UPDATED SCOPING REPORT DECEMBER 2012

SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL (SA) INCORPORATING A STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE WOKINGHAM BOROUGH DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND RELATED DOCUMENTS

Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

CONTENTS Page Section Title number

Volume 1

1 Introduction 1 2 Context 5

3 Development Plan and objectives 5 Sustainability Appraisal (SA) and Strategic Environmental 4 9 Assessment (SEA) Task A1 - Identifying other relevant plans, programmes, and 5 11 sustainability objectives Task A2 – Develop relevant baseline information and define the 6 11 character of the area 7 Task A3 - Identifying key sustainability issues 14 Task A4 - Developing the SA Framework including objectives, 29 8 indicators and targets Wokingham Borough Council Sustainability Objectives 30 SA/ SEA Objectives Internal Compatibility Assessment 31 9 SA Framework 33 10 Testing the plan objectives against the SA framework 53 Task A5 - Consulting on the scope of the SA 56 11 Consultation questions and procedures 58 12 Guidance 59 13 Bibliography 60 Appendix 1 – More detailed Review of plans, programmes and 63 policies (PPPs) Appendix 2 – Baseline Information, Indicators and Trends 152 Appendix 3 – Key Wildlife Sites (Natura 2000 Sites – Including the 198 Thames Basin Heaths SPA) Appendix 4 - Glossary 200 Appendix 5 Statements of consultation on Updated Scoping 216 Report for LDF and Scoping Report for MDD DPD

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

VOLUME 1: SA (INCOPORATING SEA) SCOPING REPORT FOR THE WOKINGHAM BOROUGH DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND RELATED DOCUMENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 The guidance ‘Sustainability Appraisal (SA) of Regional Spatial Strategies and Local Development Frameworks (LDF)’ (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) 2005) states that Planning Authorities can prepare a single Scoping Report when consulting on the scope of a number of Local Development Documents (LDDs) at the same time. LDDs include Development Plan Documents (DPDs) (which form part of the Development Plan) and Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs). This Scoping Report sets out elements common to the scope and level of detail of the SA Reports for the Development Plan and related documents. The term Local Development Framework (LDF) is no longer used but it was a non-statutory term used to describe a folder of documents, which included all the LDDs.

1.2 The Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document (MDD DPD) (Local Plan) forms part of the Development Plan and amplifies policies within the Council’s adopted Core Strategy DPD (2010).

1.3 Before consulting on the SA (inc. Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)) for the Core Strategy, the Council sought advice on whether its application of both the spatial and sustainability objectives is appropriate. This was to ensure soundness of its approach.

1.4 Wokingham Borough Council commissioned C4S (independent) consultants to validate the approach the Council had taken in producing the SA (inc. SEA) Scoping Report for the LDF (approved in May 2005) and the application of that approach to the testing of compatibility testing of the Initial Options for the Core Strategy of Wokingham Borough Council LDF (June 2005). The validation took place in April 2005. Prior to the validation of the compatibility test it was necessary to consider whether the SA process completed to date (May 2005 i.e the Approved Scoping Report) had been in line with legislative requirements, central governement guidance and current standards of good practice.

1.5 Some changes were made to the SA (inc. SEA) Scoping Report document (published for consultation in November to December 2005 as part of the public consultation on the Alternatives for the Draft Core Strategy) following the validation carried out by C4S. These changes primarily related to the addition of indicators to the Council’s Sustainability objectives. However, C4S stated that the SA process had been carried out in accordance with appropriate guidance.

1.6 The MDD DPD has to be in conformity with the Core Strategy and the SA (inc. SEA) process for the MDD reflects that carried out for the Core Strategy and found to be in accordance with appropriate guidance. The SA (inc. SEA) of the Core Strategy was tested at the Examination in Public (March to April 2009) and found to have met the tests laid down in legislation.

1.7 This document includes technical terminology and abbreviations. These are explained in the glossary at Appendix 4.

1.8 The overall aims of this SA (inc. SEA) are to:

 Make the MDD DPD as sustainable as possible by ensuring sustainable development is integrated into the strategy making process, influencing all stages of policy process.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 1

Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

 Provide a high level of environmental protection and balance environmental, economic and social considerations in the plan’s preparations.  Consult on the SA (inc. SEA) procedure to allow the public and stakeholders to have an input into its production.  Provide an environmental, economic and social audit at appropriate spatial and temporal levels.

1.9 The Scoping Report for the MDD DPD is a consultation document for the statutory agencies with environmental responsibilities in England:

1. Natural England (bringing together English Nature, the landscape, access and recreation elements of the Countryside Agency and the environmental land management functions of the Rural Development Service). 2. English Heritage 3. Environment Agency

Other relevant bodies with a sustainability remit or a local interest are consulted (see section 11 for further information on consultation).

1.10 The Initial SA (inc. SEA) for the MDD DPD Options Public Participation Stage has been undertaken using the Council’s approved LDF SA (inc. SEA) Scoping Report (which has continued to be updated since its approval in 2005) and the SA (inc. SEA) Scoping Report undertaken on the MDD DPD (March 2010).

1.11 The draft options and reasonable alternatives for the DPDs and the SA (inc. SEA) are framed in the context of: national, regional and local objectives and strategic planning, transport, environmental, social and economic policies. Therefore a comprehensive review of all relevant Policies, Plans and Programmes (PPPs) has been carried out as part of the SA (inc. SEA) Scoping process (an update to this review was carried out in December 2012). This ensured that the objectives were not in conflict with those in other PPPs. It also highlighted areas of potential conflict which may need to be addressed, for example meeting development needs whilst achieving other objectives such as enhancing biodiversity and heritage.

1.12 The Council will monitor the progress of the MDD DPD through the monitoring report

VOLUME 2: INITIAL SA (inc. SEA) for the draft Options MDD DPD (June and August 2011)

1.13 This Volume presents the first compatibility tests for the MDD DPD Public Participation Stage suggested options and alternatives against the sets of objectives within the SA (inc. SEA) Scoping Report.

1.14 The Council has also undertaken an Initial SA (inc. SEA) of the sites suggested for potential allocation through the MDD DPD. This has been undertaken using the same approach with the wider SA (inc. SEA) of the MDD DPD. This is available as a separate document.

PREVIOUS CONSULTATION (2004 to 2012)

1.15 The process of SA is an iterative one and as such the Council has made amendments to the documents that make up the Councils Scoping Report for undertaking SA (inc. SEA) as a result of consultation on documents produced within the Council’s Local Development Framework (LDF)/ Development Plan. Amendments have been made to the documents

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 2 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

that make up the Final SA Report following comments received from the Statutory Environmental Bodies (Natural England, Environment Agency, English Heritage) and other organisations and groups.

1.16 Amendments have been made to this document and the documents that make up the ‘Final SA Report for the Core Strategy’ following comments received from the Statutory Environmental Bodies and other organisations and groups. Further information on the letters sent out for consultation and the relevant Statements of Consultation can be found in Volume 4 (Statements of Consultation) of the ‘Final SA Report for the Core Strategy’. The SA Scoping Report has been used to inform the SA of various documents that the Council has produced and has been updated accordingly including to take account of consultation comments. Examples of the consultation that has taken place include:

20 September to 29 October 2004 Consultation Review of Wokingham District Local Plan (2004) – Appropriateness of Strategic Environmental Assessment objectives and indicators for Wokingham Borough

7 March to 18 April 2005 Consultation Scoping Report on the SA (incorporating Strategic Environmental Assessment) for the Wokingham Borough Local Development Framework

15 June to 27 July 2005 Core Strategy Initial Options – including the SA of Initial Options

9 November to 21 December 2005 Consultation Alternatives for the Draft Core Strategy – including the Initial SA

2 February to 9 March 2006 Consultation Wokingham Borough Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Scoping Report

1 March and 12 April 2006 Consultation Scoping Report for the SA of the All Sites Allocation and Housing Policies DPD

6 September to 11 October 2006 Consultation Planning Obligations SPD Scoping Report Barkham Village Design Statement Scoping Report Village Design Statements SPD Scoping Report

30 August to 11 October 2006 Consultation Issues and Options Stage of the Site Allocations DPD – Initial SA of Suggested Sites (residential, employment) and Existing Employment Areas.

1 August to 5 September 2007 Consultation Highways Design SPD Scoping Report Sustainable Construction SPD Scoping Report

20 August to 1 October 2008 Final SA Report – version for Core Strategy

6 July to 10 August 2009 Consultation Development Brief (Masterplan) SPD Infrastructure SPD

24 March to 30 April 2010 Consultation

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 3 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Managing Development Delivery DPD Scoping Report and Scoping Report for the Local Development Framework (LDF) update

15 June to 27 July 2011 SA (inc. SEA) of SDL SPDs and Infrastructure and Delivery Contributions SPD

15 June to 27 August 2011 Updated SA (inc. SEA) Scoping Report for the LDF Early Initial SA (incorporating SEA) for the draft Options MDD DPD

31 August 2011 to 12 October 2011 Initial SA (incorporating SEA) for the draft Options MDD DPD (following the June to August consultation on Draft Options MDD DPD)

27 June to 22 August 2012 Final SA (incorporating a SEA) of the MDD DPD Proposed Submission (June 2012

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 4 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

2.0 CONTEXT

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

2.1 A widely used definition of Sustainable Development is that as drawn up by the report ‘Our Common Future’ produced by the World Commission on Environment and Development in 1987 (Brundtland report):

“development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), top of page 2, includes a very similar definition of sustainable development. The Government sets out its aims for sustainable development in the United Kingdom Sustainable Development Strategy ‘Securing the Future’ (2005) which seeks to achieve a sustainable economy and to living within environmental limits, respecting the limits of the planet’s environmental, resource and biodiversity.

2.2 For ease of use the themes of sustainability are typically categorised under the three general headings of social, economic and environmental. However, in reality many of these issues overlap and do not fall distinctly into one of these categories.

2.3 To ensure the concept of sustainable development is integrated into all land-use plans they will be subject to a SA which requires that economic, environmental and social matters are taken into account. This process will include a SEA which is designed to provide a high level of environmental protection on a strategic basis. This integration will ensure that future development meets the needs of people living and working in the area, whilst at the same time ensuring that it is sited in such a way to protect the environment.

3.0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN

THE WOKINGHAM BOROUGH DEVELOPMENT PLAN

3.1 The current Wokingham District Local Plan is being replaced by the Local Plans which include the Core Strategy (adopted 2010) and the MDD DPD. These two documents (along with the South East Plan, Minerals and Waste Local Plans) and Neighbourhood Development Plans) form the Wokingham Borough Development Plan. The documents contain policies and proposals to guide future development in the Borough. The Local Plans are land use plans that contain policies about where different buildings, from homes to shops, offices, schools, leisure and health facilities may be built in the Borough. The documents will guide development from April 2006 until 2026.

3.2 The Local Development Scheme (LDS) is a three year project plan, prepared by the Borough Council, which outlines every LDD that the Council intends to produce over the next three years, along with a timetable for their preparation. Further information on the LDS can be at:

http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/planningcontrol/planning/planningpolicies/ldf/ldftimetable/

On the 25 September 2007, the Council received the response from the Secretary of State to its request to save Wokingham District Local Plan (WDLP) policies. All policies that the

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 5 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Council outlined to be saved in the report that went to the Council’s Executive on 25 January 2007 were granted by the Secretary of State. 113 of the Local Plan policies have been saved. The 62 policies that have not been saved officially expired on T27 September 2007. Further information can be found at:

http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/planningcontrol/planning/planningpolicies/local-plan/

LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (2006-2016) OBJECTIVES

3.3 The following are the approved LDF objectives derived by considering of local (including the Community Strategy and Local Transport Plan) and regional strategic objectives and the results of surveys undertaken by the Council, such as the ‘New Household survey’ (2004) and ‘Developing a Land Use Vision for the 21st Century survey’. Through this process an approved set of 13 objectives have been created for use as a starting point in dialogue and debate. The objectives will provide benchmarks against which the potential effects of a plan can be judged. It should be recognised that these approved objectives are not in any priority order. One overarching issue that emerged was the need to integrate sustainability across all of the objectives.

FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE DERIVATION OF THESE OBJECTIVES

Local Development Framework Spatial Objectives

To ensure all residents, workers, visitors and other interested groups are A involved in creating, developing and delivering future land use patterns across the borough To seek efficient use of resources in development proposals (including B land, materials and water) To reconcile demand for housing and other development with respect for C the borough’s character To maintain and enhance the separation and distinctiveness of the D borough’s settlements To concentrate development in the areas with best access to E users/occupiers and other services To provide housing in appropriate locations, scales and types that meet F the needs of the borough To provide non-housing development in appropriate locations, scales and G types across the borough. These include education, health, libraries and other community facilities along with shopping and employment To apply the sequential approach to development by encouraging it on H sites occupied with buildings or structures (including where recently cleared). For example brownfield sites. To keep the borough moving with appropriate infrastructure improvements I to public transport and roads where needed J To protect and enhance the natural and man-made environments To ensure appropriate high quality well designed, laid out and built K development is delivered in the borough To avoid areas where flooding, noise and pollution would impact on L development either existing or proposed Encourage the provision of appropriate infrastructure (including green M infrastructure), services and facilities that enable the borough’s residents

Sustainable development meets the Sustainable needs of the present without compromising the generations to meet is their own needs. Therefore sustainability ability of future impactslead to the social, economic and environmental of proposals acting to ensure improvementssociety for all of to achieve their potential Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 6 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

A – This relates to ensuring community engagement throughout planning, and helps to meet social objectives through involvement of all. This is consistent with the Government’s aim of increasing public involvement in planning. This also partially relates to objectives 1 and 7 of the Council’s Community Strategy in encouraging community engagement and improved linkages between groups. This could occur on the back of the planning system.

B – This is to minimize the need and use of resources. It therefore would include minimising the need for waste, as well as seeking higher densities of development, where appropriate.

C – This relates to objectives 3 and 5 of the Community Strategy. It is also consistent with the most popular response to question 2 of the Developing a Land Use Vision for the 21st Century survey (Local Plan Survey LPS3) undertaken in 2004.

D – This stems from the results of question 1 and 2 of the Developing a Land Use Vision for the 21st Century survey.

E – This is partially based on the ideas of minimising the need to travel, although it also relates to the results of the Developing a Land Use Vision for the 21st Century survey in that shopping and employment development should be concentrated in existing locations. This is the result from questions 5, 8 and 12 of the survey. It also ties into the results of the new Household survey undertaken in 2004.

F – This objective would include the provision of appropriate affordable housing and a range in any development, i.e. mix of dwelling sizes. As such, it ties into objectives 1 and 2 of the Community Strategy as it can lead to improved access to appropriate facilities and services. It can also entail the provision of development to meet the needs of particular groups, e.g. elderly, those with disabilities, etc.

G – This objective would include the provision of appropriate employment, retail or community/social buildings, either on their own or as part of a larger scheme. It would also include providing a range in any development i.e. appropriate mix of sizes in employment units. It could also involve providing appropriate facilities in conjunction with other development e.g. schools and open space with housing. As such, it ties into objectives 1 and 2 of the Community Strategy as it can lead to improved access to appropriate facilities and services. It can also entail the provision of development to meet the needs of particular groups e.g. elderly, unemployed, Gypsies and Travellers, etc.

H - This is derived from the preference in response to question 1 of the Developing a Land Use Vision for the 21st Century survey.

I – This is consistent with objective 4 of the Community Strategy, together with those of the Local Transport Plan 2 (LTP) for 2006 - 2011 and the LTP3 (2011 – 2016).

J – The need to protect recreational areas, the countryside and areas of ecological value is derived from the popular responses to questions 1 and 14 of the Developing a Land Use Vision for the 21st Century survey. This would also cover factors such as listed buildings and archaeological sites together with the landscape in general.

K – This objective relates to the design, materials and layout of development. As such it could link with objective 6 of the Community Strategy. However, in that these can impact on the character of the Borough, it can also relate to the response on question 2 of the developing land use vision.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 7 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

L – The need to avoid these areas is consistent with the responses to the Developing a Land Use Vision for the 21st Century survey (question 1).

M – This objective reflects objective 1 of the Community Strategy. It also related to Section 10 of the ‘Life Aspirations’ Questionnaire and Question 13 of Developing a Land Use Vision for the 21st Century survey. Also reflects the need for the provision of adequate utilities infrastructure to service development.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 8 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

4.0 SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL (SA) & STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA)

4.1 SAs are a requirement of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act (2004) (as amended) and Strategic Environmental Assessments are required by European Directive EC/2001/42, which was transposed into UK law by the Environmental Assessment Regulations for Plans and Programmes (July 2004). Central government guidance (ODPM, 2004) has merged this process to allow for a single joint appraisal to be carried out.

4.2 The SEA Directive applies to plans and programmes, and modifications to them, whose formal preparation begins after 21 July 2004. However, it will also apply to plans and programmes whose formal preparation began before that date, if they have not been adopted (or submitted to a legislative procedure leading to adoption) by 21 July 2006.

4.3 These processes are based on the concept of sustainability. A SEA places more emphasis on evidencing strategic alternatives and a prediction of impacts from the chosen option. A SA takes a more objective-led approach. The combined SA/ SEA will incorporate sustainability and environmental issues into the strategic decision-making process to ensure consistent quality policies and results are delivered on the ground.

4.4 The output for a SEA is an Environmental Report that will be required to include baseline information and an estimate of the environmental impacts of the plan. The Environmental Report will also identify options and alternatives and a great emphasis is placed upon consultation and monitoring. The Environmental Report will deal with the likely effects, reasonable alternatives and reasonable current data on matters relating to the plan. An Environmental Report to comply with SEA regulations has also been produced to accompany this Scoping Report and the Non Technical Summary.

4.5 The output of a SA will be a Sustainability Report which encompasses the above information and broadens this to include social and economic considerations.

4.6 The work on this appraisal is to run simultaneously to the development of the Development Plan Documents (DPDs) such as the MDD so it becomes integrated into the plan-making process as a way of improving the document as it develops and producing sustainable policies on the ground. By using stakeholders and experts along the way, a robust and fully integrated appraisal should develop.

4.7 This SA (inc. SEA) will take account of the full range of planning guidance and comply with the requirements of:

 The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004; and,  The Environmental Assessment Regulations 2004 for Plans and Programmes which incorporates European Directive 2001/42/DC (which came into effect in July 2004).

The stages of a SA covered in this document are as follows:

DPD STAGE 1 – Pre-production/Evidence Gathering SA Stages and Tasks Stage A: Setting the context and objectives, establishing the baseline and deciding on the scope • A1: Identifying other relevant policies, plans and programmes, and sustainability

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 9 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

objectives. • A2: Collecting baseline information. • A3: Identifying sustainability issues and problems. • A4: Developing the SA framework • A5: Consulting on the scope of the SA.

Subsequently the remaining stages will be completed alongside the development of other documents and will incorporate consultation comments from Stage 1. The Council may cover the later stages in separate annexes to this main document.

DPD STAGE 2 – Production SA Stages and Tasks Stage B: Developing and refining options and assessing effects • B1: Testing the DPD objectives against the SA framework. • B2: Developing the DPD options. • B3: Predicting the effects of the DPD. • B4: Evaluating the effects of the DPD. • B5: Considering ways of mitigating adverse effects and maximising beneficial effects. • B6: Proposing measures to monitor the significant effects of implementing the DPDs. Stage C: Preparing the Sustainability Appraisal Report • C1: Preparing the SA Report Stage D: Consulting on the preferred options of the DPD and SA Report • D1: Public participation on the preferred options of the DPD and the SA Report. • D2(i): Appraising significant changes. DPD Stage 3: Examination SA Stages and Tasks • D2(ii): Appraising significant changes resulting from representations.D3: DPD Stage 4: Adoption and monitoring SA Stages and Tasks • D3: Making decisions and providing information Stage E: Monitoring the significant effects of implementing the DPD • E1: Finalising aims and methods for monitoring. • E2: Responding to adverse effects.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 10 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

5.0 TASK A1 IDENTIFYING OTHER RELEVANT PLANS, PROGRAMMES, AND SUSTAINABILITY OBJECTIVES: Identify and review other relevant policies, plans and programmes, and sustainable development objectives that will affect or influence the Development Plan Document (DPD) and undertake LDD surveys.

METHODOLOGY

5.1 The SA (inc. SEA) Scoping Report should be framed in the context of: national, regional and local objectives and strategic planning, transport, environmental, social and economic policies. Therefore a comprehensive review of all relevant Policies, Plans and Programmes (PPPs) was carried out as part of the SA (inc. SEA) Scoping Reports produced (an update to this review was carried out in December 2012). This ensures that the objectives in the Scoping Report are not in conflict with those in other PPPs and also highlights other areas of potential conflict which may need to be addressed, for example meeting development needs whilst considering issues such as biodiversity and heritage.

Full details of the review of each PPP can be found in Appendix 1

REGIONAL CONTEXT

5.2 The Development Plan is bound by tests of soundness and one of these tests is to ensure it is in general conformity with the Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) – ‘The South East Plan’ (SEP). The SEP is a spatial framework of strategic policies that will promote an integrated, co-ordinated and a more environmentally sustainable approach to development in the region up to 2026. Please note the SEP is due to be revoked.

6.0 TASK A2 DEVELOP BASELINE INFORMATION: Collect relevant social, environmental and economic baseline information and produce a characterisation of the DPD area.

BASELINE INFORMATION

6.1 Baseline information has been collected on environmental, social and economic issues and is displayed in Appendix 2. The SA (inc. SEA) process will consider the likely future environmental conditions without the DPDs (the ‘no plan option’) and with a range of alternatives. For certain aspects of the environment (e.g. biodiversity, cultural heritage and landscape) predicting the future baseline will be difficult.

The SA (inc. SEA) will attempt to take account of existing and future pressures on these resources and it is envisaged that consultees may be able to assist with providing additional information on potential pressures and future trends.

The SEA is an iterative process so that next stages may identify other areas within the baseline data that need to be collected and monitored.

6.2 The suggested indicators have been chosen for their ability to collect baseline data to examine the current and future status of each SA (inc. SEA) objective. An approved list of indicators and baseline data has been compiled. This list may change as new baseline information becomes available. The baseline information is in Appendix 2. The SA Report

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 11 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

will provide a firmed-up list of indicators, the relevant baseline data and where possible gaps will be addressed by the development of a monitoring programme.

DATA LIMITATIONS

6.3 Indicators are quantified information that help explain how things are changing over time. However, they do not explain why particular trends are occurring and the secondary effects of any change.

6.4 The indicators have been chosen to monitor particular objectives and refine the broader issues into a measurable figure. Consultation on this document enabled the Council to gain consensus on which indicators are most representative of and relevant to monitoring progress towards meeting the objective.

6.5 There are gaps in the data collected as not all information is available at a local level for recent time periods. Much of the data is collected or collated by external bodies. Therefore, Wokingham Borough Council has little control over the data collected and whether collected methods may change in the future which would restrict reliable comparisons.

6.6 The following text summarises this data and uses it to define the character of the Borough accordingly. The analysis of available data was one of the mechanisms used to assess the issues within the Borough, which is described in Section 7.

THE CHARACTER OF WOKINGHAM BOROUGH

6.7 Situated in the Royal County of Berkshire within 30 miles west of London and bordered by Oxfordshire to the north and Hampshire to the south-west, the Wokingham Borough is an area of great diversity and character. 6.8 Wokingham Borough is made up of 3 towns and 14 parishes. The Borough covers an area of 17,892 hectares (Ha). Despite being near the nation’s capital and home to modern employment areas, the Borough is noted for its charming woodlands, heaths, peaceful rivers and secluded villages such as Farley Hill and Remenham. The highly valuable natural environment, wildlife, biodiversity and heritage assets of the Borough provide a considerable socio-economic value as they all contribute to the Borough’s attractiveness as a place to live, work and visit. The Borough's diversity is confirmed by the Council’s Landscape Character Assessment which shows the Borough has three separate Landscape Areas as defined at a national level. 6.9 To the north the area is part of the Metropolitan Green Belt. Wokingham, the administrative centre, is an old market town which retains its character but only houses one fifth of the Borough's population. Two fifths of the Borough's population live in the towns of Woodley and Earley which adjoin the Borough of Reading. The remainder of the population live in smaller settlements which are separated by areas of countryside that include extensive flood plains. 6.10 The Borough accommodates a stretch of the M4 motorway that connects London and South Wales and the A329M that connects Bracknell and Greater Reading. Railway links from Reading to London Paddington and to London Waterloo also run through the Borough. 6.11 The borough between 1971 and 2001 saw a 50% increase in population from 99,664 to 150,229, associated with an 85% increase in households from 30,855 to 57,252. The average household size fell 21% from 3.23 to 2.55 in this period. Between July 1976 and March 2001, around 22,200 dwellings were completed in the borough, representing about 38% of the borough’s housing stock in 2001. This demonstrates that the borough has seen

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 12 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

significant growth in population and has a relatively modern housing stock. This development over the last 30 years has reduced the separation of settlements within the borough. Forecast work undertaken for the Berkshire Joint Strategic Planning Unit by the Greater London Assembly indicates that the population of the borough will increase to 164,118 in 2026, with 70,033 households. This represents increases of 9% and 22% respectively.

6.12 The Borough’s demographic profile is broadly similar to that of England as a whole, although it has a slightly higher proportion of children under 18 and fewer residents over the age of 65 than the national average. The overall standard of health in Wokingham Borough is good and there are very few people with long-term illness, much lower than the national average.

6.13 The Borough has been subject to major development pressure for several decades. This has had a major impact on the character of the Borough both in its socio-economic aspects and the balance between built-up areas, areas with the characteristics of ‘urban fringe’ and open countryside. Since 1976 more dwellings have been built in Wokingham than in any other Borough in Berkshire. Between 1976 and 2004 22.5% of all dwelling completions in Berkshire had taken place in Wokingham Borough (West Berkshire 20.8%, Bracknell Forest 19.4%). The average household size in Wokingham Borough is larger than the average for Berkshire, the South East and England and Wales. 6.14 The Wokingham Borough is a prosperous area with a thriving economy and relatively low rate of unemployment. The Borough is home to leading information technology companies (Microsoft and Oracle) who have chosen this part of the Thames Valley for European or UK Headquarters. According to Thames Valley Enterprise, the highest rate of business growth in the UK has occurred partly in the Wokingham areas over the past 15 years. A large proportion (49.2%) of the Borough’s population is engaged in full-time employment, compared to the South East (43.2%) and England and Wales (40.5%).

6.15 Households in Wokingham own nearly 92,000 cars that equates to 1.6 cars per household. The Wokingham Borough has an extremely high level of car ownership with 90.8% of households owning one or more cars. Over half of the Borough’s households own two or more cars (third highest proportion In England and Wales). Wokingham has the second lowest proportion in England and Wales of households having no car, at 9.2 per cent. A high proportion of people (65.2%) in the Borough travel to work by car in comparison to the rest of England (55.2%) and Berkshire (60.5%). As a result, the Borough has low levels of public transport use.

6.16 Culturally the Borough’s population is predominantly white. The Borough’s population is not as diverse ethnically as Berkshire as a whole or England. However, the Borough’s Black and Minority Ethnic population has almost doubled since 1991.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 13 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

7.0 TASK A3 IDENTIFYING SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS:

KEY SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES

7.1 Certain sustainability issues are significant in Wokingham Borough and are therefore highlighted below in a tabular form as areas that the SA will need to address. This is by no means a full list of all the issues but it attempts to acknowledge those which are a priority within Wokingham Borough.

7.2 The key sustainability issues for the LDF, including the Managing Development Delivery (MDD) DPD, were identified in the following ways:  Earlier experience with issues identified in other plans and programmes  Analysing baseline data and trends;  Consultation with the public, including questionnaires/ survey’s circulated in 2004 (Planning Issues, Life Aspirations and Developing a Land Use Vision for the 21st Century), exhibitions and feedback from the Local Strategic Partnership.  Advice and participation from other departments within Wokingham Borough Council including Community Development, Community Safety, Countryside Management, Community Care, Children Services, Environmental Health, Housing Strategy, Social Services, Transport Planning and Waste and Recycling.  The Council’s Core Strategy

7.3 The key issues have been set out below under the sustainability headings of Social, Environmental and Economic. It should be noted that many of the issues are cross-cutting and could have been placed under more than one of the headings. However, for ease of discussion, and to link in with the sustainability objectives, they have been placed under one section only. The data source will be updated as new information comes forward.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 14 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

How can the LDF/Development Social Issues Description Data Source Plan address this?

The provision of housing is a very important issue affecting the Ensure that requirements for Borough. House prices in the area are high (average house price in housing numbers help to provide New Earnings Wokingham Borough which makes it difficult for people to afford to sufficient homes for all sections of Survey April buy. the community including those 2003. Nomis eligible for Key Worker Housing There are 91,000 (79.6% of working age population) economically where appropriate. Housing Flows active residents. These people earn (£641.1) well above the Reconciliation national (£475.8) average gross weekly pay. There are 58,696 at April 2004 dwellings in the Borough (Private Sector: 54,487, Registered Social Landlord: 1,133, Local Authority: 3,076). Census 1961, 1971, 1981, Wokingham has a much lower proportion of affordable housing than 1991, 2001. Housing provision elsewhere in the South East or England as a whole.. for all Opinion There is a growing proportion in single person households causing Research a drop in average household size. The average number of people Services (2002) per household in 1961 was 3.2, 2.73 in 1991 and decreased further to 2.6 in 2001. Wokingham has the second lowest proportion of any Housing Needs Borough in the country with 22.6 per cent of households containing Assessment only one person in 2001. 2002

11% of households contain someone who suffers from a long-term Maintain access, mobility and illness, health problem, mental health problem or disability that appropriate housing in order to limits housing requirements. The 2001 census identified that 1.94% meet these needs. of the economically inactive people ages 16-74 are permanently sick or disabled.

Pockets of Wokingham Borough is the 3rd least deprived Borough in the Promote social inclusion and Indices of deprivation in an Country. 5 Super Output Areas (SOAs) are outside the best 50% accessibility for disadvantaged Deprivation

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 15 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

How can the LDF/Development Social Issues Description Data Source Plan address this? otherwise nationally, with 87 in the best 20%. There are 100 SOA in groups 2004, Office of prosperous Wokingham Borough. The ward of Wokingham Without is the the Deputy Borough second-least deprived ward in the country. This ward contains the Prime Minister SOA of Honey Hill which at neighbourhood level is the most (ODPM) deprived SOA in Wokingham Borough, and falls within the most deprived 35% of SOAs nationally. This imbalance will need to be Wokingham addressed. Borough Council Policy Unit

HEALTH:

The health of the Borough is good, with the number of ‘people who Encourage new housing areas to Census 2001 consider their own health to be good’ being 77.6% (national provide ease of access to new average of 68.6%). surgeries and health facilities.

Wokingham has the largest percentage of its population reporting general good health and the least percentage of its population reporting health was not good in England and Wales. Wokingham Access to has the lowest incidence of long-term illness in England and Wales essential facilities with only 10.9% of its population reporting a long-term illness.

The percentage of elderly (aged 75 or above) in the Borough has risen from 4.4% in 1991 to 5.1% in 2001 which was less than that for Berkshire (5.8%), the South East (8.0%) and in England and Wales (7.6%). Policy S2 (Promoting sustainable health services) of the South East Plan (SEP) states that in order to reflect the increased proportion of older people in the region, local authorities should pay particular regard in their LDDs and other programmes to assess and plan for housing, facilities and services, including

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 16 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

How can the LDF/Development Social Issues Description Data Source Plan address this?

dentists.

In 2007, Wokingham Town was named as having the best quality of life in the UK by the Halifax Estate Agents Quality of Life Survey. This took into account longer life expectancy, low crime, good Halifax Estate schools and high earnings. Agents (2007)

In a survey of ill health in workers and the cost to employers of absenteeism the Berkshire Health Authority found that in Maintain and enhance access to Wokingham incidences of coronary heart disease, lung cancer, these hospitals. accidents and suicides and undetermined deaths were all below the Berkshire average. Only in incidences of stomach cancer were NHS (2004) residents of Wokingham at the Berkshire average.

Access to Royal Berkshire Hospital, Frimley Park Hospital and Community Hospitals such as Wokingham, Townlands (Henley) and Heatherwood (Ascot) must be good with special focus on the needs of vulnerable groups.

Wokingham District Council New Householder Survey (2004) identified that the average distance travelled to the doctors is less Wokingham than 4km. Primary Care Trust – NHS There are 2 Wokingham Borough Council residential homes in the Investigate the need for more care Performance Borough. There are several other registered care homes in the facilities for the elderly. Ratings Borough. 2003/04

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 17 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

How can the LDF/Development Social Issues Description Data Source Plan address this?

EDUCATION: Wokingham

Borough We have 60 schools in the Wokingham Borough. This consists of: Council 49 primary, 8 secondary, 2 special and 1 nursery. Ensure adequate provision in Education appropriate locations and Department Results in Wokingham Borough schools are above the national buildings for all educational needs.

average and many good schools provide high quality education. Best Value

Performance Results continue to improve in LEA primary and secondary schools, Access to Indicator (BVPI) with 67.6% of children gaining 5 or more GCSEs A* to C in 2011. essential facilities 38 and 39.

Results maintain the Borough’s high standards in GCSE results. Learning and These regularly show Wokingham Borough Council to be one of the Skills Council – top performing LEAs in the country in the performance tables. Maintain and enhance Berkshire performance of LEA schools in (2002) In a survey of basic skills levels in the South East Region in Spring Wokingham Borough. .

2001, the Basic Skills Agency research found that the proportion of Department for residents in Wokingham with poor literacy skills (2.1%) and Education and numeracy skills (2.3%) was amongst the lowest of any area. Skills

Only appropriate development In the Thames region, over 1.5 million people are potentially at risk within flood zones 2, 3a and 3b. Strategic Flood from flooding. In 2011 in Wokingham Borough, 2222 properties Risk Flood Risk were in flood zone 2 (medium probability), 344 properties in flood New development should not Assessment zone 3a (high probability) and 656 in flood zone 3b (function increase the risk of flooding. (SFRA) 2012 floodplain).

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 18 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Environmental Description How can the LDF address this? Data Source Issues

Wokingham District Council The Wokingham Borough landscape is considerably varied. The Protect the economic and social Landscape Borough is unified by the interlinked system of attractive lowland needs of development whilst Character river valleys – the Thames, Loddon and Blackwater. In Wokingham maintaining the character of the Assessment Borough, there are 3 areas of high sensitivity, 24 areas of moderate Borough’s landscape. sensitivity and 3 areas of low sensitivity. Local Planning

Authority Green There are approx. 3788 Ha (21% of the Borough area) of identified The Metropolitan Green Belt has Belt Statistics: urban settlements in Wokingham Borough. policies restricting development in England 2003

order to preserve the character of National A significant area, approx. 2890 Ha (16% of the Borough area), of the countryside. Statistics (2004) the Borough is covered by the Metropolitan Green Belt.

Ensure the further provision of Biodiversity Protecting the Wokingham Borough has appprox. 440 open spaces comprising Public Open Space associated Action Plan landscape of the 2241.5 Ha. This equates to 12.5% of the total area, and 14.9 Ha per with new development. (BAP) for Borough 1000 population. Wokingham

Encourage the efficient use of District (2003- There are no open spaces with Green Flag status in Wokingham agricultural land for agricultural 2012) Borough. However, our Countryside Service does audit its sites uses and rural diversification using Green Flag criteria. Site assessments show that a number of schemes, where possible. Lists of parks in Wokingham Borough would be appropriate and likely to contaminated score well if they were to be submitted for the Green Flag Award Manage development with sites held by scheme.. preference for previously Wokingham

developed sites, including Borough Rural diversification has taken place in the Borough. Including the contaminated sites, where it is Council and the re-use of buildings for commercial or residential purposes, farm possible for them to be Environment shops and craft centres, equine activities and holiday remediated to a suitable level. Agency. accommodation (Bed and Breakfast).

AMR (2004/05)

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 19 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Environmental Description How can the LDF address this? Data Source Issues

Wokingham Borough’s Local Strategic Partnership identified a Biodiversity number of key themes within the ‘Community Strategy – Building on Action Plan for Success’, including: Wokingham District (2003- “The quality of life afforded by Wokingham Borough residents is 2012) highly valued because of the balance between job opportunities, the standard of living and the quality of the natural environment in the Wokingham area.” Borough Council Countryside The Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) in Wokingham Protect the Borough’s biodiversity Service Borough are , , Sandford Mill, and ensure development has no

Lodgewood and Stanford End Mill and River Loddon. There are a adverse effect by identifying and

Biodiversity and number of other SSSIs within 2km of the Borough boundary meeting relevant Biodiversity Environment conservation (Temple Island Meadows, Rodbed Wood, Harpsden Woods, Action Plan targets. Agency issues, especially Bramshill, Wellington College Bog, Sandhurst to Owlsmoor Bogs key species and and Heaths, Broadmoor to Bagshot Woods and Heaths, Wykery Provide specific measures for English habitats Copse). habitat restoration and creation Heritage wherever possible.

The Borough also contains 3 Country Parks, 117 Local Wildlife Woodland Trust Sites (LWS) and 10 Local Nature Reserves (LNR) of which cover Possible use of buffer zones an area of 93.5ha. Thames Valley Wokingham Borough currently has 2608 ha of ancient woodlands. Environmental In total, they cover 15% of the whole borough. Records Centres In 2011-12, the Borough has approx. 2,100 hectares of BAP Priority Habitats. This equates to 12% of the total land surface area. In 2011-12 there were 106 BAP Priority species in Wokingham Images of Borough. England

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 20 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Environmental Description How can the LDF address this? Data Source Issues

The extent and condition of all habitats and species, included in Habitat Action Plans or Species Action Plans, has been produced at national, county or local level.

The Borough contains many key habitats and species, including heathland and a large population of great crested newts. The Strategic Areas of Opportunity for Biodiversity Improvement identified in the South East Plan (SEP) identify that Wokingham is a key area of heathland and acid grassland. Across Berkshire, 98% of heathland has been lost and much of what remains is in poor condition.

The Thames Basin Heath Special Protection Area (SPA) borders Wokingham Borough and areas of the consultation zones lie within the Borough. See Appendix 1 (Thames Basin Heaths Area Based Delivery Project) and Appendix 3 (Key Wildlife Sites – Natura 2000 Sites) for full details. There is a cross boundary approach to the SPA from all the Local Authorities within the zones through the Thames Basin Heaths Joint Strategic Partnership Board.

The heathland and wetland communities in Wokingham, particularly acidic lakes such as Heath Lake SSSI, are particularly vulnerable to impacts from development, including hydrological impacts from urbanisation of catchments, and in the case of the Thames Basin Heaths SPA and other similar heathland sites, increasing recreation pressure, fires and cat predation.

