2020 Races: Us Senate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2020 Races: Us Senate 2020 CAP TABLE OF CONTENTS A Message from President Rory L. Gamble ………………… 2 Issues …………………………………………………………………3 Political Almanac ……………………………………………… 27 Roll Call …………………………………………………………… 67 UAW NATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM (CAP) WASHINGTON, D.C. Feb. 2-5, 2020 UAW National Community Action Program (CAP) • Washington DC • February 2-5, 2020 1 A MESSAGE FROM PRESIDENT RORY L. GAMBLE Greetings Fellow UAW Activists: Thank you for all your hard work and dedication. With a powerful Community Action Program (CAP) voice, the UAW is a champion for pro- worker policies in our cities and state houses, as well as in Washington. In this current political climate, our activism and energy are needed to defend against bad anti-worker legislation and regulations on health care, taxes, collective bargaining rights, and to fight for social justice and civil liberties. At the UAW we understand that political action is community action. We represent the voice of UAW members, America’s middle-class families and the future jobs and prosperity for our nation. Make no mistake, we are in a fight and we are up against a well-financed, aggressive anti-worker coalition. The influence of wealthy ultra-conservatives has been felt time and time again in Washington and in state capitals. So-called right-to-work legislation has spread into the industrial heartland. Decades of progress on issues such as health and safety, workers’ compensation and others are in peril. Though we lack the money of wealthy conservatives and corporate America, we have an army of committed activists driven not by greed but by the values of equality, fairness and justice. There is great discontent in our country and the 2020 elections will be a chance to elect pro-worker candidates. Our union, with CAP activists on the front lines, will have a crucial part to play in those elections. We need to elect lawmakers who understand and support our agenda; a president, state governors and other elected leaders, and lawmakers who understand that a healthy democracy represents all Americans rather than the wealthy few. Our objective this year is to advance through political action laws and policies that: • Protect and strengthen collective bargaining and organizing rights. • Advance and protect equality in the workplace and under the law. • Prioritize the needs of working people over corporate greed. • Make certain any rewrite of our trade agreements is enforced and benefits workers and communities. • Protect our democracy from election rules that disenfranchise voters. Clearly, we have a great task in front of us. We must be the tip of the spear that helps cut through the political gridlock and anti-worker sentiment that is so widespread. We do this through actively participating in the electoral process and in our communities. We educate our co-workers, neighbors and friends on the benefits of electing pro- worker candidates and the dangers of complacency. We work for pro-worker candidates by phone banking, door knocking, holding conversations in the workplace, at the dinner table, and on social media. But, most importantly, we bring passion and commitment to our task of making this country a better and more equal place to live and work. We thank you for what you have done in the past and for what we know you will do in this election year. With your continued activism, we can make a better future for all Americans. In Solidarity, Rory Gamble President, UAW International Union 2 UAW National Community Action Program (CAP) • Washington DC • February 2-5, 2020 2020 CAP ISSUES Freedom to Form Unions …………………………………………4 Strengthening Middle Class by Raising Wages ………………6 Health Care ………………………………………………………… 7 International Trade ……………………………………………… 9 Judicial Nominations …………………………………………… 11 Manufacturing Jobs …………………………………………… 11 Infrastructure …………………………………………………… 12 Federal Budget and Taxes …………………………………… 13 Retirement Security …………………………………………… 14 Immigration ……………………………………………………… 16 Civil Rights & Voting Rights ………………………………… 17 Money and Politics …………………………………………… 19 Energy and the Environment ………………………………… 20 Education and Job Training …………………………………… 22 Health and Safety ……………………………………………… 24 Veterans ………………………………………………………… 26 UAW National Community Action Program (CAP) • Washington DC • February 2-5, 2020 3 ISSUES FREEDOM TO FORM UNIONS The right of workers to come together and of anti-worker forces have taken a toll as wages and collectively bargain with their employer is an benefits have not kept up with the true cost of living for internationally recognized human right protected by the the vast majority of working Americans. First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and enshrined Fortunately, the new Democratic House Majority in U.S. law by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) is advancing pro-worker, pro-labor legislation. House over eight decades ago. Education and Labor Committee Democrats passed the The right to form a union paved the way for the Protecting the Right to Organize Act (PRO) Act last fall creation of a strong