DOCSLIB.ORG

The Expanding Scope of Well Testing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Expanding Scope of Well Testing 59605schD7R1.qxp:59605schD7R1 5/25/07 4:25 PM Page 44 The Expanding Scope of Well Testing Well testing has come a long way since the first drillstem test was run in 1926. From a simple composite packer and valve run on drillstring, the scope of well testing has blossomed into a broad array of sophisticated downhole and surface technologies. Hani Aghar Every E&P company wants to know what type of By measuring in-situ reservoir conditions and In Salah Gas (Joint venture of fluids its well will produce, what flow rates the fluids as they flow from the formation, the testing Sonatrach, BP and Statoil) well will deliver, and how long production can process gives E&P companies access to a variety Hassi-Messaoud, Algeria be sustained. Given the right planning, of dynamic and often unique measurements. technology and implementation, well testing can Depending on the scale of a test, some param - Mark Carie provide many answers to these important eters are measured at multiple points along the New Orleans, Louisiana, USA questions. In one form or another, well testing flow path, allowing engineers to compare Hani Elshahawi has been used to determine reservoir pressures, downhole pressures, temperatures and flow rates Shell International Exploration distance to boundaries, areal extent, fluid against surface measurements of the same and Production properties, permeability, flow rates, drawdown parameters (below). Through well testing, Houston, Texas, USA pressures, formation heterogeneities, vertical operators can extract reservoir fluid samples— layering, production capacity, formation damage, both downhole and at the surface—to observe Jaime Ricardo Gomez productivity index, completion efficiency changes in fluid properties and composition Jawaid Saeedi and more. between the perforation and the wellhead. This Clay Young Houston, Texas Data Measurement Points Bruno Pinguet Surface Acquisition Clamart, France Flowhead Pressure and temperature of tubing and casing Keith Swainson Choke manifold Pressure and temperature Chevron Corporation Heater Pressure and temperature Houston, Texas Separator Pressure and temperature; differential pressure across the gas orifice; flow rates of oil, gas and water; oil shrinkage; basic sediment and water; oil and gas gravity; fluid samples Elie Takla Storage tanks Temperature and shrinkage Hassi-Messaoud, Algeria Subsea test tree Annulus pressure, temperature Bertrand Theuveny Downhole Acquisition Cambridge, England Downhole recording DST pressure and temperature, fluid samples retrieved when test string is brought to surface For help in preparation of this article, thanks to Corey Aures Surface readout Downhole pressure and temperature data retrieved by wireline and David Polson, Houston, Texas; and David Harrison, Sugar Land, Texas. Wireline tools Pressure, temperature, flow rates, samples and various other ArchiTest, CFA (Composition Fluid Analyzer), CHDT (Cased measurements, depending on the suite of tools Hole Dynamics Tester), CleanSep, CleanTest, CQG (Crystal Quartz Gauge), eFire, E-Z Tree, InterACT, IRIS (Intelligent > Data measurement points. Depending on the scale of the test, a variety of Remote Implementation System), LFA (Live Fluid Analyzer measurements may be obtained downhole, at the surface, and at different for MDT tool), MDT (Modular Formation Dynamics Tester), MFE (Multiflow Evaluator tool), OFA (Optical Fluid Analyzer), points along the flowpath. Besides establishing important flow-rate and Oilphase-DBR, PCT (Pressure Controlled Tester), PhaseTester, pressure relationships, the information derived from these measurements PIPESIM, PLT (Production Logging Tool), PowerFlow, helps project engineers track changes in cleanup fluids, understand heat PVT Express, PVT Pro, Quicksilver Probe, SenTREE and flow and hydrate formation conditions in the system and evaluate UNIGAGE are marks of Schlumberger. PhaseWatcher and Vx performance of system components. are joint marks of Schlumberger and Framo. 