Geology contributes to the diversity of the sites and species above ground which is also needed to meet aggregate demand.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 21 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Environmental Description How can the LDF address this? Data Source Issues

There are 16 Conservation Areas, 5 Historic Parks and Gardens Berkshire and 640 listed buildings (Grade I: 9, Grade II: 40, Grade II*: 591 and Historic other: 3). Environment Record – The Berkshire Historic Environment Record (HER) currently notes Berkshire over 1000 archaeological sites existing within the Borough, and that Archaeology there are many more unidentified. There is a wealth of archaeology sites existing within the Borough that are currently undesignated but form an important part of the Borough’s heritage.

The historic environment has a key part to play in the quality of life/ sense of place attributes of areas in Wokingham Borough.

Recycling rates in Wokingham Borough continue to increase year on year.

However, future targets are stringent and continued work will be Promote the sustainable use and required to meet these levels. Policy W6 (Recycling and disposal of resources. Reduction of Composting) of the South East Plan sets recycling and composting waste and Defra targets of 50% for 2015 and 60% for 2025. increase in reuse / recycling / South East Plan recovery Bracknell Forest, Reading and Wokingham Borough Councils Achieve better waste agreed in 1999 to work together to develop long-term facilities for management. managing and disposing of the areas waste. They formed a partnership called re3.

Effective and i) Planning permission was approved for the erection of an 85m Promote the installation of Annual

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 22 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Environmental Description How can the LDF address this? Data Source Issues

Efficient Use of high wind turbine on land within Green Park business area. The renewable energy systems and Monitoring Resources turbine on an annual basis will generate enough electricity to power promote the sustainable use and Reports. 1,063 homes, save over 3,018 tonnes of carbon dioxide and 35 disposal of resources. tonnes of sulphur dioxide. This development will raise awareness of renewable energy, contribute to reducing the greenhouse gas Develop policies to ensure only emissions of the Borough and help meet regional and national appropriate locations are used for targets. large scale renewable energy sources. Biogas capacity is provided by generators at the Wargrave Sewage Treatment Works. To require energy efficiency/ renewable energy technology in Star Works waste management company, Knowl Hill, Wargrave had new and redeveloped buildings to planning permission for a 600kw landfill gas engine approved on 10 be above mandatory standards/ March 2004... requirements.

A scheme of new key worker housing in Wokingham won a national award for excellent eco-practice – which included solar thermal panels and energy efficient combination boilers. The Council has also promoted energy improvement schemes such as discounted cavity wall/loft insulation and discounted condensing boiler schemes, and provided over 8,000 low energy lightbulbs to residents over the past three years.

ii) An Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) was declared for the motorway network M4, A329(M) and A3290. The 2004 AQMA Consider Improving public relates to a 60m buffer either side of the M4, within an extended transport as an integral part of Environmental area along the A329, Reading Road, where it underpasses the M4. plans. Development should , Health where possible, encourage Within the AQMA, during 2011, nitrogen dioxide levels have been walking and cycling, 2012 Air Quality recorded below the objective value but above the level of concern Updating and

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 23 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Environmental Description How can the LDF address this? Data Source Issues

(36 µg/m³). Screening Assessment for Levels in 2011 are higher than those in 2010 and 2009 by 3 µg/m³ Wokingham but are the same as those in 2008. Borough Council No exceedences of the 40 µg/m³ annual mean Particulate Matter (PM10) objective were recorded.

iii) The amount of water used by households in the South East has Wokingham increased over the past decade, as has the abstraction of water on Borough a national level. This is in conjunction with declining levels of Sustainable precipitation meaning the South East is one of the driest regions in The LDF must take account of the Environment the country. Those households supplied by Thames Water, fact that an increase in the Strategy/ consume an average of 167 litres of water, per person per day. To population, and therefore the OFWAT (2010) a lesser extent, Wokingham is supplied by South East Water, which demand for resources, may mean has an average consumption of 156 litres of water per day. Figures that the potential available water Water for Thames Water are higher than any other water company in the becomes outstripped by demand. Resources UK. The average per capita consumption in England is about 150 (Estimated that works would Management litres per person per day. Need to consider the prudent use of water require capital expenditure in the Plans produced

and issues raised in the South East Plan. region of £50 to £75 million) by Thames Water and Provided that the planned improvements, by Thames Water, to The Council should consider water South East water resources take place, the water supply in Wokingham or sewage constraints. Water. Borough would be able to serve the housing growth rate at South East Plan (Policy CP17 of the Core Strategy) and below. Ensure the water supply meets Blackwater current and future demands of the Valley Water Concern over waste water standards in surrounding areas. Where Borough. Cycle Study: waste water standards are already at the lowest permitted levels for Scoping Report discharge in the country. Would further growth in these areas have (2011) a knock-on effect on the waste water quality in Wokingham

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 24 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Environmental Description How can the LDF address this? Data Source Issues

Borough?

Loddon Catchment of Thames River Basin:

In 2009, 5% of rivers currently achieve good or better ecological status/potential.

41% of rivers assessed for biology are at good or high biological status now, with 41% at poor biological status, and no assessed river water bodies at bad status. Blackwater Phosphate levels are high in a number of rivers for example the Valley Water River Blackwater. Cycle Study: Scoping Report Thames Catchment of Thames River Basin: (2011) Ensure water quality is maintained Water Quality or improved. None of the catchment currently achieves good or better ecological Thames River status/potential. Basin Management 45% of rivers assessed for biology are at good or high biological Plan (2009) status now, with 41% at poor biological status, and no assessed river water bodies at bad status.

Phosphates are a problem for the catchment with most water bodies currently at risk of failing.

Maidenhead and Sunbury Catchment of Thames River Basin:

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 25 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Environmental Description How can the LDF address this? Data Source Issues

5% of rivers currently achieve good or better ecological status/potential.

10% of rivers assessed for biology are at good or high biological status now, with 45% at poor biological status, and 10% of assessed river water bodies at bad status.

Phosphate levels are high in a number of rivers.

Economic Issues Description How can the LDF address this? Data Source

Allow additional development, including changes of use, to Maintaining the There is concern about the viability of centres, especially vacant Health Check provide additional resources to town, Borough units, loss of traditional users and concentration of other uses. This Surveys help maintain and provide ‘key’ and village can also be affected by competition from larger centres such as essential services and amenities centres as a focus Reading and Bracknell. Planning for the community (long-term for their Commitments security). community for Employment

There are low unemployment levels in the Borough (given the Improve general skill levels, in Nomis economic downturn) with 1.3% of the population claiming Job particular hi-tech and IT skills to Seekers Allowance at August 2012 (in comparison with 2.5% in the capitalise on existing strengths. Annual Skills shortage rest of the South East. In 2011/12, 76% of people of working age in Deliver key worker housing. Monitoring the Borough were in employment. In 2011/12, 225 people who had Provide essential services, Reports been out of work for more than a year claimed unemployment specifically education. benefits. Promote ‘smart’ growth. Labour Market

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 26 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Economic Issues Description How can the LDF address this? Data Source

The most prominent employment sectors in Wokingham are Statistics South Business Activities & Finance and Public Services with 29% and Encourage training centres and East 2007 22% of employees respectively. In general, 7% of all businesses facilities on larger employment (National felt computer/IT skills needed to improve in their existing workforce. sites and Business and Enterprise Statistics) training within Schools. 8.2% of the Borough’s working residents work in skilled trade LSC – occupations. This is less than the average for Berkshire (9.6%), the Encourage studies of employment Berkshire South East (11%) and England and Wales (11.6%). needs arising from new (2002) employment development. 30% of businesses identified staff turnover and retention in their workforce as an issue, with 56% of businesses identifying a shortage of suitable people to fill vacancies as a potential concern for their organisation. Over 80% of employers in the business services sector were providing training, above the average of 70% for all sectors. Total floorspace outstanding between 2006/07 and 2011/12, had a Planning net loss of 20,005sq m of B1, from 95,620sq m, to 75,615sq m. Commitments Total floorspace completed each year between 2006/07 and for Employment 2011/12 increased by 27,338sq m.

High house prices could lead to a shortage of key workers living in the area.

Wokingham Borough has a high level of car ownership with 90.8 % Improved public transport could be of households owning one or more cars. Over 50% of its considered as an integral part of Reducing households owning two or more cars (third highest proportion in plans. Development can try to, congestion and England and Wales) and only 9.2% of households having no car. where possible, encourage Census 2001 journey times This is perhaps one of the reasons why a very high proportion of walking and cycling and locating people in Wokingham Borough travel to work by car (65.2 %) and a things that people need closer to small proportion travel by public transport (9.8%), by foot (6%) and their homes. Reducing the need to

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 27 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Economic Issues Description How can the LDF address this? Data Source

bicycle (2.65%). travel and modal shift are essential objectives to reduce This leads to congestion and levels of nitrogen oxides which are congestion and journey times. high by contrast with other levels of pollutants.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 28 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

8.0 TASK A4 DEVELOPING THE SA FRAMEWORK INCORPORATING SEA OBJECTIVES: Develop the SA framework, consisting of the sustainability objectives, indicators and targets.

SUSTAINABILITY OBJECTIVES METHODOLOGY

8.1 Section 8.4 comprises a set of Wokingham Borough Sustainability objectives. Sustainability is a complex issue so 22 Sustainability Objectives were produced to consider local issues. The purpose of these objectives is to:

 State the direction and priorities of the SA / SEA;  Give a structure to the appraisal; and,  Help identify relevant indicators.

8.2 The numbers of social, environmental and economic objectives are not evenly matched as they reflect the key issues with Wokingham Borough.

8.3 The starting point for identifying a set of approved objectives specific to Wokingham Borough were the objectives considered by the South East England Regional Assembly and partners in the Integrated Regional Development Framework 2004 (IRF). These were refined by examination alongside other relevant policy documents, for example a scope of EC, regional and local guidance. In particular this included the SEA Directive, objectives produced by the Joint Strategic Planning Unit, Western Corridor and Sub Regional Strategy Options Appraisal and other Wokingham Borough Council strategies.

8.4 The following Wokingham Borough Council departments participated in the process:

 Countryside Management  Environmental Health  Transport Planning  Waste and Recycling

8.5 In early 2004, the Council along with the other Berkshire Authorities and the Joint Strategic Planning Unit produced initial sustainability objectives and indicators. The Council sent this to all groups, organisations and companies on the Land Use and Transports mailing list. The objectives and indicators were also published on the Council’s website. The Council requested feedback.

8.6 Using the objectives as a guide and information provided by the baseline data, some relevant approved indicators were chosen, which can then be used to guide collection of baseline and monitoring information. These are detailed in the Sustainability Framework in section 9.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 29 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

8.7 WOKINGHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL SUSTAINABILITY OBJECTIVES

Wokingham Borough Council Sustainability Objectives 1. To make provision for local housing needs by ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to live in a decent sustainably constructed and affordable home 2. To reduce the risk of flooding and the resulting detriment to public well-being, the economy and the environment by ensuring no inappropriate development in any areas at risk of flooding and use sustainable drainage solutions and other solutions in line with advice from the Environment Agency where necessary. 3. Safe and secure environment 4. To improve the health and well-being of the population. 5. To create and sustain vibrant and locally distinctive communities SOCIAL 6. To reduce poverty and social exclusion 7. To raise educational attainment, skills and training opportunities 8. To improve accessibility to services, amenities and facilities in particular by safe walking and cycling routes 9. To reduce road congestion and pollution levels on the local and strategic road network (SRN) by improving travel facilities and choices including safe walking and cycling routes and public transport 10. To improve efficiency in land use through the re-use of previously developed land, existing buildings, including the re-use of resources and remediation of previously developed land 11. To minimise impacts arising from pollution and improve and prevent where possible 12. To conserve and enhance the Borough’s biodiversity, including wildlife and river corridors and networks and to maximise opportunities for building in beneficial features for biodiversity including limiting the impact of climate change. 13. To protect and enhance the Borough’s countryside and historic environment 14. To sustainably use resources (including renewable and non-renewable resources) 15. To address waste by: reducing and minimising waste as a priority, re-use then recycle, compost or energy recovery 16. To maintain, and, where appropriate improve water quality (including groundwater ENVIRONMENTAL and surface water) and to achieve sustainable water resource management of both surface and groundwater flows. 17. To maintain and where appropriate improve soil quality, and to ensure land affected by contamination is remediated to a condition suitable for use 18. To increase energy efficiency and the proportion of energy generated from renewable sources in the Borough 19. Appropriate new development makes a positive contribution or makes no material harm to the character, environment, landscape and heritage within the Borough 20. To ensure high and stable levels of employment 21. To encourage ‘smart’ economic growth

22. Maintaining a buoyant and competitive economy with a range of jobs without adversely affecting the quality of life ECONOMIC ECONOMIC

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 30 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

8.8 The approved Wokingham Borough Council objectives were tested for internal compatibility. Figure 1 below shows the outcome of this exercise and highlights that there may be the potential for internal conflicts with what they aim to achieve.

8.9 The objectives have not been prioritised at this stage, but this may be necessary later in the appraisal process in the case of conflicts. When ranking objectives it is important to recognise that the environmental requirements of the SEA must be fully met and not diluted by the ranking of environmental objectives lower than social and economic.

Figure 1 : SA / SEA OBJECTIVES INTERNAL COMPATIBILITY ASSESSMENT

1 2  3   4    5   6    7   8      9       10   11        12      13         14        15    16            17        18          19                20          21      22           

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

KEY:

 - COMPATIBLE

 - INCOMPATIBLE

- NO RELATIONSHIP

8.10 The objectives associated with to make provision for local housing provision (objective 1) and those which aim to improve efficiency of land through the re-use of previously developed land (objective 10), to conserve and enhance the Borough’s biodiversity

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 31 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

(objective 12) and to protect and enhance the Borough’s countryside and environment (objective 13) may be incompatible.

8.11 There is also potential conflict between to reduce the risk of flooding (objective 2) and those which aim to improve efficiency of land through the re-use of previously developed land (objective 10) and to conserve and enhance the Borough’s biodiversity (objective 12).

8.12 The objectives associated with to improve the efficiency in land use through the re-use of previously developed land (objective 10) and those which aim to minimise impacts airing from pollution (objective 11) and appropriate new development makes a positive contribution to the character, environment, landscape and heritage within the Borough (objective 19) may be incompatible.

8.13 The objectives should not be removed because of potential conflict, but highlighting this at an early stage allows the framework to be aware of and therefore integrate these issues.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 32 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

9.0 TASK A4 THE SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL FRAMEWORK – DEVELOPING SEA OBJECTIVES

9.1 The SA Framework provides a way in which sustainability effects can be described, analysed and compared. The Framework consists of sustainability objectives, which have been identified in the previous section. The achievement of these objectives should be measurable using identified indicators. As this scoping was very broad, the objectives were used to focus and refine the range of indicators; each objective attempted to use only 2 or 3 indicators for monitoring purposes. The following framework consists of approved indicators for comment. Some of these may not be feasible due to data limitations and others may be put forward during the consultation stage.

9.2 The collection of baseline data, in some circumstances, has highlighted a general shortage of data to fully assess ‘the likely current and future state of the environment’. Where data does exist, in some circumstances it is often either at the wrong geographical level (i.e. regional/ national) or held over insufficient time to show a trend. Wokingham Borough is in no way unusual in this respect (everyone has lots of data gaps) but the monitoring framework in the initial sustainability report will incorporate actions to collect relevant missing data.

Data collected is shown in Appendix 2.

SEA / SA Sustainability Approved indicators Specific relevant targets and current trends Topic Objectives Population 1. TO MAKE PROVISION FOR LOCAL HOUSING NEEDS BY ENSURING THAT EVERYONE HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO LIVE IN A and human DECENT SUSTAINABLY CONSTRUCTED AND AFFORDABLE HOME health Target: Meet the housing completion targets of Policy CP17 (Housing Delivery) of the South East Plan.

SOCIAL

i) Number of housing completions (market and affordable) Trend: Net average completions currently below forecasts indicated in Appendix 6 (Expected Housing Land Supply to 2026) of the Core Strategy.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 33 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

SEA / SA Sustainability Approved indicators Specific relevant targets and current trends Topic Objectives

Target: Increase the supply of affordable housing both in numbers and as a proportion of total housing stock. ii) The supply of affordable housing Trend: Requirements of Policy CP5 (Housing mix, density and affordability) of the Core Strategy.

Target: Increasing the supply of affordable housing will help decrease the ratio

Requirements of Policy CP5 (Housing mix, density and iii) Average property price compared with average incomes affordability) of the Core Strategy.

Trend: Wokingham Borough’s ratio continues to be higher than the national ratio.

Target: Reduce number of households in housing need on Local Authority waiting list.

iv) Households on the Housing Register Trend: In Wokingham Borough, the number of households has Increased from 1,851 in 2001 to 2,608 in 2011.

No data available

v) Number of unfit homes per 1,000 dwellings

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 34 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

SEA / SA Sustainability Approved indicators Specific relevant targets and current trends Topic Objectives 2. TO REDUCE THE RISK OF FLOODING AND THE RESULTING DETRIMENT TO PUBLIC WELL-BEING, THE ECONOMY AND THE ENVIRONMENT BY ENSURING NO INAPPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT IN ANY AREAS AT RISK OF FLOODING AND USE SUITABLE DRAINAGE SOLUTIONS WHERE NECESSARY. Target: Only appropriate development within flood zones 2, 3a and 3b4.

New development should not increase the risk of flooding. i) Properties at risk of flooding Trend: Climatic Information available from the EA flood mapping, Flood Map for factors Surface Water, Thames Catchment Flood Management Plan (2009), and the Council’s SFRA and PFRA. Target: No inappropriate development allowed in floodplain contrary to advice of Environment Agency. Number of planning permissions granted contrary to the

iii) advice of the Environment Agency on either flood defence Trend: grounds or water quality. In Wokingham Borough, average of 4 permissions granted contrary to the advice of the Environment Agency. For those allowed, planning conditions agreed with Environment Agency. Population 3. SAFE AND SECURE ENVIRONMENT and human Target: health Development will be designed to reduce anti –social behaviour, crime and thereby the fear of crime. i) Fear of crime

Trend: There is no obvious trend in the data available. Target: Reduction in level of burglaries, violent offences and vehicle crimes. Level of domestic burglaries, violent offences and vehicle ii) crimes Trend: Although not directly comparable, local crimes have seen a greater percentage change reduction compared to that at a regional and national level.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 35 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

SEA / SA Sustainability Approved indicators Specific relevant targets and current trends Topic Objectives Target: Reduction in level of recorded crimes.

Trend: iii) Recorded crime offences Although not directly comparable, local crimes are at a lower rate than regionally or nationally

4. TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF THE POPULATION Target Over the long term, to reduce death rates from these diseases appreciably. Death rates from circulatory disease, cancer, accidents and i) suicide Trend: All cause mortality rate continues to decline.

Target: Improve the life expectancy. Population ii) Life expectancy and human Trend: health Life expectancy for males and females in Wokingham Borough is higher than that in the South East and England.

Target: Ambition to achieve Green Flag in the future, when resources Percentage of eligible open space managed to green flag permit, for suitably recommended sites. iii) standard Trend: Currently no sites in Wokingham with a green flag award [2012]

Social 5.TO CREATE AND SUSTAIN VIBRANT AND LOCALLY DISTINCTIVE COMMUNITIES Inclusiveness Target: Keep satisfaction levels high and increase if possible Percentage of people satisfied with their local area as a place i) to live Trend: High percentage of Wokingham Borough residents are satisfied.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 36 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

SEA / SA Sustainability Approved indicators Specific relevant targets and current trends Topic Objectives Target: Keep levels high. Percentage of people who feel their local area is a place ii) where people from different backgrounds and communities Trend: can live together harmoniously Over 60% of Wokingham Borough residents definitely or tend to agree that Wokingham Borough is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together. Social 6. TO REDUCE POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION Inclusiveness Target: Maintain and enhance the number of children receiving free school meals.

Proportion of children under 16 who live in low-income i) Trend: households The percentage of pupils known to be eligible for and claiming free school meals is increasing locally, regionally and nationally. The percentage for Wokingham Borough is less than that at a regional and national level. Target: Below regional and national level.

ii) Percentage of population of working age claiming key benefits Trend: Trend appears, in the main, to be turning upwards though still well below the national average. Target: Reduce the percentage of households in fuel poverty.

No household on benefits live in homes with a SAP rating less than 35 helping to iii) Percentage of households in fuel poverty (fuel poor) reduce fuel poverty (Sustainable Environment Strategy (2010).

Trend: The percentage of households in fuel poverty for Wokingham Borough is consistently below that at a county, regional and national level.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 37 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

SEA / SA Sustainability Approved indicators Specific relevant targets and current trends Topic Objectives No data available. Number of areas that rank within the most deprived 20% of iv) areas in the country

Population 7. TO RAISE EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT, SKILLS AND TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES and human Target: health Maintain and enhance performance

i) Key Stage 2 Performance: Level 4 or above Trend: Wokingham LEA is consistently performs better than the regional and national percentage.

Target: Maintain and enhance performance

ii) Key Stage 3 Performance: Level 5 or above Trend: Wokingham LEA is consistently performs better than the regional and national percentage.

Target: Maintain and enhance performance

iii) GCSE or equivalent performance Trend: Wokingham LEA is consistently performs better than the regional and national percentage.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 38 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

SEA / SA Sustainability Approved indicators Specific relevant targets and current trends Topic Objectives Target: Reduce the proportion of the population with basic skills needs. Target those with low skills in numeracy (those adults on the borderline of functional numeracy that could reach the threshold through some support)

iv) Proportion of adults with poor literacy and numeracy skills Trend: Trend appears to be reducing over time

8. TO IMPROVE ACCESSIBILITY TO SERVICES, AMENITIES AND FACILITIES IN PARTICULAR BY SAFE WALKING AND CYCLING ROUTES Target: Social As per the requirements of policy in the Wokingham Borough Development Plan. Inclusiveness Distance of households from key service e.g. post office, I) school, doctors Trend: High percentage of new dwellings within 30 minutes public transport time from key services. Social 9. TO REDUCE ROAD CONGESTION AND POLLUTION LEVELS ON THE LOCAL AND STRATEGIC ROAD NETWORK (SRN) BY Inclusiveness/ IMPROVING TRAVEL FACILITIES AND CHOICES INCLUDING SAFE WALKING AND CYCLING ROUTES AND PUBLIC Air TRANSPORT. Target: As per the requirements of national and local policy. i) Average daily motor vehicle flows Trend: There is no obvious trend in the data available. Target: As per the requirements of national and local policy.

ii) Proportion of travel by mode Trend: There is no obvious trend in the data available. (2011 Census information not yet released).

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 39 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

SEA / SA Sustainability Approved indicators Specific relevant targets and current trends Topic Objectives

iii) Monetary investment in public transport, walking and cycling There is no obvious trend in the data available.

iv) Public Transport (Bus) Satisfaction There is no obvious trend in the data available.

10. TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY IN LAND USE THROUGH THE RE-USE OF PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED LAND, EXISTING BUILDINGS, INCLUDING THE RE-USE OF RESOURCES AND REMEDIATION OF PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED LAND

Target:

Paragraph 111 of the NPPF3:

Planning policies and decisions should encourage the effective use of land by re-using land that has been previously developed ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL (brownfield land), provided that it is not of high environmental i) Development on previously developed land (PDL) Cultural value. Local planning authorities may continue to consider the heritage and case for setting a locally appropriate target for the use of landscape brownfield land.

Trend:

Locally and nationally the % is consistently high Target:

To reduce the amount of derelict land and empty properties ii) Derelict land and empty properties Trend:

Low and similar performance to other Berkshire authorities.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 40 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

11. TO MINIMISE IMPACTS ARISING FROM POLLUTION AND IMPROVE AND PREVENT WHERE POSSIBLE Target:

Wokingham Borough Level of concern = 36 µg/m³

Trend:

i) Levels of main air quality pollutants and forecasts Within the AQMA nitrogen dioxide levels have been recorded below the objective value but above the level of concern (36 Climatic µg/m³).

Factors Levels in 2011 are higher than those in 2010 and 2009 by 3 µg/m³ but are the same as those in 2008.

Target: Establish an air quality action plan in areas which are unlikely to Days when air pollution is moderate or high meet national air quality objectives.

ii)

Trend:

Decreased significantly in UK urban areas since 1993, largely because of a reduction in particles and sulphur dioxide. Biodiversity, 12. TO CONSERVE AND ENHANCE THE BOROUGH’S BIODIVERSITY, INCLUDING WILDLIFE AND RIVER CORRIDORS AND fauna and NETWORKS AND TO MAXIMISE OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUILDING-IN BENEFICIAL FEATURES FOR BIODIVERSITY INCLUDING flora green LIMITING THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 41 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

infrastructure BAP Priority Habitats:

Target:

To have regard to core output indicators provided by Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC).

Trend:

Extent of BAP priority habitats and population of protected Rise in total area between 2005 to 2012. species i)

Change in BAP Priority Species:

Target:

To have regard to core output indicators provided by Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC).

Trend:

Slightly below the county level.

Target: Ensure no further loss, damage or deterioration of SSSIs;

ii) Condition of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) Trend: Percentage of SSSIs in the Borough in favourable condition is less than that at a county, regional and national level. See indicator on extent of BAP Priority habitats and change in Extent of key habitats for which Biodiversity Action Plans iii) BAP Priority species (BAPs) have been established

Target: No loss of ancient/ semi ancient woodland. iv) Extent of ancient woodlands Trend: Sufficient data is not available to allow a trend analysis.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 42 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Target: No damage to or loss of Local Wildlife Sites and Local Nature Number, area and condition of Local Wildlife Sites (previously Reserves. v) known as Wildlife Heritage Sites in Wokingham Borough) and

Local Nature Reserves within the plan area Trend: Stable. Target: No decline in populations or distribution Number and distribution of characteristic rare species (e.g. vi) butterfly species, bats, great crested newts, water voles) Trend: Sufficient data is not available to allow a trend analysis. Cultural 13.TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE BOROUGH’S COUNTRYSIDE AND HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT heritage and No data available.

landscape i) Land covered by management schemes Sufficient data is not available to allow a trend analysis.

Target: No loss of listed buildings.

Buildings of Grade I and II* at risk of decay and consider other Over time, reduction in the number of listed buildings on the ‘at ii) heritage assets to seek no loss risk’ register.

Trend: Currently 1 Grade II listed building in a very bad state. Target: iii) Total number of Conservation Areas in Wokingham Borough All conservation areas to have an up to data appraisal by the end of the plan period. Target: Other Village Design Statements may be adopted in the future. Total number of Village Design Statements (VDSs) in iv) Wokingham Borough Trend: 11 Village Design Statements are currently adopted.

v) Landscape/ townscape character of Wokingham Borough Sufficient data is not available to allow a trend analysis.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 43 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Target: An appropriate archaeological assessment/ plan is in place in all cases where remains are found after planning consents are implemented.

Remains to be excavated only where preservation in situ is not practical. Number of planning applications identified as having vi) archaeological implications. Trend: Due to a change in the process, far more applications are now being appraised in detail and therefore the number for the year (2004-05) is likely to increase quite dramatically.

This initial increase is expected to be a one-off, with the following year probably settling above 2004-5 and below 2005-6

14.TO SUSTAINABLY USE RESOURCES (INCLUDING RENEWABLE AND NON-RENEWABLE RESOURCES) Target: Percentage of new build and retrofit homes meeting To be above the South East Average EcoHomes Very Good standards or same level in a similar

accredited scheme Trend: i) All new dwellings to meet CfSH Level 4 (full). This is now the Code for Sustainable Homes (CfSH). The

indicator is to now monitor the percentage of new build and Wokingham Borough Council issued less code certificates than all Material retrofit homes meeting CfSH Level 4 (full). other Berkshire authorities. Assets Target: To be above the South East Average

Percentage of commercial buildings meeting BREEAM Very To require energy and water efficiency in new and redeveloped ii) Good standard or same level in a similar accredited scheme buildings to reflect best practice.

Trend: Sufficient data is not available to allow a trend analysis.

Water and 15.TO ADDRESS WASTE BY: REDUCING AND MINIMISING WASTE AS A PRIORITY, RE-USE THEN RECYCLE, COMPOST OR Soil ENERGY RECOVERY

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 44 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Target: Achieve better waste management

South East Plan Policy W6 (Recycling and Composting):

Municipal Solid Waste: 2008: 36% 2010: 40% 2015: 50% 2025: 60%

Trend: Percentage is increasing year on year.

Target: Achieve better waste management Percentage of the total tonnage of municipal waste that has i) been recycled, composted, landfilled or used to recover heat, South East Plan Policy W5 (Targets for diversion from landfill): power and other energy sources Municipal Solid Waste: 2005: 35% 2010: 52% 2015: 75%

Waste Strategy for England (2007): 2005: 40% 2010: 53%

Trend: Percentage is decreasing year on year.

Lower percentage of municipal waste is going to landfill than that for the South East and England.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 45 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Target: Achieve better waste management

South East Plan Policy W7 (Waste management capacity requirements):

Berkshire Unitaries:

Number of kilograms of household waste collected per head of Municipal Solid Waste: ii) the population 2008-2010: 441 2011-2015: 480 2016-2020: 522 2021-2025: 563

Trend: Number of kilograms is decreasing year on year.

Water and 16. TO MAINTAIN, AND, WHERE APPROPRIATE IMPROVE WATER QUALITY (INCLUDING GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE Soil WATER) AND TO ACHIEVE SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OF BOTH SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER FLOWS. i) Ecological status or potential of river of lake water bodies See Appendix 2 ii) Chemical status of river or lake water bodies See Appendix 2 iii) Biological status of river or lake water bodies See Appendix 2 Target: No category 1 and 2 incidents from all sectors iv) Incidents of major and significant water pollution Trend: Sufficient data is not available to allow a trend analysis.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 46 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Target: To ensure no net increase in per capita consumption despite development

New dwellings to meet internal potable water target of 105 litres or v) Per capita consumption of water less per person per day.

Trend: Figures for Thames Water are higher than any other water company in the UK 17. TO MAINTAIN AND WHERE APPROPRIATE IMPROVE SOIL QUALITY, AND TO ENSURE LAND AFFECTED BY CONTAMINATION IS REMEDIATED TO A CONDITION SUITABLE FOR USE Target: i) Agricultural land quality To protect land of Agricultural Land Quality grades 1 and 2. Target: The prioritisation process of potentially contaminated sites in the Number of ‘sites of potential concern’ (within Wokingham borough is not yet complete. ii) Water and Borough), with respect to land contamination Soil Trend: Sufficient data is not available to allow a trend analysis. Target: Increase in percentage of land restored to a suitable use condition. iii) Percentage of land restored to a suitable use condition

Trend: Sufficient data is not available to allow a trend analysis. Climatic 18. TO INCREASE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND THE PROPORTION OF ENERGY GENERATED FROM RENEWABLE SOURCES IN Factors THE BOROUGH

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 47 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Target: To require energy efficiency/ renewable energy technology in new and redeveloped buildings to be above mandatory standards/ requirements.

Trend: Household energy use per capita (for instance from Standard i) In the main CO emissions from domestic electricity and gas have Assessment Procedure (SAP) rating from HECA returns) 2 slightly fallen since 2005 in Wokingham Borough, South East and England.

Per capita CO2 has decreased in Wokingham Borough, South East and England.

Target: Reducing UK emissions by at least 34% by 2020 and at least 80% by 2050 – baseline year is 1990. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy consumption, ii) transport and land use and waste management Trend: In the main CO2 emissions from industry and commercial and road transport have slightly fallen since 2005 in Wokingham Borough, South East and England.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 48 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Target:

Regional targets (MW): 2010: 620 2016: 895 2020: 1,130 2026: 1750

Sub-regional targets: (Thames Valley and Surrey): 202MW [2010] 271MW [2016]

To require energy/ renewable energy technology in new and Installed capacity for energy production redeveloped buildings to be above mandatory standards/ from renewable sources: How much renewable energy is requirements. iii) supplied by this method and to what extent does it meet ideal of zero carbon development? 2009 Renewable Energy Directive sets a target for the UK to achieve 15% of its energy consumption from renewable sources by 2020.

Trend: The Borough has achieved 2010 indicative target for wind energy. The Borough has not met the indicative targets for all other technology types.

Department for Environment and Climate Change confirms that between 2003 and 2011 there was a 225% increase in generation from renewables in the UK, but faster rates of growth were recorded in areas such as the South East (282%). Cultural 19. APPROPRIATE NEW DEVELOPMENT THAT MAKES A POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION OR MAKES NO MATERIAL HARM TO THE Heritage and CHARACTER, ENVIRONMENT, LANDSCAPE, HERITAGE WITHIN THE BOROUGH

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 49 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Landscape Target:

Local Planning Policy:

Core Strategy (2010) – such as Policy CP3 (General Principles for Development)

Borough Design Guide SPD (2012)

Landscape Character Assessment (2004) i) Quality New Development Emerging Managing Development Delivery DPD

National Planning Policy:

National Planning Policy Framework – such as under Heading 7 – Requiring good design.

Trend:

Sufficient data is not available to allow a trend analysis.

Economic 20. TO ENSURE HIGH AND STABLE LEVELS OF EMPLOYMENT Development Target: High levels of employment

i) Proportion of people of working age in employment Trend: Overall very high levels of employment in Wokingham Borough. Above the levels in South East and Great Britain. ECONOMIC ECONOMIC

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 50 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Target: Maintain high ratio

Trend: Employment self-sufficiency capacity. Local balance between ii) Percentages have remained relatively stable in Wokingham available employment and number of people of working age. Borough.

Percentages for Wokingham Borough have been consistently below those for the South East and for Great Britain. Target: Proportion to be lower than the South East Average. Percentage of population claiming unemployment benefits iii) who have been out of work for more than a year. Trend: Consistently lower than national levels. Target: No net loss in registrations Business Start-ups: Percentage increase or decrease in the iv) total number of VAT registered businesses in the area Trend: Statistics for Wokingham Borough are consistent with the trend at a regional and national level. Economic 21. TO ENCOURAGE ‘SMART’ ECONOMIC GROWTH Development Target: Maintain above the South East Average

Trend: i) Gross Value Added (GVA) per worker GVA per head in Berkshire is higher than that at a national level and in the top five nation wide.

In 2009, per head growth in Berkshire was -3.8% down on 2008.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 51 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Target: Wokingham Borough Council forms part of the Thames Valley Berkshire Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP)

Measure of success will be the area’s Gross Value Added (GVA) ii) Economic Activity with Economic Partnership Areas output and the number of people in the local workforce, and their education and skills.

Trend: Sufficient data is not available to allow a trend analysis.

22. MAINTAINING A BUOYANT AND COMPETITIVE ECONOMY WITH A RANGE OF JOBS WITHOUT ADVERSELY AFFECTING THE QUALITY OF LIFE No data available – see indicator above on GVA per worker i) GVA per capita (objective 21). Economic Target: Development Raise the number of people with Level 3 qualifications.

Percentage of population of working age qualified to National iii) Trend: Vocational Qualification (NVQ) Level 3 or equivalent Wokingham Borough’s performance is above that at a regional and national level.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 52 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

10.0 TASK A4 TESTING THE LDF OBJECTIVES AGAINST THE SA /SEA FRAMEWORK.

10.1 The LDF objectives (as detailed on page 6) must be checked against the sustainability objectives, listed under Task A4, to draw attention to any conflict between them and to make certain of consistency as far as possible and to identify areas where the implementation of the objective is fundamental to a sustainable plan.

Figure 2: Testing the compatibility of LDF Objectives (page 6) against SA objectives (page 27)

10.2 The LDF and Sustainability Objectives are not ranked in terms of importance or weight.

Key  Potentially consistent  Potentially inconsistent No relationship

LDF SPATIAL OBJECTIVE A B C D E F G H I J K L M 1          2       3           4      5           6      7    8            9             10           11         12        13          14         15       16        17       18         SUSTAINABILITY OBJECTIVE NUMBER 19            20           21         22    -       A B C D E F G H I J K L M

10.3 As with the internal compatibility of the sustainability objectives, there are potential inconsistencies between the two sets of objectives. For example ‘To ensure all residents, workers, visitors and other interested groups are involved in creating, developing and delivering future land use patterns across the Borough’ (LDF Spatial objective A) may be inconsistent with the objective of ‘to protect and enhance the Borough’s countryside and historic environment’ (Sustainability objectives). However, simply because the objectives

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 53 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

are compatible or incompatible, this does not mean that the outcomes also have to be. This exercise will identify areas where the objectives need to be carefully balanced to ensure the outcomes are consistent and where possible to achieve a satisfactory conclusion.

THE ASSESSMENT OF OPTIONS AND EFFECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

10.4 There is more than one way of meeting the needs of people who live and work in Wokingham Borough, so various options (and alternative options) were presented in the DPD methodology consultation. The options (and alternative options) were assessed with sustainable development in mind to ensure the best practicable one is chosen. To achieve this, the Sustainability Report was prepared alongside the draft Options MDD DPD and both documents went out for consultation simultaneously (June to July 2011) and was accompanied by the Environmental Report, required by the SEA Directive.

10.5 In addition to the information supplied in this SA (inc. SEA) Scoping Report, the Final Sustainability Report will include the following information:

 Feedback from the consultation on the SA (inc. SEA) Scoping Report regarding the objectives, priorities, Sustainability Framework etc.  The preferred options for the Submission version of the MDD DPD and how these were identified.  A more detailed methodology of the appraisal process and how this was used to compare and appraise the social, economic and environmental effects of each of these options.  Justification for rejection of options and any proposed mitigation measures.

10.6 It is envisaged that the methodology to carry out the SA is likely to follow the format detailed in Figure 23 of the SA guidance, as summarised in the table below.

Sustainability Compatibility Score Comments/ Mitigation Objective and/or Short Term Medium Long Term indicator Term

10.7 This table will be required to assess each of the options (and alternative options) against sustainability objectives. Each option will be appraised by input into the following table which will look at the effects of each option on the current baseline or its contribution towards meeting any targets. The outcomes from each table can be compared to help decide on the Preferred Option.

10.8 By examining all the outcomes from these tables the likely secondary, cumulative and inter-related effects can also be assessed.

MONITORING

10.9 The SA (inc. SEA) process is an iterative process, so its success and effectiveness will be monitored by the continued collection of baseline data according to the identified

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 54 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

indicators. Indicators may change or require a new focus throughout the assessment stage. It may be necessary to adjust indicators to reflect this.

