<<

MARINE PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 130: 277-293. 1996 Published January 11 Mar Ecol Prog Ser

Organism cycles, , and the of marine pelagic

Peter G. Verity1,*, Victor smetacek2

'Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, 10 Circle, Savannah, Georgia 31411, USA '~lfredWegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, D-27570 Bremerhaven, Germany

ABSTRACT: This paper explores the notion that the theoretical basis for contemporary research con- cerning the structure and of marine pelagic ecosystems is self-limiting. While some findings such as the microbial web have extended our knowledge of the biological components of the upper column and their relationships to fluxes of materials and , they have not advanced our understanding of why specific pelagic forms occur in and , and why only some attain dominant status and contribute the bulk of biogenic fluxes emanating from the mixed layer. It is argued here that a major impediment to improved conceptual models is the historic focus on -dnven or 'bottom-up' factors as the dominant variables structuring planktonic ecosystems. Evidence is presented that predation or 'top-down' trophic effects may be equally important in specifying the occurrence of particular taxa, the within adjacent trophic levels, and the of domi- nant and . It is suggested that key , because of unique combinations of life history strategies, metabolic demands, and physiological performance, may exert a dominant role in the extent to which predatory interactions cascade through pelagic food webs. There is considerable evidence of of predation avoidance strategies among and . It is proposed that future research might profitably be directed toward the question of how the pelagic envi- ronment selects for life histories and morphologles of organisms under conditions when resource avail- ability and predation are both significant structural buttresses. Methodological approaches should include detailed studies of dominant key taxa from different environments, with the goal of identifying the crlt~calaspects of life history, behavior, or morphology which account for their success.

KEY WORDS: Morphology . Life history . - Pelagic - Top-down . . Predation - structure . Bottom-up

CONCEPTUAL OVERVIEW that structure pelagic ecosystems. Thus, the distribu- tion patterns of dominant pelagic species are fairly Quantitative understanding of marine processes has well established, yet we do not know why they occur increased rapidly in the past decades, driven by the when and where they do. What is lacking is knowl- development of new methods and enabling edge of the of properties that gear given spe- measurement, mapping and modelling of the fluxes cies to specific environments, and which are responsi- and cycling of biogenic elements, at scales extending ble for their occurrence or persistence in given water from molecular diffusion to global ocean circulation. masses. However, these substantial advances in quantification For example, we do not clearly understand why only and delineation of biogeochemical processes and a few diatom genera dominate oceanic new produc- provinces have not been accompanied by commensu- tion, or why calanoid contribute the bulk of rate progress in understanding of the mechanisms marine zooplankton biomass. These are important questions because the respective diatoms and cope- pods each impact the fate of organic produced or processed by them in unique ways: the silica frus-

O Inter-Research 1996 Resale of full article not permitted 278 Mar Ecol Prog Ser

tules of diatoms and the compact fecal pellets of cope- THE ROLE OF ORGANISM LIFE CYCLES AND pods both enhance vertical flux of . In MORPHOLOGIES contrast, the gelatinous colonies of Phaeocystis, which dominate new production in some environments, often The bulk of large-scale biogenic cycling and produc- contribute less to vertical flux than the equivalent bio- tion of food is dependent on relatively few taxa mass of diatoms (Wassmann 1994). Further, , and morphotypes. In the following sections, we discuss the dominant zooplankter in many , produces some examples of key species and their morphologies loose fecal matter that disintegrates following release to illustrate how specific knowledge of (Lampert 1987) and hence does not contribute to ver- biologies will greatly improve our understanding of the tical flux. Thus, neither of these properties - silica forces shaping ecosystem structure and driving bio- frustules or fecal pellets - can presently be related to geochemical fluxes. This holds consider- the dominant role diatoms and copepods in the able promise for development of a predictive frame- marine pelagial. work. The above examples illustrate the extent to which Fragilariopsis (Nifzschia) kerguelensis. This is a biological properties of dominant organisms deter- medium-sized (15 to 30 pm long) pennate diatom that mine patterns of biogeochemical cycling in today's in ribbon-shaped chains of 20 to 100 cells and ocean, but they also demonstrate the substantial gaps forms almost monospecific blooms in the Antarctic that still exist in our understanding of marine ecologi- Polar Frontal Zone (Bathmann et al. 1994). Its global cal processes and seriously hamper further progress. significance is bestowed by its inordinately robust The traditional approach to the study of marine siliceous walls, which contribute the bulk of the pelagic ecology is biased toward factors regulating silica deposits in the underlying (Burckle growth of organisms, i.e. resource acquisition (bottom- & Cirilli 1987). Indeed, deposition of its frustules has up force) is accorded more importance than predation continued unabated through glacial and interglacial (top-down force) in regulating the structure and func- cycles. This siliceous girdle around the continent is tioning of marine pelagic . We argue that this reputed to accumulate fully 75 % of the biogenic silica approach is now self-limiting, as it has not provided being deposited in today's ocean (Ledford-Hoffman et an adequate framework to advance our understand- al. 1986), although only 20% of global biogenic silica ing of how works in the marine production occurs in these (Treguer et al. 1995). pelagial. It is tempting to speculate that the thick of F. We advocate here that predation and resource kerguelensis is somehow selected for as a grazer deter- availability act through morphologies and life history rent in these waters, inducing blooms and mass sedi- strategies of organisms to structure pelagic ecosys- mentation. It follows that these factors, be they sinking tems, and hence to drive biogeochemical cycles. The and seeding strategy (sensu Smetacek 1985), or grazer potential significance of the (- protection, or both, indirectly shape the ocean silica ism-mediated incorporation of inorganic into budget. But what are these factors? organic carbon, and its sequestration into the interior Emiliania huxleyi. This is a small (

tion. Molecular genetic studies indicate that open Apart from its larger size, is very similar to ocean and coastal forms belong to the same species other euphausiids, hence any unique ability is not (Barker et al. 1994); however, when clonal cultures reflected in its morphology. of the krill from the same mesocosm experiment were compared - the region bounded by the winter extent of with one another, a surprising degree of genetic vari- sea ice around Antarctica - is rather low and the ability within the bloom came to light. Ernil- composition and biomass of plankton, contrary to ear- iania is indeed a tantalizing species. lier belief, is similar to that of other high latitude Phaeocystis. This is a polymorphic phytoplankton oceans (Smetacek et al. 1990). Krill utilizes a wide taxon whose life cycle includes, but may not be lim- range of food sources: phytoplankton, ice ited to, solitary flagellated cells of 3 to 8 pm and gela- (Marschall 1988) and copepods (Huntley et al. 1994) tinous colonies of non-flagellated cells up to 2 cm in and can easily survive long periods of starvation diameter (Kornmann 1955, Verity et al. 1988, Rous- (Ikeda & Dixon 1982). Clearly, versatility is necessary seau et al. 1994). While some uncertainty remains if such a large portion of the annual primary produc- about taxonomic identity, details of its life cycle, and tion is to be sequestered in a single population, and transitions therein (Baunlann et al. 1994, Cariou et al. Smetacek et al. (1990) argued that it is the way in 1994, Medlin et al. 1994), Phaeocystis is well known which Euphausia superba has geared its life cycle to for prodigious blooms of the colonial phase. These the seasonality of sea ice that enables it to maintain occur primarily in boreal and polar waters of both such large stocks. However, a notable feature of krill hemispheres, but occasionally in temperate and tropi- is its long life span, and consensus is now emerging cal waters (Kashkin 1963, Baumann et al. 1994). that live for at least 5 or 6 yr (Knox 1994), These blooms are important regionally and seasonally which is very unusual among pelagic crustacea and to , and their significance to global implies a slower turnover rate of the population than CO2 sinks has also been promoted (Smith et al. 1991). was previously believed. It follows that the excep- There is evidence that changes in the size structure of tional stock size of krill when compared to euphausiid Phaeocystis blooms can alter the zooplankton commu- of other oceans cannot be explained by a nity (Hansen et al. 1994), and that omnivorous zoo- faster growth rate but is more likely due to a lower plankton in the presence of Phaeocystis instead , as discussed below. on protozoans, thereby releasing Phaeocystis from The unique feature of the krill habitat is the pres- herbivory (Hansen et al. 1993).In the absence of sub- ence of the seasonal sea ice cover which is utilized stantial pressure, sedimentation of colonies by krill as a food source but which also offers protec- occurs in some environments (Wassmann 1994), tion, particularly during winter, from the air breath- although emigration of cells out of the colonies might ing, visual predators that are the chief predators minimize vertical export of cellular carbon (Verity et of krill. Another unique feature of the krill habitat al. 1988). Phaeocystis is also a copious producer of is the relative absence of clupeid fish swarms. DMS and its precursor in seawater, DMSP (Stefels & Although a clupeid morphotype has evolved in the van Boekel 1993),so that Phaeocystis may be impor- Antarctic (Pleurogramma antarcticus), its predation tant to global sulfur balances, acidification of atmos- pressure on local euphausiids is negligible compared pheric aerosols and , and change (see Liss to that of e.g. capelin, , or sardines in their et al. 1994 for review). Thus, factors influencing its respective . We speculate that this is due to productivity and fate may significantly and interac- the stress that hypoosmotic would experience tively affect biogeochemical cycling. However, the in continuous, close contact with sea ice. Whatever fate of Phaeocystis blooms seems intrinsically the reason, the fact remains that their relative ab- associated with its life cycle and the associated match sence reduces predation pressure not only on krill or mismatch with herbivores. but also on their alternative food, copepods, which Euphausia superba. is the key species are hence available to krill. Indeed, the actively for- of the Southern Ocean, as it maintains an enormous aging krill swarms encountered in open water during biomass (still in excess of Homo sapiens) in an area summer are themselves reminiscent of clupeid fish. It only twice the size of the USA. Its average density, follows that the presence of sea ice, by changing using conservative stock estimates, is at least 10 to predation patterns, leads to a biomass bulge in the 30 ind. m-2, equivalent to 1 to 3 g C m-2! None of the euphausiid group, which in turn has considerable other species of pelagic euphausiids are as prominent ramifications for the structure and population dynam- in their respective habitats as krill in the Southern ics of the predators. The implications of the krill Ocean; therefore, the unique status of knll has to be example for our conceptual view of factors constrain- explained by unique features of its biology and/or its ing marine zooplankton populations are discussed habitat. next. 280 Mar Ecol Prog SE

