DOCSLIB.ORG

Final EA Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final EA Document FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT YOCHA DEHE FEE-TO-TRUST AND HOUSING PROJECT OCTOBER 2012 LEAD AGENCY: ENT OFT TM HE I R 1824 N A T P E E R I D O . S R . U B U S R R I E A A F U F O A F INDIAN U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs Pacific Region Office 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2820 Sacramento, CA 95825-1846 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT YOCHA DEHE FEE-TO-TRUST AND HOUSING PROJECT OCTOBER 2012 LEAD AGENCY: PREPARED BY: ENT OFT TM HE I R 1824 N A T P E E R I D O . S R . U B U S R R I E A A F U F O A F INDIAN U.S. Department of the Interior Analytical Environmental Services Bureau of Indian Affairs 1801 7th Street, Suite 100 Pacific Region Office Sacramento, CA 95811 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2820 (916) 447-3479 Sacramento, CA 95825-1846 www.analyticalcorp.com TABLE OF CONTENTS YOCHA DEHE FEE-TO-TRUST AND HOUSING PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Location and Setting ........................................................................................................ 1-2 1.3 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................ 1-5 1.4 Overview of the Environmental Process .......................................................................... 1-6 1.5 Environmental Issues Addressed ..................................................................................... 1-6 1.6 Regulatory Requirements and Approvals ........................................................................ 1-7 2.0 PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES 2.1 Alternative A – Proposed Project .................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Alternative B – Reduced Acreage .................................................................................... 2-7 2.3 Alternative C – No Action ............................................................................................... 2-8 2.4 Comparision of the Proposed Project and Alternatives ................................................... 2-9 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3.1 Land Resources ................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Water Resources .............................................................................................................. 3-7 3.3 Air Quality ..................................................................................................................... 3-21 3.4 Biological Resources ..................................................................................................... 3-27 3.5 Cultural Resources ......................................................................................................... 3-50 3.6 Socioeconomic Conditions / Environmental Justice ...................................................... 3-63 3.7 Transportation and Circulation ...................................................................................... 3-66 3.8 Land Use ........................................................................................................................ 3-68 3.9 Public Services ............................................................................................................... 3-74 3.10 Noise .............................................................................................................................. 3-79 3.11 Hazardous Materials ...................................................................................................... 3-81 3.12 Visual Resources ............................................................................................................ 3-84 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 4.1 Alternative A-Proposed Project ....................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Alternative B-Reduced Acreage .................................................................................... 4-31 4.3 Alternative C-No Action ................................................................................................ 4-35 4.4 Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................................ 4-38 4.5 Growth-Inducing Effects ............................................................................................... 4-43 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES 5.1 Land Resources ................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.2 Water Resources .............................................................................................................. 5-2 5.3 Air Quality ....................................................................................................................... 5-3 5.4 Biological Resources ....................................................................................................... 5-4 i Yocha Dehe Fee-to-Trust and Housing Project October 2012 Final Environmental Assessment Table of Contents 5.5 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................... 5-9 5.6 Socioeconomic Conditions / Environmental Justice ...................................................... 5-10 5.7 Transportation and Circulation ...................................................................................... 5-10 5.8 Land Use ........................................................................................................................ 5-10 5.9 Public Services ............................................................................................................... 5-10 5.10 Noise .............................................................................................................................. 5-10 5.11 Hazardous Materials ...................................................................................................... 5-11 5.12 Visual Resources ............................................................................................................ 5-11 6.0 CONSULTATION, COORDINATION, AND LIST OF PREPARERS 6.1 Federal Agencies Consulted ............................................................................................ 6-1 6.2 State Agencies Consulted ................................................................................................ 6-1 6.3 Tribes Consulted .............................................................................................................. 6-1 6.4 Local Agencies Consulted ............................................................................................... 6-1 6.5 Preparers of Environmental Assessment ......................................................................... 6-2 7.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................ 7-1 LIST OF TABLES 1-1 Project Site Parcels .......................................................................................................... 1-1 2-1 Summary of Project Alternatives ..................................................................................... 2-1 2-2 Proposed Tribal Modified Land Uses ............................................................................ 