Diet of the Barn Owl &Lpar;<I>Tyto Alba Tuidara</I>&Rpar; In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diet of the Barn Owl &Lpar;<I>Tyto Alba Tuidara</I>&Rpar; In j RaptorRes. 34(4):334-338 ¸ 2000 The Raptor ResearchFoundation, Inc. DIET OF THE BAP,N OWL (TYTOALBA TUIDARA) IN NORTHWESTERNARGENTINE PATAGONIA MARTAS. PILt•DO AND ANA TREJO CentroRegional Universitario Bariloche, Unidad Postal Universida& 8400 San Carlosde Bariloche,Argentina KEy WORDS: Barn Owl; Tyro alba; diet;,Patagonia; Argen- where n•was the nnmber of individualsof the ith species tina. and w, was the mean weight. We also determined the mean length of rodents consunred after .Jaksi• et al. (1977): MLR = • fx•/m, wheref was the frequencyof Given its wide distribution and sedentary habits, the the i speciesin the diet, x, wasmean body length, and m diet of the Barn Owl (Tytoalba) has been studiedin more the total number of identified rodents. Mean weight of detail and more extensivelythan that of any other bird mammals and mean body length of rodents were taken of prey (Everett et al. 1992). Rodents and other small from the literature (Redford and Eisenberg 1992, Pear- mammals are the main prey in the diet of Barn Owl in son 1995). all of its range along with variable proportionsof birds, Food-nichebreadth (FNB) wasestimated using Levins' reptiles, amphibians,fish, and arthropods (Taylor 1994). (1968) index: FNB = 1/(• p•9),where p•was the propor- The Barn Owl (T. alba tuidara) is widespread in conti- tion of prey taxon i in the diet. A standardized niche breadth value (FNBst)was then calculated,which ranged nental Argentina and occasionallyon islands (Canevari from 0-1: FNBst = (FNB - 1)/(n - 1), where nwas the et al. 1991). Food habits of the Barn Owl have been thor- total number of prey categories(Colwell and Futuyma oughly studied in agrosystemsin Argentina (Bellocq 1971). Evenness(J') wascalculated by the Shannon-Wie- 1990, Bellocq and Kravetz 1994), but little is known about ner function as follows:J' = H'/H'max, where H' was its diet in southern Argentina. In Patagonia,most studies the Shannon-Wiener function and H'max was the maxi- have focusedon the arid easternsteppes (De Santisand mum value of H'; that is, the logarithm of the number Pagnoni 1989, De Santiset al. 1993, 1996, GarciaEspon- of speciesin the sample (Krebs 1989). da et al. 1998). Our aim was to provide information on RESULTS AND DISCUSSION the diet of the Barn Owl in a somewhat different area with more aresicvegetation features and a small mammal A total of 425 prey items was identified from 229 pel- fauna mixing typical steppe specieswitla others more lets. The mean number of prey/pellet was 1.9 _+ 0.9 characteristicof hunrid forestsnearby (Monjeau 1989). (+SD, range = 1-4) and the mean number of rodents/ STUDY AREA AND METHODS pellet was 1.8 _+ 0.9 (range = 1-4). Barn Owls preyed mainly on rodents (95.1%). Hares and insectsmade up The study site was located in the ReserveArea of Na- 0.5% and 4.4% of prey, respectively.The two European huel Huapi National Park, in northwesternArgentine Pa- hares (Lepuseuropaeus) fbund in the diet were newborns. tagonia (71ø07'25'qN,40ø47'14%) at 700 m elevation above sea level. The area is an ecotone between the arid Insectswere all in the family Scarabaeidae(Table 1). Patagoniansteppe to the east and the southern beech By percent frequency,the most consumedsigmodon- (Nothofagusspp.) foreststo the west. The site was domi- tine rodent specieswere Abrothrixlongipilis, Loxodontomys nated by bunchgrasses(Stipa speciosa) and cushionbushes micropus,and Oligoryzomyslongicaudatus. In ternis of bio- ( Mulinum spinosum)with scatteredtrees (Austrocedruschi- mass,Loxodontomys micropus was the most important prey lensis,Maytenus boaria, and Populusnigra). At tinres,wil- in the diet, followed by Abrothrixlongipilisand Oligoryzomys lows (Salixfragilis) formed small gallery forests. longicaudatus(Fig. 1). Owl roostswere located by observingareas of white- The Barn Owl feeds almostexclusively on small mam- wash or recording placeswhere pellets were found. Pel- mals throughout its range, although the proportions of lets were collected every two weeksfrom June 1993-May other prey may vary slightly(Taylor 1994). Barn Owls in 1994 at two lmown roost sites.Pellets were grouped into calendarseasons, oven-dried in 70øCfor 72 hr, and pro- our study preyed almost exclusivelyon rodents with ju- cessedfollowing standard methods (Marti 1987). Most venile hares and insects rarely appearing in the diet, prey were identified to species.Mammalian prey were mostlyin spring.We did not find birds, reptiles, nor am- identified and quantified on the basisof skullsarid den- phibians to be important prey aswas the casein La Pam- tanes using reference collections and keys (Pearson pa, Argentina (Noriega et al. 1993). 