Irdp) on Rural Transformation in the Trans-Ghaghara Plain
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Municipal Solid Waste Management by Urban Local Bodies
CHAPTER 2 Performance Audit on “Municipal Solid Waste Management by Urban Local Bodies” Executive Summary Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) comprises residential and commercial wastes generated in a municipal area in either solid or semi-solid form excluding industrial hazardous wastes but including treated bio-medical wastes. The Government of India (GoI), in exercise of the powers conferred under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, had framed Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000 (MSW Rules) to regulate the management and handling of MSW to protect and improve the environment and to prevent health hazards to human beings and other living creatures. As per MSW Rules, every municipal authority is responsible for collection, segregation, storage, transportation, processing and disposal of municipal solid wastes. A Performance Audit on Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) was conducted covering 36 ULBs of ten districts for the period 2011-16. Significant audit observations are as follows: ● City plans were not prepared by the test checked ULBs but for NN Lucknow, NN Kanpur and NPP Sultanpur. Paragraph 2.6.1 ● Waste processing facilities were not sanctioned in 604 ULBs of the State. The facilities were operational in only 1.4 per cent of total ULBs. Out of 36 test checked ULBs, waste processing and disposal facilities was sanctioned only for seven, whereas only three of these were operational. Paragraph 2.6.2 ● Thirty five per cent (` 177.91 crore) of sanctioned cost (` 505.30 crore) of MSW management projects in the State remained unutilised as installation works of 19 MSW processing and disposal facilities were held up due to various reasons. -
List of Class Wise Ulbs of Uttar Pradesh
List of Class wise ULBs of Uttar Pradesh Classification Nos. Name of Town I Class 50 Moradabad, Meerut, Ghazia bad, Aligarh, Agra, Bareilly , Lucknow , Kanpur , Jhansi, Allahabad , (100,000 & above Population) Gorakhpur & Varanasi (all Nagar Nigam) Saharanpur, Muzaffarnagar, Sambhal, Chandausi, Rampur, Amroha, Hapur, Modinagar, Loni, Bulandshahr , Hathras, Mathura, Firozabad, Etah, Badaun, Pilibhit, Shahjahanpur, Lakhimpur, Sitapur, Hardoi , Unnao, Raebareli, Farrukkhabad, Etawah, Orai, Lalitpur, Banda, Fatehpur, Faizabad, Sultanpur, Bahraich, Gonda, Basti , Deoria, Maunath Bhanjan, Ballia, Jaunpur & Mirzapur (all Nagar Palika Parishad) II Class 56 Deoband, Gangoh, Shamli, Kairana, Khatauli, Kiratpur, Chandpur, Najibabad, Bijnor, Nagina, Sherkot, (50,000 - 99,999 Population) Hasanpur, Mawana, Baraut, Muradnagar, Pilkhuwa, Dadri, Sikandrabad, Jahangirabad, Khurja, Vrindavan, Sikohabad,Tundla, Kasganj, Mainpuri, Sahaswan, Ujhani, Beheri, Faridpur, Bisalpur, Tilhar, Gola Gokarannath, Laharpur, Shahabad, Gangaghat, Kannauj, Chhibramau, Auraiya, Konch, Jalaun, Mauranipur, Rath, Mahoba, Pratapgarh, Nawabganj, Tanda, Nanpara, Balrampur, Mubarakpur, Azamgarh, Ghazipur, Mughalsarai & Bhadohi (all Nagar Palika Parishad) Obra, Renukoot & Pipri (all Nagar Panchayat) III Class 167 Nakur, Kandhla, Afzalgarh, Seohara, Dhampur, Nehtaur, Noorpur, Thakurdwara, Bilari, Bahjoi, Tanda, Bilaspur, (20,000 - 49,999 Population) Suar, Milak, Bachhraon, Dhanaura, Sardhana, Bagpat, Garmukteshwer, Anupshahar, Gulathi, Siana, Dibai, Shikarpur, Atrauli, Khair, Sikandra -
Restoration of Po Barhalganj
