Advantages and Limitations of Spectroscopic, Chromatographic and Electrophoretic Methods for the Characterisation of Synthetic Cannabinoids and Synthetic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Advantages and Limitations of Spectroscopic, Chromatographic and Electrophoretic Methods for the Characterisation of Synthetic Cannabinoids and Synthetic Advantages and limitations of spectroscopic, chromatographic and electrophoretic methods for the characterisation of synthetic cannabinoids and synthetic cathinone derivatives Dissertation der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) vorgelegt von Sonja Metternich aus Koblenz Tübingen 2020 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen. Tag der mündlichen Qualifikation: 08.06.2020 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Rosenstiel 1. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Carolin Huhn 2. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Jürgen Pomp Table of contents Table of contents Table of contents ......................................................................................................................... i Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Zusammenfassung ...................................................................................................................... 4 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 New psychoactive substances - a never ending-story ................................................ 5 1.1.1 Synthetic cannabinoids ........................................................................................... 6 1.1.2 Synthetic cathinone derivatives .............................................................................. 8 1.2 NPS analytics - a challenging task in Forensic Science ............................................. 9 1.2.1 Presumptive tests .................................................................................................. 10 1.2.2 Optical spectroscopy ............................................................................................ 12 1.2.3 Separation Techniques ......................................................................................... 14 1.2.4 Chiral analysis ...................................................................................................... 15 2 Ion mobility spectrometry as a fast screening tool for synthetic cannabinoids to uncover drug trafficking in jail via herbal mixtures, paper, food, and cosmetics .................................. 17 2.1 Abstract .................................................................................................................... 17 2.2 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 17 2.3 Materials and Methods ............................................................................................. 21 2.3.1 Chemicals ............................................................................................................. 21 2.3.2 Methodology: Characterization of NPS powders from seizures .......................... 23 2.4 Results ...................................................................................................................... 27 2.4.1 Characterization of NPS with UPLC, GC-MS and NMR .................................... 27 2.4.2 IMS measurements ............................................................................................... 31 2.5 Discussion ................................................................................................................ 38 2.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 40 3 Discrimination of synthetic cannabinoids in herbal matrices and of synthetic cathinone derivatives by portable and laboratory-based Raman spectroscopy ........................................ 41 3.1 Abstract .................................................................................................................... 41 3.2 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 41 3.3 Materials and Methods ............................................................................................. 43 3.3.1 Chemicals ............................................................................................................. 43 3.3.2 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 46 3.3.3 Data treatment and chemometrics ........................................................................ 48 3.4 Results and discussion .............................................................................................. 49 3.4.1 Comparison of different Raman spectrometers .................................................... 49 3.4.2 Principal Component Analysis ............................................................................. 53 3.4.3 Characteristic Raman bands for both, synthetic cathinone derivatives and synthetic cannabinoids ..................................................................................................... 56 3.4.4 Identification of synthetic cannabinoids in 60 herbal mixtures from casework samples ............................................................................................................................. 69 3.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 73 4 Terahertz spectroscopy for the contactless and non-destructive detection of synthetic cannabinoids to uncover drug trafficking ................................................................................. 