DOCSLIB.ORG

A Bioarchaeology of Captivity, Slavery, Bondage, And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Bioarchaeology of Captivity, Slavery, Bondage, And NEW DIRECTIONS IN BIOARCHAEOLOGY, PART II A BIOARCHAEOLOGYY OF CAPTIVITY, SLAVERY, BONDAGE, AND TORTURE Debra Martin and Anna Osterholtz Debra Martinn is Professorr off Bioarchaeologyy andd Anna Osterholtzz iss a PhD Candidatee and Osteologicall Collections Managerr inn thee Departmentt off Anthropology, University off Nevada, Lass Vegas. lthough we started our careers att veryy differentt times How can bioarchaeologists differentiate violence on the body (Debra received her Ph.D. in 1983, Anna will likely that is related to captivity, bondage, or slaveryy from other Acomplete hers in 2013), we have converged on a topic possible causes? One example is a series off studies we con- that has captured ourr imaginations as well as keptt us up at ducted on a group off women who lived among an Ancestral night with images off people in pain and circumstances of Pueblo communityy around 1,000 years ago (Martin ett al. untold horror. Our currentt research delves into the origins 2008). Integrating skeletal analysis, mortuary context, and evolution off culturally sanctioned violence used to sub- archaeological reconstruction, and neuropathology, we were due, capture, enslave, or torture humans. able to use multiple lines off evidence that all pointed to cap- tivity and enslavement. A subgroup off women showed injury As anthropologists, we use bioarchaeologyy as a means to recidivism, thatt is, repeated trauma and injury over the explainn humann behavior. In this case, we want to understand course off a lifetime (see Judd 2002 for one off the first stud- the biological impacts off prolonged periods off abuse att the ies linking injuryy recidivism to violence in ancient societies). hands off others or whatt itt means to be literallyy worked to the Indicators included healed cranial depression fractures like- bone as a slave, captive, or indentured servant. We work with ly due to blunt force trauma obtained during raiding and theories about the ways that nonlethal and lethal violence are abduction off females. These women also had a variety of used to subdue and exploit humans. Captivity, slavery, and healed fractures on the lower body, as well as localized trau- torture are very old and ancient practices, going backk as far ma to the joints (e.g., dislocated hip joint). These mayy be the as there are written records. Bioarchaeology can make result off punishment orr harsh treatment. These women also importantt contributions to explaining howw violence is used had indicators off poor health (infections, nutritional prob- to create and reinforce particular kinds off social orders. lems). Months or years off hard laborr resulted in pronounced muscle markers, traumatic osteoarthritis, and trauma- Bioarchaeology is the analysis off human remains in a richly induced pathologies in these women. They were recovered detailed and nuanced contextt that integrates biological, cul- from burial contexts different from individuals who did not tural, and environmental data from a numberr off sources. have bodies wracked with trauma and pathology. In this case, Joanna Sofaer captures the essence off this kind off integrated the women seem to have been placed without any intention- research when she says “we cannot take an empiricist view ality or grave offerings and in abandoned pitt structures. and assume thatt osteological data speakk for themselves . as the body is simultaneously biological, representational Philip Walker (1989) found patterns off healed cranial depres- and material” (2006:11). Bioarchaeology is informed by the sion fractures on men and women from a southern Califor- use off frameworks, models, and theories thatt aid in thinking nia group also from aboutt 1,000 years ago. However, there through the different ways that bodies can reveal the effects was not a pattern off injury recidivism or differential burial off past behaviors. The work we do in studying violence is a context, and this led him to suggest that the head wounds form off archaeological witnessing off horrific pastt events that were related to ritualized violence during periods off environ- helps us sharpen our understanding off what motivates and mental stress. In this study, Walkerr was the firstt bioarchae- drives the systems off power that use violence (see Scheper- ologistt to showw that blows to head severe enough to leave cra- Hughes and Bourgois 2004). Shining a light on these com- nial depression fractures could have caused some brain plexx behaviors can reveal howw violence is embedded in social injury. He made the initial connection between healed head structures. wwounds and long-term behavioral changes in the form off 32 The SAA Archaeological Record • May 2012 NEW DIRECTIONS IN BIOARCHAEOLOGY, PART II Figure 1: Debra Martinn workingg inn herr bioarchh lab withh undergraduate Figure 2: Anna Osterholtz inn the Sheilaghh Brooks Osteologyy Research student, Kristin Halsey. Lab att UNLV. migraine headaches, dizziness, impaired judgment, and Dealing