DOCSLIB.ORG

Precontact Archeology in Yellowstone

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

volume 18 • issue 1 • 2010 Precontact Archeology in Yellowstone Interview with Archeologist Ann Johnson A New View of Yellowstone’s Geyser Basins Science in Brief he value of Yellowstone National Park as a I would also like scientific laboratory as well as a public pleasuring to remind you of an- ground is reflected in the fact that the park hosts other forum for sci- Tmore than 200 researchers from various agencies, universi- ence in Yellowstone, the ties, and organizations each year. They produce hundreds upcoming 10th Biennial of papers, manuscripts, books, and book chapters on their Scientific Conference on work annually—a volume of information that is difficult the Greater Yellowstone NPS/HFC Commi to absorb. Yellowstone Science journal was started in 1992 to Ecosystem, “Questioning help report Yellowstone-based scientific research findings to Greater Yellowstone’s Future: researchers, park managers and staff, and the interested pub- Climate, Land Use, and SS io N lic. In each issue we feature articles written by researchers Invasive Species.” Information Colle Art ed from many disciplines—from art history to microbiology— on the conference can be found and distribute it to more than 3,500 readers as well as make on the Greater Yellowstone C it available online. Science Learning Center web- tio N A , , Since the inception of Yellowstone Science there have site (www.greateryellow- rti S been few changes to the journal. Yet with advances in tech- stonescience.org/gyesci- t Gil Co nology our audiences now receive even more information conf2010). Registration H e which is ever more widely available. With more demands on will open in June. N our time as readers, a shorter article has its advantages. In In this issue, retired keeping with the times and our audiences’ needs, Yellowstone park archeologist Ann Johnson Science is pleased to introduce a new department in this imparts what she learned over a long ca- issue, “Shorts.” This department will feature brief summaries reer in Yellowstone. Park geologist Cheryl Jaworowski shares of recent and important-to-Yellowstone projects and publi- new images of Yellowstone’s geyser basins that can help us to cations. Through Shorts, we will attempt to report on more better understand and protect these large thermal areas. We of the projects and results that researchers provide us with. hope you enjoy the issue. We hope you enjoy this new department. a periodical devoted to natural and cultural resources volume 18 • issue 1 • May 2010 Tami Blackford editor Southeast arm of Yellowstone lake, 1977. Mary Ann Franke Associate editor NPS Emily Yost Graphic designer F e at u r e s Assistant editor Janine Waller Assistant editor 8 using thermal Infrared Imagery and Artcraft Printers, Inc. LiDar in Yellowstone Geyser Basins Bozeman, Montana A collaborative monitoring project offers a new view of Printer Yellowstone’s Geyser Basins. Cheryl Jaworowski, Henry P. Heasler, Christopher M.U. Neale, and Saravanan Sivarajan 20 the Groundwork for a Career in Yellowstone’s Past Yellowstone Science is published periodically. Archeologist Ann Johnson reflects on her career in Yellowstone. Support for Yellowstone Science is provided by the Yellowstone Association, a nonprofit An interview with Dr. Ann Johnson educational organization dedicated to serving the park and its visitors. For more information about the association, including membership, 24 an Overview of Precontact archeology or to donate to the production of Yellowstone Science, visit www.yellowstoneassociation.org in Yellowstone or write: Yellowstone Association, Po Box 117, Yellowstone National Park, WY 82190. the Ann Johnson summarizes the human past in Yellowstone. opinions expressed in Yellowstone Science are the authors’ and may not reflect either Ann Johnson National Park Service policy or the views of the Yellowstone Center for resources. Copyright © 2010, the Yellowstone Association for Natural Science, History & education. For D e Pa rt m e n t s back issues of Yellowstone Science, please see www.greateryellowstonescience.org/ys. 2 news & notes Submissions are welcome from all investigators conducting formal research in the Yellowstone Michael Curtis Receives Wilderness Stewardship Award • area. to submit proposals for articles, to Summary of 2010 Yellowstone Earthquake Swarm • Northern subscribe, or to send a letter to the editor, please write to the following address: Elk Herd Winter Count • Late Winter Bison Population editor, Yellowstone Science, Po Box 168, Yellowstone National Park, WY 82190. Estimate • Olliff Wins Management Award • 10th Biennial You may also email: [email protected]. Scientific Conference Announces Keynote Speakers Yellowstone Science is printed on recycled 5 Passages paper with a soy-based ink. Grassland ecologist and long-time park researcher Linda L. Wallace will be missed. 