middle class. Over time, unions and it could be voted on by the full House anytime. We have vastly improved workplace rights, wages, benefits, endorsed the PRO Act as it would strengthen penalties and conditions for all workers. A worker with a union against corporations that violate workers’ rights, provide contract earns, on average, 13.2 percent more in wages for mediation and arbitration of first contracts, eliminate than a peer with similar education, occupation, and right to work, prohibit captive audience meetings, and experience in a nonunionized workplace in the same support workers’ right to strike for basic workplace sector. improvements. The union advantage persists despite a decline in In addition to the PRO Act, House Democrats union density. The percent of workers belonging to introduced the Public Service Freedom to Negotiate unions was 20.1 percent in 1983, while today it is less Act (H.R. 3463). This bill would strengthen labor rights than 11 percent. The decline is particularly pronounced in the public sector by reversing the Supreme Court’s in the private sector as the percentage has fallen to 6.4 dreadful Janus v. AFSCME decision and adding additional percent, levels not seen since 1932. It comes as little protections. Pro-labor legislation is nearly certain to surprise that as union membership declines, the gap be blocked in the Republican-led Senate but forward between the extremely wealthy and everyone else gets progress in the House is needed to take advantage of wider and wider. The gap between the richest and the future opportunities to advance pro-worker legislation in poorest U.S. household is now the largest that it has been a more favorable political environment. in 50 years. The wealthiest 1 percent of families in the At the same time, anti-worker policies and court United States hold approximately 40 percent of all wealth rulings continue to proliferate. Since taking office the while the bottom 90 percent of families hold less than one Trump administration has pursued an aggressive agenda quarter of all wealth. aimed at curtailing workers’ rights by gutting protections. Why has this happened and what we can do to These efforts have made it harder for workers to secure a reverse the tide? better future for themselves and their families. Eliminating Staggering wealth inequality can be attributed to these basic labor protections is a loss to all working men many factors and there is no silver bullet solution to and women. close the gap. Bad trade and tax laws that encourage the The administration and right-wing members of outsourcing of middle-class union jobs are important Congress have advanced a relentless anti-worker agenda factors. Yet misguided trade agreements and tax laws only through executive orders, federal rulemaking, and tell part of the story as there is no doubt that constant stacking the courts with anti-union federal judges who attacks by anti-worker special interest groups and enjoy lifetime appointments. Since the beginning of his politicians have played an outsized role as the NLRA failed administration, President Trump has signed over 130 to protect workers as it was intended. executive orders. He has issued orders to undo a range of Employers routinely hire anti-union consultants who policies that were enacted by the Obama administration advise them to use a variety of legal and illegal tactics with our support. The Trump administration has zeroed to stop workers from organizing and to frustrate the in on federal workers. In 2017, President Trump issued collective bargaining process. According to the Economic three executive orders which severely erode collective Policy Institute (EPI), in one of every three campaigns, bargaining rights of federal government workers. The employers fire pro-union workers, and spend at least $1 administration has more direct control over labor billion annually in opposition to organizing. Ninety percent standards of federal workers since the federal government of employers require captive-audience meetings to is the employer. These executive orders are clearly dissuade workers from joining a union. Sadly, the efforts designed to limit the power of federal employee unions 4 UAW National Community Action Program (CAP) • Washington DC • February 2-5, 2020 ISSUES by streamlining collective bargaining negotiations, reducing as the president with the highest number of judges the number of work hours union members can spend confirmed in his first term. President Nixon appointed on union business, and making it easier to fire federal 235 federal judges during his presidency, which surpassed workers. the previous record of 193 set by Franklin D. Roosevelt. To cite one example of many, in June 2019 Under Senator Mitch McConnell’s leadership, Republicans the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are filling the appellate judicial seats they held open during informed workers in an email that it would implement a President Barack Obama’s final two years in office with new contract unilaterally. Attacks on federal workers are right-wing judges who have lifetime tenure. A significant part of a larger effort to eliminate unions.