1995). Insectswere quantified by counting head capsules Based on the literature, the most important prey of and mandibles. Barn Owls in Argentine Patagoniaare Eligmodontiamor- Biomassof each rodent speciesin the total biomassof gani and Reithrodonauritus (De Santisand Pagnoni 1989, the diet was calculated by multiplying mean body mass of individualsby the number of individualsin pelletsand De Santis et al. 1993, Tiranti 1996, Travaini et al. 1997). expressedas a percentage of total rodent biomasscon- In our studyarea, neither speciesrepresented >4% and sunred.We calculatedthe geometric mean of weight of 8% of total prey items, respectively.This was not surpris- prey (Marti 1987): GMW = antilog (Z n,log w,/E n•), ing because the habitat characteristicsof our study area 334 DECEMBER 2000 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 335 336 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS VOL. 34, NO. 4 40• 35•, 30• 25 • Z0 15 10 Ct A1 Ax Em Ech It Lm O1 Px Ra Species •Frequency(%) •Biomass (%) I F•gure 1. Frequencyand biomassof rodent prey speciesin the diet of the Barn Owl. Biomassis expressedas the percentageof biomassof each speciescalculated on total rodent biomass.Ct--Ctenomys haigi, A1--Abroth•ix longipilis, Ax-•A. xanthorhinus,Em--Elig'modontia morgani, Ech--Euneomys chinchilloides, It--Irenomys tarsalis, Lm--Loxodontomys mzcropus,Ol--Oligoryzomys longicaudatus, Px--Phyllotis xanthopyga, Ra--Reithrodon au•itus. were not optimal for these rodents, which prefer the variableproportions (Don•zar et al. 1997,Trejo and Gri- more xeric and open habitatsof the Patagoniansteppe gera 1998). Evenjuvenile hares may not be very suitable (Pearson 1995). prey for Barn Owls since they are much smaller than The most common speciesin the diet, both in fre- Great Horned Owls (Everett et al. 1992). According to quency and biomass,Abroth•ix longipilis, Oligoryzomys lon- Jaksi• (1986), this is a common situation in southern gzcaudatus,and Loxodontomysmicropus are good climbers South America where some predators hunt mainly the and prefer brushy places, although the latter is also more abundant native rodents, often ignoring abundant found in shallowwet grasslands(Pearson 1983). Taking introduced lagomorphs.Jaksi• (1986) attributed this fact th•s into account,we inferred that the most frequently- to an "escapein size." Maximum weight ofjuvenile hares usedhabitats in the Barn Owls' hunting range were those is about 300 g (Bonino and Montenegro 1997), which wxthgood vegetationcover and ample water. puts them beyond the size of prey more frequently con- Hares were only occasionallyeaten by Barn Owls de- sumed by Barn Owls. Rabbits, although smaller than spxte their relative abundance (approximately 4-18 hares,were probablynot in our studyarea. hares/ha; Novaro et al. 1992), their crepuscularor noc- Mean weightsand sizesof rodentswere approximately turnal habits, and their open nests (Bonino and Monte- the same during the four seasons,suggesting that in our negro 1997), all traitswhich might make them vulnerable study area the Barn Owl preyed more upon medium- to an aerial nocturnal predator like the Barn Owl. There sized (A. longipilis,L. micropus,and O. longicaudatus)than xsonly one citation for the Argentine Patagoniarecord- on the smaller-sized(A. xanthorhinusand E. morgani)ro- xng predation by Barn Owls on rabbits (Oryct01aguscunic- dents in the area. Mean weight of prey of the Barn Owl ulus,0.1% of total prey,Travaini et al. 1997). In central in Chilean Patagoniais smaller (29.9 g), due to a greater Chile, the proportion of rabbitsin the diet of Barn Owls consumptionof smaller species(Iriarte et al. 1990). xsalso very low (0.03% of total prey, Herrera and Jaksi• Food-niche breadth is intermediate, as has been shown 1980). In Chilean Patagonia,Iriarte et al. (1990) did not in Chilean Patagonia (Iriarte et al. 1990). This indicated record predation on hares by Barn Owls although they that the Barn Owls in our study behaved essentiallyas were eaten by Great Horned Owls (Bubovirginianus) in specialized rodent predators. Diets of sympatric Great DECEMBER 2000 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 337 Horned Owls have been studied in two sites in north- EVERETT, M., I. PRESTT AND R. WAGSTAFFE. 