10.10 A monitoring scheme will be developed and reported on in the SA Report.

DETAILS OF CONSULTATIONS

10.11 See Volume 4 (Statements of Consultation) of the SA Report for the Core Strategy which contains the letter(s) sent out to consultees and the Statement of Consultation for the relevant consultation period. Appendix 5 of this document includes the Report of consultation on the updated Scoping Report for the LDF and the Scoping report on the MDD DPD

What stage Date SA/SEA Output MDD DPD Stage are we at? Consultation on the Scoping Report for MDD DPD

March –April Scoping Report on the SA (incorporating Done Pre-production 2010 Strategic Environmental Assessment) for the Wokingham Borough Local Development Framework.

Consultation on the Initial Sustainability Report (including the Done June -July 2011 Options consultation Environment Report) including initial SA of options June - August Pre Submission Done Draft Final Sustainability Report 2012 Consultation Done December 2012 Final Sustainability Report Submission Spring 2013 Test of Final Sustainability Report Examination

Autumn 2013 Publish Sustainability Statement Adoption

10.12 In addition to the consultation periods as stated in the table above, the Berkshire unitary authorities jointly considered some potential objectives and indicators that could be applicable across all six authorities for the SEA. Wokingham Borough Council consulted on the appropriateness of these potential objectives and indicators to the Wokingham Borough from 20 September to 29 October 2004.

ANNEX APPROACH

10.13 The Council will produce separate annex’s covering the later stages (B, C and D) of the SA. The Scoping Report will form a core document from which separate annexes will be produced. Each annex will explain how the DPD will achieve the objectives and implications as reinforced by the baseline information.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 55 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

11.0 TASK A5 CONSULTING ON THE SCOPE OF THE SA: Produce a Scoping Report and consult relevant authorities, the public and other key stakeholders on the scope of the appraisal and the key issues and possible options for solutions.

11.1 The consultation on this Scoping Report is in accordance with:  Article 5(4) of the European Union Directive 2001/42/EC  Regulations set out in the Environmental Assessments of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004  Regulation 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2004.

11.2 There has been guidance from and input in to the Statement of Community Involvement.

11.3 The statutory SEA Consultation Bodies with environmental responsibilities that are consulted on the Scoping Report and SA documentation are:

Consultation Body English Heritage

Environment Agency

Natural England

11.4 The Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 (Regulation 12(6)) defines certain timescales for consulting the above bodies on a Scoping Report. This requires the responsible authority’s give the consultation body a period of 5 weeks from the date it receives the Scoping Report.

11.5 In accordance with the SA Guidance 2005 other appropriate social and economic consultees will be contacted – such as those listed below. This consultation procedure will be integrated into the Statement of Community Involvement.

Consultation Body Other environmental bodies Berkshire Buckinghamshire Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust (BBOWT) Forestry Commission Forest Enterprise RSPB Wokingham Friends of the Earth Utilities - Thames Water/ South East Water/electricity /gas Social and Economic bodies Primary Care Trust Learning and Skills Council

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 56 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Consultation Body Wokingham Local Learning Partnership Thames Valley Economic Partnership Business Link Berkshire and Wiltshire Local Gateway Service Transport Local Bus operators National Rail Internal Officers – Wokingham Borough Council Members

Relevant Council Officers, including: Access Officer, Countryside, Development Management, Environment Health, Highways, Community Infrastructure, Transport Planning and Waste and Recycling.

Sustainable Environment and Climate Change LSP Parish and Town Councils Arborfield and Newland Parish Council Barkham Parish Council Charvil Parish Council Earley Town Council Finchampstead Parish Council

Hurst Parish Council Remenham Parish Council Ruscombe Parish Council Shinfield Parish Council Sonning Parish Council Swallowfield Parish Council Twyford Parish Council Wargrave Parish Council Winnersh Parish Council Wokingham Town Council Wokingham Without Parish Council Woodley Town Council Neighbouring Local Authorities Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Bracknell Forest Borough Council

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 57 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Consultation Body Reading Borough Council Hart Borough Council Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Slough Borough Council South Oxfordshire Council West Berkshire Council Wycombe Borough Council Buckinghamshire County Council Oxfordshire County Council Hampshire County Council Government Bodies Communities and Local Government and Government Office for South East (GOSE) – please note that GOSE has now been disbanded.

11.6 Consultation seeks to:  Ensure the SA is comprehensive and robust enough to support the Development Plan (and other related documents) during the later stages of full public consultation and examination.  Advise on the appropriateness of the sustainability objectives.  Advise on the appropriateness of the key sustainability issues.  Advise on the comprehensiveness of the baseline data.

CONSULTATION QUESTIONS

11.7 Consultation questions have been asked at each stage of the Scoping Report. The full list of questions from throughout the document is as follows:

1) Are there other relevant policies, plans and programmes, and sustainable development objectives that will affect or influence the DPD and undertake LDF surveys?

2) Do you agree that the baseline data collected is appropriate to the LDF?

3) Do you have, or know of, any additional relevant baseline data which should be added to that already listed?

4) As far as you are aware, are there any inaccuracies or anomalies in the data presented?

5) Do you agree that these are the key sustainability issues for Wokingham Borough?

6) Are you aware of any issues which in your opinion should be added, or any that should be removed?

7) Are the above objectives suitable in the context of Wokingham Borough?

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 58 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

8) It may be necessary to rank the objectives to help assess options. Do you have any comments on those which hold particular importance?

9) Are there any additional objectives that should be included or should any be removed?

10) Do the indicators provide a relevant measure for the associated objective? If not then please suggest additional indicators.

11) Do you have any comments on the suggested targets, especially where no target has been identified as yet or it lacks precision?

12) Do you have any further comments on the information in the SA Framework?

13) Do you have any comments on the proposed methodology for the SA process or the content of the Initial Sustainability Report?

14) Do you have any comments on the separate Annex approach that Wokingham Borough Council is considering?

12 RELEVANT GUIDANCE

European Directive 2001/42/EC ‘on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and European Commission – 2001 programmes on the environment’

SA of Regional Spatial Strategies and Local ODPM – November 2005 Development Frameworks

Countryside Council for Wales; English Nature; Strategic Environmental Assessment and RSPB; Environment Agency; Levett-Therival; Biodiversity: Guidance for Practitioners South West Ecological Surveys; Oxford Brookes University – June 2004

Natural England; Environment Agency; UK Strategic Environmental Assessment and Climate Impacts Programme, CAG, Levett- Climate Change: Guidance for Practitioners Therival – Revised June 2007

Strategic Environmental Assessment: RSPB Learning from Practice

The Environmental Assessment of Plans and ODPM – July 2004 Programmes Regulations (2004 No. 1663)

A Practical Guide to the Strategic ODPM – August 2006 Environmental Assessment Directive

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 59 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

13 BIBLIOGRAPHY

The bibliography indicates examples of sources of information used to compile this scoping report. The data sources for the sustainability issues and baseline information are listed in each respective section.

NATIONAL

Countryside Agency (2004). State of the Countryside 2004, Countryside Agency, Cheltenham

Defra (2004). Regional Quality of Life Counts 2003. Defra, London

English Heritage (1994). County List of Scheduled Monuments: Berkshire, English Heritage, Swindon

English Heritage (2003). Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest in England, English Heritage, Swindon

English Heritage (2004. Buildings at Risk Register, English Heritage, Swindon

Environment Agency (2004). State of the Environment 2004: South East England, Environment Agency, Bristol

Office of Population, Census & Surveys (1993). 1991 Census – County Report: Berkshire (part 1), HMSO, London

ODPM (2004). The English Indices of Deprivation (revised), ODPM, London

Office of National Statistics (2005). 2001 Census, HMSO, London

Nomis (2005). 2001 Census, HMSO, London

Sustainable Development (1999). A Better Quality of Life: A Strategy for Sustainable Development in the UK, Defra, London

REGIONAL

GOSE (2009) The South East Plan, Regional Spatial Strategy for the South East of England, TSO, Norwich

SEEDA (2003). Sustainability Checklist, SEEDA, Guildford

SEERA (2004). Integrated Regional Framework 2004: Better Quality of Life in the South East, SEERA, Guildford

SEERA (2004). Data and Trends. Part of the Integrated Regional Framework 2004: Better Quality of Life in the South East, SEERA, Guildford

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 60 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

SEERA (2005). The Draft South East Plan: A Clear Vision for the South East, SEERA, Guildford

Thames Valley Police (2004). Crime Disorder Reduction Partnership (CDRP) Performance Figures 03/04: Wokingham. Thames Valley Police, Kidlington

Thames Water (1999). Biodiversity Action Plan. Thames Water, Swindon

LOCAL

Arup (2004). Western Corridor and Blackwater Valley Sub-regional Strategy: Draft Report for Wokingham District Council, Arup, London

BBOWT (2003). Berkshire Bird Index: An Annual Survey of Bird Population in Berkshire, BBOWT

Berkshire County Council (1992). Survey of Households in New Dwellings in Berkshire 1990 – 91, Berkshire County Council, Reading

JSPU (2004). Berkshire Structure Plan 2001-2016 (adopted 15 July 2005), JSPU, Maidenhead

JSPU/ Wokingham District Council (2004). Planning Commitments for Employment Uses at March 2004, JSPU, Maidenhead

JSPU (2004). Planning Commitments for Housing at March 2004: The Berkshire Area Summary Tables, JSPU, Maidenhead

NHS (2004). Wokingham Primary Care Trust Vision and Annual Reports, NHS, Wokingham

RE3 (2004). Draft Municipal Waste Management Strategy Statement. RE3, Central Berkshire Waste Partnership, Wokingham.

Wokingham District Council (1997). Report of findings of New Households Survey in Shinfield Parish, Wokingham District Council, Wokingham

Wokingham District Council (2000). Wokingham District Local Transport Plan, Wokingham District Council, Wokingham

Wokingham District Council (2002). Biodiversity Action Plan. Wokingham District Council, Wokingham

Wokingham District Council (2003). Building on Success – Community Strategy for Wokingham District 2002-2012. Wokingham District, Wokingham

Wokingham District Council (2004). 2001 Census: A Profile of the Wokingham District, Wokingham District Council, Wokingham

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 61 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Wokingham District Council (2004). An Analysis of the Indices of Multiple Deprivation for Wokingham District, Wokingham District Council, Wokingham

Wokingham District Council (2004). Analysis of Survey of New Homes Undertaken in July 2004, Wokingham District Council, Wokingham

Wokingham District Council (2004). Landscape Character Assessment. Wokingham District Council, Wokingham

Wokingham District Council (2004). Planning Commitments for Housing March 2004, Wokingham District Council, Wokingham

Wokingham District Council (2004). Wokingham District Local Plan, Wokingham District Council, Wokingham

Wokingham District Council (2004). Consultation and Public Perceptions of Community Safety: Findings of Key Consultations, Wokingham District Council, Wokingham

Wokingham District Council (2005). Report on the Results of the Community Strategy Consultation, Wokingham District Council, Wokingham

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 62 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

APPENDIX 1 Review Policies, Plans and Programmes

The following is a review of relevant policies, plans, programmes, and sustainable development objectives (PPPs) that will affect or influence the Development Plan (and related documents) and SA (inc, SEA) process.

European European Sustainable Development Strategy (2001) European Sustainable Development Strategy (2006) (Reviewed 2009) European Spatial Development Perspective (1999) European Biodiversity Strategy (1998) (updated 2011) European Biodiversity Strategy 2020 EC Council Directive on the Conservation of Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (92/43/EEC) EU Sixth Environmental Action Plan (2002) European Communities Directive on the Conservation of Wild Birds (79/09/EEC) Kyoto Protocol Waste Framework Directive 2011 Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) European SEA Directive 2001/42/EC (2001) European Directive on the Energy Performance of Buildings 2002/91/EC National The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (including Regulation 61 and 102) The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (As Amended) National Biodiversity Action Plan 1992-2012 Biodiversity Strategy for England (2002) - 2010 Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for England’s wildlife and ecosystem services (August 2011), DEFRA The Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland (2007) Countryside and Rights of Way Act (2000) UK Government Sustainable Development Strategy, ‘Securing the Future’ (2005) UK Shared Framework for Sustainable Development (2005) Climate Change – the UK Programme (2006) UK making space for Water (2005) Housing a low carbon society – An ODPM leadership agenda on climate change

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 63 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

(2006) The Historic Environment: A Force for Our Future (2001) The National Framework for Sport in England 2004 Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards Safer Places – The Planning System and Crime Prevention (ODPM 2004) Code for Sustainable Homes (2008) and Technical Guidance (2010) BREEAM (such as New Construction (2011) and Refurbishment (2012)) Planning and Energy Act (2008) Climate Change Bill (2008) Flood Direction 2007 The Flood Risk Regulations 2009 Flood and Water Management Act 2010 The National Planning Policy Framework (2012) Replaces the following PPGs and PPSs: PPG2, PPG8, PPG13, PPG17, PPG19, PPG24, PPS1, Supplement to PPS1, PPS3, PPS4, PPS5, PPS7, PPS9, PPS12, PPS22, PPS23, PPS25 Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework (2012) Planning Policy for traveller sites guidance (2012) Former Planning Policy Guidance 24: Planning and Noise (1994) PPS10: Planning for Sustainable Waste Management (2011) PPS11: Regional Spatial Strategies Building Act (1984) Planning Acts (various) and associated Regulations Circular 04/00 Planning for Hazardous Substances The Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 Water Industry Act 1991 Waste Management in Buildings - Code of practice (BS 5906:2005) Homes and Community Agency Standards [Interim London Housing Design Guide] (2010) Lifetime Homes (2010) CIRIA Guidance on flood risk management, surface water drainage and sustainable water management. Regional South East Plan (2009) Regional Transport Strategy (2009)

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 64 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sustainable Communities in the South East (2003) Regional Housing Strategy: 2008 – 2011 Regional Economic Strategy 2006-2016 Integrated Regional Framework Harnessing the Elements – Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Strategy (Proposed Alterations to Regional Planning Guidance) Regional Tourism and Related Sport and Recreation Strategy Regional Waste Management Strategy Social Inclusion Statement Regional Forestry and Woodlands Framework Action for Biodiversity in the South East South East Green Infrastructure Framework (2009) Sub-Regional Blackwater Valley Sub-Regional Study Highways Agency Route Management Strategy for the M4 Thames Valley Multi Modal Transport Study Thames Basin Heaths Area Delivery Framework 2009 Thames Valley Economic Development Strategy The River Loddon Catchment Abstraction Management Strategy Biodiversity Strategy for the Loddon Catchment (2003) Blackwater Valley Countryside Strategy 2011-15 Thames Waterway Plan (2006-2011) Thames River Basin River Management Plan (2009) Blackwater Valley Water Cycle Study: Scoping Report (2011) Thames Catchment Flood Management Plan (2009) Thames Valley Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) County Berkshire Biodiversity Action Plan Berkshire Habitat Action Plan (2007) Berkshire Landscape Character Assessment 1998 Replacement Minerals Local Plan for Berkshire (incorporating alterations adopted in 1997 and 2001) Waste Local Plan for Berkshire (1998) Wokingham Borough Wokingham Borough Core Strategy (2010)

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 65 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Residual Copy of the Wokingham District Local Plan following adoption of the Core Strategy (2010) Wokingham Borough Council Local Transport Plan 2 2006-2011 Wokingham Borough Council Local Transport Plan 3 2011-2016 Wokingham Borough Council Corporate Plan: 2008 – 2018 Housing Strategy 2010-2013 Wokingham Borough Economic Development Strategy 2010-2013 Wokingham Borough Sustainable Environment Strategy 2010-2020 Air Quality Review – Updating & Screening Assessment. Draft Air Quality Action Plan. Community Strategy 2002 – 2012 Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 Race Equality Scheme Lifelong Learning Development Plan Road Safety Strategy 2009 Landscape Character Assessment 2004 Biodiversity Action Plan 2003-2012 (*Biodiversity Action Plan for 2012-2024 is emerging) Affordable Housing Supplementary Planning Document (2011) Sustainable Design and Construction Supplementary Planning Document (2010) and Companion Guide. Borough Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2012) Wokingham Town Centre Masterplan Supplementary Planning Document (2010) Strategic Development Location (SDL) Supplementary Planning Document (2011) Infrastructure and Contributions Supplementary Planning Document (2011) Public Rights of Way Improvement Plan (2010) Wokingham Parking Plan (2011) Older People’s Strategy – Young at heart (2008) Sport, Leisure and Recreation For All In Wokingham – A Strategy For Progress 2006-2016: Part 2 – Strategic Plan Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (2012) Planning Advice Note on Infrastructure Impact Mitigation Contributions for New Development (November 2010) Parking Standards Study Report (2011) Wokingham PPG17 Open Space, Sport and Recreation Audit Update Final Amended Open Space Assessment Report (2012) (KKP) Wokingham PPG17 Open Space, Sport and Recreation Study Standards Paper (2012)

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 66 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Neighbouring Local Authorities Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan 1996-2011 (Adopted 2006) Bracknell Forest Borough Council Core Strategy 2026 (Adopted 2008) Bracknell Forest Council Amen Corner Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Hart District (Replacement) Local Plan 1996-2006 (Adopted 2002) Reading Borough Council Core Strategy 2026 (Adopted 2008) Reading Borough Sites and Detailed Policies Document (Adopted 2012) Reading Centre Area Action Plan to 2026 (2009) Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Local Plan 1991-2006 (Adopted 2003) Maidenhead Town Centre Area Action Plan (Adopted 2011) South Oxfordshire District Council Local Plan 2011 (Adopted 2006) West Berkshire District Council Local Plan 1991-2006 (Adopted 2002) West Berkshire Core Strategy (Adopted 2012) Wycombe District Council Core Strategy 2026 (Adopted 2008) Buckinghamshire Minerals and Waste Core Strategy (Adopted 2012) Hampshire Minerals and Waste Core Strategy (Adopted 2007) Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Local Plan (1997)

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 67 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

MORE DETAILED REVIEW OF PPPs:

EUROPEAN

European Sustainable Development Strategy (May 2001) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response The environmental objectives and priorities of this strategy fall out of the EU Sixth Environmental Action Programme which was developed by the EU.

This strategy focuses on the need to:  Limit climate change and increase the use of clean energy In conformity with  Address threats to public health (e.g. hazardous The ESDS emphasises action to promote sustainable approved spatial chemicals, food safety) development must be taken by all and at all levels. objectives A, B, F, G, I,  Combat poverty and social exclusion J, & M.  Deal with the economic and social implications of an ageing society  Manage natural resources more responsibly (including biodiversity and waste generation)  Improve the transport system and land use management

European Sustainable Development Strategy (May 2006) (Reviewed 2009) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response

The strategy sets overall objectives and concrete actions for seven key priority challenges for the coming Plan policies to support period until 2010, many of which are predominantly The ESDS emphasises action to promote sustainable overall objectives and environmental: development must be taken by all and at all levels. requirements.

 Climate change and clean energy

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 68 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

 Sustainable transport

 Sustainable consumption & production

 Conservation and management of natural resources

 Public Health

 Social inclusion, demography and migration

 Global poverty and sustainable development challenges

European Spatial Development Perspective (May 1999) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response The ESDP emphasises the importance of achieving, equally in all regions of the EU, the three fundamental goals of European policy: The ESDP states that to achieve more spatially In conformity with  economic and social cohesion; balanced development, these goals must be pursued approved spatial  conservation and management of natural resources simultaneously in all regions of the EU and their objectives A, B, C, J, & and the cultural heritage; and interactions taken into account. M.  more balanced competitiveness of the European territory.

European Biodiversity Strategy (February 1998) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response The EBS is developed around four major themes: It needs to address the  Conservation and sustainable use of biological The EBS emphasises the important role of spatial role of spatial planning in diversity planning in the conservation and sustainable use of the conservation and  Sharing of benefits arising out of the utilisation of biodiversity. sustainable use of genetic resources biodiversity.  Research, identification, monitoring and exchange

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 69 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

of information  Education, training and awareness

European Biodiversity Strategy (2011- 2020) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response Includes six main targets:

 Full implementation of EU nature legislation to protect biodiversity

 Better protection for ecosystems, and more use of green infrastructure It needs to address the The EBS emphasises the important role of spatial role of spatial planning in  More sustainable agriculture and forestry planning in the conservation and sustainable use of the conservation and biodiversity. sustainable use of  Better management of fish stocks biodiversity.

 Tighter controls on invasive alien species

 A bigger EU contribution to averting global biodiversity loss

EC Council Directive on the Conservation of Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora 92/43/EEC Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response  Conserve fauna and flora and natural habitats of EU Plan policies to support importance. Identify relevant habitats and consider appropriate overall objectives and Establish a network of protected areas to maintain measures to protect these species and habitats in the  requirements. both the distribution and abundance of threatened appraisal.

species and habitats.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 70 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

EU Sixth Environmental Action Plan (2002) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response The 6EAP sets the environmental objectives and priorities that will be an integral part of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy. The programme sets out the major priorities and objectives for environmental policy over the next five to ten years and details the measures to be taken.

The 6EAP proposes five priority areas of strategic action to help achieve environmental objectives:

 Improve the implementation of existing legislation. Integrating environmental concerns into other The 6 EAP priorities should policies. The 6EAP sets the priorities for Sustainable be incorporated in the  Encouraging citizens and changing behaviour. Development and sets the priority areas for action. Spatial Objectives. Greening land use planning and management decisions.

The 6EAP focuses attention on four priority areas for action:

 Tackling climate change  Nature and biodiversity – protecting a unique resource  Environment and health  Sustainable use of natural resources and management of waste.

European Communities Directive on the Conservation of Wild Birds (79/09/EEC) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response The requirements of the Framework should be Plan policies to support The long term protection and conservation of all bird incorporated into the appraisal overall objectives and

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 71 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

species naturally living in the wild within the European requirements. territory of the Member States (except Greenland)

Kyoto Protocol Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response  Limit the emissions of 6 greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide and methane.  Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 5% of 1990 Plan policies to support levels by 2008-12 The causes of greenhouse gas emissions should be overall objectives and addresses and incorporated into the appraisal.  UK has an agreement to reduce emissions by requirements. 12.5% below 1990 levels by 2008/12 and a national goal to a 20% reduction in CO2 emissions below 1990 levels by 2010.

Waste Framework Directive 2011 Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response To set up a system for the coordinated management of waste within the European Community in order to limit Plan policies to support The requirements of the Framework should be waste production. Member States must promote the overall objectives and incorporated into the appraisal. prevention, recycling and conversion of wastes with a requirements. view to their reuse.

Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response Plan policies to support All inland coastal waters to reach good ecological The requirements of the Framework should be overall objectives and status by 2015. incorporated into the appraisal. requirements.

European SEA Directive 2001/42/EC (2001) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 72 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Ensure that environmental consequences of certain plans All Local Plans and SPDs and programmes are identified and assessed during their None identified. to be the subject SEA of preparation and before their adoption. where required.

European Directive on the Energy Performance of Buildings 2002/91/EC Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response

Promote the improvement in energy performance of buildings, taking into account conditions, requirements and cost-effectiveness. The timetable and method for Plan to promote energy SA Framework to include energy efficiency. achieving this is established through the Code for efficiency. Sustainable Homes and BREEAM. The baseline is set by Part L of the Building Regulations.

NATIONAL

The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (including Regulation 61 and 102) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response Usually known as the Habitats Regulations which transcribe into UK law the EC Council Directive on the Conservation of Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora 1. To provide a 92/43/EEC (see the Directives aims above). sustainable spatial policies Although the Borough does not have any European 2. To minimise the impact sites within its boundaries, it is within the consultation Must have regard to this legislation in the production of of spatial policies upon zone for the Thames Basin Heaths SPA. the LDF policies. other sectors, for example transport, Regulations 61 and 102 of the Habitats Regulations social and economic provide a stepwise procedure for assessing the effects factors. of plans or projects which must be completed before the Council can undertake or permit it through the granting of planning permission. The Council must

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 73 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

establish whether the proposed development is likely to have a significant effect on the SPA.

The Wildlife and Countryside Act (1991) as amended by the Countryside and Rights of Way Act (2000) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) is the principle mechanism for the legislative protection of wildlife in Great Britain. Amendments to the Act have occurred, the most recent being the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000. The Act has three key sections: Plan policies to support Must have regard to this legislation in the production of overall objectives and 1. Concerned with the protection of Wildlife the LDF policies. requirements. 2. Nature Conservation, Countryside and National Parks – The Act provides for the notification of SSSI’s 3. Public Rights of Way – The Act requires surveying authorities to maintain up to date definitive maps and statements.

National Biodiversity Action Plan (UKBAP) (UK Biodiversity Action Plan Steering Group 1994) 1992-2012 Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response The UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) was published in January 1994 in response to Article 6 of the Biodiversity Convention, to develop national strategies for the Policies to promote conservation of biological diversity and the sustainable biodiversity conservation The SA objectives should include an objective to use of biological resources. and enhancement in the conserve and enhance biodiversity and the baseline Borough, particularly in review should include indicators for biodiversity where relation to the built The UKBAP included contributions from Government, these are available. statutory conservation agencies, the academic world environment and urban and the voluntary sector. It committed the then green space. Government and its agencies to 59 programmes or tasks: to conserve species and habitats; to develop

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 74 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

public awareness and understanding; and to contribute to biodiversity work in the European and global context.

Biodiversity Strategy for England 2002-2010 Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response The UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UKBAP) is the UK The Core Strategy should response to the Convention on Biological Diversity The SA objectives should include an objective to include policies to promote (CBD) which was signed at the Earth Summit in Rio de minimise the impacts arising from pollution and use of renewable energy Janeiro. The plan describes the UK’s biological improve and prevent where possible (and reduce resources and promote research and details how these resources may be emissions of greenhouse gases). energy efficiency. protected.

Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for England’s wildlife and ecosystem services (August 2011), DEFRA Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response Protect water ecosystems, including habitats and Local plan and policies must be in accordance with the Plan policies to support species, through a river basin planning approach. NPPF. overall objectives and requirements. Promote approaches to flood and erosion management which conserve the natural environment and improve biodiversity.

The Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland (2007) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response This Air Quality Strategy sets out air quality objectives and policy options to further improve air quality in the These aims and objectives UK from today into the long term. As well as direct should be reflected in the benefits to public health, these options are intended to Potential impacts on air quality, noise and light overall objectives of the provide important benefits to quality of life and help to pollution and congestion. Development Plan. protect the environment. This updated strategy provides a clear, long-term vision for improving air quality in the UK and offers options for further consideration to

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 75 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

reduce the risk to health and the environment from air pollution.

The Strategy:  sets out a way forward for work and planning on air quality issues  sets out the air quality standards and objectives to be achieved  introduces a new policy framework for tackling fine particles  identifies potential new national policy measures which modelling indicates could give further health benefits and move closer towards meeting the Strategy’s objectives.

Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response Policies to promote Amended the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. The biodiversity conservation government has set a Public Service Agreement target and enhancement in the Consideration of this legislation in policy making will that 95% of Sites of Special Scientific Interest will be in Borough, particularly in help to achieve all of the SEA / SA objectives. favourable (or unfavourable recovering) condition by relation to the built 2010. environment and urban green space.

UK Government Sustainable Development Strategy, ‘ Securing the Future’ (2005) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response

 Social progress which recognises the needs of Consideration of the aims of sustainable development To provide a sustainable everyone; in policy making will help to achieve all of the SEA / SA spatial policies

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 76 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

 Effective protection of the environment; objectives. In particular the housing  Prudent use of natural resources; and allocation and development  Maintenance of high and stable levels of economic management strategies growth and employment. must ensure they include policies that are compatible with the requirements of the Habitats Regulations.

One Future – Different Paths – UK’s Shared Framework for Sustainable Development Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response To provide a sustainable A framework that promotes all areas of the UK working vision together on shared goals:  Shared understanding of sustainable development To provide a sustainable An overall influence to ensure sustainable  Common purpose outlining what we are trying to spatial policies development. Consideration of the aims of sustainable achieve and the guiding principles we all need to development in policy making will help to achieve all of follow to achieve it To minimise the impact of the SA/ SEA objectives.  Sustainable development priorities for UK action, at spatial policies upon other home and internationally sectors, for example  Indicators to monitor key issues on a UK basis transport, social and economic factors.

Climate Change – the UK Programme Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response Policies to promote the use To ensure that the UK is secure in its delivery of its of renewable energy The SA Objectives should include an objective to international target to reduce emissions of greenhouse resources and energy reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. gases to 12.5% below 1990 levels over 2008-2012. efficiency should be included.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 77 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

UK making space for Water (2005) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response These aims and objectives should be reflected in the To manage flood and erosion risk through an integrated The SA objectives should include and objective on the overall objectives of the portfolio of responses including land use planning. risk of flooding. Development Plan.

Housing a Low Carbon Society – An ODPM leadership agenda on climate change Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response Five major commitments are proposed as the backbone of this leadership agenda:

1. Join the joint DEFRA-DfT-DTI Public service Agreement on climate change Policies to promote a low 2. Set a whole house carbon reduction target for all Consideration of the aims of low carbon society carbon society, the use of housing stock at least 30 per cent by 2020, and (including the housing and communities in which renewable energy at least 60 per cent by 2050. people live) in policy making will help to achieve all of resources and energy 3. Produce and publish the new climate change the SEA / SA objectives. efficiency should be PPS by the end of 2006, and launch it through a included. high profile, cross-departmental statement by ministers. 4. Introduce a leadership duty for local government on climate change.

The Historic Environment: a Force for Our Future (DCMS/ DTLR, 2001) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators  Provide leadership by responding to public interest The SA (inc. SEA) should look at ways in which the The historic environment in the historic environment historic environment can add social, economic and should be considered  Realise the educational potential of the historic environmental value to people and communities. when allocating sites.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 78 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

The Historic Environment: a Force for Our Future (DCMS/ DTLR, 2001) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators environment as a learning resource  Include and involve people by making the historic environment accessible to everyone  Protect and sustain the historic environment for the benefit of our own and future generations  Optimise the economic potential of the historic environment by ensuring that its role as an economic asset is skilfully harnessed.

The National Framework for Sport in England 2004 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators This Framework sets out a vision for sport in England – The SA (inc. SEA) should look to include an objective to This report should be to be the most active and the most successful sporting improve the health and well-being of the population and considered when nation in the world. It is a vision shared by all of sport. to improve the accessibility to amenities and facilities undertaking work for the The baseline review should include appropriate Development Plan. The aim of the strategy is to change the culture of sport indicators where possible. and physical activity in England in order to increase participation across all social groups. This will lead to improvements in health and other social and economic benefits and provide the basis for progression into higher levels of performance. Six priority areas for change are identified including promotion and marketing, legislation and regulatory change, innovation and delivery and strategic planning and evidence.

Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 79 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators English Nature’s (now Natural England) Urban These strategic objectives and options should be This report should be Greenspace standards provide a set of benchmarks for reflected in SA/ SEA work. considered when ensuring access to places of wildlife interest. These undertaking work for the standards recommend that people living in towns and Development Plan. cities should have:

 An accessible natural greenspace less than 300 metres (5 minute walk) from home  Statutory Local Nature Reserves at a minimum level of one hectare per thousand population  At least one accessible 20 hectare site within 2km of home; one accessible from 100 hectare site within 5km of home; and one accessible 500 hectare site with 10km of home.

Safer Places – The Planning System and Crime Prevention (ODPM 2004) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Lists seven attributes of sustainable communities, Consideration of this in policy making will help to This report should be which relate to crime prevention: achieve all of the SEA / SA objectives. considered when undertaking work for the 1. Access and movement Development Plan. 2. Structure 3. Surveillance 4. Ownership 5. Physical protection 6. Activity 7. Management and maintenance

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 80 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Code for Sustainable Homes (2008) and Technical Guidance (2010) r Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response  Introduces a mandatory rating for new dwellings, offering a Consideration of this code during policy making Policies to encourage the tool for homebuilders to demonstrate their sustainability will help to achieve all of the SEA / SA construction of high rating performance. objectives. homes that include the 9  Code measures the sustainability of a new home against 9 design categories will be design categories: Energy and CO2 emissions; Water; included in the Minerals; Surface water run-off; Waste; Pollution; Health Development including and well-being; Management; Ecology. subsequent SPDs.  Performance is measured by a 1 to 6 star rating, with a home classified as rating 6 will have achieved the highest level of sustainability  The technical guidance sets out the requirements for the Code for sustainable homes. It sets out the process by which a Code assessment is reached.

BREEAM (such as New Construction (2011) and Refurbishment (2012)) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response

BREEAM sets the standard for best practice in Consideration of BREEAM standards during policy Policies to encourage the sustainable building design, construction and making will help to achieve all of the SEA / SA construction of operation and has become one of the most objectives. development to BREEAM comprehensive and widely recognised measures of a standards. building's environmental performance.

Housing Green Paper (2007) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response  Build homes that are to a high standard, in terms of Emphasis on building sustainable dwellings and This report should be design and environmental impact and homes that communities that will cater for future environmental and considered when are part of mixed communities with good local social needs. Consideration of this will mean that policy undertaking work for the facilities. making will help to achieve all of the SEA / SA Development Plan.  Seeks to create ‘greener’ homes, whereby there will objectives.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 81 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Housing Green Paper (2007) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response be a reduction in carbon emissions created by dwellings, with the aspiration to create ‘zero carbon’ homes from 2016.

Planning and Energy Act (2008) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response The Planning and Energy Act 2008 enables local Targets for energy efficiency and renewable energy to Plan policies to support planning authorities in England and Wales to set be included in SEA / SA objectives in some form. overall objectives and requirements for energy use and energy efficiency in requirements. local plans. The SA objectives should include an objective to increase energy efficiency and the proportion of energy The Act should be This will give local authorities the power to include, generated from renewable sources in the Borough, considered when policies that impose reasonable requirements for: undertaking work for the Development Plan.  a proportion of energy used in development in their area to be energy from renewable sources in the locality of the development;

 a proportion of energy used in development in their area to be low carbon energy from sources in the locality of the development; and

 development in their area to comply with energy efficiency standards that exceed the energy requirements of building regulations

The Act encompassed the “Merton Rule” in Law which is a planning policy which requires commercial developments over a certain size to source at least 10% of their energy from on-site sources of renewable energy ranging from wind turbines and solar panels to heat pumps or biomass systems

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 82 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Climate Change Act (2008) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response The SA objectives should include an objective to Plan policies to support minimise the impacts arising from pollution and improve overall objectives and Sets a legally binding target of at least an 80 percent and prevent where possible (and reduce emissions of requirements. cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 and a greenhouse gases) and addressing the consequences reduction in emissions of at least 34 percent by 2020. of climate change. Both these targets are against a 1990 baseline. Aviation and shipping emissions are included and the Act confers powers to introduce domestic emissions trading schemes more quickly and easily through secondary legislation; measures on biofuels; powers to introduce pilot financial incentive schemes in England for household waste; powers to require a minimum charge for single-use carrier bags. The Government will report at least every five years on the risks to the UK of climate change, and can require public bodies and statutory undertakers to carry out their own risk assessment and make plans to address those risks.

Flood Direction 2007 Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response This Circular sets out the requirements of the Town and A SFRA should form part of the SA of the LDDs or be Plan policies to support Country Planning (Flooding) (England) Direction 2007, used to inform it (in liaison with the Environment overall objectives and which is made under the Town and Country Agency). requirements. Planning (General Development Procedure) Order

1995 (SI 1995/419). This Direction, which comes into force on 1 January 2007, is annexed to the Circular. It Targets for planning permissions granted contrary to requires local planning authorities to notify the advice from the Environment Agency, SUDS and Secretary of State of any application for major properties at risk from flooding. development in a flood risk area, where it is minded to grant permission against advice on flood risk grounds

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 83 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Flood Direction 2007 Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response from the Environment Agency.

The Flood Risk Regulations (2009) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response Implements the EU Flood Risk Directive. Sets out Local plan and policies must be in accordance with the Plan policies to support responsibilities for County Councils and Unitary requirements. overall objectives and authorities requirements. in relation to flood risk including:

 Preparation of a Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment Ensure that plan policies Report including the identification of flood risk areas assist in directing  Preparation of Flood Hazard Maps and Flood Risk development to locations Maps at least risk of flooding and  Preparation of Flood Risk Management Plans help to reduce overall flood  By 2015 to have in place a Flood Risk Management risk. Strategy

Flood and Water Management Act (2010) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response Lead local flood authorities (Wokingham Borough Local plan and policies must be in accordance with the Plan policies to support Council) and take a lead role in managing flood risk fro requirements. overall objectives and surface water, groundwater and ordinary watercourses. requirements.

By 2015 they must:  Apply and monitor a Local Flood Risk Ensure that plan policies Management Strategy assist in directing development to locations  Maintain a register of local structures and at least risk of flooding and features likely to have a significant effect on help to reduce overall flood flood risk risk.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 84 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Flood and Water Management Act (2010) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response

 Act as Sustainable Drainage Approving Body

National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (2012) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response New simplified national planning policy framework Local plan and policies must be in accordance with the Plan policies to support (NPPF) to replace previous planning policy guidance NPPF. overall objectives and and statements. It aims to support economic growth but requirements. also to promote strong communities and the need to protect and enhance the environment, particularly the Green Belt. Core principles include:

 Support a genuinely plan-led system and plan positively for growth  Presumption in favour of sustainable development  Secure high quality design standards  Take account of the roles and character of different areas  Support transition to a low carbon future  Contribute to conserving and enhancing the natural environment and reducing pollution  Prioritising the use of previously developed land  Promote mixed use development  Conserve heritage assets  Manage patterns of growth to make full use of public transport, walking and cycling  Take account of and support local strategies to improve health, social and cultural wellbeing and deliver facilities and services to meet local needs

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 85 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Technical Guidance to the NPPF (2012) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response This document provides additional guidance to local planning authorities to ensure the effective implementation of the planning policy set out in the National Planning Policy Framework on development in Plan policies to support areas at risk of flooding and in relation to mineral overall objectives and extraction. requirements. Local Plan and policies must be in accordance with the The guidance retains key elements of Planning Policy technical guidance. Statement 25 and of the existing minerals policy statements and minerals planning guidance notes which are considered necessary and helpful in relation to these policy areas. The retention of this guidance is an interim measure pending a wider review of guidance to support planning policy

Planning Policy for traveller sites guidance (2012) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response

This document sets out the Government’s planning policy for traveller1 sites. It should be read in conjunction with the National Planning Policy Framework.

The Government’s overarching aim is to ensure fair and Local Plan and policies must be in accordance with the Plan policies to support equal treatment for travellers, in a way that facilitates guidance. overall objectives and the traditional and nomadic way of life of travellers while requirements. respecting the interests of the settled community.

