DOCSLIB.ORG

LECTURE 11: ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS Recall That a Function F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LECTURE 11: ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS Recall That a Function F LECTURE 11: ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS Recall that a function f : N ! C is called an arithmetical function. Re- call also that a multiplicative function f satisfies the property that whenever (m; n) = 1, one has f(mn) = f(m)f(n): We have proved that the function X g(n) = f(d) djn is multiplicative whenever f(n) is multiplicative. In this section we discuss various properties of arithmetical functions, many of them multiplicative, and seek to understand what they \look" like. 1. Examples of arithmetical functions • the divisor function τ(n). The function τ(n) is defined as the number of divisors of the number n. It can be written explicitly as X τ(n) = 1: djn • the sum of divisors function σ(n). The function σ(n) is defined as the sum of all divisors of the number n. It can be written explicitly as X σ(n) = d: djn • the Euler totient function φ(n). The function φ(n) is defined as the number of reduced residue classes modulo n. We have shown that it is given by a formula Y φ(n) = (pr − pr−1): prkn • the M¨obiusfunction µ(n) The function φ(n) is defined by ( (−1)`; when n = p ··· p is squarefree, µ(n) = 1 ` 0; otherwise. Here, by a squarefree number, we mean an integer that is not divisible by the square of any prime number. It is easy to check that µ is multiplicative. 1 2 LECTURE 11 Note that, just as with our earlier discussion of the Euler totient, a function that is multiplicative will be relatively easy to evaluate when its argument has a known prime factorisation. For example, one can see rather easily that when p is a prime number and h is a non-negative integer, then h X pr+1 − 1 τ(pr) = r + 1 and σ(pr) = pi = ; p − 1 i=0 and thus Y Y pr+1 − 1 τ(n) = (r + 1) and σ(n) = : p − 1 prkn prkn 2. The Mobius¨ inversion formula The M¨obiusfunction, has special properties that make it particularly useful in studying averages of other arithmetic functions (and much else besides). Recall that ( (−1)`; when n = p : : : p is squarefree, µ(n) = 1 ` 0; otherwise. We define a rather trivial multiplicative function ν(n) by ( 1; when n = 1, ν(n) = 0; otherwise. P Lemma 2.1. One has djn µ(d) = ν(n). P Proof. Since µ(n) is a multiplicative function of n, it follows that djn µ(d) is P also multiplicative. But on writing f(n) = djn µ(d), one finds that α X f(pα) = µ(ph) = 1 − 1 = 0; for α > 0; h=0 and f(1) = µ(1) = 1. Thus, in view of the multiplicativity of f(n), one finds that f(n) is zero unless n has no prime divisors, a circumstance that occurs only when n = 1. This completes the proof of the theorem. We can now describe a certain duality between arithmetic functions, and functions defined via divisor sums. Theorem 2.2 (the M¨obiusinversion formulae). (i) Let f be any arithmetical function, and define X g(n) = f(d): djn Then one has X f(n) = µ(d)g(n=d): djn LECTURE 11 3 (ii) Suppose that g is any arithmetical function, and define X f(n) = µ(d)g(n=d): djn Then one has X g(n) = f(d): djn P Proof. (i) Given that g(n) = djn f(d), one obtains X X X X X µ(d)g(n=d) = µ(d)f(e) = f(e) µ(d) djn djn ej(n=d) ejn dj(n=e) X = f(e)ν(n=e) = f(n): ejn P (ii) Given that f(n) = djn µ(d)g(n=d), one obtains X X X X f(d) = f(n=d) = µ(e)g(n=(de)) djn djn djn ej(n=d) X X X X = µ(e)g(n=(de)) = µ(e)g(d) ejn dj(n=e) ejn dj(n=e) X X X = g(d) µ(e) = g(d)ν(n=d) = g(n): djn ej(n=d) djn Note that M¨obiusinversion applies to all arithmetical functions, without any hypothesis