Biodiversity Action Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biodiversity Action Plan Bracknell Forest Biodiversity Action Plan 2006-2011 Bracknell Forest Biodiversity Action Plan 2006-2011 Contents: Page: 1. Introduction 3 2. Background Information - Bracknell Forest Borough 8 3. Bracknell Forest Biodiversity Action Plan 1997-2005 13 4. Partnerships for Biodiversity Action 14 5. Structure of Bracknell Forest Biodiversity Action Plan 2000-2005 15 6. Biodiversity Monitoring 16 7. Habitat Action Plans: 18 Neutral meadows and pastures 19 Heathland and bogs 22 Woodland, scrub & hedgerows 26 Rivers and wetlands 29 Farmed land 33 Urban and built environment 35 8. Species Action Plans: 39 Barn owl, Tyto alba 40 Brilliant emerald dragonfly, Somatochlora metallica 42 Brown trout, Salmo trutta 44 Bullfinch, Pyrrhula pyrrhula 46 Cowslip, Primula veris 48 Dartford warbler, Sylvia undata 50 Devil’s-bit scabious, Succisa pratensis 52 Glow-worm, Lampyris noctiluca 54 Great crested newt, Triturus cristatus 57 Hobby, Falco subbuteo 60 Kingfisher, Alcedo atthis 62 Nightjar, Caprimulgus europaeus 64 Noctule bat, Nyctalus noctula 67 Ragged robin, Lychnis flos-cuculi 69 Round-leaved sundew, Drosera rotundifolia 71 Silver-studded blue butterfly, Plebejus argus 73 Skylark, Alauda arvensis 76 Small red damselfly Ceriagrion tenellum 79 Stag beetle, Lucanus cervus 81 Swift, Apus apus 83 Violet click beetle, Limoniscus violaceous 85 Water vole, Arvicola terrestris 87 Wild service tree Sorbus torminalis 90 Woodlark, Lullula arborea 92 Appendix 1 95 Policy EN3 - Nature Conservation Policy EN4 - Local Nature Reserves, Wildlife Heritage Sites & Regionally Important Geological Sites. 2 Bracknell Forest Biodiversity Action Plan 2006-2011 BRACKNELL FOREST BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN 1. Introduction 1.1 Aim AIM: To conserve and enhance biodiversity within Bracknell Forest Borough. 1.2 Objectives This will be achieved through the following OBJECTIVES: 1 Comprehensive Monitoring: of species and habitats in the Borough to enable decisions to be informed, with up to date and detailed records. 2 Proactive Policies: on planning and conservation, to ensure that important sites are protected and that where development occurs actions are taken to achieve the best result for wildlife in the Borough. 3 Positive Management: on sites owned and/or managed by the Borough Council and its partners that aims to maintain, restore and create habitat for wildlife and balance the varied uses on open spaces in the area. 4 Effective Communication: between partners, landowners and the public to raise awareness, encourage partnership working, and inform decision-making. 1.3 Biodiversity in Bracknell Forest Borough Biodiversity is the variety of life - the whole range of variation within living organisms, plants, animals and their habitats and ecosystems. ‘Biodiversity’ conservation (abbreviated from the term ‘biological diversity’) is, therefore, no less than the protection of the natural world. This includes all the genetic variation with individuals of each of the multitude of species that exist, and their ecosystems, which have to accommodate the expanding influence of people. Bracknell Forest Borough is fortunate in having a rich and diverse wildlife and countryside that is deserving of protection. In fact over 20% of the total area has been recognised by the Unitary Authority Borough Council as having a strong wildlife heritage value and is protected by local designations. There are also 9 Sites of Special Scientific Interest, and two areas have been designated under European Union legislation for their international importance. 3 Bracknell Forest Biodiversity Action Plan 2006-2011 This is a situation to be proud of, and one that the Bracknell Forest Biodiversity Action Plan is designed to protect and enhance in the future. Focussing on a number of key species that range from locally characteristic to internationally rare - and the habitats upon which they depend - the plan will involve work that benefits all our wildlife. To deliver our ambitions for biodiversity, the Borough Council will work in partnership with Parish Councils, landowners, local conservation and voluntary groups, as well as neighbouring authorities and national bodies. Our local actions really will be effective. With proactive policies and action in the local area, mirrored by many others around the country and the world, the aim of global conservation of the wildlife, ecosystems and landscapes around us will be successful. 1.4 Biodiversity Action Plans Biodiversity Action Plans (BAPs) emerged as a consequence of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development held in Rio de Janeiro in June 1992. Various outcomes were achieved; one of which was a convention on biological diversity. Ratification of the convention by the UK government led to the publication of ‘UK Steering Group Report - Meeting the Rio challenge’. This publication established action plans for 391 species and 45 habitats. Out of this strategy developed a government policy to preserve and enhance biodiversity with the publication of the ‘Government response to the UK Steering Group Report on Biodiversity’ in 1996, which formally approved the Steering Groups report. A key component of the BAP was to establish 3 to 5 yearly monitoring cycle. The first round of which culminated in the publication of the ‘Millennium Biodiversity Report’ published in 1999. A second reporting round was completed in 2002; the results of which were published in 2003. 