Recommended publications
  • Ben Sasse & Deb Fischer
    NEBRASKA TAXPAYERS FOR FREEDOM: CONGRESS WATCH BULLETIN. THE VOTING RECORD OF YOUR SENATORS: 2019. 304 North 168 Cir. #213 11819 Miracle Hills Dr. #205 Omaha, NE. 68118 Omaha, NE. 68154 Phone: 402-550-8040 Phone: 402-391-3411 Fax: 402-391-4725 Sen. Ben Sasse Sen. Deb Fischer 116th CONGRESS – 2019 NTF voting scores during this session: FISCHER: 99% 1st Session SASSE: 95% Taxes. S.J. Res. 50: To disapprove a conservative IRS rule relating to charitable contributions and estate tax deductions when a taxpayer receives or expects to receive a corresponding state or local tax credit. BAD BILL/ FAILED Fischer: NO Sasse: NO Spending. HR 3055 Amend. 1019: To reduce amounts appropriated by 2% than amount appropriated in FY 2019 for several federal programs. GOOD AMENDMENT/ FAILED Fischer: YES Sasse: YES Amend. 1141: To prohibit a liberal test for mass transit expenditures. GOOD AMENDMENT/ PASSED Fischer: YES Sasse: YES Amend. 1250: To not reduce amount appropriated by 1% and put savings towards EPA infrastructure assistance. BAD AMENDMENT/ PASSED Fischer: NO Sasse: NO HR 3877: To amend the Balanced Budget Act of 1985 to suspend the federal debt limit. BAD BILL/ PASSED Fischer: NO Sasse: NO HR 4378 Amend. 942: To reduce appropriated amount by 2% for several federal agencies. GOOD AMENDMENT/ FAILED Fischer: YES Sasse: YES PN 150: To confirm Gordon Hartogensis as Director of Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation. GOOD RESOLUTION/ CONFIRMED Fisher: YES Sasse: YES Government Regulations. PN 22: To confirm Andrew Wheeler as EPA administrator. GOOD RESOLUTION/ CONFIRMED Fischer: YES Sasse: YES PN 47: To confirm Spencer Bacchus III as member of the Export-Import Bank of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Rep. Gregory Meeks, NY-5 Rep. Grace Meng, NY-6 Rep. Nydia
    Rep. Gregory Meeks, NY-5 Rep. Max Rose, NY-11 Rep. Grace Meng, NY-6 Rep. Carolyn Maloney, NY-12 Rep. Nydia Velazquez, NY-7 Rep. Adriano Espaillat, NY-13 Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, NY-8 Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, NY-14 Rep. Yvette Clarke, NY-9 Rep. Jose Serrano, NY-15 Rep. Jerrold Nadler, NY-10 Rep. Eliot Engel, NY-16 January 14, 2019 RE: Pay the Defenders of NYC and NY Harbor Dear Members of the NYC Congressional Delegation, On behalf of our membership, we urge you to take immediate action to pay uniformed members of the United States Coast Guard, the United States Public Health Service, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to keep employees critical to the defense and preparedness of New York City and New York Harbor working and paid regardless of the political battles being fought in Washington, DC. We support immediate passage of H.R. 367, with the addition of USPHS and NOAA. Though continued funding for the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S. Marine Corps, and U.S. Air Force is provisioned through the U.S. Department of Defense, members of the above three federal uniformed services critical to defending our city and port remain unpaid, and their families are left to suffer the consequences in an unforgivingly expensive metropolitan area. While we oppose the shutdown generally, it is especially abhorrent that our city’s defenders have been forced to suffer. New York City last year was named a “Coast Guard City,” yet our Coasties are being asked to sacrifice greatly just to keep serving us.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hurricanes in Haiti: Disaster and Recovery Hearing
    THE HURRICANES IN HAITI: DISASTER AND RECOVERY HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SEPTEMBER 23, 2008 Serial No. 110–227 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 44–543PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOWARD L. BERMAN, California, Chairman GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey Samoa DAN BURTON, Indiana DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey ELTON GALLEGLY, California BRAD SHERMAN, California DANA ROHRABACHER, California ROBERT WEXLER, Florida DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York EDWARD R. ROYCE, California BILL DELAHUNT, Massachusetts STEVE CHABOT, Ohio GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York THOMAS