44 Oilfield Review 59605schD7R1.qxp:59605schD7R1 6/27/07 6:19 PM Page 45 information is vital to predicting the future techniques. This article describes advances Why Test? behavior of a reservoir or well completion. across a range of downhole and surface testing Today, most prospects are explored and then In its most basic form, a well test records equipment. We also discuss the reasons for well produced on the basis of geological and seismic changes in downhole pressure that follow a testing, the strategies applied at different stages data, logging data, and then well testing data. change in flow rate. Often, downhole pressures in the life of a reservoir, and the answers that can Prior to drilling a prospect, seismic data initially and temperatures, surface flow rates and be provided by properly planned, prepared and serve to delineate the depth and breadth of a samples of produced fluids are obtained. executed well tests. Examples from a Middle East potential reservoir. During the drilling process, Variations on this basic theme are carried out gas field and a record-breaking operation in the logging data are used to determine static with regularity. Gulf of Mexico demonstrate the versatility and reservoir parameters such as porosity, lithology, To accommodate different testing needs and high performance provided by today’s well- rock type, saturation, and formation depth, strategies, service companies have developed a testing methods. thickness and dip. Dynamic reservoir properties broad array of innovative testing tools and are measured through well testing. Pressure and Spring 2007 45 59605schD7R1.qxp:59605schD7R1 5/19/07 9:48 PM Page 46 rate perturbations induced by the testing process Well Test Objectives provide important clues to the nature of a Productivity Tests reservoir and its fluids. Obtain and analyze representative samples of produced fluids Wells are tested to determine reservoir Measure reservoir pressure and temperature parameters that cannot be adequately measured Determine inflow performance relationship and deliverability through other techniques, such as mud logging, Evaluate completion efficiency coring, electrical logging and seismic surveys. Characterize well damage Admittedly, in some cases, we can obtain similar Evaluate workover or stimulation treatments measurements through these techniques, but Descriptive Tests the quality or scope may not be sufficient to meet Evaluate reservoir parameters the operator’s objectives. Pressure and tempera - Characterize reservoir heterogeneities ture measurements, flow rates and fluid samples Assess reservoir extent and geometry are keys to understanding and predicting Evaluate hydraulic communication between wells reservoir behavior and production capabilities. Well test data provide inputs for modeling > Well test objectives. The objective determines which type of test will be reservoirs, designing well completions, develop - run, and frequently more than one objective must be achieved. ing field-production strategies and designing production facilities. Well test results are also crucial for reserves estimations. Many countries require flow testing, deliverability and commercial viability of a that bottomhole pressures and temperatures with fluids produced to surface, for reserves to prospect, and is critical for booking reserves. have stabilized. be classified as proven. In addition to estimating Fluid characteristics are particularly important Unlike testing to obtain stabilized bottomhole reserves, these tests provide a means for during the early stages of a prospect’s evaluation, measurements, descriptive tests require transient- directly measuring the aggregate response of when E&P companies need to determine the type pressure measurements. Pressure transients are reservoirs at large scales and for detecting of process equipment they must install to treat induced by step changes in surface production reservoir boundaries. and move produced fluids from the wellbore to rates and can be measured by bottomhole pressure One of the more important reservoir the refinery. sensors or permanent downhole pressure gauges. parameters is permeability. Understanding During development, the operator’s focus The changes in production cause pressure permeability and its directional variability is shifts from assessing deliverability and fluid type perturbations that propagate from the wellbore to essential for developing perforating strategies, to evaluating pressure and flow and ascertaining the surrounding formation. These pressure pulses evaluating fracture or fault connectivity, compartmentalization within the reservoir. This are affected by fluids and geological features predicting well performance and modeling the information is needed to refine the field within the reservoir. While they might travel behavior of the reservoir under primary, development plan and optimize placement of straight through a homogeneous formation, these secondary or tertiary production. Permeability is subsequent wells. pulses may be hindered by low-permeability zones, a scale-sensitive tensorial property; its value During the production phase, well tests are or may vanish entirely when they enter a gas cap. depends on the scale and the direction through conducted to evaluate completion efficiency and By recording wellbore pressure response over which it is measured. And like other reservoir diagnose unexpected changes in production. These time, the operator can obtain a pressure curve that properties, permeability may be heterogeneous. tests assist in determining
