Reconstruction of Late Pleistocene Paleoclimatic Characteristics in the Great Basin and Adjacent Areas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reconstruction of Late Pleistocene Paleoclimatic Characteristics in the Great Basin and Adjacent Areas AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Kenneth A. Bevis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geology presented on March 3. 1995. Title: Reconstruction of Late Pleistocene Paleoclimatic Characteristics in the Great Basin and Adjacent Areas Signature redacted for privacy. Abstract approved:. Peter U. Clark A sequence of glaciation based on relative dating parameters was established in each of nine mountain ranges located along a northwest to southeast transect through the northern Great Basin. Each sequence consists of two or three drift units. Degree of weathering suggests that the younger drift unit in a two-fold sequence and the intermediate drift unit in a three-fold sequence represents deposition during the late Pleistocene. The late Pleistocene equilibrium-line altitude (ELA) in each range was determined by reconstructing the maximum ice extent associated with these drift units and using the accumulation area ratio technique. Paleo-ELAs increase from about 2100 m in northeastern Oregon to approximately 3200 m in central Utah. Paleoclimatic conditions along the study transect were estimated by comparing modern climatic conditions at the reconstructed late Pleistocene ELAs with climatic conditions occurring at the ELAs of modem mid-latitude glaciers. Assuming no change in winter accumulation or in the seasonal distribution of precipitation from the present, a mean summer temperature depression ranging from about 9.0 °C at the northern end of the transect to about 4.0 °C at the southern end would have been necessary to sustain glaciers in these ranges during the late Pleistocene. To simulate possible changes in late Pleistocene precipitation patterns, a change in winter accumulation between 0.5 and 2.0 times the modem value resulted in a respective increase or decrease in temperature depression by approximately 2.0 °C. These results suggest that increases in precipitation during the late Pleistocene alone could not have sustained glaciers in the mountain ranges of the study transect, except possibly at its southern end, in the central Great Basin. An increase in precipitation in this area during the late Pleistocene agrees with the interpretation of other paleoclimatic records and paleoclimatic model simulations for the Great Basin. Reconstruction of Late Pleistocene Paleoclimatic Characteristics in the Great Basin and Adjacent Areas by Kenneth A. Bevis A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fufflilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Completed March 3, 1995 Commencement June 1995 ACKNOWLEDGMENT I would especially like to thank my major professor Dr. Peter Clark for his assistance through every stage of this project. I would also like to thank the rest of my committee for putting up with me, particularly Dr. Raymond Burke for setting me on this path, and Dr. William Scott for his timely editing. Much appreciation goes to my father for the good times in the field and to my mother for all the support over the last few years. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Objectives 2 1.2 Geographic and Geologic Setting 3 1.2.1 Siskiyou Mountains 5 1.2.2 The Aspen Butte Area, Southern Oregon Cascades 9 1.2.3 Elkhorn Mountains 11 1.2.4 Strawberry Mountains 13 1.2.5 Steens Mountain 15 1.2.6 Pine Forest Range 17 1.2.7 Ruby Mountains 19 1.2.8 Deep Creek Mountains 21 1.2.9 Tushar Mountains 23 1.3 Modern and Late Pleistocene Climatic Conditions 25 1.3.1 Modern Regional Climate 25 1.3.2 Regional Late Pleistocene Paleoclimatic Interpretations 30 PALEOCLIMATIC INTERPRETATIONS FROM LATE 35 QUATERNARY PALYNOLOGICAL RECORDS IN THE GREAT BASIN AND ADJACENT AREAS 2.1 Present-day Vegetation Patterns 35 2.2 Vegetation History 37 2.2.1 Late Pleistocene Vegetation 38 2.2.2 Holocene Vegetation 43 2.3 Vegetation Dynamics and Paleoclimatic Interpretations 50 LATE QUATERNARY PLUVIAL LAKES iN THE GREAT BASIN 58 AND THEIR PALEOCLIMATIC SIGNIFICANCE 3.1 Lake-level Fluctuations 58 3.1.1 Factors Affecting Lake-level Fluctuations 60 3.1.2 Late Quaternary Lake-level Fluctuations 62 3.2 Paleoclimatic Implications of Lake-level Chronologies 74 3.3 Regional Climatic Patterns and Lake-level Fluctuations 78 3.4 Montane Glaciers and Lake-level Fluctuations 81 3.5 Summary 84 LATE QUATERNARY PERIGLACIAL FEATURES AND THEIR 86 PALEOCLIMATIC IMPLICATIONS 4.1 Introduction 86 4.2 Evidence for Late Pleistocene Periglacial Conditions in the 86 