DOCSLIB.ORG

Army Installation Rail Operations: Implications of Increased Outsourcing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Army Installation Rail Operations Implications of Increased Outsourcing Ellen M. Pint, Beth E. Lachman, Jeremy M. Eckhause, Steven Deane-Shinbrot C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2009 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover photo of Fort Hood engine courtesy of Beth E. Lachman. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This document reports the results of a research project entitled Army Rail and Public-Private Partnerships. As part of this project, we compared the Army’s three business models for instal- lation rail operations: government owned, government operated (GOGO); government owned, contractor operated (GOCO); and privatized. We also developed a methodology to compare the costs and risks of the business models to help the Army determine whether it could rely to a greater extent on privatized rail operations. This document describes the results of our analysis, which is based on detailed informa- tion gathered through visits to one installation of each type and data on Army rail require- ments, costs, and performance at installations with deployable units. We estimated potential savings from privatization and determined possible risk factors, such as a decrease in respon- siveness to short-notice deployments, loss of surge capacity, likelihood of accidents or violations of safety and environmental rules, and unexpected cost increases. This research was sponsored by the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4, and conducted within the RAND Arroyo Center’s Forces and Logistics Program. RAND Arroyo Center, part of the RAND Corporation, is a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the U.S. Army. The Project Unique Identification Code (PUIC) for the project that produced this docu- ment is HQD157609. iii Contents Preface ........................................................................................................... iii Figures ...........................................................................................................vii Tables ............................................................................................................ ix Summary ........................................................................................................ xi Acknowledgments .............................................................................................xv Abbreviations ................................................................................................. xvii CHAPTER ONE Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 Research Methodology .......................................................................................... 2 Outline of This Report .......................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER TWO Business Models for Army Installation Rail Operations ................................................ 5 Overview and Comparison of Business Models .............................................................. 5 Fort Hood Rail Operations: Government-Owned, Government-Operated Model ..................... 8 Fort Sill Rail Operations: Government-Owned, Contractor-Operated Model .........................12 Fort Benning and Fort Drum Rail Operations: Privatized Model ........................................15 Fort Benning ..................................................................................................16 Fort Drum .....................................................................................................17 Strengths and Weaknesses of the Privatized Model ......................................................18 CHAPTER THREE Cost and Risk Analysis .......................................................................................19 Estimated Cost Differences Between Army Installation Rail Operation Business Models ............................................................................................19 Risks to Army Installation Rail Operations from Changing Business Models ........................ 23 Delayed Rail Movements That Could Affect Army Readiness or Deployment Time Lines ...................................................................................................... 24 Loss of Surge Capacity for Deployments ..................................................................25 Increased Likelihood of Accidents or Violations of Safety and Environmental Rules ............... 27 Unexpected Additional Costs ...............................................................................29 Additional Risks from Increased Privatization ............................................................29 v vi Army Installation Rail Operations Comparing Cost Savings and Risks from Privatization ................................................... 30 Deployment Requirements ..................................................................................32 Sharing Rail Crews ...........................................................................................32 Local Monopoly Concerns ..................................................................................33 Infrastructure Investments ................................................................................. 34 Mitigating Risks from Privatization ......................................................................... 34 CHAPTER FOUR Conclusions .....................................................................................................35 APPENDIXES A. Marine Corps Logistics Base Barstow Yermo Annex Rail Yard Support for Fort Irwin ...............................................................................................37 B. Installation Railroad Contracts and Agreements ....................................................39 Bibliography ....................................................................................................47 Figures 2.1. Key Rail Assets and Operations That Vary by Business Model ............................... 6 2.2. Who Performs the Tasks for Each Phase of Installation Rail Deployment .................. 6 2.3. Map of Rail Lines Between Fort Hood and Port of Beaumont, Texas ...................... 9 2.4. Two Genset Locomotives at Fort Hood, Texas ................................................. 9 2.5. Map of Fort Hood Track (in red) ................................................................11 2.6. Map of the Rail Lines Between Fort Sill and Surrounding Cities ...........................13 2.7. Photo of Fort Sill Track Damage from 2016 Flood ...........................................14 2.8. Map Showing the Approximate Location of the Fort Sill Track Damage and the Portable Loading Area ........................................................15 2.9. Map of the Rail Lines on and near Fort Benning .............................................16 3.1. Cost Comparison of Business Models at Fort Sill .............................................21 3.2. Cost Comparison of Business Models at Fort Hood ..........................................21 3.3. Fiscal Year 2015 Average Monthly Number of Loaded Rail Cars Shipped by Installation .......................................................................... 23 3.4. Installations in the 407th Army Field Support Brigade Region ............................ 26 3.5. Damage from the 2005 Fort Hood Accident ................................................. 27 3.6. Damage from the 2011 Fort Carson Derailment ............................................. 28 3.7. Map of U.S. Army Field Support Brigade Regions and Installations .......................33 A.1. Trucks Being Unloaded at Fort Irwin’s Dust Bowl .......................................... 38 vii Tables 1.1. Army Installations by Rail Business Model ..................................................... 3 2.1. Rail Activity at Target Installations .............................................................. 7 3.1. Effects of Assumptions on Break-Even Point Between Government-Owned, Contractor-Operated Model and Privatization ............................................... 22 3.2. Timeliness of Rail Carriers in Fiscal Year 2015 ................................................25 3.3. Characteristics of Possible Candidates for Privatization ......................................31 3.4. Number of Brigade Combat Teams at Selected Army Installations
Recommended publications
  • FORT BENNING SPONSORSHIP and ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITIES 1 Let Us Show You How to Reach America’S Finest

