Type-Specimens of Birds in the British Museum (Natural History)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Type-Specimens of Birds in the British Museum (Natural History) Type-Specimens of Birds in the British Museum (Natural History) Vol. 1 NON-PASSERINES RACHEL L. M. WARREN TRUSTEES OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) LONDON : 1966 Price £4 Publication No. 651 TYPE-SPECIMENS OF BIRDS IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) Vol. 1 NON-PASSERINES RACHEL L. M. WARREN TRUSTEES OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) LONDON : 1966 © Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History) 1966 Printed by Eyre and Spottiswoode Limited at Grosvenor Press Portsmouth : INTRODUCTION Scope and Presentation Tffls volume lists the non-passerine birds which have been segregated, from the general collections of the Department of Zoology, as name-bearing type-specimens. Thus only holotypes, syntypes, lectotypes and neotypes are eligible for inclusion. These categories are defined by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1964, Ch. XVI). Although all members of a syntype series have equal status, only one member of each has been segregated and listed. Wherever possible the specimen selected is the one which has been regarded as the holotype, because of a manuscript indication or a subsequent publication. Listing of a syntype as "the type", as was often done in the Catalogue of Birds (BM 1874-1898), does not constitute its designation as lectotype; nor of course does its listing in the present work. Where "male and female types" were originally designated all the members of the series are regarded as syntypes, but one of the designated specimens is segregated. Specimens which have been wrongly recorded in the literature as types, and types which cannot now be found, are listed in their proper places with explanatory notes. These entries are distinguished from those relating to type-specimens by being entered under names in Roman instead of in boldface print. Since this is a purely typological work, no attempt is made to assign the listed types to currently-accepted taxa. This allows them to be arranged in alphabetical order, with the omission of a separate index, and gives the arrangement permanent validity. Any worker interested in the types per- taining to a taxon (rather than in the type bearing a particular name) there- fore needs a list of the species-group names concerned before consulting this work. However, the orders or suborders in which the types are currently placed (according to Peters 1931-1948) are indicated by means of the following key numbers, in the right-hand margins 1. iv Introduction Each entry takes the following form. The species-group name, printed in boldface, is followed by the original combination, its author and date, and the key number. Names bearing marks now prohibited are corrected (ICZN 1964, Art. 32c (i) in both the name and the combination. Next are given the original reference; the category of the type; its sex and maturity, with additions to and emendations of the original statement added in paren- theses; its nature, if not originally a study-skin and now in complete condition; its Museum register number; its locality and date of collection, with additions to and emendations of the original statement added in parentheses; any known subsequent restriction of type-locality, with reference; its field collector; and the source from which it came to the Museum. If it is a syntype, the known whereabouts of other syntypes are mentioned; and any further facts are recorded. Recognition and Segregation The earliest reference to type-specimens of birds in the British Museum seems to be by J. E. Gray (1844). This lists various collections presented to the Museum, and mentions certain specimens as types: some from the Hudson's Bay Company as the types of species described by Richardson (1831), and some collected on the Niger by J. W. R. Thompson as the types of species described by Jardine. The register of specimens for 1855, when more than four hundred birds were purchased from the Zoological Society of London on the sale of their Museum, notes a number of speci- mens as types, including those described by Gould (1841) from Darwin's voyage in H.M.S. Beagle, and others by Eraser and Vigors. The practice of designating type-specimens developed gradually, and authors differed very much in their concern for it. Some specimens in the collection are labelled as "types", which were collected after the original descriptions were published. The segregation of type-specimens was begun before 1938. In early 1939, the Trustees of the British Museum gave instructions that all type and other important specimens were to be segregated, so that they could be removed to places of safety in case of war. The work was undertaken so vigorously by the staff of the Bird Section and by two visitors, Dr. C. E. Hellmayr and Mr. A. J. Van