concerning whether or not they are multiplicative. Example 2.3. Recall that we showed that X φ(d) = n: djn As an immediate consequence of the M¨obiusinversion formulae, we deduce that X X φ(n) = µ(d)(n=d) = n µ(d)=d: djn djn 3. Estimates for arithmetical functions We now explore the \population statistics" of values of arithmetical func- tions: what is the maximal/minimal size of such a function, the average size, the variance, etc.? In order properly to discuss such issues, we need to recall some standard analytic notation. Given functions f; g : R ! R, with g taking positive values, we write f(x) = O(g(x)) (for x > x0) 4 LECTURE 11 when there exists some positive constant C for which jf(x)j 6 Cg(x) (for x > x0). 2 2 Example 3.1. One has x = O(x ) for x > 1, 1=x = O(1) for x > 1, and x x = O(e ) for x > 0. There are two useful strategies to keep in mind when addressing questions concerning estimates for arithmetic functions: • In order to estimate the size of a multiplicative function f(n), one should first estimate f(pr) on prime powers, and then combine this information with knowledge about the distribution of prime numbers. • If one wishes to estimate the average size of an arithmetical function g(n), one can apply the M¨obiusinversion formulae to write g(n) in the shape X g(n) = f(d); djn in which X f(n) = µ(d)g(n=d): djn Frequently, one finds that this new function f(n) is reasonably well behaved, and then one has X X X g(n) = f(d) 16n6x 16n6x djn X X = f(d): 16d6x 16m6x=d Here, in the last summation, we made the change of variable n = md. Thus we obtain X X X g(n) = f(d) 1 16n6x 16d6x 16m6x=d X jxk = f(d) ; d 16d6x where, as usual, we write bθc for the greatest integer not exceeding θ. Thus we see that 1 X 1 X x g(n) = f(d) + O(1) x x d 16n6x 16d6x ! X f(d) 1 X = + O jf(d)j : d x 16d6x 16d6x In many circumstances, the first term on the right hand side of the last equation is of larger order of magnitude than the last term, and then LECTURE 11 5 one has the asymptotic formula 1 X X f(d) g(n) ∼ : x d 16n6x 16d6x This formula is useful provided that the new average is easier to com- pute than the original average. We illustrate these ideas with some examples. Example 3.2. The divisor function τ(n). We claim that for any positive number ", one has " τ(n) = O(n ) for n 2 N. In order to establish this estimate, we exploit the multiplicative property of τ(n), and investigate the function τ(n) Y j + 1 = : n" pj" pj kn For any fixed prime p,(j + 1)=pj" is a decreasing function of j for sufficiently large j. In fact, with a little calculus we find that " " j + 1 p (j + 1)" log2 p p −x " j" = (j+1)" log p 6 supfx2 : x > 0g = O(p ): p " log2 p 2 2 " log2 p Thus, τ(n) Y O(p") = O(n"): n" 6 pj kn Next we turn to the matter of the average value of τ(n) for 1 6 n 6 x. In P this instance, of course, one has τ(n) = djn 1, and so X X X X X τ(n) = 1 = 1 16n6x 16n6x djn 16d6x 16m6x=d X X = bx=dc = (x=d + O(1)) 16d6x 16d6x X 1 = x + O(x): d 16d6x But (as a good exercise in calculus), X 1 X Z d+1 dt = + O(1=d2) d d t 16d6x 16d6x = log x + O(1): Thus we deduce that 1 X τ(n) = log x + O(1): x 16n6x Example 3.3. The sum of divisors function σ(n). 6 LECTURE 11 P In this instance we have the formula σ(n) = djn d, and so X X X n X X σ(n) = = m d 16n6x 16n6x djn 16d6x 16m6x=d X X x2 = 1 bx=dc(bx=dc + 1) = + O(x=d) : 2 2d2 16d6x 16d6x But 1 ! X 1 X 1 X = + O 1=d2 = ζ(2) + O(1=x); d2 d2 16d6x d=1 d>x and hence 1 X π2 σ(n) = 1 ζ(2)x + O(log x) = x + O(log x): x 2 12 16n6x Example 3.4. The Euler function φ(n). We shall use the formula X µ(d) φ(n) = n : d djn Following the above strategy, we find that X X X X X φ(n) = µ(d)n=d = µ(d) m 16n6x 16n6x djn 16d6x 16m6x=d X X x2 = µ(d) · 1 bx=dc(bx=dc + 1) = µ(d) + O(x=d) 2 2d2 16d6x 16d6x ! X µ(d) X = 1 x2 + O jµ(d)jx=d : 2 d2 16d6x 16d6x To estimate the error term, we observe that X 1 Z x dt < 1 + = O(log x): d 1 t 16d6x Furthermore, 1 ! 1 X µ(d) X µ(d) X X µ(d) = + O 1=d2 = + O(1=x): d2 d2 d2 16d6x d=1 d>x d=1 Thus 1 X φ(n) = Cx + O(log x); x 16n6x P1 µ(d) 2 where C = d=1 d2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prime Divisors in the Rationality Condition for Odd Perfect Numbers