The organisms described above represent but a few Life history patterns also vary widely, ranging from examples of species whose morphologies or life history an apparent absence of seasonality, even in polar strategies are sufficiently successful that they domi- waters, to presence of diapausing eggs in coastal spe- nate their respective environments in time and space. cies and diapausing sub-adults in many oceanic cope- They may hold space because they sequester resour- pods (Smith & Schnack-Schiel 1990). Again, a particu- ces (bottom-up structuring) better than their rivals, or lar life history does not select the morphology of the because they avoid or inhibit predators (top-down various life cycle stages that all copepods undergo, structuring). The former strategy has generally at- although geographical distribution of the various spe- tracted the most attention in marine plankton research. cies is probably constrained by this factor. Differences We consider in the following sections some conceptual in reproductive behavior are manifested in relatively arguments on why equal attention should be focussed minor details such as morphology of appendages in- upon the significance of predation, and the potential volved in transfer of sperm, although of some selective pressure of avoiding being eaten, in concep- species carry conspicuous egg sacs while others re- tual models of food web structure and biogeochemical lease them as they are produced. We are left with pre- fluxes in the marine pelagial. dation as the major constraint on morphology and several arguments can be broached in support of this. PREDATION CONSTRAINTS ON ZOOPLANKTON Firstly, all copepods throughout their respective MORPHOLOGY ranges share the same types of predators: active hunters such as chaetognaths and fish, and passive Oceanic zooplankton are the most widespread form trappers such as jellies and foraminifera. Most copepod of life on with the longest history of evo- predators are too large to be deterred by defenses such lutionary continuity. Yet the number of taxa is orders as spines or thick carapaces formed In limnetic clado- of magnitude smaller than that of the marine . cerans and none of these have been developed by Furthermore, the bulk of the biomass is present with- copepods. from visual hunters is effected in only a few morphotypes represented by dominant by small size and transparency but also by avoiding species of copepods, euphausiids, pteropods, and chae- the epipelagial during the day, using die1 vertical tognaths. Among holoplankton, the same basic migration (DVM),and both of these properties are well shape is maintained through 10 to 100x variation in developed in copepods. Hays et al. (19941, in a com- body volume in many cases. The special case of ge- prehensive study of DVM behavior in copepod species latinous zooplankton is further discussed below. The across the North Atlantic, found that large and pig- perceived similarity within the groups just mentioned mented species migrated more. They concluded that is all the more striking when compared with morpho- 'the rlsk of predation from visual predators [is]the most logical variation within the major benthic groups. important factor influencing taxonomic differences in Here we discuss the respective roles of food acquisi- DVM'. tion and predator avoidance as constraints on mor- Upon detection, escape from attacking predators is phology using the most ubiquitous form, the epipe- by flight and, to our knowledge, all copepods can lagic copepods, as an example of a highly successful 'jump' considerable distances when threatened. Hardy body shape. (1956) stated 'if it (Calanus)makes a sudden spurt the The similar morphology of calanoid copepods which first antennae fold back to offer the least ', is retained through about 2 orders of magnitude range propulsion being effected by the 'oar-like thoracic in length contrasts strikingly with the degree of ge- limbs'. The much shorter antennae of those copepods netic variation (Bucklin et al. 1995), suggesting strong with well-developed (e.g Corycaerrs) suggest a environmental constraints on morphology. The con- sensory (mechano-tactile) function of these appen- straints do not appear to be dictated by food acqui- dages. Experimental studies indicate that the first sition strategies because copepods as a group are antennae are environmental sensors (Gill & Crisp known to feed on a wide variety of ranging from 1985, Bundy & Paffenhofer 1993),which could function small suspended particles to zooplankton of equal to perceive food (Paffenhofer & Lew~s1990) or preda- size Indeed, gut contents and the actual process of tors. Support for the latter comes from those species in feeding need to be examined if one is to find out what which adult males cease feeding and reduce their constitutes the major food sources of the various spe- mouth parts whereby the first antennae and the basic cies (Paffenhofer 1988, Turner 1991). It follows that morphology are retained, although locating females by food acquisition (bottom-up control) is not a major de- e.g, pheromones will also be an important function. terminant of general body shape of epipelagic cope- Indeed, in some male copepods, one of the antennae is pods. hinged and used to embrace the during Verity & Smetacek: Variables structuring marine pelagic ecosystems 281

(Hardy 1956).Apart from this minor modification, male ever, each uses a different strategy. Both rely on trans- and female antennae are so similar that one would parency to disguise themselves from predator and expect the same function in both . Escaping pre- prey. The typical motionless behavior of chae- dation is, of course, equally as important in males as in tognaths, interrupted by short distance darts for prey females. Short-range predator recognition would be capture, further contributes to their invisibility. How- worthless were it not followed by an effective escape ever, while fish larvae are also comparatively transpar- response, which is a common feature of copepods. ent, their well-developed pigmented eyes are not; this Indeed, about two-thirds of the body is occupied by the undoubtably increases both their detection of prey and segments carrying the thoracic limbs responsible for their by predators. In contrast, chaetog- flight. Vertical migration and horizontal is naths have almost completely eliminated pigmented also effected by these limbs, although slower speeds organs and instead rely upon sensory hairs to detect require correspondingly less investment in muscle. In prey and predator (R.L. Hopcroft pers. comm.). the absence of evidence to the contrary, we suggest So far we have only considered the non-gelatinous that the characteristic shape of the cephalothorax of zooplankton that provide the bulk of the food for com- copepods is selected more by flight ability from preda- mercially important . The biomass of gelati- tors (top-down) than by efficiency (bottom nous zooplankton (hereafter called jellies), e.g. coelen- up). terates, ctenophores, salps and doliolids, does not flow That genetic constraints on morphotype are not in- up the economically important and, be- volved is amply demonstrated by the diverse gro- cause they eat the same food as the other zooplankters, tesque morphologies of parasitic copepods that attach they have long been considered a trophic dead-end, themselves to much larger hosts. These aberrant forms perhaps unjustly, since over 100 fish species are belong to the Poecilostomatoida and cyclopoid groups reported to occasionally or regularly ingest jellies which in general exhibit much greater morphological (G. R. Harbison pers. comm.). Perhaps freed from the plasticity than the more common calanoids. Steinberg need to escape from attacking predators, jellies exhibit et al. (1994)found that copepods were the most numer- a much wider range of shapes than their more muscu- ous living on discarded larvacean houses at lar counterparts. For example, 3 ctenophore genera midwater depths (100 to 500 m) and that many of these (Pleurobrachia, Beroe, and ) have strik- species 'possess benthic-like morphology and feeding ingly different morphologies, each associated with a strategy'. This example also indicates that morphology specific food acqulsltion strategy. In coelenterates, too, can well be modified to improve food acquisition. the range in body shape is wider than e.g. among free- However, these species are only common below the living copepods, and feeding behavior is more easily depth where visual predation is efficient. The domi- apparent. Furthermore, the barrel-shaped body plan of nant cyclopoid in the epipelagial, Oithona, has a salps and doliolids can be readily explained solely on morphology remarkably similar to that of the common the basis of food acquisition. calanoids. Thus, a substantial case can be argued for The common feature of jellies is their high volume: predation as a major factor constraining copepod mor- plasma ratio, which is widely believed to deter preda- phology. In the past, feeding behavior of marine cope- tors because of its low nutritional value. However, the pods has received much more attention than mecha- constraints on jellies must be more subtle, as nisms of predator avoidance (see Kerfoot & Sih 1987 for there are enough examples of non-gelatinous preda- freshwater zooplankton). This imbalance now needs to tors of jellies (e.g. pelagic , moon-fish, stroma- be rectified. We dwell next on some implications for teoid ) to show that can indeed make pelagic food web structure. a living off jellies. But turtles and moon-fish are mor- We have argued that the characteristic copepod mor- phologically very different from the standard pelagic phology is an effective way of avoiding predation in fish shape (exemplified by clupeids), and the stroma- their respective size class. Further up the size spec- teoid fish have a crop in their digestive (Biihler trum, the euphausiid morphology, also shared by 1930) presumably to facilitate feeding on jellies (G. R. mysids and decapod , appears to be a better Harbison pers. cornrn.). The question is, why are jellies way of avoiding predators and maintaining large stock not a principal dietary component of commercially size. In this morphological group, the large muscular important fish? The answer may reflect the sleek, abdomen is used for the typical -flip flight mode, streamlined form of the dominant epipelagic fish which differs strikingly from the 'normal' swimming which, as in the case of the zooplankters, is maintained pattern. The large investment in body solely for over several orders of magnitude (from anchovies to flight is very evident here. The streamlined form of ). The bodies of these fish consist largely of flight chaetognaths and juvenile fish will be equally effective muscle: 80 to 95% of the swimming musculature is in capturing motile prey and escaping predators; how- white muscle which enables the high velocities neces- 282 Mar Ecol Prog Ser