with the bioarchaeology off torture and executions otherr side effects off traumatic brain injury. has also revealed that there are key patterns revealed on the skeleton. The assemblage at Sacred Ridge, Colorado, for We extended Walker’s observations by working with a neu- example, is made up off the remains off at least 33 people ropathologist (Bradleyy Crenshaw) who examined the crania who were killed, dismembered, and placed in a pit struc- off the Ancestral Pueblo females with head wounds. We ture around A.D. 800. Examination off the foot bones of learned thatt brain injuryy results when external forces are these individuals shows a pattern off injury that is consis- applied to the outside off the skull and are transmitted to the tent with hobbling and torture, which would have been a brain. The damage occurs in two places: at the coup (where tremendously perfomative aspect during the massacre. the bluntt force is applied) and the contra-coup (where the Individuals would have been forced to watch their kin brain slams into the opposite side off the skull from the force being hobbled by blows and cuts to the sides off the feet and off hit). A multitude off side effects are possible, depending on tortured by beating the soles and tops off the feet. Peeling of which parts off the brain are most damaged. As an example, the bony tissue as well as cut marks, buckling off the bone, one female (age 30 att the time off death) had survived a crush- and other marks consistent with torture and hobbling are ing bloww that affected a large area att the top off herr head. Dr. present on adult remains off both sexes. Hobbling would Crenshaw analyzed the extentt off her injuries and feltt certain have made it impossible for the individual to physically that she would have had life-long behavioral challenges. move or flee; this has both physical and psychological Given the size, location, and status off her injury, she may effects. Hobbling is visible through the damage to the sides have had problems not onlyy with migraines and dizziness, off the feet, caused by both blows and cutting off the liga- but also with motor control, balance, and general coordina- ments that stabilize the foot for walking and running. Tor- tion. In addition to healed head wounds, this woman also ture through beating the soles off the feet has a long and had a dislocated hip thatt could have been from poor balance diverse history worldwide. Torture cements the social con- and problems with motor coordination, both off which are trol off a captive by literally giving the aggressor power to long-term side effects off traumatic brain injury. inflict pain (or to stop the infliction off pain). These types off injury have absolutely no utility after death, and so mustt Bioarchaeology off the Atlantic slave trade in the Americas have been perpetrated prior to death. was pioneered by Michael Blakey (1998) with his oversightt off the African Burial Ground Project. He and his students doc- How Can These Data from the Bodies off Former umented the ways thatt the skeleton reveals the accumulative Captives and Slaves Aid In Understanding Modern effects off subjugation and hard labor. Their findings show Day Slavery? howw pronounced musculoskeletal markers and traumatic pathologies leave signs thatt suggest excessive, grueling, and The currentt relevance off these types off behaviors cannot be long hours off physical labor. The bones tell a storyy off indi- overstated. Media images and descriptions provide dailyy ref- viduals being worked beyond their physical capabilities. erences to the global trafficking off humans in an under- May 2012 • The SAA Archaeological Record 33 NEW DIRECTIONS IN BIOARCHAEOLOGY, PART II document and even more difficult to objectivelyy score, since each individual will feel pain att differing intensities. Equally difficult for us as bioarchaeologists, and even more impor- tant for us when examining concepts such as torture in a performative light, is the impactt thatt another person’s pain has on a witness. In some ways, being forced to watch some- one you care for in pain mayy be as powerful as being sub- jected to such pain yourself. Nott only is someone you care for in distress, but you have no power to mitigate the situa- tion. Pain is inherently relatable, so the examination off pain is a way to humanize workk such as thatt seen att Sacred Ridge, where the scale off the massacre has a tendencyy to overwhelm individual observations. Through our collective studies of these kinds off violence, we can gett an idea off what that indi- vidual felt and imagine ourselves and our families in a simi- lar situation. Bioarchaeology has only begun to scratch the surface off understanding the biological effects and social contexts of captivity, slavery, bondage and torture. These data from the 3: Diagramm showingg torture andd disarticulation off the foott bones.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Publicationsthe Prohibition of Torture
