DOCSLIB.ORG

Guidelines for Human Gene Nomenclature

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guidelines for Human Gene Nomenclature Nomenclature doi:10.1006/geno.2002.6748, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on IDEAL Guidelines for Human Gene Nomenclature Hester M. Wain, Elspeth A. Bruford, Ruth C. Lovering, Michael J. Lush, Mathew W. Wright, and Sue Povey HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, The Galton Laboratory, Department of Biology, University College London, Wolfson House, 4, Stephenson Way, London, NW1 2HE, UK. E-mail: [email protected]. INTRODUCTION 1.2 Locus The word “locus” is not a synonym for gene but refers to a Guidelines for human gene nomenclature were first pub- map position. A more precise definition is given in the Rules lished in 1979 [1], when the Human Gene Nomenclature and Guidelines from the International Committee on Standardized Committee was first given the authority to approve and Genetic Nomenclature for Mice, which states: “A locus is a point implement human gene names and symbols. Updates of these in the genome, identified by a marker, which can be mapped guidelines were published in 1987 [2], 1995 [3], and 1997 [4]. by some means. It does not necessarily correspond to a gene; With the recent publications of the complete human genome it could, for example, be an anonymous non-coding DNA sequence there is an estimated total of 26,000–40,000 genes, segment or a cytogenetic feature. A single gene may have as suggested by the International Human Genome several loci within it (each defined by different markers) and Sequencing Consortium [5] and Venter et al. [6]. Thus, the these markers may be separated in genetic or physical map- guidelines (http://www.gene.ucl.ac.uk/nomenclature/ ping experiments. In such cases, it is useful to define these dif- guidelines.html) have been updated to accommodate their ferent loci, but normally the gene name should be used to application to this wealth of information, although gene sym- designate the gene itself, as this usually will convey the most bols are still only assigned when required for communica- information” (http://www.informatics.jax.org/mgihome/ tion. These updates were derived with input from the HUGO nomen/gene.shtml#trdef). Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC) International Advisory Committee and attendees of the ASHG01NW Gene 1.3 Chromosome Region Nomenclature Workshop. All approved human gene sym- In the context of gene nomenclature, “chromosome region” bols can be found in the Genew database [7]. is defined as a genomic region that has been associated with The philosophy of the HGNC remains “that gene nomen- a particular syndrome or phenotype, particularly when there clature should evolve with new technology rather than be is a possibility that several genes within it may be involved restrictive as sometimes occurs when historical and single in the phenotype. Designation of such regions may be gene nomenclature systems are applied” [2]. requested by the scientific community and approved by A summary of the guidelines is presented here: HGNC, e.g., ANCR “Angelman syndrome chromosome 1. Each approved gene symbol must be unique. region” and CECR “cat eye syndrome chromosome region.” 2. Symbols are short-form representations (or abbrevi- Symbols may therefore be assigned to the following: ations) of the descriptive gene name. a) Clearly defined phenotypes shown to be inherited 3. Symbols should only contain Latin letters and Arabic predominantly as monogenic mendelian traits, e.g., numerals. BBS1 “Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1.” 4. Symbols should not contain punctuation. b) Unidentified genes contributing to a complex trait 5. Symbols should not end in “G” for gene. shown by linkage or association with a known 6. Symbols do not contain any reference to species, for marker, e.g., IDDM6 “insulin-dependent diabetes example, “H/h” for human. mellitus 6.” c) Cloned segments of DNA with sufficient structural, functional, and expression data to identify them as 1. CRITERIA FOR SYMBOL ASSIGNMENT transcribed entities, e.g., COX8 “cytochrome c oxi- dase subunit VIII.” 1.1 Gene d) Nonfunctional copies of genes (pseudogenes), e.g., A gene is defined as: “a DNA segment that contributes to IL9RP1 “interleukin 9 receptor pseudogene 1.” phenotype/function. In the absence of demonstrated func- e) Genes encoded by the opposite (antisense) strand tion a gene may be characterized by sequence, transcription that overlap a known gene, e.g., IGF2AS “insulin- or homology.” The overwhelming majority of objects named like growth factor 2, antisense.” by HGNC are in this category. f) Transcribed but untranslated functional DNA seg- ments, e.g., XIST “X (inactive)-specific transcript.” 