Successfully Defending an OUI Case

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Successfully Defending an OUI Case CHAPTER 10 Successfully Defending an OUI Case David P. Sorrenti, Esq. Sorrenti & Delano, Brockton § 10.1 Introduction ............................................................................... 10–1 § 10.2 The Offense ................................................................................ 10–2 § 10.3 Operation ................................................................................... 10–2 § 10.3.1 Definition .................................................................... 10–2 § 10.3.2 Defense ....................................................................... 10–3 § 10.4 Public Way .................................................................................. 10–4 § 10.4.1 Definition .................................................................... 10–4 § 10.4.2 Stipulation of Proof .................................................... 10–5 § 10.4.3 Defense ....................................................................... 10–5 § 10.5 Under the Influence ................................................................... 10–6 § 10.5.1 Diminished Capacity .................................................. 10–6 (a) General Principles ............................................. 10–6 (b) Opinion Evidence .............................................. 10–7 (c) Erratic Operation ............................................... 10–7 (d) Odor of Alcohol ................................................. 10–7 (e) Red or Glassy Eyes ............................................ 10–8 (f) Slurred Speech ................................................... 10–8 (g) Field Sobriety Tests ........................................... 10–8 § 10.5.2 Cross-Examination of Arresting Officer Regarding Diminished Capacity ................................................ 10–14 (a) Opinion Evidence ............................................ 10–14 (b) Basic Approach ................................................ 10–15 (c) Cross-Examination Techniques ....................... 10–15 MCLE, Inc. | 6th Edition 2017 10–i Massachusetts Basic Practice Manual § 10.5.3 Breath and Blood Tests Under the Per Se Law ........ 10–20 (a) Refusing the Test ............................................. 10–20 (b) Taking the Test ................................................ 10–22 (c) Attacking the Test Results ............................... 10–24 (d) Expert Testimony ............................................ 10–26 § 10.6 Multiple Offenses—Prior Convictions .................................. 10–28 § 10.7 Motion Practice ....................................................................... 10–29 § 10.7.1 Independent Blood Alcohol Test and Independent Medical Examination ............................................... 10–29 § 10.7.2 Motion to Suppress Evidence/Statements Under the Fifth Amendment and Article 12 ........................ 10–30 § 10.7.3 Motion to Suppress Evidence/Statements Under the Fourth Amendment and Article 14 ..................... 10–30 § 10.7.4 Double Jeopardy ...................................................... 10–30 § 10.7.5 Miscellaneous Motions ............................................ 10–31 § 10.8 Penalties ................................................................................... 10–32 § 10.8.1 First Offense ............................................................. 10–33 § 10.8.2 Second Offense ........................................................ 10–33 § 10.8.3 Third Offense ........................................................... 10–34 § 10.8.4 Fourth Offense ......................................................... 10–35 § 10.8.5 Fifth and Subsequent Offense .................................. 10–35 § 10.9 Preserving Issues for Appeal .................................................. 10–35 § 10.10 License Reinstatement ............................................................ 10–35 CHECKLIST 10.1—Successfully Defending an OUI Case ............... 10–37 CHECKLIST 10.2— Expert Qualification—Establishing Expertise ................................................................................................. 10–41 EXHIBIT 10A—Model Jury Instruction 3.200, Operation of a Motor Vehicle .................................................................................. 