1.5 Local Biodiversity Action Plans Local Biodiversity Action Plans have proven to be an effective method for achieving action on biodiversity. They enable targets and guidance developed at a national and regional level to be interpreted into practical local action. They can also develop and tailor policies that reflect local priorities and are supported by local people. Local Biodiversity Action Plans should: 1. Ensure targets developed at the national level for the conservation and management of habitats and species are translated into effective local action. 2. Identify targets for habitats and species that are important to the local area and people. 3. Develop effective local partnerships to take action on biodiversity. 4. Raise awareness of biodiversity and conservation in the local area. 4 Bracknell Forest Biodiversity Action Plan 2006-2011 5. Provide a basis for monitoring progress in biodiversity conservation at both a local and national scale. In Berkshire, the UKBAP has been translated into local action through the publication of 4 habitat action plans produced by the Berkshire Nature Conservation Forum between 1999 and 2001. The habitats for which plans have been produced to date are (plans for woodland and farmland are in preparation): • Heathland • Lowland Unimproved Grassland • Standing Open Waters and Associated Habitats • Rivers and Associated Floodplain Habitats Steering groups, made up of members of the BNCF have been established for each of the habitats to oversee the implementation of the plans. 1.6 The role of Local Authorities Local authorities, being the closest level of government to people, have a critical role in promoting and facilitating Local BAP development, involvement and implementation. They develop and operate the economic, social and environmental infrastructure, and oversee the planning process. Indeed, responsibility for planning control is one of their most important roles, ensuring that development is sensitive to the environment. They can also affect conservation through the management of their own land, the provision of advice and grant aid to empower others to take action (for example Wildlife Trusts and private landowners), and the collection and storage of ecological data for their area. However, they will not be able to act as the lead on all aspects of biodiversity action, and it will be essential to develop effective partnerships with other organisations. Within Berkshire, Local Authorities are a part of the Berkshire Nature Conservation Forum and as such have a responsibility to implement the actions set out in the habitat action plans. Within Bracknell Forest, the two previous BAPs from 1997 and 2001 have delivered actions that will meet the targets. This action plan continues to be linked closely with the Berkshire wide targets. 1.7 Planning Policy relevant to Local BAPs The following table highlights the main planning policy that is relevant to the BAP. Planning Policy Guidance Note 9 Nature Conservation provides guidance on how nature conservation should be dealt with through the planning process. The government proposes to replace this 5 Bracknell Forest Biodiversity Action Plan 2006-2011 document with a more streamlined Planning Policy Statement 9 Biodiversity and Geological Conservation. Consultation on a draft PPS 9 was undertaken in 2004. The document formalises the role of Local Authorities in protecting and enhancing biodiversity through the protection of species and habitats listed in Section 74(2) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 2000 in addition to those receiving legal protection. The “Development Plan” for the area comprises the Structure Plan plus the Local Plan. In parts of the Borough where there is no adopted Local Plan, the Berkshire Structure Plan alone is the development plan. The current Bracknell Forest Borough Local Plan (1991 – 2006) is a “material consideration” in planning applications. The Local Plan is to be replaced from 2007 by a Local Development Framework (LDF) as required by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act which came into force in September 2004. The
Recommended publications
  • Final Sustainability Appraisal Report
    Bracknell Forest Final Sustainability Appraisal Report Bracknell Forest Borough Core Strategy Development Plan Document Technical Document B - Baseline data, characterisation, indicators and trends LDFCSSubmissionAnnexe5b0.doc LDFCSSubmissionAnnexe5b0.doc Settlement character Bracknell Forest Borough Council (BFBC) is a Unitary Authority located in the county of Berkshire in the South-East of England. The administrative area covers approximately 110 square kilometres and has a population of around 110,000 people. The Borough has seen significant population, housing and employment growth over the last few decades mainly in and around Bracknell Town. With a background as a small market town, Bracknell was earmarked for development as a ‘new town’ to alleviate the housing crisis caused by World War II. Bracknell New Town was designed on the neighbourhood principle with a primary school, shops, church, community centre and public house at the heart of each of the nine neighbourhoods. Generally the housing stock is relatively expensive and spacious at average densities, with 1007 people per km 2, compared to 424 km 2 in the South- east [ONS, 2003]. The settlements in the Borough comprise of Sandhurst and Crowthorne to the south; the semi-rural communities of Binfield, Warfield and Winkfield to the north; and the former New Town of Bracknell in the centre of the Borough. © Crown Copyright. ONS 2004. Bracknell Forest Borough Council – Final Sustainability Appraisal October 2006 B 1 LDFCSSubmissionAnnexe5b0.doc Population and Human Health Population Structure • Between 1991 and 2001, the population of Bracknell Forest rose by 13,668 (14.25%) from 95,949 to 109,617, making it the fastest Population of Bracknell Forest - Change between growing authority in Berkshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalist No
