NZ Transport Agency Western Belfast Bypass Public Consultation - Submission Analysis

June 2010 Contents

1. Introduction 1

2. Consultation Undertaken 2

3. Consultation Responses 3

4. Key Themes 4 4.1 Concerns about Western Belfast Bypass 4 4.2 Positive Points 5

5. Submission summary 7 5.1 General Locations of Submitters 7 5.2 Petition Summary 7 5.3 Summary of Alternative Routes suggested 7 5.4 Submitters from Local Government 9 5.5 Submitters from Transport Agencies/Groups 10 5.6 Submissions from Directly Affected Landowners 11

6. Summary 12

7. Conclusion 13

Appendices

A Consultation Brochure B Submission summary

Western Belfast Bypass Public Consultation - Submission Analysis 1. Introduction

Western Belfast Bypass 1 Public Consultation - Submission Analysis 2. Consultation Undertaken

A consultation brochure was prepared and circulated to those landowners and occupiers adjoining and directly affected by the project, along with an invitation to the public open day and a feedback form. In addition, open day invitations were hand- delivered to approximately 600 properties adjoining and close to Main North Road through Belfast. The project details were posted on the NZTA website and public notices advertising the open day were placed in The Press and The Star on three occasions each, from 10-17 March 2010. In addition, NZTA provided a media release which lead to a short article within The Press and a radio clip immediately prior to the open day. In cooperation with Christchurch City Council Information boards were also placed within the Groynes Recreational area to enhance the coverage of the consultation and open day. Project brochures were dropped off at:

- Christchurch City Council in Tuam Street

- New World and Countdown supermarkets at Northwood

- Redwood library

- Belfast Rugby Club The open day was held at the Belfast Rugby Clubrooms on 18 March 2010. Large scale plans of the project were available to view, and these were the basis of the open day consultation. In addition, feedback forms were distributed to all attendees, to assist with encouraging feedback on the project. The open day was well attended, particularly by local Belfast residents. The attendance record includes details for 155 attendees, though actual attendance was higher. A number of attendees completed the feedback form on the day and others took feedback forms and the project information (consultation brochure, along with some pre-prepared “frequently asked questions”) away to complete at a later date. Overall, widespread publicity about the open day was achieved within the Belfast area. Two articles appeared in local newspapers immediately after the open day, which further informed the public about the opportunity to provide feedback on the project. The submission period was open for a further month, closing on 16 April 2010. We also met with a number of individuals and groups during the consultation period, including the CCC Groynes Stakeholder Group and we held an on-site meeting with a group of dog park users within the Groynes Dog Park.

Western Belfast Bypass 2 Public Consultation - Submission Analysis 3. Consultation Responses

In total 413 responses were received on the proposed bypass. 318 responses were in the form of a petition to the proposal and did not support any of the options provided. 24 other responses were received which supported none of the options provided. Seven responses supported Option 1a, 33 supported Option 1b, five supported Option 2a, six supported Option 2b and 42 responses supported a combination of options. Of those that didn’t support any single one of the options proposed, 330 suggested an alternative alignment that they would prefer, three supported any of the options proposed and only 8 opposed the proposal altogether.

Western Belfast Bypass 3 Public Consultation - Submission Analysis 4. Key Themes

4.1 Concerns about Western Belfast Bypass The following matters were identified as being the key issues in the submissions received, ranked in order of occurrence for all the options combined: 1. Loss of area available for the dog park and safety around this (320, inclusive of a petition with 318 signatures received); 2. Pollution from exhaust emissions to the users of the Groynes Dog Park (318); 3. Concern with Dickeys Road / SH1 intersection – turning onto/across a busy road (50); 4. Noise from construction, traffic, intersections etc – on nearby dwellings, walkways and The Groynes (32); 5. Short term and temporary nature of Options 1a and 2a (19); 6. Loss of rural outlook and land for The Groynes entrance and land area (10); 7. Ecological - damage to the stream environment, existing reserve, pond rehabilitation and walkway (8); 8. Loss of property value (6); 9. Loss to and damage of rural farmland (5); 10. Disruptions to local businesses, in particular the Sawmill (4); 11. Concern over safety issues associated with access to existing properties (2).

A complete summary of the submissions received is provided in Appendix B.

The main concerns expressed with each option are as follows. [This is excluding the petition objection] Option 1a Key effects raised in the submissions: x Concern with Dickeys Road / SH1 intersection – turning onto/across a busy road; x Short term and temporary nature of proposal; Other effects raised in the submissions: x Noise – on nearby dwellings, walkways and The Groynes; x Damage to the stream; x Damage to existing farmland.

Western Belfast Bypass 4 Public Consultation - Submission Analysis Option 2a Key effects raised in the submissions: x Concern with Dickeys Road intersection – turning onto/across a busy road; x Noise – on nearby dwellings, walkways and The Groynes; Other effects raised in the submissions: x Short term and temporary nature of proposal; x Loss of rural outlook and damage to farmland; x Lost of property value. Option 1b Key effect raised in the submissions: x Noise – on nearby dwellings, walkways and The Groynes; Other effects raised in the submissions: x Damage to the Otukaikino Stream; x Damage to existing farmland. Option 2b Key effect raised in the submissions: x Noise – on nearby dwellings, walkways and The Groynes; Other effects raised in the submissions: x Loss of rural outlook; x Disruption to the existing sawmill and loss of property value.

4.2 Positive Points The following matters were identified as being the key positive points in the submissions received for each option, with the number of occurrences for the various options: Option 1a x Less intrusive on existing houses and business as it is further away (9); x Retains existing oxidation ponds and no need to fill them in (2). Option 2a x Less bridges therefore minimises stream damage (7). Option 1b x Less disruptions to existing business(13); x Offers a continuous flow of traffic (12); x Further from existing houses, therefore less noise (12);

Western Belfast Bypass 5 Public Consultation - Submission Analysis x Less loss of farm land, could make oxidation ponds into farm land (8); x Access to walkways and ponds retained and could enhance pond area (6). Option 2b x Less bridges therefore minimises stream damage (9); x Long term solution (4); x Offers a continuous flow of traffic (3).

Western Belfast Bypass 6 Public Consultation - Submission Analysis 5. Submission summary

5.1 General Locations of Submitters The majority of the 93 submissions (excluding the petition) were received from people within the Belfast area (43), with the remaining 50 submissions being received from residents residing in other Christchurch suburbs or from outside Christchurch. The location of submitters is shown in Table 1, below: Table 1 – Location of submitters and their preferences

Geographic Location Number of Submitters - Options

1a 2a 1b 2b SP Oppose SA

Belfast 11 5 29 2 1 3 5

Rest of Christchurch City 6 3 12 9 1 4 6

Other Areas - - 10 6 - 1 3

Total 16 8 51 17 2 8 14 SP – support proposal with any of the proposed options; Oppose – do not support the proposal or any of the options provided; SA – support an alternative route. It is noted that the numbers in the table above are greater that the total number of submissions received as some submitters chose more than one preferred option. The locations of the signatories of the petition are not included in the above analysis as over half did not provide such details.

5.2 Petition Summary A petition was received from Mrs Gill Spinner with 318 signatories attached. Mrs Spinner herself also filled out the submission form and returned this with the petition. Her personal views on an alternative route are discussed in section 5.3 below. The primary concern of the signatories related to the Groynes Dog Park. They do not support any of the proposed options and advocate for an alternative route. The petition proposed that the bypass boundary be moved 20 metres so that a noise bank and buffer zone of trees can be established to screen the bypass. The signatories consider that the bypass will create adverse effects for the users of the dog park in regard to exhaust emissions and noise levels.

5.3 Summary of Alternative Routes suggested 330 submissions received did not support any of the proposed routes but suggested an alternative route for the bypass. Of these, 318 were included as the petition and details are summarised in section 3.2 above.

Western Belfast Bypass 7 Public Consultation - Submission Analysis Twelve other submissions suggested 8 alternative routes which are detailed below with reasons as to why the submitter considered their alternative to be more sensible. The number in brackets being the number of submissions supporting that alternative: 1. Continue the bypass from the existing motorway right through to Templeton, behind the airport and further access via Orchard Road back to the bypass (4): x Avoids need for an underpass at The Groynes, this is dangerous and unsightly; and x Keeps bypass at a low level and uses earth bunds. 2. The Environment Canterbury proposal is to divert the existing Otukaikino Stream to the west and have the bypass follow the path of the existing stream bed (4). It is noted that one of these submissions has two alternative proposals as detailed in point 7 below:

x Minimises effects on the adjacent ECan leased land, reducing compensation required; x Would separate the stream and the road to create more useable recreation area and greater separation to the traffic; x Allows tree planting to be established to reduce noise from the road; x The stream would be away from potential contamination sources, (sawmill and ponds); x Would return the stream to its original course and offer potential for more natural indigenous restoration and an enhanced recreation environment; x The two bridges required would be of a much lower specification and the road itself would be able to be built to a straighter alignment;

x Avoids existing dairy farm, Stoneyhurst Sawmill and the decommissioned oxidation ponds reducing compensation or land purchase issues; and

x Allows the ponds area to be returned to farm lease. 3. Between the Waimakariri River and Belfast, divert traffic west onto the upgraded stopbank next to the river where a four lane motorway can be built which continues round to the Orana Park area at McLeans Island. An extension would continue and come out just south of Rolleston in the future (1):

x Avoids a lot of traffic going from The Groynes into Hornby and further south; and x This would stop congestion between Rolleston and Christchurch and could use a toll for a few years to aid costs. 4. The new bypass should come out onto Johns Road further down, perhaps link up with Sawyers Arms Road or onto McLeans Island Road, having multiple

Western Belfast Bypass 8 Public Consultation - Submission Analysis exits off the bypass at Gardiners Road, Sawyers Arms Road and McLeans Island Road (1): x Gives commuters 3 choices to enter the southern flow of traffic and would make it less congested at intersections that are created by the bypass; x Exits lead to different areas of the City. 5. Main North Road should be diverted around Woodend/Pegasus/Rangiora, across the Waimakariri River (construct another bridge), west of the airport- Pound Road, through the east side of Yaldhurst (could follow the pylon line) and join with Main South Road near Templeton (1): x Allows industry traffic to Hornby, airport traffic to the west and Christchurch bypass traffic exits to the city via Templeton to pick up Rolleston traffic; x Improves heavy traffic routes and is not just for the expanding residential development. 6. Divert north/south traffic at Dickeys Road or Coutts Island Road (riverbed country). The road could then be extended and eventually link up with Main South Road at Rolleston or Burnham (1):

x Most cost effective and reduces the unnecessary volume of traffic being directed onto Johns Road which affects residents day and night; 7. A hybrid of Option 1a with the road pushed out as far as possible to the boundary of the farm and The Groynes to minimise impact on the farm, following the curve of the boundary (1). This submitter also supports the Environment Canterbury proposal:

x Eliminates the need for two bridges and disruption to the Sawmill; x Minimise impact to existing farm irrigation infrastructure. 8. Route the bypass via the existing Dickeys Road south of the stopbank to Issacs Corner giving direct access to Main South Road and the existing highway to Arthurs Pass and beyond (Gill Spinner – Petition organiser) (1): x Long term option, 35 year plan; x Utilises existing formation of roads.

5.4 Submitters from Local Government Submissions were received from the following:

Environment Canterbury - Their comments are provided in section 5.3 above; and

Christchurch City Council - No submission has been received.

Western Belfast Bypass 9 Public Consultation - Submission Analysis 5.5 Submitters from Transport Agencies/Groups Submissions were received from the following transport related agencies/groups: 1. New Zealand Automobile Association Canterbury/West Coast District Council: x Prefer Option 1b as express traffic is drawn away from the built up industrial and residential areas; x Would be constructed on open farmland resulting in less conflict with current farming activities; x Require security lighting on the underpass. 2. N.Z. Road Transport Association: x Prefer Options 1b or 2b; x Do not support Options 1a or 2a or any option that connects via an intersection on Dickeys Road with Main North Road for the following reasons: i. Short term, short sighted and waste of resources for an option that would have a life of less than 10 years; ii. Intersection will be inefficient and have effect of slowing traffic resulting in inefficient fuel use and increased environmental effects; iii. Intersection will have increased safety risks; and iv. 80 km/h does not achieve maximum efficiencies. x Options 1b or 2b are more efficient, provide for greater fuel efficiency and enables a 100 km/h speed limit; x Consider a dual carriageway from the existing motorway to Johns Road. x The intersection onto the motorway will have ramps and a grade separated intersection. As a major road we believe the extension of the motorway onto the bypass should pass over the existing motorway where it continues onto Main North Road. x Concern over development of the Northern Arterial and its intersection with this motorway and concern about the effect of these ramp intersections in close proximity and would suggest consideration be given to 3 laning the motorway between the two, to ensure smooth integration of all traffic. and x Design should ensure that heavy vehicles operating to the weights and provisions of the recently promulgated amendments to the Vehicle Mass and Dimensions Rule for High Productivity Vehicles are fully capable of operating on it with unrestricted operation.

Western Belfast Bypass 10 Public Consultation - Submission Analysis 3. New Zealand Heavy Haulage Inc: x Consider it best to complete the project in one go with either option 1b or 2b which are longer term with no need for signals or controls and a 100 km/h speed limit is better; and x Design needs to consider overall unencumbered width for overdimension loads, overall height to any overhead restriction, capacity of structures to be HN-HO-72, any divided road medians designed for over-dimension loads to travel freely without overhanging the median;

5.6 Submissions from Directly Affected Landowners Submissions were received from the following landowners directly affected by the proposal (i.e. where land purchase is required): 1. Environment Canterbury x See comments in section 3.3 and 3.4 above 2. David & Linda Inwood (NB. have not selected any option) x Do not support the short term options 1a or 2a, given the dangerous intersection at Dickeys Road; and x It is merely moving the Johns Road/Main North Road corner problem further down the road. 3. Bonnie and Steve Cartwright (one to one meeting and attended open day) x Owners of 219 Johns Motor Camp and Motel x Need to maintain direct access off the Johns Road; and x Want good and clear signing to the premises from the bypass. We have not identified any other submissions from any of the other directly affected landowners.

Western Belfast Bypass 11 Public Consultation - Submission Analysis 6. Summary

In total 413 responses were received on the proposed options. Nineteen responses supported Option 1a, 51 supported Option 1b, 8 supported Option 2a, 17 supported Option 2b. These figures take into account the submissions which supported a combination of options. 318 responses were in the form of a petition to the proposal and did not support any of the options provided. 23 other responses were received which supported no single option provided. Of these, two supported any option, eight opposed the entire proposal and 13 suggested alternative alignments. The main concerns expressed were loss of amenity area available, safety issues and pollution around the Dog Park (petition), concern over the Dickeys Road intersection, noise impacts on nearby dwellings, walkways and The Groynes, loss of rural outlook and ecological damage. Primary concern over options 1a and 2a concerned the Dickeys Road intersection, the short term nature of the proposal and noise impacts from the proposed traffic on the neighbouring dwellings. Whilst the primary concerns over Options 1b and 2b were noise, damage to the Otukaikino Stream and loss of rural outlook. Eight alternative alignments were suggested, including one from Environment Canterbury - to divert the existing Otukaikino Stream to the west and having the bypass follow the path of the existing stream bed. This alignment was supported by two other parties. The three transport agencies that provided feedback, all preferred Options 1b or 2b, and considered the short term options were short sighted and the proposed Dickeys Road intersection inefficient and unsafe.

Western Belfast Bypass 12 Public Consultation - Submission Analysis 7. Conclusion

The preferred option appears to be Option 1b with positive points being less disruption to existing business, offers continuous flow, further from existing houses (less noise), less loss of farm land and access to walkways can be retained. Option 1b was preferred by all geographic locations summarised, i.e. Belfast, Christchurch City and Other Areas. A summary of this report will be included in the draft Consultation Report.

Western Belfast Bypass 13 Public Consultation - Submission Analysis Appendix A Consultation Brochure

Western Belfast Bypass Public Consultation - Submission Analysis Project consultation Issue 01 March 2010

Western Belfast Bypass

What’s inside The NZ Transport Agency is Page 2 Map of options Page 4 Roads of national significance seeking your feedback on Urban Development Strategy The Belfast Area Plan options for the Western What do you think? Want to know more? Belfast Bypass

The main artery of the Belfast community is congested. Around 37,000 vehicles a day use Main North Road to enter and exit Christchurch – among the highest volume for any road in Canterbury. This volume of traffic, and in particular the trucks and heavy vehicles using the road, discourage walking and cycling and restrict public transport. As traffic volumes grow, congestion will become worse, and safety and public health concerns will increase around the Main North Road/Belfast area. The NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) is currently investigating improvements for the northern and western corridors to Christchurch, including a bypass of Belfast, known as the Western Belfast Bypass. It will provide a new route from the Northern Motorway (SH1) for approximately five kilometres south to Johns Road (SH1) near The Groynes entrance. The alignment for the bypass has not been finalised, so this project consultation brochure outlines what is being proposed, and invites feedback on the initial options for the Western Belfast Bypass. Consultation closes on Friday 16 April, so read on and then have your say by completing the feedback form. Short-term options What are the benefits of a Option 1a (blue line) Getting on and off the Features of the bypass The bypass would run from the bend in Johns Road across the entrance • A safer road, with a raised median and no driveways – access to Western Belfast Bypass? to The Groynes in the south, to follow the edge of The Groynes Reserve, bypass adjoining properties will continue from Johns Road and Main North Road. • For traffic travelling through Belfast – reduced congestion and shorter then run across the Otukaikino River, to the west of the sawmill, then Short-term options travelling times between the north and western Christchurch. turn east to run along Dickeys Road to connect with Main North Road. • Lighting along the bypass route will be designed to minimise glare to The proposed speed limit is 80km/h. At the Johns Road intersection • For the local community – an estimated 17,000 fewer vehicles a day adjacent properties while meeting safety requirements. Signals are proposed for southbound traffic to assist traffic turning right on Main North Road will improve the safety and quality of life for Option 2a (green line) • Pedestrian and cycle links across the Western Belfast Bypass will onto Johns Road to travel into Belfast. There would be no signals Belfast residents. With the decrease in traffic volumes, walking and This route alignment is the same at the southern end of the road, but enable safe and convenient access to The Groynes and maintain the affecting northbound traffic. To improve efficiency and safety, there cycling will be much safer and more attractive and there’ll be scope for instead of crossing the Otukaikino River, would travel through the former Waimairi walkway circuit. Underpasses or overpasses are currently would be no right turn from Johns Road on to the bypass. more public transport. It will be easier to cross Main North Road, and oxidation ponds and the northern portion of the sawmill site, then turn being investigated. noise and air pollution will also be reduced. east to run along Dickeys Road to connect with Main North Road. The At the Dickeys Road/Western Belfast Bypass intersection proposed speed limit is 80km/h. • Cycle or pedestrian paths along the Western Belfast Bypass are likely • For the future – The bypass, as part of the Belfast Area Plan, will Dickeys Road would be a stop sign controlled T intersection. All to be limited to connections between local development and access to enable Belfast to become a vibrant growing community served by a Options 1a and 2a are short-term options that will operate efficiently and movements would be allowed. The Groynes. network of roads that enable development of new housing, social, safely until approximately 2020. At this time, option 1b or 2b would commercial and recreational facilities. likely be required to relieve congestion at the Dickeys Road/Main North At the Dickeys Road/Main North Road intersection • Landscaping, including planting and ground contouring will reduce the Road intersection. impact of the road on its surroundings. This intersection could be managed with either traffic signals or a Where should the new Long-term options roundabout. To improve safety, there would be no right turn from Main North Road onto the Christchurch Northern Motorway with the Will The Groynes Regional Option 1b and 2b (dotted lines) traffic signals option. bypass run? Instead of connecting with the Main North Road via Dickeys Road, these An alignment for the bypass is being investigated, with two variations at long-term options would continue either of options 1a or 2a on to Long-term options Park still be accessible? connect directly with the Northern Motorway, north of Dickeys Road. The NZTA is working with the Christchurch City Council to ensure the the northern end. The first option avoids all existing buildings, but At the Northern Motorway intersection crosses the Otukaikino River (requiring bridges), whereas the second With a direct connection to the Northern Motorway the proposed speed bypass supports the council’s development plans for The Groynes. Safe, option avoids the river, but may impact on the operation of the limit is 100km/h, north of Johns Road intersection. The bypass would be an extension of the existing motorway, so no public access is a top priority for both organisations. A vehicle, cycle and Stoneyhurst Sawmill. You can tell us which option you prefer (and why) in the feedback form signals or roundabouts would be required. pedestrian underpass (with restricted heavy vehicle access) is likely to be provided close to the current entrance. An additional pedestrian and or online at www.nzta.govt.nz/westernbelfastbypass/. At the Johns Road intersection cycle only entrance to the north is being investigated. If you have any As proposed for the short-term option. ideas, use the feedback form to let us know. What are the roads of national significance? The government has identified roads of national significance that are critical for supporting economic growth, reducing congestion and improving safety in our region. There are a number of projects in the Christchurch roads of national significance programme, located in the Northern Corridor, Southern Corridor and Western Corridor. The Western Belfast Bypass is part of the Western Corridor package. For more information, visit the NZTA website at www.nzta.govt.nz.

Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy The Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy (UDS) is a 35-year plan for managing growth in Greater Christchurch. The UDS integrates planning, funding and implementation, of land use, transport and infrastructure. The UDS partners are the NZ Transport Agency, Christchurch City Council, Environment Canterbury, Waimakariri District Council and Selwyn District Council. All the roads of national significance projects are included in the UDS and are integral to achieving the UDS vision of a sustainable transport system that supports prosperous communities. For more information go to www.greaterchristchurch.org.nz/. The Belfast Area Plan The Belfast area is identified for future urban growth in the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy. The Belfast Area Plan, prepared by the Christchurch City Council, provides for a strategic direction for managing the growth of Belfast and identifies the Western Belfast Bypass as critical for successful implementation of that plan. For more information on the Belfast Area Plan visit www.ccc.govt.nz/belfastareaplan. What do you think? We want to hear the communities’ view and comments. The NZ Transport Agency is seeking feedback on issues such as the communities’ support for constructing the road, the communities’ preferred option, how it should connect to existing roads and any other concerns. Your feedback will assist with future investigations and planning. Please submit your feedback no later than Friday 16 April by the following means: • Completing and posting the feedback form to the NZ Transport Agency. • Emailing feedback to [email protected]. • Using the online submission form on the project website at: www.nzta.govt.nz/westernbelfastbypass. We will acknowledge all feedback received and keep you informed of future opportunities to have your say. Want to know more? For more information, contact: Mary O’Callahan Ryan Cooney GHD Ltd NZ Transport Agency Phone: 03 364 5503 Phone: 03 963 3224 Appendix B Submission summary

Western Belfast Bypass Public Consultation - Submission Analysis Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 5/03/2010 Email Paul Starling PO Box 579 Rangiora [email protected] 1 1 Implement immediately to enable Consider bringing in overseas uninterrupted travel, avoid intersections contractors to do the work. and turning into busy roads and provide for growth in traffic over the next ten years. 9/03/2010 Email Kevin Fenaughty 91 Burma Road, Khandallah Wellington Wellington [email protected] 1 Avoids disruption to the existing sawmill, and allows for future growth. Integrates seamlessly with the northern motorway and avoids a T-intersection for through traffic wanting to bypass Christchurch altogether. 10/03/2010 Form Ross Roberts 337 Coutts Island Road Coutts Island Christchurch [email protected] 03 961 6666 1 1 Avoids a difficult Dickeys Rd/Bypass Dickeys Rd/Main Nth Rd intersection Y intersection, mimises damage to is very dangerous and difficult to Otukaikino River. Avoids temporary cross so creating another road as need for a fast (100km) bypass intersection with options 1a/2a will and no point delaying until 2020, waste simply delay correction of this of time and money problem. The Otukakino river should be vigorously protected and flood risks need to be considered.

10/03/2010 Form T.P.Gould Southbranch Farm Ltd c/-91 Dickeys Road Belfast Christchurch 7670 03 323 9566 0274 334 337 1 1 1 1 Further from my dwelling and don't Earth bunding should be considered Has consideration been given to Y T P Gould interfere with my farming operations. to lessen the effect of noise from the constructing the bypass from the Other options mean loss of farm land, bypass to nearby residents. In Waimakariri bridge on State expense with two bridges. It would be addition further plantings of trees Highway 1, SW along the present less expensive if it were in a straight line should be considered. All present stopbank and tracking straight from the sawmill to the Groynes and trees to remain in situ. I consider through to the Russley Road near preserve the integrity of the walkway shifting the river is the most common the airport. Using this route, shingle following the river without the noise and sense solution. could be abstracted from the river pollution of the road in close proximity. the primary stopbank improved and The best option is to shift the Otukaikino the bypass kept away from built up at the sawmill. This would allow the areas. No bridges would be bypass to be constructed without required and the bypass suitable to interference to the sawmill and pass on last 100 years. NW side of sawmill without crossing the river at all.

11/03/2010 Email Kelvin Ashworth 227 Terrace Road, RD 1, Amberley 7481 [email protected] 1 1 Still a lot of traffic that will be going Three laning Marshlands Road Y onward from the Groynes into Hornby would be an easy fix to help flow which could be diverted further west. there . Two lanes heading into town Between the Waimak and Belfast the till Midday then change it over - Two traffic could be diverted west onto an lanes heading out of town in the pm. upgraded stop bank next to the river Small bit of seal needed and some where a four lane motorway can be built hanging lights/signs with Green tcks which continues right round to Orana and Red crosses to direct traffic. Park area at McLeans Island. An extension would continue and come out just south of Rolleston. Extension would consist of two lanes with provision of two extra lanes in the future. Several link roads would run off this and adjoin main links to Christchurch at different points. Toll this for a few years to aid costs.