    FORT BENNING SPONSORSHIP and ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITIES 1 Let Us Show You How to Reach America’S Finest

    OCTOBER 2019 FORT BENNING SPONSORSHIP AND ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITIES 1 Let us show you how to reach America’s finest. The U.S. Army, Fort Benning Family and MWR Marketing team can help you secure a measurable return on investment and influential access to well- educated, diverse and financially stable consumers. Be part of something with value, purpose and reward. Align yourselves with something more. Make a meaningful difference. This is your opportunity to do well for those who have done so much. U.S. Army Family and MWR plans, produces, promotes and manages world-class programs for those who serve, including a host of recreation, sports, entertainment, travel and leisure activities. When you join our ranks and reach these coveted target markets with the U.S. Army, Fort Benning, you’ll also directly support exceptional programs for military members and their families. Thousands of military S ervice Members, Retirees and their Families count on our programs to boost their quality of life throughout Fort Benning and the surrounding military community. Here’s how you can help… 2 It’s one thing to plot a course. It’s another to navigate it. Nobody knows how to immerse your brand within the Fort Benning market better than our team. This is our terrain, and our audiences value authenticity and credibility of the brands that partner with us. Our mission is to help your brand develop meaningful and long-lasting relationships with the military consumer market. C reate awareness and visibility through customized marketing opportunities across multiple platforms: • Event sponsorships, Mobile Tour and Turn-key Event Access • Digital advertising (video screens, billboards and websites) • Online P romotions • Pass-through Rights with Military R etail Outlets (the E xchange/DeCA) • R egional, National and Global media exposure 3 2 So you want to reach your target? You’ve come to the right place.
  • Fort Hood AFGE