sary to avoid predators or to capture prey, with a cor- morphologica1 traits. This theory, described elsewhere respondingly lesser investment in red muscle dedi- as an 'arms ' (Dawluns 1987), proposes that as cated to 'normal' swimming (Bone 1978, Driedzic & predators evolve more effective weapons systems, Hochachka 1978). As in the case of copepods, fish body prey match these advances with equally successful form deviates, often grossly, from the streamlined form antidotes. These arms races do not escalate out of con- wherever the environment offers protection from trol, or evolve into perfect capturing and escaping visual predators. This is exemplified by the grotesque machines, because biological weaponry (e.g. speed to shapes of fish and by surface-living Sargas- capture prey or to escape predators) must be bought at sum fish that are models of effective camouflage. some other escalating cost (e.g. decreasing reproduc- While streamlining may facilitate rapid motions to cap- tive success). ture prey (Kils 1990), the above considerations imply Signor & Vermeij (1994) hypothesized that herbivo- that escape from predators may be equally or more rous and carnivorous plankton originally evolved important than resource acquisition in constraining as refuges from predation by marine benthic organisms. morphotype of epipelagic fishes. (Among , for The present paper argues that the concept of the arms example, speed is used for escape from predation race is currently applicable to the marinepelagial, where rather than food capture; Hertz et al. 1988.) This if predation is so important, selection for predator avoid- streamlining may also be the selective factor primarily ance mechanisms should be evident. Among plankton, responsible for the development of gape limitation in predator avoidance strategies appear well developed, pelagic systems (Hairston & Hairston 1993). In con- though perhaps not broadly distributed, and fall into trast, a composed solely of jellies inevitably re- 4 general categories: chemical, morphological, behav- quires large gut volume, and a 'belly full of jelly', by ioral, and life history defenses. A few of these are producing drag, will critically reduce escape speed. It described below; the reader is also directed towards follows that exclusive jelly feeders will not be able to detailed reviews elsewhere (Havel 1987, Sih 1987).Pre- maintain the body form and muscle necessary for sur- dation avoidance has also recently been evaluated as a vival in the epipelagial, and we suggest that this may selection pressure acting on (Jiirgens & Giide be the underlying reason for the dichotomy between 1994). the muscular and the gelatinous food chains. As Chemical defenses. Several classes of phytoplankton always in nature, exceptions do occur, such as in are known to include taxa which are inhibitory or toxic streamlined mackerel actively preying on small to herbivores. Examples include the presumed raph- medusae in the laboratory (Runge et al. 1987) and on idophyte Olisthodiscus luteus/Heterosigma akashiwo salps in nature (Konchina 1991); however, such events (Verity & Stoecker 1982, Van Alstyne 1986); several are unlikely to reflect the principal diets of these and (Huntley et al. 1986, Taniguchi & similar-bodied fish, given the highly episodic nature of Takeda 1988); and the freshwater cyanophytes Micro- abundant distributions of gelatinous planktonic organ- cystis and Aphanizomenon (Fulton & Paerl 1987, Jung- isms. Conversely, perhaps the potential ability of a mann et al. 1991). The active agents are generally school of to nearly exterminate a patch unknown but presumed to be secondary metabolites of jellies favored another life history strategy: the very sequestered within the cells (Faulkner 1984, Car- high rates of characteristic of michael 1986). Some diatoms apparently contain or smaller gelatinous forms, e.g. salps, doliolids. excrete chemical compounds which interfere or inhibit grazlng by copepods (Malej & Harris 1993) and reduce egg production and hatching success (Poulet et al. PREDATION AVOIDANCE AND THE ARMS RACE 1994). While it cannot be certain that such compounds evolved in response to predation, i.e. allelochemical It is a delicate balance to find sufficient food while interactions within a may also be impor- avoiding being eaten and there are several hypotheses tant (Lewis 1986), they are widely recognized for their describing the interdependent nature of organisms in role in deterring herbivory in terrestrial (Schultz evolution. It is generally recognized that terrestrial 1988) and macroalgae (Hay & Fenical 1988). Lowered plants coevolve with their herbivores (Ehrlich & nutritional quality, independent of or com- Raven 1964, Strong et al. 1984), with attendant costs, pounds which reduce digestibility, can also affect sus- e.g. growth rates are inversely proportional to ceptibility to predation (Butler et al. 1989). Induction of their chemical defenses (Coley et al. 1985). Another chemical defenses in plankton are inadequately theory, recently termed escalation (Vermeij 1994), understood. proposes that enemies are the primary agents of nat- Morphological defenses. These include both fixed ural selection among organisms, and that predation- and inducible morphologies (Havel 1987). Among de- induced direct long-term behavioral and fensive changes in prey architecture that have been ex- Verity & Smetacek: Variables striucturing marine pelagic ecosystems 283

per-mentally verified are: formation of colonies by pre- (and presumably other metazooplankton) also have viously single-celled Scenedesmus when exposed to sensors which detect variations in mechanical stimuli, herbivorous zooplankton (Hessen & Van Donk 1993, irradiance, and chemical gradients, and these provide Lampert et al. 1994); growth of neck spines by Daphnia defense mechanisms to reduce the probability of cap- when exposed to of predators, ture after encounter. Copepods, especially, are capable a process which is stage- and concentration-dependent of rapid accelerations resulting in short-term swim- (Tollrian 1993); development of extended wings and ming speeds of many body lengths per second (Strick- ridges by grazing when exposed to larger ler 1975). Their combined perceptive abilities and predatory ciliates (Kuhlmann & Heckmann 1985); and escape responses function to avoid potential predators growth of spines by to deter predation by larger which are stationary (Haury et al. 1980), drifting above zooplankton (Stemberger & Gilbert 1987). In at least (Buskey et al. 1986), in pursuit (Singarajah 1969), or 2 of these cases, the prey apparently perceived the are attempting to entrain prey in their flow fields presence of the predator through polypeptides released (Trager et al. 1994). Developmental stages as well as by the predator. Several phytoplankton taxa with fixed adults are capable of escape responses (Yen & Fields morphological protuberances have been speculated 1992), although the vulnerability to capture varies with to function as anti-predation devices, e.g. Ceratium prey taxa (Drenner et al. 1978), size and morphology (Hargrave & Geen 1970, but see Nielsen 1991). Rigid (Confer & Blades 1975), and developmental stage chitan threads, extending from cells of the diatom fam- (Greene & Landry 1985). Likewise, fish vary in their ily Thalassiosiraceae, were shown to reduce their sus- ability to capture evasive and non-evasive zooplank- ceptibility to grazing by proto- (Verity & Villareal 1986) ton (McComas & Drenner 1982, Vinyard 1982), and and metazooplankton (Gifford et al. 1981). While ef- some can learn to improve capture efficiency for more fective, some morphologies may not have evolved in evasive prey (Coughlin & Strickler 1990). Fish and response to predation, e.g. mucous sheaths in rotifers large zooplankton also exhibit complex behaviorally (Stemberger & Gilbert 1987). mediated predator avoidance mechanisms, e.g. swarm Behavioral defenses. Die1 vertical migration, where- formation. by zooplankton descend to depth during daylight Lifehistory strategies. In the enigmatic phytoplank- hours and ascend again to feed during darkness, is ton Phaeocystis (see above) cells form colonies, often attributed to a behavioral response to predators colonies can increase or decrease in size, and cells can which hunt by sight (Zaret & Suffern 1976, Ohman et emigrate from colonies (Verity et al. 1988, Cariou et al. al. 1983). Direct support for this notion comes from 1994), altering the size of Phaeocystis by volume fac- experiments in which the amplitude of migration var- tors of 106 to log. While no direct evidence ties life ied in proportion to predator (Gliwicz 1986) cycle changes to grazing pressure, it is clear that the and predation pressure (Bollens & Frost 1989). The life history stages of Phaeocystis vary in their suscepti- freshwater cladoceran Daphnia also avoids predatory bility to grazers and potentially structure the by migrating upwards in their presence (Hansen et al. 1994). Another approach is (Dodson 1988, Ramcharan et al. 1992), while the inver- that of bioluminescent dinoflagellates, whose mechan- tebrates themselves remain at depth during daylight ically stimulated flashes reduce their consumption by to avoid predation by visually feeding fish (Roth 1968). copepods (White 1979) and increase predation by fish Provocatively, both marine and freshwater on the grazing copepods (Abrahams & Townsend zooplankton can reverse their migrations in response 1993), irrespective of whether actu- to surface-feeding predators (Dodson 1988, Ohman ally evolved as an anti-predatory device. A different 1990), indicating behavioral flexibility rather than anti-predation strategy is exhibited by the copepod strict genetic programming. As observed for the in- Diaptomus, which switches from laying subitaneous ducible morphological defenses, the behavioral re- eggs to eggs coincident with seasonal peaks sponses appear to be triggered by chemical signals in predation pressure (Hairston 1987). A further exam- released by feeding predators (Dodson 1988, but see ple is the cladoceran Daphnia: in the presence of visu- Bollens et al. 1994 for marine copepods). Such anti- ally feeding planktivorous fish, which are especially predator defenses may have costs in terms of reduced effective at removing larger daphnids, Daphnia when feeding and defense are both depen- increases its intrinsic rate of population growth (Dod- dent upon (Werner & Hall 1988, Ramcharan et son 1989), reduces juvenile length increments, ma- al. 1992). For example, among marine zooplankton, tures earlier, and lays larger clutches of smaller eggs those taxa which are especially visible to fish predators (Machacek 1993); the latter responses are induced by feed primarily at night (Hobson & Chess 1976). chemicals associated with the predatory fish. In this Behavior such as DVM apparently evolved to rnini- regard, it may be that trophic cascades are more likely mize encounters with potential predators. Copepods to occur in the freshwater pelagial because Daphnia is Mar Ecol Prog Ser 130: 277-293, 1996

so often the major herbivore: through parthenogenesis ples from both disciplines, and identifies both similari- it can reproduce as rapidly as its prey and therefore ties and differences between them where evidence control their stocks, but its swimming behavior leaves warrants. Daphnia particularly susceptible to population deci- Although it has been common knowledge among mation by invertebrate and predators (Allan farmers and hunters that both resources and predation 1976, Lynch 1980, Jiirgens 1994). are important in structuring plant and animal commu- nities, most ecologists prior to 1960 viewed populations as being entirely resource-driven. In that year, Hairston PREDATION AND TROPHIC CASCADES AS et al. (1960) published their famous 'the world is green' STRUCTURAL PRINCIPLES hypothesis. They began with the observation that ex- cessive or widespread destruction of vegetation by We argue that the morphologies and life history grazers is rare, and thus there was an abundant food strategies of plankton have evolved in relation to their source available to herbivores. If the grazers were not environments. Traditionally, that 'environment' has food-limited, then their abundance must be restricted been considered to be a physical or chemical one, e.g. by predators, preventing the herbivores from depleting Margalef (1978) proposed that the functional morphol- their plant resources. Furthermore, since grazers must ogy of phytoplankton is selected by the decay of be predator-limited, their predators must be food-lim- mechanical energy of water, or turbulence. Kiarboe ited. These ideas were developed for terrestrial ecosys- (1993) argued eloquently that pelagic food web struc- tems, while aquatic ecosystems were omitted because ture is mediated by turbulence and phytoplankton cell they are not always 'green' (N. G. Hairston Jr pers. size, and that general patterns of mesoscale plankton comm.), but the concepts were later adapted to aquatic distributions are consistent with the theoretical bases habitats (Hrbacek 1962, Brooks & Dodson 1965, Smith for such arguments. However, this bottom-up or bio- 1969, Persson et al. 1992). geochemical approach has not proven successful in The generic form of these hypotheses is that organ- predicting the timing, magnitude, or temporal dyna- isms at the top of the food chain are food-limited, and mics of plankton . For example, con- at successively lower levels they are alternately preda- siderations of fluid dynamics and cell are tor- and then food-limited. Changes in food chains consistent with the notion that small size is less ad- with strong trophic links may then 'cascade' from top vantageous to phytoplankton in turbulent waters, but to bottom (McQueen et al. 1986, 1989, Carpenter et al. they do not explain the comparative of 1987). The trophic cascade model predicts that, by large cells in such environments, much less the typical their presence or absence, higher trophic levels will dominance of large cells in blooms. Kisrboe (1993) pro- determine whether or not conspicuous accumulations posed instead that large size provides a from of plant biomass will occur at the base of the system. predation, for 2 reasons: the relative abundance of The largest body of evidence supporting the trophic predator to prey decreases as size increases; and the cascade model derives from freshwater habitats generation of predators increase more rapidly (Strong 1992; see McLaren & Peterson 1994 for a re- than those of their prey as size increases, yielding cent terrestrial example). One reason why trophic cas- longer lags between phytoplankton growth and zoo- cades may be more likely to occur in aquatic than in plankton response. Thus, the risk of being eaten is terrestrial habitats is because water is so much denser diminished for larger cells. Banse (1994), too, argued than air that plants can be physically supported with- that food web structure cannot be fathomed without out having to put the vast majority of their primary equal consideration being given to top-down control. production into relatively inedible structural compo- While the extent of predation between adjacent nents, as do terrestrial plants. Being small and of high trophic levels has been the subject of considerable in- nutritious quality, they can be eaten in their entirety by terest (e.g. Sih et al. 1985), here we explore whether the small grazers, for which prey capture is typically gape- consequences of predation cascade into more distant limited (Zaret 1980), leading to a size-structured food trophic levels, and the characteristics of predators chain. Thus, there is little cheating in plankton-based which are associated with such multi-trophic re- food webs, because predators have to be big enough to lationships. This discussion also hasimplicationsforthe eat their prey in its entirety (Hambright et al. 1991), historically different approaches to and unlike herbivores in terrestrial ecosystems. oceanography. While biology in the marine pelagial Hairston & Hairston (1993) developed this idea further, has been pre-occupied with biogeochemical fluxes and suggesting that predatorprey size ratios in pelagic sys- stock exploitation, freshwater efforts have been qui- tems (where they may be size-dependent; Longhurst etly dedicated to deconvolving how lakes and 1991) are likely to be substantially larger than those work. Hence, the following discussion includes exam- typical of terrestrial ecosystems. Verity & Smetacek: Variables structuring marine pelagic ecosystems 285