13/03/2010 Email Rodney Chambers 92 Foremans Rd Islington Christchurch [email protected] 1 1 Doesn't cross the Otukaikino River, ie Reduce vehicle noise impact on Y less bridges. Reduces impact on river. Groynes Park and Otukaikino river waterway 14/03/2010 Email Jake Preston & Tiffani FieldRichmond 64 Slater Street Christchurch [email protected] 1 1 Effect on the Groynes, particularly the dog park. It is necessary that any construction of a western bypass take into account the dog park and must mitigate the noise and distraction of both construction and the eventual traffic flows for the dogs as well as their owners through both construction and use of the bypass.

14/03/2010 Email Cameron Morrison Casebrook 39 Brogar Place Christchurch [email protected] 1 1 Both options are fairly similar but are It could be a good opportunity to Long term options should be started Y urgently needed. install a cycle lane. immediately as theyeffectively extend the motorway and it is much better than having two controlled intersections to get on and off the bypass which could discourage use.

Page 1 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 15/03/2010 Form R J Craig PO Box 36524, Merivale Northwood Christchurch [email protected] 03 323 5350 1 1 Means one less pedestrian underpass is Please locate arc of bypass close to Please provide for Southbound Y needed and will allow continued city so that Otukaikino River preccint traffic on bypass to turn left onto development of plantings etc in area of curtilage is improved. Combine Johns Road to access Northwood. old ponds - an attractive section of the vehicle access to Groynes (off Speed makes sense to continue walkway. Allows existing land users to Johns) with access to North lane of 100kph across full length. continue business. Cheaper in the long bypass from Belfast for those who term and more convenient. wish to drive North

16/03/2010 Email Kevin Allen 243 Tuahiwi Road RD 1 Kaiapoi Kaiapoi 7691 [email protected] 1 1 New Bypass should come out onto Could place three exits on the Johns Road further down...Perhaps link bypass..one onto Gardeners up with Sawyers Arms Road...or onto Road..one onto Sawyers Arms the Macleans Island Road. Road.. and one onto Macleans Island Road, giving commuters three choices to enter/exit the flow of traffic

18/03/2010 Form Geoff & Maree Saunders Saunders Robinson PO Box 39 Christchurch Christchurch 8041 [email protected] 0212 287 600 1 1 1 Not convinced the loss of Groynes Noise issues, building and like Concerned re access from Johns Brown entrance and land is necessary should be included to mitigate noise Raod entrance of Willocreek Lane effects. 19/03/2010 Email Derek Johns Derek is the son of the 6 Devonvale Lane Amberley Amberley 7410 [email protected] 1 Although it necessitates 2 bridges over Protect the Historic Irrigation System I would like to congratulate NZTA on N Y guy who built the pump the river this alignment allows the with its Control Weirs at the the excellent work they have done, shed existing dairy farm to continue with the Groynes, the Canal, the Pumphouse their helpfulness and the least loss of land and with the possibility and Headraces downstream. I presentation at Belfast Rugby Club. that the decommissioned oxidisation understand that the pumphouse is All options were openly discussed ponds would then once more become directly in line with the proposed and were on the whole well part of the farm as was the original plan bypass alignment but may I suggest received, thank you when they were put in while my father that the canal be either bridged or (B.F. Johns) still held the lease. This realigned so that the road goes to land which was originally Waimakariri the river side of the pumphouse, so it River bed has been continuously farmed can remain on its historic site and for dairying since it was first protected the control structures and head from floods in the 1920/30s by races for the irrigation of Wells Dairy stopbanks and cuts. My Grandfather farm would remain in place. This (A.F.) and his brother (J.R.D.) Johns would of course mean that the Bros, Devonvale Dairy Farm took up the Groynes Reserve would lose some lease of this block and by 1932/33 had land but they are gaining more land started gravity flood irrigating there from further downstream. I would also ask the control weirs they built at the that NZTA push for the oxidisation Groynes. This system is still in use by pond area to be returned to the dairy the Wells family who took over the lease farm as was the original agreement from my father in 1978 and must be when the land was taken from the protected for the viability of the farm and lease many years ago. Without a the historic significance of the scheme. doubt the pedestrian accesses would This option also allows Stonyhurst have to be included for the Sawmills to continue without taking from completion of the Waimairi Way in their property line with Government policy on Cycle and walkway

19/03/2010 Form Ross Roberts PO Box 36651 Merivale Christchurch 8146 [email protected] 1 1 Avoids the long bypass required for Need safe junction between Dickeys Required immediately Y option 1b which will have an extremely Rd and Main Nth Rd before the detrimental effect on a lovely section of motorway is constructed. the Kaikanui stream. Its cheaper than 1b. Doing a temporary rood (ie options 1 or 2) simply increases the overall cost

19/03/2010 Form G Roberts 804 Main Nth Rd Belfast [email protected] 03 323 6045 1 1 Less impact on developed property ie The urban development strategies Complete the project by connecting Y Saw Mill & oxidation ponds. Prevemt for Nth Canterbury indicate huge to the motorway. This is the the congestion of traffic that will be growth of residential land. This plus expected final outcome so why not moved from Johns Rd to Dickeys Rd. Pegasus will put thousands more do it immediately and save all the Traffic lights/roundabouts stop traffic cars on this road per day over the long term growth issues. and the congestion that will be created next 3-5 years. at the Dickeys Rd options will be immense. 19/03/2010 Form Gert vanKruiningen 306 Main Race Rd Eyrewell Rangiora RD67476 [email protected] 03 363 9574 0211 288 312 1 1 1 Traffic lights and a roundabout can't When designing this bypass I think Y handle the amount of traffic that we see you need to consider future upgrade each morning so options 1b or 2b that options to go from 2 to 4 lanes. allow a continuous flow will be most effective. 19/03/2010 Form S Sharland 42 Rushmore Drive Belfast Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 323 7618 1 1 I live at the end of Rushmore Drive and Opportunity to allow for improved Do it once and do it right. Y utilise the walkways 3-4 times a week so vechile entry on egress from access to them is very important . Also Rushmore Drive. 1b allows better merging with motorway and seems a lot safer than controlling cars with lights.

Page 2 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 19/03/2010 Form Mike Smith 12 Rushmore Drive Belfast Christchurch [email protected] 0274 235 372 1 1 While 2b may be cheaper initially it will be more expensive when changes have to be made. Also intersection of Main Nth Rd & Dickeys Rd could present problems for a smooth exit from the motorway. 19/03/2010 Form Peter Lowe 5 Heachaw Lane Harewood Christchurch [email protected] 021 819 250 1 1 Keeps traffic flowing and cuts bottlenecks at Main Nth Rd. Traffic will increase each year and problems will occur with some of the other options 19/03/2010 Form Dallas Jamieson 73 Johns Rd Belfast Christchurch 8051 03 323 9282 1 1 Better planning for future now. Build it Build bypass before too much Please hurry up and get this thing Y right first time! development occurs - Johns Rd built. already at maximum. Concerned Johns Rd will be overlooked once bypass goes in. Also important standard of Johns Rd kept up - even better than now by council ie/ sweeping and providing adequate footpaths.

19/03/2010 Form P A Patterson PO Box 8132 Riccarton Christchurch 8440 [email protected] 03 338 5885 02102 246 213 1 Y 19/03/2010 Form 1 Go for it 19/03/2010 Form Pauline Compte SMCCC (Styx Mill 18 Brookwater Ave Styx Mill Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 323 4375 0273 219 202 1 1 One less bridge The Johns Rd underpass/access - Do this asap, seriously needed as Y country Club Committee) please ensure this slows traffic to traffic too high through Belfast & 50kph once on Johns Rd - in a Johns Rd residential area. Minimise impact on Groynes with ramps etc but does need to be considerate also of Styx Mill / Northwood residents.

19/03/2010 Form Lynda Goodrick Belfast Community PO Box 26 Belfast Christchurch [email protected] 03 323 9731 1 1 The option of 1a would cause traffic The environment at Groynes is a Network havoc with lights or roundabout at concern of what may occur in the Dickeys Rd project. This space offers a tranquil space for our community. Please don't ruin it. 19/03/2010 Form Simon Hill Belfast Community PO Box 26 Belfast Christchurch [email protected] 1 1 Groynes underpass needs to be Network higher or another entrance for trucks for community events into the park. The tranquility and environment needs to be protected if is a very busy park in our community needs to be protected

19/03/2010 Form Jeremy Sumner/Kelly 41 Johns Road Belfast Christchurch 8053 [email protected] 03 323 9071 021 409 644 / 021 666 172 1 1 1 Option would flow better onto the We're all for it. Move it along! Burton motorway. Would also be similar cost to options 2a and 2b. 19/03/2010 Form William Lambie 45a Johns Road Belfast Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 323 8557 0274 803 721 1 1 Free flow. Most cost effective Y 19/03/2010 Form Darryn Haffenden 32 Rushmore Drive Belfast Christchurch [email protected] 03 323 5414 / 03 323 5342 1 1 1 It is a quick fix generated by expanding Intersection Dickeys & Main Nth is a Alignment for a long term fix should Y residential development. It does not disaster already. Options including include another project. Main Nth improve heavy traffic heading to turning here are impractical. Rd should divert around industrial areas SW city. It does not Pegasus & airport development will Woodend/Pegasus pick up contribute to less traffic NE to Port etc. increase traffic west/south bound. Rangiora, cross the Waimak, build Johns Rd will still be a bottleneck at Ecan & CCC park developments in another bridge, cross west of airport - airport & Hornby. Traffic skirting city will greenspace will be badly affected. Pond Road, through East side still be on an inner city through road. Pollution and noise, NW or SE will Yaldhurst (Pylon line route?) and Proposal is to be built on a flood plain. get both. Works building road will junction with Main Sth Rd near Proposal is to be built on a historical cause dust and nuisance. Templeton. Allowing industry traffic major river channel. Proposal will be to Hornby, airport traffic to it's west, built within ECan and secondary Christchurch bypass traffic exit city stopbanks. Proposal will be built via Templeton to pick up benefits at through developing greenspace CCC Rolleston. Park. Proposal will sandwich current residents between two major roads. It is only a short term fix.

19/03/2010 Form 1

Page 3 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 22/03/2010 Form Wayne & Bev Hudson 40 Darroch Street Belfast Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 323 8031 0274 732 312 1 1 It is the most direct route with least Don't like the short term options Great concept please advance asap Y Y impact on land for the dairy farm at end particularly regarding Dickeys Rd of Darroch St. It will have no effect on lights/roundabout, enough sawmill, a long established business. It congestion at that intersection now. will push the road further away from If road is kept out of old sewer ponds housing near the sawmill, good for a wetlands for birdlife could be noise. This route will also only take land reinstated like we had before minimally which is not heavily farmed at draining last year, it was great. present for the Dickeys Rd bridges and Noise from stop/start intersections entry onto motorway. like Dickeys Rd would be worse than traffic doing 80-100km/hr straight through. The full bypass construction would be good for employment at the current time / the longer it is left the more expense it will be.

22/03/2010 Form Julie Malzard 23 Kildare Street Belfast Christchurch [email protected] 03 358 8266 0210 640 065 1 1 Not in favour of building two bridges as river is very pretty and will spoil walking track around that area. I think option 2b will have less effects on the river.

22/03/2010 Form Richard Peate 15 Mayfly Lane Clearwater Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 360 2227 0274 342 133 1 1 Gives more traffic capability in the Despite the 80km restriction I think it Object to the CCC proposal to use Y interim solution to channel all will be difficult to stop higher speeds Clearwater Avenue as the main northbound traffic down Dickeys Rd to on the bypass. There will be a access to the Groynes as its not built access Main Nth Rd or Northern strong inclination to go faser through or configured to take 70,000 extra motorway. the rural surround. This increases vehicles per year. The proposal the areas risk for properties such as causes significant additional security 'Devondale'. risks for Clearwater residents in addition to the inconvenience of greater traffic problems.

22/03/2010 Form John Daue 35 Rushmore Drive Belfast Christchurch 8051 03 323 9619 0274 343 448 1 1 1 Better flow of the road. Don't have to Make it two lanes each way. Widen Y buy the wood mill. Don't have to fill the bridge of the Waimak River to two old ponds as this is meant to be a lanes each way to keep the traffic wetland reserve. Just a bit further away flowing. from houses. 22/03/2010 Form Dawne & Graham 595 Johns Road Harewood Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 359 8929 1 1 1 The unnecessary volume of traffic being Johns Rd is at present NOT used as If any of these proposals go ahead, Reynolds directed onto Johns Rd is unacceptable. a normal road at all. Cycling is not what compensation is envisaged to The most cost effective solution surely is safe, walking is not safe, horse riding residents of Johns Rd, whose to divert North/South traffic at Dickeys is definitely out and with more traffic lifestyle, devaluation and saleability Rd/Coutts Island Rd. This road could and heavy traffic, your proposals will of their properties will be affected? be extended and eventually link up with make it even worse. The most Main Sth Rd at say Rolleston or practical solution is to divert (mostly Burnham. The volume of heavy traffic riverbed country) upgrade and being directed onto Johns Rd is extend Coutts Island Road to link up ridiculous and affects residents day and with the South Road with a few night. A large proportion of this traffic passing bays. has no interest in travelling through congested suburbs.

22/03/2010 Form Matt O'Malley 1 Greenmeadow Gardens Belfast Christchurch [email protected] 021 310 315 1 1 Do it once, do it right. It would make Existing walk ways to remain Y Y traffic worse than it is now if you went accessable. Four lanes should start with the Dickeys Rd option. Less noise from Johns Rd, removing the need for existing residents. Traffic would flow for a traffic controlled intersection. with no stopages. Nil effect on saw mill. 100km zones.

Page 4 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 23/03/2010 Email Stephen France 40 Riccarton Road Dunedin Dunedin [email protected] 1 1 I prefer either option 1b or 2b - direct, As well as the needs of the residents Please give consideration to building free flow connection with the Northern of Belfast, consider also the the road as a four lane, median Motorway. No preference for either 1b requirements of long distance South divided motorway from the outset, or 2b - whatever is cheaper to build and Island inter-regional traffic using SH1 allowing for future growth. If funding provides the best outcomes for the local that do not intend to stop in does not permit this, it would be residents and strategic traffic. Options Christchurch good if the enabling earthworks 1a and 2a seem shortsighted and were done now to allow four lanes - should be dropped from further the same way the the Northern consideration Motorway has been built to allow an extra (third) lane in each direction. Also, the Johns Road intersection should be re-constructed as a full diamond grade separated interchange to allow access and egress in all directions - this would remove more traffic through from Main North Road north of Johns road, and allow good connectivity to SH1 for Belfast residents. This would also negate the need for the proposed vehicle/pedestrian underpass to the Groyne

23/03/2010 Form Mary Lee 65 Rushmore Drive Belfast Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 323 4017 1 1 We live behind the sawmill on Dickeys Motorists leaving Darroch St turning Rd this will not interupt their businss. onto Main Nth Rd are at the mercy The flow off the Main Nth Rd is better of traffic flow to ease into traffic at than stopping at lights at Dickeys Rd present no holding areas in middle corner. of the road. May ease traffic flowing into city for several years. 23/03/2010 Form Mr D B Hutton 197 Highsted Road Casebrook Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 359 9121 1 1 Smoother flow of traffic both directons As the proposed Northern arterial Y on the north side of Belfast. Only one route appears to end at QE2 Drive it bridge and on/off ramp required on may not be a popular route for traffic yellow road. Cheaper construction heading to the centre of the city. costs? The dotted line which appears to link with Cranford Street suggsts this extensionto complete the arterial route proposed and then discarded in the 1960s and early 70s will be a long time in coming. This will not reduce traffic on the Main Nth Rd/Papanui Rd/Cranford St route presently in use. The result could be that traffic heading for the central city will continue to be slowed as the number of vehicles increases as Belfast/Kaiapoi population grows. Many motorists are now using Styx Mill Rd/Highsted Rd/Cavendish Rd/Claridges Rd/ Farrington Ave to avoid Main Nth Rd/Papanui Rd/Cranford on their way to the city, Riccarton and south Christchurch. The volume of traffic on all these roads on the rural urban fringe has increased considerably, expecially since the lights were installed at the Styx over bridge (north side). Many drivers using the Highsted Rd/Claridge Rd roundabout appear nto to notice the speed limit there is 50kph and often 'plant their boot' especially when travelling south fro mthe 80kph zone int o the 50kph zone. Having lived adjacent to the roundabout since it was installed we are aware of driver behaviour and the various changes in speed limits, road widths and lack of adequate sigange in terms of both size, location and messages re entering a builtup area. Gardiners Rd, Cavendish Rd, Sawyers Arms Rd, Philpotts Rd, all have much superior indicators that drivers are entering builtup areas from the north than does Highsted Rd. all these matters are overdue for action to improve the situation. While I have focussed in on Highsted Rd, I believe the proposed bypass will result in more city bound traffic coming this way.

23/03/2010 Form Mrs F Hudson 39 Darroch Street Belfast Christchurch 8051 03 323 8470 1 1 Allows for future growth and avoids the Consider going further west, west of Dickeys Road exit as it causes enough the poplars as the area along the headaches as it is. river by Coutts Island is just a wasteland that grows weeds, broom, gorse etc and the paddock along walkway between the farm is only used for people to walk their dogs. Even using half of the said areas would still give enough for recreational purposes. It seems a pity to take good farmland with this wasteland that the council struggle to maintain including cutting the grass on the walkway

Page 5 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 23/03/2010 Form Kristy Inwood 21 Rushmore Drive Belfast Christchurch [email protected] 03 323 8554 0272/ 03 375 529 9614 445 1 1 Further away from my property. Dickeys Rd intersection will be Y Dickeys Rd intersection too busy now - extremely busy if all roads merge dangerous! Outlook from Rushmore there at once. Road should flow Drive would be better * sections along better without having a round about stopbank were priced at a premium for expecially entering round about from the reserve outlook, now would be 100km motorway staring at motorway!

23/03/2010 Form Peter Lee 65 Rushmore Drive Belfast Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 021 668 885 1 1 Gives the best flow at traffic to Johns Rd The fisheries in the Otukaikino River The motorway bridge needs to be 3 Y Y and has little interuptions to the timber as this is a fish spawning area and lanes each way and the old main yard on Dickeys Rd and keeps the the reserve area. bridge needs to be replaced with a 2 traffic as far away from existing housing lane each way bridge. and therefore less noise. 23/03/2010 Form Mrs Vicki Macioce 690 Main North Road Belfast Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 323 8374 1 1 1 1 Don't mind what option as long as it Please remember when planning Yes when can you start, this is Y takes traffic off the main road. We have this bypass the walkers and cyclists urgently needed for Belfast and noticed over the years, increased traffic of this community. We don't want to surrounding areas to make our flow and heavy traffic and noise. see the Groynes ruined either. roads safer. We have more traffic Proposal will make it a safer option for flow especially with Pegasus Town all concerned plus lower up and going. Can't wait!! noise/air/polution. Concerned for my safety eg crossing the main road etc. With our primary school being on the main road this will be a safer option for the children of Belfast.

24/03/2010 Form John & Marianne Gunn 121b Johns Road Northwood Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 323 6608 1 1 This option avoids taking any land Simply avoid providing any bottle This will be the best thing which has around the ponds and the factory. The necks - we are weary of backed-up happened in Belfast for many years! short term options (1a and 2a) are a traffic as it is. The sooner the better. waste of money over the longer period and they also would cause a bottle neck at the Dickeys Rd/Main Nth Rd, which is just what should be avoided at all costs.

24/03/2010 Form Pauline & Ian Stark 47 Rushmore Drive Belfast Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 323 7377 0274 359 203 1 1 We chose this particular area in Belfast As your map is not up to date and Y to build our new home as the tranquility Horncastle Homes subdivision is not natural open space along the photographed on Sky Google yet embankment, the view and walk-way information being spoken about is within the area made us feel we still had pretty much incomplete. There are countyside to enjoy. Of course homes approximately 25 more houses built with this sort of outlook come with extra for the tranquility of the reserve view cost therefore if option 2a & 2b goes and atmosphere of living. At the ahead that will destroy this picturesque meeting in Belfast Rugby Rooms area as we will be able to see (hear) the there was mentioned about bridges motorway from our homes, which may being expensive also there was a devalue the property. It would appear thought put forward about redirecting option 1a & 1b will not be as noticeable the river so no bridge would be from the homes in Rushmore Drive and required. On option 1a & 1b which would be a huge advantage now and for would be the option my family would the future of Belfast. vote for as it is more desiragle for us and the residence of Rushmore Drive to have the mortorway further west of Belfast.

24/03/2010 Form G. M. Thompson 24 Monaghan Street Belfast Christchurch 8051 03 323 6426 1 1 This may be the more expensive choice I believe that the whole project will initially but over an extended period have minimal effect on traffic flows when other options are used to 'further through Belfast. Clearly it will only improve' traffic flow the expense of partially releive the section Dickies those will be wasted when the more Rd/Main Nth Rd/ Johns Rd. Not all efficient choice is put in place. 1a & 2a traffic coming north is bound either have the potential to create a severe west or south. Much of it will bottleneck at the junction with the continue into the city. Additional existing Main Nth Rd with consequent traffic will accrue from Johns Rd loss of value in traffic flows. 2b south gradually building up through encroaches unnecessarily on reserve the remainder of Belfast, areas. 1b will give a free flow of traffic Northwood, Styx, Redwood, at maximum permissible speeds and Northcote, Papanui and Cranford St. little or no conflict with other traffic The stated numbers of vehicles will streams. not be totally eliminated and the rush hour congestion heading for the city will be little reduced. The possible benefit for the bypass relates to a great extent to the movements of heavy transport. They will have an easier run through and avoid some delay points ie Johns Rd.

Page 6 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 24/03/2010 Email Ben Wiles 27 Prossers Road St Martins Christchurch 8022 [email protected] 1 1 Option 2B, if the impact on the sawmill Rain water runoff from the upgraded The road appears to cut through Y can be mitigated, and the money is road, and silt from the roadway close to the Groynes, through the available. Failing that, option 2a. Should construction MUST not enter the paddock behind Rosebank Estate. avoid bridging the Otukaikino Stream if Otukaikino Stream. There needs to Planting of extra trees or shrubs possible, and the Groynes should be be sufficient preventative action to would help cut down the road noise extended to the north, towards Dickeys avoid damage to the stream (silt for visitors to the park. I think the Road, with a pedestrian / cycling track traps etc). peaceful nature of the Groynes in it's along the stream edge. current state needs to be recognised, and preserved, if at all possible. Failing that, an extension of the park to the north should be considered, along with restoration plantings of native plants.

26/03/2010 Form J. A. Chapman 21 Langley Place Belfast Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 323 9454 1 1 1 It's further away from our place and I It will spoil our rural view and there is think the more gentle exit to the the noise too. motorway would work better 26/03/2010 Form Alan Arps Flat 2, 8 Darroch Street Belfast Christchurch 03 323 8215 1 1 I consider 1b to be the best option in the long run. If the river could be moved north from the old bed to Pearsons Corner by way of a cut there would be no need for two expensive bridges. I think the bypass terminating at Dickeys Rd/North Rd would be a bad option.

25/03/2010 Email James McPhee 1552 Old West Coast Road RD 1 Christchurch [email protected] 1 1 I have no problem with the proposal you Is there a plan to extend the bypass Y are putting forward, just the shortness of further? You may be aleviating traffic the change in Belfast, which isn't too bad as it splits at the Belfast lights (Johns Rd), in comparison with the traffic going south after the Airport roundabout heading South via Hornby.It is very easy to waste 20 minutes between Buchanans Rd in Russley and Pound Rd in Islington. Trucks are already using the South end of Pound Rd to avoid Hornby but they have to deal with a right filter at the Caltex station at Yaldhurst/Russley Rds. The traffic at the Hornby junction is terrible. I thought the new junction at Yaldhurst was a part of a new bypass plan, am I incorrect? None of this plan addresses the snarl up of traffic from Yaldhurst Rd to Hornby to Templeton, is there another plan to deal with it? Would it not be better to connect this bypass to McLeans Island Rd at the juction near to McArthurs Rd and at the end of Harewood Golf course, near to the Works Depot, branch onto Pound Rd, thereby allowing Christchurch true bypass traffic to have an easy transit South and ease all the Hornby congestion

29/03/2010 Form Chris Lambie 7b Barnes Road Redwood Christchurch [email protected] 03 354 1914 1 1 1a appears to be further away at the With cycling being so much more a The huge buildup of traffic between north end from recent housing vehicle of choice in Christchurch is it 7.30-9am workdays makes it difficult development possible to have a cycleway the to make a right hand turn into the whole length. The view and Main Nth Rd (from Barnes Rd) each landscape would be great. Similar to day. I don't see this being eleviated the cycleway which is the full length because the proposed motorwary of Tahunanui to Richmond (Nelson) would only replace vehicles that motorway. If it is a safe way more currently turn right into Johns Rd people would choose to bike to work. (heading to work). All traffic at the Belfast bridge end are there by choice to head to work. Only those who need to bypass this area will use the proposed motorway.

Page 7 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 30/03/2010 Form Brian W Ford 18 Mistral Road Northwood Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 323 5222 0212 538 129 1 1 1 This option presents the less disruption It is imperitive the bypass be 4 lanes Thank you for your ready efforts to Y to existing organisations (eg oxidation (2 each way). I would also like to keep us up with the various options. ponds, sawmill etc) and will enable a recommend consideration be given better flow of traffic direct to and onto to have for Nth & Sth bound lanes ChCh Northern Motorway. It will also off/on ramps for Johns Rd so as to: be a greater help to reducing noise take pressure off Hussley Rd by pollution. It does not make economic conecting up Johns Rd into sense to only do option 1a. Needs to be Northward Boulavard; Make better 4 lanes otherwise not elliviate existing use of Northward Boularvard and a issues. better and safer traffic flow to Northwood, the Supa Centre and Land on the north west side of Johns Rd zoned for futuer resisdential devleopment; these on/off ramps could also provide access to Groynes, saving an underpass plus consideration should be given to providing access to both north & south lanes probably by on/off ramps from/to Gardners Rd so traffic can flow into/out of Harewood, Bishopdale etc as at present.

