DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 25 Tsetsaut Skii Km Lax Ha

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 25 Tsetsaut Skii Km Lax Ha ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RED MOUNTAIN UNDERGROUND GOLD PROJECT VOLUME 4 | CHAPTER 25 TSETSAUT SKII KM LAX HA Table of Contents 25 Tsetsaut Skii km Lax Ha .................................................................. 1 25.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 25.2 Background and Context..................................................................................................... 2 25.2.1 Regulatory and Policy Setting ................................................................................ 2 25.2.2 TSKLH ..................................................................................................................... 3 25.2.3 Environmental Setting ......................................................................................... 16 25.3 Consultation Summary ..................................................................................................... 20 25.3.1 Pre-Application Engagement ............................................................................... 20 25.3.2 Future Engagement ............................................................................................. 21 25.4 Scope of the Assessment .................................................................................................. 22 25.4.1 Information Sources ............................................................................................ 22 25.4.2 Input from Consultation ...................................................................................... 23 25.5 Potential Effects ................................................................................................................ 23 25.5.1 Methods ............................................................................................................... 23 25.5.2 Project Interactions ............................................................................................. 23 25.5.3 Discussion of Potential Effects ............................................................................. 26 25.6 Mitigation Measures ......................................................................................................... 41 25.6.1 Key Mitigation Approaches .................................................................................. 41 25.6.2 Effectiveness of Mitigation Measures ................................................................. 41 25.6.3 Management Plans and Monitoring .................................................................... 60 25.7 Residual Effects Characterization ..................................................................................... 60 25.7.1 Summary of Residual Effects ............................................................................... 60 25.7.2 Methods ............................................................................................................... 61 IDM MINING LTD. | RED MOUNTAIN UNDERGROUND GOLD PROJECT CHAPTER 25 | i ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 25.7.3 Potential Residual Effects Assessment ................................................................ 65 25.7.4 Summary of Residual Effects Assessment ........................................................... 80 25.8 Other Matters of Concern ................................................................................................ 82 25.9 Issue Summary Table ........................................................................................................ 82 25.10 References ........................................................................................................................ 84 ii | TABLE OF CONTENTS SEPTEMBER 2017 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT List of Tables Table 25.2-1: Summary of TSKLH Aboriginal Interests in the Project Area ............................................ 15 Table 25.2-2: Project-Specific Wildlife Baseline Studies ......................................................................... 18 Table 25.4-1: Data Sources for TSKLH ..................................................................................................... 22 Table 25.5-1: Potential Project Interactions: TSKLH Aboriginal Interests .............................................. 24 Table 25.5-2: Potential Project Interactions and Effects on Fish and Fish Habitat ................................. 31 Table 25.6-1: Proposed Mitigation Measures and Their Effectiveness .................................................. 43 Table 25.6-2: Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Mitigation Measures .......................................................... 44 Table 25.6-3 Fish and Fish Habitat Mitigation Measures ...................................................................... 52 Table 25.6-4: Vegetation and Ecosystems Mitigation Measures ........................................................... 53 Table 25.7-1: Residual Effect Characterization Definitions for Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat and Vegetation and Ecosystems .............................................................................................. 