1992. Barn and western Patagonia (Donazar et al. 1997, Trejo and Gri- Bay Owls 7}to, Pholidus.Pages 36-50 in J.A. Burton gera 1998) and, in both cases,a lower food niche breadth [ED.], Owls of the world. Eurobook, Italy. (0.20) was found to be due to lower speciesevenness in GARCiAESPONDA, C.M., L.J.M. DE SANTIS,J.I. NORIEGA, the diet. G.O. PAGNONI,G.J. MoREIRA,AND N.M. BERTELLOTTI 1998. The diet of Tytoalba (Strigiformes:Tytonidae) RESOMEN.--Enel presente trabajo se estudi6 la diem de in the lower Chubut valley (Argentina). Neotropica44' Tyroalba tuidara en el noroestede la Patagoniaargentina. 57-63. Los roedores sigmodontinosfueron el componente prin- HERRERA,C.M. ANDEM. JAtcSI&1980. Feedingecology of cipal de la dieta, tanto en nfimero como en biomasa.Las the Barn Owl in central Chile and southernSpain. A liebres y los insectosfueron poco consumidos.Las espe- comparativestudy. Auk 97:760-767. cies de roedores mas consumidasfueron Abrothrixlongi- IRIARTE,J.A., W.L. FRANKLIN,AND W.E. JOHNSON.1990. pills, Loxodontomysmicropus y Oligoryzomyslongicaudatus. De los datos de la diem y teniendo en cuenta los habitats de Diets of sympatricraptors in southern Chile. J. Raptor Res. 24:41-46.
Recommended publications
  • Check List and Authors Chec List Open Access | Freely Available at Journal of Species Lists and Distribution
    ISSN 1809-127X (online edition) © 2010 Check List and Authors Chec List Open Access | Freely available at www.checklist.org.br Journal of species lists and distribution N Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae, Irenomys tarsalis ISTRIBUTIO D gaps (Philippi, 1900): New records for Argentina and filling RAPHIC Gabriel M. Martin G EO G N O E-mail:Consejo [email protected] Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia “San Juan Bosco”, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Sede Esquel, Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Evolución y Biodiversidad. Sarmiento 849, CP 9200. Esquel, CH, Argentina. OTES N Abstract: Ten new records for the Chilean tree mouse, Irenomys tarsalis, are presented from western Argentina. This at least 125 km in western Chubut Province, where I. tarsalis was previously known for only three records. Additionally, environmentalrepresents a near information 30 % increase at an inecoregional the number and of habitatknown scalelocalities is provided. for the species in this country. Nine of them fill a gap of The Chilean tree mouse Irenomys tarsalis (Philippi, I. tarsalis specimens was made 1900) is a large rodent that inhabits the temperate following Pearson (1995) and by comparison with museum rainforests of southern Chile and adjacent Argentina specimensIdentification (MLP 11.VI.96.10,of MLP 29.IV.99.11), in which (Pearson 1983; 1995; Kelt 1993). Considered one of the combination of the following characters (including the rarest sigmodontines of the Southern Temperate exosomatic, craniomandibular and dental traits) can be Rainforests, the phylogenetic relationship of the species is considered diagnostic (see also Osgood 1943; Mann 1978; still debated and very little is known of its natural history Kelt 1993; Pearson 1995): rat-like in appearance with (Pardiñas et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Intestinal Helminths in Wild Rodents from Native Forest and Exotic Pine Plantations (Pinus Radiata) in Central Chile
    animals Communication Intestinal Helminths in Wild Rodents from Native Forest and Exotic Pine Plantations (Pinus radiata) in Central Chile Maira Riquelme 1, Rodrigo Salgado 1, Javier A. Simonetti 2, Carlos Landaeta-Aqueveque 3 , Fernando Fredes 4 and André V. Rubio 1,* 1 Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas Animales, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santa Rosa 11735, La Pintana, Santiago 8820808, Chile; [email protected] (M.R.); [email protected] (R.S.) 2 Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago 7750000, Chile; [email protected] 3 Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Concepción, Casilla 537, Chillán 3812120, Chile; [email protected] 4 Departamento de Medicina Preventiva Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santa Rosa 11735, La