Rossem, that by the declaration of war in September, 85 per cent of the type-specimens were packed for removal to the Zoological Museum, Tring. At the end of the war a more complete and accurate catalogue was en- visaged. Miss P. M. Thomas, who was stationed at Tring, was asked to begin the preparation of a loose-leaf catalogue, and had finished several groups before the types were returned to London in 1947. At that time the continuation of this work was handed on to me. The status of the specimens was more critically studied, and further types were recognised in the general collection from a study of the literature. On the publication Introduction v of the volume on passerine type-specimens the work will be completed. It was when the loose-leaf catalogue was finished that the Bird Section staff helped increasingly with bringing the entries into their final form. Thus, type-specimens for segregation have been discovered both by investigating the status of all specimens in the collection which are labelled as types or with some equivalent term, and by searching the most likely literature. However, names based on specimens in the collection, whose authors have not drawn attention to the fact, may well have been overlooked. Two of the most important sources of information on acquisitions to the Museum collections are Sharpens contribution to the History of the Collections (1906) and his presidential address to the Fourth International Ornithological Congress, 1905 (1907). The latter ends: "In the record which I present to the Congress it will be seen that nearly every private collection in England has passed with the willing consent of the owners into the British Museum, while the donations of the great collections of Mr. Allan Hume, Mr. Osbert Salvin, Mr. Henry Seebohm, Mr. Philip Crowley [eggs], and other celebrated naturalists, have contributed to the renown of the British Museum." To this short list of the most important collections may be added Dr. Sharpens own, and those of the Hon. East India Company (with Sykes', Horsfield's and many of Hodgson's speci- mens), A. R. Wallace, John Gould, Capt. G. E. Shelley and P. L. Sclater. In the sixty years since the History of the Collections, types have been described and presented by numerous authors. Several collections which contain numbers of types are those of: Boyd Alexander, G. L. Bates, H. Gumey (birds of prey, presented by the Norwich Museum), H. H. Haring- ton, E. J. Johnstone, G. Loddiges, H. Lynes, E. McConnell, R. Meinertz- hagen, H. Philby, Lord Rothschild (ratites), W. Serle (part), J. Vincent, H. Whistler and J. Whitaker; and those made in New Guinea, Indo-China and the Comoro Islands by British Ornithologists' Union expeditions, and many types presented by the Raffles Museum, Singapore (Gibson-Hill 1949). Notes on some Authors and Collections While Sharpe's accounts give much valuable information, not repeated here, a few additional notes should be useful. John Co///a'( 1804 -1881) Gould's famous collection of hummingbirds was acquired in 1881, many of them still mounted in the glass cases which had been displayed the Crystal m Palace at the Great Exhibition of 1851. Gould rarely desig- nated a holotype, and the syntypes of his species have mainly been selected from his study-skins, many of which are labelled in his own handwriting. References to particular specimens are often given in his Monograph (1860-1880), after the publication of the original descriptions, but there is still some doubt about the status of some of the supposed type-specimens. vi Introduction The Museum acquired much of the rest of Gould's collection between 1837 and 1881, but his Australian collection was sold to the Academy of Sciences, Philadelphia, in 1847 (Schauensee 1957), and there are syntypes of some species in both museums. B. H. Hodgson (1800-1894) Hodgson lived from 1821 until 1843 at Katmandu in Nepal, and from then until 1859 at Darjeeling. He was a prolific collector, who described over 150 nominal species of birds, and made drawings of them. One set of these drawings is in the Museum, and another is in the library of the Zoo- logical Society of London. The specimens referred to in Hodgson's Cata- logue of Nepalese birds (1844) were acquired by the Museum in 1843, and other early specimens were in the museum of the Honourable East India Company, acquired between 1860 and 1880. Later collections received in 1845 and 1848 contained few types, and the localities of some of these were wrongly given as Behar. Hodgson's catalogue (1844) contained no descriptions, though the new names published in it are linked by numbers to his unpublished drawings and to his specimens. Although many of the original labels were destroyed by G. R. Gray, many of these early specimens in the Museum can be identified as those from which descriptions were made at a later date, and several of these are indicated in the Catalogue of Birds as the types of Hodgson's names.