To help achieve this, Government’s aims in respect of traveller sites are identified in paragraph 4 of the guidance document.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 86 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Former Planning Policy Guidance 24: Planning and Noise (1994) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response Provide advice on how the planning system can be The PPG proposed mitigation measures that might be Plan policies to support used to minimise the adverse impact of noise without used in the SA (incorporating SEA): overall objectives and placing unreasonable restrictions on development or requirements. adding unduly to the costs and administrative burdens  Engineering: reduction of noise at point of of business. generation and protection of surrounding noise- sensitive;  Lay-out: adequate distance between source and noise-sensitive building or area; screening by natural barriers, other buildings, or non-critical rooms in a building;  Administrative: limiting operating time of source; restricting activities allowed on the site; specifying an acceptable noise limit.

Planning Policy Statement 10: Planning for Sustainable Waste Management Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response Promote sustainable waste management. Through  Could result in a more sustainable waste management, moving the strategic policy (in the management of waste up the ‘waste hierarchy’ of  Assess the overall approach to future sustainable Minerals and Waste reduction, reuse, recycling and composting, using waste provision. Local Plan) to promote waste as a source of energy, and only disposing as a  Ensure that the SEA/ SA objectives are used to re-use and recycling of last resort the Government aims to break the link influence strategy and policy creation to promote waste. between economic growth and the environmental waste minimisation, re-use and recycling of waste.  In conformity with impact of waste. Approved Spatial Objectives B, J, & M.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 87 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Planning Policy Statement 11: Regional Spatial Strategies To Be revoked Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Government guidance on the creation of regional spatial strategies. A procedural document without policy implications as such, it is included here for completeness only.

Building Act (1984) Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response The Building Act 1984 is the primary legislation under  None identified. which the Building Regulations and other secondary legislation are made.

The many powers of the Building Act 1984 include those for:  Setting the status of Approved Documents  Dangerous structures  None identified.  Demolition of buildings  The role of Approved Inspectors  Enforcement of Building Regulations  Powers of entry to premises

Planning Acts (various) and associated Regulations Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response To include the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended), Planning Act 2008 and Localism Act 2011. Plans must be prepared in Plans must be prepared in accordance with this legal Combined they provide the legal framework for the accordance with this legal framework. preparation of development plans including framework. requirements for consultation, sustainability appraisal and examination.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 88 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Regulations 2010 (as amended 2011) provide the legal framework for the setting of a local levy on development to support the provision of infrastructure.

The Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations (2012) set out how neighbourhood development plans have to be prepared. Neighbourhood Development Plans must be in general conformity with strategic policies in the development plan for the local area (i.e. such as in a core strategy).

Other regulations includes those such as The Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2012 and The Town and County Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2007.

Circular 04/00 Planning for Hazardous Substances Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response This circular provides guidance on the operation of the consent procedure for hazardous substances which implement the land use planning requirements of  None identified.  None identified Directive 96/82/EC, known as the Seveso Directive, on the control of major-accident hazards.

The Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response The SEA Directive (2001/42/EC) is transposed into  All Local Plans and English law by the Environmental Assessment of Plans SPDs to be the subject  None identified. and Programmes Regulations 2004 SEA of where required.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 89 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

The Water Industry Act 1991 Key aims, relevant objectives or targets/indicators Implications for SA Plan response The Water Industry Act (1991) as principally amended by the Water Industry Act (1999) and the Water Act (2003).

This deals with such matters as:  Consider any  the appointment and economic regulation of implications on plan water and sewerage companies, and licensed and policies. water suppliers, by the Water Services Regulation Authority (Ofwat);  None identified.

 water supply and sewage disposal powers, and duties of the companies and suppliers;

 drinking water quality obligations of water companies and licensed water suppliers, and the enforcement of those obligations by Defra and the Drinking Water Inspectorate;

Waste Management in Buildings – Code of Practice (BS 5906:2005)

Code of practice for methods of storage, collection, Policies to encourage the segregation for recycling and recovery, and on-site particular methods of treatment of waste from residential and non-residential storage, collection,  Consideration of this code during policy making will buildings and healthcare establishments. It is applicable segregation and treatment help to achieve SEA / SA objectives to new buildings, including but not limited to retail and of waste will be included in offices. the plan documents and subsequent SPDs.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 90 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Waste Management in Buildings – Code of Practice (BS 5906:2005)

Code of practice for methods of storage, collection, Policies to encourage the segregation for recycling and recovery, and on-site particular methods of treatment of waste from residential and non-residential storage, collection,  Consideration of this code during policy making will buildings and healthcare establishments. It is applicable segregation and treatment help to achieve SEA / SA objectives to new buildings, including but not limited to retail and of waste will be included in offices. the plan documents and subsequent SPDs.

Homes and Community Agency Standards [Interim London Housing Design Guide] (2010)

The LHDG incorporates proposed London Plan policy, the Lifetime Homes standards (2010 edition), and the key components of Building for Life, Secured by Design and the Code for Sustainable Homes, and it also draws on other good practice guidance.

The guide is based around 6 key themes:

1. Shaping good design  Consideration of this Guide in policy making will  In conformity with 2. Housing for a diverse city help to achieve all of the SEA / SA objectives. spatial objectives. 3. From street to front door 4. Dwelling space standards (minimum space standards and guidance on the size and layout of different rooms) 5. Home as a place of retreat 6. Climate change mitigation and adaptation.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 91 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Lifetime Homes (2010)

The Lifetime Homes Standard seeks to enable ‘general needs’ housing to provide, either from the outset or through simple and cost-effective adaptation, design solutions that meet the existing and changing needs of diverse households. This offers the occupants more  Consideration of Lifetime Homes in policy making  In conformity with choice over where they live and which visitors they can will help to achieve all of the SEA / SA objectives. spatial objectives. accommodate for any given time scale. It is therefore an expression of Inclusive Design. There are 16 Design Standards.

CIRIA Guidance on flood risk management, surface water drainage and sustainable water management (various)

Guidance on flood risk management and development, property level flood resilience and protection as well as guidance on sustainable drainage and drainage exceedance. CIRIA has produced the SuDS Manual In conformity with spatial which provides best practice guidance on the planning,  Consideration of guidance in policy making will help objectives. design, construction, operation and maintenance of to achieve all of the SEA / SA objectives. SuDS. It also includes guidance on the SuDS Management Train.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 92 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

REGIONAL

South East Regional Spatial Strategy – The South East Plan (May 2009-2026) – To be revoked Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The South East Plan sets out a vision for the future of The Plan helps to achieve more sustainable The Development Plan the South East region to 2026, outlining how we need development, protect the environment and combat Documents will be in to respond to challenges facing the region such as climate change and this must be reflected in the SA general conformity with housing, the economy, transport and protecting the the South East Plan environment. policies and housing Level of housing and economic growth will be the key allocation for Wokingham The Plan is a key tool to help achieve more sustainable issue for SA (inc.SEA) Borough. development, protect the environment and combat climate change. It provides a spatial context within which Local Development Frameworks and Local Transport Plans need to be prepared, as well as other regional and sub-regional strategies and programmes that have a bearing on land use activities. These include the regional economic and housing strategies as well as strategies and programmes that address air quality, biodiversity, climate change, education, energy, community safety, environment, health and sustainable development.

Regional Transport Strategy (Alterations to RPG9) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Regional Transport Strategy is one of a set of RTS performance to be monitored by: The Development Plan selective reviews of RPG9 (which will be developed into Documents will be in  Mode of travel to work the RSS). In addition to general transport policies, the general conformity with RTS includes policies that could have important  Mode of travel to school regional guidance and its impacts in Wokingham Borough.  Kilometres travelled per person per year (by mode) replacement South East Plan

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 93 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Regional Transport Strategy (Alterations to RPG9) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators  Number of people / children killed or seriously injured (five year average)  Freight mode share per tonne  Growth rate of road traffic volume  Improvement in rural transport These could be used for SA (inc. SEA) monitoring

Sustainable Communities in the South East – Government Office for the South East / Office for the Deputy Prime Minister 2003 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators This is the regional version of the Deputy Prime A general influence for the SA  Reflected in overall Minister’s programme of action to tackle the pressing Sustainable problems facing communities in England, in particular Development definition housing. The document identifies the key issues for The right of everyone to have a decent home is which underpins the communities in the South East as housing supply, reflected in target 1 of the SA objectives and the issues Approved Spatial affordability of housing and transport. Key actions to be raised by the document will inform the appraisal. Objectives pursued in the region include: reverse the trend of  In conformity with all falling housing completions; accelerate the level of new Approved Spatial completions in growth areas; and develop the South Objectives East Regional Housing Strategy.

Regional Housing Strategy: 2008 – 2011 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Overall objective is for everyone in the south east to The objective that ‘Everyone has the right to a decent  Could result in a have access to a decent home at a price they can home’ is reflected in target 1 of the SEA / SA objectives sequential afford. and the importance of housing provision, particularly development policy affordable housing, should inform the appraisal.  Could result in a

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 94 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Regional Housing Strategy: 2008 – 2011 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Regional Housing Strategy for 2008-11 will help: The strategy suggests a number of key housing Borough-wide strategic indicators which can inform the baseline and monitoring policy provision for scheme: housing need and  Make sure 35% of all new homes are affordable, delivery either for rent or for part-rent/part-buy  Progress against decent homes standards  In conformity with  Make sure new affordable homes come in a range  Number of new homes completed Approved Spatial of sizes, to suit families as well as couples and  Number of affordable and key worker housing Objectives F, K & M. singles  Continued funding for local authority housing stock to meet the decent home standard The document outlines new build densities and energy  Make sure that new affordable homes meet high efficiency targets which should be reflected in the SA. standards of building and energy efficiency.

Regional Economic Strategy: 2006 – 2016 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The RES sets out a 10-year framework for delivering  The Strategy objectives should be reflected in SEA /  To provide an overall the region’s economic aspirations. The vision for the SA objectives. strategic policy to South East is to be a world class region achieving Look to balancing the South East targets with economic promote economic sustainable prosperity. This third Regional Economic growth objectives for Wokingham Borough growth Strategy (RES) for the South East responds to a new  To provide a policy to global context; sets targets to ensure that success is promote economic more widely accessible; and identifies the importance of smart growth quality of life as a competitive advantage.  To provide a sustainable vision The Regional Economic Strategy adopts three  To provide sustainable objectives, spatial policies  Global competitiveness  Smart growth

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 95 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

 Sustainable prosperity

Integrated Regional Framework – South East England Regional Assembly and partners Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Integrated Regional Framework provides the Its 25 Objectives and indicators should be considered  An iterative, overarching high-level policy framework for the region. for applicability in Wokingham Borough context. The SA fundamental part of It is an evolution of the existing Regional Sustainable will adapt these 25 objectives and use them as its the process of a Development Framework, building particularly on its sustainable objectives Core Strategy existing objectives and indicators. It includes separate  Sustainability sections on the range of strategies in the region and on objectives to be data and trends for each objective. Importantly, the IRF derived from sets out a universal approach to SA (detailed SA Integrated Regional guidance will be issued at a later date). Framework objectives

Harnessing the Elements – Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Strategy (Proposed Alterations to Regional Planning Guidance) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The strategy sets out a vision for the South East that The issue of energy efficiency and renewable energy is  Reflected in overall includes a target that, “by 2026, at least 16% of the reflected in target 18 of the SEA / SA objectives, targets Sustainable region’s electricity generation will be provided from and indicators. Development definition renewable resources. This will be achieved through which underpins the well-designed development that reflects the tenets of Approved Spatial sustainable development…” Objectives  Could result in an umbrella policy that promotes better use of resources whilst protecting against negative externalities

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 96 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Destination South East – Tourism and Related Sport and Recreation Strategy (Proposed Alterations to Regional Planning Guidance) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The strategy was published in May 2003 (as a The performance of the Strategy will be monitored Not relevant, for consultation draft) and sets out seven policies, with the using the following set of headline indicators (of value consideration in more overall objective of promoting a more sustainable to the SEA / SA monitoring framework): detailed policy in a pattern of tourism development through integrated composite Development  Volume and value of tourism activity (by Borough); tourism planning and management. Plan Document  Location of new regionally significant visitor attractions;  Location and number of new regionally significant sporting facilities/venues;  Mode of travel to regionally significant visitor attractions and events;  Proportion of new hotel bedspaces developed within town centres;  Number of integrated, countryside management initiatives implemented.

No Time to Waste – Regional Waste Management Strategy (Proposed Alterations to RPG9) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The strategy was published in March 2004 and its The importance of minimising waste is reflected in  Could result in an vision is for a region in which natural resources are target 15 of the SEA / SA objectives and should be a umbrella policy that used and managed efficiently so that by 2025: key issue for consideration throughout the appraisal. promotes better use of resources whilst  the amount of waste produced will be minimised; protecting against  the overwhelming majority of materials will be re- negative externalities used, recycled or have value recovered from them;  In conformity with  the environment will be protected and enhanced for Approved Spatial future generations. Objective B.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 97 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Social Inclusion Statement – SEERA Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Social Inclusion Statement was launched on 26 Several of the SEA / SA objectives will address social  For example, could June 2002 and sets out the region’s commitment to issues (e.g. health, education) however combating result in a policy for tackling social exclusion and maps the contribution social exclusion will not be a direct key theme for the affordable housing each regional partner is able to make. A Social appraisal in the Wokingham Borough context. Spatial  In conformity with Inclusion Task Group consisting of seven regional policies will largely indirectly support social initiatives to Approved Spatial partners and other bodies including the local Learning lessen crime and improve health and directly influence Objectives A, E, F, G, and Skills Councils will implement the Statement and its through land use such matters as affordable housing & M. action plan. provision.

Seeing the Woods for the Trees – Regional Forestry and Woodlands Framework Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The framework describes a series of 10 outcomes The conservation and enhancement of biodiversity is  Could result in a where woodlands and forestry can make a real reflected in target 12 of the SEA / SA objectives and Borough-wide contribution to sustainable development in the region. indicators could relate to the extent of woodland cover. umbrella policy for conservation  Could result in an umbrella policy that promotes better use of resources whilst protecting against negative externalities  In conformity with Approved Spatial Objectives H & J.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 98 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Action for Biodiversity in South East England – South East England Biodiversity Forum Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators It provides a framework that: The conservation and enhancement of biodiversity is  Reflected in overall Sustainable  Sets the objectives and targets which are needed as reflected in target 12 of the SEA / SA objectives and a first step to achieving sustainable biodiversity, indicators could relate to the number and condition of Development definition including the region’s share of national targets designated sites and also to habitats in the wider which underpins the endorsed under the UK Biodiversity Action Plan countryside. Approved Spatial Objectives  Seeks to engage and develop joint working with  Could result in a regional organisations, planners and decision- Borough-wide makers to enable them to play a full part in achieving umbrella policy for these targets by integrating biodiversity into their conservation policies, plans and actions  In conformity with  Provides a regional context for local biodiversity Approved Spatial conservation planning Objectives H & J. Provides full details of the biodiversity indicators, targets and opportunities for delivery as summarised in the Regional Sustainable Development Framework (now the Integrated Regional Framework).

South East Green Infrastructure Framework (2009) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Seeks to establish green infrastructure as an integral and essential component of sustainable communities, develop a common understanding of the role and importance of green infrastructure, and provides Consideration of guidance in policy making will help to  In conformity with detailed guidance on how green infrastructure can be achieve all of the SEA / SA objectives. spatial objectives. delivered through the planning system and local partnerships, including securing funding for its creation and long term maintenance

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 99 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

SUB-REGIONAL

Blackwater Valley Sub-Regional Study Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The study was commissioned by the Blackwater Valley These strategic objectives and options should be This report should be Network in response to the revised Regional Planning reflected in SA (inc. SEA) work. considered when Guidance (RPG) 9 for the South East. The Blackwater undertaking work for the Valley Network is a formal partnership between the nine Development Plan. local authorities having an interest in the Blackwater Valley.

The objectives of the study are:  To provide a basis for the local authorities within the Blackwater Valley to consider conceptual options for sustainable economic growth within the Blackwater Valley, and their spatial implications.  To inform and influence the review of RPG9 at a regional level.  To inform and influence the development plan process and other documents at sub-regional level.

A number of spatial options for sustainable development of the Blackwater Valley have been identified:  Concentrating development around key centres, chiefly Aldershot ad Farnborough and, to a lesser extent, Fleet, Camberley and Farnham  Spreading development within existing urban areas including the above and local centres  Rural housing, which may offer limited opportunities for growth in villages  Urban extensions will need careful evaluation given the importance of strategic gaps and the need to

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 100 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Blackwater Valley Sub-Regional Study Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators safeguard areas affected by restrictive planning and environmental designations.  New settlements, for which redevelopments of Ministry of Defence (MOD) sites may offer opportunities.

Highways Agency Route Management Strategy for the M4 - Junction 1 to15 (London to Wiltshire) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The study will provide a 10 year framework for Transport will be a key issue for the SEA / SA; in Plan policies to support managing the M4 between Junction 1 in Chiswick and particular: overall objectives and Junction 15 near Swindon which will interlock with local requirements. Reducing congestion and shortening journey times transport strategies. Increasing safety and accessibility The strategies aim is to contribute to sustainable development by maintaining, operating and improving Supporting economic development the trunk road network in support of the government's integrated transport and land use planning policies.

The Route Management Strategy (RMS) embraces the five key policy objectives for transport:  To protect and enhance the built and natural environment

 To improve safety for all travellers

 To contribute to an efficient economy to support sustainable economic growth in appropriate

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 101 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Highways Agency Route Management Strategy for the M4 - Junction 1 to15 (London to Wiltshire) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators locations

 To promote accessibility to everyday facilities for all, especially those without access to a car

 To promote the integration of all forms of transport and land use planning, leading to a better, more efficient transport system

The project is not concerned with the construction of new roads; instead it aims, with the help of the public, to make the best possible use of the current road.

Thames Valley Multi Modal Transport Study Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The study area covered parts of Berkshire, Transport will be a key issue for the SEA / SA; in Plan policies to support Buckinghamshire, Hampshire and Surrey. It looked at a particular: overall objectives and requirements. corridor between London and Reading including the Reducing congestion and shortening journey times

M4, M3 and other routes between High Wycombe and Increasing safety and accessibility Basingstoke on the north-south axis. Supporting economic development Aim of the study  To identify transport and land use problems and opportunities and develop an integrated transport strategy to address these issues.

 To identify the scope for reducing congestion by better management and modal shift between the urban centres of the Thames Valley, as well as

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 102 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Thames Valley Multi Modal Transport Study Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators options for improving access to Heathrow.

The strategy includes three main elements: demand management, improved design and information

Thames Basin Heaths Areas Delivery Framework 2009 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The plan should set out Provides strategic assessment and guidance with SA should consider the impact of development on the policies and proposals in respect to the impact of delivering housing allocations SPA. accordance with the on the Thames Basin Heath proposed Special Framework and policies to Protection Area (SPA) and sets out standards for ensure development is in mitigation. accordance with the Habitats Directive.

Thames Valley Economic Development Strategy Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The report contains a vision for the Thames Valley: These strategic objectives should be reflected in SA This report should be (inc. SEA) work. considered when ‘The Thames Valley should become the knowledge undertaking work for the capital of Europe. More specifically, over the next ten Development Plan. years, the Thames Valley will develop its knowledge base to advance its position as one of the most prosperous, skilful and create sub-regional economies in Europe. This will be achieved through sustained and sustainable investment and through the innovative use

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 103 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Thames Valley Economic Development Strategy Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators of resources.’

The Strategy also contains the following strategic objectives:

 Sustain economic development by adding value to business activities  Strengthen the links between research, education and business.  Secure specific improvements in the infrastructure  Ensure that the economic development sustains and wherever possible enhances – the quality of the natural and built environment.

The River Loddon Catchment Abstraction Management Strategy (CAMS) 2004 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The vision for the River Loddon CAMS is to ensure a These strategic objectives and options should be This report should be fair share of water for abstractors, river users and reflected in SA (inc. SEA) work. considered when environment. This will be achieved by: undertaking work for the Development Plan.  Ensuring that abstraction licenses allow realistic volumes to be abstracted.  Investigating the impact of abstraction on the River Whitewater  Investigating the water requirements of the River Backwater’s ecology  Having regard for flows in the Chalk streams of the upper River Loddon, River Lyde and River Whitewater

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 104 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

The River Loddon Catchment Abstraction Management Strategy (CAMS) 2004 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators  Considering the needs of the River Thames when licensing in the Loddon catchment

Biodiversity Strategy for the Loddon Catchment (2003) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Loddon Strategy aims to protect and enhance the biodiversity of the Loddon catchment and implement the relevant actions in the UK, Regional and Local Biodiversity Action Plans.

Key objectives of the Loddon Strategy include: Consideration of Strategy in policy making will help to In conformity with spatial  Ensuring that key areas for biodiversity are achieve all of the SEA / SA objectives. objectives. adequately protected  Creating stronger linkages between and around habitats to reduce fragmentation Influencing land use and planning to achieve sustainable development

Blackwater Valley Countryside Strategy 2011-15 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The vision for the Valley remains unchanged from the Blackwater Valley Countryside Strategy 2006-2010. Consideration of Strategy in policy making will help to In conformity with spatial This vision is of: achieve all of the SEA / SA objectives. objectives.

‘A continuous green space along the Blackwater Valley;

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 105 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Blackwater Valley Countryside Strategy 2011-15 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators attractive to wildlife and the community.’

The specific aims of this Strategy are:- i. To enhance the Valley’s landscape to create a continuous area of naturalistic countryside and maintain the important open gap between urban areas. ii. To realise the full potential of the Blackwater Valley as an outdoor recreation resource, with an emphasis on providing Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace as an alternative recreational venue to the heathlands of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area. iii. To improve the Valley for wildlife by enhancing existing habitats, expanding the areas of ecological value by the creation of new habitats, and developing links between habitats. iv. To improve riparian habitat and the water quality of the River Blackwater and maximise the flood protection role of the river and its floodplain.

Thames Waterway Plan (2006-2011) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Thames waterway plan has been prepared by the Consideration of Plan in policy making will help to In conformity with spatial Environment Agency on behalf of the River Thames achieve all of the SEA / SA objectives. objectives. Alliance. The core objectives are:

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 106 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Thames Waterway Plan (2006-2011) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators

 improve and promote access and information for all users (on water and land)  improve and maintain the river infrastructure, facilities and services for all users  contribute to enhanced biodiversity, heritage, and landscape value in the waterway corridor  increase use of the river and its corridor

Thames River Basin River Management Plan (2009) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators This plan is about the pressures facing the water environment in the Thames river basin district and the actions that will address them. It has been prepared under the Water Framework Directive.

By 2015, 22 per cent of surface waters (rivers, lakes estuaries and coastal waters) are going to improve for at least one biological, chemical or physical element, Consideration of Plan in policy making will help to In conformity with spatial measured as part of an assessment of good status achieve all of the SEA / SA objectives. objectives. according to the Water Framework Directive.

25 per cent of surface waters will be at good or better ecological status and 17 per cent of groundwater bodies will be at good overall status by 2015. In combination, 25 per cent of all water bodies will be at good or better status by 2015.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 107 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Thames River Basin River Management Plan (2009) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators At least 30 per cent of assessed surface waters will be at good or better biological quality by 2015

Blackwater Valley Watercycle Study: Scoping Report (2011) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Water Cycle Study (WCS) Scoping Report for the Blackwater Valley Local Authorities, which include Hart District Council, Surrey Heath Borough Council, Rushmoor Borough Council, Bracknell Forest Borough Council, Wokingham Borough Council and Guildford Borough Council.

This Scoping Report was undertaken to:

 Gather the relevant planning information from each Local Planning Authority (LPA) to help define the study area based on likely discharge points and abstraction sources Consideration of Study in policy making will help to In conformity with spatial achieve all of the SEA / SA objectives. objectives.  Undertake a review of the existing work and studies undertaken to date, as well as existing plans to define key issues  Confirm the development scenarios and planning data with all stakeholders  Define the programme for the Outline Study as noted in the Environment Agency’s WCS Guidance and identify the data sources  Identify the objectives of the WCS and which plans and strategies it will be used to inform and draw from

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 108 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Blackwater Valley Watercycle Study: Scoping Report (2011) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators  Identify if further work is needed to inform strategic planning decisions and agree a project scope and project plan for further work if needed  Write the technical specification for the brief for the Outline Study.

Thames Catchment Flood Management Plan (2009) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators CFMPs help to understand the scale and extent of flooding now and in the future, and set policies for managing flood risk within the Thames catchment. It is used to inform planning and decision making by key stakeholders. Consideration of Plan in policy making will help to In conformity with spatial achieve all of the SEA / SA objectives. objectives. CFMPs aim to promote more sustainable approaches to managing flood risk. The CFMP includes policies that will be delivered through a combination of different approaches.

Thames Valley Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The strategic priorities for the LEP are base around keeping innovative and best in class and include This report should be the following: Consideration of priorities in policy making will help to considered when

achieve all of the SEA / SA objectives. undertaking work for the  Ensuring we have transport infrastructure fit Development Plan. for 21st century. The LEP has focused particularly on rail infrastructure to ensure an

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 109 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Thames Valley Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators efficient alternative to road usage. The LEP have already benefited from Government backing for our Western Rail Access to Heathrow project, lobbied for electrification of the Mainline Railway, and will see the construction of Crossrail. The LEP will be responding to the Government’s Airport strategy consultation;

 Driving better information technology infrastructure through the Superfast Broadband initiative to bring particularly rural areas up to the same level of connectivity that most of us enjoy and then pushing for ultrafast broadband and better mobile networks across Thames Valley Berkshire.

 Building a world class workforce and making sure the next generation of residents are equipped for the future world of work. The LEP has focused on employability soft skills and apprenticeships and will be promoting Digital Learning Centres to upgrade everyone’s skills in new technologies

 For SMEs the LEP is working on access to finance, finding the gaps in provision working with banks and trying to improve business confidence and promoting exporting

 The LEP will work together to form an

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 110 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Thames Valley Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators effective inward investment offer and also ensure we serve the needs of the existing corporates already here to grow their businesses

COUNTY

Berkshire Biodiversity Action Plan Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Identifies Biodiversity Opportunity Areas and Habitat Methodology will be required to ensure the Local  A key Spatial Diagram Action Plans for urban areas, woodland, grassland, Biodiversity Action Plan (LBAP) targets are supported. showing key nature heathland, traditional orchards and hedgerows. GIS techniques could be used to map location of designations priority habitat.  Could result in a Borough-wide umbrella policy for SA to consider Biodiversity Opportunity Areas and conservation Habitat Action Plans  In conformity with Approved Spatial Objectives D, H & J.  Detailed protections policies in potential composite DPD / SPD (to prevent conflict the Development Plan should include specific policies on designated sites, ancient woodland, protected

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 111 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

species, wider countryside and accessible natural greenspace).  Plan to support the delivery of biodiversity through Biodiversity Opportunity Areas and to support the objectives of Habitat Action Plans

Berkshire Habitat Action Plan (2007) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The UK Biodiversity Steering Group devised a set of SA to consider Habitat Action Plans Plan to support the criteria to classify all UK habitats under threat and in objectives of Habitat need of action. National actions plans were then written Action Plans identifying the threats and the work needed to safeguard their future. These were divided into:

 Broad Habitat types - associated summary descriptions of 28 natural, semi-natural and urban habitats and the current issues affecting the habitat and broad policies to address them

 UK BAP Priority Habitat Action Plans - detailed descriptions for 45 habitats falling within the broad habitat classification and detailed actions and targets for conserving these habitats. A document containing UK BAP Priority Habitat Descriptions is available in the Useful Files.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 112 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

 Of these 28 broad habitats and 45 priority habitats identified in the UK, 11 broad habitats and 14 priority habitats are found in Berkshire.

The Berkshire Nature Conservation Forum further simplified this by categorising the habitats into 5 main headings (Grassland, Heathland, Urban, Wetland, Woodland) and established action plans to deal with the main threats to these habitats in the county.

Berkshire Landscape Character Assessment 1998 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Berkshire Landscape Character Assessment This highlights key features and management  Take into account the classifies the character of the landscape in Berkshire guidelines for different landscape ‘types’. These should landscape character. into 14 main categories. It also identifies strategic be included in the baseline data and appraisal.  In conformity with options for each character type. The Assessment can Approved Spatial be helpful when considering recommendations for the Objectives C, D, F, G, area’s future conservation and management. It H, J classifies and evaluates the Berkshire Landscape within a national context.

Replacement Minerals Local Plan for Berkshire (incorporating alterations adopted in 1997 and 2001) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The current minerals planning policy comes from the Consideration of Plan in policy making will help to  Could result in a Replacement Minerals Local Plan for Berkshire which achieve all of the SEA / SA objectives. Borough-wide was produced jointly between the six Unitary Authorities umbrella policy for which made up the former Berkshire County Council. conservation  In conformity with

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 113 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

In 2007, the Secretary of State has directed that a Approved Spatial number of policies in the Replacement Minerals Local Objectives H & I. Plan for Berkshire should be saved indefinitely until replaced by National, Regional or Local Minerals policies.

The plan identifies where future sand and gravel extraction should take place. Includes policies such as for sand and gravel extraction, other minerals and restoration and after-use.

Waste Local Plan for Berkshire (1998) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The current waste planning policy comes from the Dealing with waste, minimising waste and recycling  Reflected in overall Waste Local Plan for Berkshire which was produced waste are major environmental concerns that need a Sustainable jointly between the six Unitary Authorities which made detailed strategy and policy direction. Development definition up the former Berkshire County Council. The importance of minimising waste is reflected in which underpins the

target 15 of the SEA / SA objectives. Approved Spatial In 2007, the Secretary of State has directed that a Objectives number of policies in the Waste Local Plan for  Could result in an Berkshire should be saved indefinitely until replaced by umbrella policy that National, Regional or Local Minerals policies. promotes better use of resources whilst The plan includes policies which: protecting against  Control the types of waste management negative externalities development.  Will also be looked at  Restrict the amount of and control the nature of in detail in a composite the development Local Plan.  Ensure that necessary development takes place  In conformity with in locations which cause least environmental Approved Spatial impact Objective B.  Minimise the environmental impacts of

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 114 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

necessary development  Seek to secure waste minimisation and recycling objectives through the control of new development

WOKINGHAM BOROUGH

Wokingham Borough Core Strategy (2010) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Core Strategy sets out the long term 'spatial vision' SA Objectives: Consistent. Spatial Objectives: for the Wokingham Borough up until March 2026. This Consistent includes policies and strategies to provide new housing, schools, roads, places to work and other services.

Section 3 of the Core Strategy includes a ‘Spatial Vision for Wokingham Borough’ and 22 policies. Table 2.1 of the Core Strategy lists Spatial Objectives A to M.

Appendix 1 of the Core Strategy details how the Core Strategy replaces saved policies in the Local Plan.

Residual Copy of the Wokingham District Local Plan following adoption of the Core Strategy (2010) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Wokingham District Local Plan was adopted in Saved Local Plan policies to be replaced by Core Saved Local Plan policies 2004. In 2007, the Secretary of State directed that a Strategy and Managing Development Delivery DPD. to be replaced by Core number of policies in the Local Plan should be saved. Strategy and Managing Development Delivery Some of the Local Plan policies were replaced by Core DPD. Strategy policies (following adoption in 2010). Appendix

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 115 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

1 of the Core Strategy details how the Core Strategy replaces saved policies in the Local Plan. The remaining saved policies of the Local Plan will be replaced by the Managing Development Delivery DPD.

Wokingham Borough Local Transport Plan 2 2006-2011 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Primary objectives: Transport will be a key issue for the SEA / SA; in  Could result in an particular: overall strategic  to promote integration of all forms of transport policy and use planning, leading to a better, more Reducing congestion and shortening journey times efficient transport system Increasing safety and accessibility  In conformity with Supporting economic development Approved Spatial  to promote accessibility to everyday facilities for Objectives E, F, G, all, especially those without access to a car H, I & M.

 to improve the ease and safety of travel for all particularly for pedestrians and other vulnerable users

 to contribute to an efficient economy, and to support sustainable economic growth in appropriate locations

 to protect and enhance the built and natural environment

 to develop and promote partnership

 to ensure all means of transport protect and improve the quality of life for residents in the Borough

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 116 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

 to recognise the diverse nature of the Borough in devising transport strategies and solutions

 to promote public transport and sustainable travel choices and reduce the need to travel

 to raise public awareness of transport issues through publicity and consultation and encourage individuals to change the way they travel

Wokingham Borough Local Transport Plan 3 2011-2016 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The five LTP goals are: Transport will be a key issue for the SEA / SA; in  Could result in an particular: overall strategic policy 1. Highways Goal: “To have a resilient, safe highway Reducing congestion and shortening journey times to promote sustainable network that balances capacity for all users, enhances transport and reduce the economic prospects of the Borough, and promotes Increasing safety and accessibility the need to use the car sustainable travel.” Supporting economic development  In conformity with Approved Spatial 2. Active Travel Goal: “To work with partners to Objectives E, F, G, H, I promote walking and cycling as a health enhancing & M. physical activity for all of our residents through providing:

 Connected, convenient, safe and signed pedestrian networks across the Borough to enhance existing networks;  New cycleways integrated with the existing cycle network; and  Improved cycle parking at stations, businesses and schools”

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 117 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

3. Public Transport Goal: “To promote an integrated and inclusive public transport network that provides a convenient, acceptable, reliable and affordable alternative to car travel. “

4. Smarter Choices and Demand Management Goal: “To enable people who live, visit and work in the Borough to make informed, safe and sustainable travel decisions from a range of transport options.”

5. Strategic Projects Goal: “To manage the demand for travel in order to ensure that people have a high level of access to different destinations, with sufficient choice, whilst minimising the adverse effects of congestion.”

Wokingham Borough Council Corporate Plan: 2008 – 2018 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Corporate Plan is the Council’s road map for the To test and scope the objectives for their synergies in To ensure the plan is future. Within the context of the longer term vision, it the production of the Sustainable Objectives. consistent with the sets out specific targets for the next ten years. Corporate Plan’s objectives. In order to deliver on the Vision, the Plan has developed eight priorities:  Sound Finances and Value for Money  Excellent Children’s Services and Skills for All  Better Health for All and Support for Vulnerable People  A Cleaner and Greener Local Environment  Keeping the Borough Moving  Sustainable, Quality Development

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 118 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Wokingham Borough Council Corporate Plan: 2008 – 2018 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators  Safer and Stronger Communities  Keeping the Customer Satisfied

Housing Strategy 2010 – 2013 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Key aims of the Strategy Housing generally and affordable and key worker  Could result in a  To ensure that all households in the Borough can housing to meet local needs in particular will be a key Borough-wide strategic access well-designed, affordable and sustainable issue for the SEA / SA. policy provision for homes housing need and  To continue to enable vulnerable people to be self- delivery (including reliant and live independently affordable and key workers)  To prevent and provide for homelessness and be responsive to housing need.  In conformity with Approved Spatial  Providing high quality, value for money services to our tenants Objectives A, B, F, K & M.

Economic Development Strategy 2010-2013 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Key aims of the Strategy Ensuring economic growth and impact on environment  Could result in a  To promote innovation and enterprise will be a key issue for SEA/SA Borough-wide strategic  Enhance skills and create economic activity policy on economic growth  Improve vitality of Borough’s towns and villages  In conformity with Approved Spatial Objectives A, B, D,E’ G I,J, K & M.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 119 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sustainable Environment Strategy 2010-2020 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Key aims of the Strategy: Ensuring quality of life and respecting our environment  Could result in a  Improve quality of life now and for future will be key issues for the SEA/SA Borough-wide strategic generations policy on economic  Respect our environment from impacts of our growth activities and from growth  In conformity with Approved Spatial Objectives A, B, C,D,H,I,J,L,M

Air Quality Review – Updating and Screening Assessment, Draft Air Quality Action Plan (AQAP) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators These reports on air quality in Wokingham Borough It is predicted that all the air quality objectives in the Air  The Plan needs to monitors against UK targets for: Quality Regulations for England will be met in most contribute to  Benzene areas of the Borough except for annual average NO2. achieving, maintaining  1,3-Butadiene Some residential areas beside the motorways have and improving air  Carbon monoxide poorer air quality. quality targets in the  Lead Air quality is therefore an issue that should be Borough. Policies  Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) considered further in the SEA / SA. should be framed with  Particles (PM10) this objective in mind. The importance of minimising air pollution is reflected in  AQAP  Sulphur dioxide targets 9 and 11 of the SEA / SA objectives.

Community Strategy 2002 – 2012 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Objectives: The Plan includes strategic, long-term objectives and a As a test of soundness the Development Plan must  Fulfilling the potential of all of our residents through short-term action plan to begin to meet these identified have regard to the education, lifelong learning, the development of objectives. These might be adopted in the monitoring Community Strategy community and leisure activities and encouraging framework.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 120 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Community Strategy 2002 – 2012 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators residents to take part in local community activities  Maintaining the good health of the population Also the objectives should be tested to produce through prevention of illness and access to quality sustainable objectives. health and social care facilities  Balancing economic growth whilst respecting the countryside and recreational areas of the Borough  Keeping the Borough moving by improving public transport and sustaining or improving the road infrastructure  Balancing demands for housing growth whilst respecting the character of the Borough  Reducing crime and the fear of crime  Strengthening the links between voluntary and community groups, statutory agencies, private sector and other bodies to maximise and develop resources and opportunities for partnerships and innovation for the benefit of the community

Sustainable Community Strategy 2010 – 2020 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Strategy identifies the following priorities: Ensuring the priorities will be key issues for the As a test of soundness the Development Plan must SEA/SA. have regard to the

 Creating the best place in the country to grow up for Community Strategy children Also the objectives should be tested to produce sustainable objectives.  Creating a place that enjoys strong economic growth and prosperity

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 121 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sustainable Community Strategy 2010 – 2020 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators  Creating a sustainable place to live, visit, work and do business  Creating a place where everyone can enjoy good health and wellbeing, and where vulnerable people are supported  Creating a place where everyone feels safe  Creating a place where culture and diversity are celebrated, communities are cohesive and services are delivered in the heart of communities

Race Equality Scheme Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Obligatory to promote race equality but the weight given Employment monitoring is a duty of the Race Relations To test for racial equality to this duty should be proportionate to its relevance Act (2000) – could be used in SEA / SA monitoring on all policies. Approximately 9.5% of the country’s population belong framework to ethnic groups according to the 2001 census; but also Also a requirement to consult on the impacts of policies 9% of the population were born outside the UK and on promotion of race equality. English may not be a first language. According to the The promotion of racial equality should by inherent in 1991 Census, some 3.3% of Wokingham Borough’s policy making each policy should consider. population describe their origin as anything other than White. ‘Does the function or policy contribute to the . . .’ Growth of international business in the Borough implies Elimination of unlawful racial discrimination a growing number of visitors from overseas in this Promotion of equality of opportunity sector Promotion of good relations between people of different Ensure equitable access to information and services racial groups

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 122 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Lifelong Learning Development Plan Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Key aims: The levels of skills and qualifications within the  Could result in a policy  Widen participation in education and training Wokingham community are high by national standards. that promotes the  Improve partnership Nevertheless low levels of numeracy and literacy skills provision of essential  Improve quality in some wards still give rise for concern for reasons facilities (including both of social inclusion and for the local economy. colleges, libraries and Some employers are reporting skill shortages. In these other community circumstances it is vitally important that all Wokingham facilities) Borough residents are equipped with the basic skill on  In conformity with which further learning can be built. Approved Spatial Results of monitoring of skill levels could be used as Objectives A, E, G & baseline data. M.