Pintana, Santiago 8820808, Chile; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +56-229-780-372 Simple Summary: Land-use changes are one of the most important drivers of zoonotic disease risk in humans, including helminths of wildlife origin. In this paper, we investigated the presence and prevalence of intestinal helminths in wild rodents, comparing this parasitism between a native forest and exotic Monterey pine plantations (adult and young plantations) in central Chile. By analyzing 1091 fecal samples of a variety of rodent species sampled over two years, we recorded several helminth Citation: Riquelme, M.; Salgado, R.; families and genera, some of them potentially zoonotic. We did not find differences in the prevalence of Simonetti, J.A.; Landaeta-Aqueveque, helminths between habitat types, but other factors (rodent species and season of the year) were relevant C.; Fredes, F.; Rubio, A.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet and Activity Patterns of Leopardus Guigna in Relation To
    DIET AND ACTIVITY PATTERNS OF LEOPARDUS GUIGNA IN RELATION TO PREY AVAILABILITY IN FOREST FRAGMENTS OF THE CHILEAN TEMPERATE RAINFOREST A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Stephania Eugenia Galuppo Gaete IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE Ron Moen September 2014 © Stephania Eugenia Galuppo Gaete 2014 Acknowledgements I want to thank first people from Chile: Constanza Napolitano (the first stone) Elke Shüttler, Pepe Llaipén, Thora Herrmann, Lisa Söhn, Aline Nowak, Nicolás Gálvez, Felipe Hernández, Jerry Laker, Katherine Hermosilla, Tito Petitpas and the rest of the Kod Kod team, the community of Quetroleufu, specially the Mariñanco family, Marianela Rojas for all the paperwork, and of course my mother, grandmother and brother. I also want to thank the United States people, Gary and Leslie, first of all for their generous support in all the stages of this process, all of our friends from CSCC, Gustavo Rodrigues Oliveira-Santos for the advice, and the thesis family (words are not needed) Rodrigo and Santino for all of the rising early, the trapping, the work in the field in the front and the back of the screen and the love and support even in the smallest detail in all the process. I would like to thank dear friend, Brandon Breen, who provided a lot of positive energy. Finally I would like to thank my committee, Ron Moen, my advisor for his understanding in all my emotional stages and for his generosity, James Forester, you were always there, but I underutilized your help, and Rob Blair, who served on my committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Dromiciops Gliroides MICROBIOTHERIA: MICROBIOTHERIIDAE) in ITS SOUTHERNMOST POPULATION of ARGENTINA Mastozoología Neotropical, Vol
    Mastozoología Neotropical ISSN: 0327-9383 ISSN: 1666-0536 [email protected] Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos Argentina Sanchez, Juliana P.; Gurovich, Yamila FLEAS (INSECTA: SIPHONAPTERA) ASSOCIATED TO THE ENDANGERED NEOTROPICAL MARSUPIAL MONITO DEL MONTE (Dromiciops gliroides MICROBIOTHERIA: MICROBIOTHERIIDAE) IN ITS SOUTHERNMOST POPULATION OF ARGENTINA Mastozoología Neotropical, vol. 25, no. 1, 2018, January-June, pp. 257-262 Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos Argentina Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45758865023 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Mastozoología Neotropical, 25(1):257-262, Mendoza, 2018 Copyright ©SAREM, 2018 http://www.sarem.org.ar Versión on-line ISSN 1666-0536 http://www.sbmz.com.br Nota FLEAS (INSECTA: SIPHONAPTERA) ASSOCIATED TO THE ENDANGERED NEOTROPICAL MARSUPIAL MONITO DEL MONTE (Dromiciops gliroides MICROBIOTHERIA: MICROBIOTHERIIDAE) IN ITS SOUTHERNMOST POPULATION OF ARGENTINA Juliana P. Sanchez1 and Yamila Gurovich2, 3 1 Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, CITNOBA (CONICET- UNNOBA) Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [Correspondence: <[email protected]>] 2 CIEMEP, CONICET-UNPSJB, Esquel, Chubut, Argentina. 3 Department of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, 2052 New South Wales, Australia ABSTRACT. Dromiciops gliroides is a nocturnal marsupial endemic to the temperate forests of southern South America and the only living representative of the Order Microbiotheria. Here we study the Siphonapteran fauna of the “monito del monte” from Los Alerces National Park, Chubut Province.
