Alberta Coal Industry in 1919 and the Main Concerns of the People Connected with It

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alberta Coal Industry in 1919 and the Main Concerns of the People Connected with It I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Historical Society ofAlberta Vol. 2 ALBERTA'S COAL INDUSTRY 1919 Edited and with Introduction by DAVID JAY BERCUSON Alberta Records Publication Board HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF ALBERTA 1978 Copyright 1978 by the Historical Society of Alberta, Calgary, Alberta All rights reserved Published with the assistance of grants from the Alberta Department of Culture, the Alberta Historical Resources Foundation, and the Alberta Energy Co. Ltd. Introduction lilt INTRODUCTION This volume is an edited transcript of the hearings of the Alberta Coal Mining Industry Commission of 1919. The government-appointed Commission was established in the late spring of 1919 to study all important aspects of the min­ ing, distribution, marketing and uses of Alberta's coal resources. It held hearings in each of the coal producing areas of Alberta and witnesses- mine owners and managers, miners, government officials and consumers­ were invited to give their opinion on the state of the in­ dustry. Their verbatim evidence was transcribed from stenographers' notes and was used by the Commission to ar­ rive at a series of recommendations to the provincial govern­ ment (see Appendix I). The Commission was formed because the post-World War One period was a time of labour unrest and business uncertainty; the government and the coal industry wanted to know the industry's state of health and what could be done to improve it. Because of this, the Commission's evidence presents a good picture of the Alberta coal industry in 1919 and the main concerns of the people connected with it. Coal mining in Alberta began in the 1880s when mines vm Introduction were opened in the Lethbridge, Medicine Hat and Canmore areas. These were small operations designed to produce coal for the Canadian Pacific Railway or home heating fuel for the handful of newly-arrived white settlers. In the 1890s larger collieries were opened in the Crowsnest Pass while small mines, sometimes operated by two or three men, were dug in the vicinity of Edmonton. After 1909 the Coal Branch was opened in the foothills west of Edmonton. The last major coal region was opened two years later in Drumheller, northeast of Calgary. By the outbreak of World War One in August, 1914, coal mining was a major industry. Alberta collieries contributed more than 27 per­ cent of total Canadian production; more than 3.5 million tons in 1914. Over 8,000 persons were directly employed by the industry, the bulk working as underground miners. I Alberta coal was roughly divided into two categories. "Steam" coal was primarily mined in the Coal Branch and Crowsnest Pass areas. It was good bituminous with low ash and moisture content suitable for fuelling steam engines and providing power for the smelters of British Columbia. Steam coal collieries tended to be large operations with multiple shafts employing several hundred men in each. Until the end of World War One they generally sold all they could produce and had few marketing problems. "Domestic" coal was intended for heating buildings. It was poorer bituminous or lignite coal with a relatively high ash and moisture content. Most came from the smaller mines in the Edmonton, Drumheller and Lethbridge fields, though some collieries in these areas also produced steam coal. The market for domestic coal was always less secure than for steam coal. Producers had little trouble selling in Alberta and Saskatchewan, but beyond that their reach was limited. The west coast was serviced by mines on Vancouver Island while consumers in the American Pacific Northwest pur­ chased coal mined in the state of Washington. Alberta pro­ ducers could not compete against high quality Pennsylvania anthracite allowed into the central Canadian market by Canadian tariff policy designed to keep fuel costs as low as possible. They could usually not even compete in Winnipeg. Alberta coal went east by rail, an expensive operation, while Pennsylvania coal was shipped to the Canadian lakehead by lake steamer and unloaded at the huge coal dock facilities owned by the major Canadian railroads. By the time it ar­ rived in Winnipeg shipping costs had pushed the price Introduction zx higher than for Alberta coal, but the difference- rarely more than two dollars a ton, was not great enough to discourage consumers who preferred the cleaner burning, easier to handle American product. 