    Aid#59330/Preprints/2019-09-10/www.mathjobs.org RFSC 04-01 Revised The Prime Divisors in the Rationality Condition for Odd Perfect Numbers Simon Davis Research Foundation of Southern California 8861 Villa La Jolla Drive #13595 La Jolla, CA 92037 Abstract. It is sufficient to prove that there is an excess of prime factors in the product of repunits with odd prime bases defined by the sum of divisors of the integer N = (4k + 4m+1 ℓ 2αi 1) i=1 qi to establish that there do not exist any odd integers with equality (4k+1)4m+2−1 between σ(N) and 2N. The existence of distinct prime divisors in the repunits 4k , 2α +1 Q q i −1 i , i = 1,...,ℓ, in σ(N) follows from a theorem on the primitive divisors of the Lucas qi−1 sequences and the square root of the product of 2(4k + 1), and the sequence of repunits will not be rational unless the primes are matched. Minimization of the number of prime divisors in σ(N) yields an infinite set of repunits of increasing magnitude or prime equations with no integer solutions. MSC: 11D61, 11K65 Keywords: prime divisors, rationality condition 1. Introduction While even perfect numbers were known to be given by 2p−1(2p − 1), for 2p − 1 prime, the universality of this result led to the the problem of characterizing any other possible types of perfect numbers. It was suggested initially by Descartes that it was not likely that odd integers could be perfect numbers [13]. After the work of de Bessy [3], Euler proved σ(N) that the condition = 2, where σ(N) = d|N d is the sum-of-divisors function, N d integer 4m+1 2α1 2αℓ restricted odd integers to have the form (4kP+ 1) q1 ...qℓ , with 4k + 1, q1,...,qℓ prime [18], and further, that there might exist no set of prime bases such that the perfect number condition was satisfied.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.4 Multiplicative Functions
    3.4 Multiplicative Functions Question how to identify a multiplicative function? If it is the convolution of two other arithmetic functions we can use Theorem 3.19 If f and g are multiplicative then f ∗ g is multiplicative. Proof Assume gcd ( m, n ) = 1. Then d|mn if, and only if, d = d1d2 with d1|m, d2|n (and thus gcd( d1, d 2) = 1 and the decomposition is unique). Therefore mn f ∗ g(mn ) = f(d) g d dX|mn m n = f(d1d2) g d1 d2 dX1|m Xd2|n m n = f(d1) g f(d2) g d1 d2 dX1|m Xd2|n since f and g are multiplicative = f ∗ g(m) f ∗ g(n) Example 3.20 The divisor functions d = 1 ∗ 1, and dk = 1 ∗ 1 ∗ ... ∗ 1 ν convolution k times, along with σ = 1 ∗j and σν = 1 ∗j are all multiplicative. Note 1 is completely multiplicative but d is not, so convolution does not preserve complete multiplicatively. Question , was it obvious from its definition that σ was multiplicative? I suggest not. Example 3.21 For prime powers pa+1 − 1 d(pa) = a+1 and σ(pa) = . p−1 Hence pa+1 − 1 d(n) = (a+1) and σ(n) = . a a p−1 pYkn pYkn 11 Recall how in Theorem 1.8 we showed that ζ(s) has a Euler Product, so for Re s > 1, 1 −1 ζ(s) = 1 − . (7) ps p Y When convergent, an infinite product is non-zero. Hence (7) gives us (as already seen earlier in the course) Corollary 3.22 ζ(s) =6 0 for Re s > 1.
