DOCSLIB.ORG

Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve ANIAKCHAK NATIONAL MONUMENT AND PRESERVE TRADITIONAL USE AND USER GROUPS STUDY July 2007 Compiled by: Douglas Deur, Ph.D. Protected Area Social Research Unit NPS PNW Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit University of Washington On the basis of fieldnotes and other materials compiled by: Michele Morseth with the assistance of Una Goggin and Ronald Lind Submitted to: Lake Clark and Katmai National Park Preserve National Park Service Anchorage, Alaska This report is in partial fulfillment of PNW CESU Task Agreement UW-01-10 and PNW CESU Task Agreement J9088020020, between the National Park Service and the University of Washington. Aniakchak TUUGS, Draft Report i Disclaimer The Protected Areas Social Research Unit (PASRU) is associated with the National Park Service Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (NPS PNW CESU) coordinated from the University of Washington (UW) College of Forest Resources. The NPS PNW CESU is part of a larger virtual partnership involving nine federal agencies, 16 universities and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. The PNW CESU was created in October of 2000 to provide, research, technical assistance, and education to enhance management of natural and cultural resources on public lands in the Pacific Northwest. PASRU, the applied social science program associated with the NPS PNW CESU evolved from the social science program component of the Cooperative Park Studies Unit that operated from the UW College of Forest Resources from 1970 to 2000. The mission of PASRU is to provide social scientific understanding needed to support the sound management and conservation of our national parks and other federally protected areas. PASRU social research projects are intended to provide the appropriate depth and breadth of objective science and scholarly study to meet the information needs of cultural and natural resource managers who encounter complex problems driven by myriad biological, physical, social, cultural and economic forces. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the NPS, the UW, or any other agency or organization associated with this research project. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the view and policies of the NPS, the UW, or any other agencies associated with this report. Printed copies of this report are housed at the NPS Pacific West Regional Library and can be requested contacting the following address. Pacific West Regional Library National Park Service 168 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104 Digital copies can be requested through the PNW CESU, located in the College of Forest Resources at the University of Washington, and can be requested by contacting the following address. PNW CESU University of Washington Box 352100 Seattle, WA 98195 Aniakchak TUUGS, Draft Report ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Methods 3 Placing Aniakchak in Context 10 Russian Influences on the Alaska Peninsula 16 The American Period to World War II 19 Alutiiq Identity and Cultural Persistence 25 Settlements and Other Significant Places 29 Aniakchak Bay 30 Aniakchak Calera 32 Kujulik Bay and Vicinity 32 Meshik Lake and Vicinity 34 Changing Modes of Access 36 Modern Resource Use Traditions on the Alaska Peninsula 40 Caribou and Moose Hunting 41 Beach and Bay Hunting 44 Interior Hunting 48 Hunters from Kodiak 49 Charter Hunting and Other Hunters from Elsewhere 50 The Cultural Position of the Hunt and Modern Challenges 54 Traditional Hunting Ethics 57 Outside Hunters, New Technologies, Changing Values 58 All-Terrain Vehicles and the Hunt 61 Hunting Other Species 67 Bears and Bear Hunting 68 Bird Hunting 70 Trapping 72 Fish and Fishing 75 Shellfish 81 Berry Picking and Other Plant Uses 83 Other Forms of Visitation 85 Conclusions 89 Recommendations for Further Research 92 Sources 97 Interviewees 97 Interviewee Codes 98 Bibliography 99 Appendix A: Interview Guide for Aniakchak Traditional Use Study 117 Appendix B: Potentially Knowledgeable Individuals not Interviewed 124 Appendix C: Communities Associated with Aniakchak Natl. Mon. and Pres. 125 Appendix D: Place Names in and near Aniakchak National Mon. and Pres. 127 Appendix E: Resources used in the Vicinity of Aniakchak Natl. Mon. and Pres. 137 Appendix F: Maps 141 Notes 148 Aniakchak TUUGS, Draft Report iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report represents a summary of findings from the Aniakchak Traditional Use and User Groups Identification Study. This research effort centered on the identification and documentation of natural and cultural resources associated with traditional uses of Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve (hereafter “Aniakchak”) by Alaska Native communities in the region. Specifically, this research sought to illuminate three broad themes: 1) Historic uses of park land and resources by Alaska Native groups within and around the modern-day boundaries of Aniakchak, 2) Present-day use of park land and resources by Alaska Native groups within the boundaries of ANIA, and 3) Uses of land and resources near or related to Aniakchak that may affect, or be affected by, NPS management actions. To conduct this research, the National Park Service (NPS) entered into a cooperative task agreement with the Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU). Housed within the College of Forest Resources at the University of Washington, the PNW CESU is itself the home of the Protected Area Social Research Unit, which took principal responsibility for the current project. Ms. Michele Morseth was hired by the PNW CESU to direct this project, and Morseth