10–46 EXHIBIT 10B—Model Jury Instruction 3.280, Public Way ............. 10–48 EXHIBIT 10C—Model Jury Instruction 5.300, Operating with a Blood Alcohol Level of .08 Percent or Greater ........................ 10–53 10–ii 6th Edition 2017 | MCLE, Inc. Successfully Defending an OUI Case EXHIBIT 10D—Model Jury Instruction 5.400, Operating Under the Influence of Drugs ........................................................................... 10–58 EXHIBIT 10E—Motion in Limine to Exclude Horizontal Nystagmus Test ....................................................................................... 10–62 EXHIBIT 10F—Consolidated Motion to Suppress Warrantless Stop and Statements .............................................................................. 10–63 EXHIBIT 10G—Chart Showing Consequences of Melanie’s Law ... 10–68 EXHIBIT 10H—Motion to Inspect Evidence and Reports ................. 10–73 EXHIBIT 10I—Motion in Limine to Exclude Breath Test Results ... 10–79 EXHIBIT 10J—Areas of Breathalyzer Expert Testimony ................... 10–81 EXHIBIT 10K—Proposed Jury Instructions of Defendant ................. 10–82 EXHIBIT 10L—Motion and Order for Return of License Following a Finding of Not Guilty ........................................................ 10–86 EXHIBIT 10M—Ten Frequently Asked Questions ............................ 10–88 MCLE, Inc. | 6th Edition 2017 10–iii Massachusetts Basic Practice Manual 10–iv 6th Edition 2017 | MCLE, Inc. CHAPTER 10 Successfully Defending an OUI Case David P. Sorrenti, Esq. Sorrenti & Delano, Brockton Scope Note This chapter offers practical guidance on the defense of an “operat- ing under the influence” (OUI) case. It begins by reviewing the indi- vidual elements of the Commonwealth’s case—first addressing the defendant’s alleged “operation of motor vehicle” on a public “way” and then focusing on the allegation that the defendant was operat- ing under the influence of alcohol or with blood alcohol of .08 per- cent or greater. The chapter then discusses various aspects of the defense, including expert testimony, cross-examination, motion practice, and applicable penalties. Included with the chapter are numerous forms and other exhibits, including responses to ques- tions frequently asked by clients. § 10.1 INTRODUCTION During every legislative session, the General Court considers new bills that severely increase the penalties for operating under the influence. Important legislative enact- ments have included • Melanie’s Law, which substantially increased the length of suspension for re- fusing to take a breath test, established the use of interlocking devices by all second and subsequent offenders, and created new offenses, such as man- slaughter by motor vehicle; • a per se law that makes operating a motor vehicle with a .08 percent or greater blood alcohol level a separate crime; • elimination of the lookback period for considering prior OUIs; and • creation of new mandatory minimum sentences that carry the possibility of in- carceration in state prison for certain OUI offenses. See 2005 Mass. Acts c. 122; 2003 Mass. Acts c. 28; 1994 Mass. Acts c. 25. As a consequence, impaired driver cases dominate the District Court dockets as in- dictments are brought to take advantage of the enhanced penalties now available for subsequent offenders. Defense counsel must be prepared to fully litigate all aspects of an OUI case, including appropriate pretrial motions. MCLE, Inc. | 6th Edition 2017 10–1 § 10.1 Massachusetts Basic Practice Manual This chapter focuses on the defense of a defendant charged with OUI and offers some practical advice. Checklist 10.1 outlines key steps to take in defending against an OUI charge. § 10.2 THE OFFENSE General Laws c. 90, § 24 provides in part as follows: Whoever, upon any way or in any place to which the public has a right of access, or upon any way or in any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees, op- erates a motor vehicle with a percentage, by weight, of alcohol in their blood of eight one-hundredths or greater, or while un- der the influence of intoxicating liquor . shall be punished . The Commonwealth must, therefore, prove beyond a reasonable doubt three separate and distinct elements: • operation of the motor vehicle, • on a public