DOCSLIB.ORG

Susie Alegre Data Daemons: Protecting the Child’S Right to Dream

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Susie Alegre Data Daemons: Protecting the Child’S Right to Dream FREEDOM SECURITY SECURITY PRIVACY FREEDOM The Future of Childhood in the Digital World FREEDOM SECURITY PRIVACY The Future of Childhood in the Digital World Published and distributed by 5Rights Foundation Copyright © 5Rights Foundation, 2020 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission from the publishers or in accordance with the Copyright Designs and Patents Act, 1988. Designed by David Weller and Daniel McGhee Printed by Park Communications Ltd. Original cover photograph by Anchalee Yates 5Rights Foundation Charity number: 1178581 Company number: 11271356 www.5rightsfoundation.com FREEDOM SECURITY PRIVACY The Future of Childhood in the Digital World 9 Introduction ON FREEDOM 18 Susie Alegre Data Daemons: Protecting the Child’s Right to Dream 24 Audrey Tang A Young Democracy is a Strong Democracy: Civil Rights of Taiwan’s Children 30 Kade Crockford A New Digital Divide? Protecting Lower- Income People from Hyper-Digitalisation 36 Dr Towela Nyirenda-Jere A Child is a Child is a Child: Conversations in Africa About Children in the Digital World 42 Baroness Helena Kennedy QC New Freedom? How the Digital Environment Poses Complex Legal Challenges for the Promotion of Children’s Rights 50 Laura Higgins How Fear is Affecting Our Ability to Accept Digital Rights to Play. And Our Common Sense… 56 Farida Shaheed Cultural Rights of Children and Young Adults in the Digital World ON SECURITY 68 Dr Ian Levy On the Need for Software Safety in a Digital World 76 Uri Sadeh Who Are We Afraid Of? 84 RX Radio Our Voices: The Importance of Listening to Young People to Make the Digital Environment a Safe and Inclusive Place 90 H.E. Dr Amani Abou-Zeid Harnessing the Power of Digital Transformation for Young People in Africa 94 Adrian Lovett As The World Wide Web and the Convention on the Rights of the Child Both Turn Thirty, the Web Can Help to Secure Children’s Basic Rights 102 Professor Hany Farid Protecting Children Online: The Past, Present, and Future ON PRIVACY 114 Jānis Sārts Securing Digital Natives! 120 Francesca Fajardo My Data Isn’t Even Mine 126 Professor Sonia Livingstone OBE “It’s None of Their Business!” Children’s Understanding of Privacy in the Platform Society 134 James Graham OBE Past Norms, Future Dangers and Acceptable Compromises: What Does Freedom, Security and Privacy Mean for the Future of Young People Online? 140 John Carr OBE Privacy Lawyers Need to Up Their Game: An Internet that is Safer and Better for Children is Going to be Safer and Better for Everyone 146 John Edwards Children and Privacy Online: It’s Time to Change the Dynamic – More Responsibility on the Platforms, More Autonomy for the Kids 152 Professor Dr Eva Lievens The Rights of the Child in the Digital Environment: From Empowerment to De- Responsibilisation ON THE FUTURE OF CHILDHOOD 162 Henrietta H Fore From Privacy to Power: Children’s Rights in a Digital Age 168 Dr Ing Konstantinos Karachalios The Five Singularities We Have Created and What They Mean for Our Children 178 Amandeep Singh Gill Being a Child in the Digital Age 184 Amy Shepherd Right Click for the Kids: Open Rights Group’s Views on Building an Empowered Digital Childhood 190 Kathryn Montgomery and Jeff Chester Creating a Quality Digital Media Culture in the Big Data Era 198 Elettra Ronchi, Andras Molnar and Lisa Robinson Addressing the Needs of Children in the Digital Environment 204 Jay Harman The Enormous Potential of Technology – and the Absence of Children in the Design of the Digital World Introduction The discourse about children and the digital world is plagued by false binaries. They must pay for responsible corporate behaviour with their freedom, for access with their privacy, for personal security with 24/7 surveillance, and for services with their attention. These binaries protect the business interests of the data-driven companies of Silicon Valley, but they do not adequately meet the needs of children and young people. The digital world was not anticipated as a place in which childhood in all its complexity would be played out. Yet for a 21st-century child, it mediates every part of their experience: from the most public to the most intimate. Far from providing children and young people with a welcoming and respectful environment, their digital world is high on adult content, low on protections and, in many instances, hides behind the pretence that children are not there at all. The idea for this volume was born over lunch with someone from Facebook, who suddenly turned to me and said, “you really are the woman who wants to turn off the lights at Christmas.” I was horrified: was the cumulative result of everything that I was fighting for going to extinguish the joy of the one billion children and young people online? 