464 GENOMICS Vol. 79, Number 4, April 2002 Copyright © 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. 0888-7543/02 $35.00 doi:10.1006/geno.2002.6748, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on IDEAL Nomenclature g) Cellular phenotypes from which the existence of a alphabet (Appendix 2, Table 1). Note that such gene gene or genes can be inferred, e.g., LOH18CR1 “loss symbols will then appear in lists in the order of the of heterozygosity, 18, chromosomal region 1.” Latin alphabet. h) EST clusters which suggest a putative gene, e.g., e) A Greek letter prefixing a gene name must be changed C1orf1 “chromosome 1 open reading frame 1.” to its Latin alphabet equivalent and placed at the end i) Fragments of expressed sequence will be designated of the gene symbol. This permits alphabetical order- a D-number by GDB (The Genome Database), e.g., ing of the gene in listings with similar properties, such DXYS155E (Appendix 1). as substrate specificities, e.g., GLA “galactosidase, ␣”; j) Polycistronic genes generated from a single mRNA, GLB “galactosidase, ␤.” but with independent coding sequence, physically f) No punctuation may be used, with the exception of separable and non-overlapping with other coding the HLA, immunoglobulin, and T-cell receptor gene sequence giving independent gene products, e.g., symbols (which may be hyphenated). The HLA sym- SNURF “SNRPN upstream reading frame” and bols are assigned by the WHO Nomenclature SNRPN “small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypep- Committee for Factors of the HLA System [9] via the tide N.” IMGT/HLA database [10]. The immunoglobulin and k) Genes of unknown function which share highly sim- T-cell receptor gene symbols are assigned by the ilar sequences, e.g., FAM7A1 “family with sequence IMGT Nomenclature Committee via the IMGT/LIGM similarity 7, member A1,” etc. database [11]. l) Predicted (in silico) genes which show a high degree g) Gene symbols will not usually be assigned to alter- of sequence homology to well-characterized genes native transcripts. However, if a community working will be assigned the same symbol with an “L” for like, on a group of genes has a need for nomenclature e.g., TCP10L “t-complex 10 (mouse)-like.” where there are multiple small coding sequences m)Intronic transcripts (on the same DNA strand) will be which can be combined to form a number of different assigned separate symbols, usually relating to the larger products, then these coding sequences may be gene in which they reside, e.g., COPG2IT1 “coatomer assigned symbols, e.g., UGT1A1 “UDP glycosyltrans- protein complex, subunit g 2, intronic transcript 1.” ferase 1 family, polypeptide A1” to UGT1A13 repre- Gene symbols will not usually be assigned to alternative senting 13 distinct gene symbols. transcripts or to genes predicted solely from in silico data h) Tissue specificity or molecular weight should be (with no other supporting evidence, e.g., significant homol- avoided; where necessary this may be included in the ogy to a characterized gene). gene name. i) Some letters or combination of letters are used as pre- fixes or suffixes in a symbol to give a specific mean- 2. GENE SYMBOLS ing and their use for other meanings should be avoided (Section 10). Human gene symbols are designated by upper-case Latin let- j) Oncogenes are given symbols corresponding to the ters or by a combination of upper-case letters and Arabic homologous retroviral oncogene, but without the “v- numerals, with the exception of the C#orf# symbols. Symbols ” or “c-” prefixes, e.g., JUN “v-jun sarcoma virus 17 should be short in order to be useful, and should not attempt oncogene homolog (avian),” and SRC “v-src sarcoma to represent all known information about a gene [8]. Symbols (Schmidt-Ruppin A-2) viral oncogene homolog should be inoffensive and should not spell words or match (avian).” abbreviations that would cause problems with database searching, e.g., DNA. Ideally, symbols should be no longer than six characters in length. New symbols must not duplicate 3. GENE NAMES existing approved gene symbols in either the human (Genew: Human Gene Nomenclature Database) or the mouse (MGD) Gene names should be brief and specific and should convey the databases. character or function of the gene, but should not attempt to a) The initial character of the symbol should always be describe everything known about it. The first letter of the sym- a letter. Subsequent characters may be other letters, bol should be the same as that of the name in order to facilitate or if necessary, Arabic numerals. alphabetical listing and grouping. Gene names are written using b) All characters of the symbol should be written on the American spelling. Tissue specificity and molecular weight des- same line; no superscripts or subscripts may be used. ignations should be avoided as they have only limited use as a c) No Roman numerals may be used. Roman numbers description and may in time and across species prove inaccu- in previously used symbols should be changed to rate; however, they may be incorporated into the gene name if their Arabic equivalents. absolutely necessary. Gene names should not include terms d) Greek letters are not used in gene symbols. All Greek such as nephew, cousin, sister, etc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Distinct Visual Pathways Mediatedrosophilalarval Light
    The Journal of Neuroscience, April 27, 2011 • 31(17):6527–6534 • 6527 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive Distinct Visual Pathways Mediate Drosophila Larval Light Avoidance and Circadian Clock Entrainment Alex C. Keene,1 Esteban O. Mazzoni,1 Jamie Zhen,1 Meg A. Younger,1 Satoko Yamaguchi,1 Justin Blau,1 Claude Desplan,1 and Simon G. Sprecher1,2 1Department of Biology, Center for Developmental Genetics, New York University, New York, New York 10003-6688, and 2Department of Biology, Institute of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland Visual organs perceive environmental stimuli required for rapid initiation of behaviors and can also entrain the circadian clock. The larval eye of Drosophila is capable of both functions. Each eye contains only 12 photoreceptors (PRs), which can be subdivided into two subtypes. Four PRs express blue-sensitive rhodopsin5 (rh5) and eight express green-sensitive rhodopsin6 (rh6). We found that either PR-subtype is sufficient to entrain the molecular clock by light, while only the Rh5-PR subtype is essential for light avoidance. Acetylcholine released from PRs confers both functions. Both subtypes of larval PRs innervate the main circadian pacemaker neurons of the larva, the neuropeptide PDF (pigment-dispersing factor)-expressing lateral neurons (LNs), providing sensory input to control circadian rhythms. How- ever, we show that PDF-expressing LNs are dispensable for light avoidance, and a distinct set of three clock neurons is required. Thus we have identifieddistinctsensoryandcentralcircuitryregulatinglightavoidancebehaviorandclockentrainment.Ourfindingsprovideinsightsintothe coding of sensory information for distinct behavioral functions and the underlying molecular and neuronal circuitry. Introduction sin6 (rh6) (Sprecher et al., 2007; Sprecher and Desplan, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Analysis and Knowledge
    Dahary et al. BMC Medical Genomics (2019) 12:200 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-019-0647-8 SOFTWARE Open Access Genome analysis and knowledge-driven variant interpretation with TGex Dvir Dahary1*, Yaron Golan1, Yaron Mazor1, Ofer Zelig1, Ruth Barshir2, Michal Twik2, Tsippi Iny Stein2, Guy Rosner3,4, Revital Kariv3,4, Fei Chen5, Qiang Zhang5, Yiping Shen5,6,7, Marilyn Safran2, Doron Lancet2* and Simon Fishilevich2* Abstract Background: The clinical genetics revolution ushers in great opportunities, accompanied by significant challenges. The fundamental mission in clinical genetics is to analyze genomes, and to identify the most relevant genetic variations underlying a patient’s phenotypes and symptoms. The adoption of Whole Genome Sequencing requires novel capacities for interpretation of non-coding variants. Results: We present TGex, the Translational Genomics expert, a novel genome variation analysis and interpretation platform, with remarkable exome analysis capacities and a pioneering approach of non-coding variants interpretation. TGex’s main strength is combining state-of-the-art variant filtering with knowledge-driven analysis made possible by VarElect, our highly effective gene-phenotype interpretation tool. VarElect leverages the widely used GeneCards knowledgebase, which integrates information