6 shorts Cover photo: Cougar: Ecology and Conservation • Trumpeter Swan Stone cairn site near Yellowstone lake. Abundance and Growth Rates • The Ecology of Large Mammals Photo by NPS/robin Park. in Central Yellowstone News & Notes J A mie F Summary of January– A February 2010 Yellowstone rrell, r o Earthquake Swarm B ert B. Smit B. ert Adapted from information available on the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory H AN , , website (http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/yvo/) d C H ri S ti An earthquake swarm that began on N e Pu January 15, 2010, with a few small S k AS quakes picked up in intensity on o F t January 17 (fig. 1), and by the end H e uN of February, earthquake activity at iver S Yellowstone had returned to near- it Y o F background levels, but seismic activ- u t ity increased slightly in early April. AH Sei S The swarm was located about 10 molo miles (16 km) northwest of the Old GY r e Faithful area on the northwestern S e A r edge of the Yellowstone Caldera. CH Swarms have occurred in this area Grou several times over the past 30 years, P but this swarm is the second largest recorded in the park. It lasted longer and included more earthquakes than Figure 1. map of Yellowstone National Park showing recent swarm earthquakes last year’s swarm beneath Yellowstone (red), previous swarms from 1995–2009 (green), volcanic vents (yellow stars), Lake (December ’08/January ’09). caldera boundaries (orange), mallard lake resurgent dome—to the southwest, Calculations by the University of Utah and Sour Creek resurgent dome, to the northeast (yellow lines). Histogram shows Seismology Research Group of the total the number of earthquakes per day from January 15 to April 6, 2010. seismic energy released by all the swarm earthquakes corresponds to one earth- quake with an approximate magnitude Many of the 19 M2.5-3.0 earth- four summers he had advanced from of 4.4. The largest recorded swarm at quakes were also felt in the region. youth leader to crew leader. He then Yellowstone occurred in the fall of 1985 worked on park trails for seven seasons, in a similar location, in the northwest Michael Curtis Receives four as the leader of the South District corner of the Yellowstone Caldera. Wilderness Stewardship trail crew. He spent one winter with As of April 6, 2010, a total of 2,357 Award the Lynx Project (2001–2002), then earthquakes had been automatically became the Shoshone Lake Ranger located for the entire swarm, includ- In recognition of his role in fur- from summers 2002 through 2005. ing 16 with a magnitude greater than thering the safe use of low-impact During those winters he did snow- 3.0; 141 with M2.0–2.9; 1,742 with methods for backcountry work, mobile patrol at South. Curtis also M1.0–1.9; 1,361 with M0.0-0.9 and Yellowstone ranger Michael K. Curtis worked in Capitol Reef and Big Bend 97 with M<0.0. The largest events received the National Park Service’s national parks and as a bio-aide for were a pair of earthquakes of magni- Intermountain Region Leader in Idaho Fish and Game. Since May tude 3.7 and 3.8 that occurred after Wilderness Stewardship Award. 2006, he has been the backcountry 11 pm MST on January 20, 2010. Both Ranger Curtis started work- supervisor for the Snake River District. events were felt throughout the park ing for the National Park Service in As a backcountry supervisor, Curtis and in surrounding communities Yellowstone as a Youth Conservation has shown a dedication to refining in Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho. Corps (YCC) enrollee in 1990. After and implementing the minimum 2 Yellowstone Science 18(1) • 2010 Courte survive and elk numbers have decreased SY in areas where there are higher numbers o F m of wolves and grizzly bears, but have i CHA el Curti stabilized or even increased in areas where there are fewer predators and S only moderate population reduction from hunting. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks has issued only 100 antler- less elk permits per season in recent years and recommended closing the Gardiner late hunt for the next two years to increase the size of the elk herd. The herd winters between the park’s Northeast Entrance and Dome Mountain and Dailey Lake in Paradise Valley, Montana. In this year’s survey, Yellowstone ranger michael Curtis was recognized by the National Park Service’s the number of elk observed in the intermountain region for his leadership in wilderness stewardship. park was about equal to those counted outside the park’s north boundary. The Northern Yellowstone requirement analysis process. When unfeasible, he adopted short-duration Cooperative Wildlife Working Group, the Yellowstone Park Foundation generator use and rechargeable electric which includes biologists from (YPF) offered to provide funds for tools as the appropriate solution. Yellowstone National Park, Montana backcountry equipment, he proposed In these ways, Curtis has served as Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Gallatin saws and axes, conducted the neces- a role model for the seasonal rang- National Forest, and the US Geological sary research, found the appropriate ers who have worked with him and Survey, will continue to monitor vendors, and taught backcountry continues to impart these values, trends of the northern Yellowstone elk rangers how to use these tools.
Recommended publications
  • Overview of Landslide Hydrology