Western United States 4.3 Summary 89 Dll-FERENTIATION AND CORRELATION OF DR[FT UNITS 91 5.1 Methodology for Establishing a Glacial Chronology 91 5.2 The Results of Analyses for each Study Area 95 5.2.1 Siskiyou Mountains 95 5.2.2 Aspen Butte Area 98 5.2.3 Elkhorn Mountains 102 5.2.4 Strawberry Mountains 105 5.2.5 Steens Mountain 109 5.2.6 Pine Forest Range 112 5.2.7 Ruby Mountains 115 5.2.8 Deep Creek Mountains 118 5.2.9 Tushar Mountains 121 5.3 Drift Unit Ages 125 5.3.1 Methodology 125 5.3.2 Drift Unit Ages in each Mountain Range 137 5.4 Correlation of Drift Units among Mountain Ranges 142 5.5 Influence of Lithology and Climate On RD Parameter 145 Development and Correlation of Drift Units 5.5.1 Methodology 145 5.5.2 Lithologic Controls 154 5.5.3 Climatic Controls 157 5.6 Summary 160 ESTIMATION OF LATE PLEISTOCENE PALEOCLIMATIC 162 CHARACTERISTICS FROM RECONSTRUCTED EQUILIBRIUM- LINE ALTITUDES 6.1 Estimation of Late Pleistocene ELAs 162 6.1.1 Reconstruction of Former Ice Limits 162 6.1.2 Basal Shear Stress Calculations 163 6.1.3 Equilibrium-line Altitudes 166 6.2 Climatic Characteristics of Modern Glaciers 176 6.3 Modern Climatic Characteristics at Paleo-ELAs 178 6.4 Estimation of Late Pleistocene Temperature Depression 180 6.5 Estimation of Changes in Winter Accumulation 183 6.6 Possible Sources of Error 187 6.7 Discussion of Results 189 6.8 Comparison of Estimated Paleoclimatic Conditions between 194 this Investigation and Interpretations made from Glaciological, Paleobotanical, Pluvial, and Periglacial Data 6.9 Summary 199 7. CONCLUSIONS 204 BIBLIOGRAPHY 211 APPENDICES 227 Appendix 1 228 Appendix 2 245 Appendix 3 259 Appendix 4 269 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1.1The Great Basin and adjacent areas of the Western United States. 4 The hachured line indicates the approximate areal extent of the Great Basin. 1.2 The extent of late Pleistocene glaciers in the western United States 6 (modified from Porter et al., 1983). The hachured line indicates the approximate areal extent of the Great Basin. Glaciated mountain ranges proposed for study in this investigation are labeled: (AB) Aspen Butte, (DC) Deep Creek Mtns., (EH) Elkhorn Mtns., (PF) Pine Forest Range, (RM) Ruby Mtns., (SB) Strawbeny Mtns., (SI) Siskiyou Mtns., (SM) Steens Mtn., and (TM) Tushar Mtns. 1.3Topographic map showing the upper portion of the Clear Creek 8 watershed in the Siskiyou Mountains. 1.4Topographic map of the Aspen Butte area in the southern Oregon 10 Cascades. 1.5Topographic map showing several glaciated watersheds in the 12 Elkhorn Mountains. 1.6 Topographic map showing several glaciated watersheds in the 14 Strawbeny Mountains. 1.7Topographic map showing the glaciated watersheds of Steens 16 Mountain. 1.8Topographic map showing the glaciated watersheds of the Pine 18 Forest Range. 1.9Topographic maps of selected watersheds in the Ruby Mountains. 20 1.10 Topographic map of several glaciated watersheds in the Deep 22 Creek Mountains. 1.11 Topographic map of several glaciated watersheds in the Tushar 24 Mountains. 1.12 Precipitation gradients in the Great Basin (after Houghton, 1969). 27 1.13 Winter air-mass distribution pattern for the western United States 28 (modified from Mitchell, 1976). Region I is dominated by a Pacific component, region II by a continental component, and region ifi by a Gulf component. The wavy pattern indicates mountainous barriers to air flow. 1.14 The late Pleistocene ELA trend surface for the western United States 31 based on lowest cirque-floor altitudes (adapted from Porter et aL, 1983). 1.15 North American paleoclimatic model simulations for 18,000 years 34 B .P. and the present, based on the interpretation of atmospheric, biological, and geological data from the last glacial to interglacial transition (COHMAP Members, 1988). 2.1Site locations of pollen records of late Quaternary age discussed in the 39 text. The hachured line indicates the approximate areal extent of the Great Basin. Key to sites by state: Washington; 1) Big Meadow, 2) Bonaparte Meadows and Mud Lake, 3) Waits Lake, 4) Creston Fen, 5) Carp Lake, 6) Battle Ground Lake. Idaho; 7) Murphey's Rock Shelter, 8) Rattlesnake Cave, 9) Swan Lake, 10) Grays Lake. Wyoming; 11) Yellowstone area. Utah; 12) Confusion Range, 13) Danger Cave, 14) Deep Creek Range, 15) Hogup Cave, 16) Snowbird Bog, 17) Wah Wah Range. Oregon; 18) Chewaucan Marsh, 19) Diamond Pond, 20) Kiamath Lake, 21) Steens Mountain, 22) Warner Lake. California; 23) Bodie Canyon, 24) Eureka Valley, 25) Death Valley, 26) Westgaard Pass Cave, 27) Balsam and Exchequer Meadows, 28) Osgood Swamp. Nevada; 29) Calm's Cave, 30) Eleana Range, 31) Esmeralda Rockshelter, 32) Fishbone Cave, 33) Gatecliff Rockshelter, 34) Guano Cave, 35) Hidden Cave, 36) Leonard Rockshelter, 37) Meadow Valley Wash, 38) Mission Cross Bog, 39) Ruby Marshes, 40) Schell Creek Range, 41) Snake Range, 42) Toquima Range, 43) Winnemucca Lake basin. 