In the marine pelagial, little attention was given for prey became more distinct, especially given the capa- many years to the possibility that top-down forces bilities for prey selection evidenced by both proto- might be important. In part, this reflected the biased and metazooplankton (Cowles et al. 1988, Verity view of phytoplankton ecologists that production of 1991). algal biomass was limited by availability of nutrients However, there are relatively few instances of or irradiance, and that accumulation of biomass de- actual trophic cascades in marine waters across 3 or pended only upon the extent of production. This bot- more levels (Table 1). Of these, some are direct exper- tom-up or resource interpretation was indirectly sup- imental manipulations, some are merely interpreta- ported by the traditional view of marine food chains tions of gross patterns in communities, and some as diatoms 4 copepods +fish (see Kleppel 1993 for ori- include models of laboratory or field studies. The most gins), because estimates of grazing impact by cope- compelling evidence suggests that certain plankton pods typically were ca 10 to 50% of primary produc- food webs may show coupled population oscillations tion (e.g. Mullin 1969, Kisrboe 1991). This apparent with trophic levels limited alternately by predation inability to keep pace with algal growth implied that and resource availability (e.g. Horsted et al. 1988, phytoplankton were not grazer-limited and that cope- Dolan & Gallegos 1991). Provocatively, fully three- pods were not food-limited (Huntley & Boyd 1984). quarters of the cascades in Table 1 were initiated by Studies showing strong dependence of copepod gelatinous predators, which suggests that their ability growth upon temperature (Huntley & Lopez 1992) also to rapidly increase population biomass, their high implied that food was not limiting. weight-specific , and/or their large predator: Since that time, contemporary thinking about plank- prey size ratios, may be key characteristics in pelagic ton community structure has undergone a revolution- organisms involved in trophic cascades. It has been ary reversal, a change too significant to be merely argued that trophic cascades are unlikely in the labelled a new paradigm. In one generation, the hun- absence of keystone predators (Strong 1992). Alterna- dred year old view that diatoms were the pastures of tively, the common denominator may be moderate-to- the sea has been replaced with the notion that much strong predation pressure rather than a true keystone smaller cells are the workhorses in the euphotic zone predator (Menge et al. 1994). For example, the occur- (Pomeroy 1974), with occasional diatom bloon~ssuper- rence of gelatinous carnivores is not always associ- imposed on their productivity. It is this microbial food ated with obvious trophic cascades (Purcell et al. web that tracks changes in controlling physical and 1994). chemical processes; diatoms leave and enter the sys- Only 2 regional assessments of the potential impor- tem according to their own unique biology (Smetacek tance of trophic cascades in marine pelagic ecosystems et al. 1990, Lenz 1992). With the recognition of pico- have apparently been published. In both the and nano-sized and rnixotrophs came the and the Chesapeake Bay, USA (Verity 1987, Rudstam understanding that small zooplankton were often the et al. 1994), limited evidence suggested that trophic dominant herbivores (references in Pierce & Turner cascades may be seasonally or historically important, 1992), and estimates of their grazing plus that of but convincing documentation was not available. It has larger zooplankton can equal or exceed that of pri- also been argued that trophic cascades may be respon- mary production (e.g. Lenz et al. 1993, Verity et al. sible for patterns in plankton biomass in HNLC (high 1993). The possibility of predator (grazer) control of nutrient low chlorophyll) regimes such as the subarctic

Table 1. Examples of trophic cascades influencing the structure of marine pelagic communities.Mesoz.: mesozooplankton; microz.: microzooplankton;nanoz.. nanozooplankton;phytopl.. phytoplankton Location Cascade Data source Citation - Roskildefjord, Denmark Sticklebacks-t Mesoz. + Phytopl. Enclosure Horsted et al. (1988) Limfjord, Denmark + Mesoz./lvbcroz + Nanoz .A Bacteria Enclosure Riemannet al. (1990) Loch Ewe, Scotland Ctenophore -+ Mesoz. + Phytopl. Enclosure Gamble et al. (1977) Narragansett Bay, RI, USA Ctenophores + Mesoz. -t Phytopl. Enclosure/field Deason & Smayda (1982a,b) Rhode River, MD. USA Rotifers + Nanoz. +Bacteria Enclosure/model Dolan & Gallegos (1991) Vancouver Fjord,BC, Canada Medusae + Mesoz. + Phytopl. Field observation Huntley& Hobson (1978) IOel Bight, Germany Medusae + Mesoz. + Phytopl. Field observat~on Moller (1979) North Sea Euphausids + Copepods + Phytopl. Field observation Roff et al. (1988) Gullmar Fjord. Sweden Medusae+ Mesoz.+ Phytopl. Field observation Lindahl & Hernroth (1983) Helgoland Bight, Germany Ctenophore+ Ctenophore+ Mesoz. Field observation Greve & Reiners (1980) Cheseapeake Bay, USA Cteno/Medusae+ Mesoz -i Phytopl. Field/model Baird & Ulanowicz (1989) 286 Mar Ecol Prog Ser

Pacific (Frost 1991), and that recent accidental intro- cludes trophic cascades) is not necessarily true. If cas- ductions of ctenophores into the Black Sea have cades are less likely in oligotrophic environments, due caused significant structural changes (Kideys 1994). to strong control, then the better documenta- The apparent importance of gelatinous predators in tion of cascades in freshwater may reflect the generally the few reported marine trophic cascades may also more productive trophic status there compared to reflect on the role of fish in this capacity. While marine waters (Valiela 1984).Also relevant may be the density-dependent for food is a general Me history of Daphnia, whose reproductive strategy is feature of larval and juvenile fish (Valiela 1984), fish- designed for rapid colonization and for export to new ery ecologists generally hold that stocks of adult fish environments (e.g. by duck's feet), but whose motility are not limited by their resources and thus cannot limit behavior prevents it from holding space in the pres- them (Cushing 1975). This conclusion is supported ence of visual . It is indeed intriguing that by several typical features of fish populations, includ- the predators most common in marine cascades (jel- ing: the lack of a density-dependent stock- lies) are essentially absent from freshwater, where relationship, the occurrence of strong year classes cascades have been more commonly described, while developing from weak spawning events, and the huge the freshwater herbivore typically linked to cascades variation in fish recruitment among years with no evi- (cladocerans) are unimportant in marine waters. dence of similar variance in prey production. All of these features support the notion that populatlons of adult fish in the oceans are seldom likely to control the ROLE OF PHYSICS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR abundance of their prey, in contrast to the evidence DESIGN OF FUTURE STUDIES from freshwater systems. It has been speculated that fish in the oceans are 10 to 1000 times less abundant Ecological communities and physical processes vary than their freshwater counterparts (Horn 1972), per- in time and space across a broad range of scales haps accounting for their apparent lack of predatory (Marine Zooplankton Colloquium 1 1989, Powell 1989). impact. If thls comparative dilution of fish in the sea is In the ocean, the space-time scales of biology and correct, the would seem to be the huge physics are nearly coincident, so it is likely that their mortality losses applied primarily during embryonic interactions are closely coupled (Steele 1991a). If so, and larval development. positive correlations might be expected between the It may be instructive to consider why trophic cas- vanabilities in physical and biological processes cades appear so well developed in freshwater com- (Walsh 1977), although correspondence does not pared to in marine pelagic ecosystems. An important establish cause and effect. Physics and biology are best distinction is that taxonomic diversity of the freshwater integrated at mesoscales where biology can be bud- pelagial is simplified compared to that of marine geted, e.g. as energy or mass, analogous to the physi- waters (Valiela 1984). For example, a variety of herbi-/ cal laws of conservation of energy, mass, and momen- (Lehman 1988) and carnivores (Greene tum (Denman & Powell 1984). At these scales there is 1985) are missing, including the near-absence of good evidence for strong influences by the physics of planktonic ambush predators and clupeid-like fishes ocean circulation on the biology of fish and plankton. (Banse 1990). Moreover, feeding at more than one One example is the close correlation between ocean (lower) trophic level may be more extensive in saltwa- currents and life cycles of fish such as herring, driven ter because of the common importance of mixotrophic by climatic variations (Steele 1991b). At the population ciliates there (Stoecker et al. 1989, Putt 1990); rnixo- level, this is explained by links between mesoscale trophic are well developed in both fresh- mixing and reproductive processes. However, changes and saltwater (Sanders 1991). In general, mixotrophy at the community level, such as switching between appears more important in oligotrophic vs eutrophic dominance by pelagic versus benthic fish, have not waters (Arenovski 1994). If omnivory and generalist been explained. On the other hand, there is also no feeding are common in marine waters, and if such indication that dramatic changes in fish stocks (abun- trophic diversity reduces the Likelihood that, e.g. a cli- dance or composition) in such areas as Georges Bank matically induced, strong year class of predators would or the North Sea have cascaded down to impact zoo- decimate only a single trophic level, then trophic cas- plankton (Koslow 1983. J. H. Steele pers. comm.). cades may be minimized there or difficult to validate The present paper addresses mechanisms whereby unequivocably. However, although the success of individual species, their characteristics, and their inter- trophic level manipulation experiments In freshwaters actions contnbute to ecosystem structure. Thus, the implies that omnlvory there is not sufficient to obscure central question in the context of physics is at what distinctions between trophic levels (Hairston & Hair- spatial and temporal scales do community parameters ston 1993), the converse (that extensive omnivory pre- become less slgnlficant than species attributes (behav- Verity & Smetacek: Variables stl-uctunng manne pelagic ecosystems 287