    [Show full text]
  • List of 28 Orders, 129 Families, 598 Genera and 1121 Species in Mammal Images Library 31 December 2013
    What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library LIST OF 28 ORDERS, 129 FAMILIES, 598 GENERA AND 1121 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 DECEMBER 2013 AFROSORICIDA (5 genera, 5 species) – golden moles and tenrecs CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus – Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 4. Tenrec ecaudatus – Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (83 genera, 142 species) – paraxonic (mostly even-toed) ungulates ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BOVIDAE (46 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Impala 3. Alcelaphus buselaphus - Hartebeest 4. Alcelaphus caama – Red Hartebeest 5. Ammotragus lervia - Barbary Sheep 6. Antidorcas marsupialis - Springbok 7. Antilope cervicapra – Blackbuck 8. Beatragus hunter – Hunter’s Hartebeest 9. Bison bison - American Bison 10. Bison bonasus - European Bison 11. Bos frontalis - Gaur 12. Bos javanicus - Banteng 13. Bos taurus -Auroch 14. Boselaphus tragocamelus - Nilgai 15. Bubalus bubalis - Water Buffalo 16. Bubalus depressicornis - Anoa 17. Bubalus quarlesi - Mountain Anoa 18. Budorcas taxicolor - Takin 19. Capra caucasica - Tur 20. Capra falconeri - Markhor 21. Capra hircus - Goat 22. Capra nubiana – Nubian Ibex 23. Capra pyrenaica – Spanish Ibex 24. Capricornis crispus – Japanese Serow 25. Cephalophus jentinki - Jentink's Duiker 26. Cephalophus natalensis – Red Duiker 1 What the American Society of Mammalogists has in the images library 27. Cephalophus niger – Black Duiker 28. Cephalophus rufilatus – Red-flanked Duiker 29. Cephalophus silvicultor - Yellow-backed Duiker 30. Cephalophus zebra - Zebra Duiker 31. Connochaetes gnou - Black Wildebeest 32. Connochaetes taurinus - Blue Wildebeest 33. Damaliscus korrigum – Topi 34.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Habits of Barn Owls Along a Vegetative Gradient in Northern Patagonia
    J. Raptor Res. 41(4):277–287 E 2007 The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. FEEDING HABITS OF BARN OWLS ALONG A VEGETATIVE GRADIENT IN NORTHERN PATAGONIA ANA TREJO1 Centro Regional Bariloche, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, 8400 Bariloche, Argentina SERGIO LAMBERTUCCI Laboratorio Ecotono, Centro Regional Bariloche, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, 8400 Bariloche, Argentina ABSTRACT.—Barn Owls (Tyto alba) have been considered a useful tool for estimating extinct and extant distributions of small mammals by the analysis of their diets. To test Barn Owls’ sensitivity to environmental changes, we analyzed the trophic ecology of these owls in northern Argentine Patagonia, a region charac- terized by a marked west-east vegetative gradient. We based our study on new and published information on diets in 15 localities along this gradient, from the Andes to the Atlantic Ocean. We analyzed number of mammalian prey items, food niche breadth, and mean weight of prey. We used Barn Owls’ food habits to detect changes in the local composition of prey species, by means of correspondence and cluster analysis. Our results confirmed Barn Owls as small-mammal specialists (up to 99% of their total prey). The number of mammalian prey species and the mean weight of prey decreased from west to east, and food niche breadth was not correlated with longitude. Statistical analyses yielded an ordination of localities that corresponded to changes in vegetation and in small-mammal assemblages. Our results in northern Pata- gonia showed that prey selection along a vegetative gradient was associated with the rodent assemblages in each vegetation type. This suggests that the use of Barn Owl pellets is appropriate for study of the distri- bution of small mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Irenomys Tarsalis