74 4.1 Abstract .................................................................................................................... 74 4.2 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 74 4.3 Materials and Methods ............................................................................................. 77 4.3.1 Chemicals ............................................................................................................. 77 i Table of contents 4.3.2 Methodology: Characterisation of NPS powders from seizures .......................... 78 4.4 Results ...................................................................................................................... 83 4.4.1 Characterisation of NPS with GC-MS and NMR ................................................ 83 4.4.2 THz procedure ...................................................................................................... 83 4.4.3 Model applications and matrix tolerance ............................................................. 91 4.5 Discussion ................................................................................................................ 94 4.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 97 5 Structural similarity of synthetic cannabinoids in herbal mixtures allows to cross-calibrate analytes without reference material by UPLC-DAD ............................................................... 98 5.1 Abstract .................................................................................................................... 98 5.2 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 98 5.3 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................... 100 5.3.1 Chemicals ........................................................................................................... 100 5.3.2 Methodology ...................................................................................................... 103 5.4 Results and discussion ............................................................................................ 104 5.4.1 Characterisation of reference samples including NMR and GC-MS ................. 104 5.4.2 Evaluation of the UPLC-DAD method .............................................................. 105 5.4.3 Application to casework samples ....................................................................... 117 5.5 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 119 6 Chiral discrimination of NPS using CE-DAD: Enantioselective separation of synthetic cathinone derivatives by capillary electrophoresis with UV .................................................. 120 6.1 Abstract .................................................................................................................. 120 6.2 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 120 6.3 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................... 123 6.3.1 Chemicals ........................................................................................................... 123 6.3.2 Methodology ...................................................................................................... 127 6.4 Results and discussion ............................................................................................ 128 6.4.1 Chiral separation optimisation ..........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Identifying New/Emerging Psychoactive Substances at the Time of COVID-19; a Web-Based Approach
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 09 February 2021 doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.632405 Identifying New/Emerging Psychoactive Substances at the Time of COVID-19; A Web-Based Approach Valeria Catalani 1*, Davide Arillotta 1, John Martin Corkery 1, Amira Guirguis 1,2, Alessandro Vento 3,4,5 and Fabrizio Schifano 1 1 Psychopharmacology, Drug Misuse & Novel Psychoactive Substances Research Unit, School of Life & Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom, 2 Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Sciences 2, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom, 3 Department of Mental Health, ASL Roma 2, Rome, Italy, 4 Addictions’ Observatory (ODDPSS), Rome, Italy, 5 Department of Psychology, Guglielmo Marconi University, Rome, Italy COVID-19-related disruptions of people and goods’ circulation can affect drug markets, especially for new psychoactive substances (NPSs). Drug shortages could cause a change in available NPS, with the introduction of new, unknown, substances. The aims of the current research were to use a web crawler, NPSfinder®, to identify and categorize emerging NPS discussed on a range of drug enthusiasts/psychonauts’ websites/fora at the time of the pandemic; social media for these identified NPS were screened as Edited by: well. The NPSfinder® was used here to automatically scan 24/7 a list of psychonaut Ornella Corazza, University of Hertfordshire, websites and NPS online resources. The NPSs identified in the time frame between United Kingdom January and August 2020 were searched in both the European Monitoring Center Reviewed by: for Drugs and Drug Addictions (EMCDDA)/United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Simona Zaami, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy (UNODC) databases and on social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, Laura Hondebrink, and YouTube) as well, with a content qualitative analysis having been carried out on University Medical Center reddit.com.
