Climate Change Land Use What Is a Desert?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Climate Change Land Use What Is a Desert? What is a desert? Land Use . Build awareness and capacity at all levels and on relevant issues of Climate Change arid zone management. Humans are poor at managing variability in There are a number of different definitions for the term “desert.” At the basic Many of the current land uses (rangeland farming, agriculture, wildlife rainfall or climate change, but we can manage our impact on desert Climate change will affect Namibia’s deserts in several ways. Each level, deserts are ecosystems in which a lack of water is the main factor production, tourism, mining and urban development) within our environments. effect will not occur in isolation and has cumulative and far-reaching limiting biological processes. More specific criteria of deserts are: deserts are currently unsustainable. implications. What are some opportunities our desert biomes offer us? Due to the low amount of rainfall and long recovery periods, deserts . Rainfall – it is predicted that rainfall throughout Namibia and . Low annual rainfall. Renewable Energy are prone to land degradation and desertification. Desertification is the southern Africa will decrease, leading to even drier and expanding . Unpredictable and variable rainfall – some years there is no rain, while other The world is currently facing an energy crisis. Namibia’s need for conversion of land from a more productive state to a less productive deserts. years two or three times the annual amount falls in a very short time (boom energy will only continue to grow as the country develops. Deserts are one, typically through inappropriate land uses and poor management. Variability of rainfall – is also expected to increase, meaning rainfall and bust fluctuations). ideally suited for large-scale renewable energy generation. Solar and amounts will vary more from year to year and that droughts could . The rate of evaporation far exceeds the amount of precipitation (by a factor In order to protect our desert ecosystems, we need to carefully plan, wind farming would be ideal in certain, less attractive and less increase. of 20 or more). manage and optimize land use practices in these areas. biodiversity sensitive areas of Namibia’s deserts. As technology . Fog – it is difficult to predict what effects climate change will have on . Plants and animals show clear adaptations for survival in an arid improves efficiency, solar systems and wind turbines are able to How do we achieve this? fog, but should the amount of fog decrease, the specially adapted environment. generate more power. Promote collaborative and integrated planning at all levels. Tourism plants and animals of the Namib would be severely impacted and . Sparse vegetation cover. increases the value of previously marginal agricultural land and can Tourism and World Heritage Site we would probably witness large-scale extinctions. Fragile soils. assist in conservation efforts. An increase in tourism to desert areas Tourism with a focus on scenery, wilderness, wildlife, landscapes, . Temperature – is expected to increase. This will increase the . Low primary production and low energy systems. can also have a negative effect on the environment (water usage, geology, biodiversity and adventure/activity based enterprises that evaporation rate and reduce soil moisture levels making desert Desert systems are extremely sensitive, fragile and prone to long-term traffic to sensitive areas, etc.). However, if carefully planned and have low environmental impacts. The entire coast and inland desert areas drier and less productive. degradation with long recovery periods. managed, tourism can be beneficial and promote further strip of Namibia, from the Orange to the Kunene Rivers, has recently . Vegetation – increasing temperature, decreasing rainfall and soil conservation. been proclaimed a huge state protected national park, creating the moisture are expected to result in lower grass production and In order to survive desert extremes (lack of water and fluctuating . Secure additional land for biodiversity conservation by state, private Namib-Skeleton Coast National Park. This contiguous strip of parks possible replacement by shrubs, changing the local vegetation. temperatures), both plant and animal species have developed remarkable and communal management, particularly for the Nama Karoo biome covers over 10 million ha – making it the largest protected area in . Biodiversity – a decrease or change in vegetation will affect all adaptations, making deserts rich in rare and endemic species and highly which is poorly protected. Open areas for wildlife movement by Africa and the eighth largest in the world! desert species. Some species may experience a shrinkage of range/ vulnerable to extinction and environmental degradation. removing fences between areas with similar conservation or tourism distribution and abundance, while some may become locally extinct. Now proclaimed, this whole area, plus adjacent regions, qualify for Approximately 22% of Namibia is classified as desert. Three types of desert land uses and