    The Reading Naturalist No. 35 Published by the Reading and Di~trict Natural History Society 1983. Pri ce to Non-Members £1.00 Contents Page Meetings and ExcUrsions, 1981-82 .. ... 1 Presidential Addressg How to renew an interest in Carpentry · · B • . R. Baker 2 Hymenoptera in the neading Area H. Ho Carter 5 Wildlife Conservation at AWRE9 Aldermaston Ao Brickstock 10 Albinism in Frogs (Rana temporaria Lo ) 1978-82 j' A • . Price 12 . .t . Looking forward to the Spring So rlard 15 ';',' .. Kenfig Pool and Dunes, Glamorgan H. J. Mo Bowen 16 Mosses of Central Readingg Update Mo v. Fletcher 20 : "( Agaricus around Reading, 1982 P. Andrews 23 Honorary Recorders' Repor·ts g Fungi Ao Brickstock 27 Botany Bo H. Newman 32 .' ... 'EIl"tomology Bo Ro Baker 41 Vertebrat~s H. Ho Carter .. ... ·47 , Weather Records M. ' Parry ·· 51 Monthly vleather Notes Mo· Parry 52 Members' List 53 T3 E READIN"G NATU!tALIST The Journal of' .. " The Reading and District Natural His-t-ory Soci.ety President ~ Hon. General Secretaryg Hon-. Editor: Mrs. S. J. lihitf'ield Miss L. E. Cobb Editorial Sub-Committee: Miss E. M. Nelmes, Miss S. Y. Townend Honorary Recorders~ Botany; Hrs " B. M," NelYman 9 Mr. B. R. Baker, Vertebrates ~. Mr. H . H v Carter, Fungi: Dr. A. Brickstock, : .. - , 1 - The Annual General Meeting on 15th October 1981 (attendance 52) was ::followed by 'Mr. B. R. Baker's Presid­ ential Address entitled 'How to Renew an Interest in Carpentry' • A Natural History 'Brains Trust' (54) was held on 29th October under the chairmanship of the President, the members of the panel being Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Recording and Information Generic Biodiversity Action Plan
    Biological Recording and Information Generic Biodiversity Action Plan • Better informed policy & decision making • Avoidance of unnecessary damage to biodiversity • Effective targeting of scarce resources to best use • Compliance with statutory reporting requirements • Monitoring of programme effectiveness • Monitoring of short & mid term habitat & species trends • Important component of education & awareness raising Up to date accessible records are an essential starting point for nature conservation and the implementation of the biodiversity action plan process. Without knowledge about the location and quantity of different habitats and species, both in the past and present, declines cannot be detected and conservation management cannot be focused to achieve effective targeting of scarce resources to best use . In addition, monitoring is vital in order to determine whether conservation management is working, demonstrating whether it is maximising biodiversity or reversing any previous population declines, thus avoiding unnecessary damage to biodiversity and allowing discrete monitoring of programme effectiveness . It is essential not only to give users access to the data that already exist but also to improve the quantity, quality and relevance of biodiversity data. Information needs to be up-to-date and trustworthy, as complete as possible, accurate and rapidly accessible. Where required it must be interpreted and evaluated so that users can judge what significance should be attached to it. This provides us with a focus point for the collation and management of data relating to the wildlife of Worcestershire. The pooling of data from a number of sources provides a greater overall resource for the County of high quality, well presented, and clearly understandable data relating to, for example, species occurrences and distributions for a given area.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Appraisal Report
    Bracknell Forest Borough Council Final Sustainability Appraisal Report Technical Document D Site Specific Appraisal: Full appraisal tables October 2006 Site specific sustainability appraisal The tables in the following document provide the full sustainability appraisal for each site proposed within the Site Allocations DPD and the policies within the document. Full details of how this appraisal was carried out, how the scores were calculated, and a summary of the results, can be found in Section 3 of the Final Sustainability Appraisal Report (November 2006). Scoring of Options Score + + The site or policy will have a very positive impact on the sustainability objective + The site or policy will have a slightly positive impact on the sustainability objective The site or policy will have a negligible or neutral impact on the sustainable objective. A recorded 0 neutral effect does not necessarily mean there will be no effect at the project level, but shows that at this strategic level there are no identifiable effects. - The site or policy will have a slightly negative impact on the sustainability objective - - The site or policy will have a very negative impact on the sustainability objective The outcome of implementing the site or policy could be dependant upon implementation or more i detail is required to make an assessment ? The impact of an issue cannot be predicted at this stage Sustainability Objectives Ref. number SA Objective Meet local housing needs by ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to live in a decent, 1 sustainably constructed house. 2 Reduce the risk of flooding and harm to people, property and the environment 3 Protect and enhance human wealth and wellbeing 4 Reduce poverty and social exclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Local Plan: Submission Version (2017) 1 Foreword
