DOCSLIB.ORG

Conserving Georgia’S Nongame Wildlife 2011 REPORT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conserving Georgia’S Nongame Wildlife 2011 REPORT Conserving Georgia’s Nongame Wildlife 2011 REPORT At the Nongame Conservation Section, our mission is conserving Georgia’s nongame wildlife – those species not legally fished for or hunted. That means working daily to preserve the vibrant diversity of native animals and plants and their habitats found across this state. We do this in many ways: research and surveys, conservation programs, education, land acquisition, habitat management and watchable wildlife programs. We also raise funds. That’s because we are funded solely by direct donations, fundraising initiatives and grants. Unlike other state programs, the Nongame Conservation Section receives no money through state appropriations. Our roadmap is the State Wildlife Action Plan. Completed in 2005, this comprehensive strategy guides the conservation work of Georgia DNR and its partners. The plan outlines critical areas of need, and focuses on keeping native wildlife from declining to the point of requiring federal protection as threatened or endangered species. More than 1,000 of Georgia’s plant and animal species are considered species of conservation concern; 318 are protected by federal or state law. Through key objectives and actions, the State Wildlife Action Plan targets the needs of rare or declining species, emphasizing measures to preclude imperilment. The Nongame Conservation Section goes further, however, implementing recovery efforts for federally listed species, conducting education and outreach programs to increase public awareness of wildlife conservation needs, coordinating research and surveys to better understand the distribution and abundance of Georgia’s native species and natural habitats, and developing biodiversity databases that support conservation planning. From July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011, that work varied from beach patrols that documented a record sea turtle nesting season and Coosawattee River surveys that discovered rare darters and raised prospects for the species’ recovery, to groundwork on a conservation easement that will protect one of Georgia’s largest populations of imperiled eastern indigo snakes near the Canoochee River for generations to come. For nongame creatures large and small – North Atlantic right whales to Henslow’s sparrows – we think we fulfilled our mission in fiscal 2011. But you be the judge. This report provides highlights. Let me know what you think. And thank you for your support. Mike Harris | Chief, Nongame Conservation Section Georgia Department of NaturalFISCAL Resources | Wildlife YEAR Resources Division2011 | Nongame R ConservationEPORT Section 1 CONSERVATION EDUCATION AND OUTREACH n BIRDS n FRESHWATER n Waterbird Conservation Initiative AQUATIC SPECIES n Regional Education Centers n Red-cockaded Woodpecker Recovery n Aquatic Conservation Initiative n Youth Birding Competition n Partners in Flight n Robust Redhorse Conservation n Give Wildlife a Chance Poster Contest n Bird Surveys n Social Media Wood Stork Nests Bald Eagle Nests n PLANTS AND Swallow-tailed Kite Nests and Roosts NATURAL HABITATS LAND ACQUISITION Henslow’s Sparrows Secretive Marshbirds n Sandhills Conservation AND CONSERVATION n Rare Plant Surveys on Public and n REPTILES AND Private Lands PLANNING AMPHIBIANS n Coastal Habitat Assessment n n n Sea Turtle Conservation and Research Restoration of Mountain and Coastal Murff Tract Phase II Plain Bogs n n Sea Turtle Stranding Network Walker Lake Tract n and At-sea Recovery Habitat Improvements on State Lands n Canoochee River Corridor Easement and the Interagency Burn Team n Bog Turtles n Conservation Planning n Prescribed Fire n Gopher Tortoise and Eastern Indigo Snake Surveys n Biotics Database Development n n Gopher Frog Restoration Georgia Plant Conservation Alliance FINANCIAL AND n Ginseng Management Program n MAMMALS ADMINISTRATION n PRIVATE LanDS n North Atlantic Right Whale n Fiscal Year 2011 Funding Conservation n Private Land Activities n Weekend for Wildlife n Georgia Marine Mammal Stranding n Army Compatible Use Buffer n Wildlife Conservation Fund Network Conservation n Nongame License Plates n Florida Manatee Conservation n Community Wildlife Projects n TERN n Bottlenose Dolphin Contaminants n Project Law ENFORCEMENT n Federal and Other Funding n n Bat Conservation FOR NONGAME Administration Cover photos: DNR disentangling a right whale/Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Georgia aster/Ed McDowell Royal tern chicks/Andy Day Banding Henslow’s sparrows/Todd Schneider/GaDNR Monitoring prescribed fire at Tallulah Gorge/GaDNR ContentsSeminole bat /Trina Morris/GaDNR 2 CONSERVING GEORGIA’s NONGAME WILDLIFE Waterbird documented the continued importance of staging areas for red knots in the late summer and fall. Conservation Initiative Staff monitored red knots on the Altamaha River twice a week from August through October. Peak Georgia’s barrier island