promote the co-management of large landscapes. Species that can disperse faster than the rate of climate change World Heritage Site status. This has far-reaching implications for biomes are found in Namibia: Namib Desert, Nama Karoo and Succulent . Create incentives for better land and natural resource management. may shift their ranges provided suitable habitat is available. conservation and tourism and for the marketing and economic Karoo. The southern Kalahari is sometimes referred to as a desert because of By managing the land we have more effectively, we can ensure it is development of Namiba. This changes what used to be considered The Succulent Karoo is particularly vulnerable to climate change the extreme lack of surface water and hot dry conditions. However, this area is both productive and protected. The more flexible the management valueless land under an agriculturally driven economy into high value because of the large number of highly specialized and range restricted considered to be the dry end of the savanna biome. systems, the better they can respond to the variability of desert land on a tourism-based economy. endemics. productivity. Namib Desert Estimated to be the oldest desert in the world. Coastal plain 100 to 150 km wide stretching from Angola north of the Kunene River to Lüderitz in the south. Hyper-arid – receiving less than 100 mm of rainfall per year. The Namib supports a diversity of different habitats. Sand dunes dominate in the south and directly along the coast, gravel plains in the central areas, while mountain ranges and deeply incised river valleys are a feature of the northern Namib. Just two perennial rivers cross Namibia’s deserts, the Orange-Gariep River on the southern border with South Africa and 1,600 km north, the Northern Namib Desert (P. Tarr) Kunene River on the border with Angola. A number of ephemeral rivers cut across this biome. They provide linear oases where large trees and water support many wildlife species, other animals and people. Northern Namib – Kunene to the Huab River . A belt of white sand dunes stretches along the coast from the Kunene to the Koigab River. The Khumib, Hoarusib, Hoanib, Uniab, Koigab and Huab Rivers cut through the dune belt. Plains of sediments and calcrete are found east of the dune belt. Central Namib – Huab to Kuiseb River . Narrow dune belt between Swakopmund and Walvis Bay. The remaining area consists of calcrete gravel plains with gypsum deposits. Inselbergs are found throughout the area and harbour unique flora and fauna. The Ugab, Omaruru, Swakop and Kuiseb Rivers flow through the area creating canyons. However, only the Ugab and Swakop Rivers occasionally flood through to the ocean. Southern Namib – Lüderitz to the Kuiseb River . The Southern Namib consists of sand dunes making up the “sand sea.” . Some of the highest dunes in the world are found at Sossusvlei (300 m). The Tsondab, Tsauchab and Koichab Rivers drain into this area, but terminate in pans rather than flowing all the way to the ocean. Central Namib Desert (P. Tarr) Fog provides a vital water source and plays a critical role in the Namib Desert by providing water to unique plants and animals which have adapted to make use of this resource. The fog belt extends 40 km inland from the coast and receives fog 180 days per year. Some fog occurs from 40 to 80 km inland, only 40 days per year, while farther inland than 80 km fog is rare. The Namib is well protected. Portions have been officially protected since 1907, making it one of the oldest state conservation areas in the world. The Namib-Naukluft National Park (49,768 km2) is the largest conservation area in southern Africa which together with the Skeleton Coast Park and the Dorob National Park ensures that the vast majority of the Namib is protected (75% in national parks, 14% in communal conservancies, 3% in wildlife/tourism concession areas and 1% on freehold land, in total 92% under some form of conservation). Vegetation . Dominated by therophytes – plants which survive drought in seed form. 96% of plant cover in the Namib is annuals (Stipagrostis grass species), occurring outside of drainage areas. Within drainage areas, dwarf shrubs and other plants dominate. Lichens, a symbiotic association between fungi and algae found growing on soil or rock, are also important. Some species are unattached and blow across the desert collecting in washes. Trees are mostly confined to ephemeral rivers and drainage lines (wadis) and include Moringa ovalifolia, Commiphora species, Acacia erioloba (camelthorn), Tamarix usneoides (wild tamarisk), Faidherbia albida (Ana tree), and Salvadora persica (mustard bush). Acanthosicyos horridus (!nara plant), Welwitchia mirabilis (welwitchia) and Euphorbia virosa are Map adapted from Atlas of Namibia (Mendelsohn, et al. 2002) by Carole Roberts characteristic species of the Namib Desert. Fauna Numerous desert vertebrates (29 of which are endemic) occur in the Namib Desert. Some of these endemic species are: . Reptiles – Aporosaura anchietae (shovel-snouted lizard), two species of barking geckos, Pythonodipsas carinata (western keeled snake) and Bitis peringueyi (Peringuey’s adder).
Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Placement and Generic Re-Circumscriptions of The
    TAXON 65 (2) • April 2016: 249–261 Powell & al. • Generic recircumscription in Schlechteranthus Phylogenetic placement and generic re-circumscriptions of the multilocular genera Arenifera, Octopoma and Schlechteranthus (Aizoaceae: Ruschieae): Evidence from anatomical, morphological and plastid DNA data Robyn F. Powell,1,2 James S. Boatwright,1 Cornelia Klak3 & Anthony R. Magee2,4 1 Department of Biodiversity & Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville, Cape Town, South Africa 2 Compton Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X7, Claremont 7735, Cape Town, South Africa 3 Bolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, 7701, Rondebosch, South Africa 4 Department of Botany & Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, Johannesburg, South Africa Author for correspondence: Robyn Powell, [email protected] ORCID RFP, http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-3164 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.12705/652.3 Abstract Ruschieae is the largest tribe in the highly speciose subfamily Ruschioideae (Aizoaceae). A generic-level phylogeny for the tribe was recently produced, providing new insights into relationships between the taxa. Octopoma and Arenifera are woody shrubs with multilocular capsules and are distributed across the Succulent Karoo. Octopoma was shown to be polyphyletic in the tribal phylogeny, but comprehensive sampling is required to confirm its polyphyly. Arenifera has not previously been sampled and therefore its phylogenetic placement in the tribe is uncertain. In this study, phylogenetic sampling for nine plastid regions (atpB-rbcL, matK, psbJ-petA, rpl16, rps16, trnD-trnT, trnL-F, trnQUUG-rps16, trnS-trnG) was expanded to include all species of Octopoma and Arenifera, to assess phylogenetic placement and relationships of these genera.
    [Show full text]
  • CACTUS CORNER NEWS Fresno Cactus & Succulent Society
    CACTUS CORNER NEWS Fresno Cactus & Succulent Society www.fresnocss.org Vol. 32, no. 7 Affiliated with the Cactus & Succulent Society of America July 2015 NEXT MEETING: Thursday, July 2, 7:00 P.M. (doors open 6:30 P.M.) Deaf & Hard of Hearing Service Center (DHHSC), 5340 North Fresno Street, Fresno PROGRAM: Cacti of the Southern Andean Cordillera; Argentina and Chile PRESENTED BY: Rob Skillin This month’s program will feature the cacti from the region of the Southern Andes Mountains of Argentina and Chile (south of Peru and Bolivia), and stretching from the Pacific Ocean eastward through one of the driest areas on earth, the Atacoma Desert, into the western Andean foothills of Chile, to the eastern Andean foothills of Argentina. Our presenter will be Rob Skillin, who has made several trips through South America, from which he has put together this program of habitat shots of cacti ranging from the smallest of the small (Blossfeldia liliputana and Copiapoa laui) to the truly large (Trichocereus and Eulychnia) – with a few succulents thrown in for good measure. I have been growing cacti and succulents for approximately 37 years, and have been involved in various local societies for most of that time, starting with the San Diego C&SS in the 1970’s, then to the Santa Barbara and Bakersfield clubs. I currently belong to the Central Coast C&SS of which I was a founding member, first President and first Show and Sale Chairman. I have also been involved with the CSSA as a member of it’s Board of Directors, and am a CSSA certified Judge.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Major Families and Genera of Succulent Plants
    SOME MAJOR FAMILIES AND GENERA OF SUCCULENT PLANTS Including Natural Distribution, Growth Form, and Popularity as Container Plants Daniel L. Mahr There are 50-60 plant families that contain at least one species of succulent plant. By far the largest families are the Cactaceae (cactus family) and Aizoaceae (also known as the Mesembryanthemaceae, the ice plant family), each of which contains about 2000 species; together they total about 40% of all succulent plants. In addition to these two families there are 6-8 more that are commonly grown by home gardeners and succulent plant enthusiasts. The following list is in alphabetic order. The most popular genera for container culture are indicated by bold type. Taxonomic groupings are changed occasionally as new research information becomes available. But old names that have been in common usage are not easily cast aside. Significant name changes noted in parentheses ( ) are listed at the end of the table. Family Major Genera Natural Distribution Growth Form Agavaceae (1) Agave, Yucca New World; mostly Stemmed and stemless Century plant and U.S., Mexico, and rosette-forming leaf Spanish dagger Caribbean. succulents. Some family yuccas to tree size. Many are too big for container culture, but there are some nice small and miniature agaves. Aizoaceae (2) Argyroderma, Cheiridopsis, Mostly South Africa Highly succulent leaves. Iceplant, split-rock, Conophytum, Dactylopis, Many of these stay very mesemb family Faucaria, Fenestraria, small, with clumps up to Frithia, Glottiphyllum, a few inches. Lapidaria, Lithops, Nananthus, Pleisopilos, Titanopsis, others Delosperma; several other Africa Shrubs or ground- shrubby genera covers. Some marginally hardy. Mestoklema, Mostly South Africa Leaf, stem, and root Trichodiadema, succulents.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural and Artificial Hybrids in Mesembryanthemaceae