way, • while under the influence of liquor or with a .08 percent or greater blood alco- hol level. Perhaps the easiest way to understand the elements of operation, public way, and impairment is to study the District Court Model Jury Instructions. See Exhib- its 10A–10D. Almost every judge will read these instructions verbatim to the jury. The model OUI instruction set forth in the Criminal Model Jury Instructions for Use in the District Court (Instruction No. 5.300; see Exhibit 10C) incorporates the pro- visions of the per se law. § 10.3 OPERATION The definition of operation and various defenses based on operation are set forth below. § 10.3.1 Definition Under Instruction 3.200 of the Criminal Model Jury Instructions for Use in the Dis- trict Court (2014 ed.), [a] person “operates” a motor vehicle not only while doing all of the well-known things that drivers do as they travel on a street or highway, but also when doing any act which directly tends to set the vehicle
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Duke Football Parking & Pre-Game Traffic
    to Hillandale Rd./ 2019 DUKE FOOTBALL Fulton St. PARKING & PRE-GAME TRAFFIC MAP Hillsborough Rd. W. Markham Ave. Erwin Rd. Fifteenth St. Erwin Rd. Estimated Walk Times from Lots: Research Dr. RDG W. Main St. Duke University Chapel - 5 minutes Ninth St. Broad St. DUKE EAST CAMPUS Chemistry Lot - 8 minutes MEDICAL W. Main St. DU Road Lots - 8 minutes CENTER GC Erwin Rd. Lot H Lot Small Circuit Lot - 12 minutes Large N. Buchanan Blvd. Circuit Dr. Erwin Rd. Large Circuit Lot - 14 minutes Circuit Yearby GC & H Lots - 15 minutes Ave. RDG - 19 minutes Small Circuit Swift Ave. WEST CAMPUS CENTRAL CAMPUS W. Main St. Towerview Rd. Campus Dr. SARAH P. DUKE DUKE Anderson St. CHAPEL GARDENS Circuit Dr. Chem Oregon St. Alexander St.DUKE BRYAN POLICE to Swift Ave. CENTER Flowers Dr. Science Dr. Campus Dr. Swift Ave. Chapel Dr. NASHER MUSEUM Campus Dr. OF ART Union Dr. Public Policy Card Duke University Rd. Whitford Dr. Science Dr. BUS Towerview Rd. DU Road Science Whitford Drive B-FB SDG Visitors RECOMMENDED INGRESS ROUTES Towerview Road closed between Card Iron Duke Recommended Ingress Routes Bassett Drive Gym Lot and Towerview Roundabout Iron Duke Parking Permit Checkpoints TV Bassett Drive closed from Science Drive to General Public Recommended Ingress Routes Powers Gate Grounds B9 IRON DUKE PERMIT LOTS GAME DAY STAFF LOTS Jogging Trail Brooks/ Science Drive Garage Public Policy Grounds Science Drive Garage Pascal HART (Levels 2 & 3) (Levels 4-7) HOUSE Card Brooks/Pascal DU Road Lots Whitford Blue Zone GENERAL PUBLIC LOTS General Public Park & Walk Lots General Public Parking for Guests with Disabilities Notes: General Public Courtesy Shuttle Lots Recreational & Oversized Vehicle Lot (Small Circuit Lot) • Ingress traffic plan enacted 3 hours prior to kick-off except for North Carolina A&T (4 hrs) and Notre Dame (4 hrs prior).
    [Show full text]
  • The Scope of Police Questioning During a Routine Traffic Stop: Do
    Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 30 | Number 6 Article 3 2003 The copS e of Police Questioning During a Routine Traffict S op: Do Questions Outside the Scope of the Original Justification for the Stop Create Impermissible Seizures If They Do Not Prolong the Stop? Bill Lawrence Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Bill Lawrence, The Scope of Police Questioning During a Routine Traffict S op: Do Questions Outside the Scope of the Original Justification for the Stop Create Impermissible Seizures If They Do Not Prolong the Stop? , 30 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1919 (2003). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol30/iss6/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The copS e of Police Questioning During a Routine Traffict S op: Do Questions Outside the Scope of the Original Justification for the Stop Create Impermissible Seizures If They Do Not Prolong the Stop? Cover Page Footnote J.D. candidate, Fordham University School of Law, 2004; B.A., Communication, Villanova University, 2000. I would like to thank my family and friends for their love and support. I also sincerely thank Professor Daniel Richman for his valuable insights. This article is available in Fordham
    [Show full text]
  • When Can You Be Ticketed for Driving Without a License?