served as Project Manager during the interview and archival phases of the research. Although the major emphasis of this research has been on Aniakchak, it was necessary to collect data covering areas outside the park unit in order to provide a meaningful cultural context for analysis. Moreover, general data collection focusing on the historic and contemporary lifeways of Aniakchak-area Native peoples was deemed necessary to document the use and importance of culturally significant resources occurring within Aniakchak. The study identified specific uses of park resources by Native Alaskan communities, while also attempting to identify some of the effects of such use on natural resources, as well as any effects of NPS operations at Aniakchak on Native Alaskan uses of lands and resources. An important component of the study was to identify traditional access methods and routes, as changing transportation routes and technologies appeared to have facilitated changing patterns of resource use within ANIA, and motorized access to Aniakchak continues to be a point of debate today. Aniakchak TUUGS, Draft Report 1 As a National Park Service “Traditional Use Study,” this study has emphasized the collection of original ethnographic data, rather than prioritizing the gathering and synthesis of published materials.1 An earlier Ethnographic Overview and Assessment involved literature review; this literature review also informed and guided the current project (Morseth 2003). While the current research did not seek to identify “ethnographic resources,” it did aim to identify culturally significant resources, including those designated by other terms and cross-listed in other NPS inventories.2 Sites categorized as archeological for preservation purposes, for example, are associated with ethnographic information if Native peoples consider them to be appropriate places for historical memorialization, the teaching of young people, or ceremonial activities. Members of traditionally associated groups may also ascribe meaning to objects in park collections perceived as sacred or as items associated with Native Alaskan cultural identity and heritage. They may also assign meanings to localities and landscapes, where reference points are based on collective notions of past or present use. The current research effort was conducted to achieve multiple complimentary goals. The ethnographic information resulting from this research effort shall augments a database of cultural resource data that is used by NPS staff to better understand and consider impacts to culturally significant resources which result from proposed actions and to identify traditionally associated Native groups for purposes of consultation under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and other cultural resource laws. Ethnographic information collected during this study can also assist NPS natural resource management, cultural resource management (especially the management of archeological sites), and interpretation. Among other applications, the information shall help managers evaluate requests for access to resources, as well as identify park resources that may require special treatment or protection. Aniakchak TUUGS, Draft Report 2 METHODS In consultation with the National Park Service (NPS), the Protected Area Social Research Unit in the College of Forest Resources at the University of Washington employed Michele Morseth, an applied cultural anthropologist, as Project Manager, to plan and execute this research. Working directly with NPS staff and the NPS CESU Coordinator, the project manager prepared a research plan to guide all project phases; this plan included an overview of the types of interview questions to be asked of knowledgeable individuals (see Appendix A). Concurrently, NPS staff assisted the project manager in communicating with village representatives
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Watershed Database for National Parks in Southwestern Alaska and a System for Further Watershed-Based Analysis
    A Watershed Database for National Parks in Southwestern Alaska and a System for Further Watershed-based Analysis David M. Mixon 2005 Introduction This document describes a project designed to delineate and quantitatively describe watersheds located within or flowing into or out of national park lands in the National Inventory and Monitoring program’s Southwest Alaskan Network (SWAN) of parks. The parks included in this study are Aniakchak National Monument & Preserve, Katmai National Park & Preserve, Lake Clark National Park & Preserve, and Kenai Fjords National Park. This effort was undertaken to support decision-making processes related to the Inventory and Monitoring program’s goals. A variety of environmental and physical attributes were collected for each watershed using remotely sensed data in the form of a geographic information system (GIS). The GIS data used is from a variety of sources with variable quality. The nature of GIS analysis is such that many times a newer, higher-resolution dataset may become available during the course of any given study. For this reason, a set of scripts and methods are provided, making the incorporation of newer datasets as easy as possible. The goal is to provide an initial analysis of park hydrology as well as a means for updating the database with a minimal amount of effort. It was necessary to choose a watershed size (stream order) that would provide sufficient detail for each park and allow useful comparison of basins within the parks while minimizing the complexity of the study. Review of standards for hydrologic unit delineation being used for the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) (FGDC, 2002), suggested that the officially designated level 5 watersheds would provide the level of detail desired while minimizing redundancy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nationwide Rivers Inventory APPENDIX National System Components, Study Rivers and Physiographic Maps