    356 S.-Afr.Tydskr. Plantk. , 1990, 56(3): 356-362 Natural and artificial hybrids in Mesembryanthemaceae S. Hammer* and Sigrid Liede Mesa Garden, P.O. Box 72, Belen, NM 87002, United States of America Accepted 5 March 1990 Aspects of natural and artificial hybridization in Mesembryanthemaceae are discussed. Morphological and experimental evidence is used to trace the parent species of some natural hybrids. Natural hybridization is interpreted in evolutionary terms. The possibility that garden hybrids might invade the cultivated gene pool, thus endangering the continuity of some threatened species, is pointed out. Aspekte van natuurlike en kunsmatige hibridisering in Mesembryanthemaceae word bespreek. Morfologiese en eksperimentele bewyse is gebruik om die oorspronklike ouer-spesies van 'n aantal natuurlike hibriede op te spoor. Natuurlike hibridesering word in terme van evolusie ge·fnterpreteer. Die gevaar vir die voortbestaan van bedreigde spesies deur die indringing van tuinhibriede by 'n gekweekte genebank, is bespreek. Keywords: Hybridization, Mesembryanthemaceae *To whom correspondence should be addressed Introduction indicated in parentheses, with the date and location (MG Only a few instances of natural or artificial hybridization = Mesa Garden, KG = Karoo Garden). have been recorded in the Mesembryanthemaceae. Despite the intense field research into the family during Natural intergeneric hybrids the last century, very few natural hybrids have hitherto The best-known instance of natural hybridization in been investigated. Similarly, few artificial hybrids have Mesembryanthemaceae occurs between Gibbaeum been recorded though the family has been widely culti­ album N.E. Br. and Muiria hortenseae N.E . Br. The vated in European greenhouses for the last two natural hybrid, Muirio-Gibbaeum muirioides Rowley centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • A JOURNAL of BOTANICAL RESEARCH Vol. 39,1 May 2009
    ISSN 0006 8241 = Bothalia Bothalia A JOURNAL OF BOTANICAL RESEARCH Vol. 39,1 May 2009 TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY INSTITUTE PRETORIA Obtainable from the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), Private Bag X101, Pretoria 0001, Republic of South Africa. A catalogue of all available publications will be issued on request. BOTHALIA Bothalia is named in honour of General Louis Botha, first Premier and Minister of Agriculture of the Union of South Africa. This house journal of the South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, is devoted to the furtherance of botanical science. The main fields covered are taxonomy, ecology, anatomy and cytology. Two parts of the journal and an index to contents, authors and subjects are published annually. Three booklets of the contents (a) to Vols 1–20, (b) to Vols 21–25, (c) to Vols 26–30, and (d) to Vols 31–37 (2001– 2007) are available. STRELITZIA A series of occasional publications on southern African flora and vegetation, replacing Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa and Annals of Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens. MEMOIRS OF THE BOTANICAL SURVEY OF SOUTH AFRICA The memoirs are individual treatises usually of an ecological nature, but sometimes dealing with taxonomy or economic botany. Published: Nos 1–63 (many out of print). Discontinued after No. 63. ANNALS OF KIRSTENBOSCH BOTANIC GARDENS A series devoted to the publication of monographs and major works on southern African flora.Published: Vols 14–19 (earlier volumes published as supplementary volumes to the Journal of South African Botany). Discontinued after Vol. 19. FLOWERING PLANTS OF AFRICA (FPA) This serial presents colour plates of African plants with accompanying text.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics of Translocated Frithia Humilis, an Endangered Sandstone Endemic
    Population dynamics of translocated Frithia humilis, an endangered sandstone endemic PG Jansen 22174788 Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae in Environmental Sciences at the Potchefstroom Campus of the North-West University Supervisor: Prof SJ Siebert Co-supervisor: Dr F Siebert Assistant Supervisor: Prof J van den Berg May 2017 PREFACE Translocation of plants in South Africa is still poorly studied and seldom used as a conservation tool. Thus, the translocation of Frithia humilis for conservation purposes can be seen as a first for South Africa. Consequently, a monitoring programme was initiated to assess the feasibility of translocation as a conservation tool for this species. This study is considered to be the second phase of the monitoring program and aims to determine the long term feasibility of translocation, since the previous study determined whether F. humilis could survive the translocation process and successfully reproduce at the receptor sites. The objectives were to study the population to quantify and compare the: (i) pollination system over time and between receptor and control sites; (ii) fecundity over time and between receptor and control sites; and (iii) population structure over time and between receptor and control sites. The dissertation is divided into seven chapters. Chapter 1. Discusses project history, species account, aims and objectives, hypotheses and dissertation layout. Chapter 2. Discusses translocation challenges, factors influencing success and failure and guidelines. Chapter 3. Describes the study area, study sites and methodology. Chapter 4. The findings of observations and identification of potential pollinators are given and primary and reserve pollinators are suggested.