beaches, coastal salt counts topped 5,000 birds and more than 800 marshes and freshwater wetlands support 86 uniquely marked birds were documented. This species of seabirds, shorebirds and wading birds, effort represented the first systematic survey of collectively known as waterbirds. The Waterbird Keyes/GaDNR /Tim red knots in Georgia, and will allow scientists to Conservation Initiative includes: better understand the importance of this area to • protecting important colonial waterbird nesting this species. habitats; During fiscal 2011, the Nongame Conservation • surveying to determine status and habitat Section also tracked American oystercatchers in the needs of other resident, migratory and wintering Altamaha River and had more than 2,500 sightings waterbirds; of banded birds, sightings that represented more • identifying habitats important for these species; than 300 individually marked birds from seven and, pelican with chicks brown Rehabilitated states. Staff collaborated with several partners on American oystercatcher nesting studies and banded • creating partnerships for long-term conservation site in an un-vegetated state to promote beach- 19 chicks, ranging from Little Tybee Natural Area to of wetland-dependent bird species. nesting seabirds and discourage gull nesting. Little St Simons Island. Conservation efforts include protecting and The most diverse natural seabird colony in 2011 Of the whimbrels tagged in May 2010, one bird managing five sand islands specifically for was Pelican Spit, where least tern, gull-billed tern – named Chinquapin – was still transmitting. beach-nesting and migratory birds. While this and black skimmer chicks fledged, despite several Chinquapin has since made two trips to the Arctic, effort is especially valuable for seabirds, resident over-wash events. Nongame staff worked with a and even made headlines last fall when the and migratory shorebirds also benefit from the University of Georgia graduate student whimbrel flew into Hurricane Irene and protection of critical nesting and resting areas free studying least terns, and assisted her Keyes/GaDNR /Tim survived. At the close of the year, from disturbances. One of the areas, Little Egg in monitoring six colonies. Island Bar, supports one of the largest colonies of nesting seabirds on the south Atlantic Coast. In Surveys on migrant and 2011, there was a large brown pelican colony on wintering shorebirds Little Egg Island Bar with more than 1,000 nests. The colony produced the only documented chicks from adult birds that had been rehabilitated following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf with chick American oystercatcher of Mexico. Nongame staff is monitoring several of the chicks on the Altamaha River. A dredge-spoil island near the Brunswick shipping channel created by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 2007 and owned by the state has become an important nesting site for Georgia’s waterbirds. In 2011, 3,936 royal tern nests were documented on the island along with 330 laughing gull and eight brown pelican nests. The Nongame Conservation Section is working with the corps to maintain this Birds FISCAL YEAR 2011 REPORT 3 In Georgia, 156,997 acres are enrolled in Safe Harbor management agreements covering 105 baseline groups of woodpeckers and supporting 32 surplus groups. Most of these properties are in the Red Hills Region near Thomasville, an area that supports the /Tim Keyes/GaDNR /Tim largest population of red-cockaded woodpeckers on private lands. Since the inception of Safe Harbor in 2000, the Red Hills population has grown from about 175 family groups to more than 190. In cooperation with the Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center, a successful effort is underway to restore the red-cockaded woodpecker Schneider/GaDNR /Todd population at Ichauway Plantation in Baker County. This 29,000-acre property supported a single male in 1999. Through the translocation of 64 young First recorded roseate spoonbill nest in Georgia spoonbill nest roseate recorded First birds, the property now supports 22 family groups. sparrow Henslow’s Chinquapin was wintering in Suriname in the same Work on southeastern American kestrels continued In 2008, DNR acquired the 8,432-acre Silver Lake coastal marsh the bird used in 2010. during the summer of 2011 and included Wildlife Management Area near Bainbridge, the comprehensive population surveys of kestrels In another highlight, the wood stork colony in first state-owned property to feature red-cockaded across the state. All known populations were St. Mary’s yielded the first record of a roseate woodpeckers. The tract contains extensive stands surveyed by ground and air. The total population
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 232/Tuesday, December