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th Quarter 2020 DEA
    QUARTERLY REPORT 4th Quarter – 2020 U.S. Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration Diversion Control Division Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section Drug Enforcement Administration – Toxicology Testing Program Contents Introduction ............................................................ 3 Summary ................................................................. 4 NPS Discovered via DEA TOX ................................. 5 New Psychoactive Substances ............................... 6 Traditional Illicit Drugs ........................................... 8 Prescription and Over the Counter Drugs ............. 9 Contact Information ............................................. 10 2 | Page 4th Quarter Report – 2020 Drug Enforcement Administration – Toxicology Testing Program Introduction The Drug Enforcement Administration’s Toxicology Testing Program (DEA TOX) began in May 2019 as a surveillance program aimed at detecting new psychoactive substances within the United States. In response to the ongoing synthetic drug epidemic, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) awarded a contract with the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) to analyze biological samples generated from overdose victims of synthetic drugs. In many cases, it can be difficult to ascertain the specific substance responsible for the overdose. The goal of DEA TOX is to connect symptom causation to the abuse of newly emerging synthetic drugs (e.g. synthetic cannabinoids, synthetic cathinones, fentanyl-related substances, other hallucinogens, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Application of High Resolution Mass Spectrometry for the Screening and Confirmation of Novel Psychoactive Substances Joshua Zolton Seither [email protected]
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 4-25-2018 Application of High Resolution Mass Spectrometry for the Screening and Confirmation of Novel Psychoactive Substances Joshua Zolton Seither [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FIDC006565 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Seither, Joshua Zolton, "Application of High Resolution Mass Spectrometry for the Screening and Confirmation of Novel Psychoactive Substances" (2018). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3823. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/3823 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida APPLICATION OF HIGH RESOLUTION MASS SPECTROMETRY FOR THE SCREENING AND CONFIRMATION OF NOVEL PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in CHEMISTRY by Joshua Zolton Seither 2018 To: Dean Michael R. Heithaus College of Arts, Sciences and Education This dissertation, written by Joshua Zolton Seither, and entitled Application of High- Resolution Mass Spectrometry for the Screening and Confirmation of Novel Psychoactive Substances, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________ Piero Gardinali _______________________________________ Bruce McCord _______________________________________ DeEtta Mills _______________________________________ Stanislaw Wnuk _______________________________________ Anthony DeCaprio, Major Professor Date of Defense: April 25, 2018 The dissertation of Joshua Zolton Seither is approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Science
    Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 235R-255R Forensic Science T. A. Brettell* Forensic Science Bureau, New Jersey State Police, Box 7068, West Trenton, New Jersey 08625 K. Inman California Department of Justice DNA Laboratory, 626 Bancroft Way, Berkeley, California 94710 N. Rudin² 1563 Solano Ave. #506, Berkeley, California 94707 R. Saferstein³ Box 1334, Mount Laurel, New Jersey 08054 Review Contents Canadian Society of Forensic Science, Journal of Forensic Identifica- Drugs and Poisons 235R tion, Forensic Science Review, Analytical Toxicology, Electrophoresis, Ethanol and Volatiles 235R and BioTechniques, as well as Chemical Abstracts Selects: Forensic Cannabinoids 236R Chemistry. Our survey encompasses the period from January 1997 Morphine and Related Narcotics 237R through December 1998. Because of the normal delays in the Cocaine 237R abstraction of journal articles by Chemical Abstracts, some work Amphetamines 238R covering this period will inadvertently be omitted. Hopefully these Barbiturates 239R references will be included in the next biennial review. Benzodiazepines 239R The format selected for this survey divides coverage into three Miscellaneous Drugs and Poisons 239R distinct areas: drug and poisons, forensic DNA analysis, and trace General Procedures 241R Forensic DNA Analysis 242R evidence. Within the scope of each of the areas, articles have been DNA Extraction and Quantitation 242R selected to describe current forensic science practices in analytical Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms 242R chemistry and to outline relevant forensic science research Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms 242R interests. To keep our discussion concise and meaningful, we have Short Tandem Repeats 242R limited our survey to drugs regulated under the United States Gender Identification 243R Controlled Substances Act, ethanol, and common poisons.
    [Show full text]
  • Model Scheduling New/Novel Psychoactive Substances Act (Third Edition)
