III Moscow Mathematics and Philosophy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

III Moscow Mathematics and Philosophy UPPSALA UNIVERSITY BACHELOR THESIS Department of Modern Languages Russian language D-level Hjalmar Eriksson Spring semester 2009 Flogstavägen 25B 752 73 Uppsala 073-0681523 [email protected] Умом науку не понять1 An ideo-historical study of the rise of the Moscow mathematical school Supervisor: Fabian Linde Department of Modern Languages 1 “Science cannot be grasped by the intellect”. 1 Contents I Introduction...................................................................................................................................3 I.1 Preface...................................................................................................................................3 I.2 Objectives..............................................................................................................................4 I.3 Methods and material............................................................................................................5 I.3.1 Limitations.....................................................................................................................5 I.3.2 Material..........................................................................................................................5 I.3.3 Methods..........................................................................................................................5 II The development of mathematics in Moscow..............................................................................6 II.1 Mathematics in Russia before 1900.....................................................................................6 II.1.1 Nikolaĭ Bugaev.............................................................................................................7 II.2 The introduction of the new mathematics............................................................................8 II.2.1 Dmitriĭ Egorov..............................................................................................................8 II.2.2 Pavel Florenskiĭ............................................................................................................9 II.2.3 Nikolaĭ Luzin................................................................................................................9 II.3 A school emerges................................................................................................................11 III Moscow mathematics and philosophy......................................................................................11 III.1 A crash course in the history of Russian thought..............................................................11 III.2 An alternative philosophy of science................................................................................14 III.2.1 Platonism...................................................................................................................15 III.2.2 Mysticism..................................................................................................................18 III.2.3 Indeterminism............................................................................................................20 III.2.4 Holism.......................................................................................................................22 IV A paradigm shift in mathematics..............................................................................................24 IV.1 The development of mathematics......................................................................................24 IV.1.1 Cantor and infinity.....................................................................................................24 IV.1.2 The deficiencies of set theory....................................................................................25 IV.1.3 The foundational crisis..............................................................................................26 IV.2 Comparative analysis of the paradigm shift in the West and in Russia.............................27 IV.2.1 Exemplars of the new paradigm................................................................................27 IV.2.2 The philosophical discrepancy..................................................................................29 IV.2.3 Luzin's philosophical transformation.........................................................................30 IV.2.4 Concluding words......................................................................................................31 V Conclusion.................................................................................................................................31 V.1 Summary ............................................................................................................................31 V.2 Evaluation of sources..........................................................................................................32 V.3 Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................33 VI Bibliography.............................................................................................................................34 2 I Introduction I.1 Preface One of the most common things that the average person “knows” about Russia is that it is one of the mathematical superpowers of the world. This preconception is perhaps more of a prejudice, frequently coupled with the idea that all Russian mathematicians are grave old men with large beards. From studies of, and repeated visits to, Russia, I have realized that large beards are not necessarily more popular in Russia than in other parts of Europe. It is however true that, regardless of the beards, the Russians are especially successful in mathematics. This