2.2 The late Pleistocene/Holocene vegetation transition in the Great Basin. 52 The hachured line indicates the approximate areal extent of the Great Basin. Dashed lines separate the Great Basin and adjacent areas into a northward time-transgressive zonation that indicates approximately when modern vegetation was reestablished in this region. 3.1Pluvial lakes in the Great Basin and adjacent areas of the western 59 United States (adapted from Benson and Thompson, 1987a).
Recommended publications
  • Elko County Nevada Water Resource Management Plan 2017
    Elko County Nevada Water Resource Management Plan 2017 Echo Lake - Ruby Mountains Elko County Board of Commissioners Elko County Natural Resource Management Advisory Commission December 6, 2017 Executive Summary The Elko County Water Resource Management Plan has been prepared to guide the development, management and use of water resources in conjunction with land use management over the next twenty-five (25) years. Use by decision makers of information contained within this plan will help to ensure that the environment of the County is sustained while at the same time enabling the expansion and diversification of the local economy. Implementation of the Elko County Water Resource Management Plan will assist in maintaining the quality of life enjoyed by residents and visitors of Elko County now and in the future. Achievement of goals outlined in the plan will result in water resources found within Elko County being utilized in a manner beneficial to the residents of Elko County and the State of Nevada. The State of Nevada Water Plan represents that Elko County will endure a loss of population and agricultural lands over the next twenty-five years. Land use and development patterns prepared by Elko County do not agree with this estimated substantial loss of population and agricultural lands. The trends show that agricultural uses in Elko County are stable with minimal notable losses each year. Development patterns represent that private lands that are not currently utilized for agricultural are being developed in cooperation and conjunction with agricultural uses. In 2007, Elko County was the largest water user in the State of Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A
    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Beaver County, Utah Centennial County History Series
    A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley UTAH CENTENNIAL COUNTY HISTORY SERIES A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley The settlement of Beaver County began in February 1856 when fifteen families from Parowan moved by wagon thirty miles north to Beaver Valley. The county was created by the Utah legislature on 31 January 1856, a week before the Parowan group set out to make their new home. However, centuries before, prehistoric peoples lived in the area, obtaining obsidian for arrow and spear points from the Mineral Mountains. Later, the area became home to Paiute Indians. Franciscan Friars Dominguez and Escalante passed through the area in October 1776. The Mormon settlement of Beaver devel­ oped at the foot of the Tushar Mountains. In 1859 the community of Minersville was es­ tablished, and residents farmed, raised live­ stock, and mined the lead deposits there. In the last quarter of the nineteenth century the Mineral Mountains and other locations in the county saw extensive mining develop­ ment, particularly in the towns of Frisco and Newhouse. Mining activities were given a boost with the completion of the Utah South­ ern Railroad to Milford in 1880. The birth­ place of both famous western outlaw Butch Cassidy and inventor of television Philo T. Farnsworth, Beaver County is rich in history, historic buildings, and mineral treasures. ISBN: 0-913738-17-4 A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County A HISTORY OF Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley 1999 Utah State Historical Society Beaver County Commission Copyright © 1999 by Beaver County Commission All rights reserved ISBN 0-913738-17-4 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 98-61325 Map by Automated Geographic Reference Center—State of Utah Printed in the United States of America Utah State Historical Society 300 Rio Grande Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1182 Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii GENERAL INTRODUCTION ix CHAPTER 1 Beaver County: The Places That Shape Us .
