THE TEMPLE ESTATES of DELOS, RHENEIA, and MYKONOS 245 It Is Not Known Precisely When the Practice of Leasing Farm Estates to Tenants Was First Introduced

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE TEMPLE ESTATES of DELOS, RHENEIA, and MYKONOS 245 It Is Not Known Precisely When the Practice of Leasing Farm Estates to Tenants Was First Introduced THE TEMPLEESTATES OF DELOS, RHENEIA, AND MYKONOS (PLATES 89-90) NIM ANY templesin ancientGreece derived revenues from investmentsand loans, but the Temple of Apollo at Delos is the only one whose records are preserved in sufficient quantity to enable us to follow its financial career in considerable detail for'several centuries. This good fortune has come about not only because the site of Delos has remained virtually deserted throughout the Christian era.' but also because temple officials at Delios appear to nave iept tneir accounts ana permancin records with more care than was exercised by many of their contemporaries. Approxi-' mately one fifth of the inscriptions of Delos contain fragmentary or complete accounts of the treasurers of the Temple of Apollo. The earliest specimen of which we have any knowledge antedates the Peloponnesian War, and was a comparatively brief record: it consisted merely of a list of various sources of revenue and the total amount of money received from each source.2 Although methods of bookkeeping appear to have varied sonmewhatwith different treasurers, the accounts tended to become more detailed as time went on, and towards the end of the Amphictyonic Period (454- 314 B.C.) it was customary to include in the permanent records itemized expenditures and lists of individual rent-payers and debtors as well as a summarized financial state- ment. During the Period of Independence (314-166 B.C.) the accounts were rendered still mor'efully by the Hieropoioi, who were annual officials in charge of the Temple's finances. The Hieropoioi were accuistomedto keep their daily records on papyrus and to post a wooden notice board every month, and were obliged to make a monthly financial report to the Delian Boule.3 At the end of their term of office the Hieropoioi 'For a convenient summary of the history of Delos during the Christian Era, see A. C. Orlandos, B.C.H., LX, 1936, pp. 68-71. 2 I.G., 12, 377; Tod, A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions, P, No. 54. For the references and a discussion of prices of papyrus rolls, see J. A. 0. Larsen, Ron Greece (Economic Survey of Ancient Rome, IV), pp. 396-397. The papyrus appears to have been used for bookkeeping as well as for business documents (T. Homolle, Les archives d;e lintendance sacree a' Delos, pp. 12-13). There were two types of records on wooden tablets.. At the close of each year there was made a wooden duplicate (8EXros)of a part, if not all, ofi the text of the annual stele (I.G., XI, 2; 148, line 70; 154, A, line 46; and especially 287, A, line 197): this tablet was probably stored in the temple archives, as its wood was the durable cypress (Inscr. de Delos; 372, A, line 116; 440, A, line 47). Wood was also used to make notice boards (ir6Tcvpa and eVKW/XaTL) on which were posted monthly reports (rTU Ao'yWCKaTa p.jva: I.G., XI, 2; 145, line 44; 161, A, line 89; Inscr. de Delos; 372, A, line 116; 461, Ab, line 26), records of business contracts (ovyypa0acs: Inscr. de Delos; 372, A, line 116; 461, Ab, line 22), lists of guarantors and possibly contracts with them (et's&y- Hesperia,XVII, 4 American School of Classical Studies at Athens is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve, and extend access to Hesperia ® www.jstor.org 244 JOHN HARVEY KENT included in their annual report an inventory of sacred objects under their jurisdiction as well as a fully itemized record of all monies received and expended, and it was their custom to publish this report by engraving it on stone and to set up their inscrip- tion in the temple precinct, where the public might inspect-and doubtless audit- their records. This custom was continued by the successors of the Hieropoioi during MYKolos HAGIOS 06 (~~~~~~~~~~EORGIOf~ SACREO" ISTH4MUS 0~~~~~~~~ APE SYKIA y~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t - *06 ELOS~~~~~~~~~KIO~TR PAKfrIEASOONSI rg K"ERRo /to ~ ~ ~ o z.. Fig. 1. Delosand Vicinity the Athenian Colonial Period (post 166 B.C.) until shortly after 140 B.C., at which time it seems to have been abandoned,possibly in order to avoid unnecessary expense.4 Rentals from estates that wAereowned and.leased by the Temple of Apollo seem to have been among the earliest of the various sources of temple revenue, though yVrEls: I.G., XI, 2, 287, A, line 43; Inscr. de Delos; 461, Ab, line 26; 503, line 9), and inventories of sacredobjects (raZt 7rapa8o'o-Eat: Inscr. de De'los; 372, A, 116; 442, A, line 204). The difference between a vrevpov and a AEviIKwJJawas probably one of construction; both types were whitened (I.G., XI, 2; 203, A, line 34; 287, A, line 81). Cf. Homolle, op. cit., p. 13; W. A. Laidlaw, A History of Delos, pp. 139-140. For the monthly reports to the Boule, see pages 274, 279, and 281. 