COMPLETE COMMUNITIES An Direction Strategy PUBLIC SERVICE CONTRIBUTORS The Complete Communities Direction Strategy includes contributions from across the Public Service, including: CORE DRAFTING TEAM PLANNING, PROPERTY AND DEVELOPMENT Michael Robinson (Co-lead), Brett Shenback (Co-lead), DEPARTMENT Ayoka Anderson, Gary Holmes Deepak Joshi, Donna Beaton, Giles Bugailiskis, Lee Caldwell, Marsha Christiuk, Susanne Dewey-Povoledo, Glen OURWINNIPEG INITIATIVE TEAM Doney, Rick Enns, Martin Grady, Jennifer Hansell, Dianne Michelle Richard (OurWinnipeg Initiative Coordinator), Himbeault, John Kiernan, Robert Kostiuk, Kurtis Kowalke, Ayoka Anderson, Devin Clark, Ian Hall, Gary Holmes, Helen Malec, David Marsh, Martin Pasieczka, Mike Pyl, Judy Justin Lee, Jeff Pratte, Becky Raddatz, Michael Robinson, Redmond, Pam Sveinson, James Veitch, Barry Thorgrimson, Andrew Ross, Mamadou Lamine Sane, Brett Shenback, Bryan Ward, John Wintrup, Noah Yauk Rebecca Van Beveren PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER Brad Sacher, Diane Banash, Dave Domke, Luis Escobar, Glen Laubenstein Doug Hurl, Kevin Nixon DEPUTY CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER WATER AND WASTE DEPARTMENT Phil Sheegl Barry MacBride, Darryl Drohomerski, Frank Mazur, Mike Shkolny OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER Patti Regan WINNIPEG PARKING AUTHORITY David Hill COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Clive Wightman, Karen Beck, Kelly Goldstrand, Kathy WINNIPEG POLICE SERVICE Knudsen, Dan Prokopchuk Chief Keith McCaskill, Deputy Chief Shelley M. Hart, Inspector Brian Cyncora WINNIPEG TRANSIT Dave Wardrop, Bill Menzies, Bjorn Radstrom COMPLETE COMMUNITIES WINNIPEg’S GUIDE TO LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT Complete Communities is one of four Direction Additionally, nationally and internationally renowned Strategies supporting OurWinnipeg. It represents more experts in areas such as urban economics, planning and than two years of research and analysis about what should design were consulted to help further inform Complete be part of a ‘state of the art’ land use and development plan. Communities and its accompanying guidelines, plans and handbooks. At the direction of City Council and in order to provide the solid framework to inform the strategy, significant The result, an innovative, practical “playbook” guiding research and analysis was taken to fill what was a land use and development in Winnipeg was born from this significant gap of basic information in important areas, background work and an intensive, 6 month drafting process such as: that involved a significant cross-section of Winnipeg’s Public > What is the state of our current land supply? Service with support from a variety of stakeholders. > What type and level of growth can we expect? > What are the best practices to achieve balanced, Complete Communities sets Winnipeg on a new sustainable growth? path. New tools and approaches will foster development > How do we support the creation of that establishes Winnipeg as an urban leader— a city of complete communities? unique, sustainable and complete communities. © 2011, THE CITY OF WINNIPEG. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE PREPARATION OF THIS SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY PLAN WAS CARRIED OUT WITH ASSISTANCE FROM THE GREEN MUNICIPAL FUND, A FUND FINANCED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA AND ADMINISTERED BY THE FEDARATION OF CANADIAN MUNICIPALITIES. NOTWITHSTANDING THIS SUPPORT, THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ARE THE PERSONAL VIEWS OF THE AUTHORS, AND THE FEDERATION OF CANADIAN MUNICIPALITIES AND THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEM. H OW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT EACH SECTION ON THE URBAN STRUCTURE (SEE FIGURE H) 03 SECTION TITLE BEGINS WITH A VISION AND/OR HIGH LEVEL DESCRIPTION OF THE APPLICABLE URBAN STRUCTURE COMPONENT AND THEN MOVES TO THE DETAILS OF HOW THEY ARE TO BE 03-4 SECTION TITLE IMPLEMENTED. THE SECTIONS ARE ORGANIZED ACCORDING KEY DIRECTION VISION TO FIGURE H. ERI VELIQUUNTE VOLUPTAM ACCULLIT QUOSSITIBUS AUTE NI AM, TO QUID QUAM, OD QUE MOLUPTAT PRES AD QUE EROVIT, CONSEQUE NATUM AUT MAGNIM QUI CUM DOLENT. COMNIS RESCILIT, QUISCIUM DIOSAM FACIDEN IHILLAB IMAION REHENDAE NIHIL INCIL EXPEL EX ET QUAERO DOLOR OREHENT ET, CONSEQUATAT. ANDANT VENTO ET MOSAPERUPTAE VENDISCIET RECTATUR? INVELIQUE VELEST PELENTUREPEL MAIONSENT MAGNIAS QUIST, ODI NECTORE ICIMODIT A ESSENES APITE ID QUIA DI UT VOLUPTAS ELICIA SAM REREM RERUM VOLUPTU MENDIS KEY DIRECTION (figure a) VELIS AM QUASSIM OLUPTATUR RENTUR MOLESTIIS ETUR ARUM DOLUPTAECAE NOBIS SE VOLUPTATE VOLORE, TE RE MAXIME LAM, VOLUM ASPIDUNT, VOLORER IATATEM QUAERUM QUAM Each section has a key direction. It is meant to summarize LAMUS MAXIMAIO. ESSIMPERUM QUO EA QUIS ET VOLUPTI IN PREPERRO CORECTI CONET AUDAE CONSEQUI OPTATEM the main thrust of the section and like