Women and Poetry, 1660–1750 Women and Poetry, 1660–1750

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Women and Poetry, 1660–1750 Women and Poetry, 1660–1750 Women and Poetry, 1660–1750 Women and Poetry, 1660–1750 Edited by Sarah Prescott and David E. Shuttleton Editorial matter and selection Q Sarah Prescott and David E. Shuttleton, 2003 Chapter 12 Q Germaine Greer, 2003 Chapters 1–11 and 13–15 Q Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2003 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2003 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St. Martin’s Press, LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. MacmillanT is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union and other countries. ISBN 978-1-4039-0655-7 ISBN 978-0-230-50489-9 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9780230504899 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Women and poetry, 1660-1750 / edited by Sarah Prescott and David E. Shuttleton. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. English poetry–Women authors–History and criticism. 2. Women and literature–Great Britain–History–18th century. 3. Women and literature– Great Britain–History–17th century. 4. English poetry–Early modern, 1500-1700–History and criticism. 5. English poetry–18th century–History and criticism. I. Prescott, Sarah, 1968- II. Shuttleton, David. PR555.W6W65 2003 8210.4099287–dc21 2003048271 10987654321 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 Contents Notes on the Contributors viii Chronology xi 1 Introduction: From Punk to Poetess 1 Sarah Prescott and David E. Shuttleton Part I: Individual Poets 15 2 Aphra Behn (1640?–89): Virginia Woolf and the ‘Little Gods of Love’ 17 Susan Wiseman Notes 25 Bibliography 26 3 Anne Killigrew (1660–85): ‘ . let ’em Rage, and ’gainst a Maide Conspire’ 29 David E. Shuttleton A note on Anne Killigrew’s paintings 36 Notes 37 Bibliography 38 4 Jane Barker (1652–1732): From Galesia to Mrs Goodwife 40 Carol Shiner Wilson Notes 46 Bibliography 47 5 Mary, Lady Chudleigh (1656–1710): Poet, Protofeminist and Patron 50 Rebecca M. Mills Notes 56 Bibliography 57 6 Anne Finch, Countess of Winchilsea (1661–1720): Sorrow into Song 60 Jane Spencer Notes 67 Bibliography 69 v vi Contents 7 Elizabeth Singer Rowe (1674–1737): Politics, Passion and Piety 71 Sarah Prescott Notes 76 Bibliography 77 8 Lady Mary Wortley Montagu (1689–1762): Haughty Mind, Warm Blood and the ‘Demon of Poesie’ 79 Jennifer Keith Notes 84 Bibliography 86 9 Mary Leapor (1722–46): Menial Labour and Poetic Aspiration 88 Valerie Rumbold Notes 93 Bibliography 94 Part II: Contexts 97 10 Imagining the Woman Poet: Creative Female Bodies 99 Jane Spencer Notes 117 11 Rank, Community and Audience: the Social Range of Women’s Poetry 121 Valerie Rumbold Notes 135 12 From Manuscript to Print: a Volume of Their Own? 140 Margaret J. M. Ezell Notes 158 13 Women in the Literary Market Place: Pimping in Grub Street 161 Germaine Greer Notes 177 Part III: Poetic Practice 181 14 Classical and Biblical Models: the Female Poetic Tradition 183 Claudia Thomas Kairoff Notes 200 Contents vii 15 Political Verse and Satire: Monarchy, Party and Female Political Agency 203 Kathryn R. King Notes 220 16 The Labouring-Class Women Poets: ‘Hard Labour we most chearfully pursue’ 223 Donna Landry Notes 240 Bibliography 244 Anthologies 244 Studies on women writers 244 Related studies of interest 245 Index 247 Notes on the Contributors Margaret J. M. Ezell is the John Paul Abbott Professor of Liberal Arts at Texas A&M University. Her publications include The Patriarch’s Wife: Literary Evidence and the History of the Family, Writing Women’s Literary History and Social Authorship and the Advent of Print. Presently she is at work on Volume V of the new Oxford English Literary History Series, 1645–1714: Authors, Readers, and Literary Life. Germaine Greer has an international reputation as a writer, broad- caster and feminist intellectual. She teaches literature at the University of Warwick. In 1979 she co-edited the ground-breaking Kissing the Rod: an Anthology of Seventeenth Century Women’s Verse. Her many other pub- lications include The Obstacle Race: the Fortunes of Women Painters and Their Work (1979), Slip-Shod Sibyls: Recognition, Rejection and the Woman Poet (1995) and The Whole Woman (2000). Professor Greer also runs and owns Stump Cross Press, publishing neglected early women poets. Claudia Thomas Kairoff is Professor of English and Associate