G. TANCREDO, Colorado DIANE E. WATSON, California RON PAUL, Texas ADAM SMITH, Washington JEFF FLAKE, Arizona RUSS CARNAHAN, Missouri MIKE PENCE, Indiana JOHN S. TANNER, Tennessee JOE WILSON, South Carolina GENE GREEN, Texas JOHN BOOZMAN, Arkansas LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California J. GRESHAM BARRETT, South Carolina SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas CONNIE MACK, Florida RUBE´ N HINOJOSA, Texas JEFF FORTENBERRY, Nebraska JOSEPH CROWLEY, New York MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas DAVID WU, Oregon TED POE, Texas BRAD MILLER, North Carolina BOB INGLIS, South Carolina LINDA T.
    [Show full text]
  • Steven Menashi President Trump Nominated Steven Menashi to Serve
    Steven Menashi President Trump nominated Steven Menashi to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on August 14, 2019. Menashi is anti-choice. Career1 Bachelor of Arts, Dartmouth College, 2001 Assistant Editor, Policy Review, Hoover Institution, 2001-2002 Associate Editor, Policy Review, Hoover Institution, 2002-2004 Public Affairs Fellow, Hoover Institution, 2002-2004 Editorial Writer, The New York Sun, 2004-2005 Juris Doctorate, Stanford Law School, 2008 Clerk, Judge Douglas Ginsburg, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2008-2009 Olin-Searle Fellow, Georgetown University Law Center, 2009-2010 Clerk, Associate Justice Samuel Alito, U.S. Supreme Court, 2010-2011 Associate, Kirkland & Ellis, 2011-2013 Of Counsel, Kirkland & Ellis, 2013-2015, 2016-2017 Partner, Kirkland & Ellis, 2015-2016 Koch-Searle Research Fellow, New York University School of Law, 2013-2015 Assistant Professor, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School, 2016-2019 (on leave 2017-2019) Acting General Counsel, U.S. Department of Education, 2017-2018 Principal Deputy General Counsel, U.S. Department of Education, 2018 Special Assistant to the President/Associate Counsel, Office of White House Counsel, The White House, 2018-present Record on Reproductive Freedom Menashi submitted an amicus brief on behalf of former U.S. Department of Justice officials in Zubik v. Burwell arguing that the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive- coverage policy forced certain religious groups into “moral complicity” with the use of contraception, despite an accommodation put in place for such groups by the Obama administration.2 Menashi compared such groups’ “moral complicity” in the use of contraception to providing weapons to help someone commit a crime.3 As editor-in-chief of the Dartmouth Review, Menashi wrote several anti-choice articles and editorials.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapman Law Review
    Chapman Law Review Volume 21 Board of Editors 2017–2018 Executive Board Editor-in-Chief LAUREN K. FITZPATRICK Managing Editor RYAN W. COOPER Senior Articles Editors Production Editor SUNEETA H. ISRANI MARISSA N. HAMILTON TAYLOR A. KENDZIERSKI CLARE M. WERNET Senior Notes & Comments Editor TAYLOR B. BROWN Senior Symposium Editor CINDY PARK Senior Submissions & Online Editor ALBERTO WILCHES –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Articles Editors ASHLEY C. ANDERSON KRISTEN N. KOVACICH ARLENE GALARZA STEVEN L. RIMMER NATALIE M. GAONA AMANDA M. SHAUGHNESSY-FORD ANAM A. JAVED DAMION M. YOUNG __________________________________________________________________ Staff Editors RAYMOND AUBELE AMY N. HUDACK JAMIE L. RICE CARLOS BACIO MEGAN A. LEE JAMIE L. TRAXLER HOPE C. BLAIN DANTE P. LOGIE BRANDON R. SALVATIERRA GEORGE E. BRIETIGAM DRAKE A. MIRSCH HANNAH B. STETSON KATHERINE A. BURGESS MARLENA MLYNARSKA SYDNEY L. WEST KYLEY S. CHELWICK NICHOLE N. MOVASSAGHI Faculty Advisor CELESTINE MCCONVILLE, Professor of Law CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY HAZEM H. CHEHABI ADMINISTRATION JEROME W. CWIERTNIA DALE E. FOWLER ’58 DANIELE C. STRUPPA BARRY GOLDFARB President STAN HARRELSON GAVIN S. HERBERT,JR. GLENN M. PFEIFFER WILLIAM K. HOOD Provost and Executive Vice ANDY HOROWITZ President for Academic Affairs MARK CHAPIN JOHNSON ’05 JENNIFER L. KELLER HAROLD W. HEWITT,JR. THOMAS E. MALLOY Executive Vice President and Chief SEBASTIAN PAUL MUSCO Operating Officer RICHARD MUTH (MBA ’05) JAMES J. PETERSON SHERYL A. BOURGEOIS HARRY S. RINKER Executive Vice President for JAMES B. ROSZAK University Advancement THE HONORABLE LORETTA SANCHEZ ’82 HELEN NORRIS MOHINDAR S. SANDHU Vice President and Chief RONALD M. SIMON Information Officer RONALD E. SODERLING KAREN R. WILKINSON ’69 THOMAS C. PIECHOTA DAVID W.