is widely recognized among mathematicians and can for instance be seen in the number of Fields Medals, the most prestigious prize in mathematics, awarded to Russian/Soviet mathematicians. I have found this fact intriguing since I am fascinated by the cultural aspects of science. This is why I have decided to dedicate this essay to conducting an ideo-historical study of Russian mathematics. My initial review of literature on the history of science in Russia indicated it was not until the 20th century that Russia/USSR reached the status as one of the most important centers for the development of mathematics. The influential mathematical school did not, as one could expect, emerge in St. Petersburg, where mathematics had been a priority since the days when Leonhard Euler worked at the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences. On the contrary, the school seemed to have its roots in Moscow and to have formed around the time when Moscow mathematics started to receive world-wide attention in the early 20th century. From the Moscow school sprung a number of well-known mathematicians, who became deeply involved in the development of modern mathematics, for example Andreǐ N. Kolmogorov and Pavel S. Aleksandrov2. I do not wish to trivialize the contributions to Russian mathematics by mathematicians in St. Petersburg and elsewhere, but it is this early Moscow school that is the scope of the essay. Since the mid 1980s there has been a comparably large scholarly interest in the early development of the Moscow mathematical school. As the Soviet system crumbled, information about the first decades of the 20th century resurfaced. A connection between philosophers of the silver age, a religious renaissance of the early 20th century, and the mathematicians in Moscow was established [14, 15, 22]3. A number of Russian and foreign scholars (S. S. Demidov, S. S. Polovinkin, A. N. Parshin, C. E. Ford, A. Shields, L. Graham) have, since then, continued to examine the events and people of this period. In this research attention has been given to the connection between, on the one hand, philosophy and religion and, on the other hand, mathematics. While the research done covers most of the events and relations of this period, what is lacking is a general outline of the ideo-historical context, of which the mathematicians in question were part, and a critical review of how it manifested itself in their work. Demidov [14] and Ford [23] touch upon this and Graham & Kantor [25, 26], with a, lamentably, very narrow view of the cultural context, attempts to analyse the connection between culture and mathematics. This is exactly what I want to remedy with my essay. I attempt to show how the intellectual climate in Russia influenced the mathematics and mathematicians of the early period of the Moscow school of mathematics. I believe my essay is important as it diversifies our views on the development of science. From a western perspective the evolution of science is all to often seen only in the context, and as a product, of western society and culture. I will, however, argue that the intellectual climate among Moscow mathematicians early in the 20th century, in the terms of ontology and epistemology, was, 2 For the transliteration of Russian I use the ALA-LC romanization system for Russian with all diacritics but omitting two-letter tie characters. 3 The source numbering can be found in the bibliography under VI. Sometimes a page reference is supplied as well. 3 firstly, different from the main western tradition and, secondly, a positive force with regards to the reception and further development of certain new discoveries in mathematics4. I.2 Objectives The ontology and epistemology of the mathematical circle from which the Moscow school
Recommended publications
  • Art Without Death: Conversations on Russian Cosmism Contents
    e-flux journal Art without Death: Conversations on Russian Cosmism Contents 5 Introduction 9 Hito Steyerl and Anton Vidokle Cosmic Catwalk and the Production of Time 41 Elena Shaposhnikova and Arseny Zhilyaev Art without Death 57 Anton Vidokle and Arseny Zhilyaev Factories of Resurrection 73 Franco “Bifo” Berardi and Anton Vidokle Chaos and Cosmos 93 Boris Groys and Arseny Zhilyaev Contemporary Art Is the Theology of the Museum 109 Marina Simakova, Anton Vidokle, and Arseny Zhilyaev Cosmic Doubts 133 Bart De Baere, Arseny Zhilyaev, and Esther Zonsheim Wahlverwandtschaft Introduction For those who still benefit from colonial wealth, the indigenous lifeworlds destroyed by the steamroller of modernity are always somewhere far away. It is important that they remain so. It is important that the centers of power remain places where healthy 5 state infrastructure and decent industry produce forward-thinking and empowered individuals with enough energy in their bodies and money in the bank to believe all of it had to be for the best. After all, progress always comes at a price. The heroes of modernity can never be allowed to waver in this, for they have learned the important lesson that trium- phalism can be the only entry to the modern. And their job is to give life to those poor souls whose his- tories were usurped, who can only traffic in death, whose victimhood disallows ever reimagining their own conditions. But what if the heroes of moder- nity are also paying the price? What if, behind the veneer of triumphalism and pity—pity for others, pity for oneself—we have all lost? What if we are all victims, not only of modernity’s great redistribution of wealth, but of its wholesale reformatting of life in relation to death? But what if another kind of modernity had been developed which was even more radical—so much so that its forward arrow actually sought to conserve and preserve previous lifeworlds against the ravages not of vanguardist reforms but of time itself? And reanimate those worlds.