    Fort Hood AFGE

    2002 Negotiated Agreement Fort Hood “people first – mission always” “Working together Works” AFGE Proud to Make America Work American Federation of Government Employees AFL-CIO Local, 1920 INDEX PREAMBLE 1 ARTICLE 1 EXCLUSIVE RECOGNITION AND COVERAGE OF AGREEMENT 2 ARTICLE 2 PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT 3 ARTICLE 3 SCOPE OF CONSULTATION AND NEGOTIATION 4 ARTICLE 4 MANAGEMENT RIGHTS 6 ARTICLE 5 EMPLOYEE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 7 ARTICLE 6 REPRESENTATION 9 ARTICLE 7 PUBLICITY 11 ARTICLE 8 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 12 ARTICLE 9 LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION 16 ARTICLE 10 HOURS OF WORK 16 ARTICLE 11 OVERTIME 19 ARTICLE 12 HOLIDAYS 20 ARTICLE 13 LEAVE 22 ARTICLE 14 EMPLOYEE PERSONNEL FILES 25 ARTICLE 15 JOB CLASSIFICATION 26 ARTICLE 16 TRAINING 26 ARTICLE 17 REDUCTION IN FORCE, REORGANIZATION, AND/OR TRANSFER OF FUNCTION 27 ARTICLE 18 DISCIPLINARY AND ADVERSE ACTIONS 28 ARTICLE 19 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 30 ARTICLE 20 ARBITRATION 34 ARTICLE 21 HEALTH AND SAFETY 36 ARTICLE 22 ON THE JOB INJURIES 39 ARTICLE 23 DUES WITHHOLDING 41 ARTICLE 24 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (EAP) AND WORKPLACE VIOLENCE PROGRAM (WVP) 43 ARTICLE 25 USE OF OFFICIAL FACILITIES 45 ARTICLE 26 MERIT PROMOTION 46 ARTICLE 27 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 48 ARTICLE 28 EMPLOYEE DEBTS 49 ARTICLE 29 INCENTIVE AWARDS 49 ARTICLE 30 ENVIRONMENTAL DIFFERENTIAL PAY 50 ARTICLE 31 FIREFIGHTERS 51 ARTICLE 32 GENERAL 53 ARTICLE 33 COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES PROGRAM 53 ARTICLE 34 PARKING 53 ARTICLE 35 IMPASSES IN NEGOTIATIONS 54 ARTICLE 36 TRAVEL AND PER DIEM 54 ARTICLE 37 SCHEDULED WITHIN-GRADE
  • US Army Railroad Course Railway Track Maintenance II TR0671

    US Army Railroad Course Railway Track Maintenance II TR0671

    SUBCOURSE EDITION TR0671 1 RAILWAY TRACK MAINTENANCE II Reference Text (RT) 671 is the second of two texts on railway track maintenance. The first, RT 670, Railway Track Maintenance I, covers fundamentals of railway engineering; roadbed, ballast, and drainage; and track elements--rail, crossties, track fastenings, and rail joints. Reference Text 671 amplifies many of those subjects and also discusses such topics as turnouts, curves, grade crossings, seasonal maintenance, and maintenance-of-way management. If the student has had no practical experience with railway maintenance, it is advisable that RT 670 be studied before this text. In doing so, many of the points stressed in this text will be clarified. In addition, frequent references are made in this text to material in RT 670 so that certain definitions, procedures, etc., may be reviewed if needed. i THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. ii CONTENTS Paragraph Page INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1. TRACK REHABILITATION............................................................. 1.1 7 Section I. Surfacing..................................................................................... 1.2 8 II. Re-Laying Rail............................................................................ 1.12 18 III. Tie Renewal................................................................................ 1.18 23 CHAPTER 2. TURNOUTS AND SPECIAL SWITCHES........................................................................................
  • Herefordshire Green Infrastructure Strategy

    Herefordshire Green Infrastructure Strategy

    Green Infrastructure Strategy Herefordshire Local Development Framework February 2010 This page is deliberately left blank CONTENTS Preface PART 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1 1.2 What is Green Infrastructure? 3 1.3 Aims & Objectives of the Strategy 3 1.4 Report Structure 5 2.0 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE IN CONTEXT 2.1 Origins & Demand for the Strategy 7 2.2 Policy Background & Relationship to Other Plans 7 2.2.1 National Policy 8 2.2.6 Regional Policy 10 2.2.7 Local Policy 10 2.2.8 Biodiversity Action Plan 11 2.2.9 Sustainable Community Strategy 11 2.3 Methodology 11 2.3.1 Identification of Assets 11 2.3.5 Assessment of Deficiencies & Needs 12 2.3.7 Strategic Geographic Tiers – Definition & Distribution 13 2.3.11 Sensitivity & Opportunity 16 2.3.13 Guiding Policies 16 2.3.14 Realising Green Infrastructure – the Delivery Mechanism 17 3.0 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS – ISSUES & OPPORTUNITIES 3.1 General 19 3.2 Strategic Geographic Tiers 21 3.3 Natural Systems - Geology 23 - Hydrology 29 - Topography 35 -Biodiversity 41 3.4 Human Influences - Land Use 49 -Access & Movement 55 - Archaeology, Historical & Cultural 63 - Landscape Character 71 - Designated & Accessible Open Space 81 3.5 Natural Resources Summary 91 3.6 Human Influences Summary 91 PART 2 4.0 THE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK 4.1 General 93 4.2 A Vision for Green Infrastructure in Herefordshire 94 4.3 The Green Infrastructure Framework 95 4.3.1 Deficiencies & Needs 95 4.3.6 Strategic Tiers 98 4.3.7 County Vision 100 4.3.8 County Strategic Corridors 100 4.3.9 County Strategic Areas
  • Fort Leonard Wood Questionnaire