Road Safety Plan 2009 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Safety is an overriding consideration for all National targets – compared with average casualty  Could result in an transportation proposals in the Borough. numbers in 1994-98, by 2010: overall strategic policy Key Government objective: 40% reduction in the number of people killed or to promote sustainable seriously injured in road accidents; transport including  To reduce road casualties safety measures Key Local themes: 50% reduction in the number of children killed or  In conformity with seriously injured; and  Safer for children Approved Spatial  Safer drivers 10% reduction in the slight casualty rate, expressed as Objectives D, E, G & K  Safer infrastructure the number of people slightly injured per 100 million vehicle kilometres.  Safer speeds  Safer vehicles Local targets:  Safer motorcycling Aim to achieve the national targets for reduction by

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 123 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Road Safety Plan 2009 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators  Safer pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders 2007, instead of 2010  Better enforcement Could be adopted in SEA / SA  Promoting safer road use

Landscape Character Assessment 2004 Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Landscape Character Assessment allows for a SA (inc. SEA) to set objectives that will need to Regard should be had to comprehensive assessment if landscape to provide a consider the character and distinctiveness of the the Landscape Character framework for decision making, including an informed Borough. Assessment when background to policy making, development control creating policies. decision making and countryside management.

The assessment developed judgements on:  The quality of the landscape  An overall guiding landscape strategy  The sensitivity of the landscape  The ongoing processes that are/ will affect the future landscape and recommendations for managing change.

Local Biodiversity Action Plan (LBAP) 2003-2012 (*Biodiversity Action Plan for 2012-2024 is emerging) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Plan sets out the Council’s policies and actions for Methodology will be required to ensure the LBAP  A key Spatial Diagram protecting and conserving biodiversity and forms an targets are supported. GIS techniques could be used to showing key nature

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 124 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

integral part of the Council’s Community Strategy. map location of priority habitat. designations  Could result in a Borough-wide The Action Plans aims to: umbrella policy for  Identify the extent of the wildlife resource in the conservation Borough and to establish policies for its protection,  In conformity with management and enhancement. Approved Spatial  Raise awareness of the issues effecting biodiversity Objectives D, H & J.  Detailed protections  Encourage community involvement and action policies in potential  Promote ‘good practice’ and encourage composite DPD / SPD management sympathetic to wildlife - (to prevent conflict  Outline targets and actions for improving the the Development Plan Borough’s biodiversity. should include specific policies on designated sites, ancient woodland, protected species, wider countryside and accessible natural greenspace).

Affordable Housing Supplementary Planning Document (2011) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The SPD amplifies policy CP5 (Housing mix, density Ensuring affordable housing will be key issue for the  Could result in a and affordability) of the Core Strategy. The SPD SEA/SA Borough-wide strategic provides further guidance of the Council’s approach to policy on affordable securing affordable housing through the planning housing. process.

The objectives of the SPD are to:

 Facilitate the delivery of affordable housing to meet

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 125 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

housing needs  Assist the creating and maintenance of sustainable, inclusive and mixed communities  Provide detailed guidance on the interpretation of the requirements in respect of amount, type, size of affordable housing to the provided in accordance with the policies in the Core Strategy  Provide certainty to developers about the requirements for affordable housing as part of residential and commercial developments  Provide detailed guidance on the calculation of financial contribution in lieu of on-site provision of affordable housing.

Sustainable Design and Construction Supplementary Planning Document (2010) and Companion Document Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The SPD has the following objectives: Ensuring sustainable design and construction will be  Could result in a key issue for the SEA/SA Borough-wide strategic  To make the Borough a more attractive, well policy on affordable designed and sustainable place; housing.  To help deliver Policy CP1 (Sustainable Development) of the Core Strategy;  To complement the Borough’s Design Guide SPD;  To promote the sustainable use of resources;  To raise awareness of sustainable design, construction and renewable energy technologies;  To mitigate against the causes and adapt to the consequences of climate change;  To promote the consideration of sustainability early within the design process;

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 126 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

 To expand upon or provide further guidance on national, regional and local requirements.

There is also a companion guide to the SPD – Developers Guidance Note for the 10% renewable energy requirement of South East Plan Policy NRM11.

Borough Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2012) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The key objectives of the SPD are: Ensuring design and character will be key issue for the  Could result in a  To promote good design through the SEA/SA. Borough-wide strategic development process; policy on design.  To create attractive, harmonious and well used places;  To ensure that all developments improve the character and quality of the area;  To encourage vibrant communities where people feel safe;  To create places that provide ease of movement and are accessible to all;  To respect and be sympathetic to the character of the area in which the development is situated;  To minimise overlooking, loss of privacy, loss of amenity or over-dominance;  To take full account of the mass and height of development in relation to adjacent development and surrounding spaces;  To ensure that new development meets the needs of its users.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 127 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Wokingham Town Centre Masterplan Supplementary Planning Document (2010) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The SPD provides guidance to steer development in Consideration of SPD will help to achieve SA/ SEA  Could result in the town centre to 2026. It provides clear guidance on objectives. Borough-wide strategic streets, public spaces, land use, design and policies relating to the sustainability to support the regeneration of the town renaissance of centre. Wokingham Town Centre. The SPD has objectives to help deliver:

 A thriving town centre  An eighteen hour economy  Streets as places  Space to breathe  Setting the design standard.

Strategic Development Location (SDL) Supplementary Planning Documents (2011) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Core Strategy identifies four Strategic Consideration of SPDs will help to achieve SA/ SEA Consistent Development Locations (SDLs) in policies CP19 to objectives. CP22. These are Arborfield Garrison, South of the M4, North and South Wokingham. Separate design briefs called Supplementary Planning Documents (SPD) have been produced for each SDL along with an overarching Infrastructure Delivery SPD which covers all of the SDLs (5 SPDs in all).

The key elements of the SPD are:

 a preferred spatial framework plan which should form the applicant’s starting point for masterplanning the SDL;

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 128 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

 design principles aimed at delivering a high quality scheme;  requirements for addressing sustainable design;  requirements relating to the scheme’s delivery; and,  requirements which should be met at the Outline planning application stage and beyond to ensure adequate and consistent approaches to quality and delivery.

These documents collectively promote a consensus view of good design principles which should lie at the heart of the design of the SDL, comprising character, legibility, permeability, an articulated townscape, an integrated landscape, human scale, secure and natural surveillance, detailing, richness and interest, quality within the public realm, continuity and enclosure, adaptability, robustness and sustainability and density.

Infrastructure and Contributions Supplementary Planning Document (2011) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Core Strategy identifies four Strategic Consideration of SPD will help to achieve SA/ SEA  Consistent Development Locations (SDLs). An overarching objectives. Infrastructure Delivery and Contributions SPD has been produced which covers all of the SDLs. The SPD forms part of a suite of documents to deliver the four SDLs and should be read alongside the SPD for each SDL.

The IDC SPD enhances the Core Strategy Policies and reflects Paragraph 4.81 of that document. It does not contain any new requirements other than those already laid down in Policies CP18 - CP21, accompanying

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 129 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

paragraphs and in Appendix 7 of the Core Strategy which provides additional guidance for the development of the Strategic Development Locations.

Public Rights of Way Improvement Plan (2010) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Wokingham Borough Rights of Way Improvement Plan Consideration of Plan will help to achieve SA/ SEA  Could result in aims to: objectives. Borough-wide strategic policies relating to  Identify ways to improve access on public rights public rights of way. of way for those with visual or mobility impairments, to extend wherever possible the accessibility of the network.

 Encourage greater use of the public rights of way network especially by current nonusers.

 Improve access to open spaces, woodlands, country parks, nature reserves and rivers in the borough via public rights of way, creating links from these green spaces to urban areas.

 Ensure future improvements to the rights of way network are included in the Local Development Framework policies and that new developments contribute to the maintenance of existing rights of way and the creation of new rights of way.

 Increase opportunities for sustainable travel where appropriate to places of work and schools, using existing public rights of way or by creating new public rights of way, to help reduce traffic congestion.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 130 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

 Enhance the range, type and accessibility of information available for the public rights of way network.

Wokingham Parking Plan (2011) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Consideration of Plan will help to achieve SA/ SEA  Could result in This Parking Plan draws together the key issues, objectives. Borough-wide strategic recommendations and actions identified through a policies relating to the Borough wide study and uses this information to parking. generate statements of intent. The Parking Plan is a supporting document to the Local Transport Plan (LTP).

Key principles were used to initially guide the formulation of recommendations which were then used to generate statements of intent. The principles are:

A: Support national policies and WBC's vision for Wokingham B: Deliver an appropriate revenue return on Wokingham Borough Council’s car park asset C: Provide a clear and transparent pricing structure whilst ensuring no adverse impact on the economic viability of centres D: Recognise and balance the differing needs of the town centres, local centres, Strategic Development Locations and rural areas E: Influence the provision, quality and use of vehicle parking in a way that provides the best balance of value for the customer, stakeholders and WBC F: Provide good quality parking facilities with a safe and secure environment for car park users

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 131 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

G: Maintain and improve a high level of road safety H: Identify and recommend the preferred procedures to support and control the management of ‘on’ and ‘off- street’ parking I: Manage congestion associated with car parks and consider the impacts of parking on sustainable travel choice J: Reduce the environmental impacts of parking on issues such as visual amenity and noise K: Provide equality of opportunity for all and consider users with special requirements or needs L: Maintain a fair system of enforcement M: Provide an appropriate level of parking information for residents and visitors

Older People’s Strategy – Young at heart (2008) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Strategy for older residents in Wokingham Borough. Consideration of Plan will help to achieve SA/ SEA  Could result in Starting point for the production of the Strategy was the objectives. Borough-wide strategic following themes: policies relating that complement the Older  Comfortable and secure income People’s Strategy.  An adequate income  Safe neighbourhoods  Getting out and about  Friendships and opportunities for learning and leisure  Keeping active and healthy  Access to good, relevant information.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 132 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sport, Leisure and Recreation For All In Wokingham – A Strategy For Progress 2006-2016: Part 2 – Strategic Plan Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Strategic Plan is the second part of the ‘Sport, Ensuring sport, leisure and recreation will be a key  Could result in a Leisure and Recreation For All In Wokingham – A issue for SEA/SA Borough-wide strategic Strategy For Progress 2006-2016’. Part 1 of this policy on sport, leisure strategy is the ‘Study Report’. and recreation.

There are eight over-arching aims identified in preparing the strategy:

Aim 1: Encourage lifelong participation in sport, leisure and recreation activities in Wokingham Borough across the whole age-range of the Community

Aim 2: Support and enhance the role and strength of voluntary sports clubs, organisations and other key agencies involved in sport, leisure and recreation through a co-ordinated, collaborative approach

Aim 3: Ensure that the values and interests of sport, leisure and recreation are recognised by all relevant strategic, governmental and non-governmental agencies in both their own strategies and their practical actions

Aim 4: Seek to achieve equality of access to a wide range of sporting opportunities across the Borough

Aim 5: Support the provision and effective management of an adequate range of indoor and outdoor sport, leisure and recreation facilities, optimising the use of all existing provision and identifying and supporting appropriate new developments

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 133 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Aim 6: Provide better and more reliable pathways, with appropriate funding, for people of all ages to discover, re-discover or progress interest in sport, leisure and recreation activities

Aim 7: Articulate and advocate the need for adequate funding for sport in Wokingham Borough and an appropriate share of national funding

Aim 8: Ensure that the co-ordination, co-operation and communication between all statutory and sporting agencies and organisations facilitate the development of sport, leisure and recreation opportunities in Wokingham Borough

Wokingham Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (2012) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Ensuring flood risk (from all sources) will be key issue  Could result in a The National Planning Policy Framework requires that for the SEA/SA. Borough-wide strategic Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) to prepare a SFRA in policy on development consultation with the Environment Agency. The primary and flood risk and purpose of the SFRA is to determine the variations in sustainable drainage. flood risk across the Borough. Robust information on flood risk is essential to inform and support Wokingham Borough Council revised flooding policies in its Development Plan.

This report summarises the outcomes of the SFRA process: the collation and analysis of information

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 134 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

relating to flood risk posed to the Borough from all known sources including rivers, surface water, groundwater, large reservoirs/lakes and sewers and the delineation of Wokingham Borough into zones of ‘high’, ‘medium’ and ‘low’ probability of flooding in accordance with PPS25. This will help inform the allocation of sites for possible future development. Individual flood risk information has been summarised for over 200 LDF sites (including both confirmed and unconfirmed sites, as known at the time of writing) that will be considered for allocation in the emerging Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document (MDD DPD).

The SFRA also includes guidance on Flood Risk Assessments (FRAs) and Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) along with several recommendations for development management and emergency planning (community resilience).

Planning Advice Note on Infrastructure Impact Mitigation Contributions for New Development (November 2010) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The planning advice note (PAN) provides guidance on Consideration of PAN will help to achieve SA/ SEA  Could result in the triggers and contributions required to mitigate the objectives. Borough-wide strategic impact of planning proposals in Wokingham Borough. policies. The note explains what the Council will do when dealing with a planning application for new residential development in accordance with the approach set out in the Core Strategy.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 135 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Parking Standards Study Report (2011) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators A parking strategy was produced for Wokingham in Ensuring parking standards will be a key issue for SA  Could result in a 2003 setting out parking standards. A new parking (inc. SEA). Borough-wide strategic standards document was produced to support the policy on parking Development Plan. standards.

Wokingham Borough is constantly changing as new development is built. The way a person travels changes and adjusts to meet their local needs. It is important to ensure that parking standards keep pace with the changing built and natural environment so that parking facilities best serve the needs of the Borough’s population, whilst ensuring this is balanced with quality of life and environmental objectives.

Wokingham PPG17 Open Space, Sport and Recreation Audit Update Final Amended Open Space Assessment Report (2012) (KKP) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators This factual report provides an audit based assessment Consideration of Assessment Report will help to  Could result in of both quantitative and qualitative open space, sport achieve SA/ SEA objectives. Borough-wide strategic and recreation facilities in accordance with PPG17 and policies. the Companion Guide entitled ‘Assessing Needs and Opportunities’ published in September 2002. The specific objectives of this audit and assessment are to:

 Verify the Council’s work to date (including recent community consultation exercises)  Enhance the existing Study’s credibility (via association with experienced, Sport England rated consultants)  Provide an objective update of the Audit (including all sites updated with quality and

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 136 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

value assessments)  Identify and update local needs  Update local provision standards for use in securing developer contributions and develop associated guidance to ensure effective use of contributions either on site or off site.  Identify surpluses/deficiencies and explore opportunities for improving provision and the need to further protect current provision.  Provide strategic options for the Council’s open space, sport and recreation facilities to inform local planning policies

This study and its audit findings are important in the contribution to the production of the Development Plan and supporting documents and is an integral part of identifying and regulating Wokingham Boroughs open space infrastructure.

Wokingham PPG17 Open Space, Sport and Recreation Study Standards Paper (2012) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators It accompanies the PPG 17 compliant open space, Consideration of Standards Paper will help to achieve  Could result in sport and recreation assessment report and the sports SA/ SEA objectives. Borough-wide strategic (including grass playing pitches) assessment report. policies. Both of these reports inform this Standards Paper and provide an evidence base to help inform preparation of the appropriate WBC policy documents.

This technical report provides a summary of the key issues from the Assessment Report (which provided an audit based assessment of both quantitative and qualitative open space, sport and recreation facilities).

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 137 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

The specific objectives are to:

 Set provision standards in terms of accessibility, quality, value and quantity.  Identify deficiencies in provision.  Where appropriate, identify surplus provision.  Inform the development of policy options.

NEIGHBOURING LOCAL AUTHORITIES

Basingstoke and Deane Borough Local Plan 1996-2011 (Adopted 2006) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Plan sets out a long term, but flexible, approach to Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross- Plan objectives and the development of the Borough ahead to 2011. boundary coordination. policies to be consistent with our neighbours.  Improve economic, social and environmental well Consider implications for alternatives. being  Ensure that necessary local services, facilities and Ensure cross-boundary issues considered in cumulative infrastructure are planned and provided / synergistic assessment in Stage C.  Provide opportunities for decent homes, ensuring Identify impact development (transport/ housing growth) that new residential development provides a mix of proposals on WBC. house types and sizes  Promote a strong and dynamic local economy to provide a range of jobs for local people  Protect and enhance the Borough’s natural and built environment  Promote walking, cycling, the use of public transport and appropriate levels of car use  promote Basingstoke and Deane’s role in the sub- region, region and nationally  Strive to ensure that community involvement and engagement in the planning system is maximised

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 138 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Bracknell Forest Borough Council Core Strategy 2026 (Adopted 2008) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Policies in the Core Strategy establish the overall Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross-  Plan objectives and strategy for the development and use of land in the boundary coordination. policies to be borough up to 2026. This includes setting out the broad Consider implications for alternatives. consistent with our locations for future development. neighbours. The Core Strategy policies are divided into 6 themes: Ensure cross-boundary issues considered in cumulative  Could result in / synergistic assessment in Stage C. coordinated policy for  Sustainable Growth Identify impact development (transport / housing mitigating impacts of  Quality of Life growth) proposals on WBC. development upon the  The Environment Blackwater Valley  Somewhere to Live  Could result in  Somewhere to Work and Shop coordinated policy for  Transport mitigating impacts of development upon Thames Basin SPA.

Bracknell Forest Borough Council Amen Corner SPD Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Amen Corner Supplementary Planning Document Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross- Plan objectives and provides guidance for developing the Amen Corner site boundary coordination. policies to be consistent in Bracknell Forest Borough. with our neighbours. Consider implications for alternatives.

The Amen Corner Supplementary Planning Document Ensure cross-boundary issues (Wokingham Borough (SPD) will build on the principle of development as set countryside strip) considered in cumulative / synergistic out in Policy CS4 of the Bracknell Forest Core Strategy assessment in Stage C. (2008) which identifies Amen Corner as a broad Identify impact development (transport/ housing growth) location for a future comprehensive mixed use proposals on WBC development.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 139 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Bracknell Forest Borough Council Amen Corner SPD Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators

Paragraph 2.8 of the SPD states that within the adopted Wokingham Core Strategy [at paragraph 2.6a] there is recognition of the need to maintain a separation of Bracknell and Binfield from Wokingham, which would include the land to the west of the SPD site (known as the Wokingham Countryside Strip). Detailed proposals for the land to the west of SPD site will be taken forward through the Managing Development Delivery DPD.

Hart District Local Plan (Replacement) 1996-2006 (Adopted 2002) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Defines land use planning policies and objectives for Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross-  Plan objectives and the area of north-east Hampshire bordering the boundary coordination. policies to be Wokingham Borough authority area. The area is part of Consider implications for alternatives. consistent with our the Blackwater Valley, and therefore shares transport neighbours. and development pressures with adjacent authorities, Ensure cross-boundary issues considered in cumulative  Could result in while also containing areas of lowland heath that cross / synergistic assessment in Stage C. coordinated policy for county borders and which are subject to special Identify impact of development (transport / housing mitigating impacts of conservation status. The border between Hart District growth) proposals on WBC. development upon the and Wokingham Borough is formed by the river valley. Blackwater Valley  Could result in coordinated policy for mitigating impacts of development upon Thames Basin SPA.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 140 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Reading Borough Council Core Strategy 2026 (Adopted 2008) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Policies in the Core Strategy establish the overall Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross-  Plan objectives and strategy for the development and use of land in the boundary coordination. policies to be borough up to 2026. This includes setting out the broad Consider implications for alternatives. consistent with our locations for future development. neighbours. Ensure cross-boundary issues considered in cumulative The Core Objectives for the Strategy are: / synergistic assessment in Stage C. Identify impact of development (transport / housing  Strengthen the role of Reading, including the growth) proposals on WBC. Central Reading area, as the regional hub for the Thames Valley, providing an accessible focus for the development of employment, housing, services and facilities, meeting the needs of residents, workers, visitors, those who study in Reading Borough, and the wider area, in accordance with the South East Plan.  Improve the quality of life for those living, working, studying in and visiting the Borough, creating inclusive, sustainable communities with good access to decent and affordable housing, employment, open space and waterspace, transport, education, services and facilities (such as sustainable water supplies and wastewater treatment, healthcare services, sport and recreation etc) to meet identified needs.  Ensure new development is accessible and sustainable, in accordance with the LDF sustainability objectives.  Maintain and enhance the historic, built and natural environment of the Borough through investment and high quality design.  Improve and develop excellent transport

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 141 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Reading Borough Council Core Strategy 2026 (Adopted 2008) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators systems to improve accessibility within Reading and for the wider area by sustainable modes of transport.  Offer excellent cultural opportunities which are based on multiculturalism, local heritage and high quality, modern arts and leisure facilities.  Ensure that Reading is a multi-cultural city where significant social exclusion exists and where the needs of all its citizens are met by high quality, cost effective services and outstanding levels of community involvement.

Reading Borough Sites and Detailed Policies Document (Adopted 2012) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The adopted SDPD replaces all the remaining policies Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross-  Plan objectives and from the Local Plan 1991-2006, which had continued to boundary coordination. policies to be be operated as ‘saved’ policies. Consider implications for alternatives. consistent with our neighbours. The SDPD does not have any objectives or vision of its Ensure cross-boundary issues considered in cumulative own. Since its purpose is to deliver proposals in the / synergistic assessment in Stage C. Core Strategy, it shares the vision and objectives of that Identify impact of development (transport/ housing document. growth) proposals on WBC.

The following policies in the DPD will require cross boundary working with Wokingham Borough Council:

o SA6 (Whiteknights Campus, University of Reading).

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 142 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Reading Borough Sites and Detailed Policies Document (Adopted 2012) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators o SA15 (District and Local Centres)

Reading Central Area Action Plan to 2026 (2009) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Area Action Plan sets out the planning framework Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross-  Plan objectives and for the central area to 2026. boundary coordination. policies to be

Ensure cross-boundary issues considered in cumulative consistent with our The key principles are: / synergistic assessment in Stage C. neighbours. 1. The centre will contain a broad range of different but complementary uses within an area easily accessed by Identify impact of development proposals on WBC. foot.

2. The centre will appeal to all sectors of Reading’s population as a place to live in, work in, study in and visit.

3. New development will exhibit an excellent, safe and sustainable quality of design that contributes to the attraction of the centre.

4. The centre will make the most of its waterside areas as a destination for leisure and recreation, and protect and enhance wildlife habitats.

5. Areas of designated open space within the centre will be protected and new opportunities will be sought.

6. Access to the centre by foot, cycle and public transport will be improved.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 143 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Reading Central Area Action Plan to 2026 (2009) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators 7. Access within the centre by foot and cycle will be improved and barriers to this improved access will be overcome, particularly in a north-south direction through the core.

8. Development in the centre will benefit from and contribute towards forthcoming major transport improvements.

9. Areas and features that positively contribute to the unique and historic character of central Reading will be protected and, where appropriate, enhanced.

Royal Borough Of Windsor and Maidenhead Local Plan 1991-2006 (Adopted 2003) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Establishes policy objectives and land use development Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross-  Plan objectives and proposals in the Royal Borough of Windsor and boundary coordination. policies to be Maidenhead. The Borough Council’s strategy is based Consider implications for alternatives. consistent with our on the following main components and aims: Ensure cross-boundary issues considered in cumulative neighbours.  To maintain an environment that is naturally / synergistic assessment in Stage C.  Could result in diverse, safe and attractive and which will maintain Identify impact development (transport / housing coordinated policy for and improve the quality of life in both urban and growth) proposals on WBC. mitigating impacts of rural parts of the borough. development upon  Within the context of restraint, to promote Thames Basin SPA. sustainable forms of, and locations for, development which minimise the consumption of energy, land and other non-renewable resources and which minimise the potential adverse effects on the natural

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 144 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Royal Borough Of Windsor and Maidenhead Local Plan 1991-2006 (Adopted 2003) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators built environment, traffic congestion and pollution.  To maintain a buoyant and broadly based local economy whilst restricting further major employment growth in order to avoid increasing pressure on the green belt local housing and the environment.  To provide for a level and range of housing development which is compatible with the character of the borough and which will assist in meeting the needs of the local population, particularly for social rented housing.

Maidenhead Town Centre Area Action Plan (2011) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Maidenhead Town Centre Area Action Plan (AAP) Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross-  Plan objectives and is a plan to rejuvenate Maidenhead town centre and the boundary coordination. policies to be surrounding area. It sets out to deliver attractive streets Ensure cross-boundary issues considered in cumulative consistent with our and places, new shops, homes and business and / synergistic assessment in Stage C. neighbours. leisure opportunities. Identify impact of development proposals on WBC. The AAP will help bring about:  A vibrant, visually attractive town centre that will excite and surprise;  A memorable place with striking architecture, spaces and waterways;  A much larger shopping area with a host of new shops;  A strong local economic focus;  A centre for community art and culture;

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 145 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Maidenhead Town Centre Area Action Plan (2011) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators  Improved accessibility, particularly for pedestrians and cyclists;  A town centre that residents can relate to and be proud of.

South Oxfordshire District Council Local Plan 2011 (Adopted 2006) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Guides development in the District and sets out the Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross- Plan objectives and Council’s policies for the use of land. The plan is based boundary coordination. policies to be consistent on the principles of sustainable development. Consider implications for alternatives. with our neighbours. Six key objectives have been developed: Ensure cross-boundary issues considered in cumulative  Protecting and enhancing the natural and built / synergistic assessment in Stage C. environment Identify impact development (transport / housing  Encouraging sustainable and high-quality growth) proposals on WBC. development  Meeting the social needs of the rural and urban communities  Supporting the local economy  Supporting the vitality and viability of town centres  Promoting a sustainable transport strategy

West Berkshire District Local Plan 1991-2006 (Adopted 2002) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Sets out the Council's proposals for the development Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross-  Plan objectives and and use of land within its area for the plan period up to boundary coordination. policies to be

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 146 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

West Berkshire District Local Plan 1991-2006 (Adopted 2002) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators 2006. Some of the key aims: Consider implications for alternatives. consistent with our  To conserve the natural and built environments of Ensure cross-boundary issues considered in cumulative neighbours. West Berkshire / synergistic assessment in Stage C.  Could result in  To identify the location of the development required Identify impact development (transport / housing coordinated policy for to meet the provisions of the Berkshire Structure growth) proposals on WBC. mitigating impacts of Plan development upon  To support the principles of sustainable Thames Basin SPA. development and to effectively translate them into robust planning proposals and polices at a local level  To provide a framework within which environmental improvements and conservation of both the natural and built environments may be pursued  To conserve resources and minimise the impacts of development.  To ensure adequate provision of infrastructure, services and amenities made necessary by the development and to seek related opportunities for securing environmental enhancements. 

West Berkshire Core Strategy (Adopted 2012) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Core Strategy replaces some of the saved Local Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross-  Plan objectives and Plan policies. Remaining saved policies of the Local boundary coordination. policies to be Plan will remain in force until replaced by the Site Consider implications for alternatives. consistent with our Allocations and Delivery DPD upon adoption. neighbours. Ensure cross-boundary issues considered in cumulative

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 147 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

West Berkshire Core Strategy (Adopted 2012) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Core Strategy includes Strategic Objectives / synergistic assessment in Stage C. relating to: Identify impact of development (transport/ housing growth) proposals on WBC. 1. Tackling Climate Change

2. Housing Growth 3. Housing Needs 4. Economy 5. Infrastructure Requirements 6. Green Infrastructure 7. Transport 8. Retail 9. Heritage

Wycombe District Council Core Strategy 2026 (Adopted 2008) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators Policies in the Core Strategy establish the overall Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross- Plan objectives and strategy for the development and use of land in the boundary coordination. policies to be consistent borough up to 2026. This includes setting out the broad Consider implications for alternatives. with our neighbours. locations for future development. Ensure cross-boundary issues considered in cumulative / synergistic assessment in Stage C. The Core Strategy sets out policies on: Identify impact development (transport / housing growth) proposals on WBC.  Sustaining the landscape and character of the

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 148 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Wycombe District Council Core Strategy 2026 (Adopted 2008) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators district and its other environmental assets.  Ensuring infrastructure improvements and supporting facilities are secured.  Securing more affordable housing than in the past.  Securing quality development and more sustainable building including the use of renewable energy.

Buckinghamshire Minerals and Waste Core Strategy (Adopted 2012) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Minerals and Waste Core Strategy (MWCS) Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross-  Plan objectives and provides the strategic policy framework and provisions boundary coordination. policies to be until 2026 for minerals and waste planning within Consider implications for alternatives. consistent with our Buckinghamshire. neighbours. Ensure cross-boundary issues considered in cumulative The Core Strategy Strategic Objectives relating to: / synergistic assessment in Stage C. Identify impact of development proposals on WBC. SO1: Improving the sustainability of minerals development SO2: Improving the sustainability of waste management SO3: Safeguarding of existing minerals resources SO4: Spatial distribution of minerals development SO5: Transportation of minerals SO6: Spatial distribution of waste development SO7: Safeguarding of existing waste sites SO8: Transportation of waste

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 149 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Buckinghamshire Minerals and Waste Core Strategy (Adopted 2012) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators SO9: Protection of the Green Belt and AONB SO10: Protecting and enhancing the environment

Hampshire Minerals and Waste Core Strategy (2007) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The Core Strategy states that Hampshire will require: Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross-  Plan objectives and boundary coordination. policies to be i. New recycling and composting sites to handle over Consider implications for alternatives. consistent with our one million tonnes a year of municipal, commercial and neighbours. industrial wastes; Ensure cross-boundary issues considered in cumulative ii. New recovery and treatment sites to handle just / synergistic assessment in Stage C. under half a million tonnes a year of municipal, Identify impact of development proposals on WBC. commercial and industrial wastes; iii. New non-hazardous landfill sites to dispose of 4.2 million tonnes of un-recycled municipal, commercial and industrial wastes; iv. New inert landfill sites, to restore mineral workings, with 11 million tonnes of un-recycled construction and demolition wastes; v. New sites to manufacture an additional 850,000 tonnes a year of recycled and secondary aggregates; vi. New sites for the extraction of over 27 million tonnes of sand and gravel.

Although the Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton Minerals and Waste Local Plan (1998) has been mostly superseded by the Core Strategy as of 2007, there are still some site specific policies that have been retained

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 150 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Hampshire Minerals and Waste Core Strategy (2007) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators until the Hampshire Minerals & Waste Plan is adopted.

Oxfordshire Minerals and Waste Local Plan (1997) Key relevant objectives Implications for SA Plan response Targets/indicators The aims of the Local Plan are: Ensure decision-making criteria address need for cross-  Plan objectives and policies to be  To comply with Government guidance and boundary coordination. consistent with our Structure Plan policy to an acceptable balance Consider implications for alternatives. neighbours. between society’s need for minerals and the Ensure cross-boundary issues considered in cumulative need to conserve resources and protect the / synergistic assessment in Stage C. environment. Identify impact of development proposals on WBC.  To ensure that any proposals for mineral working are environmentally acceptable and are accompanied by satisfactory and achievable proposals for restoration and after-use.  To provide a planning framework which allows the safe and economic treatment and disposal of waste.  To encourage the re-use and recycling of materials so as to reduce the need both for mineral working and for landfill disposal of waste.

46 policies in the Minerals and Waste Local Plan were ‘saved' in 2007.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 151 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

APPENDIX 2 – BASELINE DATA, INDICATORS AND TRENDS

It may become apparent that some of the data for the indicators is not available. It may therefore be necessary to alter or even delete the indicators.

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data SOCIAL OBJECTIVES 1. TO MAKE PROVISION FOR LOCAL HOUSING NEEDS BY ENSURING THAT EVERYONE HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO LIVE IN A DECENT SUSTAINABLY CONSTRUCTED AND AFFORDABLE HOME.

Core Strategy 1. Wokingham Borough Council Net average built CP17 (Housing Planning Commitments for Housing in Wokingham Delivery)3 Documents Borough 2001 –

Completed in 2006: 435.6 Wokingham Borough April 2006 to March http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/planningc South East2: England2: - Net Completions1: 2011 – average of ontrol/planning/planningpolicies/housing Net average built in 600 dwellings per /housingmonitoring/ 21,840 [2000/01] 133,260 [200/01] Wokingham 404 [2000/01] annum 21,820 [2001/02] 129,870 [2001/02] Borough 2006 to 237 [2001/02] 2. Communities and Local Government 22,750 [2002/03] 137,740 [2002/03] 2011: 464 418 [2002/03] April 2011 to 2016 Tables 209, 232 and 253: Housing 24,280 [2003/04] 143,960 [2003/04] 492 [2003/04] – average of 700 completions 25,690 [2004/05] 155,890 [2004/05] Net average 376 [2004/05] dwellings per http://www.communities.gov.uk/housing (market and 28,210 [2005/06] 163,400 [2005/06] completions 655 [2005/06] annum /housingresearch/housingstatistics/hous affordable) 27,360 [2006/07] 167,680 [2006/07] currently below 1018 [2006/07] ingstatisticsby/housebuilding/livetables/ 30,230 [2007/08] 170,610 [2007/08] forecasts indicated 488 [2007/08] April 2016 to March 28,440 [2008/09] 140,990 [2008/09] in Appendix 6 368 [2008/09] 2021 – average of 3. Wokingham Borough Council Core 24,440 [2009/10] 119,910 [2009/10] (Expected Housing 226 [2009/10] 723 dwellings per Strategy: 20,000 [2010/11] 107,890 [2010/11] Land Supply to 220 [2010/11] annum 22,280 [2011/12] 118,190 [2011/12] 2026) of the Core 273 [2011/12] http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/planningc Strategy. April 2021 to March ontrol/planning/planningpolicies/ldf/new-

2026 – average of ldf-core-strategy/

623 dwellings per

annum.

Further information on housing delivery and forecasts can be found in:

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 152 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Core Strategy Appendix 6: http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/planningcontrol/planning/planningpolicies/ldf/new-ldf-core-strategy/

Proposed Submission Managing Development Delivery DPD Appendix 14: http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/submissionmdd/

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment: http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/planningcontrol/planning/planningpolicies/housing/shlaa/

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data New affordable homes have been completed through our partnership with Completed in Wokingham Borough Increase the supply Registered Social England1: completions1: of affordable Landlords over the

housing both in last three year 33,160 [2000/01] 80 [2000/01] Data on the numbers and as a period. Most new 1. Communities and Local Government 33,020 [2001/02] 10 [2001/02] basis of region proportion of total supply is secured Table 1008: 32,920 [2002/03] 100 [2002/03] housing stock through Section has not been 38,070 [2003/04] The supply of 90 [2003/04] 106 negotiations http://www.communities.gov.uk/housing updated as 37,470 [2004/05] affordable 90 [2004/05] Requirements of with developers, /housingresearch/housingstatistics/hous data on this 45,980 [2005/06] housing 280 [2005/06] Policy CP5 and is therefore ingstatisticsby/housebuilding/livetables/ basis are no 44,300 [2006/07] 90 [2006/07] (Housing mix, dependent on sites 53,180 [2007/08] 100 [2007/08] longer density and getting planning 2. Wokingham Borough AMR (Dec 2 55,500 [2008/09] 70 [2008/09] produced . affordability) of the consent, and 2011) 57,980 [2009/10] 90 [2009/10] Core Strategy. developers then 60,430 [2010/11] 80 [2010/11] building them out2. 57,950 [2011/12] 150 [2011/12]

Requirements of Policy CP5 of Core Strategy.

Average property Ratio of median Ratio of median Ratio of median 1.Communities and Local Government Wokingham price compared house price to house price to house price to Increasing the Table 577: Borough’s ratio with average median earnings in median median earnings supply of affordable 1 continues to be incomes Wokingham earnings in in England : housing will help http://www.communities.gov.uk/housing higher than the Borough1: South East1: decrease the ratio /housingresearch/housingstatistics/hous national ratio. 4.47 [2001] ingstatisticsby/housingmarket/livetables/

6.14 [2001] 5.82 [2001] 5.07 [2002] Requirements of

6.67 [2002] 6.28 [2002] 5.83 [2003] Policy CP5

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 153 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 7.68 [2003] 7.16 [2003] 6.58 [2004] (Housing mix, 7.64 [2004] 7.71 [2004] 6.81 [2005] density and 8.20 [2005] 8.08 [2005] 6.97 [2006] affordability) of the 7.57 [2006] 7.97 [2006] 7.23 [2007] Core Strategy. 8.44 [2007] 8.45 [2007] 6.93 [2008] 8.10 [2008] 8.42 [2008] 6.27 [2009] 7.49 [2009] 7.28 [2009] 7.01 [2010] 7.83 [2010] 8.23 [2010] 6.65 [2011] 7.77 [2011] 7.98 [2011]

Households on local Households on Households on authorities' housing local local authorities' waiting lists in authorities' housing waiting Wokingham housing waiting lists in England1: Borough1: lists in South East1: 1,039,265 [2001] In Wokingham 1,851 [2001] 1,093,342[2002] Borough, the 2,564 [2002] 129,924 [2001] 1,270,675 [2003] 1.Communities and Local Government Reduce number of number of 2,372 [2003] 129,234 [2002] 1,437,735 [2004] Table 600: Households on households in households has 2,457 [2004] 146,880 [2003] 1,547,280 [2005] the Housing housing need on Increased from 2,116 [2005] 168,725 [2004] 1,634,301 [2006] http://www.communities.gov.uk/housing Register Local Authority 1,851 in 2001 to 2,294 [2006] 181,196 [2005] 1,674,421[2007] /housingresearch/housingstatistics/hous waiting list. 2,608 in 2011. 2,699 [2007] 195,700 [2006] 1,769,939 [2008] ingstatisticsby/rentslettings/livetables/

3,036 [2008] 208,419 [2007] 1,763,140 [2009]

2,590 [2009] 203,161 [2008] 1,758,515 [2010] 2,727 [2010] 205,371 [2009] 1,837,042 [2011] 2,608 [2011] 215,373 [2010] 225,250 [2011]

No data available. Number of unfit

homes per

1,000 dwellings

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 154 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

2. TO REDUCE THE RISK OF FLOODING AND THE RESULTING DETRIMENT TO PUBLIC WELL-BEING, THE ECONOMY AND THE ENVIRONMENT BY ENSURING NO INAPPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT IN ANY AREAS AT RISK OF FLOODING AND USE SUITABLE DRAINAGE SOLUTIONS WHERE NECESSARY. Number of properties in flood zone 2 (medium probability)1:

2222

Number of properties The 2009 Flooding 1.Wokingham Borough Strategic Flood in flood zone 3a (High in England report Only appropriate Information Risk Assessment (2012) Probability): In the Thames shows that over 2.4 development within available from the Catchment Flood million properties flood zones 2, 3a EA flood mapping, 2. Thames Catchment Flood Management are at risk of and 3b4. Flood Map for Management Plan (2009), Environment Properties at 344 Area, there are flooding from rivers Surface Water, Agency. risk from over 135,000 or the sea in New development Thames Catchment flooding Number of properties in flood zone 3b properties at risk England, of which should not increase Flood Management 3. Flooding in England: A national (Functional from flooding in nearly half a million the risk of flooding. Plan (2009), and assessment of flood risk (2009), rivers.2 are at significant the Council’s SFRA Environment Agency Floodplain): 3 risk . and PFRA. 4. Core Strategy Indicators 656

*Note that flood zones are mutually exclusive.