ior, morphology, life cycles) in determining apparent act to separate predator and prey before cascades can success, i.e. standing stocks (Steele 1991a)? While the be complete, i.e. disequilibna, or because seasonal larger scale physical processes previously discussed patterns 'reset' the system, e.g. Landry (1977). also cascade down to the level of the individual, e.g. Or perhaps top-down forces may be operating but can- turbulence effects upon encounter rates (MacKenzie & not be confirmed because advectlon separates us in Leggett 199l), 'conservation laws for mass, energy, space from processes in different stages of temporal and momentum ... are not sufficient to understand ... equilibrium. These sampling issues have long hin- competition, predation, species succession and diver- dered pelagic science, whether or biology, sity, etc.' (Denman & Powell 1984, p. 127). Although at but in trying to determine the forces structuring an larger scales the 'concept of ... ecosystem, there is an additional, formidable obstacle: does not seem appropriate to the changes in marine trophic identifications for each major taxonomic group systems where we explain changing community pat- are also necessary. Some techniques have been devel- terns in a physical context' (Steele 1991a, p. 433), it can oped to sample over large spatial and temporal scales, also be argued that organisms, especially successful to minimize problems of sampling statistics. For exam- key species, have evolved to take advantage of the ple, acoustics can be used for fish higher frequency variability at smaller scales. over large scales; but can the return echoes distinguish Other aspects of physics are relevant to evaluating a from a primary from a sec- the role of predation and key species in structuring ondary ? The crux of the problem is the pelagic ecosystems, and they are advection, dispersal, extent to which we are comfortable trading realism for and patchiness. As discussed in the previous sections, analytical accuracy: our conceptual models and scien- there is sufficient theoretical and experimental evi- tific methods must necessarily be 'a judiciously chosen dence to show that predation, n~orphology,and key set of lies, or perhaps more accurately put, partial species are crucial in structuring marine pelagic com- truths about reality, which have been chosen to permit munities. However, much of the experimental support us to reason more effectively about some issue than we derives from contained populations or from descriptive otherwise could' (Baumol 1984). field data, so that the significance of predation-driven Let us assume for the moment that one has carefully forces in open waters remains uncertain. Both support- designed an experimental test, and sampling was spa- ive and disputive data are available. The major weak- tially and temporally complete. Do complications exist ness of descriptive data from open waters is that which could impede interpretation of the data? Evi- absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. The dence from both freshwater and sug- problem with containment, however, is that enclosures gests that several factors may obfuscate data analysis. must be sufficiently large to mimic the real world. For For example, predator-induced effects may occur but example, if they offer no refuges or lack natural feed- may not be evident as changes in population abun- ing guilds to utilize changing resources, then discrep- dance or as bulk removal. Rather, the affected popula- ancies will occur between theory and experimental tions may alter patterns in vertical distribution or results. Thus, perhaps the ideal environment in which migration (Rudstam et al. 1994), the taxonomic compo- to test these hypotheses is an enclosed body of water sition of a trophic level may change (McCauley & with naturally restricted exchange with adjacent Briand 1979), or its size structure (Hrbacek 1962). As waters, e.g. Landry (1978). The ctenophore-zooplank- such, food webs may not collapse clearly into food ton-phytoplankton cascade observed in Narragansett chains. Moreover, 'tangles in trophic architecture' Bay (Rhode Island, USA; Deason & Smayda 1982a, b), (Strong 1992) (i.e,omnivory, mixotrophy, substitutabil- which has a turnover time of ca 26 d (Pilson 1985), is ity of species, compensation among taxa for functions perhaps the best example to date. of others, inedibility, mobility and defenses) may pre- A related issue is that patchiness, dispersal and vent the occurrence of key species upon which sus- advection cause significant sampling artifacts in ma- tained consumption can more clearly take its toll. Top- rine ecosystems. The latter problems are minimized in down and bottom-up regulation can be additive, for small lakes, perhaps contributing to better documenta- example, starving fish larvae may be more susceptible tion of trophic cascades there, or perhaps simply mak- to predation, or both forces can be (differentially) influ- ing cascades more likely to occur; large lakes are more enced by the same abiotic factors, e.g. increased irra- complex (Schelske & Stoermer 1994). Thus, it is not so diance stimulates both primary production and visual much whether predation or trophic cascades structure predation (Aksnes & Giske 1993). Conversely, relation- marine plankton communities, but whether we can ships between trophic levels may be non-linear provide definitive approaches and methodologies to (Dwyer & Perez 1983), non-additive (Stoecker & Evans test competing hypotheses. Top-down forces may not 1985) or exhibit threshold dynamics: predation impact cascade in the pelagial because advective processes upon a prey population may be sustainable up to a cer- 288 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 130: 277-293, 1996

tain point, beyond which drastic declines in prey abun- model with that of Steele (1974). We now advocate dance occur. If ontogenetic changes (e.g. dietary) or opening the boxes, taking out the dominant species and time lags between prey consumption and predator studying them at their relevant levels of selection occur, top-down effects may be obscured (e.g. predator avoidance, life cycle strategy) and not (Power 1992). Finally, physical processes on long time just growth physiology (ICES 1994). scales may dominate shorter frequency biological This proposal has implications for contemporary interactions (Aebischer et al. 1990), so that any top- ocean science, which is being increasingly focused on down effects are muted or invisible. large-scale, interdisciplinary programs. Some of these are designed to derive horizontal or vertical fluxes of elements which have anthropogenic or geochemical CLOSING THOUGHTS significance, e.g. the carbon-based Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS). Others concentrate on establish- Theory is rather explicit about the conditions under ing the linkages between predator and prey, and their which resource availability and predation should dom- relation to physics, in order to describe ecosystem inate trophic interactions. On the other hand, the real function, e.g. Global Ocean Ecosystem Dynamics world is seldom as simple as theoretical boundary con- (GLOBEC). The paths are distinctly different, yet the ditions (Pimm 1992). Research during the past 50 yr long-term objectives are identical: an improved mech- has shown that not all plants are equally edible, not all anistic understanding of ocean dynamics and the abil- herbivores are equally effective, not all predators are ity to predict future changes. The inescapable conclu- equally proficient, and not all environments are sion from the present analysis is that attempts to equally hospitable (Hunter & Price 1992). The consid- identify the forces structurjng the marine pelagial must erations in this paper illustrate that it can be simpler to be specifically designed to address that question, i.e. construct pragmatic post hoc explanations for organism-organism and organism-environment inter- observed patterns in trophic structure than it can be to actions, and not to measure carbon fluxes. This is sim- devise theoretical underpinning. ply because and selection operate at the We propose that biogeochemical fluxes are spear- species level. But the connection between organism- headed by key taxa, perhaps even '' and element-driven oceanography is that the transfer (sensu Bond 1993) whose environmental adaptations, of elements or energy through the system depends whether through behavior, morphology, physiology, or upon trophic structure and activity (Hairston & Hair- life history, are so strong that they direct trophic rela- ston 1993): the composition of the biological pump tions. Some specific examples were postulated in the determines its efficiency of operation. One can no section on life histories and morphologies. We have more predict carbon fluxes without a mechanistic un- argued that dominant species in the marine pelagial derstanding of ecosystem structure than one can de- attain their status as much by reducing mortality due convolve the mechanisms from flux measurements to predation as by increasing growth or reproductive alone: flux estimates cannot predict whether sardines rates. While it can still be instructive to ask whether vs anchovies, or herring vs mackerel, will dominate, top-down or bottom-up forces regulate community but evidence does suggest that species determine structure, because the regulatory mechanisms are dis- fluxes. A study could be envisioned where both tinctly different, we suggest a new synthetic focus: approaches are applied concurrently: thus, the ther- 'How does the pelagic environment select for life histo- modynamic constraints on the system (e.g.light field) ries, morphologies, and behaviors of organisms under could be derived from measurement of total commu- conditions when food availability and predation both nity or throughput. The deviation of in situ affect trophic interactions?' In our rush to get into instantaneous rates from theoretical maxima indicate explanatory modelling, planktologists have trodden on the 'state' of the system and would be necessary to the species and stuffed them into trophic boxes, pyra- define the units in structural terms; i.e. how much of mids or size fract~on relationships The underlying the energy is diverted to deterrents or flight muscle assumption has been that the categories comprise and how much to reproduction of DNA supporting liv- homogeneous units. Recent work is leading to differen- ing plasma. Only by combining the 2 approaches will tiation and also to expansion of our knowledge of we ever understand how pelagic environments select pelagic system structure and its shaping forces: pico- their inhabitants and how the inhabitants determine plankton and of the 1980s are now extended and material fluxes. into and . At the same time, group- Banse (1994) argued insightfully that 'in regard to specific differences in behavior are coming to light that more realistic modeling of food webs .. we are short make it necessary to discriminate smaller constituents on explicit theory, not only for marine and freshwater within the tidy boxes: compare Longhurst's (1991) box systems, but also for ecology in general'. He, too, pro- Verity & Smetacek: Variables structuring marine pelagic ecosystems 289