    Overview of Landslide Hydrology

    water Editorial Overview of Landslide Hydrology Roy C. Sidle 1,2,* , Roberto Greco 3 and Thom Bogaard 4 1 Mountain Societies Research Institute, University of Central Asia, Khorog GBAO 736000, Tajikistan 2 Sustainability Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Dr., Sippy Downs 4556, Queensland, Australia 3 Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Università degli Studi della Campania ‘L. Vanvitelli’, via Roma 9, 81031 Aversa (CE), Italy; [email protected] 4 Department of Water Management, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +996-770-822-144 Received: 11 January 2019; Accepted: 15 January 2019; Published: 16 January 2019 Most landslides and debris flows worldwide occur during or following periods of rainfall, and many of these have been associated with major disasters causing extensive property damage and loss of life [1–9]. Given concerns about the effects of climate change on precipitation regime, in the future, some mountainous areas may likely experience more landslides with a faster response to rainfall; however, most such projections are weakly based and remain untested [10,11]. Subsurface hydrology is usually the main triggering mechanism of these landslides and associated debris flows. While the effects of hillslope hydrology on runoff generation have been thoroughly studied, much less attention has been paid to these effects on landslide and debris flow initiation. Recent syntheses demonstrate that it is no longer appropriate to view the subsurface as a static media which facilitates the transit of subsurface water, rather a variety of factors affecting the dynamics of subsurface hydrology need to be considered [12,13].
  • General Index

    General Index

    General Index Italicized page numbers indicate figures and tables. Color plates are in- cussed; full listings of authors’ works as cited in this volume may be dicated as “pl.” Color plates 1– 40 are in part 1 and plates 41–80 are found in the bibliographical index. in part 2. Authors are listed only when their ideas or works are dis- Aa, Pieter van der (1659–1733), 1338 of military cartography, 971 934 –39; Genoa, 864 –65; Low Coun- Aa River, pl.61, 1523 of nautical charts, 1069, 1424 tries, 1257 Aachen, 1241 printing’s impact on, 607–8 of Dutch hamlets, 1264 Abate, Agostino, 857–58, 864 –65 role of sources in, 66 –67 ecclesiastical subdivisions in, 1090, 1091 Abbeys. See also Cartularies; Monasteries of Russian maps, 1873 of forests, 50 maps: property, 50–51; water system, 43 standards of, 7 German maps in context of, 1224, 1225 plans: juridical uses of, pl.61, 1523–24, studies of, 505–8, 1258 n.53 map consciousness in, 636, 661–62 1525; Wildmore Fen (in psalter), 43– 44 of surveys, 505–8, 708, 1435–36 maps in: cadastral (See Cadastral maps); Abbreviations, 1897, 1899 of town models, 489 central Italy, 909–15; characteristics of, Abreu, Lisuarte de, 1019 Acequia Imperial de Aragón, 507 874 –75, 880 –82; coloring of, 1499, Abruzzi River, 547, 570 Acerra, 951 1588; East-Central Europe, 1806, 1808; Absolutism, 831, 833, 835–36 Ackerman, James S., 427 n.2 England, 50 –51, 1595, 1599, 1603, See also Sovereigns and monarchs Aconcio, Jacopo (d. 1566), 1611 1615, 1629, 1720; France, 1497–1500, Abstraction Acosta, José de (1539–1600), 1235 1501; humanism linked to, 909–10; in- in bird’s-eye views, 688 Acquaviva, Andrea Matteo (d.
  • Vegetative Ecology of a Montane Mire, Crater Lake National