    [Show full text]
  • S H a P E S O F a P O C a Ly P
    Shapes of Apocalypse Arts and Philosophy in Slavic Thought M y t h s a n d ta b o o s i n R u s s i a n C u lt u R e Series Editor: Alyssa DinegA gillespie—University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana Editorial Board: eliot Borenstein—New York University, New York Julia BekmAn ChadagA—Macalester College, St. Paul, Minnesota nancy ConDee—University of Pittsburg, Pittsburg Caryl emerson—Princeton University, Princeton Bernice glAtzer rosenthAl—Fordham University, New York marcus levitt—USC, Los Angeles Alex Martin—University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana irene Masing-DeliC—Ohio State University, Columbus Joe pesChio—University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee irina reyfmAn—Columbia University, New York stephanie SanDler—Harvard University, Cambridge Shapes of Apocalypse Arts and Philosophy in Slavic Thought Edited by Andrea OppO BOSTON / 2013 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: A bibliographic record for this title is available from the Library of Congress. Copyright © 2013 Academic Studies Press All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-61811-174-6 (cloth) ISBN 978-1-618111-968 (electronic) Book design by Ivan Grave On the cover: Konstantin Juon, “The New Planet,” 1921. Published by Academic Studies Press in 2013 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com Effective December 12th, 2017, this book will be subject to a CC-BY-NC license. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Other than as provided by these licenses, no part of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or displayed by any electronic or mechanical means without permission from the publisher or as permitted by law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fate of Russia: Several Observations on "New" Russian Identity
    THE FATE OF RUSSIA: SEVERAL OBSERVATIONS ON "NEW" RUSSIAN IDENTITY S. V. Kortunov Introduction Russia is going through a complicated historical period. A search is taking place for the optimal path of development and the best form of state structure. Social-economic ties are changing in a fundamental manner. Along with the not insignificant positive results of the political and economic reforms that are being carried out, negative processes in the economy, in the social sphere and in the relations between the center and the regions are becoming clearly evident. On the international arena, Russia is confronting the desire of a number of countries to use the transitional period to promote their economic and political interests, often to the detriment of Russians' national aspirations. Three overarching factors characterize the Russian domestic situation: the continuing systematic crisis in society, which began in the Soviet period; the country's development crisis, which appeared during the transitional period; and the difficulties of overcoming the residues of the former totalitarian regime. (These problems are in turn linked to the global crisis that has resulted from the collapse of the Cold War order.) It is obvious that the contemporary crisis is on a larger scale than the problems associated with the February and October 1917 Revolutions, the abolition of serfdom, and even the Time of Troubles. We are discussing a crisis that is comparable only to the epic transformation of the 13th century, when the collapse of one superethnos (Kievian Russ) occurred and a new nation, country, and civilization (the Russian superethnos) began to be born.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Cosmists, John and the Liturgy
    Russian cosmism, the Temple, and the Eucharist in the Gospel of John. Dominic Rubin. 1. INTRODUCTION In this talk, I would like to approach the gospel of John from two angles: firstly, looking at it through the lens of certain Russian Orthodox cosmist thinkers; and secondly, looking at it by considering how this relates to Margaret Barker’s temple theology. I believe that to a great extent their thinking is compatible and can produce useful insights for Orthodox theology and Biblical exegesis today, though it is not a completely trouble-free synthesis. My starting-point for applying this tentative and still shaky synthesis will be to see how it can illumine references to the Temple in John in general, but then I want to focus on one specific aspect of the book: the institution of the Eucharist, especially the verses in Jn 6.52 onwards which so shocked Christ’s and John’s contemporaries: “My flesh is real food and my blood is real drink…whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood lives in me and I in him.” 2. RUSSIAN COSMISM First, I should define the term Russian Cosmism. This was a general tendency in Russian religious philosophy in the first quarter of the twentieth century. It built on the ideas of early church fathers like Origen, Gregory of Nyssa, Irenaeus of Lyons and Maximus the Confessor concerning the role of man as a microcosmos and recapitulation, or anakephalaiosis, of creation, and supplemented it with various other sources, such as Western Christian mysticism and theosophy, and often Jewish and Christian Kabbalah1.