2 Coal mining was a highly complex business. It started at the coal face where men, usually in pairs, worked rooms in the coal seam. This was the "room and pillar" method. '. Tunnels were driven into the coal seam and widened into rooms separated by pillars of coal. The pillars supported the roof while the coal was being removed from the rooms by picking, if it was a soft variety, or blasting. The men who dug coal, loaded it into mine cars, laid track to the coal face and shored and bucked the rooms, were contract miners. They were paid by the amount of coal dug, graded and weighed, or by the yard. If they drove tunnel, or set up timbers and did other preparatory jobs, they were paid a set rate for each job. The contract miners were the elite of the mine labour force. They had to be highly proficient to earn a decent living and to preserve life and limb. Once the coal was loaded into cars it was taken to the sur­ face. The men responsible for the general maintenance of the mine, driving the mules that pulled the mine cars (most collieries in Alberta were too small for electric mine engines) bringing the rail and timbers to the contract miners, or cleaning up the grounds, were "company" men (sometimes also "day" men). They earned a daily wage bas­ ed on the numer of hours worked. They were also responsi­ ble for inspecting, running and repairing the huge fans that ran constantly to pull dust and gas out of the mines and force clean air in, and the pumps that kept some shafts from flooding. At the surface the coal was weighed, watched over by a check weighmen elected and paid for by the men. The mine car was then dumped, the coal cleaned of bone (rock) at a large picking table and, at most mines, passed over a screen. The screening separated the coal into lump coal (usually pieces more than eight inches in diameter), nut coal (from one to eight inches), pea coal (usually smaller than two inches), and slack (powder and tiny pieces). Miners were docked for bone or slack. And if their cars con­ tained bone more than twice, they were fired. Once graded, the coal was loaded into railroad cars and shipped directly to wholesalers in the city. Alberta coal was soft and therefore perishable. Shipping in closed box cars or gon- x Introduction dolas and storage in closed sheds was necessary. If the coal was handled too often- by the miner, the pickers, the bar men or the railroad- it deteriorated. The railroad had to be very careful when handling cars. One problem that careful handling could not solve was over-production. There were simply too many coal mines in Alberta even though it was rare for any of these mines to work at full capacity. 3 The coal business was seasonal. De­ mand for home heating fuel was almost non-existent in the spring and summer. Since it was difficult to store Alberta coal for long periods, there was little hope consumers could be educated to buy coal in the off-season when it was cheaper. But steam coal mines were also tied to seasonal rhythms. Rail traffic was slack on the prairies in the spring and summer and only became heavy in the fall and early winter when tons of grain had to be shipped. There were thus hundreds of mines in the province, from small opera­ tions to major collieries, which served a market that almost disappeared for about six months of the year. Some operators opened mines on speculation, ran them for two or three seasons and then abandoned them. Coal fields were honeycombed with unworked shafts. There were too many under-utilized mines which tied up capital and ate into pro­ fit margins while standing idle. In the off-season these mines still had to be maintained, cleaned, pumped out and kept free of gasses. The miners too suffered under these con­ ditions, and rarely worked throughout the year. They were forced to hire on as farmhands, section hands or spare labourers in the country around the mines. World War One temporarily solved some of these pro­ blems and gave a great boost to the Alberta coal industry. Coal was in demand to fuel troop and freight trains carrying war materials and to power the smelters. Production almost doubled and thousands of men were added to the mine labour force." But the industry also had problems. A coal strike in 1917, launched by District 18, United Mine Workers of America, which represented almost all western Canadian coal miners, brought production to a halt. The strike was for higher wages to enable miners to keep up with the rapidly rising cost of living. But it was in violation of a contract with the Western Coal Operators Association which represented most coal operators in Alberta. It was also against the orders of the union's headquarters in the United States. The federal government intervened to end Introduction Xl the dispute and appointed W.H. Armstrong, a Vancouver contractor, coal commissioner with power to set coal prices, regulate production, determine wages, and settle disputes.