    Model Scheduling New/Novel Psychoactive Substances Act (Third Edition) July 1, 2019. This project was supported by Grant No. G1799ONDCP03A, awarded by the Office of National Drug Control Policy. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the Office of National Drug Control Policy or the United States Government. © 2019 NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR MODEL STATE DRUG LAWS. This document may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes with full attribution to the National Alliance for Model State Drug Laws. Please contact NAMSDL at [email protected] or (703) 229-4954 with any questions about the Model Language. This document is intended for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or opinion. Headquarters Office: NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR MODEL STATE DRUG 1 LAWS, 1335 North Front Street, First Floor, Harrisburg, PA, 17102-2629. Model Scheduling New/Novel Psychoactive Substances Act (Third Edition)1 Table of Contents 3 Policy Statement and Background 5 Highlights 6 Section I – Short Title 6 Section II – Purpose 6 Section III – Synthetic Cannabinoids 13 Section IV – Substituted Cathinones 19 Section V – Substituted Phenethylamines 23 Section VI – N-benzyl Phenethylamine Compounds 25 Section VII – Substituted Tryptamines 28 Section VIII – Substituted Phenylcyclohexylamines 30 Section IX – Fentanyl Derivatives 39 Section X – Unclassified NPS 43 Appendix 1 Second edition published in September 2018; first edition published in 2014. Content in red bold first added in third edition. © 2019 NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR MODEL STATE DRUG LAWS. This document may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes with full attribution to the National Alliance for Model State Drug Laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology Editors: Damian Ballam Msc and Allister Vale MD
    Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology Editors: Damian Ballam MSc and Allister Vale MD October 2017 CONTENTS General Toxicology 11 Metals 31 Management 17 Pesticides 33 Drugs 19 Chemical Warfare 34 Chemical Incidents & 27 Plants 34 Pollution Chemicals 28 Animals 35 CURRENT AWARENESS PAPERS OF THE MONTH The interpretation of hair analysis for drugs and drug metabolites Cuypers E, Flanagan RJ. Clin Toxicol 2017; online early: doi: 10.1080/ 15563650.2017.1379603: Introduction Head hair analysis for drugs and drug metabolites has been used widely with the aim of detecting exposure in the weeks or months prior to sample collection. However, inappropriate interpretation of results has likely led to serious miscarriages of justice, especially in child custody cases. Objective The aim of this review is to assess critically what can, and perhaps more importantly, what cannot be claimed as regards the interpretation of hair test results in a given set of circumstances in order to inform future testing. Methods We searched the PubMed database for papers published 2010-2016 using the terms "hair" and "drug" and "decontamination", the terms "hair" and "drug" and "contamination", the terms "hair" and "drug-facilitated crime", the terms "hair" and "ethyl glucuronide", and the Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology is produced monthly for the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology by the Birmingham Unit of the UK National Poisons Information Service, with contributions from the Cardiff, Edinburgh, and Newcastle Units. The NPIS is commissioned by Public Health England 2 terms "hair", "drug testing" and "analysis". Study of the reference lists of the 46 relevant papers identified 25 further relevant citations, giving a total of 71 citations.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol and Drug Abuse Subchapter 9
    Chapter 8 – Alcohol and Drug Abuse Subchapter 9 Regulated Drug Rule 1.0 Authority This rule is established under the authority of 18 V.S.A. §§ 4201 and 4202 which authorizes the Vermont Board of Health to designate regulated drugs for the protection of public health and safety. 2.0 Purpose This rule designates drugs and other chemical substances that are illegal or judged to be potentially fatal or harmful for human consumption unless prescribed and dispensed by a professional licensed to prescribe or dispense them and used in accordance with the prescription. The rule restricts the possession of certain drugs above a specified quantity. The rule also establishes benchmark unlawful dosages for certain drugs to provide a baseline for use by prosecutors to seek enhanced penalties for possession of higher quantities of the drug in accordance with multipliers found at 18 V.S.A. § 4234. 3.0 Definitions 3.1 “Analog” means one of a group of chemical components similar in structure but different with respect to elemental composition. It can differ in one or more atoms, functional groups or substructures, which are replaced with other atoms, groups or substructures. 3.2 “Benchmark Unlawful Dosage” means the quantity of a drug commonly consumed over a twenty-four-hour period for any therapeutic purpose, as established by the manufacturer of the drug. Benchmark Unlawful dosage is not a medical or pharmacologic concept with any implication for medical practice. Instead, it is a legal concept established only for the purpose of calculating penalties for improper sale, possession, or dispensing of drugs pursuant to 18 V.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol and Drug Abuse Subchapter 9 Regulated Drug Rule 1.0 Authority