    [Show full text]
  • Following the Black Square: the Cosmic, the Nostalgic & the Transformative in Russian Avant-Garde Museology Teofila Cruz-Uri
    Following The Black Square: The Cosmic, The Nostalgic & The Transformative In Russian Avant-Garde Museology Teofila Cruz-Uribe A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Studies: Russia, East Europe and Central Asia University of Washington 2017 Committee: Glennys Young James West José Alaniz Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Jackson School of International Studies Cruz-Uribe ©Copyright 2017 Teofila Cruz-Uribe 1 Cruz-Uribe University of Washington Abstract Following The Black Square: The Cosmic, The Nostalgic & The Transformative In Russian Avant-Garde Museology ​ ​ Teofila Cruz-Uribe Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Jon Bridgman Endowed Professor Glennys Young History Department & Jackson School of International Studies Contemporary Russian art and museology is experiencing a revival of interest in the pioneering museology of the Russian artistic and political avant-garde of the early 20th century. This revival is exemplified in the work of contemporary Russian conceptual artist and self-styled ‘avant-garde museologist’ Arseniy Zhilyaev (b. 1984). Influential early 20th century Russian avant-garde artist and museologist Kazimir Malevich acts as the ‘tether’ binding the museologies of the past and present together, his famous “Black Square” a recurring visual and metaphoric indicator of the inspiration that contemporary Russian avant-garde museology and art is taking from its predecessors. This thesis analyzes Zhilyaev’s artistic and museological philosophy and work and determines how and where they are informed by Bolshevik-era avant-garde museology. This thesis also asks why such inspirations and influences are being felt and harnessed at this particular juncture in post-Soviet culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Kant on History 1St Edition Pdf Free Download
    KANT ON HISTORY 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Immanuel Kant | 9780023078606 | | | | | Kant On History 1st edition PDF Book Main article: Political philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Article Contents. Since things in themselves are unknowable, I can never look to them to get evidence that I possess transcendental freedom. Finally, in the second half of Critique of the Power of Judgment , Kant discusses the philosophical foundations of biology by way of an analysis of teleological judgments. The peculiar thing about these ideas of reason is that reason is led by its very structure to posit objects corresponding to these ideas. In other words, we filter what we see and hear. Encyclopedia of Philosophy , Vol. According to Kant, the ultimate aim of a rational moral agent should be to become perfectly moral. Kant's Aesthetic. Positions Aesthetics Formalism Institutionalism Aesthetic response. The mark of immorality, then, is that one makes an exception for oneself. Brockhaus AG, Mannheim , p. Kant argued that the rational order of the world as known by science was not just the accidental accumulation of sense perceptions. Kant is best known for his work in the philosophy of ethics and metaphysics, [24] but he made significant contributions to other disciplines. From the early s onward, Kant was regarded by the coming generation of philosophers as having overthrown all previous systems and as having opened up a whole new philosophical vista. Sammlung einiger bisher unbekannt gebliebener kleiner Schriften. And according to the Third Analogy which presupposes the first two , all substances stand in relations of reciprocal interaction with each other. If they were, how come no one discovered this exact moral law before when Kant wrote the Groundwork? JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser.
    [Show full text]
  • Nikolai Fedorov – Founder Oftherussiancosmism Introduction P.O
    26 Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being. 5-6`2013 / UDC 141 Nikolai Fedorov – founder of the Russian cosmism http://publishing-vak.ru ) u Volkov Vladimir Nikolaevich Full Doctor of Philosophy, professor of the department of management, socio-cultural activities and tourism, [email protected] Academy for Retraining in Arts, Culture and Tourism, P.O. Box 123007, 5-th Magistral'naya str., No. 5, Moscow, Russia; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Many studies have been published recently on the teaching of the Russian think- er Nikolai Fedorov, but in the assessment of his creativity is still evidenced by RODIS" ( Publishing House "ANALITIKA innuendo, disguise, a veil of silence silence and simply preconception. over extended periods implicitly formed the tradition of perception of Fedorov as a brilliant visionary, righteous and uncanonized holy man, whose life is easy to fit into the genre of the lives, and ideas are discussed in the tideway of orthodox philosophy or in the framework of scientific prediction, forecasting, futurologi- cal project, or both of them together. Who was cosmist Fedorov in realшен after all – scientist, philosopher, religious thinker or a charlatan? Keywords Space, patrofication, conciliarity, non-kinship, autotrophy, progress, magic, im- mortality. Introduction origin, studied independently, knew al- most by heart all the books in the library Literature about Fedorov tradi- of the Rumyantsev Museum, dressed in tionally built on hagiographic canon: he rags, slept on the trunk for 3-4 hours, ate lived quietly, wandered, concealed his bread and tea, refused increased salaries, Volkov Vladimir Nikolaevich Publishing House "ANALITIKA RODIS" 27 handed out money to the poor, consid- erary and artistic form (F.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy and Spirituality Across Cultures and Civilizations