Recommended publications
  • Watershed Stewardship in Alberta: a Directory of Stewardship Groups, Support Agencies, and Resources
    WATERSHED STEWARDSHIP IN ALBERTA: A DIRECTORY OF STEWARDSHIP GROUPS, SUPPORT AGENCIES AND RESOURCES APRIL 2005 INTRODUCTION FOREWORD This directory of WATERSHED STEWARDSHIP IN ALBERTA has been designed to begin a process to meet the needs of individuals, stewardship groups, and support agencies (including all levels of government, non- governmental organizations, and industry). From recent workshops, surveys, and consultations, community- based stewards indicated a need to be better connected with other stewards doing similar work and with supporting agencies. They need better access to information, technical assistance, funding sources, and training in recruiting and keeping volunteers. Some groups said they felt isolated and did not have a clear sense that the work they were doing was important and appreciated by society. A number of steps have occurred recently that are beginning to address some of these concerns. The Alberta Stewardship Network, for example, has been established to better connect stewards to each other and to support agencies. Collaboration with other provincial and national networks (e.g. Canada’s Stewardship Communities Network) is occurring on an on-going basis. Internet-based information sites, such as the Stewardship Canada Portal (www.stewardshipcanada.ca), are being established to provide sources of information, linkages to key organizations, and newsletters featuring success stories and progress being made by grassroots stewards. These sites are being connected provincially and nationally to keep people informed with activities across Canada. The focus of this directory is on watershed stewardship groups working in Alberta. The term ‘watershed’ is inclusive of all stewardship activities occurring on the landscape, be they water, air, land, or biodiversity-based.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Structure Plan
    ROBB AREA STRUCTURE PLAN Yellowhead County Invistec Consulting Ltd. 2716 1 AVENUE 10235 101 STREET NW EDSON, ALBERTA T7E 1N9 EDMONTON, ALBERTA T5J 3G1 780-723-4800 780-717-2599 www.yhcounty.ca www.invistec,ca July 2020 THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Project Team would like to thank the community members, organizations, and various stakeholders who contributed to the development of this Area Structure Plan by providing feedback, attending workshops, and sharing their stories. We are excited to see the active participation in implementing the Robb Area Structure Plan. We would also like to thank Yellowhead County Council for their support of the Plan. Finally, we would like to thank the Yellowhead County Planning and Development team and Administration who provided information and participated in the development of this Plan. Ward Councillor Invistec Consulting Ltd. Lavone Olson 4th Floor, 10235 101 Street NW Edmonton, AB, Canada T5J 3G1 Phone: (780) 717-2599 | [email protected] Yellowhead County Staff www.invistec.ca Brent Shepherd | Planning and Development Manager Ostap Fedynets | Planning & Engagement Officer Primary Project Team Tracy Ruszkowski | Planning & Development Officer Stephen Yu, MPlan, RPP, MCIP | Project Manager Kaylyn Stark, BPlan | Engagement Lead Steering Committee Community Members Fabio Coppola, MPlan | Planner Christine Didier Janet Johanson Kevin Hampton Tina Woods ROBB Area Structure Plan I 0.0 Table of Contents 1.0 ROBB was... 3.0 ROBB can be... 1.1 History 1 3.1 Vision Statement 17 1.2 Authorization 1 2.7 3.1.1 Understanding the Vision 1.3 Location 2 3.2 Land Use Policies 18 3.2.1 Hamlet Policies 2.0 ROBB is..
    [Show full text]
  • Published Local Histories
    ALBERTA HISTORIES Published Local Histories assembled by the Friends of Geographical Names Society as part of a Local History Mapping Project (in 1995) May 1999 ALBERTA LOCAL HISTORIES Alphabetical Listing of Local Histories by Book Title 100 Years Between the Rivers: A History of Glenwood, includes: Acme, Ardlebank, Bancroft, Berkeley, Hartley & Standoff — May Archibald, Helen Bircham, Davis, Delft, Gobert, Greenacres, Kia Ora, Leavitt, and Brenda Ferris, e , published by: Lilydale, Lorne, Selkirk, Simcoe, Sterlingville, Glenwood Historical Society [1984] FGN#587, Acres and Empires: A History of the Municipal District of CPL-F, PAA-T Rocky View No. 44 — Tracey Read , published by: includes: Glenwood, Hartley, Hillspring, Lone Municipal District of Rocky View No. 44 [1989] Rock, Mountain View, Wood, FGN#394, CPL-T, PAA-T 49ers [The], Stories of the Early Settlers — Margaret V. includes: Airdrie, Balzac, Beiseker, Bottrell, Bragg Green , published by: Thomasville Community Club Creek, Chestermere Lake, Cochrane, Conrich, [1967] FGN#225, CPL-F, PAA-T Crossfield, Dalemead, Dalroy, Delacour, Glenbow, includes: Kinella, Kinnaird, Thomasville, Indus, Irricana, Kathyrn, Keoma, Langdon, Madden, 50 Golden Years— Bonnyville, Alta — Bonnyville Mitford, Sampsontown, Shepard, Tribune , published by: Bonnyville Tribune [1957] Across the Smoky — Winnie Moore & Fran Moore, ed. , FGN#102, CPL-F, PAA-T published by: Debolt & District Pioneer Museum includes: Bonnyville, Moose Lake, Onion Lake, Society [1978] FGN#10, CPL-T, PAA-T 60 Years: Hilda’s Heritage,