62 Table 25.7-2: Residual Effect Characterization Definitions for Fish and Fish Habitat ............................ 63 Table 25.7-3: Attributes of Likelihood .................................................................................................... 64 Table 25.7-4: Confidence Ratings and Definitions .................................................................................. 65 Table 25.7-5: Characterization of Potential Residual Effects on Habitat Availability ............................. 66 Table 25.7-6: Characterization of Potential Residual Effects on Habitat Distribution ........................... 68 Table 25.7-7: Characterization of Potential Residual Effects on Mortality Risk ..................................... 68 Table 25.7-8: Characterization of Residual Effects on Fish Habitat ........................................................ 71 Table 25.7-9: Characterization of Residual Effects on Dolly Varden due to Changes in Water Quality ............................................................................................................................... 74 Table 25.7-10: Characterization of Residual Effects on Dolly Varden due to Changes in Streamflows ... 75 Table 25.7-11: Characterization of Potential Residual Effects to Plant Resources ................................... 77 Table 25.7-12: TSKLH Harvested Plants by Ecosystem VC ........................................................................ 79 Table 25.7-13: Summary of the Residual Effects Assessment on TSKLH’s Aboriginal Interests ............... 81 Table 25.9-1: TSKLH Issue Summary Table ............................................................................................. 82 IDM MINING LTD. | RED MOUNTAIN UNDERGROUND GOLD PROJECT CHAPTER 25 | iii ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT List of Figures Figure 25.2-1: TSKLH Territory (Map 1 of 2) .............................................................................................. 8 Figure 25.2-2: TSKLH Traditional Territory (Map 2 of 2) ............................................................................ 9 Figure 25.2-3: Registered Traplines held by TSKLH Members ................................................................. 12 iv | TABLE OF CONTENTS SEPTEMBER 2017 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 25 TSETSAUT SKII KM LAX HA 25.1 Introduction The purpose of this chapter is to summarize the engagement and consultation conducted by IDM with Tsetsaut Skii km Lax Ha (TSKLH) and to conduct an assessment of the potential effects of the Project on TSKLH’s Aboriginal Interests in the Bitter Creek valley, as outlined in the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 (CEAA 2012) and the Environmental Impact Statement Guidelines (the EIS Guidelines) issued for the Project by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency). This chapter includes: • Background information and context regarding TSKLH; • An assessment of the potential effects on TSKLH’s Aboriginal Interests; • Proposed mitigation measures to avoid, mitigate, manage or otherwise address potential effects on TSKLH’s Aboriginal Interests; • An assessment of the potential residual effects on TSKLH’s Aboriginal Interests, after mitigation measure have been taken into consideration; and • A summary of any other matters of concern to TSKLH as expressed to IDM. The following valued components (VCs) and intermediate components (ICs) have informed this chapter: • Air Quality Effects Assessment (Chapter 7); • Noise Effects Assessment (Chapter 8); • Vegetation and Ecosystems Effects Assessment (Chapter 15); • Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Effects Assessment (Chapter 16); • Fish and Fish Habitat Effects Assessment (Chapter 18); • Commercial, Recreational, and Aboriginal Fisheries, under the Economic Effects Assessment (Chapter 19); • Visual Quality, under the Social Effects Assessment (Chapter 20); and • Heritage Effects Assessment (Chapter 21). IDM MINING LTD. | RED MOUNTAIN UNDERGROUND GOLD PROJECT CHAPTER 25 | 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT The assessment of potential effects on TSKLH’s Aboriginal Interests is based on a comparison between the predicted future conditions with the Project and the predicted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geology of Hyder and Vicinity Southeastern Alaska