30/03/2010 Form Mark Noonan 21 Darroch Street Belfast Christchurch 8051 mbnoonanandfreenet.co.nz 03 941 8719 0272 223 315 1 1 Further from existing residences and A wonderful idea and essential to avoids making a potential traffic problem reduce traffic on the Main Nth Rd. It at Dickeys Rd. Traffic goes straight can't come soon enough! on/off the motorway without coming into Belfast and joining the Main Nth Rd at Dickeys Rd. Avoids the need to impact the operation of the Stoneyhurst sawmill (with potential job losses?)

31/03/2010 Email Anthony Connelly 25 Rushmore Drive Belfast Christchurch [email protected] 1 1 Traffic noise further from existing A lot of people walk around the I would like to be kept up to date on Y houses ponds this we work at night so am unable to get to meetings 1/04/2010 Form Robyn Ashworth 42a Regents Park Drive Redwood Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 352 3567 0276 262 022 1 1 1 To keep the traffic away from the I am very surprised they are only Y residential to reduce noise levels. Also looking at one lane each way having it coming into Belfast by Dickeys Rd would be another stop coming onto the motorway direct would be ideal.

1/04/2010 Form Reg King 729a Main North Road Belfast Christchurch 8051 03 323 8622 0274 061 614 1 1 Another set of traffic lights will hold up Either a four lane road or at very traffic once again on a free flowing road, least a long passing bay be as it is at present. provided. Options 1a, 2a, 2b all interfere with private property and should not be considered. 1b should be constructed now because of rising costs mean that any more construction could be many years away.

1/04/2010 Form Tod Hardiman 87 Cavendish Road Casebrook Christchurch 03 352 8211 1 1 Seems to be less intrusive on existig Along Johns Rd provision for future Suggest consider walk cycle way Y Y properties ie 4 houses and motel on infrastructure changes that can be along the side of Western Belfast bend Johns Rd & the sawmill as long as predicted. Often residents go Bypass and right down to airport as substantial perhaps landscaped through the upheaval of major road more and more people working at interface incorporating walk & cycleway. change - only to have the bulldozers airport & proximate industries may This could extend down Johns Rd back within 12 months to install new chooose to bike to work because of (south side) to Gardiners Rd allowing a services. parking restrictions. walk-cycle way to link around to Hussey's Rd. With underpass to Groynes this under utilised wonderful family amenity should develop. Principle ie existing properties have historical right to acces & to no increased disturbance from traffic noise if possible

Page 8 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 1/04/2010 Form L P Hills 356 Hamland Road Rangiora 7473 [email protected] 03 312 8594 0274 841 280 1 1 The 1a option is short sighted - do it The northbound option 1b could be a Sooner the better' Johns Rd also once & do it right. Keep work away merging lane similar to that which needs to be upgraded to 2 lanes from Dickeys Rd intersection with the exists for traffic coming off the north and 2 lanes south asap with a motorway too many accidents here Chaneys corner underpass. A bypass at Yaldhurst Rd for traffic to already. I could live with 1b or 2b but 1b flyover bridge would be required for link to Main Sth Rd. Avoid the perhaps offers less disruption to existing southbound traffic to let off the Carmen Rd, Main Sth Rd use property owners motorway over the norhtbound lane intersection although this will to get onto the 1b link to Johns Rd. improve with the Southern Motorway extension. Perhaps a bridge over the Waimak could be considered from Oxford to link up with Harewood Road to releive congestion from all the subdivisions in Ohoka, Swannanoa, West Eyreton, Mandaville areas in the future.

8/04/2009 Form David Knutson 9 Wayside Avenue Burnside Christchurch 8053 03 358 4483 1 1 1a and 2a will transfer the congestion to Y the intersection of Dickies Rd & Main Nth Rd. It is a waste of money to put in a short-term solution. 8/04/2009 Form Janita & Ivan Prattley Chardonnay Motor Physical: 170 Johns Road, Belfast; Belfast Christchurch [email protected] 03 347 1 1 1 We are the owners of Chardonnay If the bypass proceeds we feel it We are pleased that the Groynes Y Lodge Postal: 17 Michelangelo Drive, 4418 Motor Lodge, Johns Rd, Belfast. When would be only fair to us and our Drive will remain the same, past Rolleston 7614 we built in 1999 we sought and were leesees that prominent, very Chardonnay Motor Lodge! given assurance that Johns Rd would significant signage be erected. A remain SH1, ultimately increasing to 4 large sign preceding the off ramp to lanes. Motel business rely on through the Groynes & Johns Rd and also traffic with easy access to aid another large sign as cars approach occupancy rates, and this was an from the southern entrance important factor in our building there. indicating Chardonnay Motor Lodge Chardonnay Motor Lodge is a 4 star ahead on Johns Rd. Large signs plus motel set in spacious award would ensure better and safer traffic winning gardens, adjacent to the flow as drivers don't want to be Groynes and Rosebank winery, searching for the motel. We would attracting many overseas tourists and appreciate your early confirmation locals. They come to enjoy the beauty that this will happen as it is a matter and peace of the area! All beneficial, of huge concern to all of us. Thanks! financially to ChCh.

8/04/2009 Email Will Hewitt Christchurch [email protected] 1 1 Impact on busy Dog Park, will benefit only travellers, Belfast and houses along the current motorway. We commonly take our Dog this park for the Agility Course and a large run but the motorway would cause reason to find a different area to walk our dog, Due to the safety hazards the dogs would simply be left on the leash 3/4 of the time. This would also take up millions of tax payers money, My Great Great Grandmother went to this park while she was a child and I assure you that many other people's older relatives went to this park and highly enjoyed it.

11/04/2010 Email Stephen Mann 48 Monaghan Street Belfast Christchurch [email protected] 1 Avoiding bridges reduces cost and With the northwester in chch, a The traffic signals to control right Y allows for easier widening in future raised bank on the southwest side turning traffic into johns road from would reduce noise pollution the western bypass seems sub- optimal. It would be far more advantageous to all road-users to add a right turning filter lane, (with a broken median barrier) for people turning right onto johns road. It is likely the only right turning traffic will be residents in this area, as there are no obvious through routes that would tempt other cars down here. Hence the number of right turning traffic would be small. I believe unnecessary signals contribute significantly to frustration experienced by road users and hence reduce safety rather than increasing safety

Page 9 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 12/04/2010 Form R & C Smith 23 Langley Place Belfast Christchurch [email protected] 03 323 5550 1 1 1 We feel the road should be kept as far Is it not possible to place the road away from built up areas as posible. over behind the Groynes! Also we have noise from the Mill to contend with in certain winds so noise from the new road would add to that if it was on option 2a or 2b. 12/04/2010 Form Matt Cummins 39 Bennett Street Papanui Christchurch 8053 [email protected] 03 352 2448 1 1 Good to stay away from Otukakino It is a huge contradiction that the aim Y Y River. Could 2b be built in one go is to reduce the no. of vehicles rather than a 2020 add on? Seems travelling on the Main Nth Rd, yet more efficeient. Shame to have an the council approve an application to affect on the Goynes reserve area - it expand the Supa Centre - a massive will transform this lovely spot into a retail developmenet. noisy area.

12/04/2010 Form Linda & Dave Inwood 4 Dickeys Road Belfast Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 323 8816 1 1 The two short term options at Dickeys The Stoneyhurst sawmill and Belfast Rd / Main Nth Rd - 1a and 2a are not an Tavern 'The Peg' have a lot of option, this would be a dangerous vehicles in and out. Turning right choice. It would be shifting the Johns onto a major road to enter Main Nth Rd / Main Nth Rd corner problem Rd would cause a horrendous build further down the road. Safety is a up of vehicles and the safety aspect major issue. would be unacceptable. The short term options are absolutely not options. They will not run efficiently and safely as advised in your brochure.

12/04/2010 Email Joanne Walters NZAA Canterbury PO Box 994 City Centre Christchurch 8140 [email protected] 1 Express traffic is drawn away from built Security lighting needs to be Y up industrial and residential areas. provided in the underpass Option 1B would also be constructed on open farmland which would result in less conflict with the current farming activities. 12/04/2010 Email Tim Wells TJ Wells & JA Nicholl 43 Heywards Road, RD2 Kaiapoi Kaiapoi [email protected] 1 1 Hybrid of 1a with road pushed as far as Major disruption to current irrigation Major disruption to current operation Y (Farm managers) possible to boundary of the farm and infrastructure. of existing dairy farm and cause The Groynes and follow curve of significant changes in economic boundary to minimise impact on current structure and viability farm practices. Support redirecting Otukaikino Stream. 13/04/2010 Email Barry & Phillippa Graham 901 Main North Road Belfast [email protected] 1 1 Least disruption to existing residents. Concern over works occurring at Y night and associated disruption 13/04/2010 Email Daryn Jemmett Silver Fern Farms PO Box 283, Christchurch Mail Belfast [email protected] 1 1 Large numbers of stock trucks, Heavy transport trucks turning Y Limited Centre refridgeration trucks servicing our off/onto bypass at Dickeys Road will operation and existing industrial estate require a significant sized so need access to Belfast otherwise if intersection. 1b and 2b are used, trucks might just continue using old route rather than back track back to Belfast.

14/04/2010 Email Shirley & Maurice 239 Johns Road Belfast Christchurch [email protected] 1 1 Prefer 80km/h speed limit, consider long Effect of turning into driveways off Safer if a lane was put in to service Y O'Flaherty term option will come into effect bypass, tourists coming out onto the 4 properties in our block naturally motorway with caravans and campervans from The Groynes Caravan Park which is dangerous at 80km/h and worse if 100km/h, effect of turning out of driveways and getting up to speed of the motorway

13/04/2010 Form Gwen Cairney 18 Wingate Street Redwood Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 352 5846 1 1 I see no point in option 1a or 2a when If option 1b is chosen it would be Dickies Rd & Main Nth Rd is a Y this would only be effective until possible to reduce the speed limit to hazardous junction. approximately 2020 - get it sorted in one 80kmh on the portion of current hit. Northern Motorway where the new Belfast Bypass starts and the Dickies Rd / Main Nth Rd cross-roads intersection, thereby having motorists closer to the speed limit of 60kmh on Main Nth Rd south of the cross-roads

13/04/2010 Form Karen Wills 17 Langley Place Belfast Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 1 1 Will make make easier driving/least A bridge near Coutts Island would Y disruption to residents, plus still keeping help the traffic flow and hopefully the farm and green belt and views. stop bottlenecks. Environmentally the best choice for everyone and preserving the important wildlife and well being of all.

Page 10 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 14/04/2010 Form Brian Sowman 17 Langley Place Belfast Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 1 1 Will be smoother turn, less intrusion to A bridge somewhere around Coutts Y locals, especially the farm. Would allow Island McLeans Island. This would the former oxidation ponds to be siphon off most of the Oxford and developed for recreations purposes. No Rangiora traffic. Once the Pegasus problems for the Timberyard on Dickeys development opens up the new Rd bridge would be of great benefit. 15/04/2010 Form G Spinner (Petition Co- 47 Monaghan St Belfast Christchurch 8051 03 323 7173 1 1 1 All options will effectively create noise In short, can we be assured that the My personal suggestion is think/act Y ordinator) and pollution to the Groynes public Groynes and dog park will remain as longterm is that the bypass be areas in particular users of the dog is. Effects of noise, pollution, loss of routed via existing Dickeys Rd to park. Enclosed is the amendment dog park shingle existing road south of signed by 'some' participating public stopbank to Issacs Corner thereby users of the park stating that if it goes giving direct access to Main South ahead that there be at least a 20 metre Rd and exisitng highway to Arthurs allowance to establish a buffer zone. Pass and beyond to the West Coast.

15/04/2010 Petition Mia Immus 1/39 Hastings St West 03 337 9840 1 1 Amendment to location of bypass adjacent to the existing Groynes dog park, specifically area alongside the deer fencing. Request boundary be moved 20 metres so that a sound bank and buffer zone of trees to screen bypass can be established. If not adverse effects due to exhaust emisssions, decibel levels from traffic.

15/04/2010 Petition H Castelow 8 Holliser Avenue 03 742 1089 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition N Brownlie 275 Wairakei Road 027 361 1123 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition H Darch 7 Runnymede Dr Templeton 03 344 0012 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition John Anderson 5 Farnham Place Ilam 03 358 4459 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Jasmine Anderson 14B Newbridge Place 03 358 5774 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Shena Malden 20 Sefton Street 03 323 6188 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Victor 181 Grahams Road 021 183 1108 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Louise Lockie 359 Barrington Street Spreydon 03 960 5442 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Letitia Gravah 51 Pegasus Avenue 03 981 0508 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition B Bisset 81 Charles Street Rangiora 03 313 4446 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition J Johns 44 Belmont Avenue Rangiora 03 313 9918 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition H Gibbons 127 Dunbars Road 027 550 0102 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition M Newman 3 Ranelagh Terrace Huntsbury 027 233 7949 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition J Harris 8 Onana Crescent Hornby Christchurch 021 242 0698 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Michael Angelo 205 Blighs Road Papanui Christchurch 021 466 711 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Barry Nelson 16 Clotilda Place Christchurch 03 359 4409 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Viv Nelson 17 Clotilda Place Christchurch 03 359 4409 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Rae Campbell 23 Rearsby Drive Halswell 03 322 7600 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition H Clyne 135a Palmers Road Christchurch 03 382 9034 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition S Kearney 51 Boys Road Rangiora 03 313 0144 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition GR Kearney 51 Boys Road Rangiora 03 313 0144 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition J Brewster 11 Dunns Ave Pines Beach 03 327 5724 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition MH Bayne 8 Cedars Street 03 942 8920 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition D Rope 70 Daniels Road Belfast 03 352 3134 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Ally Exton 4a Connemara Drive 03 323 6615 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Craig Miller 10 Fairway Drive 03 325 7133 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Fusako Miller 10 Fairway Drive 03 325 7133 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Chris Mason 216 Peterborough Street City Centre 021 041 0955 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Michael Super 50 Joy Street 021 253 4978 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Jazmin Ambrose 20 Chatham Street 027 376 3624 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Ryan Bonham 22 Saunders Place 027 634 739 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Elizabeth Horton 15 Cridland Place Halswell Christchurch 03 322 1514 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Martin White 32 Kintyre Drive Avonhead Christchurch 03 342 1405 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Dianna White 32 Kintyre Drive Avonhead Christchurch 03 342 1405 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Rebecca Hall 168 Riverlea Estate Drive Kainga 03 323 4453 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Heidi Loratt 168 Riverlea Estate Drive Kainga 03 323 4453 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Rachel Moorbudd 125 Summerhill Road Cust 03 310 2265 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Elizabeth Fradd 5 Webb Street Merivale Christchurch 03 355 3368 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Tony Lunn 14 Fantasia Gardens 03 323 4540 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Bev Alexander 11 Cottesmore Close 03 358 4806 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Jodie Alexander 11 Cottesmore Close 03 358 4806 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Lisa Oskai-Wilson 11 Bronwyn Street Christchurch 8052 03 385 7852 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Daniel Wilson 11 Bronwyn Street Christchurch 8052 03 385 7852 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Joanna Goven 119 Middle Road Pigeon Bay 03 304 6861 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Nick Fitzgerald 14 Highview Lane 03 326 7087 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Jessica Johnston 10 Highview Lane 03 326 7087 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Ross & Julie Maczard 23 Kildare Street Belfast Christchurch 03 323 9886 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Bettina Dillon 17 Halberg Street Dallington Christchurch 03 980 8522 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Tracey Agnew 556 Woodfields Road Swannanoa 03 312 6575 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Steve & Mandee 14 Teriotview Place Amberley 03 314 8385 1 1 as above Rutherford 15/04/2010 Petition Sophia Smedley 319 Wairakei Road Burnside Christchurch 03 360 2721 1 1 as above

Page 11 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 15/04/2010 Petition Chris Bayne 8 Cedars Street Hoon Hay Christchurch 03 948 8928 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Candice Curwood- 8 Cedars Street Hoon Hay Christchurch 03 948 8928 1 1 as above Bayne 15/04/2010 Petition Katherine Irvine 14 Rex Street Riccarton ParkChristchurch 03 960 6109 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Penelope Lane 24 Glen Oaks Drive Christchurch 03 323 4481 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Marty Smallman 88 Crofton Road 03 323 6469 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Donna Toppa Lagan Street Belfast Christchurch 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Dan Reynolds Lagan Street Belfast Christchurch 021 227 7270 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition M Vincent 25 Manor Place Christchurch 03 351 4911 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition A Ashton 52 Wainoni Road Christchurch 03 381 5556 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition S Emmerson 52 Wainoni Road Christchurch 03 381 5556 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Jo Harvey 35/2 Mecca Place Christchurch 027 600 3505 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Hollands 12 Aldersley Street Christchurch 03 385 5027 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Nikita Summerfield 79 Chattertons Road 7676 03 342 9845 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Paul Ames Meccitor Street Kaiapoi 021 819 254 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Tammy Rone Meccitor Street Kaiapoi 021 819 254 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition P Sutherland 16 Manhine Street 03 960 7169 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition L Thompson 14a Peveret Street 03 383 7336 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Blair Holmwood 1568 Leaches Road 03 318 6971 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Bonita Robertson 2/12 Tyrone Street 03 323 8775 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Dave Hawkins 24 Glen Oaks Drive 03 323 4481 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Kim Paterson 25 Manor Place 021 387 822 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Claire Campbell 24 Gregan Crescent 03 359 3139 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Bevan Campbell 24 Gregan Crescent 03 359 3139 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Emma Henry 27a Marlene Street 03 354 8219 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Karl Lloyd 27a Marlene Street 027 304 1490 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Nicole Turner 94 St Lukes Street 027 557 9999 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Chloe Minson 1/20 De Blodge Place 03 383 7429 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Mirinha Kremes 100 Newtons Road 03 347 4810 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Melissa Erickson 15B Flemington Avenue 027 357 3512 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Chris van Tongeren 15B Flemington Avenue 027 460 5118 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Erin O'Leary 81 Rose Street Somerfield 027 660 6013 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Laura Ching 36 Grants Road 027 335 4135 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Suzanna Summerfield 79 Chattertons Road 03 342 9845 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Jan Saville 52 Awatea Road 03 344 2419 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Bob Saville 52 Awatea Road 03 344 2419 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Phillipa Kees 55 Kimberley Street 021 0236 1251 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Brad Moher 21 Mathesons Road 03 980 0445 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Wendy Sutherland 16 Manhire Street 03 960 7169 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Gordon Smith 14a Peverel Street Riccarton 03 383 7336 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Louise Deane 03 348 1784 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Rebecca Holmwood 1568 Leaches Road 03 318 6971 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Judy Galston 205A Main North Road 03 354 4351 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Stephanie Pryce 6A Rafe Place 027 319 4123 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Peter Cropp 10A Bassett Street Burwood Christchurch 03 383 3850 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Ryan Coslett 14 Jacksons Road Fendalton Christchurch 03 351 1559 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition V Shan England 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition H Watson 35 Mayor Aitken Drive Cashmere 03 337 0667 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Mark Fortune 12 Stanmore Close 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Ben Ropes 23 Strachan Place 03 313 8321 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Roma Ropes 39 Ricklane Place 03 313 8081 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Christine Williams 11 Grosvenor Lane Rangiora 03 313 5197 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Stephen Williams 11 Grosvenor Lane Rangiora 03 313 5197 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Susan Howgh 33 Northcote Road 03 352 3376 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Jeremy Alison-Cowley 33 Northcote Road 03 352 3376 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Amy Riddle 384 Yaldhurst Road 03 342 8904 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Nicky Barnet 323 Henderson Road 03 981 2458 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Donald Barnet 323 Henderson Road 03 981 2458 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Pam Kennewell 97 Rowley Avenue 03 981 2292 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Danielle Barnet 323 Henderson Road 03 981 2455 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Maria Carbon 9 Murdoch Street 03 351 1050 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Alan Carbon 9 Murdoch Street 03 351 1050 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Kieran Steele 1/55 Thakeray Place 03 358 3598 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Susan J Fox 66 Johns Road 03 323 6616 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Judy C Ensor 25A Carruthers Street 03 358 8715 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Matthew Sisson 7 Dunluce Place Hornby Christchurch 03 349 8703 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Pauline Watts 23 Glenrowan Avenue 03 388 1684 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Hannah Rae 28 Blighs Road 03 351 2681 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Juliet Fitzgerald 3 Kingsgate Place 021 271 1433 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Linda Cleland 2 Millstream Drive Lincoln 021 023 45717 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Jeremy Calcroft 72 Birdwood Avenue Beckenham 03 337 3647 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Leslie Bard 26 Appleby Crescent 03 358 7177 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Bill Kohi 7 Cleveland Street 027 276 5472 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Cara Mooney 15 Nome Street Redwood Christchurch 03 354 8654 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Anita Sharp 3/134 Huxley Street 03 332 3163 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Simon Kidgell 3/134 Huxley Street 03 332 3163 1 1 as above

Page 12 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 15/04/2010 Petition Fiona Brogen 42 Batten Grove Kaiapoi 03 327 4551 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition E Becroft 43 Batten Grover Kaiapoi 03 327 0306 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Allison Dunn 44 Brynley Street 03 344 8525 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Ailsa Dunnachie-Young 414 Barrington Street Hoon Hay 03 338 0709 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Sam Maling 71B Conway Street 03 980 5235 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Nancy Burgess 12 Diy Street 03 344 1034 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Rachael Nunns 71B Conway Street Hoon Hay 03 980 8535 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition K Robinson 3 Poulson Street 021 364 8001 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition M Martin 325 Wigram Road 021 025 49260 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Chris Archer 42 Leacroft Street 03 359 3170 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Rachel Elcock 35 Marine Parade Christchurch 027 342 3464 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition W Opkoff 127 Westbelt Rangiora 03 310 7701 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition B Van den Beres 127 Westbelt Rangiora 03 310 7701 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Richard Heighbour 24 Hillmorton Street 03 349 6656 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Chris Bradshaw 469B Fernside Road Rangiora 03 313 6747 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Ashley Bradshaw 469B Fernside Road Rangiora 03 313 6747 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Beth McPhail 46 Stapletons Road 03 381 8039 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Fiona Montgomery 267 Lake Terrace Road 03 385 3814 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Beth Baxter 414 Barrington Road Hoon Hay 03 338 0709 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Sarah Ricketts 14 Crondon Street Beckenham 03 930 0300 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Richard Elcock 35 Marine Parade North Beach Christchurch 03 382 6223 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Cassie Carr 243 Wainoni Road 03 934 7419 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Helen Neighbour-Cone 24 Hillmorton Street 03 338 1818 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Mark Bradshaw 469B Fernside Road Rangiora 03 313 6747 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Tracy Ridden 20A Vickerys Road 03 341 5232 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Carina Belcher 6 Wildwood Avenue 03 389 8983 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Natasha Stelzer 38A Dalkeith Street 03 338 9904 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Olivia Beatson 25 Vardon Crescent 03 385 6454 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Jimm 142 Bordesley Street 03 389 3738 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Emma Knitinsson 89C Blake Street 03 388 5236 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Donna Ann 12 Allstone Place Burwood Christchurch 03 383 2072 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Grant 65 Opawa Road Christchurch 021 034 004 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Sandra Thompson 18c Mulberry Place Redwood Christchurch 021 059 9257 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Tim Russ 18c Mulberry Place Redwood Christchurch 021 633 772 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Caroline Crougton 2/5 Tyrone Street Belfast Christchurch 021 171 1704 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Lynne Rowe 10 Rowan Avenue 027 290 4452 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Louise Jamieson 260a Cashmere Road Cashmere Christchurch 021 362 515 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Richard Baguley 9 Thackers Quay 03 384 0202 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Jude Howic 9 Thackers Quay Christchurch 03 384 0202 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition J Grant 10 Tepau Place 03 354 2333 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Natalie Russell 130 Cavendish Road Christchurch 03 352 6817 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Sonia Davis 64 Wither Road Blenheim 03 577 7579 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Tracy White 10 Greenmeadow Gardens Christchurch 03 323 9095 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Joy Wilson 3 Church Street Rangiora 03 313 5358 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Simone Stapht 150 Rolleston Street Rakaia 03 302 7924 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Earle Cornelius 150 Rolleston Street Rakaia 03 302 7924 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Carolyn Brickell 124 Sevel Street Kaiapoi 03 327 4524 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Natalia McClusky 12 Croziers Road St Albans Christchurch 03 355 9833 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Colin McClusky 700 Avonside Drive Christchurch 03 381 1441 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Janet Haddock 9 Aleda Place 03 382 6517 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Debbie Hattan 7 Cavan Place 03 386 2988 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Paul Hattan 7 Cavan Place 03 386 2988 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Bonnie Buzzard 76/3 Trafalgar Street Christchurch 021 131 6610 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Anna Wilson 298 Russley Road Christchurch 027 357 6753 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Wayne Sargerson 298 Russley Road Christchurch 027 622 1326 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Joyce Hanton 021 217 6828 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Shona Ball 52 Church Street Rangiora 03 313 3914 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Trudy Watson 93 East Belt Rangiora 03 313 5160 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Ivan Baker 48 Mahlet Northwood 03 323 9464 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Liz Mitchell 30 Dunbarton Street 03 354 1999 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition M Halket 250 Knowles Street Christchurch 03 355 8319 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Wayne Robinson 6a Florance Place Christchurch 03 383 8300 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Sandy Nicholson 14 Tarby Place Christchurch 03 382 6062 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Merilyn Cropp 10a Bassett Streeet 03 383 3850 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Ruth Anderson 15a Cleland Street 03 323 9266 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Nadia Smith 16 Dunrobin Place 03 358 1983 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Elane Benford 2 Dyatt Place 03 352 1034 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition M.K 1/16 High Street 03 327 5631 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Anne Farrelly 12 Primrose Hill Lane 03 352 8757 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Pauline Garrods 254 Westbelt Rangiora 03 313 5173 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Marjorie Fraser 30 Cottonwood Street 03 383 176 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Danielle Moore 61 Rowan Avenue Belfast Christchurch 03 914 1918 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Nikki Woods 253 Waterloo Road 027 212 468 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Kim Carrell 6 Wendon News Belfast Christchurch 03 323 8088 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Kelly Dillon 67 Marriotts Road North Beach Christchurch 03 981 5177 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Dianna O'Bryan 335B Burwood Road Marshland 03 383 9138 1 1 as above