Dean of the College at Wake Forest University in North Carolina. She is author of Alexander Pope and His Eighteenth-Century Women Readers (1994) and co-editor of ‘More Solid Learning’: New Perspectives on Alexander Pope’s Dunciad (2000). She has written a number of articles on Pope and on women writers. She is currently researching a study of Elizabeth Tollet and also plans a book on Anna Seward. Jennifer Keith has written several articles on eighteenth- and nineteenth-century poets, including Anne Finch, Alexander Pope, James Thomson and William Blake. She contributed the chapter on ‘Preromanticism and the Ends of Eighteenth-Century Poetry’, in John Sitter (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Eighteenth-Century Poetry. Her book-length study of poetic representation from Aphra Behn to William Cowper is forthcoming. She teaches at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Kathryn R. King teaches English at the University of Montevallo in Alabama. She is the author of Jane Barker, Exile: a Literary Career 1675– 1725 (2000), co-editor with Alex Pettit of Eliza Haywood’s The Female viii Notes on the Contributors ix Spectator and Selected Works of Eliza Haywood (2001), and has written many essays on early modern women writers. She is currently at work on a cultural history of war in the long eighteenth century. Donna Landry is Professor of English at Wayne State University in Detroit and an Honorary Research Fellow and Visiting Professor at the University of Exeter in Britain. The history of the English countryside, women’s writing, labouring-class writing, early modern British horse- manship and travellers to the Middle East are her current research interests. Her most recent book is The Invention of the Countryside: Hunting, Walking and Ecology in English Literature, 1671–1831 (2001). Other books include The Muses of Resistance: Laboring-Class Women’s Poetry in Britain, 1739–1796 (1990) and, co-edited with Gerald MacLean and Joseph P. Ward, The Country and the City Revisted: England and the Politics of Culture, 1550–1850 (1999). Rebecca M. Mills completed her D.Phil. on polemical prose and poetry by women in the early eighteenth century at the University of Oxford in the summer of 2000. She has written on the politics of Custom in the works of Augustan women writers and is currently working on an edi- tion of Elizabeth Thomas’s (1675–1731) poems and letters. She is an English teacher for Durant Senior High School and an adjunct instructor at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa, Florida. Sarah Prescott is Lecturer in English Literature at the University of Wales, Aberystwyth, where she teaches women’s writing, eighteenth- century literature, detective fiction and feminist theory. She is author of Women, Authorship and Literary Culture, 1690–1740 (2003), and has published widely on women writers of the early eighteenth century, particularly Penelope Aubin, Jane Brereton, Eliza Haywood and Elizabeth Singer Rowe. She has edited a special issue of the journal Women’s Writing on Augustan women writers (2000) and is currently working on a study of Welsh writing in English in the eighteenth century. Valerie Rumbold is Senior Lecturer in English at the University of Birmingham. She is author of Women’s Place in Pope’s World (1989) and of a range of articles on Pope and on women writers of the eighteenth century. She is editor of the Longman Annotated Texts Alexander Pope: The Dunciad in Four Books (1743) (1999), and is currently working as one of the editors of the Longman Annotated Pope. David E. Shuttleton teaches literature, theory and film in the English Department at the University of Wales, Aberystwyth. He has published x Notes on the Contributors widely in journals and anthologies on eighteenth-century literature, with a specialist interest in medical and philosophical contexts. His interest in women’s poetry took off from curiosity over the use of somatic metaphors in the poetry of Mary Chandler who reputedly died of self-starvation as the over-zealous follower of the famously obese dietician Dr George Cheyne. His first essay on Chandler appeared in Women’s Poetry of the Enlightenment: Essays on the Making of a Canon, 1730–1820, edited by Isobel Armstrong and Virginia Blaine (1998). He is currently editing Cheyne’s letters for The Cambridge Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Samuel Richardson and writing a mono- graph on smallpox and the literary imagination.