    Fort Leonard Wood Questionnaire

    Fort Leonard Wood Questionnaire Oswald remains expanding after Orazio stratifies one-handed or curses any scrutoire. Benton disgusts her windages inwards, she wizen it sweepingly. Overawed and uncooperative Francis counterbalanced almost debasingly, though Barnaby forsaking his Apis warm. Fillable Online publicsector wa gov Questionnaire phased PDFfiller. Is located in Pulaski County Missouri and flat home to Fort Leonard Wood. Certain current excepted service? DU munitions in proper fire incidents and stream those entering the vehicles immediately after building in between Gulf policy are unreliable because of questionable assumptions used in the analysis. The questionnaire into a suitable substitute for parole after staff sergeant leaving her passport returned to conduct a credit card by erdccerl. Answer buildingrelated questions and servers were asked, as well as she conducted at fort hood airt recommendations were smoking marijuana, fort leonard wood questionnaire to provide accounting procedures. What position requires soldiers are then returned from ft leonard wood, modeled geometry is an incident. Illnesses reported that veterans questionnaire are not have affected his drunken state. Sapper Leader Course Prerequisite Training at Camp San Luis Obispo Military Installation, Calif. RCK and RJU were responsible for obtaining funding. The recruits will be asked questions about their travel history. Click the button below to continue your session. Fort Bliss to Fort Hood. Joyce Provost I state an AF WingMom's questionnaire back. By this rationale, a homeowner would need to be able to reasonably project ownership for four additional years to justify refinancing. Captain Robert Burrell Defense Appellate Division This article explores two areas that often form the basis of allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel: conflicts of interests and pretrial duty to investigate.
  • A Dccconcepts “Modelling Advice” Publication

    A Dccconcepts “Modelling Advice” Publication

    A DCCconcepts “Modelling advice” publication DCC Advice #11 Page 1 Wiring Point-work & Special track conditions for DC or DCC Wiring the track… In plain English, with diagrams! If we had a $ or £ or € for every time we’ve been asked how to wire track and point-work, we’d be writing this on a beach somewhere while sipping a cold beer! A great layout needs good trackwork, so first - a word about trackwork and getting good performance. Choose carefully! DO think about making your own turnouts if you have even moderate skills. It is not as hard as you think, needs only basic skills and tools... and we do our best to make it easy with our top quality gauges, trackwork frets and templates. PLUS we will soon provide a detailed “How to make track” tutorial too. Interested? Then call or email us and we will do our best to help you. No matter what scale you will model in, DO NOT even consider using insulated frogs! Yes, lazy retailers who do not understand what they sell - and modellers who have never done a proper job of laying track so it runs well may well recommend it to you… but do NOT be tempted. No matter which brand makes the turnouts, if you use insulated frogs, you WILL have small locos stalling or also suffer from wider wheels bridging the frog tip and creating momentary shorts that are hard to fix and really are a source of constant frustration. Use more realistic rail sizes please: Usually this will be code 55 in N, or Code 75 and 83 in OO or HO Scale.
  • 79 Stat. ] Public Law 89-188-Sept. 16, 1965 793