Page 13 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 15/04/2010 Petition Johnny Hogfhoem 152 Quinns Road 027 355 6487 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Graham McCusker 37 Charon Street Brooklands Christchurch 03 329 8407 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition G Kilpatrick 4/52 Nursery Road Christchurch 03 389 4332 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Zilla Steele 3/52 Nursery Road Christchurch 03 389 2411 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Kate Shaw 6 Allison Street Ashburton 03 307 7500 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Van Deak 12 Portchina Street Ashburton 03 308 5415 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Crissey Quy 50 Buchanans Road Christchurch 027 774 5378 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Krys K PO Box 6427 Upper RiccartonChristchurch 021 558 285 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Kumi Takagi 19 Chareham Street 03 339 8656 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Tiny Billy 659 Bucananas Road 03 342 7440 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Angela Wise 10 Craig Place 03 352 9336 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Kathy C 5 Farnswood Place 03 354 1149 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition G Hendry 228A Harewood Road Christchurch 8053 03 359 4846 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Anita Lunn 14 Fantasia Gardens Northwood 03 343 4540 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Jenny Cartwright 39A Monaghan Street 03 323 6650 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Daisy Cross 39A Monaghan Street 03 323 6650 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Matthew Reach 40 Akaroa Street 03 327 7459 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Mel Hooper 5 Caroline Place 03 960 7260 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Dave Race 3 Otakaro Place 03 388 1518 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Michael Jones 027 596 0890 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Tracy Devine 19 Maple Place Belfast 03 313 8009 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Gail Cross 215 Sparks Road 03 338 2823 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Mark Thompson 2/2 Elvina Crescent 03 359 0192 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Tony Styler 8 Opal Place Casebrook Christchurch 8051 03 359 8268 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Donna Macefield 55 Woodfields Road 7475 03 312 6575 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Brian Thrush 635a Springs Road Prebbleton 03 344 3088 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Bev Rohleder 240D Sawyer Arms Road Bishopdale Christchurch 03 359 8592 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Helen Cannan 4 Vongels Lane 03 385 4917 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Donna Noble 167a High Street Oxford 03 312 1538 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Barbara Nolen 15 Penguin Street Christchurch 8062 03 382 2580 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Kim White 9A Highstead Road Bishopdale Christchurch 03 360 3904 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Helen Thomas 9A Flemington Avenue North New Brighton 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Trudie Grace 03 383 3524 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Rhonda Hughes 96 Port Hills Road 03 384 9612 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition K Ford 7 Althorp Place Avonhead 03 358 9075 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition T Scott 45A Fleming Street North New Brighton 03 388 8000 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Holly Proud 3 Kingsgate Place Burnside 03 357 4572 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Laura Proud 3 Kingsgate Place Burnside 03 357 4572 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Savannah Hurunui 5b Tod Place Lincoln 03 325 2433 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Sara Phillips 376 Ellesmere Junction Road 03 329 5102 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Angela Stuart 9 Wattle Drive New Brighton 03 388 5252 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Crystal Corben 30 Colonial Road Birkenhead 021 036 1497 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Carissa Carter 17 Fitzroy Street Papatoetoe 021 277 4465 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Wayde Primrose 13 Delemere Way 027 214 9768 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Tom Nicholas 13 Delemere Way 027 202 2924 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Julie Kennedy 141A Blighs Road Strowen Christchurch 03 352 7276 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition C Hilthorn 27 Belfast Street Christchurch 021 273 9743 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition D Rossiter 1 Florance Place Christchurch 027 435 6395 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition E Whitta 3 Stapleford Crescent Auckland 09 479 7694 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition L Autridge 263 Queenspark Drive Christchurch 021 339 365 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition J Stokes 19 Doroyer Streeet 021 386 797 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition L Pannekeels 58 Nottingham Avenue 027 423 4991 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition J Kirk 10 Vickery Street Kaiapoi 03 327 5758 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Donna Bolton 9 Overbridge Street Kainga 027 200 3835 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Krystal Woolton 105 Marlow Road 03 980 1017 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Dikkola Chardonnay Lodge 021 060 7728 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Zandra 46A Marlowe Place Rolleston 03 347 3153 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Stu Hodgson 1 Mather Place Springston 03 339 2955 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Emma Collins 17A Hardina Avenue Auckland 09 573 0367 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Elan Eddy 4 Beaumaris Place 03 342 3880 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Gary Eddy 4 Beaumaris Place 03 342 3880 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition D Burnett 12 Heathglen Avenue Parklands 03 382 0680 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition K Brown Waterholes Road Christchurch RD 8 03 344 0564 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition RMB Brown Waterholes Road Christchurch RD 8 03 344 0564 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Chris Thompson 41 Cam Road Kaiapoi 03 327 6957 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition A Butler 22 Kinley Street Rangiora 03 310 7797 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Penny Chen 3 Lynfield Avenue 03 358 0792 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Karen C 90 Blakes Road 03 3435480 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Portia Carpenter 98 Blankavey Street 03 960 5283 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Tony Bisset 81 Charles Streeet Rangiora 03 313 4446 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition S Meik 24 Aylsham Lane 03 352 9881 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition D Neale 673 Main North Road Christchurch 03 323 9224 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Mark Tayles 8 Oriana Crescent Hornby Christchurch 03 349 9968 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Diane Stephen 18 Wendy Place Christchurch 03 384 2088 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Murray Lambie 3 Beaumaris Place Riccarton Christchurch 03 342 3018 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Barbara Lambie 3 Beaumaris Place Riccarton Christchurch 03 342 3018 1 1 as above

Page 14 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 15/04/2010 Petition Anne Whitfield 03 358 9360 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Angela Webb 100 Langdales Road 027 349 1997 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Emma Waitokia 15 Norris Street Christchurch 03 349 8942 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Anthony Miller 15 Norris Street Christchurch 03 349 8942 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Jenny Heslop 20 Thornley Place Woodend 03 310 0352 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition John Heslop 20 Thornley Place Woodend 03 310 0352 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Linda Krammer 158 Quinns Road Shirley Christchurch 03 385 5316 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Allan Hooper 5 Carbine Place 03 960 7260 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Catherine Brown 22 Newmark Street 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Allan Kewish 19 Maple Place Rangiora 03 313 8009 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Joyce Ferguson 12 Dompier Street Christchurch 8023 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Robyn Valentine 635a Springs Rd Prebbleton 03 344 3099 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Stuart White 9a Highsted Road Bishopdale Christchurch 03 360 3904 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Yvonne G 24 Gayhurst Road Christchurch 03 389 9422 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Annette Jaays 300 Baker Street Christchurch 03 381 4223 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Raewen Grace Casket Street Christchurch 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Jan Ford 7 Althorp Place Christchurch 03 358 9075 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Lizzie Williams 2 Caroline Way Northwood Christchurch 03 323 5775 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Ken Webb 2 Caroline Way Belfast Christchurch 03 323 5775 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition John Anderson 15A Cleland Street Belfast Christchurch 03 323 9266 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition John and Maureen Patterson 2/20 Cordyware Place Christchurch 027 386 309 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Laura McKeown 151 Langdons Road Christchurch 027 8299 328 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Blair Thorpe 12 Hay Street Linwood Christchurch 03 980 2468 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Kirstin Lucas 42 Dacre Street Christchurch 8062 03 389 6921 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Karolyn Bedford 2 Dyatt Place Redwood Christchurch 03 352 1034 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Nigel F 12 Primrose Hill Lane 021 498 756 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Cindy Narclicke 72 Willrych Avenue 021 292 7434 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Pam Young 44 Cottonwood Streeet 03 383 5434 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Dean Moore 61 Rowan Avenue Christchurch 03 942 1918 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition A Becker 31 Broad Street 027 226 8355 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Sade 9 Chetwood Place Christchurch 03 359 8266 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition J Calbett 256 Amberley Beach Road RD1 03 314 7067 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition T Carrick 34 Birch Terrace Upper Hutt 04 526 2118 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition C Win Dolly Dogs RD3 Murchison 03 523 9577 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition K Wylie 46 Forfar Street St Albans Christchurch 03 377 8079 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Andrew Rae 633 Main North Road Christchurch 027 244 3341 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Bridget Lee 633 Main North Road Christchurch 021 165 4647 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Tracey Cromwell 261 Tuahiwi Road Kaiapoi 03 313 4548 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Petition Marie Shelder Christchurch 03 323 8230 1 1 as above 15/04/2010 Email Kevin & Sandy Wesley 241 Johns Road Harewood Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 1 We prefer 1a, though feel the speed The motorway will severely affect the We would like to see a lane Y limit will increase to 100km regardless access in and out of our property, we developed to service those and it is an expense that long term will will be unable to exit North or enter properties including the camping not be successful. from the South and will now involve grounds, safer option for all. Another a detour, safety issue entering and option is to give us access at the leaving the motorway as zero speed back, though this would involve entering an 80 or 100km zone is purchasing land. always a risk. Devaluation on our property as it wont be a selling point. An increase in noise level is an issue.

16/04/2010 Form R Geoff Wells Devonvale Farm 657 Marshland Road Styx Mill Christchurch 03 323 9977 027 220 3748 1 1 Support the Environment Canterbury The irrigation scheme that now Have a feeling the Chch Urban alternative of diverting the Otukaikino operates will be compromised. The Development Strategy partners have River at Dickeys Rd to the west, thus low cost operating gravity feed water missed an opportunity to develop allowing the bypass to be positioned system is the farms most valuable and integrate the Groynes and the away from the dairy farm, Stonehurst asset. Any extra costs or loss of land farmed by the Wells family into Sawmills and the decomissioned production put financial viability at a major northern recreation area, to oxidation ponds. This would allow the risk. The headraces, dams, sills and cope with the growing demand in ponds area to be returned to the farm dykes where all designed and this area. Sports, passive recreation lease. This option would also need one positioned by laser levels. Any camping, caravan parks etc. bridge to be built to access Coutts alteration to levels at the upper end Concern that the land developers to Island. (pump house end of farm) would the east have had so much influence mean all levels over the western on the planning of the location and area of the farm would have to be negotiations, concerned more about reconstructed worked and regrassed their needs than ours. While the (apprx 1/2 farm). dairy farm is at this time very economic, the pressures of public access and their expectations is increasing making farming in this area very challenging.

16/04/2010 Form David Walton Heywards Road Clarkville Kaiapoi RD2 7692 03 327 7696 1 1 1 These options will have to happen Options 1a and 2a will reduce traffic Otaukaikino River from Groynes anyway, in time. So within financial volumes through Belfast but will shift downstream to be joined to constraints proceed with the best option. State Highway 1 and Main North Waimakiriri River Regional Park with Road junction to the current Dickeys additional entry points at Dickeys Rd Rd intersection.

Page 15 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 16/04/2010 Email Lesley Keast Hornby 27 Boston Avenue Christchurch [email protected] 1 1 1 The proposal will decrease the size Why not use the paper road to the Y of the Groynes which is a public north of the project. recreation area. The effects on the waterways with such intensive excavations. 19/04/2010 Form Gavin Stanbury 848 Main North Road Belfast Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 323 8283 1 1 1 1 While I realise 1b is the long term option Avoid the bottleneck at the end of Lets get this done as soon as Y it should proceed in conjunction with 1a the present motorway by avoiding possible as its important to avoid creating a any expenditure here and put it all bottleneck at the Dickeys/Main North towards completing options 1a and Road corner. Don’t spend any money at 1b. the corner but put this into the 1b extension and open this when 1a is completed.

19/04/2010 Form Glenn Ewans 51 Johns Road Belfast Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 374 7399 027 464 6737 1 1 1 None of these options without further We would like information on land Whilst we appreciate the information Y detailed information on design, ownership constraints, time we need to make decisions re: materials, bureaucratic implications - implication factors, realistic start/end property really warrant public option at this stage. dates, allocation of funds. We would sell/buy/renovate/build/subdivide. be surprised that there is any form of The quicker realistic can be obtained objection to improvements of the better our support and decision statehighway 1 in this area. We are making can be. not exactly clear why apart from PC What can the public do to move the reasons the public is asked for start date forward. For what its detailed input into design options worth any pedestrian/cycleways when its not exactly clear a go ahead crossing/intercepting with highway has been given from should be underground (no governance/transitNZ at this stage. overpasses) reduces shades, less visual impact on environment also allows cycleway flow (no steep push- bike over bridges)

19/04/2010 Form Mark Beckett 762 Browns Road Swannanoa Rangiora RD57475 03 312 6965 1 1 1 Bottleneck stretches back some km onto Remove the proposal of traffic lights The existing motorway section Y the motorway. Putting intersections at on southbound traffic at Johns Rd. eneds to have access via an the end of this would defeat all logic and Should be an underpass so that underpass in order to ensure fraffic in my opinion result in higher accidents. vehicles intending to get on travel flow is unimpeded for north bound Therefore 1b, 2b will overcome this. under the right and merge with traffic coming from the Main North traffic. Could be combined with the Rd. If not done the existing Main underpass to groynes thereby North Rd to motorway entry will allowing traffic out to pass under, need upgrading for the increased turn right and head south. traffic flows. Also the underpass Some form of access for southbound need traffic to merge on the left side traffic to get onto the bypass at unlike the current stupid access Dickey Rd would also ensure a which is very poorly designed. Fix reduction ex Kaiapoi. 1b would offer the existing underpass to merge on an entry and exit option at the bridge the left side. crossing Dickeys Rd for both north and southbound traffic.

19/04/2010 Form Ron & Jacqui Burns 9 Goodall Street Mosgiel Dunedin 9024 [email protected] 03 951 7050 027 479 3037 1 1 1 As homeowners on Johns Rd, where The effects on our property is a Further to our correspondance with Y the bypass sits really makes no major issue. The volume of traffic Alan Harvey of 24/04/2009 we difference to us. Our objection is the past our house will be huge. How will asked a number of questions bypass goes right in front of our we get access to our property? Are regarding the proposed bypass. We property. Don’t believe any we going to lose any of our land? were advised that as it was still in a consideration has been given to us as scoping stage, many of our the bypass will devalue our property and questions did not have answers. No noise levels will be unbearable consideration or discussion has especially at 80kmh zone. been entered into with us homeowners. It would seems that it will go ahead regardless of objections or concerns from ratepayers.

19/04/2010 Email David Robert Walsh 9 Dickeys Road Belfast Christchurch [email protected] 1 1 Addresses the congestion problem and Avoid an intersection of any type on Option 1a and 2a - problems at the Y place the roadway out further from what is a main highway. The Dickeys proposed intersection with the residential dwellings.I live in Dickeys Rd, Rd intersection is dangerous and shingle and wood trucks already in my interest to have it further away. would have to be modified in a major using Dickeys Rd. The sawmill way. (Stoneyhurst) is not going to relocate very easy. The site probably has toxins in it so its best to leave it there. The Inwoods at 4 Dickeys Rd have said the farm could be bought giving the option some go ahead. There was also talk of rediverting the Otukaikino river as it was diverted before. If the roadway was to use Dickeys Rd how would we use our driveways?

Page 16 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 22/04/2010 Form E Reddish 15 Shepherd Place Kaiapoi Kaiapoi 7630 [email protected] 03 327 8773 1 1 Don’t waste money on temporary What sort of intersection is proposed I only received notice of these solutions, do it once, do it right. for the Johns Rd/Bypass proposals on the 20/04/2010. It Roundabouts/traffic lights at the end of intersection? Underpass, overpass doesn’t seem to have been very well a motorway are a stupid idea. or other? publicised. I saw nothing of it in the local kaiapoi newspapers. None Form Roly & Jan Suckling 24 Rushmore Drive Belfast Christchurch 8051 [email protected] 03 981 5679 1 1 The least disruption to community and the timber mill None Form Joan Bell 905 Main Nth Road Belfast Christchurch 8015 03 981 8520 1 Would take traffic away from residential If no right turn to drive down to If people would do 60miles/hr area Belfast to post office and groceries instead of about 100 milles/hr etc where am I going to turn? heading for the motorway it would help 13/04/2010 Letter Peter Goodwin FCILT NZ Road Transport 41 Carlyle Street Sydenham Christchurch 8023 03 366 9854 1 1 Do not support any option that connects With the development of the 1. Dual carriageway from existing Y Assoc via an intersection on Dickeys Rd with Northern Arterial and its intersection motorway to Johns Rd constructed Main North Rd as its short term, short with the motorway we are concerned now to cater for future growth and sighted and a waste of resources; an about the effect of these ramp demand. 2. there is little discussion intersection will be inefficient and have intersections in close proximity and of the linage and intersection directly the effects of slowing traffic resulting in would suggest consideration be to the motorway which would require inefficient fuel use and associated given to a 3 laning motorway ramps and a grade separated increased environmental effects; the between the 2 to ensure the smooth intersection. We consider the conflict of an intersection will have integration of all traffic. extension of the motorway onto the increased safety risks; and speed limit bypass should pass over the existing on byass will be reduced to 80kph and motorway where it continues onto does not achieve the max efficiences Main North Rd. 3.The design of the possible. 1b or 2b will be more efficeint new route should ensure that heavy and save time, provide greater fuel vehicles operating to the weights efficiency and enable 100kph speed and provisions of the recently limit (90kph for trucks). promulgated amendments to the Vehicle Mass and Dimensions Rule for High productivity Vehicles are fully capable of operating on it with unrestricted operation.

15/04/2010 Email Devondale Nurseries PO Box 36-242, Merivale Belfast Christchurch 8146 [email protected] 1 1 We prefer a Bypass route from the We do not support an underpass to Y Limited existing motorway right through to the Groynes. This is dangerous and Templeton behind the Airport. With unsightly. An elevated Bypass would further access via Orchard Road to the create noise and nuisance for Bypass Belfast residents. We support keeping the Bypass at low level and using earth bunds to mitigate effects. We support a feature treated pine bridge like the "Krusrak" wooden bridge in Sneek the Netherlands for the junction of access road to the Groynes Road and the Bypass or thereabouts.

15/04/2010 Email Darroch Holdings Ltd PO Box 36242, Merivale Merivale Christchurch 8146 [email protected] 1 1 We prefer a Bypass route from the We do not support an underpass to Y existing motorway right through to the Groynes. This is dangerous and Templeton behind the Airport. With unsightly. An elevated Bypass would further access via Orchard Road to the create noise and nuisance for Bypass Belfast residents. We support keeping the Bypass at low level and using earth bunds to mitigate effects. We support a feature treated pine bridge like the "Krusrak" wooden bridge in Sneek the Netherlands for the junction of access road to the Groynes Road and the Bypass or thereabouts.

15/04/2010 Email John & Lyn Powell 58 Johns Road Belfast Christchurch [email protected] 1 1 We prefer a Bypass route from the We do not support an underpass to Y existing motorway right through to the Groynes. This is dangerous and Templeton behind the Airport. With unsightly. An elevated Bypass would further access via Orchard Road to the create noise and nuisance for Bypass Belfast residents. We support keeping the Bypass at low level and using earth bunds to mitigate effects. We support the Northern Arterial and this should take priority to the Bypass if funding problems exist.

Page 17 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 16/04/2010 Email Johnathan Thomson NZ Heavy Haulage PO Box 1778 Wellington Wellington 6140 [email protected] 04 472 0366 1 1 Best to complete project in one go with Overall unencumbered width for Bypass supported if it includes Y Assoc either option 1b or 2b, longer term, no overdimension loads, overal height provision to cater to overdimension need for signals or controls, 100kph to any overhaed restriction, capacity loads although it is acknowledged better. of structures to be HN-HO-72, any that this request puts demands on divided road medians designed for the design. overdimension loads to travel freely without overhanging median.

16/04/2010 Email Belfast Community Trust PO Box 36242 Merivale Christchurch [email protected] 1 1 We prefer a Bypass route from the We do not support an underpass to Y existing motorway right through to the Groynes. This is dangerous and Templeton behind the Airport. With unsightly. An elevated Bypass would further access via Orchard Road to the create noise and nuisance for Bypass Belfast residents. We support keeping the Bypass at low level and using earth bunds to mitigate effects.

16/04/2010 Email ChCh Children's Day PO Box 5142 Christchurch [email protected] 1 1 Children's Day is a community event When the bypass does get Y Planning Committee held at the Groynes. Last year we saw constructed it is important that the number of participants increase to landscaping and design do as much approximately 14000. The Groynes is a as possible to reduce the noise unique setting offering users the pollution. People go to the Groynes opportunity to experience a number of for a feel of the rural quiet different types of environments and environment. The current project is activities. With by pass going thru the looking at the underpass entry into Groynes the old established picnic area the Groynes. The current height of will not be available for this community proposed underpass would not allow events use trucks to enter the Groynes. The Childrens Day event needs truck access to the Groynes

16/04/2010 Email Mrs A Balsom 71 Lamorna Rd Parklands Christchurch [email protected] 1 1 2a and 2b Not keen on crossing the It will be more cost effective to do the The congestion on Marshland Road river. Too much ecological damage long term option now rather than from the Northern Motorway to constructing the bridge. 2020. The cost and congestion QE11 Drive is a priority with should be dealt with now. It will Pegasus Town and the Styx Mill never be cheaper. Ecological housing proposed. damage of crossing river 16/04/2010 Letter Tami Woods Environment Canterbury PO Box 345 City Centre Christchuch [email protected] 1 1 Believe a third alignment option is This option would: minimise effects Would allow trees to be panted to Y better, requiring a diversion of the on adjacent ECan land (reduce reduce noise; moving stream would stream and the bypass would then compensation); reduce reduce contamination sources; follow the path of the existing stream encroachment on timber mill site so would return stream to original bed. so compensation required. course and offer potential for more natural restoration and enhancement; would separate the stream and the road to create more useable recreation area; the 2 bridges required would be of much loweer specification and the road itself would be on a straighter alignement.

19/04/2010 Letter Brian Vieceli Clearwater Golf Club & Clearwater Ave Harewood Christchurch 8544 [email protected] 03 360 2146 1 1 Supportive of the bypass in principal We also object to this proposal on Y Clearwater Resort subject to the following comments: we the following grounds: 1. Clearwater Residents accept that the benefits of the proposed Ave is not designed to accommodate bypass will be significant - in terms of the significant number of vehicles reducing congestion on the main artery that access the Groynes on a daily of the Belfast community; Getting On & basis (which we understand reaches Off the Bypass - we agree that in excess of 5,000 per day at peak northbound traffic should be able to turn times) the costs associated with right onto Johns Rd from the bypass - to upgrading Clearwater Ave will be allow access into Belfast, we also agree significant; 2. We are concerned that that in the interests of safety there increased traffic volumes on should be no right turn from Johns Rd Clearwater Ave will create safety onto the bypass; Access to the Groynes -concerns, for example, vehicle we note that a 'vehicle, cycle and numbers will increase significantly pedestrian underpass (with restriction during the NZ PGA Championship on heavy vehicle access) is likely to be that is played at Clearwater each provided close to the current Groynes year, and upon completion of the entrance; we understand through accessway into the Isaac discussions with senior ChCh City Conservation Park; 3. A dual Council officers that this entrance will be carriage-way underpass close to the a secondary access, and that the main current entrance would provide the entrance into the Groynes will be via safest and most convenient access Clearwater Ave. We are concerned that for vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians this proposal is not noted in your Project entering the Groynes from Johns Rd Consultation notice and will not elicit and the bypass public feedback as a result.

Page 18 of 19 Preferred Reply Method Contact Details Alignment Option Preference Contact Exclude Contact re none specififed, Support/ none Effects to Consider Comments Feedback Project support any of the suggest Date Method Name Organisation Postal Address Suburb City Postcode Email Phone Mobile Email Post 1a 2a 1b 2b none and Explanation from Report Development options proposed alternative oppose (SP) (SA) 20/04/2010 Letter Cynthia Ward Belfast Park c/- 84 Peterborough St Belfast Christchurch 8013 [email protected] 03 962 9770 1 This option operates efficiently and Strongly support fast tracking as part Y safely and can be constructed without of the wider RON's Western undue delay as this would enable the Corridor package. Its critical for planning and consent processing for the development of an integrated, Northern Growth Cells CN1 - CN4 to sustainable transport system. progress and is most consistent with Regionally significant as part of development sequencing of objectives implementation of the Greater of Change 1 to CRPS. Christchurch Urban Development Strategy and growth management areas identified in Change 1 to the CRPS. We have lodged private Plan Change Request with CCC to rezone area of land from Rural 3 to Living G and Business 1 and 4, Plan Change 43. Bypass will significantly improve traffic in area.

39 22198 51 17 341 2 8 331

Page 19 of 19 GHD Limited Level 11, Guardian Trust House 15 Willeston Street, Wellington T: 64 4 472 0799 F: 64 4 472 0833 E: [email protected]

© GHD Limited 2010 This document is and shall remain the property of GHD Limited. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited.