Number of In Wokingham planning No inappropriate Borough, average permissions development 2004/05: 3 of 4 permissions granted allowed in 2005/06: 3 granted contrary to contrary to the floodplain 1. Wokingham Borough Council Annual 2006/07: 3 the advice of the advice of the Monitoring Reports (2004-05 to 2010- 2007/08: 2 No data available No data available. contrary to advice Environment Environment 11) 2008/09: 7 of Environment Agency. For those Agency on 2009/10: 7 Agency. allowed, planning either flood 2010/11: 4 conditions agreed defence with Environment grounds or Agency. water quality.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 155 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 3. SAFE AND SECURE ENVIRONMENT

Wokingham Borough Safe Communities Survey (2011)`:

51.6% agreed that the police and local counsel are dealing with the anti-social behaviour and crime issues that matter in Perceived this area. likelihood of being After dark, only a victim of burglary and violent crime2: 1. Wokingham Borough Save 25.9% felt very safe Development will Communities Survey 2011 walking around 2009/10: 15% be designed to outside their home 2010/11: 13% There is no obvious reduce anti –social 2. British Crime Survey 2009/10 and Fear of crime within the borough. No data available trend in the data behaviour, crime 2010/11. Perceived available. and thereby the 46.5% of respondents likelihood of being fear of crime3. 3. Core Strategy Vision – paragraph were very or fairly a victim of car 3.6. worried about having crime: their home broken into and something 2009/10: 21% stolen. 2010/11: 17%

28.3% were very or fairly worried about having their stolen.

25.8% were worried about being physically attacked by a stranger.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 156 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 1. British Crime Survey 2010/11: Recorded crime

by offence, in the Recorded crime by Recorded crime by http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publicatio Thames Valley offence, in offence, in ns/science-research-statistics/research- Police area, England, Wokingham Borough, statistics/crime- percentage percentage change Although not percentage change research/hosb1011/hosb1011-clt- change 2009/10 2009/10 to directly Level of 2009/10 to 2010/111: tabs?view=Binary to 2010/112: 2010/112: comparable, local burglaries, Reduction in level crimes have seen a violent offences Dwelling burglary: of burglaries, 2. British Crime Survey 2010/11 Burglaries: -6% Burglaries: -3% greater percentage and vehicle -27% violent offences change reduction crimes and vehicle crimes. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publicatio Violence against Violence against compared to that at Violence against the ns/science-research-statistics/research- the person: -10% the person: -6% a regional and person: -23% statistics/crime- national level. research/hosb1011/hosb1011- Offences against Offences against Theft of a motor pfatabs?view=Binary#'Table 2'!A1 vehicles: -21% vehicles: -8% vehicle: -39%

1. British Crime Survey 2010/11:

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publicatio ns/science-research-statistics/research- statistics/crime- Although not Percentage Percentage change research/hosb1011/hosb1011-clt- Percentage change directly 1 change 2009/10 2009/10 to tabs?view=Binary 2009/10 to 2010/11 : 2 2 comparable, local Recorded crime to 2010/11 : 2010/11 : Reduction in level crimes are at a offences of recorded crimes. 2. British Crime Survey 2010/11 -29% lower rate than -7% -4% regionally or http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publicatio nationally. ns/science-research-statistics/research- statistics/crime- research/hosb1011/hosb1011- pfatabs?view=Binary#'Table 2'!A1

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 157 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 4. TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF THE POPULATION

All cause mortality All cause rates per 100,000 mortality rates per population in 100,000 Wokingham population in Borough: England:

2000: 560 2000: 684 Death rates from Annual public health report for 2001: 574 2001: 668 Over the long term, circulatory All cause mortality Berkshire West 2010/11: 2002: 561 2002: 663 to reduce death disease, cancer, No data available rate continues to 2003: 536 2003: 662 rates from diseases accidents and decline. http://www.berkshirewest.nhs.uk/_store/ 2004: 508 2004: 627 appreciably. suicide documents/public-health-ar-2012.pdf 2005: 496 2005: 613 2006: 500 2006: 592 2007: 447 2007: 579 2008: 464 2008: 575 2009: 435 2009: 547 2010: 423 2010: 543

Life expectancy (at Life expectancy Life expectancy (at birth) in Wokingham (at birth) in South birth) in England1: Borough1: East1: 2000-2002: 2000-2002: 2000-2002: Life expectancy for Male: 75.7 males and females 1. Office for National Statistics Male: 78.7 Male: 77.2 Female: 80.4 in Wokingham Female: 82.7 Female: 81.5 Improve life Life expectancy Borough is higher http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/ 2001-2003: expectancy. than that in the re-reference- 2001-2003: 2001-2003: Male: 75.9 South East and tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77-223356 Male: 78.9 Male: 77.4 Female: 80.5 England. Female: 82.6 Female: 81.6 2002-2004: 2002-2004: 2002-2004: Male: 76.18 Male: 79.6 Male: 77.7 Female: 80.7 Female: 82.7 Female: 81.8

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 158 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 2003:2005: 2003:2005: 2003:2005: Male: 76.6 Male: 79.9 Male: 78.1 Female: 80.9 Female: 83.2 Female: 82.0 2004-2006: 2004-2006: 2004-2006: Male: 77.0 Male: 80.4 Male: 78.5 Female: 81.3 Female: 83.4 Female: 82.4 2005-2007: 2005-2007: 2005-2007: Male: 77.3 Male: 81.0 Male: 78.9 Female: 81.5 Female: 83.6 Female: 82.7 2006-2008: 2006-2008: 2006-2008: Male: 77.5 Male: 81.3 Male: 79.2 Female: 81.7 Female: 83.8 Female: 83.0 2007-2009: 2007-2009: 2007-2009: Male: 77.9 Male: 81.7 Male: 79.4 Female: 82.0 Female: 84.3 Female: 83.3 2008-2010: 2008-2010: 2008-2010: Male: 78.2 Male: 81.5 Male: 79.7 Female: 82.3 Female: 84.4 [ Female: 83.5 Currently no sites in

Wokingham with a South East2: green flag award 1site [98/99] Ambition to achieve [2012]. 3 sites [99/00] England and Green Flag in the 1. Wokingham Borough Council PPG17

Percentage of 4 sites [00/01] Wales2: future, when Open Space, Sport and Recreation Site assessments Currently no sites eligible open 6 sites [01/02] resources permit, Audit Update (February 2012) show that a number in Wokingham with space managed 10 sites [02/03] 322 [04/05] for suitably of parks in a green flag award to green flag 13 sites [03/04] 551 [07/08] recommended 2. Green Flag Award Wokingham Borough [2012] standard 25 sites [04/05] 899 [08/09] sites1. would be appropriate 56 sites [07/08] 1232 in UK [2012] http://www.greenflagaward.org.uk/ and likely to score 92 sites [07/08] well if they were to be 135 sites [2012] submitted for the

Green Flag Award

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 159 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data scheme1.

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 5. TO CREATE AND SUSTAIN VIBRANT AND LOCALLY DISTINCTIVE COMMUNITIES Wokingham Borough Wokingham Borough Place Survey Place Survey Percentage of High percentage of [2008/09] [2008/09] people satisfied Keep satisfaction Wokingham No data with their local No data available. levels high and Borough residents http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/council/c 88% very or fairly available. area as a place increase if possible are satisfied. onsultations/results/placesurvey/ satisfied with their to live local area as a place

to live Place Survey Results (2008)

To what extent do you agree or disagree Percentage of that your local area is Over 60% of people who feel a place where people Wokingham their local area from different Borough residents is a place where backgrounds get on Wokingham Borough Place Survey definitely or tend to people from well together? [2008/09] agree that different No data No data available. Keep levels high. Wokingham backgrounds Definitely agree 121 available. http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/council/c Borough is a place and (5.6%) onsultations/results/placesurvey/ where people from communities Tend to agree 1246 different can live (57.7%) backgrounds get on together Tend to disagree 158 well together. harmoniously (7.3%) Definitely disagree 61 (2.8%) Don’t know 419 (19.4%) Too few people in

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 160 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data local area 59 (2.7%) All the same background 94 (4.4%)

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 6. TO REDUCE POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION

Percentage of pupils Percentage of Percentage of known to be eligible pupils known to pupils known to be for and claiming free be eligible for eligible for and school meals: and claiming free claiming free The percentage of school meals: school meals: pupils known to be National Statistics Maintained nursery eligible for and and state-funded Maintained Maintained nursery claiming free http://www.statistics.gov.uk/hub/release primary pupils – nursery and Proportion of and state-funded Maintain and school meals is - state-funded children under primary pupils – enhance the increasing locally, calendar/index.html?newquery=*&uday Jan 2011:5.3% primary pupils – 16 who live in number of children regionally and =0&umonth=0&uyear=0&title=Schools Jan 2012: 5.4% low-income Jan 2011: 18% receiving free nationally. The %2C+Pupils+and+their+Characteristics Jan 2011: 12.4% households Jan 2012: 18.1% school meals. percentage for &pagetype=calendar- State-funded Jan 2012: 12.7% Wokingham entry&lday=&lmonth=&lyear= secondary schools: State-funded Borough is less State-funded secondary schools: than that at a Jan 2011: 4.6% secondary regional and Jan 2012: 5.3% schools: Jan 2011: 14.6% national level.

Jan 2012: 14.8% Jan 2011: 9.1%

Jan 2012: 9.6%

Percentage of Claiming Job Seekers South East – UK – claiming JSA: Trend appears, in Labour Market Profile – All People population of Allowance (JSA): claiming JSA: Below regional and the main, to be Claiming Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) working age national level. turning upwards Nomis: claiming key Jan 00: 0.70% Jan 00: 1.9% Jan 00: 3.1% though still well

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 161 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data benefits Jan 01: 0.50% Jan 01: 1.5% Jan 01: 2.9% below the national https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/reports/lm Jan 02: 0.80% Jan 02: 1.5% Jan 02: 2.8% average. p/la/2038431754/subreports/jsa_time_s Jan 03: 1.10% Jan 03: 1.6% Jan 03: 2.7% eries/report.aspx Jan 04: 1.00% Jan 04: 1.6% Jan 04: 2.6% Jan 05: 0.80% Jan 05: 1.5% Jan 05: 2.3% Jan 06: 0.80% Jan 06: 1.6% Jan 06: 2.6% Jan 07: 0.70% Jan 07: 1.6% Jan 07: 2.6% Jan 08: 0.60% Jan 08: 1.6% Jan 08: 2.2% Feb 09: 1.7% Feb 09: 2.8% Feb 09: 3.9% Jan 10: 1.7% Jan 10: 3.0% Jan 10: 4.1% Jan 11: 1.4% Jan 11: 2.5% Jan 11: 3.7% Jan 12: 1.4% Jan 12: 2.7% Jan 12: 4.0%

South East: Reduce the 2006: Not percentage of available England: households in fuel The percentage of 2008: 9.9% poverty. households in fuel Department for Energy and Climate Wokingham Borough: 2009: 11.8% 2003: 5.9 poverty for Change Percentage of 2010: 11.5% 2004: 5.9 No household on Wokingham households in 2006: 5.9% 2005: 7.2 benefits live in Borough is http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/ fuel poverty 2008: 6.8% Berkshire: 2006: 11.5 homes with a SAP consistently below statistics/fuelpov_stats/regional/regional (fuel poor) 2009: 8.2% 2007: 13.2 rating less than 35 that at a county, .aspx 2010: 7.8% 2006: Not 2008: 15.6 helping to regional and available 2009: 18.4 reduce fuel poverty national level. 2008: 8.0% 2010: 16.4 (Sustainable 2009: 10.4% Environment 2010: 10.5% Strategy (2010).

Number of areas that rank Sufficient data is within the most not available to No data available No data available No data available deprived 20% allow a trend areas in the analysis. country

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 162 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 7. TO RAISE EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT, SKILLS AND TRAINING OPPORTUNTIES Key Stage 2 Wokingham LEA is

Performance: (in English and (in English and consistently Department for Education (in English and Maintain and Level 4 or Maths) Maths) performs better Maths) enhance above than the regional http://www.education.gov.uk/rsgateway/ performance See table below See table below and national DB/SFR/s001047/index.shtml See table below percentage.

Table showing the Percentage of pupils achieving Level 4 or above in Key Stage 2 – English and Maths in Wokingham LEA, South East and England between 2007 to 2011

Wokingham LEA South East England Year English (%) Maths (%) English (%) Maths (%) English (%) Maths (%) 2007 87 83 81 77 80 77 2008 88 83 82 78 81 79 2009 86 83 81 78 80 79 2010 87 84 81 79 81 80 2011 86 84 82 80 82 81

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data Wokingham LEA is Department for Education Key Stage 3 (English, Maths and (English, Maths (English, Maths consistently Maintain and Performance: Science) and Science) and Science) performs better enhance http://www.education.gov.uk/rsgateway/ Level 5 or than the regional performance DB/SFR/s001018/sfr18- above See table below See table below See table below and national 2011v5.xls#'Table 14'!A1 percentage.

Year Wokingham LEA South East England English (%) Maths (%) Science (%) English (%) Maths (%) Science (%) English (%) Maths (%) Science (%) 2007 84 87 83 77 80 78 74 79 75 2008 85 87 86 78 81 79 76 79 76 2009 88 86 88 79 81 81 77 79 78 2010 89 88 90 81 82 82 79 80 80 2011 92 89 92 82 82 84 82 81 83

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 163 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data South East: Wokingham Borough: England

5 or more A* - C 5 or more A* - C 5 or more A* - C Grades Grades (including Grades (including (including English and Maths): English and Wokingham LEA is English and Department for Education Maths): consistently GCSE or Maths): Maintain and 2011: 67.6% performs better equivalent enhance http://www.education.gov.uk/rsgateway/ 2010: 65.6% 2011: 59.0% than the regional Performance: 2011: 59.6% performance DB/SFR/s001056/sfr02- 2009: 63.2% 2010: 53.5% and national 2010: 57.5% 2012atv2.xls#'Table 17'!A1 2008: 61.0% 2009: 49.8% percentage. 2009: 53.7% 2007: 57.6 2008: 47.6% 2008: 51.7% 2007: 46.3% 2007: 49.4%

South East: Great Britain: Wokingham Borough:

Reduce the No No Qualification: No Qualifications1: proportion of the Qualifications: population with

2000: 6.1% basic skills needs 2000: 12% 2000: 16.8% 1. Nomis 2001: 8.9% 2001: 11.9% 2001: 16.7% 2002: 10.7% Target those with Proportion of 2002: 12.1% 2002: 16.5% http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/reports/Imp/ 2003: 7.3% low skills in Trend appears to adults with poor 2003: 11.3% 2003: 15.6% la/2038431754/subreports/quals_time_s 2004: 5.6% numeracy (those be reducing over literacy and 2004: 10.8% 2004: 15.1% eries/report.aspx 2005: 6.1% adults on the time numeracy skills 2005: 10.1% 2005: 14.3% 2006: 5% borderline of 2006: 9.6% 2006: 13.8% 2007: 6.1% functional 2007: 9.9% 2007: 13.3% 2008: 6.2% numeracy that 2008: 7.7% 2008: 12.4% 2009: 5.6% could reach the 2009: 9.2% 2009: 12.3% 2010: 4.9% threshold through 2010: 8.5% 2010: 11.3% 2011: 5.6% some support) 2011: 7.9% 2011: 10.6%

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 164 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 8. TO IMPROVE ACCESSIBILITY FOR ALL TO SERVICES, AMENITIES AND FACILITIES IN PARTICULAR BY SAFE WALKING AND CYCLING ROUTES

As per the High percentage of Distance of No up-to-date No up-to-date requirements of new dwellings See below households comparable comparable policy in the within 30 minutes

from key information is information is Wokingham public transport

services available. available. Borough time from key Development Plan. services.

The following data was derived from annual housing monitoring data for years 04/05, 05/06, 06/07, 07/08 and 08/08. In this instance completions are defined as whole schemes completed for this year. This therefore omits dwellings completed in the monitoring year that are a part of a whole scheme that has not yet been completed (other dwellings under construction).

Percentage of new residential development in Wokingham Borough within 30 minutes public transport time of:

–Dwellings GP Children’s Place of Secondary Employment Major Retail Leisure Facility Community centre worship School Centre Centre Venue 2004/05 94% (637/677) Not available Not available 38% (242/677) 94% (633/677) 82% (555/677) Not available Not available 2005/06 94% (419/444) Not available Not available 71% (316/444) 93% (412/444) 90% (399/444) Not available Not available 2006/07 76% (507/671) Not available Not available 60% (404/671) 55% (367/671) 58% (391/671) Not available Not available 2007/08 99% (524/530) 89% (473/530) 99% (524/530) 92% (488/530) 75% (398/530) 81% (431/530) 86% (454/530) 99% (524/530) 2008/09 97% (391/404) 92% (373/404) 97% (392/404) 96% (386/404) 88% (355/404) 85% (342/404) 84% (341/404) 97% (392/404) 2009/10 No data available 2010/11 No data available

Source: Annual Monitoring Reports (December 2005-2009) http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/environment/planning/ldf/annual-monitoring-report

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 165 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 9. TO REDUCE ROAD CONGESTION AND POLLUTION LEVELS ON THE LOCAL AND STRATEGIC ROAD NETWORK (SRN) BY IMPROVING TRAVEL FACILITIES AND CHOICES INCLUDING SAFE WALKING AND CYCLING ROUTES AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT The Local Transport Plan 3 (2011-2026) states that there are The Local Transport Plan 3 approx. 111,000 As per the Average daily There is no obvious journeys to work each requirements of motor vehicle No data available No data available trend in the data day. Of the total, national and local http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/council/pl flows available. policy. ans/?assetdet4607173=210332&catego Inbound: 30,000 ryesctl4691439=4127 Outbound: 45,000 Internal: 35,500 South East Travel to work by England and Wales Travel to work by (2001): by (2001): (2001):

Car = driving a Car = driving a car Car = driving a car or car or a van, or a van, National (Neighbourhood) Statistics a van, passenger in a There is no obvious passenger in a passenger in a car As per the 2001: car or van and taxi. trend in the data Proportion of car or van and or van and taxi. requirements of available. (2011 travel by mode taxi. national and local http://neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk Car – 69.61% Census information car – 62%; policy. Motorbike – 0.92% not yet released). Car – 65.3% motorbike – 1.1%; Cycle – 2.65% Motorbike – 1.1% Cycle – 2.8%; Bus – 4.44% Cycle – 3.1% Bus – 7.4%; Rail – 5.37% Bus – 4.4% Rail – 7.1%; Walk – 6% Rail – 5.8% Walk – 10.0% Walk – 9.9% Transport Spending Programme 2003- Monetary 041: investment in There is no obvious bus and rail Total Capital Budget No data available No data available trend in the data Wokingham Borough Council travel, = £8.409 million available. walking and cycling Total Expenditure = £5.204 million

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 166 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data Transport Spending Programme 2004/05:

Total Capital Budget = £9.264 million

Total Expenditure = £6,597,772 [2010/11] Borough Wide Results (2008/09 Place Survey1) excluding blank responses

Very Satisfied: Count – 232 14%

Fairly Satisfied: Count – 499 30% Public There is no obvious 1. Wokingham Borough Wide Place Transport (Bus) Neither satisfied nor No data available No data available trend in the data Survey 2008/09 Satisfaction dissatisfied: available. Count – 487 29%

Fairly Dissatisfied: Count – 270 16%

Very Dissatisfied: Count – 189 11%

TOTAL COUNT: 1676

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 167 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIVES Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 10. TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY IN LAND USE THROUGH THE RE-USE OF PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED LAND, EXISTING BUILDINGS, INCLUDING THE RE-USE OF RESOURCES AND REMEDIATION OF PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED LAND Gross new homes built on previously developed land1:

2001/02: 92% Paragraph 111 of 1. BVPI 106 – Percentage of new (Target: 50%) the NPPF3: homes built on previously developed land. 2002/03: 90% Planning policies (Target: 55%) and decisions Wokingham Borough Council Planning Dwellings should encourage Commitments for Housing 2003/04: 90% (including the effective use of (Target: 85%) conversions built land by re-using http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/planningc on PDL)2 land that has been ontrol/planning/planningpolicies/housing 2004/05: 71% previously /housingmonitoring/ (Target: 71%) 2002: 67% developed Locally and Development on No data available 2003: 70% (brownfield land), nationally the % is 2. Communities and Local Government PDL 2004/05: 72% 2004: 75% provided that it is consistently high Land Use Change Statistics (Target: 60%) 2005: 77% not of high 2006: 76% environmental http://www.communities.gov.uk/plannin 2005/06: 72% 2007: 77% value. Local gandbuilding/planningbuilding/plannings (Target: 71.4%) 2008: 80% planning authorities tatistics/landusechange/ 2009: 80% may continue to 2006/7: 78% 2010: 72% consider the case 3. NPPF (Target: 74%) for setting a locally appropriate target https://www.gov.uk/government/publicat 2007/8: 93 (Target: for the use of ions/national-planning-policy- 78%) brownfield land. framework--2

2008/09 100% (no target)

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 168 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

2009/10 100% (no target)

2010/11 84% (no target)

2011/12 53% (no target)

Employment floor space completed on Previously Developed land in Wokingham Borough from April 2004 to March 20011

Source: Annual Monitoring Reports http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/environment/planning/ldf/annual-monitoring-report

Gross external floorspace B1 B2 B8 B1-B8 Mix (sq.m) – Completed 2004-05* 0% N/A 93% 0% 2005-06 1,772 (50%) N/A 1,809 (100%) 7,828 (100%) 2006-07 N/A N/A 981 (100%) N/A 2007-08 809 (100%) N/A 4,628 (86%) 4,427 (100%) 2008-09 N/A 419 (100%) 2,984 (100%) 4,977 (100%) 2009-10 18,693 (81%) N/A N/A 2,372 (68%) 2010-11 -614 (-100%) -400 (-100%) -2,708 (-100%) N/A

No data available at a sub-regional/ regional and national level.

Target: Ensure at least 80% of employment development by 2026 is on previously developed land within development limits (Wokingham Borough Core Strategy Indicators and Targets).

Trend: High percentage on previously developed land (PDL). Except during the last monitoring year (2010-11) when there was a loss of floorspace (100% all on PDL sites).

*Floor space completion amounts not available.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 169 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional / National Indicator Local data Target Trend Data Sources regional data data Vacant Vacant Vacant dwellings dwellings in dwellings in in Wokingham South East: England: Borough: To reduce the Gov.uk 2004: 97,804 2004: 710,935 amount of 2004: 1,274 Low and similar Derelict land 2005: 100,480 2005: 723,509 derelict land 2005: 1,359 performance to https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department- and empty 2006: 102,812 2006: 744,931 and empty 2006: 1,191 other Berkshire for-communities-and-local-government/series/dwelling- properties 2007: 101,809 2007: 763,319 properties 2007: 1,301 authorities. stock-including-vacants 2008: 102,884 2008: 783,119 2008: 1,379 2009: 103,426 2009: 770,496 2009: 1,309 2010: 98,996 2010: 737,147 2010: 1,232 2011: 99,569 2011: 719,999 2011: 1,340

11. TO MINIMISE IMPACTS ARISING FROM POLLUTION AND IMPROVE AND PREVENT WHERE POSSIBLE

Site ID: Woodward Close Automatic Within the AQMA Monitoring Site, nitrogen dioxide Winnersh (within levels have been Air Quality recorded below the 2012 Air Quality Updating and Screening Monitoring Area) objective value but Levels of Assessment for Wokingham Borough Council: Wokingham above the level of main air Annual mean Borough Level concern (36 µg/m³). quality No data No data http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/safety/pollution/air-quality- concentration of of concern = pollutants available available monitoring/air-quality-review-assessment/?locale=en nitrogen dioxide Levels in 2011 are and forecasts (µg /m3) 36 µg/m³ higher than those in There are also 69 passive monitoring sites at roadside 2010 and 2009 by locations around the borough. 2007: 35 3 µg/m³ but are the 2008: 38 same as those in 2009: 35 2008. 2010: 35 2011: 38

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 170 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional / National Indicator Local data Target Trend Data Sources regional data data

Site ID: Woodward Close Automatic Monitoring Site, 2012 Air Quality Updating and Screening Winnersh (within Assessment for Wokingham Borough Council: Air Quality Monitoring Area) UK average No exceedences of http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/safety/pollution/air-quality- (Urban): the 40 µg/m³ monitoring/air-quality-review-assessment/?locale=en Site ID: annual mean PM10 Woodward Close No data 2007: 25 objective were 69 passive monitoring sites at roadside locations around Annual mean available 2008: 23 40 µg/m³ recorded. the borough. concentration of 2009: 22 Particulate 2010: 22 Similar to UK Defra Air Quality Statistics in the UK (1987 to 2011) Matter (PM10) 2011: 22 average (µg/m3) http://www.defra.gov.uk/statistics/files/Air-Qual-Statistics- final-release-2011.pdf 2007: 27 2008: 24 2009: 24 2010: 22 2011: 23 England Nearest data is Urban vs. for Reading 1 Defra Rural (2000 - New Town 2006)2: (Cemetery Establish an http://data.defra.gov.uk/env/aqfg02c-aq-detaileddays- Days 1 Decreased Junction) : air quality 201207.csv (average No data available Urban: significantly in UK action plan in number) for Wokingham urban areas since 2004: 46 areas which 2. Defra Air Quality Statistics in the UK (1987 to 2011) when air Borough. 2004: 22 1993, largely 2005: 39 are unlikely to pollution is 2005: 21 because of a 2006: 45 meet national http://www.defra.gov.uk/statistics/files/Air-Qual-Statistics- moderate or 2006: 38 reduction in 2007: 39 air quality final-release-2011.pdf high 2007: 23 particles and 2008: No data objectives. 2008: 26 sulphur dioxide. 2009: 40 2009: 10 2010: No data 2010: 8 2011: 35 2011: 16

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 171 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 12. TO CONSERVE AND ENHANCE THE BOROUGHS BIODIVERSITY, INCLUDING WILDLIFE AND RIVER CORRIDORS AND NETWORKS AND TO MAXIMISE OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUILDING-IN BENEFICIAL FEATURES FOR BIODIVERSITY INCLUDING LIMITING THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE

Extent of BAP Priority habitats and population BAP Priority Habitats BAP Priority To have regard to Rise in total area Thames Valley Environmental Records of protected Habitats No data available core output between 2005 to Centre species. Total area in Total area in indicators provided 2012. Wokingham Borough: Berkshire: by Thames Valley Wokingham Borough Annual Monitoring Environmental Reports (2004-05 to 2010-11) 2005-06: 1,441 Ha 2005-06: Not Records Centre (8% of total land available (TVERC). surface area) 2006-07: 12, 919 2006-07: 1,432 Ha Ha (8% of total land (10% of total land surface area) surface area)

2007-08: 1,432 Ha 2007-08: 12,427 (8% of total land Ha surface area) (10% of total land surface area) 2008-09: 1,432 Ha Wokingham Borough (8%Council of total – December land 20122008-09: 12,495 172 surface area) Ha (10% of total land 2009-10: 1,897 Ha surface area) (11% of the total land Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data

Change in BAP Change in BAP Priority Species Priority Species Berkshire: Wokingham Borough: Thames Valley Environmental Records 2004-05: 34 To have regard to Centre 2004-05: 34 2005-06: 33 core output

2005-06: 33 2006-07: Not indicators provided Wokingham Borough Annual Monitoring 2006-07: 33 available by Thames Valley Slightly below the Not available Reports (2004-05 to 2010-11) 2007-08: 83 2007-08: Not Environmental county level.

2008-09: Not available Records Centre *The full UK list of BAP priority species available 2008-09: Not (TVERC). was revised in 2007-08 onwards to 2009-10: Not available include more species available 2009-10: Not 2010-11: 108 available 2011-12: 106 2010-11: 178 2011-12: 177

Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (SPA) Species

Data on the Thames Basin Heaths SPA species may be available at http://www.englishnature.org.uk/about/teams/Init.asp?Id=5 and TVERC.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 173 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data Berkshire (B) Wokingham and South East Borough: (SE) England – April

2008/091: 2009: April 20092:

Favourable: 26.1% Favourable: 43.6% Favourable:

B: 43.7% Unfavourable Unfavourable SE: 45.9%; Recovering: 0% Recovering: 44.5%

Unfavourable Unfavourable No Unfavourable no Recovering: Charge: 73.9% change: 7.8% B: 51%

SE: 44.4%; 1. Wokingham Borough Annual Unfavourable Unfavourable Monitoring Reports (2004-05 to 2010- Declining: 0% Declining: 4.1% Unfavourable No Percentage of 11)

Charge: SSSIs in the Part Destroyed/ Part destroyed/ Ensure no further B: 3.0% Borough in 2. Natural England - Berkshire Destroyed: 0% destroyed: 0.1% loss, damage or Condition of SE: 4.0%; favourable deterioration of SSSIs condition is less http://www.sssi.naturalengland.org.uk/S England – August SSSIs; Unfavourable than that at a pecial/sssi/reportIndex.cfm 2011/12: 2012 Declining: county, regional

B: 2.3% and national level. * There are 4 SSSIs wholly or partly Favourable: 26.1% Favourable: 37.3% SE: 5.7% within Wokingham Borough Council,

representing <1% of the land area. Unfavourable Unfavourable Part Destroyed/ Recovering: 43.5% recovering: 59.3% Destroyed:

B: 0% Unfavourable No Unfavourable no SE: 0.1% Charge: 30.4% change: 2.2%

August 2012: Unfavourable

Unfavourable declining: 1.2% Favourable: Declining: 0% B: 54.9% Part destroyed/ SE: 47.5% Part Destroyed/ destroyed: 0.03%

Destroyed: 0% Unfavourable

recovering:

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 174 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data B: 41.4% SE: 49.9%

Unfavourable no change: B: 3.5% SE: 1.2%

Unfavourable declining: B: 0.3% SE: 1.3%

Part destroyed/ destroyed: B: 0.0% SE: 0.1% Extent of key See indicator on extent of BAP Priority habitats and change in BAP Priority species habitats for

which BAPs

have been

established

Wokingham Borough 1. Wokingham Borough Council GIS currently has 2608 ha data. No data Ancient woodland Sufficient data is Extent of of ancient woodlands. No loss of ancient/ available. accounts for not available to ancient In total, they cover semi ancient 2. Woodland Trust around 2% of UK’s allow a trend woodlands 15% of the whole 2 woodland land use analysis. borough1. http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/en/new s-media/fact-file/pages/ancient- woodland-facts.aspx Number, area Local Wildlife Local Wildlife No damage to or and condition of Sites1: Sites loss of Local 1. Wokingham Borough Annual Local Wildlife Wildlife Sites and Monitoring Reports (2004-05 to 2010- No data available. Stable Sites Wokingham Borough Berkshire: Local Nature 11) (previously Reserves known as Number: Area (Ha and %

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 175 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data Wildlife of land area): Heritage Sites 2007-08 134 in Wokingham 2008-09: 118 2010-11: Borough) and 2009-10: 117 9,637 (7.2% Local Nature 2010-11: 117 Reserves 2011-12: 117 2011-12: within the plan area Area (Ha and % of 9,577 (7.6%) land area): Local Nature 2007-08: 1,337.1 Reserves (7.5%) 2008-09: 1,327.3 Area (Ha and % (7.4%) of land area): 2009-10: 1,306.8 (7.3%) 2010-11: 2010-11: 1,318.1 487.4 (0.4%) (7.4%) 2011-12: 1, 293 2011-12: (7.2%) 487.4 (0.4%)

Condition:

2007-08: Stable 2008-09: Stable 2009-10: Stable 2010-11: Stable 2011-12: Stable

Local Nature Reserves

Number:

2010-12: 10 2011-12: 10

Area (Ha and % of

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 176 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data land area):

2010-11: 93.5 (0.52%)

2011-12: 93.5 (0.52%)

Condition:

2010-11: Stable 2011-12: Stable

Number and distribution of characteristic Sufficient data is rare species No decline in not available to (e.g. butterfly No data available No data available No data available populations or allow a trend species, bats, distribution analysis. great crested newts, water voles)

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 177 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data

13. TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE BOROUGH’S COUNTRYSIDE AND HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT

Sufficient data is Land covered not available to by management No data available No data available No data available No data available allow a trend schemes analysis.

640 Listed Buildings in the Borough1:

Grade I: 9 Grade II: 40 Grade II*: 591

183 buildings at Buildings at risk2: 1. Listed Buildings Totals – Images of risk (including No loss of listed Buildings of 1,954 buildings at England: Statistics by County Places of buildings. Grade I and II* 1 Grade II listed risk (including Worship) in the at risk of decay building in a very bad Places of Worship) Currently 1 Grade II http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk South East – Over time, and consider state = St. in England – listed building in a excluding reduction in the other heritage Bartholomew’s excluding very bad state. 2. Buildings at Risk Register: Scheduled number of listed assets to seek Church, Arborfield) Scheduled Ancient Ancient buildings on the ‘at no loss Monuments2. http://risk.english- Monuments2. risk’ register. Infirmary Stables, heritage.org.uk/register.aspx

Arborfield Garrison,

Arborfield is in a very bad state (not listed but a Scheduled Monument)

Total Number of 16 Conservation All conservation conservation Areas: Arborfield, areas to have an

areas in Finchampstead up to data appraisal Wokingham Church, Hurst, by the end of the

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 178 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data Borough Langborough Road, plan period. Murdoch Road, Heritage Assets Remenham, at risk Remenham Church, Ruscombe, Sindlesham, Sonning, Swallowfield, Twyford, Twyford Station, Wargrave, Woodley, Wokingham Town Centre

11 Village Design Statements are currently adopted. Total number of Borough Design Guide SPD (May 2012) Village Design The Borough Design Other Village 11 Village Design Statements Guide Supplementary Design Statements Statements are No data available No data available (VDS’s) in Planning Document may be adopted in currently adopted. http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/planningc Wokingham (May 2012) the future. ontrol/planning/planningguidance/desig Borough incorporates the nspd/ currently adopted Village Design Statements.

Landscape Character Areas of Sensitivity:

Wokingham Borough Council Areas of High Landscape Character Assessment April Landscape/ Sensitivity - 3 Sufficient data is 2004 townscape not available to character of Areas of Moderate No data available No data available allow a trend http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/planningc Wokingham Sensitivity - 24 analysis. ontrol/planning/planningpolicies/country Borough side-and-open- Areas of Low space/landscapecharacterspg/ Sensitivity - 3

Landscape Character

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 179 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data Areas of Quality:

Areas of High Quality - 10

Areas of Moderate Quality - 19

Areas Low Quality – 1

Number of applications appraised against the Sites and Monuments Due to a change in Record: the process, far more applications 2004 – 05 = 151 are now being An appropriate appraised in detail archaeological Number of proposals and therefore the assessment/ plan is found to have number for the year in place in all cases Number of potential (2004-05) is likely where remains are planning archaeological to increase quite found after applications implication: dramatically. planning consents identified as No data available No data available Berkshire Archaeology are implemented. having 2004 – 05 = 55 This initial increase

archaeological is expected to be a Remains to be implications Archaeological one-off, with the excavated only "events": following year where preservation 2004 – 05 = 17 probably settling in situ is not (Investigations and above 2004-5 and practical. other fieldwork) below 2005-6

2012 Number of applications appraised against the sites and monuments

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 180 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data record: 77

Number of proposals found to have potential archaeological implication: 71

Archaeological “events” (investigations and other fieldwork: 21

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 181 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 14. TO SUSTAINABLY USE RESOURCES (including renewable and non-renewable resources) Percentage of new build and March 2008 to March 2008 to June retrofit homes June 2012 in 2012 in England:, meeting Berkshire:, EcoHomes* Very 118,106 code Good standard or 1,765 code certificates (all code Code for sustainable homes and March 2008 to same level in a certificates (all Levels) issued at energy performance of buildings June 2012 in similar accredited code Levels) design stage. data, Communities and Local Wokingham To be above the scheme issued at design Wokingham Borough Government Borough:, South East average stage. England, Wales and Council issued less

This is now the Northern Ireland: code certificates than all https://www.gov.uk/government/pu 158 code All new dwellings to Code for March 2008 to other Berkshire blications/code-for-sustainable- certificates (all meet CfSH Level 4 Sustainable June 2012 in Number of CfSH authorities. homes-and-energy-performance- code Levels) (full). Homes (CfSH). South East:, Level 4 certificates of-buildings-data-england-wales- issued at design The indicator is to issued as design and-northern-ireland-up-to-end-of- stage. now monitor the 20,764 code stage: june-2012 percentage of new certificates (all build and retrofit code Levels) 2008-09: 21 homes meeting issued at design 2009-10: 1,150 CfSH Level 4 stage. 2010-11: 5,561 (full). 2011-12: 16,231 South East: 232 assessments – 1998 to 2001: To be above the Percentage of South East commercial Very Good 147; Average buildings meeting Excellent 70 SEEDA Sustainability Checklist NO DATA Sufficient data is not BREEAM Very NO DATA To require energy AVAILABLE available to allow a Good standard or 35 assessments AVAILABLE and water trend analysis. same level in a – 2002: efficiency in new similar accredited and redeveloped scheme Very Good 25; buildings to reflect Excellent 4 — best practice. office buildings only

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 182 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 15. TO ADDRESS WASTE BY: REDUCING AND MINIMISING WASTE AS A PRIORITY, RE-USE THEN RECYCLE COMPOST OR ENERGY RECOVERY Achieve better waste management Percentage of Reuse, Recycling or Household Household the total composting: recycling rates: recycling rates: South East Plan tonnage of Policy W6 DEFRA:: municipal waste Wokingham Borough: South East: England: (Recycling and

that has been Composting): Percentage is http://www.defra.gov.uk/statistics/enviro recycled, 2006-07: 34.0% 2006-07: 33.1% 2006-07: 30.9% increasing year on nment/waste/wrfg23-wrmsannual/ composted, 2007-08: 37.1% 2007-08: 36.0% 2007-08: 34.5% Municipal Solid year.

landfilled or 2008-09: 36.7% 2008-09: 38.4% 2008-09: 37.6% Waste: South East Plan (May 2009) used to recover 2009-10: 38.4% 2009-10: 40.0% 2009-10: 39.7% heat, power and 2010-11: 41% 2010-11: 41.3% 2010-11: 41.5% 2008: 36% other energy 2011-12: 42.6% 2011-12: 43.3% 2011-12: 43.0% 2010: 40% sources. 2015: 50% 2025: 60% Achieve better waste management

South East Plan Policy W5 (Targets Landfill: Landfill: Landfill: for diversion from Percentage is

landfill): decreasing year on Wokingham Borough: South East: England: year. DEFRA::

Municipal Solid 2006-07: 65.3% 2006-07: 54.0% 2006-07: 57.9% Waste: Lower percentage http://www.defra.gov.uk/statistics/enviro 2007-08: 62.2% 2007-08: 51.2% 2007-08: 54.4% of municipal waste nment/waste/wrfg23-wrmsannual/ 2008-09: 60.4% 2008-09: 45.6% 2008-09: 50.3% 2005: 35% is going to landfill 2009-10: 44.6% 2009-10: 37.9% 2009-10: 46.9% 2010: 52% than that for the South East Plan (May 2009) 2010-11: 21% 2010-11: 32.7% 2010-11: 43.3% 2015: 75% South East and 2011-12: 15.3% 2011-12: 25.1% 2011-12: 37.4% England.