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2021 Annual General Meeting and Proxy Statement 2020 Annual Report
    2020 Annual Report and Proxyand Statement 2021 Annual General Meeting Meeting General Annual 2021 Transocean Ltd. • 2021 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT • 2020 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS NOTICE OF 2021 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT COMPENSATION REPORT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS ABOUT TRANSOCEAN LTD. Transocean is a leading international provider of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells. The company specializes in technically demanding sectors of the global offshore drilling business with a particular focus on ultra-deepwater and harsh environment drilling services, and operates one of the most versatile offshore drilling fleets in the world. Transocean owns or has partial ownership interests in, and operates a fleet of 37 mobile offshore drilling units consisting of 27 ultra-deepwater floaters and 10 harsh environment floaters. In addition, Transocean is constructing two ultra-deepwater drillships. Our shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol RIG. OUR GLOBAL MARKET PRESENCE Ultra-Deepwater 27 Harsh Environment 10 The symbols in the map above represent the company’s global market presence as of the February 12, 2021 Fleet Status Report. ABOUT THE COVER The front cover features two of our crewmembers onboard the Deepwater Conqueror in the Gulf of Mexico and was taken prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, our priorities remain keeping our employees, customers, contractors and their families healthy and safe, and delivering incident-free operations to our customers worldwide. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Any statements included in this Proxy Statement and 2020 Annual Report that are not historical facts, including, without limitation, statements regarding future market trends and results of operations are forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities law.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Kenneth Peters
    Petroleum Systems and Exploration/Development Geochemistry - Instructor Instructor: Dr. Kenneth Peters ◆ Science Advisor (Petroleum Geochemistry) I am excited by the challenge of combining the least expensive yet most effective technology to solve practical exploration and production problems for our clients, while gaining trust, credibility, and profitable business associations for Schlumberger. I also enjoy teaching bright young students and 'giving back' to our science. ◆ Assignment History /Experience • 2008 Sep-present Science Advisor (Petroleum Geochemistry) WG Houston Technology Center • 2002-2008 Research Geologist, Western Region Earth Surface Processes Energy Team, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA. • 1999-2002 Senior Research Associate, Geochemistry and Migration, Trap, and Charge Groups, Hydrocarbon Systems Analysis Division; ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, Houston, TX. • 1996-2000 Instructor (concurrent with Mobil and ExxonMobil) Oil and Gas Consultants International, Tulsa, OK. • 1993-1999 Associate Geochemical Advisor and Senior Geochemical Research Advisor, Basin Analysis Group, Mobil Technology Company, Dallas, TX. • 1990-1993 Biomarker Coordinator, Exploration Evaluation Group, Chevron Overseas Petroleum Inc., San Ramon, CA. • 1989-1990 Geochemical Coordinator, Chevron U.S.A., San Ramon, CA. • 1986-1989 Senior Research Geochemist, Biomarker Group, Chevron Richmond Refinery, Richmond, CA. • 1978-1986 Research Geochemist and Senior Research Geochemist, Chevron Oil Field Research Company, La Habra, CA. Professional Experience ◆ Education • 1972 B.A. in Geology, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California • 1975 M.A. in Geology, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California • 1978 Ph.D. in Geochemistry, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California Petroleum Systems and Exploration/Development Geochemistry - Instructor ◆ Honors - Awards • Best Paper Award - Organic Geochemistry Div., Geochemical Society 1978 (pub.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Global Stewardship Report Schlumberger Limited Contents