    THE PROHIBITION OF TORTURE: AN INTRODUCTORY GUIDE This is a publication of the Center for Hu- man Rights & Humanitarian Law at American University College of Law — authored by Associate Director of Impact Litigation and the Kovler Project Against Torture Jennifer de Laurentiis and Assistant Director of the Anti- Torture Initiative Andra Nicolescu, and designed by Center Program Coordinator Anastassia Fagan. TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM DEAN CAMILLE A. NELSON.......................................................................................................i MESSAGE FROM CENTER DIRECTOR, PROFESSOR MACARENA SAEZ.........................................................ii INTRODUCTION: WHY DOES THE PROHIBITION OF TORTURE AND OTHER ILL-TREATMENT MATTER?...............................................................................................................1 WHAT IS TORTURE?.....................................................................................................................................................2 WHAT ARE “OTHER ACTS OF CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT WHICH DO NOT AMOUNT TO TORTURE?”...................................................5 WHAT IS THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN TORTURE & OTHER ILL-TREATMENT?...........................................6 CAN PRIVATE ACTORS COMMIT “TORTURE”?......................................................................................................7 WHAT DOES THE CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE REQUIRE?.....................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Torture in Great Britain, the United States, and Argentina, 1869-1977
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2014 Holes in the Historical Record: The olitP ics of Torture in Great Britain, the United States, and Argentina, 1869-1977 Lynsey Chediak Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Chediak, Lynsey, "Holes in the Historical Record: The oP litics of Torture in Great Britain, the United States, and Argentina, 1869-1977" (2014). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 875. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/875 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLAREMONT McKENNA COLLEGE Holes in the Historical Record: The Politics of Torture in Great Britain, the United States, and Argentina, 1869-1977 SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR LISA FORMAN CODY AND DEAN NICHOLAS WARNER BY LYNSEY CHEDIAK FOR SENIOR HISTORY THESIS SPRING 2014 April 28, 2014 Acknowledgments This thesis would not have been possible without the brilliant minds of my professors at Claremont McKenna College and the encouragement of my family. First, I would like to thank my reader and advisor, Professor Lisa Forman Cody. From my first day in her class, Professor Cody took what I was trying to say and made my statement, and me, sound ten times smarter. From that moment, I started to truly believe in the power of my ideas and a central tenet that made this thesis possible: there is no wrong answer in history, only evidence. Through countless hours of collaboration, Professor Cody spurred my ideas to levels I never could have imagined and helped me to develop my abilities to think critically and analytically of the historical record and the accuracy of sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Rights Violations As Torture Or Ill-Treatment
    REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AS TORTURE OR ILL-TREATMENT CAT Committee Jurisprudence on Violations of Reproductive Rights The Committee against Torture (CAT Committee) has found that several restrictions on access to reproductive health services and abuses that occur when seeking these services may constitute violations of the Convention against Torture (CAT) because they put women’s health and lives at risk or may otherwise cause them severe physical or mental pain or suffering. For instance, the CAT Committee has found that complete bans on abortion, which exist in only five countries in the world (Nicaragua, El Salvador, Chile, Malta, and the Dominican Republic) may constitute torture or ill-treatment on their face, because these laws place women at a risk of preventable maternal mortality. • As the CAT Committee noted in its 2009 review of El Salvador, “the current Criminal Code of 1998 penalizes and punishes with imprisonment for periods ranging from 6 months to 12 years all forms of recourse to voluntary interruption of pregnancy, including in cases of rape or incest, which has resulted in serious harm to women, including death,” recommending that El Salvador take measure to prevent torture and ill-treatment by “providing the required medical treatment, by strengthening family planning programmes and by offering better access to information and reproductive health services, including for adolescents.”1 The CAT Committee has also recommended that abortion be legal in a variety of instances where a pregnancy may cause a woman severe physical or mental suffering. To date, the CAT Committee has found that states have an obligation to ensure access to abortion for women whose health or life is at risk, who are the victims of sexual violence, or who are carrying non- viable fetuses.