ACTION PLAN FOR RESTORATION OF POLLUTED STRETCH OF RIVER GHAGHRA FROM BARHALGANJ (GORAKHPUR) TO BHAGALPUR (DEORIA) River Ghaghra at Gorakhpur UTTAR PRADESH POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD TC – 12V, VIBHUTI KHAND, GOMTINAGAR, LUCKNOW (UP) INDEX Executive Summary a-c 1. Introduction 1-4 1.1 Identified Polluted stretch of River Ghaghra (Barhalganj, 5-6 Gorakhpur To Bhagalpur, Deoria) 2. Objective of the Action Plan 6 3. Pollution Inventory 7-23 3.1 Details of drains polluting River Ghaghra within 7-17 identified stretch 3.2Details of Sewage Pollution Sources 18 3.3Details of Waste Management 19-23 . 3.3 (a)Municipal Solid Waste 19 . 3.3 (b)Bio- Medical Waste 20-21 . 3.3 (c)Hazardous Waste 22 . 3.3 (d)E-Waste 23 4. Details of Industrial Pollution Sources 24 5. Status of Ground Water 25-26 6. Monitoring of Pollution Sources 27-29 6.1 Monitoring of Drains 27 6.2 Monitoring of River 28 6.3 Establishment of River Ghaghra Pollution Control Room 29 7. Polluted River Stretch Rejuvenation Action Plan 30-42 Appendices 43 Appendix-1 Pollution Source Mapping of Ghahgra from 44-45 Barhalganj(Gorakhpur) to Bhagalpur (Deoria) Appendix-2 Details of cities & Towns 46 Appendix-3 Details of Gram Panchayats & revenue Villages on the 47 banks of River Appendix-4 Wetlands/Water bodies along the River Ghaghra 48 49-52 Appendix-5 Status of E-waste Management Appendix-6 River Water Quality Data 53-62 Appendix-7 MSW improvement action plan time-line for the ULBs of 63-65 Department of Urban Development, UP Standard 66-68 Appendix-8 Other Relevant Information 69-71 ACTION PLAN FOR RESTORATION OF POLLUTED STRETCH OF RIVER GHAGHRA FROM BARHALGANJ (GORAKHPUR) TO BHAGALPUR (DEORIA) Executive Summary River Ghaghra is a perennial Trans-Boundary River. -
District Population Statistics, 33-Deoria, Uttar Pradesh
II Census of India, 1951 DISTRICT POPULATION STATISTICS UTTAR PRADESH 33-DEORIA DISTRICT 315.42 ALLAHABAD: TING AND STA,nONERY, UTIAR PRADESH, INDIA 3Jl J 5"42.. 1951 1953 1\ 1) £:0 -J> OED OPS ~~~~-~---------------------------------' _ _liiIiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii_________ ......... ~;;o; ,;;;;;~~~~;;;;;;,;,;;;;;;;,;,;;;;;;;,;,;_......,;~ Price, Be.i-S. FOREWORD THE Uttar Pradesh Government asked me in March, 19S2, t~ supply them for the purposes of elections to local bodies population statistics with separation for scheduled castes (i) ,mohalla/ward-wise for urban areas, and (ii) village-wise foc rural 'areas. The Census Tabulation Plan did not provide for sorting of scheduled castes population for areas smaller than a tehsil or urban tract and the request from the Uttar Pradesh Government came when the slip sorting had been finished and the Tabulation Offices closed. As the census slips are mixed up for the purposes of sorting in one lot for a tehsil or urban tract, collection of data regarding scheduled castes population by moh all as/ward s and villages would have involved enormous labour and expense if sorting of the slips had been taken up afresh. Fortunately, however, a secondary census record, viz. the N ationa! Citizens' Register, in which each slip has been copied, was available. By singular foresight it had been pre pared mohalla/ward-wise for urban areas and village-wise for rural areas. The required information has, therefore, been extracted from this record. 2. In (he above circumstances there is a slight difference in the figures of population as arrived at by an earlier sorting of the slips and as now determined by counting from the National Citizens' Register. -
