 The BioBlitz Blackboard 2017 30 Figure 15 Oak Processionary Moth Nest 31 Figure 16 Honey Bee on Bird’s-foot Trefoil 33 Figure 17 WPC’s Dog Waste Challenge 33 List of Appendices Appendix 1 a. Forum and volunteers etc 36 b. Dave Wills Obituary 37 Appendix 2 WPC Wildlife and Conservation Events 2017 and Associated 38 W&C Forum Activities Appendix 3 Plants 3a Floral Records for The Plain 39 3b BioBlitz Plant Communities - Beyond the Main Area of The Plain – The 44 Habitat Patches Appendix 4 Butterflies 4a The Long-established Transect 46 4b Wimbledon Common SW and Fishponds Wood 47 Appendix 5 Dragonflies and Damselflies 48 Appendix 6 Moths 49 Appendix 7 Fungi 62 Appendix 8 Rainfall data 66 Appendix 9 BioBlitz Flyer 67 Appendix 10 Woodland and Meadow Mini-Beasts 68 Appendix 11 BioBlitz Fauna 70 Wimbledon and Putney Commons ECOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AT WIMBLEDON AND PUTNEY COMMONS 2017 CONTEXT 2017 has been a challenging year. Diverse events conspired to disrupt monitoring activities. Most significantly, the sudden illness and death of the lead bird recorder, Dave Wills (Appendix 1); exceptional and untimely mid-summer pressures on some staff and Conservators, who are regular contributors to recording, relating to the appointment and fact-finding activities of an Interim Manager for the Wimbledon and Putney Commons; and conflicting major family commitments of some key recorders. In mid-April, fire affected two heathland areas and disrupted some reptile and amphibian monitoring sites as well as impacting on the habitats concerned more generally. Consequently, there are no systematic bird records for The Plain for 2017; the proposed high-summer, pre-mowing, floral survey of The Plain did not take place; and plans to extend the field survey to a wider heathland area linked to the NVC report were put ‘on hold’. Only occasional anecdotal reports of people pressures and environmental conditions are available. Since a key aim of the volunteer monitoring activity is to gather reliable data that can inform management, the loss of data that has been available in previous years, and hopefully years to come, is unfortunate. But what it does highlight is the need to have a larger pool of volunteers with the necessary skills and this must be a priority moving forward. Very positively, however, from among the regular volunteer bird watchers on the Commons, a new lead bird expert, Adrian Podmore (AP), came forward. Thus the programme of bird walks, bird monitoring at the BioBlitz, and the regular Annual Bird Report have all still been achieved. Furthermore, working with other Forum members, notably Les Evans-Hill (LE-H), a fuller and more seasonally extensive series of bird walks and workshops has been established for 2018. Consideration is being given to new public- information materials drawing on the increasing pool of systematic data that has emerged during the recent monitoring push (2014 to date). As a trial, brief notes on butterflies, dragonflies and damselflies have been incorporated into the 2017 Bird Report following the style of the long-established bird reporting. Work to make recent historical records for these species more readily available in a form compatible with the new records has been started. Despite the challenges, much was achieved in 2017 (Appendix 2). A second Wildlife and Conservation Forum (W&C Forum) Winter Talk was held in February, this time on the theme of Hedgehog Conservation. The 2017 guest speaker was Dr Nigel Reeves. Around 80 guests attended. The topic was especially pertinent since, though under threat in London’s Park and across Greater London generally, Hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) had recently been spotted at Putney Lower Common. Dr Reeve subsequently visited Putney Lower Common with the Head Ranger (Bill Rowland) and Peter Haldane (Conservation and Engagement Officer (C&EO)) and made site evaluations of potential Hedgehog habitat at the same time 1 giving helpful advice for maintenance of Hedgehog presence in that area. Later in the year a Hedgehog was also reported in a staff garden on Wimbledon Common. These are the first reported sightings for the Commons for many years and, given the well-documented nationwide decline in Hedgehog populations (BTO, 2018; The Guardian 2018; PTES & BHPS, 2011), their presence is particularly pleasing and their conservation needs to be promoted. All maintenance staff involved with regular sward mowing in the grassy areas of Putney Lower Common now first beat and search to ensure no Hedgehogs get injured in this process (C&EO report to W&C Forum, 2017). The National Vegetation Classification Survey and Habitat Assessment Report (NVC Report) on the key habitats of Wimbledon and Putney Commons was received in January 2017 (PAA, 2016). It affirmed that current conservation activities, such as mowing regimes on The Plain and other grassy areas, were indeed appropriate and if maintained could lead to improved conservation status for the Commons. It also highlighted where further beneficial intervention could be considered. The report forms the basis for linking monitoring to specific habitat units and for targeted habitat improvements. It is an essential baseline against which to regularly monitor change on the Commons. In mid-summer, the BioBlitz was well supported despite a sudden switch in weather