    Borough Local Plan 2013 - 2033 Submission version Borough Local Plan: Submission Version (2017) 1 Foreword Foreword by Leader of the Council and the Lead Member for Planning We are delighted to present the Borough Local Plan for the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. The Borough Local Plan promotes a sustainable pattern of development for the Borough until 2033. The new development that is proposed in this plan aims to provide for new housing and affordable housing to fulfil the needs of all of our residents, whilst at the same time protecting our valued natural and built historic environment and assets. The plan aims to protect and enhance those elements that make our Borough special in the eyes of not only our residents but all those who choose to visit, work and invest in the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. We are privileged to be home to one of the most recognisable and valued historic assets in the country, Windsor Castle and the Windsor Great Park which the Borough Local Plan seeks to protect not only for our own benefit but also for future generations. The Borough Local Plan is based on a substantial and robust evidence base and on the results of the consultation exercises we have carried out in the past, as guided by national policy and legislation. We have worked with partners including our neighbouring local authorities, statutory bodies and local communities and agencies, as well as considering the many emerging and adopted Neighbourhood Development Plans being prepared by parishes and neighbourhood forums. Planning often presents difficult choices and requires a balance of national policy and local wishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Published in December 2014 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 2 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................8 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................8 1.1 The Purpose of the Strategy ...........................................................................................8 1.2 Overview of the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead ................................................9 1.3 Types of flooding ....................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Who is this Strategy aimed at? .....................................................................................12 1.5 The period covered by the Strategy ...............................................................................12 1.6 The Objectives of the Strategy ......................................................................................12 1.7 Scrutiny and Review ...................................................................................................13 2 Legislative Context ..........................................................................................................14 2.1 The Pitt Review .........................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • RSPB Newsletter Color.Indd
    RSPB Wokingham and Bracknell Local Group Spring newsletter The RSPB is the country’s largest nature conservation charity, inspiring everyone to give nature a home. February 2018 Chairman’s Message – WHAT PRICE NATURE? The winter edition of BTO News, which birds in a coffee estimated plantation at is a quarterly news update from the $310 per hectare, (£223). Great tits predating British Trust for Ornithology, had an caterpillars in a Dutch orchard were found to article written by Tony Juniper which improve the apple harvest by 50%. The value caught my eye, writes Patrick Crowley. provided by animals such as bees, doing the pollination work that underpins a trillion He wrote that ‘the loss of natural habitats dollars’ worth of agricultural sales has been and species are generally regarded as valued at $190 billion per year, (£137.46 regrettable’, and is the ‘price of progress’ or billion). The GDP value derived from fish a ‘necessary cost of achieving economic stocks and associated industries are about growth’. But this presupposes that we $274 billion per year, (£196.79 billion). cannot (or should not?) put a price on our The wider value of the marine and coastal environment. However, there are an systems from storms, taking carbon dioxide increasing number of specialist studies that from the atmosphere and replenishing its reveal the huge economic value being oxygen levels has been put at $21 trillion, destroyed by policies geared to promoting (£15.08 trillion)! 2017 photographic winner economic activity. Those watching Blue Planet 2 recently on Our UK Wildlife competition winner For example, the cost of losing India’s BBC1, will have been horrified by the was select this year from eight vultures has been estimated at $34 billion amount of plastic that is going into our entrants, and again as previous (£24.42 billion), due to the public health costs oceans, and by the destruction of coral reefs years the standard of images were and controlling rabies infections.