Assessment of Domestic Pollution Load from Urban Agglomeration in Ganga Basin: Uttar Pradesh
Report Code: 060_GBP_IIT_EQP_S&R_10_VER 1_DEC 2014 Assessment of Domestic Pollution Load from Urban Agglomeration in Ganga Basin: Uttar Pradesh GRBMP: Ganga River Basin Management Plan by Indian Institutes of Technology IIT IIT IIT IIT IIT IIT IIT Bombay Delhi Guwahati Kanpur Kharagpur Madras Roorkee Report Code: 060_GBP_IIT_EQP_S&R_10_VER 1_DEC 2014 2 | P a g e Report Code: 060_GBP_IIT_EQP_S&R_10_VER 1_DEC 2014 Preface In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (3) of Section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (29 of 1986), the Central Government has constituted National Ganga River Basin Authority (NGRBA) as a planning, financing, monitoring and coordinating authority for strengthening the collective efforts of the Central and State Government for effective abatement of pollution and conservation of the river Ganga. One of the important functions of the NGRBA is to prepare and implement a Ganga River Basin Management Plan (GRBMP). A Consortium of 7 Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) has been given the responsibility of preparing Ganga River Basin Management Plan (GRBMP) by the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), GOI, New Delhi. Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) has been signed between 7 IITs (Bombay, Delhi, Guwahati, Kanpur, Kharagpur, Madras and Roorkee) and MoEF for this purpose on July 6, 2010. This report is one of the many reports prepared by IITs to describe the strategy, information, methodology, analysis and suggestions and recommendations in developing Ganga River Basin Management Plan (GRBMP). The overall Frame Work for documentation of GRBMP and Indexing of Reports is presented on the inside cover page. There are two aspects to the development of GRBMP. -
1 Village Kathera, Block Akrabad, Sasni to Nanau Road , Tehsil Koil
Format for Advertisement in Website Notice for appointment of Regular / Rural Retail Outlet Dealerships Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) proposes to appoint Retail Outlet dealers in Uttar Pradesh, as per following details: Fixed Fee / Security Estimated monthly Type of Minimum Dimension (in M.)/Area of Mode of Minimum Bid Sl. No Name of location Revenue District Type of RO Category Finance to be arranged by the applicant Deposit (Rs. Sales Potential # Site* the site (in Sq. M.). * Selection amount (Rs. In In Lakhs) Lakhs) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9a 9b 10 11 12 SC, SC CC-1, SC PH ST, ST CC-1, ST PH OBC, OBC CC- CC / DC / Estimated fund Estimated working Draw of Regular / 1, OBC PH CFS required for MS+HSD in Kls Frontage Depth Area capital requirement Lots / Rural development of for operation of RO Bidding infrastructure at RO OPEN, OPEN CC- 1, OPEN CC- 2,OPEN-PH Village Kathera, Block Akrabad, Sasni to Nanau Road , Draw of 1 Tehsil Koil, Dist Aligarh ALIGARH RURAL 90 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Lots 0 2 Village Dhansia, Block Jewar, Tehsil Jewar,On Jewar to GAUTAM BUDH Draw of 2 Khurja Road, dist GB Nagar NAGAR RURAL 160 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Lots 0 2 Village Dewarpur Pargana & Distt. Auraiya Bidhuna Auraiya Draw of 3 Road Block BHAGYANAGAR AURAIYA RURAL 150 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Lots 0 2 Village Kudarkot on Kudarkot Ruruganj Road, Block Draw of 4 AIRWAKATRA AURAIYA RURAL 100 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Lots 0 2 Draw of 5 Village Behta Block Saurikh on Saurikh to Vishun Garh Road KANNAUJ RURAL 100 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Lots 0 2 Draw of 6 Village Nadau, -
