Sport Fishing Areas Latitude- Longitude
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Prehistoric Aleut Influence at Port Moller
12 'i1 Pribilof lis. "' Resale for so 100 150 200 ·o oO Miles .,• t? 0 Not Fig. 1. Map of the Alaska Peninsula and Adjacent Areas. The dotted line across the Peninsula represents the Aleut boundary as determined by Petroff. Some of the important archaeological sites are marked as follows: 1) Port Moller, 2) Amaknak Island-Unalaska Bay, 3) Fortress or Split Rock, 4) Chaluka, 5) Chirikof Island, 6) Uyak, 7) Kaflia, 8) Pavik-Naknek Drainage, 9) Togiak, 10) Chagvan Bay, 11) Platinum, 12) Hooper Bay. PREHISTORIC ALEUT INFLUENCES AT PORT MOLLER, ALASKA 1 by Allen P. McCartney Univ. of Wisconsin Introduction Recent mention has been made of the Aleut influences at the large prehistoric site at Port Moller, the only locality known archaeologically on the southwestern half of the Alaska Penin sula. Workman ( 1966a: 145) offers the following summary of the Port Moller cultural affinities: Although available published material from the Aleutians is scarce and the easternmost Aleutians in particular have been sadly neglected, it is my opinion that the strongest affinitiesResale of the Port Moller material lie in this direction. The prevalence of extended burial and burial association with ocher at Port Moller corresponds most closely with the burial practices at the Chaluka site on Umnak Island. Several of the more diagnostic projectile points have Aleutian affinities as do the tanged knives and, possibly,for the side-notched projectile point. Strong points of correspondence, particularly in the burial practices and the stone technology, lead me to believe that a definite Aleut component is represented at the site. Data currently available will not allow any definitive statement as to whether or not there are other components represented at the site as well. -
A Watershed Database for National Parks in Southwestern Alaska and a System for Further Watershed-Based Analysis
A Watershed Database for National Parks in Southwestern Alaska and a System for Further Watershed-based Analysis David M. Mixon 2005 Introduction This document describes a project designed to delineate and quantitatively describe watersheds located within or flowing into or out of national park lands in the National Inventory and Monitoring program’s Southwest Alaskan Network (SWAN) of parks. The parks included in this study are Aniakchak National Monument & Preserve, Katmai National Park & Preserve, Lake Clark National Park & Preserve, and Kenai Fjords National Park. This effort was undertaken to support decision-making processes related to the Inventory and Monitoring program’s goals. A variety of environmental and physical attributes were collected for each watershed using remotely sensed data in the form of a geographic information system (GIS). The GIS data used is from a variety of sources with variable quality. The nature of GIS analysis is such that many times a newer, higher-resolution dataset may become available during the course of any given study. For this reason, a set of scripts and methods are provided, making the incorporation of newer datasets as easy as possible. The goal is to provide an initial analysis of park hydrology as well as a means for updating the database with a minimal amount of effort. It was necessary to choose a watershed size (stream order) that would provide sufficient detail for each park and allow useful comparison of basins within the parks while minimizing the complexity of the study. Review of standards for hydrologic unit delineation being used for the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) (FGDC, 2002), suggested that the officially designated level 5 watersheds would provide the level of detail desired while minimizing redundancy. -
Regional Subsistence Bibliography Volume V Western & Southwestern
REGIONAL SUBSISTENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY Volume V Western & Southwestern Alaska Number I BY David B. Andersen and Jan H. Overturf Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Technical Paper No. 111 Juneau. Alaska 1986 CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................ .v Introduction ............................................... ..vi i . Abbreviations .............................................. ..Xl x Bibliographic citations .................................... ..l Keyword Index ................................................ 169 Author Index ................................................ 199 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people have contributed time and reference material to help produce this publication. Reference collection work done in 1983 was was greatly assisted by Elizabeth Andrews, Steve Rehnke, John Wright, and Dr. Robert Wolfe who made their own collections of regional references available and offered useful suggestions regarding organiza- tion of the bibliography and additional sources. References collected in 1983 sat for over two years awaiting further work and funding, and. for a time it appeared that they would never make it into print. We have Jim Fall to thank for spearheading efforts to resurrect the project in 1986, offering suggestions for updating the collection with new material, reviewing citations and introductory text, and providing the funds for printing. Others contributing additional reference material to the updated collection include Elizaheth Andrews. Susan Georgette, Judy Morris. and Janet Schichnes. Thanks also to Dan Foster, who expertly prepared the maps appearing in the introduction. to Kathy Arndt, who painstakingly edited an early rough draft of the hihliography. and to Margie Yadlosky, who efficiently handled data entry and editing tasks on the data file. Cover artwork was the creation of Tim Sczawinski. Finally. special thanks go to Louis Brown for his programming wizardry which created the microcomputer version of the data base and the indexing routines. -