    [Show full text]
  • NICHOLAS EDWARD BROWN BIOGRAPHY Chuck Staples, CSSA Historian
    NICHOLAS EDWARD BROWN BIOGRAPHY Chuck Staples, CSSA Historian Brown, Dr Nicholas Edward (1849–1934)—describer of over 10,000 new species of plants with many drawings and paintings by him—specializing in African succulents—especially Euphorbiaceae, Stapelieae and Mesembryanthemaceae. Born at Redhill, England, on 11 July 1849, Nicholas Edward Brown became a herbarium botanist, taxonomist, artist, systematist, and geographer. After high school graduation and already interested in natural science, he first obtained work at William Wilson Saunders' (1809–1879) private museum of natural history and notable private garden at Reigate, Surrey, England 1867–1873. NE Brown's interest in succulent plants became due to the collection of such plants by Thomas Cooper (1815–1913) from South Africa 1859–1862 that were in a couple of greenhouses at Reigate. NE Brown then became the chief assistant in the Herbarium of Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew, England from 1873 until retirement in 1914. He continued his association with Kew for many years after his retirement. He was enamored with the succulent plants of South Africa—Asclepiadaceae, Ericaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Iridaceae, Stapelieae and especially Mesembryanthemaceae along with other genera and species which bears his author citation "N.E.Br." behind its name. NE Brown finished up the last 4 volumes (1896–1933) of Flora Capensis with Sir William Turner Thiselton-Dyer (1843–1928) after the deaths of Dr William Henry Harvey (1811–1866) and Dr Otto Wilhelm Sonder (1812–1881) who had completed the first 3 vols (1860–1865) of Flora Capensis. NE Brown was credited with articles from various journals/bulletins (including Gardeners Chronicle) on Sansevierias, Mesembs & allied genera, and Stapelias.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships in the Southern African Genus Drosanthemum (Ruschioideae, Aizoaceae)
    Phylogenetic relationships in the southern African genus Drosanthemum (Ruschioideae, Aizoaceae) Sigrid Liede-Schumann1, Guido W. Grimm2, Nicolai M. Nürk1, Alastair J. Potts3, Ulrich Meve1 and Heidrun E.K. Hartmann4,† 1 Department of Plant Systematics, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany 2 Unaffiliated, Orléans, France 3 African Centre for Coastal Palaeoscience, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa 4 Department of Systematics and Evolution of Plants, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany † Deceased. ABSTRACT Background. Drosanthemum, the only genus of the tribe Drosanthemeae, is widespread over the Greater Cape Floristic Region in southern Africa. With 114 recognized species, Drosanthemum, together with the highly succulent and species-rich tribe Ruschieae, constitute the `core ruschioids' in Aizoaceae. Within Drosanthemum, nine subgenera have been described based on flower and fruit morphology. Their phylogenetic relationships, however, have not yet been investigated, hampering understanding of monophyletic entities and patterns of geographic distribution. Methods. Using chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequence data, we performed network- and tree-based phylogenetic analyses of 73 species of Drosanthemum with multiple accessions for widespread species. A well-curated, geo-referenced occurrence dataset comprising the 134 genetically analysed and 863 further accessions was used to describe the distributional ranges of intrageneric lineages and the genus as a whole. Results. Phylogenetic inference supports nine clades within Drosanthemum, seven of which group in two major clades, while the remaining two show ambiguous affinities. The nine clades are generally congruent to previously described subgenera within Submitted 8 November 2019 Accepted 26 March 2020 Drosanthemum, with exceptions such as cryptic species. In-depth analyses of sequence Published 8 May 2020 patterns in each gene region were used to reveal phylogenetic affinities inside the Corresponding author retrieved clades in more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesembs. (Except Lithops, Conos)