    [Show full text]
  • MORE-ON-SEMIPRIMES.Pdf
    MORE ON FACTORING SEMI-PRIMES In the last few years I have spent some time examining prime numbers and their properties. Among some of my new results are the a Prime Number Function F(N) and the concept of Number Fraction f(N). We can define these quantities as – (N ) N 1 f (N 2 ) 1 f (N ) and F(N ) N Nf (N 3 ) Here (N) is the divisor function of number theory. The interesting property of these functions is that when N is a prime then f(N)=0 and F(N)=1. For composite numbers f(N) is a positive fraction and F(N) will be less than one. One of the problems of major practical interest in number theory is how to rapidly factor large semi-primes N=pq, where p and q are prime numbers. This interest stems from the fact that encoded messages using public keys are vulnerable to decoding by adversaries if they can factor large semi-primes when they have a digit length of the order of 100. We want here to show how one might attempt to factor such large primes by a brute force approach using the above f(N) function. Our starting point is to consider a large semi-prime given by- N=pq with p<sqrt(N)<q By the basic definition of f(N) we get- p q p2 N f (N ) f ( pq) N pN This may be written as a quadratic in p which reads- p2 pNf (N ) N 0 It has the solution- p K K 2 N , with p N Here K=Nf(N)/2={(N)-N-1}/2.
    [Show full text]
  • On Arithmetic Functions of Balancing and Lucas-Balancing Numbers 1
    MATHEMATICAL COMMUNICATIONS 77 Math. Commun. 24(2019), 77–81 On arithmetic functions of balancing and Lucas-balancing numbers Utkal Keshari Dutta and Prasanta Kumar Ray∗ Department of Mathematics, Sambalpur University, Jyoti Vihar, Burla 768 019, Sambalpur, Odisha, India Received January 12, 2018; accepted June 21, 2018 Abstract. For any integers n ≥ 1 and k ≥ 0, let φ(n) and σk(n) denote the Euler phi function and the sum of the k-th powers of the divisors of n, respectively. In this article, the solutions to some Diophantine equations about these functions of balancing and Lucas- balancing numbers are discussed. AMS subject classifications: 11B37, 11B39, 11B83 Key words: Euler phi function, divisor function, balancing numbers, Lucas-balancing numbers 1. Introduction A balancing number n and a balancer r are the solutions to a simple Diophantine equation 1+2+ + (n 1)=(n +1)+(n +2)+ + (n + r) [1]. The sequence ··· − ··· of balancing numbers Bn satisfies the recurrence relation Bn = 6Bn Bn− , { } +1 − 1 n 1 with initials (B ,B ) = (0, 1). The companion of Bn is the sequence of ≥ 0 1 { } Lucas-balancing numbers Cn that satisfies the same recurrence relation as that { } of balancing numbers but with different initials (C0, C1) = (1, 3) [4]. Further, the closed forms known as Binet formulas for both of these sequences are given by n n n n λ1 λ2 λ1 + λ2 Bn = − , Cn = , λ λ 2 1 − 2 2 where λ1 =3+2√2 and λ2 =3 2√2 are the roots of the equation x 6x +1=0. Some more recent developments− of balancing and Lucas-balancing numbers− can be seen in [2, 3, 6, 8].