to heat wave ◦ conditions (over 30 C by mid-day). Building on the success of the small mammal pilot survey in autumn 2016, a fuller survey was incorporated into the 2017 BioBlitz. A lunch-time talk on Bee-Keeping and Bee behaviour was another new and much-liked addition to the programme. A programme of wildlife and conservation-management themed walks with the public was offered throughout the year enriching the co-learning opportunities. A noteworthy popular addition was the high-summer butterfly, damselfly and dragonfly walk. Seasonal walks with the staff management team have proved popular and the Walks for Health programme became increasingly well supported and in all weather conditions. Fun activities for children at Easter and Halloween have brought families onto the Commons who were not previous visitors and are potentially generating their active engagement in future volunteering and recording events. Meanwhile, the ‘scrub bashers’ volunteer group maintained momentum clearing invasive scrub from the heathland areas. Their activities are supported by follow-through work from the Maintenance Team poisoning tree stumps and removing the excess woody materials generated. New mid-week volunteer programmes were under development by late 2017. These will allow a greater diversity of volunteering opportunities from estates and simple grounds maintenance work such as litter picking, post painting, etc. through to data sorting and wildlife monitoring. For the latter some training will be offered. These activities will be overseen by the C&EO and will dovetail to reflect management needs in relation to the new Land Management Plan to be developed in 2018 under the review of the W&C Forum. Monitoring priorities for 2017 were to:- • Consolidate further the records for The Plain (Figure1) as initiated in 2014 using, as far as possible, the same methodology as previously described in Monitoring the Plain, Summer 2014 and Wimbledon and Putney Commons Monitoring Report Spring/Summer 2015; Ibid 2016. • Continue to review the impact, if any, of use of an earlier summer mowing date for The Plain as adopted in summer 2014 (Table 1) on ground nesting song bird species and flora and fauna more generally.
Recommended publications
  • Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods
    . O O o . 0 O . 0 . O Shoping growth in Docorum Appendices for Topic Paper for the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC A summary/overview of available evidence BOROUGH Dacorum Local Plan (2020-2038) Emerging Strategy for Growth COUNCIL November 2020 Appendices Natural England reports 5 Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation 6 Appendix 1: Citation for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) 7 Appendix 2: Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Features Matrix 9 Appendix 3: European Site Conservation Objectives for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation Site Code: UK0012724 11 Appendix 4: Site Improvement Plan for Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, 2015 13 Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 27 Appendix 5: Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI citation 28 Appendix 6: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 31 Appendix 7: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 33 Appendix 8: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Ashridge Commons and Woods, SSSI, Hertfordshire/Buckinghamshire 38 Appendix 9: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Ashridge Commons and Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003 40 Tring Woodlands SSSI 44 Appendix 10: Tring Woodlands SSSI citation 45 Appendix 11: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 48 Appendix 12: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 51 Appendix 13: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Tring Woodlands SSSI 53 Appendix 14: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Tring Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Health & Biosecurity Working Papers OVERVIEW OF FOREST PESTS ROMANIA January 2007 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FBS/28E Forest Management Division FAO, Rome, Italy Forestry Department DISCLAIMER The aim of this document is to give an overview of the forest pest1 situation in Romania. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © FAO 2007 1 Pest: Any species, strain or biotype of plant, animal or pathogenic agent injurious to plants or plant products (FAO, 2004). Overview of forest pests - Romania TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Forest pests and diseases................................................................................................. 1 Naturally regenerating forests..................................................................................... 1 Insects ..................................................................................................................... 1 Diseases................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION BARLEY Barley (Also Known As Groats) Is a Cereal