from > 150 automatically-mined data sources. Access to such a comprehensive data compendium also facilitates TGex’s broad variant annotation, supporting evidence exploration, and decision making. TGex has an interactive, user-friendly, and easy adaptive interface, ACMG compliance, and an automated reporting system. Beyond comprehensive whole exome sequence capabilities, TGex encompasses innovative non-coding variants interpretation, towards the goal of maximal exploitation of whole genome sequence analyses in the clinical genetics practice. This is enabled by GeneCards’ recently developed GeneHancer, a novel integrative and fully annotated database of human enhancers and promoters.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between Sequence Homology, Genome Architecture, and Meiotic Behavior of the Sex Chromosomes in North American Voles
    HIGHLIGHTED ARTICLE | INVESTIGATION Relationship Between Sequence Homology, Genome Architecture, and Meiotic Behavior of the Sex Chromosomes in North American Voles Beth L. Dumont,*,1,2 Christina L. Williams,† Bee Ling Ng,‡ Valerie Horncastle,§ Carol L. Chambers,§ Lisa A. McGraw,** David Adams,‡ Trudy F. C. Mackay,*,**,†† and Matthew Breen†,†† *Initiative in Biological Complexity, †Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, **Department of Biological Sciences, and ††Comparative Medicine Institute, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 04609, ‡Cytometry Core Facility, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom, CB10 1SA and §School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011 ORCID ID: 0000-0003-0918-0389 (B.L.D.) ABSTRACT In most mammals, the X and Y chromosomes synapse and recombine along a conserved region of homology known as the pseudoautosomal region (PAR). These homology-driven interactions are required for meiotic progression and are essential for male fertility. Although the PAR fulfills key meiotic functions in most mammals, several exceptional species lack PAR-mediated sex chromosome associations at meiosis. Here, we leveraged the natural variation in meiotic sex chromosome programs present in North American voles (Microtus) to investigate the relationship between meiotic sex chromosome dynamics and X/Y sequence homology. To this end, we developed a novel, reference-blind computational method to analyze sparse sequencing data from flow- sorted X and Y chromosomes isolated from vole species with sex chromosomes that always (Microtus montanus), never (Microtus mogollonensis), and occasionally synapse (Microtus ochrogaster) at meiosis. Unexpectedly, we find more shared X/Y homology in the two vole species with no and sporadic X/Y synapsis compared to the species with obligate synapsis.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Nomenclature System for Rice
    Rice (2008) 1:72–84 DOI 10.1007/s12284-008-9004-9 Gene Nomenclature System for Rice Susan R. McCouch & CGSNL (Committee on Gene Symbolization, Nomenclature and Linkage, Rice Genetics Cooperative) Received: 11 April 2008 /Accepted: 3 June 2008 /Published online: 15 August 2008 # The Author(s) 2008 Abstract The Committee on Gene Symbolization, Nomen- protein sequence information that have been annotated and clature and Linkage (CGSNL) of the Rice Genetics Cooper- mapped on the sequenced genome assemblies, as well as ative has revised the gene nomenclature system for rice those determined by biochemical characterization and/or (Oryza) to take advantage of the completion of the rice phenotype characterization by way of forward genetics. With genome sequence and the emergence of new methods for these revisions, we enhance the potential for structural, detecting, characterizing, and describing genes in the functional, and evolutionary comparisons across organisms biological community. This paper outlines a set of standard and seek to harmonize the rice gene nomenclature system procedures for describing genes based on DNA, RNA, and with that of other model organisms. Newly identified rice genes can now be registered on-line at http://shigen.lab.nig. ac.jp/rice/oryzabase_submission/gene_nomenclature/. The current ex-officio member list below is correct as of the date of this galley proof. The current ex-officio members of CGSNL (The Keywords Oryza sativa . Genome sequencing . Committee on Gene Symbolization, Nomenclature and Linkage) are: Gene symbolization Atsushi Yoshimura from the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 812-8581, Japan, email: [email protected] Guozhen Liu from the Beijing Institute of Genomics of the Chinese Introduction Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, email: [email protected] The biological community is moving towards a universal Yasuo Nagato from the Graduate School of Agricultural and Life system for the naming of genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolic Inactivation of the Circadian Transmitter, Pigment Dispersing Factor (PDF), by Neprilysin-Like Peptidases in Drosophila R