4 The latest dated temple account is from the year 140-39 B.C. (Inscr. de Delos, No. 1450). THE TEMPLE ESTATES OF DELOS, RHENEIA, AND MYKONOS 245 it is not known precisely when the practice of leasing farm estates to tenants was first introduced. Thucydides relates that in 523 B.C. the island of Rheneia was cap- tured by Polycrates, the tyrant of Samos, and.was presented by him..to the Delian Apollo: this gift probably marks the earliest of the various holdings in real estate to which the Temple of Apollo held title. It is uncertain how soon after 523 B.C. the part of the island that was retained by the temple was converted into estates, but presumably the interval would not have been long, so that it well may be that the earliest leases issued for estates on Rheneia dated from the late sixth century B.C. It is, however, clear that the temple authorities did not assume direct control of the entire island. They appear to -have shepherdedthe Rheneians into the northwest area of Rheneia, west of the hills that are known today as Loutra and Pyrgos, where they permitted them to fotunda small town and to continue to live in an independent city state.6 At the same time a narrow strip of land in the southeast half of the island, bordering on the strait that separates Delos from Rheneia, seems to have been set aside as a cemetery area.7 The remainder of the island, consisting of most of the 5 Thucydides i, 13, 6; iii, 104, 2. For the date and circumstances of Polycrates' action, see H. W. Parke, Class. Quart., XL, 1946, pp. 105-08. Cf. also F. Courby, Explor. archeol. de Delos, XII, pp. 207-218; P. N. Ure, The Origin of Greek Tyranny, p. 71; Laidlaw, op. cit., pp. 57-58; C.A.H., IV, p. 102. Glotz-Cohen, Histoire grecquie, I, p. 283. The existence of this state in the fifth century B.C. is attested bv the Athenian tribute lists (Meritt, Wade-Gery, McGregor, The Athetnian T7ributeLists, I, pp. 392-93), and its continuance during the Hellenistic Age is attested in many Delian inscriptions (e. g., I.G., XI, 2; 161, A, line 11; 287, A, lines 159-160; cf. P. Roussel, De'os colonie athe'nienne,p. 16). The excavations conducted at the site of the town by Stavropoullos (cf. IIpaKKTLKa, 1900, pp. 67-69) and Pippas (cf. B.C.H.; XLVII, 1923, p. 529; XLVIII, 1924, p. 484) are for the most part unpublished: the excavators' notes, together with Stavropoullos' records of his excavation of the great cemetery, were in 1939 in the Museum of Mykonos, where they were being studied by K. A. Rhomaios (one article has appeared to date: AEXn'ov,XII, 1929, pp. 181-224)-, but due to their age and bulk the work was proceeding slowly. The chief discovery in the town of Rheneia is a rectangular structure ca. 30 m. by 12 m. which seems to be a Mithraeum: it has a paved forecourt to the west and a large blue marble bench at the east (rear) end of the interior room, behind which is a small apse containing a Hellenistic dolphin mosaic (cf. P1. '89, No. 1). There seems little doubt that the territory of the city-state embraced the whole northwest part of the island, which is a theatre-shaped geographical unit. The town's chief export seems to have been gneiss flagstones (cf. L. Cayeux, Explor. arche'ol. de Delos, IV, pp. 22-24). The acropolis of the state was situated on the summit of the hill of Pyrgos; its ruins, also unpublished, include a high wall ca. 100 m. in length and foundations of two ancient towers, each ca. 8 m. square. Extensive walls of mediaeval date suggest that this was the site of the fourteenth century castle of the Knights of Saint john (cf. J. 'Cantacuzenus,Historiarun, II, 29 [Corpus Script. Hist. By-antin., XX]; M. Buchon, Revue de Paris, 1843, XVI, p. 339; R. C. Jebb, J.H.S., I, 1880, p. 38; W. Miller, The Latins in the Levant, p. 585). Cf. Fig. 2 and P1. 89, No. 2. 7 The cemetery area extends from almost the north end of the strait between Rheneia and'Delos to a spot opposite the Bay of Phourni, and south of the area the Rheneian shore consists of the steep hills of Phylladi Martiou and Marmarokopio (cf. A. Bellot, Explor. archeol. de Delos, I, P1. I; this splendid map is reproduced in Cayeux, op. cit., P1. I); it is thus apparent that none of the temple estates bordered tupon the strait.