    The Nationwide Rivers Inventory APPENDIX National System Components, Study Rivers and Physiographic Maps The National Park Service United States Department of the Interior Washington, DC 20240 January 1982 III. Existing Components of the National System 1981 National Wild and Scenic Rivers System Components State Alaska 1 _ ** River Name County(s)* Segment Reach Agency Contact Description (mile1s) (s) Designation State Congressional Section(s) Length Date of District(s) Managing Physiographic Agency Alagnak River including AK I&W The Alagnak from 67 12/2/80 NPS National Park Service Nonvianuk Kukaklek Lake to West 540 West 5th Avenue boundary of T13S, R43W Anchorage, AK 99501 and the entire Nonvianuk River. Alntna River AK B.R. The main stem within the 83 12/2/80 NPS National Park Service Gates of the Arctic 540 West 5th Avenue National Park and Preserve. Anchorage, AK 99501 Andreafsky River and AK I614- Segment from its source, 262 12/2/80 FWS Fish and Wildlife Service East Fork including all headwaters 1011 E. Tudor and the East Fork, within Anchorage, AK 99503 the boundary of the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge. AK All of the river 69 12/2/80 NPS National Park Service Aniakchak River P.M. including its major 540 West 5th Avenue including: Hidden Creek tributaries, Hidden Creek, Anchorage, AK 99501 Mystery Creek, Albert Mystery Creek, Albert Johnson Creek, North Fork Johnson Creek, and North Aniakchak River Fork Aniakchak River, within the Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve. *Alaska is organized by boroughs. If a river is in or partially in a borough, it is noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Peninsula Becharof National Wildlife Refuges
    Fishery Management Plan ALASKA PENINSULA BECHAROF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES July 1994 Region 7 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service • Department of the Interior FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN ALASKA PENINSULA AND BECHAROF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES Fiscal Years 1994 - 1998 Prepared By: King Salmon Fishery Resource Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service P.O. Box 277 King Salmon, Alaska 99613 May 1994 SUMMARY STATEMENT The Alaska Peninsula and Becharof National Wildlife Refuges Fishery Management Plan (Plan) provides the management direction necessary to ensure conservation of fishery resources and habitat. In addition, the Plan provides for continued use of fishery resources by subsistence, commercial, and recreational users consistent with the purposes for which the Alaska Peninsula and Becharof refuges (Complex) were established and are managed. The Complex's biological and physical environment is described and fishery resources, human use, management history, and major issues and concerns are discussed. This information was obtained from the Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plans, a literature search, and discussions with Alaska Department of Fish and Game personnel. Objectives and tasks are developed to address the issues and concerns. Federal tasks are assigned priorities and costs for each year of continuation. The Plan encompasses a five year period, at which time it will be revised. Major issues and concerns identified include the following: competition between user groups; incomplete salmon escapement data bases to refine management of the Complex fish populations; and inadequate fishery law enforcement. In some cases, concerns were identified because of the perception that they would develop into serious problems if current levels of use or consumption were allowed to continue or expand.
    [Show full text]
  • Ugashik Lakes
    Chapter 3 - Region 13: Ugashik Lakes Region 13: Ugashik Lakes Summary of Resources and Uses in the Region Region Boundary Region 13 includes the uplands on a portion of the Alaska Peninsula that includes the Ugashik Lakes and the area eastwards to the boundary of the Lake and Peninsula Borough (Map 3-13). The Region is bounded on the west and north by Region 12, on the east by the Kodiak Island Borough. The southern boundary is generally along the Dog Salmon River corridor. There are no communities in the Region. Except for navigable waterbodies and three sections, there are no other state-owned or selected uplands in Region 13. State Lands: Ownership and Acreage State-owned navigable waterbodies, notably Upper and Lower Ugashik Lakes, dominate the western one-quarter of the Region. Much of the remainder is in Federal ownership and within the Alaska Peninsula National Wildlife Refuge. Native ownership of land is concentrated southwest of Lower Ugashik Lake between the Ugashik River and the Dog Salmon River. The plan applies to 1,541 acres of state-owned uplands. The plan also applies to state-owned shorelands (acreages of shorelands have not been calculated). Physical Geography Region 13 is within the Alaska Peninsula ecological province and encompasses some well dissected but rugged terrain. Drainage is predominantly westward towards Bristol Bay. The principal drainages are the Ugashik Lakes and tributaries including Ugashik, Crooked, Moore, Deer, and Black Creeks. The western portion of the Region rises to the spine of the Alaska Peninsula; thus the highest elevations are attained along the eastern boundary of the Region in the vicinity of Deer Mountain (elev.