9 Of course, the digital holds within it the promise of unimaginable benefits. Who in their right mind would want to turn the lights off on that? Not me. But what of those one billion kids? Do the protections and privileges of childhood need to be formally integrated into the digital world? Should we demand greater responsibility and transparency from those building the technology itself? Are we all going to have to give up some freedom to give children and young people more protection? Does one person’s freedom of expression trump the silencing of another person or group of people? Has the idea of freedom itself been undermined by practices of data extraction and digital nudging? What constitutes an appropriate balance of freedom, security (both individual and national) and privacy for a 21st-century child? The authors of the essays that make up this volume start to answer some of these questions from multiple perspectives. They are loosely divided into four chapters: Freedom, Security, Privacy and the Future of Childhood; although many could have been in more than one chapter. Between them, they offer a much more sophisticated conversation than the public conversation we are currently having. The authors, all experts in their fields and writing in personal capacities, focus on issues of their choosing and, whatever their differences, they overwhelmingly deliver the message that we have failed to properly design a digital world for children. Lawyers Susie Alegre and Baroness Helena Kennedy QC, and Executive Director of UNICEF, Henrietta H Fore, argue that children have existing rights and that the digital is a part of, not separate from, all other environments. Susie defends a “child’s right to dream” and that freedom of thought represents their “budding inner life.” Children and young people's inability to realise rights that allow them control over their reputation and personal information concerns New Zealand’s Privacy Commissioner, John Edwards. In her uplifting essay, Taiwan’s Digital Minister Audrey Tang (herself one of the world’s youngest government ministers) chronicles the contribution of empowered young people to the democratic agenda, demonstrating what access can mean; whilst Farida Shaheed, former UN Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights, highlights cultural 10 and language barriers which prevent millions of children and young people from truly participating in the digital space. In her compelling essay, she points out that two-thirds of the world’s population live in Asia, but that only one-quarter of internet communication is in Asian languages: “take out Mandarin and that drops to a shocking 7%.” Meanwhile Dr Towela Nyirenda-Jere, one of Malawi’s first female engineers, outlines the specific experiences and hopes of children and young people already online in Africa. Dr Ing Konstantinos Karachalios, Managing Director of the IEEE Standards Association, takes us back in time to show us the long tail of what is being undermined or challenged (take your pick) by the new world order. Unsurprisingly for an engineer, he has a schema to put things right. Meanwhile, Kade Crockford, Director of the Technology for Liberty Program at the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, considers history, knowledge, power and authority, cautioning that we have allowed technology into the lives of young people without first asking some fundamental questions. “What does Alexa say when a child asks why Daddy hurts Mommy?”, Kade demands to know. Director of Digital Civility at Roblox, Laura Higgins, takes a different tack, remarking on the media’s ‘sensationalist’ portrayal of the online space, which she fears demonises the digital and diminishes the ability of children to play freely. In his very moving essay, Uri Sadeh, who works on the frontline of child online protection at Interpol (like all our authors, writing in a personal capacity), outlines the tragic way in which children have become collateral damage as governments and businesses fail to put their safety above all other considerations. Similarly defiant are Dr Ian Levy and Jānis Sārts, of the UK National Cyber Security Centre and NATO respectively. Jānis argues that “not everything should be allowed” and Ian calls for “safe software” that embodies (and prevents) both hazards and harms, as is standard practice in any other area of life. Professor Hany Farid, the co-developer of photoDNA, and John Carr OBE, one of the world’s leading authorities on children’s protection online, express deep frustration that both industry and civil governments’ inaction is Introduction 11 and was “never one of technological limitation”, but merely one of corporate and political will. H.E. Dr Amani Abou-Zeid, the Commissioner for Infrastructure and Energy at the African Union, cites issues specific to Africa (although familiar to all territories) when she says that we must strengthen online security, so that children and young people can access the digital environment safely.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Sharenting': the Forgotten Children of the GDPR