Document Status

Rev Reviewer Approved for Issue Author No. Name Signature Name Signature Date

Final Melissa Mary Mary Anthony O’Callahan O’Callahan

Western Belfast Bypass Public Consultation - Submission Analysis NZ Transport Agency Western Belfast Bypass Public Consultation Submission Analysis

March 2011 Contents

1. Introduction 4

2. Consultation Methods 5

3. Response Summary 6

4. Option 1: Johns Road Location 7 4.1 Key Theme Comparison by Location 7 4.2 Accessibility 7 4.3 Other Matters Influencing Preference 8 4.4 Other Comments 9

5. Option 2: Dickeys Road Location 10 5.1 Key Themes Comparison by Location 10 5.2 Traffic Reduction 10 5.3 Impact on the Groynes 10 5.4 Other Matters Influencing Preference 11 5.5 Other Comments 11

6. Unsure or Neither of the Proposed Locations 13 6.1 Other Comments 13

7. Otukaikino Stream Realignment 14 7.1 Support for the Stream Realignment 14 7.2 Opposed to the Stream Realignment 15 7.3 Unsure regarding the Stream Realignment 16

8. Submissions from Affected Parties 17 8.1 Submissions from Government Agencies 17 8.2 Submissions from Directly Affected Landowners 18 8.3 Other Affected Parties in Support of Option 1: Johns Road 18 8.4 Other Affected Parties in Support of Option 2: Dickeys Road 22

9. Summary 23 9.1 The Preferred Option 23 9.2 The Stream Realignment 23

Western Belfast Bypass Public Consultation Submission Analysis Appendices

Consultation Brochure Submissions Summary

Western Belfast Bypass Public Consultation Submission Analysis 1. Introduction

The NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) is currently investigating improvements for the northern and western corridors to Christchurch, including the Western Belfast Bypass. This will provide a limited access route from the Northern Motorway (SH1) for approximately 5km south to Johns Road (SH1), bypassing Belfast Village. Following public consultation undertaken in March 2010, the NZTA has been working through the alignment options - taking account of the community feedback; further investigation work; and the new Roads of National Significance (RoNS) standards. As a result of this work, the NZTA is now focusing on x a bypass based on the proposed Option B, with a direct connection to the Northern Motorway; x a potential realignment of the Otukaikino Stream back to its original path, reducing the stream crossing requirements for the new road; x the design for the Johns Road connection and connectivity for Belfast residents. Consequently, further consultation was undertaken in November 2010 seeking specific input on the location of a northbound off-ramp and the option of diverting part of the Otukaikino Stream. The route of the proposed stream diversion; and two options for the location of the northbound off-ramp were outlined in a consultation brochure, attached as Appendix A to this report. These options were the Johns Road off-ramp (Option 1) and the Dickeys Road off-ramp (Option 2). The following report provides an overview of the submissions received on the Western Belfast Bypass proposal following public consultation on the options presented in November 2010 as detailed above.

Western Belfast Bypass 4 Public Consultation Submission Analysis 2. Consultation Methods

A consultation brochure was prepared and posted to approximately 98 key stakeholders, along with an invitation to a public Open Day and a feedback form. These documents were also distributed by either post or email to approximately 600 parties who had previously participated in the consultation for this project and to 1800 properties adjoining and close to Dickeys, Johns and Main North Road, Belfast. The project details were posted on the NZTA website and an advertisement was placed in local newspapers. In cooperation with Christchurch City Council (CCC), information boards were placed within the Groynes Recreational area to enhance the coverage of the consultation and Open Day. Consultation brochures were dropped off at:

Christchurch City Council Civic Offices in Tuam Street

New World and Countdown supermarkets at Northwood

Redwood Library

Papanui Library and Council Service Centre

Belfast Rugby Club

Groynes Park Rangers Office The Open Day was held at the Belfast Rugby Clubrooms on Tuesday 16 November 2010, in conjunction with consultation on the Northern Arterial Project. Large scale plans of the project were available to view, with feedback forms being distributed to all attendees to assist with encouraging feedback on the project. The Open Day was well attended, particularly by local Belfast residents. The attendance record includes details for 207 attendees in total, 110 of these attendees indicating specific interest in the WBB proposal. The submission period closed on Friday 26 November 2010. Meetings were also held with a number of affected landowners and business operators during the consultation period. Key matters raised during these discussions as they relate to the proposed options have been included in Section 8.

Western Belfast Bypass 5 Public Consultation Submission Analysis 3. Response Summary

Written submissions were received from a total of 180 parties. 77 submissions were received in support of the Johns Road location for the northbound off-ramp (Option 1), with 64 of these respondents providing addresses in the Belfast area. 79 parties submitted support for the Dickeys Road location for the northbound off-ramp (Option 2); 65 of these respondents are recorded as residing or owning property in the Belfast area. Eleven respondents indicated a preference for a northbound off-ramp to be located at both Dickeys and Johns Road; nine of these were from the Belfast area. An additional four submitters also noted this preference; however these respondents conceded selection of Option 1 (Johns Road). Six respondents selected ‘unsure / neither’ for reasons that did not include a preference for a northbound off-ramp at both locations. Only one of these respondents opposed the proposal altogether. Seven respondents did not make a selection for the location of the northbound off-ramp. 158 responses were received with regard to the proposed realignment of the Otukaikino Stream. 134 responses were in support of the stream realignment; 113 of these respondents are recorded as residing in the Belfast area. Twelve respondents do not support the stream realignment. Another twelve submitters selected ‘unsure / neither’ in response to the proposed stream realignment. The location of submitters is shown in Table 1. Table 1 – Location of submitters and their selections

Geographic Location Off-Ramp Location Stream Realignment Options Options No. of Submitters No. of Submitters

1 2 U/N Both Y N U/N

Belfast Area 64 65 4 9 113 10 11

Rest of Christchurch City 8 7 1 - 13 - 1

Other Areas 1 2 1 2 5 - -

Unknown 4 5 - - 3 2 -

Total 77 79 6 11 134 12 12 Off-Ramp Location 1 – Johns Road; Off-Ramp Location 2 – Dickeys Road; U/N – unsure/ neither Stream Realignment Options: Y – Yes; N – No; U/N – unsure / neither

Western Belfast Bypass 6 Public Consultation Submission Analysis 4. Option 1: Johns Road Location

77 submissions were made in support of Option 1. 64 of these submissions were from people who reside or own property in the Belfast area with the remaining 13 being from those who reside in other areas or whose place of residence is unknown. Of those submitters who reside in Belfast, 53 provided explanations for their preferences. These are detailed below.

4.1 Key Theme Comparison by Location The following have been identified as the key matters given in support of the northbound off-ramp being located at Johns Road. These are ranked in order of highest occurrence with the number of times the matter is referenced being indicated in brackets. 1. Accessibility (Belfast area (34); Other area (4)) 2. Main North & Dickeys Roads Intersection (Belfast area (5)) 3. Through-traffic on Local Roads (Belfast area (3); Other area (1)) 4. Network Legibility (Belfast area (2); Other area (1)) 5. Impact on Property Values (Belfast area (2)) 6. Clearwater Avenue Safety (Belfast area (2)) 7. Suitability for Traffic Volumes (Belfast area (2)) 8. Traffic Reduction (Belfast area (1); Other area (1)) 9. Property Privacy (Belfast area (1)) 10. Noise Reduction for Dickeys Area Properties (Belfast area (1))

4.2 Accessibility Matters of accessibility, being convenient vehicle access to and from Northwood and the central Belfast area, were the most referenced reasons for preferring Option 1. Direct access to residences, the Groynes, shopping centres and other businesses was also noted, as was direct access from these areas to the south and west of Christchurch.

The key implications of restricted accessibility that were commonly referred to included increases in travel time, distance and the further inconvenience of having to back-track or wind through local roads. An additional implication of restricted accessibility noted in submissions was the adverse impacts on business. This includes impacts on the legibility of business site access, particularly those vying for the custom of tourists. Further detail regarding the potential implications for businesses can be found in Section 8.

Western Belfast Bypass 7 Public Consultation Submission Analysis 4.3 Other Matters Influencing Preference

4.3.1 Main North & Dickeys Roads Intersection Concern with traffic management at the intersection of Main North and Dickeys Roads was cited five times as an explicit reason for preferring Option 1. There were implications noted for this intersection should Option 2 be implemented. These included increased congestion, safety concerns and in one instance, the desire not to have a large intersection which was seen as necessary to manage the increased traffic volume.

4.3.2 Through-traffic on local roads Four submitters were concerned that the implementation of Option 2 would result in an increase of traffic (including heavy vehicles) using local roads to avoid congestion. This matter concerns the use of Northwood streets to avoid congestion at Sawyers Arms Road and the intersection of Johns and Main North Roads.

4.3.3 Network legibility Three submitters cited a need for the on and off ramps to be located at the same place as a reason for their preference. This facilitates peoples’ understanding of how the interchange operates and enables them to easily ‘make sense’ of how to get to where they need to go.

4.3.4 Impact on property values A devaluation of property values was cited by two submitters as a factor influencing their preference for Option 1. More details on these specific submissions can be found in Section 8 of this report.

4.3.5 Clearwater Avenue safety Two submissions cited concerns with safety as influencing their preference, should the main entrance to the Groynes be developed from Clearwater Avenue. This includes both road accident safety and the safety of Groynes users. More details on one of these submissions can be found in Section 8.

4.3.6 Suitability for traffic volumes The suitability of Johns Road to manage traffic volumes was cited twice as the primary reason for preferring Option 1.

4.3.7 Traffic reduction Two submitters specifically cited a reduction of traffic (including heavy vehicles) on Main North Road and through Belfast as reasons for their preference.

4.3.8 Property privacy One submission noted a preference for Option 1 to maintain privacy at the Clearwater Resort.

Western Belfast Bypass 8 Public Consultation Submission Analysis 4.3.9 Noise reduction for Dickeys Road area properties One submission noted a preference for Option 1 as it would minimise the noise impacts on their property from heavy vehicles engine breaking and accelerating.

4.4 Other Comments Further comments and suggestions provided by those in favour of Option 1 are listed below. Road Improvements

Need to link northern and southern motorways overhead through Christchurch with on and off-ramps to the suburbs and city.

Roundabouts suggested at the site of the proposed underpass, and to get on and off Johns Road.

Make bypass four lanes and Johns and Russley Roads to facilitate traffic flow.

Northbound on/off ramp on Northern Arterial to access Marshlands Road may alleviate Belfast access constraints. Groynes

Concern with overall adverse impact on the Groynes. The Groynes is ‘Belfast’s greatest asset’.

Need to ensure minimal impact on the dog park.

Need to ensure the dog park is properly fenced to prevent dogs escaping onto the motorway.

Landscaped noise bund between dog park and bypass to avoid adverse impacts of traffic noise on the dogs.

An architecturally designed overbridge to the Groynes to enhance the entranceway, and the sinking of the bypass to further reduce aesthetic impact.

Maintain loop track around the Groynes dog park for safe pedestrian use.

Landscaped noise bund from Dickeys Road to Groynes Drive.

Acquire further land to the east of Johns Road and align bypass further from the Groynes to minimise its impact on this land and better accommodate the off-ramp. Noise concerns

Noise mitigation required on the eastern side of bypass (Rushmore Dr subdivision)

Grade separation limits options for noise mitigation

General noise concerns Other

Construct the bypass as soon as possible.

Support for the service lane.

Western Belfast Bypass 9 Public Consultation Submission Analysis 5. Option 2: Dickeys Road Location

79 submissions were made in support of Option 2. 65 of these submissions were from people who reside or own property in the Belfast area with the remaining 14 being from those who reside in other areas or whose place of residence is unknown. Of those submitters who reside in Belfast, 57 provided explanations for their preferences. These are detailed below.

5.1 Key Themes Comparison by Location The following have been identified as the key matters given in support of the northbound off-ramp being located at Dickeys Road. These are ranked in order of highest occurrence and the number of times the matter is referenced is indicated in brackets: 1. Traffic Reduction (Belfast area (24); Other area (2)) 2. Impact on the Groynes (Belfast area (19); Other area (4)) 3. Residential Amenity (Belfast area (10); Other area (2)) 4. Accessibility (Belfast area (7)) 5. Environmental Impact (not otherwise specified) (Belfast area (3)) 6. Impact on Property Values ( Belfast area (2)) 7. Land Requirements ( Belfast area (2)) 8. Less Cost ( Belfast area (1)) 9. Supports Local Businesses ( Belfast area (1))

5.2 Traffic Reduction The most often cited reason in support of Option 2 was the reduction in traffic volume along Main North and Johns Roads. A comment noted in relation to this reduction in traffic is an outcome where Belfast becomes a destination rather than a thoroughfare. Three submissions specifically noted a reduction in heavy vehicles as influencing the preference for Option 2.

5.3 Impact on the Groynes A lesser impact on the Groynes in comparison with Option 1 is the second most commonly referred to reason for preferring Option 2. These adverse impacts include visual effects, noise, land loss and detrimental impacts upon wild life. This was the reason most cited by those residing outside of the Belfast area. Submitters commented that Option 2 offered the opportunity to minimise disruption to this ‘valuable recreational area’, whereas Option 1 has a greater physical and visual impact on the Groynes while advantaging a relatively small number of local residents.

Western Belfast Bypass 10 Public Consultation Submission Analysis 5.4 Other Matters Influencing Preference Other considerations influencing the preference for Option 2 were as follows:

5.4.1 Residential Amenity Thirteen submissions were received that referred to lesser implications for residential amenity as a reason for supporting Option 2. The cited effects on residential amenity included traffic and construction noise; pollution; and consequently further implications on health and safety. Comments within this category indicated that it is preferable that the off-ramp be located furthest from the area of greater residential density.

5.4.2 Accessibility Better access was cited in seven submissions. Access to industrial areas, as well as from residences to the airport, the Southern Motorway, and the Groynes were destinations referred to in the submissions.

5.4.3 Environmental Impact Three submissions from the Belfast area cited less environmental impacts as a reason for supporting Option 2. However, no specific impacts were noted. Where these effects have been referred to in relation to the Groynes or residences, they have been included in those categories.

5.4.4 Impact on Property Values Two submissions received from the Belfast area prefer Option 2 as it is believed that the implementation of Option 1 would devalue their properties.

5.4.5 Land Requirements Two submissions cite a lesser requirement for land as a reason for their preference.

5.4.6 Less Cost One submission made reference to Option 2 costing less than Option 1 as a reason for their preference.

5.4.7 Supports Local Businesses One submission noted that Option 2 would support local businesses.

5.5 Other Comments Further comments and suggestions provided by those in favour of Option 2 are listed below. Groynes

Concerned that the Groynes will never be the same and should be considered thoughtfully.

Otukaikino walkway is very popular. Need to consider safe pedestrian access.

Proposal should not impact on the pump house. Would like more details on the plans for the pump house.

A small ramp to the Groynes to service access from the south.

Western Belfast Bypass 11 Public Consultation Submission Analysis Road Improvements

Speed limit reduction on Johns Road to mitigate the shaking of houses at through the night from heavy traffic; and due to growing area from Main North Road to the Groynes.

Trucks will still use Main North Road if there is no provision for a southbound access ramp at Dickeys Road, as would traffic from the eastern area.

Concern with traffic management at Dickeys and Main North Roads intersection.

Northwood Boulevard intended to connect Belfast residents to the WBB and link into Johns and Radcliffe Roads. Query as to why boulevard has been closed off. Noise

Interested to know noise mitigation measures to be undertaken.

General concern with increased noise. Other

Opportunities to improve access, facilities and awareness of the Waimakariri River recreational areas.

Question the one year delay between when planning consent is sought and construction?

Belfast will become more of a community and a more liveable environment.

Construct the bypass as soon as possible.

Full benefit will be realised in conjunction with the Northern Arterial.

Expressions of thanks for the opportunity to participate.

An offer to help with further surveys or traffic counts in the area.

Western Belfast Bypass 12 Public Consultation Submission Analysis 6. Unsure or Neither of the Proposed Locations

Ten submissions were received that selected the ‘unsure / neither’ option provided on the feedback form; however four of these submissions prefer that an on and off-ramp is located at both the Dickeys Road and Johns Road locations. Reasons provided for this preference were as follows:

Service Johns Road area (including the Groynes) and industrial areas;

Greater flexibility to integrate with future property developments;

Easy to detour in the event of an accident. Of the remaining six submissions, two of these explicitly indicated that they did not support either option due to the impact upon the Groynes. One submitter resides in Belfast and the other in the Christchurch area. This latter submitter is specifically concerned about the impacts on the dog park and the lack of information available on how this will be managed. This submitter is in support of the bypass provided that the dog park is conserved. The other four responses that selected ‘unsure / neither’ were from submitters residing in Belfast and from one person living in Kaiapoi. The explanations provided for this selection are as follows:

Traffic management at Dickeys and Main North Roads intersection is not indicated on plans. This intersection requires urgent attention to improve safety.

Prefers to leave decision-making to those more qualified

Requires further and simpler clarification of the full impact of both options on residents and businesses in the Belfast area

Two alternative bypass connections suggested: 1). Traffic to re-enter Johns Road near the Sawyers Arms intersection; and 2). Follow Coutts Island Road so that bypass goes behind Clearwater Resort.

6.1 Other Comments Other comments and suggestions from those that selected the ‘unsure / neither’ option, were received on the following matters:

Dickeys Road location provides connection to Marshlands Road.

Bypass does not fully address future needs or the issues between Clearwater and Hornby.

Solve local traffic issues by creating a free-flowing road around Clearwater and the airport to prevent through-traffic in Belfast.

Need pedestrian and cycle access to the Groynes.

Query as to how people at upper end of Johns Road access their properties.

Cannot prevent more than 10,000 from direct access to the airport and the south.

Southbound off-ramp at the Groynes onto Johns Road would be good

Western Belfast Bypass 13 Public Consultation Submission Analysis 7. Otukaikino Stream Realignment

7.1 Support for the Stream Realignment 134 submissions were received in support of the proposed realignment of the Otukaikino Stream. Three of these were conditional. The locations of those in support of the proposed realignment are shown in Table 6, with Table 7 demonstrating the reasons given in support of the stream realignment. Table 6 – Locations of submitters in support of the stream realignment

Total Belfast Area Rest of ChCh Other Areas Unknown

134 113 13 5 3

Table 7 – Reasons for supporting the stream realignment & locations of submitters per reason

Reason Total Belfast Rest of Other Unkno Area ChCh Areas wn

Less bridge crossings 22 17 2 3

Recreational impacts & 18 12 1 2 1 opportunities ~

Provision of cycling and 9 5 1 2 1 pedestrian access and facilities

Less impact on pedestrian 3 3 traffic

Better for recreational areas 5 5 and outdoor public facilities

River recreational pursuits 1 1 (kayaking)

Sensible or good idea 16 15 1

Cost-savings 13 9 2 1 1

Aids proposed extensions to the 7 5 2 Groynes and Regional Park area

Complements Option 2 / Bypass 7 6 1

Environmental impacts ~ 7

Beneficial to wildlife (distance 4 3 1 from motorway; less stream pollution)

Western Belfast Bypass 14 Public Consultation Submission Analysis Less risk of contamination from 1 1 old sewage ponds and saw mills

Easier stream management 1 1

Little to no impact on the 1 1 environment

No difference or little impact (inc. 4 4 on public)

For all reasons noted in brochure 2 2

Prevents off-ramp at Dickeys Road 1 1

Better for road vehicles 1 1

Opportunities for Belfast expansion 1 1

Less noise impacts on area 1 1

Opportunity to enhance area 1 1

~ Subcategories for the reasons are provided below the main categories. The total figures for the main categories are the sum of the figures for the subcategories.

7.1.1 Other Comments Further comments and suggestions regarding the proposed stream realignment include the following matters:

The stream should follow its original course rather than that illustrated on the consultation material, even if freehold land is required from this submitter for this purpose.

There should be no back-water effects.

The stream should be enhanced to improve the existing trout habitat.

The creation and enhancement of walkways, cycle ways and recreational areas should be incorporated.

Make the works look as natural as possible.

7.2 Opposed to the Stream Realignment Twelve submissions were received that did not support the proposed realignment. Ten submitters reside in the Belfast area and the remaining two have not provided address details. The reasons provided in opposition to the realignment are as follows:

Any loss of land or additional traffic nearby would ruin the enjoyment of the dog park.

Seems unnecessary if the river is to be bridged / still need two bridges whether it is moved or not.

The present course was determined by a flood that could happen again.

Western Belfast Bypass 15 Public Consultation Submission Analysis The Kaputone Stream was destroyed when the water was cut-off to build Northwood. It has never been the same as it was during the last 30 years.

7.3 Unsure regarding the Stream Realignment Twelve submissions were received that were unsure as to whether to support the proposed realignment. Eleven of these submitters reside in the Belfast area and one in another area of Christchurch. The explanations provided for this uncertainty were as follows:

Stream has high recreational and conservation values. Plans will damage this very valuable waterway.

Not sure that ‘mucking around’ with river alignments is a good idea but can understand why it needs to be done. A further three submitters would support the proposal provided that:

The stream is realigned back to its original state and fish-life are not harmed;

The loop walkway around Darroch / reserve / the Groynes remains; and

The South Branch remains accessible.

Western Belfast Bypass 16 Public Consultation Submission Analysis 8. Submissions from Affected Parties

8.1 Submissions from Government Agencies

8.1.1 Environment Canterbury A letter was received from Michael D Rachlin on behalf of Environment Canterbury (ECan) on 26 November 2010. Preference is given to the Johns Road location for the off-ramp (Option 1), as the Dickeys Road location would: x affect ECan’s ability to provide for and enhance the Waimakariri River Regional Park in this area. This includes the provision of land for parks and recreation, the provision of shelter screen planting, car parking and a ranger’s base; and x compromise flood management in the area by blocking an overflow channel. Support is given to the realignment of the Otukaikino Stream for the reasons outlined in the earlier ECan submission. However, ECan has indicated that there are issues that they would like to discuss further including the need not to compromise the drainage of potential flood overflows in the Waimakariri floodplain.

8.1.2 Christchurch City Council A letter was received from Jane Parfitt, General Manager of the City Environment Group, dated 6 December 2010. Preference is given to the Dickeys Road location (Option 2) for the northbound off-ramp for the following reasons: x Option 1 would require a substantial area of the Groynes, in close proximity to the picnic and internal access road and would impact on the existing features and amenity values of the park; x Option 2 may facilitate a more direct route to the proposed business areas in northern and eastern Belfast which would minimise community severance issues caused by heavy vehicles traversing Johns and Main North Roads and be consistent with Belfast Area Plan Objectives 9.2, 11.1 and 11.3 Support is given to the proposed realignment of the Otukaikino Stream. The key reasons for this support is summarised as follows: x High water quality can be retained with the Otukaikino Stream situated further from the proposed WBB and sawmill site than it is currently; x Fewer river crossings will have a greater positive impact on the Groynes; x Opportunities to establish an ecological buffer along the stream, from the Groynes; and x Recreation and ecological area would be located further from the WBB, enabling a range of wildlife and recreational activities along the Otukaikino Stream corridor unaffected by overhead bridges.

Western Belfast Bypass 17 Public Consultation Submission Analysis 8.1.3 Department of Conservation An online reply was received from Kingsley Timpson at the Department of Conservation in response to the consultation material he received. This reply advised that the matter had been forwarded to Bryan Jensen (conservation manager for the project area) for his further consideration. No feedback from Bryan Jensen has been received to date.

8.2 Submissions from Directly Affected Landowners Participation in this round of consultation has been undertaken by the following directly affected landowners (i.e. where land purchase is required):

8.2.1 Environment Canterbury Please see comments under section 8.1.1.

8.2.2 David and Linda Inwood, 4 Dickeys Road David Inwood attended the open day; however a feedback form has not been received. A phone call was received prior to the Open Day regarding concern with traffic management at the Dickeys and Main North Roads intersection; and the absence of a proposed southbound off-ramp located at Dickeys Road. These concerns were discussed during the phone call.

8.2.3 Wells Farm Spencerville Ltd A meeting was held with Geoff and Tim Wells (Wells Farm Spencerville Ltd) on 3 December 2010 with representatives from the NZTA and ECan, and consultants from GHD and Opus in attendance. This discussion primarily concerned land requirement matters.

8.2.4 Other Directly Affected Landowners No other submissions have been identified from directly affected landowners.

8.3 Other Affected Parties in Support of Option 1: Johns Road Submissions were received from the following respondents identified as other parties particularly affected by the proposal:

8.3.1 Bonnie and Steve Cartwright, Owners of 219 on Johns Motor Camp & Motel A feedback form was received from Bonnie and Steve Cartwright on 10 November 2010 and a meeting was held with them on 15 December 2010 with attendees from the NZTA and GHD. The feedback form indicated a preference for Option 1 (Johns Road) to prevent the loss of business from passers-by who desire convenient access. This was reiterated by the submitter during the meeting with thirty percent of business attributed to passing traffic. Other key matters reiterated during the meeting included: x Access for north and southbound traffic to enter and exit their premises; x Maintenance of client access to the Groynes. This includes vehicular access as many guests are elderly and/or have many dogs in trailers so access the Groynes by vehicle; and

Western Belfast Bypass 18 Public Consultation Submission Analysis x Provision of dog walking areas as the motel premises are dog friendly.

8.3.2 Janita and Ivan Prattley, Owners of Chardonnay Motel, 170 Johns Road A feedback from was received from Janita and Ivan Prattley indicating a strong preference for the Johns Road location for the northbound off-ramp (Option 1). This option was viewed as far less detrimental to business at the Chardonnay Motor Lodge than Option 2.

8.3.3 Terry and Louise Donaldson, Operators of Chardonnay Motor Lodge, 170 Johns Road Terry Donaldson attended the open day and a feedback form was received from him and Louise Donaldson prior to his attendance. Preference was given to the Johns Road location (Option 1) for the northbound off-ramp as it would better benefit their business and Johns Road residents. Option 2 would make it difficult for people to locate their premises and they would potentially lose business from travellers coming from the airport.