Recommended publications
  • The Basilinna Genus (Aves: Trochilidae): an Evaluation Based on Molecular Evidence and Implications for the Genus Hylocharis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85: 797-807, 2014 DOI: 10.7550/rmb.35769 The Basilinna genus (Aves: Trochilidae): an evaluation based on molecular evidence and implications for the genus Hylocharis El género Basilinna (Aves: Trochilidae): una evaluación basada en evidencia molecular e implicaciones para el género Hylocharis Blanca Estela Hernández-Baños1 , Luz Estela Zamudio-Beltrán1, Luis Enrique Eguiarte-Fruns2, John Klicka3 and Jaime García-Moreno4 1Museo de Zoología, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Apartado postal 70- 399, 04510 México, D. F., Mexico. 2Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Apartado postal 70-275, 04510 México, D. F., Mexico. 3Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, University of Washington, Box 353010, Seattle, WA, USA. 4Amphibian Survival Alliance, PO Box 20164, 1000 HD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected] Abstract. Hummingbirds are one of the most diverse families of birds and the phylogenetic relationships within the group have recently begun to be studied with molecular data. Most of these studies have focused on the higher level classification within the family, and now it is necessary to study the relationships between and within genera using a similar approach. Here, we investigated the taxonomic status of the genus Hylocharis, a member of the Emeralds complex, whose relationships with other genera are unclear; we also investigated the existence of the Basilinna genus. We obtained sequences of mitochondrial (ND2: 537 bp) and nuclear genes (AK-5 intron: 535 bp, and c-mos: 572 bp) for 6 of the 8 currently recognized species and outgroups.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Birdtree.Org [48] to Take Into Account Phylogenetic Uncertainty in the Comparative Analyses [67]
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/586362; this version posted November 19, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Distribution of iridescent colours in Open Peer-Review hummingbird communities results Open Data from the interplay between Open Code selection for camouflage and communication Cite as: preprint Posted: 15th November 2019 Hugo Gruson1, Marianne Elias2, Juan L. Parra3, Christine Recommender: Sébastien Lavergne Andraud4, Serge Berthier5, Claire Doutrelant1, & Doris Reviewers: Gomez1,5 XXX Correspondence: 1 [email protected] CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France 2 ISYEB, CNRS, MNHN, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, 45 rue Buffon CP50, Paris, France 3 Grupo de Ecología y Evolución de Vertrebados, Instituto de Biología, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia 4 CRC, MNHN, Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication, CNRS, Paris, France 5 INSP, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Paris, France This article has been peer-reviewed and recommended by Peer Community In Evolutionary Biology Peer Community In Evolutionary Biology 1 of 33 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/586362; this version posted November 19, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Identification errors between closely related, co-occurring, species may lead to misdirected social interactions such as costly interbreeding or misdirected aggression. This selects for divergence in traits involved in species identification among co-occurring species, resulting from character displacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Journal of Caribbean Ornithology RESEARCH ARTICLE Vol. 33:1–14. 2020 Composition of bird community in Portachuelo Pass (Henri Pittier National Park, Venezuela) Cristina Sainz-Borgo Jhonathan Miranda Miguel Lentino Photo: Pedro Arturo Amaro Journal of Caribbean Ornithology jco.birdscaribbean.org ISSN 1544-4953 RESEARCH ARTICLE Vol. 33:1–14. 2020 birdscaribbean.org Composition of bird community in Portachuelo Pass (Henri Pittier National Park, Venezuela) Cristina Sainz-Borgo1, Jhonathan Miranda2, and Miguel Lentino3 Abstract The purpose of this study was to describe the composition of the bird community in Portachuelo Pass, located in Henri Pittier National Park, Venezuela. Portachuelo Pass is an important route for migratory birds between northern South America and the Southern Cone. During 11 months of sampling between 2010 and 2012, we captured 1,460 birds belonging to 125 identified species, 29 families, and 9 orders. The families with the highest relative abundance and species richness were Trochilidae and Thraupidae and the most common species were the Violet-chested Hummingbird (Sternoclyta cyanopectus), Olive-striped Flycatcher (Mionectes olivaceus), Plain-brown Woodcreeper (Dendrocincla fuliginosa), Orange-bellied Euphonia (Euphonia xanthogaster), Violet-fronted Brilliant (Heliodoxa leadbeateri), Vaux’s Swift (Chaetura vauxi), Red-eared Parakeet (Pyrrhura hoematotis), Golden-tailed Sapphire (Chrysuronia oenone), Black-hooded Thrush (Turdus olivater), and Gray-rumped Swift (Chaetura cinereiventris). These species represented 52.4% of total captures and 8.0% of identified species. We captured 5 endemic species and 8 migratory species. The months of greatest relative abundance and species richness were June and July 2010 and January 2011. Birds captured belonged to the following feeding guilds: insectivorous, nectarivorous-insectivorous, frugivorous, frugivorous-insectivorous, granivorous, frugivorous-folivorous, omnivorous, carnivorous, and frugivorous-graniv- orous.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird) Species List