    [Show full text]
  • Algebraic Combinatorics on Trace Monoids: Extending Number Theory to Walks on Graphs
    ALGEBRAIC COMBINATORICS ON TRACE MONOIDS: EXTENDING NUMBER THEORY TO WALKS ON GRAPHS P.-L. GISCARD∗ AND P. ROCHETy Abstract. Trace monoids provide a powerful tool to study graphs, viewing walks as words whose letters, the edges of the graph, obey a specific commutation rule. A particular class of traces emerges from this framework, the hikes, whose alphabet is the set of simple cycles on the graph. We show that hikes characterize undirected graphs uniquely, up to isomorphism, and satisfy remarkable algebraic properties such as the existence and unicity of a prime factorization. Because of this, the set of hikes partially ordered by divisibility hosts a plethora of relations in direct correspondence with those found in number theory. Some applications of these results are presented, including an immanantal extension to MacMahon's master theorem and a derivation of the Ihara zeta function from an abelianization procedure. Keywords: Digraph; poset; trace monoid; walks; weighted adjacency matrix; incidence algebra; MacMahon master theorem; Ihara zeta function. MSC: 05C22, 05C38, 06A11, 05E99 1. Introduction. Several school of thoughts have emerged from the literature in graph theory, concerned with studying walks (also known as paths) on graphs as algebraic objects. Among the numerous structures proposed over the years are those based on walk concatenation [3], later refined by nesting [13] or the cycle space [9]. A promising approach by trace monoids consists in viewing the directed edges of a graph as letters forming an alphabet and walks as words on this alphabet. A crucial idea in this approach, proposed by [5], is to define a specific commutation rule on the alphabet: two edges commute if and only if they initiate from different vertices.
    [Show full text]
  • On a Certain Kind of Generalized Number-Theoretical Möbius Function
    On a Certain Kind of Generalized Number-Theoretical Möbius Function Tom C. Brown,£ Leetsch C. Hsu,† Jun Wang† and Peter Jau-Shyong Shiue‡ Citation data: T.C. Brown, C. Hsu Leetsch, Jun Wang, and Peter J.-S. Shiue, On a certain kind of generalized number-theoretical Moebius function, Math. Scientist 25 (2000), 72–77. Abstract The classical Möbius function appears in many places in number theory and in combinatorial the- ory. Several different generalizations of this function have been studied. We wish to bring to the attention of a wider audience a particular generalization which has some attractive applications. We give some new examples and applications, and mention some known results. Keywords: Generalized Möbius functions; arithmetical functions; Möbius-type functions; multiplica- tive functions AMS 2000 Subject Classification: Primary 11A25; 05A10 Secondary 11B75; 20K99 This paper is dedicated to the memory of Professor Gian-Carlo Rota 1 Introduction We define a generalized Möbius function ma for each complex number a. (When a = 1, m1 is the classical Möbius function.) We show that the set of functions ma forms an Abelian group with respect to the Dirichlet product, and then give a number of examples and applications, including a generalized Möbius inversion formula and a generalized Euler function. Special cases of the generalized Möbius functions studied here have been used in [6–8]. For other generalizations see [1,5]. For interesting survey articles, see [2,3, 11]. £Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC Canada V5A 1S6. [email protected]. †Department of Mathematics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
    [Show full text]
  • Note on the Theory of Correlation Functions
    Note On The Theory Of Correlation And Autocor- relation of Arithmetic Functions N. A. Carella Abstract: The correlation functions of some arithmetic functions are investigated in this note. The upper bounds for the autocorrelation of the Mobius function of degrees two and three C C n x µ(n)µ(n + 1) x/(log x) , and n x µ(n)µ(n + 1)µ(n + 2) x/(log x) , where C > 0 is a constant,≤ respectively,≪ are computed using≤ elementary methods. These≪ results are summarized asP a 2-level autocorrelation function. Furthermore,P some asymptotic result for the autocorrelation of the vonMangoldt function of degrees two n x Λ(n)Λ(n +2t) x, where t Z, are computed using elementary methods. These results are summarized≤ as a 3-lev≫el autocorrelation∈ function. P Mathematics Subject Classifications: Primary 11N37, Secondary 11L40. Keywords: Autocorrelation function, Correlation function, Multiplicative function, Liouville function, Mobius function, vonMangoldt function. arXiv:1603.06758v8 [math.GM] 2 Mar 2019 Copyright 2019 ii Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Autocorrelations Of Mobius Functions . ..... 1 1.2 Autocorrelations Of vonMangoldt Functions . ....... 2 2 Topics In Mobius Function 5 2.1 Representations of Liouville and Mobius Functions . ...... 5 2.2 Signs And Oscillations . 7 2.3 DyadicRepresentation............................... ... 8 2.4 Problems ......................................... 9 3 SomeAverageOrdersOfArithmeticFunctions 11 3.1 UnconditionalEstimates.............................. ... 11 3.2 Mean Value And Equidistribution . 13 3.3 ConditionalEstimates ................................ .. 14 3.4 DensitiesForSquarefreeIntegers . ....... 15 3.5 Subsets of Squarefree Integers of Zero Densities . ........... 16 3.6 Problems ......................................... 17 4 Mean Values of Arithmetic Functions 19 4.1 SomeDefinitions ..................................... 19 4.2 Some Results For Arithmetic Functions .