    Cultural Heritage and Contemporary Change Series IVA. Central and Eastern European Philosophical Studies, Volume 46 General Editor George F. McLean Philosophy and Spirituality across Cultures and Civilizations Russian Philosophical Studies, VII Edited by Nur Kirabaev Yuriy Pochta Ruzana Pskhu The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy Copyright © 2015 by The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy Box 261 Cardinal Station Washington, D.C. 20064 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Philosophy and spirituality across cultures and cilizations / edited by Nur Kirabaev, Yuriy Pochta, Ruzana Pskhu. -- first [edition]. pages cm. -- (Cultural heritage and contemporary change. Series IVA, Eastern and Central Europe ; v. 46) (Russian philosophical studies ; 7) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Philosophy--21st century--Congresses. 2. Civilization--21st century-- Congresses. 3. Spirituality--21st century--Congresses. I. Kirabaev, N. S., editor of compilation. B805.P45 2013 2013011486 100--dc23 CIP ISBN 978-1-56518-282-0 (pbk.) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 PART I. PHILOSOPHY: DIVERSITY IN UNITY 1.1 Russian Approach Chapter I. Contemporary Challenges to Traditional 11 Values and Virtues: A Russian Case Marietta Stepanyants Chapter II. Eurasianism as a Post-revolutionary Variant of 21 the Russian Idea Michail Maslin Chapter III. Vladimir Solovyev: Justification of Philosophy 31 Vladimir Serbinenko Chapter IV. Synthesis of Theology and Science in the Philosophy 35 of History by Lev Karsavin Vasily Vanchugov Chapter V. V.D. Kudryavtsev-Platonov’s Theological and 43 Philosophical System Irina V. Tsvyk Chapter VI. The Basic Issues of Human Life in 55 N.I.Pirigov’s Philosophy Elena S.
    [Show full text]
  • {Download PDF} Russia
    RUSSIA PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Jilly Hunt | 48 pages | 01 Feb 2012 | Heinemann Educational Books | 9781432961367 | English | Chicago, IL, United States RT - Breaking news, shows, podcasts February Main article: Economy of Russia. See also: List of the largest trading partners of Russia , List of countries by oil exports , and List of countries by natural gas exports. Main articles: Agriculture in Russia and Fishing industry in Russia. This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. April Learn how and when to remove this template message. Main articles: Timeline of Russian inventions and technology records , Science and technology in Russia , List of Russian scientists , and List of Russian inventors. Main article: Water supply and sanitation in Russia. Main article: Corruption in Russia. Main articles: Demographics of Russia and Russians. Russia's population pyramid as of 1 January Main article: List of cities and towns in Russia by population. Main article: Ethnic groups in Russia. This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. Play media. Main articles: Religion in Russia and Consecration of Russia. Main article: Healthcare in Russia. Main article: Education in Russia. Main article: Russian culture. See also: Russian traditions , Russian political jokes , Russian fairy tales , Russian cuisine , and Gopnik. Main articles: Russian architecture and List of Russian architects. Main article: Russian artists. Main articles: Russian literature , Russian philosophy , Russian poets , Russian playwrights , Russian novelists , and Russian science fiction and fantasy. Main article: Sport in Russia. See also: Doping in Russia. Main articles: Public holidays in Russia and Cultural icons of Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2005, 10(2): 97 - 104 Journal of Futures Studies
    ARTICLE .97 Russian Philosophical Cosmology: One Step Backward and Two Steps Forward – Approaching the Universal Evolutionary Future Konstantin S. Khroutski Novgorod State University Russia The natural sciences is right stating its truths, but is not right in relation the things which are passed over in silence. Karl-Friedrich Von Weizsacker Epistematic Versus Epistemic Song4, who, during the ABC5 in Tsukuba and while debating my presentation of the original Cosmist philo- During the Fifth Asian Bioethics Conference1 in sophical system – of subjective functionalist evolutionary Tsukuba, Professor Hyakudai Sakamoto2, a leading universalism5, posed a question about the plain defini- Eastern expert in bioethics, while presenting his out- tions of my core notions – "cosmic" and "cosmist". The look for the future development of global bioethics, crux was that I used these notions precisely in the epis- proclaimed the fundamental necessity of "a new human- tematic, but not in the accepted epistemic reasoning. ism without human-centrism", as a overriding way in The fact is that I have elaborated an original Cosmist harmonizing (or, "bargaining") "every kind of antagonis- episteme – an original system of fundamental princi- tic values on the Globe". In his exploration Prof. ples, which strives to obtain the capability to generate Sakamoto necessarily transcends the area of epistemic (thus providing modern science with) the universal the- reasoning (the area of Western episteme3 itself, inas- ory and methodology of comprehending the living much as he definitely rejects its cornerstone principles: world, primarily – the object of individual's health (the anthropocentrism and rational foundation of ethics on personalist wellness). the whole) and enters the emergent level of the epis- Generally, we treat "cosmos" and "cosmic" from the tematic creative work (by comparing the different epis- accepted standpoint of the science of physics – the sci- temes or creating a new episteme).