    PHRG Peace Human Rights Governance Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2020 ‘Sharenting’: The Forgotten Children of the GDPR Sheila Donovan Research Articles* DOI: 10.14658/pupj-phrg-2020-1-2 How to cite: Donovan, S. (2020) ‘“Sharenting”: The Forgotten Children of the GDPR’, Peace Human Rights Governance, 4(1), 35-59. Article first published online March 2020 *All research articles published in PHRG undergo a rigorous double-blind review process by at least two independent, anonymous expert reviewers VA ADO UP P PHRG 4(1), March 2020 ‘Sharenting’: The Forgotten Children of the GDPR Sheila Donovan* Abstract The exponential growth of the internet and social media use in the recent past followed by a widespread increase of the scale, scope and sharing of information has impacted greatly on the concept of privacy. This growth has been accompanied by innumerable duplication and storage in perpetuity of personal data. While debates surrounding the protection and safety of social network users, in particular minor users have emerged as a matter of concern, there has been minimal focus on the privacy of minors, in particular, those minors who are the subject of ‘sharenting’ which is defined as ‘the online posting of images and data of children’. The introduction of the General Data Protection Regulation 2016 was designed to give more robust protection and rights to all individuals, in particular children, who were recognised as being particularly vulnerable. The GDPR, however, in seeking to address the security and safety of the private identity of minors who engage in social networking, places the oversight of minors’ digital privacy into parental hands, regardless of their digital competency.
    [Show full text]
  • 16, 2019 • Merrill Auditorium
    PRESENTS MAY 15 - 16, 2019 • MERRILL AUDITORIUM BAKER NEWMAN NOYES AD Best of luck with your 2019 season JS MCCARTHY AD You dream it we print it. jsmccarthy.com 888 465 6241 JSM_Portland Ovation_Neverland Ad.indd 1 4/30/19 10:04 AM NETworks Presentations LLC presents BOOK BY MUSIC AND LYRICS BY James Graham Gary Barlow & Eliot Kennedy Based on the Miramax Motion Picture written by David Magee and the play The Man Who Was Peter Pan by Allan Knee STARRING Jeff Sullivan Ruby Gibbs WITH Conor McGiffin Emmanuelle Zeesman Brody Bett Seth Erdley Caleb Reese Paul Paul Schoeller Josiah Smothers Ethan Stokes AND Emilia Brown Marie Choate Josh Dunn Ashley Edler Joshua William Green Daniel S. Hayward Benjamin Henley Elizabeth Lester Michael Luongo André Malcolm Spenser Micetich Melody Rose Kelsey Seaman Adrien Swenson Josh McWhortor SCENIC DESIGNER COSTUME DESIGNER LIGHTING DESIGNER SOUND DESIGNER PROJECTION DESIGNER Scott Pask Suttirat Anne Larlarb Kenneth Posner Shannon Slaton Jon Driscoll HAIR & MAKE UP DESIGNER ILLUSIONS AIR SCULPTOR FLYING EFFECTS Bernie Ardia Paul Kieve Daniel Wurtzel Hudson Scenic Studio ORIGINAL MUSIC SUPERVISION VOCAL DESIGNER MUSIC DIRECTOR MUSIC COORDINATOR AND DANCE AND INCIDENTAL MUSICAL ARRANGER AnnMarie Milazzo Patrick Hoagland John Mezzio David Chase ANIMAL DIRECTOR CASTING TOUR BOOKING TOUR PRESS & MARKETING William Berloni Stewart/Whitley The Booking Group Anita Dloniak & Meredith Blair Associates, Inc. GENERAL MANAGER COMPANY MANAGER PRODUCTION STAGE MANAGER PRODUCTION MANAGER GENTRY & ASSOCIATES NETWORKS PRESENTATIONS LLC Jamey Jennings Heather Moss David D’Agostino Evan Rooney EXECUTIVE PRODUCER ASSOCIATE CHOREOGRAPHER Trinity Wheeler Camden Loeser ORCHESTRATIONS Simon Hale MUSIC SUPERVISION Fred Lassen CHOREOGRAPHY Mia Michaels DIRECTION RECREATED BY Mia Walker ORIGINAL DIRECTION Diane Paulus Finding Neverland was developed and premiered at The American Repertory Theater at Harvard University, Diane Paulus, Artistic Director, Diane Borger, Producer.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Puer Optionis:” Contemporary Childhood Adultization, Spectacularization, and Sexualization
    Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica – Journal of Theories and Research in Education 12, 2 (2017). ISSN 1970-2221 The “Puer Optionis:” Contemporary childhood adultization, spectacularization, and sexualization Davide Cino ABSTRACT This paper tries to conceptualize postmodern childhood by suggesting the expression “Puer Optionis” as a way to summarize the condition of contemporary children in the Western world. Why are our children prone to looking for an audience? According to some academics, our Zeitgeist evolved and, along with it, the values spread through our children have changed, shifting from communitarian and altruistic to individualistic and narcissistic (Uhls, Greenfield, 2011). In a “spectacularized” society (Codeluppi, 2007), fame and desire for visibility are shown as goals to be reached during a developmental phase, childhood, where the construction of a belief system (Bandura A. et al., 1963) can considerably magnify them. Three examples of “showcases” are suggested, regarding the child spectacularization process: the city; the stage; social networking sites (SNS), opening a short parenthetical about “Sharenting.” Finally, an evolution of the Imaginary Audience theory by David Elkind (Elkind, 1967) will be assessed: in a world where every aspect of our lives can be dragged into the spotlight, is this audience still “imaginary?” What are the implications for our children and the educational challenges we face as educators? L’articolo propone un’analisi di alcuni aspetti dell’infanzia postmoderna, abitata da quello che viene definito “Puer Optionis”: il bambino adultizzato dell’attuale. Nell’intento di supportare la tesi per cui certi indicatori del nostro Zeitgeist stanno rendendo sempre più flebili i confini tra mondo adulto e infantile, verranno presentati i concetti di adultizzazione, vetrinizzazione e sessualizzazione.
    [Show full text]
  • European Crime Prevention Network
    European Crime Prevention Network Thematic Paper Youth Internet Safety: risks and prevention In the framework of the project ‘The further implementation of the Multiannual Strategy of the EUCPN and the Informal network on the Administrative Approach’- EUCPN Secretariat, May 2018, Brussels With the financial support of the Prevention of and Fight against Crime Programme of the European Union European Commission – Directorate-General Home Affairs Thematic Paper Youth Internet Safety Abstract This thematic paper is published by the EUCPN Secretariat in connection with one of the EU priorities, more specifically cybercrime. It focusses on the prevention of risks children encounter online. A brief overview is given of several forms of cybercrime considering youth and what motives and facilitating factors enhance them. The last part of the paper focusses on prevention tips with existing examples. Citation EUCPN (2018). Youth Internet Safety: Risks and Prevention. In: EUCPN Secretariat (eds.), EUCPN Theoretical Paper Series, European Crime Prevention Network: Brussels. Legal Notice The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the official opinions of any EU Member State or any agency or institution of the European Union or European Communities. Authors Orchana De Corte, Intern, EUCPN Secretariat Jorne Vanhee, Research Officer, EUCPN Secretariat Cindy Verleysen, Senior Research Officer, EUCPN Secretariat Febe Liagre, Strategic Policy Officer, EUCPN Secretariat EUCPN Secretariat Waterloolaan / Bd. De Waterloo 76 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone: +32 2 557 33 30 Fax: +32 2 557 35 23 [email protected] – www.eucpn.org 2 Thematic Paper Youth Internet Safety Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 4 2. International legislation: ............................................................................... 6 3. Dangers on the internet ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Scenes
    behind the scenes Written by Sam Maynard Rehearsal photography by Manuel Harlan Production photography by Johan Persson CONTENTS BACKGROUNDPRODUCTIONRESOURCES Contents Introduction 3 Section 1: Background to Privacy 4 James Graham and PRIVACY 5 Verbatim Theatre 6 PRIVACY and Political Theatre 8 Edward Snowden, the NSA and GCHQ 9 Edward Snowden 9 The NSA revelations 10 What do these revelations mean? 12 Real people in PRIVACY 14 Section 2: The Donmar’s Production 17 Cast and Creative Team 18 Josh Seymour’s Rehearsal Diary 19 A conversation with James Graham 24 A conversation with Josie Rourke 29 Section 3: RESOURCES 33 A Glossary of Key Terms used in PRIVACY 34 Practical Exercise for use in the classroom 37 Select Bibliography and Suggestions for further reading 40 About the Donmar Warehouse 41 2 CONTENTS BACKGROUNDPRODUCTIONRESOURCES Introduction Welcome to the Behind