    Vegetative Ecology of a Montane Mire, Crater Lake National

    AJ ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Susan Cornelia Seyer for the degree of Master of Science in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on December 14, 1979 Title: VEGETATIVE ECOLOGY OF A MONTANE MIRE, CRATER LAKE NATIONAL PARK, OREGON Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: Jerry F. Franklin Mires, or peat-producing ecosystems, dominated by sedges, shrubs, and brown mosses, are common features in Cascade subalpine regions, occurring where moisture accumulates in small basins or on poorly-drained slopes. Although descriptions and classifications have been developed for mire vegetation in much of the world, there is little information of even a descriptive nature for these montane mires in Oregon and Washington. This thesis reports on phytosocia- logical structure, env'ironental relations, and successional trends in one such mire in the Oregon Cascade mountains. To characterize the general phytosociological structure of the mire vegetation at Sphagnum Bog, Crater Lake National Park, quantitative species cover data were used in conjunction with a Braun-Blanquet tabular analysis and two-dimensional stand ordinations, reciprocal averaging and a Bray-Curtis polar ordination. Defined community types correspond to physiognomic types as follows: Carex rostrata (reedswamp); Eleocharis pauciflora-Carex limosa, Eleocharis pauciflora/bryophytes (low sedge fens); Carex sichensis (tall sedge fen); Vaccinium/ Aulacomnium palustre, Vaccinium occidentala/Carex sitchensis (shrub thickets; Alnus incana/Brachythacium sp. and Salix barclayi (marginal carrs).Phases were defined when appropriate. A vegetation map was made to illustrate the locations and extent of the variouscommunities. Comparisons with other montane mires in thearea determined that the physiognomic units defined are repeatable when appropriate habitat conditions are present, and that they usually includemany of the same characteristic species, the dominant mosses being particularly constant.
  • Great Falls Montana Tourism Marketing Strategy

    Great Falls Montana Tourism Marketing Strategy

    Great Falls Montana Tourism Marketing Strategy April 2017 Executive Summary Great Falls Montana Tourism has begun an ambitious initiative to attract more visitors to the City of Great Falls, supporting its growth and bolstering its economy. Successful tourism attraction will depend on the highly-targeted engagement of Great Falls’ audience groups – people looking for a vacation or meeting experience centered around the assets Great Falls has to offer. Great Falls Montana Tourism has engaged Atlas to develop a comprehensive tourism marketing strategy for the city to guide tourism attraction tactics and campaigns for maximum impact. To develop an effective strategy, Atlas has: • Assessed Great Falls’ tourism strengths and weaknesses, and the opportunities and threats, to growing the tourism economy, along with an analysis of in-state and regional competing communities • Performed a national survey of professional meeting planners to gauge the perception of Great Falls as a meeting destination, including respondents that have actively planned meetings in Great Falls and those who have not • Researched Great Falls’ online reputation on popular travel websites, including TripAdvisor, Yelp, Google Maps, and Facebook • Interviewed Great Falls Montana Tourism leadership and reviewed the previous, internally-developed marketing plan and tourism brand package and its supporting research developed by North Star Destination Strategies From this foundation of analysis and research, Atlas developed the positioning statement for Great Falls as a tourism
  • Effects of Sediment Pulses on Channel Morphology in a Gravel-Bed River