Recommended publications
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • Bronze Age Aegean Harboursides
    J.W. SHAW Bronze Age Aegean Harboursides ABSTRACT R ecent excavations and exploration have contributed new and crucial information warranting a review of our earlier understanding of Bronze Age Aegean harboursides, especially of the topographical conditions and geographical locations selected by the Aegeans. Major sites which can be cited are Kea, Kommos, Zakros, and Amnisos. Further information derives from precious pictorial depictions of coastal towns and possible harbours, as in frescoes found at Kea and, especially, in the West House at Akrotiri, or in the recently published sealing from Chania. The paper will discuss this new material and address questions of defence, ship storage, relations with inland towns, trade, relative water-levels, and the nature of the possible harbour installations during the Middle and Late Bronze Age in the Aegean. Introduction With its often large, well-furnished buildings, the Akrotiri settlement (Fig. 1) appears relatively opulent in comparison with Ayia Irini on Kea (Fig. 2)or more densely built Phylakopi on Milos (Fig. 3). At Akrotiri, of course, there still remain unusual contrasts among the building groups. For instance, the agglutinative room-group B/D, which probably consisted of three or more residences, appears to be sprawling in comparison with the much larger, more carefully planned ashlar buildings, whether one considers the relatively small West House, or Ashlars III and IV which in size and with the care given to their construction compare favourably with the largest of the houses at Ayia Irini (House A) or at Phylakopi (the Mansion) or, for that matter, with large houses in the Knossos area.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Tour of Greece
    Grand Tour of Greece Day 1: Monday - Depart USA Depart the USA to Greece. Your flight includes meals, drinks and in-flight entertainment for your journey. Day 2: Tuesday - Arrive in Athens Arrive and transfer to your hotel. Balance of the day at leisure. Day 3: Wednesday - Tour Athens Your morning tour of Athens includes visits to the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, Panathenian Stadium, the ruins of the Temple of Zeus and the Acropolis. Enjoy the afternoon at leisure in Athens. Day 4: Thursday - Olympia CORINTH Canal (short stop). Drive to EPIDAURUS (visit the archaeological site and the theatre famous for its remarkable acoustics) and then on to NAUPLIA (short stop). Drive to MYCENAE where you visit the archaeological site, then depart for OLYMPIA, through the central Peloponnese area passing the cities of MEGALOPOLIS and TRIPOLIS arrive in OLYMPIA. Dinner & Overnight. Day 5: Friday – Delphi In the morning visit the archaeological site and the museum of OLYMPIA. Drive via PATRAS to RION, cross the channel to ANTIRION on the "state of the art" new suspended bridge considered to be the longest and most modern in Europe. Arrive in NAFPAKTOS, then continue to DELPHI.. Dinner & Overnight. Day 6: Saturday – Delphi In the morning visit the archaeological site and the museum of Delphi. Rest of the day at leisure. Dinner & Overnight in DELPHI. Day 6: Sunday – Kalambaka In the morning, start the drive by the central Greece towns of AMPHISSA, LAMIA and TRIKALA to KALAMBAKA. Afternoon visit of the breathtaking METEORA. Dinner & Overnight in KALAMBAKA. Day 7: Monday - Thessaloniki Drive by TRIKALA and LARISSA to the famous, sacred Macedonian town of DION (visit).Then continue to THESSALONIKI, the largest town in Northern Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Saronic Gulf POROS