2-11 3-1 Project Site Soils .............................................................................................................. 3-4 3-2 100-Year Floodplain Status by Parcel Number ............................................................. 3-12 3-3 Capay Valley Subbasin Well Characteristics ................................................................ 3-13 3-4 CVRWQCB Surface Water Quality Objectives ............................................................ 3-16 3-5 Surface Water Quality of Cache Creek (2007) .............................................................. 3-19 3-6 CVRWQCB Groundwater Quality Objectives .............................................................. 3-20 3-7 Groundwater Quality of CCCR Wells ........................................................................... 3-21 3-8 National Ambient Air Quality Standards ....................................................................... 3-25 3-9 Exceedances of NAAQS in the YSAQMD ................................................................... 3-26 3-10 Summary of Habitat Types on the Project Site .............................................................. 3-38 3-11 Federal, State, and CNPS Listed Potentially Occurring Special-Status Species ........... 3-44 3-12 Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Located Within APE .................................... 3-59 3-13 Newly Identified Cultural Resources Located Within APE .......................................... 3-61 3-14 Regional Population ....................................................................................................... 3-63 3-15 Regional Housing Stock ................................................................................................ 3-64 3-16 2009 Property Values and Expected Property Tax ........................................................ 3-64 3-17 SR-16 Traffic Counts in the Project Area ...................................................................... 3-66 4-1 Unmitigated Construction Emissions .............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Costumes.Pdf
    Historical People, Characters During the 1830-40’s there were various people who were in Sonoma and at Rancho de Petaluma. There is not a lot of written documentation that we have found about the women or wives of the men. We have tried our best to include good resources in the bibliography, but often the descriptions and details we desire for the role playing exercises are missing. We understand that there might be a lot of “creative” attributes given to the characters, however, we ask that the children stay within the realm of the possible. We are constantly searching for sources and ask for your help. Two resources are especially good on descriptions of the people and the period. Two Years Before the Mast by Richard Henry Dana A “journal” of a man’s experience at sea during the hide and tallow trade. His descriptions of the trade and process are excellent. As well, his description of the clothing and hairstyles of those in Monterey is very detailed. 75 Years in California by William Heath Davis A historian who actually visited the sites he wrote about. His book is still considered one of the best historical accounts of the time period for which he wrote. He did visit Rancho de Petaluma and wrote about it within the book. Mariano and Francisca Vallejo had 16 children together. Of these 16, 10 lived to adulthood. We don’t include the 6 who died in the historical figures list, but they are included on the Vallejo Family page. As well, some of the information about the family occurred after the dates of 1836-1846, which is the time period for Rancho de Petaluma.
    [Show full text]
  • CHIEF SOLANO Nez Perce in the 1870'S; Red Cloud and Sitting Bull of the Sioux, and Finally Cochise and Geronimo of the Apaches in the Legend Examined the 1880'S
    Shawnee of the revolutionary and the early republic periods, Quanah Parker of the Comanche, and Chief Joseph of the CHIEF SOLANO Nez Perce in the 1870's; Red Cloud and Sitting Bull of the Sioux, and finally Cochise and Geronimo of the Apaches in The Legend Examined the 1880's. Implicit in these records in addition to personal character byM. C. Low is the existence of a freely living native people whose well If a traveller had come west on the old Sacramento high­ being and survival as a nation were the purpose and chal­ way some four miles past Fairfield, county seat of Solano lenge of leadership on the part of each Indian chief.3 Was County, California, on the Sunday afternoon of June 3, this ever the case with Chief Solano? An examination of the 1934, he would have happened upon a most unusual cere­ historical records does not support this traditional belief. mony attended by some 3,000 persons gathered around a Instead, if anything, the role of Solano was that of a native great twelve foot high bronze statue set on a knoll overlook­ or aboriginal auxiliary in the military force of the conquer­ ing the verdant orchards of Suisun Valley. The statue was ing European invader, whose contribution was to advance that of an Indian chief, nude except for loincloth and three the defeat and destruction of the Indian nation. Solano's eagle feathers in his hair, parted in the middle in long record resembles tha t of the Indian scouts and auxiliaries of tresses.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Ethnolinguistic Identity of the Napa Tribe: the Implications of Chief Constancio Occaye's Narratives As Recorded by Lorenzo G
    UC Merced Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Title On the Ethnolinguistic Identity of the Napa Tribe: The Implications of Chief Constancio Occaye's Narratives as Recorded by Lorenzo G. Yates Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3k52g07t Journal Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 26(2) ISSN 0191-3557 Author Johnson, John R Publication Date 2006 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology | Vol. 26, No. 2 (2006) | pp. 193-204 REPORTS On the Ethnolinguistic of foUdore, preserved by Yates, represent some of the only knovra tradhions of the Napa tribe, and are thus highly Identity of the Napa Tribe: sigiuficant for anthropologists mterested m comparative The Implications of oral hterature in Native California. Furthermore, the Chief Constancio Occaye^s native words m these myths suggest that a reappraisal of Narratives as Recorded the ethnohnguistic identhy of the Napa people may be by Lorenzo G. Yates in order. BACKGROUND JOHN R. JOHNSON Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History Lorenzo Gordin Yates (1837-1909) was an English 2559 Puesta del Sol, Santa Barbara, CA 93105 immigrant who came to the United States as a teenager. He became a dentist by profession, but bad a lifelong About 1876, Lorenzo G. Yates interviewed Constancio passion for natural history. Yates moved his famUy from Occaye, described as the last "Chief of the Napas," and Wisconsm to California in 1864 and settled m CentreviUe recorded several items of folklore from his tribe. Yates in Alameda County, which later became a district of included Constancio's recollections about the use of Fremont.