Recommended publications
  • Shearer West Phd Thesis Vol 1
    THE THEATRICAL PORTRAIT IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY LONDON (VOL. I) Shearer West A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St. Andrews 1986 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2982 This item is protected by original copyright THE THEATRICAL PORTRAIT IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY LONDON Ph.D. Thesis St. Andrews University Shearer West VOLUME 1 TEXT In submitting this thesis to the University of St. Andrews I understand that I am giving permission for it to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subject to any copyright vested in the work not being affected thereby. I also understand that the title and abstract will be published, and that a copy of the I work may be made and supplied to any bona fide library or research worker. ABSTRACT A theatrical portrait is an image of an actor or actors in character. This genre was widespread in eighteenth century London and was practised by a large number of painters and engravers of all levels of ability. The sources of the genre lay in a number of diverse styles of art, including the court portraits of Lely and Kneller and the fetes galantes of Watteau and Mercier. Three types of media for theatrical portraits were particularly prevalent in London, between ca745 and 1800 : painting, print and book illustration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eloquence of Mary Astell
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2005 The eloquence of Mary Astell Sutherland, Christine Mason University of Calgary Press Sutherland, C. M. "The eloquence of Mary Astell". University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/49316 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 Unported Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca University of Calgary Press www.uofcpress.com THE ELOQUENCE OF MARY ASTELL by Christine Mason Sutherland ISBN 978-1-55238-661-3 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This open-access work is published under a Creative Commons licence.
    [Show full text]
  • FELLERS-DISSERTATION-2013.Pdf (819.7Kb)
    A STUDY IN CONTRASTS: MARY COLLIER AND MARY LEAPOR’S DIVERSE CONTRIBUTIONS TO EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY BRITISH LABORING-CLASS WOMEN’S POETRY _________________ A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of English University of Houston _________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _________________ By Kathy G. Fellers August, 2013 A STUDY IN CONTRASTS: MARY COLLIER AND MARY LEAPOR’S DIVERSE CONTRIBUTIONS TO EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY BRITISH LABORING-CLASS WOMEN’S POETRY _________________ An Abstract of a Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of English University of Houston _________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _________________ By Kathy G. Fellers August, 2013 ABSTRACT Mary Collier and Mary Leapor (two of the first laboring-class female authors) share many characteristics, least of which is their desire to be writers and to depict and comment on gender and class dynamics more accurately than had been done before. This artistic focus on “the gap between the ideal and the real” (Messenger 172-174) is partly rooted in the mode of satire where writers create irony by contrasting more realistic images or situations with idealized ones (often implicitly). Part of satire’s purpose is amusement, but equally important is its social critique. Hence, Collier and Leapor are very much writers of their age, yet while they both reflect the writing impulses of the eighteenth-century, they draw from a mixture of different writing traditions. Moreover, their differing economic, creative, and educational circumstances make for significant differences in their writing, despite their common laboring-class backgrounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Romeo Revived .Pdf
    McGirr, E. (2017). "What's in a Name?": Romeo and Juliet and the Cibber Brand. Shakespeare. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450918.2017.1406983 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1080/17450918.2017.1406983 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Taylor and Francis at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17450918.2017.1406983. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Elaine M. McGirr Reader in Theatre & Performance Histories University of Bristol “What’s in a name?”: Romeo and Juliet and the Cibber brand Abstract: The 1744 and 1748/50 performances of Romeo and Juliet by Theophilus Cibber, Jenny Cibber and Susannah Cibber explain the significance of the play’s return to the repertory, uncover the history of rival interpretations of Juliet’s character, and make sense of the careers and reputations of the theatrical Cibbers. The “Cibberian” airs of all three Cibbers were markedly different, as were their interpretations of Shakespeare’s star-crossed lovers. Keywords: Shakespearean adaptation, performance history, celebrity, authorial reputation, repertory In Romeo and Juliet, Juliet apostrophizes Romeo to deny thy father and refuse thy name, assuring her (supposedly) absent lover that a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.