The Nationwide Rivers Inventory APPENDIX National System Components, Study Rivers and Physiographic Maps
The Nationwide Rivers Inventory APPENDIX National System Components, Study Rivers and Physiographic Maps The National Park Service United States Department of the Interior Washington, DC 20240 January 1982 III. Existing Components of the National System 1981 National Wild and Scenic Rivers System Components State Alaska 1 _ ** River Name County(s)* Segment Reach Agency Contact Description (mile1s) (s) Designation State Congressional Section(s) Length Date of District(s) Managing Physiographic Agency Alagnak River including AK I&W The Alagnak from 67 12/2/80 NPS National Park Service Nonvianuk Kukaklek Lake to West 540 West 5th Avenue boundary of T13S, R43W Anchorage, AK 99501 and the entire Nonvianuk River. Alntna River AK B.R. The main stem within the 83 12/2/80 NPS National Park Service Gates of the Arctic 540 West 5th Avenue National Park and Preserve. Anchorage, AK 99501 Andreafsky River and AK I614- Segment from its source, 262 12/2/80 FWS Fish and Wildlife Service East Fork including all headwaters 1011 E. Tudor and the East Fork, within Anchorage, AK 99503 the boundary of the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge. AK All of the river 69 12/2/80 NPS National Park Service Aniakchak River P.M. including its major 540 West 5th Avenue including: Hidden Creek tributaries, Hidden Creek, Anchorage, AK 99501 Mystery Creek, Albert Mystery Creek, Albert Johnson Creek, North Fork Johnson Creek, and North Aniakchak River Fork Aniakchak River, within the Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve. *Alaska is organized by boroughs. If a river is in or partially in a borough, it is noted. -
Lake and Peninsula Borough Comprehensive Plan
Lake and Peninsula Borough Comprehensive Plan Pilot Point Community Action Plan Pilot Point is located on the northern coast of the Alaska Peninsula, on the east shore of Ugashik Bay. The Alaska Peninsula Wildlife Refuge is accessible by plane or skiff up the Ugashik River. The community has a history of ethnic diversity, including both Alutiiq and Yup'ik ancestry, and currently has a fishing and subsistence lifestyle. Population has both risen and fallen over the past several years, with a significant recent increase of 20 people from 2010-2011. Community Strengths and Successes Community residents shared the following recent successes as clear illustrations of Pilot Point’s entrepreneurial and collaborative spirit that ability to secure resources for important community projects. • Local high school students raised $38,000 for a trip to Hawaii. • The Pilot Point Native Corporation started a gravel pit. • A continuing transition to wind energy, • Upgrades to well and septic systems, • A new landfill and burn box, • A new clinic, • A bulkhead upgrade (with CDBG and state funding), and • A road upgrade project (moved a one-mile section of the road). The city and tribe’s working relationship has been the key to Pilot Point’s success in securing these important projects. Community Recommendations Population and Education. Pilot Point experienced a significant population loss of 32 people from 2000 to 2010 (100 to 68 persons). The most recent population estimates, 2011- 2012, indicates a population increase of 20 persons. This may be in part to improved fisheries. School enrollment has decreased since 2000. Though it remains above the 10- student threshold for closing the school, at 13 students (in 2011), the community is close enough to be concerned about keeping young people and families in Pilot Point. -
Alaska Peninsula Becharof National Wildlife Refuges
Fishery Management Plan ALASKA PENINSULA BECHAROF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES July 1994 Region 7 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service • Department of the Interior FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN ALASKA PENINSULA AND BECHAROF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES Fiscal Years 1994 - 1998 Prepared By: King Salmon Fishery Resource Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service P.O. Box 277 King Salmon, Alaska 99613 May 1994 SUMMARY STATEMENT The Alaska Peninsula and Becharof National Wildlife Refuges Fishery Management Plan (Plan) provides the management direction necessary to ensure conservation of fishery resources and habitat. In addition, the Plan provides for continued use of fishery resources by subsistence, commercial, and recreational users consistent with the purposes for which the Alaska Peninsula and Becharof refuges (Complex) were