    [Show full text]
  • A MODEL for BIOMASS ASSESSMENT E-023 SUBMITTED BY: Dr
    • A MODEL FOR BIOMASS ASSESSMENT E-023 SUBMITTED BY: Dr. Stephen J. Walsh Associate Professor Dr. George p. Malanson Assistant Professor Dr. John D. Vitek Associate Professor Dr. David R. Butler Assistant Professor Department of Geography Oklahoma State University & in conjunction with USDA/Agricultural Research Service SUBMITTED TO: Dr. Norman N. Durham, Director Water Research Center Oklahoma State University March 14, 1983 Introduction The surface of the earth is a complex system responding to the input of energy, natural and human. Human use of the surface for maximum agricultural efficiency requires knowledge of the interactions of all variables involved in the system. Broad categories of phenomena, including the atmosphere (weather and climate), biosphere (vegetation, fauna, and human activity), hydrosphere (precipitation, runoff, infiltration, fluvial erosion, and evapotranspiration), and the lithosphere (soil, topography, and parent material), can be identified as the major variables in any assessment. Assessment of interactions requires data from various sources. The emergence of remote sensing as a source of data for assessments in the last decade permits the development of more accurate predictive models. Refinements in data acquisition, such as improved resolution, the use of radar, and the correlation of detailed surface observations with satellite overpasses, provide researchers with the capability to assess inter­ relationships and create accurate models. A conceptual model, Figure 1, illustrates the interaction of the Department of Geography/CARS and the USDA/Agricultural Research Service with components of the natural system for the purpose of creating a predictive model for biomass assessment~~CARS, the remote sensing center at Oklahoma State University, plus ARS of the USDA bring different skills to this joint research effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Names
    GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Geologic Map of the Southwestern Quarter of the Beaver 30' X 60' Quadrangle Utah Department of Natural Resources
    Plate 1 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Utah Geological Survey Open-File Report 686DM a division of Interim Geologic Map of the Southwestern Quarter of the Beaver 30' x 60' Quadrangle Utah Department of Natural Resources 113°00'00" 112°52'30" 112°45'00" 112°37'30" 112°30'00" b E E E E E ! ! E ! E ! E E ! ! E E ! ! ! ! F ! E ! 38°15'00" ! ! 38°15'00" ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tm (Ticl) QTs Qms *c ! Qal1 1 Ppk ! Qat ! Tm (Jn) E QTs Qal1 ! Qaf1 Qaf3 Tm (Tdv) Qat1 ! E ! E Qal1 Tm (Tlk) ! Pt M Tm (Tdv) ! Qaf ! E E 4 ! Qaf2 ! Qat1 E Qms A ! ! E ! E ! Qal1 Tm ! ! R ! Qal1 ! ! Tm ! E ! ! Qat1 ! Qaf1 31 K ! ! ! ! ! ! ^m ! ! A ! Pp ! 1 ! ! Qat ! (Tda) G ! ! ! ! ! (Tdv) ! E ! E ! E ! U ! ! ! E 1 E ! ! Qat ! ! ! N ! ! Tm (Tdv) ! ! ! ! E ! ! ! ! T ! ! QTs ! ! Qat2 2 ! Qaf ! ! Tm ! E E ! ! Qaf2 Tm (Tdv) ! ! ! Qaf1 Qat1 ! ! ! Tm (Tlk) ! E E ! ! E Tm (Ticl) ! ! Qat1 ! ! E ! ! ! ! ! ! (Tda) b ! Qat1 ! E ! ! Qaf3 ! ! ! Qaf1 ! ! E ! 7 ! E ! E ! ! ! ! Qaf3 Pt E 1 ! ! Qaf ! ! Tm (Tin) Tb Qat2 ! ! ! ! ^cm ! ! E E 1 ! ! ! Qaf ! Qaf2 Qaf3 ! ! ! E Qaf3 ! E ! Tm (Tlk) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ppk E ! ! E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! E 3 ! Qaf E Qaf3 ! ! 1 ! E Qaf ! ! E ! ! ! ! ! ! E ! ! ! ! Qaf1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tm (Tlb) ! ! ! ! ! E ! Tm (Tdb) ! ! ! ! E Tm ! ! ! E Qaf2 ! E ! ! Tm (Tda) E ! ! ! ! 2 ! ! Qaf Pq ! E ! ! ! E E ! ! E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tm (Tdv) E Qaf3 ! ! ! (Tin) ! Qaf2 ! ! ! E ! E ! Qaf2 E ! ! ! ! ! ! Qaf2 ! Tm (Tdv) ! ! ! ! ! E ! ! ! Tm E ! ! Qat1 ! ! Tm (Tdv) ! Qaf1 ! ! E ! ! ! ! E ! E ! Qal ! 2 ! ! ! E E! ! Tm (Tda) ! ! ! ! ! Tm (Tdv) ! ! ! ! ! ! E E E ! ! E ! ! ! ! Tm (Tdv) ! !
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Evaluation of Potential Acecs---Royal