    [Show full text]
  • Handel's Oratorios and the Culture of Sentiment By
    Virtue Rewarded: Handel’s Oratorios and the Culture of Sentiment by Jonathan Rhodes Lee A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Music in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Davitt Moroney, Chair Professor Mary Ann Smart Professor Emeritus John H. Roberts Professor George Haggerty, UC Riverside Professor Kevis Goodman Fall 2013 Virtue Rewarded: Handel’s Oratorios and the Culture of Sentiment Copyright 2013 by Jonathan Rhodes Lee ABSTRACT Virtue Rewarded: Handel’s Oratorios and the Culture of Sentiment by Jonathan Rhodes Lee Doctor of Philosophy in Music University of California, Berkeley Professor Davitt Moroney, Chair Throughout the 1740s and early 1750s, Handel produced a dozen dramatic oratorios. These works and the people involved in their creation were part of a widespread culture of sentiment. This term encompasses the philosophers who praised an innate “moral sense,” the novelists who aimed to train morality by reducing audiences to tears, and the playwrights who sought (as Colley Cibber put it) to promote “the Interest and Honour of Virtue.” The oratorio, with its English libretti, moralizing lessons, and music that exerted profound effects on the sensibility of the British public, was the ideal vehicle for writers of sentimental persuasions. My dissertation explores how the pervasive sentimentalism in England, reaching first maturity right when Handel committed himself to the oratorio, influenced his last masterpieces as much as it did other artistic products of the mid- eighteenth century. When searching for relationships between music and sentimentalism, historians have logically started with literary influences, from direct transferences, such as operatic settings of Samuel Richardson’s Pamela, to indirect ones, such as the model that the Pamela character served for the Ninas, Cecchinas, and other garden girls of late eighteenth-century opera.
    [Show full text]
  • Weaver, Words, and Dancing in the Judgment of Paris
    On Common Ground 5:Weaver, Dance inWords, Drama, and Drama Dancing in in DanceThe Judgment of Paris DHDS March 2005 Text copyright © Moira Goff and DHDS 2005 Weaver, Words, and Dancing in The Judgment of Paris Moira Goff On 31 January 1733, the Daily Post let its readers know that ‘The Judgment of Paris, which was intended to be perform’d this Night, is deferr’d for a few Days, upon Account of some Alterations in the Machinery’. John Weaver’s new afterpiece, which was to be his last work for the London stage, received its first performance at Drury Lane on 6 February 1733.1 Weaver had not created a serious dance work since his ‘Dramatic Entertainments of Danc- ing’ The Loves of Mars and Venus of 1717 and Orpheus and Eurydice of 1718. When the description for The Judgment of Paris was published to accompany performances, it an- nounced a change from Weaver’s earlier practice by referring to the work as a ‘Dramatic Entertainment in Dancing and Singing’.2 Why did Weaver resort to words? Did he feel that they were necessary to attract audiences and explain the story to them? The Judgment of Paris was performed six times between 6 and 15 February 1733, and then dropped out of the repertoire. On 31 March The Harlot’s Progress; or, The Ridotto Al’Fresco was given its first performance. This afterpiece by Theophilus Cibber, based on the very popular series of paintings and prints by William Hogarth, included a ‘Grand Masque call’d, The Judgment of Paris’.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in the Work of Colley Cibber
    BULLETIN OF THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HUMANISTIC STUDIES Vol. 1 October 1, 1912 No. 1 STUDIES IN THE WORK OF COLLEY CIBBER BY DE WITT C.:'CROISSANT, PH.D. A ssistant Professor of English Language in the University of Kansas LAWRENCE, OCTOBER. 