established and are managed. The Complex's biological and physical environment is described and fishery resources, human use, management history, and major issues and concerns are discussed. This information was obtained from the Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plans, a literature search, and discussions with Alaska Department of Fish and Game personnel. Objectives and tasks are developed to address the issues and concerns. Federal tasks are assigned priorities and costs for each year of continuation. The Plan encompasses a five year period, at which time it will be revised. Major issues and concerns identified include the following: competition between user groups; incomplete salmon escapement data bases to refine management of the Complex fish populations; and inadequate fishery law enforcement. In some cases, concerns were identified because of the perception that they would develop into serious problems if current levels of use or consumption were allowed to continue or expand. -
Southwest Alaska Network Long-Term Visitor Use Monitoring Protocol Development Final Report
Southwest Alaska Network Long-Term Visitor Use Monitoring Protocol Development Final Report prepared for National Park Service Southwest Alaska Network Inventory and Monitoring Program prepared by Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska Anchorage Steve Colt, Director (907)-786-1753 Principal Author: Ginny Fay EcoSystems October 11, 2007 Contract Agreement Number: CA9088A0008 Funding Source: Inventory & Monitoring Program, National Park Service Acknowledgements Funding for this project was provided through the National Park Service, Inventory and Monitoring Program. The creation of the protocol narrative and SOPs involved the contributions of numerous individuals. Becky Brock, Chief of Concessions, Lake Clark National Park and Preserve and Katmai National Park and Preserve, was instrumental to the project. Colleen Matt, formerly with the National Park Service, offered invaluable assistance at project inception. Mike Tetreau, former of Kenai Fjords National Park, shared the excellent progress Kenai Fjords National Park has made in tracking backcountry visitation. Janette Chiron, Kenai Fjords National Park, saw the project through with value comments. Dorothy Mortenson, National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring program, provided helpful suggestions related to data management and comments on an earlier draft. A number of the parks’ staff generously provided their time for interviews and information. Numerous Commercial Use Authorization operators for all the SWAN parks graciously volunteered their time to be interviewed and review draft activity reporting forms. The contributions of all individuals who assisted in this project are greatly appreciated. File Name: FayG_2007_SWAN_VisitorUseMonitoringFinalRept_0710.doc Recommended Citation: Fay, Ginny. 2007. Southwest Alaska Network Long-Term Visitor Use Monitoring Protocol Development Final Report. Southwest Alaska Network. National Park Service. -
Recreation, Tourism, and Scenic Resources
Chapter 2 - Recreation, Tourism, and Scenic Resources Recreation, Tourism, and Scenic Resources Background The Bristol Bay area is known for its world class fishing, hunting and other outdoor recreation opportunities. In part to support these activities, many federal and state parks, refuges, preserves, monuments, and recreation sites have been created. The largest state park in Alaska, the 1.6 million acre Wood-Tikchik State Park, is a major recreational asset of the region. Other significant sites include: Lake Clark National Park, Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve, Katmai National Park and Preserve (Brooks Camp and the Valley of 10,000 Smokes), the Alaska Peninsula, Alaska Maritime, Izembek, Togiak, and Becharof National Wildlife Refuges, as well as several National Wild and Scenic Rivers: the Alagnak, Chilikadrotna, Mulchatna, and Tlikakila Rivers. There are also many private camps and lodges that provide support for recreational users. While many of these private operations are in or adjacent to the public lands mentioned above they also serve other areas. Notable concentrations outside of these dedicated public lands are found in the Iliamna Lake, Naknek Lake, lower Nushagak and Alagnak drainages. Goal Recreation Opportunities. Lands will be provided for accessible outdoor recreational opportunities with recreational facilities where the demand warrants such facilities. In addition, undeveloped lands should be provided for recreation pursuits that do not require developed facilities. These opportunities shall be realized by: -
Lake Clark National Park and Preserve, Alaska Water
LAKE CLARK NATIONAL PARK AND PRESERVE, ALASKA WATER RESOURCES SCOPING REPORT Don P. Weeks Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2001/292 United States Department of the Interior • National Park Service The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 ii LAKE CLARK NATIONAL PARK AND PRESERVE ALASKA WATER RESOURCES SCOPING REPORT Don P. Weeks1 Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2003/??? Month, 2003 -
Layers of Meaning in Lake Clark National Park and Preserve