    [Show full text]
  • Wal-Mart Draft EIR Part I
    CITY OF SUISUN CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PUBLIC NOTICE - NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE WAL-MART WALTERS ROAD PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# 2006072026) September 17, 2007 TO: RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES TRUSTEE AGENCIES OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES SUBJECT: NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF THE WAL-MART WALTERS ROAD PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# 2006072026 ) OVERVIEW: The City of Suisun City has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) to consider the potential environmental effects of the proposed Wal-Mart Walters Road Project (generally located on the northwest corner of Walters Road and State Route 12, Suisun City, CA). The proposed project requires the approval of a Site Plan and Architectural Application No. 06-08, Parcel Map 06-02, Sign Application No. 06-04, and Encroachment Permits to Local Streets. The project consists of approximately 230,000 square feet of commercial activities on approximately 20.1 acres. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: The DEIR found significant impacts related to Aesthetics, Light, and Glare, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology, Soils, and Seismicity, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use, Noise, Public Services and Utilities, Transportation, and Urban Decay. Many of these impacts were reduced to a less-than-significant level through the implementation of mitigation measures. However, even with implementation of applicable mitigation measures, the DEIR found that the project would still result in significant and unavoidable impacts to Aesthetics (Visual Character) Air Quality (Long-Term Operational Emissions, Cumulative Impacts, Greenhouse Gas Emissions), Noise (Construction Noise, Stationary Noise Sources, Operational Noise – Vehicular Sources), and Transportation (Intersections Operations, Long-Term Intersection Operations, Queuing).
    [Show full text]
  • Solano Project History
    Solano Project Zachary Redmond Bureau of Reclamation 2000 Table Of Contents The Solano Project.............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Prehistoric Setting .................................................3 Historic Setting ...................................................5 Project Authorization.....................................................8 Construction History ....................................................10 Post-Construction History................................................17 Settlement of the Project .................................................21 Uses of Project Water ...................................................22 Conclusion............................................................24 About the Author .............................................................24 Bibliography ................................................................25 Archival Collections ....................................................25 Government Documents .................................................25 Articles...............................................................25 Books ................................................................25 Web Sites.............................................................26 Index ......................................................................27 1 The Solano Project The Solano Project is a water
    [Show full text]
  • Old Stone Building Sparks New Historical Research and Discoveries Jerry Bowen
    Old Stone Building Sparks New Historical Research and Discoveries Jerry Bowen Our voyage of discovery began when Cordelia historian and artist, Daphne Nixon, called me and asked if I knew anything about a small rubble stone and adobe building on Suisun Valley Road near the college. Since then we have found that Solano County is lucky enough to have roughly a mile of historic sites that date back to the earliest recorded history of the county that still survive in one form or another. That historic mile extends from Rockville to Interstate 80 where thousands commuters pass daily, unaware of the historic significance ofthe sites along Suisun Valley Road. The sites include Rockville itself, the Pony Express Trail, an old wagon and stage road, the site of Chief Solano's rancheria (village) a mission site, an old structure built of stone, Chief Solano's original gravesite and the original location of Cordelia before it was moved to its present site. It was along this route that the first Pony Express rider, William Hamilton, rode from Rockville to Benicia on April 23, 1860. One of the sites, the Santa Eulalia Mission was known about but the location or its status was not. For over a hundred seventy years it was assumed there was nothing left of the mission buildings. A call from Cordelia artist and historian, Daphne Nixon set Carol Noske, and Jerry Bowen on a fantastic trip through time researching old records, history books and maps trying to learn more about the small rubble stone structure near Suisun Valley Road on the old Mangels Winery property.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Assessment of the Cannery Project, a Proposed Subdivision in Davis
    CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED CANNERY PROJECT, DAVIS, YOLO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared by Peak & Associates, Inc. 3941 Park Drive, Suite 20, #329 El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 Prepared for De Novo Planning Group 4630 Brand Way Sacramento, CA 95819 September 5, 2012 (Job # 12-051) INTRODUCTION ConAgra Foods Inc. proposes The Cannery project on its 98.4-acre property north of East Covell Boulevard in the City of Davis. The Cannery project (“project”) is an innovative, mixed-use, multi-generational neighborhood and place with housing opportunities for young families, young professionals and seniors. The project is designed to be consistent with the character and values of Davis and provide amenities and features which benefit the City and existing residents of adjacent neighborhoods. The Cannery includes amenities that are beneficial to the adjacent neighborhoods such as accessible open space features, bike and pedestrian connections, organic urban farm, civic space, parks, office and commercial uses. ConAgra’s vision for the site is to sustain its historical connection with Davis by establishing an organic urban farm on the east side of the project and support a new generation of young, entrepreneurial farmers while increasing opportunities for youth to understand the source of their food. Cannery Farm forms a prominent physical eastern edge and establishes a local food supply, promotes healthier living, reduces waste and contributes to a vibrant community. It will connect and relate to uses envisioned in the commercial mixed- use area (i.e. food plaza, restaurants, pubs, cafes) and will influence the modern agrarian architectural design planned for the overall project.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.4 - Cultural Resources
    County of Solano – Solano360 Specific Plan Draft EIR Cultural Resources 3.4 - Cultural Resources 3.4.1 - Introduction This section describes the existing cultural resources setting and potential effects from project implementation within the project site and its surrounding area that are based on a Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment conducted by MBA. 3.4.2 - Environmental Setting Regional Setting The City of Vallejo is located in the southwestern portion of Solano County, California. Vallejo is approximately 53.58 square miles in area and is centered along State Route 29 (SR-29) and Interstate 80 (I-80), which both traverse north and south through the City. SR-37 also traverses east and west through the City. The southern portion of Vallejo is dominated by high and medium-density residential land uses with commercial land uses immediately adjacent to I-80. Mare Island industrial uses are also located in the southern portion of the City. Project Site The 149.11-acre Solano County Fairgrounds project site is located immediately southwest of the Interstate 80 and State Route 37 interchange in the City of Vallejo, California, adjacent to the Six Flags Discovery Kingdom theme park and Lake Chabot. The site consists of the existing Solano County Fairgrounds, which includes administration and exposition buildings, a horse track, grandstands, equestrian buildings, horse barns, and several parking areas. Surrounding Area Following is a brief description of the areas surrounding the project site. North A Courtyard by Marriott Hotel and SR-37 are located north of the project site. The Country Club Crest residential subdivision is located beyond the hotel and SR-37.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.05 Cultural & Paleo
    4.5 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section discusses the potential impacts to cultural resources and paleontological resources from the proposed Project. Cultural resources include archaeological resources, traditional cultural properties, and historic architectural resources. Paleontological resources include fossil specimens, fossil sites, and fossil-bearing rock units. SETTING Regional Overview Prehistoric Archaeological and Ethnographic Overview The following overviews are taken from A Cultural Resources Study for the Lake Herman Quarry Expansion Project EIR, Near Vallejo, Solano County, California (Scher 2010a) and A California Register of Historical Resources District Evaluation of the Brownlie Mercury Mining Complex, near Vallejo, Solano County, California (Scher 2010b). An analytic framework for the interpretation of the Bay area, including Solano County, prehistory is provided by Fredrickson (1974), who divided human history in California into three broad periods: the Paleoindian period, the Archaic period, and the Emergent period. This scheme used sociopolitical complexity, trade networks, population, and the introduction and variations of artifact types to differentiate between cultural units. This scheme, with minor revisions remains the dominant framework for prehistoric archaeological research in the region. The earliest documented human occupation in California, the Paleoindian period (ca. 10,000- 6000 B.C.), was a time of variable climate, rising sea levels, and other broad-scale environmental change. People lived in small, highly mobile groups, moving through broad geographic areas and leaving relatively meager archaeological remains. With the more stable climate of the long Archaic period (6000 B.C. to A.D. 1000), people gradually became more sedentary, new groups entered the area, and regional distinctions developed. The Archaic has been divided into three subperiods (Lower, Middle, and Upper), based on changes in sociopolitical complexity, trade networks, populations, and the introduction of new artifact types.