posed that research should focus on the biology of key Arenovski AL (1994) Distribution, abundance, and ecology of species, but did not believe that scientists and funding rnixotrophic algae In marine and freshwater plankton agencies would support endless autecological investi- communities. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Tech- nology/Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, Cambridge gations. The avenues we suggest here are not to and Woods Hole. WHOI-94-22 concentrate so much on metabolic assessments or to Baird D, Ulanowicz RE (1989) The seasonal dynamics of the search for minutiae, which are unlikely to differ much Chesapeake Bay ecosystem. Ecol Monogr 59:329-364 Banse K (1990) On pelagic food web interactions in large I among species, but to identify critical aspects of life water bodies. In: Tilzer MM, Serruya C (eds) Large lakes. history, morphology, or behavior. These should be Ecological structure and function. Springer-Verlag, New examined in the context of rigorous testing of explicit York, p 556-579 hypotheses. For too long we have shied from playing Banse K (1994) Grazing and zooplankton production as key Pandora, that is, harnessing courage to curiosity. By controls of phytoplankton production in the open ocean. studying individual species in greater detail, we will Oceanography 7:13-20 Barker GLA, Hayes PK, Medlin LK (1994) Preliminary results be able to understand the shaping forces of the abiotic uslng the RAPD analysis as a means of screening popu- environment on the one hand, and biotic interactions, lation~during the development of natural blooms and including competition and predation, on the other. In mesocosm blooms of the prymnesiophyte, Emiliania. answering this question we can truly integrate ecolog- Sarsia 79301-306 Bathmann U, Smetacek V, de Baar H. Fahrbach E, Krause G ical concepts with predictive models, and make signif- (1994) The expeditions Antarktis X/6-8 of R/V 'Polarstern' icant purchase in our climb toward understanding in 1992/93. Ber Polarforsch 135:235 pelagic processes. Baumann MEM, Lancelot C, Brandini FP. Sakshaug E, John DM (1994) The taxonomic identity of the cosmopol~tan Acknowledgements. The musings in this paper were stimu- prymnesiophyte Phaeocystis: a n~orphological and eco- lated into def~nableform by invitations from P. LeB. Williams physiological approach. J mar Syst 55-22 to present opposing views in the argument over predation vs Baumol WJ (1984) On my attitudes: soc~opoliticaland method- resource limitation as structural edifices supporting marine ological. Am Econ 28:5-9 plankton communities, as part of a workshop in November Berge G (1962) Discoloration of the sea due to Coccolithus 1993 planning the evolution of a new research program in the huxleyi 'bloom'. Sarsia 6:27-40 U.K., 'Plankton Reactivity in the Marine Environment' Bollens SM, Frost BW (1989) Predator-induced die1 vertical (PRIME). Further refined concepts were presented at the migration in a marine planktonic copepod. J Plankton Res ICES Symposiun~ on Zooplankton Production convened in 11:104?-1065 Plymouth, England, in August 1994. We thank the PRIME and Bollens SM, Frost BW, Cordell JR (1994) Chemical, mechani- ICES steering committees for their support and encourage- cal, and visual cues in the vertical migration of the marine ment, especially the late J C. Gamble, and R. P. Harris, T planktonic copepod Acartia hudsonica. J Plankton Res 16: Kierboe, J. H. Steele, and P. LeB. Williams. Travel support was 555-564 provided by the U.K.National Environment Research Council Bond WJ (1993) Keystone species. In: Schulze ED, Mooney and the U S. National Science Foundation. The opportunity to HA (eds) Biodiverslty and ecosystem function. Springer- ruminate on these ideas would not have been possible with- Verlag, New York, p 237-253 out salary support provided by U.S. DOE grant FG02- Bone Q (1978) Locomotor muscle. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ 92ER61419, NSF grant OCE-90-22318, and the Skidaway In- (eds) , Vol 7, Loconlotion. Academic Press, stitute of Oceanography. Numerous colleagues promoted this New York, p 361-424 effort and offered valuable advice and insights, including K. Bratbak G, Egge JK. Heldal M (1993) Viral mortality of the G. Banse, J. Dolan, W. Greve, N. G. Hairston Jr., R. Hopcroft, marine alga Emiliania huxleyi (Haptophyceae) and termi- P. Kremer, J. Lenz, G.-A. Paffenhofer, J. C. Roff, J. H. Steele, nation of algal blooms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 93:39-48 J. T Turner, and 2 anonymous reviewers. Ideas are of little Brooks JL, Dodson S1 (1965) Predation, body size, and compo- use if everyone agrees with them. This paper is offered In the sition of plankton. Science 150:28-35 hope that imagination and knowledge are equal partners in Brown CW, Yoder JA (1994) Coccolithophorid blooms in the the pursuit of understanding marine pelagic ecosystems. This global ocean. J geophys Res 99:?46?-7482 publication is no. 942 of the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar Bucklin A, Frost BW, Kocher TD (1995) Molecular and Marine Research and no. 6 of PRIME. of 6 Calanus and 3 Metridia species (Calanoida, Cope- poda). Mar Biol 121:655-664 Biihler H (1930) Die Verdauungsorgane der Stromateidae ().Z Morph Okol Tiere 19:59-115 LITERATURE CITED Bundy MH, Paffenhofer GA (1993) Innervation of copepod antennules investigated using laser scanning confocal Abrahams MV, Townsend LD (1993) Bioluminescence in microscopy. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 102:l-14 dinoflagellates: a test of the burglar alarm hypothesis. Burckle LH. Cirilli J (1987) Origin of the diatom ooze belt in Ecology 74:258-260 the Southern Ocean: implications for late Quaternary Aebischer NJ. Coulson JC, Colebrook JM (1990) Parallel paleoceanography Micropaleontology 33:82-86 long-term trends across four marine trophic levels and Buskey EJ, Mann CG, Swift E (1986) The shadow response of weather. Nature 34?:?53-755 the estuarine copepod Acartia tonsa (Dana).J exp mar Biol Aksnes DL, Giske J (1993) A theoretical model of aquatic Ecol 103:65-75 visual feeding. Ecol Model 67:233-250 Butler NM. Suttle CA. Neill WE (1989) Discrimination by Allan JD (1976) Life history patterns in zooplankton. Am Nat freshwater zooplankton between single algal cells differ- 110:165-180 ing in nutritional status. Oecologia ?8:368-372 290 Mar Ecol Prog Ser

Cariou V, Casotti R,Birrien JL, Valout D (1994) The initiation Gill CW, Crisp DJ (1985) Sensitivity of intact and antennule- of Phaeocystis colonies. J Plankton Res 16457-470 amputated copepods to water . Mar Ecol Prog Carmichael \V.v (1986) Algal toxins. Adv bot Res 12:47-101 Ser 21:221-227 Carpenter SR. Kitchell JF, Hodgson JR, Cochran PA, Elser JJ, Gliwicz MZ (1986) Predation and the evolution of vertical Elser MM, Lodge DM, Kretchmer D. He X, von Ende CN migration in zooplankton. Nature 320:746-748 (1987) Regulation of lake primary productivity by food Greene CH (1985) Planktivore functional groups and patterns web structure Ecology 68.1863-1876 of prey selection in pelagic communities. J Plankton Res 7: Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS 111 (1985) Resource availabil- 35-40 ity and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895-899 Greene CH, Landry MR (1985) Patterns of prey selection in Confer JL, Blades PI (1975) Omnivorous zooplankton and the cruising calanoid predator Euchaeta elongata. Ecology planktivorous fish. Limnol Oceanogr 20:571-579 66:1408-1416 Coughlin DJ, Strickler JR (1990) Zooplankton capture by Greve W, Reiners F (1980) The impact of prey-predator waves fish: an adaptive response to evasive prey. from on the planktonic . In: Environ Biol Fish 29:35-42 Kennedy VS (ed)Estuarine perspectives. Academic Press, Cowles TJ, Olson RJ, Chisholm SW (1988) Food selection by New York, p 405-421 copepods: discrimination on the basis of food quality. Mar Hairston NG Jr (1987) Diapause as a predator-avoidance Biol 100:41-49 adaptation. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation. Univ Cushing DH (1975)Marine ecology and . Cambridge Press of New England, Hanover, NH, p 281-290 Univ Press, Cambridge Hairston NG Jr, Hairston NG Sr (1993) Cause-effect relation- Dawkins R (1987) The blind watchmaker. WW Norton & CO, ships in energy flow, trophic structure, and interspecific New York interactions. Am Nat 142:379-411 Deason EE. Smayda TJ (1982a) Ctenophore-zooplankton- Hairston NG Sr, Smith FE, Slobodkin LB (1960) Community phytoplankton interactions in Narragansett Bay, Rhode structure, , and competition. Am Nat 94: Island, USA, during 1972-1977. J Plankton Res 4: 421-425 203-217 Hambright KD, Drenner RW, McComas SR, Hairston NG Jr Deason EE, Smayda TJ (1982b) Experimental evaluation of (1991) Gape-limited , planktivore size refuges, herbivory in the ctenophore Mnerniopsis leidyi relevant and the trophic cascade hypothesis. Arch Hydrobiol 121: to ctenophore-zooplankton-phytoplankton interactions in 389-404 Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA. J Plankton Res 4: Hansen B. Verity P, Falkenhaug T, Tande KS, Norrbin F 219-236 (1994) On the trophic fate of Phaeocystis pouchetii (Har- Denman KL, Powell TM (1984) Effects of physical processes riot) V. Trophic relationships between Phaeocystls and on planktonic ecosystems in the coastal ocean. Oceanogr zooplankton: an assessment of methods and size depen- mar Biol A Rev 22:125-168 dence. J Plankton Res 16:487-511 Dodson S1 (1988) The ecological role of chemical stimuli for Hansen FC, Reckermann M, Klein Breteler WCM, kegman R the zooplankton: predator avoidance behavior in Daphnia. (1993) Phaeocystis bloonling enhanced by copepod preda- Limnol Oceanogr 33:1431-1439 tion on protozoa evidence from Incubation experiments. Dodson S1 (1989) The ecological role of chemical stimuli for Mar Ecol Prog Ser 102:51.-57 the zooplankton: predator-lnduced morphology in Daph- Hardy AC (1956) The open sea, its , Part 1, The nia. Oecologia 78:361-367 world of plankton. Houghton Mifflin, Boston Dolan JR, Gallegos CL (1991) Trophic coupling of rotifers, Hargrave BT, Geen GH (1970) Effects of copepod grazing on microflagellates, and bacteria during fall months in the two natural phytoplankton populations. J Fish Res Bd Can Rhode River . Mar Ecol Prog Ser 77.147-156 27.1395-1403 Drenner RW, Strickler JR, O'Brien WJ (1978) Capture pro- Haury LR, Kenyon DE, Brooks JR (1980) Experimental evalu- bability: the role of zooplankter escape in the selective ation of the avoidance reaction of Calanus fjnmarchicus. feeding of planktivorous fish. J Fish Res Bd Can 35: J Plankton Res 2:187-202 1370-1373 Havel JE (1987) Predator-induced defenses: a review. In: Ker- Driedzic WR, Hochachka PW (1978) Metabolism in fish dur- foot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation. Univ Press of New Eng- ing exercise. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ (eds) Fish physiol- land, Hanover, NH, p 263-278 ogy, Vol V11 Academic Press, New York, p 503-543 Hay ME, Fenical W (1988) Marine plant-herbivore interac- Dwyer RL, Perez KT (1983) An experimental examination of tions: the ecology of . A Rev Ecol Syst 19: ecosystem linearization. Am Nat 121:305-323 111-145 Ehrlich PR, Raven PH (1964) and plants: a study in Hays GC, Proctor CA, John AWG, Warner AJ (1994) Interspe- . Evolution 18:586-608 cific differences in the die1 vertical migration of marine Emiliani C (1993) Viral extinctions in deep sea specles. copepods: the implications of size, color, and morphology. Nature 366.217-218 L~mnolOceanogr 39: 1621-1629 Faulkner DJ (1984) Marine natural products: metabolites of Hertz PE, Huey RB, Garland T Jr (1988) Time budgets. marine algae and herbivorous marine molluscs. Nat Prod , and maximal locomotor performance: Rep 1:251- 280 are reptiles Olympians or Boy Scouts? Am Zoo1 28: Frost BW (1991) The role of grazing in nutnent-rich areas of 927-938 the open sea. Limnol Oceanogr 36:1616-1630 Hessen DO, van Donk E (1993) Morphological changes in Fulton RS 111, Paerl HW (1987) Toxic and inhibitory effects of Scenedesmus induced by substances released from Daph- the blue-green alga Microcystis aeruginosa on herbivo- nia. Arch Hydrobiol 127:129-140 rous zooplankton. J Plankton Res 9:837-855 Hobson ES, Chess JR (1976) Trophic interactions among fish Gamble JC, Davies JM. Steele JH (1977) Loch Ewe bag and zooplankters near shore at Santa Catalina Island, Cal- experiment, 1974. Bull mar Sci 27:146-175 ifornia. Fish Bull US 74567-598 Gifford DJ, Bohrer RW, Boyd CM (1981) Spines on dlatoms: Horn MH (1972) The amount of space available for marine do copepods care? Lmnol Oceanogr 26 1057-1062 and freshwater fishes. Fish Bull US 70:1295-1298 Verity & Smetacek: Variables struc:tunng marine pelagic ecosystems 291