    Aves (Bird) Species List Higher Classification1 Kingdom: Animalia, Phyllum: Chordata, Class: Reptilia, Diapsida, Archosauria, Aves Order (O:) and Family (F:) English Name2 Scientific Name3 O: Tinamiformes (Tinamous) F: Tinamidae (Tinamous) Great Tinamou Tinamus major Highland Tinamou Nothocercus bonapartei O: Galliformes (Turkeys, Pheasants & Quail) F: Cracidae Black Guan Chamaepetes unicolor (Chachalacas, Guans & Curassows) Gray-headed Chachalaca Ortalis cinereiceps F: Odontophoridae (New World Quail) Black-breasted Wood-quail Odontophorus leucolaemus Buffy-crowned Wood-Partridge Dendrortyx leucophrys Marbled Wood-Quail Odontophorus gujanensis Spotted Wood-Quail Odontophorus guttatus O: Suliformes (Cormorants) F: Fregatidae (Frigatebirds) Magnificent Frigatebird Fregata magnificens O: Pelecaniformes (Pelicans, Tropicbirds & Allies) F: Ardeidae (Herons, Egrets & Bitterns) Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis O: Charadriiformes (Sandpipers & Allies) F: Scolopacidae (Sandpipers) Spotted Sandpiper Actitis macularius O: Gruiformes (Cranes & Allies) F: Rallidae (Rails) Gray-Cowled Wood-Rail Aramides cajaneus O: Accipitriformes (Diurnal Birds of Prey) F: Cathartidae (Vultures & Condors) Black Vulture Coragyps atratus Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura F: Pandionidae (Osprey) Osprey Pandion haliaetus F: Accipitridae (Hawks, Eagles & Kites) Barred Hawk Morphnarchus princeps Broad-winged Hawk Buteo platypterus Double-toothed Kite Harpagus bidentatus Gray-headed Kite Leptodon cayanensis Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus Ornate Hawk-Eagle Spizaetus ornatus Red-tailed
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Das Aves Do Brasil
    90 Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee / Lista comentada das aves do Brasil pelo Comitê Brasileiro de Registros Ornitológicos content / conteÚDO Abstract ............................. 91 Charadriiformes ......................121 Scleruridae .............187 Charadriidae .........121 Dendrocolaptidae ...188 Introduction ........................ 92 Haematopodidae ...121 Xenopidae .............. 195 Methods ................................ 92 Recurvirostridae ....122 Furnariidae ............. 195 Burhinidae ............122 Tyrannides .......................203 Results ................................... 94 Chionidae .............122 Pipridae ..................203 Scolopacidae .........122 Oxyruncidae ..........206 Discussion ............................. 94 Thinocoridae .........124 Onychorhynchidae 206 Checklist of birds of Brazil 96 Jacanidae ...............124 Tityridae ................207 Rheiformes .............................. 96 Rostratulidae .........124 Cotingidae .............209 Tinamiformes .......................... 96 Glareolidae ............124 Pipritidae ............... 211 Anseriformes ........................... 98 Stercorariidae ........125 Platyrinchidae......... 211 Anhimidae ............ 98 Laridae ..................125 Tachurisidae ...........212 Anatidae ................ 98 Sternidae ...............126 Rhynchocyclidae ....212 Galliformes ..............................100 Rynchopidae .........127 Tyrannidae ............. 218 Cracidae ................100 Columbiformes
    [Show full text]
  • AC27 Doc. 12.5
    Original language: English AC27 Doc. 12.5 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________ Twenty-seventh meeting of the Animals Committee Veracruz (Mexico), 28 April – 3 May 2014 Interpretation and implementation of the Convention Review of Significant Trade in specimens of Appendix-II species [Resolution Conf. 12.8 (Rev. CoP13)] SELECTION OF SPECIES FOR TRADE REVIEWS FOLLOWING COP16 1. This document has been prepared by the Secretariat. 2. In Resolution Conf. 12.8 (Rev. CoP13) on Review of Significant Trade in specimens of Appendix-II species, the Conference of the Parties: DIRECTS the Animals and Plants Committees, in cooperation with the Secretariat and experts, and in consultation with range States, to review the biological, trade and other relevant information on Appendix-II species subject to significant levels of trade, to identify problems and solutions concerning the implementation of Article IV, paragraphs 2 (a), 3 and 6 (a)... 3. In accordance with paragraph a) of that Resolution under the section Regarding conduct of the Review of Significant Trade, the Secretariat requested UNEP-WCMC to produce a summary from the CITES Trade Database of annual report statistics showing the recorded net level of exports for Appendix-II species over the five most recent years. Its report is attached as Annex 1 (English only) to the present document. The raw data used to prepare this summary are available in document AC27 Inf. 2. 4. Paragraph b) of the same section directs the Animals Committee, on the basis of recorded trade levels and information available to it, the Secretariat, Parties or other relevant experts, to select species of priority concern for review (whether or not such species have been the subject of a previous review).