    TH YEARS ANNIVERSARY ANNIVERSARY TH ANNIVERSARY YEARS ANNIVERSARY GETSTARTED! TH YEARS ANNIVERSARY ANNIVERSARY TH 01. ABOUT 06. SPETSES ISLAND 02. 10TH ANNIVERSARY 07. PARALIO ASTROS ANNIVERSARY 03. THE FLEET 08. NAFPLION 04. ROUTE MAP 09. FUN SIDE EVENTS 05. POROS ISLAND 10. PHOTOS & VIDEOS YEARS ANNIVERSARY TH YEARS ANNIVERSARY ANNIVERSARY 01. ABOUT TH ANNIVERSARY YEARS ANNIVERSARY INDEX PAGE Catamarans Cup is an international regatta for everyone who wishes to experience a sailing race of cruising catamarans while also having the opportunity to relax for a week in the Greek islands. WE INVITE YOU Launched by Istion Yachting in 2010, the Catamarans Cup counts 9 consecutive years of success reflected in high joining TO PARTICIPATE rates and loyal returning participants. Full of side events, thematic competitions, cocktail parties, beach BBQs, dinners and of course a special welcome organised for competing yachts at each port of call, Catamarans Cup is as much fun IN THE ULTIMATE partying on the islands as it is racing to them! EVENT FOR CRUISING Under the auspices of the Greek Ministry of Tourism (Greek National Tourism Organization) and with CATAMARANS LAGOON Catamarans as its Grand sponsor. 02.10th ANNIVERSARY TH YEARS ANNIVERSARY ANNIVERSARY INDEX PAGE TH Catamarans Cup lovers from all over the world can ANNIVERSARY expect a truly memorable 10th edition this year! THE ULTIMATE New destinations, multiple social events & competitions will add LET’S MAKE IT CATAMARANS EVENT a fresh tone to this annual gathering of competitive sailors & regatta enthusiasts. After having actively engaged in the interactive platform TOGETHER IS ABOUT TO CELEBRATE for ideas & helped plan this year’s regatta, they will will have the chance CONTACT: [email protected] TH IT’S 10 ANNIVERSARY to experience a fascinating anniversary edition full of surprises! YEARS ANNIVERSARY TH YEARS ANNIVERSARY ANNIVERSARY 03.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Rig UDW Inc
    Ocean Rig UDW Inc. Investor Day OCEAN RIG UDWNASDAQ: INC. “ORIG” December 2014 Forward Looking Statements Matters discussed in this presentation may constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect the Company’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance and may include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements, which are not statements of historical facts. The forward-looking statements in this presentation are based upon various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions, including without limitation, management's examination of historical operating trends, data contained in our records and other data available from third parties, which have not been independently verified by the Company. Although Ocean Rig UDW Inc. believes that these assumptions were reasonable when made, because these assumptions are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies which are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control, Ocean Rig UDW Inc. cannot assure you that it will achieve or accomplish these expectations, beliefs or projections. Important factors that, in the Company’s view, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include the strength of world economies and currencies, general market conditions, including changes in charter hire rates and vessel values, changes in demand that may affect attitudes of time charterers to scheduled and unscheduled drydocking, changes in Ocean Rig UDW Inc’s operating expenses, including bunker prices, dry-docking and insurance costs, or actions taken by regulatory authorities, potential liability from pending or future litigation, domestic and international political conditions, potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents and political events or acts by terrorists.
