Homeobox Gene IRX1 Is a Tumor Suppressor Gene in Gastric Carcinoma

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Homeobox Gene IRX1 Is a Tumor Suppressor Gene in Gastric Carcinoma Oncogene (2010) 29, 3908–3920 & 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/10 www.nature.com/onc ORIGINAL ARTICLE Homeobox gene IRX1 is a tumor suppressor gene in gastric carcinoma X Guo1,3, W Liu1,3, Y Pan1,PNi2,JJi1, L Guo1, J Zhang1,JWu1, J Jiang1, X Chen1, Q Cai1, JLi1, J Zhang1,QGu1, B Liu1, Z Zhu1 and Y Yu1 1Department of Surgery of Shanghai Ruijin Hospital and Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai, PR China and 2Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China The IRX1 tumor suppressor gene is located on 5p15.33, a locatedonLOHloci.Ourgrouppreviouslycharacterized cancer susceptibility locus. Loss of heterozygosity of a high frequency of LOH at 5p15.33 in human gastric 5p15.33 in gastric cancer was identified in our previous cancer. We hypothesized that genes located on this locus work. In this study, we analyzed the molecular features may contribute to the pathogenesis of gastric cancer (Lu and function of IRX1. We found that IRX1 expression et al., 2005). IRX1 is harbored in this chromosome locus was lost or reduced in gastric cancer. However, no and belongs to the Iroquois homeobox gene family, which mutations were identified in IRX1-encoding regions. IRX1 has six members from IRX1 to IRX6. IRX1 is closely transcription was suppressed by hypermethylation, and the related to embryonic development, including foregut expression of IRX1 mRNA was partially restored in organs such as the lung (Ferguson et al.,1998;Becker gastric cancer cells after 5-Aza-dC treatment. Restoring et al., 2001; van Tuyl et al., 2006; Alarcon et al., 2008). IRX1 expression in SGC-7901 and NCI-N87 gastric Because the stomach is also of foregut origin, the high cancer cells inhibited growth, invasion and tumorigenesis frequency of LOH at the IRX1 locus in gastric cancer in vitro and in vivo. We identified a number of target genes suggested that the IRX1 gene may be involved in the by global microarray analysis after IRX1 transfection development of gastric cancer. Asaka et al. (2006) reported combined with real-time PCR and chromatin immunopre- that IRX3 is downregulated in breast cancer patients with cipitation assay. BDKRB2, an angiogenesis-related gene, shorter survival times. IRX3 was also downregulated in HIST2H2BE and FGF7, cell proliferation and invasion- androgen-insensitive prostate cancer cell lines (Zhao et al., related genes, were identified as direct IRX1 target genes. 2005). Lewis et al. (1999) reported that IRX2 is involved in The hypermethylation of IRX1 was not only detected in epithelial cell differentiation as well as ductal and lobular primary gastric cancer tissues but also in the peripheral proliferation of breast cells. The association of the IRX1 blood of gastric cancer patients, suggesting IRX1 could gene with gastric cancer has not previously been studied. potentially serve as a biomarker for gastric cancer. A typical tumor suppressor gene should have the Oncogene (2010) 29, 3908–3920; doi:10.1038/onc.2010.143; following features: the genetic alterations occur in both published online 3 May 2010 alleles (for example, one deleted and another mutated) or both alleles are deleted or mutated in cancer (Knudson, Keywords: epigenetic; gastric carcinoma; homeobox 1996, 2001). In the absence of an allelic mutation, reduced genes; IRX1; tumor suppressor gene expression in cancer may be caused by an epigenetic abnormality such as hypermethylation of the promoter region (Garinis et al., 2002; Esteller, 2007). To date, Introduction significant effort has been directed at identifying tumor suppressor genes related to gastric cancer; however, these Chromosome 5p15.33 is a cancer susceptibility locus. efforts have been unsuccessful thus far. In this study, we Significant genetic variants of 5p15.33 have been reported systematically analyzed the genetic structure, promoter in lung cancer in Western and Chinese populations activity and methylation status of the IRX1 gene. We also (McKay et al., 2008; Jin et al., 2009). Gastric cancer is analyzed its functional features after reconstitution of one of the common malignancies characterized by IRX1 expression in vitro and in vivo. IRX1 functions as a genomic instability with multiple genetic alterations, transcription factor, but the exact role IRX1 has in the including oncogene activation and tumor suppressor gene development of gastric cancer is currently unknown. The inactivation. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is one type of target genes and related pathways of IRX1 have not yet genetic variation, and tumor suppressor genes are always been identified. cDNA microarrays provide a powerful tool for Correspondence: Dr Y Yu or Dr Z Zhu, Department of Surgery, exploring complex gene expression profiles. Microarray Ruijin Hospital and Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai analysis of experimental samples, such as gene-trans- Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Ruijin er Road, No. 197, fected cells, has led to identification of valuable Shanghai 200025, PR China. molecular markers involved in tumor proliferation, E-mails: [email protected] or [email protected] 3These authors contributed equally to this work. angiogenesis, prognosis and therapeutic response Received 10 September 2009; revised 26 March 2010; accepted 2 April (Duggan et al., 1999; Quackenbush, 2006; Perez-Diez 2010; published online 3 May 2010 et al., 2007; Iorns et al., 2009). Thus, we used a global IRX1 gene in gastric carcinoma X Guo et al 3909 Figure 1 Gene expression, gene copy numbers and promoter analysis of IRX1.(a) IRX1 mRNA detection in gastric cancer cell lines and immortalized gastric mucosa cell line GES-1 by real-time PCR (top) and gene copy numbers (bottom). IRX1 mRNA expression was significantly reduced or nearly absent in cancer cells but retained in GES-1 cells, and four out of seven gastric cancer cell lines showed IRX1 copy number reduction compared with the GES-1 cell line. (b) Putative motifs of the 50-flanking region of the IRX1 gene. Important putative motifs are identified and underlined. The transcriptional start site (TSS) is indicated as þ 1. (c) Progressive deletions and activity analysis of the IRX1 promoter by luciferase reporter. Progressive 50-deletions were constructed (left side) and transiently transfected into 293 T or GES-1 cells. The promoter fragments were linked to luciferase (black box). Bars on the right side denote luciferase activities, represented as mean±s.d. The data are representative examples taken from one of three experiments. cDNA microarray to identify downstream target genes cancer cell lines (Po0.001, Figure 1a, top). We of IRX1. We identified a number of target genes by examined the IRX1 copy numbers on all cell lines by global microarray analysis after IRX1 transfection real-time PCR, and four out of seven gastric cancer cell combined with real-time PCR and chromatin immuno- lines showed IRX1 copy number reduction compared precipitation assay. This work revealed that IRX1 is with the GES-1 cell line (Figure 1a, bottom). We downregulated in gastric cancer. Downregulation of sequenced PCR products for four exons of the IRX1 IRX1 due to LOH of 5p15.33, combined with epigenetic gene from seven gastric cancer cell lines and the GES-1 suppression of the retained allele, is the mechanism of control. No mutations were found except one single IRX1 inactivation in gastric cancer. nucleotide polymorphism within exon 2 in four out of seven cancer cell lines and the GES-1 cell line, which does not alter the encoded amino acid (rs844154, Results Supplementary Figure 1). (Sequencing results for other reported single nucleotide polymorphisms are shown in Analysis of IRX1 expression, mutation, gene copy Supplementary Table 1) We used online-accessible numbers and promoter region platforms to analyze the 50-franking from the transcrip- Compared with the GES-1 gastric mucosa cell line, tional start site of IRX1. The fragment À600 bp from the IRX1 mRNA was barely detectable in four gastric transcriptional start site was predicted as a probable cancer cell lines and was decreased in three gastric promoter region (Figure 1b). We amplified a 775-bp Oncogene IRX1 gene in gastric carcinoma X Guo et al 3910 Figure 2 Methylation status of IRX1 CpG islands and the effects of 5-Aza-dC on IRX1 expression. (a) Schematic locations of CpG sites within the CpG islands that surround the IRX1 transcription start site by MSP and BSP analysis. (b) Upper: The core promoter region was methylated in all gastric cancer cell lines (marked as M) but unmethylated in the GES-1 cell line (marked as U). Lower: expression of IRX1 mRNA was restored in gastric cancer cell lines after 5-Aza-dC treatment (marked as E). (c) Methylated CpG site analysis by sequencing the PCR products. Compared with wild-type sequence (top letters), cytosines of methylated CpGs in gastric cancer cell lines are not converted, whereas unmethylated CpGs in GES-1 control cells are converted (indicated by arrow). (d) Schematic summary of 12 CpG sites in the promoter region from À519 to À679. Methylation analysis was performed in 10 clones for each cell line. Each row of circles represents a single clone, and each circle represents a single CpG site. Open circle represents unmethylated cytosine; filled circle represents methylated cytosine. All gastric cancer cell lines showed higher methylation levels compared with the GES-1 control. The methylation ratios of 10 clones for each cell lines are summarized in the lowest bar chart. fragment and inserted the fragment into a luciferase bisulfate sequencing (BSP), which covered the regions of reporter vector (pGL3-Basic) for promoter activity À236 to À388 and À519 to À679, respectively (Figure 2a). analysis. A series of promoter/reporter fusion plasmids The core promoter region was methylated in all cancer cell containing progressive 50 deletions was constructed. lines according to MSP analysis. We treated cancer cell The different constructs were transiently transfected lines with 10 mM 5-Aza-20-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-dC) for 96 into 293T or GES-1 cell lines and luciferase activities or 120 h.