    4465 The Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 4465-4470 Published by The Company of Biologists 2007 doi:10.1242/jeb.012088 Metabolic inactivation of the circadian transmitter, pigment dispersing factor (PDF), by neprilysin-like peptidases in Drosophila R. Elwyn Isaac1,*, Erik C. Johnson2, Neil Audsley3 and Alan D. Shirras4 1Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK, 2Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, NC, USA, 3Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ, UK and 4Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 4 October 2007 Summary Recent studies have firmly established pigment confirming that such cleavage results in PDF inactivation. dispersing factor (PDF), a C-terminally amidated The Ser7–Leu8 peptide bond was also the principal octodecapeptide, as a key neurotransmitter regulating cleavage site when PDF was incubated with membranes rhythmic circadian locomotory behaviours in adult prepared from heads of adult Drosophila. This Drosophila melanogaster. The mechanisms by which PDF endopeptidase activity was inhibited by the neprilysin –1 functions as a circadian peptide transmitter are not fully inhibitors phosphoramidon (IC50, 0.15·␮mol·l ) and –1 understood, however; in particular, nothing is known thiorphan (IC50, 1.2·␮mol·l ). We propose that cleavage by about the role of extracellular peptidases in terminating a member of the Drosophila neprilysin family of PDF signalling at synapses. In this study we show that PDF endopeptidases is the most likely mechanism for is susceptible to hydrolysis by neprilysin, an endopeptidase inactivating synaptic PDF and that neprilysin might have that is enriched in synaptic membranes of mammals and an important role in regulating PDF signals within insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Aneuploidy: Using Genetic Instability to Preserve a Haploid Genome?
    Health Science Campus FINAL APPROVAL OF DISSERTATION Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Science (Cancer Biology) Aneuploidy: Using genetic instability to preserve a haploid genome? Submitted by: Ramona Ramdath In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Science Examination Committee Signature/Date Major Advisor: David Allison, M.D., Ph.D. Academic James Trempe, Ph.D. Advisory Committee: David Giovanucci, Ph.D. Randall Ruch, Ph.D. Ronald Mellgren, Ph.D. Senior Associate Dean College of Graduate Studies Michael S. Bisesi, Ph.D. Date of Defense: April 10, 2009 Aneuploidy: Using genetic instability to preserve a haploid genome? Ramona Ramdath University of Toledo, Health Science Campus 2009 Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my grandfather who died of lung cancer two years ago, but who always instilled in us the value and importance of education. And to my mom and sister, both of whom have been pillars of support and stimulating conversations. To my sister, Rehanna, especially- I hope this inspires you to achieve all that you want to in life, academically and otherwise. ii Acknowledgements As we go through these academic journeys, there are so many along the way that make an impact not only on our work, but on our lives as well, and I would like to say a heartfelt thank you to all of those people: My Committee members- Dr. James Trempe, Dr. David Giovanucchi, Dr. Ronald Mellgren and Dr. Randall Ruch for their guidance, suggestions, support and confidence in me. My major advisor- Dr. David Allison, for his constructive criticism and positive reinforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Homology and Multiple-Sequence Alignment: an Analysis of Concepts and Practice