    Preliminary Evaluation of Potential ACECs—Royal Gorge Field Office Relevance and Importance Criteria Prepared by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Royal Gorge Field Office Cañon City, CO February 2017 This page intentionally left blank Preliminary Evaluation of Potential iii ACECs—Royal Gorge Field Office Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... xi _1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 _1.1. Eastern Colorado Resource Management Plan ............................................................... 1 _1.2. Authorities ....................................................................................................................... 1 _1.3. Area of Consideration ..................................................................................................... 1 _1.4. The ACEC Designation Process ..................................................................................... 1 _2. Requirements for ACEC Designation .................................................................................... 3 _2.1. Identifying ACECs .......................................................................................................... 5 _2.2. Special Management
    [Show full text]
  • Frozen Ground
    Frozen Ground Th e News Bulletin of the International Permafrost Association Number 32, December 2008 INTERNATIONAL PERMAFROST ASSOCIATION Th e International Permafrost Association, founded in 1983, has as its objectives to foster the dissemination of knowledge concerning permafrost and to promote cooperation among persons and national or international organisations engaged in scientifi c investigation and engineering work on permafrost. Membership is through national Adhering Bodies and Associate Members. Th e IPA is governed by its offi cers and a Council consisting of representatives from 26 Adhering Bodies having interests in some aspect of theoretical, basic and applied frozen ground research, including permafrost, seasonal frost, artifi cial freezing and periglacial phenomena. Committees, Working Groups, and Task Forces organise and coordinate research activities and special projects. Th e IPA became an Affi liated Organisation of the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) in July 1989. Beginning in 1995 the IPA and the International Geographical Union (IGU) developed an Agreement of Cooperation, thus making IPA an affi liate of the IGU. Th e Association’s primary responsibilities are convening International Permafrost Conferences, undertaking special projects such as preparing databases, maps, bibliographies, and glossaries, and coordinating international fi eld programmes and networks. Conferences were held in West Lafayette, Indiana, U.S.A., 1963; in Yakutsk, Siberia, 1973; in Edmonton, Canada, 1978; in Fairbanks, Alaska, 1983; in Trondheim, Norway, 1988; in Beijing, China, 1993; in Yellowknife, Canada, 1998, in Zurich, Switzerland, 2003, and in Fairbanks, Alaska, in 2008. Th e Tenth conference will be in Tyumen, Russia, in 2012.Field excursions are an integral part of each Conference, and are organised by the host Executive Committee 2008-2012 Council Members Professor Hans-W.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey
    DBPABTMBHT OF THE INTERIOR BULLETIN OF THK UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY No. 166 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING- OFFICE 1.900 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (JHAKLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOK QAZETTEEE OF UTAH BY HENRY G-ANNETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT rilTNTING OFFICE 1900 ' \ CONTENTS Page. Letter of transmittal........................................................ 7 General description of the State ..........-................. -..- - ---- 9 Political history and area ............................................... 9 Exploration............................................................ 10 Settlement.......................................;..................... 12 Topography ........................................................... 12 Rivers................................................................. 13 Great Salt Lake ........................................................ 