    [Show full text]
  • Ring of Fire Proposed RMP and Final EIS- Volume 1 Cover Page
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management N T OF M E TH T E R A IN P T E E D R . I O S R . U M 9 AR 8 4 C H 3, 1 Ring of Fire FINAL Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final Environmental Management Plan Resource Proposed Ring of Fire Volume 1: Chapters 1-3 July 2006 Anchorage Field Office, Alaska July 200 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMMENT 6 Volume 1 The Bureau of Land Management Today Our Vision To enhance the quality of life for all citizens through the balanced stewardship of America’s public lands and resources. Our Mission To sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. BLM/AK/PL-06/022+1610+040 BLM File Photos: 1. Aerial view of the Chilligan River north of Chakachamna Lake in the northern portion of Neacola Block 2. OHV users on Knik River gravel bar 3. Mountain goat 1 4. Helicopter and raft at Tsirku River 2 3 4 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Ring of Fire Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement Prepared By: Anchorage Field Office July 2006 United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Alaska State Office 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13 Anchorage, Alaska 995 13-7599 http://www.ak.blm.gov Dear Reader: Enclosed for your review is the Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement (Proposed RMPIFinal EIS) for the lands administered in the Ring of Fire by the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM's) Anchorage Field Office (AFO).
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Peninsula/Becharof National Wildlife Refuge Complex
    ALASKA PENINSULA/BECHAROF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE COMPLEX King Salmon, Alaska ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1992 U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM ALASKA PENINSULA/BECHAROF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE COMPLEX King Salmon, Alaska ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1992 U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM.S REVIEWS AND APPROVALS ALASKA PENINSULA/BECl~OF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE COMPLEX King Salmon, Alaska ANWJAL NARRP.TIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1992 h~.S-~'f ~~ :ti?<A/6( Refuge Manager Date A~cfate Manager Review Date ~ ~ Regional Office Approval Date TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION A. HIGHLIGHTS .•.....•......•••••••••.....•. 10 B. CLIMATIC CONDITIONS .•...•.•....•........ 11 C. LAND ACQUISITION 1. Fee Title ................................................•......... 17 2. Easements .......................................................... 20 3. Other .............................................................. 20 D. PLANNING 1. Master Plan ....................................................... NTR 2. Management Plan .................................................... 20 3. Public Participation ............................................... 24 4. Compliance with Environmental Mandates ...........................•. 25 5. Research and Investigations ........................................ 25 6. Other ..................................................•........... 26 E. ADMINISTRATION 1. Personnel .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Park Science. Volume 3, Issue 2
    National Park Service U.S. Department of Interior Alaska Regional Office Alaska Park Science Anchorage, Alaska Connections to Natural and Cultural Resource Studies in Alaska’s National Parks Volume 3, Issue 2 Table of Contents New Frontiers, Old Fossils: Recent Dinosaur Noatak National Preserve Discoveries in Alaska National Parks ____________ 5 Gates of the Arctic Cape Krusenstern National Park and Preserve Glacier Toads and Frozen Frogs: National Monument Alaska’s Surprising Amphibian Diversity ______ 11 Kobuk Valley National Park Suqpiat of the Lower Kenai Peninsula Coast __ 17 Bering Land Bridge National Preserve Mammal Diversity: Inventories of Alaska Yukon-Charley Rivers K A National Preserve National Parks Stimulate New Perspectives ____ 23 A S Norton Sound L Managing Exit Glacier’s Popularity: A ____ Social Science Looks at Visitor Experiences 29 Denali National Park and Preserve Aniakchak Sockeye Salmon Investigations ____ 35 Wrangell-St. Elias National Park Science News________________________________ 40-43 and Preserve ISSN 1545- 4967 Klondike Gold Rush Lake Clark Historical Park National Park and Preserve Glacier Bay Kenai Fjords National Park Alaska Park Science National Park and Preserve http://www.nps.gov/akso/AKParkScience/index.htm Katmai National Park and Preserve Sitka Editor: Monica Shah Bristol Bay Historical Park Copy Editor: Thetus Smith Aniakchak Project Lead: Robert Winfree, Regional Science Advisor, National Monument email: [email protected] and Preserve Gulf of Alaska Alaska Park Science Journal Board: Ted Birkedal, Team Leader for Cultural Resources Don Callaway, Cultural Anthropologist Terry DeBruyn, Regional Wildlife Biologist Joy Geiselman, Deputy Chief, Biological Science Office USGS Alaska Science Center Alaska National Parks Russ Kucinski, Team Leader for Natural Resources John Morris, Education Coordinator John Quinley, Assistant Regional Director for Communications Jane Tranel, Public Affairs Specialist This project is made possible through funding from the Alaska Park Science is published twice a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigable Rivers and Lakes