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Roy O. West, Secretary U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY George Otis Smith, Director Bulletin 807 GEOLOGY OF HYDER AND VICINITY SOUTHEASTERN ALASKA WITH A RECONNAISSANCE OF CHICKAMIN RIVER BY A. F. RUDDINGTON UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1&29 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS TJ.S.OOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 35 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS Page Foreword, by Philip S. Smith._________________________ vn Introduction...____________________________________________________ 1 Field work_.._.___._.______..____...____. -_-__-. .. 1 Acknowledgments. _-_-________-_-___-___-__--_____-__-- -____-_ 2 History._________________________________________________________ 2 Bibliography ________-______ _____________._-__.-___-__--__--_--_-_ 3 Alaska.__-___-__---______-_-____-_-___--____-___-_-___-__-___ & British Columbia____-_____-___-___________-_-___--___.._____- 4 Geography_______________________________________-____--___-__--_ 4 Location and transportation facilities.___________________________ 4 Climate. __--______-______.____--__---____-_______--._--.--__- 5 Vegetation ___________________________________________________ 6 Water power._--___._____.________.______-_.._____-___.-_____ 7 Topography-___________--____-_-___--____.___-___-----__--_-- 7 General features of the relief----______-_---___-__------_-_-_ 7 Streams.._ _______________________________________________ 9 Glaciation.. _ __-_____-__--__--_____-__---_____-__--_----__ 10 Geology.... __----_-._ -._---_--__-.- _-_____-_____-___-_ 13 General features___-_-____-__-__-___-..____--___-_-____--__-._ 13 Hazelton group._....._.._>___-_-.__-______----_-----'_-__-..-- 17 General character.-----.-------.-------------------------- 17 Greenstone and associated rocks.._______.__.-.--__--_--_--_ 18 Graywacke-slate division.._________-_-__--_-_-----_--_----_ 19 Coast.Range intrusives__________-__-__--___-----------_-----_- 22 Texas Creek batholith and associated dikes..__--__.__-__-__-.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Summary and Information Needs White-Winged Scoter (Melanitta Fusca)
    Species Status Summary and Information Needs Sea Duck Joint Venture, March 2015 White-winged Scoter (Melanitta fusca) Population Size and Trends: The number of White-winged Scoters breeding in western Canada and Alaska appear to have declined in the past half-century, based on declines in total scoter numbers in regions where White-winged Scoters predominate. The recent trend is unknown, but the population is probably below historic levels (Bowman et al. 2015). Scoters (all three species combined) declined from the early 1980s to the early 2000s but seem to have increased beginning around 2004 (Bowman et al. 2015). The number of White-winged Scoters breeding in the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge was apparently stable from 2001 to 2011, with no apparent trend and no significant differences between years (Guldager and Bertram 2010; Bowman et al. 2015). However, species-specific data from the Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat survey indicates an increasing trend in Alaska between 1993 and 2012 (Bowman et al. 2015). Alisauskas et al. (2004) found that the number of breeding White-winged Scoters in northern Manitoba and Saskatchewan increased during the 1990s while continuing to decline in northern Alberta and the Northwest Territories; breeding populations disappeared from southern Alberta and southern Manitoba by 1998. Range-wide surveys during winter are only at the developmental stage. A 35% decline has been observed in Puget Sound, Washington, from 1999 to 2013 (Bowman et al. 2015) and a significant negative trend (-7.6%/year) in the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia, has been recorded by the BC Coastal Waterbird Survey (Crewe et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellow-Cedar Decline in the North Coast Forest District of British Columbia
    United States Department of Agriculture Yellow-Cedar Decline in the Forest Service North Coast Forest District Pacific Northwest Research Station of British Columbia Research Note PNW-RN-549 Paul E. Hennon, David V. D’Amore, Stefan Zeglen, and October 2005 Mike Grainger1 Abstract The distribution of a forest decline of yellow-cedar (Callitropsis nootkatensis (D. Don) Örsted) has been documented in southeast Alaska, but its occurrence in British Columbia was previously unknown. We conducted an aerial survey in the Prince Rupert area in September 2004 to determine if yellow-cedar forests in the North Coast Forest District of British Columbia were experiencing a similar fate as in nearby Alaska. Numerous large areas of concentrated yellow-cedar mortality were found, extending the known distribution of the decline problem 150 km south of the Alaska–British Columbia border. The forests with the most concentrated tree death occurred at 300 to 400 m elevation, frequently on south aspects. The appearance of these forests including proximity to bogs; mixtures of dying, recently killed, and long-dead trees; and crown and bole symptoms of dying trees were all consistent with the phenomenon in southeast Alaska. Introduction 2 Yellow-cedar (Callitropsis nootkatensis (D. Don) Örsted) decline (fig. 1) extends over 200 000 ha in a broad band through southeast Alaska to the Alaska–British Columbia border along Portland Canal (fig. 2) (Wittwer 2004). The problem is specific to yellow-cedar and is characterized on the landscape as a progressive and intensifying process that results in fading trees with thin or offcolor crowns and numerous standing dead trees, some killed recently and others up to 100 1 Paul E.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Does Canada Have So Many Unresolved Maritime Boundary Disputes? –– Pourquoi Le Canada A-T-Il Autant De Différends Non Résolus Concernant Ses Frontières Maritimes?