    FICHA DE ANTECEDENTES DE ESPECIE Id especie: 784 Nombre Científico: Irenomys tarsalis (Philippi 1900) rata arbórea; rata arborícola chilena; laucha arbórea; rata chilena de los Nombre Común: árboles; chilean arboreal rat (inglés); chilean tree mouse (inglés). Reino: Animalia Orden: Rodentia Phyllum/División: Chordata Familia: Cricetidae Clase: Mammalia Género: Irenomys Mus tarsalis Philippi, 1900 (Localidad típica “fundo San Juan” cerca de La Unión, provincia de Valdivia, Chile); Reithrodon longicaudatus Philippi, Sinonimia: 1900 (Localidad típica “Melinca (= Melinka)”, islas Guaitecas, Chiloé, Chile); Irenomys longicaudatus Thomas, 1919 (Registrado en Beatriz, Lago Nahuelhuapi, Argentina). Antecedentes Generales: ASPECTOS MORFOLÓGICOS: Es una especie de roedor con grandes ojos, pelaje sedoso y tupido, y dorsalmente es de color café oscuro con visos ocres. En el vientre se aclara a un ocre-acanelado con tonos rojizos. Pabellones auriculares medianos de color negro y cola muy larga de color café oscuro, provista de un pincel terminal. Manos y pies blanquecinos. El cráneo, similar a Phyllotis darwini, presenta incisivos superiores desarrollados y acanalados por profundos surcos. Los molares tienen ángulos entrantes pronunciados, que subdividen estos dientes en láminas típicas. Adaptado a la trepación, con manos y pies anchos y fuertes, además de huesos largos provistos de fuertes crestas para la inserción muscular (Osgood 1943, Mann 1978, Kelt 1993, Muñoz-Pedreros & Gil 2009). ASPECTOS REPRODUCTIVOS: Se reproduce en primavera. En Aysén se han capturado machos con testículos escrotales y hembras preñadas con seis embriones en el mes de marzo. En el sur de Chile se capturaron machos con testículos escrotales en febrero, marzo, mayo y junio, hembras con embriones en febrero, marzo y junio, y juveniles en abril.
    [Show full text]
  • Irenomys Tarsalis (Philippi, 1900) and Geoxus Valdivianus (Philippi, 1858): Istributio D
    ISSN 1809-127X (online edition) © 2011 Check List and Authors Chec List Open Access | Freely available at www.checklist.org.br Journal of species lists and distribution N Mammalia, Rodentia, Sigmodontinae, Irenomys tarsalis (Philippi, 1900) and Geoxus valdivianus (Philippi, 1858): ISTRIBUTIO D 1* 1 2 3 RAPHIC Karla García , Juan Carlos Ortiz , Mauricio Aguayo and Guillermo D’Elía G Significant ecological range extension EO 1 Universidad de Concepción, Departamento de Zoología, Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile. G N 2 Universidad de Concepción, Centro de Ciencias Ambientales EULA, Chile. O 3 Universidad Austral de Chile, Instituto de Ecología y Evolución, Valdivia, Chile. * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] OTES N Abstract: Irenomys tarsalis) and Valdivian long-clawed mouse (Geoxus valdivianus) in non-native forestry plantations. Despite being characterized as forest species, specimens of I. tarsalis and G. valdivianus We present were the captured first records within ofa the30-year-old Chilean treePinus mouse contorta ( plantation in Coyhaique National Reserve. These records show our limited understanding of this fauna and suggest the need for further surveys and monitoring, including disturbed habitats. The mammal fauna of Chile is one of the best Pardiñas et al. (2004), the known distribution in Argentina known in the Neotropics. Nonetheless, new taxa and was extended both northward and southward. Kelt (1994, distribution records are often reported, suggesting that 1996) indicated that I. tarsalis is usually found in wooded the diversity and distribution of Chilean mammals is still habitats, and Figueroa et al. (2001) indicated that this not completely known (e.g., Patterson 1992; Hutterer species is strictly associated with dense, humid forest 1994; Kelt and Gallardo 1994; Saavedra and Simonetti 2001; D’Elía et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoxus Valdivianus (Philippi 1858) Ratón Topo Valdiviano; Ratón Topo Pardo; Ratón Topo De La Selva; Valdivian Nombre Común: Mole Mouse (Inglés)