    [Show full text]
  • Torture and the Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment of Detainees: the Effectiveness and Consequences of 'Enhanced
    TORTURE AND THE CRUEL, INHUMAN AND DE- GRADING TREATMENT OF DETAINEES: THE EFFECTIVENESS AND CONSEQUENCES OF ‘EN- HANCED’ INTERROGATION HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION, CIVIL RIGHTS, AND CIVIL LIBERTIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 8, 2007 Serial No. 110–94 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://judiciary.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 38–765 PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 15:46 Jul 29, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 H:\WORK\CONST\110807\38765.000 HJUD1 PsN: 38765 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan, Chairman HOWARD L. BERMAN, California LAMAR SMITH, Texas RICK BOUCHER, Virginia F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JERROLD NADLER, New York Wisconsin ROBERT C. ‘‘BOBBY’’ SCOTT, Virginia HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina ELTON GALLEGLY, California ZOE LOFGREN, California BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas STEVE CHABOT, Ohio MAXINE WATERS, California DANIEL E. LUNGREN, California WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts CHRIS CANNON, Utah ROBERT WEXLER, Florida RIC KELLER, Florida LINDA T. SA´ NCHEZ, California DARRELL ISSA, California STEVE COHEN, Tennessee MIKE PENCE, Indiana HANK JOHNSON, Georgia J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia BETTY SUTTON, Ohio STEVE KING, Iowa LUIS V. GUTIERREZ, Illinois TOM FEENEY, Florida BRAD SHERMAN, California TRENT FRANKS, Arizona TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin LOUIE GOHMERT, Texas ANTHONY D.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of the US Torture Statute to the Physical and Psychological
    Rape as Torture: Application of the U.S. Torture Statute to the Physical and Psychological Consequences of Rape and Sexual Violence on Victims Lindsay Gorman Rape is considered a crime against humanity and an act of torture in international law in large part due to its severe physical and psychological effects on individuals and communities. It is not the purpose of this memorandum to contrast U.S. and international jurisprudence, but rather to explore these physical and psychological effects common to incidents of sexual violence with an eye towards situating this crime within the bounds of the U.S. torture statute, 18 U.S.C. §2340. Elsewhere, we discuss the psychological motivations of the perpetrator of these crimes in the interest of satisfying the statute’s specific intent requirement. Here, our focus is on the victims—and precisely on showing that rape and sexual crimes indisputably meet Title 18’s severity standards. In this section, we will show that rape and sexual crimes: (1) have the potential to cause severe physical pain or suffering; (2) result in prolonged mental harm; and (3) cause this prolonged mental harm via circumstances enumerated under the U.S. torture statute. Points (2) and (3) are sufficient to show that rape and sexual violence amount to the “severe mental pain or suffering” stipulated by the statute. (1) “torture” means an act committed by a person acting under the color of law specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions)
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to Political Participation in International Law
    The Right to Political Participation In International Law Gregory H. Fox I. INTRODUCTION ................................................ 540 I1. THE EMERGING INTERNATIONAL LAW OF PARTICIPATORY RIGHTS ................. 544 A. ParticipatoryRights Before 1948: The Reign of the State Sovereignty Approach ..... 544 B. The Nature and Scope of Post-War Treaty-Based ParticipatoryRights ........... 552 1. The InternationalCovenant on Civil and PoliticalRights ................ 553 a. Non-Discrimination .................................... 553 b. The Right to Take Part in Public Affairs........................ 555 c. Requirements Concerning Elections ........................... 555 2. The FirstProtocol to the European Convention on Human Rights ........... 560 a. Rights Concerning Elections ................................ 561 b. Non-Discrimination .................................... 563 3. The American Convention on Hwnan Rights ........................ 565 4. Other InternationalInstruments Guaranteeing ParticipatoryRights .......... 568 a. The African Charteron Hwnan and Peoples' Rights ................ 568 b. Council on Security and Co-operationin Europe Accords ............. 568 5. Summary of Treaty-Based Norms ................................ 570 II. INTERNATIONAL ELECTION MONITORING: THE ELABORATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF PARTICIPATORY RIGHTS ......................................... 570 A. Election Monitoring Priorto 1945 .................................. 571 B. Monitoring Under the United Nations System .......................... 572 1. The