    INTRODUCTION BARLEY Barley (also known as groats) is a cereal grain botanically known as Hordeum vulgare L. , and is believed for its origin from western Asia or Ethiopia. Barley is still considered one of the top five cereal grains in the world. Only ten percent of barley is used as human food, while the remaining percentage is used for brewing malt beverages, including beer and whiskey. However, the majority of harvest barley is used for livestock feed. Barley is also a prime ingredient in the making of variety of the popular foods in the world. The exact origin of barley is debatable, possibly originating in Egypt, Ethiopia, and the near East of Tibet (4). However, it is confirmed that certain barley species was among the earliest cultivated grains, around the same time as domestication of wheat, Barley was grown in the Middle East prior to 10,000 BC (5), but barley's cultivation in China and India probably occurred later (5, 20, 31) . The old English word for 'barley' was baere, which traces back to Proto-Indo- European and is cognate to the Latin word farina "flour". The un-derived world ‘baere’ survives in the north of Scotland as bere , and refers to a specific strain of six-row barley (4, 15). The word barn, which originally meant barley-house, is also rooted in these words (2). In a ranking of cereal crops (2007) in the world, barley was fourth both in terms of quantity produced (136 million tons) and in area of cultivation (566,000 km²) 6. 1 BARLEY IN ISLAMIC LITERATURE According to the scholars of Hadiths (Prophetic sayings) barley supposed to be very nutritious, beneficial in coughs and inflammation of the stomach.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hordeum Toolbox: the Barley Coordinated Agricultural Project Genotype and Phenotype Resource
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH The Hordeum Toolbox: The Barley Coordinated Agricultural Project Genotype and Phenotype Resource Victoria C. Blake,* Jennifer G. Kling, Patrick M. Hayes, Jean-Luc Jannink, Suman R. Jillella, John Lee, David E. Matthews, Shiaoman Chao, Timothy J. Close, Gary J. Muehlbauer, Kevin P. Smith, Roger P. Wise, and Julie A. Dickerson Abstract RADITIONALLY, plant breeders have collected phenotype The use of DNA markers in public sector plant breeding is now Tdata from breeding populations and used it to select the norm. Such markers are common across breeding programs for superior genotypes. Data access was limited to indi- and this commonality enables and enhances collaboration. vidual programs via spreadsheets or in-house databases. Therefore, large collaborative research projects that measure Th is approach has been successful in developing novel several phenotypes across multiple environments coupled with germplasm and varieties. However, with the exception the expanding amount of genotype data attainable with current of the few lines being grown in regional nurseries, the marker technologies are on the rise and these projects demand only scientists that had access to these extensive datasets effi cient data delivery. However, development of computational were those that were intimately associated with the pro- tools for advanced data integration, visualization, and analysis is grams that generated the data. Th erefore, there was little still a bottleneck, even though these resources have the greatest understanding of the relationship of germplasm between potential impact for users who are extracting and developing programs, and the ability to share germplasm between hypothesis-based solutions. The Hordeum Toolbox (THT) was programs in an intelligent manner was restricted.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Surveys at Hunsbury Hill Country Park 2018
    FRIENDS OF WEST HUNSBURY PARKS BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS AT HUNSBURY HILL COUNTRY PARK 2018 Ryan Clark Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre April 2019 Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre Introduction Biological records tell us which species are present on sites and are essential in informing the conservation and management of wildlife. In 2018, the Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre ran a number of events to encourage biological recording at Hunsbury Hill Fort as part of the Friends of West Hunsbury Park’s project, which is supported by the National Lottery Heritage Fund. Hunsbury Hill Country Park is designated as a Local Wildlife Site (LWS). There are approximately 700 Local Wildlife Sites in Northamptonshire. Local Wildlife Sites create a network of areas, which are important as refuges for wildlife or wildlife corridors. Hunsbury Hill Country Park was designated as a LWS in 1992 for its woodland flora and the variety of habitats that the site possesses. The site also has a Local Geological Site (LGS) which highlights the importance of this site for its geology as well as biodiversity. This will be surveyed by the local geological group in due course. Hunsbury Hill Country Park Local Wildlife Site Boundary 1 Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre (NBRC) supports the recording, curation and sharing of quality verified environmental information for sound decision-making. We hold nearly a million biological records covering a variety of different species groups. Before the start of this project, we looked to see which species had been recorded at the site. We were surprised to find that the only records we have for the site have come from Local Wildlife Site Surveys, which assess the quality of the site and focus on vascular plants, with some casual observations of other species noted too.