    FICHA DE ANTECEDENTES DE ESPECIE Id especie: 783 Nombre Científico: Geoxus valdivianus (Philippi 1858) ratón topo valdiviano; ratón topo pardo; ratón topo de la selva; valdivian Nombre Común: mole mouse (inglés). Reino: Animalia Orden: Rodentia Phyllum/División: Chordata Familia: Cricetidae Clase: Mammalia Género: Geoxus Oxymycterus valdivianus Philippi, 1858 (Localidad típica Valdivia, Chile); Notiomys valdivianus Philippi, 1858; (Akodon) valdivianus Thomas, 1894; Mus (Oxymycterus) valdivianus Philippi, 1900; Sinonimia: Hesperomys (Akodon) michaelseni Matschie, 1898 (Punta Arenas, Magallanes.); Geoxus valdivianus Thomas, 1919 (supra cit.); Notiomys valdivianus Osgood, 1925; Notiomys valdivianus Osgood, 1925; Notiomys valdivianus araucanus Osgood, 1925 (Tolhuaca, Malleco). Antecedentes Generales: ASPECTOS MORFOLÓGICOS: Es una especie de roedor pequeño con cola corta, y ojos y pabellones auriculares reducidos. Muestra adaptaciones a la vida cavícola, como cuello corto, silueta redondeada, miembros anteriores fuertes y con amplias superficies de inserción muscular. Una gran superficie de manos y pies, y largas garras anteriores. Hocico aguzado. Pelaje corto, denso y aterciopelado de color café oscuro dorsal y ventralmente. Longitud máxima de 160 mm (Mann 1978, Muñoz-Pedreros & Gil 2009). ASPECTOS REPRODUCTIVOS: Su reproducción es poco conocida. En Antillanca (Osorno) se capturó una hembra preñada con cuatro embriones. En Aysén se capturaron machos con testículos descendidos en noviembre y marzo (Muñoz-Pedreros & Gil 2009). COMPORTAMIENTO: G. v. valdivianus es principalmente nocturno. Subterráneo, cava galerías que utiliza de refugio, aunque también ocupa la litera densa de la vegetación herbácea, en cortas excursiones nocturnas. Demuestra un importante grado de automatismo en sus respuestas, en particular la conducta de escape, cavando independientemente del sustrato en que se encuentre (Mann 1978, Muñoz- Pedreros & Gil 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Taxa for Which MIL Has Images
    LIST OF 27 ORDERS, 163 FAMILIES, 887 GENERA, AND 2064 SPECIES IN MAMMAL IMAGES LIBRARY 31 JULY 2021 AFROSORICIDA (9 genera, 12 species) CHRYSOCHLORIDAE - golden moles 1. Amblysomus hottentotus - Hottentot Golden Mole 2. Chrysospalax villosus - Rough-haired Golden Mole 3. Eremitalpa granti - Grant’s Golden Mole TENRECIDAE - tenrecs 1. Echinops telfairi - Lesser Hedgehog Tenrec 2. Hemicentetes semispinosus - Lowland Streaked Tenrec 3. Microgale cf. longicaudata - Lesser Long-tailed Shrew Tenrec 4. Microgale cowani - Cowan’s Shrew Tenrec 5. Microgale mergulus - Web-footed Tenrec 6. Nesogale cf. talazaci - Talazac’s Shrew Tenrec 7. Nesogale dobsoni - Dobson’s Shrew Tenrec 8. Setifer setosus - Greater Hedgehog Tenrec 9. Tenrec ecaudatus - Tailless Tenrec ARTIODACTYLA (127 genera, 308 species) ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BALAENIDAE - bowheads and right whales 1. Balaena mysticetus – Bowhead Whale 2. Eubalaena australis - Southern Right Whale 3. Eubalaena glacialis – North Atlantic Right Whale 4. Eubalaena japonica - North Pacific Right Whale BALAENOPTERIDAE -rorqual whales 1. Balaenoptera acutorostrata – Common Minke Whale 2. Balaenoptera borealis - Sei Whale 3. Balaenoptera brydei – Bryde’s Whale 4. Balaenoptera musculus - Blue Whale 5. Balaenoptera physalus - Fin Whale 6. Balaenoptera ricei - Rice’s Whale 7. Eschrichtius robustus - Gray Whale 8. Megaptera novaeangliae - Humpback Whale BOVIDAE (54 genera) - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Addax nasomaculatus - Addax 2. Aepyceros melampus - Common Impala 3. Aepyceros petersi - Black-faced Impala 4. Alcelaphus caama - Red Hartebeest 5. Alcelaphus cokii - Kongoni (Coke’s Hartebeest) 6. Alcelaphus lelwel - Lelwel Hartebeest 7. Alcelaphus swaynei - Swayne’s Hartebeest 8. Ammelaphus australis - Southern Lesser Kudu 9. Ammelaphus imberbis - Northern Lesser Kudu 10. Ammodorcas clarkei - Dibatag 11. Ammotragus lervia - Aoudad (Barbary Sheep) 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Sigmodontine Rodents (Muroidea), with Special Reference to the Akodont Genus Deltamys
