The Prehistoric Vajont Rockslide: an Updated Geological Model
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257034796 The prehistoric Vajont rockslide: An updated geological model Article in Geomorphology · October 2012 DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.021 CITATIONS READS 39 63 2 authors: Paolo Paronuzzi Alberto Bolla University of Udine University of Udine 31 PUBLICATIONS 217 CITATIONS 12 PUBLICATIONS 83 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: A new comprehensive interpretation on the Vajont landslide View project Failure mechanisms of unstable rock slopes View project All content following this page was uploaded by Paolo Paronuzzi on 21 July 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Geomorphology 169–170 (2012) 165–191 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph The prehistoric Vajont rockslide: An updated geological model Paolo Paronuzzi ⁎, Alberto Bolla Dipartimento di Chimica, Fisica e Ambiente, Sezione Georisorse e Territorio, Università degli Studi di Udine, via Cotonificio 114‐33100 Udine, Italy article info abstract Article history: This study presents the detailed reconstruction of the entire structure of the prehistoric Vajont rockslide Received 12 July 2011 (about 270–300 million m3 of rocks and debris) for the first time, describing the complex geometry and Received in revised form 24 April 2012 the characteristic superimposition of distinct rigid blocks on a very thick shear zone. The prehistoric Vajont Accepted 26 April 2012 rockslide was characterized by an enormous ‘en masse’ motion of a rigid overlying rock mass (100–130 m Available online 3 May 2012 thick) that moved downslope, sliding onto a very thick shear zone (40–50 m thick, on average) made up of a chaotic assemblage of blocks, limestone angular gravel, and high plasticity clays (montmorillonitic clays). Keywords: Vajont (Vaiont) rockslide Coarse loose sediments, still exposed on the 9 October 1963 detachment surface, are always associated with Prehistoric landslide large blocks made of strongly fractured rock masses (Fonzaso Formation: middle‐upper Jurassic) preserving Shear zone the stratification. The blocks of stratified and folded limestone sequences appear to be ‘sheared off’ from the Multistage failure underlying bedrock and can be considered as displaced rock masses planed off by the motion of the overlying En masse motion rigid rock mass (‘rock mass shavings’). The prehistoric Vajont rockslide was characterized by a multistage Northeastern Italy failure with a marked retrogressive evolution. The first rupture (Pian del Toc block) rapidly destabilized the upper slope, mobilizing a second rock mass block (Pian della Pozza block) that, in turn, determined the multiple rupture of the revealed shear zone material (Massalezza lobe). Even if the exact timing of the differ- ent phases is not known, the entire multistaged failure process was very rapid. At the end of the multistage retrogressive failure, the slope morphology of the northern toe of Mt. Toc was drastically changed and the large failed rock mass settled into the preexisting Vajont Valley assuming the unusual chair-like geometry. The Vajont rockslide represents a very significant example on how a complex geological situation, if not adequately analyzed and reconstructed, can lead to dangerous misinterpretations or even to erroneous engi- neering–geological and geotechnical models. Accurate fieldwork and modern technologies can be fundamen- tal in solving such a very intriguing ‘geological puzzle.’ © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction The name ‘Vajont’ (Fig. 1) is used in this paper (the exact pronunci- ation in English is ‘Vaiont’) according to the current Italian toponymy, On 9 October 1963 at 10:39 p.m. (GMT+1), an enormous mass whereas other authors formerly utilized both Vajont and Vaiont. In cer- (about 270–300 million m3) of rocks and debris slid into the Vajont res- tain cases, even the same author utilized both spelling of the name in ervoir provoking a giant wave that overflowed the dam, destroying the different papers: as for example Semenza (Giudici and Semenza, village of Longarone and killing about 2000 people (Fig. 1). This event is 1960; Semenza, 1965, 2001, 2010)andMüller (1964, 1968, 1987). considered the most disastrous rockslide ever to occur in European ter- Even recently the well-known catastrophic rockslide has been reported ritory (Schuster, 1996), and for this reason it represents an important as Vajont (Kilburn and Petley, 2003; Paronuzzi, 2009b) and as the case history for scientists and researchers dealing with large rockslides Vaiont landslide (Genevois and Ghirotti, 2005; Alonso and Pinyol, and/or