    [Show full text]
  • Ca-Son-2294/H Studies Suggest Native Populations
    CA-SON-2294/H STUDIES SUGGEST NATIVE POPULATIONS RETURNED TO TRADITIONAL LIFEWAYS TO COPE WITH CIRCUMSTANCES AFTER THE 1837-1839 SMALLPOX EPIDEMIC IN THE NORTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA SUSAN H. ALVAREZ ALVAREZ CONSULTING E. BRECK PARKMAN CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS (RETIRED) Archaeological investigations of CA-SON-2294/H, including one controlled excavation and one salvage excavation, yielded remains of two structural types linked to native workers living on Adobe Creek and serving Mariano Vallejo’s Rancho Petaluma. Stone alignments revealed during creek bank rehabilitation suggest a walled structure destroyed during previous embankment collapse. Upstream, clay daub from traditional structures was recovered with valued items and household goods likely discarded during efforts to halt smallpox devastation. To increase understanding of cultural land use on the Adobe Creek flat, we anticipate that CA-SON-2294/H materials will point toward a return of the epidemic-beleaguered population to traditional building methods. Archaeological materials suggest that native populations, severely diminished due to the 1837-1839 Miramontes Smallpox Epidemic north of San Francisco Bay, reestablished specific traditional lifeways on a Mexican Republic Era rancho. The study area is a large cultural site (CA-SON-2294/H; hereafter referred to as SON-2294/H), the remnant of Rancho Petaluma’s base for rancho-period native workers presently within Petaluma Adobe State Historic Park, in Sonoma County. The site covers most of an ancient alluvial floodplain formed by Adobe Creek which flows along the base of a hill crowned by Rancho Petaluma Adobe. Over four decades, the portion of SON-2294/H situated on the floodplain was subject to controlled archaeological studies by Charles Gebhardt (1963), Stephen Silliman (2000), and one emergency monitoring documentation of disrupted pit features (Bisbee 1961).
    [Show full text]
  • A FLORA of the VACA MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA John Wendy
    A FLORA OF THE VACA MOUNTAIN S, CALIFORNIA John Wendy Willoughby B.A., Ca lifornia State University, Sacramento THESIS Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MA ST ER OF ARTS in BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES at CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO A FLORA OF THE VACA MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA A The sis by John Wendy Willoughby Approved by: ~rr;~I!!'~·s~=;j;' /,-7-L,=~~r-.:-'7---- ______ 1 Cha i r F~~frr/ .,-fYl'--"-l,:caJt:...;.:-AA..:..".,,,:i"''---"-W:..Mf________ ' Sec 0 n d Re a de r Marda L. West ~~~~~~~~u}~~. ~uJ~~~~2~~L---_--, Third Reader Harold W. Wiedman Date: Name 0 f Student! John Wendy Willoughby I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the Manual 0 f Instructions for the Preparation and Submission of the Master's Thesis or Master ' s Project, and that this thesis or project is suitable for shelving in the Library. Signature Date Graduate Coordinator or Chair Department of Biological Sciences .. ---......... Abstract II of A FLORA OF THE VACA MOUNTAINS, CA LIFORNIA by John Wendy Willoughby Statement of Problem: This study was undertaken to provide as complete an account as possible of all the vascular plants growing without cultivation in the Vaca Mountains, California. This written flora will be of use to those interested in the plants of the area for practical or aes­ thetic reasons and to those concerned with broader phyto­ geographical questions. It provides more detailed informa­ tion than that available in more general floras on the habitats of the plant taxa present in the Vaca Mountains and offers more recent taxonomic treatments of those taxa found in the range.
    [Show full text]
  • New Cement Hill Pipeline Project
    Draft Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration New Cement Hill Pipeline Project Prepared for: Suisun-Solano Water Authority October 2018 PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT: NEW CEMENT HILL PIPELINE PROJECT LEAD AGENCY: SUISUN-SOLANO WATER AUTHORITY (SSWA) Under CEQA, the lead agency is the public agency with primary responsibility over approval of the project. SSWA is the CEQA lead agency because it is responsible for implementation and operation of the New Cement Hill Pipeline. PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY SSWA proposes to construct and operate the New Cement Hill Pipeline (proposed project) which would provide a second pipeline from the Cement Hill Water Treatment Plant (CHWTP) to two 2-million-gallon water storage tanks on Cement Hill. The primary intent of the project is to enhance the operation of the CHWTP by turning the tanks into flow-through clearwell storage for filtered water to improve the CHWTP reliability and regulatory compliance. The pipeline would be constructed of 20-inch diameter PVC pipe, and most of the pipeline would be underground, with a short aerial crossing of the Putah South Canal. Construction would predominantly be open-cut construction in an approximately 4-foot-wide by 5.5-foot-deep trench. After pipeline placement, the ground surface would be restored. Disturbed areas in roadways would be repaved. Construction of the pipeline is anticipated to begin in spring of 2019 and would take 85 to 105 calendar days. Construction would occur 5 days per week for a total of up to 9 hours per day. Construction activities on public roads would occur between 9 a.m.
    [Show full text]