    2019 Global Stewardship Report Schlumberger Limited Contents Governance and Ethics 4 Environment and Climate 11 Social and Community 21 Index and Data 47 Corporate Governance 4 Managing Environmental Risk 12 Education 22 Frameworks 48 Ethics and Compliance 7 Environmental Performance Data 16 Health and Safety 24 Global Reporting Initiative Standards (GRI) 48 Key Environmental Issues 17 Human Rights 38 Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) 50 Technology Advantage 19 Stakeholder Engagement 41 Task Force on Climate-Related Schlumberger New Energy 20 Employment and Human Capital 43 Financial Disclosures (TCFD) 52 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals Mapping (UN SDGs) 53 Performance Data 56 Our Sustainability Focus The energy industry is changing, and Schlumberger’s vision is to define and drive high performance, sustainably. Our core competence is to enable our customers to operate safely, efficiently, effectively, and in an environmentally responsible manner. Our Global Stewardship program addresses: .» identifying and managing opportunities and risks associated with the energy transition and climate change .» protecting the environment .» investing in and engaging with the communities where we and our customers live and work .» respecting human rights and promoting diversity 1 GOVERNANCE ENVIRONMENT SOCIAL INDEX Introduction 2019 Global Stewardship Report Message from the CEO Schlumberger’s vision is to define and drive high performance, sustainably. We are focused on our purpose: creating amazing technology that unlocks
    [Show full text]
  • Transmissivity, Hydraulic Conductivity, and Storativity of the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer in Texas
    Technical Report Transmissivity, Hydraulic Conductivity, and Storativity of the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer in Texas by Robert E. Mace Rebecca C. Smyth Liying Xu Jinhuo Liang Robert E. Mace Principal Investigator prepared for Texas Water Development Board under TWDB Contract No. 99-483-279, Part 1 Bureau of Economic Geology Scott W. Tinker, Director The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78713-8924 March 2000 Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2 Study Area ......................................................................................................................... 5 HYDROGEOLOGY....................................................................................................................... 5 Methods .............................................................................................................................. 13 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................... 14 DATA COMPILATION ...................................................................................................... 14 EVALUATION OF HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES FROM THE TEST DATA ................. 19 Estimating Transmissivity from Specific Capacity Data.......................................... 19 STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Method 9100: Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity, Saturated Leachate
    METHOD 9100 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY, SATURATED LEACHATE CONDUCTIVITY, AND INTRINSIC PERMEABILITY 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope and Application: This section presents methods available to hydrogeologists and and geotechnical engineers for determining the saturated hydraulic conductivity of earth materials and conductivity of soil liners to leachate, as outlined by the Part 264 permitting rules for hazardous-waste disposal facilities. In addition, a general technique to determine intrinsic permeability is provided. A cross reference between the applicable part of the RCRA Guidance Documents and associated Part 264 Standards and these test methods is provided by Table A. 1.1.1 Part 264 Subpart F establishes standards for ground water quality monitoring and environmental performance. To demonstrate compliance with these standards, a permit applicant must have knowledge of certain aspects of the hydrogeology at the disposal facility, such as hydraulic conductivity, in order to determine the compliance point and monitoring well locations and in order to develop remedial action plans when necessary. 1.1.2 In this report, the laboratory and field methods that are considered the most appropriate to meeting the requirements of Part 264 are given in sufficient detail to provide an experienced hydrogeologist or geotechnical engineer with the methodology required to conduct the tests. Additional laboratory and field methods that may be applicable under certain conditions are included by providing references to standard texts and scientific journals. 1.1.3 Included in this report are descriptions of field methods considered appropriate for estimating saturated hydraulic conductivity by single well or borehole tests. The determination of hydraulic conductivity by pumping or injection tests is not included because the latter are considered appropriate for well field design purposes but may not be appropriate for economically evaluating hydraulic conductivity for the purposes set forth in Part 264 Subpart F.