    WHEN CAN YOU BE TICKETED FOR DRIVING WITHOUT A LICENSE? LAW: “No person, except those expressly exempted, shall drive any motor vehicle upon a highway or public property in this Commonwealth unless the person has a driver's license valid under the provisions of this chapter.” “Public property” only includes parking lots owned or leased by the Commonwealth. 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1501(a). MEANING: Based on the language of the statute, you cannot be cited for driving without a license while only in the Home Depot parking lot because it is not a public highway. DEFENSE: If you were cited for driving without a license in the parking lot you should request a hearing to dispute the ticket. At the hearing you could make a corpus delicti objection (principle that a crime must have been proven to have occurred before conviction). If asked how you arrived at the parking lot, you can invoke 5th amendment protection (against self-incrimination) to not respond. If the officer never observed you driving outside the lot, then you may prevail in disputing the ticket. TIP: If you are stopped in the parking lot the officer could ask you how you got to the parking lot. You should not answer that question. BUT WHAT ABOUT PROBABLE CAUSE? CAN THE POLICE STOP ME WHENEVER THEY WANT? No, the police need probable cause to stop you in your car. There is no probable cause for stopping a driver for driving without a license. Therefore, unless there is another reason to stop a vehicle, such as expired registration, or speeding, there should not be a traffic stop.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Interference by Common Odoriferous Foodstuffs in the Determination of Breath-Alcohol Content Using the Intoxilyzer 4011AS
    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons University of the Pacific Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 1988 Possible interference by common odoriferous foodstuffs in the determination of breath-alcohol content using the Intoxilyzer 4011AS Gail Eileen Jones University of the Pacific Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds Part of the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Jones, Gail Eileen. (1988). Possible interference by common odoriferous foodstuffs in the determination of breath-alcohol content using the Intoxilyzer 4011AS. University of the Pacific, Thesis. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/2152 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of the Pacific Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POSSIBLE INI'ERFERENCE BY CXM-m OOORIFERCUS FOODS'IUFFS IN 'lliE DEI'ERMINATICN OF' BREATH-ALCOHOL CCNl'ENl' USIN:; THE INIDXILyzER 40llAS Gail Eileen Jones, B. s. Cameron University, Lawton, Oklahana, 1982 A 'lhesis sutmi.tted in Partial F\llfillmant of the RequirE!!"!Vants for the Degree of M:tster of Science in Toxicology at the University of the Pacific December 2, 1988 This thesis, written and submitted by Gail Eileen Jones is approved for recommendation to the Committee on Graduate Studies, University of the Pacific Dean of the School or Department Chairman: Co-Chairman Co-Chairman Dated__ ()_~__;~~~-+----'/ 9-=(......:.( __ _ TABLE OF CCNI'ENI'S Page LIST OF TABLES •• ii LIST OF FIGURES. • . i ii INI'RODUcriCN • • • • 1 Historical and Theoretical Backgroun::i • 1 Drinking, Driving and the I.aw • • 1 Ethanol : Chemical and Pharrca.cological Properties 10 Physiological Principles and the Detennination of Bl ood ~1.