Horsted SJ, Nielsen TG, hemann B, Pock-Steen J, Bjernsen posium on Benguela Trophic Functioning, Univ of Cape PK (1988) Regulation of zooplankton by suspension-feed- Town, Sept 1991. Univ of Cape Town, Cape Town, p 74 ing bivalves and fish in estuarine enclosures. Mar Ecol Kornmann P (1955) Beobachtungen an Phaeocystis-Kulturen. Prog Ser 48:217-224 Helgolander wiss Meeresunters 5:218-233 Hrbacek J (1962) Species composition and the amount of zoo- Koslow JA (1983) Zooplankton community structure In the plankton in relation to the fish stock. Rozpr Cesk Akad North Sea and Northeast Atlantic: development and test Ved, Rada Mat Prir Ved 72:l-116 of a biological model. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40:1912-1924 Hunter MD, Price PW (1992) Playing chutes and ladders: het- Kuhlmann HW, Heckmann K (1985) Interspecific morphogens erogeneity and the relative roles of bottom-up and top- regulating predator-prey relationships in protozoa. Sci- down forces in natural communities. Ecology 73:724-732 ence 227,1347-1349 Huntley ME, Boyd C (1984) Food-limited growth of marine Lampert W (1987) Feeding and nutrition in Daphnja. In: zooplankton. Am Nat 124:455-478 Peters RH, de Bernardi R (eds) Daphnia. Mem 1st Ital Idro- Huntley ME, Hobson LA (1978) Medusa predation and plank- b10145:143-192 ton dynamics in a temperate fjord, British Columbia. J Fish Lampert W, Rothhaupt KO, von Elert E (1994) Chemical Res Bd Can 35257-261 induction of colony formation in a green alga (Scene- Huntley ME, Lopez MDG (1992) Temperature-dependent desmus acutus) by grazers (Daphnia). Limnol Oceanogr production of marine copepods: a global synthesis. Am 39:1543- 1550 Nat 140:201-242 Landry MR (1977) A review of important concepts in the Huntley ME, Nordhausen W, Lopez MDG (1994) Elemental trophic organization of pelagic ecosystems. Helgolander composition, metabolic activity and growth of Antarctic wiss Meeresunters 30:8-17 krill Euphausia superba during winter. Mar Ecol Prog Ser Landry MR (1978) and production of a 107:23-40 planktonic marine copepod, Acartia clausii, in a small Huntley ME, Sykes P, Rohan S, Marin V (1986) Chemically- temperate on San Juan Island, Washington. Int Rev mediated rejection of prey by the copepods ges Hydrobiol63:77-119 Calanuspacificus and Paracalanusparvus: mechanism, oc- Ledford-Hoffman PA, DeMaster DJ, Nittrouer CA (1986) Bio- currence, and significance. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 28:105-120 genic silica in the Ross Sea and the importance of Antarc- ICES (1994) Report of the workshop on the trans-latitudinal tic continental shelf deposits in the marine silica budget. study of Calanus finmarchicus in the North Atlantic. Geochim cosmochim Acta 50:2099-2110 Cornrn Meet int Counc Explor Sea CM-ICES 1994/L:10 Lehman JT (1988) Ecological pnnciples affecting community Ikeda T, Dixon P (1982) Body shrinkage as a possible over- structure and secondary production by zooplankton in wintering mechanism of the Antarctic krill Euphausia marine and freshwater environments. Limnol Oceanogr superba Dana. J exp mar Biol Ecol62:143-151 33(part 2):931-945 Jungmann D, Henning M, Juttner F (1991) Are the same com- Lenz J (1992) , , and classi- pounds in Microcystis responsible for to Daphnia cal food chain: their significance in pelagic marine ecosys- and inhibition of its filtering rate? Int Rev ges Hydrobiol tems. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergeb Limnol 37:265-278 76:47-56 Lenz J, Morales A, Gunkel J (1993) Mesozooplankton stand- Jiirgens K (1994) Impact of Daphnla on planktonic microbial ing stock during the North Atlantic spring bloom study in food webs - a review. Mar microb Food Webs 8:295-324 1989 and its potential grazing pressure on phytoplankton- Jiirgens K, Giide H (1994) The potential importance of graz- a comparison between low, medium, and high latitudes. ing-resistant bacteria in planktonic ecosystems. Mar Ecol Deep Sea Res I1 40:559-572 Prog Ser 112:169-188 Lewis WM Jr (1986) Evolutionary interpretations of allelo- Kashkin NI (1963) Materials on the ecology of Phaeocystis chemical interactions in phytoplankton algae. Am Nat pouchetii (Hariot) Lagerheim 1893 (Chrysophyceae). 11. 12?:184-194 Habitat and specification of biogeographical characteris- Lindahl 0, Hernroth L (1983) Phyto-zooplankton community tics. Okeanologiya 3:697-705 (in Russian) in coastal waters of western Sweden - an ecosystem off Kerfoot WC, Sih A (1987) Predation - direct and indirect balance? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 10:119-126 impacts on aquatic communities. Univ Press of New Eng- Liss PS, Malln G, Turner SM, Holligan PM (1994) Dimethyl land. Hanover, NH sulphide and Phaeocystis: a review. J mar Syst 5:41-53 Kideys AE (1994) Recent dramatic changes in the Black Sea Longhurst AR (1991) Role of the marine in the ecosystem: the reason for the sharp decline in Turkish global carbon cycle. Limnol Oceanogr 36:1507-1526 anchovy fisheries. J mar Syst 5:171-181 Longhurst AR, Harrison WG (1989) The biological pump: pro- Kils U (1990) On the microstructure of microlayers: results of files of plankton production and consumption in the upper an in situ zooplankton counter. EOS 71:94 ocean. Prog Oceanogr 22:47-123 Kisrboe T (1991) Pelagic fisheries and spatio-temporal vari- Lynch M (1980) The evolution of cladoceran life histories. ability In zooplankton productivity. Proc 4th Conf Cope- Q Rev Biol 55:23-42 poda. Bull Plankton Soc Japan Spec Vol: 229-249 Machacek J (1993) Comparison of the response of Daphnia hsrboe T (1993) Turbulence, phytoplankton cell size, and the galeata and Daphnja obtusa to fish-produced chemical structure of pelagic food webs. Adv mar Biol 29:l-72 substance. Limnol Oceanogr 38:1544-1550 ECltchell JF, Carpenter SR (1987) Piscivores, planktivores, fos- MacKenzie BR. Leggett WC (1991) Quantifying the contribu- sils, and phorbins. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation. tion of small-scale turbulence to the encounter rates Univ Press of New England, Hanover, NH, p 132-146 between larval fish and their zooplankton prey: effects of Kleppel GS (1993) On the diets of calanoid copepods. Mar and . Mar Ecol Prog Ser 73:149- 160 Ecol Prog Ser 99:183-195 Malej A, Harris RP (1993) Inhibition of copepod grazing by Knox G (1994) The biology of the Southern Ocean. Cam- diatom exudates: a factor in the development of mucus bridge Univ Press, Cambndge aggregates? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 96.33-42 Konchina W (1991) Trophic status of Peruvian fisheries in Margalef R (1978) Life forms of phytoplankton as survival alter- South Pacific oceanic ecosystems. In: International Sym- nativesinanunstableenvironment. Ocean01 Acta 1:493-510 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 130: 277-293. 1996