    [Show full text]
  • Contempt of Courts? President Trump's
    CONTEMPT OF COURTS? PRESIDENT TRUMP’S TRANSFORMATION OF THE JUDICIARY Brendan Williams* Faced with a letter from the American Bar Association (ABA) assessing him as “arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking in knowledge of the day-to-day practice,” Lawrence VanDyke, nominated by President Trump to serve on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, cried during an October 2019 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.1 Republican senators dutifully attacked the ABA as liberally-biased.2 In a Wall Street Journal column, a defender of VanDyke assailed what he called a “smear campaign” and wrote that “[t]he ABA’s aggressive politicization is especially frustrating for someone like me, an active member of the ABA[.]”3 VanDyke was confirmed anyway.4 Contrary to Republican protestations, the ABA has deemed 97% of President Trump’s nominees to be “well qualified” or “qualified.”5 Indeed, in the most polarizing judicial nomination of the Trump Administration, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Kavanaugh’s defenders pointed to the ABA having rated him “well qualified” despite the association having once, in 2006, dropped his rating to “qualified” due to concerns about his temperament.6 *Attorney Brendan Williams is the author of over 30 law review articles, predominantly on civil rights and health care issues. A former Washington Supreme Court judicial clerk, Brendan is a New Hampshire long-term care advocate. This article is dedicated to his father Wayne Williams, admitted to the Washington bar in 1970. 1Hannah Knowles, Trump Judicial Nominee Cries over Scathing Letter from the American Bar Association, WASH. POST (Oct. 30, 2015). 2Id.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 BMS PAC Contributions
    Exhibit A(ii) EMPLOYEE POLITICAL ADVOCACY FUND FOR INNOVATION 2018 CONTRIBUTIONS State Candidate Contribution Amount Alabama Rep. Terri Sewell $1,000 Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema $1,000 California Sen. Dianne Feinstein $2,500 Rep. Ami Bera $2,000 Rep. Anna Eshoo $5,000 Rep. Steve Knight $1,000 Rep. Doris Matsui $1,000 Rep. Kevin McCarthy $5,000 Rep. Scott Peters $2,500 Rep. Linda Sanchez $2,500 Rep. Adam Schiff $1,000 Rep. Jackie Speier $2,500 Rep. Mike Thompson $1,000 Rep. Mimi Walters $2,500 Colorado Sen. Cory Gardner $1,000 Sen. Michael Bennet $1,000 Rep. Diana DeGette $2,500 Colorado Democratic Party $1,000 Delaware Sen. Tom Carper $2,500 Sen. Chris Coons $2,000 Blue Hen PAC (Sen. Chris Coons) $3,000 Florida Rep. Gus Bilirakis $1,000 Rep. Kathy Castor $2,500 Rep. Carlos Curbelo $1,000 Rep. Stephanie Murphy $1,000 Rep. Darren Soto $1,000 Georgia Sen. Johnny Isakson $1,000 Sen. David Perdue $2,000 Rep. Buddy Carter $2,500 Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds $2,000 Sen. Chuck Grassley $2,500 State Sen. Charles Schneider $2,000 State Sen. Tom Shipley $500 Idaho Sen. Mike Crapo $5,000 Illinois Rep. Cheri Bustos $1,000 Rep. Bill Foster $1,000 Rep. Robin Kelly $1,000 Rep. Darin LaHood $1,000 Rep. Pete Roskam $1,000 Rep. Brad Schneider $1,000 Rep. John Shimkus $2,500 Indiana Sen. Mike Braun $1,000 Sen. Joe Donnelly $2,500 Rep. Larry Bucshon $2,500 Rep. Susan Brooks $2,000 Rep. Andre Carson $1,000 Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges
    Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges September 3, 2020 Executive Summary In June, President Donald Trump pledged to release a new short list of potential Supreme Court nominees by September 1, 2020, for his consideration should he be reelected in November. While Trump has not yet released such a list, it likely would include several people he has already picked for powerful lifetime seats on the federal courts of appeals. Trump appointees' records raise alarms about the extremism they would bring to the highest court in the United States – and the people he would put on the appellate bench if he is reelected to a second term. According to People For the American Way’s