    Mamm. biol. 68 (2003) 351±364 Mammalian Biology ã Urban & Fischer Verlag http://www.urbanfischer.de/journals/mammbiol Zeitschrift fuÈr SaÈ ugetierkunde Original investigation Phylogenetic analysis of sigmodontine rodents (Muroidea), with special reference to the akodont genus Deltamys By G. D'ELIÂA,E.M.GONZAÂLEZ, and U. F. J. PARDINÄ AS The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, Laboratorio de EvolucioÂn, Facultad de Ciencias, Montevideo, Uruguay, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Montevideo, Uruguay and Centro Nacional Pa- tagoÂnico, Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina Receipt of Ms. 24. 06. 2002 Acceptance of Ms. 13. 01. 2003 Abstract We present a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis based on cytochrome b gene sequences of sig- modontine rodents. Our particular interest is to estimate the phyletic position of Deltamys, a tax- on endemic to a small portion of the La Plata river basin in Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay, and to assess its generic status. The three primary conclusions derived from our analyses are: (1) cotton rats (Sigmodon) are the sister group of the remaining sigmodontines, (2) the tribe Akodontini is monophyletic with moderate support, and (3) Deltamys falls outside of a clade containing all spe- cies of subgenera of Akodon yet examined, and thus we grant Deltamys status of full genus. Key words: Akodon, Akodontini, Muroidea, Sigmodontinae, phylogeny Introduction The high diversity of muroid rodents to Thomas (1916, 1918) who recognised the belonging to the New World subfamily Sig- morphologic similarity among Akodon and modontinae has seriously challenged re- some other taxa ranked as genera by him searchers attempting to understand their (e.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics of Sigmodontinae (Rodentia, Muroidea, Cricetidae), with Special Reference to the Akodont Group, and with Additional Comments on Historical Biogeography
    Cladistics Cladistics 19 (2003) 307–323 www.elsevier.com/locate/yclad Phylogenetics of Sigmodontinae (Rodentia, Muroidea, Cricetidae), with special reference to the akodont group, and with additional comments on historical biogeography Guillermo DÕElııaa,b a The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, USA b Laboratorio de Evolucion, Facultad de Ciencias, Igua 4225 esq. Mataojo, Montevideo CP 11400, Uruguay Accepted 6 June 2003 Abstract This is the first cladistic analysis of sigmodontine rodents (Cricetidae, Sigmodontinae) based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Two most parsimonious cladograms (7410 steps in length; CI ¼ 0.199; RI ¼ 0.523) were discovered. Sig- modontinae appears well supported. Sigmodon is sister to the remaining living sigmodontines. It is shown that Euneomys is not a phyllotine and that the Reithrodon group is not monophyletic. Results corroborate that the abrothricines form a natural group that is not part of the akodont radiation. The akodontine tribe is well supported, and is composed of five main clades, whose limits and relationships are thoroughly discussed. For instance, the scapteromyines do not form a natural group and they fall within the akodontine clade. Additionally, I present some taxonomic judgments and comments on the historical biogeography of sigm- odontines in the light of the newly discovered relationships. For example, five akodontine divisions are suggested: the Akodon, the Bibimys, the Blarinomys, the Oxymycterus, and the Scapteromys Divisions. It is shown that traditional hypotheses of sigmodontine historical biogeography are falsified by the recovered topology. Ó 2003 The Willi Hennig Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction time it has seriously challenged researchers attempting to study their phylogenetic relationships and classify With about 71 extant genera, muroids of the sub- them accordingly (Table 1).
    [Show full text]