    79 Stat. ] Public Law 89-188-Sept. 16, 1965 793

    79 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 89-188-SEPT. 16, 1965 793 Public Law 89-188 AIM APT September 16, 1Q65 ^^^^^^ [H. R. 10775] To authorize certain eoiistruotion at military installations, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled^ stmction^Aia°hori- zation Act, 1966. TITLE I SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop ^""^y- military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public vv^orks, including site preparations, appurtenances, utilities and equip­ ment for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES, LESS ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND (First Army) Fort Devens, Massachusetts: Hospital facilities and troop housing, $11,008,000. Fort Dix, New Jersey: Maintenance facilities, medical facilities, and troop housing, $17,948,000. Federal Office Building, Brooklyn, New York: Administrative facilities, $636,000. _ United States Military Academy, West Point, New York: Hospital facilities, troop housing and community facilities, and utilities, $18,089,000. (Second Army) Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Training facilities, and hospital facilities, $2,296,000. East Coast Radio Transmitter Station, Woodbridge, Virginia: Utilities, $211,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia: Utilities, $158,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, troop housing, and community facilities, $15,422,000. Fort Lee, Virginia: Community facilities, $700,000. Fort Meade, Maryland: Ground improvements, $550,000. Fort Monroe, Virginia: Administrative facilities, $4,950,000. Vint Hill Farms, Virginia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $1,029,000. (Third Army) Fort Benning, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $5,325,000.
  • The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960 Dissertation

    The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960 Dissertation

    INTIMIDATING THE WORLD: THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ARMY, 1956-1960 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Paul C. Jussel, B.A., M.M.A.S., M.S.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Advisor Professor John R. Guilmartin __________________ Professor William R. Childs Advisor Department of History ABSTRACT The atomic bomb created a new military dynamic for the world in 1945. The bomb, if used properly, could replace the artillery fires and air-delivered bombs used to defeat the concentrated force of an enemy. The weapon provided the U.S. with an unparalleled advantage over the rest of the world, until the Soviet Union developed its own bomb by 1949 and symmetry in warfare returned. Soon, theories of warfare changed to reflect the belief that the best way to avoid the effects of the bomb was through dispersion of forces. Eventually, the American Army reorganized its divisions from the traditional three-unit organization to a new five-unit organization, dubbed pentomic by its Chief of Staff, General Maxwell D. Taylor. While atomic weapons certainly had an effect on Taylor’s reasoning to adopt the pentomic organization, the idea was not new in 1956; the Army hierarchy had been wrestling with restructuring since the end of World War II. Though the Korean War derailed the Army’s plans for the early fifties, it returned to the forefront under the Eisenhower Administration. The driving force behind reorganization in 1952 was not ii only the reoriented and reduced defense budget, but also the Army’s inroads to the atomic club, formerly the domain of only the Air Force and the Navy.
  • The Big Spring Daily Herald

    The Big Spring Daily Herald

    - 1!"rt rwiir- ij. isjmiyr' j TRAFFIC TOLL WEATHER Ckradjr, oecesietuU rate ht; 17 Injured In Big Dead, Spring Daily i Wednesday partiy eteedy Herald and warmer. Howard County, 10U VOL. 13; tiO. 295 (AP-Asao- cited Press) BIG SPRING, TEXAS, TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 1941 Eight Pages Today FINE LIVESTOCK Legislature BRITISH, GREEKS, GERMANS PREPARE TO Hearing ON EXHIBIT HERE Sets With more than 100 fat animals from five counties on On Strike Act FIGHT AS YUGOSLAVS SIGN AXIS PACT display, the fourth annual district- - club boy livestock show was off to a good start hero Tuesday morning. Committee Of Whole Judging was scheduled to begin at 1 p. m. with R. M. Mil-holle- n, House To Take Up Allies Shift C'sofu JlSISIll Soviet War San Angelo, in charge. First on tap was a special Matter Thursday BULGARIA placing for Howard county l r wi H$ii;:i: AUSTIN, March 95 MO Heed- ?:; animals. crowd. All during the morning - .VJ fctw.wii Tnw WSSBsskkw :::: n l. a r jc Materials Go largo number of people visited ing appeals for prompt action, the Troops Over A YUVJJ- TROOPS ON GREEK- - Entries were Hated from Howard, a house of representatives today set Martin, Sterling, Taylor and Glass- and after noon the place waa be- ginning to look packed. for hearing Thursday Governor W. cock counties at noon. emergency bill de- I V fcI.m li:!H!-:i:;j:j::::::- were seven calves shown Lee O'Danlfl's Into Marshall Allen, who with George There signed prevent violence Wider Front ,jsV Turkey by Martin county 4-- boys.
  • Missoula County the WYE Targeted Economic Development District (TEDD) Comprehensive Development Plan

    Missoula County the WYE Targeted Economic Development District (TEDD) Comprehensive Development Plan