Waste Strategy for England (2007):

2005: 40% 2010: 53%

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 183 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 2015: 67% Achieve better waste management

South East Plan Policy W7 (Waste management

capacity Number of 2006-07: 470 2006-07: 799 2006-07: 798 DEFRA:: requirements): kilograms of 2007-08: 480 2007-08: 754 2007-08: 735 Number of

household 2008-09: 462 2008-09: 684 2008-09: 669 kilograms is http://www.defra.gov.uk/statistics/enviro Berkshire Unitaries: waste collected 2009-10: 456 2009-10: 644 2009-10: 625 decreasing year on nment/waste/wrfg23-wrmsannual/

per head of the 2010-11: 447 2010-11: 624 2010-11: 598 year. Municipal Solid population 2011-12: 423 2011-12: 592 2011-12: 568 South East Plan (May 2009) Waste:

2008-2010: 441 2011-2015: 480 2016-2020: 522 2021-2025: 563

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 184 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 16. TO MAINTAIN, AND, WHERE APPROPRIATE IMPROVE WATER QUALITY (INCLUDING GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER) AND TO ACHIEVE SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OF BOTH SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER FLOWS. See table below. Blackwater Valley Water Cycle Study:

Scoping Report (2011) Also, see key Ecological actions for Loddon status or Thames River Basin Management Plan Catchment as potential of See table below. See table below. Data not available See table below. (2009) identified in the river of lake Thames River water bodies http://www.environment- Basin Management agency.gov.uk/research/planning/12503 Plan. 5.aspx

See table below. Blackwater Valley Water Cycle Study: Scoping Report (2011) Also, see key Chemical status actions for Loddon Thames River Basin Management Plan See table below. of river or lake See table below. See table below. Data not available Catchment as (2009)

water bodies identified in the Thames River http://www.environment- Basin Management agency.gov.uk/research/planning/12503 Plan. 5.aspx

See table below. Blackwater Valley Water Cycle Study: Also, see key Scoping Report (April 2011) Biological actions for Loddon

status of river Catchment as Thames River Basin Management Plan See table below. See table below. Data not available See table below. or lake water identified in the (2009)

bodies Thames River Basin Management http://www.environment- Plan. agency.gov.uk/research/planning/12503 5.aspx

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 185 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Loddon Catchment Thame Catchment Maidenhead and Sunbury Catchment 2009` 2015 2009` 2015 2009` 2015 Ecological status or potential of river of 9% 9% 8 8 23 23 lake water bodies Chemical status of river or lake water 41% 47% 13 16 35 35 bodies Biological status of river or lake water 83% 83% 83% 83 83 100 bodies Trends In 2009, 5% of rivers currently achieve None of the catchment currently 5% of rivers currently achieve good or good or better ecological status/potential. achieves good or better ecological better ecological status/potential. status/potential. 41% of rivers assessed for biology are at 10% of rivers assessed for biology are at good or high biological status now, with 45% of rivers assessed for biology are at good or high biological status now, 41% at poor biological status, and no good or high biological status now, with with 45% at poor biological status, and assessed river water bodies at bad 41% at poor biological status, and no 10% of assessed river water bodies at status. assessed river water bodies at bad bad status. status. Phosphate levels are high in a number of Phosphate levels are high in a number of rivers for example the River Blackwater. Phosphates are rivers. a problem for the catchment with most water bodies currently at risk of failing.

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data

Thames Water1 1.Thames Water Annual Performance Report 2011-12 2011: https://www.thameswater.co.uk/about- Category 1 and 2: 20 us/13874.htm In 2010, there were Incidents of Category 3: 248 Sufficient data is 401 category 1 and major and No Category 1 and not available to 2. South East Water Annual 2 water pollution significant South East Water2 2 incidents allow a trend Performance Report 2011-12 incidents in water pollution analysis. England3. 2011: http://www.southeastwater.co.uk/media/ 124401/SEWAnnualPerformanceReport Category 1: 2012.pdf Category 2: 1 Category 3: 5 3. Defra

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 186 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data http://data.defra.gov.uk/env/spfg15- serious-poll-incid-201112.csv

Pollution Incidents per category: Category 1 = the most serious Category 2 = significant but less severe Category 3 = relatively minor

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data

To ensure no net increase in 1Those households supplied by Thames consumption Water, consume an average of 167 litres England: despite 1. Wokingham Borough Council of water, per person per day. 1Figures for development. Sustainable Environment Strategy Per capita Thames Water are 2Average per capita (2010)/ OFWAT consumption of To a lesser extent, Wokingham is supplied higher than any consumption is New dwellings to water by South East Water, which has an other water about 150 litres per meet internal 2. Blackwater Valley Water Cycle average consumption of 156 litres of company in the UK. person per day. potable water Study: Scoping Report (April 2011) water per day. target of 105 litres

or less per person per day.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 187 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 17. TO MAINTAIN AND WHERE APPROPRIATE IMPROVE SOIL QUALITY, AND TO ENSURE LAND AFFECTED BY CONTAMINATION IS REMEDIATED TO A CONDITION SUITABLE FOR USE 1. Region in Figures, South East – 7,500 ha of land in Maps showing National Statistics 2001 use for agriculture agricultural land 1 [2000] quality are http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/t Total farmed area Total farmed available from heme_compendia/region_in_figures_20 in South East3: 8,000 ha of land in area in South DEFRA, National 01/south_east.pdf 3 use for agriculture East : Soil Institute and 2 2007: [2003] To protect land of via 2. Region in Figures, South East – 9, 291, 357 (Ha) Agricultural 2007: Agricultural Land www.magic.gov.uk National Statistics 2003

land quality Total farmed area in 1,208,460 (Ha) Quality grades 1 (web-based

Reading and and 2. interactive mapping http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/t 3 2010: Wokingham : 2010: system bringing heme_compendia/region_in_figures_wi 8, 887,289 (Ha) together nter04/South_East.pdf 1,140,878 (Ha) 2007: 8, 660 (Ha) information on key

2010: 8 825 (Ha) environmental 3.Defra schemes and http://www.defra.gov.uk/statistics/foodfa designations). rm/landuselivestock/junesurvey/junesur veyresults/ 443 Sites in Wokingham identified as ‘sites of potential concern’ with respect to land contamination Number of [2007/08]1 ‘sites of The prioritisation 1 BVPI 216 (a) and (b) – Identifying potential process of Sufficient data is However to date we Contaminated Land concern’ (within No data is potentially not available to have identified 838 No data is available Wokingham available contaminated sites allow a trend potentially 2.Environmental Health, Wokingham Borough), with in the borough is analysis. contaminated land Borough Council (2012) respect to land not yet complete. uses in the borough contamination [2012]. (This number includes multiple land uses on the same sites).

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 188 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data

Increase in Sufficient data is Percentage of percentage of land not available to land restored to No data available No data available No data available restored to a allow a trend a suitable use suitable use analysis. condition condition

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 18. TO INCREASE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND THE PROPORTION OF ENERGY GENERATED FROM RENEWABLE SOURCES IN THE BOROUGH

In the main CO Wokingham Borough: South East: England: 2 emissions from

domestic electricity Household Domestic Electricity Domestic Domestic Electricity To require energy and gas have energy use per CO emissions (units Electricity CO CO emissions efficiency/ 2 2 2 slightly fallen since Department for Environment and capita (for – kt CO ): emissions (units (units – kt CO ): renewable energy 2 2 2005 in Climate Change instance from – kt CO ): technology in new 2 Wokingham Standard 2005: 164.6 2005: 63,922.5 and redeveloped Borough, South http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/ Assessment 2006: 170.8 2005: 9,048.9 2006: 66,672.5 buildings to be East and England. statistics/local_auth/co2_las/co2_las.as Procedure 2007: 172.1 2006: 9,385.3 2007: 66,482.6 above mandatory px (SAP) rating 2008: 166.7 2007: 9,378.9 2008: 63,991.1 standards/ Per capita CO has from HECA 2009: 150.2 2008: 9,126.9 2009: 57,819.3 requirements. 2 decreased in returns) 2010: 153.9 2009: 8,244.2 2010: 59,291.6 Wokingham 2010: 8,488.3 Borough, South Domestic Gas CO Domestic Gas CO 2 2 East and England. emissions (units – kt Domestic Gas emissions (units –

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 189 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data CO2): CO2 emissions kt CO2): (units – kt CO2): 2005: 213.7 2005: 76,741.4 2006: 210.9 2005: 10,491.0 2006: 73,804.9 2007: 204.5 2006: 10,162.7 2007: 70,453.3 2008: 208.1 2007: 9,750.1 2008: 71,994.4 2009: 183.0 2008: 9,953.3 2009: 64,278.4 2010: 202.8 2009: 8,905.6 2010: 71,402.1 2010: 9,940.2 Per capita CO2 Per capita CO2 emissions (all Per capita CO2 emissions (all sources) (units – t emissions (all sources) (units – t CO2): sources): CO2): (units – t CO2) 2005: 5.8 2005: 7.5 2006: 5.8 2005: 6.9 2006: 7.4 2007: 5.7 2006: 6.9 2007: 7.2 2008: 5.5 2007: 6.7 2008: 7.0 2009: 5.0 2008: 6.5 2009: 6.4 2010: 5.1 2009: 5.9 2010: 6.6 2010: 6.1 Wokingham South East1: England: Borough1: Industry and Industry and Industry and Commercial CO Commercial CO 1. Department for Environment and 2 2 In the main CO Emissions of Commercial CO emissions (units emissions (units – 2 Climate Change 2 emissions from greenhouse emissions (units – kt – kt CO ): kt CO ): Reducing UK 2 2 industry and gases from CO ): emissions by at http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/ 2 commercial and energy 2005: 21,019.8 2005: 191,079.8 least 34% by 2020 statistics/local_auth/co2_las/co2_las.as road transport have consumption, 2005: 292.1 2006: 21,080.5 2006: 189,755.8 and at least 80% by px slightly fallen since transport and 2006: 302.8 2007: 20,455.3 2007: 184,414.4 2050 – baseline 2005 in land use and 2007: 299.3 2008: 20,180.3 2008: 181,191.8 year is 19902. 2. Climate Change Act 2000: Wokingham waste 2008: 297.9 2009: 17,642.2 2009: 159,284.3 Borough, South management. 2009: 271.9 2010: 19,042.3 2010: 168,485.3 http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/ East and England. 2010: 279.7 legislation/cc_act_08/cc_act_08.aspx Road Transport Road Transport Road Transport CO2 CO2 emissions CO2 emissions emissions (units – kt (units – kt CO2): (units – kt CO2):

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 190 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data CO2): 2005: 15,049.8 2005: 103,750.6 2005: 204.1 2006: 14,888.5 2006: 103,468.4 2006: 200.7 2007: 15,002.8 2007: 104,432.5 2007: 203.6 2008: 14,431.1 2008:100,858.1 2008: 196.0 2009: 13,872.1 2009: 97,242.6 2009: 185.4 2010: 13,811.6 2010: 96,873.0 2010: 183.5

Regional targets (MW)3:

2010: 620 The Borough has 2016: 895 achieved 2010 2020: 1,130 indicative target for 2026: 1750 wind energy. The Installed South East2: England2: Borough has not capacity for Sub-regional met the indicative energy Installed capacity Installed capacity of 1. Wokingham Borough Annual targets: (Thames targets for all other production of site generating site generating Monitoring Report (2009/10) Valley and Surrey) technology types. from renewable electricity from electricity from

sources: How renewable renewable sources 202MW [2010] Department for much sources (MW): (MW): 2. Department for Environment and 271MW [2016] Environment and renewable Climate Change – Regional Renewable See table below1 Climate Change energy is 2005: 258 2005: 1,376 Statistics. To require energy/ confirms that supplied by this 2006: 346 2006: 1,844 renewable energy between 2003 and method and to 2007: 347.1 2007: 2,276.1 https://restats.decc.gov.uk/cms/regional technology in new 2011 there was a what extent 2008: 387.9 2008: 2,662.9 -renewable-statistics/#Data and redeveloped 225% increase in does it meet 2009: 461.5 2009: 3,121.0 buildings to be generation from ideal of zero 2010: 857.5 2010: 3,727.5 3. South East Plan (2009) above mandatory renewables in the carbon 2011: 1,025.2 2011: 5,880.4 standards/ UK, but faster rates development? requirements. of growth were recorded in areas 2009 Renewable such as the South Energy Directive East (282%). sets a target for the UK to achieve 15% of its energy

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 191 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data consumption from renewable sources by 2020.

Wokingham Borough Council renewable energy capacity 31 March 2010 & 2010 targets Extracted 17/12/10 from TV Energy installations database

Technology New capacity Installed capacity Indicative 2010 target Electricity, Electricity, Electricity MWe Electricity, MWe MWe % target attained Wind 0 2.002 0.941 213% Solar PV 0 0.004 0.309 1% Hydro 0 0n/an/a Landfill gas 0 0n/an/a Sewage gas 0 0.250 0.429 58% Animal biomass 0 0n/an/a Plant biomass 0 0 2.044 0% Biomass co-firing 0 0n/an/a MSW combustion 0 0n/an/a TOTAL 0 2.256 3.723 61%

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 192 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data

19. APPROPRIATE NEW DEVELOPMENT THAT MAKES A POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION OR MAKES NO MATERIAL HARM TO THE CHARACTER, ENVIRONMENT, LANDSCAPE, HERITAGE WITHIN THE BOROUGH

Local Planning Policy:

Core Strategy (2010) – such as Policy CP3 (General Principles for Development)

Borough Design Guide SPD (2012) Local Planning Sufficient data is Authority planning Landscape Character Assessment not available to Quality New application decisions. (2004) No data available No data available allow a trend Development analysis. Planning Appeal Emerging Managing Development

decisions Delivery DPD

National Planning Policy:

National Planning Policy Framework – such as under Heading 7 – Requiring good design.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 193 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data

20. TO ENSURE HIGH AND STABLE LEVELS OF EMPLOYMENT

Wokingham Borough: South East: Great Britain

April 04 – March 05: April 04 – March April 04 – March 82,800 (80.4%) 05: 77.3% 05: 72.7%

April 05 – March 06: April 05 – March April 05 – March 84,000 (80.4%) 06: 77.2% 06: 72.5%

April 06- March 07: April 06- March April 06 – March Overall very high 82,900 (78.7%) 07: 76.7% 07: 72.5% Nomis levels of

Proportion of employment in April 07 – March 08: April 07 – March April 07 – March http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/reports/lmp/ people of High levels of Wokingham 85,900 (81.2%) 08: 76.7% 08: 72.6% la/2038431754/subreports/ea_time_seri working age in employment Borough. Above es/report.aspx? employment the levels in South April 08 – March 09: April 08 – March April 08 – March East and Great 83,200 (77.1%) 09: 76.4% 09: 72.0% Britain.

April 09 – March 10: April 09 – March April 09 – March 83,300 (75.9%) 10: 74.5% 10: 70.3%

April 10 – March 11: April 10 – March April 10 – March 87,500 (79.1%) 11: 74.6% 11: 70.2%

April 11 – March 12: April 11 – March April 11 – March 85,100 (75.9% 12: 74.6% 12: 70.2%

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 194 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Job density (ratio of Job density (ratio Job density (ratio of total jobs to of total jobs to total jobs to Percentages have population aged 16- population aged population aged remained relatively Employment 64) 16-64) 16-64) stable in self-sufficiency Wokingham capacity. Local 1. Nomis Wokingham Borough: South East: Great Britain: Borough. balance https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/reports/lm

between p/la/2038431754/report.aspx#tabjobs 2004: 0.71 2004: 0.83 2004: 0.80 Maintain high ratio Percentages for available 2005: 0.70 2005: 0.84 2005: 0.81 Wokingham employment Employment Land Study (October 2006: 0.72 2006: 0.82 2006: 0.79 Borough have been and number of 2005) and updates 2007: 0.73 2007: 0.82 2007: 0.80 consistently below people of 2008: 0.72 2008: 0.82 2008: 0.79 those for the South working age. 2009: 0.69 2009: 0.80 2009: 0.78 East and for Great 2010: 0.72 2010: 0.80 2010: 0.77 Britain.

Wokingham Borough:

April 2006: 110 (0.1%)

April 2007: 100 South East: Great Britain: Proportion of (0.1%) people claiming April 2006: 0.1% April 2006: 0.4% Nomis: unemployment Proportion to be April 2008: 50 (0.0%) April 2007: 0.1% April 2007: 0.4% Consistently lower benefits who lower than the April 2008: 0.0% April 2008: 0.3% than national http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/reports/lmp/ have been out South East April 2009: 80 (0.1%) April 2009: 0.1% April 2009: 0.3% levels. la/2038431754/subreports/ccadr_time_ of work for Average. April 2010: 0.2% April 2010: 0.6% series/report.aspx? more than a April 2010: 220 April 2011: 0.2% April 2011: 0.5% year (0.2%) April 2012: 0.2% April 2012: 0.9%

April 2011:185 (0.2%)

April 2012: 225 (0.2%) Business Start- Wokingham Borough South East: Great Britain: ups – Statistics for Nomis: Percentage 2000: 610 2000: 28,750 2000: 174,320 Wokingham

increase or 2001: 555 2001: 27,180 2001: 165,620 No net loss in Borough are http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/reports/lmp/ decrease in the 2002: 620 2002: 28,605 2002: 172,620 registrations consistent with the la/2038431754/subreports/vat_time_ser total number of 2003: 675 2003: 30,960 2003: 187,660 trend at a regional ies/report.aspx? VAT registered 2004: 600 2004: 28,955 2004: 179,770 and national level. businesses in 2005: 560 2005: 28,675 2005: 177,935

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 195 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

the area 2006: 555 2006: 28,665 2006: 177,615 2007: 715 2007: 31,970 2007: 201,315

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data

21. TO ENCOURAGE ‘SMART’ ECONOMIC GROWTH

GVA per head in GVA per head Berkshire is higher GVA per head growth growth in 2009: GVA per head than that at a in 2009: growth in 2009: national level and Maintain above National Statistics Berkshire, in the top five GVA per worker Berkshire: £31,057 South East and Buckinghamshire England: nation wide. national average http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/gva12 and Oxfordshire: 06.pdf £20,000 per head. In 2009, per head

£26,259 per growth in Berkshire head. was -3.8% down on 2008. Measure of success will be the area’s Gross Value Economic Sufficient data is Wokingham Borough Council forms part of the Thames Valley Added (GVA) Activity within not available to Thames Valley Berkshire LEP Berkshire Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) output and the Economic allow a trend number of people Partnership analysis. http://thamesvalleyberkshire.co.uk/ in the local Areas workforce, and their education and skills.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 196 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Sub regional Indicator Local data / regional National data Target Trend Data Sources data 22. MAINTAINING A BUOYANT AND COMPETITVE ECONOMY WITH A RANGE OF JOBS WITHOUT ADVERSELY AFFECTING THE QUALITY OF LIFE

No data available – see indicator above on GVA per worker (objective 21). GVA per capita

Wokingham Borough: South East: Great Britain:

Jan 04 – Dec 04: Jan 04 – Dec 04: Jan 04 – Dec 04: 59.3% 50.4% 46.8% Jan 05 – Dec 05: Jan 05 – Dec 05: Jan 05 – Dec 05: 60% 50.8% 47.1% Jan 06 – Dec 06: Jan 06– Dec 06: Jan 06– Dec 06: Percentage of Wokingham 62.9% 51.4% 47.9% population of Raise the number Borough’s Jan 07 – Dec 07: Jan 07 – Dec 07: Jan 07 – Dec 07: Nomis: working age of people with NVQ performance is 60.2% 51.3% 48.4% qualified to NVQ Level 3 above that at a Jan 08 – Dec 08: Jan 08 – Dec 08: Jan 08 – Dec 08: https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/reports/lfm Level 3 or qualifications regional and 62.9% 51.7% 48.2% p/la/2038431754/subreports/quals_time equivalent national level. Jan 09 – Dec 09: Jan 09 – Dec 09: Jan 09 – Dec 09: _series/report.aspx 64.4% 52.5% 49.3% Jan 10 – Dec 10: Jan 10 – Dec 10: Jan 10 – Dec 10: 63.6% 53.8% 51.0% Jan 11 – Dec 11: Jan 11 – Dec 11: Jan 11 – Dec 11: 64.0% 56.7% 52.7%

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 197 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

APPENDIX 3 – KEY WILDLIFE SITES (NATURA 2000 SITES)

A3-1 Natura 2000 sites are protected habitats for flora and fauna of European importance. This is a therefore a collective term for Special Areas of Conservation (designated under the Habitats Directive) and Special Protection Areas (SPAs) (designated under the Birds Directive).

In respect to the SEA Regulations, the table below lists those Natura 2000 sites lying within 15km of the Wokingham Borough boundary:

Nature 2000 sites within 15km (linear) of Wokingham Borough

Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) Special Protection Areas (SPA)

Aston Rowant, Burnham Beeches, Chiltern Thames Basin Heaths Beechwoods, Hartslock Wood, Thursley, Ash, Pirbright & Chobham and Windsor Forest & Great Park

Further information on these sites can be found in the Habitats Regulations Assessment of the MDD DPD pursuant to Regulations 61 and 102 of “The Conservation of Species and Habitats Regulations 2010.”

SPECIAL PROTECTION AREAS (SPAs)

A3-2 The UK Government is required under the Birds Directive to take special measures to conserve the habitats of rare and migratory birds. Those species requiring special conservation measures are listed in Annex 1 of the Directive. SPAs are those which contain the most suitable habitats for these species; they are designated by the government, following advice from Natural England and consultation with owners, occupiers, local authorities and a range of bodies having interests in the area of land concerned.

THAMES BASIN HEATHS SPA

A3-3 The Thames Basin Heath SPA is a European designated site (under the EC Habitats Directive) for the protection of the Nightjar, Dartford Warbler and Woodlark. With regard to housing delivery Natural England has produced draft mitigation standards for residential development (September 2005).

The Thames Basin Heaths project was the first in the southeast region, and focuses on the area around the Thames Basin Heaths SPA. It is a partnership project led by Natural England, and includes 11 local planning authorities. Other non-governmental organisations, such as the RSPB, act as consultants on key areas of the project, including the Thames Basin Heaths Delivery Plan.

Parts of Wokingham Borough fall within the 2km mitigation zone (areas of Pinewood, Crowthorne) and much of the Borough south of the M4 falls within the 5km mitigation zone – around 30% of the Borough lies within 5km of the Thames Basin Heaths SPA. A map showing the location of the Thames Basin Heaths SPA and those areas within 5km and more information can be viewed at:

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 198 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/planningcontrol/planning/planningpolicies/thamesbasinheath sspa/

Further information is available on the Natural England website:

http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/

It must be made clear that there is no SPA or Special Area of Conservation (SAC) within Wokingham Borough.

APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT – 1994 HABITAT REGULATIONS (AMENDED 2007) ASSESSMENT OF THE SUBMISSION WOKINGHAM BOROUGH CORE STRATEGY

A3-4 Wokingham Borough Council (the Council) produced a draft Screening Report to detail its conclusions of the likely significant effects of the Core Strategy upon protected European (Natura 2000) sites. The Council consulted a range of organisations (listed in appendix 1) from 6 June to 11 July 2007 on whether the Core Strategy was likely to generate significant effects upon Natura 2000 sites, and what (if any) impacts could arise. The Statement of Consultation details the issues raised and how the authority has addressed them in finalising this Habitats Regulations Assessment which incorporates the Appropriate Assessment (AA) required following Screening. The amended screening has been incorporated into Section 3 of the document.

An AA considers whether the approach of a plan or project is likely to have a significant effect on the conservation objectives of a European site and how these can be avoided. These effects can either be from the plan or project on its own or in combination with other commitments or proposed plans in the vicinity of the European site. The Council will assess whether an AA is required when it produces each Local Development Document (LDD).

The Core Strategy sets out the broad approach to where development will occur within the Borough in the period to 2026, within the overall context of national and regional policy. The Core Strategy also includes a range of policies to ensure proposals adequately address any issues arising in national or regional policy, together with evidence collected by the authority (including the views of the community). Furthermore, the findings of the AA together with the Sustainability Appraisal (incorporating a Strategic Environment Assessment) could also inform the Core Strategy to ensure relevant issues are addressed. Further details of potential affects of the Core Strategy upon Natura 2000 are set out in the Screening section of the AA.

The authority needed to consider whether the Core Strategy was likely to generate significant effects upon Natura 2000 sites to accord with the requirements of “The Conservation (Natural Habitats & c.) (Amendment) Regulations 2007” (the 2007 Regulations). These Regulations impose a requirement for LDD to be assessed where they are likely to have a significant affect upon a European site. Where likely significant effects arise, an AA is then required to demonstrate how these will be avoided.

The Council has considered the likely development arising from the South East Plan and other plans or projects which could affect the Natura 2000 sites within 15km (linear) of Wokingham borough. For further information please see the ‘1994 Habitat Regulations (amended 2007) Assessment of the Submission Wokingham Borough Core Strategy’.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 199 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

APPENDIX 4

GLOSSARY

Activity Halls Sport England’s Active Places Power defines activity halls as ‘multi-sports (facilities) where activities take place, (they do) not qualify as a (sports) hall and (are) not a purpose built studio’. They are typically on a site where there is a sports hall. Conversely, they could be on a site where there is no other sports hall. An activity hall is not necessarily marked for sports but must be at least 10m x 18m. This assessment of activity halls, therefore, includes halls that could be used for sport and which are less than three badminton courts in size. In general these are the community buildings that are occasionally used for other related uses. Affordable Housing In the context of Core Strategy policies CP5 Housing mix, Supplementary density and affordability, CP15 Employment Development Planning Document and CP16 Science Park, it provides further guidance on the Supplementary Council’s approach to securing affordable housing through Planning Document the planning process. The SPD was adopted on 2 June 2011. (SPD) Agricultural Land A classification of farmland quality by the Department for Classification Environment, Food & Rural Affairs used to inform decisions about the future use of the land. Land is classified into five categories according to versatility and suitability for growing crops. (See also Best and most versatile agricultural land). Air Quality Areas designated by Local Authorities because they are not Management Areas likely to achieve national air quality objectives by the relevant (AQMA) deadlines. There is a requirement to draw up an action plan for each AQMA. Allocated site A parcel of land which is identified for a particular use within a Development Plan Document (DPD). Annual Monitoring See ‘Monitoring Report’. Report (AMR) Appropriate This is required when a plan or project is likely to result in a Assessment significant effect upon a Natura 2000 site when considered in combination with other similar proposals. The Appropriate Assessment indicates how these likely significant effects will be avoided. Atomic Weapons Atomic Weapons Establishment, There are two licensed Establishment (AWE) nuclear installations located in West Berkshire which are the Atomic Weapons Establishment sites in Aldermaston (AWE A) and in Burghfield (AWE B). Audit Report The State of the District Audit Report published in December 2005. Best and most Land in grades 1, 2, and 3a of the Agricultural Land versatile agricultural Classification, as defined in the National Planning Policy land Framework (NPPF). (See also Agricultural Land Classification). Biodiversity Or Biological Diversity is a term given to the variety of life on Earth, and the natural patterns it forms.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 200 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Biodiversity Areas where biodiversity improvements are likely to have the Opportunity Areas most beneficial results at a strategic scale. (BOA) BREEAM (Building A widely used means of reviewing and improving the Research environmental performance of buildings. BREEAM Establishment assessment methods generally apply to commercial Environmental developments (industrial, retail, etc.). Assessment Method) Code for Sustainable The Code is intended as a single national standard to guide Homes (CfSH) industry in the design and construction of sustainable homes. It measures the sustainability of a home against design categories, rating the ‘whole home’ as a complete package. There are different levels.

CfSH Level 4 requires a mandatory minimum percentage of energy efficiency – 44% better than Part L1A of the 2006 Building Regulations. It also requires a mandatory maximum standard in indoor water consumption of 105 litres per person per day.

Combined Heat and The combined production of heat, usually in the form of Power (CHP) steam, and power, usually in the form of electricity. Community Facilities Community facilities include development for health (including preventative social care and community support services), education, play and leisure or culture together with libraries, village/community halls and religious buildings. It also includes burial sites. Community A levy allowing local authorities to raise funds from owners or Infrastructure Levy developers of land undertaking new building projects in their (CIL) areas. CIL is a new levy that local authorities in England and Wales can choose to charge on new developments in their area. The money can be used to support development by funding infrastructure that the council, local community and neighbourhoods need – for example, new or safer road schemes, park improvements, or a new health centre. The system is very simple. It applies to most new buildings and charges are based on the size and type of the new development. The Community Infrastructure Levy will replace planning obligations as the mechanism for funding the delivery of most forms of infrastructure from April 2014. Comparison retail Retailing related to clothing and footwear; household textiles and furnishings; furniture and floor coverings; household appliances; audio visual equipment; hardware, DIY goods, decorating supplies; chemist and medical goods, cosmetics and beauty products; books; jewellery, watches; china, glassware and kitchen utensils; recreational, personal and luxury goods. Completions This term is used to describe where housing is completed. The housing unit does not necessarily have to be occupied. Convenience retail Retailing related to food, alcoholic drink, tobacco products, newspapers, and periodicals, non-durable household goods. Core Employment These tend to be the largest employment areas in the Area (CEA) Borough and are where development for business, industry, or warehousing will generally be permitted and where, the

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 201 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

expansion or intensification of existing employment uses is acceptable. Core Strategy A Development Plan Document (DPD) setting out the spatial vision and strategic objectives of the planning framework for an area, having regard to the Community Strategy. The Wokingham Borough Core Strategy was adopted on 29th January 2010. (See also DPDs) Cross Cutting Cross Cutting (prefixed with a ‘CC’) policies cover the more detailed generic policies that will apply to most types of development Curtilage The General Permitted Development Order, Schedule 2, Part 1 3B 2055 defines domestic curtilage as usually a garden, but can include parking areas, access roads, vegetable plots, children’s play equipment, and stables (where the horses are kept for pleasure rather than agricultural use). The domestic curtilage is not necessarily marked off or enclosed, but it must be clearly attached to the house or serve the house is some useful and intimate way.

Decentralised energy Local renewable energy and local low-carbon energy usually (DE) but not always on a relatively small scale encompassing a diverse range of technologies. Decentralised energy (DE) systems generate power at or near the point of use. Demand Management The application of strategies, policies and other measures to reduce or redistribute travel demand and improve the use of sustainable travel options instead of car-based travel. Department for DCMS works to make sure the communications, creative, Culture, Media and media, cultural, tourism, sport and leisure economies have Sport (DCMS) the framework to grow and have real impact on people’s lives. Responsibilities also include listing of historic buildings, scheduling of ancient monuments, export licensing of cultural goods. Design and Access A Design and Access Statement is required for many types of Statement planning application – full, outline, and listed building application. It should clearly identify a number of issues including the philosophy and approach to inclusive design and the key issues of the particular scheme. Detailed Emergency An area within either 3km of Atomics Weapon Establishment Planning Zone (DEPZ) (AWE) Aldermaston or 1.5km of AWE Burghfield where issues of emergency preparedness are considered. Development Limits Development limits identify the area within which development proposals would be acceptable, subject to complying with other policies contained in the Development Plan. They seek to prevent development from gradually extending into the surrounding countryside. Development Plan A document setting out the policies and proposals for the development and use of land and buildings in the authority's area. It is defined in section 38 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. The documents that make up the Development Plan are shown in Figure 1 of the MDD DPD.

The Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document (Local Plan) is one of the Development Plan

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 202 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

documents prepared by Wokingham Borough Council that make up the Development Plan for the Borough. The other Development Plan document produced by the Council is the Core Strategy, adopted on 29 January 2010, which sets out the strategic planning policy to guide development in the Borough to 2026.

Under the Localism Act 2011, there is the ability for Parish and Town Councils to produce Neighbourhood Development Plans, which would also form part of the Development Plan.

Regional strategies remain part of the Development Plan until they are abolished by Order using powers taken in the Localism Act. It is the government’s clear policy intention to revoke the regional strategies outside of London, subject to the outcome of the environmental assessments that are currently being undertaken. The South East Plan is the Regional Strategy for the Borough. Development Plan DPDs are prepared by local planning authorities and outline Documents (DPD) the key development goals of the Development Plan.

The first DPD prepared by Wokingham Borough Council is the Core Strategy. The Managing Development Delivery document is also a DPD. There will also be an adopted proposals map which illustrates the spatial extent of policies that must be prepared and maintained to accompany DPDs.

All DPDs must be subject to rigorous procedures of community involvement, consultation, and independent examination, and adopted after receipt of the inspector's binding report. Once adopted, development control decisions must be made in accordance with them unless material considerations indicate otherwise.

Together, the Core Strategy and the Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document are also known as the Local Plan. Dwelling A self-contained building or part of a building used as a residential accommodation, and usually housing a single household. A dwelling may be a house, bungalow, flat, maisonette, or converted farm building. Economic Sets out a joint vision, priority themes, and activities that seek Development Strategy to improve the economic well-being and quality of life for residents in Wokingham over the next 3 years (for the period 2010-2013). It was adopted by Wokingham Borough Council on 25th March 2010. Edge of Centre For retail purposes, a location that is well connected and up to 300 metres of the primary shopping area. For all other main town centre uses, a location within 300 metres of a town centre boundary. For office development, this includes locations outside the town centre but within 500 metres of a public transport interchange. In determining whether a site falls within the definition of edge of centre, account should be taken of local circumstances.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 203 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Empirical data Based on observation or experience rather than theory Flexibility Flexibility is applied by the Council and equates to 10% of all the sources of housing land supply excluding completions. Flood Risk An assessment of the likelihood of flooding in a particular Assessments (FRAs) area so that development needs and mitigation measures can be carefully considered. Freight Transport Trade association that represents the transport interests of Association (FTA) companies moving goods by roads, rail, sea, and air. Geodiversity The range of rocks, minerals, fossils, soils and landforms. Green Belt A designation for land around certain towns and built-up areas, which aims to keep the land permanently open or largely undeveloped. The purposes of the green belt are to:

 check the unrestricted sprawl of large built up areas  prevent neighbouring towns from merging  safeguard the countryside from encroachment  preserve the setting and special character of historic towns  assist urban regeneration by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land

In Wokingham Borough, the Green Belt comprises land north and east of Twyford but excluding Wargrave, and includes land in the parish of St. Nicholas Hurst east of the ‘The Straight Mile’ and north of Carter’s Hill. Greenfield Land that is not previously developed. Green Infrastructure A network of multi-functional green space, urban and rural, which is capable of delivering a wide range of environmental and quality of life benefits for local communities. Green Routes Roads into settlements that are lined with trees and other vegetation which make a significant contribution to character and environment of the area and contribute to the Borough’s network of wildlife corridor. Green Route These are stretches of road that have the potential to be Enhancement Areas green routes, particularly sections running between existing green routes. Habitats Regulations An appraisal of plans or projects that affect Natura 2000 sites Appraisal of which the Appropriate Assessment forms part. The appraisal is required in response to the Habitats Directive (Directive 92/43/EEC) on the conservation of natural habitats and wild fauna and flora. Heritage Asset A building, monument, site, place, area, or landscape identified as having a degree of significance meriting consideration in planning decisions, because of its heritage interest. Heritage asset includes designated heritage assets and assets identified by the local planning authority (including local listing).

The National Heritage List for England (NHLE) is the official database which provides access to up to date information on all nationally designated heritage assets (Listed Buildings; Scheduled Monuments, and nationally important Historic Parks and Gardens). The list can be accessed from the English Heritage website at www.english-

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 204 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

heritage.org.uk/list

For listed buildings and Registered Parks and Gardens, the List is the statutory record. For scheduled monuments the statutory record is kept by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) and the record that appears on the National Heritage List is a copy of this.