    Chapter 8 – Alcohol and Drug Abuse Subchapter 9 Regulated Drug Rule 1.0 Authority This rule is established under the authority of 18 V.S.A. §§ 4201 and 4202 which authorizes the Vermont Board of Health to designate regulated drugs for the protection of public health and safety. 2.0 Purpose This rule designates drugs and other chemical substances that are illegal or judged to be potentially fatal or harmful for human consumption unless prescribed and dispensed by a professional licensed to prescribe or dispense them, and used in accordance with the prescription. The rule restricts the possession of certain drugs above a specified quantity. The rule also establishes benchmark unlawful dosages for certain drugs to provide a baseline for use by prosecutors to seek enhanced penalties for possession of higher quantities of the drug in accordance with multipliers found at 18 V.S.A. § 4234. 3.0 Definitions 3.1 “Analog” means one of a group of chemical components similar in structure but different with respect to elemental composition. It can differ in one or more atoms, functional groups or substructures, which are replaced with other atoms, groups or substructures. 3.2 “Benchmark Unlawful Dosage” means the quantity of a drug commonly consumed over a twenty-four hour period for any therapeutic purpose, as established by the manufacturer of the drug. Benchmark Unlawful dosage is not a medical or pharmacologic concept with any implication for medical practice. Instead, it is a legal concept established only for the purpose of calculating penalties for improper sale, possession, or dispensing of drugs pursuant to 18 V.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure-Activity Relationships of Synthetic Cathinones
    Structure-Activity Relationships of Synthetic Cathinones Richard A. Glennon and Małgorzata Dukat Abstract Until recently, there was rather little interest in the structure-activity relationships (SARs) of cathinone analogs because so few agents were available and because they represented a relatively minor drug abuse problem. Most of the early SAR was formulated on the basis of behavioral (e.g., locomotor and drug discrimination) studies using rodents. With the emergence on the clandestine market in the last few years of a large number of new cathinone analogs, termed “synthetic cathinones”, and the realization that they likely act at dopamine, norepi- nephrine, and/or serotonin transporters as releasing agents (i.e., as substrates) or reuptake inhibitors (i.e., as transport blockers), it has now become possible to better examine their SAR and even their quantitative SAR (QSAR), in a more effective and systematic manner. An SAR picture is beginning to emerge, and key structural features, such as the nature of the terminal amine, the size of the α-substituent, stereochemistry, and the presence and position of aromatic substituents, are being found to impact action (i.e., as releasing agents or reuptake inhibitors) and trans- porter selectivity. Keywords DAT • Methcathinone • Monoamine transporters • NET • QSAR • SAR • SERT Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................... 20 2 Early SAR of Cathinone ..................................................................... 23 3 The Methcathinone
    [Show full text]
  • COMMITTEE/SUBCOMMITTEE AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 1175 (2012) Amendment No
    COMMITTEE/SUBCOMMITTEE AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 1175 (2012) Amendment No. 1 COMMITTEE/SUBCOMMITTEE ACTION ADOPTED (Y/N) ADOPTED AS AMENDED (Y/N) ADOPTED W/O OBJECTION (Y/N) FAILED TO ADOPT (Y/N) WITHDRAWN (Y/N) OTHER 1 Committee/Subcommittee hearing bill: Criminal Justice 2 Subcommittee 3 Representative Ingram offered the following: 4 5 Amendment 6 Remove lines 147-236 and insert: 7 84. Naphyrone (naphthylpyrovalerone). 8 85. N-N-Dimethyl-3,4-methylenedioxycathinone. 9 86. N-N-Diethyl-3,4-methylenedioxycathinone. 10 87. 3,4-methylenedioxy-propiophenone. 11 88. 2-Bromo-3,4-Methylenedioxypropiophenone. 12 89. 3,4-methylenedioxy-propiophenone-2-oxime. 13 90. N-Acetyl-3,4-methylenedioxycathinone. 14 91. N-Acetyl-N-Methyl-3,4-Methylenedioxycathinone. 15 92. N-Acetyl-N-Ethyl-3,4-Methylenedioxycathinone. 16 93. Bromomethcathinone. 17 94. Buphedrone (alpha-methylamino-butyrophenone). 18 95. Eutylone (beta-Keto-Ethylbenzodioxolylbutanamine). 19 96. Dimethylcathinone. 964151 - h1175-line147.docx Published On: 1/13/2012 6:13:24 PM Page 1 of 4 COMMITTEE/SUBCOMMITTEE AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 1175 (2012) Amendment No. 1 20 97. Dimethylmethcathinone. 21 98. Pentylone (beta-Keto-Methylbenzodioxolylpentanamine). 22 99. (MDPPP) 3,4-Methylenedioxy-alpha-pyrrolidinopropiophenone. 23 100. (MDPBP) 3,4-Methylenedioxy-alpha-pyrrolidinobutiophenone. 24 101. Methoxypyrrolidinopropiophenone (MOPPP). 25 102. Methylpyrrolidinohexiophenone (MPHP). 26 103. Benzocyclidine (BCP) or benzothiophenylcyclohexylpiperidine 27 (BTCP). 28 104. Fluoromethylaminobutyrophenone (F-MABP). 29 105. Methoxypyrrolidinobutyrophenone (MeO-PBP). 30 106. Ethylpyrrolidinobutyrophenone (Et-PBP). 31 107. 3-Methyl-4-Methoxymethcathinone (3-Me-4-MeO-MCAT). 32 108. Methylethylaminobutyrophenone (Me-EABP) 33 109. Methylaminobutyrophenone (MABP). 34 110. Pyrrolidinopropiophenone. 35 111. Pyrrolidinobutiophenone (PBP). 36 112. Pyrrolidinovalerophenone (PVP).