the Scenes Guide to PRIVACY, a new play by James Graham. Over the following pages you will find a wealth of information designed to give you a closer look at the process of developing this production, from the original ideas to the final performance. PRIVACY is James Graham’s first play to be staged at the Donmar Warehouse, and tackles one of the most important issues of our time. Drawing on interviews with journalists, politicians, and analysts, PRIVACY asks how much we give away when we share, and whether there really is such a thing as privacy anymore. This guide aims to set this production in context through discussions with the cast and creative teams, through summaries of some of the key events referred to in the production, rehearsal diaries, and more.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dangerous Inheritance: a Child's Digital Identity
    A Dangerous Inheritance: A Child’s Digital Identity Kate Hamming* “[Y]ou can choose your friends but you sho’ can’t choose your family, an’ they’re still kin to you no matter whether you acknowledge ‘em or not, and it makes you look right silly when you don’t.”1 ABSTRACT This Comment begins with one family’s story of its experience with social media that many others can relate to in today’s ever-growing world of technology and the Internet. Technology has made it possible for a person’s online presence to grow exponentially through continuous sharing by other Internet users. This ability to communicate and share information amongst family, friends, and strangers all over the world, while beneficial in some regard, comes with its privacy downfalls. The risks to privacy are elevated when children’s information is being revealed, which often stems from a child’s own parents conduct online. Parents all over the world are creating their children’s digital identities before these children even have the chance to develop them on their own. And other safety issues are often overlooked, such as those relating to online pedophiles and identity theft. This Comment argues the need for a legislative solution in the United States incentivizing adults to restrict the types of information that they choose to disclose online. However, such legislation must consider First Amendment hurdles and incorporate realistic and unambiguous restrictions, which are based in tort law and provide for a private right of action that can ultimately serve the specific * J.D. Candidate 2020, Seattle University School of Law; B.A., University of Washington; Sympo- sium Chair, Seattle University Law Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomarbeit
    Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades einer Magistra der Rechtswissenschaften an der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz Kinderrechtekonvention im Wandel der Zeit – Chancen und Risiken der Digitalisierung Vorgelegt von Tijana KLARIĆ Beurteilt von Ao.Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr.iur. Gerd Oberleitner am Institut für Völkerrecht und Internationale Beziehungen Graz, am 30.03.2020 1 Ehrenwörtliche Erklärung Ich, Tijana Klarić, erkläre hiermit ehrenwörtlich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbstständig und ohne fremde Hilfe verfasst, andere als die angegebenen Quellen nicht benutzt und die den Quellen wörtlich oder inhaltlich entnommenen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht habe. Die Arbeit wurde bisher in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form keiner anderen inländischen oder ausländischen Prüfungsbehörde vorgelegt und auch noch nicht veröffentlicht. Die vorliegende Fassung entspricht der einge- reichten elektronischen Version. 30.03.2020 Unterschrift 2 Danksagung An dieser Stelle möchte ich mich bei allen Menschen bedanken, die mich durch mein Studium und die Verfassung dieser Diplomarbeit begleitet, unterstützt und inspiriert haben. An erster Stelle danke ich meiner Familie, insbesondere meiner Mutter und meinem Vater, die ihre eigenen Bedürfnisse oft zurückgestellt haben, um meiner Schwester und mir eine unbeschwerte und glückliche Kindheit, Schulzeit und Studienzeit zu er- möglichen. Nie wurde ich in eine Richtung gedrängt; stets durfte ich die Entschei- dungen für meine Zukunft selbst treffen. Vielen Dank dafür, Mama und Papa. Insbesondere möchte ich mich auch bei meiner Schwester Andrea für ihren uner- schütterlichen Glauben in meine Fähigkeiten und ihre bedingungslose Unterstützung in allen Lebenslagen bedanken. Ich danke meinen zwei wunderbaren Nichten, Annabella und Helena, die mich nicht nur zu diesem Thema inspiriert haben, sondern mich stets daran erinnern, wie wich- tig es ist, die Welt hin und wieder mit Kinderaugen zu sehen.