a goal, it provides a Uptasped quam doloris doluptae pratios ideliti volor re labori que estinum secatis aut dolupiet rerempores dolecti description of the results that the City is hoping to achieve. It secae nieniam enim et endit volo eum veneces sequas cuptinctorum aut min re, to blaudae nimusan ditent qui exerferum repudae nis soluptiis nonseque nat. utae eos mi, con consequias autatent. is from this direction that the rest of each section is based. Us aborro et quation sereperumqui odis eum fuga. Estiurem veliqua temporia ditation excepellorem sit qui ad ut mi, que vitibus maximiliqui quat. VISION (figure b) nientoreicia sa si ut ex essit laut es de liquia niatquid quae. Ita vitium quam, simpore autem secat que re volupisci Genistrum ut aut et, cullaboreped que aut et aut placcatio omnimagniam, untiae porem et undant dipitatibus te aut mos archita aspe experit ut ut repelignat pore aciis An inspirational statement regarding how the area alit adia dolore pro volenis resteceperio velliqu ostores aerfernatio venderum facil invelibus utem eiumenimet aut mos etusda volorum quis dolorestem eaque molest will evolve. quatur? Nemos eius et lia sunda quiaspe lloreiusa volor asperum TSub-section DESCRIPTION (figure c) > elendis moluptias ut ut eum eos et ent, ut rae voloribus esequi ut magnis verit quisinveles voluptisci ipsus, ut This is the main body of the section. It outlines the characteristics of the area, how it fits into the Urban Section Title B Structure and may outline examples of that part of the Urban Structure. figure a figure b figure c HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT 03 SECTION TITLE SUPPORTING DIRECTIONS (figure d) Supporting Directions are based on the Key Directions and describe the City’s objectives concerning the SECTION TITLE > SUB-SECTION component of the Urban Structure in more detail. SUPPORTING DIRECTION AND ENABLING STRATEGIES DIRECTION 1 ENABLING STRATEGIES NI NON EXPLATEM EXERI CONET, QUIA QUE QUAS ELIS IPIS (figure e) VOLUPTA DELIQUIBUSAM QUAM CUM FUGIT EICITECABORI The enabling strategies come from each supporting direction. vollatur sequi aboressitem eum nimillo resedis doluptatur They are the strategies that will guide the City to fulfilling the sim ent ullaccusant omnis qui sectiis aliqui inulpa susam quidem voluptat ipsusaecerum aute corerch directions for each component of the Urban Structure. vollatur sequi aboressitem eum nimillo resedis doluptatur sim ent ullaccusant omnis qui sectiis TOOLS (figure f) aliqui inulpa susam quidem voluptat ipsu tur sequi aboressitem eum nimillo resedis Each enabling strategy has been assessed as to how they doluptatur sim ent ullaccusant omnis qui secti can be implemented. There are four categories of tools: tur sequi aboressitem eum nimillo resedis doluptatur sim ent ullaccusant omnis qui secti Planning, Incentives, Capital Budget/Infrastructure, and Leadership/Partnership. Where an enabling strategy will use one or more tools, their corresponding symbols will be IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS shown next to the strategy. Planning Incentive Toolbox TSub-section > Capital Budget/ The details of the specific tools and actions that will Infrastructure Leadership/Partnership be used to implement the enabling strategies have not Section Title Section Title been specified in this paper. They will be further defined D through the Complete Communities Toolbox and through figure g figure f figure e figure d future work plans. (see Implementation Section) IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS (figure g) GLOssARY Planning Complete Communities is a technical document which uses terms that may not be familiar to all users. For that Incentive Toolbox reason, there is a comprehensive glossary at the back of Capital Budget/Infrastructure the document to help the reader better understand and Leadership/Partnership use the document. HOW TO USE THIS DOCUMENT DOCUMENT STRUCTURE THROUGHOUT THE INTRODUCTION THE INTRODUCTION PROPOSES A VISION OF COMPLETE COMMUNITIES AND OUTLINES THE DOCUMENT YOU WILL SHIFT TO ACCOMMODATING GROWTH AND CHANGE IN WINNIPEG BASED ON AN URBAN FIND GRAPHICAL CUES FOR STRUCTURE. IT ALSO EXPLAINS HOW THIS DOCUMENT IS RELATED TO OTHER PLANNING QUICK REFERENCE AND DOCUMENTS AND TO OURWINNIPEG IN PARTICULAR. NOTES REFERRING YOU TO U RBAN STRUCTURE PROVIDES A VISION FOR THE ARRANGEMENT OF LAND USES WITHIN THE CITY. OTHER DOCUMENTS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. TRANSFORMATIVE AREAS: TRANSFORMATIVE AREAS ARE THOSE AREAS OF THE CITY DOWNTOWN THAT PROVIDE THE BEST OPPORTUNITY FOR GROWTH THIS SECTION WILL GIVE CENTRES & CORRIDORS AND CHANGE. YOU A QUICK VIEW OF THE MaJOR REDEVELOPMENT SITES DOCUMEnt’S STRUCTURE NEW COMMUNITIES AND DETAIL THESE CUES AND REFERENCES TO HELP AREAS OF STABILITY: AREAS OF STABILITY REFER TO AREAS THAT WILL MATURE COMMUNITIES ACCOMMODATE MODERATE GROWTH AND CHANGE YOU NAVIGATE THROUGH IT. RECENT COMMUNITIES THAT FITS WITH THE EXISTING