    San Gabriel Valley Cactus and Succulent Society Succulent of the Month June 2001 – Mesembs. (Except Lithops, Conos) The Mesembryanthemaceae are along with cacti Most of the mesembs are easily grown and one of the largest of the succulent plant families. propagated. Seed is readily available for many There are about 123 genera, depending on the common and uncommon species. Seed can be date and author, and several thousand species. A sown in either the spring or fall, some growers few of the mesembs are very common, used as starting all their seed in the fall, some splitting ground cover around the world, and grown by the sowing between the two seasons. people who would ordinarily have nothing to do Germination is quick, usually 10 days to two with a succulent plant. weeks. The seedlings grow quickly, often doubling in size in just a few weeks, and capable Many others are favorites of many collectors, of withstanding slight droughts even at a month. Lithops and Conophytum each having their own Reasonable size plants and flowers are possible cults and specialists, and each having a well in a year, and certainly in two for almost all deserved prominent place on our show tables. genera. There are some other genera that are commonly seen, with only one or two species represented. Many of the species do well from cuttings, as Faucaria tuberculosa and F. tigrina, Cheiridopsis long as a small piece of stem is included. denticulata, Trichodiadema bulbosum, are seen at nearly every show, but are just a few select Some mesembs are very particular about water members from a wealth of species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Richtersveld Cultural and Botanical Landscape
    THE RICHTERSVELD CULTURAL AND BOTANICAL LANDSCAPE APPLICATION FOR INCLUSION ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST January, 2006 Richtersveld Cultural and Botanical Landscape World Heritage Site Nomination 1 APPLICATION FOR INCLUSION ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST THE RICHTERSVELD CULTURAL AND BOTANICAL LANDSCAPE Main Authors: Mr. Mark Thornton, EcoAfrica Dr. Francois Odendaal, EcoAfrica Contributing Authors: Ms. Annelise le Roux, Succulent Karoo Knowledge Centre, CapeNature Prof. Norbert Jürgens, BioCentre Klein Flottbek and Botanical Garden, University Hamburg Mr. Andrew Hall, Northern Cape Provincial Department of Sport, Arts and Culture Richtersveld Cultural and Botanical Landscape World Heritage Site Nomination 2 Contents List of Abbreviations 5 Executive Summary 6 1. Identification of the Property 13 1.a. Country 13 1.b. Province 13 1.c. Name of Property 13 1.d. Geographic Coordinates to the Nearest Second 13 1.e. Maps 13 1.f. Area of Nominated Property and Proposed Buffer Zones 14 2. Description 15 2.a. Description of Property 15 2.a.i. Location 15 2.a.ii. Buffer Zones 16 2.a.iii. Potential Future Inclusions in the World Heritage Site 18 2.a.iv. Overview of Climate and Geology 20 2.a.v. Overview of Fauna 23 2.a.vi. Flora of the Richtersveld Community Conservancy 25 2.a.vii. Cultural Landscape, Transhumance, Pastoralism and Architecture 48 2.a.viii Traditional Nama Architecture: the |haru oms 52 2.b. History and Development 3. Justification for Inscription 72 3.a. Criteria Under Which Inscription is Proposed 76 3.b. Proposed Statement of Outstanding Universal Value 80 3.c. Comparative Analysis 80 3.d. Integrity and Authenticity 86 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin for Gardeners: Over 3,000 Plant Names Explained and Explored