    [Show full text]
  • To Stop Sharenting & Other Children's Privacy Harms, Start Playing
    PLUNKETT (DO NOT DELETE) 6/4/2020 2:40 PM TO STOP SHARENTING & OTHER CHILDREN’S PRIVACY HARMS, START PLAYING: A BLUEPRINT FOR A NEW PROTECTING THE PRIVATE LIVES OF ADOLESCENTS AND YOUTH (PPLAY) ACT Leah Plunkett* I. SHARENTING: WHAT IT IS & WHY IT IS RISKY (AND ALSO WHY IT CAN BE BENEFICIAL) .............................................................. 460 A. Sharenting Snapshot .......................................................... 460 B. Criminal, Illegal, or Dangerous Ramifications ................. 468 C. Legal—Invasive, Opaque, and Suspect ............................. 468 D. Identity Formation Consequences (Reputation, Interpersonal Relationships, Sense of Self) .......................................... 471 E. Benefits .............................................................................. 473 II. CURRENT FEDERAL LEGAL LANDSCAPE ...................................... 474 A. Bedrock Sharenting Legal Framework ............................. 474 B. COPPA .............................................................................. 474 C. Notice & Consent .............................................................. 476 D. FERPA .............................................................................. 478 E. PPRA ................................................................................. 479 F. Non-Federal Privacy Innovation........................................ 480 III. PPLAY ........................................................................................ 481 A. Why PPLAY? ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sharenting and the (Potential) Right to Be Forgotten
    Indiana Law Journal Volume 95 Issue 3 Article 9 Summer 2020 Sharenting and the (Potential) Right to Be Forgotten Keltie Haley Indiana University, Maurer School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the First Amendment Commons, Fourteenth Amendment Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Privacy Law Commons Recommended Citation Haley, Keltie (2020) "Sharenting and the (Potential) Right to Be Forgotten," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 95 : Iss. 3 , Article 9. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol95/iss3/9 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sharenting and the (Potential) Right to Be Forgotten KELTIE HALEY* INTRODUCTION Social networking sites—like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube—provide parents with the ability to instantly share information about their children with family and friends across the globe. While most parents are content sharing birthday pictures and humorous anecdotes about their toddlers with a select group of Facebook friends, other parents have capitalized (socially and monetarily) on disclosing information about their children to strangers on the internet.1 Social media accounts dedicated to images, videos, and information about the accountholder’s children are often
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Children in the Frontier of Surveillance Capitalism
    Texas A&M University School of Law Texas A&M Law Scholarship Student Scholarship 2-2021 Protecting Children in the Frontier of Surveillance Capitalism Cole F. Watson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/student-scholarship Part of the Consumer Protection Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Juvenile Law Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Richmond Journal of Law & Technology Volume XXVII, Issue 2 PROTECTING CHILDREN IN THE FRONTIER OF SURVEILLANCE CAPITALISM Cole F. Watson* Cite as: Cole F. Watson, Protecting Children in the Frontier of Surveillance Capitalism, 27 RICH. J.L. & TECH., no. 2, 2021. * J.D. Candidate, 2021, Texas A&M Univ. School of Law; B.A., 2016, Univ. of Texas at Austin. This paper is dedicated to my soon-to-be-born son: you are fiercely loved. Many thanks to my wife and family for encouraging me through this process. To Ivan Escobar, Josh Jones, Ryan Cairns, and Christian Albuquerque: thank you for your much-needed insights and much-appreciated Bluebook knowledge. To the Richmond JOLT Editorial Staff: your comments and editing skills were invaluable. All errors, omissions, and missed steaks are my own.” 1 Richmond Journal of Law & Technology Volume XXVII, Issue 2 “Come senators, congressmen Please heed the call Don’t stand in the doorway Don’t block up the hall For he that gets hurt Will be he who has stalled There’s a battle outside and it is ragin’ It’ll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls For the times they are a-changin’”1 –Bob Dylan I.
