<<

J. SE Asian Appl. Geol., Jan–Jun 2011, Vol. 3(1), pp. 45-53

PETROGENETIC INTERPRETATION OF GRANITOID ROCKS USING MULTICATIONIC PARAMETERS IN THE SANGGAU AREA, KALIMANTAN ISLAND, INDONESIA

Kyaw Linn Zaw*1,2, Lucas Donny Setijadji1, I Wayan Warmada1, and Koichiro Watanabe3

1Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 2Department of Geology, Yangon University, Myanmar 3Department of Earth Resources Engineering, Kyushu University, Japan

Abstract ern margin of the greater Eurasian plate. It is bounded to the north by the South China Sea Granitoid compositions from a range of tec- marginal oceanic basin, to the east by the Philip- tonic environments are plotted on a multicationic di- pine Mobile Belt and the Philippine Sea Plate agram, based on major and trace element geochem- and to the south by the Banda and Sunda arc istry and K-Ar dating. This shows that there is a dif- systems (Figure 1). It is bounded to the west ferent tectonic nature, rock affinity and suites. The by the Sunda Shelf and ultimately by Paleozoic basement granitoid rocks are ranging from diorite to and Mesozoic continental crust of the Malay composition. They appear to the products Peninsula. The Greater Kalimantan Block is of crystallization differentiation of a calc-alkaline surrounded to the north, east, and south by of island affinity and range to metalumi- plate boundaries and arc systems which are nous , granodiorite and . The tec- presently active or which have been active dur- tonic setting has two kinds which are subduction ing the Tertiary and it is bounded to the west and post-subduction. The geochemical interpreta- by an underexplored shelf region which possi- tion, origin and melting of mechanism and tectonic bly conceals a terrain boundary. setting shows the types of granitoid are M and I-M Based on petrological and geochemical char- type. The basement of granite and granodiorite are acteristics such as rock assemblage, petrogeo- a segment of island arc that were happened the Sin- chemistry, K-Ar age, studied petrogenesis of tang Intrusion as post subduction or syn-collision different stages of magmatism of the granitic tectonic setting. rocks from the Sanggau Area in Kalimantan. Keywords: Petrogenetic, tectonic, affinity, Sintang The magmatic activities of the Sanggau area Intrusion, Kalimantan can be divided into three stages. The Meso- zoic magmatism, induced by northern subduc- 1 Introduction tion of The Paleocene-Eocene magmatism was the most intensive, and resulted from a com- Sanggau area is located in the northwest part plex progress of Neotethyan oceanic slab, in- of West Kalimantan Province. The island of cluding subduction, rollback, and subsequent Kalimantan presently lies upon the southeast- breakoff. Neotethyan slab, was continuously developed, with two peak periods of Late Juras- *Corresponding author: K.L. ZAW, Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gadjah sic and Early Cretaceous. Mada University, Jl. Grafika 2 Yogyakarta, 55281, Indone- And the Oligocene-Miocene magmatism was sia. E-mail: [email protected]

45 ZAW et al.

Figure 1: Location map and tectonic features of the Indonesia attributed to the convective removal of thick- margins of the granodiorite and tonalite of the ened lithosphere in an east-west extension set- Schwaner Batholiths, which in turn are consid- ting after India and Asia. ered to reflect the trend of a subduction zone active in Early Cretaceous times. The struc- 2 REGIONAL GEOLOGICAL SET- tural development of Sanggau was probably TING initiated in Triassic times with the subduction- related deformation of the igneous rocks of the The main elements of regional structure in Embuoi Complex, as recorded by K-Ar ages on West and Central Kalimantan and Sarawak biotite from foliated granitoids. The prevailing are the huge prism of upper Cretaceous to regional trend preserved in all these formations lower Tertiary greywacke in the north, and is west-northwesterly, which together with the the Lower to Upper Cretaceous subduction- orientation of belts of mélange in adjacent Sheet related Schwaner Batholith in the south. The areas reflects a convergent continental margin western part of this region is formed by pre- with the same orientation. Along this margin, Tertiary igneous, metamorphic, and deformed which was probably located to the south of sedimentary rocks (Figure 2), which constitute Sanggau deformation and accretion occurred the Northwest Kalimantan Domain of William intermittently from Triassic until early Tertiary et al. (1988). The Semitau ridge is the most times. important structural feature in Sanggau. It is an east-southeasterly trending structural 3 ridge spanning outcrops of Permo-Triassic fo- liated igneous rocks of the Busang Complex Major elements in the east and Embuoi Complex in Sang- The numbers of schemes based on chem- gau (Doutche, 1992). The huge Schwaner ical composition have been applied for Batholith and its northwestern extension, the the classification and nomenclature of ig- Singkawang Batholith (Amiruddin, 1989), ap- neous rocks. The classification scheme of pear to be confined to the southern side of the De La Roche et al. (1980) involving the fundamental structure forming the Semitau whole rock chemical composition into cation ridge. The Semitau ridge parallels the northern