Marine Zooplankton Colloquium 1 (1989) Future marine zoo- Purcell JE, White JR, Roman MR (1994) Predation by gelati- plankton research - a perspective. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 55. nous zooplankton and resource limitation as potential con- 197-206 trols of Acartia tonsa copepod populations in Chesapeake Marschall HP (1988) The overwlntering strategy of Antarctic Bay. Lirnnol Oceanogr 39:263-278 krill under the pack ice of the Weddell Sea. Polar Biol 9: Putt M (1990) Abundance, chlorophyll content, and photosyn- 129-135 thetic rates of ciliates in the Nordic Seas during summer. McCauley E, Briand F (1979) Zooplankton grazing and phyto- Deep Sea Res 37:1713-1731 plankton : field tests of the predation Ramcharan CW, Dodson SI, Lee J (1992) Predation risk, prey hypothesis. Limnol Oceanogr 24:243-252 behamor, and feeding rate in Daphnla pulex. Can J Fish McComas SR, Drenner RW (1982) Species replacement in a Aquat Sci 49:159-165 reservoir fish community: silverside feeding mechanics Riemann B, Sorensen HM, Bjornsen PK, Horsted SJ, Jensen and competition. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 39:815-821 LM. Nielsen TG, Ssndergaard M (1990) Carbon budgets McLaren BE, Peterson R0(1994) , moose, and tree of the microbial food web in estuarine enclosures. Mar rings on . Science 266:1555-1558 Ecol Prog Ser 65159-170 ~McQueen DJ. Johannes MRS, Post JR, Stewart TJ, Lean Roff JC, Middlebrook K, Evans F (1988) Long-term vanability DRS (1989) Bottom-up and top-down impacts on fresh- in North Sea zooplankton off the Northumberland coast: water pelagic community structure. Ecol Monogr 59: productivity of small copepods and analysis of trophic 289-309 interactions. J mar biol Ass UK 68:143-164 McQueen DJ, Post JR, Mills EL (1986) Trophic relationships in Roth JC (1968) Benthic and limnetic distribution of three freshwater pelagic ecosystems. Can J Fish Aquat Scl 43. Chaoborous species in a southern Michigan lake (Diptera, 1571-1581 Chaoboridae). Limnol Oceanogr 13 242-249 ~MedlinLK, Lange M, Baumann MEM (1994) Genetic differ- Rousseau V, Vaulot D, Casotti R, Cariou V, Lenz J, Gunkel J, entiation among three colony-forming species of Phaeo- Baumann M (1994) The life cycle of Phaeocystis (Prymne- cystis: further evidence for the phylogeny of the Prymne- siophyceae): evidence and hypotheses. J mar Syst 5:23-39 siophyta. Phycologia 33:199-212 Rudstam LG, Aneer G. Hilden M (1994) Top-down control in Menge BA, Berlow EL, Blanchette CA, Navarette SA, the pelagic Baltic ecosystem. Dana 10:105-129 Yamada SB (1994) The keystone : varia- Runge JA, Pepin P, Sdvert W (1987) Feeding behavior of the tion in interaction strength in a rocky intertidal habitat. Atlantic mackerel Scornber scombrus on the hydromedusa Ecol Monogr 64:249-286 Aglantha digitale. Mar Biol 94:329-333 Moller H (1979) Significance of coelenterates in relation to Sanders RW (1991) Mixotrophic in marine and fresh- other plankton organisms Meeresforsch 27:l-18 water ecosystems. J Protozool 38:76-81 Mullin MM (1969) Production of zooplankton in the ocean: Schelske CL, Stoermer EF (1994) Did top-down effects amp- the present status and problems. Oceanogr mar Biol A Rev lify anthropogen~cnutrient perturbations in Lake Michi- 7:293-314 gan? Comment on Evans (1992). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 51: Nielsen TG (1991) Contribution of zooplankton grazing to the 2147-2149 decline of a Ceratium bloom. Limnol Oceanogr 36: Schultz JC (1988) Many factors influence the evolution of her- 1091-1106 bivore diets, but plant chemistry is central. Ecology 69: Ohman MD (1990) The demographic benefits of diel vertical 896-897 migration by zooplankton. Ecol Monogr 60:257-281 Sieracki ME, Verity PG, Stoecker DK (1993) Plankton com- Ohman MD, Frost BW, Cohen EB (1983) Reverse diel vertical munity response to sequential silicate and nitrate deple- migration: an escape from invertebrate predators. Science tion during the 1989 North Atlantic spring bloom. Deep 220:1404-1407 Sea Res 11 40:213-226 Paffenhofer GA (1988) Feeding rates and behavior of zoo- Signor PW, Vermeij GJ (1994)The plankton and the benthos - plankton. Bull mar Sci 43:430-445 orig~nsand early history of an evolving relationship. Paleo- Paffenhofer GA, Lewis KD (1990) Perceptive performance biology 20:297-319 and feeding behavior of calanoid copepods. J Plankton Sih A (1987) Predators and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and Res 12:933-946 ecological overview. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation. Persson L, Diehl S, Johansson L, Andersson G, Hamrin SF Univ Press of New England, Hanover, NH, p 203-224 (1992) Trophic interactions in temperate lake ecosystems: Sih A, Crowley P, McPeek M, Petranka J, Strohme~erK (1985) a test of food chain theory. Am Nat 140:59-84 Predation, competition, and prey communities: a review of Pierce RW, Turner JT (1992) Ecology of planktonic ciliates in field experiments. A Rev Ecol Syst 16:269-311 marine food webs. Rev aquat Sci 6:139-181 Singarajah KV (1969) Escape reactions of zooplankton: the Pilson MEQ (1985) On the residence time of water in Narra- avoidance of a pursuing tube. J exp mar Biol Ecol gansett Bay. Estuaries 8.2-14 3:171-178 Pimm SL (1992) and ocean iron. Nature 360: Smetacek V (1985)The annual cycle of kel Bight plankton: a 298-299 long-term analysis. Estuaries 8:145-157 Pomeroy LR (1974) The ocean's food web: a changing para- Smetacek V, Scharek R, Nothig EM (1990) Seasonal and digm. BioSci 24:542-544 regional variation in the pelagial and its relationship to the Poulet SA. Ianora A. Miralto A. Meijer L (1994) Do diatoms life history of kd.In: Kerry KR, Hempel G (eds) Antarctic arrest embryonic development in copepods? Mar Ecol ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p 103-114 Prog Ser 111:79-86 Smith FE (1969) Effects of ennchment in mathematical Powell TM (1989) Physical and biological scales of variability models. In: : causes, consequences, correc- in lakes, estuaries, and the coastal ocean. In: Roughgar- tive~.National Academy of Science, Wash~ngton.DC, den J, May R, Levin S (eds) Perspectives in ecological p 631-645 theory. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, p 157-176 Smith SL, Schnack-Schiel S (1990) Polar zooplankton. In: Power ME (1992) Top-down and bottom-up forces in food Smith WO Jr (ed) Polar oceanography, Part B. Academic webs: do plants have pnmacy? Ecology 73:733-746 Press, San Diego, CA, p 527-598 Verity & Smetacek: Variables structuring manne pelagic ecosystems 293

Smith WO Jr, Codispoti LA, Nelson DM, Manley T, Buskey EJ Valiela 1 (1984) Marine ecological processes. Springer-Verlag, Jr, Niebauer HJ, Cota GF (1991) Importance of Phaeocys- New York tis blooms in the high-latitude ocean carbon cycle. Nature Van Alstyne KL (1986) Effects of phytoplankton taste and 352.514-516 smell on feeding hehavior of the copepod Centropages Steele JH (1974)The structure of marine ecosystems. Harvard harnatus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 34:187-190 Univ Press, Cambridge Verity PG (1987) Factors driving changes in the pelagic Steele JH (1991a) Can ecological theory cross the land-sea trophic structure of estuaries, with implications for the boundary? J theor Biol 153:425-436 Chesapeake Bay. In: Lynch MP, Krome EC (eds) Perspec- Steele JH (1991b) Marine functional diversity. BioSci 41: tives on the Chesapeake Bay: recent advances in estuar- 470-474 ine . Chesapeake Research Consortium Pub1 No Stefels J, van Boekel WHM (1993) Production of DMS from dis- 127, Gloucester Point, VA, p 35-56 solved DMSP in cultures of the marine phytoplank- Verity PG (1991) Feeding in planktonic protozoans: evi- ton species Phaeocystissp. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 97:ll-18 dence for non-random acquisition of prey. J Protozool 38: Steinberg DK, Silver MW, Pilskaln CH, Coale SL, Paduan JB 69-76 (1994) Midwater zooplankton communities on pelagic Verity PG. Stoecker DK (1982) Effects of Olisthodiscus luteus (giant larvacean houses) in Monterey Bay, Cali- on the growth and abundance of tintinnids. Mar Biol 72: fornia. Limnol Oceanogr 39:1606-1620 79-87 Stemberger RS, Gilbert JJ (1987) Defenses of planktonic ro- Verity PG, Stoecker DK, Sieracki ME, Nelson JR (1993) Graz- tifers against predators. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Preda- ing, growth, and mortality of microzooplankton during the tion. Univ Press of New England, Hanover, NH, p 227-239 1989 North Atlantic spring bloom at 47" N, 18" W. Deep Stoecker DK, Evans GT (1985) Effects of protozoan herbivory Sea Res 40:1793-1814 and carnivory in a m~croplanktonfood web. 'Mar Ecol Prog Verity PG, Villareal TA (1986) The relative food value of Ser 25 159-167 diatoms, dinoflagellates, flagellates, and for Stoecker DK, Taniguch~A, Michaels AE, Davis LH (1989) tint~nnidciliates Arch Protistenkd 131:71-84 Abundance of autotrophic, mixotrophic, and hetero- Verity PG, Vdlareal TA, Smayda TJ (1988) Ecological investi- trophic planktonic ciliates in shelf and slope waters. Mar gations of colonial Phaeocystispouchetii. 11. The role of life Ecol Prog Ser 50:241-254 cycle phenomena in bloom termination. J Plankton Res 10: Strickler JR (1975) Swimming of planktonic Cyclops species 749-766 (Copepoda. Crustacea): pattern, movements, and their Vermeij GJ (1994) The evolutionary interaction among spe- control. In: Wu TYT, Brokaw CJ, Brennan C (eds) Swim- cies: selection, escalation, and coevolution. A Rev Ecol ming and flying in nature, Vol2. Plenum Press, New York, Syst 25:219-236 p 599-613 Vinyard GL (1982) Variable kinematics of Sacrament0 perch Strong DR Jr (1992) Are trophic cascades all wet: differentia- (Archoplites interruptus) capturing evasive and noneva- tion and donor control in speciose ecosystems. Ecology 73: sive prey. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 39:208-211 747-754 Walsh JJ (1977) A biological sketchbook for an eastern Strong DR Jr. Lawton JH, Southwood TRE (1984) on boundary current. In: Goldberg ED, McCave IN, O'Brien plants: community patterns and mechanisms. Harvard JJ, Steele JH (eds) The sea, Vol6. John Wiley & Sons, New Univ Press. Cambridge York, p 923-968 Taniguchi A, Takeda Y (1988) Feeding rate and behavior of Wassmann P (1994) Significance of sedimentation for the ter- the tintinnid Favella taraikaensis observed with a mination of Phaeocystis blooms. J mar Syst 5:81-100 high speed VTR system. Mar microb Food Webs 3:21-34 Werner EE, Hall DJ (1988) Ontogenetic habitat shifts in Tollrian R (1993) Neckteeth formation in as an : the foraging rate-predation risk tradeoff. Ecology example of continuous plasticity: morphologi- 69:1352-1366 cal effects of Chaoborus concentration and White HH (1979) Effects of dinoflagellate bioluminescence on the11quanhficat~on. J Plankton Res 15:1309-1318 the ingestion rates of herbivorous zooplankton. J exp mar Trager G, Achituv Y, Genin A (1994) Effects of prey escape Biol Ecol 36.217-224 ability, flow speed, and predator feeding mode on zoo- Yen J, Fields DM (1992) Escape responses of Acartja hudson- plankton capture by . Mar Biol 120:251-259 ica (Copepoda) nauplii from the flow field of Temora Treguer P, Nelson DM, Van Bennekom AJ, DeMaster DJ, longicornis (Copepoda). Arch Hydrobiol Beih 36:123-134 Leynaert A, Queguiner B (1995) The silica balance in the Zaret TM (1980) Predation and freshwater communities. Yale world ocean: a reestimate. Science 2683375-379 Univ Press, New Haven Turner JT (1991) Zooplankton feeding ecology: do co-occur- Zaret TM, Suffern JS (1976) Vertical migration in zooplankton ring copepods compete for the same food? Rev aquat Sci as a predator avoidance mechanism. Limnol Oceanogr 21. 5.101-195 804-813

This article was submitted to the editor Manuscript first received: March 14, 1995 Revised version accepted: August 23, 1995