    73182 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 2, 2008 / Rules and Regulations (subtitle E of the Small Business any person acting subject to the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of direction or control of a foreign Federal Emergency Management Agency 1996). Therefore, the reporting government or official where such (FEMA) makes the final determinations requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not person is an agent of Cuba or any other listed below for the modified BFEs for apply. country that the President determines each community listed. These modified Paperwork Reduction Act (and so reports to the Congress) poses a elevations have been published in threat to the national security interest of newspapers of local circulation and The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) the United States for purposes of 18 ninety (90) days have elapsed since that does not apply to this rule change. See U.S.C. 951; or has been convicted of or publication. The Assistant 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521. The PRA imposes entered a plea of nolo contendere to any Administrator of the Mitigation certain protocol for the ‘‘collection of offense under 18 U.S.C. 792–799, 831, Directorate has resolved any appeals information’’ by government agencies. or 2381, or under section 11 of the resulting from this notification. The Act defines the ‘‘collection of Export Administration Act of 1979, 50 This final rule is issued in accordance information’’ as ‘‘the obtaining, causing U.S.C. app. 2410. with section 110 of the Flood Disaster to be obtained, soliciting, or requiring * * * * * Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream-Temperature Characteristics in Georgia
    STREAM-TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS IN GEORGIA By T.R. Dyar and S.J. Alhadeff ______________________________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4203 Prepared in cooperation with GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Atlanta, Georgia 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 3039 Amwiler Road, Suite 130 Denver Federal Center Peachtree Business Center Box 25286 Atlanta, GA 30360-2824 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Page Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Purpose and scope . 2 Previous investigations. 2 Station-identification system . 3 Stream-temperature data . 3 Long-term stream-temperature characteristics. 6 Natural stream-temperature characteristics . 7 Regression analysis . 7 Harmonic mean coefficient . 7 Amplitude coefficient. 10 Phase coefficient . 13 Statewide harmonic equation . 13 Examples of estimating natural stream-temperature characteristics . 15 Panther Creek . 15 West Armuchee Creek . 15 Alcovy River . 18 Altamaha River . 18 Summary of stream-temperature characteristics by river basin . 19 Savannah River basin . 19 Ogeechee River basin. 25 Altamaha River basin. 25 Satilla-St Marys River basins. 26 Suwannee-Ochlockonee River basins . 27 Chattahoochee River basin. 27 Flint River basin. 28 Coosa River basin. 29 Tennessee River basin . 31 Selected references. 31 Tabular data . 33 Graphs showing harmonic stream-temperature curves of observed data and statewide harmonic equation for selected stations, figures 14-211 . 51 iii ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing locations of 198 periodic and 22 daily stream-temperature stations, major river basins, and physiographic provinces in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Consumption Guidelines: Rivers & Creeks
    FRESHWATER FISH CONSUMPTION GUIDELINES: RIVERS & CREEKS NO RESTRICTIONS ONE MEAL PER WEEK ONE MEAL PER MONTH DO NOT EAT NO DATA Bass, LargemouthBass, Other Bass, Shoal Bass, Spotted Bass, Striped Bass, White Bass, Bluegill Bowfin Buffalo Bullhead Carp Catfish, Blue Catfish, Channel Catfish,Flathead Catfish, White Crappie StripedMullet, Perch, Yellow Chain Pickerel, Redbreast Redhorse Redear Sucker Green Sunfish, Sunfish, Other Brown Trout, Rainbow Trout, Alapaha River Alapahoochee River Allatoona Crk. (Cobb Co.) Altamaha River Altamaha River (below US Route 25) Apalachee River Beaver Crk. (Taylor Co.) Brier Crk. (Burke Co.) Canoochee River (Hwy 192 to Ogeechee River) Chattahoochee River (Helen to Lk. Lanier) (Buford Dam to Morgan Falls Dam) (Morgan Falls Dam to Peachtree Crk.) * (Peachtree Crk. to Pea Crk.) * (Pea Crk. to West Point Lk., below Franklin) * (West Point dam to I-85) (Oliver Dam to Upatoi Crk.) Chattooga River (NE Georgia, Rabun County) Chestatee River (below Tesnatee Riv.) Conasauga River (below Stateline) Coosa River (River Mile Zero to Hwy 100, Floyd Co.) Coosa River <32" (Hwy 100 to Stateline, Floyd Co.) >32" Coosa River (Coosa, Etowah below Thompson-Weinman dam, Oostanaula) Coosawattee River (below Carters) Etowah River (Dawson Co.) Etowah River (above Lake Allatoona) Etowah River (below Lake Allatoona dam) Flint River (Spalding/Fayette Cos.) Flint River (Meriwether/Upson/Pike Cos.) Flint River (Taylor Co.) Flint River (Macon/Dooly/Worth/Lee Cos.) <16" Flint River (Dougherty/Baker Mitchell Cos.) 16–30" >30" Gum Crk. (Crisp Co.) Holly Crk. (Murray Co.) Ichawaynochaway Crk. Kinchafoonee Crk. (above Albany) Little River (above Clarks Hill Lake) Little River (above Ga. Hwy 133, Valdosta) Mill Crk.