    Why Does Canada Have So Many Unresolved Maritime Boundary Disputes? –– Pourquoi le Canada a-t-il autant de différends non résolus concernant ses frontières maritimes? michael byers and andreas Østhagen Abstract Résumé Canada has five unresolved maritime Le Canada a cinq frontières maritimes qui boundaries. This might seem like a high n’ont pas encore été délimitées. Ce nom- number, given that Canada has only three bre peut paraitre élevé étant donné que le neighbours: the United States, Denmark Canada n’a que trois voisins: les États-Unis, (Greenland), and France (St. Pierre and le Danemark (Groënland) et la France (St. Miquelon). This article explores why Pierre et Miquelon). Cet article cherche à Canada has so many unresolved maritime découvrir pourquoi le Canada a tant de boundaries. It does so through a compar- frontières maritimes irrésolues. Pour ce ison with Norway, which has settled all of faire, l’article se penche sur le cas de la its maritime boundaries, most notably in Norvège, qui a réussi à délimiter toutes ses the Barents Sea with Russia. This compar- frontières maritimes, y compris dans la mer ison illuminates some of the factors that de Barents avec la Russie. Cette comparai- motivate or impede maritime boundary son met en relief certains des facteurs qui negotiations. It turns out that the status favorisent ou entravent les négociations of each maritime boundary can only be pour la résolution de différends maritimes explained on the basis of its own unique frontaliers. Il s’avère que le statut des fron- geographic, historic, political, and legal tières maritimes ne peut s’expliquer qu’en context.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Canal News ABOUT THIS DISTRICT
    provincial Library, Victoria, THE NEWS WILIflKE^EP TOU POSTED ON* THE SEND THIS COPY TO DEVELOPMENT OF THE YOUR FRD3ND WHO MINES—$5.00 THE VEAR. WANTS INFORMATION Portland Canal News ABOUT THIS DISTRICT. Davoted to the Interests of the Mining Districts ot Northwestern British Columbiia VOL. 8, NO. 8 STEWART, BRITISH COLUMBIA, FRIDAY, JULY 16, 1926 $5 THE YEAR—10c. the Copy NEW HOPE FOR ANOTHER VEIN I WM. H, LONGLEY DEVELOPING THE LEAD-ZINC ORE ON BIG MISSOURI Athletic dance tonight. Wm. Bunting left last Monday DIESJN HYDER RUTH &JRANCIS No mineral district in British R.G.Birch of the Bank of Mon­ night on a business trip to Rupert Reports of new discoveries on William H. Longley was found J. H. Nesbitt is developing hig Columbia is so vitally interested treal staff left for Rupert last Hugh B. McGuire, manager of the Big Missouri are coming with dead in his cabin in Hyder last Ruth and Francis group near the Saturday. the Alaska-Canadian Co., arrived in the reopening and successful a regularity that may be becom­ Saturday evening by Jack Fitz­ head of the south fork of Glacier from the south Saturday. operation of the Ladysmith smel­ ing monotonous to some readers; Mr^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ and Mrs Stanley Alton o^f gerald, who had engaged him to creek, four miles beyond the Prem e An election to decide the ques­ ter on Vancouver island as the nevertheless another must be re- j ' -* 'eft this week for Craig, take supplies in to the Titan Dunwell mine. The work now Alaska on a tion as to incorporating a local Portland Canal district.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boundary Reefs: Glass Sponge (Porifera: Hexactinellidae) Reefs on the International Border Between Canada and the United States
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-264 The Boundary Reefs: Glass Sponge (Porifera: Hexactinellidae) Reefs on the International Border Between Canada and the United States by R. P. Stone, K. W. Conway, D. J. Csepp, J. V. Barrie U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Fisheries Science Center January 2014 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS The National Marine Fisheries Service's Alaska Fisheries Science Center uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum series to issue informal scientific and technical publications when complete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible. Documents within this series reflect sound professional work and may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. The NMFS-AFSC Technical Memorandum series of the Alaska Fisheries Science Center continues the NMFS-F/NWC series established in 1970 by the Northwest Fisheries Center. The NMFS-NWFSC series is currently used by the Northwest Fisheries Science Center. This document should be cited as follows: Stone, R. P., K. W. Conway, D. J. Csepp, and J. V. Barrie. 2013. The boundary reefs: glass sponge (Porifera: Hexactinellida) reefs on the international border between Canada and the United States. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-AFSC-264, 31 p. Document available: http://www.afsc.noaa.gov/Publications/AFSC-TM/NOAA-TM-AFSC-264.pdf Reference in this document to trade names does not imply endorsement by the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-264 The Boundary Reefs: Glass Sponge (Porifera: Hexactinellidae) Reefs on the International Border Between Canada and the United States by R.