    [Show full text]
  • Poison King: the Life and Legend of Mithradates the Great, Rome's
    Copyrighted Material Kill em All, and Let the Gods Sort em Out IN SPRING of 88 BC, in dozens of cities across Anatolia (Asia Minor, modern Turkey), sworn enemies of Rome joined a secret plot. On an appointed day in one month’s time, they vowed to kill every Roman man, woman, and child in their territories. e conspiracy was masterminded by King Mithradates the Great, who communicated secretly with numerous local leaders in Rome’s new Province of Asia. (“Asia” at this time referred to lands from the eastern Aegean to India; Rome’s Province of Asia encompassed western Turkey.) How Mithradates kept the plot secret remains one of the great intelli- gence mysteries of antiquity. e conspirators promised to round up and slay all the Romans and Italians living in their towns, including women and children and slaves of Italian descent. ey agreed to confiscate the Romans’ property and throw the bodies out to the dogs and crows. Any- one who tried to warn or protect Romans or bury their bodies was to be harshly punished. Slaves who spoke languages other than Latin would be spared, and those who joined in the killing of their masters would be rewarded. People who murdered Roman moneylenders would have their debts canceled. Bounties were offered to informers and killers of Romans in hiding.1 e deadly plot worked perfectly. According to several ancient histo- rians, at least 80,000—perhaps as many as 150,000—Roman and Italian residents of Anatolia and Aegean islands were massacred on that day. e figures are shocking—perhaps exaggerated—but not unrealistic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Hellenistic Domestic Sculpture in Its Cultural and Spatial Contexts
    THE NATURE OF HELLENISTIC DOMESTIC SCULPTURE IN ITS CULTURAL AND SPATIAL CONTEXTS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Craig I. Hardiman, B.Comm., B.A., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. Mark D. Fullerton, Advisor Dr. Timothy J. McNiven _______________________________ Advisor Dr. Stephen V. Tracy Graduate Program in the History of Art Copyright by Craig I. Hardiman 2005 ABSTRACT This dissertation marks the first synthetic and contextual analysis of domestic sculpture for the whole of the Hellenistic period (323 BCE – 31 BCE). Prior to this study, Hellenistic domestic sculpture had been examined from a broadly literary perspective or had been the focus of smaller regional or site-specific studies. Rather than taking any one approach, this dissertation examines both the literary testimonia and the material record in order to develop as full a picture as possible for the location, function and meaning(s) of these pieces. The study begins with a reconsideration of the literary evidence. The testimonia deal chiefly with the residences of the Hellenistic kings and their conspicuous displays of wealth in the most public rooms in the home, namely courtyards and dining rooms. Following this, the material evidence from the Greek mainland and Asia Minor is considered. The general evidence supports the literary testimonia’s location for these sculptures. In addition, several individual examples offer insights into the sophistication of domestic decorative programs among the Greeks, something usually associated with the Romans.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclades - Greece 7 Days Charter Itinerary Cyclades - Greece 2
    Cyclades - Greece 7 days Charter Itinerary Cyclades - Greece 2 Tessaly Evia GREECE TURKEY North Aegean Attica Andros Piraeus Aegina Kea Tinos Poros Mykonos Kythnos Syros Delos Peloponnese Hydra Spetses Seriphos Aegean Sea Paros Naxos Sifnos Milos Schinoussa Kos Ios Santorini Cyclades - Greece 3 Ports and distances Day Ports Distance in n.m. 1 Athens-Kea 49 2 Kea-Tinos-Mykonos 63 3 Mykonos-Delos-Paros 32 4 Paros-Ios-Santorini 73 5 Santorini-Milos 51 6 Milos-Sifnos 29 7 Sifnos-Seriphos-Kythnos 45 8 Kythnos-Piraeus 53 Total distance - 395 n.m. Cyclades - Greece 4 Athens Te Capital of Greece. Within the sprawling city of Athens it is easy to imagine the golden age of Greece when Pericles had the Parthenon (the most eminent monument of the ancient Greek architecture) built. Athens is built around the Acropolis and the pinnacled crag of Mt. Lycabettus, which the goddess Athena was said to have dropped from the heavens as a bulwark to defend the city. Te suburbs have covered the barren plain in all directions and the city is packed with lively taverns and bustling shops. Cyclades - Greece 5 Kea An exceptionally picturesque island. On the south side of Nikolaos Bay - which was a pirate stronghold in the 13th c. - is the little port of Korissia, built on the side of ancient Korissia. Tere are remains of the ancient town walls and a Sanctuary of Apollo. Te famous lion - carved from the native rock in the 6th c. BCE - can be seen just north-east of Kea town. Another highlight is the beautiful anchorage of Poleis.