Recommended publications
  • BMP Signaling Orchestrates a Transcriptional Network to Control the Fate of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (Mscs)
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/104927; this version posted February 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. BMP signaling orchestrates a transcriptional network to control the fate of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) Jifan Feng1, Junjun Jing1,2, Jingyuan Li1, Hu Zhao1, Vasu Punj3, Tingwei Zhang1,2, Jian Xu1 and Yang Chai1,* 1Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA 2State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China 3Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA *Corresponding author: Yang Chai 2250 Alcazar Street – CSA 103 Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA Phone number: 323-442-3480 [email protected] Running Title: BMP regulates cell fate of MSCs Key Words: BMP, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), odontogenesis, Gli1 Summary Statement: BMP signaling activity is required for the lineage commitment of MSCs and transcription factors downstream of BMP signaling may determine distinct cellular identities within the dental mesenchyme. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/104927; this version posted February 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analysis of KRAS Mutant Cell Lines Ben Yi Tew1,5, Joel K
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of KRAS mutant cell lines Ben Yi Tew1,5, Joel K. Durand2,5, Kirsten L. Bryant2, Tikvah K. Hayes2, Sen Peng3, Nhan L. Tran4, Gerald C. Gooden1, David N. Buckley1, Channing J. Der2, Albert S. Baldwin2 ✉ & Bodour Salhia1 ✉ Oncogenic RAS mutations are associated with DNA methylation changes that alter gene expression to drive cancer. Recent studies suggest that DNA methylation changes may be stochastic in nature, while other groups propose distinct signaling pathways responsible for aberrant methylation. Better understanding of DNA methylation events associated with oncogenic KRAS expression could enhance therapeutic approaches. Here we analyzed the basal CpG methylation of 11 KRAS-mutant and dependent pancreatic cancer cell lines and observed strikingly similar methylation patterns. KRAS knockdown resulted in unique methylation changes with limited overlap between each cell line. In KRAS-mutant Pa16C pancreatic cancer cells, while KRAS knockdown resulted in over 8,000 diferentially methylated (DM) CpGs, treatment with the ERK1/2-selective inhibitor SCH772984 showed less than 40 DM CpGs, suggesting that ERK is not a broadly active driver of KRAS-associated DNA methylation. KRAS G12V overexpression in an isogenic lung model reveals >50,600 DM CpGs compared to non-transformed controls. In lung and pancreatic cells, gene ontology analyses of DM promoters show an enrichment for genes involved in diferentiation and development. Taken all together, KRAS-mediated DNA methylation are stochastic and independent of canonical downstream efector signaling. These epigenetically altered genes associated with KRAS expression could represent potential therapeutic targets in KRAS-driven cancer. Activating KRAS mutations can be found in nearly 25 percent of all cancers1.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression Analysis of Progesterone‑Regulated Mirnas in Cells Derived from Human Glioblastoma
    MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS 23: 475, 2021 Expression analysis of progesterone‑regulated miRNAs in cells derived from human glioblastoma DIANA ELISA VELÁZQUEZ‑VÁZQUEZ1, AYLIN DEL MORAL‑MORALES1, JENIE MARIAN CRUZ‑BURGOS2, EDUARDO MARTÍNEZ‑MARTÍNEZ3, MAURICIO RODRÍGUEZ‑DORANTES2 and IGNACIO CAMACHO‑ARROYO1 1Unidad de Investigación en Reproducción Humana, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología‑Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510; 2Oncogenomics Laboratory, The National Institute of Genomic Medicine; 3Laboratory of Cell Communication and Extracellular Vesicles, The National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Mexico City 14610, Mexico Received August 16, 2020; Accepted February 2, 2021 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2021.12114 Abstract. Glioblastomas (GBMs) are the most frequent and is characterized by being highly infiltrative, angiogenic and malignant type of brain tumor. It has been reported that resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The medical progesterone (P4) regulates the progression of GBMs by modi‑ history of patients with GBM is short as few of them survive fying the expression of genes that promote cell proliferation, more than one year (1‑3). GBM is mainly diagnosed in adults migration and invasion; however, it is not fully understood >50 years old, but it can occur at any age and the incidence is how these processes are regulated. It is possible that P4 medi‑ higher in men than in women (3:2) (4). ates some of these effects through changes in the microRNA Studies have focused on the identification of new biomarkers (miRNA) expression profile in GBM cells. The present study and therapeutic agents in GBM. Of particular interest are the investigated the effects of P4 on miRNAs expression profile microRNAs (miRNAs), which are single‑stranded, short, in U‑251MG cells derived from a human GBM.