District Block Village Total Flood Affected Villages
DISTRICT BLOCK VILLAGE TOTAL FLOOD AFFECTED VILLAGESTotal Block AMBEDKAR NAGAR AKBARPUR Alampur Akhai 290 9 Alaval Pur Amartal Asarafpur Pachau Bhekhu Pur Chandpur Bhatpura Chetoune Dargah Shan Ramjan Daudpur Gos Pur Hajepur Marui Isamail Pur Jagadeshpur Norva Jamune Pur Kala Pur Kasav Pur Kotava Mahamuda Pur Lala Pur Majesa Makadum Pur Mohiudden Pur Mubarakpur Daiyadeh Rajepur Dhava Salaudden Pur Salem Pur Satarahe Sehmau Karempur Sikrohar Sultanpur Tulsepur Tulse Pur Vangaon Variyavan Vijay Gaon ATRAULIA Arama Baharpur Basant Patti Fattepur Khas Gohanarpur Harpur Hazipur Jagadishpur Mt. Fatte Nariyaon Rampur Mt.Gohanarpur BASKHARI 1Sonhan Akdalla Arusa Azampur Asrafpur Kichhauchha Baniyane Barhe Afdilpur Dayampur Foolpur Gohila Harnedeh Hiswar Husenpur Grant Jalalpur Sabakpur Kewtala Lakhanpur Mahmud Pur Mainpur Kaithole Majha Ajmeri Badshahp Majha Danjwal Majha Gannpur Majha Kewtala Majha Naserabad Mkoiya Mohmadpur Sabukpur Mohmmadpur Kapure Narayanpur Pretampur Pura Choube Ramdih Saray Rampur Benepur Sabook Pur Semra Naserpur Shadipur Shekhpur Singhpur Tandwa Daarupur Tandwa Purb BHIYAON Amdahi Ashapur Baroona Bhiyav Bihamadpur Chakia Dulhupur Kala Ekullapur Fulwari Goori Barah Harsinghpur Karimnagar Madhavpur Marhara Mathia Mathura Rasoolpur Nimtini Purabaldahi Ratna Semra Tundawa Maulahi JAHANGIRGANJAenwa Ahirauli Rani Mau Ambare Araji Debara Balepur Bankata Buzurg Berkhet Bizli Padauli Chadipur Khurd Chak Madhopur Chaoepur Kala Chhichnapur Daswat Pur Ethiya Devlar Dihwa Ramgulam Esoura Dolepur Fulwariya Gadaye Pur Gahwal Ghughurpatti -
Households and Household Population by Language Mainly Spoken in the Household, Series-22, Uttar Pradesh
CENSUS OF INDIA 198]_ SERIES-22 UTTAR PRADESH PAPER 1 OF 1987 HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSEHOLD POPULATION BY LANGUAGE MAINLY SPOKEN IN THE HOUSEHOLD RAVINDRA GUPTA of the Indian Administrative Service Director of Census Operations, Uttar Pradesh CONTENTS Page Foreword (iv) Preface (v) Acknowledgement (vi) Note on the Language Data 1-5 Table HH-16 Part A (i) : Households and Household Population by Language mainly spoken in the Household (inclusive of variants grouped under each) specified in Schedule VIII to the Constitution of India 8-45 Table HH-16 Part A (ii) Households and Household Population by Language mainly spoken in the household (inclusive of variants grouped under each) specified in Schedule VIII to the Constitution of India 46-323 Table HH -16 Part B (i) Households and Household Population by Language mainly spoken in the Household (inclUSive of variants where grouped) other than those specified in Schedule VIII to the Constitution of India 326---:-343 Table HH-16 Part B (ii) Households and Household Population by Language mainly spoken in the household (inclusive of variants where grouped) other than those specified in Scheduled VIII to the Constitution of India 344-401 FOREWORD This volume contains the data on languages collected through the Household Schedule canvassed in the 1981 Census. The information pertains to language mainly spoken in the households. The presentation is based on the same principles as were adopted in the 1971 Census presentation of language/mother tongue data. The table presented which comes in the series of household tables of 1981 Census Tabulation Plan bears the number HH-16 (A & B). -