    [Show full text]
  • Cadomin and Jasper Areas Willem Langenberg and John Waldron
    Field Guide to Selected Geological Sections of the Cadomin and Jasper Areas Willem Langenberg and John Waldron Edmonton Geological Society Field Trip Guide September 22-23, 2007 Introduction The Rocky Mountains can be divided into Foothills, Front Ranges, and Main Ranges as shown in the cartoon below (Fig. 1). Outcrops in the foothills are dominated by softer weathering Mesozoic rocks of the foreland basin: mainly sandstone and shale but also including conglomerates and coal. Most of the clastic rocks represent material eroded from earlier-formed parts of the orogen to the west, which was subsequently cannibalized as the thrustbelt advanced westward in late Mesozoic to early Cenozoic time. Locally in the foothills, the more resistant late Paleozoic carbonate rocks come to the surface in elongated ridges. Saturday's traverse will begin in the foothills of the Cadomin area and proceed southwest into the Front Ranges. In the Front Ranges carbonates dominate the landscape. These represent the late Paleozoic continental margin of the Laurentian continent, now sliced into multiple imbricated thrust sheets. Mesozoic clastics are confined to narrow valleys. On Sunday morning we will take the Yellowhead Highway further into the Front Ranges and eventually into the Main Ranges of the Rockies. In the Main Ranges, lower parts of the stratigraphy are preserved, including widespread outcrops of older, Early Paleozoic carbonates, clastics, and the underlying Proterozoic succession of the Windermere Supergroup. The structural style is different, too. Although thrust sheets are present, they are generally much larger in scale, and their dips are gentler. In addition, the rocks were more ductile when deformed, so that cleavage and folds are much more widely developed in the mudrocks.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Municipal Codes
    2017 Municipal Codes Updated December 22, 2017 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] 2017 MUNICIPAL CHANGES STATUS CHANGES: 0315 - The Village of Thorsby became the Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017). NAME CHANGES: 0315- The Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017) from Village of Thorsby. AMALGAMATED: FORMATIONS: DISSOLVED: 0038 –The Village of Botha dissolved and became part of the County of Stettler (effective September 1, 2017). 0352 –The Village of Willingdon dissolved and became part of the County of Two Hills (effective September 1, 2017). CODE NUMBERS RESERVED: 4737 Capital Region Board 0522 Metis Settlements General Council 0524 R.M. of Brittania (Sask.) 0462 Townsite of Redwood Meadows 5284 Calgary Regional Partnership STATUS CODES: 01 Cities (18)* 15 Hamlet & Urban Services Areas (396) 09 Specialized Municipalities (5) 20 Services Commissions (71) 06 Municipal Districts (64) 25 First Nations (52) 02 Towns (108) 26 Indian Reserves (138) 03 Villages (87) 50 Local Government Associations (22) 04 Summer Villages (51) 60 Emergency Districts (12) 07 Improvement Districts (8) 98 Reserved Codes (5) 08 Special Areas (3) 11 Metis Settlements (8) * (Includes Lloydminster) December 22, 2017 Page 1 of 13 CITIES CODE CITIES CODE NO. NO. Airdrie 0003 Brooks 0043 Calgary 0046 Camrose 0048 Chestermere 0356 Cold Lake 0525 Edmonton 0098 Fort Saskatchewan 0117 Grande Prairie 0132 Lacombe 0194 Leduc 0200 Lethbridge 0203 Lloydminster* 0206 Medicine Hat 0217 Red Deer 0262 Spruce Grove 0291 St. Albert 0292 Wetaskiwin 0347 *Alberta only SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Graveyards of Industry – Exploring the Effects of a Resource-Reliant
    Graveyards of Industry – Exploring the effects of a resource-reliant economy on the towns of early Alberta Aaron Kyle Lang – [email protected] Website: http://www.ghosttownsofcanada.com/ Summary This research focuses on Western Alberta’s ghost towns, and how resource focused economies have led to the formation, the prosperity, and eventually the demise of these now desolate localities. This project investigates the local geology, socio-economic climate, and broader historical events that have shaped these areas, and how it has impacted modern life and industrial activity. The areas explored were mostly coal-based economies, which include the Alberta Coal Branch, Banff National Park, Crowsnest Pass, Kananaskis, and Southern Alberta. The findings from this research highlight that rapid changes in technology and relying on a single industry to maintain economic activity will result in the creation of a ghost town. The extent the localities have changed in recent years has dramatically varied based on its value to locals, industry, and the government. Introduction Alberta has always been reliant on its abundant natural resources, such as coal and oil. However, in a fast- changing world with the prominence of modern issues such as climate change and renewable energies, we must look to history to examine what has happened in the past to understand the future. To do this, there must be a careful study of the epitaphs of Alberta's rich industrial history to find the warning signs of the adverse effects of a region relying on one industry. We must understand the ghost towns of Alberta. A ghost town in the Alberta context is a locality that experienced a period of rapid growth due to the economic advantages of a single-resource based or agrarian economy, which provided access to amenities required for a healthy municipality, such as hotels, restaurants, general stores, and hospitals.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesoproterozoic–Early Cretaceous Provenance and Paleogeographic Evolution of the Northern Rocky Mountains