ongoing research, these judges (including those likely to be on Trump’s short list), have written or joined more than 100 opinions or dissents as of August 31 that are so far to the right that in nearly one out of every four cases we have reviewed, other Republican-appointed judges, including those on Trump’s previous Supreme Court short lists, have disagreed with them.1 Considering that every Republican president since Ronald Reagan has made a considerable effort to pick very conservative judges, the likelihood that Trump could elevate even more of his extreme judicial picks raises serious concerns. On issues including reproductive rights, voting rights, police violence, gun safety, consumer rights against corporations, and the environment, Trump judges have consistently sided with right-wing special interests over the American people – even measured against other Republican-appointed judges. Many of these cases concern majority rulings issued or joined by Trump judges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies 2009 Annual Report
    The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies 2009 Annual Report “The Courts must declare the sense of the law; and if they should be disposed to exercise will instead of JUDGMENT, the consequences would be the substitution of their pleasure for that of the legislative body.” The Federalist 78 THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY aw schools and the legal profession are currently strongly dominated by a L form of orthodox liberal ideology which advocates a centralized and uniform society. While some members of the academic community have dissented from these views, by and large they are taught simultaneously with (and indeed as if they were) the law. The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in the current state of the legal order. It is founded on the principles that the state exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution, and that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be. The Society seeks both to promote an awareness of these principles and to further their application through its activities. This entails reordering priorities within the legal system to place a premium on individual liberty, traditional values, and the rule of law. It also requires restoring the recognition of the importance of these norms among lawyers, judges, law students and professors. In working to achieve these goals, the Society has created a conservative intellectual network that extends to all levels of the legal community.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S1909
    April 12, 2016 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S1909 understand and appreciate what this Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend I first learned of the threats they are can do for their constituents, what this increased expensing limitations, and for facing, the U.S. Agency for Inter- can do for the American workplace, other purposes. national Development has provided and how we can help small businesses Mitch McConnell, Daniel Coats, Lamar millions of dollars to nongovernmental Alexander, Bob Corker, Roger F. provide the services and benefits they Wicker, Orrin G. Hatch, Thom Tillis, organizations in Indonesia to try to en- need to provide so they can compete in John Hoeven, Kelly Ayotte, John sure their survival in the wild. this very competitive workforce envi- Thune, Mike Rounds, Roy Blunt, John Important progress has been made. ronment. Cornyn, Pat Roberts, John Barrasso, Back when the program started, it was With that, I yield the floor. Johnny Isakson, James M. Inhofe. feared that the orangutan would be ex- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The ma- Mr. MCCONNELL. I ask unanimous tinct in the wild within 15 years if jority leader. consent that the mandatory quorum nothing was done. That has not hap- AMENDMENT NO. 3464, AS AMENDED call be waived. pened, but their survival is far from as- Mr. MCCONNELL. Mr. President, I The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without sured, as an article in the April 6, 2016, move to table the Thune amendment objection, it is so ordered. edition of the New York Times entitled ‘‘Adapting to Life as Orphans, Fires No. 3464. AMENDMENT NO. 3680 TO AMENDMENT NO.