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Russian Religious Philosophy of XIX – Beginning of XX Century in the Spiritual and Moral Education of Young People
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 2 S1 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy March 2015 The Value of Russian Religious Philosophy of XIX – Beginning of XX Century in the Spiritual and Moral Education of Young People P. Andreevich Ponomarev1 A. Mihaylovich Rudenko1 S. Ivanovich Samygin2 1Don State Technical University, 2 Rostov State University of Economics Email: [email protected] Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2s1p275 Abstract This article is about the national peculiarity of Russian religious philosophy of XIX -the beginning of XX centuries. In this article were presented multi-faceted problems of human existence, and introspection of Russian thinkers is focused on the spiritual aspect. In this article problem - solving of socio-anthropological and moral-religious problematic is shown by Russian religious philosophers. Important is the analyses and interpretation of the idea of catholicity suggested by Russian religious philosophers. The analysis of the concept of unity which is the further evolution of the doctrine of the unity is realizing. It is noted the unity as the inner essence of life is inherent in human being and God. The path to unity is through love. Identity conception and its relationship with society are presented by Russian thinkers. The idea of unity advanced by Russian religious philosophy thinkers is considered as moral and axiological unity of freedom, grace and love. It is concluded that the education of “solid-hearted human being” is possible only on the bases of “the integrity of the spirit”. It is pointed that the moral aspect in human is central and determinative state of other spheres of the spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Cosmism, Cosmism, Russian
    ALIENOCENE – THEORY/FICTION _________________________________________________________________________________ MIKKEL KRAUSE FRANTZEN ALIENOCENE – THEORY/FICTION On Russian Cosmism, ed. Boris Groys (New York: e-flux and MIT Press, 2018) “Philosophy must become the knowledge not only of what is but of what ought to be, that is, from the passive, speculative explanation of existence it must become an active project of what must be, the project of universal action.” -Nikolai Fyodorovich Fedorov The moon is back. First Man premiered in Denmark the other day, a movie about the moon landing starring Ryan Gosling. Also in the fall of 2018, the exhibition “The Moon: From Inner Worlds to Outer Space” opened at Louisiana, showing among many other things: The cover of British Bishop Francis Godwin’s science fiction book The Man in the Moone (1638), the Jules Verne-inspired movie Le Voyage dans la Lune (A Trip to the Moon, 1902) by Georges Méliés, and a William Blake engraving from 1793 with a boy trying to get to the moon with a giant ladder and a caption that reads: I want! I want! More or less simultaneously, visitors at Brandt, another Danish art museum, could walk through the exhibition “Into the unknown. A journey through Science 3/1/2019 1 ALIENOCENE – THEORY/FICTION Fiction.” And earlier this year the 50th anniversary edition of Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey was shown in movie theatres around the world. Clearly, mankind still dreams about space as evidenced by the dream factory of Hollywood. Or does it? To paraphrase William Blake’s little boy: What do we want from the galaxy today? Besides tapping into the changing tides of the art world’s fashions a couple of years too late, the two art exhibitions in Denmark were above all retrospectives: They gave the viewer the opportunity to stand in the present and look back at futures past.
    [Show full text]