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights
    Universal Declaration of Human Rights Preamble Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people, Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law, Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations, Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in cooperation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms, Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge, Now, therefore, The General Assembly, Proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of American Prisoners of War in Southeast Asia 1961-1973 by John N. Powers
    Treatment of American Prisoners of War In Southeast Asia 1961-1973 By John N. Powers The years 1961 to 1973 are commonly used when studying American POWs during the Vietnam War, even though history books generally refer to the years 1964 to 1973 in defining that war. Americans were captured as early as 1954 and as late as 1975. In these pages the years 1961 to 1973 will be used. Americans were held prisoner by the North Vietnamese in North Vietnam, the Viet Cong (and their political arm the National Liberation Front) in South Vietnam, and the Pathet Lao in Laos. This article will not discuss those Americans held in Cambodia and China. The Defense Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Office (DPMO) lists 687 American Prisoners of War who were returned alive by the Vietnamese from 1961 through 1976. Of this number, 72 were returned prior to the release of the bulk of the POWs in Operation Homecoming in 1973. Twelve of these early releases came from North Vietnam. DPMO figures list thirty-six successful escapes, thirty-four of them in South Vietnam and two in Laos. There were more than those thirty-six escapes, including some from prison camps in Hanoi itself. Some escapes ended in recapture within hours, some individuals were not recaptured for days, and some were simply never seen again. There were individuals who escaped multiple times, in both North and South Vietnam. However, only thirty- six American prisoners of war escaped and reached American forces. Of those thirty- six successful attempts, twenty-eight of them escaped within their first month of captivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Accountability for Torture: Why a Criminal Investigation Is Necessary
    Accountability for Torture: Why a Criminal Investigation is Necessary The Senate Intelligence Committee’s torture report confirms that the CIA tortured and brutalized prisoners in secret prisons around the world. The report, which is the culmination of a multi-year inquiry, also provides startling, new details about the level of cruelty perpetrated in our names. The conduct that the report describes violates both international and domestic law. Much of this conduct was authorized at the highest levels of government, with the involvement of the White House, the Justice Department, and the Defense Department. Given the gravity of the conduct described in the report, the Justice Department has a duty to investigate issues of criminal responsibility. A criminal investigation is an unequivocal obligation under international law. It is also necessary to repair our country’s damaged moral authority and prevent similar abuses from occurring again. The Justice Department Should Appoint a Special Prosecutor To ensure that the investigation of the torture program is comprehensive and insulated from political interference, Attorney General Eric Holder should appoint a special prosecutor from within the Justice Department and transfer to that special prosecutor all of his authority to investigate and prosecute crimes relating to the program. A special prosecutor would be able to make prosecutorial decisions without having to seek the attorney general’s permission. The special prosecutor’s mandate should be broad. It should include the authority to investigate and prosecute decisions to approve torture, to carry it out, and to conceal it. The special prosecutor should also examine CIA efforts to impede or improperly access the Senate’s investigation of CIA torture.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Shadow Report Submitted by Advocates for U.S. Torture Prosecutions