    Effects of Sediment Pulses on Channel Morphology in a Gravel-Bed River

    Effects of sediment pulses on channel morphology in a gravel-bed river Daniel F. Hoffman† Emmanuel J. Gabet‡ Department of Geosciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59802, USA ABSTRACT available to it. The delivery of sediment to riv- channel widening, braiding, and fi ning of bed ers and streams in mountain drainage basins material, followed by coarsening, construction Sediment delivery to stream channels in often comes in large, infrequent pulses from of coarse grained terraces, and formation of mountainous basins is strongly episodic, landslides and debris fl ows (Benda and Dunne, new side channels. After the sediment wave had with large pulses of sediment typically 1997; Gabet and Dunne, 2003). This sediment passed, they observed channel incision down to delivered by infrequent landslides and debris supply regime differs from that of channels an immobile bed and bedrock. Cui et al. (2003) fl ows. Identifying the role of large but rare in lowland environments with a more regular conducted fl ume experiments to investigate sed- sediment delivery events in the evolution of sediment supply and is refl ected in the form iment pulses and found that in a channel with channel morphology and fl uvial sediment and textural composition of the channel and alternate bars, the bed relief decreased with the transport is crucial to an understanding of fl oodplain. Processing large pulses of sediment arrival of the downstream edge of the sediment the development of mountain basins. In July can be slow and leave a lasting legacy on the wave, and increased as the upstream edge of the 2001, intense rainfall triggered numerous valley fl oor.
  • Bedload Transport and Large Organic Debris in Steep Mountain Streams in Forested Watersheds on the Olympic Penisula, Washington

    Bedload Transport and Large Organic Debris in Steep Mountain Streams in Forested Watersheds on the Olympic Penisula, Washington

    77 TFW-SH7-94-001 Bedload Transport and Large Organic Debris in Steep Mountain Streams in Forested Watersheds on the Olympic Penisula, Washington Final Report By Matthew O’Connor and R. Dennis Harr October 1994 BEDLOAD TRANSPORT AND LARGE ORGANIC DEBRIS IN STEEP MOUNTAIN STREAMS IN FORESTED WATERSHEDS ON THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA, WASHINGTON FINAL REPORT Submitted by Matthew O’Connor College of Forest Resources, AR-10 University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195 and R. Dennis Harr Research Hydrologist USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station and Professor, College of Forest Resources University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195 to Timber/Fish/Wildlife Sediment, Hydrology and Mass Wasting Steering Committee and State of Washington Department of Natural Resources October 31, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii OVERVIEW 1 INTRODUCTION 2 BACKGROUND 3 Sediment Routing in Low-Order Channels 3 Timber/Fish/Wildlife Literature Review of Sediment Dynamics in Low-order Streams 5 Conceptual Model of Bedload Routing 6 Effects of Timber Harvest on LOD Accumulation Rates 8 MONITORING SEDIMENT TRANSPORT IN LOW-ORDER CHANNELS 11 Monitoring Objectives 11 Field Sites for Monitoring Program 12 BEDLOAD TRANSPORT MODEL 16 Model Overview 16 Stochastic Model Outputs from Predictive Relationships 17 24-Hour Precipitation 17 Synthesis of Frequency of Threshold 24-Hour Precipitation 18 Peak Discharge as a Function of 24-Hour Precipitation 21 Excess Unit Stream Power as a Function of Peak Discharge 28 Mean Scour
  • Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping

    Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping

    Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping Summary Yellowstone National Park This document summarizes the results of a geologic resource evaluation scoping session that was held at Yellowstone National Park on May 16–17, 2005. The NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD) organized this scoping session in order to view and discuss the park’s geologic resources, address the status of geologic maps and digitizing, and assess resource management issues and needs. In addition to GRD staff, participants included park staff and cooperators from the U.S. Geological Survey and Colorado State University (table 1). Table 1. Participants of Yellowstone’s GRE Scoping Session Name Affiliation Phone E-Mail Bob Volcanologist, USGS–Menlo Park 650-329-5201 [email protected] Christiansen Geologist/GRE Program GIS Lead, NPS Tim Connors 303-969-2093 [email protected] Geologic Resources Division Data Stewardship Coordinator, Greater Rob Daley 406-994-4124 [email protected] Yellowstone Network Supervisory Geologist, Yellowstone Hank Heasler 307-344-2441 [email protected] National Park Geologist, NPS Geologic Resources Bruce Heise 303-969-2017 [email protected] Division Cheryl Geologist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-2208 [email protected] Jaworowski Katie Geologist/Senior Research Associate, 970-586-7243 [email protected] KellerLynn Colorado State University Branch Chief, NPS Geologic Resources Carol McCoy 303-969-2096 [email protected] Division Ken Pierce Surficial Geologist, USGS–Bozeman 406-994-5085 [email protected] Supervisory GIS Specialist, Yellowstone Anne Rodman 307-344-7381 [email protected] National Park Shannon GIS Specialist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-7381 [email protected] Savage Monday, May 16, involved a welcome to Yellowstone National Park and an introduction to the Geologic Resource Evaluation (GRE) Program, including status of reports and digital maps.
  • Yellowstone Hot Springs Are Organic Chemodiversity Hot Spots Michael Gonsior1, Norbert Hertkorn2, Nancy Hinman3, Sabine E.-M