    [Show full text]
  • Event Brochure
    INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR THE ENERGY TRANSFORMATION: COLLABORATING FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE www.wpcleadership.com About the Global WPC Leadership Series A powerful series of high-level dialogues starting in April 2021, will The Audience take us on the path to the 23rd World Petroleum Congress and Over 1500 participants are expected to connect and watch each beyond, addressing key issues around responsibility, cooperation episode of the WPC Leadership Global Series. Those include: and sustainability in the oil, gas and energy sector. Organisations: Profile: WPC National Committees C-Level Executives Ministries and Government Institutions Government Representatives It will bring together industry leaders to discuss and demonstrate NOCs and IOCs Sustainability Managers Service Companies HSE Managers best available technology and actions in order to minimise impacts Technology Providers Operations Managers and risks to the people and environments where we operate around Equipment Manufacturers Technology Managers the world by highlighting the industry’s global strategies that can Consultants Business Analysts NGOs Young Industry Professionals contribute to raising the standards across the sector. Universities Academia Industry Associations Media “Given the complexity and challenges that the oil, gas and energy business faces in delivering cleaner, affordable, and reliable energy for sustainable development of the world, responsible culture needs to be incorporated at all levels, from the small communities where we operate and throughout our global business. Stable long-term relationships and cooperation with all stakeholders enables our industry to provide sustainable energy for all, a key theme that our Global Series of virtual events will explore further in 2021.” Tor Fjaeran The WPC Leadership is a platform for stakeholders to set the stage for the future through responsibility, President, World Petroleum Council cooperation and sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Slug Tests in Partially Penetrating Wells
    WATERRESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 30,NO. 11,PAGES 2945-2957, NOVEMBER 1994 Slugtests in partially penetratingwells ZafarHyder, JamesJ. Butler, Jr., Carl D. McElwee, and Wenzhi Liu KansasGeological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence Abstract.A semianalyticalsolution is presentedto a mathematicalmodel describing theflow of groundwaterin responseto a slugtest in a confinedor unconfinedporous formation.The modelincorporates the effectsof partialpenetration, anisotropy, finite- radiuswell skins, and upper and lower boundariesof either a constant-heador an impermeableform. This modelis employedto investigatethe error that is introduced intohydraulic conductivity estimates through use of currentlyaccepted practices (i.e., Hvorslev,1951; Cooper et al., 1967)for the analysisof slug-testresponse data. The magnitudeof the error arisingin a varietyof commonlyfaced field configurationsis the basisfor practicalguidelines for the analysisof slug-testdata that can be utilizedby fieldpractitioners. Introduction that the parameter estimatesobtained using this approach must be viewed with considerableskepticism owing to an Theslug test is one of the mostcommonly used techniques error in the analytical solution upon which the model is by hydrogeologistsfor estimatinghydraulic conductivityin based. the field [Kruseman and de Ridder, 1989]. This technique, In terms of slug tests in unconfined aquifers, solutionsto whichis quite simple in practice, consistsof measuringthe the mathematicalmodel describingflow in responseto the recoveryof head in a well after a near instantaneouschange induced disturbance are difficult to obtain because of the in waterlevel at that well. Approachesfor the analysisof the nonlinear nature of the model in its most general form. recovery data collected during a slug test are based on Currently, most field practitioners use the technique of analyticalsolutions to mathematical models describingthe Bouwer and Rice [1976; Bouwer, 1989], which employs flow of groundwater to/from the test well.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Test Report
    PNNL-18732 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Field Test Report: Preliminary Aquifer Test Characterization Results for Well 299-W15-225: Supporting Phase I of the 200-ZP-1 Groundwater Operable Unit Remedial Design FA Spane DR Newcomer September 2009 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-ACO5-76RL01830 Printed in the United States of America Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062; ph: (865) 576-8401 fax: (865) 576 5728 email: [email protected] Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Corporate Responsibility Report Highlights