14 Elevation.............................................................. 15 Climate................................................................. 16 Population............................................................. 16 Industries .............................................................. 18 Counties.........'.............................................-......... 20 Gazetteer of the State....................................................... 21 ILLUSTRATIONS. PLATE I. Map of Utah...................................................... 9 FIG. 1. Historical map...................................................... 10 - 5 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Ground -Water Conditions and Storage in the Central Sevier Valley
    Groundr -Water Conditions and Storage in the Central Sevier Valley, Utah By RICHARD A. YOUNG and CARL H. CARPENTER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1787 Prepared in cooperation with the Utah State Engineer PROPERTY OF U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GROUND WATER BRANCH TRENTON, N.J. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract_ _______________________________________________________ 1 Introduction._____________________________________________________ 3 Purpose and scope of investigation_____________________________ 3 Location and extent of area____________________________________ 3 Previous work________________________________________________ 4 Personnel and methods of investigation___________---_-____--___ 4 Acknowledgments. ___ _ ______________________________________ 6 Well-numbering system__ ______________________________________ 6 Geography _____________________________________________________ 8 Physiography and drainage.____________________________________ 8 Climate._------_-_-----_-___---_---_--_--_-_-__----__--_-____ 9 Vegetation._ _ ________________________________________________ 10 Population, agriculture, and industry__--_-----__-------_-_------ 12 Geology._________________________________________________________ 12 Generalized stratigraphy________________________________________ 12
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Colorado Sheep & Goat
    C OLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE 2017 Colorado Sheep & Goat APPLICATION DEADLINE: APRIL 4 online brochure cpw.state.co.us 2017 Colorado Sheep & Goat Hunting Online Features Watch more Colorado Parks and Wildlife videos on our VIMEO & YOUTUBE VIDEO CHANNELS VIDEOS: WHAT’S NEW: 2017 BIG GAME GET UPDATED on the new, general regulatory changes to the 2017 Sheep & Goat and Big Game brochures. See this brochure for species- and unit- specific changes. THE FUTURE OF CONSERVATION LEARN HOW your license dollars contribute directly to the conservation of wildlife species and outdoor recreation in Colorado. HUNTER PINK GET INFORMED about the new hunter pink cloth- ing alternative to fluorescent orange. There’s a link MORE ONLINE to the fact sheet in the video too! QUIZ AND RESOURCES: MOUNTAIN GOAT IDENTIFICATION HUNTING COLORADO’S If you are hunting mountain goats, it is difficult — but extremely impor- tant — that you identify female goats properly. Read the CPW online PUBLIC LANDS guide and take the quiz to ensure you know your target and avoid fines once you are hunting in the field. CLICK TO TAKE THE QUIZ HEAR THE DETAILS about big game, small game Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep and waterfowl hunting on Colorado’s public lands, © Wayne Lewis, CPW 2 including State Wildlife Areas, State Trust Lands and State Parks. 2017 Colorado Sheep & Goat Hunting 2017 Colorado Sheep & Goat Hunting TABLE OF CONTENTS 2017 What’s New ...................................................1 CPW OFFICE LOCATIONS cpw.state.co.us License Fees & Information ................................. 1 ADMINISTRATION Watch more Colorado Parks and Wildlife videos on our VIMEO & YOUTUBE VIDEO CHANNELS • Fees and surcharges 1313 Sherman St., #618 • Hunter education requirements Denver, 80203 303-297-1192 In the Field & Special License Information .........
    [Show full text]