    [Show full text]
  • Parking Problems and Creative Solutions
    AN OVERVIEW OF COMMON PARKING ISSUES, PARKING MANAGEMENT OPTIONS, AND CREATIVE SOLUTIONS PREPARED FOR: CITY OF PASADENA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AUGUST 2003 Banerjee & Associates Pasadena Parking August 2003 AN OVERVIEW OF COMMON PARKING ISSUES, PARKING MANAGEMENT OPTIONS, AND CREATIVE SOLUTIONS Prepared for City of Pasadena Department of Transportation Report prepared by Banerjee & Associates Parking is a key component of Pasadena’s transportation program. The City has addressed parking problems associated with educational institutions, entertainment uses, religious institutions, commercial activities, special events, and most recently the opening of Gold Line Light Rail service. Experience with such programs underscores the need for the City to foster ongoing coordination and cooperation among businesses, institutions, residents, and governmental agencies in order to address parking needs in a collaborative manner. The Department of Transportation is conducting a more focused review of parking management programs including options for use in residential neighborhoods. The objective of this review is to create, in collaboration with the community, a toolbox of parking management solutions that can be used throughout the City to address parking problems. This information will be incorporated into a forthcoming community handbook on the City’s Neighborhood Traffic Management Program. This briefing material is intended to support and encourage public dialogue on parking solutions. BANERJEE & ASSOCIATES Pasadena Parking August 2003 COMMON PARKING ISSUES With the high percentage of vehicle ownership in the United States, parking has become a conflicting and confusing situation for a number of people. Whether at an airport, bus stations and shopping centers, problems with parking are an everyday occurrence. Lack of accessible parking can hurt local business and decrease the quality of life for residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Powers, Trespass and Expressive Rights Under the Canadian Constitution
    The Peter A. Allard School of Law Allard Research Commons Faculty Publications Allard Faculty Publications 2007 Police Powers, Trespass and Expressive Rights Under the Canadian Constitution W. Wesley Pue Allard School of Law at the University of British Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.allard.ubc.ca/fac_pubs Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law Commons Citation Details W Wesley Pue, "Police Powers, Trespass and Expressive Rights Under the Canadian Constitution" (2007) [unpublished]. This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Allard Faculty Publications at Allard Research Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Allard Research Commons. Pue, Trespass & Rights, paper prepared for the Ipperwash Inquiry, 2005-02-04 1 of 96 Trespass and Expressive Rights By. W. Wesley Pue … the rights guaranteed in the Charter erect around each individual, metaphorically speaking, an invisible fence over which the state will not be allowed to trespass. The role of the courts is to map out, piece by piece, the parameters of the fence. • R. v. Morgentaler, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 30, at p. 164, per Wilson J. Paper prepared for The Ipperwash Inquiry, The Honourable Sidney B. Linden, Commissioner, established by the Government of Ontario on November 12, 2003, under the Public Inquiries Act to inquire and report on events surrounding the death of Dudley George, shot during a protest by First Nations representatives at Ipperwash Provincial Park in 1995. Pue, Trespass & Rights, paper prepared for the Ipperwash Inquiry, 2005-02-04 2 of 96 Table of Contents Introduction The Summit of the Americas, 2001 Legal Issues “Authorized by Law” R.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction “Road Rage” Is a Potentially Dangerous Phenomenon
    1 Introduction “Road rage” is a potentially dangerous phenomenon that, given our individual proximity to driving or riding in automobiles, has broad ranging personal and societal impacts. As such, road rage has recently been the subject of significant public and media attention, and sensational stories about “road rage” fill the newspapers (Carter, 2007; Eckinger, 2007; Fumento, 1998; Richmond, 2007; Thompson, 2007), magazines (Best & Furedi, 2001; A. Ferguson, 1998; Jenson, 2007; Liu, 2006) and television news ("Best and worst cities for road rage.," 2006; "Miami Road Rage Fight," 2006; "Police: Man Pointed Shotgun At Car In Road Rage Incident," 2007; "Road Rage rears its head," 2006). Pervasive public interest in “road rage” has led to a proliferation of websites and blogs that attempt to serve a variety of functions from helping upset drivers vent their anger ("AboveAverageDriver.com"; "Road Rage - A blog about driving in Houston"; "RoadRagers.com") to electronic vigilantism in which users can report the locations, car makes, and license plate numbers of offending drivers ("PlateRage.com"; "Platewire.com"). Another website offers books of flip-cards with large print—and mostly obscene—statements that tell drivers how their road behavior is affecting the card-waving driver ("RoadRageCards.com"). Road rage is not unique to America and has been the topic of a great deal of media, research, and government attention in numerous countries across the 2 globe including the United Kingdom, the Philippines, India, Israel, China, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, and Australia (Alave, 2007; Best & Furedi, 2001; Brewer, 2000; James & Nahl, 2000a; Liu, 2006; Mdletshe, 2007; Muhammad, 2007; Shanthi, 2007; Yagil, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Mm Ajo. ^545 1