8.3.4 Ernest and Elise Glad, Owners of Rosebank Estate and Winery, 180 Johns Road A letter was received on 25 November 2010 from Ernest and Elise Glad (Corvest Ltd) in strong support of Option 1 (Johns Road), and a meeting was held with them on 15 December 2010 with attendees from the NZTA and GHD. Option 1 is preferred as it provides easy access to and from the site of their restaurant and winery business, and proposed childcare centre. Site access is a key concern as the day-to-day winery clients are primarily visitors to the Groynes and/or stop-by on their way from the airport. In addition, the catchment for the proposed childcare facility would be from people living locally and those travelling past on their way to work at or around the airport. Option 1 supports satisfactory access to the Groynes and would better service the anticipated growth associated with the development of the ‘Applefields’ site. The submitter went on to state that given that those occupying residences in the Dickeys Road area would be able to utilise a less congested arterial route (Johns Road), Option 1 is not considered disadvantageous to these residents. Conversely, Option 2 is considered by the submitter to inconvenience those residing in the wider Belfast area.

8.3.5 Justin Prain, Johns Road Horticultural Limited A feedback form was received on 17 December 2010 from Justin Prain on behalf of Johns Road Horticultural Ltd. Option 1 (Johns Road) was the preferred location for the northbound off-ramp. In support of this preference, a transport study prepared by Traffic Design Group (TDG) contends that the combined impact of the WBB and the Northern Arterial will dramatically reduce traffic volumes in Belfast, irrespective of the off-ramp locations currently under consideration. Therefore TDG identifies the key issue as ascertaining how the access needs of the majority of Belfast residents can be met. Identifying three key destinations (Northwood/Belfast, Applefields, North Belfast) this high-level review demonstrates that vehicular travel to all these locations is lesser in distance and time via the proposed Johns Road off-ramp location in comparison to journeys via Sawyers Arms Road or the proposed Dickeys Road off-ramp.

Western Belfast Bypass 19 Public Consultation Submission Analysis It is noted that a key disadvantage of the Johns Road off-ramp location is the impact upon the Groynes. In this regard it is suggested that further land is acquired to the east of Johns Road so as to align the bypass further from the Groynes and better accommodate the off-ramp. Support was given to the realignment of the Otukaikino Stream, due to the opportunities provided to integrate walking and stream amenity.

8.3.6 Tim Gould, Southbranch Farm Limited Tim Gould attended the open day and submitted a feedback form in support of Option 1 (Johns Road). The impacts of the WBB on Mr Gould include the need for him to reduce stock numbers; and restricted access to sections of his leasehold land. Option 2 (Dickeys Road) would further interfere with his farming operations and affect the viability of this business. Preference for Option 1 is also given as it will service the larger residential population in the Belfast area. Heavy vehicle traffic to the proposed industrial areas is not considered a concern as these will operate during the day-time, and heavy vehicle traffic on Johns Road is expected to decrease from current levels. Mr Gould does not support the proposed realignment of the Otukaikino Stream as it has been depicted in consultation material. He does however support a proposed realignment provided that it is contained within its previous course (even if this requires small parts of his freehold land). This would eliminate the need for two major river crossings and allow the bypass to be aligned as close as possible to the sawmill, and more significantly – as far from the river as possible over its entire distance. This would enable recreational use of the river to be maintained and enhanced.

8.3.7 Steven Power, Clearwater Golf Club Limited & Clearwater Resort Owners Society The Clearwater Golf Club Board of Directors and the Clearwater Resort Owners Society submitted a letter in support of Option 1 (Johns Road). The primary reason for this preference concerns traffic safety on Clearwater Avenue. Without a northbound off-ramp at Johns Road, it is noted that traffic would need to utilise Clearwater Avenue to access the Groynes – a situation that this submitter outlines is unsuited to this single carriageway. While it is understood that the NZTA is working alongside CCC to develop safe access to the Groynes via Clearwater Avenue; the Board and Committee believe that this would necessitate substantial remodelling of Clearwater Avenue. In addition, a feedback form was received from Steven Power (attached to the letter) in support of Option 1 for similar reasons (high traffic volumes resulting in congestion and safety concerns), but also due to the need to maintain privacy at the resort.

8.3.8 Sue and Robin Clements, Clearview Lodge, 8 Clearwater Avenue A feedback form was received from Sue and Robin Clements in support of Option 1 (Johns Road). Their concerns with Option 2 (Dickeys Road) involve the additional travel distances incurred by their guests who may miss their turn-off and need to back-track ten kilometres; and also those incurred by their neighbour Simon Long (250 Johns Road). Another concern includes an increase in noise. This is due to the expected loss of their shelter trees and road frontage that provides a buffer. It is commented that there is already notable noise at the eastern

Western Belfast Bypass 20 Public Consultation Submission Analysis end of their property. As the road will come closer to their property, it is expected that these noise impacts will increase. This submission is in support of the proposed realignment of the Otukaikino Stream.

8.3.9 Geoff and Maree Saunders, 1 Willowcreek Lane Written submissions were received by post on 10 November 2010 (feedback form and letter), 18 November 2010 (email), and 29 November 2010 (feedback form). Mr and Mrs Saunders support Option 1 (Johns Road). If no other improvement works were to be carried out to their own and their neighbours’ Johns Road access, then their preference is for an off-ramp at Johns Road that provides a U-Turn facility. Their primary concern with Option 2 regards the impact this would have on travel and accessibility to their and other properties off Johns Road. Destinations such as central Belfast and the Clearwater Resort and Golf Club would involve substantially increased distances and travel times should Option 2 be implemented. This is due to the proposed left-in and left-out property access (with no U-Turn facility) associated with Option 2. Other concerns include property devaluation; and a potential service lane that would locate the WBB another twenty metres into their property. These concerns were discussed at a meeting held on 24 November 2010. With regards to project design, the further options for investigation discussed included: x The possible extension of the WBB project to include the Clearwater roundabout (which is within the ‘Johns to Groynes Four-Laning’); and x The possible use of an existing right of way and paper road from Clearwater Drive to provide an alternative access to the Saunders and Koh properties. In addition, Mr Saunders has identified a number of residents also affected by his concerns with which he has suggested a group meeting be organised for further consultation. These residents include Robin and Sue Clements; Simon; James and Mary Koh; and Grant and Angela Silvester. Mr and Mrs Saunders are in support of the proposed realignment of the Otukaikino Stream.

8.3.10 James and Mary Koh, Owners of 11 Willowcreek Lane James and Mary Koh are in support of Option 1 (Johns Road) due to direct access from their property to destinations such as the city, airport and Clearwater. Option 2 (Dickeys Road) would result in substantial detours to access these same destinations. An additional concern includes the devaluation of their property. Further concerns can be noted from the submission summary for Geoff and Maree Saunders. James and Mary Koh support the proposed realignment of the Otukaikino Stream.

Western Belfast Bypass 21 Public Consultation Submission Analysis 8.4 Other Affected Parties in Support of Option 2: Dickeys Road

8.4.1 Ting Leong Lee, Eminence Investments Limited Ting Leong Lee returned a feedback form in support of Option 2 (Dickeys Road) as this option achieves the purpose of the bypass – traffic reduction on Johns Road. Option 1 (Johns Road) is not considered preferable due to its visual impact on the Groynes; visual and noise impact on surrounding residences; impacts upon the proposed development to the east of Groynes Drive; and the potential expense incurred by the NZTA to acquire land to develop this option. Key concerns relating to the land owned by Eminence Investments Ltd. include the following: x The revised alignment encroaches more onto their land than that proposed in March 2010; x The additional height will have greater visual and noise impacts upon their development; x Additional land acquisition will affect their land value; and x Measures should be taken to ensure the bypass is aligned as far west as possible to avoid the need for additional land to buffer the increased exposure of the development to the bypass.

Western Belfast Bypass 22 Public Consultation Submission Analysis 9. Summary

9.1 The Preferred Option In total 180 written responses were received on the proposed options. Option 1 received 77 submissions of support and Option 2 received 79. A further six submissions selected ‘unsure/neither’ for the location of the proposed bypass and eleven submissions indicated that a north-bound off-ramp at both locations is preferred. The overwhelming reason given in support of Option 1 concerned accessibility – direct access primarily to residences, shopping centres, and other businesses; but also to the Groynes and the airport. In contrast, the primary reasons given in support of Option 2 were a reduction in traffic volumes along Main North and Johns Roads; and the lesser impact of this option on the Groynes. Of the 14 directly affected and nearby landowners and that provided feedback, 11 preferred Option 1, with three preferring Option 2. Option 1 was favoured for reasons primarily relating to the maintenance of property access. The three landowner submissions in support of Option 2 cited the reduced impact on the Groynes as a primary reason for their preference; however one of these submitters also noted potential impacts on his proposed residential development as influencing this preference.

9.2 The Stream Realignment 158 responses were received on the proposed realignment of the Otukaikino Stream. Support for this proposal was provided by 134 submissions, with twelve submissions opposed to the proposal and another twelve uncertain. The most cited reason given in support of the proposal was that there would be fewer bridge crossings, reduced costs resulting in less of an impact on wildlife and stream pollution and facilitating the ability to provide safer pedestrian and cycle access. The other primary reason for this support was reduced impacts on and opportunities to provide for enhanced recreational areas and facilities.

Western Belfast Bypass 23 Public Consultation Submission Analysis Appendix A Consultation Brochure

Western Belfast Bypass 26 Public Consultation Submission Analysis Christchurch Motorways Consultation October 2010 Roads of national significance

Update on previous consultation Christchurch Motorways

The NZTA undertook consultation in • the loss of land from the dog park the construction of the highway would require only a minor amount of land from the dog park March 2010, and sought feedback on four • safety at the interim intersection with at its south-western and north-eastern extents options for the WBB – two full bypass and Dickeys Road / Main North Road Consultation and it is not as significant as had been first two lower-cost interim bypass options. • noise envisaged by the petition authors. Western Belfast Bypass October 2010 The NZTA liaised with targeted stakeholders, Consequently, the majority of the concerns • impact on property values distributed newsletters to residents and raised in the petition have been addressed. • potential for a diversion of the Otukaikino attended local meetings (eg the Groynes In general, positive support for the highway was Stream Recreational Area Annual Users meeting). An gained from the community, with the preferred open day was also held on 18 March 2010. Over • maintaining the ecological values of the option being the long-term alignment option 150 people attended and this turnout was the land around the proposed highway (1B) that avoids the sawmill and former What is being proposed? result of public notices placed in local oxidation ponds, and provides a direct Public open days • potential disruption to business. newspapers, signs in the Groynes and an connection to the Northern Motorway. After invitation that was distributed to key As part of the feedback, a petition concerning further consideration, the NZTA is now stakeholders and over 600 properties within The NZTA is holding a public open day the impacts of the highway on the dog park progressing with this alignment option. The NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) is seeking feedback the Belfast area. to discuss the proposed options and within the Groynes Recreational Area was The NZTA is very grateful for the feedback on the preferred option for the proposed Western received. A subsequent on-site meeting was seek community feedback on the The consultation produced 413 responses, provided earlier this year and wishes to thank arranged with the petition organiser and others Belfast Bypass (WBB). proposed project. Information on two which provided the NZTA with valuable those who provided feedback and attended the to discuss the impact of the highway on the dog RoNS projects in the Belfast area will be feedback and direction from the community. public open day. The WBB runs from Johns Road (near supporting economic growth, reducing Key issues raised in the feedback included: park. At this meeting, the NZTA clarified that the Groynes Recreational Park congestion and improving safety in our available for discussion at the open day. intersection) and connects to the region. These two projects are: existing Northern Motorway, north of This newsletter outlines the progress of the • the Western Belfast Bypass Belfast. project and reports on the outcomes of the • the Northern Arterial & QEII Drive The WBB will reduce traffic on Johns Road public consultation undertaken in March Four-Laning. What happens next? What do you think? and Main North Road, thereby reducing 2010. It also discusses the two options congestion and making travel times more currently being considered for the location of NZTA staff and the project consultants predictable. By reducing traffic on those a northbound off-ramp and the option of The NZTA is now seeking feedback on The NZTA would like to know what you think about the options for the location of the will present plans and be available to roads, the WBB will also make cycling and diverting part of the Otukaiino Stream. The discuss the options for these projects. this proposal, with specific input northbound off-ramp and proposed diversion of the Otukaikino Stream. walking more attractive in Belfast and NZTA is seeking feedback on these options. sought on the location of the The time and location is: Please provide feedback to the NZTA no later than Friday 26 November 2010 by one improve the reliability of public transport on northbound off-ramp and the Main North Road. Current walking and of the methods below: Tuesday 16 November 2010 proposed stream realignment. cycling tracks within the Groynes will also be What’s inside? maintained. Attend an open day Page 2 Project overview plan 3.30 to 7.30pm – Belfast Rugby Following this further consultation, the Clubrooms (18 March Place, Belfast) Feedback forms will be available to complete at the open day. The WBB is an important link in the Page 4 Update on previous preferred option will be developed and Christchurch Western Corridor and has been finalised around March 2011. A period Post the completed feedback form consultation identified as part of the government’s seven What happens next? Fill in your comments, include contact details so that we can keep you informed of of detailed design will then follow, with roads of national significance (RoNS) What do you think? the necessary planning consent the project progress, fold and tape the edges together before posting. programme. The RoNS are critical for approvals sought mid to late 2011. Email feedback to: [email protected] Construction of the bypass is still Use the online submission form on the project website: some time away. The earliest date for www.nzta.govt.nz/westernbelfastbypass commencing construction works is 2013.

Our contact details

For more information, contact: Ryan Cooney Mary O’Callahan NZ Transport Agency GHD Ltd 03 963 3224 03 378 0926 [email protected] [email protected]

Belfast area looking south towards the proposed Western Belfast Bypass alignment (indicative)

NZ Transport Agency October 2010 Christchurch Motorways Consultation

Options for the northbound off-ramp Option 2: No off-ramp at Johns Road Option 2: Off-ramp at Dickeys Road Option 2 – Dickeys Road location Further design work and safety analysis has been undertaken This option includes locating the northbound off-ramp at since the previous consultation and identified safety concerns Dickeys Road, with no off-ramp at the Johns Road intersection. DICKEYS ROAD with the traffic signals previously proposed at the intersection of SERVICE LANE On-ramp Northbound traffic accessing the Belfast area would use the Johns Road and the WBB. With traffic signals, there would be a Dickeys Road off-ramp or the Sawyers Arms Road intersection. high risk of crashes due to the high travel speeds on the highway. Northbound traffic heading to the Groynes would use an Consequently, this intersection was subject to more detailed Off-ramp upgraded access from Clearwater Avenue. investigations as the project progressed. JOHNS RD Advantages The NZTA has been investigating an underpass in this area and • No off-ramp at Johns Road means less land is required from the Groynes Recreational area the nature of the potential on and off-ramps. People travelling GROYNES ACCESS RD from the Belfast area who want to access the Groynes will use an • Lower embankments and retaining walls in the vicinity of underpass that goes beneath the highway and there will be an the Groynes as the underpass will be of a lower height (3 metres) on-ramp from Johns Road onto the highway for people wishing to • Less visual impacts of the highway on Groynes users travel south towards the city and airport from Belfast. There is no southbound off-ramp proposed at Johns Road, as southbound • Improved access to Northern Belfast, future industrial land DICKEYS ROAD for Belfast and the Chaneys Industrial Area traffic from the north of the city will use the Main North Road OTUKAIKINO STREAM off-ramp. • Reduction of vehicles along Johns Road and Main North Road, including heavy vehicles travelling to industrial areas Two options are being investigated for a northbound off-ramp. The NZTA seeks your feedback on the two northbound off-ramp Disadvantages options, outlined below: • Travel times for Johns Road residents would increase DOG PARK AREA slightly as either Sawyers Arms Road or Dickeys Road Option 1 – Off-ramp at Johns Road, no off-ramp at Dickeys Road would become the connection into Belfast • Minor increases of traffic on local roads Option 2 – Off-ramp at Dickeys Road, no off-ramp at Johns Road • No direct access to the Groynes from the south

1 N POTENTIAL CYCLE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO GROYNES MAIN NORTH ROAD 1 MOTORWAY JOHNS ROAD GROYNESDRIVE CHRISTCHURCH NORTHERN

Option 1 – Johns Road location Otukaikino Stream diversion

The NZTA is also seeking feedback on the Option 1: Off-ramp at Johns Road Retaining wall / embankment Option 1: No off-ramp at Dickeys Road STREAM REALIGNMENT FOLLOWING PATH OF OLD Off-ramp 1 proposed realignment of the Otukaikino Stream near Dickeys Road. This proposal is to divert the OTUKAIKINO STREAM DICKEYS ROAD 1 Otukaikino Stream back to its original course New walkways and cycle access On-ramp within an extended regional SERVICE LANE approximately 100m north of the highway. It will JOHNS ROAD rejoin the current stream course close to the DICKEYS RD park existing Northern Motorway.

JOHNS RD Advantages • The diversion will complement the bypass Existing Otukaikino Stream MAINROAD NORTH alignment GROYNES DRIVE alignment by reducing the number of highway bridges across the Otukaikino This option includes locating the northbound off-ramp at the Johns Road intersection and having no off-ramp at Dickeys Road. People stream travelling north on the bypass would be able to exit onto Johns Road, using the off-ramp, and then travel into Belfast. • Provides an opportunity for better integration of the highway with proposed extensions to the Groynes and Regional Park areas – eg proposed cyclelanes, walkways and landscape plantings Advantages Disadvantages • Provides for managed riparian (stream-side) restoration of the Otukaikino Stream in this area • Direct access to Johns Road from the highway • High embankments and retaining walls in the vicinity of the • A high clearance underpass (6 metres) for traffic accessing Groynes Recreational Area Johns Road from the highway • More land required from the Groynes Recreational Area Disadvantages • Direct access to the Groynes from the highway (northbound) • Heavy vehicles will have to use Johns Road and Main North Road • A new stream channel will need to be constructed – however, any potential effects can be mitigated with good construction to access industrial land at Chaneys and future industrial land in techniques and extensive riparian plantings and restoration Northern Belfast

NZ Transport Agency October 2010 Appendix B Submissions Summary

Western Belfast Bypass 27 Public Consultation Submission Analysis Receipt Details Respondent Contact Details Northbound Off-Ramp Location Preference Stream Realignment Privacy & Participation Comments Date Method Name and Organisation Address Phone Email Option 1 Johns Option 2 Dickeys Unsure/ Neither Yes No Unsure/ Neither Exclude Feedback Contact Further Explanation for Location Preference Explanation for Otukaikino Option Selection Other Comments 3/11/2010 Form Rcvd Brian Thrush 635a Springs Road 03 344 3088 [email protected] X Y Does not want access to the Groynes cut-off to people to the south m of the bypass. 3/11/2010 Form Rcvd Wayne Robinson 6A Florance Place 03 383 8300 waynejrobinson@hot X N X Dog owners who are regular users of the Groynes. Any loss of Dog owners who are regular users of the Groynes. Has been going to the Groynes for 30 years and loves it. mail.com land or additional traffic nearby would ruin the enjoyment. Any loss of land or additional traffic nearby would Concerned that it will never be the same. ruin the enjoyment. 3/11/2010 Form Rcvd K.J Cooper 1 Stable Way 03 323 5545 [email protected]. X Y X Johns Road off-ramp would push heavy traffic back into One bridge rather than two. Management of a nz residential areas, thus defeating the purpose of the WBB. Cost straight rather than meandering stream makes savings in land and development would be significant. common sense.

3/11/2010 Form Rcvd No name or contact details X Y X Better access to northern Belfast area Logical in relation to cost-saving and with good management will enhance the area. 3/11/2010 Form Rcvd Tony Bisset 81 Charles Street 03 313 446 bisset.buuch@slingsh X Y Better sense considering traffic volumes using the off-ramp. The Realignment would be the cheaper option. The proposed bypass should be located / constructed with ot.co.nz Groynes is popular & therefore requires greater access than minimal impact on the Dog Park area. Dickeys Rd which has minimal traffic. 3/11/2010 Form Rcvd Ross Roberts 337 Coutts Island Road 03 323 5740 X X X Extremely concerned with the safety of the Dickeys and Main Stream has high recreational value for fishermen Urgent attention is required to improve the safety of the Dickeys North Rds intersection. Plans do not show how this intersection and a high conservation value. Plans will damage and Main North Rds intersection. These plans do not improve the will cope with the traffic from the off-ramp. this very valuable waterway. situation. 3/11/2010 Form Rcvd Tony Westley 47b Johns Road 03 323 6583 [email protected] X X To stop trucks travelling pass so often which makes turning into driveway very dangerous. 3/11/2010 Form Rcvd Dianne O'Bryan 335b Burwood Road 03 383 9138 X Y X May increase traffic on local roads, but this is likely to be cars Aids with the improvements and extensions to the rather than heavy vehicles. Also less of an impact on the Groynes and regional parks. Less bridges may cut Groynes. Believes it is important to retain large areas for down on construction costs, funding that could be recreation. directed to the upgrade of the Groynes and regional parks.

3/11/2010 Form Rcvd DE & JM Ward 97B Johns Road, Belfast 03 323 6303 X Y X Less heavy traffic to disturb sleep and peace. Looks like the better option. Sooner done the better for the area. 3/11/2010 Form Rcvd Mrs. Vicki Macioce 690 Main North Road, Belfast 03 323 8374 None Selected None Selected None Selected Y X No option selected Would reduce vehicles along Johns and Main North Roads 3/11/2010 Form Rcvd R Valentine 635a Springs Road 021 703 652 [email protected] X Y Access to the Groynes from the South is vital and should be om maintained. The Groynes are for all. 3/11/2010 Form Rcvd No name or contact details X Y 4/11/2010 Form Rcvd GM Thompson 24 Monaghan Street, Belfast 03 323 6426 X Y X Option 1 will make very little difference to the volumes of Best option for road vehicles and for recreational Nothing is perfect. Full benefit to Belfast will not accrue until the northbound heavy traffic on Johns and Main North Roads. areas. Northern Arterial is in use. 9/11/2010 Form Rcvd Mrs J Cramorel 17 Tahi Place, Belfast 03 358 0103 X Y Time savings Have both proposed off-ramps 9/11/2010 Form Rcvd No name or contact details X N Prevents confusion regarding on/off ramp access and also Seems unnecessary direct access to the Groynes 9/11/2010 Form Rcvd Jim Arps 85 Englefield Road, Belfast 03 323 8811 X Y Enables traffic to enter Belfast shopping area One less bridge 9/11/2010 Form Rcvd Jim Sherwin 32 Pewter Place, Northwood 03 323 5267 X Y 9/11/2010 Form Rcvd Norman Daly 12A Third Street, Belfast 03 323 7493 X No option selected 9/11/2010 Form Rcvd I W Leeder 6 Darroch Street, Belfast 03 323 6137 X No option selected 9/11/2010 Form Rcvd Lisa Van Maaren 17 Burnridge Place, Belfast X Y Diverts heavy traffic away from the Belfast town centre 9/11/2010 Form Rcvd Angela Lagan Street, Belfast Neither Leave as is - especially as the road will impact upon the No option selected Leave as is - especially as the road will impact upon the Groynes Groynes 9/11/2010 Form Rcvd Tom Gorman 12 Marble Court, Northwood 03 323 9344 [email protected] X Y Johns Road looks to be the better option.

9/11/2010 Form Rcvd Mrs. F Hudson 39 Darroch Street, Belfast 03 323 8470 X Y For all the advantages noted in the newsletter Good idea in general. Would complement Dickeys Rd off-ramp location. 9/11/2010 Form Rcvd Alan Arps F2/8 Darroch Street, Belfast 03 323 8215 X Y 9/11/2010 Form Rcvd Paul van der Merwe 42 Kildare Street, Belfast 03 323 4026 X Y Less traffic around the Groynes will maintain peaceful Better opportunities to integrate recreational facilities atmosphere. Cleaner traffic flow with less potential for accidents. with the Groynes. Cost-effective. More opportunities Easier & safer bicycle access to the Groynes from Belfast. for further Belfast expansion.

9/11/2010 Form Rcvd Neil Hawker 8a Thompsons Road 03 323 8424 X Y X For all the advantages noted in the newsletter. Preserve the For all the advantages noted in the newsletter. Prefer Supports the bypass - Belfast will benefit from not havnig heavy Groynes - regular walkers and do not wish to cross heavy traffic the stream and associated tracks to not pass under traffic and noise and will become more of a community in the long- lanes. Otukaikino walk is very popular. Will bring traffic back the motorway. term. down Main North Road which will support local business.

9/11/2010 Form Rcvd Helen Murphy 6B Kaputone Place 03 371 9183 X Y X Reduction of vehicles along Johns and Main North roads. Less Good idea to divert back to original course; however land taken from the Groynes. do not want it to mess up the re-establishment of Kaputone Stream as has taken 10 years to get a decent flow again.

9/11/2010 Form Rcvd Brian Palmer 36 Millstream Drive 03 354 9246 [email protected] X Y X Direct access to heart of Belfast and Shopping Mall. 85-90% of Makes sense. Sure it will be done to look as natural residents live to the south of Dickeys Road. as possible. 9/11/2010 Form Rcvd Jurgen Suppan 64 Johns Road 03 323 4415 [email protected] X Y X Prefers both locations. How can people at upper end of Johns M Road reach their properties? Cannot cut off more than 10,000 people from direct access to airport and to the south. Receipt Details Respondent Contact Details Northbound Off-Ramp Location Preference Stream Realignment Privacy & Participation Comments Date Method Name and Organisation Address Phone Email Option 1 Johns Option 2 Dickeys Unsure/ Neither Yes No Unsure/ Neither Exclude Feedback Contact Further Explanation for Location Preference Explanation for Otukaikino Option Selection Other Comments 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Dean Strang 59 Lagan Street 03 420 4200 [email protected] X Y People currently take short-cut through Northwood streets to Cost-effective with little to no impact on the public. om avoid traffic at MNR/Johns intersection and at Sawyers Arms Rd. Dickeys Rd location would increase use of these shortcuts.