1912 PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY CONTENTS I Notes on Cibber's Plays II Cibber and the Development of Sentimental Comedy Bibliography PREFACE The following studies are extracts from a longer paper on the life and work of Cibber. No extended investigation concerning the life or the literary activity of Cibber has recently appeared, and certain misconceptions concerning his personal character, as well as his importance in the development of English literature and the literary merit of his plays, have been becoming more and more firmly fixed in the minds of students. Cibber was neither so much of a fool nor so great a knave as is generally supposed. The estimate and the judgment of two of his contemporaries, Pope and Dennis, have been far too widely accepted. The only one of the above topics that this paper deals with, otherwise than incidentally, is his place in the development of a literary mode. While Cibber was the most prominent and influential of the innovators among the writers of comedy of his time, he was not the only one who indicated the change toward sentimental comedy in his work. This subject, too, needs fuller investigation. I hope, at some future time, to continue my studies in this field. This work was suggested as a subject for a doctor's thesis, by Professor John Matthews Manly, while I was a graduate student at the University of Chicago a number of years ago, and was con• tinued later under the direction of Professor Thomas Marc Par- rott at Princeton.
    [Show full text]
  • I the POLITICS of DESIRE: ENGLISH WOMEN PLAYWRIGHTS
    THE POLITICS OF DESIRE: ENGLISH WOMEN PLAYWRIGHTS, PARTISANSHIP, AND THE STAGING OF FEMALE SEXUALITY, 1660-1737 by Loring Pfeiffer B. A., Swarthmore College, 2002 M. A., University of Pittsburgh, 2010 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2015 i UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Loring Pfeiffer It was defended on May 1, 2015 and approved by Kristina Straub, Professor, English, Carnegie Mellon University John Twyning, Professor, English, and Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies, Courtney Weikle-Mills, Associate Professor, English Dissertation Advisor: Jennifer Waldron, Associate Professor, English ii Copyright © by Loring Pfeiffer 2015 iii THE POLITICS OF DESIRE: ENGLISH WOMEN PLAYWRIGHTS, PARTISANSHIP, AND THE STAGING OF FEMALE SEXUALITY, 1660-1737 Loring Pfeiffer, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2015 The Politics of Desire argues that late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-century women playwrights make key interventions into period politics through comedic representations of sexualized female characters. During the Restoration and the early eighteenth century in England, partisan goings-on were repeatedly refracted through the prism of female sexuality. Charles II asserted his right to the throne by hanging portraits of his courtesans at Whitehall, while Whigs avoided blame for the volatility of the early eighteenth-century stock market by foisting fault for financial instability onto female gamblers. The discourses of sexuality and politics were imbricated in the texts of this period; however, scholars have not fully appreciated how female dramatists’ treatment of desiring female characters reflects their partisan investments.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01316-2 - The Cambridge Companion to Women’s Writing in Britain, 1660–1789 Edited by Catherine Ingrassia Frontmatter More information the cambridge companion to women’s writing in britain, 1660–1789 Women writers played a central role in the literature and culture of eighteenth- century Britain. Featuring essays on female writers and genres by leading scho- lars in the field, this Companion introduces readers to the range, significance, and complexity of women’s writing across multiple genres in Britain between 1660 and 1789. Divided into two parts, the Companion first discusses women’s participation in print culture, featuring essays on topics such as women and popular culture, women as professional writers, women as readers and writers, and place and publication. Additionally, Part I explores the ways that women writers crossed generic boundaries. The second part contains chapters on many of the key genres in which women wrote, including poetry, drama, fiction (early and later), history, the ballad, periodicals, and travel writing. The Companion also provides an introduction surveying the state of the field, an integrated chronology, and a guide to further reading. catherine ingrassia is Professor of English at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, Virginia. She is the author of Authorship, Commerce, and Gender in Eighteenth-Century England: A Culture of Paper Credit (Cambridge, 1998); editor of a critical edition of Eliza Haywood’s Anti- Pamela and Henry Fielding’s Shamela (2004); and co-editor of A Companion to the Eighteenth-Century Novel and Culture (2005) and the anthology British Women Poets of the Long Eighteenth Century (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • An A2 Timeline of the London Stage Between 1660 and 1737