    Mesoproterozoic–Early Cretaceous provenance and paleogeographic evolution of the Northern Rocky Mountains: Insights from the detrital zircon record of the Bridger Range, Montana, USA Chance B. Ronemus†, Devon A. Orme, Saré Campbell, Sophie R. Black, and John Cook Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173480, Bozeman, Montana 59717-3480, USA ABSTRACT Jurassic detritus into the foreland basin to rels et al., 1996, 2011; Gehrels and Ross, 1998; dominate by the Early Cretaceous. Park et al., 2010; Laskowski et al., 2013). These The Bridger Range of southwest Montana, ancient sources may consist of first-cycle grains USA, preserves one of the most temporally INTRODUCTION derived from Precambrian basement provinces extensive sedimentary sections in North or more recent magmatism. However, zircons America, with strata ranging from Meso- Sedimentary rocks in the Bridger Range of are more commonly sourced from erosion and proterozoic to Cretaceous in age. This study southwest Montana, USA, record the Mesopro- recycling of previously deposited sedimentary presents new detrital zircon geochronologic terozoic–Mesozoic history of sedimentation in rock (e.g., Schwartz et al., 2019). data from eight samples collected across this this region of North America, with Mesopro- The evolution of sedimentary provenance is mountain range. Multidimensional scaling terozoic to Cretaceous stratigraphy exposed as strongly influenced by tectonic factors (Gehrels, and non-negative matrix factorization sta- a generally eastward dipping homoclinal panel 2014). Tectonic events, such as rifting and moun- tistical analyses are used to quantitatively across the range (Fig. 1). The >8 km of stratig- tain building, trigger drainage reorganization unmix potential sediment sources from these raphy collectively record critical information and uplift new sediment sources.
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia
    118°30'0"W 118°0'0"W 117°30'0"W 117°0'0"W 116°30'0"W 116°0'0"W 115°30'0"W 115°0'0"W 114°30'0"W 114°0'0"W 113°30'0"W 113°0'0"W 112°30'0"W Blefgen Island Grassland Island Lake Atmore Village / Hamlet Gray Lake Lake 10 km Study Corridor R21R20 W5M R19 R18 R17 R16R15 R14 R13 R12 R11 R10 R9R8 R7 R6 R5 R4 R3 R2 R1 W5M Lake R26 W4M R25 R24 R23 R22 R21 R20 R19 R18 R17 R16 W4M T67 Kilometre Post (KP) Island Lake South Oakley Dakin Lake Brereton September Lake 30 km Study Corridor Lake Baptiste LAC LA Lake 54°45'0"N Existing Trans Mountain Pipeline 44 Lake Grassy PROPOSED TRANS BICHE ATHABASCA LANDING Trans Mountain Expansion Whispering Hills COUNTY T66 Lake MOUNTAIN T67 West Baptiste SETTLEMENT 100 km Study Corridor 55 Selected Study Corridor (V4) Sunset Beach 63 EXPANSION PROJECT Roche MUNICIPAL DISTRICT Burnt North Hylo Trans Mountain Expansion Lake OF LESSER SLAVE Lake Alternate Corridor (V4) City / Town Francis South Baptiste ATHABASCA Buck Lake ATHABASCA 54°45'0"N Windfall RIVER NO. 124 Lake ALBERTA SWAN COUNTY Terminal Lake Cross Lake HILLS Flatbush Bleak Trapeze Indian Reserve / Métis Settlement Provincial Park Flat T65 T66 Lake Pump Station (Pump Addition or Relocation, Lake Lake APRIL 2013 DRAFT Freeman Skeleton Caslan Valves and/or Scraper Facilities) Io Canoe Lake se Lake National Park gu Meekwap Lake Mewatha Beach n Duck Narrow Colinton Bondiss R Lake New Pump Station (Proposed) iv WOODLANDS Sara Lake Lake Boyle er Foley Amisk Buffalo Lake COUNTY Lake Metis Settlement Provincial Park Lake Lake T65 T64 Pump Station (Reactivation) MUNICIPAL
    [Show full text]
  • CADOMIN Area Structure Plan
    CADOMIN Area Structure Plan Lovatt Planning Consultants Inc. May 2012 CADOMIN Area Structure Plan Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Plan Background ......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Regional Context ......................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Historical Context ........................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Process ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.6 Plan Organization ........................................................................................................ 3 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Population ................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Physical Features ......................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Municipal Services .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hinton/Coal Branch Area