    [Show full text]
  • List of TMDL Implementation Plans with Tmdls Organized by Basin
    Latest 305(b)/303(d) List of Streams List of Stream Reaches With TMDLs and TMDL Implementation Plans - Updated June 2011 Total Maximum Daily Loadings TMDL TMDL PLAN DELIST BASIN NAME HUC10 REACH NAME LOCATION VIOLATIONS TMDL YEAR TMDL PLAN YEAR YEAR Altamaha 0307010601 Bullard Creek ~0.25 mi u/s Altamaha Road to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River FC 2012 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 2006 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010603 Five Mile Creek Headwaters to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010603 Goose Creek U/S Rd. S1922(Walton Griffis Rd.) to Little Goose Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Mushmelon Creek Headwaters to Delbos Bay Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010604 Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier
    [Show full text]
  • Tmdl Implementation Plan
    STATE OF GEORGIA TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared by The Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Atlanta, GA Introduction TMDL Implementation Plans are not required for the segments discussed below because Georgia Environmental Protection Division (Georgia EPD) has delisted them, United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has rescinded them, or the United States District Court for the Northern District Court of Georgia, Atlanta Division has vacated the order to establish them. Delisted Segments EPA requires Georgia EPD to demonstrate good cause for not including stream segment on the Section 303(d) list. Good cause includes, but is not limited to, more recent and accurate data, more sophisticated water quality modeling, flaws in the original analysis that led to the waterbody being listed or changes in conditions, e.g. new control equipment, or elimination of discharges. In its Draft 2002 Section 303(d) listing proposal Georgia EPD submitted good cause justification to EPA to delist the stream segments listed below from its 2002 Section 303(d) list. Georgia EPD delisted stream segments using methodology from the Water Quality in Georgia 1998- 99 Report (305(b) report), Appendix A, and USEPA document Guidance for 303(b) listing. In considering all the data on the affected segments EPD concluded that water quality is being met and removed them from the 2002 Section 303(d) list. Therefore, no TMDL Implementation Plans are required for the following delisted segments. Waterbody Name Stream Location River Basin Pollutant 1. Alapahoochee River Confluence of Mud and Grand Bay Cr. To Stateline Suwannee FCG(Hg) 2. Buck Creek Downstream Sylvania WPCP to Savannah River Savannah Cyanide, Zn, Tox 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards ( 1) Purpose. The establishment of water quality standards. (2) W ate r Quality Enhancement: (a) The purposes and intent of the State in establishing Water Quality Standards are to provide enhancement of water quality and prevention of pollution; to protect the public health or welfare in accordance with the public interest for drinking water supplies, conservation of fish, wildlife and other beneficial aquatic life, and agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other reasonable and necessary uses and to maintain and improve the biological integrity of the waters of the State. ( b) The following paragraphs describe the three tiers of the State's waters. (i) Tier 1 - Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected. (ii) Tier 2 - Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the division finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the division's continuing planning process, that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Climate-Change-Induced Flood Risk in the Conasauga River
    Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1739–1757, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1739-2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Assessing climate-change-induced flood risk in the Conasauga River watershed: an application of ensemble hydrodynamic inundation modeling Tigstu T. Dullo1, George K. Darkwah1, Sudershan Gangrade2,3, Mario Morales-Hernández3,4, M. Bulbul Sharif5, Alfred J. Kalyanapu1, Shih-Chieh Kao2,3, Sheikh Ghafoor5, and Moetasim Ashfaq3,4 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN 38505, USA 2Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA 3Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA 4Computational Sciences and Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA 5Department of Computer Science, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN 38505, USA Correspondence: Alfred J. Kalyanapu ([email protected]) Received: 13 