DOCSLIB.ORG

Ammendment and the Interstate Commerce Clause (Article 1, §8) of the United States Constitution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ammendment and the Interstate Commerce Clause (Article 1, §8) of the United States Constitution THE COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS RESOLUTION TO AMMEND THE 10th AMMENDMENT AND THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE CLAUSE (ARTICLE 1, §8) OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION Resolution Summary Recently, state leaders have found themselves expressing concern that Congress is enacting mandates to the states that are beyond the enumerated powers granted to Congress under Article 1, Section 8 (Interstate Commerce Clause) of the U.S. Constitution. Modern laws and directives at the federal level, notably the Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 19951, Presidential Executive Order 13132 (1999)2 and the 2009 Presidential Memorandum, re: Preemption of State Law3, have sought to restore the constitutional balance of power within our federal system. Despite these actions, work remains if state and federal leaders are to gain not only an appropriate balance of power, but a truly cooperative and productive partnership in solving today’s far-reaching policy issues. This policy resolution: Asserts that rights reserved to the state under the 10th amendment to the U.S. Constitution are being infringed upon by Congress as a result of unconstitutional mandates; Urges Congress to cease and desist from enacting mandates that are beyond the scope of the enumerated powers granted to Congress by the U.S. Constitution; Encourages CSG members to call upon their congressional delegations and Congress to initiate the amendment process to the U.S. Constitution to amend the 10th Amendment and Article 1, Section 8 (the interstate commerce clause) of the U.S. Constitution as proposed by the Resolution; Calls upon Congress to specify that the proposed amendments to the U.S. Constitution shall be operative upon ratification of three-fourths of the several states, provided that such ratification occurs within 7 years of the submission of the amendments to the states by Congress. 1 http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s104-1 2 http://www.epa.gov/fedreg/eo/eo13132.htm 3 http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Presidential-Memorandum-Regarding-Preemption Additional Resource Information The 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Reserved Powers, Scope and Purpose, and Relevant Case Law. Sponsored by the U.S. Senate and U.S. Government Printing Office. Tenth Amendment Center CSG Management Directives Management Directive #1: CSG will affirm on behalf of its member states their sovereignty under the 10th Amendment and support continued and meaningful dialogue between federal and state officials on matters of common interest. Management Directive #2: CSG will transmit a copy of this resolution to the executive and legislative leaders in each state so that they may contact their states’ Congressional Delegation to emphasize the important role of the states in our federal system. Management Directive #3: CSG will transmit a copy of this resolution to the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker and the Clerk of the United States House of Representatives and post a copy of this resolution on its website. THE COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS RESOLUTION TO AMMEND THE 10th AMMENDMENT AND THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE CLAUSE (ARTICLE 1, §8) OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."; WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; WHEREAS, the scope of the power defined by the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; WHEREAS, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; WHEREAS, many powers assumed by the federal government and federal mandates are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; WHEREAS, the Interstate Commerce Clause in Article 1, §8 of the Constitution of the United States provides that Congress shall have the power: "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with Indian Tribes;" WHEREAS, the Interstate Commerce Clause is limited to the federal government regulating trade between the states and between the states and other nations, to help prevent conflicts between states over commercial activities and to prevent the erection of barriers to commerce between the states; WHEREAS, the Interstate Commerce Clause should not be used to provide Congress with authority to regulate matters that are primarily intrastate with only an insignificant or collateral effect upon interstate commerce; WHEREAS, many federal laws are beyond the scope and intent of the Interstate Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States assures that we, the people of the United States of America and each sovereign state in the union of states, now have, and have always had, rights the federal government may not usurp; WHEREAS, Article 4, §4, of the Constitution of the United States says: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government," and the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States adds "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."; and WHEREAS, Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Congress take action to initiate the amendment process provided by Article 5 of the Constitution of the United States to amend the Tenth Amendment and Article 1, §8 (the Interstate Commerce Clause), of the Constitution of the United States. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Congress amend the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States as follows, with proposed changes indicated in underscored text: The powers not expressly delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. This amendment shall be considered by all courts as a rule of interpretation and construction in any case involving an interpretation of any constitutional power claimed by the Congress. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Congress amend the interstate commerce clause, article 1 section 8, of the Constitution of the United States as follows, with proposed changes indicated in underscored text: To directly regulate Commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian Tribes, with no authority in Congress to regulate matters that are primarily intrastate with only an insignificant or collateral effect upon interstate commerce; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Congress shall specify that the amendments to the Tenth Amendment and the Interstate Commerce Clause, Article 1, §8 of the Constitution of the United States, as provided herein, shall be operative upon ratification by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states, provided that such ratification shall occur within seven years from the date of the submission of the amendments to the states by Congress. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that states are encouraged to express their sentiments to members of their congressional delegation on the need to amend the Tenth Amendment and Article 1, §8 of the Constitution of the United States as provided in this resolution. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker and the Clerk of the United States House of Representatives. Adopted this 6th Day of December, 2010 at CSG’s 2010 National Conference in Providence, Rhode Island. Governor M. Michael Rounds, SD Senate President David L. Williams, KY 2010 CSG President 2010 CSG Chairman .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Evolving Role of Brazil's Supreme Court
    BRAZIL INSTITUTE A Conversation with Justice José Antonio Dias Toffoli The Evolving Role of Brazil's Supreme Court THE WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS, established by Congress in 1968 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., is a liv- ing national memorial to President Wilson. The Center’s mission is to commem- orate the ideals and concerns of Woodrow Wilson by providing a link between the worlds of ideas and policy, while fostering research, study, discussion, and collaboration among a broad spectrum of individuals concerned with policy and scholarship in national and international affairs. Supported by public and private funds, the Center is a nonpartisan institution engaged in the study of national and world affairs. It establishes and maintains a neutral forum for free, open, and informed dialogue. Conclusions or opinions expressed in Center publica- tions and programs are those of the authors and speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center staff, fellows, trustees, advisory groups, or any individuals or organizations that provide financial support to the Center. Jane Harman, Director, President and CEO BOARD OF TRUSTEES Thomas R. Nides, Chairman Public members: James H. Billington, Librarian of Congress; John F. Kerry, Secretary, U.S. Department of State; G. Wayne Clough, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution; Arne Duncan, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education; David Ferriero, Archivist of the United States; Fred P. Hochberg, Chairman and President, Export-Import Bank; Carole Watson, Acting Chairman, National Endowment for the Humanities; Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Private Citizen Members: Timothy Broas, John T. Casteen III, Charles Cobb, Jr., Thelma Duggin, Carlos M.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Documents of All Tcountries in Southeast Asia As of December 2007, As Well As the ASEAN Charter (Vol
    his three volume publication includes the constitutional documents of all Tcountries in Southeast Asia as of December 2007, as well as the ASEAN Charter (Vol. I), reports on the national constitutions (Vol. II), and a collection of papers on cross-cutting issues (Vol. III) which were mostly presented at a conference at the end of March 2008. This collection of Constitutional documents and analytical papers provides the reader with a comprehensive insight into the development of Constitutionalism in Southeast Asia. Some of the constitutions have until now not been publicly available in an up to date English language version. But apart from this, it is the first printed edition ever with ten Southeast Asian constitutions next to each other which makes comparative studies much easier. The country reports provide readers with up to date overviews on the different constitutional systems. In these reports, a common structure is used to enable comparisons in the analytical part as well. References and recommendations for further reading will facilitate additional research. Some of these reports are the first ever systematic analysis of those respective constitutions, while others draw on substantial literature on those constitutions. The contributions on selected issues highlight specific topics and cross-cutting issues in more depth. Although not all timely issues can be addressed in such publication, they indicate the range of questions facing the emerging constitutionalism within this fascinating region. CONSTITUTIONALISM IN SOUTHEAST ASIA Volume 2 Reports on National Constitutions (c) Copyright 2008 by Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Singapore Editors Clauspeter Hill Jőrg Menzel Publisher Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung 34 Bukit Pasoh Road Singapore 089848 Tel: +65 6227 2001 Fax: +65 6227 2007 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Role and Functions of Upper House
    COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION ROLE AND FUNCTIONS OF UPPER HOUSE By Dr. Anant Kalse, Principal Secretary, Maharashtra Legislature Secretariat. Maharashtra Legislature Secretariat Vidhan Bhavan, Nagpur ROLE AND FUNCTIONS OF UPPER HOUSE By Dr. Anant Kalse, Principal Secretary, Maharashtra Legislature Secretariat. Hb 851–1 FOREWORD An attempt is made by this publication to present the position of the second chambers of Legislature in the Indian Parliamentary System and the world. It throws light on the role and necessity of bicameral system in our Parliamentary form of Government. The House of Elders, as is popularly known, takes a lead in reaffirming the core values of the republic and set up the highest standards of healthy debates and meaningful discussions in Parliamentary Democracy. The debate and discussion can be more free, more objective and more useful in the second chamber. Bicameralism is a fit instrument of federalism and it acts as a check to hasty, rash and ill-considered legislation by bringing sobriety of thought on measures passed by the Lower House. Due to over increasing volume of legislations in a modern State, it is extremely difficult for a single chamber to devote sufficient time and attention to every measure that comes before it. A second chamber naturally gives relief to the Lower House. I am extremely grateful to Hon. Shri Ramraje Naik-Nimbalkar, Chairman, Maharashtra Legislative Council, and Hon. Shri Haribhau Bagade, Speaker, Maharashtra Legislative Assembly for their continuous support and motivation in accomplishing this task. I am also grateful to Shri N. G. Kale, Deputy Secretary (Law), Shri B.B. Waghmare, Librarian, Information and Research Officer, Shri Nilesh Wadnerkar, Technical Assistant, Maharashtra Legislature Secretariat for rendering valuable assistance in compiling this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections 2008 Elections Parliamentary of Chronicle Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections Volume 42
    Couverture_Ang:Mise en page 1 22.04.09 17:27 Page1 Print ISSN: 1994-0963 Electronic ISSN: 1994-098X INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION CHRONICLE OF PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2008 CHRONICLE OF PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS VOLUME 42 Published annually in English and French since 1967, the Chronicle of Parliamen tary Elections reports on all national legislative elections held throughout the world during a given year. It includes information on the electoral system, the background and outcome of each election as well as statistics on the results, distribution of votes and distribution of seats according to political group, sex and age. The information contained in the Chronicle can also be found in the IPU’s database on national parliaments, PARLINE. PARLINE is accessible on the IPU web site (http://www.ipu.org) and is continually updated. Inter-Parliamentary Union VOLUME 42 5, chemin du Pommier Case postale 330 CH-1218 Le Grand-Saconnex Geneva – Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 919 41 50 Fax: +41 22 919 41 60 2008 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.ipu.org 2008 Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections VOLUME 42 1 January - 31 December 2008 © Inter-Parliamentary Union 2009 Print ISSN: 1994-0963 Electronic ISSN: 1994-098X Photo credits Front cover: Photo AFP/Pascal Pavani Back cover: Photo AFP/Tugela Ridley Inter-Parliamentary Union Office of the Permanent Observer of 5, chemin du Pommier the IPU to the United Nations Case postale 330 220 East 42nd Street CH-1218 Le Grand-Saconnex Suite 3002 Geneva — Switzerland New York, N.Y. 10017 USA Tel.: + 41 22 919
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Xvith Meeting of the Association of European Senates
    2 Report of the XVIth Meeting of the Association of European Senates Focus on the senate Modern concepts in the functioning of senates in bicameral parliamentary systems Contents Welcome address ..................................................... 2 Theme I: Hard power vs. soft power .............................. 3 Theme II: Composition of the senate ............................. 18 Theme III: The importance of public opinion .................... 29 Announcements on future conferences ........................... 37 2 Welcome address by Ankie Broekers-Knol, President of the Senate of the Kingdom of the Netherlands Chair: Good morning, dear colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. A warm welcome here in the plenary hall of the senate of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. A special welcome to our colleagues from Poland who have arrived early this morning and to the delegation from Ireland, who are here on our special invitation. Yesterday evening we convened in the century old Hall of Knights. This morning, again, we convene in a century old hall. This hall has been in use as a meeting hall for representatives of the people continuously since 1655. That makes it the oldest of its kind in the world. When this room was created in the mid seventeenth century, the Golden Age of the Dutch Republic of the seven provinces in the 17th century, it was specifically requested that it expressed a strong international connection. If you look up, you will see people from all over the world looking down on us with a sense of curiosity. If you look closely, you can recognise the Polish, the Persians, the Turks, the Spanish, the Mexicans, the French, the Italians, the Russians, the English, and the Germans.