    [Show full text]
  • Whose Information Should Be Shared with Whom?: Parents' Awareness of Children's Digital Privacy in Turkey
    Media Literacy and Academic Research | Vol. 3, No. 2, December 2020 photo: Denisa Valachová Derya Gül Ünlü, Oya Morva Whose Information Should Be Shared With Whom?: Parents’ Awareness Of Children’s Digital Privacy In Turkey ABSTRACT Today, parents make use of social media accounts for many different purposes, such as obtaining information, giving advice, receiving support, and exchanging ideas with other parents. In parallel with the use of social media, according to their parenting roles, individuals frequently share various content related to both their own daily practices and the development processes of their children. The fact that most of the content shared is about children raises the question of digital privacy in this context. Based on this focus, this research aims to determine the priorities attached by the parents when they share content about children on their social media accounts, and what kind of measures they take in sharing this content to protect the digital privacy of their children. Therefore, a questionnaire based quantitative field study was carried out within the scope of this research. As a result of the study, it was found that parents primarily prefer sharing special occasions with their children, family photographs and photographs of their children at early ages; if the child is at a later age, they tend to consult him/her before sharing the content, but they do not tend to pay enough attention to ensuring that the child's identity is kept confidential and sharing of personal information is avoided. KEY WORDS Sharenting. Digital parenting. Digital privacy. Studies page 109 Media Literacy and Academic Research | Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharenting, Intimate Surveillance and the Right to Be Forgotten
    This is a post-print (peer reviewed, but not formatted or paginated) of Leaver, T. (2020). Balancing Privacy: Sharenting, Intimate Surveillance and the Right to Be Forgotten. In L. Green, D. Holloway, K. Stevenson, T. Leaver, & L. Haddon (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Children and Digital Media. Routledge. BALANCING PRIVACY: SHARENTING, INTIMATE SURVEILLANCE AND THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN Tama Leaver orcid.org/0000-0002-4065-4725 In early 2020, the daughter of a prominent Instagram influencer used an anonymous account to post to the Reddit forum ‘Am I the Asshole?’ where posters describe a personal situation and ask other users to judge whether they were in the right or wrong. In her message, the original poster (OP) described how she had ordered custom-made hoodies with various messages printed on them, including ‘no photos’, ‘I do not consent to be photographed’, ‘respect my privacy’, and ‘no means no’ (FinallyAnonymous6, 2020). The OP describes wearing this hoodie, and providing her younger sister with one for the same reason, to prevent her influencer mother taking and sharing photos of her and sharing them on social media. The OP made it clear that she had requested her mother stop sharing photos of her a number of times, and made it explicitly clear that she did not consent to any images being posted online. As her mother did not respect OP’s request, she had begun wearing the hoodie in her home, to family events, and anywhere her mother might be taking photos, to deliberately interrupt her mother’s photography and online sharing.
    [Show full text]