reservoir-induced slope failures. Owing to its scientificcomplex- 2010; Superchi et al., 2010). ity, the Vajont rockslide event is often regarded as a milestone in rock The bibliographical archive on the Vajont rockslide currently in- slope stability studies, and it has also been considered as the starting cludes more than 120 scientific papers and technical reports (Superchi point for the development of modern rock mechanics and rock engi- et al., 2010), starting from the first studies carried out at the time of neering (Hoek, 2007). Despite the great scientific interest related to the dam construction (Giudici and Semenza, 1960) to the latest histor- this catastrophic episode, many geological, hydrogeological, and geo- ical reviews (Semenza and Ghirotti, 2000; Genevois and Ghirotti, 2005; technical aspects of the Vajont rockslide still remain unexplained Ghirotti, 2006) and recent papers on specifictopics(Alonso and Pinyol, (Paronuzzi, 2009a). 2010; Pinyol and Alonso, 2010; Ferri et al., 2011a,b). If one examines the extensive bibliography on the Vajont rockslide, we see that most well- known research papers are written in the English language, but some ⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 0432 558718; fax: +39 0432 558700. Italian papers were published immediately after the 1963 catastrophe E-mail address: [email protected] (P. Paronuzzi). containing important geological descriptions that are often unavailable 0169-555X/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.021 166 P. Paronuzzi, A. Bolla / Geomorphology 169–170 (2012) 165–191 Fig. 1. Orthophoto (date: 6 August 1998) showing the Mt. Toc massif (at the bottom), the final stretch of the Vajont Valley with the Vajont rockslide area (in the central part), and the main Piave Valley (on the left). to international researchers. As a consequence, the adopted geotechni- documentation taken by Edoardo Semenza during his field investigations cal and hydrogeological models do not very often consider some impor- (1957–1965, mainly) was made available to the public in a digital format tant geological evidence that is mainly reported in papers written in the (Masè et al., 2004). Semenza's photographic archive is fundamental for Italian language. A ‘gap’ exists between the geological studies carried the objective reexamination of main geomorphological and geological out essentially by Italian researchers, first of all by Edoardo Semenza features that were visible on the field before the dramatic 1963 slope (the geologist who was the son of the dam designer, Carlo Semenza) failure. and the subsequent geotechnical investigations aimed at the mechani- From a conceptual viewpoint, the main aspect of the geological in- cal reconstruction of the catastrophic 1963 rockslide. On the other terpretation of the Vajont rockslide is the presence of an ancient hand, poor understanding of the geological conditions occurring on failed rock mass located on the northern toe of Mt. Toc. The occur- the Mt. Toc slope before the disaster has a determining influence on rence of an ancient failed rock mass (palaeoslide) was hypothesized the mechanical reconstruction and on related slope stability back- in 1959 by Edoardo Semenza after the identification of the paramount analyses. outcrop of ‘Colle Isolato’ (Semenza, 2001, 2010), as reported in his Among numerous scientific papers dealing with the Vajont rockslide, first technical report (Giudici and Semenza, 1960) ordered by SADE some fundamental works are of note: the special issue dedicated to the (i.e., the dam owner) and delivered to the dam designers on June first geological studies on the Vajont rockslide, written immediately 1960. Unfortunately, the hypothesis of an ancient failed rock mass after the disaster (Selli and Trevisan, 1964); two comprehensive papers or ‘prehistoric rockslide’ of Mt. Toc was not accepted by all the scien- written by Müller (1964, 1968) focusing on the main geotechnical and tists and engineers involved in the stability analyses, either during the hydrogeological features of the rockslide, including a review of the per- dam construction (the consultant geologists Giorgio Dal Piaz and formed slope stability back-analyses (Müller, 1968); the geological map Francesco Penta) or in the years following the catastrophe. For exam- of the Vajont rockslide, before and after the 9 October 1963 catastrophe, ple, Leopold Müller, the main geotechnical investigator of the Vajont surveyed immediately after the landslide and published for the first time rockslide, did not share Semenza's opinion on the prehistoric Vajont in 1965 (Rossi and Semenza); the book by Hendron and Patton (1985), or Mt. Toc rockslide and no reference to this topic was made in his