    [Show full text]
  • Mitred Conure Control on Maui
    UC Agriculture & Natural Resources Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference Title Mitred Conure Control on Maui Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7jc2c0g2 Journal Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 26(26) ISSN 0507-6773 Authors Radford, Adam Penniman, Teya Publication Date 2014 DOI 10.5070/V426110411 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Mitred Conure Control on Maui Adam Radford and Teya Penniman Maui Invasive Species Committee, Makawao, Hawai‘i ABSTRACT: Hawai‘i has no native parrots (Psittacidae), but at least two species of this family have naturalized on the island of Maui, the result of accidental or deliberate releases of pet birds. A breeding pair of mitred conures was illegally released in approximately 1986 on the north shore of Maui. At its peak, a population of over 150 birds was documented, demonstrating that conures in Hawai‘i can be highly productive in the wild. These non-native birds pose a threat to Hawaiian ecosystems, agricultural productivity, and quality of life. They are highly adaptable, reproduce rapidly, eat a variety of fruits and seeds, are extremely loud, can carry viral and bacterial diseases, and may compete with native seabirds for cliffside burrows. Of particular concern is the conures’ ability to pass viable seed of highly invasive species, including Miconia calvescens, a tree which is found near the conures’ roosting/breeding areas. Information from the conures’ native range in South America suggests these birds can become established at elevations in excess of 3,000 meters, underscoring the potential for spreading invasive weeds into intact, native forests, and high value watersheds at upper elevations.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Avian Biology JAV-00869 Wang, N
    Journal of Avian Biology JAV-00869 Wang, N. and Kimball, R. T. 2016. Re-evaluating the distribution of cooperative breeding in birds: is it tightly linked with altriciality? – J. Avian Biol. doi: 10.1111/jav.00869 Supplementary material Appendix 1. Table A1. The characteristics of the 9993 species based on Jetz et al. (2012) Order Species Criteria1 Developmental K K+S K+S+I LB Mode ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter albogularis 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter badius 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter bicolor 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter brachyurus 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter brevipes 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter butleri 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter castanilius 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter chilensis 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter chionogaster 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter cirrocephalus 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter collaris 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter cooperii 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter erythrauchen 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter erythronemius 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter erythropus 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter fasciatus 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter francesiae 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter gentilis 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter griseiceps 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter gularis 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter gundlachi 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter haplochrous 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter henicogrammus 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter henstii 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES Accipiter imitator 0 0 0 0 1 ACCIPITRIFORMES
    [Show full text]
  • Check List 5(2): 222–237, 2009
    Check List 5(2): 222–237, 2009. ISSN: 1809-127X LISTS OF SPECIES Birds (Aves), Serrania Sadiri, Parque Nacional Madidi, Depto. La Paz, Bolivia Peter Andrew Hosner 1 Kenneth David Behrens 2 A. Bennett Hennessey 3 1 University of Kansas, Museum of Natural History, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Division of Ornithology. Dyche Hall, 1345 Jayhawk Blvd., University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66046. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Tropical Birding, 1 Toucan Way. Bloubergrise 7441, South Africa. 3 Asociación Civil Armonía. Avenida Lomas de Arena, Casilla 3566, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Abstract We surveyed the Serrania Sadiri for birds at elevations between 500-950m for a combined total of 15 days in three different months. The area surveyed was along the Tumupasa/San Jose de Uchupiamones trail at the edge of Parque Nacional Madidi in Depto. La Paz, Bolivia. We report observations of 231 species of birds detected by sight and sound, including many outlying ridge specialists. We report and present photographs of a new species for Depto. La Paz (Caprimulgis nigrescens), the second Bolivian localities for Porphyrolaema prophyrolaema, Zimerius cinereicapillus, and Basileuterus chrysogaster, and five new species records for Parque Nacional Madidi. Introduction Foothills and outlying ridges of the Andes are From the small village of Tumupasa (14°8'46" S, often very difficult or impossible to access. As a 67°53'17" W; 400 m a.s.l; Figures 1 and 2), an old result, many of the specialist bird species in these trail leads generally southwest over the Serrania areas are poorly known and some only recently Sadiri to the town of San Jose de Uchupiamones described, and these areas generally have unique (14°12'47" S, 68°03'14" W; 520 m a.s.l).