October 2020 – Discussion started: 20 October 2020 Revised: 7 April 2021 – Accepted: 18 April 2021 – Published: 2 June 2021 Abstract. This study evaluates the impact of potential future Copyright statement. This paper has been authored by UT-Battelle, climate change on flood regimes, floodplain protection, and LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Depart- electricity infrastructures across the Conasauga River wa- ment of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the pub- tershed in the southeastern United States through ensemble lisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that hydrodynamic inundation modeling. The ensemble stream- the US government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, flow scenarios were simulated by the Distributed Hydrol- worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this paper, or allow others to do so, for US government purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • * This Is an Excerpt from Protected Animals of Georgia Published By
    Common Name: BLACKBANDED SUNFISH Scientific Name: Enneacanthus chaetodon Other Commonly Used Names: none Previously Used Scientific Names: none Family: Centrarchidae Rarity Ranks: G4/S1 State Legal Status: Endangered Federal Legal Status: Not Listed Description: The blackbanded sunfish is a small, laterally compressed and deep-bodied species reaching a maximum total length of 100 mm (4 inches). There is a prominent notch separating the spinous and soft-rayed portions of the dorsal fin. It is distinctively marked with 5-6 black bars along the sides that extend from the dorsum to the venter. The first of these bars passes through the eye, and the third extends through the first three membranes of the spinous dorsal fin to the upper edge of the fin. No other sunfish has this barring pattern. The blackbanded sunfish is also very colorful with black vertical bars, olive-brown to variegated-brown on the dorsum and upper sides, and orange-copper marking the leading edge of the pelvic fins and the irises. Similar Species: The small body size and distinctive color pattern make it difficult to confuse the blackbanded sunfish with any other fish species in Georgia waters. It may superficially resemble the banded (Enneacanthus obesus) and bluespotted (E. gloriosus) sunfishes, which differ in having only a shallow notch separating the spinous and soft-rayed portions of the dorsal fin and lacking the prominent dark bar extending through the anterior dorsal fin membranes. Habitat: Blackbanded sunfish are restricted to shallow, low-velocity, non-turbid waters of lakes, ponds, rivers and streams. They are strongly associated with aquatic plants, which provide habitat for foraging and cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefits of Water Trails
    National Park Service Rivers, Trails & Conservation Assistance Program Southeast Regional Office--Atlanta Recreation Conservation Low investment Revenue generators Georgia has a variety of water resources--lakes, rivers and the coast. Each offers a different kind of opportunity for healthy outdoor activity In the U.S., participation increased 117% from 1995-2005. Water trails provide recreational opportunities for all sizes and ages- -children, adults, seniors. Water quality & quantity Wildlife Land use Canoe trails make connections between land, water, riparian edges and wildlife habitats. Canoe trails create environmental stewards. They are a constituency that understands land use & watershed issues. Upstream issues = downstream problems. And paddle groups such as Georgia Canoe Association sponsor clean-ups of rivers. The economics of the trail implementation: Inexpensive relative to other recreation projects. Not as much land to buy or structures to build. Access facilities can be minimal and inexpensive. Existing public land and facilities on rivers, lakes and the coast. Revenue generation from the canoe trail: Increased spending in the local area. Existing businesses increase profits-- restaurants, outfitters, lodging . New businesses develop to support the trail. Purchases of gear & equipment increase and support business. Festivals and events around the trail support the local community. More value from local government support. Improve local community with higher quality of life & improved tax base. Altamaha River www.altmahariver.org trail starts near the end of the Ocmulgee river and goes to Darien. City of Canton—Greenway Master Plan (2000) includes blueway. Will become part of the Etowah River Blueway. Chattahoochee Canoe Trail –Upper section (proposed)—about 40 miles from Sautee Creek to Clarks Bridge at Lake Lanier.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program in Georgia