    [Show full text]
  • Circumpolar Wild Reindeer and Caribou Herds DRAFT for REVIEW
    CircumpolarCircumpolar WildWild ReindeerReindeer andand CaribouCaribou HerdsHerds DRAFTDRAFT FORFOR REVIEWREVIEW 140°W 160°W 180° 160°E Urup ALEUTIAN ISLANDS NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN KURIL ISANDS Paramushir ALEUTIAN ISLANDS Petropavlovsk Kamchatskiy Commander Islands Bering Sea Kronotskiy Gulf r ive Gulf of Kamchatka a R k 50°N at ch NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN m Ka 40°N Sea of Okhotsk Bristol Bay KAMCHATKA PENINSULA Karaginskiy Gulf Okha ALASKA PENINSULA Tatar Strait Kodiak Gulf of Sakhalin Bethel Iliamna Lake Shelikhova Gulf P’yagina Pen. Koni Pen. Riv Homer ina er iver zh Magadan Cook Inlet R n m Pe Taygonos Pen. wi Coos Bay ok sk u Kenai K Kotlit S . F Gulf of Anadyr' Okhotsk-Kolyma Upland Kenai Peninsula o Western Arctic Wi r Uda Bay llam Anchorage k iver Eugenee Ku r’ R tt Tillamook Gulf of Alaska sk dy e S o Nome A na R Prince William Sound kw Salem2iv Queen Charlotte Islands u im s e Astoria Palmeri R Norton Sound ive r t iv R r STANOVOY RANGE n e a r a Valdez m Portland2 R y r Aberdeen2 Port HardyQueen Charlotte Sound i l e Dixon Entrance v o v Vancouver1 e CHUKCHI PENINSULA K i r R y r Centralia Bering Strait O u e Sitka l t v Olympia Seward Peninsula o h i ALASKA RANGE y R k R Courtenay ive u ia KetchikanAlexander Archipelago r K b TacomaStrait of Juan de Fuca Nanaimo m r Bol’sho u e y l A Wrangell v n o Puget Sound Strait of Georgia i United States of America yu C SeattleEverett R y r er Kotzebue Sound Ri e Juneau p ve iv BellinghamVancouver2 S op r R Yakima t C Kotzebue n ik r o COAST MOUNTAINS in e l COLUMBIA PLAT.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Environmental Knowledge of the Stewart Estuary
    STATUS OF ENVIRONMENTAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE STEWART ESTUARY by T.R. CLEUGH Memorandum Report Habitat Protection Division Fisheries and Oceans November 1979 TABLE OF C-ONTENTS INTRODUCTION . " GEOGRAPHY . " . CLIMATE • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • 3 GEOLOGY . 5 LAND USE • • . • . • . ' 5 HYDROLOGY OF BEAR RIVER ' . 8 SALMON ESCAPEMENT . " . 8 1979 STUDIES •• • • • • l 0 Methods ..... • • • • • • 10 Results • • • 0 • • 0 • • • • 13 DISCUSSION • Cl • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 21 REFERENCES . • . ~ . • • . 23 ( i i ) \\ LIST OF TABLES Table Bear River above Bitter Creek - Monthly and annual mean discharges in \\ cfs for 1967 - 1976 ••..••.•• • • • • 0 9 2 Macrofauna detected in benthic samples from Stewart, B. C. .•...•.•• 14 3 Meiofauna detected in benthic samples from Stewart, B.C. • ••••••.• 15 4 Species of fish caught including times and site numbers •.•.••.••.• 19 5 Salinities and temperatures, Upper Bear River Estuary . 20 . LIST OF PLATES Plate Upper eastern ~stuary, Stewart, B.C., 28 May 1975 ... · • · • • · • . 24 . ' (iv) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS R. Russell ahd B. Lawley assisted with the sample collections, and B. Raymond identified the benthic samples. W. Field drafted the figures and T. Collins typed and proofread this memo report. J, Morrison provided critical comments • • . ' i\ INTRODUCTION A Master Plan Study for the Port of Stewart was prepared in 1978 for the .British Columbia Harbours Board. The purpose was to provide cognizant guidelines for a co-ordinated development plan. The study was to provide a ready reference of information to partie~ Interested in developing port facilities. Included in this plan was an environmental overview of the estuary. and area. On reviewing the environmental aspects of this document there were several biological statements for which no quantitative or qualitative information was presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Thepacific Slope