46 © 2011 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University PETROGENETIC INTERPRETATION OF GRANITOID ROCKS USING MULTICATIONIC PARAMETERS

Figure 2: Regional geological map of the area proportions yields mixed result. The re- grouping of cations is such that the X-axis, [R1 = 4 Si − 11 (Na + K) − 2 (Fe + Ti)], of the diagram portrays variation in content while the Y-axis, [R2 = 6 Ca + 2 (Mg + Al)], portrays variation in Mg/Fe ratio and An content of the constituent . For basic rocks with common assemblage plagio- clase, pyroxene, and olivine, this classification scheme portrays their composition satisfactory. However, for basic and intermediate rocks con- taining cumulus amphibole, the R2 becomes unrealistically high, resulting in the classifica- tion of gabbroic rocks as ultrabasic and those of diorites as gabbros. In this scheme, the ana- lyzed samples of the area plot closely; three in the field of granodiorites, tonalite and diorite (Figure 3). On SiO2 vs. Na2O + K2O classification scheme of Cox et al. (1979), the basement Figure 3: Classification of the study rocks using samples as granite, granodiorite and diorite the parameters R1 and R2 (after De La Roche, (Figure 4). In O’Connor’s (1965) normative 1980), calculated from multication proportions An-Ab-Or diagram, the rocks plot in the field of tonalite, granodiorite and granite (Figure 5).

© 2011 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University 47 ZAW et al.

Figure 4: Plot of the rock samples from Sanggau area in the classification diagram of Cox et al., (1979) Figure 5: Ab-An-Or ternary plot classifying the silicic rocks (> 10% modal quartz) of the rocks. The rocks are essentially calc-alkaline on the Fields are after O’Connor (1965) with modifica- AFM diagram (Figure 6) of Irvine and Baragar tion of Barker (1979) (1971).

Major Element variations

The TiO2 and Na2O+K2O vs. SiO2 plots (Fig- ure 7) clearly discriminate samples contain vari- ation correlation of oxide elements. As noted that, the samples show little variation in SiO2 and while FeOt, TiO2, MgO and CaO exhibit negative correlation, P2O5 and K2O show posi- tive correlation with increasing in SiO2. A lack of iron-enrichment in the basement rocks with fractionation suggests their calc alkaline nature (Miyashiro 1977; Irvine and Baragar, 1971)

4 Petrogenesis and Tectonic Setting of Origin

For assessing the petrogenetic associa- tion, the basement analyses are plotted in ACNK vs. ANK (where ACNK = molar Al2O3/[CaO+Na2O+ K2O], and ANK = mo- lar Al2O3/[Na2O+K2O]) diagram of Maniar Figure 6: AFM diagram showing the calc- and Piccoli (1989). alkaline character of the sample alalyzsis The analyzed samples of basement rocks (Irvine & Baragar, 1971) show metaluminous character (Figure 8). The AFM diagram is most commonly used to distin-

48 © 2011 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University PETROGENETIC INTERPRETATION OF GRANITOID ROCKS USING MULTICATIONIC PARAMETERS

Figure 7: Binary plots showing behavior of major elements against SiO2 in granitoid rocks from Sanggau area

© 2011 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University 49 ZAW et al.