    [Show full text]
  • Single Cell Regulatory Landscape of the Mouse Kidney Highlights Cellular Differentiation Programs and Disease Targets
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22266-1 OPEN Single cell regulatory landscape of the mouse kidney highlights cellular differentiation programs and disease targets Zhen Miao 1,2,3,8, Michael S. Balzer 1,2,8, Ziyuan Ma 1,2,8, Hongbo Liu1,2, Junnan Wu 1,2, Rojesh Shrestha 1,2, Tamas Aranyi1,2, Amy Kwan4, Ayano Kondo 4, Marco Pontoglio 5, Junhyong Kim6, ✉ Mingyao Li 7, Klaus H. Kaestner2,4 & Katalin Susztak 1,2,4 1234567890():,; Determining the epigenetic program that generates unique cell types in the kidney is critical for understanding cell-type heterogeneity during tissue homeostasis and injury response. Here, we profile open chromatin and gene expression in developing and adult mouse kidneys at single cell resolution. We show critical reliance of gene expression on distal regulatory elements (enhancers). We reveal key cell type-specific transcription factors and major gene- regulatory circuits for kidney cells. Dynamic chromatin and expression changes during nephron progenitor differentiation demonstrates that podocyte commitment occurs early and is associated with sustained Foxl1 expression. Renal tubule cells follow a more complex differentiation, where Hfn4a is associated with proximal and Tfap2b with distal fate. Mapping single nucleotide variants associated with human kidney disease implicates critical cell types, developmental stages, genes, and regulatory mechanisms. The single cell multi-omics atlas reveals key chromatin remodeling events and gene expression dynamics associated with kidney development. 1 Renal, Electrolyte, and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2 Institute for Diabetes, Obesity, and Metabolism, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Yeast Phenomic Model for the Influence of Warburg Metabolism on Genetic Buffering of Doxorubicin Sean M
    Santos and Hartman Cancer & Metabolism (2019) 7:9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40170-019-0201-3 RESEARCH Open Access A yeast phenomic model for the influence of Warburg metabolism on genetic buffering of doxorubicin Sean M. Santos and John L. Hartman IV* Abstract Background: The influence of the Warburg phenomenon on chemotherapy response is unknown. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mimics the Warburg effect, repressing respiration in the presence of adequate glucose. Yeast phenomic experiments were conducted to assess potential influences of Warburg metabolism on gene-drug interaction underlying the cellular response to doxorubicin. Homologous genes from yeast phenomic and cancer pharmacogenomics data were analyzed to infer evolutionary conservation of gene-drug interaction and predict therapeutic relevance. Methods: Cell proliferation phenotypes (CPPs) of the yeast gene knockout/knockdown library were measured by quantitative high-throughput cell array phenotyping (Q-HTCP), treating with escalating doxorubicin concentrations under conditions of respiratory or glycolytic metabolism. Doxorubicin-gene interaction was quantified by departure of CPPs observed for the doxorubicin-treated mutant strain from that expected based on an interaction model. Recursive expectation-maximization clustering (REMc) and Gene Ontology (GO)-based analyses of interactions identified functional biological modules that differentially buffer or promote doxorubicin cytotoxicity with respect to Warburg metabolism. Yeast phenomic and cancer pharmacogenomics data were integrated to predict differential gene expression causally influencing doxorubicin anti-tumor efficacy. Results: Yeast compromised for genes functioning in chromatin organization, and several other cellular processes are more resistant to doxorubicin under glycolytic conditions. Thus, the Warburg transition appears to alleviate requirements for cellular functions that buffer doxorubicin cytotoxicity in a respiratory context.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic and Functional Profiling of Duplicated Chromosome