    [Show full text]
  • MASON V(Irtual) Mid-Atlantic Seminar on Numbers March 27–28, 2021
    MASON V(irtual) Mid-Atlantic Seminar On Numbers March 27{28, 2021 Abstracts Amod Agashe, Florida State University A generalization of Kronecker's first limit formula with application to zeta functions of number fields The classical Kronecker's first limit formula gives the polar and constant term in the Laurent expansion of a certain two variable Eisenstein series, which in turn gives the polar and constant term in the Laurent expansion of the zeta function of a quadratic imaginary field. We will recall this formula and give its generalization to more general Eisenstein series and to zeta functions of arbitrary number fields. Max Alekseyev, George Washington University Enumeration of Payphone Permutations People's desire for privacy drives many aspects of their social behavior. One such aspect can be seen at rows of payphones, where people often pick an available payphone most distant from already occupied ones.Assuming that there are n payphones in a row and that n people pick payphones one after another as privately as possible, the resulting assignment of people to payphones defines a permutation, which we will refer to as a payphone permutation. It can be easily seen that not every permutation can be obtained this way. In the present study, we consider different variations of payphone permutations and enumerate them. Kisan Bhoi, Sambalpur University Narayana numbers as sum of two repdigits Repdigits are natural numbers formed by the repetition of a single digit. Diophantine equations involving repdigits and the terms of linear recurrence sequences have been well studied in literature. In this talk we consider Narayana's cows sequence which is a third order liner recurrence sequence originated from a herd of cows and calves problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2008.10398V1 [Math.NT] 24 Aug 2020 Children He Has
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000{000 S 0894-0347(XX)0000-0 RECURSIVELY ABUNDANT AND RECURSIVELY PERFECT NUMBERS THOMAS FINK London Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 35a South St, London W1K 2XF, UK Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France The divisor function σ(n) sums the divisors of n. We call n abundant when σ(n) − n > n and perfect when σ(n) − n = n. I recently introduced the recursive divisor function a(n), the recursive analog of the divisor function. It measures the extent to which a number is highly divisible into parts, such that the parts are highly divisible into subparts, so on. Just as the divisor function motivates the abundant and perfect numbers, the recursive divisor function motivates their recursive analogs, which I introduce here. A number is recursively abundant, or ample, if a(n) > n and recursively perfect, or pristine, if a(n) = n. There are striking parallels between abundant and perfect numbers and their recursive counterparts. The product of two ample numbers is ample, and ample numbers are either abundant or odd perfect numbers. Odd ample numbers exist but are rare, and I conjecture that there are such numbers not divisible by the first k primes|which is known to be true for the abundant numbers. There are infinitely many pristine numbers, but that they cannot be odd, apart from 1. Pristine numbers are the product of a power of two and odd prime solutions to certain Diophantine equations, reminiscent of how perfect numbers are the product of a power of two and a Mersenne prime.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Problems of Erdős on the Sum-Of-Divisors Function