    [Show full text]
  • Assocation of European Senates
    Association of European Senates/Association des Sénats d’Europe 15th Meeting, London/XVème Réunion, Londres Friday 15 June 2013/vendredi 15 juin 2013 The meeting opened at 9.28 am. The Relationship between Upper and Lower Chambers Baroness D’Souza, Lord Speaker of the House of Lords, United Kingdom Good morning, everyone. Thank you all so very much for being on time. In the history of these conferences, we are making history by starting two minutes early. Welcome to Westminster for this 15th meeting of our association. It is a great honour for me to be able to host this year’s meeting. In making arrangements for today, I thought that it was very important that we should meet in the Houses of Parliament and, more particularly, in this beautiful room, the Queen’s Robing Room. Let me take a few minutes to explain the significance of our location. Since the first half of the 16th century, the two Houses of Parliament—the Commons and the Lords—have met here in the Palace of Westminster, which in the times of King Henry VIII had ceased to be a royal residence. What you see now is not the original palace, because in 1834 it was seriously damaged by fire. Our Victorian predecessors were nothing if not ruthless. Much of what remained of the earlier buildings was pulled down and the new Houses of Parliament were erected in the 1840s and 1850s. The architect was Charles Barry and the interior designer was Augustus Pugin, a church architect devoted to the gothic revival style.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Second Chamber in European States
    Strasbourg, 1 March/1er mars 2006 CDL(2006)011 Or. Bil. Study No. 335/2005 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) COMMISSION EUROPEENNE POUR LA DEMOCRATIE PAR LE DROIT (COMMISSION DE VENISE) THE ROLE OF THE SECOND CHAMBER IN EUROPEAN STATES LE ROLE DE LA DEUXIEME CHAMBRE DANS LES ETATS EUROPEENS CONTRIBUTIONS BY VENICE COMMISSION MEMBERS CONTRIBUTIONS DES MEMBRES DE LA COMMISSION DE VENISE This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera pas distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. CDL(2006)011 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE DES MATIERES Page THE SECOND CHAMBERS OF PARLIAMENT, by Christoph Grabenwarter, Constitutional Court, Vienna, Substitute Member, Austria......................................................................................3 LE SENAT DE BELGIQUE, par Jean-Claude Scholsem, Université de Liège, Membre, Belgique ..............................................................................................................................................7 ROLE OF THE SECOND HOUSE OF THE PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, by Cazim Sadikovic, University of Sarajevo, Member, Bosnia and Herzegovina......................................................................................................................................12 THE ROLE OF THE SECOND CHAMBER IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC: THE SENATE OF THE PARLIAMENT OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC, by Eliska Wagnerova, Constitutional Court, Brno, Member, Czech Republic...........................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Bicameralism in Belgium: the Dismantlement of the Senate for the Sake of Multinational Confederalism by Patricia Popelier
    ISSN: 2036-5438 Bicameralism in Belgium: the dismantlement of the Senate for the sake of multinational confederalism by Patricia Popelier Perspectives on Federalism, Vol. 10, issue 2, 2018 Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License E -215 Abstract Belgium was established in 1830 as a unitary state with a bicameral parliament, with symmetrical powers for the upper and the lower house. While federalism and bicameralism are often considered a pair, the Belgian system shows an inverse relationship. The Senate gradually turned into a house representative of the sub-states, but its powers declined inversely proportional to the level of decentralisation of the Belgian state. This paper inquires how the dismantling of the Belgian Senate fits in the increasingly devolutionary nature of the Belgian state structure. First, it nuances the link between bicameralism and federalism: bicameralism is an institutional device for federalism, but not by necessity, and only under specific conditions. The official narrative is that the Belgian Senate was reformed to turn it into a house of the sub-states in line as a federal principle, but in reality the conditions to fulfil this task are not fulfilled. Instead, the paper holds that bicameralism in Belgium is subordinate to the needs of multinational conflict management, and that complying with the federative ideal of an upper house giving voice to the collective needs of the sub-states would stand in the way of the evolution of the Belgian system towards confederalism based on two major linguistic groups. Key-words Bicameralism, parliamentary systems, federalism, confederalism, multinationalism Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License E -216 Even before its establishment, when Belgium’s founders discussed the design of the new Belgian State, the upper chamber was highly contentious in Belgium.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicameralism
    Bicameralism International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer 2 Bicameralism International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer 2 Elliot Bulmer © 2017 International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA) Second edition First published in 2014 by International IDEA International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. The electronic version of this publication is available under a Creative Commons Attribute-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) licence. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the publication as well as to remix and adapt it, provided it is only for non-commercial purposes, that you appropriately attribute the publication, and that you distribute it under an identical licence. For more information on this licence visit the Creative Commons website: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/> International IDEA Strömsborg SE–103 34 Stockholm Sweden Telephone: +46 8 698 37 00 Email: [email protected] Website: <http://www.idea.int> Cover design: International IDEA Cover illustration: © 123RF, <http://www.123rf.com> Produced using Booktype: <https://booktype.pro> ISBN: 978-91-7671-107-1 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 Advantages of bicameralism.....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Delegation for Relations with the Arab Peninsula
    DELEGATION FOR RELATIONS WITH THE ARAB PENINSULA 6th EP/Oman Interparliamentary Meeting 20-22 February 2011 Report from Ms Angelika Niebler, Chair of the European Parliament Delegation for relations with the Arab Peninsula CR\868223EN.doc PE 462.185 EN EN Introduction Oman is a country which has experienced steady development during the 40 years of reign of Sultan Qaboos ibn Said al-Said. In terms of economic development and social modernisation, Oman has taken important strides becoming the country with the fastest rate of development as measured by the Human Development Index (UNDP). The Omani Government pursues investment-friendly policies and the business climate is generally considered welcoming to foreign businesses. The opening of the political system, however, has been more gradual with the power entrenched firmly in the hands of the Sultan. The Majlis al-Shura, the second chamber of the Omani Parliament is elected by universal suffrage but it only plays a consultative role in the Omani political structure. Political parties are illegal and the freedom of association is restricted. All the members of the upper chamber, the Majlis al-Dawla, are appointed by the Sultan. The Sultan is considered favourable to gradual opening of civil society and stronger representation of women in politics. On 13 March, as a response to weeks of public protest, the most serious civil unrest in the four decades of reign, Sultan Qaboos granted more legislative and regulatory powers to the Council of Oman. He appointed a technical committee to draft a new law to effect the Council of Oman’s transition to a legislative body.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal, 1959
    THE CONSTITUTION OF THE KINDOM OF NEPAL, 1959 PREAMBLE Whereas His late majesty King Tribhuvan Bir Bikram Shah Dev, Father of the Nation and revered descendant of the illustrious King Prithvi Narayan Shah, adherent of Aryan Culture and Hindu religion, having led a Great revolution for the rights and welfare of His subject, earned immortal fame in the history of the world and was firmly resolved to establish real democracy in Nepal by giving fundamental rights to the people; And Whereas we also being firmly resolved to help our subjects to attain all- round progress and achieve the fullest development of their personality; to ensure to them political, social and economic justice; and cement the unity of the nation by bringing about political stability through the establishment of an efficient monarchical form of government responsive to the wishes of the people; And Whereas for the said purpose it is desirable to enact and promulgate a Constitution for the Sovereign Kingdom of Nepal, I, King Mahendra Bir Bikram Shah Deva in the exercise of the sovereign powers pf the Kingdom of Nepal and prerogatives vesting in US in accordance with the traditions and customs of our country and which devolved on US from Our August and Respected forefathers, do hereby enact and promulgate this fundamental law entitled “ The Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal.” PAT 1 PRELIMINARY 1. The Constitution as the Fundamental Law (1) This Constitution is the fundamental law for Nepal and all laws inconsistent with it, shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, and subject to the provisions of this Constitution, be void.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of the Kingdom of Belgium
    THE BELGIAN CONSTITUTION This publication contains the text of the Belgian Con- stitution as updated following the constitutional revi- sion of 24 October 2017 (Belgian Official Gazette of 29 November 2017) JULY 2018 BELGIAN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Legal Affairs and Parliamentary Documentation Department of the Belgian House of Representatives D/2018/4686/11 2 CONTENTS Title I On federal Belgium, its components and its territory 5 Title Ibis On general political objectives of federal Belgium, the Communities and the Regions 6 Title II On Belgians and their rights 6 Title III On powers 13 Chapter I – On the federal Houses 16 Section I – On the House of Representatives 22 Section II – On the Senate 24 Chapter II – On federal legislative power 30 Chapter III – On the King and the Federal Government 35 Section I – On the King 35 Section II – On the Federal Government 37 Section III – On responsibilities 40 Chapter IV – On Communities and Regions 42 Section I – On bodies 42 Sub-section I – On Community and Regional Parliaments 42 Sub-section II – On Community and Regional Governments 44 Section II – On responsibilities 47 Sub-section I – On the responsibilities of the Communities 47 Sub-section II – On the competences of the Regions 50 Sub-section III – Special provisions 50 Chapter V – On the Constitutional Court, and the prevention and resolution of conflicts 52 Section I – On the prevention of conflicts of competence 52 Section II – On the Constitutional Court 52 Section III – On the prevention and the settlement of conflicts of interest
    [Show full text]