    [Show full text]
  • European Court of Human Rights Examines Living Conditions in Hotspots Moria, Pyli & Vial
    This project has been supported by the European Programme for Integration and Migration (EPIM), a collaborative initiative of the Network of European Foundations (NEF). The sole responsibility for the project lies with the organiser(s) and the content may not necessarily reflect the positions of EPIM, NEF or EPIM’s Partner Foundations. For immediate release EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS EXAMINES LIVING CONDITIONS IN HOTSPOTS MORIA, PYLI & VIAL Chios, Kos & Lesvos, January 20, 2021 While the situation on the East Aegean islands received particular attention after the outbreak of the fire in Moria, it has subsided more recently. At the same time, living conditions on the islands continue to be catastrophic. People have little access to medical care, wash facilities, and proper shelter, and are regularly forced to sleep in tents that flood easily in the winter rains. Particularly vulnerable people are not exempt from these conditions. Even in times when the Covid-19 was and is on the verge of an outbreak in the camps, members of at-risk groups continue to live exposed to these conditions without protection. The European Court of Human Rights has now asked the Greek government questions regarding the treatment of a total of eight people, all of whom were living in one of the so-called EU hotspots and had pre-existing medical conditions or were particularly vulnerable. In total, the Court connected 8 cases involving Chios, Kos, Lesvos and Samos, i.e. 4 out of 5 EU hotspots. These cases therefore demonstrate the structural illegality and impossibility to implement the hotspot approach and border procedures in a way that does not violate human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacchylides 17: Singing and Usurping the Paean Maria Pavlou
    Bacchylides 17: Singing and Usurping the Paean Maria Pavlou ACCHYLIDES 17, a Cean commission performed on Delos, has been the subject of extensive study and is Bmuch admired for its narrative artistry, elegance, and excellence. The ode was classified as a dithyramb by the Alex- andrians, but the Du-Stil address to Apollo in the closing lines renders this classification problematic and has rather baffled scholars. The solution to the thorny issue of the ode’s generic taxonomy is not yet conclusive, and the dilemma paean/ dithyramb is still alive.1 In fact, scholars now are more inclined to place the poem somewhere in the middle, on the premise that in antiquity the boundaries between dithyramb and paean were not so clear-cut as we tend to believe.2 Even though I am 1 Paean: R. Merkelbach, “Der Theseus des Bakchylides,” ZPE 12 (1973) 56–62; L. Käppel, Paian: Studien zur Geschichte einer Gattung (Berlin 1992) 156– 158, 184–189; H. Maehler, Die Lieder des Bakchylides II (Leiden 1997) 167– 168, and Bacchylides. A Selection (Cambridge 2004) 172–173; I. Rutherford, Pindar’s Paeans (Oxford 2001) 35–36, 73. Dithyramb: D. Gerber, “The Gifts of Aphrodite (Bacchylides 17.10),” Phoenix 19 (1965) 212–213; G. Pieper, “The Conflict of Character in Bacchylides 17,” TAPA 103 (1972) 393–404. D. Schmidt, “Bacchylides 17: Paean or Dithyramb?” Hermes 118 (1990) 18– 31, at 28–29, proposes that Ode 17 was actually an hyporcheme. 2 B. Zimmermann, Dithyrambos: Geschichte einer Gattung (Hypomnemata 98 [1992]) 91–93, argues that Ode 17 was a dithyramb for Apollo; see also C.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece • Crete • Turkey May 28 - June 22, 2021
    GREECE • CRETE • TURKEY MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 Tour Hosts: Dr. Scott Moore Dr. Jason Whitlark organized by GREECE - CRETE - TURKEY / May 28 - June 22, 2021 May 31 Mon ATHENS - CORINTH CANAL - CORINTH – ACROCORINTH - NAFPLION At 8:30a.m. depart from Athens and drive along the coastal highway of Saronic Gulf. Arrive at the Corinth Canal for a brief stop and then continue on to the Acropolis of Corinth. Acro-corinth is the citadel of Corinth. It is situated to the southwest of the ancient city and rises to an elevation of 1883 ft. [574 m.]. Today it is surrounded by walls that are about 1.85 mi. [3 km.] long. The foundations of the fortifications are ancient—going back to the Hellenistic Period. The current walls were built and rebuilt by the Byzantines, Franks, Venetians, and Ottoman Turks. Climb up and visit the fortress. Then proceed to the Ancient city of Corinth. It was to this megalopolis where the apostle Paul came and worked, established a thriving church, subsequently sending two of his epistles now part of the New Testament. Here, we see all of the sites associated with his ministry: the Agora, the Temple of Apollo, the Roman Odeon, the Bema and Gallio’s Seat. The small local archaeological museum here is an absolute must! In Romans 16:23 Paul mentions his friend Erastus and • • we will see an inscription to him at the site. In the afternoon we will drive to GREECE CRETE TURKEY Nafplion for check-in at hotel followed by dinner and overnight. (B,D) MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 June 1 Tue EPIDAURAUS - MYCENAE - NAFPLION Morning visit to Mycenae where we see the remains of the prehistoric citadel Parthenon, fortified with the Cyclopean Walls, the Lionesses’ Gate, the remains of the Athens Mycenaean Palace and the Tomb of King Agamemnon in which we will actually enter.
    [Show full text]