    [Show full text]
  • March 11, 2020 the Honorable Carolyn B. Maloney Chairwoman
    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN March 11, 2020 The Honorable Carolyn B. Maloney Chairwoman Committee on Oversight and Government Reform U.S. House of Representatives 2157 Raybum House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Dear Chairwoman Maloney: In response to a May 2017 incident in which a surge in comments caused disruption to the Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System (ECF$), GAO was asked to review both (1) the actions that the Commission took in response to the May 2017 event, and (2) the extent to which the FCC has implemented security controls to effectively protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of ECFS and two related FCC systems. As a result of that investigation, on September 26, 2019, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a limited official-use only (LOUO) report entitled FCC Improved Its Electronic Comment System, but Needs to Remedy Additional Control Weaknesses, GAO 19-247 SU (Report).” During the course of its review, GAO shared with the Commission a draft of its Report, which identified a number of issues with the Commission’s information security program and made 136 recommendations for correcting those issues. In a September 13, 2019, response to this draft report, the FCC Managing Director concurred with GAO’s recommendations, noted that the Commission submitted evidence to GAO that we had mitigated 83 of those recommendations, and explained the Commission’s timeline for addressing the remaining 53 recommendations. Based on the FCC’s response and subsequent actions taken in response to the draft report, the GAO has closed 85 of its 136 recommendations as having been addressed by the agency.
    [Show full text]
  • AAUW Action Fund Congressional Voting Record 115TH CONGRESS (January 2017-September 2018)
    AAUW Action Fund Congressional Voting Record 115TH CONGRESS (January 2017-September 2018) Dear AAUW Action Fund advocates, oliticians and policy makers routinely make decisions about issues that directly affect Pwomen and families. The 115th Congress saw legislative victories and defeats on issues impacting women and girls, ranging from attacks on Title IX and defunding Planned Parenthood to bipartisan legislation increasing women’s and girls’ access to science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). To create real change, women must be part of the conversation, and one of the most powerful places for us to chime in is at the polls. The AAUW Action Fund Congressional Voting Record serves as an accountability tool inside and outside of Washington, D.C. for AAUW members and supporters, providing information about how elected federal legislators vote on critical issues. AAUW and its members and supporters have a long history of lobbying Congress and holding legislators accountable for how they vote on AAUW priorities. We’ve utilized various AAUW and AAUW Action Fund advocacy tools, including the Congressional Voting Record, to remind members of Congress that women are paying attention and will hold candidates’ feet to the fire for their actions—or inactions—on issues important to women and their families. The AAUW Action Fund It’s My Vote: I Will Be Heard campaign harnesses the power of our advocates to increase voter registration and turnout among young women voters, in turn fostering a generation in establishing lifelong voting habits. Using this Congressional Voting Record is a powerful way to ensure that elected officials are held accountable—before and after the election—on critical policy issues for women and families.
    [Show full text]