    Chapter 3 – Navigable Rivers and Lakes Navigable Rivers and Lakes Management Intent of Navigable Waterbodies Background The intent of the plan is to designate and provide management intent for the shorelands under all navigable waterbodies. There are so many navigable rivers and lakes in the planning area that it is not practical to state the management intent for each individual waterbody. Therefore the plan identifies general management intent and designations for most of the waterbodies within the planning area. In some cases, however, specific designations are identified for a particular waterbody because of the size, uniqueness, or particular values and functions of a river or lake. The term "shorelands" is defined as land belonging to the state, which is covered by non-tidal water that is navigable under the laws of the United States up to the ordinary high water mark as modified by accretion, erosion, or reliction (AS 38.05.965). See Figure 1.1 at the beginning of Chapter 1 for a diagram that illustrates the differences between shorelands, submerged lands, and uplands. Shorelands are not identified on the preceding plan designation maps within this Chapter. Identification of all such waterbodies is impractical on maps of the scale used in this plan. The DNR records on navigability and hydrology must be consulted in order to determine whether a specific stream or lake is likely to be navigable. These records are available in the Public Access Assertion & Defense Unit, Division of Mining, Land, and Water in Anchorage. For further information on the state’s navigability policy, go to http://www.dnr.state.ak.us/mlw/nav/nav_policy.htm Public Trust Doctrine The Public Trust Doctrine provides that public trust lands, waters and living natural resources in a state are held by the state in trust for the benefit of all the people, and establishes the right of the public to fully utilize the public trust lands, waters, and resources for a wide variety of public uses.
    [Show full text]
  • ALASKA PENINSULA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE King Salmon
    ALASKA PENINSULA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE King Salmon, Alaska ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1983 U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM 5 2 3 4 1 Personnel 1. John Taylor Refuge Manager GS=485-12 EOD 08/26/79 2. Vernon D. Berns Asst. Refuge Manager (Pilot) GS-485-12 EOD 02/18/82 3. C. Randall Arment Asst. Refuge Manager (Pilot) GS-485-11 EOD 10/03/82 4. John W. Solberg Asst. Refuge Manager GS-485-05 EOD 03/06/83 5. Randall J. Wilk Biological Technician GS-404-05 EOD 06/27/83 6. J. Michael Humerick Maintenance Worker WG-4749-8 EOD 05/23/82 Glenn Elison, Refuge Manager GS-485-12 EOD 10/08/81 Transferred 09/26/83 Kelie Swanson, Refuge Assistant GS-303-4 EOD 08/22/82 Resigned 07/20/83 Sharon Workman GS-303-4 EOD 10/13/83 Resigned 01/06/84 Temporary Carl Reintsma Biol. Technician EOD 06/13/83 Termin. 08/09/83 Y.C.C. Denise Reynolds EOD 06/13/83 Termin. 07/22/83 Tani Wieber EOD 06/13/83 Termin. 07/22/83 Review and Approvals Refuge Manager Date Regional Office Review Date TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION A. HIGHLIGHTS B. CLAMACTIC CONDITIONS 1 C. LAND ACQUISITION 1. Fee Title 4 2. Easements NTR 3. Other 4 D. PLANNING 1. Master. Plan D 2. Management Plan 6 3. Public Participation 6 4. Compliance with Environmental Mandates 7 5. Research and Investigations NTR E. ADMINISTRATION 1. Personnel 7 2. Youth Programs 8 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Sport Fishing Areas Latitude- Longitude