    Yellowstone Hot Springs Are Organic Chemodiversity Hot Spots Michael Gonsior1, Norbert Hertkorn2, Nancy Hinman3, Sabine E.-M

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Yellowstone Hot Springs are Organic Chemodiversity Hot Spots Michael Gonsior1, Norbert Hertkorn2, Nancy Hinman3, Sabine E.-M. Dvorski2, Mourad Harir2, William J. Cooper4 & Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin2,5 Received: 5 June 2018 Yellowstone National Park hydrothermal springs were investigated according to their organic Accepted: 11 September 2018 geochemistry with a special focus on the Yellowstone hot spring dissolved organic matter (YDOM) Published: xx xx xxxx that was solid-phase extracted. Here we show that YDOM has a unique chemodiversity that has not yet been observed anywhere else in aquatic surface environments and that Yellowstone hot springs are organic chemodiversity hot spots. Four main geochemically classifed hot spring types (alkaline- chloride, mixed alkaline-chloride, acid-chloride-sulfate and travertine-precipitating) exhibited distinct organic molecular signatures that correlated remarkably well with the known inorganic geochemistry and manifested themselves in excitation emission matrix fuorescence, nuclear magnetic resonance, and ultrahigh resolution mass spectra. YDOM contained thousands of molecular formulas unique to Yellowstone of which 80% contained sulfur, even in low hydrogen sulfde containing alkaline-chloride springs. This unique YDOM refects the extreme organic geochemistry present in the hydrothermal features of Yellowstone National Park. Physical, chemical, and biological processes control the evolution of minerals and dissolved organic mat- ter (DOM) over a vast range of mass, length, and time1. Indeed, mutual interferences and interactions among these processes presumably have defned chemical and biological evolution throughout Earth history. Modern terrestrial biology operates largely within limited temperature, pH, and redox conditions. In contrast, extreme environments, such as hot springs, have wide ranges of physicochemical parameters, generally believed to be similar to environments found on early Earth2.
  • Visiting the Upper Geyser Basin (Old Faithful Geyser)

    Visiting the Upper Geyser Basin (Old Faithful Geyser)

    ® Visiting the Upper Geyser Basin (Old Faithful Geyser) The Old Faithful Area (Upper Geyser Basin) is one of the most popular and crowded areas in the Summer. Start off with a visit to the new visitor’s center. Tour the center, but most importantly check the information desk for the estimated eruption times of pop - ular geysers in the basin. (Note that they are estimated times... so plan accordingly). Beat the crowds by starting early in the morning before those who did not sleep in the area arrive. Walk around the geyser basin and witness numerous well-known features; Old Faithful, Beehive, Castle, Grotto, Riverside & Morning Glory Pool to name a few. The cool morning air temperature intensifies the steam making the basin more magical. By mid-morning the Summer crowds get larger as the day goes until sunset. (When the area gets congested... head to the hills!, and take the hikes in the back country.) You’ll never get to see all the geysers erupt and will have to pick and chose those you want to invest with your time and how long younger family members can hold out. Prep your walk with a bathroom break and pack bottled beverages. Touring the basin takes time and before you know it you have walked a few miles. (For those in need there is a no frills bathroom near Morning Glory Pool.) Upper Geyser Basin Sites of Interest: 1. Walk through the new Visitor’s Center (opened in the Summer of 2011) 2. Tour the Upper Geyser Basin Boardwalk Upper Geyser Basin is the best place in Yellowstone to see geysers erupt.
  • DMAAC – February 1973