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Systematic Botany, 2015, 28,46–62 LAS Johnson Review http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SB15001 Molecular homology and multiple-sequence alignment: an analysis of concepts and practice David A. Morrison A,D, Matthew J. Morgan B and Scot A. Kelchner C ASystematic Biology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, Uppsala 75236, Sweden. BCSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. CDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, 5305 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-5305, USA. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Sequence alignment is just as much a part of phylogenetics as is tree building, although it is often viewed solely as a necessary tool to construct trees. However, alignment for the purpose of phylogenetic inference is primarily about homology, as it is the procedure that expresses homology relationships among the characters, rather than the historical relationships of the taxa. Molecular homology is rather vaguely defined and understood, despite its importance in the molecular age. Indeed, homology has rarely been evaluated with respect to nucleotide sequence alignments, in spite of the fact that nucleotides are the only data that directly represent genotype. All other molecular data represent phenotype, just as do morphology and anatomy. Thus, efforts to improve sequence alignment for phylogenetic purposes should involve a more refined use of the homology concept at a molecular level. To this end, we present examples of molecular-data levels at which homology might be considered, and arrange them in a hierarchy. The concept that we propose has many levels, which link directly to the developmental and morphological components of homology.
    [Show full text]
  • NLS-Mediated NPC Functions of the Nucleoporin Pom121
    FEBS Letters 584 (2010) 3292–3298 journal homepage: www.FEBSLetters.org NLS-mediated NPC functions of the nucleoporin Pom121 Sevil Yavuz, Rachel Santarella-Mellwig, Birgit Koch, Andreas Jaedicke, Iain W. Mattaj *,1, Wolfram Antonin **,1 European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany article info abstract Article history: RanGTP mediates nuclear import and mitotic spindle assembly by dissociating import receptors Received 23 February 2010 from nuclear localization signal (NLS) bearing proteins. We investigated the interplay between Revised 31 May 2010 import receptors and the transmembrane nucleoporin Pom121. We found that Pom121 interacts Accepted 2 July 2010 with importin a/b and a group of nucleoporins in an NLS-dependent manner. In vivo, replacement Available online 14 July 2010 of Pom121 with an NLS mutant version resulted in defective nuclear transport, induction of aber- Edited by Ulrike Kuttay rant cytoplasmic membrane stacks and decreased cell viability. We propose that the NLS sites of Pom121 affect its function in NPC assembly both by influencing nucleoporin interactions and pore membrane structure. Keywords: Pom121 Nucleoporin Structured summary: Importin MINT-7951230: pom121 (uniprotkb:Q5EWX9) physically interacts (MI:0914) with nup155 (uni- protkb:O75694), Nup133 (uniprotkb:Q8WUM0) and Importin beta (uniprotkb:Q14974) by pull down (MI:0096) MINT-7951210: pom121 (uniprotkb:Q5EWX9) physically interacts (MI:0915) with Importin alpha (uni- protkb:P52170) and Importin beta (uniprotkb:P52297)
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Homology and Multiple-Sequence Alignment: an Analysis of Concepts and Practice
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Systematic Botany, 2015, 28, 46–62 LAS Johnson Review http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SB15001 Molecular homology and multiple-sequence alignment: an analysis of concepts and practice David A. Morrison A,D, Matthew J. Morgan B and Scot A. Kelchner C ASystematic Biology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, Uppsala 75236, Sweden. BCSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. CDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, 5305 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-5305, USA. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Sequence alignment is just as much a part of phylogenetics as is tree building, although it is often viewed solely as a necessary tool to construct trees. However, alignment for the purpose of phylogenetic inference is primarily about homology, as it is the procedure that expresses homology relationships among the characters, rather than the historical relationships of the taxa. Molecular homology is rather vaguely defined and understood, despite its importance in the molecular age. Indeed, homology has rarely been evaluated with respect to nucleotide sequence alignments, in spite of the fact that nucleotides are the only data that directly represent genotype. All other molecular data represent phenotype, just as do morphology and anatomy. Thus, efforts to improve sequence alignment for phylogenetic purposes should involve a more refined use of the homology concept at a molecular level. To this end, we present examples of molecular-data levels at which homology might be considered, and arrange them in a hierarchy. The concept that we propose has many levels, which link directly to the developmental and morphological components of homology.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) Portal for New Biomarkers in Urinary Bladder Carcinoma