    Missoula County The WYE Targeted Economic Development District (TEDD) Comprehensive Development Plan (Mapcarta, n.d.) Figure 1. Wye Area Adopted by the Missoula Board of County Commissioners 2020 Figure 2. Summit Drive Acknowledgements Missoula County Board of Commissioners, Josh Slotnick, Chair Missoula Development Authority, Dori Brownlow Community and Planning Services, Karen Hughes, Lindsey Romaniello, and Andrew Stickney Project Consultants – Community Development Services of Montana, Janet Cornish and Lanette Windemaker The WYE TEDD – Comprehensive Development Plan – 2020 Table of Contents Chapter Page 1. Introduction and Overview ........................................................................................ 1 2. Portrait of the WYE TEDD ........................................................................................... 6 3. Infrastructure Analysis - Statement of Infrastructure Deficiencies and Area Eligibility 13 4. Planning Consistency & Zoning Accordance with the Missoula County Growth Policy 17 5. Goals of the WYE TEDD ............................................................................................ 27 6. Targeted Economic Development Activities .............................................................. 31 7. Program Administration ........................................................................................... 38 8. Plan Amendments .................................................................................................... 41 References ..................................................................................................................
  • Albuquerque Morning Journal, 11-26-1922 Journal Publishing Company

    Albuquerque Morning Journal, 11-26-1922 Journal Publishing Company

    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Albuquerque Morning Journal 1908-1921 New Mexico Historical Newspapers 11-26-1922 Albuquerque Morning Journal, 11-26-1922 Journal Publishing Company Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/abq_mj_news Recommended Citation Journal Publishing Company. "Albuquerque Morning Journal, 11-26-1922." (1922). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ abq_mj_news/761 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the New Mexico Historical Newspapers at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Albuquerque Morning Journal 1908-1921 by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TP-T- A P TTA TTTCTTDeTh Trnrn ATS TVnn&TiP f at hjt JOURNAL iohia -- i mill) it; a it. New FACES TODAY IN VOL. CLXXV. No. 57. Albuquerque, Mexico, Sunday, November 26, 1922 24 TWO SUCTIONS PH1CK FIVE CUNTS, -j- n1 osE T'T" ('f! PEflSOWS I 30 MINERS ALSO INJURED 77.GQ0 SOIOiV iV WASHINGTON; TS TSI1EZING OUT ADMINISTRATION SUCCEEDS FIRST WOMAN SENATOR G l V A FIGHT INST THE PROFITEERS SHIPPING BILL' IN GAS BLAST AT MADRID, 10 TO 3 DEFEAT RATIFICATION OF PLAN OF SOUS; CAUSES HEATER 1 Y CAUSE IS 101 DETERMINED Harvard's Initiative and Re- ITER COMPACT Measures to Relieve the Fi- ISE WRANGLE source Overcome the nancial Plight of Farmers Big Blue Team; Clemen-cea- u Is Discussed With Hard- First of a Series of Public Big Guns on Both Sides Are Cots, Supplies, Nurses and Physi- Witnesses Contest ing at White House Surgical Meetings to Urge Its De- Turned Loose; Absent Nov.
  • Nurail Project ID: Nurail2012-UTK-R04 Macro Scale

    Nurail Project ID: Nurail2012-UTK-R04 Macro Scale

    NURail project ID: NURail2012-UTK-R04 Macro Scale Models for Freight Railroad Terminals By Mingzhou Jin Professor Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering University of Tennessee at Knoxville E-mail: [email protected] David B. Clarke Director of the Center for Transportation Research University of Tennessee at Knoxville E-mail: [email protected] Grant Number: DTRT12-G-UTC18 March 2, 2016 Page 1 of 6 DISCLAIMER Funding for this research was provided by the NURail Center, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign under Grant No. DTRT12-G-UTC18 of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research & Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Centers Program. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. March 2, 2016 Page 2 of 6 TECHNICAL SUMMARY Title Macro Scale Models for Freight Railroad Terminals Introduction This project has developed a yard capacity model for macro-level analysis. The study considers the detailed sequence and scheduling in classification yards and their impacts on yard capacities simulate typical freight railroad terminals, and statistically analyses of the historical and simulated data regarding dwell-time and traffic flows. Approach and Methodology The team developed optimization models to investigate three sequencing decisions are at the areas inspection, hump, and assembly.