Subsistence, Tourism, and Research: Layers of Meaning in Lake Clark National Park and Preserve Karen Gaul Abstract—Overlapping designations of park, preserve, and wil- This creation story has as its locus not some mythical derness are assigned to Lake Clark National Park and Preserve in place or unearthly realm, but features the very real and south-central Alaska. The Park was established in 1980 as a result spectacular Telaquana Mountain (fig. 1) in what is now the of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA). wilderness area of Lake Clark National Park and Preserve. Consisting of over four million acres, it includes homelands and From Telaquana, according to this Dena’ina story, all the hunting and fishing grounds for the inland Dena’ina, a northern animals of the Earth tumbled out. This story represents Athabaskan-speaking people, who still engage in subsistence prac- just one set of meanings read into the complex and beauti- tices within the park. Dena’ina understandings of the environment ful landscapes that now make up Lake Clark National Park include multiple spiritual dimensions. The Park and Preserve are and Preserve. also used by sport fishers and hunters, backpackers, rafters, and Cultural resource specialists in the National Park Service other park visitors who are in search of a variety of wilderness (NPS) have been increasingly attentive to the cultural his- experiences. National Park Service researchers conduct a range of tory that is part of every national park, no matter how wild research projects that contribute to efforts to monitor and protect or remote. In this discussion, I consider the cultural use cultural and natural resources in the area. -
Thesis and Dissertation Abstracts Jason Rogers Northern Land Use Monty Rogers Stephen R
Alaska Journal of Anthropology Volume 12, Number 2 2014 Alaska Journal of Anthropology © 2014 by the Alaska Anthropological Association: All rights reserved. ISSN 1544-9793 editors alaska anthropological association Kenneth L. Pratt Bureau of Indian Affairs board of directors Erica Hill University of Alaska Southeast Rachel Joan Dale, President research notes Jenya Anichtchenko Alaska State Historic Anne Jensen UIC Science Preservation Office book reviews Molly Odell University of Washington Amy Steffian Alutiiq Museum Jeffrey Rasic National Park Service thesis and dissertation abstracts Jason Rogers Northern Land Use Monty Rogers Stephen R. Braund & Associates Research Alaska Cynthia Williams Bureau of Indian Affairs correspondence Manuscript and editorial correspondence should be sent (elec- other association officials Vivian Bowman Secretary/Treasurer tronically) to one or both of the Alaska Journal of Anthropology (AJA) editors: Sarah Carraher Newsletter Editor University of Alaska Anchorage Kenneth L. Pratt ([email protected]) Rick Reanier Aurora Editor Reanier & Associates Erica Hill ([email protected]) membership and publications Manuscripts submitted for possible publication must con- form with the AJA Style Guide, which can be found on For subscription information, visit our website at www.alaskaanthropology.org. Information on back issues and the Alaska Anthropological Association website (www. additional association publications is available on page 2 of the alaskaanthropology.org). subscription form. Please add $8 per annual -
Lake Clark Fact Sheet
National Park Service Lake Clark U.S. Department of the Interior Lake Clark National Park & Preserve www.nps.gov/lacl Fact Sheet Purpose Lake Clark was established to protect a region of dynamic geologic and ecological processes that create scenic mountain landscapes, unaltered watersheds supporting Bristol Bay red salmon, and habitats for wilderness dependent populations of fish & wildlife, vital to 10,000 years of human history. Established December 1, 1978 ....................... Designated as a National Monument by President Carter December 2, 1980 ....................... Designated as a National Park and Preserve and enlarged through the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. Size Total ............................................. 4,030,006 acres or ~ 6,297 square miles National Park ............................... 2,619,713 acres or ~ 4,093 square miles National Preserve ....................... 1,410,293 acres or ~ 2,204 square miles For comparison, the state of Hawaii is 4.11 million acres or 6,423 square miles. Rhode Island and Connecticut combined are only 3.77 million acres or 5,890 square miles. Additional 2.61 million acres ......................... National Wilderness Preservation System Designations 4 .................................................... National Register of Historic Places Dr. Elmer Bly House listed in 2006 Dick Proenneke Site listed in 2007 Libby’s No. 23 Bristol Bay Double-Ender listed in 2013 Wassillie Trefon Dena’ina Fish Cache listed in 2013 3 .................................................... National Wild Rivers Chilikadrotna River - 11 miles listed in 1980 Mulchatna River - 24 miles listed in 1980 Tlikakila River - 51 miles listed in 1980 2 .................................................... National Natural Landmarks Redoubt Volcano listed in 1976 Iliamna Volcano listed in 1976 1 .................................................... National Historic Landmark Kijik Archeological District listed in 1994 Employment NPS Permanent Employees ....