10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Stewart Holdem 791 Main North Road 027 486 2402 [email protected] X Y X Prefers both locations - better access to Belfast and Northwood. Sensible and will look good. Balance traffic flows. Easy to detour if there is an accident. More flexibility to integrate with future property deveopments. Both options take heavy traffic off Main North Road.

10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Geoff & Maree Saunders 1 Willowcreek Lane 03 323 9010 [email protected] X Y X Dickeys Road option is not in Belfast so is grossly inconvenient. Makes sense. It would also involve loss of property values in the area at a great cost to NZTA and owners. 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Steve Cartwright, 219 on Johns 219 Johns Road 027 664 4506 [email protected] X X Prevent loss of business - Dickeys Rd off-ramp would require Access requirements for Johns Rd ramp location as already Motel .nz potential guests to double-back which is unlikely to appeal. noted. Would like to meet further with planners to discuss Have requirements for Johns Road location - access in and out concerns. Need to know why a roundabout has not been of business for north and south bound traffic. Many guests are proposed at the location of the proposed underpass. elderly and/or have many dogs in trailer so drive across to the Groynes.

10/11/2010 Form Rcvd No name or contact details X Y 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd MF & LS Gibson 6 Riegler Place, Belfast 03 323 6694 GibsonFamily@clear. X Y X Reduction of traffic on MNR/ diversion of heavy trucks behind Allows more outdoor facilities to be available to the Concerned with potential noise. Interested to know noise mitigation net.nz Belfast housing areas. public plans to reduce impact of noise on residents. 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd William Lambie 45a Johns Road, Belfast 03 323 8557 [email protected] X X Y X Has selected both options. Okay for those who live on Johns Road and other streets nearby. 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd C. Ouwetketk 3 Englefield Road, Belfast 03 323 9354 X X Is eighty years old and prefers to leave decisions to other Is eighty years old and prefers to leave decisions to people who this person believes are more qualified. other people who this person believes are more qualified. 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Bruce Luke 13 Donegal Street, Belfast 03 323 8738 Bruce+Sue.BLC@xtra X N Less heavy traffic through Belfast Leave as is. Believes the present course of the The sooner the bypass is built the better. .co.nz stream was determined by a flood which can happen again. 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Merv Phillips 16 Sefton Street, Belfast 027 696 2149 [email protected] X none selected Easier access to Belfast No option selected om 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Kevin Allen 243 Tuahiwi Road, Kaiapoi 03 358 1447 [email protected]. X none selected Suggested two options for bypass connections: 1. Traffic to re- nz enter Johns Road near the Sawyers Arms intersection. 2. Follow Coutts Island Road so bypass goes behind Clearwater

10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Shane & Helen Campbell 779 Main North Road, Belfast 03 323 9230 X Y Less land required from the Groynes; access to northern Will complement bypass Bypass long overdue. Will create a more liveable environment - Belfast; traffic reduction along Johns and Main North Roads; less traffic, less noise, less shaking to homes from trucks and Opportunities to improve access, faciltities and awareness of the easier access to and from properties. Waimakariri River recreational areas.

10/11/2010 Form Rcvd No name or contact details X Y Groynes too valuable to lose land and be disfigured. Motorway Great idea. should go to the industrial area in northern Belfast.

10/11/2010 Form Rcvd David Knutson 9 Wayside Ave, Burnside 03 358 4483 X Y Johns Road location has complicated engineering. Not cost- Supports the reasons noted in the newsletter. effective for small number of users going to west Belfast. North- bound traffic to Belfast can use Sawyers Arms/Gardiners/ Styx Mill Roads. A connection between Northwood Blvd and Johns Rd would provide another route to Groynes and West Belfast. Retain Groynes Drive

10/11/2010 Form Rcvd I.K & P.J Stark 47 Rushmore Drive, Belfast 03 323 7377 [email protected] X Y X Reduced number of bridges. Opportunities for cycleways and walkways. 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Phillip Moore, Belfast Traders 774 Main North Road 03 323 8839 [email protected] X Y X Less land required from the Groynes; improved access to Supports due to reduction in highway bridges .nz northern Belfast. crossing stream and returning stream to its original course. 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Graham Pullan 12A Castile Place, Belfast 021 713 992 X Y Access to residence in Belfast. Would like both off-ramp Supportive. locations. 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd J & N Fulton 82 Johns Road, Belfast 03 323 8897 X Y X Would make Belfast a much more desirable place to live in. Go ahead as soon as possible - first suggested a bypass 30 years ago but unfortunately may not be residents by the time it comes to fruition.

10/11/2010 Form Rcvd No name or contact details X Y Better for trucks. Embankment not as high. 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Bob Ogilvie 42B Third Street, Belfast 027 332 3408 X Y Best access to residence in east Belfast. Heavy vehicles going Good as no major construction or ecological north can still bypass MNR but local industries can still be changes are needed. accessed by MNR. Access to the Groynes is maintained as at present.

10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Gary Tavendale 9 Donegal Street, Belfast 03 323 7132 X Y 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Brent & Rachel Hefford 3 Springbrook Lane, Northwood 03 323 4141 [email protected] X Y X Less impact on the Groynes (regular users). Prefer less heavy Seems reasonable to put back to orignal course. Happy for project to start ASAP as traffic congestion heading into o.nz traffic on Johns as house backs onto Johns Rd. town is now unreasonable. Receipt Details Respondent Contact Details Northbound Off-Ramp Location Preference Stream Realignment Privacy & Participation Comments Date Method Name and Organisation Address Phone Email Option 1 Johns Option 2 Dickeys Unsure/ Neither Yes No Unsure/ Neither Exclude Feedback Contact Further Explanation for Location Preference Explanation for Otukaikino Option Selection Other Comments 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd AA & SR McNabb 93 Northwood Boulevard, 03 323 5625 [email protected] X Y More central for both Belfast and Northwood areas Northwood o.nz 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Sandra Woods 735A Main North Road, Belfast 03 323 7338 X Y Better access to Belfast for goods vehicles (esp. from Hornby Less bridges required, looks good and potentially and Airport) servicing shops. Better access to residences and cost-effective. for travelling to and from airport. 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd D & J Keast 18 Langley Place 03 323 6672 X Explicitly Unsure X Pointless to cross MNR/ Dickeys Rd intersection to come back to Belfast if located at Dickeys Rd 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd No name or contact details X Dickeys Road location too far to come back to Belfast 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Gillian Koster 37 Shenley Drive 03 323 7447 X Y Heavy vehicles off main road through suburb; alternative dog Doesn't really make much difference if returning to park on Husseys Road that locals can use; aid congestion relief original site on MNR 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd George Hemopo 19 Tisch Place, Belfast 03 323 7146 diana.hemopo@cante X X X Easier access off highway The Kaputone Stream was destroyed (never the Bypass proposal is very good as congestion at peak times is rbury.ac.nz same as was during the 30 years that have been becoming a nightmare. residents) when water was cut-off when Northwood was built.

10/11/2010 Form Rcvd R H Poynter 18A Sneyd St, Kaiapoi 03 327 6078 X X Y 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd R M Booler 21A Belfast Road 03 323 5502 X Y On and off-ramps at both Dickeys and Johns Roads locations is best. Comments that Johns Rd on & off ramp is best suited for Belfast residents. 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Paul Starling P O Box 759, Rangiora 027 432 9770 X Y X Enables traffic from the city to use the Groynes and return using Reduces cost due to less bridges. the main road. 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd R E Anderson 15A Clealand Street, Belfast 03 323 9266 X Y 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Peter Bramhall 8 Ballymena Drive, Belfast 03 323 6651 X Y Resides in Belfast. More convenient access. Less bridges and less noise. Wildlife safer away from motorway. 10/11/2010 Form Rcvd Paul & Nikki Dumelon 2 Springwater Ave, Belfast 03 354 1404 [email protected] X Y X Saves Groynes recreational land; less visual impact on Johns Opportunities for recreational facilities: - would like Rd residences; traffic reduction along MNR & Johns Rd; better cycleways through NW ChCh; dangerous reduction in heavy vehicles using Johns Rd; noise reduction for riding on Johns Rd due to heavy traffic & trucks; Johns Rd residences. would like extended recreational area and activities within the Groynes - great for picnics and walking dogs.

15/11/2010 Form Rcvd B Wolfe 14 Shenley Drive 03 323 8778 X Y X Any motorway must have an on and off ramp so as to service Small sacrifice for a large roading system. This is a stop gap project. ChCh needs the linking of the northern the area. Realignment will be the same if not better than and southern motorways overhead through ChCh with on/off currently. ramps to the suburbs and city. We New Zealanders seem to do things on the cheap and don't look towards the future. For example the Main Arterial Route was proposed by Mayor Guthrey back in the 70s. If this was implemented then there would not be the present problems (and expense).

29/11/2010 Form Rcvd Andrew & Claire Hill 16 Innisfree Pl, Northwood 03 323 7388 [email protected] X X X X Makes sense to have an on and off ramp at Johns Rd so as to Leave it as it is - natural. service the area. Off ramp at Dickeys Rd will assist with proposed industrial area/vehicles can use "Smiths hire' exit to get into industrial area.

1/12/2010 Form Rcvd Adrian Low Clearwater 03 358 1135 [email protected] X Did not answer X Reduction of vehicles along Johns Rd, industry heavy vehicles z travelling to industrial area. Turning right from Clearwater to Johns Rd will be easier. 1/12/2010 Form Rcvd Whatley 17 Innisfree Pl, Northwood 03 323 8004 [email protected] X Y X Less disruption to Groynes & less heavy traffic on Johns Rd. To compliment the bypass If heavy traffic is to remain on Johns Rd it is imperative that the speed limit is reduced as it goes all through the night and shakes houses not only on Johns Rd but in the immediate vicinity as well

1/12/2010 Form Rcvd Kevin O'Connor 14 Sefton St, Belfast 03 323 7189 [email protected]. X Y X The off ramp traffic noise, pollution, build-up which will be Anytime natural water courses are allowed to follow Thank you for the opportunity herein to express an opinion on nz inevitable at peak hours, is better dealt with in less built up areas their own directions as much as possible, the less these matters. (Dickeys Rd). During the lengthly construction period, the likely we are to suffer unexpected subsequential disruption is also better handled at Dickeys Rd. outcomes.

29/11/2010 Form Rcvd Maree Saunders 1 Willowcreek Lane, Northwood 03 323 9010 maree- X Y X Option 2 will greatly affect property value and is far too It makes sense. [email protected] inconvenient as it will involve driving 7km through 3 traffic signals to equal the current right turn from our drive. 1/12/2010 Form Rcvd X X X As we live near all that is happening. On-ramp/off-ramp would suit. 1/12/2010 Form Rcvd Mark & Paula Brown 57 Applefield Court, Northwood 03 366 1681 [email protected] X Y X X The advantages of this option significantly out-weigh the Probably less expensive than building road bridge z advantages of the Johns Rd off-ramp option over stream. Receipt Details Respondent Contact Details Northbound Off-Ramp Location Preference Stream Realignment Privacy & Participation Comments Date Method Name and Organisation Address Phone Email Option 1 Johns Option 2 Dickeys Unsure/ Neither Yes No Unsure/ Neither Exclude Feedback Contact Further Explanation for Location Preference Explanation for Otukaikino Option Selection Other Comments 30/11/2010 Form Rcvd Louise & Terry Donaldson 170 Johns Rd, Belfast 03 323 8224 [email protected] X X (Unsure) X Better for our business and all residents of Johns Rd. If the Why can't we have a roundabout to get on and off Johns Rd as z closest off-ramp is at Dickeys Rd we will loose business from you are planning at Clearwater? Would be a cheaper option. travellers leaving the airport. May be difficult for anyone to find Currently many roundabouts on SH1 so why not feasible with us if the off-ramp is Dickeys Rd. bypass? Still very concerned about overall negative impact bypass will have on Groynes. Like to know if there will be any change to our entrance off Johns Rd and any change to The Groynes that may interfer with our guests access to it.

30/11/2010 Form Rcvd Connie Koskinen 14B Thompsons, Belfast 0273 629 363 X X (unsure) X Is unsure, would like further and simpler clarification and clearer Unsure as to what the benefits/pitfalls would be. Please advise on the full impact both options would have on picture of both options. residents and businesses in the area and redo plans to a simple understanding of both options.

29/11/2010 Form Rcvd Richard Smith PO Box 5, Christchurch 03 379 2430 r.smith@duncancotteri X X X Groynes visitors use Johns Rd entrance. Option 1 will allow that ll.com to continue particularly for north bound traffic. result; less cars driving through the Groynes (if other access is off Clearwater Ave) = safer for all Groynes users. Clearwater Ave not designed for large increase in vehicle numbers that will arise if the Johns Rd off-ramp is not constructed. Already been close misses on Clearwater Ave due to the road bends. Road not designed for thousands of cars per day going to the Groynes.

29/11/2010 Form Rcvd Andrew & Charlotte McGuire 19 Ballymena Dr, Belfast 03 323 7009 grizzmcguire@hotmail. X Y X Dickeys Rd option will have less of an impact on the Groynes, To reduce the amount of highway bridges across the com will require less land and have less of a visual impact for stream which should decrease pollution into the residents. It will decrease Johns Rd and Main North Rd traffic. stream. If it allows Groynes park area to be extended Doesn’t think travel times will increase significantly for residents it is a positve move. Should limit the effect of pollution and there are many routes to the Groynes from the south. for wildlife. Advantages for this option greatly out-weigh disadvantages for Johns Rd off-ramp.

29/11/2010 Form Rcvd T Bryan 763 Main North Rd, Belfast 03 323 8340 [email protected] X X X Prefer Johns Rd location as we live on Main North Road on LHS going north so would benefit us more than Dickeys Rd off- ramp. Form Rcvd Ivan Hibberd 784 Main North Rd, Belfast 03 323 8769 n/a X Y X Advantages as outlined. Concerned about junction of Dickies, Ovbious solution. Would like a more detailed drawing of the Pump Shed House the motorway and Main North Rd. idea. The bypass should not impinge on the above. The Pump House epitamises the farming industry Belfast area and beyond.

29/11/2010 Form Rcvd Steven Power PO Box 14069, Christchurch Airport 03 360 2140 steven.power@clearw X Y X Safety and traffic flow issues if Clearwater Ave is the main Reduction of number of bridges along the highway. Refer to Master Consultation Database for attached letter. aternz.com access road to the Groynes with high traffic volumes and associated traffic accidents on this road. Issues with maintaining privacy at the resort.

29/11/2010 Form Rcvd Lois Bilton 4/7 Donegal Street, Belfast 03 323 6051 n/a X Y X Much easier for trucks and traffic from north. Worry if no off- It will require only one bridge. A one who uses ramp they will still go through Belfast. walkway through that area daily, it seems it will be easier. 29/11/2010 Form Rcvd Penny & Mike Coggan 5 Springbrook Lane, Northwood 03 352 5940 penelopecoggan@hot X Y X Less traffic and noise along Johns Rd. Less residential at mail.com Dickeys Rd. Preservation of Groynes recretion area. 29/11/2010 Form Rcvd Lisa Lemon & Nick Van Eijk 8 Purakanui Place, Belfast 0272 474 920 n/a X Y X X Why is there a years delay (minimum) once planning consent approvals have been sought, to start date?? Thankyou. 26/11/2010 Form Rcvd J Challies 55A Tyrone Street, Belfast 03 323 7778 [email protected] X Y X It will lower the volume of traffic passing through Belfast. In keeping with other alterations. I attended the information day at Rugby rooms and found all .nz Facilitate easier access to southern motorway and airport people very helpful and well informed. 6/12/2010 Letter Rcvd Jane Parfitt (CCC Staff) X Y Greater detrimental effect due to area of Groynes used and Greater positive effects on Groynes. Retain high Any development with WBB not to have run-off/environmental impact on features and visual amenity of Groynes. Option 2 water quality by moving away from WBB and saw effects on water quality. CCC want involvement in could provide direct route for business traffic in proposed mill. Limit amount of river crossing and development/concept planning for area of alignment/effects on business areas (northern and eastern Belfast). Reduce culverts/bridges required. Opportunity for area if Dickeys Rd is chosen. Pubic access needs to be community severence issues (heavy vehicles) and consistent Establishing ecological buffer along stream and from considered throughout design. Council staff welcome opportunity with Belfast Area Plan Objectives 9.2, 11.1 & 11.3. Groynes. Wildlife not affected by WBB overhead to be involved in project and meetings re Roads of National bridges/culverts. Significance. Flood risks need to be looked at (Dickeys Rd is between primary and secondary stop banks). 2.12 of Belfast Area Plan to obtain agreement with NZTA on use of land adjacent to key transport corridors for possible development to improve biodiversity/recreational opportunities.

26/11/2010 Form Rcvd A J Searby 11 Marble Court, Northwood 03 352 7986 n/a X Y X Johns Rd option would increase noise in area as cars slow down/accelerate on/off motorway. Receipt Details Respondent Contact Details Northbound Off-Ramp Location Preference Stream Realignment Privacy & Participation Comments Date Method Name and Organisation Address Phone Email Option 1 Johns Option 2 Dickeys Unsure/ Neither Yes No Unsure/ Neither Exclude Feedback Contact Further Explanation for Location Preference Explanation for Otukaikino Option Selection Other Comments 26/11/2010 Form Rcvd Ting Leong Lee 19 Sayers Crescent, Ilam 03 343 4388 [email protected] X (no answer) X Purpose of bypass to reduce traffic on Johns Rd. Dickeys Rd Is the director for Eminence Investments. New alignment invovles achieves this. Johns Rd will have visual and noise impact on much more land than March version. Additional height will have Groynes and neighbourhood. Also would affect more house if more visual and noise impact on their development. Extra land goes ahead east of Groynes Drive. More expensive and need needed will affect their land value. Shift bypass as far west or else more land than Dickeys Rd. more land will be required as buffer due to increase in exposure to bypass.

26/11/2010 Form Rcvd R Smith 23 Langley Place, Belfast 03 323 5550 n/a X X Dickeys Rd off ramp would cause too much conjestion where Not necessary if river is to be bridged. existing motorway and Dickies Rd meet. Need lights. Cause problems with traffic coming off motorway. 26/11/2010 Form Rcvd Max Alexander & Faye Marriott PO Box 20369, Bishopdale 03 341 2661 [email protected] X Y X Reduces heavy traffic on Johns Rd. Reduces visual impact on Will be done well and provide additional benefits. Groynes and preserves as much of it as possible. Takes motorway exit noise well away from residential area.

22/11/2010 Form Rcvd Bruce McDowell 33 Castile Place, Belfast 03 323 7513 n/a X Y X Better access to Johns Rd residents. 22/11/2010 Form Rcvd Dallas Jamieson 73 Johns Rd, Belfast 03 323 9282 n/a X Y X 22/11/2010 Form Rcvd Pat Nevin 25 Saracen Ave, Northwood 03 323 7887 n/a X Y X No other access into Belfast in this area. Like to see an off ramp onto Dickeys Rd included in option 1. 22/11/2010 Form Rcvd Leigh Rollinson 20 Brookwater Ave, Styx Mill 03 323 7040 [email protected] X Y X It will reduce flow of traffic on Johns Rd. Johns Rd option would Minimal Groynes land use for this project please. m devalue my property greatly. 22/11/2010 Form Rcvd Reg King 729A Main North Road, Belfast 03 323 8622 n/a X Y X Johns Rd option encourages larger vehicles to pass through Better access to regional park. Could a small ramp from south service Groynes? Johns Rd and more land taken from park. 22/11/2010 Form Rcvd Dennis & Jan Watt 21 Redfern Street, Northwood 03 354 6204 n/a X Y Absolutely common sense. 22/11/2010 Form Rcvd D Buttolph 10 Marble Court, Northwood 03 323 5432 n/a X Y X Reduction of vehicles using Johns Rd and Main North Rd. To compliment the bypass. 22/11/2010 Form Rcvd Neil J.K. Brailsford 50 South Belt, Lincoln 03 325 7999 n/a X X Y X Gives good optional access to the Groynes and to recreational Simplifies motorway crossing of Dickeys Rd. Stream development in Belfast. Dickeys Rd off ramp will best service diversion will enable an on ramp connection at the industrial area and connect traffic to Marshlands Rd. Dickeys Rd to service Northern Belfast, Marshlands, Brooklands areas northbound.

19/11/2010 Form Rcvd Sandy Wesley 241 Johns Rd, Belfast 03 323 9479 [email protected] X Y Bypass directly affects property. Want option to travel both north and south instead of major detour to access their house. Already had oppostion from Northwood residents when using that route. Access from rear would be great but still not easiest access to bypass.

19/11/2010 Form Rcvd K.J. Wesley 241 Johns Rd, Belfast 03 323 9479 [email protected] X Y X Easy access to Groynes, businesses, Belfast Centre. Option 2 Better option all round. Recreation wise and benefit would deter people heading north to turn back to Belfast Centre Groynes area, walkway etc. (lose business). 19/11/2010 Form Rcvd D.J. Dewit 10 Innisfree Place, Belfast 0272 234 110 [email protected] X X Y X X Build both. Why is there two options? Supports whatever option is cheaper. Feel this is another short term plan that doesn’t fully address future needs. Solve local traffic by stopping through traffic with a free flowing rind around Clearwater and airport. Bypass doesn't address issues between Clearwater and Hornby.

19/11/2010 Form Rcvd C.R. Cook 92B Englefield Rd, Belfast X Y Both options. See advantages and disadvanges in both. Industrial increasing at Chaneys - goods and workers benefit from Dickeys. Concerned about southbound off ramps, one at the Groynes would be good swinging into Johns Rd.

22/11/2010 Form Rcvd R & C Haliday 145 Hussey Rd, Northwood [email protected] X Y Reduces effect on Groynes and reduces heavy traffic on Johns To enhance the walking track, take it away from the .nz Rd and Main North Rd. motorway. 22/11/2010 Form Rcvd Spence & May Gray 2/12 Lagan Street, Belfast 03 323 7210 X Y 22/11/2010 Form Rcvd Ann Taylor 171 Guthries Rd, Belfast 03 323 7051 [email protected] X Y X Much closer to get home from south. Why did CCC close off Get on with it and do it. Wasting money not doing anything. Why Northwood Blvd as was meant to connect Belfast residents to can't both options be done (satisfy residents and industrial)? WBB (& link into Johns and Radcliffe Rd)? 16/11/2010 Form Rcvd Jenene Parker 32a Lagan Street, Belfast 03 323 8595 janeneparker@yahoo. X Y com 16/11/2010 Form Rcvd Brent Baxter PO Box 20202 03 352 9257 [email protected] X X (unsure) It is lower so less noise, less effect on residental and move motorway closer to Groynes to get futher away. 16/11/2010 Form Rcvd Garry O'Connor 30B Dunbarton Street, Redwood 03 352 8619 n/a Has a problem with cycleway/walkway proposed to be next to boundary fence instead of on roadside (acess to property for unwanted people). 16/11/2010 Form Rcvd Lee Bargh 40 Rushmore Drive, Belfast 03 323 5042 [email protected] X X (unsure) Smoother flow with less impact on environment (Groynes & Depends how it is realigned and the changes and Option 2 will serve well for the future. Only downside is on the wildlife) with less noise. Main North Rd traffic flow diverted so benefits achieved. Popular and great ecosystem so Groynes (do it thoughtfully). Option 1 could be a disaster with less pollution and noise to area. Johns Rd seems pointless as benefits could arise if done properly. future bottlenecks on Main North Rd. Main North Rd would still have heavy traffic/disrupt flow for long distance commuters.

16/11/2010 Form Rcvd Sue & Robin Clements - 8 Clearwater Ave 03 359 5797 relax@clearviewlodge. X Y X Concerns for neighbour Simon Long (250 Johns Rd) - only go Concerns about increased noise as will loose shelter & road Clearview Lodge com left out of drive so will have to go 10km futher to visit family in frontage. Easterly wind will carry the noise. Avonside. Also if B&B guests miss lodge will have to travel 10km further. Receipt Details Respondent Contact Details Northbound Off-Ramp Location Preference Stream Realignment Privacy & Participation Comments Date Method Name and Organisation Address Phone Email Option 1 Johns Option 2 Dickeys Unsure/ Neither Yes No Unsure/ Neither Exclude Feedback Contact Further Explanation for Location Preference Explanation for Otukaikino Option Selection Other Comments 16/11/2010 Form Rcvd S Palmer 27A Lagan Street, Belfast [email protected] X X X If no south off ramp at Groynes traffic has to go through Still need two bridges whether you move it or not. Northwood/Husseys Rd/Gardiners Rd to get to aiport/south. Increased traffic in Northwood, unsafe for children. Need on ramp at Dickeys Rd for Brooklands/Spencerville traffic to avoid Belfast/Northwood.

16/11/2010 Form Rcvd V & E Stent 15B Englefield Rd, Belfast 03 323 8133 X Y Less impact and better access to Groynes. Facilitate construction of on/off ramps. 16/11/2010 Form Rcvd T Birnie 35 MacDonalds Rd, Belfast 03 323 6153 X Need Johns Rd off ramp as often go south of city. 16/11/2010 Form Rcvd Paula Le Compte 18 Brookwater Ave, Styx Mill 03 323 4375 X Y X Reduces traffic flow on Johns Rd. The off ramps at Dickeys and Combined with Dickeys Rd off ramp would be most Concerns about increased noise as will loose shelter & road Sawyers are sufficient for Belfast area. Dickeys Rd is more logical. Reduces bridges. frontage. Easterly wind will carry the noise. appropriate for future industrial areas and be a much cheaper option. Divert traffic away from residental areas should be the focus.