    440000 445000 450000 455000 460000 465000 What is a Public Land Use Zone? Legend A Public Land Use Zone (PLUZ) is an area of land to which legislative controls are applied under the authority of the Public Lands k k e Act. A PLUZ is created specically for that land base and the conditions that exist within it. Various levels of access control can be e e r e r C is C achieved through the designation, including the following: William A. Switzer rv ra Access in the Hinton/Coal Branch Roads Ja a rb Provincial Park a • complete exclusion of motorized and/or non-motorized activities, including recreational camping; B Area Public Land Use Zones Divided Highway dhay River Wil • restriction of motorized activities to designated trails or travel corridors; Wildhay River Highway 40 2 Lane Undivided Road • exclusion of motorized and non-motorized activities from certain highly-sensitive areas within a zone; and Motorized OHV Access 5935000 Gravel Road • seasonal restrictions for motorized and/or non-motorized activities during certain times of the year. Time Constrained Motorized OHV Access Three separate PLUZs within the Coal Branch Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) area were designated in May 1999 to manage access OHV use permitted June 25 to October 15 only Unimproved Road and add greater protection to sensitive areas and key wildlife habitat. The PLUZs will provide continued opportunities for most ldman Creek O traditional recreational use. Designated off-highway vehicle (OHV) trails have been identied through the Coal Branch Access k Motorized 4X4 Access e e Management Plan (1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Valley Robb Trend
    Section A Project Introduction Robb Trend Project Section A – Project Introduction TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A PROJECT INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 A.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 A.2 PROJECT PROPONENT ............................................................................................... 1 A.3 PROJECT NEED AND ALTERNATIVES ................................................................... 2 A.3.1 Project Need ....................................................................................................... 2 A.3.2 Project Alternatives ............................................................................................ 3 A.4 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL ............................................................................... 5 A.4.1 Applicant Information ........................................................................................ 6 A.4.2 Existing Approvals ............................................................................................. 7 A.4.3 Request for Approval ......................................................................................... 7 A.4.4 Application Guide and Description .................................................................. 10 A.5 REGIONAL AND LOCAL SETTING ........................................................................ 11 A.6 DEVELOPMENT PLAN ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:30 AM
    YELLOWHEAD COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, September 12, 2017 9:30 AM Our Mission Statement Building a better community for present and future generations. Vision Statement Recognized as a place of choice for those who want to be where great things happen. Page 1 of 54 COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA COUNCIL CHAMBERS YELLOWHEAD COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, EDSON, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 Page 1.0 AGENDA 1.01 Adoption of Agenda That Council for Yellowhead County accepts the September 12, 2017 Council meeting agenda as presented. 2.0 MINUTES 2.01 Adoption of Council Meeting Minutes 4 - 13 That Council for Yellowhead County adopts the August 22, 2017 Council meeting minutes as presented. 3.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 3.01 Public Hearing for Bylaw 02.17, being a Bylaw to adopt 14 - 32 the Hamlet of Peers Area Structure Plan dated August 22, 2017 3.02 Public Hearing for Bylaw 03.17, being a Bylaw to adopt 33 - 44 the Edson Intermunicipal Development Plan dated August 2017 3.03 An application to redistrict Plan 1222207; Block 1; Lot 12 45 - 47 within the Hamlet of Niton Junction from Hamlet Commercial (HC) to Hamlet General (HG). 4.0 SCHEDULED PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS 5.0 CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 6.0 INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES 7.0 COMMUNITY SERVICES 8.0 PROTECTIVE SERVICES 9.0 CORPORATE AND PLANNING SERVICES 10.0 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Yellowhead County Council Meeting Agenda September 12, 2017 Page 2 of 54 10.01 Follow Up Action List 48 - 51 That Council for Yellowhead County accepts the Follow Up Action List as presented for information purposes.
    [Show full text]