    Human Molecular Genetics, 2006, Vol. 15, No. 6 853–869 doi:10.1093/hmg/ddl004 Advance Access published on January 30, 2006 Genomic and functional profiling of duplicated chromosome 15 cell lines reveal regulatory alterations in UBE3A-associated ubiquitin–proteasome pathway processes Colin A. Baron1, Clifford G. Tepper2, Stephenie Y. Liu1, Ryan R. Davis1, Nicholas J. Wang3, N. Carolyn Schanen4 and Jeffrey P. Gregg1,* 1Department of Pathology and 2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA, 3Department of Human Genetics, University of 4 California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA and Center for Pediatric Research, Nemours Biomedical Research, Downloaded from Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, USA Received November 21, 2005; Revised and Accepted January 25, 2006 Autism is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder having both genetic and epigenetic etiological elements. hmg.oxfordjournals.org Isodicentric chromosome 15 (Idic15), characterized by duplications of the multi-disorder critical region of 15q11–q14, is a relatively common cytogenetic event. When the duplication involves maternally derived con- tent, this abnormality is strongly correlated with autism disorder. However, the mechanistic links between Idic15 and autism are ill-defined. To gain insight into the potential role of these duplications, we performed a comprehensive, genomics-based characterization of an in vitro model system consisting of lymphoblast cell lines derived from individuals with both autism and Idic15. Array-based comparative genomic hybridiz- ation using commercial single nucleotide polymorphism arrays was conducted and found to be capable of by guest on December 17, 2010 sub-classifying Idic15 samples by virtue of the lengths of the duplicated chromosomal region.
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Detection of the Circulating Cell-Free Methylated DNA Pattern
    Supplementary Files Automatic Detection of the Circulating Cell‐Free Methylated DNA Pattern of GCM2, ITPRIPL1 and CCDC181 for Detection of Early Breast Cancer and Surgical Treatment Response Sheng‐Chao Wang, Li‐Min Liao, Muhamad Ansar, Shih‐Yun Lin, Wei‐Wen Hsu and Chih‐Ming Su, Yu‐Mei Chung, Cai‐Cing Liu, Chin‐Sheng Hung and Ruo‐Kai Lin Figure S1. Representative standard sequencing diagram for bisulfite direct sequencing of the CCDC181, GCM2, ITPRIPL1, ENPP2, LOC643719, ZNF177, ADCY4 and RASSF1 genes. Figure S2. Representative figures showing the DNA methylation levels of the candidate genes CCDC181, GCM2, ITPRIPL1, ENPP2, LOC643719, ZNF177, ADCY4 and RASSF1 using qMSP in breast cancer patients. Table S1. The clinical parameters of breast cancer patients for plasma ccfDNA analysis. Automatic Automatic Manual Manual Labturbo Duo Prime Characteristics 0.2 mL Plasma 0.5 mL Plasma 1.6 mL Plasma 1.6 mL Plasma N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) Overall 45 34 63 57 Type 45 19(42.2) 13(38.2) 9(14.3) 10(17.5) 45 26(57.8) 21(61.8) 54(85.7) 47(82.5) Type DCIS 3(6.7) 10(29.4) 7(11.1) 1(1.8) IDC 40(88.9) 22(64.7) 47(74.6) 48(84.2) ILC 1(2.2) 2(5.9) 1(1.6) 2(3.5) Others 1(2.2) 0 8(12.7) 6(10.5) Tumor Stage 0, I and II 32(71.1) 29(85.3) 52(82.5) 44(77.2) III and IV 13(28.9) 5(14.7) 11(17.5) 13(22.8) Tumor Size T0–T2 38(84.4) 31(91.2) 56(88.9) 49(86.0) T3–T4 7(15.6) 3(8.8) 7(11.1) 8(14.0) Lymph node N = 0 16(35.6) 22(64.7) 31(49.2) 30(52.6) N > 0 29(64.4) 1235.3) 32(50.8) 27(47.4) ER Negative 21(46.7) 7(20.6) 19(30.2) 19(33.3) Positive 24(53.3) 27(79.4) 44(69.8) 38(66.7) PR Negative 20(44.4) 11(32.4) 21(33.3) 22(38.6) Positive 25(55.6) 23(67.6) 42(66.7) 35(61.4) HER2 Negative 35(77.8) 26(76.5) 46(73.0) 35(61.4) Positive 10(22.2) 8(23.5) 17(27.0) 22(38.6) Ki‐67 High 24(53.3) 24(70.6) 39(61.9) 39(68.4) Low 21(46.7) 10(29.4) 24(38.1) 12(21.1) n.d.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mutation in Histone H2B Represents a New Class of Oncogenic Driver
