Narratives in the Spotlight: an Analysis Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Master thesis in Sustainable Development 2020/01 Examensarbete i Hållbar utveckling Narratives in the spotlight: an analysis of two positions in sustainability Thomas May DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES INSTITUTIONEN FÖR GEOVETENSKAPER Master thesis in Sustainable Development 2020/01 Examensarbete i Hållbar utveckling Narratives in the spotlight: an analysis of two positions in sustainability Thomas May Supervisor: Lars Rudebeck Subject Reviewer: Simon Davidsson Copyright © Thomas May and the Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University Published at Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University (www.geo.uu.se), Uppsala, 2020 Content 1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………1 1.1 Research aim……………………………………………………………………………………4 2 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………..5 2.1 Material ……………………………………..…………………………………………………6 2.2 The work process…………………………………………………………………………… ...7 3 Analysis of the key parameters of the two narratives………………………………………...8 3.1 Eco Centrism…………………………………………………………………………………...8 3.1.1 Overpopulation………………………………………………………………………8 3.1.2 Energy………………………………………………………………………………11 3.1.3 Decentralization…………………………………………………………………….12 3.1.4 Economy……………………………………………………………………………13 3.2 Techno Optimism…………………………………………………………………………… .19 3.2.1 Overpopulation …………………………………………………………………… 19 3.2.2 Energy……………………………………………………………………………..23 3.2.3 Decentralization……………………………………………………………………26 3.2.4 Economy…………………………………………………………………………...34 4 Analysis of the two bridging positions……………………………………………………… 37 4.1 Arcologies………………………………………………………………………………… ..37 4.1.1 Overpopulation……………………………………………………………………38 4.1.2 Energy…………………………………………………………………………… .38 4.1.3 Decentralization…………………………………………………………………...39 4.1.4 Economy ………………………………………………………………………….39 4.2 Sustainocene…………………………………………………………………………………39 4.2.1 Overpopulation ……………………………………………………………………39 4.2.2 Energy……………………………………………………………………………..40 4.2.3 Decentralization……………………………………………………………………40 4.2.4 Economy………………………………………………………………………….. 40 5 Results………………………………………………………………………………………….42 5.1 Overpopulation……………………………………………………………………….42 5.2 Energy………………………………………………………………………………..42 5.3 Decentralization……………………………………………………………………...43 5.4 Economy……………………………………………………………………………..44 6 Bridging the gap.........................................................................................................................45 7 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………..46 8 Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………………..48 9 References……………………………………………………………………………………..49 10 Abbreviations………………………………………………………………………………..54 Narratives in the spotlight: an analysis of two positions on sustainability THOMAS MAY MAY, T., 2020: Narratives in the spotlight: an analysis of two positions in sustainability. Master thesis in Sustainable Development at Uppsala University, 2020/01, 54 pp, 30 ECTS/hp Abstract: People’s view of the world can cause them to make decisions that may not be sensible or based on incomplete information. A way to rectify this problem is by drawing upon ideas that are presented within bestselling popular science publications, in this case relating to sustainable development. This thesis sets out to map two positions in sustainability, techno optimism (based around technological solutions for societal and ecological problems) and eco centrism (based around the importance and irreplaceability of natural capital). Four parameters were selected for analysis; overpopulation, energy, decentralization, and economy, to analyse the key ideas of the respective positions. A small number of texts were used, based on the prominence of the authors and their relevance to the field. The two positions were chosen for their similarities, and how others had attempted to combine them in the past. In addition, a chapter on the Sustainocene was added, an idea based around humans living sustainably within the environment; important due to including ideas from both positions. A similar concept, the arcology, was also included. Both concepts were discussed as a means of bridging the gap between eco centrism and techno optimism. It was found that there were some similarities between the two positions, although several important differences, mainly relating to the role of ecosystems and limits to growth. A future thesis would ideally further build on this one in discussing ways in which the two positions could be combined further within sustainable development. Keywords: Sustainable Development, Eco centrism, Techno optimism, Positions, Sustainocene, Arcologies Thomas May, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, SE- 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden Narratives in the spotlight: an analysis of two positions on sustainability THOMAS MAY MAY, T., 2020: Narratives in the spotlight: an analysis of two positions in sustainability. Master thesis in Sustainable Development at Uppsala University, 2020/01, 54 pp, 30 ECTS/hp Summary: People’s view of the world can cause them to make decisions that may prove unwise or based on incomplete information. A way to solve this problem is by drawing upon ideas that are presented within bestselling popular science publications, in this case relating to sustainable development. This thesis sets out to map two ideas in sustainability, techno optimism (a positive view of technology and its use in solving world problems) and eco centrism (based around the belief in the importance of ecology and its link to human social justice). Four areas were chosen for analysis; overpopulation, energy, decentralization, and economy, to study the key ideas of the respective positions. A small number of texts were used, based on the importance of the authors and their relevance to the field. The two positions were chosen for their similarities, and how others had attempted to combine them in the past. In addition, a chapter on the Sustainocene was added, an idea based around humans living sustainably within the environment; important due to having ideas from both positions. A similar idea, the arcology (the idea of cities being built in an ecologically friendly way) was also included. Both concepts were used as a means of bridging the gap between eco centrism and techno optimism. It was found that there were some similarities between the two positions, although several important differences, mainly relating to the role of ecosystems and limits to growth. A future thesis would ideally further build on this one in discussing ways in which the two ideas could be combined further within sustainable development. Keywords: Sustainable Development, Eco centrism, Techno optimism, Positions, Sustainocene, Arcologies Thomas May, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, SE- 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden 1. Introduction Modern sustainability is a massive field, almost bewilderingly so, with multiple areas of study and policy reaching back decades. To a newcomer to the field, it is easy to fixate on a few, high visibility issues or technologies, such as climate change or solar panels. However, this view, although understandable, is somewhat limited and problematic given the requirement for a holistic worldview necessary to confront a myriad of interconnected problems and formulate potential solutions. I chose to conduct this study in particular because of my varied reading on sustainability. According to Repko, a certain level of complexity demands an interdisciplinary approach (Repko 2012, p.85). While the traditional definition of interdisciplinary studies relates to combining two academic disciplines into a single project, given the complexity of this field and the varying approaches of the researchers discussed within this text, I decided to follow Repko’s definition and incorporate this into my approach to techno optimism and eco centrism. In addition, while sustainability may appear to be a united cause with clear goals, this is far from the case; many proponents take different approaches to similar problems, as illustrated over the course of this thesis. In this thesis, sustainability is defined by drawing upon the Brundtland commission definition of sustainable development (published in 1987): ‘development which meets the needs of current generations without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’ (Brüntland n.d.). The commission goes on to expand on this definition with two further concepts, ‘the concept of 'needs', in particular the essential needs of the world's poor… and 'the idea of limitations imposed by the state of technology and social organization on the environment's ability to meet present and future needs (Brüntland n.d.). For the purposes of this thesis the timescale discussed is variable depending on coming developments; for example, the advent of widespread commercialized fuel cell technologies in the coming decades, as discussed in later sections, will enable new forms of sustainable development approaches that did not exist at the time of the original report’s publication. Existing advances include the development and widespread commercialization of the internet. Other concepts discussed within this thesis, in particular the Sustainocene, deal with a sustainable development model that is essentially indefinite; that is, sustainable within the scope of foreseeable human life on Earth. Sustainability is often divided into weak and strong sustainability. Strong sustainability is defined by Cabeza Gutés (1995, p.147), as the ability of natural capital to provide services that manmade capital is incapable of providing, and therefore