Determining Rank-Size Distribution of Urban Centres of Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India
IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 19, Issue 9, Ver. VI (Sep. 2014), PP 50-59 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org Determining Rank-Size Distribution of Urban Centres of Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India Dr. (Mrs.) Kiran Kumari Associate Professor, Department of Geography Rajiv Gandhi University, Rono Hills, Doimukh -791112 Arunachal Pradesh (India) Abstract: The concept of city-size distribution has riveted the attention of social scientists during the last four decades. The existence of three types of city-size distribution has been noted in the literature on city-size distribution and settlement system. These are central place, rank-size and primate city distributions. This paper is primarily concerned with the last two. The Rank-Size rule is one of the methods of analyzing total settlement network in a region and also a tool for analyzing the settlement system that helps in the description and interpretation of the relationship between rank and population size of urban centres. A city-size distribution, in which the largest, city is several times larger than the second largest is known as the primate city-size distribution. The present study aims to examine the validity of Rank-Size Rule in India’s backward region Eastern Uttar Pradesh. A Stochastic model of the actual and expected population of the primate city and its variation from the estimated one provides interesting results that the urban centres in Eastern U.P. do not completely conform to the rank size rule. Keywords: Rank-Size Rule, Zipf’s Law, Primacy Index, Primate City I. -
AUDIT BUREAU of CIRCULATIONS Details of Distribution and Territorial Breakdown of Circulation No
AUDIT BUREAU OF CIRCULATIONS Details of Distribution and Territorial Breakdown of circulation No. Name of the Publication : DAINIK JAGRAN, Gorakhpur 120 218-A Average Circulation for the audit period : July/December 2008 : 1,22,238 Section A Section B Statewise distribution in India and outside India Townwise distribution (250 copies or more) in various States Average Average Circulation Circulation 1.In the town(s) of Publication GORAKHPUR 45,527 UTTAR PRADESH 2. In the State(s) in which the town(s) of publication is situated : Basti Dist. UTTAR PRADESH 75,461 Basti 6,083 3. In Other States Other Places 4,277 SOUTHERN ZONE Andhra Pradesh - Karnataka - Dist. Total 10,360 Kerala - Deoria Dist. Lakshadweep - Bhatni Bazar 530 Pondicherry - Bhatpar Rani 527 Tamil Nadu - Deoria 6,692 WESTERN ZONE Gaura Barhaj 680 Chhattisgarh - Lar 379 Dadra & Nagar Haveli - Rudrapur 601 Daman & Diu - Salempur 425 Goa - Other Places 7,282 Gujarat - Madhya Pradesh - Dist. Total 17,116 Maharashtra - Gorakhpur Dist. NORTHERN ZONE Bansgaon 378 Chandigarh - Barhalganj 765 Delhi - Gola Bazar 328 Haryana - Gorakhpur 45,527 Himachal Pradesh - Pipiganj 849 Jammu & Kashmir - Pipraich 418 Punjab - Sahjanwa 990 Rajasthan - Other Places 11,333 Uttaranchal - EASTERN ZONE Dist. Total 60,588 Andaman & Nicobar Islands - Kushinagar Dist. Arunachal Pradesh - Hata 578 Assam - Kaptanganj 587 Bihar 509 Khadda 313 Jharkhand - Padrauna 2,186 Manipur - Ramkola 503 Meghalaya - Other Places 8,024 Mizoram - Nagaland - Orissa - Dist. Total 12,191 Rest of India - - Maharajganj Dist. Sikkim Anandnagar 450 Tripura - 1,437 - Mahrajganj West Bengal Nautanwa 278 4. Outside India 741 Nichlaul 324 Siswa Bazar 409 Other Places 4,721 Dist. -