    TOIAJME LXXTII.-NO. 156.The SanSAN FRANCISCO,FranciscoWEDNESDAY MORNING, MAY 15,Call.1895. PRICE FIVE CENTS. Stanford University; Miss Estelle M.Dar- bring the loveliest of blooms to headquar- claims of this section for recognition. The rah, Teachers' Training School, St. Paul; ters. Inthe rooms of the Ladies' Auxiliary— directors express themselves in favor of an Miss Irene Hardy, Stanford University; the most beautiful flowers can be seen air line so far as practicable. Such a line from Fresno to Visalia will through the SANTAROSA MOURNS Miss Mary P. Adams, Normal School, San LIKE AFAIRY CITY. the choicest from many gardens of the AMIDFRESNO VINES go SLOPE. included in organization re- PACIFIC the THE Logan brought towns the Jose; MelvilleB. Anderson, Stanford Uni- city. Mrs. J. H. to versity; E. B. Barnard, Lick Observatory, rooms of the Ladies' Auxiliary a bunch of cently formed here to secure the road. Royalists Said and Samuel F. Black,Superintendent Pub- Healdsburg a Maze of peonies measuring three feet indiameter. The Valley Road Party The committee is well pleased with the Alva Porter Moore the Hawaiian licInstruction. Five thousand seats will be placed on assurance given by the directors. Plotting at the 5000 more on the river Victim of a Railroad to Be SAXTA CLAHA FRUIT. Bright-Hued Bunting avenue and Visits the Land of Work of the Engineer*. Angeles. front. STOCKTON, Cal., May 14.—The camp Los Shipments the Keek Shotr an and Flowers. balloting for the maids of honor Vineyards. Accident. for Increase The of the at work the new road Over a Year Ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Dixon Entrance
    118 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 8, Chapter 4 19 SEP 2021 Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 8—Chapter 4 131°W 130°W NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml 133°W 132°W UNITEDCANADA ST ATES 17420 17424 56°N A 17422 C L L U A S R N R 17425 E I E N N E V C P I E L L A S D T N G R A I L B A G E E I L E T V A H N E D M A L 17423 C O C M I H C L E S P A B A L R N N I A A N L A N C C D E 17428 O F W 17430 D A 17427 Ketchikan N L A E GRAVINA ISLAND L S A T N I R S N E E O L G T R P A E T A S V S I E L N A L P I A S G S L D I L A G O N E D H D C O I N C 55°N H D A A N L N T E E L L DUKE ISLAND L N I I S L CORDOVA BAY D N A A N L T D R O P C Cape Chacon H A T H A 17437 17433 M S O Cape Muzon U N 17434 D DIXON ENTRANCE Langara Island 17420 54°N GRAHAM ISLAND HECATE STRAIT (Canada) 19 SEP 2021 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical and Legal Study of Sovereignty in the Canadian North : Terrestrial Sovereignty, 1870–1939
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2014 A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939 Smith, Gordon W. University of Calgary Press "A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939", Gordon W. Smith; edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50251 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL STUDY OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE CANADIAN NORTH: TERRESTRIAL SOVEREIGNTY, 1870–1939 By Gordon W. Smith, Edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer ISBN 978-1-55238-774-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at ucpress@ ucalgary.ca Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specificwork without breaching the artist’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Duncan Lake): a Draft Report
    Tse Keh Nay Traditional and Contemporary Use and Occupation at Amazay (Duncan Lake): A Draft Report Amazay Lake Photo by Patrice Halley Draft Submission to the Kemess North Joint Review Panel May, 2007 Report Prepared By: Loraine Littlefield Linda Dorricott Deidre Cullon With Contributions By: Jessica Place Pam Tobin On Behalf of the Tse Keh Nay ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was written under the direction of the Tse Keh Nay leaders. The authors would like to thank Grand Chief Gordon Pierre and Chief Johnny Pierre of the Tsay Keh Dene First Nation; Chief John Allen French of the Takla Lake First Nation and Chief Donny Van Somer of the Kwadacha First Nation for their support and guidance throughout this project. The authors are particularly indebted to the advisors for this report who took the time to meet with us on very short notice and who generously shared with us their knowledge of Tse Keh Nay history, land and culture. We hope that this report accurately reflects this knowledge. We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Grand Chief Gordon Pierre, Ray Izony, Bill Poole, Trevor Tomah, Jean Isaac, Robert Tomah, Chief John Allen French, Josephine West, Frank Williams, Cecilia Williams, Lillian Johnny, Hilda George and Fred Patrick. We would also like to thank the staff at the Prince George band and treaty offices for assembling and providing us with the documents, reports, maps and other materials that were used in this report. J.P. Laplante, Michelle Lochhead, Karl Sturmanis, Kathaleigh George, and Henry Joseph all provided valuable assistance and support to the project.
    [Show full text]