    [Show full text]
  • Heathland 700 the Park & Poor's Allotment Species List
    The Park & Poor's Allotment Bioblitz 25th - 26th July 2015 Common Name Scientific Name [if known] Site recorded Fungus Xylaria polymorpha Dead Man's Fingers Both Amanita excelsa var. excelsa Grey Spotted Amanita Poor's Allotment Panaeolus sp. Poor's Allotment Phallus impudicus var. impudicus Stinkhorn The Park Mosses Sphagnum denticulatum Cow-horn Bog-moss Both Sphagnum fimbriatum Fringed Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum papillosum Papillose Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum squarrosum Spiky Bog-moss The Park Sphagnum palustre Blunt-leaved Bog-moss Poor's Allotment Atrichum undulatum Common Smoothcap Both Polytrichum commune Common Haircap The Park Polytrichum formosum Bank Haircap Both Polytrichum juniperinum Juniper Haircap The Park Tetraphis pellucida Pellucid Four-tooth Moss The Park Schistidium crassipilum Thickpoint Grimmia Poor's Allotment Fissidens taxifolius Common Pocket-moss The Park Ceratodon purpureus Redshank The Park Dicranoweisia cirrata Common Pincushion Both Dicranella heteromalla Silky Forklet-moss Both Dicranella varia Variable Forklet-moss The Park Dicranum scoparium Broom Fork-moss Both Campylopus flexuosus Rusty Swan-neck Moss Poor's Allotment Campylopus introflexus Heath Star Moss Both Campylopus pyriformis Dwarf Swan-neck Moss The Park Bryoerythrophyllum Red Beard-moss Poor's Allotment Barbula convoluta Lesser Bird's-claw Beard-moss The Park Didymodon fallax Fallacious Beard-moss The Park Didymodon insulanus Cylindric Beard-moss Poor's Allotment Zygodon conoideus Lesser Yoke-moss The Park Zygodon viridissimus Green Yoke-moss
    [Show full text]
  • A T L a S Parazytoidów Szkodników Pierwotnych Sosny
    ATLAS JACEK HILSZCZAN´ SKI, CEZARY BYSTROWSKI parazytoidów szkodników pierwotnych sosny ATLAS parazytoidów szkodników pierwotnych sosny ISBN 978-83-61633-21-1 ATLAS parazytoidów szkodników pierwotnych sosny JACEK HILSZCZAN´ SKI, CEZARY BYSTROWSKI ATLAS parazytoidów szkodników pierwotnych sosny Wydano na zlecenie Dyrekcji Generalnej Lasów Państwowych Warszawa 2010 © Centrum Informacyjne Lasów Państwowych ul. Bitwy Warszawskiej 1920 r. nr 3, 02-362 Warszawa tel.: (22) 822-49-31, fax: (22) 823-96-79 e-mail: [email protected] www.lasy.gov.pl Recenzenci prof. dr hab. Agnieszka Draber-Mońko (Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN) prof. dr hab. Tadeusz Kaźmierczak (Katedra Entomologii Leśnej Uniwersytetu Rolniczego w Krakowie) mgr inż. Piotr Gawęda (Zespół Ochrony Lasu w Gdańsku) Redakcja Aleksandra Dominiewska Autorzy zdjęć i rysunków Jacek Hilszczański, Cezary Bystrowski Zdjęcie na 4 stronie okładki: Wojciech Gil Projekt graficzny i redakcja techniczna Bożena Widłaszewska Korekta Elżbieta Kijewska ISBN 978-83-89744-88-3 Przygotowanie do druku ANTER – Poligrafia, ul. Jaracza 8 m. 18, 00-378 Warszawa Druk i oprawa Ośrodek Rozwojowo-Wdrożeniowy Lasów Państwowych w Bedoniu ul. Sienkiewicza 19, 95-020 Andrespol Spis treści Wstęp ................................................................ 7 1. Definicje i terminologia morfologii parazytoidów . 9 2. Zarys biologii i identyfikacja wybranych taksonów parazytoidów . 17 2.1. Błonkówki . 17 2.2. Muchówki . 27 3. Metody zbioru, hodowli i preparowania . 33 3.1. Błonkówki . 33 3.2. Muchówki . 35 4. Zasady używania atlasu . 37 5. Przegląd systematyczny parazytoidów . 38 Rząd: Hymenoptera – błonkówki . 38 Rząd: Diptera – muchówki . 40 6. Opisy gatunków . 43 7. Literatura . 209 Wstęp Jedną z najliczniejszych grup w świecie owadów są parazytoidy należące do rzę- dów błonkówek (Hymenoptera) i muchówek (Diptera).