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, SERIES B Volume 3, Pages 1–26 (April 5, 2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/btran/10 SOME PROBLEMS OF ERDOS˝ ON THE SUM-OF-DIVISORS FUNCTION PAUL POLLACK AND CARL POMERANCE For Richard Guy on his 99th birthday. May his sequence be unbounded. Abstract. Let σ(n) denote the sum of all of the positive divisors of n,and let s(n)=σ(n) − n denote the sum of the proper divisors of n. The functions σ(·)ands(·) were favorite subjects of investigation by the late Paul Erd˝os. Here we revisit three themes from Erd˝os’s work on these functions. First, we improve the upper and lower bounds for the counting function of numbers n with n deficient but s(n) abundant, or vice versa. Second, we describe a heuristic argument suggesting the precise asymptotic density of n not in the range of the function s(·); these are the so-called nonaliquot numbers. Finally, we prove new results on the distribution of friendly k-sets, where a friendly σ(n) k-set is a collection of k distinct integers which share the same value of n . 1. Introduction Let σ(n) be the sum of the natural number divisors of n,sothatσ(n)= d|n d. Let s(n) be the sum of only the proper divisors of n,sothats(n)=σ(n) − n. Interest in these functions dates back to the ancient Greeks, who classified numbers as deficient, perfect,orabundant according to whether s(n) <n, s(n)=n,or s(n) >n, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Number Theory, Lecture 3
    Number Theory, Lecture 3 Number Theory, Lecture 3 Jan Snellman Arithmetical functions, Dirichlet convolution, Multiplicative functions, Arithmetical functions M¨obiusinversion Definition Some common arithmetical functions Dirichlet 1 Convolution Jan Snellman Matrix interpretation Order, Norms, 1 Infinite sums Matematiska Institutionen Multiplicative Link¨opingsUniversitet function Definition Euler φ M¨obius inversion Multiplicativity is preserved by multiplication Matrix verification Divisor functions Euler φ again µ itself Link¨oping,spring 2019 Lecture notes availabe at course homepage http://courses.mai.liu.se/GU/TATA54/ Number Summary Theory, Lecture 3 Jan Snellman Arithmetical functions Definition Some common Definition arithmetical functions 1 Arithmetical functions Dirichlet Euler φ Convolution Definition Matrix 3 M¨obiusinversion interpretation Some common arithmetical Order, Norms, Multiplicativity is preserved by Infinite sums functions Multiplicative multiplication function Dirichlet Convolution Definition Matrix verification Euler φ Matrix interpretation Divisor functions M¨obius Order, Norms, Infinite sums inversion Euler φ again Multiplicativity is preserved by multiplication 2 Multiplicative function µ itself Matrix verification Divisor functions Euler φ again µ itself Number Summary Theory, Lecture 3 Jan Snellman Arithmetical functions Definition Some common Definition arithmetical functions 1 Arithmetical functions Dirichlet Euler φ Convolution Definition Matrix 3 M¨obiusinversion interpretation Some common arithmetical Order, Norms,
    [Show full text]
  • EQUIDISTRIBUTION ESTIMATES for the K-FOLD DIVISOR FUNCTION to LARGE MODULI
    EQUIDISTRIBUTION ESTIMATES FOR THE k-FOLD DIVISOR FUNCTION TO LARGE MODULI DAVID T. NGUYEN Abstract. For each positive integer k, let τk(n) denote the k-fold divisor function, the coefficient −s k of n in the Dirichlet series for ζ(s) . For instance τ2(n) is the usual divisor function τ(n). The distribution of τk(n) in arithmetic progression is closely related to distribution of the primes. Aside from the trivial case k = 1 their distributions are only fairly well understood for k = 2 (Selberg, Linnik, Hooley) and k = 3 (Friedlander and Iwaniec; Heath-Brown; Fouvry, Kowalski, and Michel). In this note I'll survey and present some new distribution estimates for τk(n) in arithmetic progression to special moduli applicable for any k ≥ 4. This work is a refinement of the recent result of F. Wei, B. Xue, and Y. Zhang in 2016, in particular, leads to some effective estimates with power saving error terms. 1. Introduction and survey of known results Let n ≥ 1 and k ≥ 1 be integers. Let τk(n) denote the k-fold divisor function X τk(n) = 1; n1n2···nk=n where the sum runs over ordered k-tuples (n1; n2; : : : ; nk) of positive integers for which n1n2 ··· nk = −s n. Thus τk(n) is the coefficient of n in the Dirichlet series 1 k X −s ζ(s) = τk(n)n : n=1 This note is concerned with the distribution of τk(n) in arithmetic progressions to moduli d that exceed the square-root of length of the sum, in particular, provides a sharpening of the result in [53].
    [Show full text]