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 23, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0393 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. A Mutation in Histone H2B Represents A New Class Of Oncogenic Driver Richard L. Bennett1, Aditya Bele1, Eliza C. Small2, Christine M. Will2, Behnam Nabet3, Jon A. Oyer2, Xiaoxiao Huang1,9, Rajarshi P. Ghosh4, Adrian T. Grzybowski5, Tao Yu6, Qiao Zhang7, Alberto Riva8, Tanmay P. Lele7, George C. Schatz9, Neil L. Kelleher9 Alexander J. Ruthenburg5, Jan Liphardt4 and Jonathan D. Licht1 * 1 Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL 2 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Northwestern University 3 Department of Cancer Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School 4 Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University 5 Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago 6 Department of Chemistry, Tennessee Technological University 7 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida 8 Bioinformatics Core, Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research, University of Florida 9 Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston IL 60208 Running title: Histone mutations in cancer *Corresponding Author: Jonathan D. Licht, MD The University of Florida Health Cancer Center Cancer and Genetics Research Complex, Suite 145 2033 Mowry Road Gainesville, FL 32610 352-273-8143 [email protected] Disclosures: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare Downloaded from cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org on September 27, 2021. © 2019 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 23, 2019; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0393 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Differentially Expressed Genes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis
    916 ONCOLOGY LETTERS 18: 916-926, 2019 Investigation of differentially expressed genes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by integrated bioinformatics analysis ZhENNING ZOU1*, SIYUAN GAN1*, ShUGUANG LIU2, RUjIA LI1 and jIAN hUANG1 1Department of Pathology, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong 524023; 2Department of Pathology, The Eighth Affiliated hospital of Sun Yat‑sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518033, P.R. China Received October 9, 2018; Accepted April 10, 2019 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10382 Abstract. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a common topoisomerase 2α and TPX2 microtubule nucleation factor), malignancy of the head and neck. The aim of the present study 8 modules, and 14 TFs were identified. Modules analysis was to conduct an integrated bioinformatics analysis of differ- revealed that cyclin-dependent kinase 1 and exportin 1 were entially expressed genes (DEGs) and to explore the molecular involved in the pathway of Epstein‑Barr virus infection. In mechanisms of NPC. Two profiling datasets, GSE12452 and summary, the hub genes, key modules and TFs identified in GSE34573, were downloaded from the Gene Expression this study may promote our understanding of the pathogenesis Omnibus database and included 44 NPC specimens and of NPC and require further in-depth investigation. 13 normal nasopharyngeal tissues. R software was used to identify the DEGs between NPC and normal nasopharyngeal Introduction tissues. Distributions of DEGs in chromosomes were explored based on the annotation file and the CYTOBAND database Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a common malignancy of DAVID. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of occurring in the head and neck. It is prevalent in the eastern Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis and southeastern parts of Asia, especially in southern China, were applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Cervista™ HPV HR 95-438 PRD-00804
    Cervista™ Cervista™ HPV HR 95-438 PRD-00804 An in vitro diagnostic test for the detection of DNA from14 high-risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68) in Cervical Specimens. -15°C 95-438: -30°C PRD-00804: Do NOT store in frost-free freezer. Protect from light. Table of Contents General Information .......................................................................................................................... 2 Abbreviations Used ........................................................................................................................... 3 Summary and Explanation of the Test ............................................................................................. 3 Principles of the Procedure .............................................................................................................. 4 Reagents Provided ............................................................................................................................ 5 Warnings and Precautions ............................................................................................................... 6 Reagent Storage and Handling Requirements ................................................................................ 6 Additional Reagents and Materials .................................................................................................. 6 Materials Required, But Not Provided, for Manual Testing ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WNT16 Is a New Marker of Senescence