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Oak Processionary Moth Control Programme Final Report
    Evaluation of the Oak Processionary Moth Control Programme Final Report 19 February 2016 This page is intentionally blank Evaluation of the Oak Processionary Moth Control Programme - Final Report Evaluation of the Oak Processionary Moth Control Programme Final Report A report submitted by ICF International in association with Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Date: 19 February 2016 Job Number 30300452 Andrew Jarvis ICF International Watling House 33 Cannon Street London EC4M 5SB T +44 (0)20 3096 4800 F +44 (0)20 3368 6960 www.icfi.com Evaluation of the Oak Processionary Moth Control Programme - Final Report Document Control Document Title Evaluation of the Oak Processionary Moth Control Programme – Final Report (r) Job No. 30300452 Prepared by Mavourneen Conway, Andrew Jarvis, David McNeil, Naazia Ebrahim (ICF) Michael Pocock, Colin Harrower, John Redhead (CEH) Checked by Andrew Jarvis Date 19 February 2016 This report is the copyright of Defra and has been prepared by ICF Consulting Services Ltd under contract to Defra. The contents of this report may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor passed to any other organisation or person without the specific prior written permission of Defra. ICF has used reasonable skill and care in checking the accuracy and completeness of information supplied by the client or third parties in the course of this project under which the report was produced. ICF is however unable to warrant either the accuracy or completeness of such information supplied by the client or third parties, nor that it is fit for any purpose. ICF does not accept responsibility for any legal, commercial or other consequences that may arise directly or indirectly as a result of the use by ICF of inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by the client or third parties in the course of this project or its inclusion in this project or its inclusion in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • January Review of Butterfly, Moth and Other Natural History Sightings 2019
    Review of butterfly, moth and other natural history sightings 2019 January January started dry and settled but mostly cloudy with high pressure dominant, and it remained generally dry and often mild during the first half of the month. The second half became markedly cooler with overnight frosts and the last week saw a little precipitation, some which was occasionally wintry. With the mild weather continuing from December 2018 there were a small number of migrant moths noted in January, comprising a Dark Sword-grass at Seabrook on the 5th, a Silver Y there on the 13th and 2 Plutella xylostella (Diamond-back Moths) there on the 15th, whilst a very unseasonal Dark Arches at Hythe on the 4th may have been of immigrant origin. Dark Sword-grass at Seabrook (Paul Howe) Dark Arches at Hythe (Ian Roberts) More typical species involved Epiphyas postvittana (Light Brown Apple Moth), Satellite, Mottled Umber, Winter Moth, Chestnut, Spring Usher and Early Moth. Early Moth at Seabrook (Paul Howe) Spring Usher at Seabrook (Paul Howe) The only butterfly noted was a Red Admiral at Nickolls Quarry on the 1st but the mild weather encouraged single Buff-tailed Bumblebees to appear at Seabrook on the 7th and Mill Point on the 8th, whilst a Minotaur Beetle was attracted to light at Seabrook on the 6th. A Common Seal and two Grey Seals were noted regularly off Folkestone, whilst at Hare was seen near Botolph’s Bridge on the 1st and a Mink was noted there on the 17th. February After a cold start to the month it was generally mild from the 5th onwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoogeography of the Holarctic Species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): Importance of the Bering Ian Refuge
    © Entomologica Fennica. 8.XI.l991 Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Bering ian refuge Kauri Mikkola, J, D. Lafontaine & V. S. Kononenko Mikkola, K., Lafontaine, J.D. & Kononenko, V. S. 1991 : Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Beringian refuge. - En to mol. Fennica 2: 157- 173. As a result of published and unpublished revisionary work, literature compi­ lation and expeditions to the Beringian area, 98 species of the Noctuidae are listed as Holarctic and grouped according to their taxonomic and distributional history. Of the 44 species considered to be "naturall y" Holarctic before this study, 27 (61 %) are confirmed as Holarctic; 16 species are added on account of range extensions and 29 because of changes in their taxonomic status; 17 taxa are deleted from the Holarctic list. This brings the total of the group to 72 species. Thirteen species are considered to be introduced by man from Europe, a further eight to have been transported by man in the subtropical areas, and five migrant species, three of them of Neotropical origin, may have been assisted by man. The m~jority of the "naturally" Holarctic species are associated with tundra habitats. The species of dry tundra are frequently endemic to Beringia. In the taiga zone, most Holarctic connections consist of Palaearctic/ Nearctic species pairs. The proportion ofHolarctic species decreases from 100 % in the High Arctic to between 40 and 75 % in Beringia and the northern taiga zone, and from between 10 and 20 % in Newfoundland and Finland to between 2 and 4 % in southern Ontario, Central Europe, Spain and Primorye.
