Great Expectations: Ethnicity, Performance, and Ugandan Voters∗ Elizabeth Carlson PhD Candidate Department of Political Science UCLA
[email protected] April 22, 2010 Abstract When voters vote ethnically, as they do in many African countries, what is the reason? Do voters prefer coethnics because of ethnic pride? Or is ethnicity as a proxy for performance? I use a voting simulation experiment in Uganda to investigate the underlying rationale for ethnic voting. I find evidence that voters anticipate more future goods from a coethnic presidential candidate. Most strikingly, I find that coethnicity matters to voters only when the candidate has a record of prior goods provisions and, similarly, that record matters most when the candidate is coethnic. Furthermore, those types of voters who would be most likely to receive ethnic patronage are those who are most likely to vote ethnically. I confirm this finding by asking respondents to make predictions about the future performance of coethnic and non-coethnic candidates. I find that respondents expect more future goods from coethnics than from non- coethnic candidates. 1 Introduction In Uganda, as elsewhere in Africa, there is an ethnic pattern to voting. Though President Museveni garners support from voters throughout the country, the president’s tribe,1 the Banyankole, vote for him in numbers much higher than the public as a whole. Tribes throughout the Western region, ∗This project is funded by the National Science Foundation. The author thanks Daniel Posner, Miriam Golden, Edmond Keller, Lynn Vavreck and Craig McIntosh for support and feedback over the course of the project; the mem- bers of the Working Group on African Political Economy for their invaluable suggestions; Mountains of the Moon University for allowing me to be an affiliate of their university; and, especially, Kenneth Ekode and the rest of my research team for their hard work.