    DMAAC – February 1973

    LUNAR TOPOGRAPHIC ORTHOPHOTOMAP (LTO) AND LUNAR ORTHOPHOTMAP (LO) SERIES (Published by DMATC) Lunar Topographic Orthophotmaps and Lunar Orthophotomaps Scale: 1:250,000 Projection: Transverse Mercator Sheet Size: 25.5”x 26.5” The Lunar Topographic Orthophotmaps and Lunar Orthophotomaps Series are the first comprehensive and continuous mapping to be accomplished from Apollo Mission 15-17 mapping photographs. This series is also the first major effort to apply recent advances in orthophotography to lunar mapping. Presently developed maps of this series were designed to support initial lunar scientific investigations primarily employing results of Apollo Mission 15-17 data. Individual maps of this series cover 4 degrees of lunar latitude and 5 degrees of lunar longitude consisting of 1/16 of the area of a 1:1,000,000 scale Lunar Astronautical Chart (LAC) (Section 4.2.1). Their apha-numeric identification (example – LTO38B1) consists of the designator LTO for topographic orthophoto editions or LO for orthophoto editions followed by the LAC number in which they fall, followed by an A, B, C or D designator defining the pertinent LAC quadrant and a 1, 2, 3, or 4 designator defining the specific sub-quadrant actually covered. The following designation (250) identifies the sheets as being at 1:250,000 scale. The LTO editions display 100-meter contours, 50-meter supplemental contours and spot elevations in a red overprint to the base, which is lithographed in black and white. LO editions are identical except that all relief information is omitted and selenographic graticule is restricted to border ticks, presenting an umencumbered view of lunar features imaged by the photographic base.
  • Yellowstone National Park Is in the U.S

    Yellowstone National Park Is in the U.S

    english for everyone.org Name________________ Date________________ “Yellowstone”e Reading Comprehension – Informational Passages (5) Directions: Read the passage. Then answer questions about the passage below. Yellowstone National Park is in the U.S. states of Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana. It became the first National Park in 1872. There are geysers and hot springs at Yellowstone. There are also many animals at Yellowstone. There are elk, bison, sheep, grizzly bears, black bears, moose, coyotes, and more. More than 3 million people visit Yellowstone National Park each year. During the winter, visitors can ski or go snowmobiling there. There are also snow coaches that give tours. Visitors can see steam (vapor water) come from the geysers. During other seasons, visitors can go boating or fishing. People can ride horses there. There are nature trails and tours. Most visitors want to see Old Faithful, a very predictable geyser at Yellowstone. Visitors can check a schedule to see the exact time that Old Faithful is going to erupt. There are many other geysers and boiling springs in the area. Great Fountain Geyser erupts every 11 hours. Excelsior Geyser produces 4,000 gallons of boiling water each minute! Boiling water is 100 degrees Celsius, or 212 degrees Fahrenheit – that’s very hot! People also like to see the Grand Prismatic Spring. It is the largest hot spring in the park. It has many beautiful colors. The beautiful colors are caused by bacteria in the water. These are forms of life that have only one cell. Different bacteria live in different water temperatures. Visiting Yellowstone National Park can be a week–long vacation or more.
  • Foundation Document Overview Yellowstone National Park Wyoming, Montana, Idaho

    Foundation Document Overview Yellowstone National Park Wyoming, Montana, Idaho

    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview Yellowstone National Park Wyoming, Montana, Idaho Contact Information For more information about the Yellowstone National Park Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or 307-344-7381 or write to: Superintendent, Yellowstone National Park, PO Box 168, Yellowstone National Park, WY 82190-0168 Park Description Yellowstone became the world’s first national park on March This vast landscape contains the headwaters of several major 1, 1872, set aside in recognition of its unique hydrothermal rivers. The Firehole and Gibbon rivers unite to form the Madison, features and for the benefit and enjoyment of the people. which, along with the Gallatin River, joins the Jefferson to With this landmark decision, the United States Congress create the Missouri River several miles north of the park. The created a path for future parks within this country and Yellowstone River is a major tributary of the Missouri, which around the world; Yellowstone still serves as a global then flows via the Mississippi to the Gulf of Mexico. The Snake resource conservation and tourism model for public land River arises near the park’s south boundary and joins the management. Yellowstone is perhaps most well-known for its Columbia to flow into the Pacific. Yellowstone Lake is the largest hydrothermal features such as the iconic Old Faithful geyser. lake at high altitude in North America and the Lower Yellowstone The park encompasses 2.25 million acres, or 3,472 square Falls is the highest of more than 40 named waterfalls in the park. miles, of a landscape punctuated by steaming pools, bubbling mudpots, spewing geysers, and colorful volcanic soils.