    L ATIN for GARDENERS ACANTHUS bear’s breeches Lorraine Harrison is the author of several books, including Inspiring Sussex Gardeners, The Shaker Book of the Garden, How to Read Gardens, and A Potted History of Vegetables: A Kitchen Cornucopia. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 © 2012 Quid Publishing Conceived, designed and produced by Quid Publishing Level 4, Sheridan House 114 Western Road Hove BN3 1DD England Designed by Lindsey Johns All rights reserved. Published 2012. Printed in China 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 1 2 3 4 5 ISBN-13: 978-0-226-00919-3 (cloth) ISBN-13: 978-0-226-00922-3 (e-book) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Harrison, Lorraine. Latin for gardeners : over 3,000 plant names explained and explored / Lorraine Harrison. pages ; cm ISBN 978-0-226-00919-3 (cloth : alkaline paper) — ISBN (invalid) 978-0-226-00922-3 (e-book) 1. Latin language—Etymology—Names—Dictionaries. 2. Latin language—Technical Latin—Dictionaries. 3. Plants—Nomenclature—Dictionaries—Latin. 4. Plants—History. I. Title. PA2387.H37 2012 580.1’4—dc23 2012020837 ∞ This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). L ATIN for GARDENERS Over 3,000 Plant Names Explained and Explored LORRAINE HARRISON The University of Chicago Press Contents Preface 6 How to Use This Book 8 A Short History of Botanical Latin 9 Jasminum, Botanical Latin for Beginners 10 jasmine (p. 116) An Introduction to the A–Z Listings 13 THE A-Z LISTINGS OF LatIN PlaNT NAMES A from a- to azureus 14 B from babylonicus to byzantinus 37 C from cacaliifolius to cytisoides 45 D from dactyliferus to dyerianum 69 E from e- to eyriesii 79 F from fabaceus to futilis 85 G from gaditanus to gymnocarpus 94 H from haastii to hystrix 102 I from ibericus to ixocarpus 109 J from jacobaeus to juvenilis 115 K from kamtschaticus to kurdicus 117 L from labiatus to lysimachioides 118 Tropaeolum majus, M from macedonicus to myrtifolius 129 nasturtium (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Greg Daniels Mesemb Plant List March 2015 [email protected] 07 3376 3404
    Greg Daniels Mesemb Plant List March 2015 [email protected] 07 3376 3404 Genus/species Collector No Locality Price No. available Acrodon bellidiflorus Rooivlei 5 3 Aloinopsis loganii Matjiesfontein, N 6 1 Aloinopsis schooneesii 5 1 Antimima argentea Namus Kloof 5 1 Antimima limbata Langebaan 5 5 Antimima solida SB1515 Grootgraafwater 5 19 Antimima sp. Brandkop 5 1 Antimima sp. SB1942 Quaggaskop 5 4 Antimima turneriana 5 2 Argyroderma congregatum HH5032 Vredendal, near 5 4 Argyroderma congregatum SB614 Vredendal, near 5 9 Argyroderma delaetii PV255 Nuwerus, 40 km W of 5 3 Argyroderma delaetii 'aureum' Langdam, Bitterfontein 5 13 Argyroderma fissum Klawer 5 3 Argyroderma fissum Klawer, 3 km S of 5 3 Argyroderma fissum 'brevipes' Vredendal 5 3 Argyroderma fissum 'litorale' SB1542 Strandfontein, E of 5 11 Argyroderma framesii ssp. hallii 'cerise fl' Holrivier TL 5 14 Argyroderma patens Kliprand Road 5 1 Argyroderma patens 'lemon to amber fl' Soutrivier Bridge, 8 miles NE of 5 2 Argyroderma pearsonii var. luckhoffii ‘yellow fl' 5 2 Argyroderma pearsonii 'purple fl' 5 6 Argyroderma testiculare 5 2 Astridia longifolia 'bright red fl' SB758 Remhoogte 5 1 Astridia sp. 5 34 Astridia velutina RJC163/97 Hellskloof Gate and Sendlingsdrift, between 5 2 Bergeranthus concavus 6 3 Bergeranthus multiceps 'addoensis' Sondagsrivierpoort 5 3 Bergeranthus multiceps 'artus' 5 10 Bergeranthus scapiger 5 3 Braunsia apiculata Klein Cederberg 5 9 Cephalophyllum alstonii Ceres Karoo 5 22 Cephalophyllum curtophyllum 5 4 Cephalophyllum ebracteatum Lüderitz 5 5 Cephalophyllum loreum SB619 Gifberg 5 4 Cephalophyllum pillansii 5 1 Cephalophyllum pulchrum 5 10 Cephalophyllum rigidum 'aureorubrum' #same? 5 2 Cephalophyllum sp.
    [Show full text]