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 References
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/62332 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Jansen, Justin J.F.J. Title: The ornithology of the Baudin expedition (1800-1804) Date: 2018-05-22 661 Chapter 7 References 662 Chapter 7 - References A Ade, M. S., Frahnert, S. and Stark, Ch. 2001. Analysing databases of Southern African material at the Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin. Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin 77 (2): 325-331. Agardh, C. A. 1821. Species Algarum Rite Cognitae cum Synonymis, Differentiis Specificis et Descriptionibus Succinctis. Lund, Berlin. Agardh, C. A. 1824. Systema Algarum. Lund, Berlin. Åhlander, E., Kullander, S. O. and Fernholm, B. 1997. Ichthyological collection building at the Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm. pp. 13-25. In Pietsch, T. W. and Anderson, W. D. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists Special Publication Number 3. Aitinger, J. C. 1626-1631. Kurtzer Und Einfeltiger bericht Von Dem Vogelstellen. Cassel. Albert, H. 1913. The use of oil as a final preservative for specimens, the natural colour of which is to be retained. International Association of Medical Museums IV: 44-45. Aldrovandi, U. 1599–1603. Omithologiae hoc est de avibus historiae Libri XII. Bologna. Alexander, W. B. 1924. White’s Journal of a voyage to New South Wales. Emu 23: 209-215. Aliabadian, M., Alaei-Kakhki, N., Mirshamsi, O., Nijman, V. and Roulin, A. 2017. Phylogeny, biogeography, and diversification of barn owls (Aves: Strigiformes).Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 119 (4): 904-918. Altmann, J. 2012. Zeichnen als beobachten. Die Bildwerke der Baudin-Expedition (1800-1804).
    [Show full text]
  • Exotic Parrots Breeding in Urban Tree Cavities
    Diamond and Ross Avian Res (2019) 10:39 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-019-0176-3 Avian Research RESEARCH Open Access Exotic parrots breeding in urban tree cavities: nesting requirements, geographic distribution, and potential impacts on cavity nesting birds in southeast Florida Joshua M. Diamond* and Michael S. Ross Abstract Background: Exotic parrots have established breeding populations in southeast Florida, including several species that nest in tree cavities. We aimed to determine the species identity, nest site requirements, relative nest abundance, geographic distribution, and interactions of parrots with native cavity-nesting bird species. Methods: We searched Miami-Dade County, Florida, and nearby areas for natural cavities and holes excavated by woodpeckers, recording attributes of potential nest trees. We inspected all cavities with an elevated video inspec- tion system to determine occupancy by parrots or other birds. We mapped nearly 4000 citizen science observations of parrots in our study area corresponding to our study period, and used these to construct range maps, comparing them to our nesting observations. Results: Not all parrots reported or observed in our study area were actively breeding. Some parrots were observed at tree cavities, which previous studies have suggested is evidence of reproduction, but our inspections with an ele- vated video inspection system suggest they never initiated nesting attempts. Several parrot species did successfully nest in tree cavities, Red-masked Parakeets (Psittacara erythrogenys) and Orange-winged Parrots (Amazona amazonica) being the most common (n 7 and 6 nests, respectively). These two parrots had similar nesting requirements, but Orange-winged Parrots use nests= with larger entrance holes, which they often enlarge.
    [Show full text]