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 COMMITTEE AMENDMENT Bill No. CS for SB 1502
    Florida Senate - 2012 COMMITTEE AMENDMENT Bill No. CS for SB 1502 370844 Ì3708442Î LEGISLATIVE ACTION Senate . House Comm: RCS . 02/16/2012 . The Committee on Health Regulation (Fasano) recommended the following: 1 Senate Amendment 2 3 Delete lines 137 - 237 4 and insert: 5 71. N,N-Diallyl-5-Methoxytryptamine. 6 72. DOI (4-Iodo-2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine). 7 73. DOC (4-Chloro-2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine). 8 74. 2C-E (4-Ethyl-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine). 9 75. 2C-T-4 (2,5-Dimethoxy-4-isopropylthiophenethylamine). 10 76. 2C-C (4-Chloro-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine). 11 77. 2C-T (2,5-Dimethoxy-4-methylthiophenethylamine). 12 78. 2C-T-2 (2,5-Dimethoxy-4-ethylthiophenethylamine). Page 1 of 5 2/16/2012 9:40:44 AM HR.HR.03514 Florida Senate - 2012 COMMITTEE AMENDMENT Bill No. CS for SB 1502 370844 Ì3708442Î 13 79. 2C-T-7 (2,5-Dimethoxy-4-(n)-propylthiophenethylamine). 14 80. 2C-I (4-Iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine). 15 81. Butylone (beta-keto-N-methylbenzodioxolylpropylamine). 16 82. Ethcathinone. 17 83. Ethylone (3,4-methylenedioxy-N-ethylcathinone). 18 84. Naphyrone (naphthylpyrovalerone). 19 85. N-N-Dimethyl-3,4-methylenedioxycathinone. 20 86. N-N-Diethyl-3,4-methylenedioxycathinone. 21 87. 3,4-methylenedioxy-propiophenone. 22 88. 2-Bromo-3,4-Methylenedioxypropiophenone. 23 89. 3,4-methylenedioxy-propiophenone-2-oxime. 24 90. N-Acetyl-3,4-methylenedioxycathinone. 25 91. N-Acetyl-N-Methyl-3,4-Methylenedioxycathinone. 26 92. N-Acetyl-N-Ethyl-3,4-Methylenedioxycathinone. 27 93. Bromomethcathinone. 28 94. Buphedrone (alpha-methylamino-butyrophenone). 29 95. Eutylone (beta-Keto-Ethylbenzodioxolylbutanamine). 30 96.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Printed in Brazil - ©2021 Sociedade Brasileira De Química
    https://dx.doi.org/10.21577/0103-5053.20200205 J. Braz. Chem. Soc., Vol. 32, No. 3, 513-522, 2021 Article Printed in Brazil - ©2021 Sociedade Brasileira de Química Identification of Synthetic Drugs on Seized Blotter Papers Using ATR-FTIR and PLS-DA: Routine Application in a Forensic Laboratory Maísa F. Custódio,a Laiz O. Magalhães,a Luciano C. Arantes b and Jez W. B. Braga *,a aInstituto de Química, Universidade de Brasília, CP 4478, 70910-900 Brasília-DF, Brazil bSeção de Perícias e Análises Laboratoriais, Instituto de Criminalística, Polícia Civil do Distrito Federal, 70610-907 Brasília-DF, Brazil Blotter papers seizures containing synthetic drugs have intensified over the last decades. These drugs were originally conceived as “legal” alternatives to traditional illicit drugs, designed to mimic their effects and circumvent control agencies. Reference methods for determining these substances on blotter papers are based on chromatographic techniques using mass spectrometry detection. However, these procedures are destructive, expensive, and time consuming. Some compounds are also thermolabile and not suitable for regular gas chromatography analyses. In this paper, two multivariate models were presented and incorporated in the routine of a forensic laboratory as a screening method. They were developed and validated using a representative dataset of 158 seizures analyzed by attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and a partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) model. The first model (model A) discriminates between samples with and without different types of drugs, and the second one (model B) discriminates between samples containing NBOMe and NBOH, two N-benzyl 2,5-dimethoxy substituted phenethylamine commonly incorporated into blotter papers.
    [Show full text]