    NAME SiteCode sitelab Lat Long Lake & Peninsula Borough R0008 Naknek Lake - Bay of Islands 58.483333 -155.866667 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0009 Naknek Lake 58.650000 -155.866667 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0010 Brooks River (into Naknek Lake) 58.550000 -155.783333 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0011 Ugashik system 57.500000 -157.616667 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0012 Becharof system 57.933333 -156.250000 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0013 Brooks Lake 58.500000 -155.733333 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0014 Egegik River (Becharof system) 57.933333 -156.250000 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0015 Shosky Creek (Becharof system) 57.933333 -156.250000 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0016 Kejulik River (Becharof system) 57.933333 -156.250000 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0017 Becharof Lake (Becharof system) 57.933333 -156.250000 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0115 Alec River 56.466667 -158.933333 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0121 Bear Creek (into Becharof system) 57.683333 -156.033333 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0125 Big Creek (north of Egegik) 58.283333 -157.533333 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0127 Black Lake (Chignik area) 56.416667 -158.950000 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0130 Chignik River 56.283333 -158.633333 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0132 Cinder River 57.366667 -158.033333 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0134 Dog Salmon River 57.333333 -157.333333 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0135 Fracture Creek 56.466667 -159.750000 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0137 Grosvenor Stream 58.700000 -155.500000 Lake & Peninsula Borough R0144 King Salmon River (Egegik Bay) 58.266667 -156.583333 Lake & Peninsula Borough
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act
    APPENDIX - ANILCA 537 XXIII. APPENDIX 1. Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act PUBLIC LAW 96–487—DEC. 2, 1980 94 STAT. 2371 Public Law 96–487 96th Congress An Act To provide for the designation and conservation of certain public lands in the State Dec. 2, 1980 of Alaska, including the designation of units of the National Park, National [H.R. 39] Wildlife Refuge, National Forest, National Wild and Scenic Rivers, and National Wilderness Preservation Systems, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Alaska National SECTION 1. This Act may be cited as the “Alaska National Interest Lands Interest Lands Conservation Act”. Conservation Act. TABLE OF CONTENTS 16 USC 3101 note. TITLE I—PURPOSES, DEFINITIONS, AND MAPS Sec. 101. Purposes. Sec. 102. Definitions. Sec. 103. Maps. TITLE II—NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM Sec. 201. Establishment of new areas. Sec. 202. Additions to existing areas. Sec. 203. General administration. Sec. 204. Native selections. Sec. 205. Commercial fishing. Sec. 206. Withdrawal from mining. TITLE III—NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM Sec. 301. Definitions. Sec. 302. Establishment of new refuges. Sec. 303. Additions to existing refuges. Sec. 304. Administration of refuges. Sec. 305. Prior authorities. Sec. 306. Special study. TITLE IV—NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA AND NATIONAL RECREATION AREA Sec. 401. Establishment of Steese National Conservation Area. Sec. 402. Administrative provisions. Sec. 403. Establishment of White Mountains National Recreation Area. Sec. 404. Rights of holders of unperfected mining claims. TITLE V—NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM Sec. 501. Additions to existing national forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve Vascular Plant Inventory
    ANIAKCHAK NATIONAL MONUMENT AND PRESERVE VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY ANIAKCHAK NATIONAL MONUMENT AND PRESERVE VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT Robert Lipkin Alaska Natural Heritage Program Environment and Natural Resources Institute University of Alaska Anchorage 707 A Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 National Park Service Southwest Alaska Network Inventory & Monitoring Program NPS Report: NPS/AKR/SWAN/NRTR-2005/06 November 2005 Cooperative Agreement No. 1443CA991000013 Funding Source: National Park Service, Inventory & Monitoring Program i ANIAKCHAK NATIONAL MONUMENT AND PRESERVE VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY SUGGESTED CITATION: Lipkin, R. 2005. Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve, vascular plant inventory, final technical report. National Park Service, Southwest Alaska Network, Anchorage, AK. NPS/AKR/SWAN/NRTR-2005/06. 41 pp. TOPIC(S): biological inventories, vascular plants THEME KEYWORDS: vascular plants, species of conservation concern, biological inventories PLACE NAME KEYWORDS: Southwest Alaska Network, Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve, Aniakchak Caldera, Aniakchak River, Black Creek Lagoon, the Garden Wall, the Gates, Meshik Camp, Meshik River, Packer’s Cabin, Waterfall Creek ACRONYMS: I&M Inventory & Monitoring SWAN Southwest Alaska Network AKNHP Alaska Natural Heritage Program ANIA Aniakchak National Monument & Preserve KATM Katmai National Park & Preserve LACL Lake Clark National Park & Preserve INITIAL DISTRIBUTION: Southwest Alaska Network ii ANIAKCHAK NATIONAL MONUMENT AND PRESERVE VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY
    [Show full text]