Houses in Multiple Residential property where common areas such as Occupancy (HMOs) bathrooms and kitchens are shared by more than one household. HMOs consist of a variety of property types such as bedsits, shared houses, and purpose-built HMOs. Inclusive Communities that promote integration and aim to tackle the Communities exclusion of marginalised groups. This is primarily achieved through suitable housing provision, the co-ordination of appropriate services and addressing the requirements of the population. Infrastructure Permanent resources service society’s needs including: roads, sewers, schools, hospitals, railways, and communications - see also the supporting text (paragraph 4.27) to policy CP4 – Infrastructure Requirements of the Core Strategy. Infrastructure The Infrastructure Delivery Plan includes details of the Delivery Plan (IDP) infrastructure needed to support the delivery of the local plan. Landscape Character Formally describes and classifies different landscapes. It also Assessment outlines how landscapes should be conserved and managed. Lifetime Homes What makes a Lifetime Home is the incorporation of 16 design features that together create a flexible blueprint for accessible and adaptable housing in any setting. The Lifetime Homes concept increases choice, independence and longevity of tenure, vital to individual and community well being. Limited Development Limited development locations are those containing a basic Location range of services and facilities and are physically and socially cohesive. Within the development limits of these settlements, limited development would be acceptable. This includes affordable housing to meet identified local needs. Limited Development Locations are listed in Core Strategy policy CP9 - Scale and location of development proposals. Local Areas of/for An area of at least 100m2 with up to three activities, with a Play (LAP) minimum 5m buffer zone. Local Development These include DPDs (which form part of the statutory Documents (LDD) Development Plan) and Supplementary Planning Documents or SPDs (which do not form part of the statutory Development Plan). LDDs collectively deliver the spatial planning strategy for the local planning authority's area. Localism Act Devolves more planning powers to councils and local communities, including the introduction of neighbourhood planning and other measures. Locally Equipped An area of at least 400m2 with at least five activities, with Area of/for Play minimum 20m buffer zones (NB minimum of 30m buffer (LEAP) zones for teenage equipment). Local Nature Non-statutory habitats of local significance designated by Reserves (LNR) local authorities where protection and public understanding of

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 205 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

nature conservation is encouraged. Local Plan The plan for the future development of the local area, drawn up by the local planning authority in consultation with the community. In law this is described as the Development Plan documents adopted under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. Current Core Strategies or other planning policies, which under the planning regulations would be considered to be Development Plan documents, form part of the Local Plan. The term includes old policies which have been saved under the 2004 Act. Local Transport Plan An integrated transport strategy, prepared by local authorities (LTP) in partnership with the community, seeking funding to help provide local transport projects. The plan sets out the resources predicted for delivery of the targets identified in the strategy. Local Wildlife Sites Local Wildlife Sites are non-statutory sites of significant value (LWS) for the conservation of wildlife. These sites represent local character and distinctiveness and have an important role to play in meeting local and national targets for biodiversity conservation. Lower Layer Super A geographic area defined for the collection and publication of Output Area (LLSOA) small area statistics. Main town centre Retail development (including warehouse clubs and uses factory outlet centres); leisure, entertainment facilities the more intensive sport and recreation uses (including cinemas, restaurants, drive-through restaurants, bars and pubs, night- clubs, casinos, health and fitness centres, indoor bowling centres, and bingo halls); offices; and arts, culture and tourism development (including theatres, museums, galleries and concert halls, hotels and conference facilities). Major Development Major development locations are those with the greatest Location range of facilities and services which allow residents the greatest choice in modes to access them. It is it within the development limits of these settlements where major development (including urban extensions within these limits) would be acceptable. They are listed in Core Strategy policy CP9 - Scale and location of development proposals. Market Housing Housing supply where the type, design, and prices are set in the open market. MDD DPD The Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document. This is both a Development Plan Document and a Local Plan. Modest Development Modest development locations are those with access to some Location facilities and services either within them or through good public transport services to major development locations or centres in neighbouring areas, e.g. Bracknell, Crowthorne, and Reading. It is within the development limits of these settlements where modest development would be acceptable. They are listed in Core Strategy policy CP9 - Scale and location of development proposals. Monitoring Report A report prepared at least annually by the Local Authority which assesses progress with and the effectiveness of planning policy. Previously referred to as Annual Monitoring Report (AMR).

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 206 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

National Heritage List The official database which provides access to up to date for England (NHLE) information on all nationally designated heritage assets. National Planning National Planning Policy Framework, which has replaced Policy Framework Planning Policy Statements (PPS) and Planning Policy (NPPF) Guidance Notes, with the exception of PPS10: Planning for Sustainable Waste Management. National trail Long distance routes for walking, cycling, and horse riding. Neighbourhood An area of at least 1000m2 with at least eight activities, with a Equipped Area for minimum 30m buffer zone. Play (NEAP) Neighbourhood Plan A plan prepared by a Parish Council or Neighbourhood Forum for a particular neighbourhood area (made under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004). Noise Abatement The objective of the Noise Abatement Society is to raise Society (NAS) awareness of, and find solutions to, noise pollution and pollutants related to solving noise issues, for example light disturbance and air pollution. Office for Nuclear Seeks to secure the protection of people and society from the Regulation (ONR) hazards of the nuclear industry, by ensuring compliance with relevant legislation and by influencing the nuclear industry to create an excellent health, safety, and security culture. Older people’s range Private Retirement Housing of housing Generally planning use class C3 (see ‘use class’). Housing developments of a similar type to sheltered housing, but built for sale, usually on a leasehold basis. Generally considered Category 1 sheltered housing, purpose built and designed for older people, with an alarm system but likely to have very littler other support facilities.

There is now a growing private rental market in retirement housing. In the main, a private retirement housing rental means an individual property available for renting in an otherwise owner-occupied development.

Sheltered Housing Generally planning use class C3 (see ‘use class’). Sheltered housing (also known as retirement housing) is a group of flats or bungalows where all residents are older people (usually over 55). With a few exceptions, all developments (or 'schemes') provide independent, self-contained homes with their own front doors. Can be Category 1 sheltered housing where there is unlikely to be support facilities or Category 2 where usually there are some common facilities that all residents can use - such as a residents' lounge, a guest suite, a garden and often a laundry.

Category 2 schemes also have their own 'manager' or 'warden', either living on-site or nearby, whose job is to manage the scheme and help arrange any services residents need. Properties are usually also linked to a careline service (also called emergency alarm or community alarm service) so that residents can call help if needed.

There are many different types of scheme, either to rent or to

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 207 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

buy. They usually contain between 15 and 40 properties ranging in size from studios to 2 bedrooms. Properties in most schemes are designed to make life a little easier for older people - with features like raised electric sockets, lowered worktops, walk-in showers, and so on. Some are designed to accommodate wheelchair users.

Enhanced Sheltered Housing Generally planning use class C3 (see ‘use class’). Sheltered housing where personal care and support services are available, but not 24/7. The care services are likely to be registered with the Care Quality Commission for ‘Domiciliary Care Services’.

Extra Care Housing May be either planning use class C3 or C2 (see ‘use class’). Extra care housing offers self-contained apartments, each one with a bedroom, a living room, bathroom and kitchen either for rent or to purchase. A care team is onsite 24 hours a day and personal care and support for individuals is tailored to each persons assessed needs. The care service will be registered with the Care Quality Commission for ‘Extra Care Housing Services’.

Extra care housing offers a community with facilities for people to socialise and pursue their hobbies and interests together with catering facilities on site providing meals to purchase. Extra care housing gives people control over their income, care and support and assistance in emergencies.

Assisted Living May be either planning use class C3 or C2 (see ‘use class’). A name initially introduced from the United States to describe a form of 'housing with care' designed for older people, and now adopted by a number of housing developers for both the private and rental markets. There is no single definition. The 'Extra care housing' definition will apply to most Assisted living developments, but some also have features of 'Close care housing', that is, access to the services of a nearby care home.

Dementia Extra Care Housing May be either planning use class C3 or C2 (see ‘use class’). Dementia extra care housing is designed specifically for people with dementia and caters for a wide range of needs and individual circumstances. Each individual has a self contained apartment together with access to communal facilities such as lounges, kitchens and activity rooms. 24 hour care and support is available onsite, tailored to individual needs. The care service will be registered with the Care Quality Commission for ‘Extra Care Housing Services’.

Residents are encouraged to maintain as much independence as possible.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 208 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Close Care/Continuing Care Housing Generally planning use class C2 although elements maybe C3 (see ‘use class’). Close Care or Continuing Care schemes are a relatively new concept and consist of independent flats or bungalows built on the same site as a care home. This scheme may have several services registered with the Care Quality Commission, if there is a care home on site, this is likely to be registered as a ‘Care Home’, separately from services provided to other accommodation on site, which may be registered for ‘Domiciliary Care Services’. Residents often have some services (such as cleaning) included in their service charge and other services can be purchased from the care home.

Close/Continuing care schemes can either be rented or purchased. Purchasers may receive a guarantee that the management will buy back the property if they enter the care home.

Care Homes Will be planning use class C2 (see ‘use class’). Formerly known as residential care, a care home is a residential setting where a number of older people live, usually in single rooms, on a full board basis and have access to on-site care services. This type of home will be required to be registered with the Care Quality Commission as a ‘Care Home’.

A home registered simply as a care home will provide personal care only - help with washing, dressing and giving medication. Some care homes are registered to meet a specific care need, for example dementia or terminal illness.

Care Home with Nursing Will be planning use class C2 (see ‘use class’). The term nursing home has been replaced by care home with nursing. This type of home will be required to be registered with the Care Quality Commission as a ‘Care Home with Nursing’. A home registered for nursing will provide personal care (help with washing, dressing and giving medication), and will also have a qualified nurse on duty twenty-four hours a day to carry out nursing tasks, the exact number of nursing staff to residents will depend on the number of occupants of the home. These homes are for people who are physically or mentally frail or people who need regular attention from a nurse. Accommodation is provided, usually in single rooms, on a full board basis.

Some homes, registered either for personal care or nursing care, can be registered for a specific care need, for example dementia or terminal illness. Dual registered homes no longer exist, but homes registered for nursing care may accept people who just have personal care needs but who may need nursing care in the future. Open space All open space of public value, including not just land, but

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 209 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

also areas of water (such as rivers, canals, lakes and reservoirs) which offer important opportunities for sport and recreation and can act as a visual amenity. Out of Centre A location which is not in or on the edge of a centre but not necessarily outside the urban area. Planning Advice Note An informal document produced by Wokingham Borough Council providing additional guidance on an issue. These may be produced to provide additional guidance whilst the authority prepares Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs) or commissions further research to resolve any issues. Planning Obligations A legally enforceable obligation entered into under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) to mitigate the impacts of a development proposal. Planning Policy Government national land use & planning policies which were Guidance (PPG) being replaced by Planning Policy Statements. Were then replaced by the National Planning Policy Framework. Planning Policy Government national land use & planning policies which were Statement (PPS) replacing Planning Policy Guidance notes. Were then replaced by the National Planning Policy Framework. Policies (Proposals) This shows the location of proposals and designations in the Map Core Strategy and the Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document on an Ordnance Survey base map. Powered Two Wheeler These are two wheeled vehicles such as motorcycles and (PTW) scooters Proposed submission A version of a Development Plan Document for Council document (sometimes Members, prepared prior to submission of the submission called the pre- draft to the Secretary of State for examination. (Also see submission version) ‘submission draft’). Primary shopping Defined area where retail development is concentrated area (generally comprising the primary and those secondary frontages which are adjoining and closely related to the primary shopping frontage). Primary shopping Primary frontages are likely to include a high proportion of frontage retail uses which may include food, drinks, clothing, and household goods. Regional Strategy The South East Plan is the Regional Strategy for the Borough. Regional strategies remain part of the Development Plan until they are abolished by Order using powers taken in the Localism Act. It is the government’s clear policy intention to revoke the regional strategies outside of London, subject to the outcome of the environmental assessments that are currently being undertaken. Renewable and low Includes energy for heating and cooling as well as generating carbon energy electricity. Renewable energy covers those energy flows that occur naturally and repeatedly in the environment – from the wind, the fall of water, the movement of the oceans, from the sun and also from biomass and deep geothermal heat. Low carbon technologies are those that can help reduce emissions (compared to conventional use of fossil fuels). Reserve site Sites allocated for development post after the plan period (1 allocation, reserve April 2026). However, in line with paragraph 4.82 of the Core housing site Strategy they could be developed before this in order to

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 210 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

maintain a supply against broad requirements of Core Strategy policy CP17 – Housing Delivery. Replacement Minerals The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Local Plan for Government directed that a number of policies in the Berkshire Replacement Minerals Plan for Berkshire should be saved (incorporating the until they are replaced by a new Minerals Local Plan. alterations adopted in December 1997 and May 2001) Retail Centre The centres defined in Table 2 of the MDD DPD. For the purposes of the Core Strategy and MDD DPD, ‘retail centre’ is equivalent to ‘town centre’ as defined in the National Planning Policy Framework in relation to the development of retail and main town centre uses. Rights of Way A Rights Of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP) 2009 seeks to Improvement Plan improve public rights of way and other non-motorised (ROWIP) routes to support of the needs of all types of users. Adopted 18th December 2009. Rural exception Small sites used for affordable housing in perpetuity where housing, rural sites would not normally be used for housing. Rural exception exception sites sites seek to address the needs of the local community by accommodating households who are either current residents or have an existing family or employment connection. Small numbers of market homes may be allowed at the local authority’s discretion, for example where essential to enable the delivery of affordable units without grant funding. Saved Policies Policies within Local Plans that were saved for a time until their replacement by policies in Development Plan Documents. In the case of Wokingham they are being replaced by the Core Strategy and MDD, once adopted (adopted by resolution of the Borough Council following a decision that the document is ‘sound’ by a Planning Inspector after Examination in Public.) Science and A science and innovation park is essentially a cluster of Innovation Park knowledge-based businesses, where support and advice are supplied to assist in the growth of the companies. In most instances, science parks are associated with a centre of technology such as a university or research institute. Secondary shopping Secondary frontages provide greater opportunities for a frontage diversity of uses such as restaurants, cinemas, and businesses. Section 106 A legal agreement through which a developer makes a contribution towards infrastructure and local services and facilities to offset the impact of new development. The contribution can be financial, although in some cases a developer may agree to provide a particular facility or element of infrastructure according to the Council's need. Settlement See Development Limits. Boundaries Settlement Separation Areas between settlements where there is the greatest risk of Areas settlement coalescence which are kept free from significant levels of development to help retain the gap between and distinct character of different settlements. The Council and the local community attach great importance to the function of

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 211 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

these areas as a means of maintaining individual settlement identity. These areas will help to retain the separation areas between settlements within the Borough and with those between settlements in the Borough and settlements outside the Borough. Site Allocations Site Allocations (prefixed with a ‘SAL in the MDD DPD’) (‘SAL’) provide policies for those sites, which will be allocated for development. Sites of Special Sites designated by Natural England under the Scientific Interest Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. (SSSI) Sites of Urban Open areas within settlements that are important to local Landscape Value character, amenity and landscape and which may have (SULVs) biodiversity and recreational roles. Small Group Homes Small group homes are generally houses with individual bedrooms (preferably with en suite) but with shared communal facilities for 3 or 4 people with disabilities or young people leaving care where there are staff on site for at least part of the day. They are sometimes supported by staff 24/7 depending on the needs of the individuals. Smarter Choices Is a term used to describe measures and techniques for influencing behaviour towards the use of more sustainable modes of transport and reducing the demand for car-based transport South East Plan (SEP) The Regional Spatial Strategy for South East England covering the period 2006-2026. It was approved by the Secretary of State on 6 May 2009. Regional strategies remain part of the Development Plan until they are abolished by Order using powers taken in the Localism Act. It is the government’s clear policy intention to revoke the regional strategies outside of London, subject to the outcome of the environmental assessments that are currently being undertaken. Special Areas of Sites classified under the European Community Directive on Conservation (SAC) Habitats to protect internationally important habitats. Special Protection Sites classified under the European Community Directive on Areas (SPA) Wild Birds to protect internationally important bird species. Station, health & In the context of open space, sport and recreational facilities fitness station standards for residential development, a health & fitness station is an area or installation, such as a bench for weight- lifting or a rowing machine, where a participant can partake in a health & fitness activity. A facility or site such as a gym may host numerous stations. Strategic Access This is a project overseen by Natural England and Hampshire Management and County Council to implement standard messages and Monitoring (SAMM) additional wardening and education across the Thames Basin Heaths SPA. Strategic These are the key sites allocated through Core Strategy Development policies CP18-21 – Strategic Development Locations to take Location (SDL) a significant proportion of the Borough’s development. Strategic A procedure (set out in the Environmental Assessment of Environmental Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004) which requires the Assessment (SEA) formal environmental assessment of certain plans and programmes which are likely to have significant effects on the

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 212 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

environment. Strategic Housing A SHLAA assists in the identification of sufficient deliverable Land Availability sites for residential development and the assessment of Assessment (SHLAA) whether a rolling five year supply of housing land is available. It should be undertaken as part of the evidence base for the Local Plan. Undertaking a SHLAA is a key requirement of National Planning Policy Framework. Submission A Development Plan Document submitted to the Secretary of Document or State for independent examination by a government- submission draft appointed planning inspector. (Also see ‘Proposed submission draft’). Sui Generis Certain uses do not fall within any use class and are considered 'sui generis'. Such uses include: theatres, houses in multiple occupation, hostels providing no significant element of care, scrap yards. Petrol filling stations and shops selling and/or displaying motor vehicles. Retail warehouse clubs, nightclubs, launderettes, taxi businesses, amusement centres and casinos. Also see ‘Use Class’ Suitable Alternative Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspaces or ‘SANGs’ are new Natural Green Spaces or existing open spaces designed to attract visitors away from (SANG) the Special Protection Area by providing an enjoyable natural environment for recreation. Supplementary Documents which add further detail to the policies in the Planning Document Local Plan. They can be used to provide further guidance for (SPD) development on specific sites, or on particular issues, such as design. Supplementary planning documents are capable of being a material consideration in planning decisions but are not part of the Development Plan. Sustainability An appraisal of the economic, environmental, and social Appraisal effects of a plan from the outset of the preparation process to (incorporating allow decisions to be made that accord with sustainable Strategic development. Environmental Assessment)(SA/SEA) Sustainability A required for residential development involving the creation Statement of a new dwelling and non-residential development over 100 sq m of floorspace. It is required for full and reserved matters applications. It should evidence how the planning application has addressed the sustainable design and construction aspects in line with national and local planning policy. Sustainable A strategy prepared by the Local Authority to improve local community strategy quality of life and aspirations, under the Local Government Act 2000. The strategy for Wokingham is called the Sustainable Community Strategy for Wokingham 2020. Sustainable Resolution 42/187 of the United Nations General Assembly Development defined sustainable development as meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Sustainable Drainage Sustainable drainage systems use techniques to control Systems (SuDS) surface water run-off as close to its origin as possible, before it enters a watercourse. This involves moving away from traditional piped drainage systems towards engineering solutions, which mimic natural drainage processes. Sustainable drainage systems cover the whole range of

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 213 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

sustainable approaches to surface drainage management. Sustainable Sets out a vision, priority themes, and activities that seek to Environment Strategy improve the local environment over the next 10 years (for the period 2010-2020) and supports a sustainable future for Wokingham residents. Adopted by Wokingham Borough Council on 24 June 2010. Tandem Development A term used to describe a dwelling built behind another, the rear building having no frontage and being accessed by a private roadway or track alongside the front building.

Thames Basin Heaths A collection of sites on the borders of Berkshire, Hampshire, Special Protection and Surrey covering an area of 8,274 hectares. It was Area (TBH SPA) classified under the European Community Directive on Wild Birds to protect internationally important bird species on 9 March 2005 for the populations of three Annex 1 bird species – Nightjar, Woodlark, and Dartford Warbler. Topic Based (‘TB’) Topic Based policies in the MDD DPD, that generally only apply to certain types of development. Use Class The Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 (as amended) puts uses of land and buildings into various categories known as 'Use Classes' and include:  A1 (shops)  A2 (financial & professional services)  A3 restaurants & cafés  A4 (drinking establishments)  A5 (takeaways)  B1 (business)  B2 (general industrial)  B8 (storage & distribution)  C1 (hotels)  C2 (residential institutions)  C2A (secure residential institutions)  C3 (dwellinghouses)  C4 (houses in multiple occupation)  D1 (non-residential institutions)  D2 (assembly & leisure)

Also see ‘Sui Generis’

Vitality and Viability Vitality and viability are concepts used to measure the health of a retail centre. Vitality refers to how busy a centre is and viability refers to the centres’ capacity to attract investment and adapt to changing needs. Waste Local Plan for The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Berkshire 1998 Government directed that a number of policies in the Waste Local Plan for Berkshire should be saved until they are replaced by a new Waste Local Plan. Wildlife corridor Areas of habitat connecting wildlife populations. Windfall sites Sites which have not been specifically identified as available in the Local Plan process. They normally comprise previously-developed sites that have unexpectedly become available.

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 214 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Wokingham District The old-style Development Plan prepared by the then Local Plan (WDLP) Wokingham District Council setting detailing planning policies in the area. It was adopted on 11 March 2004. Following the implementation of the Planning & Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, some of the policies ceased to be relevant for determining planning applications after 28 September 2007 whereas others were saved beyond this date. See Core Strategy Appendix 1 for more information on saved policies. (See also ‘saved policies’ above).

Wokingham Borough Council – December 2012 215 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Appendix 5 Report of consultation on Updated Scoping report for LDF and Scoping Report for the Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document (MDD DPD)

Council’s Report of Consultation on the updating of the Scoping Report for undertaking Sustainability Appraisal (incorporating Strategic Environmental Assessment) on Local Development Framework Documents

Report of Consultation on the scoping Report to undertake SA incorporating SEA on the MDD DPD June 2011 216 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Consultation on the Scoping Report for the LDF took place between 24th March 2010 until 5pm on Friday 30th April 2010. This was to ensure that this iterative process remains up to date.

The following bodies were consulted on the Scoping Report.

English Heritage, Environment Agency, Natural England, Berkshire Buckinghamshire Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust, Forestry Commission, Forest Enterprise, RSPB, Wokingham Friends of the Earth, Utilities - Thames Water/ South East Water/electricity /gas, Primary Care Trust, Learning and Skills Council, Wokingham Local Learning Partnership, Thames Valley Economic Partnership, Business Link Berkshire, Wiltshire Local Gateway Service, Local Bus operators, National Rail, Sustainable Environment and Climate Change, LSP Arborfield and Newland Parish Council, Barkham Parish Council, Charvil Parish Council, Earley Town Council, Finchampstead Parish Council, Hurst Parish Council, Remenham Parish Council, Ruscombe Parish Council, Shinfield Parish Council, Swallowfield Parish Council, Twyford Parish Council, Wargrave Parish Council, Winnersh Parish Council, Wokingham Town Council, Wokingham Without Parish Council, Woodley Town Council, Joint Strategic Planning Unit, Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, Bracknell Forest Borough Council, Reading Borough Council, Hart Borough Council, Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead, South Oxfordshire Council, West Berkshire Council, Wycombe Borough Council, Buckinghamshire County Council, Oxfordshire County Council, Hampshire County Council, Government Office for the South East, South East England Development Agency (SEEDA) and South East England Partnership Board (SEEPB)

Members, Relevant Council Officers, including: Access Officer, Countryside, Development Management, Environment Health, Highways, Community Infrastructure, Transport Planning and Waste and Recycling

These bodies were informed by letter and/or e-mail. A copy of the scoping report was also available on the Council’ website. Consultees could also request a hard copy.

Following consultation amendments have been made to the Scoping Report for the LDF where appropriate and these will be used in undertaking the sustainability appraisal on future Local Development Framework Documents. A copy of the amended Scoping Report and the Report of Consultation on the Scoping Report for the LDF Scoping Report will be made available on the Council’s website and to view at the Council’s principle offices at Shute End.

SEA within the sustainability appraisal.

The SA covers economic and social objectives as well as environmental. Those objectives of the sustainability appraisal which are specifically related to environmental issues in line with the SEA regulations are objectives 10 to 19.

Report of Consultation on the scoping Report to undertake SA incorporating SEA on the MDD DPD June 2011 217 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

The following Consultation questions were asked for the Updated SA Scoping Report for the Local Development Framework:

1) Are there other relevant policies, plans and programmes, and sustainable development objectives that will affect or influence the DPD and undertake LDF surveys?

2) Do you agree that the baseline data collected is appropriate to the LDF?

3) Do you have, or know of, any additional relevant baseline data which should be added to that already listed?

4) As far as you are aware, are there any inaccuracies or anomalies in the data presented?

5) Do you agree that these are the key sustainability issues for Wokingham Borough?

6) Are you aware of any issues which in your opinion should be added, or any that should be removed?

7) Are the above objectives suitable in the context of Wokingham Borough?

8) It may be necessary to rank the objectives to help assess options. Do you have any comments on those which hold particular importance?

9) Are there any additional objectives that should be included or should any be removed?

10) Do the indicators provide a relevant measure for the associated objective? If not then please suggest additional indicators.

11) Do you have any comments on the suggested targets, especially where no target has been identified as yet or it lacks precision?

12) Do you have any further comments on the information in the SA Framework?

13) Do you have any comments on the proposed methodology for the SA process or the content of the Initial Sustainability Report?

14) Do you have any comments on the separate Annex approach that Wokingham Borough Council is considering?

Report of Consultation on the scoping Report to undertake SA incorporating SEA on the MDD DPD June 2011 218 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Question Respondent Comment Summary Council’s Response Key Sustainability Issues Natural England Welcomes the discussion regarding air Noted. Amend baseline data pollution. (p26) to reflect APIS as a data Consider using the Air Pollution Information source System (APIS) as a key data source Sustainability Appraisal Natural England Suggests Borough has regard to the following Noted. Regard will be given to framework documents on climate change the documents http://www.southeast- ra.gov.uk/documents/regional_planning/ldf/climat change/Climate_Change_LDFguide_Main_Conte .pdf

http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/regions/south _east/ourwork/makingspaceforwildlife.aspx

Question 10 Natural England Supports inclusion of objectives and indicators. Noted Amend indicator. This Suggests include green infrastructure to the reflects PPS9 indicator on biodiversity, fauna and flora Scoping Report English Heritage Update scoping report to refer to recently Noted. Update Scoping report to GOSE published PPS5 and practice guidance. reflect this. Biodiversity Environment Agency Refer to River Loddon and Emm Brook in key Noted Amend section environmental issues (p22). Consider buffer zones Character of the Borough English Heritage Refer to heritage assets Noted amend to refer to heritage assets Para 7.2 English Heritage Refer to PPS5 Policy HE3.4 and HE5.1 with Noted. Council will have to have regard to conserving types of heritage assets regard to PPS5 in considering that are most a t risk Heritage Issues Para 8.8 English Heritage Use integrate rather than balance to reflect Noted Amend to refer to English heritage’s Environmental Quality in integrate. Spatial Planning Section 9 Objective 13 English Heritage Suggest using a wider basket of assets at risk Noted. Amend to refer to basket with target of no loss of assets as well as conservation areas

Report of Consultation on the scoping Report to undertake SA incorporating SEA on the MDD DPD June 2011 219 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Section 12 English Heritage Update BVPI 219 Noted. update Scoping Report RSPB Consider baseline information key issues Noted provide a robust framework for the subsequent stages of the document. Scoping Report GOSE Update PPS6/7/8 to reflect PPS4 Noted. Update to reflect PPS4 Scoping Report South East England Regard should be given to South East Plan Noted. Scoping Report will have Partnership Board Regional Sustainability framework regard to status of South East Plan Scoping Report Earley Town Council No comment Noted Scoping Report St Nicholas Hurst Parish No Comment Noted council Scoping Report Woodley Town Council No comment Noted Appendix 2 Baseline Data, Barkham Parish Council Interesting information within document Indicators and Trends It would be useful to show percentages with Noted. The Scoping Report regard to baseline data at regional and national does indicate that there is data level but recognises the lack of availability of limitation in some areas. some of this data Need to consider enforcement issues

Report of Consultation on the scoping Report to undertake SA incorporating SEA on the MDD DPD June 2011 220 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Council’s Report of Consultation on the Scoping Report for undertaking the Sustainability Appraisal (SA) incorporating a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) on the Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document (MDD DPD)

Report of Consultation on the scoping Report to undertake SA incorporating SEA on the MDD DPD June 2011 221 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

In line with Regulations 12 (5) & (6) of The Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 (the SEA Regulations), the Council has undertaken a consultation on the Scoping Report for the Sustainability Appraisal (incorporating a Strategic Environmental Assessment) which will be undertaken on the Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document (MDD DPD) . The Draft Options (Public Participation version) (Reg25) of the MDD DPD will include options and reasonable alternatives which will be subject to a Sustainability Appraisal (produced in line with Regulation 24(2) of The Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2004 (as amended) (the LDF Regulations) and Regulations 12(2) (b) of the SEA Regulations (with respect of the Strategic Environmental Assessment incorporated into the Sustainability Appraisal).

The Scoping Report for the MDD DPD sets out a framework for assessing the DPD against social, economic and environmental objectives. The Scoping Report for the MDD DPD is based on the Council’s approved SA scoping report for the Local Development Framework. The LDF scoping report has also been consulted on in parallel with the consultation on the scoping report for the MDD DPD to ensure that this iterative process remains up to date.

The MDD DPD as required by Regulation 13(6) of the LDF Regulations has to be in conformity with the Council’s adopted Core Strategy. Taking account of “Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation” [1947] EWCA Civ 1 (10 November 1947), the Council considers that “reasonable alternatives” within the MDD DPD for the purposes of Regulation 12(2) (b) of the SEA Regulations are only those that confirm with the approach of the Core Strategy, otherwise the MDD DPD would not confirm with Regulation 13(6) of the LDF Regulations. Such a view is considered to be consistent with paragraph 5.14 of the Commissions Guidance “Implementation of Directive 2001/42 on The Assessment of the Effects of Certain Plans and Programmes on the Environment”.

Consultation on the Scoping Report for the MDD DPD and the Scoping Report for the LDF took place between 24th March 2010 until 5pm on Friday 30th April. The following bodies were consulted on the Scoping Report.

English Heritage Environment Agency Natural England Berkshire Buckinghamshire Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust Forestry Commission Forest Enterprise RSPB Wokingham Friends of the Earth Utilities - Thames Water/ South East Water/electricity /gas Primary Care Trust Learning and Skills Council Wokingham Local Learning Partnership Thames Valley Economic Partnership Business Link Berkshire and Wiltshire Local Gateway Service Local Bus operators National Rail Members Relevant Council Officers, including: Access Officer, Countryside, Development Management, Environment Health, Highways, Community Infrastructure, Transport Planning and Waste and Recycling Sustainable Environment and Climate Change LSP Arborfield and Newland Parish Council Barkham Parish Council Charvil Parish Council Earley Town Council Finchampstead Parish Council Hurst Parish Council Remenham Parish Council Ruscombe Parish Council Shinfield Parish Council Swallowfield Parish Council Twyford Parish Council Wargrave Parish Council Winnersh Parish Council Wokingham Town Council Wokingham Without Parish Council Woodley Town Council Joint Strategic Planning Unit Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Bracknell Forest

Report of Consultation on the scoping Report to undertake SA incorporating SEA on the MDD DPD June 2011 222 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Borough Council Reading Borough Council Hart Borough Council Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead South Oxfordshire Council West Berkshire Council Wycombe Borough Council Buckinghamshire County Council Oxfordshire County Council Hampshire County Council Government Office for the South East South East England Development Agency (SEEDA) South East England Partnership Board (SEEPB)

These bodies were informed by letter and/or e-mail. A copy of the scoping report was also available on the Council’ website. Consultees could also request a hard copy.

Following consultation amendments have been made to the Scoping Report for the MDD DPD and the Scoping Report for the LDF where appropriate and these will be used in undertaking the sustainability appraisal on the MDD DPPD draft options. A copy of the amended Scoping Report and the Reports of Consultation on the Scoping Report for the MDD DPD and the LDF Scoping Report will be made available on the Council’s website and to view at the Council’s principle offices at Shute End.

SEA within the sustainability appraisal

The SA covers economic and social objectives as well as environmental. Those objectives of the sustainability appraisal which are specifically related to environmental issues in line with the SEA regulations are objectives 10 to 19 .Further information on those parts of the SA which form the Environmental Report required by the SEA Regulations for the MDD DPD will be detailed in the SA.

English Heritage, Environment Agency, Natural England, Berkshire Buckinghamshire Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust, Forestry Commission, Forest Enterprise, RSPB, Wokingham Friends of the Earth, Utilities - Thames Water/ South East Water/electricity /gas, Primary Care Trust, Learning and Skills Council, Wokingham Local Learning Partnership, Thames Valley Economic Partnership, Business Link Berkshire, Wiltshire Local Gateway Service, Local Bus operators, National Rail, Sustainable Environment and Climate Change, LSP Arborfield and Newland Parish Council, Barkham Parish Council, Charvil Parish Council, Earley Town Council, Finchampstead Parish Council, Hurst Parish Council, Remenham Parish Council, Ruscombe Parish Council, Shinfield Parish Council, Swallowfield Parish Council, Twyford Parish Council, Wargrave Parish Council, Winnersh Parish Council, Wokingham Town Council, Wokingham Without Parish Council, Woodley Town Council, Joint Strategic Planning Unit, Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, Bracknell Forest Borough Council, Reading Borough Council, Hart Borough Council, Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead, South Oxfordshire Council, West Berkshire Council, Wycombe Borough Council, Buckinghamshire County Council, Oxfordshire County Council, Hampshire County Council, Government Office for the South East, South East England Development Agency (SEEDA) and South East England Partnership Board (SEEPB)

Members, Relevant Council Officers, including: Access Officer, Countryside, Development Management, Environment Health, Highways, Community Infrastructure, Transport Planning and Waste and Recycling

Report of Consultation on the scoping Report to undertake SA incorporating SEA on the MDD DPD June 2011 223 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

The following Consultation questions were asked for the SA Scoping Report for the Managing Development Delivery DPD:

1) Are there other relevant policies, plans and programmes, and sustainable development objectives that will affect or influence the DPD and undertake LDF surveys?

2) Do you agree that the baseline data collected is appropriate to the LDF?

3) Do you have, or know of, any additional relevant baseline data which should be added to that already listed?

4) As far as you are aware, are there any inaccuracies or anomalies in the data presented?

5) Do you agree that these are the key sustainability issues for Wokingham Borough?

6) Are you aware of any issues which in your opinion should be added, or any that should be removed?

7) Are the above objectives suitable in the context of Wokingham Borough?

8) It may be necessary to rank the objectives to help assess options. Do you have any comments on those which hold particular importance?

9) Are there any additional objectives that should be included or should any be removed?

10) Do the indicators provide a relevant measure for the associated objective? If not then please suggest additional indicators.

11) Do you have any comments on the suggested targets, especially where no target has been identified as yet or it lacks precision?

12) Do you have any further comments on the information in the SA Framework?

13) Do you have any comments on the proposed methodology for the SA process or the content of the Initial Sustainability Report?

Report of Consultation on the scoping Report to undertake SA incorporating SEA on the MDD DPD June 2011 224 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Question Respondent Comment Summary Council’s Response Sustainable Development English Heritage Update scoping report to refer to recently Noted. Update Scoping GOSE published PPS5 and practice guidance. report at Para 9.3 to reflect this. MDD DPD Spatial Objectives English Heritage Welcomes recognition of heritage in MDD. Noted. Consider that the Consider updating objective C of the Spatial Council’s sustainability Objectives to reflect South East Plan core objective 13 which is objective at Para 7.2 Support SA objectives 13 developed from the spatial and 19 objectives recognises the need to protect and enhance the Borough’s historic environment. The MDD will contain policy on heritage, including archaeology. Scoping Report Natural England No comment Noted Scoping Report Environment Agency Regard should be given to PPS25 and the Noted. Para 9.3 of the Council’s SFRA Scoping Report recognises PPS25 and Para 9.8 refers to Council’s SFRA and Catchment Flood Management Plans Scoping Report Environment Agency Regard should be given to Code for Noted Spatial Objective B Sustainable Homes and BREEAM with regard and Sustainability objective to water resources. 14 recognise the need to seek efficient use of resources, including water Scoping Report Environment Agency Regard should be given to waste water Scoping Report RSPB Consider baseline information key issues Noted provide a robust framework for the subsequent Amend Para 9.7 to refer stages of the document. Refer to Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area Delivery framework for SA/SEA at Para 9.7 Scoping Report South East England Regard should be given to South East Plan Noted. Scoping Report will

Report of Consultation on the scoping Report to undertake SA incorporating SEA on the MDD DPD June 2011 225 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Partnership Board Regional Sustainability framework have regard to status of South East Plan Scoping Report Earley Town Council No comment Noted Scoping Report St Nicholas Hurst Parish No Comment Noted council Scoping Report Woodley Town Council No comment Noted Table1 Spatial Objectives Barkham Parish Council Consider that sustainability will not always lead Noted. Sustainability to improvements for all of society Appraisal aims to consider impacts and to indicate how these could be mitigated. LDF Spatial Objectives Barkham Parish Council Agree to objectives A-M but consider that Noted. Scoping report does Borough Council does not have total control not indicate that the over delivery (Objective A) Borough Council will have total control on delivery LDF Spatial Objective Barkham Parish Council Concern that Borough will have difficulty in Noted. The Core Strategy meeting Spatial Objective 1 Keeping the at Policy CP10 lays out Borough Moving strategic transport improvements required and Policy CP6 lays down criteria for developments in terms of managing travel demand. The MDD will need to be in conformity with the Core Strategy LDF Spatial Objective Barkham Parish Council Consider water holding areas in Spatial Option Noted. Sustainability L. objective 2 which builds on Spatial Objective L seeks to reduce the risk of flooding, this may include SUDs. Amend Sustainability Objective 2 to reflect use of other solutions in line with advice from the Environment Agency

Report of Consultation on the scoping Report to undertake SA incorporating SEA on the MDD DPD June 2011 226 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

LDF Spatial Objective Barkham Parish Council Consider Borough will find it hard to fund Noted. Spatial Objective M appropriate infrastructure Spatial Objective M Seeks to encourage the provision of appropriate infrastructure. Policy CP4 of the Core Strategy seeks appropriate arrangements for the improvement or provision of infrastructure. The MDD will need to be in conformity with the Core Strategy. Regard will also be given to the Community Infrastructure Levy Sustainability Objectives Barkham Parish Council Consider answering yes in Table 3 wishful Noted. Council considers thinking that MDD can deliver these objectives Consultation Questions Barkham Parish Council Need to have regard to Draft Sustainable Amend to have regard to design and Construction SPD (Q1) the SPD

It would be useful to show percentages with Noted. The Scoping Report regard to baseline data at regional and national does indicate that there is level but recognises the lack of availability of data limitation in some some of this data (Q2) areas.

Include zero carbon homes and water holding Noted. Amend areas (Q5) Sustainability Objective 2 to reflect use of other solutions in line with advice from the Environment Agency Sustainability Objective 14 seeks to sustainably use resources this could include zero carbon homes.

Report of Consultation on the scoping Report to undertake SA incorporating SEA on the MDD DPD June 2011 227 Updated Approved SA Scoping Report for the Development Plan and related documents

Need to consider enforcement issues (Q6) Noted. Not considered relevant for this document. Enforcement is considered in other Planning Acts.

Consider objective desirable but considers Noted borough may not be able to deliver due to external forces. (Q7)

Would rank objectives as flooding, transport, provision of infrastructure, preserving open Noted space and countryside (Q8)

Report of Consultation on the scoping Report to undertake SA incorporating SEA on the MDD DPD June 2011 228