Annual Technical Inspection Report on Urban Local Bodies for the Year
Annual Technical Inspection Report on Urban Local Bodies for the year ended 31 March 2016 Office of the Principal Accountant General (General & Social Sector Audit) Uttar Pradesh Government of Uttar Pradesh TABLE OF CONTENTS Reference to Particulars Paragraph Page No. No. PREFACE - iii OVERVIEW - v CHAPTER 1 An Overview of the Functioning, Accountability Mechanism and Financial Reporting Introduction 1.1 1 Organisational set up of Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) 1.2 2 Functioning of ULBs 1.3 2 Formation of various Committees 1.4 3 Audit arrangement 1.5 3 Response to Audit observations 1.6 4 Property Tax Board 1.7 5 Service Level Benchmark 1.8 5 Fire-hazard response 1.9 6 Submission of Utilisation Certificates 1.10 6 Financial reporting 1.11 6 Conclusion 1.12 11 CHAPTER 2 Performance Audit Performance Audit on “Municipal Solid Waste Management by Urban 2 13 Local Bodies” CHAPTER 3 Compliance Audit Audit on “Management of own funds by Municipal Boards including 3.1 43 collection of Revenue in Urban Local Bodies” Audit Paragraphs Wasteful expenditure in Nagar Nigam Varanasi 3.2 56 Unfruitful expenditure in Nagar Palika Parishads Khatauli and 3.3 57 Bangarmau Unfruitful expenditure in Nagar Nigam Allahabad 3.4 59 Violation of pollution norms in Nagar Nigams Agra and Lucknow 3.5 60 Loss of revenue in Nagar Palika Parishad Hathras 3.6 61 Loss of revenue in Nagar Nigam Varanasi 3.7 62 i Appendices Number Particulars Page Number 1.1 Functions of Urban Local Bodies 65 1.2 Functions performed exclusively by Urban Local Bodies 65 1.3 Sharing of functions between Urban Local Bodies and Government 66 Agencies 1.4 Functions performed by Government departments/ agencies 66 1.5 Details of maintenance of records, SLBs etc. -
District Census Handbook, Deoria, Part
CENSUS OF INDIA 2001 SERIES-10 UTTAR PRADESH DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK Part - A & B DEORIA VOLUME - II VILLAGE & TOWN DIRECTORY VILLAGE AND TOWNWISE . PRIMARY CENSUS ABSTRACT . DIRECTORATE OF CENSUS OPERATioNS, UTTAR PRADESH LUCKNOW Contents Page Foreword X Preface XII Acknowledgement Xlii VOLUME - I District Highlights - 2001 Census xv Important Statistics in the District xvi Ranking of Tahsils in the District xviii Statement-I Name of the headquarters of district/tahsil, their rural-urban status XJX and distance from district headquarters, 2001 Statemer.t-2 Name of the headquarters of district/C D block their rural-urban xix status and distance from district headquarters, 2001 Statement-3 Population of the district at each census from 1901 to 2001 xx Statement-4 Area, number of villages/towns and population in district and XXI tahsil, 2001 Statement-5 C D Blockwise number of villages and rural population, 2001 XXII Statement-6 Population of Urban Agglomerations/towns, 2001 XXII Statement-7 Villages with population of 5,000 and above at C D Block level as xxiii per 2001 census and amenities available Statement-8 Statutory towns with population less than 5000 as per 2001 Census XXIV and amenities available Statement-9 Houseless and Institutional population oftahsils, rural and xxiv urban, 2001 Analytical Note (i) History and scope of the District Census Handbook 2 (ii) Brief history of the district 2 (iii) Administrative set-up 4 (iv) Physical features (I) Location and size 5 (2) Physiography 5 (3) Drainage 5 (4) Climate 6 (5) Natural Economic Resources 6' (v) Census Concepts 11 (vi) Non-Census Concepts 17 (vii) 2001 Census findings-Population, its distribution etc.