    1660-61 1659-60 1661-62 1662-63 1663-64 1664-65 1665-66 1666-67 William Beeston The United Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company @ Salisbury Court Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company & Thomas Killigrew @ Salisbury Court @Lincoln’s Inn Fields @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant Rhodes’s Company @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane @ Red Bull Theatre @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields George Jolly John Rhodes @ Salisbury Court @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane The King’s Company The King’s Company PLAGUE The King’s Company The King’s Company The King’s Company Thomas Killigrew Thomas Killigrew June 1665-October 1666 Anthony Turner Thomas Killigrew Thomas Killigrew Thomas Killigrew @ Vere Street Theatre @ Vere Street Theatre & Edward Shatterell @ Red Bull Theatre @ Bridges Street Theatre @ Bridges Street Theatre @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane @ Bridges Street Theatre, GREAT FIRE @ Red Bull Theatre Drury Lane (from 7/5/1663) The Red Bull Players The Nursery @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane September 1666 @ Red Bull Theatre George Jolly @ Hatton Garden 1676-77 1675-76 1674-75 1673-74 1672-73 1671-72 1670-71 1669-70 1668-69 1667-68 The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company Thomas Betterton & William Henry Harrison and Thomas Henry Harrison & Thomas Sir William Davenant Smith for the Davenant Betterton for the Davenant Betterton for the Davenant @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields
    [Show full text]
  • The Business of Literature in Eighteenth-Century Britain" (1999)
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Literature in English, British Isles English Language and Literature 1999 Misogynous Economies: The Business of Literature in Eighteenth- Century Britain Laura C. Mandell Miami University of Ohio Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Mandell, Laura C., "Misogynous Economies: The Business of Literature in Eighteenth-Century Britain" (1999). Literature in English, British Isles. 64. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_english_language_and_literature_british_isles/64 Misogynous Economies Misogynous Economies The Business of Literature in Eighteenth-Century Britain Laura Mandell THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY Publication of this volume was made possible in part by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Copyright © 1999 by The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine College, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Club Historical Society, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. All rights reserved. Editorial and Sales Offices: The University Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008 03 02 01 00 99 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mandell, Laura.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ELOQUENCE of MARY ASTELL by Christine Mason Sutherland ISBN 978-1-55238-661-3
    Archiving note from Unglue.it Notwithstanding the publisher's copyright statement which follows, the cover art for this book is the painting Bildnisstudie einer jungen Dame by Sir Joshua Reynolds dating from 1765-1770 and is in the public domain throughout the world. It may copied and re-used without restriction. See the Europeana website for more information: http://www.europeana.eu/portal/reco rd/15502/GG_6264.html University of Calgary Press www.uofcpress.com THE ELOQUENCE OF MARY ASTELL by Christine Mason Sutherland ISBN 978-1-55238-661-3 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This open-access work is published under a Creative Commons licence. This means that you are free to copy, distribute, display or perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to its authors and publisher, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form, and that you in no way alter, transform, or build on the work outside of its use in normal academic scholarship without our express permission.
    [Show full text]