    { I 1 ^ ' ^Vl ' C?(cX-^tL<3/^- of ^outi| (Carolina ^/V6^ mm ajo. ^545 1 (Office of t^e ^ttomeg (General T. TRAVIS MCOLOCK R6M8ERT C DENNIS BUILDING ATTOflNeY GENERAL POST OFFICE BOX 11549 COLUMBIA SC 29211 TELEPHONE 803-758-3970 April 22, 1985 The Honorable Ted B. Wyndham Municipal Judge Post Office Box 148 Greenwood, South Carolina 29646 Dear Judge Wyndham: In a letter to this Office you questioned whether Section 23-1-15 of the 1976 Code of Laws, which permits public parking lots to be brought within police jurisdiction, authorizes a law enforcement officer to administer a breathalyzer test to an k individual arrested for driving under the influence while driving in such a parking lot. Such statute provides "(a)ny real property which is used as a parking lot and is open to use by the public for motor vehicle traffic shall be within the police jurisdiction with regard to the unlawful operation of motor vehicles in such parking lot . (when posted) ... In any such area the law enforcement agency con cerned shall have the authority to enforce all laws or ordinances relating to the" unlawful operation of motor vehicles which such agency has with regard to public streets and highways immediately adjoining or connecting to tke parking area." [Emphasis added] . REQUEST LETTER Continuation Sheet Number 2 To: The Honorable Ted B. Wyndham April 22, 1985 Section 56-5-2950 of the 1976 Code of Laws, the "implied consent" statute, provides that: "(a)ny person who operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this State shall be deemed to have given consent to a chemical test of his breath for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of his blood if arrested..
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 - Laws and Related Issues PA Driver’S Manual
    Chapter 5 - Laws and Related Issues PA Driver’s Manual CHAPTER 5: LAWS AND RELATED ISSUES This chapter will provide information you need to know about recent Pennsylvania laws or other relevant driver related laws. For more information on Pennsylvania laws please visit www.dmv.state.pa.us, select laws and regulations listed under Information Centers. REQUIRED NOTIFICATION FOR CHANGE IN NAME OR ADDRESS In accordance with Section 1515 of the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code, if your name or address is changed, you must notify PennDOT within 15 days of that change even if moving out of state. You may report your address change by visiting our website at www.dmv.state.pa.us or calling our Customer Call Center at 1-800-932-4600. The Pennsylvania Vehicle Code prohibits the issuance of driver license products to anyone who is not a resident of Pennsylvania. By law, if you are a registered voter in Pennsylvania, this application will allow us to notify your county voter registration office of your address change. You may change your name by completing a Non- Commercial Driver's License Application for Change/Correction/Replacement (Form DL-80) available on the website. You will be issued a driver's license update card containing the new information. This card must be carried with your driver’s license. There is no fee for this service for non-commercial drivers. SEAT BELT LAW In accordance with Section 4581 of the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code, it is a law in Pennsylvania that: • All drivers and front seat passengers in vehicles, light trucks and motor homes must wear seat belts.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile CCTV Enforcement - Frequently Asked Questions
    Mobile CCTV Enforcement - Frequently Asked Questions What is a CCTV Enforcement Vehicle? A CCTV enforcement vehicle (or “camera car”) is an ordinary car fitted with equipment which enables it to record parking contraventions. It has a camera fitted on the top and the Council’s logo on the side. Both the car and the vehicle must be approved for this purpose by the Secretary of State for Transport, and Gateshead Council has the necessary approvals. Where can it be used? The camera car can be used to enforce any parking restriction which is visible from the vehicle and where an observation period is not required. Government guidance says that it should only be used where “enforcement is difficult or sensitive and CEO enforcement is not practical”. We will use it mainly on “school keep clear” zig-zag markings outside schools and in mandatory bus stop clearways, but it may also be used in areas covered by a loading ban. Why can’t you just use officers on foot? The Council’s Civil Enforcement Officers will still carry out all parking enforcement in our car parks as well as most on street enforcement. But it is not practical to use officers on foot to cover all of the Borough’s schools and bus stops because of the nature of those parking problems and the distances involved. When will the car be used? As with other parking enforcement activities, the Council will not be advertising in advance of each visit to a particular location. It may be used at any time when Gateshead Council – Transport Strategy Service Page 1 08/2013 parking enforcement is carried out.