    Table S1. A. Complete list of 177 genes overexpressed in replicative senescence Value Gene Description UniGene RefSeq 2.440 WNT16 wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 16 (WNT16), transcript variant 2, mRNA. Hs.272375 NM_016087 2.355 MMP10 matrix metallopeptidase 10 (stromelysin 2) (MMP10), mRNA. Hs.2258 NM_002425 2.344 MMP3 matrix metallopeptidase 3 (stromelysin 1, progelatinase) (MMP3), mRNA. Hs.375129 NM_002422 2.300 HIST1H2AC Histone cluster 1, H2ac Hs.484950 2.134 CLDN1 claudin 1 (CLDN1), mRNA. Hs.439060 NM_021101 2.119 TSPAN13 tetraspanin 13 (TSPAN13), mRNA. Hs.364544 NM_014399 2.112 HIST2H2BE histone cluster 2, H2be (HIST2H2BE), mRNA. Hs.2178 NM_003528 2.070 HIST2H2BE histone cluster 2, H2be (HIST2H2BE), mRNA. Hs.2178 NM_003528 2.026 DCBLD2 discoidin, CUB and LCCL domain containing 2 (DCBLD2), mRNA. Hs.203691 NM_080927 2.007 SERPINB2 serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 2 (SERPINB2), mRNA. Hs.594481 NM_002575 2.004 HIST2H2BE histone cluster 2, H2be (HIST2H2BE), mRNA. Hs.2178 NM_003528 1.989 OBFC2A Oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding fold containing 2A Hs.591610 1.962 HIST2H2BE histone cluster 2, H2be (HIST2H2BE), mRNA. Hs.2178 NM_003528 1.947 PLCB4 phospholipase C, beta 4 (PLCB4), transcript variant 2, mRNA. Hs.472101 NM_182797 1.934 PLCB4 phospholipase C, beta 4 (PLCB4), transcript variant 1, mRNA. Hs.472101 NM_000933 1.933 KRTAP1-5 keratin associated protein 1-5 (KRTAP1-5), mRNA. Hs.534499 NM_031957 1.894 HIST2H2BE histone cluster 2, H2be (HIST2H2BE), mRNA. Hs.2178 NM_003528 1.884 CYTL1 cytokine-like 1 (CYTL1), mRNA. Hs.13872 NM_018659 tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 10d, decoy with truncated death domain (TNFRSF10D), 1.848 TNFRSF10D Hs.213467 NM_003840 mRNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Pancreatic Α- and Β-Cellular Clocks Have Distinct Molecular Properties and Impact on Islet Hormone Secretion and Gene Expression
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 4, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Pancreatic α- and β-cellular clocks have distinct molecular properties and impact on islet hormone secretion and gene expression Volodymyr Petrenko,1,2,3 Camille Saini,1,2,3,9 Laurianne Giovannoni,1,2,3,9 Cedric Gobet,4,5,9 Daniel Sage,6 Michael Unser,6 Mounia Heddad Masson,1 Guoqiang Gu,7 Domenico Bosco,8 Frédéric Gachon,4,5,10 Jacques Philippe,1,10 and Charna Dibner1,2,3 1Endocrinology, Diabetes, Hypertension, and Nutrition, University Hospital of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; 2Department of Cellular Physiology and Metabolism, Diabetes Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; 3Institute of Genetics and Genomics in Geneva (iGE3), University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland; 4Department of Diabetes and Circadian Rhythms, Nestlé Institute of Health Sciences, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; 5School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; 6Biomedical Imaging Group, EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; 7Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37240, USA; 8Department of Surgery, Cell Isolation and Transplantation Centre, University Hospital of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland A critical role of circadian oscillators in orchestrating insulin secretion and islet gene transcription has been dem- onstrated recently. However, these studies focused on whole islets and did not explore the interplay between α-cell and β-cell clocks. We performed a parallel analysis of the molecular properties of α-cell and β-cell oscillators using a mouse model expressing three reporter genes: one labeling α cells, one specific for β cells, and a third monitoring circadian gene expression.
    [Show full text]