    2018 corporate responsibility report highlights human energy for complete reporting, visit chevron.com/cr we are in the business of progress At the heart of The Chevron Way is our vision … to be the global energy company most admired for its people, partnership and performance. We enable human progress by developing the energy that improves lives and powers the world forward. read more chevron.com/chevronway Since our industry’s inception, energy has continued to evolve on On the cover: Daw Win Mar, a crop farmer in the Kyauk Se Lay different paths, at different speeds in different geographies. village of Myanmar, is a beneficiary of the Ahlin Yaung program. Chevron partners with one of the longest-serving international To learn more about our social investments worldwide, see nongovernmental organizations in Myanmar, Pact, to deliver affordable, chevron.com/creatingprosperity. renewable solar energy to homes and communities. The Ahlin Yaung program, meaning “light” in Burmese, has enabled over 240,000 people to benefit from solar energy, including helping households to shift from kerosene and wood-based energy sources to solar. a message from our chairman and chief executive officer This year, Chevron celebrates an important milestone in our company’s history— our 140th anniversary of enabling human progress around the world. We strive to uphold this proud legacy every day as we deliver the affordable, reliable and ever-cleaner energy that life depends on. We are in the business of progress, and our work helps billions of people achieve better living standards, access to education, longer and healthier lives, and social and economic opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrological Behavior of a Deep Sub-Vertical Fault in Crystalline
    Hydrological behavior of a deep sub-vertical fault in crystalline basement and relationships with surrounding reservoirs Cl´ement Roques, Olivier Bour, Luc Aquilina, Benoit Dewandel, Sarah Leray, Jean Michel Schroetter, Laurent Longuevergne, Tanguy Le Borgne, Rebecca Hochreutener, Thierry Labasque, et al. To cite this version: Cl´ement Roques, Olivier Bour, Luc Aquilina, Benoit Dewandel, Sarah Leray, et al.. Hydrological behavior of a deep sub-vertical fault in crystalline basement and relation- ships with surrounding reservoirs. Journal of Hydrology, Elsevier, 2014, 509, pp.42-54. <10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.023>. <insu-00917278> HAL Id: insu-00917278 https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-00917278 Submitted on 11 Dec 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destin´eeau d´ep^otet `ala diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publi´esou non, lished or not. The documents may come from ´emanant des ´etablissements d'enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche fran¸caisou ´etrangers,des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou priv´es. 1 HYDROLOGICAL BEHAVIOR OF A DEEP SUB-VERTICAL FAULT IN 2 CRYSTALLINE BASEMENT AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH 3 SURROUNDING RESERVOIRS 4 C. ROQUES*(1), O. BOUR(1), L. AQUILINA(1), B. DEWANDEL(2), S. LERAY(1), JM. 5 SCHROETTER(3), L. LONGUEVERGNE(1), T. LE BORGNE(1), R. HOCHREUTENER(1),
    [Show full text]
  • Production Management
    Process Solutions Guide Production Management Key Benefits Common Common GAS • Improve availability of wells and Header #1 Header #2 Gas Lift GAS facilities Production Separator OIL • Manage declining production and Well 1 Oil / Gas / Water WATER dynamic production characteristics Test Separator Flow • Improve reservoir modeling GAS Computer 3-Phase Separator OIL • Reduce cost of maintenance and Well 40 WATER operations 2-Phase GAS Turbine Water Cut Separator Meter Probe OIL & WATER Proven Coriolis Applications Net Oil Tank • Gas lift System Coriolis Computer Meter • Volume measure of oil, gas and MANUAL/AUTO produced water SAMPLING Process Diagram • Net oil / water cut Process Overview Production management involves establishing and maintaining optimal hydrocarbon production rates (oil / natural gas) while maximizing the overall recovery of the hydrocarbons available in the reservoir (yield). Production facilities are either oil or natural gas predominant and depending upon the type of reservoir or production methodology employed can produce various combinations and quantities of oil / condensate, natural gas and water. Well production is dependent upon the rate at which hydrocarbons flow toward the well bore and the reservoir pressure available to move the fluids to the surface for production. Over time, well production is typically assisted through artificial lift technology to help pump produced fluids to the surface. This can involve surface rod pumps, Electric Submersible Pumps, plunger lift or gas lift systems. Decline in reservoir pressure is countered with Secondary Recovery methods that involve the injection of natural gas or water back into the reservoir through injection wells to maintain reservoir pressure. The produced fluids from each well are measured to determine the volume production rate of oil, natural gas and water from each well in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSOCEAN INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) ______
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 _________________ FORM 10-K (Mark One) x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 OR o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _____ to ______. Commission file number 333-75899 _________________ TRANSOCEAN INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) _________________ Cayman Islands 66-0582307 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 4 Greenway Plaza 77046 Houston, Texas (Zip Code) (Address of principal executive offices) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (713) 232-7500 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of class Exchange on which registered Ordinary Shares, par value $0.01 per share New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No o Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No x Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]