    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program in Georgia David Lekson, PWS Kelly Finch, PWS Richard Morgan Savannah District August, 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Topics § Savannah District Regulatory Division § Regulatory Efficiencies § On the Horizon 2 BUILDING STRONG® Introduction § Joined Savannah District in Jan 2013 § 25 years as Branch Chief in the Wilmington District, NC § Certified Professional Wetland Scientist with extensive field and teaching experience across the country § Participated in regional and national initiatives (wetland delineation and assessment, Mitigation/Banking); Served 6- month detail at the Pentagon in 2012 § Evaluated phosphate/sand/rock mining, wind energy, port and military projects, water supply, landfills, utilities, transportation (highway, airport, rail), and other large-scale commercial and residential projects 3 BUILDING STRONG® Georgia § Largest state east of the Mississippi River TN NC § 59,425 Square miles § Abuts 5 states § 5 Ecoregions SC § 159 Counties AL § 70,000 Miles of waterways § 7.7 Million acres of wetlands FL 4 BUILDING STRONG® Savannah Regulatory Organization Lake Lanier Piedmont Branch Mr. Ed Johnson (678) 422-2722 Morrow Coastal Branch Ms. Kelly Finch (912) 652-5503 Savannah Albany § 35 Team members § 3 Field Offices & Savannah § 3 Branches (Piedmont, Coastal, Multipurpose Management) 5 BUILDING STRONG® Regulatory Efficiencies § General Permits ► Re-issuance of existing Regional and Programmatic General Permits ► New RGP37 for Inshore GADNR Artificial Reefs
    [Show full text]
  • Unsuuseuracsbe
    StRd Opelika 85 Junction City HARRIS StRte 96 Geneva StRte 90 96 37 s te e 1 ran TALBOT tR t te S tR e y S V w DISTRICT e 96 Fort Valley 2 Montrose k t 1 S P tR te 96 1 S StR (M TWIGGS e t on Rd iami Valley Rd t R Mac ) R 6 t 2 d Reynolds e 9 S Dublin 9 8 StRt StRte 80 96 StRte 96 Smiths 80 8 PEACH LEE 2 lt Butler 9 S 1 A tR 4 319 7 e t t e StRte 112 2 e MACON t Dudley y DISTRICT 2 R Armour Rd w TAYLOR t R (EmRd 200) SH t StRte 278 Bibb U 4 7 S TAYLOR S 16 0 3 City Upatoi Cr 1 129 11 e t R S t t S 109th Congress of the United StatesR StRte 112 t 32nd (EmRd 200) e MUSCOGEE 3 Phenix G St Reese Rd 6 3 o 2 2 8 Edgewood Rd l 1 e City Forest Rd d 1 Rt e t COLUMBUS 127 e S n t StRte R I t Steam Mill Rd s S Wickham Dr l e Columbus Marshallville 341 s StR te H S w te 2 t R tR Dexter Ladonia Merval Rd 1 te S 1 7 te 127 S y V 185 2 t Rt tRt e 247 ic 2nd Armored Division Rd 7 tR e 127 S t (S o ) S t 0 137 Rte 90) S r Wolf Cr t 57 y 4 d S Perry Rte 2 Upatoi Cr 2 R D tR r e e t t i StRte 41 StRte e 9 StRte n 0 R 23 t n S 126 t S o StRte 6 R StRte 117 R 2 t ( (Airp 1 ) e Rentz o Rd Chester 27 Fort Benning Military Res rt 3 StRte 128 Whitson Rd 4 Cochran 3 22 8 te R TAYLOR Ideal t CHATTAHOOCHEE S MARION StRte 117 StR USHwy 441 Fort Benning te 9 S 0 StRte 26 7 South t Rte 19 129 BLECKLEY 5 Cadwell 13 7 2 7 te 1 RUSSELL StRte 2 StRte 49 HOUSTON tR 1 40 P S e Buena Vista er t StR ry tR te 26 Hwy S S StRt Cusseta tR e 2 te Oglethorpe 6 ( oad 9 26 Montezuma Fire R 00) B u r S n t R t StRte 126 6 B 2 te DISTRICT r S e ) 3 g Hawkinsville t t e R StR 9 r 2 9
    [Show full text]
  • Streamflow Maps of Georgia's Major Rivers
    GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 21 STREAMFLOW MAPS OF GEORGIA'S MAJOR RIVERS by M. T. Thomson United States Geological Survey Prepared cooperatively by the Geological Survey, United States Department of the Interior, Washington, D. C. ATLANTA 1960 STREAMFLOW MAPS OF GEORGIA'S MAJOR RIVERS by M. T. Thomson Maps are commonly used to show the approximate rates of flow at all localities along the river systems. In addition to average flow, this collection of streamflow maps of Georgia's major rivers shows features such as low flows, flood flows, storage requirements, water power, the effects of storage reservoirs and power operations, and some comparisons of streamflows in different parts of the State. Most of the information shown on the streamflow maps was taken from "The Availability and use of Water in Georgia" by M. T. Thomson, S. M. Herrick, Eugene Brown, and others pub­ lished as Bulletin No. 65 in December 1956 by the Georgia Department of Mines, Mining and Geo­ logy. The average flows reported in that publication and sho\vn on these maps were for the years 1937-1955. That publication should be consulted for detailed information. More recent streamflow information may be obtained from the Atlanta District Office of the Surface Water Branch, Water Resources Division, U. S. Geological Survey, 805 Peachtree Street, N.E., Room 609, Atlanta 8, Georgia. In order to show the streamflows and other features clearly, the river locations are distorted slightly, their lengths are not to scale, and some features are shown by block-like patterns.
    [Show full text]