    Exploring the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) Portal for New Biomarkers in Urinary Bladder Carcinoma Tina Bergström Bachelor degree project in biomedicine, 10 hp, 2010 Department of Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University Supervisors: Ulrika Segersten and Kenneth Wester Summary Urinary bladder cancer is the fifth most common cancer form in industrial countries. The primary risk factors for bladder cancer are tobacco smoking, exposure to aromatic amines from occupational sources, cancer drugs and Schistosomal infection. Vegetables, fruit and a high intake of fluid are considered as risk reducing factors for developing bladder cancer. Diagnosis and management of bladder cancer includes cystoscopy, an invasive method causing patients pain and discomfort. Hence, there is great need for non-invasive methods, such as biomarkers predicting tumour recurrence or progression. The aim of this study was to finding new potential biomarkers for urinary bladder carcinoma by exploration of the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database portal, an antibody-based protein atlas comprising histological images which are a resource for many areas of biomedical research, including biomarker discovery. Initially, 35 selected proteins were evaluated in 42 tissue scores, representing bladder cancer biopsies from 24 individual cancer patients of which 7 had low-grade and 17 had high-grade tumours. The protein expression in tumour cells was scored and related to high and low tumour grade. Expression pattern for two proteins, 4, also known as immunoglobulin binding protein 1 (IGBP1) and UPF0500 protein C1orf216, were significantly altered (p < 0.5) with tumour grades. The function of C1orf216 is so far unknown. 4 is a regulator of protein phosphatase 2 (PP2A) and thereby controls dephosphorylation of substrates important in cell survival, apoptosis and cell migration.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Review of the Genetics of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy: Potential Overlap with Sudden Cardiac Death and Arrhythmia-Related Genes C
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS Systematic Review of the Genetics of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy: Potential Overlap With Sudden Cardiac Death and Arrhythmia-Related Genes C. Anwar A. Chahal, MBChB; Mohammad N. Salloum, MD; Fares Alahdab, MD; Joseph A. Gottwald, PharmD; David J. Tester, BS; Lucman A. Anwer, MD; Elson L. So, MD; Mohammad Hassan Murad, MD, MPH; Erik K. St Louis, MD, MS; Michael J. Ackerman, MD, PhD; Virend K. Somers, MD, PhD Background-—Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the leading cause of epilepsy-related death. SUDEP shares many features with sudden cardiac death and sudden unexplained death in the young and may have a similar genetic contribution. We aim to systematically review the literature on the genetics of SUDEP. Methods and Results-—PubMed, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, Ovid Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus were searched through April 4, 2017. English language human studies analyzing SUDEP for known sudden death, ion channel and arrhythmia-related pathogenic variants, novel variant discovery, and copy number variant analyses were included. Aggregate descriptive statistics were generated; data were insufficient for meta- analysis. A total of 8 studies with 161 unique individuals were included; mean was age 29.0 (ÆSD 14.2) years; 61% males; ECG data were reported in 7.5% of cases; 50.7% were found prone and 58% of deaths were nocturnal. Cause included all types of epilepsy. Antemortem diagnosis of Dravet syndrome and autism (with duplication of chromosome 15) was associated with 11% and 9% of cases.
    [Show full text]