    Shadow Report to the United Nations Committee Against Torture on the Review of the Periodic Report of the United States of America September 29, 2014 Prepared by Advocates for U.S. Torture Prosecutions Dr. Trudy Bond, Prof. Benjamin Davis, Dr. Curtis F. J. Doebbler, and The International Human Rights Clinic at Harvard Law School Summary: Since the United States last reported to the Committee Against Torture in 2006, even more evidence has emerged confirming that civilian and military officials at the highest level created, designed, authorized, and implemented a sophisticated, international criminal program of torture. In August 2014, President Barack Obama conceded that the United States tortured people as part of its so-called “War on Terror,” yet the United States continues to shield senior officials from liability for these crimes, in violation of its obligations under the Convention Against Torture. Recommended Questions: 1. Why has the United States not prosecuted senior officials for authorizing conduct it admits was torture? 2. Were the following people ever criminally investigated for their role in torture, and why have they not been prosecuted? a. Former President George W. Bush b. Former Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) at the Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo c. Former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) contractor Dr. James Mitchell Suggested Recommendation: 1. That the United States promptly and impartially prosecute senior military and civilian officials responsible for authorizing, acquiescing, or consenting in any way to acts of torture committed by their subordinates. Advocates for U.S. Torture Prosecutions I. Reporting Organization Advocates for U.S. Torture Prosecutions is a group composed of concerned U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sec 5.1~Abuse of Prisoners As Torture
    1 5. Substantive Legal Assessment 5.1 Abuse of Prisoners as Torture and War Crimes under Sec. 8 of the CCIL and International Law The crimes described above against detainees at Abu Ghraib and the plaintiffs al Qahtani and Mowsboush constitute torture and war crimes under German and international criminal law. Therefore, sufficient evidence exists of criminality under Sec. 8 I nos. 3 and 9 CCIL. The following will provide a detailed legal analysis of the prohibitions in the CCIL and international law that were violated by the above-described acts. First, it will note the way in which two high-ranking members of the U.S. government dealt with the traditional torture techniques of “water boarding” and “longtime standing,” which is significant from the plaintiff’s perspective. In their publicly documented statements, both of government officials reveal a high degree of cynicism, coupled with ignorance of historical, legal and medical contexts. “Water Boarding” and “Longtime Standing” In the course of an interview on 24 October 2006, the Vice President of the United States, Richard Cheney, asked by radio reporter Scott Hennen whether “a dunk in water is a no- brainer if it can save lives,” gave the following answer: “It's a no-brainer for me, but for a 2 while there, I was criticized as being the ‘Vice President for torture.’ We don't torture. That's not what we're involved in. We live up to our obligations in international treaties that we're party to.” Cheney was the first member of the Bush government to admit that “water boarding” had been used in the case of detainee Khalid Scheikh Mohammed and other high-ranking al Quaeda members.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Perspectives on Torture: Law and Practice
    Gender Perspectives on Torture: Law and Practice CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & HUMANITARIAN LAW Anti-Torture Initiative Gender Perspectives on Torture: Law and Practice CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & HUMANITARIAN LAW Anti-Torture Initiative ii GENDER PERSPECTIVES ON TORTURE: Law and Practice Table of Contents � v Acknowledgements vii Preface: Macarena Sáez xi Introduction: Juan E. Méndez xv Foreword: Dubravka Šimonović 1 I. Gender-Based Violence: State Responsibility 3 The Vital Voices Justice Institute: Helping States Combat Gender-Based Violence Gigi Scoles and Anupama Selvam 19 Reparations for Sexual and Other Gender-Based Violence Carla Ferstman 33 How Non-State Torture is Gendered and Invisibilized: Canada’s Non-Compliance with the Committee Against Torture's Recommendations Jackie Jones, Jeanne Sarson, and Linda MacDonald 57 The Importance of Investigating Torture Against Women and Girls by Non-State Actors: Applicable Legal Standards from International Human Rights Law Teresa Fernández Paredes 87 II. Gender and Sexuality as the Basis for Specific Harms 89 Murdered in the Name of “Honor” Aisha K. Gill 105 Female Genital Mutilation as a Form of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment": Intersections with the Migration Context Els Leye and Ino Kehrer 123 Pregnancy and Virginity Testing in Educational Settings and the Torture and Other Ill-Treatment Framework Esther Major 139 Forced Contraception as a Means of Torture Christie J. Edwards 161 The Humanisation of Women: A Work in Progress Purna Sen 183 Gendering the Lens: Critical Reflections on Gender, Hospitality and Torture Mauro Cabral Grinspan and Morgan Carpenter iii iv GENDER PERSPECTIVES ON TORTURE: Law and Practice 197 III.
    [Show full text]