    [Show full text]
  • Various Stuff!
    Various Stuff! Peter Thurman [email protected] Some Notes On: • The Tenacity of Trees • Some Benefits of Trees • Trees and Culture • Some Threats to Trees + Some Solutions • Biosecurity • Biodiversity • Tree Planting & Aftercare • Some Trees to Avoid • New trees to Consider? The Tenacity of Trees Coping & Helping with Soil Erosion Moving Concrete St Jose, USA Chinese privet (Ligustrum lucidum) Clipped hard every 4 years “Planting the Space” Orvieto, Italy Proliferating root growth Tetrameles nudiflora at Ta Prohm Temple in Cambodia Hong Kong Chinese banyan Ficus microcarpa Looking for oxygen and trying to get rid of carbon dioxide but seeking moisture in the paving joints - Hong Kong Tolerance of Very Low Ground and Air Temperatures [here = Bavaria] Long Living/Resilience Ancient Olive [Olea europaea] tree in Montenegro High wind / exposure Trees adapt, evolve and survive – Phenotypic and Genotypic adaptation “Base of a Wine Glass root systems” ...but not always... Benefits Why do we plant trees? Aesthetics Their attractive visual appearance – Decoration and Ornament Oxygen! The Air that we Breathe Architecture and Landscape Design Framing, Screening, Shelter, Unifying, Softening, Space Division, Green Mass and Infrastructure Engineering SUDS, Canopy Cover, Climate and Pollution Amelioration, Soil Stabilisation, Erosion Control Cultural/Historical/Educational Linking the past with the present and the future, Social Traditions Wildlife Biodiversity and Flora, Fauna & Habitat Conservation Well Being and Recreation Contributing to the Mental and Physical Health & Happiness of humans - Biophilia Economic Added-value to properties and districts, Energy conservation, Bio-Fuels, Timber and many other Bi-products Aesthetics Marks Hall Gardens and Arboretum, Essex Do people notice plant form more than flowers? “Imagine if trees gave off Wi-Fi signals… We would be planting so many.
    [Show full text]
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Insectos 2020 2ª Ed
    Os nomes galegos dos insectos 2020 2ª ed. Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (20202): Os nomes galegos dos insectos. Xinzo de Limia (Ourense): A Chave. https://www.achave.ga /wp!content/up oads/achave_osnomesga egosdos"insectos"2020.pd# Fotografía: abella (Apis mellifera ). Autor: Jordi Bas. $sta o%ra est& su'eita a unha licenza Creative Commons de uso a%erto( con reco)ecemento da autor*a e sen o%ra derivada nin usos comerciais. +esumo da licenza: https://creativecommons.org/ icences/%,!nc-nd/-.0/deed.g . 1 Notas introdutorias O que cont n este documento Na primeira edición deste recurso léxico (2018) fornecéronse denominacións para as especies máis coñecidas de insectos galegos (e) ou europeos, e tamén para algúns insectos exóticos (mostrados en ám itos divulgativos polo seu interese iolóxico, agr"cola, sil!"cola, médico ou industrial, ou por seren moi comúns noutras áreas xeográficas)# Nesta segunda edición (2020) incorpórase o logo da $%a!e ao deseño do documento, corr"xese algunha gralla, reescr" ense as notas introdutorias e engádense algunhas especies e algún nome galego máis# &n total, ac%éganse nomes galegos para 89( especies de insectos# No planeta téñense descrito aproximadamente un millón de especies, e moitas están a"nda por descubrir# Na )en"nsula * érica %a itan preto de +0#000 insectos diferentes# Os nomes das ol oretas non se inclúen neste recurso léxico da $%a!e, foron o xecto doutro tra allo e preséntanse noutro documento da $%a!e dedicado exclusivamente ás ol oretas, a!ela"ñas e trazas . Os nomes galegos
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Deadwood in Forests and Woodlands
    Practice Guide Managing deadwood in forests and woodlands Practice Guide Managing deadwood in forests and woodlands Jonathan Humphrey and Sallie Bailey Forestry Commission: Edinburgh © Crown Copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence or write to the Information Policy Team at The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail [email protected]. This publication is also available on our website at: www.forestry.gov.uk/publications First published by the Forestry Commission in 2012. ISBN 978-0-85538-857-7 Jonathan Humphrey and Sallie Bailey (2012). Managing deadwood in forests and woodlands. Forestry Commission Practice Guide. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh. i–iv + 1–24 pp. Keywords: biodiversity; deadwood; environment; forestry; sustainable forest management. FCPG020/FC-GB(ECD)/ALDR-2K/MAY12 Enquiries relating to this publication should be addressed to: Forestry Commission Silvan House 231 Corstorphine Road Edinburgh EH12 7AT 0131 334 0303 [email protected] In Northern Ireland, to: Forest Service Department of Agriculture and Rural Development Dundonald House Upper Newtownards Road Ballymiscaw Belfast BT4 3SB 02890 524480 [email protected] The Forestry Commission will consider all requests to make the content of publications available in alternative formats. Please direct requests to the Forestry Commission Diversity Team at the above address, or by email at [email protected] or by phone on 0131 314 6575. Acknowledgements Thanks are due to the following contributors: Fred Currie (retired Forestry Commission England); Jill Butler (Woodland Trust); Keith Kirby (Natural England); Iain MacGowan (Scottish Natural Heritage).
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Management Site Specification – Wokingham to Reading
    Wessex Route CP6 Year 1 - Vegetation Management Site Specification – Wokingham to Reading 1. Site of Work Wokingham Station to Reading Station 2. Vegetation Management Overview The line of route between Wokingham and Reading is generally a heavily wooded urban area, which narrows in places and runs through a series of cuttings and embankments. Management of lineside vegetation between Wokingham and Reading has been overlooked in recent years and as a result, this route now tops Network Rail Wessex’s priority list for vegetation management. Lineside vegetation along this route is to be managed in order to prevent it causing obstruction and damage to either the rail network or to our lineside neighbours. In considering the work required, several criteria have been considered: • All lines of route must have a safe cess (walkway) for staff who are required to walk along the lineside to carry out their duties. A minimum 7 metre wide cut-back of vegetation has been specified in order to maintain a 6 metre wide vegetation-free corridor either side of the outermost rails. • Embankments supporting the railway tracks generally need vegetation to be retained at the bottom third of their slope in order to maintain stability at the toe of the embankment. In certain circumstances all vegetation is removed to allow for retaining structures to be installed. Where vegetation has the potential to cause an issue to Network Rail’s lineside neighbours it is to be removed. • There are several cutting slopes (where the railway is lower in elevation than the surrounding terrain) on the Wokingham to Reading route.
    [Show full text]
  • Bracknell Forest Ramblers Route
    This broad, straight track is part of a Follow a cinder track for 350 yards (315m) and then turn left off the footpath by some white fencing, where Location map Roman road which once linked London Section 1 you’ll follow an old tarmac road for a further 350 yards. Turn right just after the gas pumping station and follow a with the Roman town of Silchester. Even Ramblers route bridleway, which runs parallel to power lines, in a westerly direction, crossing a stream at one point. Stay on this The Look Out to Wildmoor Heath: though the Romans constructed the road, path for 0.8 miles (1.3 km) until you reach the Crowthorne to Sandhurst road. 4.5 miles (7.2 km) local people who lived here after the Roman Introduction Occupation believed that only the Devil could Numbered text relates to numbered route The Ramblers Route have been responsible for such a feat of sections in the maps. engineering - hence its name. is 26 mile/ 41.8km Section 1 The Look Out Discovery Centre is open daily circular walking trail Continue straight along the Devil’s Highway, and provides many attractions for the family, drop down a slope to a gate and follow the that passes through with over 90 science and nature exhibits. The track beneath the route of the Sandhurst- attractive countryside Look Out is situated on the edge of Swinley Crowthorne bypass. About 175 yards (160m) on the outskirts of Forest which is the largest area of unbroken beyond the bypass, turn left onto a footpath woodland (mostly Scots Pine) in Berkshire at and head south.
    [Show full text]