Figure 8: Classification of granitoid rocks from Figure 9: Samples showing the affinity of calc- Sanggau area on the basic of Shand’s molar in- alkaline and tholeiite series of the granitoid dices, ACNK= Al2O3 (CaO+Na2O+K2O) and rock analyses after Miyashiro (1974). ANK= Al2O3 (Na3O+K2O) (after Maniar and Piccoli,1989) of Sanggau is evident from major cation param- eters of Debon and Le Fort (1983), which essen- guish between tholeiitic and calc-alkaline dif- tially consist of biotite+ amphibole±pyroxene ferentiation trends in the sub-alkaline magma assemblage (Figure 11). The R1-R2 multica- series. Miyashiro (1974) presented dividing tion factors (De La Roche et al., 1980) classify lines separating the rocks of the calc-alkaline the samples as granodiorite and quartz mon- series and tholeiitic series. On this diagram zonite (Figure 5), corresponding to basement (Figure 9), the analyses plots in the field of rocks formed in pre-plate collision and Sintang most are calc-alkaline series. It was concluded Intrusions formed by syn-collision tectonic set- that the basement rocks evolved from magma ting (Figure 12). of calc-alkaline affinity. The calc-alkaline char- The basement rock is compared with gran- acter of the basement rocks is further substanti- ites and granodiorite from type tectonic settings ated by their metaluminous character revealed in terms of ocean ridge granite (ORG)- normal- by their high ANK ratio (1.2–3.9) relative to ized trace element patterns (Figure 13). The ACNK (0.62–1.0). rock from Sintang Intrusion has a spiked pat- Whereas the major element chemistry of the tern, which makes it different from all other basement rocks is of limited usage, restricted tectonic settings. However, a lower content to classification, nomenclature, and assessment of HFSE, negative Nb anomaly, and not too of their petrological association, some sample enriched abundance of LILE suggest a closer with full set of trace elements is of greater help, match with island arc tholeiites and volcanic in determining the nature of the source mate- arc granites than with the within-plate granites. rial, and in deciphering the tectonic setting of The basement rock from pre-plate collision and origin. Pearce et al., (1984) devised a variety of Sintang intrusion is from syn-collision in terms diagrams based on incompatible trace elements of trace element spider diagram. for distinguishing within-plate, collisional, vol- canic arc and oceanic-ridge granites. The vol- canic arc origin for the basement sample is sub- stantiated by Rb vs. Y + Nb plot of Pearce et al., (1984) in Figure 10. The metaluminous nature

50 © 2011 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University PETROGENETIC INTERPRETATION OF GRANITOID ROCKS USING MULTICATIONIC PARAMETERS

Figure 10: Rb vs. Y+Nb discriminant of the rock analysis of the samples. Syn-collisional granite (syn-COLG), volcanic arc granite (VAG), within plate granite (WPG) and ocean ridge granite (ORG) are after Pearce et al. (1984) Figure 12: Classification and nomenclature of granitoid rocks using the parameters R1 and R2 of De La Roche et al., (1980), calculated from multication proportions

Figure 11: A-B diagram (Debon and Le Fort, 1983) plotted for granitoid in present. Each of its six sectors, numbered from I to VI, corresponds to a specific mineral as- semblage. I, II and III are peraluminous sectors, where I: muscovite>biotite (by vol- ume); II: biotite>muscovite; III: biotite (usu- Figure 13: Comparison of the eight represen- ally alone, at times with a few amphi- tative samples from Sanggau area (ocean ridge boles); IV, V and VI are metaluminous sec- granite value after Pearce et al., 1984) tors, where IV: biotite+ amphibole±pyroxene; V:clinopyroxene±amphibole±biotite; VI: un- usual rocks (e.g., carbonatites)

© 2011 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University 51 ZAW et al.