    [Show full text]
  • British Lepidoptera (/)
    British Lepidoptera (/) Home (/) Anatomy (/anatomy.html) FAMILIES 1 (/families-1.html) GELECHIOIDEA (/gelechioidea.html) FAMILIES 3 (/families-3.html) FAMILIES 4 (/families-4.html) NOCTUOIDEA (/noctuoidea.html) BLOG (/blog.html) Glossary (/glossary.html) Family: SPHINGIDAE (3SF 13G 18S) Suborder:Glossata Infraorder:Heteroneura Superfamily:Bombycoidea Refs: Waring & Townsend, Wikipedia, MBGBI9 Proboscis short to very long, unscaled. Antenna ~ 1/2 length of forewing; fasciculate or pectinate in male, simple in female; apex pointed. Labial palps long, 3-segmented. Eye large. Ocelli absent. Forewing long, slender. Hindwing ±triangular. Frenulum and retinaculum usually present but may be reduced. Tegulae large, prominent. Leg spurs variable but always present on midtibia. 1st tarsal segment of mid and hindleg about as long as tibia. Subfamily: Smerinthinae (3G 3S) Tribe: Smerinthini Probably characterised by a short proboscis and reduced or absent frenulum Mimas Smerinthus Laothoe 001 Mimas tiliae (Lime Hawkmoth) 002 Smerinthus ocellata (Eyed Hawkmoth) 003 Laothoe populi (Poplar Hawkmoth) (/002- (/001-mimas-tiliae-lime-hawkmoth.html) smerinthus-ocellata-eyed-hawkmoth.html) (/003-laothoe-populi-poplar-hawkmoth.html) Subfamily: Sphinginae (3G 4S) Rest with wings in tectiform position Tribe: Acherontiini Agrius Acherontia 004 Agrius convolvuli 005 Acherontia atropos (Convolvulus Hawkmoth) (Death's-head Hawkmoth) (/005- (/004-agrius-convolvuli-convolvulus- hawkmoth.html) acherontia-atropos-deaths-head-hawkmoth.html) Tribe: Sphingini Sphinx (2S)
    [Show full text]
  • Garden Moth Scheme Report 2017
    Garden Moth Scheme Report 2017 Heather Young – April 2018 1 GMS Report 2017 CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 2 Top 30 Species 2017 3 Scientific Publications 4 Abundant and Widespread Species 8 Common or Garden Moths 11 Winter GMS 2017-18 15 Coordination Changes 16 GMS Annual Conference 16 GMS Sponsors 17 Links & Acknowledgements 18 Cover photograph: Peppered Moth (H. Young) Introduction The Garden Moth Scheme (GMS) welcomes participants from all parts of the United Kingdom and Ireland, and in 2017 received 360 completed recording forms, an increase of over 5% on 2016 (341). We have consistently received records from over 300 sites across the UK and Ireland since 2010, and now have almost 1 ½ million records in the GMS database. Several scientific papers using the GMS data have now been published in peer- reviewed journals, and these are listed in this report, with the relevant abstracts, to illustrate how the GMS records are used for research. The GMS is divided into 12 regions, monitoring 233 species of moth in every part of the UK and Ireland (the ‘Core Species’), along with a variable number of ‘Regional Species’. A selection of core species whose name suggests they should be found commonly, or in our gardens, is highlighted in this report. There is a round-up of the 2017-18 Winter Garden Moth Scheme, which attracted a surprisingly high number of recorders (102) despite the poor weather, a summary of the changes taking place in the GMS coordination team for 2018, and a short report on the 2018 Annual Conference, but we begin as usual with the Top 30 for GMS 2017.
    [Show full text]