    [Show full text]
  • Parking Citation
    Exhibit 3 - Schedule of Civil Penalties for Parking Violations and for Late Payments SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATIONS Code Description City Penalty Current Total Late Payment Section Amount State Fees Penalty Penalty Amount 3.04.030(a) Beach Parking Lot Permits (Sunset to Sunrise) $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00 3.04.050(a) Payment of Posted Fee Required-Attendant $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00 3.04.050(b) Payment of Posted Fee Required-Pay Machine $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00 3.04.100 Parking Spaces $45.50 $12.50 $58.00 $58.00 3.06.040 Car Share Permit Required $150.50 $12.50 $163.00 $163.00 3.08.110 Preferential Parking $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00 3.12.270 Disobey Posted Signs $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00 3.12.380 Parking on Drive Apron/Parkway/Sidewalk $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $53.00 3.12.730 Green Zone - 15 Minutes $45.50 $12.50 $58.00 $58.00 3.12.740 Yellow Load Zone 7am - 6pm Mon-Sat $45.50 $12.50 $58.00 $58.00 3.12.760 White Zone - Max of 3 Minutes $45.50 $12.50 $58.00 $58.00 3.12.775a Disabled Placard - Use of Lost, Stolen, Revoked or $350.50 $12.50 $363.00 $36.00 3.12.775b Disabled Placard - Not Used For Transport of Person $350.50 $12.50 $363.00 $36.00 3.12.775c Disabled Placard - Use of Counterfeit, Forged, Altered $350.50 $12.50 $363.00 $36.00 3.12.790(b) Head in Parking $50.50 $12.50 $63.00 $63.00 3.12.820 Block Passage of Vehicle In Alley $55.50 $12.50 $68.00 $68.00 3.12.830 Parking Prohibited in Specified Places $60.50 $12.50 $73.00 $73.00 3.12.840 Overtime Parking $45.50 $12.50 $58.00 $58.00 3.12.845 Street Sweeping $60.50 $12.50
    [Show full text]
  • If Approached Or Stopped by a Police Officer Traffic Stop
    WHY DO POLICE STOP CITIZENS OR TRAFFIC STOP – WHAT TO DO POLICE AT YOUR HOME VEHICLES? Slow down and pull to the right, or onto a side Usually if a police officer knocks on your Person appears to need assistance street. door, it is for one of the these reasons: Traffic violation If you feel unsafe or suspect it’s not really the . To interview you or a member of your Person suspected of violating the law police, turn on your emergency flashers and household as a witness or a suspect to an Person fits the description of a suspect continue slowly to a well-lit location like a gas incident that is being investigated. To serve an arrest warrant Person has been pointed out as a suspect station. If still unsure, dial 9-1-1 to get confirmation. To serve a search warrant Person may have witnessed a crime If stopped at night, turn on the dome light. To make a notification Officer seeking information about a crime Spotlights and flashlights are used to If they are not in uniform, make sure they Officer is making a community contact illuminate the scene for everyone’s safety, not really are law enforcement officers by to intimidate you. requesting to see a badge and identification IF APPROACHED OR STOPPED BY A Do not exit your vehicle, but wait for the card. POLICE OFFICER officer. Whenever police come to your door, they Keep your hands where the officer can see Keeping your hands visible, such as on the should willingly provide identification and them and don’t put them in your pockets.
    [Show full text]