5 Adakite Geochemistry

The term adakite comes from island of Adak (Aleutian Island, Alasaka) and was originally defined to describe Cenozoic (<25 Ma) arc- related volcanic rocks with a a number of geo- chemical characteristics, including SiO2 ≥ 56 wt.%, Al2O3 ≥ 5 wt.%, 3 wt.%≤ MgO ≤ 6 wt.%, Y ≤ 18 ppm, Sr ≥ 400 ppm (Defant and Drum- mond, 1990). Contrary to normal, arc-related tholeiitic and calc-alkaline rocks that originate in the mantle wedge and later evolve by crystal fractionation or other processes, the adakitic rocks are derived from direct partial melting of a subducting slab (Defant and Drummond, 1990). These authors related the magma gen- eration to the melting of hot, young (<25 Ma) Figure 14: Y vs. Sr/Y binary diagram showing subducting lithosphere. Numerical and petro- adakite field of the analyses logical models (Peacock et al., 1994) restrict the process to even younger subducting litho- sphere (<5 Ma) at typically 60–80 km depth. a major role in fractionation history of gran- A graph of Sr/Y vs. Y (Figure 14) empha- ites. The trace element geochemistry of sam- sizes the difference between basement grani- ples collected from the basement is reflective toid rocks and Sintang . Samples of typical of island arcs. In conclu- from Sintang Intrusive rocks are within adakite sion, the basement of granite and granodiorite field. Partial melting of source would gener- are a segment of island arc that were happened ate melting curves that pass through the adakite the Sintang Intrusion as post subduction or syn- field toward high Sr/Y but low Y. According collision tectonic setting. to adakite geochemistry and trace element in- terpretation, Sintang Intrusive rocks may come Acknowledgements from post subduction tectonic setting. According to dating, in the correspond area, The author is very grateful to Dr. Lucas Donny younger magmatic products of 28.1 ± 0.4 Ma in- Setijadji for his providing and allowing using dicate the chemical characters of adakitic mag- the data and his kind guidance and suggestion matism. These all of the above data show that for academic support, as well as AUN/SEED- during Oligo-Miocene time in Sintang areas, the Net (JICA), Japan International Co-operation previous magmatic system giving the products Agency, for financially support to process this have been introduced by the back-arc magmatic research work. system. The occurrence of Sintang adakites then may correlate rather to the collision than References to the subducted young oceanic plate, hence the collision of Luconian continental block to Kali- Amiruddin (1989) Preliminary study of the granitic mantan (Priadi, 2010). rocks of west Kalimantan, Indonesia. MSc The- sis, Department of Geology, University of Wollon- gong, Australia. 6 Discussion and Conclusion Cox, K.G., Bell, J.D., and Pankhurst, R.J. (1979) The interpretation of igneous rocks. George Allen and On the basis of geochemistry, the granite rocks Unwin, London. are considered to be product of crystalliza- Debon, F., and Le Fort, P. (1983) A chemical- tion differentiation of a calc-alkaline magma mineralogical classification of common plutonic with pyroxene, biotite and amphibole playing

52 © 2011 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University PETROGENETIC INTERPRETATION OF GRANITOID ROCKS USING MULTICATIONIC PARAMETERS

rocks and association. Earth Sciences. 73. 135- Miyashiro, A. (1977) Subduction zone ophiolites and 149. island arc ophiolites. (S.K. Saxena and Bhat- De La Roche, H., et al. (1980) A classification of vol- tachargi, S, Eds.). Energetics of geological pro- canic and plutonic rocks using R1-R2 diagrams cesses. Springer-Verlag (NY). and major element analyses- its relationship and O’Connor, J.T. (1965) A classification of igneous current nomenclature. Chemical Geology, 29, 193- rocks, based on quartz and ratios, USGS 210. Prof. Paper, 525-B, 79-84. Defant, M.J., and Drummond, M.S. (1990) Deriva- Peacock, S.M., Rushmer, T., Thompson, A.B. (1994) tion of some modern arc magmas by melting of Partial melting of subducting oceanic crust. Earth young subducted lithosphere: Nature, 347, 662- and Planetary Science Letters, 121, 227-244. 665. Pearce, J.A., Harris, N.B.W., and Tindle, A.G. (1984) Doutche, H.F. (1992) Aspects of the structural histo- Trace element discrimination diagrams for the ries of the sedimentary basins of East, Central and tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks. Journal West Kalimantan and their margins. BMR jour- of Petrology, 25, 956-983. nal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 13(3), Priadi, P. (2010) Kalimantan Coal and Mineral Re- 237-250. sources, in Proceeding MEGI-IAGI. 187-190. Irvine, T.N., and Baragar, W.R.A. (1971) A guide Supriatna, S., Margono, U., Sutrisno, Keyser, F. de., to the chemical classification of the common vol- Langford, R.P., Trail, D.S. (1993) Geology of the canic rocks. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, Sanggau Sheet area, Kalimantan. Geological Re- 8, 523-548. search and Development Centre. Maniar, P.D., and Piccoli, D.R. (1989) Tectonic dis- William, P.R., Johnston, C.R., Almond, R.A., & crimination of granitoids. Geological Society of Simamora, W.H. (1988) Northwest Borneo: a late- America, Abst. Prog. 11, 468. Cretaceous to early-Tertiary Accretionary com- Miyashiro, A. (1974) Volcanic rock series in island plex. Tectonophysics, 149, 279-297. arc and active continental margins. American Journal of Science, 274, 321-355.

© 2011 Department of Geological Engineering, Gadjah Mada University 53