16/11/2010 Form Rcvd Tony Straw 40 Rushmore Drive, Belfast 03 323 5042 [email protected] X Y X Less environmental impact on Groynes. Lower height reduces Enhance environmental walk/cycle way along Option 2 has a lesser impact than Option 1, both physically and z noise. Reduces traffic along Main North Rd. These 3 major stream. Futher from sawmill. visually. Option 2 better for noise and traffic. Option 1 would be a environmental factors outweigh minor inconviences e.g. less disaster. direct route to Groynes for some people.

15/11/2010 Form Rcvd B Wolfe 14 Shenley Drive, Belfast 03 323 8778 X Y X Any motorway must have an on/off ramp to service the area. Small sacrifice for large roading system. This is a stop gap project. Need to link North and South Realignment will probably be better than it is now. motorways overhead through ChCh with on/off ramps to suburbs/city.

Form Rcvd D Saunders 9A Lagan Street, Belfast X X X A lot more people go to Groynes than Dickeys Rd. Damage has already been done. Leave it where it is. 15/11/2010 Form Rcvd John Kavanagh 1/28 Englefield Rd, Belfast 03 323 9597 X Y Looks great, let go! 15/11/2010 Form Rcvd R. Beardsmore 18 Tisch Place, Belfast 03 323 7234 X Y X 15/11/2010 Form Rcvd J & B Blundell 23 Watermill Blvd, Styx Mill 03 323 8602 [email protected] X Y X Member of Styx Mill Country Club & pay extra rates. Johns Rd Return the stream to its natural course. would dealuate property and traffic noise would affect lifestyle. Noise pollution is a health hazard to children in area. Traffic should be diverted away from suburbs for health and safety reasons.

15/11/2010 Form Rcvd X Y Keep both on/off ramps at same location. If at Dickeys Rd you Works better. I'm pleased you're going with the 'do it once, do it right' option. need better traffic control at Main North Rd. 15/11/2010 Form Rcvd Jo Harvey 35 Flat 2 Mecca Place, Bromley 0276 003 505 [email protected] X (neither) X X Dog park at Groynes states it's one of best dog parks in NZ. No As long as it's put back to original state and fishlife Happy with the change as long as you see how much this dog .nz one will tell what will happen to park. Like to see plans that this are not harmed. park means to so many dog owners in ChCh. Conserve park and amazing site will not be destroyed. make people happy. 15/11/2010 Form Rcvd B C Edwards (Mrs) 21 Sefton Street, Belfast 03 942 7600 [email protected] X Y Johns Rd is an excellent route for Belfast to Airport/South. If at Both logical and sensible. Will be more cost effective. .nz Dickeys Rd Belfast people will have to double back to get to Belfast. Dickeys Rd only services a few residents. 17/11/2010 Form Rcvd Les McFadden 86 Englefield Rd, Beflast 03 323 7236 [email protected]. X Y X Will cater for majority of Belfast and Northwood people. Easier Reduces number of bridges and will eventually It bypass asap to ease traffic volume through Belfast/Johns Rd nz access to/from airport and south. Dickeys would mean people benefit wildlife in/around stream. junction/Main North Rd. would have to double back. 17/11/2010 Form Rcvd Ted Hardiman 87 Cavendish Rd, Casebrook 03 352 8211 n/a X Y X More convenient to 219 Johns Rd Motel and Holiday Park Makes sense. which has historic business. Convenience of Belfast people working airport/south way. 17/11/2010 Form Rcvd Ohs 9A Darroch Street, Belfast 03 323 6678 cheiree.ohs@nzcourie X Y X Direct access to Belfast/Northwood. Once established will still be relatively quiet place to r.co.nz fish/enjoy. 17/11/2010 Form Rcvd Jane Grant Po Box 13916, Armargh [email protected]. X Y X Less through traffic via Main North Rd. Better long term traffic nz control. 17/11/2010 Form Rcvd Denise & Lindsay Wilson 4 Purakanui Place, Belfast 03 379 8530 [email protected]. X Y X Big users of Groynes and local residents. Dockeys will increase Don't ideally want to see changes but are sure they Shame that Groynes has to be altered. Realise traffic issues need nz traffic on local roads, already happening with motorists finding will be done tastefully. to be addressed. shortcuts from Main North Rd to Johns Rd.

17/11/2010 Form Rcvd X Y 17/11/2010 Form Rcvd Darryl Batchelor 30 Connemara Drive, Belfast 0272 258 522 [email protected]. X X X Dickeys Rd provides better access to future Belfast and nz industrial area. Less visual impact for Groynes users. Reduces traffic flow through Belfast West, makes Belfast a destination instead of pass through suburb.

25/11/2010 Form Rcvd Murray & Pam Aspinall 12 Janal Place, Northwood 03 323 5063 [email protected] Y Diverts the traffic for the off ramp away from built up area. 25/11/2010 Form Rcvd James & Mary Koh 338 Whites Rd, Ohoka 03 312 0022 [email protected] X Y X X Fairest option with respect the property at Willowcreek Lane. Requested a meeting with NZTA. Will comment futher after More direct access to city/airport/Clearwater without substantial meeting. detour. Result in large compensation claim. 8/12/2010 Form Rcvd Tim Gould 91 Dickeys Rd, Coutts Island, Belfast 03 323 9566 X Y Dickeys Rd would interfere with my farm. Bypass already Support if contain realginment within old course. The means farm has to downsize, access to parts of land will be two major crossings of the river will not be required very restricted. Seriously effect viability of farming operation. and bypass can be close as possible to sawmill. Johns Rd will service a large residental area and few heavy Keep bypass away from river to maintain vehicles to CCC proposed industrial area will be day time traffic recreational river purposes. and much less than present. Receipt Details Respondent Contact Details Northbound Off-Ramp Location Preference Stream Realignment Privacy & Participation Comments Date Method Name and Organisation Address Phone Email Option 1 Johns Option 2 Dickeys Unsure/ Neither Yes No Unsure/ Neither Exclude Feedback Contact Further Explanation for Location Preference Explanation for Otukaikino Option Selection Other Comments 17/11/2010 Form Rcvd X Y X Less environmental damage/impact. Need more cycleway around the area. 17/11/2010 Form Rcvd Snelder 32 Connemara Drive, Belfast Groynes is quiet, away from noise. Why do we need another No opinion on this matter. road to bypass Belfast? 17/11/2010 Form Rcvd S R Chapman 21 Langley Place, Belfast 03 323 9454 [email protected] X Y Trucks can cart out of F/H Pit and keep out of Belfast Cost. Cheaper to move river than biuld bridges. 17/11/2010 Form Rcvd Helena Lackie 27 Brookwater Ave, Norhwood [email protected] X Y Take traffic from Johns Rd to where I live is preferable. 17/11/2010 Form Rcvd E Fradd 5 Webb Street, St Albans [email protected] X Y X Less impact on Groynes. Proposed extension to Groynes park. 17/11/2010 Form Rcvd Martin Jones 51 Springwater Ave, Belfast 03 352 1383 [email protected] X Y Less Groynes land affected. Fewer bridges. m 17/11/2010 Form Rcvd Matt Stokes 875 Main North Rd, Belfast 0277 395 828 X Y X Less effect on Groynes. Better integration of highway. Any chance construction could start in 2011?? 17/11/2010 Form Rcvd W B Taylor 50 Kildare Street, Northwood [email protected] X Y X Minimises impact on Groynes. Improves recreation to area for public. 25/11/2010 Form Rcvd I G & J J Prattley 17 Michelangelo Place, Rolleston 03 347 4418 [email protected] X X Strongly favour Johns Rd. Far less detrimental to our business at Chardonnay Motor Lodge. Would appreciate clear, large signage, well positiond to allow safe motorway exiting in both directions and be able to locate motel easily. Popular motel due to grounds and proximity to Groynes.

25/11/2010 Form Rcvd J M Johnson 43 Shenley Drive, Belfast 03 323 7070 X X Less disruption to Groynes. 25/11/2010 Form Rcvd Russell Wordsworth 16 Langley Place, Belfast 03 323 8189 russell.wordsworth@c X X Less acceleration and breaking at Dickeys Rd will reduce noise Only support if current walkway/circular route Consider shelterbelts/noise reduction options along eastern side of anterbury.ac.nz for residents at Northern end of Rushmore Dr. abound Darroch/reserve/Groynes will remain. Not bypass and keep as far away from Rushmore Dr subdivision. happy with bypass, bought house to be close to nature, understand it's beneficial to ChCh.

25/11/2010 Form Rcvd M Petrie 23 Swift Street, Belfast 03 323 6054 X Y Less heavy traffic through Belfast. Makes sense. 25/11/2010 Form Rcvd Dave Walsh 9 Dickeys Rd, Belfast 03 327 8185 kaiapoicarclinic@para X Y X Johns Rd closer to Northwood and surrounding high density Put stream back to where it was. Stop pricey bridges Johns Rd is better suited for heavy traffic. All roads on city side join dise.net.nz areas. More direct route for these people. Dickeys Rd option being needed. to it. Won’t increase traffic on local roads (consequence of Dickeys would still have heavy traffic through Belfast on Main North Rd Rd option). (defeats purpose). Don't need major intersection at Dickeys Rd and Main North Rd. More traffic back through Belfast doesn't make sense.

24/11/2010 Form Rcvd Tim Hawke 8 Northwood Dr, Belfast 03 323 6447 [email protected] X Y X Less heavy traffic past growing residential area either side of Logical to divert to natural course to reduce number Due to growing area from Main North Rd to Groynes would like Johns Rd and Main North Rd. Lower cost option. of bridges. speed limit reduced on that section of Johns Rd. 24/11/2010 Form Rcvd Dennis Moffat 801 Main North Rd, Belfast 03 323 6317 [email protected] X Y X Advantage to Belfast and residential travelling in area. Less bridges. 24/11/2010 Form Rcvd Gavin Stanbury 848 Main North Rd, Belfast 03 323 8283 [email protected]. X Y X Reduce heavy traffic through Belfast. Less environmental Less bridges. Less impact on pedestrian traffic. nz impact. 24/11/2010 Form Rcvd Garnet Chapman 800 Main North Rd, Belfast 03 323 8030 X X Resident of North Belfast, better suited when coming in from As long as South Branch is still accessible. north. 24/11/2010 Form Rcvd John Daue 35 Rushmore Drive, Belfast 03 323 9619 X Y X Make the bypass four lanes. 24/11/2010 Form Rcvd P A Chapman 800 Main North Rd, Belfast 03 323 8030 X Y X 24/11/2010 Form Rcvd Lynette Boaden 35 Rushmore Drive, Belfast 03 323 9619 X Y X Hope it's four lanes and Johns and Russley Rd are upgraded to four lanes to allow good flow of traffic. 24/11/2010 Form Rcvd Paul McFadden 4 Kilmore Place, Belfast 03 323 7008 [email protected]. X X If off ramp at Groynes a problem can there not be a turning right Denite NO! nz lane? Turning right at Dickeys Rd would be unpractical for most Belfast residents. 24/11/2010 Form Rcvd S Long 14 Ballymena Drive, Belfast 03 323 5745 carol.stephen@nettel. X Y X Smoother entry to Belfast and less traffic via Husseys Rd. Sound economic sense. net.nz Dickeys Rd involves greater travel time, more fuel consumption and conjestion at Main North Rd intersection. 24/11/2010 Form Rcvd Lou Bailey 15 Pentland Drive, Belfast 03 323 9615 X Y X 24/11/2010 Form Rcvd Pat Walsh 10 Purakanui Place, Northwood 03 323 7397 X X 24/11/2010 Form Rcvd Ian Allso 26 Donegal Street, Belfast 03 323 6067 [email protected] X Y X 24/11/2010 Form Rcvd David Easr? 16 Sea Eagles Place, North Beach 03 388 1104 [email protected] X Y X Access to Belfast severely decreased by no north bound off Effectively prevents an off ramp at Dickeys Rd Northern arterial is unclear in its direction as to access from ramp. Johns Rd disadvantages industrial area. Marshlands Rd to motorway. Could northbound on/off ramp access to Marshland Rd overcome some of these obstacles? 24/11/2010 Form Rcvd Tim Ashworth 65 Brookwater Ave, Northwood 03 352 3567 [email protected] X Y X Reduce traffic at Johns Rd, Main North Rd intersection. 25/11/2010 Letter Rcvd Ernest & Elise Glad 180 Johns Rd 03 323 7353 ernest.glad@cortellgr X X X Strongly supports Johns Rd. Affect restaurant, winery business No viewpoint on stream realignment. Reduction of noise options needs to be explored (bundling, oup.com and proposed childcare centre. Customers need access from acoustic fences). Raising bypass above ground level limit options site. Dickeys Rd option would mean parents backtracking/using to reduce noise. local roads, putting clients off. The Applefields development will be affected by exit location. Truck noise is a minor issue on Johns Rd. Johns Rd will provide good access to Groynes. Would rather have a little noise than have to travel further to Dickeys Rd. Dickeys Rd would be highly inconvenient by moving our access.

28/11/2010 Online Peter Marks 310 Papanui Rd [email protected] X Y Visitors to Groynes/Belfast from south shouldn't have to divert Support if reduces costs and no backwater effects. Use Groynes Dog Park. Small dogs can get under gate alongside Submission through Main North Rd/exit boyond Belfast. irrigation race 1/2 way down and can get through deer fence. Fence needs smaller mesh to prevent dogs escaping onto motorway.

27/11/2010 Online Phil Watkins 508 Coutts Island Rd, R.D.1, Belfast [email protected] X Y Lower visual impact. No underpass needed. Less bridges. Submission Receipt Details Respondent Contact Details Northbound Off-Ramp Location Preference Stream Realignment Privacy & Participation Comments Date Method Name and Organisation Address Phone Email Option 1 Johns Option 2 Dickeys Unsure/ Neither Yes No Unsure/ Neither Exclude Feedback Contact Further Explanation for Location Preference Explanation for Otukaikino Option Selection Other Comments 26/11/2010 Email Mark Coulthard 478 Coutts Island Rd, Belfast [email protected]. X Belfast travellers don’t have to backtrack/take local roads. nz Heavy traffic along Husseys road would be unacceptable. Limited traffic to use off ramp at Dickeys does not justify. Concern with access from Dickeys Rd to Old Main North Rd/go south on Main North Rd.

26/11/2010 Online Shirley & Maurice O'Flaherty 239 Johns Rd oflaherty.family@xtra. X Y Best for travelling north along Johns Rd/accessing houses off Advantages outweigh disadvantages. Less bridges Thankyou for providing a service lane. You have been very Submission co.nz new service lane and Belfast. Dickeys Rd wouldn't benefit will be safer/good for walkways and cycle access. professional. motel/caravan park business on Johns Rd. 26/11/2010 Email Stephen Lee Level 8, 109 Featherstone Street, [email protected] X Owner of Johns Rd property. Dickeys Rd has more Wellington o.nz advantages. Johns Rd has greater environmental impact with high clearance pass. 26/11/2010 Online R J Hodge Private Bag 92029, Auckland [email protected] X Y Given planned residential development in area, access to Extended walkways and less bridges. Flyover over Submission Belfast via Johns Rd is necessary. Land lost from Groynes will Dickeys Rd would be much smaller (less visual be more than offset by significant expansion of Groynes/Isaacs impact). Conservation Park (ECAN lease land).

25/11/2010 Online P W Timbs 3 Mayfly Lane, Northwood X Y Makes more sense Less bridges - less cost The sooner the better Submission 25/11/2010 Online Mark Rountree, Devondale Y Supported subject to the stream being enhanced to Provided a list of detailed conditions / recommendations Submission Nursuries Ltd, Darroch Holdings improve its existing trout habitat. concerning immediate replacement of any dog park area taken; Ltd, Belfast Community Trust landscaped bunding between dog park & WBB; maintenance & safety of Groynes farm track; landscaped noise bund from Dickeys to Groynes Drive; enhancement of Otukaikino Trout habitat; and recommended bridge design for Groynes entrance overpass.

26/11/2010 Online Graeme Kerr 24 Sefton Street, Belfast Both Both On/Off ramps at both locations. Massive anticipated industrial/ Need accessible pedestrian/ cycle access to the Groynes. Submission commercial growth in East Belfast and around Bridgend - case for on & off ramp at Dickeys Rd to avoid heavy vehicles travelling to & from these areas using MNR / Johns to access Johns Rd ramp.

25/11/2010 Online Charlotte Gavin 38 Johns Road, Belfast X X If an off ramp via Johns Road allows residents from the south to Providing adequate cycle and pedestrian access is Runs the 5km loop track around the groynes dog park at least 3 Submission still access the Groynes which is the preferred option. However allowed for to get from East of Belfast across the times per week. Track must be maintained for safe pedestrian we suggest the Groynes entranceway could be enhanced by highway and to the river via Dickeys Rd. Plus all the use. Replaced immediately any dog park area taken with a erecting an attractive and architechtually designed overbridge flora and fauna are maintained and ensuring a landscaped bund btwn WBB to maintain peaceful environment for over the western bypass and sinking the bypass thus also satisfactory bund put around the highway to our dogs who have extremely sensitive hearing and could behave reducing its aestetic impact. minimise the impact of noise on this prestine and rather aggressively if frightened by traffic noises. Maintain access idellic piece of nature. off Johns Rd to the Groynes. A landscaped noise bund from Dickeys Rd to Groynes Drive.The Groynes is the greatest asset Belfast has (liken it to Hagley Park to the central residents of Christchurch) its very important that the residents can continue to enjoy this park rather than sacrifice it to the likes of people who do not live here and just "drive through". Protect our piece of paradise Please.

25/11/2010 Online Kingsley Timpson - Department of Area from Johns Road (near the Groynes) to the existing Northern Submission Conservation Motorway in Christchurch is outside his conservation area of accountability. Message been forwarded to (Bryan Jensen), the accountable conservation manager for this area for his further consideration.The presentation of options put forward and the open project day are a positive step to working through the advantages and disadvantages of each option.

25/11/2010 Online Ian Pye 15 Swift Street, Belfast X Y Reduction in heavy vehicles using MNR/Johns = reduction in The stated benefits of this change would seem to far Whichever option gets the go ahead the massive reduction if traffic Submission noise & congestion in their immediate area. Less intrusion on outweigh the one stated disadvantage of this option. currently needlessly travelling through Belfast will be greatly the Groynes. Acknowledge longer time/distance to get home reduced - which will be fantastic. This should greatly improve traffic which will be a bit of a pain but positive benfefits outweigh this. follows in the Belfast area. It is fantastic this project has been brought forward. Thank you for the opportunity to have a say on this project and the recent information evening. Receipt Details Respondent Contact Details Northbound Off-Ramp Location Preference Stream Realignment Privacy & Participation Comments Date Method Name and Organisation Address Phone Email Option 1 Johns Option 2 Dickeys Unsure/ Neither Yes No Unsure/ Neither Exclude Feedback Contact Further Explanation for Location Preference Explanation for Otukaikino Option Selection Other Comments 24/11/2010 Online P & B Graham 901 Main North Road X X This would help relieve some of the congestion at the motorway Not sure if mucking around with river alignments is a Submission end of Belfast good idea but can understand why you need to do it.

22/11/2010 Online Murray Watson - Whitewater 9 Riselaw Street, Mairehau X X Our Club would prefer to see as little disruption to this valuable Golden opportunity to develop a moving water facility Submission Canoe Club recreational area possible. the alternative would provide an for kayakers and canoeists and the public in general advantage for a relatively small number of local residents and utilising anything that will float in relatively shallow have more physical and visual impact on the Groynes. water which potentially could be navigable through to the Waimakariri confluence. The present water course is limited both a by a lack of design to ensure sufficient depth and by willow encroachment. Such a facility would be invaluable not only to our Club for instruction but to the many schools, other Clubs and CPIT. CPIT, for example, estimates up to 140 students would use the area 3 times annually. Kaiapoi High School typically has 30-40 students using the area annually and Burnside High School 60-80 students using the area 1-2 times. The type of development envisaged would be very compatible with new channel having a "natural" appearance on completion. Such a development has the support, in principle, of CCC Ranger staff at the Groynes and is in keeping with the current Management Plan for the area.

22/11/2010 Online Ben Wiles 151 Kingsford Street, Burwood X X Network legibility - one & off in same location. Does not like Easier ped & cycle access.Measures to reduce the Submission idea of heavy vehicles negotiating local roads as would happen impacts on any threatened species (if any) should be with Dickeys. Adverse effects can be mitigated. made & sediments from earthworks.

16/11/2010 Online Paul O'Connell Johns Road X X Network legibility - one & off in same location. More convenient Just as happy with option 2 as it reduces traffic and noise past Submission travel to and from house to westrern ChCh house. 26/11/2010 Letter Rcvd Ecan - Michael D Rachlin X Y • An off-ramp at Dickeys Road would prejudice our ability to For the reasons set out in our original submission. provide for and enhance the Waimakariri River Regional Park There are, however, a number of issues which we in this area. This includes provision of land for recreation and would wish, as land owners, to discuss with NZTA the park, provision of shelter screen planting, car parking and a about the details of the realignment. It is also ranger’s base. important that the proposal does not compromise the drainage of possible flood overflows in this • An off-ramp at Dickeys Road would compromise flood Waimakariri River floodplain area. Again we would management in the area by blocking an overflow channel welcome direct discussions with the agency on this matter.

25/11/2010 Letter Rcvd Mandy Dunne-Lee Styx Mill X Opposed to option 1 due to impact on the Groynes, visual impacts of embankments and retaining wall. Access from own property to the Groynes. 19/11/2010 Online Derek Johns 6 Devonvale Lane, Amberley X Y Heavy traffic removed from Belfast. Less impact on the One less bridge. Connect the expanded Groynes Submission Groynes. Hopefully more room at Dickeys Rd end and can Recreational Area with the Waimakariri Regional avoid the pumphouse. Park without having to cross the major roads - greater cycling and pedestrian access, eventually connecting through to McLean’s Island.Shifting it back into an old channel is a natural thing to happen and with modern techniques no serious harm will be done. Lessen risk of contamination from the old sewage ponds and from Stoneyhurst Sawmills. Receipt Details Respondent Contact Details Northbound Off-Ramp Location Preference Stream Realignment Privacy & Participation Comments Date Method Name and Organisation Address Phone Email Option 1 Johns Option 2 Dickeys Unsure/ Neither Yes No Unsure/ Neither Exclude Feedback Contact Further Explanation for Location Preference Explanation for Otukaikino Option Selection Other Comments 6/12/2010 Email CCC - Jane Parfitt X Y Option 1 not preferred as requires a substantial area of the • have greater positive effects on the Groynes when 1) The Otukaikino stream is noted as having good water quality. Groynes, in close proximity to the picnic and internal access compared to having two large structures built over Any development associated with the WBB should not deliver run- road and impact on the existing features and the visual amenity the current river alignment and any effects this might off or cause detrimental environmental effects to the water quality. of the Groynes landscape setting and quiet enjoyment of the have on river quality. The river must not be compromised through this process and park. Option 2 could help to provide business traffic with a • aid in the retention of high water quality by moving once the WBB is completed. more direct route to the proposed business areas in northern the Otukaikino Stream further away from the WBB and eastern Belfast. This would help to reduce the community and the existing saw mill site. This will limit the 2) It is still unclear what the area of the Otukaikino stream severance issues caused by heavy goods vehicles travelling amount of river crossings and requirement for realignment will look like once completed. CCC staff would prefer through the centre of Belfast (Johns Rd & Main North Rd), and culverts and bridges. It provides separation and to continue to have involvement in any development or concept would be consistent with Belfast Area Plan Objectives 9.2, 11.1 opportunities for establishing an ecological buffer planning for this area. This includes both the Otukaikino stream & 11.3. along the Otukaikino Stream and from the Groynes. realignment and the effects on this area if the Dickeys Road off It moves the WBB further to the east of the recreation ramp is the preferred development option. It is essential that public and ecological area, enabling a range of wildlife and access (pedestrian/cyclist and vehicular) is considered throughout recreational activities to flow along the Otukaikino the design of the WBB to ensure that all opportunities to improve Stream corridor and not be affected by potential safe connectivity is achieved, and not compromised. WBB overhead bridges or culverts. 3) Council staff welcome the opportunity to be involved in project and statutory advisory group meetings for this project, as well as other stakeholder meetings regarding the Roads of National Significance. As the project develops it is likely that there will be additional issues that will arise, that have not been identified in this submission. These additional issues will be raised by Council staff during future advisory group meetings.

4) The proposed location of the off ramp at Dickeys Rd appears to fall between the primary & secondary stop banks. Flood risks would therefore need to be taken into account.

13/12/2010 Form Rcvd Neil Wilson 7 Innisfield Place, Belfast 03 323 8598 [email protected] X Y X Prefer Dickeys Rd option as reduction of traffic on Johns Rd. Supports stream realignment as makes sense. No provision for southbound access ramp from Dickeys Rd. Residents northbound turn off at Sawyers Arms, Gardiners Rd, Trucks still will use Main North Rd. Eastern Area traffic forced to Hussey Rd/Styx Mill. use Main North Rd/Johns Rd. If you requrie further survey/traffic count in area I can help.

15/12/2010 Form Rcvd Gary Kirkpatrick 7 Harts Creek Lane, Northwood 03 360 3077 X X X Please keep me updated on further development. GHD Limited Level 11, Guardian Trust House 15 Willeston Street, Wellington T: 64 4 472 0799 F: 64 4 472 0833 E:

© GHD Limited 2011 This document is and shall remain the property of GHD Limited. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited.

Document Status

Rev Reviewer Approved for Issue Author No. Name Signature Name Signature Date

V1 Katie Crosbie Mary Mary O’Callahan O’Callahan

Western Belfast Bypass Public Consultation Submission Analysis